Abstract
With the emerging energy demand, water shortage in rural areas, electric supply challenges, and urgent needs for net zero technologies, there has been a recent response with alternative Hydro-Powered Pumping (HPP) technology, known as the Bunyip. The recently developed system continues to build commercial success, designed to overcome several limitations associated with the previous technology of Hydraulic Ram Pump (HRP) system, such as capacity, height and water leakage issues. This paper is aimed at providing in-depth investigation into the HPP system and possible further hydraulic enhancement, using CFD parametric analysis. This could provide an insight into the fundamental flow mechanics, operational efficiency, standard capacity, and relative delivery. The investigation comprises an initial manufacture data appraisal of performance for three HPP devices. We paired our analysis with the meticulous application and numerical modelling to gather the parametric dataset, and validate against physical testing data. One key finding was that for a delivery head of 50 m, a 6 L/s supply at 4 m of head, resulted in an efficiency of 12% with respect to the water delivered relative to the volume ‘wasted’ through the discharge. Thus, in order to facilitate some of the distinguishing features for the Bunyip, the efficiency is sacrificed to a value lower than that comparable to an HRP.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
7.1 Introduction
The conventional Hydraulic Ram Pump (HRP) depicted utilises two check valves that enable the system to generate cyclic changes in pressure [1]. The water hammer generated can be manipulated to pump water to a higher elevation than its initial source in the expense of a portion of expelled water. The cycle is described by three phases: The first phase, ‘acceleration’, supplies water through the body and discharges at the waste valve. Once the flow reaches a critical velocity, the drag forces acting upon the waste valve are sufficient to close the check-valve, trapping the high dynamic pressure flow to rapidly transfer into static pressure. This hammer surge in pressure breaches the delivery valve, injecting a small volume of high pressure water into the delivery line. This pumps water against the elevation pressure, known as the ‘delivery’ phase. To restart the cycle, the ‘recoil’ phase is a resultant of the drop in pressure within the device following delivery. This reopens the waste valve and enables the flow to accelerate out of the device once more. The air chamber is implemented to manage the peaks in pressure and results in a continuous stream of pumped water [2, 3].
In recent years, our understanding and approach towards the climate crisis has escalated, with ambitious commitments set across the globe [4]. Consequently, technologies powered by renewable sources have increased in demand and research has been reinvigurated into both the conventional system and alternative Hydro Powered Pump (HPP) mechanisms [5]. The following piece of research centres around an emerging alternative design, developed recently in Australia by Brett Porta and Ralph Glockemann called the Bunyip ‘pressure amplifier’ perpetual piston pump. Significant contributions were made by the author Young in [3] and [6]. This work continues to be frequently used today to support the numerical analyses undertaken, improving our understanding of the internal flow details and phenomena within HRP. The first piece of research to discuss, aimed to understand the influence of the waste valve entry region shape upon its performance [7]. The research identified that local diffuser enlargements performed best by reducing the head loss coefficient, drag coefficient and velocity uniformity across the component. The paper additionally highlighted that the abrupt changes in flow area and direction induce vortex regions, negatively influencing the performance. Consequently, conventional designs require precisely manufactured parts to achieve higher efficiency values, increasing their cost and complexity of manufacture. In what follows, the proposed system is designed with parametric analysis, using ANSYS-Fluent CFD software tool [8].
7.2 System Design
The initial stage of modelling was to extract the fluid body within the system and appropriately defeature the design in such a way that will simplify the modelling process, whilst being conscious not to introduce significant systematic error within the model. The system is powered solely by water, developed over the last decade through incremental invention [9, 10]. One of the founders had moved to the ‘Australian Bush’, opting to construct a HRP to supply water from a local creek [11]. However, with insufficient supply head and intermittent flow, failed to meet its requirements [12, 13]. Consequently, a series of concepts were developed, soon translating into commercial success, developing several models including the Oasis, Water Dragon and the Glockemann Pump, achieving a Gold Medal at the Geneva 2002 International Exhibition [14] and [15]. The system remained to be noisy and disruptive to the local area. Thus, in an attempt to reduce the undesired characteristics, the water hammer phenomena could be removed, leading to a series of redesigns and eventually the Bunyip PA-13 [8, 16–19], depicted in Fig. 7.1.
To attain a representative geometry, engagement with the pump manufacturers enabled a scaled cross section of the large Bunyip PA-13 model to be shared, depicted in Fig. 7.2. Initially, the known length could be taken from the 100mmØ supply pipe and used to determine the geometry throughout the system.
Following [21], when defeaturing the design, the following assumptions were made to reduce the modelling complexity, without introducing systematic errors from the real system. Initially within the lower region of the pump, the area below the inlet pipe can be assumed to be flat, without the requirement to model the fixings for the internal springs and fixed rod length, considered to have negligible influence upon the internal flow of the system [22, 23]. Additionally, the tyre mechanism deformation would add significant complexity to the wall definition and processing activities of the model, outlining the initial locations and profile of movement throughout the calculation. For this reason, the tyre has been constructed as a constant diameter cylinder that will simulate deformation and changes in volume through the extension of the cylinder height. Within the upper region, several defeatures could also be made. Firstly, the inlet and outlet check valves if modelled could introduce associated systematic error, without time to appropriately study their operation within the scope of research. Therefore, the valves will be manipulated as inlets and outlets, synchronised with the anticipated position of the valves throughout the cycle. Additionally, a series of discharge holes are located within the internal bore, highlighted within Fig. 7.2 using an asterisk, enabling the piston to discharge once it has descended beyond these points. The modelled geometry relocates the discharge point to the underside of the piston, eliminating the required interaction of the sliding piston and discharge locations, whilst ensuring the same access is available for water to freely exhaust from the volume.
7.3 Results
An execute commands have been defined and embedded within a Scheme file script of ANSYS-Fluent [8, 24]. This utilises a series of ‘IF’ logic statements and the flowtime within the calculation to manipulate TUI commands to define the boundary zone types and parameters [25]. The times for each phase could be determined, starting with a larger period than required and iteratively estimating the period using the previous result. At this stage, each of the inlets and outlets could be set, using velocity, pressure, and mass-flow methods, suited for use with incompressible water. The zone details are provided in Table 7.1.
The post-processing of the CFD-Post module is conducted within ANSYS [26], enabling the efficient production of surface contours, vectors and streamlines for the velocity and pressure within the system [27]. The content will be discussed within Sect. 4. System Velocity Contours are shown in Fig. 7.3. The lower stream is shown in Fig. 7.4, the delivery streamlines are shown in Fig. 7.5, the upper piston operation is illustrated in Figs. 7.6 and 7.7.
In order to validate the model, two data sets will be used to contrast against the outputs attained through previous stages. Firstly, the publicly available Bunyip output chart enables direct reference for the supply rate, supply elevation and delivery head of 6 L/s, 4 m and 50 m as modelled. Additionally, having contacted the manufacturer, an advanced calculator tool was shared, used to quote customers, and advise the most suitable system for application [28]. The two data sets could be summarised for validation in Table 7.2.
7.4 Conclusions
The Bunyip dynamic motion was fully defined using the 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) solver, incorporating both the Bunyip mass and the internal spring stiffness, manipulating the mesh using the layering method to construct/destroy mesh layers. Once the model was processed the results were analysed and illustrated using the integrated CFD-post module to produce a series of figures and plots discussed. The model produced was successfully validated against two data sets, achieving agreement within the region of 10% for both the daily output and supply efficiency, recognised to consistently underestimate output parameters as a consequence of a slightly reduced piston diameter, deemed appropriate for the current research application. Despite the lack of information to validate the waste efficiency, the model emphasises that the larger diameter waste valve for pressure amplification will naturally exhaust larger volumes to provide some of the distinguishing features of the Bunyip. Consequently, it is expected that the Bunyip waste efficiency, determined at ~ 12%, is unlikely to achieve any greater than 30% waste efficiency. Thus, for water scarce applications, may not be as viable as precision made industry HRP alternatives achieving ~ 60% or more. Beyond quantitative data, the model enabled the flow mechanics and characteristics of the Bunyip to be visualised and discussed to elaborate upon operation, identifying potential ways to improve the function and share further research opportunities for the Bunyip system.
References
The Pump Company, “History of the hydraulic ram,” n.d. [Online]. http://www.theramcompany.com/history.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2021
R. Balgude, S. Rupanavar, P. Bagul, M.R. Ramteke, Designing of hydraulic ram pump. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 4(5), 11966–11971 (2015)
B.W. Young- a, Design of hydraulic ram pump systems. Proc. IMechE Part A J. Power Energy 209(4), 313–322 (1995)
A. Kherde, A. Kadaskar, E. Dhoble, M. Gawal, T. Bawankar, T. Chavan, N. Singh, Research paper on hydraulic ram pump. IRE J. 3(10), 282–284 (2020)
D.F. Muriel, R.O. Tinoco, B.P. Filardo, E.A. Cowen, Development of a novel, robust, sustainable and low cost self-powered water pump for use in free-flowing liquid streams. Renew. Energy 91, 466–476 (2016)
B.W. Young- b, The gravity pump: a new approach to a natural energy water pump. J. Power Energy 217, 45–51 (2003)
X. Guo, J. Li, K. Yang, H. Fu, T. Wang, Y. Guo, Q. Xia, W. Huang, Optimal design and performance analysis of hydraulic ram pump system. J. Power Energy: IMechE 232(7), 841–855 (2018)
ANSYS, “ANSYS free student software download,” [Online]. Available https://www.ansys.com/academic/free-student-products. Accessed 01 Oct 2020
M.N. Harith, R.A. Bakar, D. Ramasamy M. Quanjin, A significant effect on flow analysis and simulation study of improve design hydraulic pump. in 4th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering Research, (2017)
W. Asvapoositkul, J. Juruta, N. Tabtimhin, Y. Limpongsa, Determination of hydraulic ram pump performance: Hindawi: Adv. Civil Eng. (2019), pp. 1–11
B. Porta, I. Trew, Introducing the Bunyip pump—no electricity or fuel needed (YouTube),” March 2019. [Online]. Available https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHJmYeFkJU8. Accessed 08 January 2021
J.C.I. Zambrano, J. Michavila, E.A. Pinilla, J.C. Diehl, M.W. Ertsen, Water lifting water: a comprehensive spatiotemporal review on the hydro-powered water pumping technologies. Water 1677, 1–33 (2019)
J. Li, K. Yang, X. Guo, W. Huang, T. Wang, Y. Guo, H. Fu, Structural design and parameter optimization on a waste valve for hydraulic ram pumps. J. Power Enegry: IMechE, pp. 1–19, (2020)
B. Porta, R. Glockemann- b, Bunyip vs. RAM comparison research [email] to S.Beard [01 February 2021], Porta Affordable Pumps, (2021)
B.P. Filardo, D.F. Muriel, R.O. Tinoco, E.A. Cowen, Development of a novel, robust, sustainable and low cost self-powered water pump for use in free-flowing liquid streams. Renew. Energy 91, 466–476 (2016)
Portas Affordable Pumps, “Bunyip Output Chart,” n.d. [Online]. Available http://portasaffordablepumps.com.au/assets/images/chart.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2021
Portas Affordable Pumps, “PA Pump Output & Stroke Calculator,” n.d. [Online]. Available http://portasaffordablepumps.com.au/about.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2021
B. Porta, R. Glockemann- a, Bunyip, Install and user guide [email] to S. Beard [21 January 2021], Portas Affordable Pumps, (2021)
J. Tu, G.H. Yeoh, C. Liu, Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Approach, 3rd edn. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2018)
M.N. Harith, R.A. Bakar, D. Ramasamy, K. Kardigama, M. Quanjin, A study of waste and delivery valve design modification to the pump performance. Mater. Sci. Eng, 1–12, (2018)
W. Sobieski, D. Gyro, Fluid flow in the impulse valve of a hydraulic ram. Tech. Sci. 22(3), 205–220 (2019)
P.B. Shende, A.P. Ninawe, S.K. Choudhary, Analysis and enhancement of hydraulic ram pump using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). IJIRST–Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Technol. 2(3), 109–133 (2015)
ANSYS, “Module 09: Best Practice Guidelines,” ANSYS, Inc, (2016)
ANSYS, “Fluent User's Guide—Fluent 2020 R2,” n.d. [Online]. Available https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/account/secured?returnurl=/Views/Secured/corp/v202/en/flu_ug/flu_ug.html. Accessed January-April 2021
J. Zhu, H. Zhu, J. Zhang, H. Zhang, A numerical study on flow patterns inside an electrical submersible pump. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 173, 339–350 (2019)
Portas Affordable Pumps- b, “PA Pump Output & Stroke Calculator,” n.d. [Online]. Available http://portasaffordablepumps.com.au/about.html. Accessed 20 January 2021
M. Inthachot, S. Saehaeng, J.F. Max, J. Müller, W. Spreer, Hydraulic ram pumps for irrigation in Northern Thailand. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 5, 107–114 (2015)
Portas Affordable Pumps- a, “About Bunyip Pumps,” n.d. [Online]. Available http://portasaffordablepumps.com.au/about.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2021
P. Diwan, A. Patel, L. Sahu, Design and fabrication of hydraulic RAM with methods if improving efficiency. Int. J. Current Eng. Sci. Res. (IJCESR) 3(4), 5–13 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Beard, S.D., Al Qubeissi, M., Khanal, B. (2023). Computational Analysis of Hydro-powered Bunyip Pump. In: Nixon, J.D., Al-Habaibeh, A., Vukovic, V., Asthana, A. (eds) Energy and Sustainable Futures: Proceedings of the 3rd ICESF, 2022. ICESF 2022. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30960-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30960-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30959-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30960-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)