Abstract
Purpose
We present a case of a bilateral reversed palmaris longus muscle and a systematic review of the literature on this anatomical variation.
Methods
Routine dissection of a 90-year-old male cadaver revealed a rare bilateral reversed palmaris longus. This was documented photographically, and length and relation to anatomical landmarks were recorded. This finding stimulated a systematic review of the literature on the reversed palmaris longus variation, from which measurements were collated and statistical analysis performed to determine the prevalence, average length, relationship to side and sex, and to discuss its clinical and evolutionary implications.
Results
The average length of the muscle belly and tendon of reversed palmaris longus was 135 mm and 126 mm, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed no disparity in presentation due to sex and side; however, bilateral reversed palmaris longus has only been reported in males. A high proportion (70.8%) of reversed palmaris longus were discovered in the right upper limb compared to the left.
Conclusion
Variations in palmaris longus are purported to be as a result of phylogenetic regression. Clinically, patients with this variant may present with pain or swelling of the distal forearm, often as a result of intense physical exertion related to occupation or sport. Clinicians should be aware of this muscle variant as its presence could lead to confusion during tendon allograft harvesting procedures in reconstructive and tendon grafting surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Palmaris longus (PL) is a muscle of the anterior compartment of the forearm. It is located within the superficial group of flexor muscles, medial and superficial to pronator teres and flexor carpi radialis, and lateral to flexor carpi ulnaris. It is attached to the medial epicondyle and epicondylar ridge of the humerus via the common flexor tendon. Typically, the fusiform muscle belly runs distally and becomes tendinous in the mid-forearm. Tendinous fibers insert into the flexor retinaculum and palmar aponeurosis of the hand. Due to its insertion points, PL acts as an accessory flexor muscle and as an anchor of the skin and fascia to resist horizontal shearing forces. The neurovascular supply to PL is through the median nerve and branches of the ulnar artery [43].
Palmaris longus is considered to be the most variable muscle in human anatomy. The most common variation is complete agenesis, which is prevalent in 20.25% of the global population [49]. When present, PL can be digastric, duplicated, bifurcated, trifurcated or have atypical tendinous insertions [16]. While variations of PL are common, it is essential that rare presentations of the muscle are reported on, as these variations have important surgical and clinical implication. Firstly, PL is often used for tendon grafting and reconstructive surgeries as the removal of the muscle does not affect the function of the forearm and it is easily resected due to its superficial location [36]. The presence of a reversed PL (RPL) may prevent the tendon from being harvested for tendon grafting. Secondly, if present, RPL may be a rare cause of symptoms of neuropathy and neural compression, due to its close anatomical relationship to the median and ulnar nerves [15, 16].
Materials and methods
Case report
A 90-year-old male cadaver was fixed traditionally with 10% formalin. Skin and subcutaneous tissue of the forearms were reflected, and the antebrachial fascia and bicipital aponeuroses were removed. PL was observed to be in a reversed orientation bilaterally. RPL was separated from its fascial compartments and measurements of the tendons and muscle bellies were recorded with a 150 mm range digital-pocket-caliper (Scala, Germany). The proximal tendon was measured from the medial epicondyle of the humerus to the most proximal visible muscle fiber. The muscle bellies were measured from the most proximal to the most distal visible muscle fiber. The distal tendons were measured from the most distal muscle fiber to the tendon’s insertion point onto the palmar aponeurosis at a line between the proximal scaphoid and pisiform bones. Each measurement was duplicated and an average (mean) length was calculated.
Literature review
A literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases, using the keywords: ‘reserved palmaris longus’ or ‘reverse palmaris longus’. Only papers which reported the presence of RPL were discussed. All related articles were carefully reviewed and studies that did not include information on side and sex were excluded from the study. The prevalence of RPL in surgical and cadaveric cases and the average length of the tendon and muscle belly was calculated. A Chi squared test with Fisher’s exact post hoc test was performed with GraphPad Prism (Version 6e) to assess the relationship of RPL to sex and side.
Primary consent was given by all donors in line with best practice guidelines developed by the Anatomical Committee of the Irish Medical Schools and the Medical Council of Ireland.
Research ethics committee approval for this study from the School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee at Trinity College Dublin was also obtained.
Results
Case report
Palmaris longus was reversed bilaterally with a proximal tendon, originating from the medial epicondyle of the humerus and distal muscle belly, inserting via a short distal tendon onto the flexor retinaculum and palmar aponeurosis of the hand. All other anatomical relations were consistent with the literature; however, the left RPL received an additional slip of muscle from flexor digitorum superficialis near its proximal insertion. Both arms showed no signs of muscular atrophy or hypertrophy. Proximally, the median nerve travelled deep to PL and there was no indication of median nerve entrapment along its course. Distally, the median nerve travelled more superficially in the carpal tunnel and entered the wrist lateral to RPL (Fig. 1).
The total lengths of the two (bilateral) RPL were 264 mm and 246 mm on the right and left forearms, respectively. The proximal and distal tendons were longer on the right side at 119 mm and 50 mm, respectively, compared to 116 mm and 11 mm on the left. Conversely, the muscle belly on the left was longer on the left side at 120 mm compared to 96 mm on the right (Table 1).
Literature review
A total of 152 relevant articles were accessed from the years 1814 to 2019. Fifty-five cases of RPL were recorded in 39 of these articles (Table 2). Six articles were excluded after initial screening as they did not contain information on sex or side. In total, 33 articles were included that report. Thirteen (39.4%) variants were revealed through cadaveric studies, while 20 (60.4%) were reported in clinical case studies as a result of pain and swelling in the distal anterior forearm, and subsequent surgical intervention, or through ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Taking our measurements, and the six reported in the literature into consideration, the average recorded length of the muscle belly and proximal tendon of RPL was 135 mm and 126 mm, respectively (Table 3). Of the 43 individuals where information on sex was available, 20 (46.5%) were female and 23 (53.5%) were male. Of the 48 upper limbs where information on side was available, 34 (70.9%) RPL presented in the right forearm, while 14 (29.1%) were found in the left. When isolating results from cadaveric studies, of 15 cases 7 (46.7%) were found in the right upper limb and 8 (53.3%) in the left. Five males (100%) presented with bilateral RPL. A Chi squared test with Fisher’s post hoc revealed no statistical difference in the frequency of presentation of RPL (P > 0.05) due to sex and side.
Discussion
One of the earliest reports of RPL was discovered through dissection in 1868 at King’s College London [48]. The earliest clinical presentation, from our literature review, of bilateral RPL was reported in Germany in 1993 in a 21-year-old male who had suffered from median nerve compression, outside the carpal tunnel, as a result of hypertrophy of the muscle. Resection of the muscle belly relieved the symptoms immediately [19]. Three cases of bilateral RPL were reported in male donors from Chile [39], Brazil [23] and India [21]. All reports of RPL originated from the medial epicondyle of the humerus; however, the distal insertion points varied. One case reported on a short distal tendon on the left side, similar to our findings, which inserted into the distal aponeurosis [39]. Conversely, the remaining RPL attached to their distal insertion points via the distal muscular bellies directly [23]. Another case reported on a trifid insertion, which was laterally continuous with the fascia of the thenar muscles, centrally continuous with the palmar aponeurosis, and medially continuous with the fascia covering abductor digiti minimi [21]. The reported cases of RPL also showed differences in their relationship with the median nerve in the wrist. The right muscle and tendon were situated lateral to the median nerve, whereas the distal third of the left muscle compressed the median nerve [39].
There was no obvious correlation between sex and RPL. However, it is interesting to note that reports of bilateral cases of RPL have only been discovered in male donors to date, despite widespread anatomical dissection throughout the world. Perhaps this occurrence of RPL serves as an example of a minor evolutionary dimorphism between the sexes. A hypothesis warrants further investigations. Collating results from literature revealed a higher frequency of RPL in right upper limb. However, when only taking cadaveric studies into consideration, there is no difference in sidedness. This suggests that results for sidedness may not reflect the frequency of RPL in the population, but rather be skewed due to presentation in clinical scenarios. As RPL in right and left hand mirrors the population proportions of left and right handedness, this suggests that clinical presentations of symptoms of RPL result from increased activity of dominant limbs.
Previous studies have assessed the prevalence of bilateral agenesis of PL to sex and also reported no statistical correlation [26]. Conversely, a meta-analysis performed by Yammine et al. found that there is a statistically higher rate of agenesis on the right side compared to the left, but no significant difference between the combination of side and sex. In addition, the proportion of agenesis varies between different ethnic groups, with the lowest proportion among the East Asian and African population, and the highest observed in the Arab Middle Eastern population [49].
Only six sets of measurements of RPL muscle have been recorded in the literature from three previous studies [16, 20, 22]. As we report on a bilateral occurrence, we contribute two further measurements. Both tendon measurements were similar to those reported in the literature. The left tendon was 3 mm shorter than the average tendon measurement, whereas the right tendon did not deviate from the average (Table 2). Conversely, both muscle bellies were considerably shorter than the average measurement. The right muscle belly deviated 46 mm from the mean, while the left deviated 22 mm (Table 2).
Accurate measurements of PL are necessary as the muscle is often used in tendon grafting procedures to treat facial paralysis, ptosis correction and lip augmentation [36] and reconstructive surgeries [14]. According to Harvey and colleagues, a tendon must be greater than 150 mm for it to be suitable for tendon grafting [22]. We report that the average tendon length of RPL is 126 mm implying that this muscular anomaly is not suitable for tissue harvesting. Although it must be noted that a graft longer than 15 cm may not always be required depending on the type of reconstruction taking place [24]. Therefore, if possible ultrasound should be utilized to measure the tendon length and suitability for grafting pre-operatively. If ultrasound is not available, ineligibility of the muscle for use in tendon grafting may only be discovered intraoperatively [24, 25]. This may result in negative consequences for both the patient and surgeon as morbidity may increase and the patient may not have given consent for the harvesting of alternative tissue [11].
When discovered in a clinical scenario, RPL is often present in athletes or in professions that require intense physical exertion, such as lumberjacks, soldiers and manual laborers [14, 17, 48]. The repeated action of axial loading, power gripping and flexion/extension stresses can cause the muscle belly of the RPL to hypertrophy. The additional volume and pressure in the flexor compartment of the forearm may cause exertional compartment syndrome resulting in median or ulnar nerve paranesthesia and effort-related volar forearm pain [1, 8, 39]. Clinicians, physiotherapists and radiologists should be aware of this rare muscular anomaly, as it may be overlooked when diagnosing forearm pain and could be mistaken for a tumor or ganglion on MRI or clinical examination [4, 17].
Anatomical variations in the PL muscle are a consequence of phylogenetic degeneration [43]. This occurred as a result of a shift from quadrupedal or arboreal locomotion to habitual bipedalism during human evolution. As the function of the forearm evolved from a weight-bearing forelimb to a prehensile limb, capable of precise movement, the flexor muscles have partially atrophied in a caudocranial direction [2]. In fact, the relative tendon size of PL increases from ancestral genera, such as lemuriformes and new world primates, to more derived genera such as great apes including modern humans [3]. This shortening of the muscular belly has resulted in an overall weakening of the muscle and, as a result, complete agenesis of the PL does not affect forearm function. The anatomical variations of PL and its rudimentary function have led to the hypothesis that the upper extremity in man is still undergoing a process of evolution [6, 10].
Variations of the PL muscle are caused by disturbances of the intracellular or extracellular pathways that control embryonic muscle growth, which cannot be compensated for during later development. Anomalies and agenesis of PL in human fetuses are similar to those observed in adults [35]. Interestingly, variations in PL are distinctly heritable. Thomson et al. hypothesized that partial or complete absence of the muscle is due to a single dominant gene, which acts as an inhibitor of its development, but this inhibition is frequently incomplete due to modifying conditions such as sex and side [46].
Although a search strategy was implemented, it cannot be assumed that all articles containing information on this variant were included. However, efforts were made to include the most relevant studies containing the most information relevant to this review.
Conclusion
Variations in the PL muscle are not uncommon and are purported to be as a result of phylogenetic regression. We have presented a further rare bilateral anomaly of a RPL again in male cadaver. Clinicians should be aware of this muscle variant as it may be a rare cause of volar wrist pain in grip-intensive sports or occupations and may give rise to confusion in reconstructive and plastic surgery.
References
Acikel C, Ulkur E, Karagoz H, Celikoz B (2007) Effort-related compression of median and ulnar nerves as a result of reversed three-headed and hypertrophied palmaris longus muscle with extension of Guyon’s canal. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 41:45–47
Ashby BS (1964) Hypertrophy of the palmaris longus muscle; report of a case. J Bone Jt Surg Br 46:230–232
Aversi-Ferreira RA, Bretas RV, Maior RS, Davaasuren M, Paraguassu-Chaves CA, Nishijo H, Aversi-Ferreira TA (2014) Morphometric and statistical analysis of the palmaris longus muscle in human and non-human primates. Biomed Res Int 2014:178906
Bencteux P, Simonet J, el Ayoubi L, Renard M, Attignon I, Dacher JN, Thiebot J (2001) Symptomatic palmaris longus muscle variation with MRI and surgical correlation: report of a single case. Surg Radiol Anat 23:273–275
Bhashyam AR, Harper CM, Iorio ML (2017) Reversed palmaris longus muscle causing volar forearm pain and ulnar nerve paresthesia. J Hand Surg 42:298.e291–298.e295
Capdarest-Arest N, Gonzalez JP, Turker T (2014) Hypotheses for ongoing evolution of muscles of the upper extremity. Med Hypotheses 82:452–456
Cope JM, Looney EM, Craig CA, Gawron R, Lampros R, Mahoney R (2009) Median nerve compression and the reversed palmaris longus. Int J Anat Var 2:102–104
Depuydt KH, Schuurman AH, Kon M (1998) Reversed palmaris longus muscle causing effort-related median nerve compression. J Hand Surg Br 23:117–119
Eren F, Melikoglu C, Kok D, Iskender S (2015) Reversed palmaris longus forming a mass in the distal forearm. Int J Anat Var 8:37–39
Eric M, Krivokuca D, Savovic S, Leksan I, Vucinic N (2010) Prevalence of the palmaris longus through clinical evaluation. Surg Radiol Anat 32:357–361
Erquicia JI, Gelber PE, Doreste JL, Pelfort X, Abat F, Monllau JC (2013) How to improve the prediction of quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 41:1857–1863
Fazan VPS (2007) Reversed palmaris longus muscle and median nerve relationships: case report and literature review. Braz J Morphol Sci 24(2):88–91
Fragiadakis EG, Papavassiliou N, Giannikas A (1978) Variations of palmaris longus. Handchirurgie 10(149–151):14
Gandhi MJ, Knight TP, Ratcliffe PJ (2016) Scapholunate ligament reconstruction using the palmaris longus tendon and suture anchor fixation in chronic scapholunate instability. Indian J Orthop 50:616–621
George SC, Hassan Z (2018) A bifid reversed palmaris longus muscle causing median nerve compression in a child. J Hand Surg Eur 43:665–666
Georgiev GP, Iliev AA, Dimitrova IN, Kotov GN, Malinova LG, Landzhov BV (2017) Palmaris Longus muscle variations: clinical significance and proposal of new classifications. Folia Med 59:289–297
Georgiev GP, Jelev L (2009) Unusual coexistence of a variant abductor digiti minimi and reversed palmaris longus and their possible relation to median and ulnar nerves entrapment at the wrist. Rom J Morphol Embryol 50:725–727
Getzmann JM, Schweizer A (2018) Surgical resection of a reversed palmaris longus muscle causing chronic exertional compartment syndrome in a competitive swimmer: a case report. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967118769615
Giunta R, Brunner U, Wilhelm K (1993) Bilateral reversed palmaris longus muscle—a rare cause of peripheral median nerve compression syndrome. Case report. Unfallchirurg 96:538–540
Güler and Çeliköz (1998) Anomalous palmaris longus muscle causing carpal tunnel-like syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 4:296–297
Gune AR, Pote AJ, Patil AD, Patil PS, Nikam VR (2014) Bilateral reversed palmaris longus muscle with trifid insertion, a rare variation. Int J Res Med Sci 2:741–743
Harvey FJ, Chu G, Harvey PM (1983) Surgical availability of the plantaris tendon. J Hand Surg Am 8:243–247
Heck L, Campos D (2014) Embryological considerations on the bilateral reversed palmaris longus muscle: a case report in human. J Morph Sci 31:58–61
Jakubietz MG, Jakubietz DF, Gruenert JG, Zahn R, Meffert RH, Jakubietz RG (2011) Adequacy of palmaris longus and plantaris tendons for tendon grafting. J Hand Surg Am 36:695–698
Johnson CC, Vutescu ES, Miller TT, Nwawka OK, Lee SK, Wolfe SW (2018) Ultrasound determination of presence, length and diameter of the palmaris longus tendon. J Hand Surg Eur 43:948–953
Kigera JWM, Mukwaya S (2011) Frequency of agenesis palmaris longus through clinical examination—an East African study. PLoS One 6:e28997
Marpalli S, Bhat ALS, Gadahad MRK (2016) A case of reverse palmaris longus muscle—an additional muscle in the anterior compartment of the forearm. J Clin Diagn Res 10:AD03–AD04
Mathew AJ, Sukumaran TT, Joseph S (2015) Versatile but temperamental: a morphological study of palmaris longus in the cadaver. J Clin Diagn Res 9:AC01–AC03
Meyer FN, Pflaum BC (1987) Median nerve compression at the wrist caused by a reversed palmaris longus muscle. J Hand Surg Am 12:369–371
Morrison JT (1916) A palmaris longus muscle with a reversed belly, forming an accessory flexor muscle of the little finger. J Anat Physiol 50:324–326
Murabit A, Gnarra M, Mohamed A (2013) Reversed palmaris longus muscle: anatomical variant—case report and literature review. Can J Plast Surg 21:55–56
Natsis K, Levva S, Totlis T, Anastasopoulos N, Paraskevas G (2007) Three-headed reversed palmaris longus muscle and its clinical significance. Ann Anat 189:97–101
Ninkovic M, Ohler HK (1995) Acute median nerve compression produced by reversed palmaris longus muscle. Eur J Plast Surg 18:129–130
Ogun TC, Karalezli N, Ogun CO (2007) The concomitant presence of two anomalous muscles in the forearm. Hand (N Y) 2:120–122
Olewnik L, Wasniewska A, Polguj M, Podgorski M, Labetowicz P, Ruzik K, Topol M (2018) Morphological variability of the palmaris longus muscle in human fetuses. Surg Radiol Anat 40:1283–1291
Pal JN, Bera AK, Roy AN, Bari W (2016) Palmaris longus tendon grafting for extensor pollicis longus tendon rupture bScrew tip after 20 years. J Orthop Case Rep 6:25–27
Pires L, Perisse JP, Araujo GCS, Manaia J, Fonseca Junior A, Babinski MA (2018) Hypertrophic reversed palmaris longus muscle: a cadaveric finding. Folia Morphol 77:403–405
Regan PJ, Roberts JO, Bailey BN (1988) Ulnar nerve compression caused by a reversed palmaris longus muscle. J Hand Surg Br 13:406–407
Salgado G, Cantin M, Inzunza O, Munoz A, Saez J, Macuer M (2012) Bilateral reversed palmaris longus muscle: a rare anatomical variation. Folia Morphol 71:52–55
Schlafly B, Lister G (1987) Median nerve compression secondary to bifid reversed palmaris longus. J Hand Surg 12:371–373
Schuurman AH, van Gils AP (2000) Reversed palmaris longus muscle on MRI: report of four cases. Eur Radiol 10:1242–1244
Seyhan T (2005) Median nerve compression at the wrist caused by reversed 3-headed palmaris longus muscle: case report and review of the literature. Am J Orthop 34:544–546
Standring S (2015) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 41st edn. Elsevier Health Sciences, New York, p 850
Still J, Kleinert H (1973) Anomalous muscles and nerve entrapment in the wrist and hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 52:394–400
Tenaw B (2018) Unilateral reversed palmaris longus muscle—anatomical variation: a case report. J Clin Case 1:1014
Thompson JW, McBatts Danforth (1921) Hereditary and racial variation in the musculus palmaris longus. Am J Phys Anthropol 4:205–218
Twoon M, Jones CD, Foley J, Davidson D (2017) Reversed palmaris longus muscle: a report of two cases. Case Rep Plast Surg Hand Surg 4:73–76
Wood J (1867) IV. Variations in human myology observed during the winter session of 1866-67 at King’s college, London. Proc R Soc Lond 15:518–546
Yammine K (2013) Clinical prevalence of palmaris longus agenesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinc Anat 26:709–718
Yildiz M, Sener M, Aynaci O (2000) Three-headed reversed palmaris longus muscle: a case report and review of the literature. Surg Radiol Anat 22:217–219
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GL: project development, data collection and management, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. DS: project development, data collection and management, manuscript writing. NM: manuscript editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Longhurst, G., Stone, D. & Mahony, N. Bilateral reversed palmaris longus muscle: a case report and systematic literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 42, 289–295 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02363-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02363-z