Abstract
This study investigated sociodemographic and clinical factors influencing help-seeking attitudes and behavior among adolescents with mental health problems. As part of the ProHEAD (“Promoting Help-seeking using E-technology for ADolescents”) consortium a school-based, online assessment of sociodemographic information, psychopathology, risk-taking and self-harming behavior, help-seeking attitudes and behavior, and barriers to help-seeking was conducted in adolescents aged ≥ 12 years recruited from randomly selected schools in five regions of Germany. Linear regression analyses with the LMG formula were performed to explore predictors of help-seeking attitudes and behavior and assess their relative importance. Nine thousand five hundred and nine participants (95.5%) completed the online assessment (mean age: 15.1 years, 58.6% female). In total, 1606 participants (16.9%) showed relevant mental health problems (e.g., depressive and eating disorder symptoms, alcohol problems, and thoughts of self-harming behavior). Among them, 895 (55.7%) reported having sought help (lifetime), with higher rates for informal (n = 842, 52.4%) compared to professional (n = 380, 23.7%) sources. High help-seeking propensity emerged as the most important factor contributing to professional help-seeking, followed by elevated levels of psychopathology and perceived barriers, with sociodemographic factors being less impactful. Psychopathological severity also outweighed sociodemographic factors in predicting negative help-seeking attitudes. These findings indicate that attitudes towards seeking professional help, perceived barriers, and psychopathology severity critically influence limited adolescent help-seeking behavior. This emphasizes the need for initiatives that promote help-seeking, reduce negative attitudes, and address structural barriers in adolescent mental health care.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nearly half of all mental disorders begin before the age of 18, and 62% manifest before the age of 25, with a peak age of onset for all mental disorders at 14.5 years [1]. In Europe, almost one in five children and adolescents suffer from a mental disorder [2]. Developing mental health issues before 14 years of age increases the risk of adult mental disorder [3]. Mental disorders are the leading cause of Years Lived with Disability (YLDs), and self-harm is a prominent cause of Years of Life Lost (YLLs) among young people in most European countries [4], highlighting the negative long-term impact of mental disorders at a young age on both individuals and societies.
Despite the high prevalence and significant impact of mental disorders in young people, a large proportion of them do not seek help. Help-seeking is recognized as an “adaptive process that is the attempt to obtain external assistance to deal with a mental health concern” that can be professional (e.g., mental health professionals, primary health care providers, teachers) or informal (e.g., friends, parents) [5]. In a representative school-based study across 11 European countries, 61.9% of adolescents aged 13–17 years were at risk for a mental disorder or risk behavior [6], but only 10% sought professional treatment within one year. Additionally, 4.2% reported current suicidality, yet the majority did not seek professional help within a year [7]. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated the delay and reduction in help-seeking for mental health problems [8].
Recent systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative studies exploring barriers and facilitators of help-seeking for mental health problems from the perspective of the adolescents and their parents have identified various factors influencing help-seeking behavior that lie with the adolescents/families, the society, or the healthcare system [9,10,11]. These barriers include limited knowledge about mental health and available services, prior negative experiences with mental health professionals, negative attitudes towards mental health problems and help-seeking, stigmatization, preference for self-help or informal support, confidentiality concerns, service and indirect costs (e.g., travel costs, loss of wages), logistical barriers (e.g., long travel distances, limited availability of parents), and limited access to professional help (e.g., waiting times, difficulty in getting a referral, inflexible appointment systems) [10, 11]. However, the current evidence is constrained by selective samples (e.g., adolescents/families who accessed services), the lack of evaluated measures of mental health problems and of facilitators/barriers for help-seeking, the focus on help-seeking attitudes or intentions rather than actual help-seeking behavior, and the insufficient examination of the relative importance of different factors influencing help-seeking behavior.
To address these gaps, the current study had three main objectives. Firstly, to examine in a large school-based sample of adolescents the rates of professional and informal help-seeking for mental health problems. Secondly, to explore various sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with attitudes towards seeking assistance and actual help-seeking behavior and assess their relative importance. According to the theory of planned behavior, attitude is not truly a measure of help-seeking in the sense of an active coping attempt but influences observable behavior [5]. Thirdly, to investigate potential differences in sociodemographic and clinical factors influencing help-seeking attitudes and behavior between adolescents who exceeded a pre-defined threshold for relevant mental health problems (i.e., “the clinical group”) and those who did not (i.e., “the non-clinical group”).
Methods
Sample and procedure
The present study is a data analysis of baseline screening data collected within the ProHEAD (“Promoting Help-seeking using E-technology for ADolescents”) consortium. The consortium aims at (1) improving help-seeking behavior in young people who experience relevant mental health problems; (2) improving the selective prevention of common disorders in those who are at risk; and (3) strengthening resources to counteract the development of mental disorders in young people [12]. The consortium conducted longitudinal, school-based, online assessments of mental health problems in adolescents between 12 and 25 years old. After the completion of the initial screening assessment, participants were allocated to one of five online randomized controlled trials based on their screening results, followed by two annual follow-up assessments. The baseline screening was conducted at randomly selected schools in five regions of Germany (i.e., Heidelberg, Hamburg, Leipzig, Schwäbisch Gmünd, Marburg). The randomized selection was stratified by regional district and school-type to ensure the selection of a representative sample of schools within each recruitment area. Inclusion criteria were sufficient German skills and internet access. Eligible adolescents and their legal guardians were asked to provide written informed consent before participating. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty at the University of Heidelberg (S-086/2018; leading study site) as well as the respective institutional review boards of the additional study sites. For the present study, the data of the initial screening were used.
Instruments
Sociodemographic information
Sociodemographic information included age, gender [f/m], center [Heidelberg, Hamburg, Leipzig, Schwäbisch Gmünd or Marburg], school type [Gymnasium, Realschule, Haupt- und Werkrealschulen, Gemeinschaftsschulen (Oberschule, Stadtteilschule), Berufsschule, other], and migration status (no [0], unknown [2] or yes [1] , meaning that the hild or one of the parent was not born in Germany). The socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed using the Family Affluence Scale (FAS) [13]. The FAS is a short four-item measure, with a total score ranging between 0 and 2 indicating low, between 3 and 5 medium, and between 6 and 9 high SES. The Laucht-Index [14] was applied to assess psychosocial adversity (e.g. parental unemployment) that may pose a risk on the development of a child. It comprises 10 items and distinguishes no risk [0], low risk [1, 2] and high risk [> 2]. For the current analysis, the mean scores of the FAS and the Laucht-Index were used.
Psychopathology
The KIDSCREEN-10 was used to assess health-related quality of life [15]. It contains ten items with a score ranging from 0 [never/not at all/excellent] to 4 [very much/always/bad]. A higher total score reflects greater health-related quality of life. Furthermore, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) [16] was applied to assess mental health problems in the previous six months. It is a 25-item measure, with each item being scored from 0 [not applicable] to 2 [clearly applicable]. A greater total score indicates more psychological problems. An extended version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 modified for adolescents (PHQ-A) [17] was used as a severity measure for depressive symptoms within the past two weeks. This questionnaire consists of ten items scored from 0 [not at all/no] to 3 [almost daily/extremely] as well as three items scored as 0 [no] or 1 [yes]. A greater total score means more severe symptoms of depression.
Features of eating disorder pathology in the previous four weeks were assessed by using the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for Children (ChEDE-Q) [18]. The ChEDE-Q is a 22-item measure scored from 0 [no day/never/not at all] to 6 [everyday/every time/clearly uncomfortable]. The total mean score was used as an indicator of severity of eating disorder symptoms.
A brief screening for personality disorders was performed using the Self-Rated Standardized Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS) [19]. This questionnaire consists of eight items with dichotomous answer options [no = 0/yes = 1], with a greater total score reflecting more severe personality pathology.
Risk-taking behavior and self-harm
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) [20], which is composed of ten items, was applied to detect signs of alcohol use disorders in the previous 12 months. Its items are coded from 0 [never/1–2 glasses/no] to 4 [four times a week or more/ten or more/yes in the last year]. A greater total score indicates more severe alcohol misuse.
Suicidal ideation and attempts were assessed using the Paykel Scale [21]. Two items measured suicidal thoughts and plans in the past 12 months, rated on a scale from 0 [never] to 5 [always]. In contrast, suicidal thoughts and plans in the last two weeks were assessed as either present [1] or absent [0]. The occurrence of suicidal ideation was defined as a score of 1 [seldom] or higher on either the suicidal thoughts or the suicidal plans item for the last 12 months period, or as a score of 1 [present] on the suicidal thoughts or suicidal plans items for the last two weeks. Additionally, one item measured the occurrence of suicidal attempts [0 = no/1 = yes].
The life-time occurrence of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) [0 = no/1 = yes] was assessed using the respective item of the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behavior Interview (SITBI) [22].
Help-seeking
Attitudes towards help-seeking for mental health problems were assessed using the Inventory of Attitudes Towards Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS) [23]. This questionnaire comprises 24 items scored from 0 [do not agree] to 4 [agree] and can be classified into three subscales, with eight items each: (a) psychological openness, which evaluates a person’s willingness to acknowledge and seek professional help for mental health problems, (b) help-seeking propensity, which measures the extent to which a person believes he or she is capable of seeking professional help and how strongly he or she is personally inclined to do so, and (c) indifference to stigma, which assesses how much a person worries about what other people might think, if they found out, that he or she is seeking professional help.
Actual help-seeking behavior was assessed by using the Actual Help-Seeking Questionnaire (AHSQ) [24] containing 13 items. The first question asks whether the individual has ever sought help for a mental health problem [0 = no; 1 = yes, in the last 12 months; 2 = yes, but it has been longer than 12 months]. In the case of help-seeking, items 2–13 list various forms of professional and informal help that can be marked as used [1] or not used [0]. Dichotomous items [0 = no; 1 = yes, in the last 12 months or more than 12 months ago] for professional [i.e., item 2 (partner), 3 (friend), 4 (parent), 5 (other family member)] and informal [i.e., item 6 (school psychologist/social worker), 7 (psychotherapist), 8 (psychiatrist), 9 (counselling centre), 10 (telephone counselling), 11 (family doctor), 12 (teacher)] help were used for the current analysis [24, 25].
Barriers to help-seeking behavior were surveyed using a 14-item questionnaire that was based on an extensive literature review and specifically designed for the purpose of the ProHEAD consortium. The first item asked whether the individual would seek professional help for mental health problems and was dichotomous [0 = no/1 = yes]. If “no” was indicated, items 2 to 14 were presented listing potential reasons for the lack of help-seeking behavior. These items were scored from 0 [not true] to 3 [true]. The mean score, indicating more perceived barriers to seeking help, was included in the current analysis.
Data analysis
Participants were allocated to the clinical group or non-clinical group, respectively, reflecting whether they reached a predefined threshold for relevant mental health problems or not. The threshold reflects the allocation criteria to the first RCT of the ProHEAD consortium (i.e., ProHEAD Online by Kaess et al. [26]), which are detailed in Online Resource 1. Pearson correlations between all variables revealed a high overlap between the SDQ, the KIDSCREEN-10, and the PHQ-A (see Fig. 1 in Online Resource 1). Accordingly, a composite score reflecting “general psychopathology” was created by summing up the z-standardized scores of the three scales. Notably, the KIDSCREEN-10 score was multiplied by − 1 before the composite score was built. For descriptive purposes, the number and percentages for categorical variables and the mean and standard deviations for continuous variables were calculated.
To explore predictors of help-seeking attitudes and behavior, three linear regression analyses were conducted for IASMHS psychological openness, help-seeking propensity, and indifference to stigma, and three logistic regression analyses for AHSQ actual help-seeking, professional help-seeking, and informal help-seeking as outcome variables, respectively. Age, gender, center, migration status, socioeconomic status (FAS), psychosocial adversity (Laucht-Index), general psychopathology (composite score derived from SDQ, KIDSCREEN-10, and PHQ-A), eating disorder psychopathology (ChEDE-Q), personality pathology (SAPAS), alcohol problems (AUDIT), suicidal ideation (Paykel), suicide attempts (Paykel), and NSSI (SITBI) were entered as predictor variables into the regression analyses. In the regression analyses with the AHSQ variables as outcomes, the IASMHS subscales and the barriers to help-seeking questionnaire were considered as additional predictors. Continuous predictor variables were z-standardized to facilitate comparison between predictors. The importance of single predictor variables was determined using the LMG formula [27]. LMG calculates the relative contribution of each predictor to the explained total variance (R2) for linear regressions and the explained Mc Fadden’s pseudo R2 for logistic regressions, respectively, with the consideration of the sequence of predictors appearing in the model. The explained variance (in % of the total variance) or pseudo R2 by each predictor variable reflecting its relative importance estimated by LMG is presented in the results below. The regression coefficients for linear regression and Odds Ratios (OR) for logistic regressions, respectively, representing the direction and strength of the relationships between predictor and outcome variables can be found in Online Resource 1. Finally, to explore whether the importance of predictor variables shows differences between adolescents who reached the threshold for relevant mental health problems and those who did not, all regression analyses were repeated including interaction terms clinical group-status × predictor for all predictor variables. The inclusion of the interaction terms allows the examination of the clinical group-status as a moderator of the associations between the predictor variables and the outcomes. As suggested by a reviewer, the regression analyses predicting help-seeking attitudes (IASMHS subscales) and actual help-seeking behavior (AHSQ subscales) were repeated with the SDQ subscales (i.e., conduct problems, emotional symptoms, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior), the KIDSCREEN-10 and the PHQ-9 as individual predictors instead of the general psychopathology composite score. Full results of these additional analyses are provided in Online Resource 1 (Tables 3–6). The overall patterns of findings remained unchanged. All analyses were run with R [28] using r packages relaimpo and sensitivity for LMG calculations.
Results
Sample characteristics
Out of 767 invited schools, 185 (24.12%) did not respond, 378 declined (49.28%), and 195 (25.42%) agreed to participate in the study. While 45’084 adolescents were invited to take part in the study, 9954 (22.08%) initiated, and 9509 (21.09%) completed the initial screening assessment, and were, thus, included in the current study.
A total of 1606 participants (16.9%) showed clinically relevant mental health problems (i.e., the clinical group). Of those adolescents, 895 (55.7%) reported having sought help (in a lifetime), with higher rates observed for informal (n = 834, 51.9%) compared to professional (n = 411, 25.6%) sources. Detailed sociodemographic and clinical data of the whole sample as well as of the clinical and non-clinical groups are provided in Table 1.
Correlates of attitudes toward seeking mental health services
All sociodemographic and clinical factors together explained 15.84% of the variance of indifference to stigma, 9.91% of the variance of help-seeking propensity, and 6.84% of the variance of psychological openness. The respective proportions of the variances explained by each predictor reflecting their relative importance are shown in Table 2. The regression coefficients (and their 95% confidence intervals) are presented in Table 1 in Online Resource 1 and illustrated in Fig. 1.
Correlates of actual help-seeking behavior
Sociodemographic, clinical, and attitudinal factors as well as perceived barriers had pseudo R2 values of 20.44% for actual help-seeking behavior, 22.62% for professional help-seeking, and 18.75% for informal help-seeking. The respective proportions of the pseudo R2 explained by each predictor reflecting their relative importance are given in Table 3. The OR (and their 95% confidence intervals) are presented in Table 2 in Online Resource 1 and illustrated in Fig. 2.
Moderation by clinical group-status
The additional amount of variance or pseudo R2 for the outcome variables explained by the interaction terms clinical group status × predictor (for all variables) ranged between 0.003 and 0.007 (see Table 4). This indicates that the moderation of the associations between the sociodemographic and clinical variables and attitudes towards or actual help-seeking behavior, respectively, by the clinical group status was negligible.
Discussion
In a large sample of German adolescents aged 12–25, 16.9% showed clinically relevant mental health symptoms according to the results of an online self-report screening. This matches the recently reported prevalence rates of mental disorders among children and adolescents in Europe [2]. Also, 17.6% reported lifetime NSSI, which is consistent with the meta-analytic finding that approximately one in five adolescents engage in deliberate self-harm over time [29]. Moreover, 34.3% of the adolescents reported suicidal ideation and 2.9% a suicide attempt in the previous 12 months. These 12-month prevalence rates are somewhat lower than the reported life-time prevalence rates for suicidal thoughts and attempts in young people [30]. Strikingly, while 55.7% of the young people with clinically relevant mental health symptoms reported having sought help (lifetime), substantially more did so from informal (51.9%) than from professional (25.6%) sources, confirming the previously reported low professional help-seeking behavior of this age group [6, 7].
A positive attitude towards professional help-seeking, reflected in higher help-seeking propensity scores, emerged as the most important factor explaining variability in professional help-seeking behavior, followed by perceived barriers to mental health help-seeking and clinical factors (i.e., increased levels of general psychopathology, NSSI, and suicidal ideations in the last 12 months). This aligns with previous findings that attitudes towards help-seeking and perceived barriers and facilitators significantly influence professional help-seeking [31, 32]. Clinical factors had, overall, a greater impact compared to sociodemographic factors on both, help-seeking attitudes, and actual help-seeking behavior, potentially indicating that the level of psychopathological distress is a key determinant of help-seeking. Therefore, initiatives aimed at increasing help-seeking behavior, especially among young people with high levels of psychopathological distress, should primarily focus on fostering positive attitudes towards professional help-seeking and reducing perceived barriers. This approach is crucial for minimizing the duration of untreated illness, which is associated with poor outcomes [33,34,35]. Consistent with previous findings [11, 36,37,38], higher SES, female gender, and older age were related to more positive attitudes towards professional help-seeking, and with an increased likelihood to seek professional help. The influence of SES and age may be attributed to differences in mental health literacy (which tend to increase with SES and age) [39], while the gender effect could be explained by gender-specific norms and socialization patterns [36]. Interestingly, higher levels of psychopathology (i.e., general, eating disorder, and personality pathology, NSSI, and suicidal ideation) were related to more negative attitudes (as reflected in lower levels of psychological openness, help-seeking propensity, and indifference to stigma), but increased likelihood for professional help-seeking behavior. These findings raise the question whether previous negative experiences with mental health services have contributed to the negative perception about professional help, as previously reported [40,41,42]. For instance, experiencing prior treatment as stigmatizing or unhelpful may exacerbate feelings of hopelessness and distrust toward mental health professionals. Finally, the results of the moderation analyses indicate that the relevance of sociodemographic and clinical predictors for both attitudes towards help-seeking and actual help-seeking behavior were comparable for adolescents with clinically relevant mental problems (i.e., the clinical group) and those without (i.e., the non-clinical group). However, the interpretation of this finding remains complex, as the clinical group-status overlaps with clinical variables (i.e., general and eating disorder psychopathology, and alcohol problems) that were identified as important predictors of attitudes towards help-seeking and actual help-seeking behavior.
Several limitations must be considered: First, the representativeness of the sample is limited, because recruitment took place in five pre-selected regions in Germany and was dependent on the agreement of schools and students to participate. The Covid-19 pandemic as well as the low participation rate at student level made it necessary to invite more schools than originally planned (e.g., also vocational schools). A recent analysis conducted at one of the study centers identified that a primary reason for non-participation was a lack of concern about the topic of “mental health” [43]. This suggests that students who chose not to participate might have experienced fewer mental health problems compared to those who did participate in the study. Alternatively, these findings may reflect a fear of stigma related to mental health, which presents a major barrier to help-seeking. The representativeness of the sample is further constrained by including only male and female genders, which limits the generalizability of the study results to non-binary adolescents. Future research should explore gender diversity as a predictor of help-seeking attitudes and behaviors. Second, the clinical group-status of participants was based on self-report, which is not equivalent to a psychiatric diagnosis as obtained through a structured clinical interview with an adolescent and their parents. In addition, the determination of the clinical group-status in this study is somewhat arbitrary. The chosen criteria align with the allocation criteria to the first RCT of the ProHEAD consortium [26]. Notably, the initial allocation criteria were adjusted after a preliminary analysis of 10% of the sample data revealed that they were too inclusive. The adequacy of these adjusted criteria is supported by the fact that the frequencies of mental health problems in the current study correspond well with prevalence rates reported previously [2]. Third, recent social and economic changes may have affected the FAS’ ability to accurately measure adolescent SES. These changes include climate change, which may alter travel patterns (potentially influencing the car ownership item), the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to travel restrictions and a shift to online education and remote work (potentially influencing the holiday and computer items), or technological advances making personal computers more affordable and therefore less suitable as an indicator for adolescent SES [44, 45] Future research should consider multiple SES indicators when predicting help-seeking attitudes and behaviors. Fourth, the predictor variables considered in the current analyses explained less variance in help-seeking attitudes (IASMHS subscales) compared to help-seeking behavior (AHSQ subscales). This suggests that other variables not assessed in the current study, such as peer influence or exposure to mental health education, may play a significant role in shaping attitudes towards seeking professional mental health help. These factors could be important areas for future research. Finally, as the current study was cross-sectional, correlates of mental health help-seeking attitudes and behavior were examined, which does not allow for causal conclusions.
To conclude, the findings of the current study confirm attitudinal aspects, perceived barriers, as well as clinical and sociodemographic characteristics as relevant factors for the understanding of why some young people with mental health problems do seek professional help, while others do not [9,10,11]. They extend previous research by demonstrating that the individual propensity and capacity to seek professional help is most relevant, followed by severity of psychopathology and perceived barriers (e.g., lack of knowledge of mental health services or lack of time resources, travel distances, and confidentiality concerns), while sociodemographic factors such as SES, age, and gender are of minor relevance. These findings overall carry noteworthy socio-political implications, as they emphasize that action is needed to enable and empower young people to seek professional help (e.g., through classroom-based interventions to increase mental health literacy), and to reduce stigma (e.g., through mental health campaigns) and structural barriers to mental health treatment [9, 26].
Data availability
Data is available upon on request from the corresponding author.
References
Solmi M, Radua J, Olivola M et al (2022) Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry 27:281–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7
Sacco R, Camilleri N, Eberhardt J et al (2022) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of mental disorders among children and adolescents in Europe. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-02131-2
Mulraney M, Coghill D, Bishop C et al (2021) A systematic review of the persistence of childhood mental health problems into adulthood. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 129:182–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.030
Castelpietra G, Knudsen AKS, Agardh EE et al (2022) The burden of mental disorders, substance use disorders and self-harm among young people in Europe, 1990–2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Reg Health Eur 16:100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100341
Rickwood T (2012) Conceptual measurement framework for help-seeking for mental health problems. Psychol Res Behav Manag 5:173–183. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S38707
Lustig S, Kaess M, Schnyder N, Michel C, Brunner R, Tubiana A, Kahn JP, Sarchiapone M, Hoven CW, Barzilay S, Apter A, Balazs J, Bobes J, Saiz PA, Cozman D, Cotter P, Kereszteny A, Podlogar T, Postuvan V, Värnik A, Resch F, Carli V, Wasserman D (2023) The impact of school-based screening on service use in adolescents at risk for mental health problems and risk-behaviour. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32(9):1745–1754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-01990-z
Kaess M, Schnyder N, Michel C et al (2022) Twelve-month service use, suicidality and mental health problems of European adolescents after a school-based screening for current suicidality. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 31:229–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-020-01681-7
Yonemoto N, Kawashima Y (2023) Help-seeking behaviors for mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 323:85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.043
Aguirre Velasco A, Cruz ISS, Billings J et al (2020) What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 20:293. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02659-0
Radez J, Reardon T, Creswell C et al (2021) Why do children and adolescents (not) seek and access professional help for their mental health problems? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 30:183–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01469-4
Reardon T, Harvey K, Baranowska M et al (2017) What do parents perceive are the barriers and facilitators to accessing psychological treatment for mental health problems in children and adolescents? A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 26:623–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-016-0930-6
Kaess M, Bauer S (2019) Editorial promoting help-seeking using E-Technology for ADolescents: the ProHEAD consortium. Trials 20:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3162-x
Boyce W, Torsheim T, Currie C, Zambon A (2006) The Family Affluence Scale as a measure of National Wealth: validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Soc Indic Res 78:473–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-1607-6
Laucht M, Esser G, Schmidt MH et al (1992) Risikokinder: Zur Bedeutung biologischer und psychosozialer Risiken für die kindliche Entwicklung in den beiden ersten Lebensjahren. Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie 41:275–285
Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Rajmil L et al (2005) KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 5:353–364. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.5.3.353
Goodman A, Goodman R (2009) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a dimensional measure of child mental health. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48:400–403. https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181985068
Johnson JG, Harris ES, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW (2002) The Patient Health Questionnaire for adolescents. J Adolesc Health 30:196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00333-0
Hilbert A, Tuschen-Caffier B (2016) Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire: Deutschsprachige Übersetzung. dgvt, Tübingen
Hesse M, Moran P (2010) Screening for personality disorder with the Standardised Assessment of Personality: Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS): further evidence of concurrent validity. BMC Psychiatry 10:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-10
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M (1993) Development of the Alcohol Use DisordersIdentification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcoholconsumption–II. Addiction 88(6):791–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x (PMID: 8329970)
Paykel ES, Myers JK, Lindenthal JJ, Tanner J (1974) Suicidal feelings in the general population: a prevalence study. Br J Psychiatry 124:460–469. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.124.5.460
Fischer G, Ameis N, Parzer P et al (2014) The German version of the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI-G): a tool to assess non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior disorder. BMC Psychiatry 14:265. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0265-0
Mackenzie CS, Gekoski WL, Knox VJ (2006) Age, gender, and the underutilization of mental health services: the influence of help-seeking attitudes. Aging Ment Health 10:574–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860600641200
Rickwood DJ, Braithwaite VA (1994) Social-psychological factors affecting seeking help for emotional problems. Soc Sci Med 39:563–572
Rickwood D, Deane FP, Wilson CJ, Ciarrochi J (2005) Young people’s help-seeking for mental health problems. Aust E-J Adv Ment Health 4:218–251. https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.4.3.218
Kaess M, Ritter S, Lustig S et al (2019) Promoting help-seeking using E-technology for ADolescents with mental health problems: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial within the ProHEAD Consortium. Trials 20:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3157-7
Grömping U (2006) Relative importance for linear regression in R: the Package relaimpo. J Stat Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i01
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Xiao Q, Song X, Huang L et al (2022) Global prevalence and characteristics of non-suicidal self-injury between 2010 and 2021 among a non-clinical sample of adolescents: a meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry 13:912441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.912441
Van Meter AR, Knowles EA, Mintz EH (2023) Systematic review and meta-analysis: international prevalence of suicidal ideation and attempt in youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 62:973–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2022.07.867
Al Omari O, Khalaf A, Al Sabei S et al (2022) Facilitators and barriers of mental health help-seeking behaviours among adolescents in Oman: a cross-sectional study. Nord J Psychiatry 76:591–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2022.2038666
Ma SON, McCallum SM, Pasalich D et al (2023) Understanding parental knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy in professional help-seeking for child anxiety. J Affect Disord 337:112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.05.079
Ghio L, Gotelli S, Marcenaro M et al (2014) Duration of untreated illness and outcomes in unipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 152–154:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.002
Penttilä M, Jääskeläinen E, Hirvonen N et al (2014) Duration of untreated psychosis as predictor of long-term outcome in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 205:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.127753
Kisely S, Scott A, Denney J, Simon G (2006) Duration of untreated symptoms in common mental disorders: association with outcomes: international study. Br J Psychiatry 189:79–80. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.105.019869
Haavik L, Joa I, Hatloy K et al (2019) Help seeking for mental health problems in an adolescent population: the effect of gender. J Ment Health Abingdon Engl 28:467–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1340630
Horwitz AG, McGuire T, Busby DR et al (2020) Sociodemographic differences in barriers to mental health care among college students at elevated suicide risk. J Affect Disord 271:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.115
Schomerus G, Appel K, Meffert PJ et al (2013) Personality-related factors as predictors of help-seeking for depression: a population-based study applying the behavioral model of health services use. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48:1809–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0643-1
González-Sanguino C, Rodríguez-Medina J, Redondo-Pacheco J et al (2024) An exploratory cross-sectional study on mental health literacy of Spanish adolescents. BMC Public Health 24:1469. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18933-9
Chandra A, Minkovitz CS (2007) Factors that influence mental health stigma among 8th grade adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 36:763–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9091-0
Gould MS, Marrocco FA, Hoagwood K et al (2009) Service use by at-risk youths after school-based suicide screening. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48:1193–1201. https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181bef6d5
Sylwestrzak A, Overholt CE, Ristau KI, Coker KL (2015) Self-reported barriers to treatment engagement: adolescent perspectives from the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent supplement (NCS-A). Community Ment Health J 51:775–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-014-9776-x
Baldofski S, Klemm S-L, Kohls E et al (2024) Reasons for non-participation of children and adolescents in a large-scale school-based mental health project. Front Public Health 11:1294862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1294862
Currie C, Alemán Díaz AY, Bosáková L, De Looze M (2024) The International Family Affluence Scale (FAS): charting 25 years of indicator development, evidence produced, and policy impact on adolescent health inequalities. SSM Popul Health 25:101599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101599
Boer M, Moreno-Maldonado C, Dierckens M et al (2024) The implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for the construction of the Family Affluence Scale: findings from 16 countries. Child Indic Res 17:395–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10082-6
Acknowledgements
The ProHEAD Consortium: The ProHEAD consortium comprises six study sites in Germany. Site leaders are: Michael Kaess (University Hospital Heidelberg), Stephanie Bauer (University Hospital Heidelberg), Rainer Thomasius (University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf), Christine Rummel-Kluge (University Leipzig), Heike Eschenbeck (University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd), Hans-Joachim Salize (Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University) and Katja Becker (Philipps- University Marburg). Further members of the consortium are: Sabrina Bonnet, Johannes Feldhege, Christina Gallinat, Stella Hammon, Julian Koenig, Sophia Lustig, Markus Moessner, Fikret Özer, Regina Richter, Johanna Stadler (all University Hospital Heidelberg), Steffen Luntz (Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials Heidelberg), Silke Diestelkamp, Anna-Lena Schulz (all University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf), Sabrina Baldofski, Sarah-Lena Klemm, Elisabeth Kohls, Sophia Müller, Lina-Jolien Peter, Mandy Rogalla (all University Leipzig), Vera Gillé, Johanna Jade, Laya Lehner (all University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd), Elke Voss (Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University), Alisa Hiery, Jennifer Krämer (all Philipps-University Marburg).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The ProHEAD Consortium was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Grant (01GL1744B). Marialuisa Cavelti was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PZ00P1_193279).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
MK, SB, RT, CR-K, HE, and KB led the study at the various sites. MM was responsible for setting up the database and data management. JK, SD, VG, SB, and JK were involved in study management and data collection at the different study sites. SS performed the statistical analyses. MC and NR drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty at the University of Heidelberg (S-086/2018; leading study site) as well as the respective institutional review boards of the additional study sites.
Consent to participate
Eligible adolescents and their legal guardians were asked to provide written informed consent before participating.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cavelti, M., Ruppen, N.A., Sele, S. et al. An examination of sociodemographic and clinical factors influencing help-seeking attitudes and behaviors among adolescents with mental health problems. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02568-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02568-7