Abstract
If dark matter has strong self-interactions, future astrophysical and cosmological observations, together with a clearer understanding of baryonic feedback effects, might be used to extract the velocity dependence of the dark matter scattering rate. To interpret such data, we should understand what predictions for this quantity are made by various models of the underlying particle nature of dark matter. In this paper, we systematically compute this function for fermionic dark matter with light bosonic mediators of vector, scalar, axial vector, and pseudoscalar type. We do this by matching to the nonrelativistic effective theory of self-interacting dark matter and then computing the spin-averaged viscosity cross section nonperturbatively by solving the Schrödinger equation, thus accounting for any possible Sommerfeld enhancement of the low-velocity cross section. In the pseudoscalar case, this requires a coupled-channel analysis of different angular momentum modes. We find, contrary to some earlier analyses, that nonrelativistic effects only provide a significant enhancement for the cases of light scalar and vector mediators. Scattering from light pseudoscalar and axial vector mediators is well described by tree-level quantum field theory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
D.N. Spergel and P.J. Steinhardt, Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 3760 [astro-ph/9909386] [INSPIRE].
R. Dave, D.N. Spergel, P.J. Steinhardt and B.D. Wandelt, Halo properties in cosmological simulations of selfinteracting cold dark matter, Astrophys. J. 547 (2001) 574 [astro-ph/0006218] [INSPIRE].
S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure, Phys. Rept. 730 (2018) 1 [arXiv:1705.02358] [INSPIRE].
R.A. Flores and J.R. Primack, Observational and theoretical constraints on singular dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. Lett. 427 (1994) L1 [astro-ph/9402004] [INSPIRE].
B. Moore, Evidence against dissipationless dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature 370 (1994) 629 [INSPIRE].
B. Moore et al., Dark matter substructure within galactic halos, Astrophys. J. Lett. 524 (1999) L19 [astro-ph/9907411] [INSPIRE].
A.A. Klypin, A.V. Kravtsov, O. Valenzuela and F. Prada, Where are the missing galactic satellites?, Astrophys. J. 522 (1999) 82 [astro-ph/9901240] [INSPIRE].
M. Boylan-Kolchin, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat, Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive milky way subhaloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 415 (2011) L40 [arXiv:1103.0007] [INSPIRE].
K.A. Oman et al., The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452 (2015) 3650 [arXiv:1504.01437] [INSPIRE].
R. Kuzio de Naray, G.D. Martinez, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat, The case against warm or self-interacting dark matter as explanations for cores in low surface brightness galaxies, Astrophys. J. Lett. 710 (2010) L161 [arXiv:0912.3518] [INSPIRE].
F. Governato et al., At the heart of the matter: the origin of bulgeless dwarf galaxies and dark matter cores, Nature 463 (2010) 203 [arXiv:0911.2237] [INSPIRE].
A.M. Brooks and A. Zolotov, Why baryons matter: the kinematics of dwarf spheroidal satellites, Astrophys. J. 786 (2014) 87 [arXiv:1207.2468] [INSPIRE].
T. Sawala et al., The APOSTLE simulations: solutions to the local group’s cosmic puzzles, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 457 (2016) 1931 [arXiv:1511.01098] [INSPIRE].
A.M. Brooks et al., How to reconcile the observed velocity function of galaxies with theory, Astrophys. J. 850 (2017) 97 [arXiv:1701.07835] [INSPIRE].
J.I. Read, M.G. Walker and P. Steger, Dark matter heats up in dwarf galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 484 (2019) 1401 [arXiv:1808.06634] [INSPIRE].
A. Del Popolo, F. Pace, M. Le Delliou and X. Lee, Energy transfer from baryons to dark matter as a unified solution to small-scale structure issues of the ΛCDM model, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 063517 [arXiv:1809.10609] [INSPIRE].
J.L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat and H.-B. Yu, Halo shape and relic density exclusions of Sommerfeld-enhanced dark matter explanations of cosmic ray excesses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 151301 [arXiv:0911.0422] [INSPIRE].
M.R. Buckley and P.J. Fox, Dark matter self-interactions and light force carriers, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 083522 [arXiv:0911.3898] [INSPIRE].
A. Loeb and N. Weiner, Cores in dwarf galaxies from dark matter with a Yukawa potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 171302 [arXiv:1011.6374] [INSPIRE].
M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter halos as particle colliders: unified solution to small-scale structure puzzles from dwarfs to clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 041302 [arXiv:1508.03339] [INSPIRE].
A. Sommerfeld, Über die Beugung und Bremsung der Elektronen (in German), Annalen Phys. 403 (1931) 257.
W.E. Caswell and G.P. Lepage, Effective Lagrangians for bound state problems in QED, QCD, and other field theories, Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 437 [INSPIRE].
G.P. Lepage, How to renormalize the Schr¨odinger equation, in 8th Jorge Andre Swieca summer school on nuclear physics, (1997), pg. 135 [nucl-th/9706029] [INSPIRE].
J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto and M.M. Nojiri, Unitarity and higher order corrections in neutralino dark matter annihilation into two photons, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 075014 [hep-ph/0212022] [INSPIRE].
J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto and M.M. Nojiri, Explosive dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 031303 [hep-ph/0307216] [INSPIRE].
J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, M.M. Nojiri and O. Saito, Non-perturbative effect on dark matter annihilation and gamma ray signature from galactic center, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063528 [hep-ph/0412403] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, D.P. Finkbeiner, T.R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, A theory of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015014 [arXiv:0810.0713] [INSPIRE].
S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek, Beyond collisionless dark matter: particle physics dynamics for dark matter halo structure, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115007 [arXiv:1302.3898] [INSPIRE].
B.A. Dobrescu and I. Mocioiu, Spin-dependent macroscopic forces from new particle exchange, JHEP 11 (2006) 005 [hep-ph/0605342] [INSPIRE].
J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP 11 (2010) 042 [arXiv:1008.1591] [INSPIRE].
A. Fitzpatrick, W. Haxton, E. Katz, N. Lubbers and Y. Xu, The effective field theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP 02 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1203.3542] [INSPIRE].
F. Bishara, J. Brod, B. Grinstein and J. Zupan, Chiral effective theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP 02 (2017) 009 [arXiv:1611.00368] [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko, C. Kilic and R.K. Mishra, A classification of dark matter candidates with primarily spin-dependent interactions with matter, arXiv:1003.1912 [INSPIRE].
M. Freytsis and Z. Ligeti, On dark matter models with uniquely spin-dependent detection possibilities, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 115009 [arXiv:1012.5317] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, M. Cliche and P. Tanedo, Effective theory of self-interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 083506 [arXiv:1307.1129] [INSPIRE].
P.F. Bedaque, M.I. Buchoff and R.K. Mishra, Sommerfeld enhancement from Goldstone pseudo-scalar exchange, JHEP 11 (2009) 046 [arXiv:0907.0235] [INSPIRE].
Z.-P. Liu, Y.-L. Wu and Y.-F. Zhou, Sommerfeld enhancements with vector, scalar and pseudoscalar force-carriers, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 096008 [arXiv:1305.5438] [INSPIRE].
F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and S. Wild, Dark matter self-interactions from a general spin-0 mediator, JCAP 08 (2017) 003 [arXiv:1704.02149] [INSPIRE].
S. Nussinov, Technocosmology: could a technibaryon excess provide a ‘natural’ missing mass candidate?, Phys. Lett. B 165 (1985) 55 [INSPIRE].
D.B. Kaplan, A single explanation for both the baryon and dark matter densities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 741 [INSPIRE].
K.M. Zurek, Asymmetric dark matter: theories, signatures, and constraints, Phys. Rept. 537 (2014) 91 [arXiv:1308.0338] [INSPIRE].
J.E. Moody and F. Wilczek, New macroscopic forces?, Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 130 [INSPIRE].
R. Daido and F. Takahashi, The sign of the dipole-dipole potential by axion exchange, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 127 [arXiv:1704.00155] [INSPIRE].
P. Fadeev, Y.V. Stadnik, F. Ficek, M.G. Kozlov, V.V. Flambaum and D. Budker, Revisiting spin-dependent forces mediated by new bosons: potentials in the coordinate-space representation for macroscopic- and atomic-scale experiments, Phys. Rev. A 99 (2019) 022113 [arXiv:1810.10364] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields. Volume 1: foundations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2005) [INSPIRE].
F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, M.T. Frandsen and S. Sarkar, Colliding clusters and dark matter self-interactions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 437 (2014) 2865 [arXiv:1308.3419] [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, L. Randall and J. Scholtz, Make dark matter charged again, JCAP 05 (2017) 022 [arXiv:1610.04611] [INSPIRE].
X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely and H. Murayama, Finite-size dark matter and its effect on small-scale structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 041101 [arXiv:1901.00075] [INSPIRE].
X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely and H. Murayama, A practical and consistent parametrization of dark matter self-interactions, JCAP 06 (2020) 043 [arXiv:1908.06067] [INSPIRE].
X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely and H. Murayama, Velocity dependence from resonant self-interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 071103 [arXiv:1810.04709] [INSPIRE].
F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, K. Sigurdson, J. Zavala, T. Bringmann, M. Vogelsberger and C. Pfrommer, ETHOS — an effective theory of structure formation: from dark particle physics to the matter distribution of the universe, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 123527 [arXiv:1512.05344] [INSPIRE].
M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, C. Pfrommer, T. Bringmann and K. Sigurdson, ETHOS — an effective theory of structure formation: dark matter physics as a possible explanation of the small-scale CDM problems, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 460 (2016) 1399 [arXiv:1512.05349] [INSPIRE].
A. Díaz Rivero, C. Dvorkin, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, J. Zavala and M. Vogelsberger, Gravitational lensing and the power spectrum of dark matter substructure: insights from the ETHOS N -body simulations, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 103517 [arXiv:1809.00004] [INSPIRE].
M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder, An introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, U.S.A. (1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2003.00021
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Agrawal, P., Parikh, A. & Reece, M. Systematizing the effective theory of self-interacting dark matter. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)191
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)191