Abstract
Leptoquarks provide viable solutions to the flavour anomalies, i.e. they can explain the tensions between the measurements and the Standard Model predictions of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon as well as b → sℓ+ℓ− and b → cτν processes. However, LQs also contribute to other flavour observables, such as ∆F = 2 processes, at the loop-level. In particular, Bs − \( \overline{B} \)s mixing provides a crucial bound in setups addressing b → cτν data, often excluding a big portion of the parameter space that could otherwise account for it. In this article, we first derive the complete leading order matching, including all five scalar LQ representations, for D0 − \( \overline{D} \)0, K0 − \( \overline{K} \)0 and Bs,d − \( \overline{B} \)s,d mixing (at the dimension-six level). We then calculate the next-to-leading order αs matching corrections to these ∆F = 2 processes in generic scalar leptoquark models. We find that the two-loop corrections increase the effects in ∆F = 2 processes by ~ 5-10% and significantly reduce the matching scale uncertainty.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J.C. Pati and A. Salam, Lepton Number as the Fourth Color, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 275 [Erratum ibid. 11 (1975) 703] [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438 [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi, H.R. Quinn and S. Weinberg, Hierarchy of Interactions in Unified Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 451 [INSPIRE].
H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons, Annals Phys. 93 (1975) 193 [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller, R. Ruckl and D. Wyler, Leptoquarks in Lepton-Quark Collisions, Phys. Lett. B 191 (1987) 442 [Erratum ibid. 448 (1999) 320] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Evidence for an excess of \( \overline{B} \) → D(*)τ−\( \overline{\nu} \)τ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 101802 [arXiv:1205.5442] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Measurement of an Excess of \( \overline{B} \) → D(*)τ−\( \overline{\nu} \)τ Decays and Implications for Charged Higgs Bosons, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 072012 [arXiv:1303.0571] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions \( \mathcal{B} \)(\( \overline{B} \)0 → D*+τ−\( \overline{\nu} \)τ)/\( \mathcal{B} \)(\( \overline{B} \)0 → D*+μ−\( \overline{\nu} \)μ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 111803 [Erratum ibid. 115 (2015) 159901] [arXiv:1506.08614] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Test of Lepton Flavor Universality by the measurement of the B0 → D*−τ+ντ branching fraction using three-prong τ decays, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 072013 [arXiv:1711.02505] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the ratio of the B0 → D*−τ+ντ and B0 → D*−μ+νμ branching fractions using three-prong τ-lepton decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 171802 [arXiv:1708.08856] [INSPIRE].
Belle collaboration, Measurement of \( \mathcal{R} \)(D) and \( \mathcal{R} \)(D*) with a semileptonic tagging method, arXiv:1904.08794 [INSPIRE].
CMS and LHCb collaborations, Observation of the rare \( {B}_s^0 \) → μ+μ− decay from the combined analysis of CMS and LHCb data, Nature 522 (2015) 68 [arXiv:1411.4413] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Angular analysis of the B0 → K*0μ+μ− decay using 3 fb−1 of integrated luminosity, JHEP 02 (2016) 104 [arXiv:1512.04442] [INSPIRE].
Belle collaboration, Angular analysis of B0 → K*(892)0ℓ+ℓ−, arXiv:1604.04042 [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality with B0 → K*0ℓ+ℓ− decays, JHEP 08 (2017) 055 [arXiv:1705.05802] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Search for lepton-universality violation in B+ → K+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 191801 [arXiv:1903.09252] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of CP-Averaged Observables in the B0 → K*0μ+μ− Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 011802 [arXiv:2003.04831] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, Nature Phys. 18 (2022) 277 [arXiv:2103.11769] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].
HFLAV collaboration, Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of summer 2016, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 895 [arXiv:1612.07233] [INSPIRE].
C. Murgui, A. Peñuelas, M. Jung and A. Pich, Global fit to b → cτν transitions, JHEP 09 (2019) 103 [arXiv:1904.09311] [INSPIRE].
R.-X. Shi, L.-S. Geng, B. Grinstein, S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, Revisiting the new-physics interpretation of the b → cτν data, JHEP 12 (2019) 065 [arXiv:1905.08498] [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, T. Kitahara, M. Moscati, U. Nierste and I. Nišandžić, Addendum to “Impact of polarization observables and Bc → τν on new physics explanations of the b → cτν anomaly”, arXiv:1905.08253 [Addendum ibid. 100 (2019) 035035] [INSPIRE].
S. Kumbhakar, A.K. Alok, D. Kumar and S.U. Sankar, A global fit to b → cτ\( \overline{\nu} \) anomalies after Moriond 2019, PoS EPS-HEP2019 (2020) 272 [arXiv:1909.02840] [INSPIRE].
S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias and J. Virto, Global analysis of b → sℓℓ anomalies, JHEP 06 (2016) 092 [arXiv:1510.04239] [INSPIRE].
B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias and J. Virto, Patterns of New Physics in b → sℓ+ℓ− transitions in the light of recent data, JHEP 01 (2018) 093 [arXiv:1704.05340] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, P. Stangl and D.M. Straub, Interpreting Hints for Lepton Flavor Universality Violation, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 055008 [arXiv:1704.05435] [INSPIRE].
M. Algueró et al., Emerging patterns of New Physics with and without Lepton Flavour Universal contributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 714 [Addendum ibid. 80 (2020) 511] [arXiv:1903.09578] [INSPIRE].
A.K. Alok, A. Dighe, S. Gangal and D. Kumar, Continuing search for new physics in b → sμμ decays: two operators at a time, JHEP 06 (2019) 089 [arXiv:1903.09617] [INSPIRE].
M. Ciuchini et al., New Physics in b → sℓ+ℓ− confronts new data on Lepton Universality, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 719 [arXiv:1903.09632] [INSPIRE].
J. Aebischer, W. Altmannshofer, D. Guadagnoli, M. Reboud, P. Stangl and D.M. Straub, B-decay discrepancies after Moriond 2019, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 252 [arXiv:1903.10434] [INSPIRE].
A. Arbey, T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, D.M. Santos and S. Neshatpour, Update on the b → s anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015045 [arXiv:1904.08399] [INSPIRE].
D. Kumar, K. Kowalska and E.M. Sessolo, Global Bayesian Analysis of new physics in b → sμμ transitions after Moriond-2019, arXiv:1906.08596 [INSPIRE].
M. Algueró, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias and M. Novoa-Brunet, b → sℓℓ Global Fits after \( {R}_{K_S} \) and \( {R}_{K^{\ast +}} \), arXiv:2104.08921 [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer and P. Stangl, New physics in rare B decays after Moriond 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 952 [arXiv:2103.13370] [INSPIRE].
A.K. Alok, S. Kumbhakar and S. Uma Sankar, A unique discrimination between new physics scenarios in b → sμ+μ− anomalies, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 354 [arXiv:2001.04395] [INSPIRE].
T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi and S. Neshatpour, Model independent analysis of the angular observables in B0 → K*0μ+μ− and B+ → K*+μ+μ−, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 095020 [arXiv:2012.12207] [INSPIRE].
M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini and M. Valli, Lessons from the B0,+ → K*0,+μ+μ− angular analyses, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 015030 [arXiv:2011.01212] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Complete Tenth-Order QED Contribution to the Muon g − 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 111808 [arXiv:1205.5370] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Theory of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Electron, Atoms 7 (2019) 28.
A. Czarnecki, W.J. Marciano and A. Vainshtein, Refinements in electroweak contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 073006 [Erratum ibid. 73 (2006) 119901] [hep-ph/0212229] [INSPIRE].
C. Gnendiger, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, The electroweak contributions to (g − 2)μ after the Higgs boson mass measurement, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 053005 [arXiv:1306.5546] [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g − 2 and α(\( {m}_Z^2 \)) using newest hadronic cross-section data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 827 [arXiv:1706.09436] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, Muon g − 2 and α(\( {M}_Z^2 \)): a new data-based analysis, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 114025 [arXiv:1802.02995] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter and P. Stoffer, Two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 02 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1810.00007] [INSPIRE].
M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid and B. Kubis, Three-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 08 (2019) 137 [arXiv:1907.01556] [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(\( {m}_Z^2 \)), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 241 [Erratum ibid. 80 (2020) 410] [arXiv:1908.00921] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, g − 2 of charged leptons, α(\( {M}_Z^2 \)), and the hyperfine splitting of muonium, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 014029 [arXiv:1911.00367] [INSPIRE].
A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard and M. Steinhauser, Hadronic contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment to next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 734 (2014) 144 [arXiv:1403.6400] [INSPIRE].
K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment revisited, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 113006 [hep-ph/0312226] [INSPIRE].
P. Masjuan and P. Sanchez-Puertas, Pseudoscalar-pole contribution to the (gμ − 2): a rational approach, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 054026 [arXiv:1701.05829] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: two-pion contributions, JHEP 04 (2017) 161 [arXiv:1702.07347] [INSPIRE].
M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, S. Leupold and S.P. Schneider, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: pion pole, JHEP 10 (2018) 141 [arXiv:1808.04823] [INSPIRE].
A. Gérardin, H.B. Meyer and A. Nyffeler, Lattice calculation of the pion transition form factor with Nf = 2 + 1 Wilson quarks, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 034520 [arXiv:1903.09471] [INSPIRE].
J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Short-distance constraints for the HLbL contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134994 [arXiv:1908.03331] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, F. Hagelstein, M. Hoferichter, L. Laub and P. Stoffer, Longitudinal short-distance constraints for the hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g − 2)μ with large-Nc Regge models, JHEP 03 (2020) 101 [arXiv:1910.13432] [INSPIRE].
T. Blum et al., Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 132002 [arXiv:1911.08123] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, A. Nyffeler, M. Passera and P. Stoffer, Remarks on higher-order hadronic corrections to the muon g − 2, Phys. Lett. B 735 (2014) 90 [arXiv:1403.7512] [INSPIRE].
B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia and S.A. Renner, Composite leptoquarks and anomalies in B-meson decays, JHEP 05 (2015) 006 [arXiv:1412.1791] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, B. Grinstein and J. Martin Camalich, Lepton universality violation and lepton flavor conservation in B-meson decays, JHEP 10 (2015) 184 [arXiv:1505.05164] [INSPIRE].
L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin and T. Ota, Effective Field Theory Approach to b → sℓℓ(′) , B → K(*)\( \nu \overline{\nu} \) and B → D(*)τν with Third Generation Couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 181801 [arXiv:1506.02661] [INSPIRE].
G. Hiller, D. Loose and K. Schönwald, Leptoquark Flavor Patterns & B Decay Anomalies, JHEP 12 (2016) 027 [arXiv:1609.08895] [INSPIRE].
B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, J.-P. Guévin, D. London and R. Watanabe, Simultaneous Explanation of the RK and \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) Puzzles: a Model Analysis, JHEP 01 (2017) 015 [arXiv:1609.09078] [INSPIRE].
D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori and D. Marzocca, B-physics anomalies: a guide to combined explanations, JHEP 11 (2017) 044 [arXiv:1706.07808] [INSPIRE].
R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, A. Pattori and F. Senia, Anomalies in B-decays and U(2) flavour symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 67 [arXiv:1512.01560] [INSPIRE].
R. Barbieri, C.W. Murphy and F. Senia, B-decay Anomalies in a Composite Leptoquark Model, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 8 [arXiv:1611.04930] [INSPIRE].
L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin and T. Li, Model of vector leptoquarks in view of the B-physics anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 115002 [arXiv:1709.00692] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, D. Müller, A. Signer and Y. Ulrich, Correlating lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with μ → eγ using leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 015019 [arXiv:1706.08511] [INSPIRE].
L. Di Luzio, A. Greljo and M. Nardecchia, Gauge leptoquark as the origin of B-physics anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 115011 [arXiv:1708.08450] [INSPIRE].
M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martín and G. Isidori, Low-energy signatures of the PS3 model: from B-physics anomalies to LFV, JHEP 10 (2018) 148 [arXiv:1805.09328] [INSPIRE].
J. Kumar, D. London and R. Watanabe, Combined Explanations of the b → sμ+μ− and b → cτ−\( \overline{\nu} \) Anomalies: a General Model Analysis, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 015007 [arXiv:1806.07403] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, C. Greub, D. Müller and F. Saturnino, Importance of Loop Effects in Explaining the Accumulated Evidence for New Physics in B Decays with a Vector Leptoquark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 011805 [arXiv:1807.02068] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin and F. Saturnino, Explaining the Flavor Anomalies with a Vector Leptoquark (Moriond 2019 update), PoS DIS2019 (2019) 163 [arXiv:1906.01222] [INSPIRE].
C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin and G. Isidori, Revisiting the vector leptoquark explanation of the B-physics anomalies, JHEP 07 (2019) 168 [arXiv:1903.11517] [INSPIRE].
M. Bordone, O. Catà and T. Feldmann, Effective Theory Approach to New Physics with Flavour: General Framework and a Leptoquark Example, JHEP 01 (2020) 067 [arXiv:1910.02641] [INSPIRE].
J. Bernigaud, I. de Medeiros Varzielas and J. Talbert, Finite Family Groups for Fermionic and Leptoquark Mixing Patterns, JHEP 01 (2020) 194 [arXiv:1906.11270] [INSPIRE].
J. Aebischer, A. Crivellin and C. Greub, QCD improved matching for semileptonic B decays with leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 055002 [arXiv:1811.08907] [INSPIRE].
J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori, M. König and N. Selimović, Vector Leptoquarks Beyond Tree Level, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035024 [arXiv:1910.13474] [INSPIRE].
O. Popov, M.A. Schmidt and G. White, R2 as a single leptoquark solution to \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) and \( {R}_{K^{\left(\ast \right)}} \), Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 035028 [arXiv:1905.06339] [INSPIRE].
S. Fajfer and N. Košnik, Vector leptoquark resolution of RK and \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) puzzles, Phys. Lett. B 755 (2016) 270 [arXiv:1511.06024] [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke and A. Crivellin, B Meson Anomalies in a Pati-Salam Model within the Randall-Sundrum Background, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 011801 [arXiv:1801.07256] [INSPIRE].
I. de Medeiros Varzielas and J. Talbert, Simplified Models of Flavourful Leptoquarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 536 [arXiv:1901.10484] [INSPIRE].
I. de Medeiros Varzielas and G. Hiller, Clues for flavor from rare lepton and quark decays, JHEP 06 (2015) 072 [arXiv:1503.01084] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, D. Müller and F. Saturnino, Flavor Phenomenology of the Leptoquark Singlet-Triplet Model, JHEP 06 (2020) 020 [arXiv:1912.04224] [INSPIRE].
S. Saad, Combined explanations of (g − 2)μ, \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \), \( {R}_{K^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) anomalies in a two-loop radiative neutrino mass model, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015019 [arXiv:2005.04352] [INSPIRE].
S. Saad and A. Thapa, Common origin of neutrino masses and \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \), \( {R}_{K^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015014 [arXiv:2004.07880] [INSPIRE].
V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca and E. Venturini, Low-energy phenomenology of scalar leptoquarks at one-loop accuracy, JHEP 01 (2021) 138 [arXiv:2008.09548] [INSPIRE].
L. Da Rold and F. Lamagna, Model for the singlet-triplet leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 115007 [arXiv:2011.10061] [INSPIRE].
J. Davighi, M. Kirk and M. Nardecchia, Anomalies and accidental symmetries: charging the scalar leptoquark under Lμ − Lτ, JHEP 12 (2020) 111 [arXiv:2007.15016] [INSPIRE].
S. Iguro, J. Kawamura, S. Okawa and Y. Omura, TeV-scale vector leptoquark from Pati-Salam unification with vectorlike families, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 075008 [arXiv:2103.11889] [INSPIRE].
S. Iguro and R. Watanabe, Bayesian fit analysis to full distribution data of \( \overline{B} \) → D(*)ℓ\( \overline{\nu} \): |Vcb| determination and new physics constraints, JHEP 08 (2020) 006 [arXiv:2004.10208] [INSPIRE].
S. Iguro, T. Kitahara, Y. Omura, R. Watanabe and K. Yamamoto, D* polarization vs. \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) anomalies in the leptoquark models, JHEP 02 (2019) 194 [arXiv:1811.08899] [INSPIRE].
M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin and G. Isidori, A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 317 [arXiv:1712.01368] [INSPIRE].
A. Biswas, D. Kumar Ghosh, N. Ghosh, A. Shaw and A.K. Swain, Collider signature of U1 Leptoquark and constraints from b → c observables, J. Phys. G 47 (2020) 045005 [arXiv:1808.04169] [INSPIRE].
J. Heeck and D. Teresi, Pati-Salam explanations of the B-meson anomalies, JHEP 12 (2018) 103 [arXiv:1808.07492] [INSPIRE].
S. Sahoo and R. Mohanta, Scalar leptoquarks and the rare B meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 094019 [arXiv:1501.05193] [INSPIRE].
C.-H. Chen, T. Nomura and H. Okada, Explanation of B → K(*)ℓ+ℓ− and muon g − 2, and implications at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 115005 [arXiv:1607.04857] [INSPIRE].
U.K. Dey, D. Kar, M. Mitra, M. Spannowsky and A.C. Vincent, Searching for Leptoquarks at IceCube and the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 035014 [arXiv:1709.02009] [INSPIRE].
D. Bečirević and O. Sumensari, A leptoquark model to accommodate \( {R}_K^{\mathrm{exp}} \) < \( {R}_K^{\mathrm{SM}} \) and \( {R}_{K^{\ast}}^{\mathrm{exp}} \) < \( {R}_{K^{\ast}}^{\mathrm{SM}} \), JHEP 08 (2017) 104 [arXiv:1704.05835] [INSPIRE].
B. Chauhan, B. Kindra and A. Narang, Discrepancies in simultaneous explanation of flavor anomalies and IceCube PeV events using leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095007 [arXiv:1706.04598] [INSPIRE].
D. Bečirević, I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, D.A. Faroughy and O. Sumensari, Scalar leptoquarks from grand unified theories to accommodate the B-physics anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 055003 [arXiv:1806.05689] [INSPIRE].
S. Fajfer, J.F. Kamenik, I. Nišandžić and J. Zupan, Implications of Lepton Flavor Universality Violations in B Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 161801 [arXiv:1206.1872] [INSPIRE].
N.G. Deshpande and A. Menon, Hints of R-parity violation in B decays into τν, JHEP 01 (2013) 025 [arXiv:1208.4134] [INSPIRE].
M. Freytsis, Z. Ligeti and J.T. Ruderman, Flavor models for \( \overline{B} \) → D(*)τ\( \overline{\nu} \), Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 054018 [arXiv:1506.08896] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer and M. Neubert, Minimal Leptoquark Explanation for the \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \), RK, and (g − 2)μ Anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 141802 [arXiv:1511.01900] [INSPIRE].
X.-Q. Li, Y.-D. Yang and X. Zhang, Revisiting the one leptoquark solution to the R(D(*)) anomalies and its phenomenological implications, JHEP 08 (2016) 054 [arXiv:1605.09308] [INSPIRE].
J. Zhu, H.-M. Gan, R.-M. Wang, Y.-Y. Fan, Q. Chang and Y.-G. Xu, Probing the R-parity violating supersymmetric effects in the exclusive b → cℓ−\( \overline{\nu} \)ℓ decays, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 094023 [arXiv:1602.06491] [INSPIRE].
O. Popov and G.A. White, One Leptoquark to unify them? Neutrino masses and unification in the light of (g − 2)μ, \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) and RK anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 923 (2017) 324 [arXiv:1611.04566] [INSPIRE].
N.G. Deshpande and X.-G. He, Consequences of R-parity violating interactions for anomalies in \( \overline{B} \) → D(*)τ\( \overline{\nu} \) and b → sμ+μ−, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 134 [arXiv:1608.04817] [INSPIRE].
D. Bečirević, N. Košnik, O. Sumensari and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Palatable Leptoquark Scenarios for Lepton Flavor Violation in Exclusive b → sℓ1ℓ2 modes, JHEP 11 (2016) 035 [arXiv:1608.07583] [INSPIRE].
Y. Cai, J. Gargalionis, M.A. Schmidt and R.R. Volkas, Reconsidering the One Leptoquark solution: flavor anomalies and neutrino mass, JHEP 10 (2017) 047 [arXiv:1704.05849] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, P.S. Bhupal Dev and A. Soni, \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) anomaly: A possible hint for natural supersymmetry with R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 095010 [arXiv:1704.06659] [INSPIRE].
S. Kamali, A. Rashed and A. Datta, New physics in inclusive B → Xcℓ\( \overline{\nu} \) decay in light of R(D(*)) measurements, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095034 [arXiv:1801.08259] [INSPIRE].
T. Mandal, S. Mitra and S. Raz, \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) motivated \( \mathcal{S} \)1 leptoquark scenarios: Impact of interference on the exclusion limits from LHC data, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 055028 [arXiv:1811.03561] [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov, D. Bardhan, D. Ghosh, F. Sgarlata and E. Venturini, Anatomy of b → cτν anomalies, JHEP 11 (2018) 187 [arXiv:1805.03209] [INSPIRE].
J. Zhu, B. Wei, J.-H. Sheng, R.-M. Wang, Y. Gao and G.-R. Lu, Probing the R-parity violating supersymmetric effects in Bc → J/ψℓ−\( \overline{\nu} \)ℓ, ηcℓ−\( \overline{\nu} \)ℓ and Λb → Λcℓ−\( \overline{\nu} \)ℓ decays, Nucl. Phys. B 934 (2018) 380 [arXiv:1801.00917] [INSPIRE].
A. Angelescu, D. Bečirević, D.A. Faroughy and O. Sumensari, Closing the window on single leptoquark solutions to the B-physics anomalies, JHEP 10 (2018) 183 [arXiv:1808.08179] [INSPIRE].
T.J. Kim, P. Ko, J. Li, J. Park and P. Wu, Correlation between \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) and top quark FCNC decays in leptoquark models, JHEP 07 (2019) 025 [arXiv:1812.08484] [INSPIRE].
U. Aydemir, T. Mandal and S. Mitra, Addressing the \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) anomalies with an S1 leptoquark from SO(10) grand unification, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 015011 [arXiv:1902.08108] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin and F. Saturnino, Correlating tauonic B decays with the neutron electric dipole moment via a scalar leptoquark, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115014 [arXiv:1905.08257] [INSPIRE].
H. Yan, Y.-D. Yang and X.-B. Yuan, Phenomenology of b → cτ\( \overline{\nu} \) decays in a scalar leptoquark model, Chin. Phys. C 43 (2019) 083105 [arXiv:1905.01795] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, D. Müller and T. Ota, Simultaneous explanation of R(D(*)) and b → sμ+μ−: the last scalar leptoquarks standing, JHEP 09 (2017) 040 [arXiv:1703.09226] [INSPIRE].
D. Marzocca, Addressing the B-physics anomalies in a fundamental Composite Higgs Model, JHEP 07 (2018) 121 [arXiv:1803.10972] [INSPIRE].
I. Bigaran, J. Gargalionis and R.R. Volkas, A near-minimal leptoquark model for reconciling flavour anomalies and generating radiative neutrino masses, JHEP 10 (2019) 106 [arXiv:1906.01870] [INSPIRE].
P.S. Bhupal Dev, R. Mohanta, S. Patra and S. Sahoo, Unified explanation of flavor anomalies, radiative neutrino masses, and ANITA anomalous events in a vector leptoquark model, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 095012 [arXiv:2004.09464] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, P.S.B. Dev, A. Soni and Y. Sui, Addressing \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \), \( {R}_{K^{\left(\ast \right)}} \), muon g − 2 and ANITA anomalies in a minimal R-parity violating supersymmetric framework, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015031 [arXiv:2002.12910] [INSPIRE].
J. Fuentes-Martín and P. Stangl, Third-family quark-lepton unification with a fundamental composite Higgs, Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135953 [arXiv:2004.11376] [INSPIRE].
A. Djouadi, T. Kohler, M. Spira and J. Tutas, (eb), (et) type leptoquarks at e-p colliders, Z. Phys. C 46 (1990) 679 [INSPIRE].
D. Chakraverty, D. Choudhury and A. Datta, A nonsupersymmetric resolution of the anomalous muon magnetic moment, Phys. Lett. B 506 (2001) 103 [hep-ph/0102180] [INSPIRE].
K.-m. Cheung, Muon anomalous magnetic moment and leptoquark solutions, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 033001 [hep-ph/0102238] [INSPIRE].
C. Biggio, M. Bordone, L. Di Luzio and G. Ridolfi, Massive vectors and loop observables: the g − 2 case, JHEP 10 (2016) 002 [arXiv:1607.07621] [INSPIRE].
S. Davidson, D.C. Bailey and B.A. Campbell, Model independent constraints on leptoquarks from rare processes, Z. Phys. C 61 (1994) 613 [hep-ph/9309310] [INSPIRE].
G. Couture and H. Konig, Bounds on second generation scalar leptoquarks from the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 555 [hep-ph/9507263] [INSPIRE].
U. Mahanta, Implications of BNL measurement of δaμ on a class of scalar leptoquark interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C 21 (2001) 171 [hep-ph/0102176] [INSPIRE].
F.S. Queiroz, K. Sinha and A. Strumia, Leptoquarks, Dark Matter, and Anomalous LHC Events, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 035006 [arXiv:1409.6301] [INSPIRE].
E. Coluccio Leskow, G. D’Ambrosio, A. Crivellin and D. Müller, (g − 2)μ, lepton flavor violation, and Z decays with leptoquarks: Correlations and future prospects, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 055018 [arXiv:1612.06858] [INSPIRE].
C.-H. Chen, T. Nomura and H. Okada, Excesses of muon g − 2, \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \), and RK in a leptoquark model, Phys. Lett. B 774 (2017) 456 [arXiv:1703.03251] [INSPIRE].
D. Das, C. Hati, G. Kumar and N. Mahajan, Towards a unified explanation of \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \), RK and (g − 2)μ anomalies in a left-right model with leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 055034 [arXiv:1605.06313] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, Combined explanations of (g − 2)μ,e and implications for a large muon EDM, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 113002 [arXiv:1807.11484] [INSPIRE].
K. Kowalska, E.M. Sessolo and Y. Yamamoto, Constraints on charmphilic solutions to the muon g-2 with leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 055007 [arXiv:1812.06851] [INSPIRE].
I. Doršner, S. Fajfer and O. Sumensari, Muon g − 2 and scalar leptoquark mixing, JHEP 06 (2020) 089 [arXiv:1910.03877] [INSPIRE].
L. Delle Rose, C. Marzo and L. Marzola, Simplified leptoquark models for precision ℓi → ℓfγ experiments: two-loop structure of O(αsY2) corrections, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 115020 [arXiv:2005.12389] [INSPIRE].
I. Bigaran and R.R. Volkas, Getting chirality right: Single scalar leptoquark solutions to the (g − 2)e,μ puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 075037 [arXiv:2002.12544] [INSPIRE].
I. Doršner, S. Fajfer and S. Saad, μ → eγ selecting scalar leptoquark solutions for the (g − 2)e,μ puzzles, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 075007 [arXiv:2006.11624] [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu, P.S.B. Dev, S. Jana and A. Thapa, Unified framework for B-anomalies, muon g − 2 and neutrino masses, JHEP 03 (2021) 179 [arXiv:2009.01771] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, D. Mueller and F. Saturnino, Correlating h → μ+μ− to the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon via Leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 021801 [arXiv:2008.02643] [INSPIRE].
L. Di Luzio, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, M. Nardecchia and S. Renner, Maximal Flavour Violation: a Cabibbo mechanism for leptoquarks, JHEP 11 (2018) 081 [arXiv:1808.00942] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 07 (2021) 208 [arXiv:2103.02708] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, C.A. Manzari and M. Montull, Correlating nonresonant di-electron searches at the LHC to the Cabibbo-angle anomaly and lepton flavor universality violation, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 115016 [arXiv:2103.12003] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, D. Müller and L. Schnell, Combined constraints on first generation leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 115023 [arXiv:2104.06417] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, M. Kirk, C.A. Manzari and L. Schnell, First-generation new physics in simplified models: from low-energy parity violation to the LHC, JHEP 10 (2021) 221 [arXiv:2107.13569] [INSPIRE].
B. Belfatto, R. Beradze and Z. Berezhiani, The CKM unitarity problem: A trace of new physics at the TeV scale?, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 149 [arXiv:1906.02714] [INSPIRE].
Y. Grossman, E. Passemar and S. Schacht, On the Statistical Treatment of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly, JHEP 07 (2020) 068 [arXiv:1911.07821] [INSPIRE].
C.-Y. Seng, X. Feng, M. Gorchtein and L.-C. Jin, Joint lattice QCD-dispersion theory analysis confirms the quark-mixing top-row unitarity deficit, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 111301 [arXiv:2003.11264] [INSPIRE].
A.M. Coutinho, A. Crivellin and C.A. Manzari, Global Fit to Modified Neutrino Couplings and the Cabibbo-Angle Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 071802 [arXiv:1912.08823] [INSPIRE].
C.A. Manzari, A.M. Coutinho and A. Crivellin, Modified lepton couplings and the Cabibbo-angle anomaly, PoS LHCP2020 (2021) 242 [arXiv:2009.03877] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin and M. Hoferichter, β Decays as Sensitive Probes of Lepton Flavor Universality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 111801 [arXiv:2002.07184] [INSPIRE].
A. Carvunis, A. Crivellin, D. Guadagnoli and S. Gangal, The Forward-Backward Asymmetry in B → D*ℓν: One more hint for Scalar Leptoquarks?, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) L031701 [arXiv:2106.09610] [INSPIRE].
C. Bobeth, M. Bordone, N. Gubernari, M. Jung and D. van Dyk, Lepton-flavour non-universality of \( \overline{B} \) → D*ℓ\( \overline{\nu} \) angular distributions in and beyond the Standard Model, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 984 [arXiv:2104.02094] [INSPIRE].
M. Krämer, T. Plehn, M. Spira and P.M. Zerwas, Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 341 [hep-ph/9704322] [INSPIRE].
M. Krämer, T. Plehn, M. Spira and P.M. Zerwas, Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 057503 [hep-ph/0411038] [INSPIRE].
D.A. Faroughy, A. Greljo and J.F. Kamenik, Confronting lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with high-pT tau lepton searches at LHC, Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 126 [arXiv:1609.07138] [INSPIRE].
A. Greljo and D. Marzocca, High-pT dilepton tails and flavor physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 548 [arXiv:1704.09015] [INSPIRE].
J. Blumlein, E. Boos and A. Kryukov, Leptoquark pair production in hadronic interactions, Z. Phys. C 76 (1997) 137 [hep-ph/9610408] [INSPIRE].
I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, D.A. Faroughy and N. Košnik, The role of the S3 GUT leptoquark in flavor universality and collider searches, JHEP 10 (2017) 188 [arXiv:1706.07779] [INSPIRE].
A. Cerri et al., Report from Working Group 4: Opportunities in Flavour Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 867 [arXiv:1812.07638] [INSPIRE].
P. Bandyopadhyay and R. Mandal, Revisiting scalar leptoquark at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 491 [arXiv:1801.04253] [INSPIRE].
G. Hiller, D. Loose and I. Nišandžić, Flavorful leptoquarks at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 075004 [arXiv:1801.09399] [INSPIRE].
T. Faber et al., Collider phenomenology of a unified leptoquark model, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095024 [arXiv:1812.07592] [INSPIRE].
M. Schmaltz and Y.-M. Zhong, The leptoquark Hunter’s guide: large coupling, JHEP 01 (2019) 132 [arXiv:1810.10017] [INSPIRE].
K. Chandak, T. Mandal and S. Mitra, Hunting for scalar leptoquarks with boosted tops and light leptons, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 075019 [arXiv:1907.11194] [INSPIRE].
B.C. Allanach, T. Corbett and M. Madigan, Sensitivity of Future Hadron Colliders to Leptoquark Pair Production in the Di-Muon Di-Jets Channel, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 170 [arXiv:1911.04455] [INSPIRE].
L. Buonocore, U. Haisch, P. Nason, F. Tramontano and G. Zanderighi, Lepton-Quark Collisions at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 231804 [arXiv:2005.06475] [INSPIRE].
U. Haisch and G. Polesello, Resonant third-generation leptoquark signatures at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 05 (2021) 057 [arXiv:2012.11474] [INSPIRE].
C. Borschensky, B. Fuks, A. Kulesza and D. Schwartländer, Scalar leptoquark pair production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 115017 [arXiv:2002.08971] [INSPIRE].
S. Iguro, M. Takeuchi and R. Watanabe, Testing leptoquark/EFT in \( \overline{B} \) → D(*)l\( \overline{\nu} \) at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 406 [arXiv:2011.02486] [INSPIRE].
P. Bandyopadhyay, A. Karan and R. Mandal, Distinguishing signatures of scalar leptoquarks at hadron and muon colliders, arXiv:2108.06506 [INSPIRE].
P. Bandyopadhyay, S. Dutta, M. Jakkapu and A. Karan, Distinguishing Leptoquarks at the LHC/FCC, Nucl. Phys. B 971 (2021) 115524 [arXiv:2007.12997] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, C. Greub, D. Müller and F. Saturnino, Scalar Leptoquarks in Leptonic Processes, JHEP 02 (2021) 182 [arXiv:2010.06593] [INSPIRE].
E. Keith and E. Ma, S, T, and leptoquarks at HERA, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 4318 [hep-ph/9707214] [INSPIRE].
I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J.F. Kamenik and N. Košnik, Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders, Phys. Rept. 641 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1603.04993] [INSPIRE].
A. Bhaskar, D. Das, B. De and S. Mitra, Enhancing scalar productions with leptoquarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 035002 [arXiv:2002.12571] [INSPIRE].
J. Zhang, C.-X. Yue, C.-H. Li and S. Yang, Constraints on scalar and vector leptoquarks from the LHC Higgs data, arXiv:1905.04074 [INSPIRE].
V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca and E. Venturini, Matching scalar leptoquarks to the SMEFT at one loop, JHEP 07 (2020) 225 [Erratum ibid. 01 (2021) 006] [arXiv:2003.12525] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, D. Müller and F. Saturnino, Leptoquarks in oblique corrections and Higgs signal strength: status and prospects, JHEP 11 (2020) 094 [arXiv:2006.10758] [INSPIRE].
O.U. Shanker, Flavor Violation, Scalar Particles and Leptoquarks, Nucl. Phys. B 206 (1982) 253 [INSPIRE].
O.U. Shanker, πℓ2, Kℓ3 and K0 − \( \overline{K} \)0 Constraints on Leptoquarks and Supersymmetric Particles, Nucl. Phys. B 204 (1982) 375 [INSPIRE].
M. Leurer, A comprehensive study of leptoquark bounds, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 333 [hep-ph/9309266] [INSPIRE].
M. Leurer, Bounds on vector leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 536 [hep-ph/9312341] [INSPIRE].
P. Arnan, D. Bečirević, F. Mescia and O. Sumensari, Probing low energy scalar leptoquarks by the leptonic W and Z couplings, JHEP 02 (2019) 109 [arXiv:1901.06315] [INSPIRE].
B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, C.A. Manzari and M. Montull, Explaining b → sℓ+ℓ− and the Cabibbo angle anomaly with a vector triplet, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 015032 [arXiv:2005.13542] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C.A. Manzari and M. Montull, Global Electroweak Fit and Vector-Like Leptons in Light of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly, JHEP 12 (2020) 166 [arXiv:2008.01113] [INSPIRE].
M. Kirk, Cabibbo anomaly versus electroweak precision tests: An exploration of extensions of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 035004 [arXiv:2008.03261] [INSPIRE].
A.K. Alok, A. Dighe, S. Gangal and J. Kumar, The role of non-universal Z couplings in explaining the Vus anomaly, Nucl. Phys. B 971 (2021) 115538 [arXiv:2010.12009] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, C.A. Manzari, M. Algueró and J. Matias, Combined Explanation of the Z → b\( \overline{b} \) Forward-Backward Asymmetry, the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly, and τ → μνν and b → sℓ+ℓ− Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 011801 [arXiv:2010.14504] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C.A. Manzari and L. Panizzi, Searching for lepton flavor universality violation and collider signals from a singly charged scalar singlet, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 073002 [arXiv:2012.09845] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and C.A. Manzari, Fermi Constant from Muon Decay Versus Electroweak Fits and Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 071801 [arXiv:2102.02825] [INSPIRE].
B. Belfatto and Z. Berezhiani, Are the CKM anomalies induced by vector-like quarks? Limits from flavor changing and Standard Model precision tests, JHEP 10 (2021) 079 [arXiv:2103.05549] [INSPIRE].
G.C. Branco, J.T. Penedo, P.M.F. Pereira, M.N. Rebelo and J.I. Silva-Marcos, Addressing the CKM unitarity problem with a vector-like up quark, JHEP 07 (2021) 099 [arXiv:2103.13409] [INSPIRE].
C. Bobeth and A.J. Buras, Leptoquarks meet ε′/ε and rare Kaon processes, JHEP 02 (2018) 101 [arXiv:1712.01295] [INSPIRE].
I. Doršner, S. Fajfer and M. Patra, A comparative study of the S1 and U1 leptoquark effects in the light quark regime, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 204 [arXiv:1906.05660] [INSPIRE].
R. Mandal and A. Pich, Constraints on scalar leptoquarks from lepton and kaon physics, JHEP 12 (2019) 089 [arXiv:1908.11155] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin and L. Schnell, Complete Lagrangian and set of Feynman rules for scalar leptoquarks, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271 (2022) 108188 [arXiv:2105.04844] [INSPIRE].
T. Plehn, H. Spiesberger, M. Spira and P.M. Zerwas, Formation and decay of scalar leptoquarks/squarks in e p collisions, Z. Phys. C 74 (1997) 611 [hep-ph/9703433] [INSPIRE].
T. Mandal, S. Mitra and S. Seth, Pair Production of Scalar Leptoquarks at the LHC to NLO Parton Shower Accuracy, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 035018 [arXiv:1506.07369] [INSPIRE].
J.B. Hammett and D.A. Ross, NLO Leptoquark Production and Decay: The Narrow-Width Approximation and Beyond, JHEP 07 (2015) 148 [arXiv:1501.06719] [INSPIRE].
I. Doršner and A. Greljo, Leptoquark toolbox for precision collider studies, JHEP 05 (2018) 126 [arXiv:1801.07641] [INSPIRE].
A. Monteux and A. Rajaraman, B Anomalies and Leptoquarks at the LHC: Beyond the Lepton-Quark Final State, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 115032 [arXiv:1803.05962] [INSPIRE].
L. Di Luzio, M. Kirk and A. Lenz, Updated Bs-mixing constraints on new physics models for b → sℓ+ℓ− anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095035 [arXiv:1712.06572] [INSPIRE].
M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, I. Scimemi and L. Silvestrini, Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to ∆F = 2 effective Hamiltonians, Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 501 [hep-ph/9711402] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Buras, M. Misiak and J. Urban, Two loop QCD anomalous dimensions of flavor changing four quark operators within and beyond the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 397 [hep-ph/0005183] [INSPIRE].
UTfit collaboration, Model-independent constraints on ∆F = 2 operators and the scale of new physics, JHEP 03 (2008) 049 [arXiv:0707.0636] [INSPIRE].
L. Di Luzio, M. Kirk, A. Lenz and T. Rauh, ∆Ms theory precision confronts flavour anomalies, JHEP 12 (2019) 009 [arXiv:1909.11087] [INSPIRE].
J. Aebischer, C. Bobeth, A.J. Buras and J. Kumar, SMEFT ATLAS of ∆F = 2 transitions, JHEP 12 (2020) 187 [arXiv:2009.07276] [INSPIRE].
J. Aebischer, M. Fael, C. Greub and J. Virto, B physics Beyond the Standard Model at One Loop: Complete Renormalization Group Evolution below the Electroweak Scale, JHEP 09 (2017) 158 [arXiv:1704.06639] [INSPIRE].
M. Ciuchini et al., ∆MK and ϵK in SUSY at the next-to-leading order, JHEP 10 (1998) 008 [hep-ph/9808328] [INSPIRE].
M. Ciuchini et al., D-\( \overline{D} \) mixing and new physics: General considerations and constraints on the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 655 (2007) 162 [hep-ph/0703204] [INSPIRE].
J. Virto, Exact NLO strong interaction corrections to the ∆F = 2 effective Hamiltonian in the MSSM, JHEP 11 (2009) 055 [arXiv:0907.5376] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, S. Gori, P. Paradisi and D.M. Straub, Anatomy and Phenomenology of FCNC and CPV Effects in SUSY Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 17 [arXiv:0909.1333] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin and U. Nierste, Chirally enhanced corrections to FCNC processes in the generic MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 095007 [arXiv:0908.4404] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin and M. Davidkov, Do squarks have to be degenerate? Constraining the mass splitting with Kaon and D mixing, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 095004 [arXiv:1002.2653] [INSPIRE].
J. Virto, Top mass dependent \( \mathcal{O} \)(\( {\alpha}_s^3 \)) corrections to B-meson mixing in the MSSM, JHEP 01 (2012) 120 [arXiv:1111.0940] [INSPIRE].
F. Mescia and J. Virto, Natural SUSY and Kaon Mixing in view of recent results from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095004 [arXiv:1208.0534] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, A. Kokulu and C. Greub, Flavor-phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models with generic Yukawa structure, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 094031 [arXiv:1303.5877] [INSPIRE].
P. Arnan, L. Hofer, F. Mescia and A. Crivellin, Loop effects of heavy new scalars and fermions in b → sμ+μ−, JHEP 04 (2017) 043 [arXiv:1608.07832] [INSPIRE].
P. Arnan, A. Crivellin, M. Fedele and F. Mescia, Generic Loop Effects of New Scalars and Fermions in b → sℓ+ℓ−, (g − 2)μ and a Vector-like 4th Generation, JHEP 06 (2019) 118 [arXiv:1904.05890] [INSPIRE].
A.I. Davydychev and J.B. Tausk, Two loop selfenergy diagrams with different masses and the momentum expansion, Nucl. Phys. B 397 (1993) 123 [INSPIRE].
Fermilab Lattice and MILC collaborations, \( {B}_{(s)}^0 \)-mixing matrix elements from lattice QCD for the Standard Model and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 113016 [arXiv:1602.03560] [INSPIRE].
ETM collaboration, ∆S = 2 and ∆C = 2 bag parameters in the standard model and beyond from Nf =2+1+1 twisted-mass lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 034516 [arXiv:1505.06639] [INSPIRE].
A. Bazavov et al., Short-distance matrix elements for D0-meson mixing for Nf = 2 + 1 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 034513 [arXiv:1706.04622] [INSPIRE].
R.J. Dowdall et al., Neutral B-meson mixing from full lattice QCD at the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 094508 [arXiv:1907.01025] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
Flavour Lattice Averaging Group collaboration, FLAG Review 2019: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 113 [arXiv:1902.08191] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Buras, S. Jäger and J. Urban, Master formulae for ∆F = 2 NLO QCD factors in the standard model and beyond, Nucl. Phys. B 605 (2001) 600 [hep-ph/0102316] [INSPIRE].
K.G. Chetyrkin, J.H. Kühn and M. Steinhauser, RunDec: A Mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses, Comput. Phys. Commun. 133 (2000) 43 [hep-ph/0004189] [INSPIRE].
S.A. Larin, The renormalization of the axial anomaly in dimensional regularization, Phys. Lett. B 303 (1993) 113 [hep-ph/9302240] [INSPIRE].
M. Gorbahn, S. Jäger, U. Nierste and S. Trine, The supersymmetric Higgs sector and B − \( \overline{B} \) mixing for large tan β, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 034030 [arXiv:0901.2065] [INSPIRE].
K.G. Chetyrkin, M. Misiak and M. Münz, |∆F| = 1 nonleptonic effective Hamiltonian in a simpler scheme, Nucl. Phys. B 520 (1998) 279 [hep-ph/9711280] [INSPIRE].
M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch, Effective Hamiltonian for non-leptonic |∆F| = 1 decays at NNLO in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 713 (2005) 291 [hep-ph/0411071] [INSPIRE].
E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and P. Stoffer, Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Operators and Matching, JHEP 03 (2018) 016 [arXiv:1709.04486] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2109.13600
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Crivellin, A., Eguren, J.F. & Virto, J. Next-to-leading-order QCD matching for ∆F = 2 processes in scalar leptoquark models. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 185 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)185
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)185