Abstract
In the AdS/CFT correspondence, amplitudes associated to connected bulk manifolds with disconnected boundaries have presented a longstanding mystery. A possible interpretation is that they reflect the effects of averaging over an ensemble of boundary theories. But in examples in dimension D ≥ 3, an appropriate ensemble of boundary theories does not exist. Here we sharpen the puzzle by identifying a class of “fixed energy” or “sub-threshold” observables that we claim do not show effects of ensemble averaging. These are amplitudes that involve states that are above the ground state by only a fixed amount in the large N limit, and in particular are far from being black hole states. To support our claim, we explore the example of D = 3, and show that connected solutions of Einstein’s equations with disconnected boundary never contribute to these observables. To demonstrate this requires some novel results about the renormalized volume of a hyperbolic three-manifold, which we prove using modern methods in hyperbolic geometry. Why then do any observables show apparent ensemble averaging? We propose that this reflects the chaotic nature of black hole physics and the fact that the Hilbert space describing a black hole does not have a large N limit.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J.M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten and S.-T. Yau, Connectedness of the boundary in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 1635 [hep-th/9910245] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Maldacena and L. Maoz, Wormholes in AdS, JHEP 02 (2004) 053 [hep-th/0401024] [INSPIRE].
P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115 [INSPIRE].
S.R. Coleman, Black holes as red herrings: topological fluctuations and the loss of quantum coherence, Nucl. Phys. B 307 (1988) 867 [INSPIRE].
S.B. Giddings and A. Strominger, Loss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 307 (1988) 854 [INSPIRE].
D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information, JHEP 08 (2020) 044 [arXiv:2002.08950] [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking and D.N. Page, Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de Sitter space, Commun. Math. Phys. 87 (1983) 577 [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE].
N. Beisert et al., Review of AdS/CFT integrability: an overview, Lett. Math. Phys. 99 (2012) 3 [arXiv:1012.3982] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, A note on complex spacetime metrics, arXiv:2111.06514 [INSPIRE].
J. Cotler and K. Jensen, AdS3 gravity and random CFT, JHEP 04 (2021) 033 [arXiv:2006.08648] [INSPIRE].
H. Maxfield and G.J. Turiaci, The path integral of 3D gravity near extremality; or, JT gravity with defects as a matrix integral, JHEP 01 (2021) 118 [arXiv:2006.11317] [INSPIRE].
S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect, JHEP 03 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1306.0622] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Why does quantum field theory in curved spacetime make sense? And what happens to the algebra of observables in the thermodynamic limit?, arXiv:2112.11614 [INSPIRE].
J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE].
P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity, arXiv:1806.06840 [INSPIRE].
J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman and A. Maloney, Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs, arXiv:2203.06511 [INSPIRE].
J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: an example from three-dimensional gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207 [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft, A planar diagram theory for strong interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461 [INSPIRE].
M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, The black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099] [INSPIRE].
A. Strominger, Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates, JHEP 02 (1998) 009 [hep-th/9712251] [INSPIRE].
M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, The holographic Weyl anomaly, JHEP 07 (1998) 023 [hep-th/9806087] [INSPIRE].
R. Dijkgraaf, J.M. Maldacena, G.W. Moore and E.P. Verlinde, A black hole farey tail, hep-th/0005003 [INSPIRE].
J. Manschot and G.W. Moore, A modern farey tail, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 4 (2010) 103 [arXiv:0712.0573] [INSPIRE].
A. Maloney and E. Witten, Quantum gravity partition functions in three dimensions, JHEP 02 (2010) 029 [arXiv:0712.0155] [INSPIRE].
T. Dray and G. ’t Hooft, The effect of spherical shells of matter on the Schwarzschild black hole, Commun. Math. Phys. 99 (1985) 613 [INSPIRE].
R. Haag, N.M. Hugenholtz and M. Winnink, On the equilibrium states in quantum statistical mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 5 (1967) 215 [INSPIRE].
J. Cardy, A. Maloney and H. Maxfield, A new handle on three-point coefficients: OPE asymptotics from genus two modular invariance, JHEP 10 (2017) 136 [arXiv:1705.05855] [INSPIRE].
C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, hep-th/0509212 [INSPIRE].
P. Saad, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and S. Yao, Wormholes without averaging, arXiv:2103.16754 [INSPIRE].
B. Mukhametzhanov, Factorization and complex couplings in SYK and in matrix models, arXiv:2110.06221 [INSPIRE].
K. Krasnov, Holography and Riemann surfaces, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4 (2000) 929 [hep-th/0005106] [INSPIRE].
K. Krasnov, 3D gravity, point particles and Liouville theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 1291 [hep-th/0008253] [INSPIRE].
L. Takhtajan and P. Zograf, On uniformization of Riemann surfaces and the Weil-Petersson metric on the Teichmüller and Schottky spaces, Mat. Sb. 132 (1987) 303 [Math. USSR Sb. 60 (1988) 297].
L.A. Takhtajan and L.-P. Teo, Liouville action and Weil-Petersson metric on deformation spaces, global Kleinian reciprocity and holography, Commun. Math. Phys. 239 (2003) 183 [math.CV/0204318] [INSPIRE].
K. Krasnov and J.-M. Schlenker, On the renormalized volume of hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 279 (2008) 637 [math.DG/0607081] [INSPIRE].
K. Krasnov and J.-M. Schlenker, The Weil-Petersson metric and the renormalized volume of hyperbolic 3-manifolds, in Handbook of Teichmüller theory. Volume III, volume 17 of IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys., Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, Switzerland (2012), p. 779.
J.-M. Schlenker, The renormalized volume and the volume of the convex core of quasifuchsian manifolds, Math. Res. Lett. 20 (2013) 773 [arXiv:1109.6663].
S. Kojima and G. McShane, Normalized entropy versus volume for pseudo-Anosovs, Geom. Topol. 22 (2018) 2403.
B. Loustau, Minimal surfaces and symplectic structures of moduli spaces, Geom. Dedicata 175 (2015) 309.
K. Krasnov and J.-M. Schlenker, A symplectic map between hyperbolic and complex Teichmüller theory, Duke Math. J. 150 (2009) 331 [arXiv:0806.0010] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Brock and K.W. Bromberg, Inflexibility, Weil-Petersson distance, and volumes of fibered 3-manifolds, Math. Res. Lett. 23 (2016) 649.
S. Moroianu, Convexity of the renormalized volume of hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 139 (2017) 1379.
F. Vargas Pallete, Local convexity of renormalized volume for rank-1 cusped manifolds, arXiv:1505.00479.
F. Vargas Pallete, Continuity of the renormalized volume under geometric limits, arXiv:1605.07986.
F. Vargas Pallete, Additive continuity of the renormalized volume under geometric limits, arXiv:1708.04009.
C. Ciobotaru and S. Moroianu, Positivity of the renormalized volume of almost-Fuchsian hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016) 151.
M. Bridgeman, K. Bromberg and F. Vargas Pallete, The Weil-Petersson gradient flow of renormalized volume on a Bers slice has a global attracting fixed point, arXiv:2105.01207.
M. Bridgeman, J. Brock and K. Bromberg, Schwarzian derivatives, projective structures, and the Weil-Petersson gradient flow for renormalized volume, Duke Math. J. 168 (2019) 867.
M. Bridgeman and R.D. Canary, Renormalized volume and the volume of the convex core, Ann. Inst. Fourier 67 (2017) 2083.
F. Vargas Pallete, Upper bounds on renormalized volume for Schottky groups, arXiv:1905.03303.
M. Bridgeman, J. Brock and K. Bromberg, The Weil-Petersson gradient flow of renormalized volume and 3-dimensional convex cores, arXiv:2003.00337.
W.P. Thurston, Three-dimensional geometry and topology, originally notes of lectures at Princeton University, (1979), recent version available on http://www.msri.org/publications/books/gt3m/, (1980).
R.D. Canary, Pushing the boundary, in In the tradition of Ahlfors and Bers, III, Contemp. Math. 355, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, U.S.A. (2004), p. 109.
W. Thurston, Minimal stretch maps between hyperbolic surfaces, math.GT/9801039.
J.S. Birman and C. Series, Geodesics with bounded intersection number on surfaces are sparsely distributed, Topology 24 (1985) 217.
W.P. Thurston, Hyperbolic structures on 3-manifolds, II: surface groups and 3-manifolds which fiber over the circle, math.GT/9801045.
A.A. Borisenko, Complete l-dimensional surfaces of non-positive extrinsic curvature in a Riemannian space, Math. USSR Sb. 33 (1977) 485.
T. Sugawa, Uniform perfectness of the limit sets of Kleinian groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001) 3603.
R.D. Canary, The conformal boundary and the boundary of the convex core, Duke Math. J. 106 (2001) 193.
M. Bridgeman and R.D. Canary, From the boundary of the convex core to the conformal boundary, Geom. Dedicata 96 (2003) 211.
C.R. Graham and E. Witten, Conformal anomaly of submanifold observables in AdS/CFT correspondence, Nucl. Phys. B 546 (1999) 52 [hep-th/9901021] [INSPIRE].
I. Kra and B. Maskit, Remarks on projective structures, in Riemann surfaces and related topics: proceedings of the 1978 Stony Brook Conference (State Univ. New York, Stony Brook, NY, 1978), Ann. Math. Stud. 97, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A. (1981), p. 343.
C. Guillarmou, S. Moroianu and F. Rochon, Renormalized volume on the Teichmüller space of punctured surfaces, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa 17 (2017) 323.
Z. Nehari, The Schwarzian derivative and Schlicht functions, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 55 (1949) 545.
M. Bridgeman and R.D. Canary, Bounding the bending of a hyperbolic 3-manifold, Pacific J. Math. 218 (2005) 299.
B. Maskit, Comparison of hyperbolic and extremal lengths, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. A 10 (1985) 381.
F. Bonahon and J.-P. Otal, Laminations mesurées de plissage des variétés hyperboliques de dimension 3 (in French), Ann. Math. 160 (2004) 1013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2202.01372
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Schlenker, JM., Witten, E. No ensemble averaging below the black hole threshold. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 143 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)143
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)143