Abstract
It is realized recently that the entanglement entropy in gauge theories is ambiguous because the Hilbert space cannot be expressed as a simple direct product of Hilbert spaces defined on the two regions; different ways of dividing the Hilbert spaces near the boundary leads to significantly different result, to the extreme that it could annihilate the otherwise finite topological entanglement entropy between two regions altogether. In this article, we first show that the topological entanglement entropy in the Kitaev model [1] which is not a true gauge theory, is free of ambiguity. Then, we give a physical interpretation, from the perspectives of what can be measured in an experiment, to the purported ambiguity of true gauge theories, where the topological entanglement arises as redundancy in counting the degrees of freedom along the boundary separating two regions. We generalize these discussions to non-Abelian gauge theories.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A.Y. Kitaev, Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals Phys. 303 (2003) 2 [quant-ph/9707021] [INSPIRE].
P.V. Buividovich and M.I. Polikarpov, Entanglement entropy in gauge theories and the holographic principle for electric strings, Phys. Lett. B 670 (2008) 141 [arXiv:0806.3376] [INSPIRE].
H. Casini, M. Huerta and J.A. Rosabal, Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 085012 [arXiv:1312.1183] [INSPIRE].
A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 110404 [hep-th/0510092] [INSPIRE].
M.A. Levin and X.-G. Wen, String net condensation: a physical mechanism for topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 045110 [cond-mat/0404617] [INSPIRE].
M. Levin and Z.-C. Gu, Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 86 (2012) 115109 [arXiv:1202.3120] [INSPIRE].
L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan, String-net models with Z N fusion algebra, Phys. Rev. B 86 (2012) 235132 [arXiv:1207.6169] [INSPIRE].
O. Buerschaper and M. Aguado, Mapping Kitaev’s quantum double lattice models to Levin and Wen’s string-net models, Phys. Rev. B 80 (2009) 155136 [arXiv:0907.2670].
W. Donnelly, Entanglement entropy and non-Abelian gauge symmetry, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 214003 [arXiv:1406.7304] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly, Decomposition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 085004 [arXiv:1109.0036] [INSPIRE].
K.-W. Huang, Central charge and entangled gauge fields, arXiv:1412.2730 [INSPIRE].
S. Ghosh, R.M. Soni and S.P. Trivedi, On the entanglement entropy for gauge theories, arXiv:1501.02593 [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1501.04389
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Hung, LY., Wan, Y. Revisiting entanglement entropy of lattice gauge theories. J. High Energ. Phys. 2015, 122 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)122
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)122