Abstract
We formulate point-particle effective field theory (PPEFT) for relativistic spin-half fermions interacting with a massive, charged finite-sized source using a first-quantized effective field theory for the heavy compact object and a second-quantized language for the lighter fermion with which it interacts. This description shows how to determine the near-source boundary condition for the Dirac field in terms of the relevant physical properties of the source, and reduces to the standard choices in the limit of a point source. Using a first-quantized effective description is appropriate when the compact object is sufficiently heavy, and is simpler than (though equivalent to) the effective theory that treats the compact source in a second-quantized way. As an application we use the PPEFT to parameterize the leading energy shift for the bound energy levels due to finite-sized source effects in a model-independent way, allowing these effects to be fit in precision measurements. Besides capturing finite-source-size effects, the PPEFT treatment also efficiently captures how other short-distance source interactions can shift bound-state energy levels, such as due to vacuum polarization (through the Uehling potential) or strong interactions for Coulomb bound states of hadrons, or any hypothetical new short-range forces sourced by nuclei.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Weinberg, Phenomenological lagrangians, Physica A 96 (1979) 327 [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi, Effective field theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43 (1993) 209 [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, Introduction to effective field theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 329 [hep-th/0701053] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, Quantum gravity in everyday life: general relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel. 7 (2004) 5 [gr-qc/0311082] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, P. Hayman, M. Williams and L. Zalavari, Point-particle effective field theory I: classical renormalization and the inverse-square potential, JHEP 04 (2017) 106 [arXiv:1612.07313] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, P. Hayman, M. Rummel, M. Williams and L. Zalavari, Point-particle effective field theory II: relativistic effects and Coulomb/inverse-square competition, JHEP 07 (2017) 072 [arXiv:1612.07334] [INSPIRE].
W.D. Goldberger and I.Z. Rothstein, An effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104029 [hep-th/0409156] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, D. Hoover, C. de Rham and G. Tasinato, Effective field theories and matching for codimension-2 branes, JHEP 03 (2009) 124 [arXiv:0812.3820] [INSPIRE].
A. Bayntun, C.P. Burgess and L. van Nierop, Codimension-2 brane-bulk matching: examples from six and ten dimensions, New J. Phys. 12 (2010) 075015 [arXiv:0912.3039] [INSPIRE].
F. Niedermann and R. Schneider, Fine-tuning with brane-localized flux in 6D supergravity, JHEP 02 (2016) 025 [arXiv:1508.01124] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, R. Diener and M. Williams, EFT for vortices with dilaton-dependent localized flux, JHEP 11 (2015) 054 [arXiv:1508.00856] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, R. Diener and M. Williams, The gravity of dark vortices: effective field theory for branes and strings carrying localized flux, JHEP 11 (2015) 049 [arXiv:1506.08095] [INSPIRE].
W.E. Caswell and G.P. Lepage, Effective lagrangians for bound state problems in QED, QCD, and other field theories, Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 437.
G.T. Bodwin, E. Braaten and G.P. Lepage, Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1125 [Erratum ibid. D 55 (1997) 5853] [hep-ph/9407339] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians, Phys. Lett. B 251 (1990) 288 [INSPIRE].
D.B. Kaplan, M.J. Savage and M.B. Wise, Nucleon-nucleon scattering from effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 478 (1996) 629 [nucl-th/9605002] [INSPIRE].
T. Mehen and I.W. Stewart, A momentum subtraction scheme for two nucleon effective field theory, Phys. Lett. B 445 (1999) 378 [nucl-th/9809071] [INSPIRE].
A.V. Manohar and I.W. Stewart, Renormalization group analysis of the QCD quark potential to order v 2, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 014033 [hep-ph/9912226] [INSPIRE].
E. Braaten and H.W. Hammer, Universality in few-body systems with large scattering length, Phys. Rept. 428 (2006) 259 [cond-mat/0410417] [INSPIRE].
D.M. Jacobs, An artificial boundary approach for short-ranged interactions, J. Phys. A 49 (2016) 295203 [arXiv:1511.03954] [INSPIRE].
G. Allwright and D.M. Jacobs, Robin boundary conditions are generic in quantum mechanics, arXiv:1610.09581.
A.M. Essin and D.J. Griffiths,, Am. J. Phys. 74 (2006) 109.
A.C. Zemach, Proton structure and the hyperfine shift in hydrogen, Phys. Rev. 104 (1956) 1771 [INSPIRE].
J.L. Friar, Nuclear finite size effects in light muonic atoms, Annals Phys. 122 (1979) 151 [INSPIRE].
F. Hagelstein and V. Pascalutsa, Breakdown of the expansion of finite-size corrections to the hydrogen Lamb shift in moments of charge distribution, Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 040502.
J.L. Friar and J.W. Negele, Theoretical and experimental determination of nuclear charge distributions, Adv. Nucl Phys. 8 (1975) 219.
E. Borie and G.A. Rinker, The energy levels of muonic atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54 (1982) 67.
K. Pachucki, Theory of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A 53 (1996) 4.
K. Pachucki, Proton structure effects in muonic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A 60 (1999) 3593.
D. Andrae, Finite nuclear charge distributions in electronic structure calculations for atoms and molecules, Phys. Rept. 336 (2000) 413.
E. Borie, Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 032508 [physics/0410051] [INSPIRE].
M.O. Distler, J.C. Bernauer and T. Walcher, The RMS charge radius of the proton and Zemach moments, Phys. Lett. B 969 (2011) 343.
C.E. Carlson and M. Vanderhaeghen, Higher-order proton structure corrections to the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A 84 (2011) 020102.
A. Antognini et al., Theory of the 2S-2P Lamb shift and 2S hyperfine splitting in muonic hydrogen, Ann. Phys. 331 (2013) 127.
U.D. Jentschura, Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen. I. Verification and update of theoretical predictions, Ann. Phys. 326 (2011) 500.
T.P. Gorringe and D.W. Hertzog, Precision muon physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 84 (2015) 73 [arXiv:1506.01465] [INSPIRE].
M.I. Eides, H. Grotch and V.A. Shelyuto, Theory of light hydrogen-like atoms, Phys. Rept. 342 (2001) 63 [hep-ph/0002158] [INSPIRE].
R. Pohl, R. Gilman, G.A. Miller and K. Pachucki, Muonic hydrogen and the proton radius puzzle, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63 (2013) 175 [arXiv:1301.0905] [INSPIRE].
C.E. Carlson, The proton radius puzzle, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 82 (2015) 59 [arXiv:1502.05314] [INSPIRE].
R. Pohl et al., The size of the proton, Nature 466 (2010) 213 [INSPIRE].
A. Pineda, The chiral structure of the Lamb shift and the definition of the proton radius, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 065205 [hep-ph/0412142] [INSPIRE].
R.J. Hill and G. Paz, Model independent analysis of proton structure for hydrogenic bound states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 160402.
C. Peset and A. Pineda, Model-independent determination of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen and the proton radius, Eur. Phys. J. A 51 (2015) 32 [arXiv:1403.3408] [INSPIRE].
C. Peset and A. Pineda, The Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen and the proton radius from effective field theories, Eur. Phys. J. A 51 (2015) 156 [arXiv:1508.01948] [INSPIRE].
T. Liu, A.A. Penin and A. Rayyan, Coulomb artifacts and bottomonium hyperfine splitting in lattice NRQCD, JHEP 02 (2017) 084 [arXiv:1609.07151] [INSPIRE].
W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise, Renormalization group flows for brane couplings, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 025011 [hep-th/0104170] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, Classical renormalization of codimension-two brane couplings, AIP Conf. Proc. 957 (2007) 309 [arXiv:0710.4598] [INSPIRE].
E. Dudas, C. Papineau and V.A. Rubakov, Flowing to four dimensions, JHEP 03 (2006) 085 [hep-th/0512276] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, C. de Rham and L. van Nierop, The hierarchy problem and the self-localized Higgs, JHEP 08 (2008) 061 [arXiv:0802.4221] [INSPIRE].
R. Diener and C.P. Burgess, Bulk stabilization, the extra-dimensional Higgs portal and missing energy in Higgs events, JHEP 05 (2013) 078 [arXiv:1302.6486] [INSPIRE].
B. Nickel, Nuclear size effects on hydrogenic atom energies: a semi-analytic formulation, J. Phys. B 46 (2013) 015001.
R.T. Deck, J.G. Amar and G. Fralick, Nuclear size corrections to the energy levels of single-electron and -muon atoms, J. Phys. B 38 (2005) 2173.
R.J. Hill and G. Paz, Model independent extraction of the proton charge radius from electron scattering, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 113005 [arXiv:1008.4619] [INSPIRE].
E.A. Uehling, Polarization effects in the positron theory, Phys. Rev. 48 (1935) 55 [INSPIRE].
W. Pauli and M.E. Rose, Remarks on the polarization effects in the positron theory, Phys. Rev. 49 (1936) 462 [INSPIRE].
E.H. Wichmann and N.M. Kroll, Vacuum polarization in a strong Coulomb field, Phys. Rev. 101 (1956) 843 [INSPIRE].
A.M. Frolov, On the interaction between two point electric charges, arXiv:1111.2303 [INSPIRE].
S. Deser, M.L. Goldberger, K. Baumann and W.E. Thirring, Energy level displacements in π mesonic atoms, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 774 [INSPIRE].
E. Klempt, F. Bradamante, A. Martin and J.M. Richard, Antinucleon nucleon interaction at low energy: scattering and protonium, Phys. Rept. 368 (2002) 119 [INSPIRE].
ATHENA collaboration, N. Zurlo et al., Evidence for the production of slow antiprotonic hydrogen in vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 153401 [arXiv:0708.3717] [INSPIRE].
C.J. Batty, Antiprotonic-hydrogen atoms, Rep. Prog. Phys. 52 (1989) 1165.
D. Tucker-Smith and I. Yavin, Muonic hydrogen and MeV forces, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 101702 [arXiv:1011.4922] [INSPIRE].
V. Barger, C.-W. Chiang, W.-Y. Keung and D. Marfatia, Proton size anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 153001 [arXiv:1011.3519] [INSPIRE].
B. Batell, D. McKeen and M. Pospelov, New parity-violating muonic forces and the proton charge radius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 011803 [arXiv:1103.0721] [INSPIRE].
J.D. Carroll, A.W. Thomas, J. Rafelski and G.A. Miller, Non-perturbative relativistic calculation of the muonic hydrogen spectrum, Phys. Rev. A 84 (2011) 012506 [arXiv:1104.2971] [INSPIRE].
C.G. Parthey et al., Improved measurement of the Hydrogen 1S-2S transition frequency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 203001 [arXiv:1107.3101] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1706.01063
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Burgess, C.P., Hayman, P., Rummel, M. et al. Point-particle effective field theory III: relativistic fermions and the Dirac equation. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2017)007
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2017)007