Abstract
We revisit the computation of the trace anomaly for Weyl fermions using dimensional regularization. For a consistent treatment of the chiral gamma matrix γ* in dimensional regularization, we work in n dimensions from the very beginning and use the Breitenlohner-Maison scheme to define γ*. We show that the parity-odd contribution to the trace anomaly vanishes (for which the use of dimension-dependent identities is crucial), and that the parity-even contribution is half the one of a Dirac fermion. To arrive at this result, we compute the full renormalized expectation value of the fermion stress tensor to second order in perturbations around Minkowski spacetime, and also show that it is conserved.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
M.J. Duff, Weyl, Pontryagin, Euler, Eguchi and Freund, J. Phys. A 53 (2020) 301001 [arXiv:2003.02688] [INSPIRE].
S.M. Christensen and M.J. Duff, New Gravitational Index Theorems and Supertheorems, Nucl. Phys. B 154 (1979) 301 [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakayama, CP-violating CFT and trace anomaly, Nucl. Phys. B 859 (2012) 288 [arXiv:1201.3428] [INSPIRE].
L. Bonora, S. Giaccari and B. Lima de Souza, Trace anomalies in chiral theories revisited, JHEP 07 (2014) 117 [arXiv:1403.2606] [INSPIRE].
L. Bonora, A.D. Pereira and B. Lima de Souza, Regularization of energy-momentum tensor correlators and parity-odd terms, JHEP 06 (2015) 024 [arXiv:1503.03326] [INSPIRE].
L. Bonora, M. Cvitan, P. Dominis Prester, A. Duarte Pereira, S. Giaccari and T. Štemberga, Axial gravity, massless fermions and trace anomalies, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 511 [arXiv:1703.10473] [INSPIRE].
F. Bastianelli and R. Martelli, On the trace anomaly of a Weyl fermion, JHEP 11 (2016) 178 [arXiv:1610.02304] [INSPIRE].
F. Bastianelli and M. Broccoli, Axial gravity and anomalies of fermions, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 276 [arXiv:1911.02271] [INSPIRE].
M.B. Fröb and J. Zahn, Trace anomaly for chiral fermions via Hadamard subtraction, JHEP 10 (2019) 223 [arXiv:1904.10982] [INSPIRE].
F. Bastianelli and M. Broccoli, On the trace anomaly of a Weyl fermion in a gauge background, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 292 [arXiv:1808.03489] [INSPIRE].
F. Bastianelli and M. Broccoli, Weyl fermions in a non-abelian gauge background and trace anomalies, JHEP 10 (2019) 241 [arXiv:1908.03750] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakayama, Realization of impossible anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 085002 [arXiv:1804.02940] [INSPIRE].
K. Nakagawa and Y. Nakayama, CP-violating super Weyl anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 105013 [arXiv:2002.01128] [INSPIRE].
A.D. Dolgov, Baryogenesis, 30 years after, Surv. High Energy Phys. 13 (1998) 83.
J.C. Fabris, A.M. Pelinson and I.L. Shapiro, Anomaly induced effective action for gravity and inflation, Grav. Cosmol. 6 (2000) 59 [gr-qc/9810032] [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking, T. Hertog and H.S. Reall, Trace anomaly driven inflation, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 083504 [hep-th/0010232] [INSPIRE].
R. Auzzi, S. Baiguera and G. Nardelli, Trace anomaly for non-relativistic fermions, JHEP 08 (2017) 042 [arXiv:1705.02229] [INSPIRE].
O. Catà, W. Kilian and N. Kreher, Gauge anomalies in the Standard-Model Effective Field Theory, arXiv:2011.09976 [INSPIRE].
F. Feruglio, A Note on Gauge Anomaly Cancellation in Effective Field Theories, JHEP 03 (2021) 128 [arXiv:2012.13989] [INSPIRE].
C.G. Bollini and J.J. Giambiagi, Dimensional Renormalization: The Number of Dimensions as a Regularizing Parameter, Nuovo Cim. B 12 (1972) 20 [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft and M.J.G. Veltman, Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields, Nucl. Phys. B 44 (1972) 189 [INSPIRE].
G. Leibbrandt, Introduction to the Technique of Dimensional Regularization, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47 (1975) 849 [INSPIRE].
C.G. Bollini and J.J. Giambiagi, Evanescent couplings and compensation of adler anomaly, Acta Phys. Austriaca 38 (1973) 211 [INSPIRE].
P.A. Baikov and V.A. Ilyin, Status of γ5 in dimensional regularization, Theor. Math. Phys. 88 (1991) 789 [INSPIRE].
P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison, Dimensional Renormalization and the Action Principle, Commun. Math. Phys. 52 (1977) 11 [INSPIRE].
G. Thompson and H.L. Yu, γ5 in dimensional regularization, Phys. Lett. B 151 (1985) 119 [INSPIRE].
J.G. Körner, D. Kreimer and K. Schilcher, A Practicable γ5 scheme in dimensional regularization, Z. Phys. C 54 (1992) 503 [INSPIRE].
D. Kreimer, The γ5 Problem and Anomalies: A Clifford Algebra Approach, Phys. Lett. B 237 (1990) 59 [INSPIRE].
G. Rufa, Mathematical foundations of the dimensional method, Annalen Phys. 47 (1990) 6.
J.M. Martín-García et al., xAct: Efficient tensor computer algebra for the Wolfram Language, http://www.xact.es (2020).
D. Brizuela, J.M. Martín-García and G.A. Mena Marugan, xPert: Computer algebra for metric perturbation theory, Gen. Rel. Grav. 41 (2009) 2415 [arXiv:0807.0824] [INSPIRE].
D.Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, Ingredients of supergravity, Fortsch. Phys. 59 (2011) 1118 [arXiv:1106.1097] [INSPIRE].
A.D. Kennedy, Clifford Algebras in Two ω Dimensions, J. Math. Phys. 22 (1981) 1330 [INSPIRE].
M. Forger and H. Römer, Currents and the energy momentum tensor in classical field theory: A Fresh look at an old problem, Annals Phys. 309 (2004) 306 [hep-th/0307199] [INSPIRE].
G. Bonneau, Preserving Canonical Ward Identities in Dimensional Regularization With a Nonanticommuting γ5, Nucl. Phys. B 177 (1981) 523 [INSPIRE].
C.P. Martin and D. Sánchez-Ruiz, Action principles, restoration of BRS symmetry and the renormalization group equation for chiral nonAbelian gauge theories in dimensional renormalization with a nonanticommuting γ5, Nucl. Phys. B 572 (2000) 387 [hep-th/9905076] [INSPIRE].
D. Sánchez-Ruiz, BRS symmetry restoration of chiral Abelian Higgs-Kibble theory in dimensional renormalization with a nonanticommuting γ5, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 025009 [hep-th/0209023] [INSPIRE].
H. Bélusca-Maïto, A. Ilakovac, M. Mađor-Božinović and D. Stöckinger, Dimensional regularization and Breitenlohner-Maison’t Hooft-Veltman scheme for γ5 applied to chiral YM theories: full one-loop counterterm and RGE structure, JHEP 08 (2020) 024 [arXiv:2004.14398] [INSPIRE].
R.P. Woodard, The Vierbein Is Irrelevant in Perturbation Theory, Phys. Lett. B 148 (1984) 440 [INSPIRE].
L. Álvarez-Gaumé and P.H. Ginsparg, The Topological Meaning of Nonabelian Anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 243 (1984) 449 [INSPIRE].
R.E. Gamboa Saraví, M.A. Muschietti, F.A. Schaposnik and J.E. Solomin, A ζ-function method for Weyl fermionic determinants, Lett. Math. Phys. 16 (1988) 325 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations. II. Can these corrections become large?, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 023508 [hep-th/0605244] [INSPIRE].
P. Adshead, R. Easther and E.A. Lim, Cosmology With Many Light Scalar Fields: Stochastic Inflation and Loop Corrections, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 063504 [arXiv:0809.4008] [INSPIRE].
L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, On Loops in Inflation, JHEP 12 (2010) 008 [arXiv:0912.2734] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet Divergences in Cosmological Correlations, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 063508 [arXiv:1011.1630] [INSPIRE].
M.B. Fröb, A. Roura and E. Verdaguer, One-loop gravitational wave spectrum in de Sitter spacetime, JCAP 08 (2012) 009 [arXiv:1205.3097] [INSPIRE].
G. Passarino and M.J.G. Veltman, One Loop Corrections for e+e− Annihilation Into μ+μ− in the Weinberg Model, Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 151 [INSPIRE].
V.A. Smirnov, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics. Vol. 211: Evaluating Feynman Integrals, Springer, Heidelberg Germany (2005), http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=isbn:978-3-540-23933-8.
H. Godazgar and H. Nicolai, A rederivation of the conformal anomaly for spin-\( \frac{1}{2} \), Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 105013 [arXiv:1801.01728] [INSPIRE].
O. Piguet and S.P. Sorella, Algebraic renormalization: Perturbative renormalization, symmetries and anomalies, Lect. Notes Phys. 28 (1995) 1 [INSPIRE].
K. Sibold, Algebraic methods of renormalization, Lect. Notes Phys. 572 (2001) 183 [INSPIRE].
S. Hollands, Renormalized Quantum Yang-Mills Fields in Curved Spacetime, Rev. Math. Phys. 20 (2008) 1033 [arXiv:0705.3340] [INSPIRE].
K. Fredenhagen and K. Rejzner, Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism in perturbative algebraic quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 317 (2013) 697 [arXiv:1110.5232] [INSPIRE].
M.B. Fröb, Anomalies in Time-Ordered Products and Applications to the BV-BRST Formulation of Quantum Gauge Theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 372 (2019) 281 [arXiv:1803.10235] [INSPIRE].
J. Wess and B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous Ward identities, Phys. Lett. B 37 (1971) 95 [INSPIRE].
L. Bonora, P. Cotta-Ramusino and C. Reina, Conformal Anomaly and Cohomology, Phys. Lett. B 126 (1983) 305 [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich, F. Brandt and M. Henneaux, Local BRST cohomology in Einstein Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 455 (1995) 357 [hep-th/9505173] [INSPIRE].
F. Jegerlehner, Facts of life with γ5, Eur. Phys. J. C 18 (2001) 673 [hep-th/0005255] [INSPIRE].
L. Casarin, H. Godazgar and H. Nicolai, Conformal Anomaly for Non-Conformal Scalar Fields, Phys. Lett. B 787 (2018) 94 [arXiv:1809.06681] [INSPIRE].
S.B. Edgar and A. Höglund, Dimensionally dependent tensor identities by double antisymmetrization, J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 659 [gr-qc/0105066] [INSPIRE].
S.L. Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426 [INSPIRE].
T. Kimura, Divergence of axial-vector current in the gravitational field, Prog. Theor. Phys. 42 (1969) 1191 [INSPIRE].
R. Delbourgo and A. Salam, The gravitational correction to pcac, Phys. Lett. B 40 (1972) 381 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2101.11382
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Abdallah, S., Franchino-Viñas, S.A. & Fröb, M.B. Trace anomaly for Weyl fermions using the Breitenlohner-Maison scheme for γ*. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 271 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)271
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)271