Abstract
We analyse global anomalies and related constraints in the Standard Model (SM) and various Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) theories. We begin by considering four distinct, but equally valid, versions of the SM, in which the gauge group is taken to be G = GSM/Γn, with GSM = SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) and Γn isomorphic to ℤ/n where n ∈ {1, 2, 3, 6}. In addition to deriving constraints on the hypercharges of fields transforming in arbitrary representations of the SU(3) × SU(2) factor, we study the possibility of global anomalies in theories with these gauge groups by computing the bordism groups \( {\Omega}_5^{\mathrm{Spin}}(BG) \) using the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence. In two cases we show that there are no global anomalies beyond the Witten anomaly, while in the other cases we show that there are no global anomalies at all, illustrating the subtle interplay between local and global anomalies. While freedom from global anomalies has been previously shown for the specific fermion content of the SM by embedding the SM in an anomaly-free SU(5) GUT, our results here remain true when the SM fermion content is extended arbitrarily. Going beyond the SM gauge groups, we show that there are no new global anomalies in extensions of the (usual) SM gauge group by U(1)m for any integer m, which correspond to phenomenologically well-motivated BSM theories featuring multiple Z′ bosons. Nor do we find any new global anomalies in various grand unified theories, including Pati-Salam and trinification models. We also consider global anomalies in a family of theories with gauge group SU(N ) × Sp(M ) × U(1), which share the phase structure of the SM for certain (N, M ). Lastly, we discuss a BSM theory in which the SM fermions are defined using a spinc structure, for example by gauging B − L. Such a theory may be extended to all orientable four-manifolds, and we find no global anomalies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].
D. Tong, Line operators in the Standard Model, JHEP 07 (2017) 104 [arXiv:1705.01853] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, An SU(2) anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 324 [INSPIRE].
M.F. Atiyah, V.K. Patodi and I.M. Singer, Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian geometry. I, Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 77 (1975) 43.
E. Witten, Global gravitational anomalies, Commun. Math. Phys. 100 (1985) 197 [INSPIRE].
X.-Z. Dai and D.S. Freed, η invariants and determinant lines, J. Math. Phys. 35 (1994) 5155 [Erratum ibid. 42 (2001) 2343] [hep-th/9405012] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Fermion path integrals and topological phases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 035001 [arXiv:1508.04715] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, The “parity” anomaly on an unorientable manifold, Phys. Rev. B 94 (2016) 195150 [arXiv:1605.02391] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten and K. Yonekura, Anomaly inflow and the η-invariant, in The Shoucheng Zhang memorial workshop, (2019) [arXiv:1909.08775] [INSPIRE].
I. García-Etxebarria and M. Montero, Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics, JHEP 08 (2019) 003 [arXiv:1808.00009] [INSPIRE].
D.S. Freed, Pions and generalized cohomology, J. Diff. Geom. 80 (2008) 45 [hep-th/0607134] [INSPIRE].
J. Wang and X.-G. Wen, A non-perturbative definition of the Standard Models, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 023356 [arXiv:1809.11171] [INSPIRE].
Z. Wan and J. Wang, Higher anomalies, higher symmetries, and cobordisms I: classification of higher-symmetry-protected topological states and their boundary fermionic/bosonic anomalies via a generalized cobordism theory, Ann. Math. Sci. Appl. 4 (2019) 107 [arXiv:1812.11967] [INSPIRE].
Z. Wan and J. Wang, Beyond Standard Models and grand unifications: anomalies, topological terms, and dynamical constraints via cobordisms, JHEP 07 (2020) 062 [arXiv:1910.14668] [INSPIRE].
S.L. Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426 [INSPIRE].
J.S. Bell and R. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle: π0 → γγ in the σ model, Nuovo Cim. A 60 (1969) 47 [INSPIRE].
K. Yonekura, Dai-Freed theorem and topological phases of matter, JHEP 09 (2016) 022 [arXiv:1607.01873] [INSPIRE].
J. Wang, X.-G. Wen and E. Witten, A new SU(2) anomaly, J. Math. Phys. 60 (2019) 052301 [arXiv:1810.00844] [INSPIRE].
M.F. Atiyah, V.K. Patodi and I.M. Singer, Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian geometry. II, Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 78 (1975) 405.
M.F. Atiyah, V.K. Patodi and I.M. Singer, Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian geometry. III, Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 79 (1976) 71.
E. Witten, Global anomalies in string theory, in Symposium on anomalies, geometry, Topology, Argonne, IL, U.S.A., 28–30 March 1985.
A. Scorpan, The wild world of 4-manifolds, American Mathematical Society, U.S.A. (2005).
D.S. Freed and C. Teleman, Relative quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 326 (2014) 459 [arXiv:1212.1692] [INSPIRE].
S. Monnier, Hamiltonian anomalies from extended field theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 338 (2015) 1327 [arXiv:1410.7442] [INSPIRE].
D.S. Freed and M.J. Hopkins, Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases, arXiv:1604.06527 [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Five-brane effective action in M-theory, J. Geom. Phys. 22 (1997) 103 [hep-th/9610234] [INSPIRE].
D.S. Freed and G.W. Moore, Setting the quantum integrand of M-theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 263 (2006) 89 [hep-th/0409135] [INSPIRE].
M.F. Atiyah and F. Hirzebruch, Vector bundles and homogeneous spaces, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 3 (1961) 7.
A. Hatcher, Spectral sequences, (2004).
J. McCleary, A user’s guide to spectral sequences, second edition, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2000).
H. Cartan, Sur l’it́eration des oṕerations de Steenrod (in French), Comm. Math. Helv. 29 (1955) 40.
D. Anderson, E. Brown Jr. and F.P. Peterson, Spin cobordism, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 72 (1966) 256.
J. May, A concise course in algebraic topology, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, U.S.A. (1999).
P. Teichner, Topological four-manifolds with finite fundamental group, Ph.D. thesis, Johannes-Gutenberg Universit¨at, Mainz, Germany (1992),
P. Teichner, On the signature of four-manifolds with universal covering spin, Math. Annalen 295 (1993) 745.
A. Borel and J.-P. Serre, Groupes de Lie et puissances ŕeduites de Steenrod (in French), Amer. J. Math. 75 (1953) 409.
N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Gapped boundary phases of topological insulators via weak coupling, PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C101 [arXiv:1602.04251] [INSPIRE].
X. Gu, On the cohomology of the classifying spaces of projective unitary groups, arXiv:1612.00506.
L. Breen, R. Mikhailov and A. Touzé, Derived functors of the divided power functors, Geom. Topol. 20 (2016) 257.
J. Davighi and N. Lohitsiri, Anomaly interplay in U(2) gauge theories, JHEP 05 (2020) 098 [arXiv:2001.07731] [INSPIRE].
D. Tong, Lectures on gauge theory, (2018).
N. Lohitsiri and D. Tong, If the weak were strong and the strong were weak, SciPost Phys. 7 (2019) 059 [arXiv:1907.08221] [INSPIRE].
P. Langacker, The physics of heavy Z′ I gauge bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1199 [arXiv:0801.1345] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn and P. Tunney, Anomaly-free models for flavour anomalies, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 238 [arXiv:1705.03447] [INSPIRE].
B.C. Allanach, J. Davighi and S. Melville, An anomaly-free ATLAS: charting the space of flavour-dependent gauged U(1) extensions of the Standard Model, JHEP 02 (2019) 082 [Erratum ibid. 08 (2019) 064] [arXiv:1812.04602] [INSPIRE].
D.B. Costa, B.A. Dobrescu and P.J. Fox, General solution to the U(1) anomaly equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 151601 [arXiv:1905.13729] [INSPIRE].
S.L. Glashow, A. de Rujula and H. Georgi, Trinification of all elementary particle forces, in Fifth workshop on grand unification, Providence, RI, U.S.A., 12–14 April 1984, pg. 0088.
G.M. Pelaggi, A. Strumia and S. Vignali, Totally asymptotically free trinification, JHEP 08 (2015) 130 [arXiv:1507.06848] [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking and C.N. Pope, Generalized spin structures in quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B 73 (1978) 42 [INSPIRE].
A. Bahri and P. Gilkey, The eta invariant, pinc bordism, and equivariant spinc bordism for cyclic 2-groups, Pacific J. Math. 128 (1987) 1.
A. Back, P.G.O. Freund and M. Forger, New gravitational instantons and universal spin structures, Phys. Lett. B 77 (1978) 181 [INSPIRE].
S.J. Avis and C.J. Isham, Generalized spin structures on four-dimensional space-times, Commun. Math. Phys. 72 (1980) 103 [INSPIRE].
N. Pointet-Tischler, La suspension cohomologique des espaces d’Eilenberg-MacLane (in French), Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. 325 (1997) 1113.
A. Hatcher, Algebraic topology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2000). [55] C. Teleman, Representation theory, (2005).
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 1910.11277
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Davighi, J., Gripaios, B. & Lohitsiri, N. Global anomalies in the Standard Model(s) and beyond. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 232 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2020)232
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2020)232