Abstract
The composition of stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) is widely used for tracking the origin of organic matter (OM) present in lacustrine sediments. These isotopes also define the evolution of OM in food web loops. Charophyte species Nitella flexilis C. Agardh, 1824 can be found in different aquatic environments where it contributes significantly to sediment formation and influences biota function. Therefore, it is crucial to study more about δ13C and δ15N in different lake types. Here, we present the results of the first comprehensive study of N. flexilis δ13C and δ15N, which add to the knowledge of the C and N isotope records of charophytes. We obtained the δ13C and δ15N records of N. flexilis OM from hardwater and softwater lakes and checked for differences between these records. We also analyzed the differences in physical and chemical parameters. Finally, we compared the δ13C and δ15N records with physical and chemical parameters to identify the variables that have the highest influence on N. flexilis δ13C and δ15N values. Our study showed that both δ13C and δ15N did not differ significantly in the two types of lakes, although the lakes had significant differences in several physical and chemical parameters (pH, Ca2+, dissolved inorganic carbon, total phosphorus, conductivity). However, we observed that δ13C values were influenced by light conditions (photosynthetic active radiation, depth, dissolved OM), while δ15N values were influenced by the total nitrogen concentration in water.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Charophytes (Charales; Charophyta) are macroscopic green algae distributed in various aquatic environments, including freshwater wetlands, brackish ecosystems, running and standing water, and permanent and ephemeral waters (Pukacz et al. 2013; Rodrigo et al. 2016; Torn et al. 2019; Brzozowski and Pełechaty 2020; Romanov et al. 2022). However, these organisms mainly prefer freshwater ecosystems, especially lakes with good lighting (high water transparency) (Pukacz et al. 2013; Brzozowski and Pełechaty 2020). Nitella flexilis C. Agardh, 1824 is an example species with a broad ecological amplitude; however, it forms dense underwater meadows covering the bottom in oligo-mesotrophic softwater lakes characterized by a low but more neutral water pH (Bociąg et al. 2011). Nonetheless, this charophyte species can be found as well-developed communities in more hardwater and eutrophic lakes (Urbaniak and Gąbka 2014). After their decay, these macrophytes might significantly contribute to the formation of organic sediments. Literature data indicate that charophytes from the Chara genus participate in the deposition of carbonate-rich sediments as a high amount of calcium carbonate precipitates from their heavily encrusted thallus (Pełechaty et al. 2013). However, Nitella spp. may be slightly encrusted or unencrusted, depending on the calcium concentration in water (Apolinarska et al. 2011; John and Rindi 2015). Thus, N. flexilis occurring in different lake habitats, ranging from softwater to hardwater, could be an excellent study material to analyze the stable carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures (δ13C and δ15N) of their OM and the variables influencing them. In this work, we investigated the δ13C and δ15N records of this charophyte species because knowledge of its relationship with physical and chemical water parameters may help to conduct further paleoecological research, for example, to track the vegetation changes or the evolution of lakes from oligotrophic, softwater lakes to mesotrophic, more hardwater lakes based on sediment deposition by this species.
The concentration of calcium ions is not the only factor that differentiates softwater and hardwater lakes, as their names might suggest (Murphy 2002). Other important physical and chemical parameters, namely conductivity and pH (Murphy 2002), which differentiate aquatic vegetation with stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes, also differ between these lakes. According to researchers, the δ13C and δ15N values of aquatic plants in different aquatic ecosystems might be related to multiple parameters of water and sediment chemistry, such as pH and nutrient concentration (King et al. 2009; Matuszak et al. 2011; Apolinarska et al. 2016; Pronin et al. 2016, 2019; Chappuis et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2022). Moreover, literature reports on the δ13C values of the organic matter (OM) of charophytes are limited (Pentecost et al. 2006; Sensuła et al. 2006; Matuszak et al. 2011; Apolinarska et al. 2016; Pronin et al. 2016; Rodrigo et al. 2016; Chappuis et al. 2017; Morkūnė et al. 2022), and even less in the case of δ15N values (King et al. 2009; Matuszak et al. 2011; Chappuis et al. 2017; Morkūnė et al. 2022).
Due to the environmental plasticity of N. flexilis, it is an excellent material to verify if the differences in the water chemistry of softwater and hardwater lakes have an impact on the δ13C and δ15N values of the OM of N. flexilis. It is worth emphasizing that, to our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the δ13C and δ15N values of N. flexilis. The study also attempted to identify the water parameters that have the highest influence on the isotope values of N. flexilis.
Materials and methods
Study sites
The study included 12 hardwater lakes (Ca2+ concentration from 21.9 to 47.4 mg/l, Table 1) and 11 softwater lakes (Ca2+ concentration from 2.2 to 12.4 mg/l, Table 1). The hardwater lakes were investigated in the middle of the growing season of 2008–2010 and softwater lakes in July 2020 (Fig. 1). The classification of softwater lakes followed the recommendation of Murphy (2002). Moreover, to determine the character of the direct catchment, a 100-m belt was created around each lake using ArcGIS 10.7 software (Esri) and Geoportal (https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/) and CORINE Land Cover maps (CLC). This helped identify the main land cover types, which are listed in Table 1. We used ArcGIS software and Geoportal to calculate the total area of each investigated lake, as shown in Table 1. To assess the trophy state of the lakes, we calculated the Carlson Trophy State Index (TSI) based on the available data of total phosphorus (TP) and Secchi disk visibility (Carlson 1977). The TSI is listed in Table 1 as an average of these two components.
Field study
Through an experienced SCUBA diver, ten individuals were collected at each plant study site for further analyses of δ13C of OM (δ13CORG) and δ15N of total nitrogen (δ15NTN). Before plant collection, field measurements of pH, oxygen concentration, and conductivity were performed from a boat using a multivariate sonde YSI 650 MDS with 6600 V2 probe in 2020 and a WTW 320/SET1 pH meter with glass METTLER electrode and SENTIX 97T electrode in 2008–2010. Photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) was measured using a Licor LI-250 Light Meter and expressed here as percentage of the light reaching the water surface (based on the obtained values for the water surface and just above-investigated plants), and the depth of the stands was also recorded. In addition, water from the surroundings of the plants was collected in a 0.5-l plastic bottle for chemical analyses to determine the concentrations of nutrients [total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP)], calcium (Ca2+), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC).
Laboratory analyses, including δ 13CORG and δ 15NTN analysis
The concentration of dissolved forms of inorganic carbon (CO2, HCO3−, and CO32−) was assessed in the collected water samples by titration. Ca2+ concentration was measured using a complexometric method with EDTA disodium salt in the presence of calconcarboxylic acid sodium salt as an indicator. TN and TP concentrations were determined by photometric methods using a MERCK Spectroquant cuvette on a UV–Vis spectrophotometer. TP was analyzed after mineralizing the water samples using a mixture of nitric and sulfuric acid (2:1). Mineralization was done in a Mars 5 CEM microwave digestion system (USA). After estimating %C and %N concentrations in plant samples (Flash Smart EA, Thermo Scientific USA), the C/N ratios were calculated.
The samples of plants were washed in the field, and epiphytes and other contaminations (sand, sediments, and others) were removed. Then, the samples were dried at 60 °C for 48 h and stored. The plant materials collected from 2008 to 2010 were stored dry in envelopes but dried again before further treatment. Next, dry plant samples were powdered using a mixer mill (MM 400 Retsch Germany) or, if the amount was low, an agate mortar. Afterward, with the use of highly concentrated HCl, N. flexilis samples from both lakes were checked for the presence of carbonates. No carbonates were found in the samples from softwater lakes, while samples from hardwater lakes were decarbonated using the desiccator method with 37% of HCl in a desiccator by creating an acidic mist with which the carbonates reacted. The samples in small glass vials were allowed to stay in the desiccator for 48 h. Then, they were placed under a fume cupboard for 24 h for evaporation, dried in the oven at 40 °C for 24 h, and homogenized again using an agate mortar. Finally, the powder was transferred to tiny capsules and weighed. The δ13C and δ15N analyses of plants OM were performed in 23 samples (triplicated as a laboratory standard procedure—comprehensive analyses of 69 samples) in the GISMO platform in the Biogéosciences Laboratory of the University of Burgundy (Dijon, France). The analyses were done on a Flash Smart EA elemental analyzer (Thermo Scientific, USA) coupled to a Delta V stable isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). The standard USG40 (glutamic acid, δ13C = −26.39‰, δ15N = −4.5‰) and the standard Wheat Flour B2157 (Elemental Microanalysis) certified reference materials were used for calibration and as control. The δ13C and δ15N values were expressed in ‰ relative to V-PDB standard for carbon and atmospheric N2 for nitrogen. The precision of the analysis was validated by external reproducibility of replicate standard analyses (USG40 and B2157) and found to be better than ±0.15‰ for δ13C and ±0.20‰ for δ15N (2σ).
Statistical analysis
All the values of stable isotopes and other analyzed physical and chemical variables were checked for the normality of distribution by applying the Shapiro–Wilk test using the Statistica 13.0 software (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). As the analyzed variables were not normally distributed, nonparametric analyses were used. The data of all variables were not additionally normalized. The Mann–Whitney U test was applied for comparing the values of δ13C and δ15N of N. flexilis and other water parameters in the two types of investigated lakes. In addition, Spearman rank correlations were used to determine the relationships between the investigated variables in all lakes. Moreover, the variables before the principal component analysis (PCA) were standardized as z-score to avoid scale effect. All these analyses were performed using the Statistica 13.0 software and visualized by R.4.0.3 software (R Core Team 2022) using the ggplot2 package (Wickham 2009). For all the statistics, p < 0.05 was used to determine significance. Correlation heat maps were created in the corrplot R package (Wei and Simko 2021). The PCA was performed using the FactoMineR package (Lê et al. 2008), and the obtained results were visualized using the factoextra and ggplot2 packages (Lê et al. 2008; Wickham 2009).
Results
The results showed no statistically significant differences between the calculated δ13C and δ15N values of N. flexilis collected from the two types of lakes (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the δ13C values in softwater lakes showed more variations (ranging from −33.12‰ to −14.75‰; Table 1, Fig. 2a) compared with the values in hardwater lakes (from −30.06‰ to −20.05‰; Table 1, Fig. 2a). On the other hand, the δ15N values only slightly differed in the investigated groups of lakes (−7.69‰ to 2.88‰ in hardwater and −5.49‰ to 3.18‰ in softwater lakes; Table 1, Fig. 2b). Comparing the results of selected investigated variables in the two types of lakes, we observed statistically significant differences (Mann–Whitney U test: p < 0.05) in pH, Ca2+ concentration, TP concentration, DIC concentration, and conductivity (Fig. 3a–e). There were also differences in TN concentration, where a wide range of values was detected in the softwater lakes, but in the hardwater lakes, the variability of TN concentrations was narrower (Fig. 2f); however, these differences were statistically insignificant (Mann–Whitney U test: p > 0.05). The above-mentioned differences were also reflected by the PCA results (Fig. 4), where the two groups of investigated lakes were clearly segregated. Among the investigated variables, pH, Ca2+, conductivity, DIC, TP, and TN differed the most in the two groups of lakes and correlated with the first axis of PCA (Fig. 4). Moreover, N. flexilis values of δ13C were more closely related to the second PCA axis, which correlated with PAR, depth, and DOC. TN concentration was also found to be a crucial factor affecting N. flexilis values of δ15N (Fig. 4). The first two PCA axes explained 51.5% of the total variance. We found several relationships when comparing the obtained δ13C and δ15N values of N. flexilis with the physical and chemical parameters of water. The values of δ13C were positively related to PAR and negatively correlated with the depth and concentration of DOC. In turn, δ15N values showed a moderate positive relationship with TN and a low negative relationship with Ca2+ concentration (Fig. S1 in Supplementary Materials 1).
Discussion
The δ13C and δ15N values of aquatic plants range widely among different aquatic ecosystems. The δ13C values of macrophytes range from −50‰ to 0.4‰ (Herzschuh et al. 2010), and that of δ15N from −15‰ to 20‰ (Douglas et al. 2022). Our study showed that the δ13C and δ15N values of N. flexilis OM also fall in the above-mentioned ranges. Moreover, the values of δ13C reported by us are in line with the range of values previously reported for charophytes (Pentecost et al. 2006; Apolinarska et al. 2016; Pronin et al. 2016; Rodrigo et al. 2016; Chappuis et al. 2017). Similarly, the values of δ15N determined in this study were in line with those reported for charophytes in the limited available literature (King et al. 2009; Matuszak et al. 2011; Chappuis et al. 2017; Morkūnė et al. 2022).
Stable carbon isotope composition of N. flexilis
Compared with hardwater lakes, the concentration of DIC is limited in softwater lakes, and the water pH is usually lower. Thus, we expected significantly lower δ13C values in the studied softwater lakes. We made this assumption by changing the proportion of C in water according to the variability of pH. In water with pH below 4.5, CO2 is the only form of inorganic carbon. On the other hand, in water with a neutral pH, HCO3– starts to be the dominant form (the highest concentration is in pH about 8.5), whereas if pH is higher than 10.5, CO32– is the main C form. The forms of C differ in δ13C values; in CO2, 13C is depleted by 8–12‰ compared with HCO3– (Mook et al. 1974; Shmit and Walker 1980). This assumption was confirmed in the case of Jeleń and Zakrzewie lakes, where water pH was high and the δ13C values were also among the highest (Table 1). On the other hand, in Lake Kamień, where water pH was almost neutral, the values of δ13C were also high (Table 1). Unfortunately, in this study, we did not investigate the δ13C values of DIC, which would indicate the isotope value of inorganic carbon in water. However, we found significant positive correlations between pH and DIC (Fig. S1 in Supplementary Materials 1). This relationship might partly explain the high variability in the obtained δ13C values of N. flexilis, especially in softwater lakes, because N. flexilis could use both CO2 and HCO3– forms of DIC for photosynthesis (Shmit and Walker 1980; Chmara et al. 2021). Furthermore, a study on a Mediterranean pond near shallow lagoons in Spain, which is richer in Ca2+, showed that δ13C values of Nitella hyalina ranged from −26‰ to −20‰ (Rodrigo et al. 2016). We assumed that the δ13C values of hardwater lakes would not differ much due to more consistent water pH and the fact that the water in these lakes has higher buffer capability compared with that in softwater lakes. Although the range of δ13C values in hardwater lakes was lower than that of softwater lakes, it was still significant (Fig. 2). These results indicate that other variables may also have a more significant influence on the δ13C values of N. flexilis OM.
One of these variables might be related to the ecology of N. flexilis, as this species forms more complex and dense underwater meadows in hardwater lakes (Urbaniak and Gąbka 2014; Table 1). These meadows perform many functions in lakes, one of which is the accumulation of biomass (Kufel and Kufel 2002; Pełechata et al. 2023) that might release a higher amount of 12CO2 during decomposition. Moreover, such dense meadows of charophytes stimulate more CO2 release from the interstitial water, which might have higher 12CO2 than the ambient water. These assumptions align with the significant differences observed by Pronin et al. (2016) between two morphologically different Chara species. The authors suggested that differences between the δ13C values of OM of those two species were due to the use of different proportions of C sources for photosynthesis: CO2 and partly HCO3− by Chara globularis Thuillier 1799 and mostly HCO3– by Chara tomentosa L. This might also partly explain the high variability in the δ13C values of the two groups of lakes investigated here. However, other researchers who investigated charophytes as a whole group (including Nitella and Chara genera together) found extensive variability in δ13C values in the OM of charophytes (from −40‰ to −10‰; Chappuis et al. 2017), which could not be explained only by the use of different isotopic signals of C source for photosynthesis. Similarly, our findings, especially those observed for softwater lakes, are outside the range of differences of δ13C values between CO2 and HCO3−; thus, this might only partly explain this variability.
The above statement is in line with the results of Liu et al. (2022), who suggested that the differences in δ13C values between CO2 and HCO3− only partly explain the observed differences between the two macrophytes (Potamogeton sp. and Cladophora sp.) investigated in their study. The rest of the high variability in δ13C values (average 14–16‰, which was close to 10‰ in hardwater lakes and 18‰ in softwater lakes reported by us) between these two species was probably caused by biosynthesis fractionation (Liu et al. 2022). Our results might also support this statement due to the relationships of δ13C with the lake’s light conditions (PAR, depth, and DOC concentration; Figs. 4 and S1). Light availability increases the efficiency of photosynthesis (Van Den Berg et al. 1998), and plants preferentially uptake 12C (O’Leary et al. 1992). Thus, we can assume that under more intensive photosynthesis, plants might use more 13C due to rapidly decreasing 12C, and as a result, δ13C of their OM increases.
Furthermore, a study on Lake Constance in Germany showed high negative relationships between the δ13C values of Chara spp. and depth (Matuszak et al. 2011). Our results on the δ13C values of N. flexilis also support this observation. However, this relationship was only noticeable and not very high (Fig. S1 in Supplementary Materials 1). This might be due to the fact that diverse lake ecosystems were included in our study. On the other hand, Liu et al. (2022) did not find such relationships when they investigated two plant species along a depth gradient in three Tibetan Plateau lakes in China. Thus, we believe that all types of related isotopic studies concerning macrophytes, including charophytes, are essential to better understand the complexity of δ13C in plant OM.
Stable nitrogen isotope composition of N. flexilis
Similar to δ13C values, our results on the δ15N values of N. flexilis were in line with those reported in the literature. King et al. (2009) showed that the δ15N values of Nitella sp. varied from −9.94‰ to 6.50‰, which are higher than that reported by us (−7.69‰ to 3.18‰). Similar values were also reported by Chappuis et al. (2017) for charophytes; however, the range was shifted to 15N-enriched values (from about −2.5‰ to 9.9‰). Thus, our results do not differ much from those reported for various lakes, ranging from coastal lakes to mountain oligotrophic lakes (Chappuis et al. 2017) and nutrient-limited upland lakes (King et al. 2009). Our findings confirmed the high variability of δ15N in macrophytes, especially charophytes, previously reported in several studies (King et al. 2009; Matuszak et al. 2011; Chappuis et al. 2017; Morkūnė et al. 2022). The high variability of δ15N macrophytes and charophytes might be related to their use of different N sources for tissue development (Chappuis et al. 2017). According to studies, macrophytes might use different forms of N dissolved in water, namely NO3−, NH4+, and NORG, for the development of their structures (Schuurkes et al. 1986; Peipoch et al. 2012, 2014; Pastor et al. 2014).
Furthermore, the fractionation of δ15N during the development of plant tissues tends to favor 14N (Evans 2001). However, this might be less important when the plant N demand exceeds plant N availability (Pennock et al. 1996; Waser et al. 1998; Jones et al. 2004). Unfortunately, in our study, we obtained only complete data on TN for both types of investigated lakes. Therefore, we can assume that the recorded δ15N variability of N. flexilis was related to a different form of dissolved N in water. This hypothesis might be supported by the moderate positive correlations found between δ15N and TN (Fig. S1 in Supplementary Materials 1). However, this might also be related to the impact of N load from the catchment of investigated lakes. Chappuis et al. (2017) observed this relationship in their study on 81 aquatic ecosystems across Catalonia (northeastern Spain). The lakes investigated in our study were mainly located in the forest-dominated catchment (Table 1); thus, we can conclude that the variability of N input was relatively low. Our comparison showed that the difference in TN concentration between hardwater and softwater lakes was statistically insignificant; however, higher concentrations were recorded in softwater lakes (Fig. 3f). This might be related to the potential C or P limitation of these lakes due to significantly lower TP and DIC concentrations compared with hardwater lakes (Fig. 3c and d). Therefore, the slight variability in δ15N between hardwater and softwater lakes observed in this study might be due to N demand and availability than other factors, as evidenced by King et al. (2009). On the other hand, the pH variability (Fig. 3a) in softwater lakes may favor the occurrence of NH4+ and NO3− forms in water, which can be available for uptake by N. flexilis.
δ 13C and δ 15N of plant OM and C/N ratio as a potentially helpful marker in different types of studies
In many types of studies, the authors support their research using stable isotope methods. In the past two decades, δ13C and δ15N values of plant OM have more often been used in source mixing models, for example, to estimate the proportional contribution of OM in lacustrine sediments (Guo et al. 2020; Duan et al. 2022; Wu et al. 2022; Douglas et al. 2022). Recently, some authors studied macrophytes, including charophytes, to track food sources in the food web loop in aquatic environments (Morkūnė et al. 2022). The C/N results presented by us are in line with those reported in the literature for some charophyte species (Rodrigo et al. 2016). As Meyers (1994) suggested, parameters such as the C/N ratio of plants and sediments are a good indicator of the origin of material that forms sediments and are also included as an additional proxy in source mixing models with isotopic data (Duan et al. 2022). Thus, to the best of our knowledge, the first complete information on the δ13C and δ15N values and C/N ratio of N. flexilis collected from different lake types, presented in this paper, might be helpful to validate better the isotopic-oriented models used for the above-mentioned purposes. Furthermore, our results indicated that it could be difficult to track vegetation changes and shifts in lake trophic conditions on the basis of N. flexilis δ13C and δ15N values and C/N ratio in the OM deposited in the sediments of the studied lakes. This is due to the non-statistically significant differences in δ13C and δ15N values and C/N ratios between the two investigated groups of lakes and the relatively higher variability of the obtained results, especially in softwater lakes.
Conclusion
Although the two studied groups of lakes (softwater and hardwater) showed differences in Ca2+, pH, conductivity, DIC, and TP, the δ13C and δ15N values of N. flexilis OM were not statistically different. We found some relationships indicating the influence of light conditions on the δ13C values of the investigated green macroalgae and a moderate relationship between the δ15N values and TN concentration. Our results suggest that an attempt to identify the factors differentiating δ13C and δ15N in plant OM should be cautiously approached. The findings presented by us suggest the need for more in-depth studies, especially experimental ones with thoughtful factor gradient settings, to determine the factors that significantly shape the δ13C and δ15N values of submerged plants. The information from such studies might be helpful, for example, to identify the source of OM in lacustrine sediments and to better interpret food webs with charophytes as primary producers.
Data availability
Most data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. The rest of the included data are available from the authors on reasonable request.
References
Apolinarska K, Pełechaty M, Pukacz A (2011) CaCO3 sedimentation by modern charophytes (Characeae): can calcified remains and carbonate δ13C and δ18O record the ecological state of lakes?—a review. Stud Limnol Telmatologica 5:55–66
Apolinarska K, Pełechaty M, Pronin E (2016) Discrepancies between the stable isotope compositions of water, macrophyte carbonates and organics, and mollusc shells in the littoral zone of a charophyte-dominated lake (Lake Lednica, Poland). Hydrobiologia 768:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2524-6
Bociąg K, Rekowska E, Banaś K (2011) The disappearance of stonewort populations in lobelia lakes of the Kashubian Lakeland (NW Poland). Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 40:30–36. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13545-011-0014-7
Brzozowski M, Pełechaty M (2020) Broad morphological and reproductive variability of the endangered macroalga Lychnothamnus barbatus in the depth gradient. Aquat Bot. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2020.103239
Carlson RE (1977) A trophic state index for lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 22:361–369. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1977.22.2.0361
Chappuis E, Seriñá V, Martí E et al. (2017) Decrypting stable-isotope (δ13C and δ15N) variability in aquatic plants. Freshw Biol 62:1807–1818. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12996
Chmara R, Pronin E, Szmeja J (2021) Functional macrophyte trait variation as a response to the source of inorganic carbon acquisition. PeerJ 9:e12584. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12584
Douglas PMJ, Stratigopoulos E, Park S, Keenan B (2022) Spatial differentiation of sediment organic matter isotopic composition and inferred sources in a temperate forest lake catchment. Chem Geol 603:120887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.120887
Duan L, Zhang H, Chang F et al. (2022) Isotopic constraints on sources of organic matter in surface sediments from two north–south oriented lakes of the Yunnan Plateau, Southwest China. J Soils Sediments. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03191-2
Evans RD (2001) Physiological mechanisms influencing plant nitrogen isotope composition. Trends Plant Sci 6:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(01)01889-1
Gąsiorowski M, Sienkiewicz E (2013) The sources of carbon and nitrogen in mountain lakes and the role of human activity in their modification determined by tracking stable isotope composition. Water Air Soil Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1498-0
Guo Q, Wang C, Wei R et al. (2020) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of source for organic carbon and nitrogen in sediments of rivers and lakes based on stable isotopes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 195:110436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110436
Herzschuh U, Mischke S, Meyer H et al. (2010) Using variations in the stable carbon isotope composition of macrophyte remains to quantify nutrient dynamics in lakes. J Paleolimnol 43:739–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-009-9365-0
John DM, Rindi F (2015) Filamentous (Nonconjugating) and Plantlike Green Algae. Elsevier Inc, Amsterdam
Jones RI, King L, Dent MM et al. (2004) Nitrogen stable isotope ratios in surface sediments, epilithon and macrophytes from upland lakes with differing nutrient status. Freshw Biol 49:382–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01194.x
King L, Maberly SC, De Ville MM et al. (2009) Nitrogen stable isotope ratios of lake macrophytes in relation to growth form and nutrient-limitation. Fundam Appl Limnol 175:307–315. https://doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2009/0175-0307
Kufel L, Kufel I (2002) Chara beds acting as nutrient sinks in shallow lakes—a review. Aquat Bot 72:249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00204-2
Lê S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25:1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01
Liu H, Liu J, Hu J et al. (2022) Systematical δ13C investigations of TOC in aquatic plants, DIC and dissolved CO2 in lake water from three Tibetan Plateau lakes. Ecol Indic 140:109060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109060
Matuszak A, Voigt CC, Storch I et al. (2011) Depth-specific and spatiotemporal variation of δ13C and δ15N in charophytes of Lake constance: implications for food web studies. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25:2089–2094. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.5094
Meyers PA (1994) Preservation of elemental and isotopic source identification of sedimentary organic matter. Chem Geol 114:289–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)90059-0
Mook WG, Bommerson JC, Staverman WH (1974) Carbon isotope fractionation between dissolved bicarbonate and gaseous carbon dioxide. Earth Planet Sci Lett 22:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(74)90078-8
Morkūnė R, Bučas M, Kataržytė M et al. (2022) Food sources for benthic grazers in trophic networks of macrophyte habitats in a transitional Baltic ecosystem. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14101565
Murphy KJ (2002) Plant communities and plant diversity in softwater lakes of northern Europe. Aquat Bot 73:287–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(02)00028-1
O’Leary MH, Madhaven S, Paneth P (1992) Physical and chemical basis of carbon isotope fractionation in plants. Plant Cell Environ 15:1099–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01660.x
Pastor A, Riera JL, Peipoch M et al. (2014) Temporal variability of nitrogen stable isotopes in primary uptake compartments in four streams differing in human impacts. Environ Sci Technol 48:6612–6619. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405493k
Peipoch M, Martí E, Gacia E (2012) Variability in σ15N natural abundance of basal resources in fluvial ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Freshw Sci 31:1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.1899/11-157.1
Peipoch M, Gacia E, Blesa A et al. (2014) Contrasts among macrophyte riparian species in their use of stream water nitrate and ammonium: insights from 15N natural abundance. Aquat Sci 76:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-013-0330-7
Pełechata A, Kufel L, Pukacz A et al. (2023) Climate features or the composition of submerged vegetation? which factor has a greater impact on the phytoplankton structure in temperate lakes? Ecol Indic 146:109840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109840
Pełechaty M, Pukacz A, Apolinarska K et al. (2013) The significance of Chara vegetation in the precipitation of lacustrine calcium carbonate. Sedimentology 60:1017–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12020
Pennock JR, Velinsky DJ, Ludlam JM et al. (1996) Isotopic fractionation of ammonium and nitrate during uptake by Skeletonema costatum: Implications for δ15N dynamics under bloom conditions. Limnol Oceanogr 41:451–459. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.3.0451
Pentecost A, Andrews JE, Dennis PF et al. (2006) Charophyte growth in small temperate water bodies: Extreme isotopic disequilibrium and implications for the palaeoecology of shallow marl lakes. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 240:389–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.02.008
Pronin E, Pełechaty M, Apolinarska K et al. (2016) Sharp differences in the δ13C values of organic matter and carbonate encrustations but not in ambient water DIC between two morphologically distinct charophytes. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2698-6
Pronin E, Panettieri M, Torn K, Rumpel C (2019) Stable carbon isotopic composition of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) as a driving factor of aquatic plants organic matter build-up related to salinity. Ecol Indic 99:230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.036
Pukacz A, Pełechaty M, Pełechata A (2013) The relation between charophytes and habitat differentiation in temperate lowland lakes. Pol J Ecol 61:105–118
R Core Team (2022) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput Vienna, Austria. http//wwwR-project.org/
Rodrigo MA, García A, Chivas AR (2016) Carbon stable isotope composition of charophyte organic matter in a small and shallow Spanish water body as a baseline for future trophic studies. J Limnol 75:226–235. https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2015.1268
Romanov RE, Nikulin AY, Nikulin VY, Gontcharov AA (2022) New species Chara oryzae and a new section Corillionia of Chara (Charales, Charophyceae) from European Mediterranean rice fields. Eur J Phycol 57:328–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2021.1987527
Schuurkes JAAR, Kok CJ, Den Hartog C (1986) Ammonium and nitrate uptake by aquatic plants from poorly buffered and acidified waters. Aquat Bot 24:131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(86)90093-8
Sensuła B, Böttger T, Pazdur A et al. (2006) Carbon and oxygen isotope composition of organic matter and carbonates in recent lacustrine sediments. Geochronometria 25:77–94
Shmit FA, Walker NA (1980) Photosynthesis by aquatic plants: effects of unstirred layers in relation to assimilation of CO2 and HCO3- and to carbon isotopic discrimination. New Phytol 86:245–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb00785.x
Torn K, Peterson A, Herkül K, Suursaar Ü (2019) Effects of climate change on the occurrence of charophytes and angiosperms in a brackish environment. Webbia 00:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00837792.2019.1607499
Urbaniak J, Gąbka M (2014) Polish Charophytes an illustrated guide to identification. Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, Wrocław
Van Den Berg MS, Scheffer M, Coops H, Simons J (1998) The role of characean algae in the management of eutrophic shallow lakes. J Phycol 34:750–756. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340750.x
Waser NAD, Harrison PJ, Nielsen B et al. (1998) Nitrogen isotope fractionation during the uptake and assimilation of nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, and urea by a marine diatom. Limnol Oceanogr 43:215–224. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1998.43.2.0215
Wei T, Simko V (2021) R package “corrplot”: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. (Version 0.92) https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot
Wickham H (2009) ggplot2. Springer New York, New York, NY
Wu J, Yang H, Yu W et al. (2022) Effect of ecosystem degradation on the source of particulate organic matter in a Karst lake: a case study of the Caohai. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14121867
Zhang P, Kong X, Bakker ES et al. (2021) Temperature affects carbon and nitrogen stable isotopic signatures of aquatic plants. Aquat Sci 83:39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-021-00794-8
Acknowledgements
This study was financed by the Polish National Science Centre, under project no. 2019/32/C/NZ8/00147, and the UGrants—start program 533-D000-GS21-22, according to application no. 1220/34/2022. The authors thank the GISMO platform and its staff (Biogéosciences, UMR 6282 CNRS, Université de Bourgogne). Prof. Józef Szmeja is acknowledged for his valuable comments, and Emilia Rekowska for helping in N. flexilis collection from hardwater lakes. Małgorzata Pronin is acknowledged for her support and valuable comments on manuscript preparation. We would like to thank the Translmed Publishing Group (TPG), a proofreading and copyediting company, for helping in proofreading and copyediting of this manuscript. The authors also thank the Regional Director of Environmental Protection in Gdańsk for allowing them to collect N. flexilis from the investigated lakes and natural reserves such as Jezioro Smołowe, Jezioro Kamień, Jezioro Krasne, and Jezioro Moczadło (decision no. RDOŚ-Gd-WZG.6400.92.2020.AB.2 and no. RDOŚ-Gd-WOC.6205.24.2020.MaK.2). Two anonymous peer reviewers are kindly acknowledged for their comments and suggestions, which helped improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EP: conceptualization, supervision, methodology, project administration, funding acquisition, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization. KB: methodology, writing—review and editing. RC: methodology, writing—review and editing. MM: methodology, writing—review and editing. RR: methodology, writing—review and editing. ALS: methodology, writing—review and editing. OM: methodology, writing—review and editing
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pronin, E., Banaś, K., Chmara, R. et al. Do stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values of Nitella flexilis differ between softwater and hardwater lakes?. Aquat Sci 85, 79 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-023-00976-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-023-00976-6