Abstract
Objectives
To explore which preoperative clinical data and conventional MRI findings may indicate microvascular invasion (MVI) of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and have clinical significance.
Methods
The study enrolled 113 patients with histopathologically confirmed cHCC-CCA (MVI-positive group [n = 56], MVI-negative group [n = 57]). Two radiologists retrospectively assessed the preoperative MRI features (qualitative analysis of morphology and dynamic enhancement features), and each lesion was assigned according to the LI-RADS. Preoperative clinical data were also evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relative value of these parameters as potential predictors of MVI. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates after hepatectomy in the two groups were estimated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test.
Results
The majority of cHCC-CCAs were categorized as LR-M. On multivariate analysis, a higher serum AFP level (OR, 0.523; 95% CI, 0.282–0.971; p = 0.040), intratumoral fat deposition (OR, 14.368; 95% CI, 2.749–75.098; p = 0.002), and irregular arterial peritumoral enhancement (OR, 0.322; 95% CI, 0.164–0.631; p = 0.001) were independent variables associated with the MVI of cHCC-CCA. After hepatectomy, patients with MVI of cHCC-CCA showed earlier recurrence than those without MVI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.402; 95% CI, 0.189–0.854, p = 0.013).
Conclusion
A higher serum AFP level and irregular arterial peritumoral enhancement are potential predictive biomarkers for the MVI of cHCC-CCA, while intratumoral fat detected on MRI suggests a low risk of MVI. Furthermore, cHCC-CCAs with MVI may have worse surgical outcomes with regard to early recurrence than those without MVI.
Key Points
• Higher serum levels of AFP combined with irregular arterial peritumoral enhancement are independent risk factors for the MVI of cHCC-CCA, while fat deposition might be a protective factor.
• cHCC-CCA with MVI may have a higher risk of early recurrence after surgery.
• Most cHCC-CCAs were categorized as LR-M in this study, and no significant difference was found in MVI based on LI-RADS category.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a relatively uncommon subtype of primary hepatic malignant tumors, accounting for 2–5% of primary liver carcinomas (PLCs) [1,2,3]. Some studies have shown that cHCC-CCA has a biological behavior and prognosis that are intermediate between those of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) [4]; however, some reports have also stated that cHCC-CCA has a significantly worse prognosis than HCC and ICC, even after curative resection [5]. At present, the risk factors identified as being related to prognosis of cHCC-CCA are not uniform across studies because of the relatively low incidence and variations in sample size. Currently, studies have indicated that vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, satellite nodules, and tumor size are major predictive factors for the prognosis of cHCC-CCA [6,7,8]. Studies have also shown that the level of cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) or the presence of cirrhosis is a factor affecting the prognosis of cHCC-CCA [9, 10]. Scholars have not yet come to a consensus regarding the prognostic factors of cHCC-CCA. Although previous studies have confirmed that microvascular invasion (MVI) is a prognostic factor for tumor recurrence and is associated with poor survival outcomes in HCC [11,12,13,14] and ICC [15, 16], the relationship between prognosis and the presence of MVI in cHCC-CCA patients has not yet been established.
Currently, multiple magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have been used to improve the preoperative prediction of MVI in HCC [17,18,19,20,21]. Some imaging findings, such as “arterial peritumoral enhancement,” “tumor margin,” and “peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase (HBP),” have been reported to be related to MVI in HCC [20]; some studies have shown that “incomplete tumor capsule” has a significant relationship with MVI in HCC [21]. A small number of studies have also used MRI to predict the MVI of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [22]. Currently, almost all the existing MRI studies have only described the imaging features or clinical characteristics of cHCC-CCA compared to those of pure HCC and ICC, usually with a small sample size [23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Recently, studies have utilized LR-M features (including rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), peripheral “washout” appearance and delayed central enhancement) defined in version 2017 of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to identify cHCC-CCA and HCC, and shown that LI-RADS categorization may provide prognostic information on cHCC-CCAs after surgery [30, 31]. However, these studies did not attempt to identify valuable preoperative MRI features indicating MVI in cHCC-CCA patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of preoperative clinical data and conventional MRI findings including morphology, enhanced features, and the LI-RADS category for the preoperative prediction of the MVI of cHCC-CCA. Furthermore, the effect of MVI risk on the early recurrence of cHCC-CCA after surgery was estimated by the follow-up recurrence-free survival (RFS).
Materials and methods
Patient selection
This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, and the need for informed patient consent was waived. Between January 2016 and June 2019, in total, 192 consecutive patients were confirmed by postoperative pathology to have cHCC-CCA and without extrahepatic metastasis by preoperative examinations. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) primary liver lesions without any prior treatment; (b) the MRI examinations were performed within 30 days before hepatectomy, and the MRI scans satisfied the diagnostic criteria; (c) there was a single mass without intrahepatic metastasis or lesions with multiple origins; and (d) the maximum diameter of the lesion was ≥ 1 cm. Finally, 79 cases were excluded for the following reasons: previous treatment history (n = 17, 8 cases of hepatectomy and 9 cases of transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] therapy); no MRI scans within 1 month before surgery (n = 20); poor MRI quality, including respiratory motion artifact effects (n = 2); two or more lesions of cHCC-CCA in the same liver (n = 35); and the maximum diameter of the lesion was less than 1 cm (n = 5). Finally, 113 patients with cHCC-CCA were enrolled in this study (Fig. 1).
MRI acquisition
All patients were examined with a 24-channel 1.5-T magnetic scanner (uMR 560; United Imaging Healthcare). Routine plain-scan liver protocols consisted of a transverse T2-weighted breath-hold fat-suppressed fast spin-echo sequence, T1-weighted breath-hold in-phase and opposed-phase gradient echo sequence, and free-breath diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with a transverse single-shot spin-echo planar sequence (b value, 0, 50, and 500 s/mm2). Dynamic imaging was performed with a breath-hold T1-weighted 3-dimensional fat-suppressed quick spoiled gradient echo sequence before the intravenous administration of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) (Magnevist; Bayer HealthCare). Gd-DTPA was administered at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg at a rate of 2 ml/s, followed by a 20-ml saline flush using a power injector (Spectris; Medrad). The arterial phase acquisition was triggered automatically by monitoring when the contrast media reached the ascending aorta. For subsequent acquisitions, dynamic T1-weighted MRI at 70–90 s (the portal venous phase) and 160–180 s (the delay phase) was performed. The detailed parameters of each acquisition sequence are shown in Table 1.
Imaging analysis
All MRI scans were retrospectively analyzed together using a picture archiving and communication system (PACS; Pathspeed, GE Medical Systems Integrated Imaging Solutions) by two radiologists (X.L.W. and C.Y., with 7 and 13 years of experience in abdominal imaging, respectively). Both radiologists were aware that all patients had cHCC-CCA but were blinded to other clinical data, laboratory tests, and pathology results. A third experienced abdominal radiologist (K.X.) with more than 30 years of experience was invited to resolve any disagreements between the two observers.
Qualitative analysis
The following qualitative imaging parameters of the lesions were evaluated on the plain scan: (a) shape of the tumors (globular, lobulated or irregular); (b) contour (smooth or nonsmooth margin); (c) homogeneous or heterogeneous on T2WI; (d) tumor location (right, left, both, or other liver lobe); (e) hemorrhage/hemosiderin; (f) intratumoral fat deposition; (g) necrosis; (h) upper abdominal lymphadenopathy (lymph nodes > 1 cm on the short axis); (i) peritumoral bile duct dilatation; and (j) hepatic capsular retraction. Dynamic enhancement characteristics were as follows: (A) arterial phase—(a) hypervascularity or nonhypervascularity; (b) homogeneity or heterogeneity enhancement; and (c) peritumoral enhancement patterns (assessed as detectable enhancing portion adjacent to the tumor border [wedge shaped], an extensive enhancement surrounding the tumor border [irregular shaped], or absent); (B) portal venous phase—(d) washout (nonperipheral washout or peripheral washout) and (e) enhancing capsule (complete, incomplete, or absent); (C) in the targetoid mass—(f) rim-APHE; (g) peripheral washout; (h) progressive central enhancement; and (i) targetoid diffusion restriction. In addition, all the lesions were categorized based on the LI-RADS v2018, LR-M (definitely or probably malignant, not HCC specific, including rim APHE, peripheral washout, and delayed and progressive concentric enhancement). Threshold growth was excluded because many patients had only one preoperative MRI examination.
Clinical data and MVI pathological evaluation
The following clinical data were collected from the medical records: (a) demographic characteristics (age, sex); (b) etiology (hepatitis B or C virus infection, schistosomiasis, average daily alcohol consumption > 100 g/day, without obvious causes); (c) largest tumor diameter (divided into the 1–5 cm group and the > 5 cm group); (d) liver functional parameters (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransaminase [AST], γ-glutamyltranspeptidase [GGT], albumin [ALB], total bilirubin [TB], and direct bilirubin [DB]; and (e) tumor biomarkers (α-fetoprotein [AFP], carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], and cancer antigen 19-9 [CA19-9]).
The pathological characteristics of the hepatectomy specimens were evaluated by a team of experienced pathologists (each individual had more than 12 years of experience in reading histopathological slices), who were blinded to the MRI and clinical results. MVI was defined as tumor cells within a vascular space lined by endothelium located in the periphery of the tumor at the tumor and liver parenchyma interface that was visible only by microscopy. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups (MVI-positive and MVI-negative) based on pathological characteristics.
Follow-up RFS after surgery
All of the enrolled 113 patients with cHCC-CCAs underwent R0 liver resection (no residual tumor) within 30 days after the first MRI examination, with the surgical techniques and perioperative management the same as in previous reports [4]. Follow-up for RFS consisted of chest radiography, laboratory tests including serum AFP or protein induced by vitamin k absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), and abdominal MRI at 1 month after surgery; if there was no recurrence, the patient was reexamined every 2–3 months. If only the level of a tumor marker increased without any radiographic evidence of a new tumor, follow-up was continuous until a tumor presented on imaging, at which point the time of recurrence was recorded.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 and MedCalc software (version 15.0). Normally distributed data are expressed as the means ± standard deviations, and comparisons between the two groups were performed using independent sample t tests. The data with skewed distributions are expressed as the medians (25%, 75%), and comparisons between the two groups were performed using rank sum tests. Categorical variables are reported as the numbers of cases and percentages, and χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests were used. Comparisons between groups of categorical variables were performed by one-way analysis of variance. Parameters were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to determine whether they were independent risk factors predicting MVI (the univariate analysis was performed first, and only those parameters found to have statistical significance were used in the stepwise multivariate logistic regression). A p value less than 0.05 indicated a significant difference. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each significant finding and combinations of significant findings on multivariate logistic regression with regard to predicting MVI. The RFS after hepatectomy in two groups were estimated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test.
Results
Patient clinical and MR characteristics
The comparisons of patient clinical characteristics stratified by the MVI status and data are detailed in Table 2. The results revealed MVI-positive lesions in 56 patients (49.6%) and MVI–negative lesions in 57 patients (50.4%). There were significant differences in the tumor size > 5 cm and the level of serum AFP ≥ 400 ng/ml between MVI-positive and MVI-negative groups (p = 0.006 and p = 0.022, respectively), but when the serum level of AFP was between 20 and 400 ng/ml, there was no significant differences between the two groups. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in age, sex, etiology, liver functional parameters, or the levels of CA19-9 and CEA between the two groups (Table 2).
Among the recorded MRI characteristics (Table 3), tumor shape (p = 0.025), hemorrhage/hemosiderin (p = 0.032), intratumoral fat deposition (p = 0.013), upper abdominal lymphadenopathy (p = 0.010), the arterial phase peritumoral enhancement pattern (p < 0.001), and peritumoral bile duct dilatation (p = 0.044) were significantly associated with MVI. Most (89/113, 78.8%) of the cHCC-CCA could be properly categorized as LR-M (Fig. 2), and no significant difference in MVI was found based on the LI-RADS category (p = 0.819). Other features did not differ between the two groups (Table 3).
Univariate and multivariate analyses
Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that there were eight risk factors that were significantly related to the MVI of cHCC-CCA (Table 4). A larger tumor size (p = 0.002), a higher serum level of AFP (p = 0.013), an irregular shape (p = 0.005), hemorrhage/hemosiderin (p = 0.036), intratumoral fat deposition (p = 0.014), upper abdominal lymphadenopathy (p = 0.012), arterial phase homogeneity enhancement (p = 0.044), and irregular arterial peritumoral enhancement (p < 0.001) were associated with MVI. These parameters were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Higher serum levels of AFP (odds ratio [OR], 0.523; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.282–0.971; p = 0.040), intratumoral fat deposition (OR, 14.368; 95% CI, 2.749–75.098; p = 0.002), and irregular arterial peritumoral enhancement (OR, 0.322; 95% CI, 0.164–0.631; p = 0.001) were independent variables associated with the MVI of cHCC-CCA.
The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for the prediction of MVI by the three significant factors and their combination are shown in Table 5. When all three factors were combined (Fig. 3), the specificity was 98.2% (56/57), and the sensitivity was 12.5% (7/56).
RFS outcomes after surgery
All 113 patients with cHCC-CCAs received R0 liver resection (no residual tumor) within 30 days after the first MRI examination. After hepatectomy, patients with MVI of cHCC-CCA had a median RFS of 10.8 months (range 1–25 months), while those without MVI had a median RFS of 25.4 months (range 1–40 months), and the early recurrence rates (< 2 years) were estimated to be 83.9% (47/56) and 49.1% (28/57), respectively. There was a significant difference in RFS between patients with MVI-positive and MVI-negative tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 0.402; 95% CI, 0.189–0.854, p = 0.013). Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated (Fig. 4).
Discussion
Our results illustrated that a higher serum level of AFP and irregular arterial phase peritumoral enhancement may indicate a higher risk of the MVI of cHCC-CCA, while intratumoral fat detected on MRI suggests a lower risk. Combining these three findings for the prediction of MVI resulted in specificity greater than 98%. In addition, cHCC-CCAs with MVI may have worse surgical outcomes with regard to early recurrence than those without MVI.
Previously, a few studies reported that a higher serum level of AFP was one of the independent risk factors associated with MVI in HCC [32, 33] and ICC [34] patients. Our findings also showed that a higher serum level of AFP was an independent predictor of MVI in cHCC-CCA, but when the serum level of AFP was between 20 and 400 ng/ml, there were no significant differences in MVI. Furthermore, some studies have suggested that the clinical characteristics of cHCC-CCA are similar to those of HCC; for example, the majority of cHCC-CCAs occur against a background of positive hepatitis B serology and cirrhosis, and the patients are predominately male [28, 35]. Our results were consistent with these studies. In this study, the patients had a sex ratio (male: female) of 77:36, and most patients (79.6%) had been infected with the hepatitis B virus; however, no significant differences in age, sex, or etiology were found regard to in MVI.
Intratumoral fat deposition was an additional significant factor for predicting a lower risk of the MVI of cHCC-CCA in our study, which was consistent with some reports. Min et al [36] described that intratumoral fat was one of the independent variables for suggesting a lower risk of the MVI of HCC. A few studies have suggested that intratumoral fatty changes are associated with favorable tumor grades on histologic examination and a lower likelihood of MVI; therefore, fat-containing lesions may predict a more favorable prognosis than non-fat-containing lesions [36, 37]. Moreover, as is well known, fatty changes in HCC are associated with ischemia, which may be related to a reduced normal portal vein blood supply [38]. Increased intratumoral fat may indicate less aggressive HCC, as evidenced by the fact that HCC with diffuse fat tends to grow slowly. Because our sample size for fat-containing cHCC-CCA with MVI was relatively small, the relationship between intratumoral fat and the prognosis of cHCC-CCA remains to be further studied.
Our study also showed that irregular arterial phase peritumoral enhancement was a significant MRI finding predicting the MVI of cHCC-CCA. Many reports [18, 20, 39] have shown that arterial peritumoral enhancement is an independent predictive factor of MVI in HCC. To date, few studies have described the relationship between peritumoral enhancement of cHCC-CCA and MVI. The mechanism of hemodynamic changes in this type of MRI feature is interpreted as a decrease in or disappearance of portal blood flow due to tumor thrombosis in the microportal branch around the tumor, resulting in compensatory hepatic arterial hyperperfusion [40]. In addition, although previous studies have reported that a large tumor size could be considered a major predictor of HCC with MVI [36], it has not always been considered an independent predictor of the MVI of HCC [18, 19]. In this study, tumor size, tumor shape, intratumoral hemorrhage, upper abdominal lymphadenopathy, and arterial phase heterogeneity enhancement were important risk factors for the MVI of cHCC-CCA in univariate analysis, but they were not independent factors predicting MVI.
It has been reported that MVI is one of the most important prognostic factor for the early recurrence of HCC after hepatic resection or radiofrequency ablation [20, 39]; we also found that cHCC-CCAs with MVI may have worse surgical outcomes with regard to early recurrence than those without MVI. Recent studies [30] have reported that patients with cHCC-CCAs in the LR-M category had a higher early recurrence rate (≤ 6 months) than those with cHCC-CCAs in the LR-5/4 categories. While there was no significant difference in RFS, cHCC-CCAs mimicking HCCs on imaging (LR-5/4) may have improved surgical outcomes. Unlike this study, a substantial proportion of cHCC-CCAs were categorized as LR-M (78.8%, 89/113) in our study; nevertheless, no significant difference in the MVI of cHCC-CCA was found based on the LI-RADS categories.
This study has several limitations. First, because this research was a single-center and retrospective study, there might have been selection bias. Second, tumor size and the number of lesions were confined to larger than 1 cm in maximum diameter and a single mass in this study; therefore, the conclusions cannot be generalized to other size lesions or two or more lesions. Third, the data for overall survival (OS) were not available; thus, the relationship between the MVI of cHCC-CCA and OS requires further research in the future. Fourth, in this study, Gd-DTPA was used as a contrast agent for MRI; therefore, further research is warranted on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for the identification of the MVI of cHCC-CCA. Fifth, our sample size for fat-containing cHCC-CCA with MVI was relatively small which resulted in a low diagnostic sensitivity when all the three parameters were combined; therefore, more patients needed to be enrolled to clarify the diagnostic efficacy. Finally, in our study, cHCC-CCA was assessed only as either MVI-positive or MVI-negative. In a recent study [41], MVI was further categorized into different grades based on the number of vessels invaded. Further study is needed to assess the relationship between preoperative clinical or MRI findings and different grades of MVI of cHCC-CCA.
In summary, the proportion of MVI-positive patients accounts for approximately half of all cHCC-CCA patients. Higher serum levels of AFP and irregular arterial peritumoral enhancement were independent variables associated with the MVI of cHCC-CCA, while fat deposition might be a protective factor. In addition, cHCC-CCA with MVI may have a higher early recurrence rate after surgery.
Abbreviations
- AFP:
-
Alpha-fetoprotein
- APHE:
-
Arterial phase hyperenhancement
- CA19-9:
-
Cancer antigen 19-9
- CEA:
-
Carcinoembryonic antigen
- cHCC-CCA:
-
Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- DWI:
-
Diffusion-weighted imaging
- Gd-DTPA:
-
Gadopentate dimeglumine
- HBP:
-
Hepatobiliary phase
- HCC:
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- ICC:
-
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
- LI-RADS:
-
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System
- LR-M:
-
Probably or definitely malignant, not HCC specific
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MVI:
-
Microvascular invasion
- NPV:
-
Negative predictive value
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- OS:
-
Overall survival
- PLCs:
-
Primary liver carcinomas
- PPV:
-
Positive predictive value
- RFS:
-
Recurrence-free survival
- TACE:
-
Transarterial chemoembolization
References
European Association For The Study Of The Liver (2012) EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56:908–943
Jung DH, Hwang S, Hong SM et al (2016) Post-resection prognosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma cholangiocarcinoma according to the 2010 WHO classification. World J Surg 41:1347–1357
Wang AQ, Zheng YC, Du J et al (2016) Combined hepatocellular cholangio- carcinoma: controversies to be addressed. World J Gastroenterol 22:4459–4465
Yin X, Zhang BH, Qiu SJ et al (2012) Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: clinical features, treatment modalities, and prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2869–2876
Lee JH, Chung GE, Yu SJ et al (2011) Long-term prognosis of combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection comparison with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 45:69–75
Lee SD, Park SJ, Han SS et al (2014) Clinicopathological features and prognosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma after surgery. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:594–601
Tang D, Nagano H, Nakamura M et al (2006) Clinical and pathological features of Allen’s type C classification of resected combined hepatocellular and cholangio- carcinoma: a comparative study with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangio-cellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 10:987–998
Groeschl RT, Turaga KK, Gamblin TC (2013) Transplantation versus resection for patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 107:608–612
Maganty K, Levi D, Moon J et a1 (2010) Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: outcome after liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 55:3597–3601
Zhou YM, Sui CJ, Zhang XF, Li B, Yang JM (2017) Influence of cirrhosis on long-term prognosis after surgery in patients with combined hepatocellular-cholangio-carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol 17:25
Cong WM, Bu H, Chen J et al (2016) Practice guidelines for the pathological diagnosis of primary liver cancer: 2015 update. World J Gastroenterol 22:9279–9287
Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R et al (2009) Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol 10:35–43
Zhang XP, Wang K, Wei XB et al (2019) An eastern hepatobiliary surgery hospital microvascular invasion scoring system in predicting prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and microvascular invasion after R0 liver resection: a large-scale, multicenter study. Oncologist 24:1–13
Yuan SX, Yang F, Yang Y et al (2012) Long noncoding RNA associated with microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma promotes angiogenesis and serves as a predictor for hepatocellular carcinoma patients’ poor recurrence-free survival after hepatectomy. Hepatology 56:2231–2241
Hu LS, Weiss M, Popescu I et al (2019) Impact of microvascular invasion on clinical outcomes after curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangio-carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 119:21–29
Wang C, Pang S, Si-Ma H et al (2019) Specific risk factors contributing to early and late recurrences of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection. World J Surg Oncol 17:2
Feng ST, Jia Y, Liao B et al (2019) Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular cancer: a radiomics model using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5935-8
Wang WT, Yang L, Yang ZX et al (2018) Assessment of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma with diffusion kurtosis imaging. Radiology 286:571–580
Wei Y, Huang Z, Tang H et al (2019) IVIM improves preoperative assessment of microvascular invasion in HCC. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06088-w
Lee S, Kim SH, Lee JE, Sinn DH, Park CK (2017) Preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for predicting microvascular invasion in patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 67:526–534
Zhu F, Yang F, Li J et al (2019) Incomplete tumor capsule on preoperative imaging reveals microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44:3049–3057
Zhou Y, Wang X, Xu C et al (2019) Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: can diffusion-weighted imaging predict microvascular invasion? J Magn Reson Imaging 50:315–324
Wells ML, Venkatesh SK, Chandan VS et al (2015) Biphenotypic hepatic tumors: imaging findings and review of literature. Abdom Imaging 40:2293–2305
Brunt E, Aishima S, Clavien PA et al (2018) cHCC-CCA: consensus terminology for primary liver carcinomas with both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentation. Hepatology 68:113–126
Fowler KJ, Sheybani A, Parker RA 3rd et al (2013) Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (biphenotypic) tumors: imaging features and diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:332–339
Potretzke TA, Tan BR, Doyle MB, Brunt EM, Heiken JP, Fowler KJ (2016) Imaging features of biphenotypic primary liver carcinoma (hepatocho-langiocarcinoma) and the potential to mimic hepatocellular carcinoma: LI-RADS analysis of CT and MRI features in 61 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:25–31
Hwang J, Kim YK, Park MJ et al (2012) Differentiating combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma from mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:881–889
Wang Y, Yang Q, Li S et al (2019) Imaging features of combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma compared with those of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma in a Chinese population. Clin Radiol 74:407
De Campos RO, Semelka RC, Azevedo RM et al (2012) Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma: report of MR appearance in eleven patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:1139–1147
Jeon SK, Joo I, Lee DH et al (2019) Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 29:373–382
Lee HS, Kim MJ, An C (2019) How to utilize LR-M features of the LI-RADS to improve the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma on gadoxetate- enhanced MRI? Eur Radiol 29:2408–2416
Lin S, Ye F, Rong W et al (2019) Nomogram to assist in surgical plan for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prediction model for microvascular invasion. J Gastrointest Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04140-0
Ryu T, Takami Y, Wada Y et al (2019) A clinical scoring system for predicting microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. J Gastrointest Surg 23:779–787
Tang Z, Liu WR, Zhou PY et al (2019) Prognostic value and predication model of microvascular invasion in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Cancer 10:5575–5584
Li R, Yang D, Tang CL et al (2016) Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangio- carcinoma (biphenotypic) tumors: clinical characteristics, imaging features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography. BMC Cancer 16:158
Min JH, Kim YK, Lim S et al (2015) Prediction of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinomas with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: impact of intra-tumoral fat detected on chemical-shift images. Eur J Radiol 84:1036–1043
Siripongsakun S, Lee JK, Raman SS et al (2012) MRI detection of intratumoral fat in hepatocellular carcinoma: potential biomarker for a more favorable prognosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:1018–1025
Kutami R, Nakashima Y, Nakashima O, Shiota K, Kojiro M (2000) Pathomorphologic study on the mechanism of fatty change in small hepatocellular carcinoma of humans. J Hepatol 33:282–289
Lee S, Kang TW, Song KD et al (2019) Effect of microvascular invasion risk on early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery and radiofrequency ablation. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003268
Choi JY, Lee JM, Sirlin CB (2014) CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part II. Extracellular agents, hepatobiliary agents, and ancillary imaging features. Radiology 273:30–50
Sumie S, Nakashima O, Okuda K et al (2014) The significance of classifying micro-vascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1002–1009
Funding
This study has received funding by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 91859107), the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (grant number18DZ1930102), the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (grant number 19411965500), the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (grant number 2018ZSLC22), and the Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty (grant number W2019-018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Chun Yang.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and Biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Ethical approval
This retrospective study performed at one institution was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University.
Methodology
• Retrospective
• Diagnostic or prognostic study
• Performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Wang, W., Ma, X. et al. Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: which preoperative clinical data and conventional MRI characteristics have value for the prediction of microvascular invasion and clinical significance?. Eur Radiol 30, 5337–5347 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06861-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06861-2