Abstract
The potential impact on mental health of home schooling and social isolation due to COVID-19 lockdowns has led to widespread concern, particularly for adolescents. However, studies including pre-pandemic data from longitudinal cohorts with an assessment of the longer-term impact of the Covid-19 pandemic beyond the first months of 2020 are scarce. This longitudinal study of 1534 adolescents attending a secondary school in Hunan province investigated self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression using two validated scales (Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders, Child Mood and Feelings Questionnaire) at six time points before, during, and after the 2020 national lockdown restrictions in China. Perceived COVID-related stress was assessed by an author-developed scale at two timepoints during the lockdown. We investigated trends in symptoms over time with a fixed effects model and multiple imputations of missing data. Counter to our expectations, depressive and anxiety symptoms were reduced during the 2020 lockdown relative to pre-lockdown (depression: b = − 3.37, SE = 0.345, Cohen’s d = − 0.25, p < 0.0001; anxiety: b = − 4.55, SE = 0.382, Cohen’s d = − 0.30, p < 0.0001). Symptoms remained significantly reduced even after lockdown restrictions eased. Higher symptom levels during lockdown were associated with greater self-reported COVID-related stress (depression: b = 0.11, SE = 0.026, p < 0.0001; anxiety: b = 0.11, SE = 0.036, p < 0.0001). Although COVID-related stresses correlated with higher levels of anxiety and depression, the lockdown period was associated with improved symptom levels in the adolescents taking part in our study. School closures may have improved the mental health of adolescents in China. We speculate this beneficial effect of lockdown can be explained by the adverse effects of attending school itself such as exposure to bullying and achievement pressures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to raise profound and long-lasting concerns about the population's mental health, particularly in adolescents. In China, following the first national lockdown in the spring of 2020, subsequent control measures were local in scope with the implementation of the “Dynamic COVID-zero” strategy. This contrasts with the recurring national restrictions adopted in many Western countries. However, the prevention and control measures including local strict quarantine, travel and border control, large-scale PCR testing, and decreased human mobility. The chronicity and comprehensiveness of the lockdown restrictions may have caused an upsurge in anxiety, complaints, frustrating and mental health problems under severe uncertainties. This could be particularly problematic for children and adolescents as they may have less psychological and social resources to handle chronic stress. A meta-analysis study based on cross-sectional design revealed increased levels of mental health problems in among Chinese children and adolescents during the lockdown [1]. For other countries, several systematic reviews of the prevalence of depression and anxiety also showed a significant increase in the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak [2, 3]. However, these studies lack pre-lockdown information which makes it difficult to characterise the time course of the mental health burden associated with the pandemic. Furthermore, longitudinal studies on adolescent psychological profiles covering the entire period of the pandemic from pre- to post-lockdown are lacking.
Contrary to concerns raised early in the pandemic, longitudinal studies on adolescents’ mental health, including ours [4], reported that lockdown had minimal or no impact on mental health compared to pre-pandemic level [5, 6], even an improvement in wellbeing [6, 7]. Another recent study reviewed 65 longitudinal cohort studies including adults/children/adolescents comparing mental health prior to and during a pandemic and found a small increase in depression in the early stages of the pandemic and then a decrease over the following months with a period of psychological adaptation and resilience [8]. Similar findings were also found in the general population: a review based on 25 longitudinal studies concluded that the psychological impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns was small on average compared with pre-lockdown levels, and suggested that most people were resilient during the first months of the pandemic [1]. Notably, several large-scale studies that included pre-pandemic data did not find evidence of a worsening of mental health symptoms among samples of patients with pre-existing mental health conditions [9, 10]. Adolescents with high pre-pandemic symptoms reported no change in emotional symptoms [8, 11] or a decrease in both internalizing problems and externalizing problems during the pandemic [12]. These reports are consistent with growing evidence that some people exposed to acute adversity see improved mental health functioning from before to after exposure or psychosocial gains from adversity [13].
One explanation for these improvements is that acute stress and pandemics could stimulate family and social connectedness, trustworthiness and sharing behaviour, prompting a greater sense of solidarity and bonding [14, 15]. Indeed, the pandemic’s effects on mental health will be heterogeneous across individuals, situations and contexts [13]. Although the risk of harm to mental health is considerable, a number of protective factors may mitigate these harms. As research has shown, people have the capacity to successfully adapt and even flourish following large-scale stressful life events [16]. The pattern of adaptive functioning, or resilience, is likely to be shaped by distinct individual characteristics, but also by the socio-political context of lockdown restrictions [17]. Cultural beliefs about adversity can also influence how people adjust to COVID-19 [18]. In Confucian philosophy, adversity is an opportunity for the self-cultivation of virtues, and Chinese people may have strong forbearance and perseverance in the face of severe limitations on the capacity for in-person social interaction which might differ from other cultures [19, 20]. This highlights the need to consider culture-specific factors when investigating and interpreting the mental health effects of the pandemic.
For China, there were few longitudinal studies that have been able to map out how adolescents’ mental health has responded over the longer term, after the initial reaction to the Covid-19 pandemic relative to pre-Covid levels. Therefore, the present study aimed to address this important gap in evidence by investigating the temporal evolution of depressive and anxiety symptoms over the course of the pandemic. We had the unique opportunity of studying a sample of adolescents attending secondary school with available pre-pandemic data from an ongoing study. Here we investigated the following research questions:
-
1.
Did symptoms of anxiety and depression worsen or improve during the initial pandemic lockdown?
-
2.
Did these changes in symptoms persist or return to pre-COVID levels in the period post-lockdown?
-
3.
Was the experience of pandemic-related stress associated with changes in symptoms of anxiety and depression in the initial lockdown.
Methods
Participants
Participants in Years 10–11 were recruited from a single secondary school in Chenzhou city (Hunan Province, China) as a part of an ongoing (October 2018-present) longitudinal study on bullying, victimization, and mental health among adolescents. In the Chinese education system, Year 10 (ages 15–16) is the first of three years of high school or "senior secondary" education, the last being Year 12 (ages 17–18) which is followed by university in those continuing academic education. The mental health questionnaires used in this study are completed and recorded routinely for non-research purposes (to monitor student mental health) and were only used for research purposes with informed consent. Data from six time points (see below) are included, labelled Time 1 to 6 and henceforth abbreviated: T1–T6. At the commencement of the study (T1, October 2018) and again in April 2020 (T4) students were invited to participate in the study and by doing so have their routinely collected scores used for research purposes. In total 1557 students provided informed consent to participate in the study, and, of these, 1534 (98.5%) could be linked to completed questionnaire data acquired from one or more study time points. Participants were predominantly female (n = 1060, 69.1%) and mostly aged 15–16 at the start of the study (age 14: 7.2%, 15: 61.2%, 16: 27.6%, 17: 3.5%, 18: 0.5%).
The 23 subjects who consented but could not be identified in the records were not significantly different from the rest of the sample in terms of sex (p = 0.07, Fisher’s exact test) or mean age (p = 0.887, t test).
No participants were excluded, but records that could not be linked to a participant who provided informed consent were not analysed (n = 1207, 14.7% of records; T1 = 58, T2 = 95, T3 = 146, T4 = 445, T5 = 261, T6 = 202). Further to this, repeat online submissions (i.e. T3 and onwards) that were logged from a subject ID who had already completed a submission for that survey were excluded (328 records total; T3 = 12, 1.2%; T4 = 117, 7.7%; T5 = 124, 10.5%; T6 = 75, 10.8%). Figure 1 presents a flowchart of participants with records identified at each time point.
Ethical considerations
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants and their parents or guardian. Participation was voluntary and no incentive or reward was given. Anonymity was emphasized; however, participants were asked to provide Pinyin abbreviation of their name to match across timepoint. It took participants approximately 30 min to complete the survey. The study protocol was approved by the Wenzhou Medical University ethics committee (2020–131).
Timepoints
Mental health scores were obtained twice prior to COVID: T1 in October 20–23, 2018, n = 1319 records (68.9% female; Mean age = 15.29, SD age = 0.68); and one year after, T2: October 25–30, 2019, n = 1272 records (69.7% female; Mean T1 age = 15.27, SD = 0.68).
The third survey (T3, n = 957, 73.2% female; Mean T1 age = 15.31, SD = 0.67) was conducted between February 24–26, 2020, four weeks after the start of Chinese lockdown, during which time China was going through a phase of rapid increase in the number of COVID-19 cases and associated deaths. At this point, students had not attended school for six weeks (because the lockdown was timed just after the Chinese New Year national holiday). Participants were again invited to complete the COVID-19 effect on mental health survey with invitations were sent to students and their parents via a family-school communication app by the school mental health service.
The fourth survey (T4, n = 1401, 69.0% female; Mean T1 age = 15.25, SD = 0.64) was conducted from April 6 to 8, 2020, 11 weeks after the start of the lockdown. The Chinese government announced a step-by-step easing of the lockdown schedule, after evidence of a rapid decline in the number of new and suspected cases of COVID-19. Students had not attended school for 13 weeks at this time point.
The fifth survey (T5, n = 1060, 74.0% female; Mean T1 age = 15.20, SD = 0.61) was conducted from June 6 to 9, 2020, when there was a low number of cases, most social activities had resumed as normal, and students had been back at school for eight weeks (resumed school on April 13, 2020).
The sixth survey (T6, n = 617, 68.6% female; Mean T1 age = 15.08, SD = 0.54) was conducted from January 19 to 31 2021, around one year after the start of lockdown. Social and school life were normal, but Covidpass was necessary to access public or transportation, and smaller-scale local lockdowns were common under the "dynamic zero" policy.
Outcomes and procedure
COVID 2019 stressful events scale
This self-rated scale was developed by the author (X.Y.) to evaluate stress experienced due to the COVID 2019 pandemic [21]. The following 16 items were included as potential causes of stress: (1) restrictions on the free movement of citizens, (2) testing of temperature and wearing masks in public, (3) closed residential community, (4) being unable to meet friends and relatives, (5) widespread news and information about the new virus, (6) daily reporting of their health situation, (7) being unable to exercise outdoors, (8) school closures, (9) learning online rather than face-to-face, (10) parents’ management of children’s learning rather than teachers, (11) family’s fears of COVID-19, (12) healthcare staffs infection and risk of hospitals being overwhelmed, (13) lack of supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE) i.e. masks or protective clothes, (14) confirmed cases in your area, (15) increasing daily incidence, (16) increasing daily deaths toll. Participant were instructed to report how stressful they found the influence of these items from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very severe). For analysis, we use a total score, which sums all individual item scores to reflect both the number and intensity of stressful experiences related to COVID/lockdown. The internal reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha) of this scale was “excellent” > 0.9 (0.93 at T3 and 0.95 at T4).
Anxiety symptoms
The Chinese version of the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) was used to screen for signs of anxiety disorders in children [22]. The SCARED is a 41-item inventory developed for ages 9–18 with five factors: generalized anxiety, separation anxiety, social phobia, school phobia and panic/somatic anxiety. Items were rated on a 3-point Likert scale: 0 (not true) to 2 (very true), with lower total scores indicating a higher risk of anxiety disorders.
Depressive symptoms
The Chinese version of the Child Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ-C) was used to measure self-reported experiences of depression [23]. The MFQ-C comprises 33 items rated on a 3-point Likert scale: 0 (not true) to 2 (true), with lower scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity. The MFQ-C was developed and validated for ages 6–19.
Procedure
The study was part of a school mental health program, implemented in line with Chinese guidelines to improve mental health in primary and secondary schools (2012) 15). Data collection at T1 and T2 took place via a paper-and-pencil survey during a regularly scheduled class period in the school setting. During the national lockdown, and after (T3–T6), data collection was conducted through an online system called ‘Wen Juan Xing’, distributed on Wechat social media platforms. The COVID-19 stressful events questionnaire was administered only at T3 and T4.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were carried out in three phases. The first phase describes the key COVID-19-related stressors reported by the sample. Next, a fixed effects approach to panel data was used to assess the secular effects of lockdown/COVID on depression and anxiety. In the third phase, COVID-19 stress total score was added to the models from the second phase to probe any impact on lockdown/COVID-related changes in depression and anxiety symptoms. For models in phase 3, we additionally include gender, and age at baseline, in the model and consider whether these covariates have a statistically significant impact on the effects of interest.
All tests are two-tailed with an alpha threshold of 0.05 for statistical significance. Multiple comparison corrections use the Holm step-down procedure [24].
An investigation of longitudinal measurement invariance for the MFQ and SCARED scales was carried out and identified no significant problems (see supplementary materials).
Missing data
There was no missing data for age and gender which were acquired during the consent process, however, sporadically missing questionnaire data from one or more time points was common. A total of 6626 of a possible 9204 records (72%) were matched over the 1534 participants and 6 time points. For the key comparison of pre-lockdown vs. post-lockdown, 1420 (92.6%) participants had at least one observation of each type and so could contribute information to effect estimates. Of the remaining 114 subjects, 35 could be linked to only pre-COVID data and 79 to only post-COVID data.
To address missing data in the outcome variables and the COVID-19-related stressors questionnaire, we used multiple imputations—particularly the chained equations method in the R package “mice” [25]. MFQ and SCARED total scores over all six-time points were imputed along with the COVID stressful events questionnaire total score (acquired just at T3 and T4). Age at baseline and gender were included as auxiliary variables. Fifty iterations of Predictive Mean Matching were employed and 100 imputed datasets were generated. This is an “FCS-Standard” approach (based on the taxonomy in a recent overview of imputation methods for longitudinal data [26]. This is appropriate as we have homogenous timing of assessments and a small number of longitudinal observations/variables relative to the sample size. This approach is unstructured with respect to timepoint and does not assume the parameterisation of time employed in the linear mixed models described above. There were no convergence problems, confirmed by visual inspection for lack of trend in the line plots of each variable’s mean and variance during imputation plotted against iteration number [27]. Note that the covid stressful events individual items were not imputed, only the total score, as a result the item-level descriptive analysis excludes missing observations.
Results for multiply imputed data were pooled using Rubin’s rules [28], with small sample correction for degrees of freedom [29]. Coefficient tests use the Wald method [28] and model comparison uses the “D1” method for multivariate Wald tests [30].
Results
Stressors during lockdown
None of the participants reported becoming infected with COVID-19 during the study. This is consistent with the low rates of COVID in this province at the time. During the early lockdown (T3) stressful events scale total scores were on average 32.5 (SD 12.7). This corresponds to an average item rating of 2.02 (SD = 0.79) on the 1–5 scale. The most commonly identified stressful items in the questionnaire (i.e. rated severe or very severe) were: the increasing daily death toll (25.3%), lack of supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE; 21.2%), increasing daily incidence (20.2%), school closures (19.0%), medical staff infections and risk of hospitals being overwhelmed (17.0%), confirmed cases in your area (15.5%), and learning online rather than face-to-face (14.0%). As expected, we observed systematic reductions in the total stress scores from T3 to T4, as the lockdown eased: average change in the total score was − 2.17 (SE = 0.39; t(391.88) = − 5.51, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s d: 0.179). At an item level, the proportion endorsing severe or very severe stress decreased for all but one item. Largest decreases were seen for lack of supplies of PPE (− 7.44%, McNemar χ2 = 23.7, p < 0.0001), news about the virus (− 5.26%, McNemar χ2 = 22.0, p < 0.0001), daily death toll (− 6.29%, McNemar χ2 = 14.1, p < 0.0002), school closures (− 5.26%, McNemar χ2 = 13.5, p < 0.0003). The only item to show an increase was stress about the number of confirmed cases in your area which was endorsed by an additional 1.37%, however, this was not a statistically significant change (McNemar χ2 = 0.776, p = 0.378). Further detail is available in Supplementary Table 2.
The mental health impact of the COVID-19 lockdown
Self-report total symptom scores for depression (MFQ) and anxiety (SCARED) are plotted for each timepoint in Fig. 2, and pairwise comparisons are presented in Table 1.
For the key question of a lockdown effect, we found both depression and anxiety total scores decreased significantly following lockdown (i.e. at time point T3): depression T3–T2 = − 3.37 (SE = 0.345), T(572) = − 9.80, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s D = − 0.25; anxiety T3–T2 = − 4.55 (SE = 0.382), T(506) = − 11.9, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s D = − 0.30. These T3 decreases were also significant relative to the previous year’s assessment (T1; see Table 1). The same pattern of statistically significant decreases from T2 and T1 observations was seen over all subsequent time points to T3 (pairwise comparisons presented in Table 1). Comparable results were obtained without using imputation by employing a pairwise complete-cases analysis (Supplementary Table S3).
After the immediate impact of the lockdown at T3 there were no subsequent significant differences in anxiety or depression scores with time, either as pairwise differences between time points (see Table 1) or as a linear trend with time: depression annualised trend estimate: − 0.516 (SE = 0.472), T(236) = − 1.09, p = 0.275, Cohen’s D = 0.028; anxiety annualised trend estimate: 0.148 (SE = 0.580), T(195) = 0.255, p = 0.80, Cohen’s D = 0.006.
Predictors of mental health outcomes
Models to evaluate predictors of the change in symptom scores between T2 and T3 (adjusted for T2 scores) are summarised in Table 2. They reveal significant linear effects of the Covid Stressful Events scale total score such that each additional point was associated with greater scores (i.e. a lower reduction) in depression (+ 0.11, SE = 0.026, p < 0.0001) and anxiety (+ 0.11, SE = 0.036, p < 0.0001). Age and gender were not significant predictors of change and no predictors interacted significantly with the baseline scale score. We next probed estimated marginal means from these models to estimate the cross-over point where the effect of covid stress would start to reverse the secular trend. This revealed participants with CSE scores of 64 and 77 would show on average no reduction in depression and anxiety, respectively. These are extreme values in this sample (98.9th and 99.6th percentiles, respectively) and suggest that although self-reported covid stress was associated with a lower level of lockdown-related improvement in scores, it was a relatively small effect.
Discussion
This study highlighted both the impact during the start and ongoing nature of the pandemic, and the potentially long-term impact of the pandemic on adolescent mental health compared with prior to the 2020 Chinese lockdown. Contrary to common expectations, we found a substantial decrease in depressive and anxiety symptoms compared with the previous waves, suggesting that mental health levels in Chinese adolescents aged 14–17 years saw improvements with the lockdown. In 8 weeks after schools reopening, anxiety and depression were still significantly lower than before the lockdown. The improvement was even sustained a year after the lockdown, suggesting the positive effects were relatively long-lasting.
These findings were consistent with some previous studies [6, 7], which suggested that there was a positive impact of lockdown on adolescent mental health and wellbeing in China. Li et al. [7] investigated how mental health developed across before, during, and after the pandemic breakout and found that depression and insomnia were the highest before the pandemic, then decreased during home confinement, and continued to decline after the lockdown. Qu et al. [6] reported also that the incidence of anxiety and depression in 10,216 adolescents were lower after two months of home confinement than that before lockdown. They described this positive pattern could be due to the lower academic pressure after school closure. Indeed, a recent systematic review of longitudinal adolescent studies revealed decreases in anxiety and depression over the initial months of the first lockdown [8]. The authors speculated that there had been considerable resilience in mental health. Adolescents with pre-existing mental health conditions also appeared not to be affected by pandemic-related changes and uncertainties [11, 12], they reasoned that this unexpected result might be attributable to some sense of relaxation and shared cohesiveness. In sum, these findings did not support the expectation that adolescents would be negatively affected by pandemic-related changes and school closures.
However, our findings were inconsistent with some other longitudinal studies that have suggested child mental health worsened due to the negative effects of social deprivation caused by the lockdowns [31, 32]. These longitudinal studies, however, have covered rather short intervals, e.g., several weeks or a few months, or lacked pre-pandemic comparative baseline data [33]. They were further unable to determine whether the increase in symptoms was transient or persistent. Thus, we would argue that limited conclusions can be drawn from these studies.
Whether our results can be generalised to other countries requires further considerations. School-related problems are a major stressor that contributes to students’ mental health problems across the globe [34]. It has been suggested that Chinese adolescents place particular importance on education, and devote their energy and time to obtaining high academic performance to increase future development opportunities [35]. Compared with adolescents from Western countries, Chinese students endure greater academic stress from heavy homework burden, high competitive pressure, and high parents’ expectation [36]. Such academic stress and workload demands were significant predictors of school burnout and emotional issues [37]. Bullying is also common among Chinese school students. In 2019, over half (57.29%) of students said they had been bullied at school in the past one year, compared to 26.1% in 2016 (i.e. an increase of 31%) [38]. The school disruption of the COVID-19 lockdown may have provided unexpected benefits to escape these negative stressors resulting in a better sense of well-being. For example, students staying at home could experience alleviation from the strict school environment, with reduced academic stress, peer- and teacher-related pressures, more time to think, better quality of sleep and relaxation [39]. They further had more opportunities for play-related activity and rest, as well as more independence and freedom to expand their autonomy [40]. These changes are likely to have contributed to reducing psychological distress and improving well-being, provided that their family and home environment supported these positive changes.
This explanation would be consistent with the finding that 80% of Chinese children and adolescents in primary and secondary school were satisfied with their life status during lockdown, and 21.4% of participants became more satisfied with life than before the pandemic [41]. Chinese adolescents also experienced strong positive changes in multiple life outcomes (e.g. relationships, physical activity, sleep, work) over the national lockdown period [42]. Outside of China, there were other studies pointing in the same direction: An overall reduction in anxiety and an increase in wellbeing were found in students aged 13–14 during the lockdown in England [43], and 90% of parents reported improvements in their children’s mental health compared with before the COVID-19 period in India [44]. In Canada, almost half of adolescents reported that the pandemic exerted positive effects, with more time to spend with one’s family[45], and more time to sleep, as well as increased psychosomatic health [46, 47]. These findings suggested that school closures may have protected pupils from some of the usual factors which can lead to poor mental health, including academic pressures, school bullying, and more subtle challenges in negotiating relationships with peers and teachers.
In contrast, other studies have argued that being confined to one’s home could severely limit an adolescent’s capacity for in-person social interaction and so harm their mental health [48]. However, some data suggested that despite adhering to the physical distancing measures, some people were still able to maintain pre-pandemic levels of social connection [49]. The decrease in adolescents’ face-to-face contact might have been less detrimental due to widespread access to digital forms of social interaction through social media [50]. Moreover, evidence has already emerged of a positive impact of social media on teenagers during COVID-19 in China [51]. Online contacts via social media had been quite helpful to deal with loneliness, boredom and anxiety as a constructive coping strategy for adolescents [52], and to maintain their social connections including to stay in touch with friends and schools during COVID-19 lockdowns [53].
Despite the substantial negative effects of lockdown on everyday life, a resilience perspective suggested improved family closeness during this stressful time [54]. Indeed, in another study, the majority of parents reported the lockdown improved their relationship with their children including engaging in more everyday activities with their children [55], showing more physical affection, warmth and love toward their children [56]. In our previous study, Chinese children and adolescents reported a significant decrease in different types of child maltreatment during lockdown [4]. These potentially beneficial effects may also explain why positive psychological functioning such as wellbeing, life satisfaction, or connectedness were unaffected by the COVID-19 lockdown in the general population [1].
On a more cautionary note, several limitations of our study need to be considered. First, we note limitations in the scales employed. All were self-report, and although the SCARED and MFQ-C are well established, the Covid Stressful Events scale was developed rapidly in response to the pandemic and so lacks validation. However, we note that this scale’s reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha) was excellent in this sample. Further, scales assessing other potential causes of mental health improvements (i.e. assessing the school and family environment) were not obtained, and so there is a need for future research to understand the potential mechanisms. Second, although the sample was large, it was a convenience sample taken from one high school which limits the generalizability of the results. Although the sex ratio of the school year groups was not recorded at the time, we presume this population was balanced and so our 70% female sample reflects a differing participation rate in research between males and females. Another potential limitation was the incomplete follow-up. Missingness was especially present for the final observation (T6) when older students had graduated, and to a lesser degree at T3 when many students were taking part in the Chinese Spring Festival holiday and so were away from school in their rural hometowns. Furthermore, some participants may have been unable or unwilling to complete the online survey when we transitioned from paper-and-pencil to an online format, this appears to be a limited effect as 97.7% completed at least one online survey. Also, our analysis focused on the average response to the pandemic and identifying distinct trajectories of adjustment using latent growth mixture modelling should be examined in future studies, because it is unclear how people with previous more severe mental health conditions, such as major depressive disorder, were affected by the pandemic. Finally, our findings, drawn from a single country, may not be generalizable to adolescents in other regions of the world. Different countries have widely varied in their response to COVID-19 so some of the strategies undertaken in China, and how this affected adolescent mental health, will not be relevant for other countries. However, it is hoped that useful findings can be taken from the effect of the wider remit of restrictions that many countries have introduced on adolescents’ mental health.
Conclusion
To our knowledge, this is one of the first longitudinal studies on the adolescent mental health impact of COVID-19 covering almost all pandemic stages so far, with rather large intervals between the assessment waves. There was a significant short- and long-term improvement in depression and anxiety symptom during the national lockdown. We speculate that the benefits of lockdown on affective symptoms in adolescents in Hunan province were driven by relieving school-related stress or increasing resilience factors.
Data availability
Anonymous data will be made available following the end of the pandemic.
References
Prati G, Mancini AD (2021) The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns: a review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies and natural experiments. Psychol Med 51:201–211
Viner R, Russell S, Saulle R, Croker H, Stansfield C, Packer J, Nicholls D, Goddings AL, Bonell C, Hudson L, Hope S, Ward J, Schwalbe N, Morgan A, Minozzi S (2022) School closures during social lockdown and mental health, health behaviors, and well-being among children and adolescents during the first COVID-19 wave: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr 176:400–409
Racine N, McArthur BA, Cooke JE, Eirich R, Zhu J, Madigan S (2021) Global prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents during COVID-19: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 175:1142–1150
Long M, Huang J, Peng Y, Mai Y, Yuan X, Yang X (2022) The short- and long-term impact of COVID-19 lockdown on child maltreatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12;19(6):3350
Butterworth P, Schurer S, Trinh TA, Vera-Toscano E, Wooden M (2022) Effect of lockdown on mental health in Australia: evidence from a natural experiment analysing a longitudinal probability sample survey. Lancet Public Health 7:e427–e436
Qu M, Yang K, Cao Y, Xiu MH, Zhang XY (2023) Mental health status of adolescents after family confinement during the COVID-19 outbreak in the general population: a longitudinal survey. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 273:335–345
Li Y, Zhou Y, Ru T, Niu J, He M, Zhou G (2021) How does the COVID-19 affect mental health and sleep among Chinese adolescents: a longitudinal follow-up study. Sleep Med 85:246–258
Robinson E, Sutin AR, Daly M, Jones A (2022) A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. J Affect Disord 296:567–576
Pan KY, Kok AAL, Eikelenboom M, Horsfall M, Jorg F, Luteijn RA, Rhebergen D, Oppen PV, Giltay EJ, Penninx B (2021) The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with and without depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders: a longitudinal study of three Dutch case-control cohorts. Lancet Psychiatry 8:121–129
Tsamakis K, Tsiptsios D, Ouranidis A, Mueller C, Schizas D, Terniotis C, Nikolakakis N, Tyros G, Kympouropoulos S, Lazaris A, Spandidos DA, Smyrnis N, Rizos E (2021) COVID-19 and its consequences on mental health (Review). Exp Ther Med 21:244
Bouter DC, Zarchev M, de Neve-Enthoven NGM, Ravensbergen SJ, Kamperman AM, Hoogendijk WJG, Grootendorst-van Mil NH (2023) A longitudinal study of mental health in at-risk adolescents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32:1109–1117
Penner F, Hernandez Ortiz J, Sharp C (2021) Change in youth mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in a majority hispanic/latinx US sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 60:513–523
Mancini AD (2020) Heterogeneous mental health consequences of COVID-19: costs and benefits. Psychol Trauma 12:S15–S16
Calo-Blanco A, Kovarik J, Mengel F, Romero JG (2017) Natural disasters and indicators of social cohesion. PLoS ONE 12:e0176885
von Dawans B, Fischbacher U, Kirschbaum C, Fehr E, Heinrichs M (2012) The social dimension of stress reactivity: acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psychol Sci 23:651–660
Chen S, Bonanno GA (2020) Psychological adjustment during the global outbreak of COVID-19: a resilience perspective. Psychol Trauma 12:S51–S54
Sandbakken EM, Moss SM (2021) “Now we are all in the same boat. at the same time, we are not”. Meaning-making and coping under COVID-19 lockdown in Norway. Human Arenas 6:201–225
Shek DTL, Tang V, Lam CM, Lam MC, Tsoi KW, Tsang KM (2012) The relationship between Chinese cultural beliefs about adversity and psychological adjustment in Chinese families with economic disadvantage. Am J Fam Therapy 31:427–443
Shek DTL (2020) Chinese adolescent research under COVID-19. J Adolesc Health 67:733–734
Al-Krenawi A (2005) Socio-political aspects of mental health practice with Arabs in the Israeli context. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 42:126–136
XH Y, SX L, LL C, CX W, MQ L (2022) Changes in depression pre-, during and post-lockdown in a Chinese student sample. J Dep Anxiety 11:487
Su L, Wang K, Fan F, Su Y, Gao X (2008) Reliability and validity of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED) in Chinese children. J Anxiety Disord 22:612–621
Gao F, Su L, Cheng P (2009) Reliability and validity of the mood and feelings questionnaire in Chinese adolescents. Chin J Clin Psychol 17:440–442
Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70
van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011) mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations inR. J Stat Softw 45:1–67
Huque MH, Carlin JB, Simpson JA, Lee KJ (2018) A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 18:168
van Buuren S (2018) Flexible imputation of missing data, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley
Barnard J, Rubin DB (1999) Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation. Biometrika 86:948–955
Li KH, Raghunathan TE, Rubin DB (1991) Large-sample significance levels from multiply imputed data using moment-based statistics and an F reference distribution. J Am Stat Assoc 86:1065–1073
Bignardi G, Dalmaijer ES, Anwyl-Irvine AL, Smith TA, Siugzdaite R, Uh S, Astle DE (2020) Longitudinal increases in childhood depression symptoms during the COVID-19 lockdown. Arch Dis Child 106:791–797
Zhang L, Zhang D, Fang J, Wan Y, Tao F, Sun Y (2020) Assessment of mental health of Chinese primary school students before and after school closing and opening during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 3:e2021482
Racine N, Cooke JE, Eirich R, Korczak DJ, McArthur B, Madigan S (2020) Child and adolescent mental illness during COVID-19: a rapid review. Psychiatry Res 292:113307
Qu Y, Yang B, Telzer EH (2020) The cost of academic focus: daily school problems and biopsychological adjustment in chinese american families. J Youth Adolesc 49:1631–1644
Zhu B (2020) Cultural reproduction or cultural mobility? Unequal education achievement among Chinese college students. J Chin Sociol 7:6
Jiang S, Ren Q, Jiang C, Wang L (2021) Academic stress and depression of Chinese adolescents in junior high schools: moderated mediation model of school burnout and self-esteem. J Affect Disord 295:384–389
Liu Y, Lu Z (2011) The Chinese high school student’s stress in the school and academic achievement. Educ Psychol 31:27–35
Song YP, Han X, Zhang JW (2019) Analysis of the situation of school bullying and related factors in junior high school students in China 2016. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 53:1032–1037
Bruining H, Bartels M, Polderman TJC, Popma A (2021) COVID-19 and child and adolescent psychiatry: an unexpected blessing for part of our population? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 30:1139–1140
Williams L, Rollins L, Young D, Fleming L, Grealy M, Janssen X, Kirk A, MacDonald B, Flowers P (2021) What have we learned about positive changes experienced during COVID-19 lockdown? Evidence of the social patterning of change. PLoS ONE 16:e0244873
Tang S, Xiang M, Cheung T, Xiang YT (2021) Mental health and its correlates among children and adolescents during COVID-19 school closure: the importance of parent-child discussion. J Affect Disord 279:353–360
Li JB, Dou K, Liu ZH (2022) Profiles of positive changes in life outcomes over the COVID-19 pandemic in Chinese adolescents: the role of resilience and mental health consequence. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 16:13
Widnall E, Winstone L, Mars B, Haworth CMA, Kidger J (2020) Young people's mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: initial findings from a secondary school survey study in South West England. NIHR School for Public Health Research. https://sphr.nihr.ac.uk/
Patra S, Patro BK, Acharya SP (2020) COVID-19 lockdown and school closure: boon or bane for child mental health, results of a telephonic parent survey. Asian J Psychiatr 54:102395
Oosterhoff B, Palmer CA, Wilson J, Shook N (2020) Adolescents’ motivations to engage in social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: associations with mental and social health. J Adolesc Health 67:179–185
Choi J, Park Y, Kim HE, Song J, Lee D, Lee E, Kang H, Lee J, Park J, Lee JW, Ye S, Lee S, Ryu S, Kim Y, Kim YR, Kim YJ, Lee Y (2021) Daily life changes and life satisfaction among korean school-aged children in the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(6):3324
van der Laan SEI, Finkenauer C, Lenters VC, van Harmelen AL, van der Ent CK, Nijhof SL (2021) Gender-specific changes in life satisfaction after the COVID-19-related lockdown in Dutch adolescents: a longitudinal study. J Adolesc Health 69:737–745
Panda PK, Gupta J, Chowdhury SR, Kumar R, Meena AK, Madaan P, Sharawat IK, Gulati S (2021) Psychological and behavioral impact of lockdown and quarantine measures for COVID-19 pandemic on children, adolescents and caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trop Pediatr 67(1):fmaa122
Folk D, Okabe-Miyamoto K, Dunn E, Lyubomirsky S (2020) Did social connection decline during the first wave of COVID-19?: the role of extraversion. Collabra: Psychol 6 (1):37
Orben A, Tomova L, Blakemore SJ (2020) The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 4:634–640
Zhao N, Zhou G (2020) Social media use and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: moderator role of disaster stressor and mediator role of negative affect. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 12:1019–1038
Cauberghe V, Van Wesenbeeck I, De Jans S, Hudders L, Ponnet K (2021) How adolescents use social media to cope with feelings of loneliness and anxiety during COVID-19 lockdown. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 24:250–257
Yue J, Zang X, Le Y, An Y (2022) Anxiety, depression and PTSD among children and their parent during 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in China. Curr Psychol 41:5723–5730
Tull MT, Edmonds KA, Scamaldo KM, Richmond JR, Rose JP, Gratz KL (2020) Psychological outcomes associated with stay-at-home orders and the perceived impact of COVID-19 on daily life. Psychiatry Res 289:113098
Stallard P, Pereira AI, Barros L (2021) Post-traumatic growth during the COVID-19 pandemic in carers of children in Portugal and the UK: cross-sectional online survey. BJPsych Open 7:e37
Lee SJ, Ward KP, Chang OD, Downing KM (2021) Parenting activities and the transition to home-based education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child Youth Serv Rev 122:105585
Funding
This study received funding from the MSc-PHD Talent project of Changning Health Commission (RCJD2022S08) and the East China Normal University and Health Joint Fund (2022JKXYD09003) to author XHY, the Clinical Project of Changning Health Commission (20194Y013) and Shanghai Health Commission (20204Y0499) to author LLC. Authors RZ and AJL received support from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RZ devised the study concept and directed the analysis plan. XHY designed, interpreted the data. XHY and AL wrote up the first draft. PH and CY made important contributions to writing the manuscript. LLC and CLW collected the data. YLL administrated the study. All authors contributed to editing and commenting on the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
RZ is a private psychiatrist service provider at The London Depression Institute and co-investigator on a Livanova-funded observational study of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression. RZ has received honoraria for talks at medical symposia sponsored by Lundbeck as well as Janssen. He has collaborated with EMIS PLC and advises Depsee Ltd. He is affiliated with the D’Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro and has received funding from the Scients Institute USA, UK Medical Research Council, UK National Institute of Health and Care Research, Rosetrees Trust and US Brain & Behavior Research Foundation. The remaining authors declare they have no relevant financial or non-financial interests directly or indirectly related to the work.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Wenzhou Medical University ethics committee (2020-131). All participants and their parents or guardian provided fully informed consent.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X., Lawrence, A.J., Harrison, P. et al. Positive effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on depression and anxiety in Chinese adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 33, 1551–1561 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-023-02263-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-023-02263-z