Abstract
Background
Optimal pain management is one of the core elements of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocols and remains a challenge. Acupuncture (AC) is an effective treatment for various pain conditions. Systematic and personalized allocation of acupoints may be decisive for efficacy.
Methods
Based on the predominant pressure sensitivity of six gastrointestinal (GI) checkpoints (G1-G6), we devised a method to detect personalized patterns of pain and a corresponding set of acupoints. We performed a single AC treatment with semi-permanent needles and assessed the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, pain threshold based on pressure algometry (PA), and temperature changes on abdominal skin areas before and 5 min after AC.
Results
Between April and June 2021, thirty-eight patients were prospectively included in this pilot study. The mean reduction in subjective pain sensation as assessed by VAS was 86%, paralleled by an augmentation of the pain threshold as measured by PA by 64%. A small but significant increase in the skin temperature was observed above the abdominal surface. These effects were independent of the type of surgery.
Conclusion
Checkpoint acupuncture may be a complementary tool for postoperative pain management. Further investigations are needed to explore this analgesic effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Postoperative pain is one of the major complaints [1, 2] and fear in patients undergoing surgical interventions [3]. Optimal perioperative pain management within optimized perioperative pathways, such as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®), remains challenging. Postoperative pain frequently impedes compliance with ERAS®-core elements like early mobilization and gastrointestinal (GI)-recovery [4, 5]. According to a US national survey, the majority of patients receiving analgesic medications to reduce postoperative pain reported adverse effects, such as vomiting and nausea. In addition, this study also demonstrated that 39% of the patients showed no adequate response to their first dose of analgesic treatment and that they complained of consistent moderate to severe pain after their initial dose [6]. In a cross-sectional study, almost 90% of perioperative patients experienced moderate-to-severe fear of postoperative pain [3]. Recent studies showed that perioperative fears have a negative impact on the surgical outcome as well as the postoperative recovery [7, 8]. Furthermore, poor postoperative pain management could facilitate the development of chronic pain and opioid dependence [9], leading to increased morbidity and impaired quality of life [10, 11].
Acupuncture (AC) has become an increasingly popular modality for the treatment of acute and chronic pain [12]. Additionally, acupuncture significantly improved gastrointestinal function and reduced postoperative hospitalization [13]. A contemporary concept of AC [14,15,16,17] understands it as a vegetative reflex therapy. According to this explanatory model, ancient diagnostic systems are traditionally applied to determine the vegetative functional state and to choose an individually effective set of AC-points. This diagnostic approach, consisting of observation, auscultation, olfaction, and palpation, is highly experience-based [18], time consuming, and difficult for non-acupuncturists. Hence, we investigated a method to address abdominal discomfort and pain through palpation of six specific abdominal points: gastro 1–gastro 6 (G1-G6) without making use of the ancient diagnostic approach.
Materials and methods
Study design
The study was designed as a prospective proof-of-principle study investigating the analgesic effects of checkpoint AC in patients after abdominal surgery. Informed consent was obtained before enrollment, according to a clinical trial protocol approved by the local Ethical Committee (EK 2021-604).
Eligibility criteria
Adult patients who underwent elective or emergency abdominal surgery with a postoperative pain score of ≥3 on a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) were eligible. Sufficient language communication skills were necessary for inclusion in the study. Patients with needle phobia, relevant actively treated psychiatric conditions such as bipolar disorder, chronic pain syndrome prior to surgery, polyneuropathy, relevant bleeding disorders, impaired mental state, and poor German language communication skills were excluded.
Standard patient care
All participants underwent standard pain management according to the ERAS® protocol. On surgical ward, patients were given scheduled baseline analgesics, such as paracetamol or dipyrone (1g every 6 h). Oxycodone with naloxone (oral 20 mg/10 mg every 12 h) was used as the first-line rescue medication. If no adequate pain relief was achieved, immediate release oxycodone was prescribed (10 mg upon request).
Patients who underwent bowel followed a highly standardized Bowel-ERAS®-Protocol within our ERAS®-qualified department. Other patients followed local, highly standardized clinical pathways integrating the ERAS®-variables [19].
STRICTA criteria
Study reporting was conducted according to the STRICTA guidelines [20]:
-
(1)
Acupuncture rationale: Acupuncture was performed based on our established checkpoint concept (G-points) [21, 22], which dates back to reflections described in the Shang Han Lun by Zhang Zhongjing before 220 AD [23].
-
(2)
Needling technique: length, diameter, pressure of insertion, and depth of insertion were identical by using semi-permanent needles (Sedatelec ASP Original Classic steel needle) [24, 25]. We did not seek for subjective needling sensations (de qi) or any other individual responses.
-
(3)
All patients received a single AC treatment after surgery. The needles remained until discharge. Verbal communication was reduced to a minimum.
-
(4)
Other treatment components: No additional treatment was administered.
-
(5)
The study acupuncturists (EG, JG) performed acupuncture on a daily basis for several years.
-
(6)
Control or comparator interventions: As this was a preliminary pilot study focusing on feasibility and practicality, no control group was included.
Checkpoint acupuncture
AC was applied as an additional element in the standardized multimodal approach to relieve pain after abdominal surgery. In this study, we examined six defined regions located in the abdominal cavity (Fig. 1, Tables 1 and 2) [21, 22]. Each point was palpated, and the most sensitive abdominal pressure point was manually identified (similar to examining the McBurney point for appendicitis). This hypersensitive region may resemble a dysfunctional vegetative pattern that can be addressed using defined AC strategies (Fig. 2).
Study assessments and intervention
Examination 1
After verifying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, VAS was assessed. The temperature was measured on all six visceral indicator points (G1–G6) using a touchless infrared thermometer (Domotherm Free, NT17, CE-approved). The most pressure-sensitive checkpoint was detected by careful palpation, and the pain threshold was assessed via digital PA (PCE instruments-FM 200 device) [26, 27].
Intervention
Patients were treated with AC points selected according to checkpoint diagnosis (Table 2, Fig. 2).
Examination 2
Following a 5-min resting period, all parameters of Examination 1 were re-assessed.
Statistical analysis
SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical calculations. For qualitative factors, absolute and relative frequencies are given. Quantitative variables approximately normally distributed are presented by mean value and standard deviation (i.e., temperature). For skewed or ordinal scaled data, median and range are given (i.e., VAS). Graph Pad Prism (Version 9.4.1) was used to create the figures. In order to compare parameters before and after intervention, a Wilcoxon test or a t test for two paired samples was used, as appropriate. For the comparison of two independent subgroups, Wilcoxon two-sample test was performed. The results of the statistical test were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.
Results
Between April and June 2021, thirty-eight patients were included in this pilot study. Twenty-one (55%) were female, and 17 (45%) were male. Mean age was 50.9±17.1 (23-80) years. Thirty-three patients (87%) underwent elective surgery, and five patients (15%) underwent emergency surgery (Table 2). The details of the procedures are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Three (8%) patients developed complications after surgery (two anastomotic insufficiencies and one urinary retention).
Total cohort
Subjective pain assessment by VAS
Before AC, the median VAS score for all 38 patients was 5.5 (3–9) indicating significant pain. Following acupuncture, the median VAS score was 0 (0–5) with an average reduction by 86% (25–100%, (p<0.0001). Figure 3A shows the overall effect of acupuncture on the pain score (VAS). Complete pain remission was achieved in more than half of the cases (55.5%) after single AC treatment.
Objective pain assessment by PA
In addition to subjective pain relief, AC augmented the pain threshold. The median pain threshold before treatment was reached at a pressure of 12.8N (1.78N–41.3N), compared to 21.8N (2.0N–79.9N) after AC, indicating a clinically relevant pain reduction and augmentation of the pain threshold by 67% on average. Hence, a highly significant difference was detected between the algometric measurement before and after treatment was detected (p<0.0001, Fig. 3B).
Skin temperature
With means of 36.9°C ±0.4°C before and 36.7°C ±0.2°C after the intervention, a significant difference has been measured above G1 (p<0.0005, Fig. 3C). Also, for G2 and G6, significant decreases were observed (G2: 36.9°C ±0.3°C before and 36.7°C ±0.2°C after AC, p = 0.0009; G6: 37.0°C ±0.4°C before and 36.5°C ±0.5°C after AC, p = 0.0099). No differences were observed above other G-points.
Effect over time
As shown in Fig. 4, significant pain reduction was achieved through acupuncture regardless of the postoperative day.
Subgroup analyses
Conventional open vs. minimally invasive laparoscopic
AC had similar pain-releasing effects without a significant difference (Fig. 5) between patients undergoing minimally invasive and conventional open surgeries, with median values of 5.75 (3–9) and 4.75 (3–8), respectively (p = 0.4145).
Distribution of surgery type and G-point-syndrome
Analysis of subgroups revealed that the type of surgery was linked to a tendency towards certain checkpoint syndromes. The largest subgroups included bariatric and colorectal surgeries (supplementary Table 2, 3, 4).
Bariatric surgeries (n=16)
Subjective pain assessment by VAS
Overall, patients undergoing bariatric surgery showed reduced pain levels by 86.7% on average, with a median VAS score of 6 (3–9) before and 0 (0–3) after acupuncture (p<0.0001), as shown in Fig. 6A. Most of the bariatric patients showed G3-syndrome (compare Supplementary Material Table 2).
Objective pain assessment by PA
The initial pain threshold increased from 17.4N (7–41.3) to 29.3 N (10.6–29.7; p=0.0003; Fig. 6B). These results demonstrated an equivalent increase in the pain threshold by 54%.
Skin temperature
After AC, the bariatric patients showed slight but significant lower temperature levels than before (before: 36,9°C ±0.4°C, after: 36.7°C ±0.2°C; p=0.0200 and 36.8°C ±0.2°C and 36.7°C ±0.2° C, p = 0.0218) above G1 and G2. No differences were observed above the other G-points.
Surgery of the small intestine (n=7)
Subjective pain assessment by VAS
Median postoperative pain after ileostoma relocation and small intestine resections was 4.5 (min: 3; max: 6), indicating a moderate pain. Through AC, a significant pain reduction of 80% was achieved, reaching a median VAS of 0 (min 0; max: 3,4, Fig. 7A). For checkpoint diagnosis, compare Supplementary Material Table 3.
Pain as assessed by algometry
The initial pain threshold (median) increased from 4.1N (2.6N–12.8N) to 6.7N (3.6N–21.6N) after. This results slightly failed to reach statistical significant (p = 0.0625, Fig. 7B).
Skin temperature
For G1 and G4, slight but significant temperature changes could be observed for this subgroup (each 36.8±0.2°C before and 36.7±0.2°C after AC, p = 0.0046 and p = 0.0341, respectively).
Colorectal surgeries (n=10)
Subjective pain assessment by VAS
The median postoperative pain score was 5.5 (min: 3; max: 8). After AC, the patients experienced pain of a median VAS 0 (min: 0; max: 3) equaling a pain reduction of 93% percent on average. Eight patients showed a complete pain remission (VAS 0). Pain reduction was statistically significant (p=0.0020). Nine out of ten patients showed either G1- or G3-syndrome (Supplementary Material Table 4).
Objective pain assessment by PA
Before AC, the median pain threshold was 10.6N (1.78–25). After AC, an augmented pain threshold of 15.4N (2N–79.9N) could be observed (p = 0.0156) (Fig. 8A and B).
Skin temperature
Temperature changes above the indicator points were not significantly different (each p>0.05).
Discussion
This present pilot study evaluated the effect of the novel concept of checkpoint AC after abdominal surgery within the ERAS® setting. Significant pain relief after a single acupuncture session was demonstrated in this heterogeneous patient population on different postoperative days and time points. This indicates a potential improvement in postoperative pain management within ERAS® protocols [28].
ERAS® pathways and protocols have emerged over the past 10 years as the gold standard for improving postoperative recovery, resulting in shortened hospitalization and reduced costs [29]. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) is an essential component of ERAS®. Although acupuncture has been proven to be effective in promoting gastrointestinal function recovery and preventing prolonged postoperative ileus [30, 31], its efficacy as complementary analgesic therapy after surgery is controversial [32,33,34,35].
Considering that postoperative pain is one of the main concerns of patients undergoing surgery [3], this additional analgesic tool might reduce perioperative fears. Depression and anxiety are psychological elements that appear to have an impact on both the experience of pain and effectiveness of analgesic therapy [7, 8]. Acupuncture has proven to be an efficient treatment for anxiety and depressive disorders [36,37,38,39,40]. This may have amplified the analgesic efficacy observed in our study.
Our data suggest that there may be a correlation between surgical intervention and affected hyperalgesic abdominal pressure points. While most lower GI surgeries had G1-syndrome, bariatric surgeries were prone to have G3-syndrome [22]. G3 is located above the gastric corpus. Hence, a correlation between anatomical location and the respective G-syndrome may be observed.
Pain reduction after checkpoint acupuncture demonstrated a pain-reducing effect that was not influenced by the type of surgery, whether open or minimally invasive. This implies that it may be more effective in alleviating visceral pain than wound pain.
Limitations
Owing to the pilot design with heterogeneity of patients, surgeries, and intervention time points, the trial was neither randomized nor blinded and prone to selection, performance, and detection bias. Thus, a placebo effect with similar pain reduction effects cannot be eliminated [41]. However, data of the current study can be used for a sample size calculation for future randomized, blinded trials to validate the effect of checkpoint acupuncture after abdominal surgery. Moreover, the endpoints were assessed 5 min after acupuncture; therefore, long-term effects and adverse effects after the observation period remain unclear. They are to be evaluated in further trials.
Conclusion
This pilot study showed that checkpoint acupuncture may be an effective and safe complementary tool for postoperative pain management, even within the implemented ERAS® pathways. Breaking down the complexity of the diagnosis of Chinese Medicine to a few abdominal checkpoints will allow others to apply AC without requiring generous knowledge of traditional Chinese Medicine. Further randomized, blinded trials are needed to verify these conclusions.
Data Availability
Data can be shared by reasonable request.
References
Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS et al (2003) Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg 97:534–540
Robleda G, Roche-Campo F, Sanchez V et al (2015) Postoperative discomfort after abdominal surgery: an observational study. J Perianesth Nurs 30:272–279
Ustunel F, Erden S (2022) Evaluation of fear of pain among surgical patients in the preoperative period. J Perianesth Nurs 37:188–193
Simpson JC, Bao X, Agarwala A (2019) Pain management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 32:121–128
Joshi GP, Kehlet H (2019) Postoperative pain management in the era of ERAS: An overview. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 33:259–267
Gan TJ, Habib AS, Miller TE et al (2014) Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain: results from a US national survey. Curr Med Res Opin 30:149–160
Andersson V, Bergstrand J, Engström Å, Gustafsson S (2020) The impact of preoperative patient anxiety on postoperative anxiety and quality of recovery after orthopaedic surgery. J Perianesthesia Nurs 35(3):260–264
Bayrak A, Sagiroglu G, Copuroglu E (2019) Effects of preoperative anxiety on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative pain. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 29(9):868–873
Tedesco D, Gori D, Desai KR et al (2017) Drug-free interventions to reduce pain or opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 152:e172872
Gan TJ (2017) Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res 10:2287–2298
Baratta JL, Schwenk ES, Viscusi ER (2014) Clinical consequences of inadequate pain relief: barriers to optimal pain management. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:15S–21S
Xiang A, Cheng K, Shen X et al (2017) The immediate analgesic effect of acupuncture for pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2017:3837194
Yuan HC, Xiang Q, Zhang N et al (2020) Acupuncture combined with early enteral nutrition on patients with postoperative laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a prospective randomized trial. Chin J Integr Med 26:769–775
Xia Y (2022) Advanced acupuncture research: from bench to bedside, 1st edn. Springer
Greten HJ (2017) Kursbuch traditionelle chinesische medizin (Textbook of TCM), 3rd edn. Thieme: 692
Greten HJ (2011) Chinese medicine as vegetative systems biology. Part I: therapeutic methods. Hno 59:1160–1164
Greten HJ (2011) Chinese medicine as vegetative systems biology. Part II: the structure of TCM diagnosis. HNO 59:1165–1175
Kang H, Zhao Y, Li C et al (2015) Integrating clinical indexes into four-diagnostic information contributes to the Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B. Sci Rep 5:9395
Seyfried S, Herrle F, Schroter M et al (2021) Initial experiences with the implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) protocol. Chirurg 92:428–433
MacPherson H, Altman DG, Hammerschlag R et al (2010) Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. Acupunct Med 28:83–93
Santos MJMA, Machado J, Morcos M, Greten HJ, Froeschen P (2020) G1-5 syndromes, a novel model of diagnosis of upper abdominal syndromes and their treatment. Biomed J Sci Tech Res 10:26717
Ghanad E, Staff S, Weiss C et al (2023) Reduction of pain after laparoscopic bariatric surgery by personalized checkpoint acupuncture-data of a STRICTA conform pilot study. Obes Surg 33(7):2176–2185
Zhongjing Z (220AD) Shang Han Lun
Shah AN, Moore CB, Brigger MT (2020) Auricular acupuncture for adult tonsillectomy. Laryngoscope 130:1907–1912
Collinsworth KM, Goss DL (2019) Battlefield acupuncture and physical therapy versus physical therapy alone after shoulder surgery. Med Acupunct 31:228–238
Pelfort X, Torres-Claramunt R, Sánchez-Soler JF et al (2015) Pressure algometry is a useful tool to quantify pain in the medial part of the knee: an intra- and inter-reliability study in healthy subjects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:559–563
Jerez-Mayorga D, Dos Anjos CF, Macedo MC et al (2020) Instrumental validity and intra/inter-rater reliability of a novel low-cost digital pressure algometer. PeerJ 8:e10162
Ljungqvist O, de Boer HD (2023) Will acupuncture be the next addition to enhanced recovery after surgery protocols? JAMA Surg 158:28
Lee SM, Kang SB, Jang JH et al (2013) Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 27:3902–3909
Wang Y, Yang JW, Yan SY et al (2023) Electroacupuncture vs. sham electroacupuncture in the treatment of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 158:20–27
Yang JW, Shao JK, Wang Y et al (2022) Effect of acupuncture on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic elective colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine 49:101472
Cho YH, Kim CK, Heo KH, Lee MS, Ha IH, Son DW, Choi BK, Song GS, Shin BC (2015) Acupuncture for acute postoperative pain after back surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Prac 15(3):279–291
Liu XL, Tan JY, Molassiotis A, Suen LK, Shi Y (2015) Acupuncture-point stimulation for postoperative pain control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 11:2015
Sun Y, Gan TJ, Dubose JW, Habib AS (2008) Acupuncture and related techniques for postoperative pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesthes 101(2):151–160
Usichenko TI, Lehmann Ch Fau - Ernst E, Ernst E (2008) Auricular acupuncture for postoperative pain control: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Anaesthesia 63(12):1343–1348
Linton SJ, Shaw WS (2011) Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Phys Ther 91:700–711
Nahman-Averbuch H, Nir RR, Sprecher E et al (2016) Psychological factors and conditioned pain modulation: a meta-analysis. Clin J Pain 32:541–554
Li M, Niu J, Yan P et al (2020) The effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for depression: an overview of meta-analyses. Complement Ther Med 50:102202
Yang XY, Yang NB, Huang FF et al (2021) Effectiveness of acupuncture on anxiety disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Gen Psychiatry 20:9
Mehling WE, Jacobs B, Acree M et al (2007) Symptom management with massage and acupuncture in postoperative cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 33:258–266
Haake M, Muller HH, Schade-Brittinger C et al (2007) German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups. Arch Intern Med 167:1892–1898
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception and design: EG, CY, HJG, CR, FH. Acquisition of data: EG, CY, HJG
Analysis and interpretation of data: EG, CY, CW, CR, HJG, FH. Drafting of manuscript: EG, CY, CW, CR, HJG, FH. Critical revision of manuscript: EG, CY, CW, MG, MJS, NC, CR, HJG, FH
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures of the study were ethically compliant and approved (EK 2021-604) by the Institutional Review Board of the University Medicine Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.
Human and animal rights
The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 73 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ghanad, E., Yang, C., Weiß, C. et al. Personalized checkpoint acupuncture can reduce postoperative pain after abdominal surgery—a STRICTA-conform pilot study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 408, 391 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03051-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03051-8