Abstract
Major cardiovascular outcome trials and real-life observations have proven that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), regardless of structural GLP-1 homology, exert clinically relevant cardiovascular protection. GLP-1RAs provide cardioprotective benefits through glycaemic and non-glycaemic effects, including improved insulin secretion and action, body-weight loss, blood-pressure lowering and improved lipid profile, as well as via direct effects on the heart and vasculature. These actions are likely combined with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties that translate into robust and consistent reductions in atherothrombotic events, particularly in people with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic CVD. GLP-1RAs may also have an impact on obesity and chronic kidney disease, conditions for which cardiovascular risk-reducing options are limited. The available evidence has prompted professional and medical societies to recommend GLP-1RAs for mitigation of the cardiovascular risk in people with type 2 diabetes. This review summarises the clinical evidence for cardiovascular protection with use of GLP-1RAs and the main mechanisms underlying this effect. Moreover, it looks into how the availability of upcoming dual and triple incretin receptor agonists might expand the possibility for cardiovascular protection in people with type 2 diabetes.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The cardiovascular burden in type 2 diabetes
The goal of treatment in people with type 2 diabetes is delaying, if not preventing, the development of debilitating and sometime lethal complications. Among the latter, CVD still contributes to the excess of morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetes [1]. As compared with individuals without diabetes, those with type 2 diabetes have at least a doubling of mortality rate irrespective of having or not having an established cardiovascular event [1]. For a long time, glycaemic control has represented the main goal of pharmacological treatment in type 2 diabetes. However, although good metabolic control can reduce the risk of microvascular complications [2], its impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is still a matter of discussion. Compared with less-intensive glucose control, more intensive glucose control was indeed found to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) by 9% (HR 0.91 [95% CI 0.84, 0.99]) in previous trials largely based on metformin, sulfonylureas and insulin therapy [3]. This reduction in risk was primarily owing to a 15% reduced risk of myocardial infarction (HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.76, 0.94]) with no effect on cardiovascular mortality [3]. Starting in 2008, large cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) have been carried out to test the safety and efficacy of new glucose-lowering agents, revealing the cardiovascular protective actions of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). More recently, novel co-agonists of GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon have also been approved or are under evaluation for the treatment of diabetes and associated metabolic diseases, holding potential for cardiovascular risk reduction. This review focuses on the cardiovascular protection associated with use of GLP-1RAs, and outlines how the field may evolve in the near future with the introduction of dual or triple incretin receptor co-agonists.
Physiological actions of incretins in the heart and vasculature
The incretin family comprises peptides secreted in the gut that are derived from the proglucagon gene [4]. This family primarily includes GLP-1, GIP and glucagon. Although these peptides exert different metabolic effects, they share the ability to stimulate or potentiate insulin secretion in response to nutrient ingestion and reduce food intake. Several actions on the heart and vasculature have also been reported in experimental and clinical studies of incretin hormones and their analogues, as recently reviewed [4] (Fig. 1). These actions may be owing to direct activation of incretin hormone receptors, which are widely distributed in extra-pancreatic tissues, or mediated by indirect mechanisms. The results of CVOTs of GLP-1RAs support a positive effect of these agents on the cardiovascular system, although these results have been achieved using pharmacological levels of GLP-1 analogues. Of interest, no reduction in the risk for cardiovascular events was observed in CVOTs of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), which prolong the half-life of endogenous GLP-1 and GIP [5,6,7,8,9]. The effect of GIP on the cardiovascular system is controversial, as much of the information in this area is largely based on experimental animal models, without a clear understanding of whether any of the observed activity also occurs in humans. In mice, inactivation of the GIP receptor was associated with improved outcomes after experimental myocardial infarction [10], whereas GIP infusion was found to exert significant anti-atherogenic effects in mouse models of diabetes [11]. GIP receptors have been reported in the human heart, and an epidemiological study in an elderly Swedish population observed an association between physiologically elevated levels of fasting GIP and increased intima–media thickness in the common carotid artery [12]. Furthermore, in a prospective, community-based study, elevated GIP levels were associated with greater risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [13]. At a physiological concentration, glucagon is not believed to exert significant effects on the heart, while at supraphysiological concentrations it increases heart rate and cardiac contractility [14]. Because of these properties, glucagon has been evaluated for its potential to improve symptomatic heart failure (HF). However, most of these studies were of small size and lacking rigorous control and, as such, any cardioprotective effect of glucagon remains uncertain [15]. The available evidence for the cardiovascular effects of GIP has been reviewed in detail in this special issue [4, 16]. Also, while rigorous CVOTs have been carried out to assess safety and benefits of GLP-1RAs, no such studies are currently available for any other incretin. Therefore, we will focus on the cardiovascular effects of GLP-1RAs.
The lessons from CVOTs
Since 2016, five dedicated CVOTs have demonstrated a significant reduction in the three-point MACE (3P-MACE) composite outcome, encompassing non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and cardiovascular death, in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving long-acting GLP-1RAs (Fig. 2). In the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) [17] trial, the Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-term Outcomes with Semaglutide in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN-6) [18], the Harmony Outcomes [19] trial and the AMPLITUDE-O [20] trial, individuals with type 2 diabetes and at high risk of CVD (81–100% with established CVD) were randomly assigned to receive either GLP-1RA or placebo. During a median follow-up of 1.6–3.8 years, the relative risk of 3P-MACE was reduced by 13% in participants treated with once-daily liraglutide (HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.78, 0.97]) [17], and by 22–27% in participants treated with once-weekly injectable semaglutide (HR 0.74 [95% CI 0.58, 0.95]) [18], albiglutide (HR 0.78 [95% CI 0.68, 0.90]) [19] and efpeglenatide (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.58, 0.92]) [20], compared with the placebo groups. Consistently, in the Researching Cardiovascular Events With a Weekly Incretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial [21], treatment with dulaglutide reduced the rate of 3P-MACE by 12% (HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.79, 0.99]) in patients at lower CVD risk (31% with established CVD) during a longer follow-up period of 5.4 years. In contrast, four CVOTs reported neutral effects on 3P-MACE with long-term treatment with lixisenatide (the Evaluation of Lixisenatide in Acute Coronary Syndrome [ELIXA] trial) [21], oral semaglutide (the Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment [PIONEER] 6 trial) [22], and exenatide prescribed as a once-weekly injection (Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering [EXSCEL]) [23] or administered via continuous subcutaneous release (FREEDOM Cardiovascular Outcomes [CVO]) [24] (Fig. 2). Discrepancies between CVOTs were also observed among individual 3P-MACE components: cardiovascular death was only found to be significantly reduced in the LEADER [17] and PIONEER 6 [22] trials; the rate of myocardial infarction (both fatal and non-fatal events) was significantly reduced in the LEADER [17] and Harmony Outcomes [19] trials; and the rate of stroke (combined fatal and non-fatal events) was significantly reduced in the REWIND trial only [25], while non-fatal stroke was reduced in the REWIND [25] and SUSTAIN-6 [18] trials (Fig. 2).
Heterogeneous populations and trial designs may account for some of these differences and preclude a direct comparison between benefits of different GLP-1RAs on morbidity and mortality; however, cardiovascular protection appears to be largely consistent across different members of this drug class (Fig. 2). In a meta-analysis of eight CVOTs, comprising 60,080 individuals, the relative risk of developing 3P-MACE with use of GLP-1RAs compared with placebo was reduced by 14% (HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.80, 0.93]) (Fig. 2), without statistical heterogeneity across subgroups stratified by trial duration, GLP-1RA dosing (daily vs weekly), human GLP-1 homology, participants’ age, BMI, baseline glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk and kidney function [26]. The inclusion of the FREEDOM CVO trial in the meta-analysis [24], which employed a subcutaneous delivery system to ensure long-lasting elevation of the circulating GLP-1 analogue, did not influence the benefits of GLP-1RAs on 3P-MACE (n=64,236; HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.81, 0.94]) [27]. Collectively, the greatest relative risk reduction was observed for stroke (−17%; HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.76, 0.92]), followed by cardiovascular death (−13%; HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.80, 0.94]), all-cause death (−12%; HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.82, 0.94]) and myocardial infarction (−10%; HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.83, 0.98]) (Fig. 2) [26].
In the same meta-analysis, the relative risk of hospital admission for HF was also reduced by 11% in patients treated with GLP-1RAs (HR 0.89 [95% CI 0.82, 0.98]) [26], confirming the beneficial effect previously observed only in the Harmony Outcomes [19] and AMPLITUDE-O [20] trials. These CVOTs reported the greatest numerical reductions in the rate of myocardial infarction, with the decrease being statistically significant in the Harmony Outcomes trial [19], raising the possibility that the benefit of GLP-1RAs on HF might reflect protective actions against myocardial damage. A recent meta-analysis corroborates this hypothesis, reporting that GLP-1RAs prevent hospitalisation for new-onset HF but do not reduce HF readmissions in patients with previous HF history [28].
Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) [29] has demonstrated that the cardiometabolic benefits of GLP-1RAs surpass that of older second-line glucose-lowering agents. In this RCT, 5047 patients with type 2 diabetes received either liraglutide, insulin glargine, glimepiride or sitagliptin in addition to metformin. In a prespecified secondary analysis, liraglutide reduced the relative risk for cardiovascular events by approximately 30% compared with sitagliptin (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.51, 0.90]), glimepiride (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.53, 0.93]) and the three other agents combined (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.56, 0.90]) after a median follow-up of 5.0 years [29].
In summary, the available clinical evidence confirms that a significant cardiovascular protection is exerted by GLP-1RAs in type 2 diabetes patients who are at high cardiovascular risk or have established CVD. Given their body-weight lowering effect, it is also hypothesised that GLP-1RAs confer cardiovascular protection in obese individuals without diabetes but with established CVD. The ongoing Phase III Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People With Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT03574597) will be the first CVOT to evaluate superiority of a GLP-1RA (semaglutide 2.4 mg) vs placebo on 3P-MACE in obese individuals without diabetes. Moreover, the benefits of semaglutide in people with obesity-related HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), both with or without type 2 diabetes (ClinicalTrials.gov registration nos. NCT04916470 and NCT04788511, respectively), are under investigation.
Real-world evidence of GLP-1RA effects on CVD
Real-world observational studies performed in routine clinical settings are required to fully appreciate the potential for GLP-1RAs to elicit the cardiovascular protection that has been established in randomised clinical trials, using rigorous methodology. Because of such strict methodology, the populations included in CVOTs may not be representative of the general diabetes population. When the clinical characteristics of participants in the LEADER, REWIND and SUSTAIN-6 trials were compared with the typical diabetes population in Spain [30], the UK [31] and the USA [32], even the most representative of these CVOTs (REWIND) captured only a fraction (42.6–53.6%) of the real-world type 2 diabetes population (Fig. 3). Data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database, with contributions from over 640 UK general practices, have been used to compare matched type 2 diabetes patients who have been exposed (n=8345) or unexposed (n=16,541) to GLP-1RAs [33]. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, while the secondary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction and ischaemic heart disease, stroke and transitory ischaemic attack, and HF. Over a mean follow-up of 32 months, a total of 1146 deaths were recorded; individuals receiving a GLP-1RA were less likely to die from any cause compared with matched control participants (incidence rate ratio: 0.69 [95 %CI 0.61, 0.79]). A prospective observational study based on a Swedish registry (2010–2017) examined data from 17,868 people with type 2 diabetes who had survived their first myocardial infarction, 365 of whom were using GLP-1RAs (87% taking liraglutide, and 13% taking either exenatide, lixisenatide or dulaglutide) [34]. Over a 3 year follow-up, the use of GLP-1RAs was associated with a 28% reduction in the risk of MACE (adjusted HR 0.72 [95% CI 0.56, 0.92]) when compared with other glucose-lowering agents, primarily due to a lower rate of re-infarction and stroke. The use of GLP-1RAs was also associated with a 24% reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events in the first 30 days of follow-up (adjusted HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.58, 0.99]). Administrative claims data (2011–2015) from 11,351 type 2 diabetes patients who had previously been treated with metformin have recently been retrospectively analysed to compare CVD event rates following initiation of either liraglutide (66.3% of individuals), exenatide (29.6%) or other GLP-1RAs (4.1%) [35]. The primary outcome was time to first major CVD event (ischaemic heart disease, stroke, HF or peripheral arterial disease) after starting the GLP-1RA. Compared with liraglutide, initiating exenatide once weekly or twice daily early during the course of type 2 diabetes was not associated with a composite of major CVD events. The HR for an ischaemic event with exenatide once weekly relative to liraglutide was 1.85 (95% CI 0.97, 3.53). The analysis of another contemporary database from Slovenia, which included individuals with type 2 diabetes who were starting GLP-1RAs (n=855), DPP4i (n=3817) or sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i; n=2851) as add-on therapy to metformin (85% of individuals) and/or sulfonylureas (74% of individuals) showed that GLP-1RA combination therapy was associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR 0.64 [95% CI 0.43, 0.97]) and all-cause death (HR 0.53 [95% CI 0.35, 0.79]) compared with DPP4i, but not with SGLT2i. In contrast, no significant effect was observed with regard to CVD-related death or HF [36]. At odds with such findings, others have documented that SGLT2i exert stronger protection against MACE and HF vs GLP-1RAs [37], as previously observed in some RCTs.
Finally, one of the longest retrospective real-life observational studies to provide information on the relationship between the use of GLP-1RAs or SGLT2i and mortality comes from Italy [38]. In this study, death rates in 2010 and 2018 in the regions of Lombardy and Apulia were compared. Reductions in deaths were associated with the use of GLP-1RAs (HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.56, 0.65] and HR 0.63 [95% CI 0.55, 0.71], respectively), but these were numerically lower than the reductions obtained with SGLT2i (HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.40, 0.54] and HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.32, 0.57], respectively).
Mechanisms of action of incretin-induced cardiovascular protection
Several direct and indirect mechanisms could account for the long-term cardioprotective actions of GLP-1RAs, which usually become evident 6–18 months after treatment initiation. These include the sustained reduction of multiple proatherogenic risk factors, encompassing hyperglycaemia, obesity, arterial hypertension, systemic and tissue inflammation, liver steatosis, dyslipidaemia, platelet aggregation and albuminuria [39]. Remarkable improvements in glycaemic control and body weight can certainly contribute to GLP-1RA-mediated cardiovascular benefits [40]. Mendelian randomisation studies support a causal role of genetically driven hyperglycaemia in atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) [41,42,43] and show that glucose-lowering variants of the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) gene, GLP1R, confer protection against heart disease [44]. The glucoregulatory actions of GLP-1RAs are well known and include glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion and inhibition of glucagon release, resulting in a marked reduction in HbA1c in people with type 2 diabetes. By directly interacting with multiple hypothalamic circuits, GLP-1RAs also reduce appetite and food intake, leading to sustained weight loss in people with overweight and obesity [45]. Nevertheless, whether these mechanisms alone can fully explain the cardiovascular protection associated with GLP-1RA use has been questioned since investigators of the Harmony Outcomes trial found that the rate of MACEs decreased even in the absence of substantial HbA1c and weight reductions during treatment with albiglutide [19].
The activation of extra-pancreatic GLP-1Rs may mediate direct benefits of GLP-1RAs on the heart and vasculature. Expression of GLP-1Rs has been detected at low levels in cardiomyocytes in atria and ventricles, endocardial and vascular endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells [46]. In clinical trials, GLP-1RAs modestly increased heart rate and reduced systolic blood pressure by up to 6 mmHg in hypertensive individuals [47], regardless of background blood-pressure-lowering therapy. Proposed mechanisms include increased natriuresis, vasorelaxation and secretion of cardiac natriuretic peptides [48], although these effects appear to be attenuated with chronic use of GLP-1RAs and have not been confirmed in all studies [49]. Clinical evidence also suggests that GLP-1RAs can enhance endothelium-dependent vasodilatation and microvascular recruitment [50], which may preserve ventricular function and survival under ischaemic conditions [46, 51,52,53].
Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of GLP-1RAs, possibly mediated by GLP-1Rs expressed by gut intraepithelial lymphocytes and hepatic γδ T cells, have been reported in both animals [54] and humans [55]. Inflammatory cytokines and microbial infections enhance GLP-1 secretion by intestinal L cells, which, in turn, can attenuate colonic and systemic inflammation via GLP-1R signalling [56]. In people with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), both liraglutide and semaglutide decreased liver inflammation and prevented fibrosis [57]. In mice, GLP-1RAs reduced aortic inflammation and prevented progression of atherosclerosis [58], whereas inconclusive findings have been reported in humans on the effects of GLP-1RA treatment on arterial inflammation [59] and carotid plaque composition and volume [60].
Treatment with GLP-1RAs rapidly reduces plasma triglyceride and LDL-cholesterol levels, even in the presence of statins [25]. GLP-1RAs also decrease postprandial triglyceride excursions by modulating gut chylomicron synthesis and secretion [61]. The improvements in fasting and postprandial dyslipidaemia are likely supported by concomitant body-weight loss and improved insulin sensitivity [62] given that GLP-1Rs are not expressed in the cells responsible for lipoprotein production, namely hepatocytes and enterocytes [63].
The regulation of platelet activation, thrombosis and platelet-mediated inflammation by GLP-1RAs is possibly mediated by GLP1Rs expressed on human platelets and represents another potential mechanism for reduced atherothrombotic events [64,65,66]. In fact, liraglutide attenuated thromboxane-induced platelet aggregation by 54% compared with sitagliptin or energy restriction in adults with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance [65], and a similar effect was observed in people with type 2 diabetes [66].
Accumulating evidence from clinical trials [67, 68] and real-world data [69] suggests that GLP-1RAs may offer additional renal benefits, which would translate into cardiovascular protection given the strong association between chronic kidney disease (CKD), ASCVD and HF [70]. While a dedicated kidney outcome trial is being conducted (the FLOW trial; ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT03819153), secondary analyses of GLP-1RA CVOTs indicate that liraglutide [17], semaglutide [18], dulaglutide [25] and efpeglenatide [20] may reduce the relative risk of a composite kidney outcome, comprising new-onset macroalbuminuria, worsening kidney function, end-stage renal disease and renal death, by 15–36%. This effect is mainly driven by reduced macroalbuminuria, combined with a modest reduction in the slope of renal function decline [25, 67, 68].
Several mechanisms of protection against hospitalisation for HF have been demonstrated in different animal models, including increased myocardial glucose uptake, and reduced myocyte apoptosis, cardiac inflammation, adverse left ventricular remodelling, and atrial enlargement [71]. Nonetheless, these mechanisms have not been consistently replicated in humans, particularly in individuals with severely reduced left ventricular function who may not benefit [72, 73], or may even being harmed [74], from treatment with GLP-1RAs.
A clear explanation for the greater benefit of GLP-1RAs on stroke compared with myocardial infarction is still lacking [26]. GLP-1RAs neither reduce the risks for atrial fibrillation (and, thus, cerebral embolism) [75] or haemorrhagic stroke [76], nor do they acutely affect cerebral blood flow velocity [77]. However, direct anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, neurotrophic and neuroprotective actions of GLP-1RAs and GIP/GLP-1 co-agonists have been reported in animal models of stroke and neurodegenerative diseases [78].
An evolving scenario
The results from CVOTs have set an unprecedented scenario and have provided a step forward to reducing cardiovascular burden in people with type 2 diabetes. Use of higher doses of dulaglutide [79] and semaglutide [80] than those initially approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes have been shown to offer an even larger effect in terms of glycaemic control and body-weight reduction. However, whether this may also translate into greater cardiovascular protection has not been assessed. Furthermore, the advancement of precision medicine approaches, which combine progress in pharmacogenomics with established knowledge of the heterogeneous pathological processes underlying the aetiology of type 2 diabetes, holds the potential to uncover distinct subsets of individuals who are differentially responsive to the beneficial cardiometabolic actions of incretin-based therapies [81]. This novel approach would explain the varying responses to GLP-1RAs observed in clinical trials and may help to facilitate clinical decision-making, allowing for individualised treatment selection and optimised outcomes. As mentioned, along with GLP-1RAs, evidence has been gathered for the cardiovascular protective actions of SGLT2i, with the latter conferring a more pronounced protection with respect to HF and CKD, whereas GLP-1RAs may be associated with a greater benefit in relation to fatal and non-fatal stroke [82]. Current guidelines reflect this compelling evidence and indicate early treatment initiation with GLP-1RAs and/or SGLT2i in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal events in people with type 2 diabetes [83]. Of interest, the mechanisms of action of these two classes of drugs are different and potentially complementary, supporting the combined use of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i in people with type 2 diabetes [84,85,86,87,88,89]. In the EXSCEL CVOT trial, 8.7% of participants randomized to exenatide once weekly were also started on an SGLT2i. Upon propensity matching, the risk for all-cause mortality with the combined use of exenatide and SGLT2i was significantly lower compared with placebo (HR 0.38 [95% CI 0.16, 0.90]) and exenatide alone (HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.17, 0.95]) [84]. In an exploratory analysis of the AMPLITUDE-O trial, which had the highest proportion (15.2%) of participants receiving SGLT2i at baseline among the available GLP-1RA CVOTs [20], the efficacy of efpeglenatide on preventing 3P-MACE and associated cardiometabolic variables appeared to be independent of concurrent SGLT2i use [85].
Previous work has highlighted potential synergistic effects among members of the incretin family, leading to the development of multi-incretin agonists [90]. Among those in a more advanced stage of development are the GLP-1/glucagon and in particular the GIP/GLP-1 dual agonists, of which tirzepatide was the first to be made available in the USA and is expected to enter Europe soon. The use of this GIP/GLP-1 dual agonist in individuals with type 2 diabetes has shown superiority with respect to HbA1c lowering, body-weight reduction, improvement in lipid profile and reduction of arterial blood pressure, as compared with placebo, semaglutide or insulin [91, 92]. Moreover, post hoc analyses have provided initial support to an effect in terms of renal protection [93] and reductions in liver steatosis [94], two conditions contributing to cardiovascular risk in diabetes. In a meta-analysis including data from 4887 participants treated with tirzepatide and 2328 control participants, an HR of 0.80 (95% CI 0.57, 1.11) was calculated for four-point MACE (MACE-4), 0.90 (95% CI 0.50, 1.61) for cardiovascular death and 0.80 (95% CI 0.51, 1.25) for all-cause mortality [95]. However, the results of the SURPASS-CVOT trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT04255433) will better define the cardiovascular safety and benefit of tirzepatide as compared with dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes patients with established ASCVD.
The next chapter of incretin-based therapy for lowering cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes will be represented, most likely, by the development of tri-agonists capable of simultaneous activation of GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors. Encouraging results of a Phase Ib trial with retatrutide, an incretin tri-agonist, have shown an acceptable safety profile, suitability for once-weekly dosing, and robust reductions in glucose levels and body weight [96].
Conclusion
The incretin concept was initially developed to account for gut factors able to stimulate and potentiate insulin secretion [4]. The first peptide to attract attention was GIP, soon followed by GLP-1 because of its more suitable features as a pharmacological agent for improvement of glucose control and body-weight reduction in people with type 2 diabetes [4]. Glucagon has always been considered a main player in diabetes, as a counterregulatory hormone, although some interest was transiently generated because of its inotropic and chronotropic action [16]. However, it was only with the results of CVOTs based on GLP-1RAs that a new era in the treatment of type 2 diabetes has been triggered: together with SGLT2i, for the first time, it has been possible to go to the heart of the problem of type 2 diabetes, i.e. its cardiovascular complications. These results have revolutionised the therapeutic management of diabetes, moving from mere glycaemic targets towards a more holistic approach to the disease [83]. GLP-1RAs, for the first time, have permitted simultaneous control of glucose, body weight and cardiovascular risk factors, and enabled us to confer effective cardioprotection in those with organ damage. Despite the incretin chapter opening more than 100 years ago [4], it is now moving with full steam ahead by taking advantage of simultaneous multi-incretin agonism. We are now at the heart of the problem and will look for even more efficient ways to prevent CVD in a growing number of people with (and possibly without) diabetes.
Abbreviations
- ASCVD:
-
Atherosclerotic CVD
- CKD:
-
Chronic kidney disease
- CVOT:
-
Cardiovascular outcome trial
- DPP-4i:
-
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors
- EXSCEL:
-
Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering
- FREEDOM CVO:
-
FREEDOM Cardiovascular Outcomes
- GIP:
-
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide
- GLP-1:
-
Glucagon-like peptide-1
- GLP-1R:
-
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor
- GLP-1RA:
-
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist
- HF:
-
Heart failure
- LEADER:
-
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results
- MACE:
-
Major adverse cardiovascular event
- PIONEER:
-
Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment
- 3P-MACE:
-
Three-point major adverse cardiovascular event
- REWIND:
-
Researching Cardiovascular Events With a Weekly Incretin in Diabetes
- SGLT2i:
-
Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors
- SUSTAIN-6:
-
Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-term Outcomes with Semaglutide in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes
References
The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (2015) Association of cardiometabolic multimorbidity with mortality. JAMA 314(1):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.7008
Zoungas S, Arima H, Gerstein HC et al (2017) Effects of intensive glucose control on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 5(6):431–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30104-3
Control G, Turnbull FM, Abraira C et al (2009) Intensive glucose control and macrovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 52(11):2288–2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1470-0
Drucker DJ, Holst JJ (2023) The expanding incretin universe: from basic biology to clinical translation. Diabetologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-05906-7
Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E et al (2013) Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 369(14):1317–1326. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307684
White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR et al (2013) Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 369(14):1327–1335. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1305889
Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW et al (2015) Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 373(3):232–242. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1501352
Rosenstock J, Perkovic V, Johansen OE et al (2019) Effect of linagliptin vs placebo on major cardiovascular events in adults with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular and renal risk. JAMA 321(1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.18269
Rosenstock J, Allison D, Birkenfeld AL et al (2019) Effect of additional oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin on glycated hemoglobin in adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin alone or with sulfonylurea. JAMA 321(15):1466–1480. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.2942
Ussher JR, Campbell JE, Mulvihill EE et al (2018) Inactivation of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor improves outcomes following experimental myocardial infarction. Cell Metab 27(2):450–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.11.003. (e456)
Nogi Y, Nagashima M, Terasaki M, Nohtomi K, Watanabe T, Hirano T (2012) Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide prevents the progression of macrophage-driven atherosclerosis in diabetic apolipoprotein E-null mice. PLoS One 7(4):e35683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035683
Jujic A, Nilsson PM, Atabaki-Pasdar N et al (2021) Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide in the high-normal range is associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness. Diabetes Care 44(1):224–230. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1318
Jujic A, Atabaki-Pasdar N, Nilsson PM et al (2020) Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality: a prospective study. Diabetologia 63(5):1043–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05093-9
Thuesen L, Christiansen JS, Sorensen KE, Orskov H, Henningsen P (1988) Low-dose intravenous glucagon has no effect on myocardial contractility in normal man. An echocardiographic study. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 48(1):71–75. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365518809085396
Petersen KM, Bogevig S, Holst JJ, Knop FK, Christensen MB (2018) Hemodynamic effects of glucagon: a literature review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103(5):1804–1812. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00050
Tschöp M, Nogueiras R, Ahrén B (2023) Gut hormone-based pharmacology: novel formulations and future possibilities for metabolic disease therapy. Diabetologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-05929-0
Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K et al (2016) Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 375(4):311–322. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1603827
Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A et al (2016) Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 375(19):1834–1844. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607141
Hernandez AF, Green JB, Janmohamed S et al (2018) Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 392(10157):1519–1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32261-X
Gerstein HC, Sattar N, Rosenstock J et al (2021) Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with efpeglenatide in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 385(10):896–907. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2108269
Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Diaz R et al (2015) Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 373(23):2247–2257. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1509225
Husain M, Birkenfeld AL, Donsmark M et al (2019) Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 381(9):841–851. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1901118
Holman RR, Bethel MA, Mentz RJ et al (2017) Effects of once-weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 377(13):1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1612917
Ruff CT, Baron M, Im K, O’Donoghue ML, Fiedorek FT, Sabatine MS (2022) Subcutaneous infusion of exenatide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Nat Med 28(1):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01584-3
Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR et al (2019) Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 394(10193):121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3
Sattar N, Lee MMY, Kristensen SL et al (2021) Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(10):653–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00203-5
Lee MMY, Kristensen SL, Gerstein HC, McMurray JJV, Sattar N (2022) Cardiovascular and mortality outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis with the FREEDOM cardiovascular outcomes trial. Diabetes Metab Syndr 16(1):102382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102382
Ferreira JP, Saraiva F, Sharma A et al (2023) Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled outcome trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 25(6):1495–1502. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14997
The GRADE Study Research Group (2022) Glycemia reduction in type 2 diabetes — microvascular and cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med 387(12):1075–1088. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2200436
Romera I, Artime E, Ihle K et al (2022) A retrospective observational study examining the generalizability of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist cardiovascular outcome trials to the real-world population with type 2 diabetes in spain: the REPRESENT Study. Adv Ther 39(8):3589–3601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02196-0
Webb J, Mount J, von Arx LB et al (2022) Cardiovascular risk profiles: a cross-sectional study evaluating the generalizability of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist cardiovascular outcome trials REWIND, LEADER and SUSTAIN-6 to the real-world type 2 diabetes population in the United Kingdom. Diabetes Obes Metab 24(2):289–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14580
Boye KS, Riddle MC, Gerstein HC et al (2019) Generalizability of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist cardiovascular outcome trials to the overall type 2 diabetes population in the United States. Diabetes Obes Metab 21(6):1299–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13649
Toulis KA, Hanif W, Saravanan P et al (2017) All-cause mortality in patients with diabetes under glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists: a population-based, open cohort study. Diabetes Metab 43(3):211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2017.02.003
Trevisan M, Fu EL, Szummer K et al (2021) Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and the risk of cardiovascular events in diabetes patients surviving an acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 7(2):104–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa004
Wallia A, O'Brien M, Hakimian S et al (2023) Comparative cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 agonists using real-world data. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab e339. https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.339
Zerovnik S, Kos M, Locatelli I (2021) Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes using novel antidiabetic medicines as add-on therapy: an observational real-world study. BMJ Open 11(9):e051549. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051549
Longato E, Di Camillo B, Sparacino G, Gubian L, Avogaro A, Fadini GP (2020) Cardiovascular outcomes of type 2 diabetic patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in real-life. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 8(1):e001451. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001451
Baviera M, Genovese S, Lepore V et al (2021) Lower risk of death and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a real-world study in two Italian cohorts. Diabetes Obes Metab 23(7):1484–1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14361
Hammoud R, Drucker DJ (2023) Beyond the pancreas: contrasting cardiometabolic actions of GIP and GLP1. Nat Rev Endocrinol 19(4):201–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-022-00783-3
Buse JB, Bain SC, Mann JFE et al (2020) Cardiovascular risk reduction with liraglutide: an exploratory mediation analysis of the LEADER Trial. Diabetes Care 43(7):1546–1552. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-2251
Merino J, Leong A, Posner DC et al (2017) Genetically driven hyperglycemia increases risk of coronary artery disease separately from type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 40(5):687–693. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2625
Mutie PM, Pomares-Millan H, Atabaki-Pasdar N et al (2020) An investigation of causal relationships between prediabetes and vascular complications. Nat Commun 11(1):4592. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18386-9
Yuan S, Mason AM, Burgess S, Larsson SC (2022) Differentiating associations of glycemic traits with atherosclerotic and thrombotic outcomes: Mendelian randomization investigation. Diabetes 71(10):2222–2232. https://doi.org/10.2337/db21-0905
Scott RA, Freitag DF, Li L et al (2016) A genomic approach to therapeutic target validation identifies a glucose-lowering GLP1R variant protective for coronary heart disease. Sci Transl Med 8(341):341ra76. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aad3744
Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S et al (2021) Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med 384(11):989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183
McLean BA, Wong CK, Kabir MG, Drucker DJ (2022) Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor Tie2+ cells are essential for the cardioprotective actions of liraglutide in mice with experimental myocardial infarction. Mol Metab 66:101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101641
Buse JB, Drucker DJ, Taylor KL et al (2010) DURATION-1: exenatide once weekly produces sustained glycemic control and weight loss over 52 weeks. Diabetes Care 33(6):1255–1261. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1914
Crajoinas RO, Oricchio FT, Pessoa TD et al (2011) Mechanisms mediating the diuretic and natriuretic actions of the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 301(2):F355–F363. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00729.2010
Lovshin JA, Barnie A, DeAlmeida A, Logan A, Zinman B, Drucker DJ (2015) Liraglutide promotes natriuresis but does not increase circulating levels of atrial natriuretic peptide in hypertensive subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 38(1):132–139. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-1958
Chai W, Dong Z, Wang N et al (2012) Glucagon-like peptide 1 recruits microvasculature and increases glucose use in muscle via a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism. Diabetes 61(4):888–896. https://doi.org/10.2337/db11-1073
Noyan-Ashraf MH, Momen MA, Ban K et al (2009) GLP-1R agonist liraglutide activates cytoprotective pathways and improves outcomes after experimental myocardial infarction in mice. Diabetes 58(4):975–983. https://doi.org/10.2337/db08-1193
Woo JS, Kim W, Ha SJ et al (2013) Cardioprotective effects of exenatide in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results of exenatide myocardial protection in revascularization study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 33(9):2252–2260. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301586
Chen WR, Hu SY, Chen YD et al (2015) Effects of liraglutide on left ventricular function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 170(5):845–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.014
Wong CK, Yusta B, Koehler JA et al (2022) Divergent roles for the gut intraepithelial lymphocyte GLP-1R in control of metabolism, microbiota, and T cell-induced inflammation. Cell Metab 34(10):1514–1531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2022.08.003
Chaudhuri A, Ghanim H, Vora M et al (2012) Exenatide exerts a potent antiinflammatory effect. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97(1):198–207. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-1508
Yusta B, Baggio LL, Koehler J et al (2015) GLP-1R agonists modulate enteric immune responses through the intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte GLP-1R. Diabetes 64(7):2537–2549. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-1577
Yabut JM, Drucker DJ (2023) Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-based therapeutics for metabolic liver disease. Endocr Rev 44(1):14–32. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac018
Rakipovski G, Rolin B, Nohr J et al (2018) The GLP-1 analogs liraglutide and semaglutide reduce atherosclerosis in ApoE(-/-) and LDLr(-/-) mice by a mechanism that includes inflammatory pathways. JACC Basic Transl Sci 3(6):844–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.09.004
Ripa RS, Zobel EH, von Scholten BJ et al (2021) Effect of liraglutide on arterial inflammation assessed as [(18)F]FDG uptake in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 14(7):e012174. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012174
Koska J, Migrino RQ, Chan KC, Cooper-Cox K, Reaven PD (2021) The effect of exenatide once weekly on carotid atherosclerosis in individuals with type 2 diabetes: an 18-month randomized placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Care 44(6):1385–1392. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2014
Hermansen K, Baekdal TA, During M et al (2013) Liraglutide suppresses postprandial triglyceride and apolipoprotein B48 elevations after a fat-rich meal in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 15(11):1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12133
Kosiborod MN, Bhatta M, Davies M et al (2023) Semaglutide improves cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with overweight or obesity: STEP 1 and 4 exploratory analyses. Diabetes Obes Metab 25(2):468–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14890
Richards P, Parker HE, Adriaenssens AE et al (2014) Identification and characterization of GLP-1 receptor-expressing cells using a new transgenic mouse model. Diabetes 63(4):1224–1233. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-1440
Cameron-Vendrig A, Reheman A, Siraj MA et al (2016) Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor activation attenuates platelet aggregation and thrombosis. Diabetes 65(6):1714–1723. https://doi.org/10.2337/db15-1141
Cahill KN, Amin T, Boutaud O et al (2022) Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor regulates thromboxane-induced human platelet activation. JACC Basic Transl Sci 7(7):713–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.04.004
Loganathan J, Cohen AC, Kaloupis GM et al (2022) A pilot clinical study to Evaluate Liraglutide-mediated Anti-platelet activity in patients with type-2 Diabetes (ELAID study). J Diabetes Complications 36(5):108188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108188
Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR et al (2019) Dulaglutide and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 394(10193):131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31150-X
Shaman AM, Bain SC, Bakris GL et al (2022) Effect of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists semaglutide and liraglutide on kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled analysis of SUSTAIN 6 and LEADER. Circulation 145(8):575–585. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055459
Pasternak B, Wintzell V, Eliasson B et al (2020) Use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and risk of serious renal events: Scandinavian Cohort Study. Diabetes Care 43(6):1326–1335. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-2088
Jankowski J, Floege J, Fliser D, Bohm M, Marx N (2021) Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease: pathophysiological insights and therapeutic options. Circulation 143(11):1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050686
Poornima I, Brown SB, Bhashyam S, Parikh P, Bolukoglu H, Shannon RP (2008) Chronic glucagon-like peptide-1 infusion sustains left ventricular systolic function and prolongs survival in the spontaneously hypertensive, heart failure-prone rat. Circ Heart Fail 1(3):153–160. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.766402
Margulies KB, Hernandez AF, Redfield MM et al (2016) Effects of liraglutide on clinical stability among patients with advanced heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316(5):500–508. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.10260
Lepore JJ, Olson E, Demopoulos L et al (2016) Effects of the novel long-acting GLP-1 agonist, albiglutide, on cardiac function, cardiac metabolism, and exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail 4(7):559–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2016.01.008
Jorsal A, Kistorp C, Holmager P et al (2017) Effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, on left ventricular function in stable chronic heart failure patients with and without diabetes (LIVE)-a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail 19(1):69–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.657
Nreu B, Dicembrini I, Tinti F, Sesti G, Mannucci E, Monami M (2020) Major cardiovascular events, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation in patients treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 30(7):1106–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2020.03.013
Wei J, Yang B, Wang R et al (2022) Risk of stroke and retinopathy during GLP-1 receptor agonist cardiovascular outcome trials: an eight RCTs meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol 13:1007980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1007980
Olmestig J, Marlet IR, Vilsboll T et al (2022) A single dose of exenatide had no effect on blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery in elderly healthy volunteers: randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Front Aging Neurosci 14:899389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.899389
Kopp KO, Glotfelty EJ, Li Y, Greig NH (2022) Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and neuroinflammation: implications for neurodegenerative disease treatment. Pharmacol Res 186:106550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106550
Frias JP, Bonora E, Nevarez Ruiz L et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-11). Diabetes Care 44(3):765–773. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1473
Frias JP, Auerbach P, Bajaj HS et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2.0 mg versus 1.0 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN FORTE): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3B trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(9):563–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00174-1
Dawed AY, Mari A, Brown A et al (2023) Pharmacogenomics of GLP-1 receptor agonists: a genome-wide analysis of observational data and large randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 11(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00340-0
Giugliano D, Longo M, Signoriello S et al (2022) The effect of DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors on cardiorenal outcomes: a network meta-analysis of 23 CVOTs. Cardiovasc Diabetol 21(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01474-z
Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS et al (2022) Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 65(12):1925–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05787-2
Clegg LE, Penland RC, Bachina S et al (2019) Effects of exenatide and open-label SGLT2 inhibitor treatment, given in parallel or sequentially, on mortality and cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: insights from the EXSCEL trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol 18(1):138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-019-0942-x
Lam CSP, Ramasundarahettige C, Branch KRH et al (2022) Efpeglenatide and clinical outcomes with and without concomitant sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition use in type 2 diabetes: exploratory analysis of the AMPLITUDE-O Trial. Circulation 145(8):565–574. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057934
Cahn A, Wiviott SD, Mosenzon O et al (2021) Cardiorenal outcomes with dapagliflozin by baseline glucose-lowering agents: post hoc analyses from DECLARE-TIMI 58. Diabetes Obes Metab 23(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14179
Dave CV, Kim SC, Goldfine AB, Glynn RJ, Tong A, Patorno E (2021) Risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes after addition of SGLT2 inhibitors versus sulfonylureas to baseline GLP-1RA therapy. Circulation 143(8):770–779. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047965
Lopez PD, Bhatia K, Bohra C, Mahmood K, Baruch L, Eng C (2022) Benefits of adding glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists to sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in diabetic patients with atherosclerotic disease and heart failure. Am J Cardiol 181:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.07.012
Arnott C, Neuen BL, Heerspink HJL et al (2020) The effects of combination canagliflozin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy on intermediate markers of cardiovascular risk in the CANVAS program. Int J Cardiol 318:126–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.06.011
Brandt SJ, Muller TD, DiMarchi RD, Tschop MH, Stemmer K (2018) Peptide-based multi-agonists: a new paradigm in metabolic pharmacology. J Intern Med 284(6):581–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12837
Karagiannis T, Avgerinos I, Liakos A et al (2022) Management of type 2 diabetes with the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 65(8):1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05715-4
Del Prato S, Kahn SE, Pavo I et al (2021) Tirzepatide versus insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk (SURPASS-4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 398(10313):1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02188-7
Heerspink HJL, Sattar N, Pavo I et al (2022) Effects of tirzepatide versus insulin glargine on kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes in the SURPASS-4 trial: post-hoc analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 10(11):774–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00243-1
Gastaldelli A, Cusi K, Fernandez Lando L, Bray R, Brouwers B, Rodriguez A (2022) Effect of tirzepatide versus insulin degludec on liver fat content and abdominal adipose tissue in people with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3 MRI): a substudy of the randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 SURPASS-3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 10(6):393–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00070-5
Sattar N, McGuire DK, Pavo I et al (2022) Tirzepatide cardiovascular event risk assessment: a pre-specified meta-analysis. Nat Med 28(3):591–598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01707-4
Urva S, Coskun T, Loh MT et al (2022) LY3437943, a novel triple GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon receptor agonist in people with type 2 diabetes: a phase 1b, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, multiple-ascending dose trial. Lancet 400(10366):1869–1881. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02033-5
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università di Pisa within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Authors’ relationships and activities
AS has received research grants to the institution from Sankyo and Sanofi; has served as an advisor for Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; and has received fees for speaking from Sanofi, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk and Sankyo. DT has served as an advisor for Amarin; and has received fees for speaking from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly & Co. and Novo Nordisk. SDP has served as president of EASD/European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD) (2020–2022); has received research grants to the institution from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; has served as advisor for Abbott, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Co., EvaPharma, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Menarini International, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis Pharmaceutical Co., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Sun Pharmaceuticals; and has received fees for speaking from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Co., Laboratori Guidotti, Merck Sharpe & Dohme and Novo Nordisk. The authors declare that there are no other relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.
Contribution statement
All authors were responsible for drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved this version to be published.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Solini, A., Tricò, D. & Del Prato, S. Incretins and cardiovascular disease: to the heart of type 2 diabetes?. Diabetologia 66, 1820–1831 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-05973-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-05973-w