Abstract
Purpose
To compare open surgical anastomotic revision with endourological techniques for the treatment of ureteroenteric strictures in patients with urinary diversions.
Methods
All records of patients treated for ureteroenteric strictures in our clinic between 1989 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. In 76 patients, 161 completed procedures were analyzed: 26 open revisions vs. 135 endourological treatments, including balloon dilation, Wallstent and/or laser vaporization.
Results
Median follow-up was 34 months. At 60 months, patency rates were 69% (95% CI 52–92%) after open vs. 27% (95% CI 19–39%) after endo-treatment (p = 0.003); median patency duration was 15.5 vs. 5 months, respectively (p = 0.014). Eventually, 15% of patients required open surgery after primary endo-treatment and 21% received endoscopic re-treatment after primary open surgery. Cox regression analysis revealed no confounding factors among the risk factors added to the model. Complication rates were higher after open surgery (27% Clavien 2, 12% Clavien 3–4 vs. 5% Clavien 1–2, 3% Clavien 3, p = 0.528). Median postoperative hospital stay was 14 days (open) vs. 2 days (endo), p < 0.001. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate improved with + 17 (open) vs. + 8.1 (endo), p = 0.024. Renal function was compromised in 8% of patients in the open surgery group vs. 6% in the endo-treatment group.
Conclusions
In these patients, in terms of patency and patency duration, open surgery was superior to endourology. Nevertheless, endourological treatments offer a safe and less-invasive alternative to delay or avoid open surgery, especially in patients who are unfit for open surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
For the construction of a urinary diversion, either a continent pouch (e.g., Indiana pouch), an orthotopic neobladder or an incontinent urostomy (e.g., ileal conduit or colon conduit) can be considered [1]. This complex reconstructive surgery is associated with significant perioperative morbidity, with reported acute complication rates of 52–78% [1,2,3,4]. Among potential long-term complications, benign obstructive ureteroenteric strictures (UES) form an important risk factor for renal function deterioration [5,6,7]. Although symptoms can include severe flank pain and recurrent urinary tract infections, UES can also be asymptomatic [6, 8]. Strictures consist of fibrotic tissue and are typically formed at the anastomosis between ureter and bowel segment [5, 6]. This is mostly considered to be the result of ischemia, caused by compromised vascularization during mobilization of the ureters in reconstructive surgery [5, 9, 10]. With a reported prevalence of 1.4–15% [6,7,8,9, 11,12,13], UES usually occur within the first 12 months after construction of the urinary diversion, although in some cases strictures may form many years postoperatively [6, 8, 12, 13]. Open surgical revision of the anastomosis has considerable risks because it is often impeded by intra-abdominal adhesions [9, 12]. Therefore, endourological techniques have been developed to potentially avoid the need for open surgery. In the available comparative literature, reported patency rates for endourology vs. open surgery are 8–29% vs. 49–95%, respectively [8, 9, 12, 13]. In our tertiary academic clinic, both endourological techniques and open surgical revision have been used to treat patients with UES. Presented here is our 27-year institutional experience with, to our knowledge, the largest cohort of UES patients analyzed until now.
Methods
Data were retrospectively collected by reviewing the records of all patients treated for benign UES at the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) between April 1989 and February 2016. The institutional Medical Research Ethics Committee provided a waiver declaring that for this type of study, formal consent was not required.
For verification of a suspected stricture after cystectomy and urinary diversion, diagnostic imaging studies included ultrasound, renal scintigraphy, retrograde loopography, antegrade pyelography and/or CT scan, depending on urologist preferences. To rule out the possibility of tumor recurrence, urine cytology was evaluated. Choice of treatment approach was mainly based on the physical condition of the patient: open surgery was preferred if the patient was fit enough. Inoperable patients were often referred to our clinic for endourologic treatment because of our extensive experience with these techniques. Endo-procedures included placement of a chronic Wallstent, laser vaporization, and balloon dilation. Excluded from the present study were: placement of a nephrostomy catheter as final or temporary treatment, temporary ureteral stent placement, and endo-procedures that were aborted due to total obstruction (10 Wallstents, 3 laser vaporizations, 2 balloon dilations).
Open surgical revision consisted of resection of the stenosed ureter and re-implantation of the patent end to the enteric segment. Follow-up imaging was performed after removal of all temporary drainage tubes such as nephrostomy tubes and catheters, with renal scintigraphy after 6 weeks, CT combined with intravenous pyelography after 12 weeks, and yearly check-ups thereafter, with renal scintigraphy alternated with CT-intravenous pyelography. Symptoms like fever or flank pain were considered indications for interim radiographic imaging. Follow-up was defined as the time between treatment and the last visit to the urology department.
Data were retrospectively analyzed for patient characteristics, patency rates and perioperative outcomes. Physical status was scored according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System [14]. Complications within 30 days after treatment were scored by the Clavien–Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications [15].
Primary outcomes were the patency rate after treatment and the duration of patency. Patency was defined as no radiographic sign of obstruction of the upper urinary tract, absence of infection or flank pain, and no need for nephrostomy tube placement during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were perioperative outcomes such as postoperative hospital stay, complication rate, and effect on renal function.
Statistical analysis
Between-group differences of continuous variables were tested using the independent samples t test for continuous normally distributed variables, and the Mann–Whitney U test for non-normally distributed variables. Categorical data differences were tested with Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. All tests were two-sided and statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.
Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed and the difference between techniques was tested with the log-rank test. For the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, missing data for the determinants and outcome were imputed 20 times. Missing data were considered missing at random. The model was built using treatment type and adding potential confounders one by one to determine the influence of each determinant separately and in total. No categorization of continuous variables was applied to limit information loss. Baseline statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistics version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Multiple imputation (mice package [16]) and the modeling process (rms package [17]) were performed using the R language environment (version 3.2.4) [18].
Results
Overall, 78 patients were diagnosed with UES. Two patients were excluded from the study because they opted for no treatment of their UES due to multiple sclerosis and high age, respectively. In the patient with multiple sclerosis, the kidney on the stenosed side became afunctional; the elderly patient had a renal function of 22% on the stenosed side but died of bladder cancer recurrence with metastases to the liver 18 months after diagnosis of the UES. Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics of 76 patients with one or two affected renal units (RU) (35 left-sided, 29 right-sided, 12 bilateral). Most patients (59%) had undergone cystectomy and urinary diversion elsewhere before they were referred to the UMCU for treatment of UES. In this study group, all patients had a refluxing end-to-side ureteroenteric anastomosis (Nesbit), with the exception of one patient who had a Wallace-I anastomosis.
A total of 135 endourologic and 26 open surgical procedures were analyzed with a median follow-up of 34 months (range 0–319). Table 2 presents patient and stricture characteristics at the time of treatment. Overall, 88 left-sided and 73 right-sided strictures were treated. More than half of all analyzed procedures were primary procedures (53%), with a range of 1–9 procedures performed per patient. Primary endo-procedures in 72 RU were followed by one or more endoscopic re-treatments in 36%, and 15% eventually underwent open surgery. Of 14 RU primarily treated with open re-implantation, 21% required endoscopic re-treatment.
Treatment results are summarized in Table 3. The absolute patency rate of 135 endo-procedures was 38.8% (42.2% for 83 Wallstents, 26.7% for 30 laser vaporizations, and 36.4% for 22 balloon dilatations) vs. 69.2% for 26 open surgical procedures (p value 0.003). When analyzing primary procedures only, patency rates were 38.9% after 72 endo-procedures vs. 64.3% after open surgery in 14 RU (p value 0.079). In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, at 60 months the patency rate after endo-procedures was 27% (95% CI 19–39%) vs. 69% (95% CI 52–92%) after open surgery. For primary procedures, at 60 months the patency rates were 25% after endo-procedures (95% CI 15–42%) vs. 70% after open surgery (95% CI 49–100%). The log-rank test revealed a significant difference when analyzing all procedures (p = 0.003), but not for primary procedures alone (p = 0.10). Kaplan–Meier curves are presented in Fig. 1a, b. Median patency duration was significantly shorter after endourological treatments compared with open surgery (5 vs. 15.5 months, p = 0.014).
In the endo-group, six (5%) Clavien 1–2 complications occurred, including postoperative fever requiring antibiotics, venous bleeding requiring packed cells after laser treatment and an arterial bleeding after laser treatment that was treated conservatively. Two (1.5%) Clavien 3a complications occurred, requiring intravenous antibiotics and nephrostomy catheter placement. Furthermore, two (1.5%) Clavien 3b complications occurred. A Wallstent was placed in the right ureter of a patient with an unknown Wallace-I anastomosis, resulting in obstruction of the left ureter which was treated with open re-implantation on both sides. In the other patient, laser treatment inside an obstructed Wallstent resulted in perforation of the ureter, requiring re-implantation during laparotomy. In the open group, there were seven (27%) Clavien 2 complications, including postoperative fever treated with antibiotics and wound dehiscence that was treated conservatively. Two (8%) Clavien 3b complications occurred. In one patient, acute signs of urinary leakage 7 days postoperatively resulted in re-laparotomy and reconstruction of the urinary diversion. In the other patient, the atherosclerotic arterial wall of the right common iliac artery was lacerated, requiring a femoro-femoral crossover bypass performed by a vascular surgeon. One (4%) Clavien 4 complication occurred in the open group, when a patient became septic after developing an enterocutaneous fistula and was admitted to the intensive care unit for 3 days. The enterocutaneous fistula was subsequently treated conservatively. Proportionally, there were more complications in the open surgery group (p = 0.528), and the complications were more severe.
Median postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer after open surgery (2 days after endo vs. 14 days after open procedures, p < 0.001). Mean improvement of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eFGR) was higher after open surgery than after endo-procedures (+ 17.0 vs. + 8.1, p = 0.024). Renal function deterioration after treatment was seen after eight procedures (6%) in the endo-treatment group (range − 3.9 to − 0.9) and after two procedures (8%) in the open surgery group (− 8.0 and − 4.6).
Within the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (Table 4), the chance of stricture recurrence was lower after open surgery than after endourologic treatments (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17–0.74, p = 0.006). After adjustment for risk factors (age, ASA score, BMI, history of chemotherapy/pelvic radiotherapy, renal function, stricture side and number of previous procedures), the difference in stricture recurrence risk remained significant, with minimal to no changes to the HR (HR between 0.34 and 0.36, p value between 0.006 and 0.009).
Discussion
UES form a therapeutic challenge due to frequent recurrences and the potential risk of causing progressive loss of renal function and eventually end-stage renal disease due to obstructive nephropathy. While classic open re-implantation is related to higher complication rates and morbidity, minimally invasive endo-treatments often have poorer patency rates. In the present study, the risk of stricture recurrence was lower after open surgery, even after adjustment for patient and stricture characteristics. However, more complications occurred after open surgery and these complications were more severe. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer after open surgery. Both the endourologic and surgical procedures mostly improved renal function, with low rates of renal function deterioration (8% and 6%, respectively).
The available comparative literature mainly consists of small retrospective cohort studies, with heterogeneous patient and stricture characteristics [6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 19]. In these studies, different types of endo-procedures were compared with open re-implantation with absolute patency rates as their main outcome. In most studies, differences in the results between primary and secondary treatments were accounted for with reported patency rates for primary procedures of 8–29% after endo-procedures vs. 49–95% after open surgery, with a median follow-up of 21–47 months [8, 9, 12, 13]. In their analyses, Laven et al. and Tal et al. did not separate primary and secondary treatments and reported patency rates of 45–50% after endo-procedures vs. 80–93% after open surgery, at a median follow-up of 35–62.5 months [6, 19].
Patency rates vary widely between different endo-treatments. For example, DiMarco et al. reported very low patency rates of 15%, 15% and 5% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively, after balloon dilation (p = 0.0001 vs. open) [13], whereas Campschroer et al. reported that Wallstents yielded a primary patency rate of 41.1% at a mean follow-up of 37.7 months [20].
In studies focusing on renal function, open surgery does not seem superior to less-invasive or observational strategies. Helfand et al. compared long-term renal function between re-implantation and non-operative UES management, including ureteral stent or nephrostomy tube; no significant differences were found in ΔeGFR (– 25.0 vs. – 18.9 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.66) or rates of renal function loss (34.6% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.68) [7]. Rivera et al. analyzed chronic kidney disease-free survival, comparing active intervention (open or endourologic treatment) with observation alone; no significant differences were found in 5-year chronic kidney disease-free survival (observation 50% vs. active treatment 33% p = 0.40) [21].
This comparative study has several limitations. Firstly, missing data were inevitable due to the retrospective nature of the study and the collection of data back to the year 1989. Missing data (such as ASA scores) were supplemented retrospectively based on the classification system, although misclassification might have caused information bias. Multiple imputation in the Cox model helped to reduce bias due to missing data. Within our study group, there was a propensity for right-sided strictures (45%) whereas, traditionally, UES occur more commonly on the left. Almost half of these patients (48%) were referred to us, making it difficult to explain this discrepancy. Although stricture length has been described as a risk factor [8, 13], this was not added to our model as a potential confounder because 77% of the data were missing. Also, due to a geographical incentive to return to their referring physician, some patients were lost to follow-up causing a large variability in length of follow-up. For 17.4% of all procedures, the length of follow-up was ≤ 3 months; this should be taken into account when considering the data on patency duration, which was measured until the last date of follow-up. The lack of a standardized management algorithm led to strong heterogeneity of the patient group. Over the 27 years, only 26 RU were treated with an open surgical procedure (of which 14 primarily), thereby limiting the comparative power. Confounding by indication clearly plays a role in this retrospective analysis. Differences between endourologic procedures were not fully accounted for, since the analyses mainly focused on the difference between open surgery and endourological treatments as a whole. However, chronic Wallstents yielded a higher individual success rate (42.2%). Furthermore, the retrospective analysis of renal function was obscured because measurement was not performed in a standardized manner. Therefore, the posttreatment intervals to measurement of the eGFR differed between patients and procedures.
Strengths of this study lie in the analysis of a large number of patients and procedures, facilitating a clear comparison between treatment options. Moreover, analyses were performed with an overall long period of follow-up (median 34 months, range 0–319 months). The view on treatment of UES was broadened by not only analyzing patency and patency duration, but also the complication rate, postoperative hospital stay, and effect on renal function.
Patients presenting with UES should be thoroughly counseled for their treatment options. In our opinion, there are no insurmountable disadvantages to endourological treatments, apart from the higher chance of stricture recurrence. The potential of delaying or even avoiding the need for surgical re-implantation is of great benefit, especially for patients with poor physical condition who are unfit for open surgery.
Conclusions
In conclusion, our 27 years’ experience in treating patients with UES shows that open surgical re-implantation of the ureter results in higher patency rates with longer patency duration compared with endourological treatments. However, open surgery has higher (and more severe) complication rates and postoperative hospital stay is significantly longer. Renal function is rarely compromised by either type of treatment. Therefore, we consider endourological treatments to be a safe alternative treatment for UES, which delays or perhaps even avoids the need for open surgery.
Abbreviations
- ASA:
-
American Society of Anesthesiologists
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- eGFR:
-
estimated Glomerular filtration rate
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- RU:
-
Renal units
- UES:
-
Ureteroenteric stricture
- UMCU:
-
University Medical Center Utrecht
- 95% CI:
-
95% Confidence interval
References
Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD et al (2015) Comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 67(6):1042–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043
Sood A, Kachroo N, Abdollah F et al (2017) An evaluation of the timing of surgical complications following radical cystectomy: data from the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. Urology 103:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.036
Nazmy M, Yuh B, Kawachi M et al (2014) Early and late complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a standardized analysis by urinary diversion type. J Urol 191(3):681–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.022
Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC et al (2009) Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 55(1):164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031
Tyritzis SI, Wiklund NP (2015) Ureteral strictures revisited…Trying to see the light at the end of the tunnel: a comprehensive review. J Endourol 29(2):124–136. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0522
Tal R, Sivan B, Kedar D, Baniel J (2007) Management of benign ureteral strictures following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer. J Urol 178(2):538–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.142
Helfand AM, Beach R, Hadj-Moussa M et al (2017) Treatment of ureteral anastomotic strictures with reimplantation and survival after cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urol Oncol 35(1):33.e1–33.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.07.018
Milhoua PM, Miller NL, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Smith JA, Herrell SD (2009) Primary endoscopic management versus open revision of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after urinary diversion–single institution contemporary series. J Endourol 23(3):551–555. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0230
Schondorf D, Meierhans-Ruf S, Kiss B et al (2013) Ureteroileal strictures after urinary diversion with an ileal segment-is there a place for endourological treatment at all? J Urol 190(2):585–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.039
Gin GE, Ruel NH, Parihar JS et al (2017) Ureteroenteric anastomotic revision as initial management of stricture after urinary diversion. Int J Urol 24(5):390–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13323
Ahmed YE, Hussein AA, May PR et al (2017) Natural history, predictors and management of ureteroenteric strictures after robot assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3339
Nassar OA, Alsafa ME (2011) Experience with ureteroenteric strictures after radical cystectomy and diversion: open surgical revision. Urology 78(2):459–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.040
DiMarco DS, LeRoy AJ, Thieling S, Bergstralh EJ, Segura JW (2001) Long-term results of treatment for ureteroenteric strictures. Urology 58(6):909–913
Dripps RD (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011) Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45(3):1–67
Harrell FE, Jr. (2015) Rms: regression modeling strategies. R package version 4.3-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms. Accessed 1 May 2018
Team RC (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Laven BA, O’Connor RC, Gerber GS, Steinberg GD (2003) Long-term results of endoureterotomy and open surgical revision for the management of ureteroenteric strictures after urinary diversion. J Urol 170(4 Pt 1):1226–1230. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000086701.68756.8f
Campschroer T, Lock MT, Lo RT, Bosch JL (2014) The wallstent: long-term follow-up of metal stent placement for the treatment of benign ureteroileal anastomotic strictures after bricker urinary diversion. BJU Int 114(6):910–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12729
Rivera M, Viers B, Cockerill P et al (2015) Clinical outcomes of ureteroileal anastomotic stricture management. J Urol 193(4):E344–E345
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MJS: Project development, data collection, manuscript writing; MTWTL: Project development, data collection, manuscript writing; MP: Data analysis; EEFP: Project development; RPM: Project development, manuscript editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in these studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
van Son, M.J., Lock, M.T.W.T., Peters, M. et al. Treating benign ureteroenteric strictures: 27-year experience comparing endourological techniques with open surgical approach. World J Urol 37, 1217–1223 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2475-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2475-4