Abstract
The clinical impact of infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- and/or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (Ent) has reached dramatic levels worldwide. Infections due to these multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens—especially Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae—may originate from a prior asymptomatic intestinal colonization that could also favor transmission to other subjects. It is therefore desirable that gut carriers are rapidly identified to try preventing both the occurrence of serious endogenous infections and potential transmission. Together with the infection prevention and control countermeasures, any strategy capable of effectively eradicating the MDR-Ent from the intestinal tract would be desirable. In this narrative review, we present a summary of the different aspects linked to the intestinal colonization due to MDR-Ent. In particular, culture- and molecular-based screening techniques to identify carriers, data on prevalence and risk factors in different populations, clinical impact, length of colonization, and contribution to transmission in various settings will be overviewed. We will also discuss the standard strategies (selective digestive decontamination, fecal microbiota transplant) and those still in development (bacteriophages, probiotics, microcins, and CRISPR-Cas-based) that might be used to decolonize MDR-Ent carriers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The global spread and continuous increase of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales (Ent) represent a serious concern for our health-care systems [1, 2]. These Gram-negative pathogens can be resistant to the commonly used third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) and carbapenems, mainly due to the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL; e.g., CTX-M-types) and carbapenemases (e.g., KPC-, NDM-, and OXA-48-types), respectively. Moreover, since such ESBL and carbapenemase genes are carried by mobile-genetic elements (MGEs; e.g., plasmids) co-harboring other antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), these organisms are also frequently co-resistant to other classes of antibiotics, such as quinolones, aminoglycosides, and polymyxins [1,2,3,4]. Overall, this phenomenon drastically limits our treatment options [5]. As a result, infections caused by ESBL- (ESBL-Ent) or carbapenemase-producing Ent (CPE) are responsible for higher morbidity and mortality rates compared to those due to less resistant organisms [6, 7]. In 2018, this fact prompted the World Health Organization to classify both ESBL-Ent and CPE among the most critical priority pathogens for research and development of new therapeutic strategies and rapid diagnostics [8].
Since the Ent are common commensals of the intestinal microbiota [9], infections due to MDR-Ent—especially Escherichia coli (Ec) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp)—may arise from a prior asymptomatic gut colonization [10, 11]. In addition, in both hospital and community settings, long-standing carriers can transmit such pathogens to other people in close contact with them [12]. Therefore, subjects colonized with MDR-Ent should be rapidly and accurately identified to implement infection prevention and control (IPC) measures [13, 14]. More importantly, eradication of MDR-Ent from the gut of carriers (“decolonization”) can represent an ideal clinical solution to prevent difficult-to-treat infections [15], but may also limit the epidemiological spread of these life-threatening bacteria in humans [16]. In this review, we present a summary of the different aspects linked to intestinal colonization due to MDR-Ent.
Screening of carriers
In the hospital setting, screening for the intestinal carriage of MDR-Ent is an important procedure [13]. In fact, this approach is implemented with the aim to detect such carriage (e.g., patients with CPE) and prevent or contain the spread of MDR-Ent (e.g., occurrence of outbreaks) [14]. For instance, in many countries, such proactive procedures are routine when patients are transferred between hospitals or admitted from high prevalence areas [17,18,19]. However, also healthy individuals can be colonized with MDR-Ent. In fact, various surveys have shown that risk factors such as travel and previous antibiotic treatment greatly influence colonization [17, 20]. Therefore, not only subjects in healthcare-associated settings and in high-endemic regions, but also healthy people in the community can be screened to identify MDR-Ent carriers.
Screening of the intestinal flora for MDR-Ent (e.g., ESBL-Ent and/or CPE) is achieved by analyzing fecal samples (stool, perianal/perirectal, or rectal swabs) using culture- or molecular-based methods [13, 21]. A stool specimen is considered the gold standard, but perianal swabs are easier to obtain and less invasive than rectal swabs. Unfortunately, the performance of perianal swabs in detecting colonization with MDR-Ent has been investigated in only two comparative studies. Lautenbach et al. found 90% sensitivity of perianal swabs for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Ec [22]. In a larger study, Kubiak et al. found that perianal swabs had a concordance of ≥ 98% with stool in detecting ESBL-Ent [23]. Notably, in both studies, selective cultures were performed without broth pre-enrichments (see below).
Culture-based methods
In culture-based methods, a fecal sample (~ 50-100 µg) is plated directly onto various commercially available selective chromogenic media. For instance, to detect carbapenem-resistant Ent (CRE), the CHROMID® CARBA or CARBA SMART (bioMérieux), and KPC or mSuperCARBA™ (CHROMagar™) are commonly used [13]. For the detection of 3GC- and colistin-resistant (COL-R) strains, many other media exist and their performances have been extensively discussed elsewhere (e.g., [24,25,26,27]). Importantly, the main advantages that chromogenic media offer are the simultaneous detection of resistance phenotypes and species-level differentiation (i.e., colonies of different colors). Alternatively, non-chromogenic media such as in MacConkey agar supplemented with antibiotic disks (e.g., ertapenem) can be used for the detection, for example, of CRE in stools [28].
Detection of MDR-Ent directly from fecal samples using chromogenic media has a typical turnaround time (TAT) of 18–20 h (overnight incubation), though the final antimicrobial susceptibility tests require at least a further day. This approach can detect organisms with variable limits of detection (LOD), which typically depend on several factors such as chromogenic media brand, species, resistance mechanisms (e.g., KPC- vs. OXA-48-type carbapenemase producers), and input (i.e., stool inoculum) [13]. Therefore, direct plating on chromogenic media may not be sufficient to detect low level carriage of MDR organisms (MDROs).
To overcome this issue, the performance (i.e., increase in detection) of direct plating can be optimized by an additional pre-enrichment step [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. This step is usually achieved by overnight incubation in the presence of one or several antibiotics in liquid broth [29]. The benefit of pre-enrichment is well known, but not consistently implemented due to the extra hands-on time in the clinical laboratory. Importantly, the implementation of a pre-enrichment step offers an increase in the recovery of low carriage organisms below the LOD [29]. For instance, Rondinaud et al. showed that an overnight pre-enrichment (100 mg of stools in 10 mL of brain-heart infusion broth supplemented by 1.5 mg/L of cefotaxime) improved the detection of ESBL-Ent by 11.7% without decreasing specificity [36]. In another study involving 343 patients, the direct culture identified only 71.1% of the stools positive for ESBL-Ent, whereas using pre-enrichments in tryptic soy broth, MacConkey or MacConkey plus cefuroxime [32 mg/L] and vancomycin [64 mg/L] positive samples were 88.9%, 91.1%, and 91.1%, respectively [31].
Molecular-based methods
Various nucleic acid-based methods exist for the detection of MDR-Ent directly from fecal samples. These include the real-time PCR- (quantitative PCR, qPCR)-based, which allow for ARGs identification from fecal genomic DNA. Alternative to qPCR, the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is not affected by PCR-inhibitors typically present in fecal DNA, and is a fast and cheaper substitute to screen for MDR-Ent carriage [21, 37,38,39].
The qPCR method has been integrated into several automated systems that offer minimal hands-on time and faster TAT compared to culture methods. For instance, a multiplex qPCR approach is used by the GeneXpert® platform (Cepheid), which can implement the Xpert® Carba-R assay for the detection of major carbapenemase genes in less than 1 h [40, 41]. Other similar rapid qPCR-based automated platforms designed to detect ESBL and/or carbapenemase genes are, for example, BD MAX™ Check-Points CPO® (Check-Points), LightMix® modular carbapenemase (Roche), CRE/ESBL ELITe MGB® (ELITechGroup), and Novodiag® CarbaR+ (Hologic) assays; all of which provide results in less than 3 h [42,43,44,45,46]. However, a major drawback of these automated systems is that they are generally unable to detect novel ARGs because they rely on predefined targets [13]. They also tend to be significantly more expensive than culture-based systems [47]. Nevertheless, in this context, we emphasize that the longer TAT of culture-based methods may actually imply higher overall healthcare costs (e.g., for unnecessarily preemptive isolation for non-colonized patients) [48].
Molecular-based methods offer equal or higher sensitivity as culture-methods, with LODs that are variable from method-to-method and usually gene-dependent [42, 44]. For instance, Nass et al. showed that an in-house qPCR designed to detect the blaNDM-1 carbapenemase gene in spiked stool had 100% sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, the LOD was 1–3 x 101 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL, whereas that of CHROMagar™ KPC selective culture plates ranged between 101 and 103 CFU/mL [49]. When testing 128 clinal rectal swabs, the BD MAX™ Check-Points CPO® showed sensitivity and specificity of 92.8% and 97.8%, respectively. In particular, 5 samples identified as positive by culture (ChromID® CARBA SMART plates) and by Xpert® Carba-R were not detected by the Check-Points CPO® assay [45]. Compared to the broth pre-enrichment culture, GeneXpert® showed sensitivity and specificity of 100% and ≥ 99% for the detection of blaKPC and blaVIM carbapenemase genes in fecal samples. Moreover, the system was able to detect 100% of the samples spiked with blaNDM-positive K. pneumoniae strains at concentrations of 300 CFU/mL [41].
As in culture-based approaches, molecular-based methods can greatly benefit from an enrichment step. For example, Donà et al. demonstrated that detection of the COL resistance gene mcr-1 by qPCR increased when selective broth enrichments were used compared with native stools [50]. Similarly, a study by Girlich et al. found that an enrichment step was necessary for the detection of an OXA-181-producing Ec (OXA-181-Ec) from a rectal swab, which was previously categorized as negative by the qPCR-based Cepheid Xpert® Carba-R system and when using direct plating [51]. Therefore, molecular-based systems may require an enrichment step to increase their sensitivity to detect low carriage of MDR-Ent in stool.
It should also be noted that these methods cannot distinguish between DNA from alive and dead bacteria, so the presence of viable MDR-Ent is overestimated (i.e., negative result in culture, but positive in molecular method) [52]. For instance, in a multisite study involving 383 patients, 4–5% of the fecal samples resulted positive for carbapenemase genes with the Cepheid Xpert® Carba-R system with a corresponding negative result with the standard reference culture (MacConkey broth containing 1 mg/L meropenem and subculture in a MacConkey agar plate with a 10 μg meropenem disk) [40].
Epidemiology and risk factors
Hospital setting
The gut flora is a rich, constant, and dynamic reservoir that has been shown to be the major source of MDR-Ent in hospitalized patients [10]. Moreover, it hinges on various predisposing factors such as underlying diseases, exposure to antibiotics, and use of medical devices (e.g., nasogastric tubes and urinary catheters). As a consequence, intensive care units (ICUs) represent the setting with the highest risk for colonization and cross-transmission of MDR-Ent between patients [53, 54].
Numerous investigations have analyzed the MDR-Ent gut carriage in hospitalized patients. Depending on (i) the geographic region, (ii) its epidemiological situation (e.g., low-prevalence vs. endemicity), and (iii) the type of admission ward, very different prevalence data have been reported. In contrast, similar risk factors linked to the acquisition of the MDR-Ent are described. For instance, in the general population of hospitalized patients, the rates of MDR-Ent colonization (ESBL-Ent and CRE) ranged between 12 and 65% in different countries. However, history of antibiotic use, duration of hospital stay, nursing home residency, receiving parenteral nutrition, and previous hospital admission(s) were constantly recognized as independent factors associated with the carriage [55,56,57,58,59].
For ICU-patients, ESBL-Ent carriage rates of 62.3%, 8%, and 5.3% were recorded during 2014–2015 in Thailand, Switzerland, and France, respectively [60,61,62]. In Spain (period 2012–2013), 16% of the ICU-patients carried CPE [mostly OXA-48-producing Kp (OXA-48-Kp)], and the main risk factors associated with this condition were chronic renal disease, previous digestive/biliary endoscopy, hospitalization(s), intra-abdominal surgery, antibiotic use, and higher mortality prediction scores (e.g., median APACHE II score of 15) [63].
Gut colonization with MDR-Ent may also frequently involve pediatric patients. In Tanzania (2017–2018), Tunisia (2015), Gabon (2010–2011), and Cambodia (2012), 56%, 28.6%, 45%, and 55% of the hospitalized children were carriers of ESBL-Ent, respectively [64,65,66,67]. In Serbia (2017–2018), gut carriage with ESBL-producing Kp (ESBL-Kp) or ESBL-producing Ec (ESBL-Ec) was recorded in 59% of the hospitalized pre-term neonates; previous hospitalization, delivery by cesarean section, and mechanical ventilation were associated with colonization [68]. In a study from Morocco (2013–2015), up to 59.4% and 12.5% of the neonatal ICU (NICU)-patients were colonized with ESBL-Ent and CPE, respectively [69]. CPE carriage was also observed in 8.6% of inpatients in a pediatric hospital in China (2019), with those colonized having a history of invasive procedures and antibiotic exposures [70].
Long-term care facilities and nursing homes
People residing in chronic care facilities are at increased risk of gut colonization with MDROs, but the estimated prevalence varies between countries [71, 72]. For instance, in Switzerland (2010–2020), 10.5% of the long-term care facilities (LTCF) residents were colonized with ESBL-Ec, of which 58% belonged to the pandemic sequence type (ST) 131 lineage [73]. Consistent results were obtained in a more recent national Swiss study (2019), with an ESBL-Ent carriage of 11.6% and again a high prevalence of ST131 Ec strains [74]. In an Italian study (2008), 64% of the LTCF residents were colonized with ESBL-Ent, while 6.3% had CPE. Risk factors for colonization included age ≥ 86 years, antibiotic treatment in the previous 3 months, indwelling devices, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and physical disability [75].
In French nursing homes (2017–2018), 19.8% of the patients were colonized with ESBL-Ent, whereas CPE were not detected; use of a shared bathroom, previous antibiotic use and recent history of hospitalization were risk factors for colonization [76]. Similarly, in Belgium (2015) and California (2016–2017), 11.3% and 16% of the nursing home residents were gut carriers of ESBL-Ent, respectively [77, 78]. In Japan (2015–2017), this prevalence was instead as high as 36% [79].
Community setting
The prevalence of MDR-Ent among healthy people in the community has reached alarming levels and now represents one of the most important threats to public health [80]. In the 1990s, MDROs were mainly associated with nosocomial infections. Since then, however, there has been an emergence and dissemination outside the hospital context, leading to an increase in infections due to these pathogens [81]. In particular, community-onset infections due to ESBL-Ent were increasingly being reported in the early to mid-2000s, while reports about community-associated CRE infections started to emerge around 2010 [82, 83]. More recently, there have also been an increasing number of reports for community-associated COL-R isolates that simultaneously possessed resistance mechanisms against other antimicrobials such as carbapenems, 3GCs, and aminoglycosides [84,85,86].
While intestinal colonization with MDR-Ent has been reported worldwide, the prevalence among the healthy population varies greatly between different regions. In a meta-analysis by Bezabih et al. regarding ESBL-Ec, the average prevalence for intestinal colonization ranged from 6% in Europe to around 20% in the Eastern Mediterranean and Africa, while it was up to 24.5% and 27% for the Western Pacific and South-East Asia, respectively [87]. However, for some countries, the reported numbers were much higher, with low-income countries usually showing a higher prevalence. For instance, studies from Tanzania (2018), Laos (2018), and Thailand (2010) reported rates of ESBL-Ent carriage in the healthy population as high as 91.5%, 70%, and 69.3%, respectively [88,89,90]. Though in high-income Asian countries such as Japan, the prevalence for ESBL-Ec in 2011–2012 (8.5%) was comparable to those reported for European countries (e.g., 7.1% in Switzerland in 2013–2016) [57, 91]. Furthermore, Bezabih et al. observed a yearly increase of 1.5% in the prevalence of ESBL-Ec with an estimated global prevalence of nearly 30% in 2020 [87]. This development is also reflected in a study conducted by French researchers who observed a 10-fold increase in the prevalence of ESBL-Ec in healthy subjects living in Paris from 2006 (0.6%) to 2011 (6.1%) [92]. A few studies have also indicated a high prevalence of healthy children in the community who are colonized with ESBL-Ent, such as ~ 5% in France (2010–2011), the Netherlands (2010–2012), and the USA (2013–2015), ~ 13% in Libya (2007), ~ 22% in Iran (2017), and 43% in Pakistan (2016) [93,94,95,96,97,98].
During 2016–2019, the prevalence of COL-R-Ent carriage among healthy people ranged from 2 to 3% in studies conducted in Taiwan, Spain (considering health-care workers, HCWs), and South Africa (considering children), while it was 15% in two studies that analyzed healthy Chinese and Laotian people in 2016 and 2018–2019, respectively [89, 99,100,101,102]. In contrast, a study from Bolivia (2016) and one from Vietnam (2017–2018) reported a wide dissemination of COL-R bacteria in the healthy community with rates of 38.3% and 70.4%, respectively [103, 104]. From the 70.4% of COL-R-Ec in Vietnam, the majority (92.8%) were also MDR. In both studies, the authors discussed the high amounts of COL used for animal breeding as a possible explanation for the high dissemination among the healthy community [103, 104]. In line with this, a study from China observed a decrease in Ec carrying the COL resistance gene mcr in the gut of healthy adults from 11.5% in 2018 to 2.4% in 2019 following the ban of COL as a growth promoter in animal breeding in 2017 [105].
CRE are also reported to colonize the intestinal tract of healthy individuals. In Cambodia (2011), Switzerland (2014), and India (2015–2017), CRE were detected in 1%, 0.1%, and 6.4% of the healthy population, respectively [106,107,108]. In Lebanon (2018), researchers found 6% of healthy bakery workers to carry CR-Ec [109]. Likewise, in the Eastern Mediterranean, a study conducted in Kuwait (2016–2018) found 7.7% of people working in the food industry to carry CRE, while 30.5% of the Ent isolates were also MDR [110].
With regard to the risk factors for people in the community, in some studies, regular contact with children and animals, and consumption of contaminated food (e.g., meat products and aquatic food) have been identified as risk factors for acquiring MDR-Ent [99, 100, 105, 106, 111,112,113,114]. More importantly, international travel (see below), previous hospitalization, and general health status (e.g., underlying disease, extreme age group, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2) are significantly associated with the carriage of MDR bacteria (e.g., [67, 111, 115]). For instance, HIV-positive individuals are at increased risk for acquiring MDR-Ent [116]. Of note, in such group of individuals, those receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART) appear to acquire MDR-Ent as likely as the general population. In the Swiss HIV cohort (2015–2016), the prevalence of 3GC-R-Ent carriers was found to be 6.7% [117], which is consistent with the rate found in healthy people (7.1%) during the same period [91]. In contrast, in low-income countries, subjects not receiving ART showed higher MDR-Ent colonization rates (e.g., 23–33% in Tanzania) than the general population [118, 119]. Interestingly, in a recent analysis, carriage of ESBL-Ent was more frequent in men who have sex with men undergoing preexposure prophylaxis or living with HIV-positives and with high number of sexual partners [120].
Concerning the transmission from animals, exposure to livestock, their manure, and slaughter products were found to be significantly associated to ESBL-Ent carriage [106, 121]. A Dutch study from 2020 that analyzed 3GC-R-Ec by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) confirmed the transmission between broilers and people working and living on farms in six cases [122]. Similarly, a study from Thailand (2018) applied a WGS approach to analyze ESBL- and CR-Kp and found the same clones in pigs and farmers, suggesting a direct transmission between the two groups [123]. In contrast, transmission from pets to humans seems to be less common. A recent meta-analysis found no significantly higher risk for carriage of 3GC-R-Ent in pet owners compared to non-pet owners [124]. In line with this, co-carriage of ESBL-Ent between owner and pet was rare in a Dutch study performed in 2020, with only 5 cases detected out of 550 analyzed pet-owner pairs [125]. Likewise, in a Swiss study (2016) in which 72 owners and their pets were screened for ESBL-Ec, only one case of direct transmission was detected, whereas in a more recent Swiss study (2021), no co-carriage of MDR-Ent was detected in 50 pet-owner pairs [126, 127].
Health-care workers
Health-care workers (HCWs) represent a special population in the community that may have a significantly different colonization prevalence with MDR-Ent. For instance, the prevalence of HCWs colonized with 3GC-R-Ec was 4%, 12%, 24%, 47%, 65%, and > 75% in Germany (2013–2014), Italy (2016), Egypt (2013), Rwanda (2014), Vietnam (2019), and Madagascar (2014–2015), respectively [55, 128,129,130,131,132]. Nevertheless, such prevalence seems consistent to that recorded in the general population (see previous section). Moreover, the above studies did not establish a clear association (transmission event) between MDR-Ent isolated from HCWs and MDR-Ent isolated from the patients at the same institutions. In fact, only the few surveys that have implemented adequate molecular techniques (e.g., pulse field gel electrophoresis, PFGE; multi-locus sequence typing, MLST; and WGS), are able to address this issue [133].
Among them, the MOSAR study (2008–2011) indicated that 3.5% of the HCWs of five rehabilitation units located in Israel, Italy, France, and Spain were gut colonized with ESBL-Ent (mostly ESBL-Ec); feeding patients was associated with carriage. However, only 1/3rd of the ESBL-Ec from the medical staff were actually molecularly linked (i.e., identical or highly-related clones) to those from their patients [134]. In another Spanish study (2018) involving 6 hospitals, only 3.1% HCWs resulted colonized with ESBL-Ent. No statistically significant risk factors for colonization were identified; more importantly, the rate of colonization was not higher than that reported for healthy people in the corresponding community [101]. In a Swiss study conducted in 4 veterinary institutions (2018), only 2 out of 108 (1.9%) HCWs resulted colonized with hyperepidemic clones of CP-Ec (i.e., ST410 producing OXA-181 and ST167 producing NDM-5); however, these CP isolates were molecularly identical to those frequently found among dogs and cats hospitalized at the same institutions [135].
Overall, the above studies seem to indicate that HCWs have a low risk of being colonized with the same MDR-Ent affecting their patients. Nevertheless, data on this context are still scarce, as emphasized by the systematic analysis of Peters et al. [136]. Therefore, further high-quality research is needed to assess the risk of occupational colonization with MDR-Ent.
International travelers
One of the main risk factors for the acquisition of MDROs in the community of low prevalence areas is travelling to endemic countries [137,138,139,140,141]. In particular, travels to Asia and Africa have been associated with a high risk for MDR-Ent acquisition, especially ESBL-Ec [112, 138, 142,143,144,145]. The use of antibiotics during the trip can further contribute to an enhanced risk for colonization [112, 137].
In the COMBAT study (2012–2013), 34.3% of the overall Dutch tourists acquired ESBL-Ent when traveling abroad, but for those visiting southern Asia was 75.1%. Regarding the sub-group of travelers visiting the African continent, the acquisition rates were 18.9%, 27.8%, and 42% for Western Africa, Middle and Eastern Africa, and Northern Africa, respectively [146]. In another Swiss study conducted at the same time, 69.4% of all travelers from Switzerland to the Indian subcontinent returned colonized with ESBL-Ec, but those specifically returning from India had a colonization rate of 86.8% [144]. In a more recent study (2018–2019), we observed that 54% of Swiss travelers to Tanzania acquired MDR-Ent, of which 54% were ESBL-Ec and 16.2% were COL-R-Ec. Such MDR-Ent had a corresponding (identical) strain among resident people, food, animal and/or environmental sources [139]. COL-R-Ec strains possessing the mcr-1 gene or chromosomal mechanisms were also isolated in 10.5% of the stool of Swiss travelers returning from India in 2015 [141]. Finally, we note that the isolation of CPE in returning travelers is still very rare, but their importation to low prevalence countries is a concern [144, 147].
Length of colonization and spontaneous decolonization
The duration of intestinal colonization due to MDR-Ent has been analyzed in several studies involving adult patients hospitalized in acute institutions or admitted to various types of LTCFs. In contrast, data regarding healthy people in the community are scarce, with most of the surveys performed on international travelers.
Hospitalized patients
In general, hospitalized people tend to remain colonized with MDR-Ent for the duration of their nosocomial stay, and approximately 50% of them show spontaneous decolonization without intervention within 6 months of discharge. However, this phenomenon occurs over a broad timeframe and depends on many factors (see examples below) [148, 149]. In addition, 15–45% of patients may retest positive after multiple negative screenings [150, 151]. This last phenomenon has important clinical implications (e.g., isolation of patients) and can be possibly explained in two ways: (i) the MDR-Ent was not eliminated from the intestinal tract, but only suppressed at a concentration below the LOD for the screening method used [13, 29, 31, 36, 50]; (ii) patients were actually decolonized, but re-acquired the MDR-Ent because they were exposed to the same environment, interventions, and/or treatments. In this context, the number of consecutive negative tests needed to define the eradication of intestinal colonization is essential, though standard criteria have not yet been defined in this regard [149]. Basically, eradication rates may be higher when a single sample defines the end of carriage than when multiple negative samples are required. Another issue is that most studies fail to demonstrate the persistence of the identical MDR-Ent using WGS techniques [149].
Several studies have well-summarized the above concepts [148, 149]. For instance, the meta-analysis by Bar-Yoseph et al. found that in the healthcare setting, 77% of colonized patients were still carriers of MDR-Ent at 1 month, 75% at 3 months, 55% at 6 months, and 35% at 12 months [149]. In a 14-year French study (1997–2010), 40% of readmitted patients with prior ESBL-Ent carriage were still colonized [152]. During an outbreak of KPC-2-producing Kp (KPC-2-Kp) in Germany (2010–2013), Lübbert et al. analyzed the gut carrier prevalence of adult patients by implementing both culture screening and a blaKPC-targeted PCR approach. Resolution of carriage was defined as at least 3 consecutive negative PCR tests at least 48 h apart. As a result, 69% of colonized patients tested positive after 1 month, 59% after 3 months, 35% after 6 months, 26% after 1 year, and 17% after 2 years. Of note, two patients retested positive for KPC-2-Kp after they had previously shown 3 consecutive negative tests, while one patient was colonized for 1191 days. The majority of patients who experienced spontaneous decolonization were those discharged from the hospital, whereas those who were long-term colonized usually had prolonged or repeated hospitalizations [153]. In a similar study, the multivariable logistic analysis performed by Kim et al. indicated that during 2015–2016, readmission [odds ratio (OR) = 9.96], carbapenem use (OR = 9.15), positive culture for a clinical sample (OR = 6.26), and duration of hospitalization (OR = 1.03) were predictive for persistent carriage of KPC-Kp after 6 months [154]. In another analysis (2013–2018), the same authors also indicated that CP-Kp may have a higher probability of prolonged carriage than other species of CPE. Furthermore, OXA-48-like-Ent showed a significantly increased risk of prolonged carriage than those producing NDMs; there was no significant difference between OXA-48-like and KPC producers [155].
Pediatric patients
Löhr et al. investigated the duration of fecal carriage with ST17 and ST485 CTX-M-15-producing Kp (CTX-M-15-Kp) in infants colonized during a NICU outbreak (2008–2009) in Norway. The median carriage duration in infants after discharge was 12.5 months (the longest was 23.5 months). Risk factors for prolonged carriage were delivery by caesarean section and treatment with antibiotics during hospitalization [156]. Nordberg et al. performed a prospective cohort study (2008–2015) on 13 neonates colonized with an ST101 CTX-M-15-Kp responsible for an outbreak in two Sweden NICUs. As a result, the MDR pathogen was still found in two children at 23 and 26 months [157].
Long-term residents
Unlike hospitalized patients, intestinal colonization with MDR-Ent in subjects admitted to long-term institutions can last for months. During 2013–2019, in a Dutch nursing home with an unusually high prevalence of rectal ESBL-Ec carriage, the colonization dynamics of ST131 ESBL-Ec vs. non-ST131 strains were evaluated. Spontaneous decolonization was observed in 33% of the ST131 carriers vs. 62% of those with other STs (P = 0.03). Survival analysis to calculate the median time to clearance showed that the half-life of carriage for the ST131 was 13 months, whereas only 2–3 months for other lineages (P < 0.001) [158].
General population in the community
In a Dutch analysis (2014–2015), following a cross-sectional study (sample time T0), a subset of ESBL-Ec/ESBL-Kp gut carriers (n = 76) and non-carriers (n = 249) volunteered to provide 5 fecal swabs with an interval of 1 month (sample times T1 to T5). The median time between T0 and T1 was 125 days (range, 71–234 days). Of the initially positive participants (colonized), 25 (32.9%) remained positive in all subsequent samples (> 8 months), while 31 (12.4%) of initially negative individuals acquired ESBL-Ec/ESBL-Kp strains. Colonized subjects often carried the same blaESBL gene and plasmid, but sometimes in different host strains, indicative for horizontal gene transfer of MGEs (plasmids). Prolonged carriage was significantly associated with travel to countries with a high-prevalence of ESBL producers and being colonized with Ec strains of (i) phylogenetic groups B2/D, (ii) ST131, and (iii) producing CTX-M-9 group ESBLs [159].
International travelers
Several cohort surveys conducted on healthy travelers assessed the MDR-Ent intestinal carriage among positive subjects after returning home. The VOYAG-R and the COMBAT studies (both in 2012–2013) reported that 10–25%, 5–14%, and 2–11% of the travelers returning colonized with MDR-Ent were still colonized with MDR-Ent at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups, respectively [146, 160]. Other similar studies reported that after 6 months, 20–28% of the travelers who tested positive upon return were still colonized with MDR-Ent [140, 161,162,163]. Overall, these figures indicated that only 6 months after returning travelers have similar colonization rates to the non-traveling general population in high-income countries (e.g., 3–6% in Europe and North America) [20, 91]. Therefore, traveling abroad can be considered an additional risk factor for infection and/or transmission of MDR-Ent in the first 6 months upon return.
Some studies have also tried to assess the factors associated with sustained carriage in post-trip subjects. The VOYAG-R study revealed that carriage duration increased with travel destination, with Asia representing a higher risk compared to Africa and Latin America. This phenomenon might be linked to the higher concentration of MDR-Ent in the intestinal tract of people returning from Asia than those traveling back from other continents [160]. The COMBAT study reported that carriage of CTX-Ms-Kp and traveling to the Middle East were associated with a shorter carriage duration [146]. In another analysis, Armand-Lefèvre et al. suggested that long-term gut carriage in post-travelers is primarily due to the acquisition of specific epidemic clones of Ec (e.g., ST10, ST14, ST38, ST69, ST131, and ST648) that provide good adaptation to the human intestinal microbiota [164]. In our analyses, we noted that travelers may carry a median of 2 MDR-Ent clones (range 1 to 5) and that prolonged colonization in the follow-up period is due to clonal persistence or presence of the same plasmid in a new bacterial host [163]. Moreover, no specific microbiota patterns before travel were significantly associated with a higher risk of 3GC-R-Ent colonization [140]. In contrast, Peng et al. suggested that having low Actinobacteria richness and low abundance of short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria in the gut microbiota may increase the risk of acquiring ESBL-Ent [165].
Impact of colonization
Clinical impact
As discussed above, MDR-Ent gut colonization is increasing in many settings. Thus, clinicians have to consider the risk of endogenous infections due to these difficult to treat pathogens. In this context, we emphasize that infections due to MDR-Ent are associated with higher health-care costs, morbidity and mortality [6, 7].
Numerous studies have indicated an association between previous gut colonization and infection due to MDR-Ent. However, this association seems to depend on the type of patients. For instance, Reddy et al. noted that 8.5% of the patients colonized with ESBL-Ent and admitted to high-risk wards during 2000–2005 developed a subsequent bloodstream infection (BSI) due to the same organism [166]. In a prospective analysis at three ICUs, Christiaens et al. reported that 69% of patients that were gut colonized with ESBL-Ent also had an infection or colonization with these organisms in another body site; in contrast, this was observed only in 12% of non-colonized subjects [167]. Another prospective study (2011–2012) with 497 hematological patients identified previous colonization as the most important risk factor (OR = 52) for BSI due to ESBL-Ent [168]. In a Swedish analysis considering a general hospitalized population (2004–2014), 6% of the gut carriers of ESBL-Ent developed an infection, but only 0.7% of them had a BSI [169]. This seems to support the hypothesis that gut colonization with MDR-Ent is a risk factor for BSI only in compromised patients. In a German study (2014–2015), 2386 ESBL-Ec and 585 ESBL-Kp rectal carriers admitted to a tertiary care centre were analyzed prospectively. Authors noted that the medical conditions of patients colonized with ESBL-Kp were more severe than those of patients colonized with ESBL-Ec. Moreover, a hospital-acquired infection (HAI) was observed in 7.8% and 13.8% following gut colonization with ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp, respectively. The most frequent types of infections were urinary tract infections (UTIs), surgical site infections, and BSIs. Patients colonized with ESBL-Kp had a significantly higher risk of developing HAIs with these pathogens than patients colonized with ESBL-Ec [relative risk (RR) = 1.62; P = 0.020] [10].
In the community, travel-related gut colonization with MDR-Ent seems to represent a non-negligible risk factor for infection, especially for UTIs [11, 170]. Several studies indicated that having traveled abroad (especially to Asian countries) within the year prior to symptoms is a 4- to 14-fold risk factor for UTI caused by an ESBL-Ec [171,172,173,174]; this is also true for children (OR = 8.93) during the first 6 months after the trip [175]. Moreover, Soraas et al. reported a 21-fold risk of UTI in adults when a shorter period of 6 weeks after travel was considered [176]. However, for all of these studies, analysis of fecal samples was not performed. Therefore, a definite link between previous gut colonization and subsequent UTI cannot be established.
Contribution to the transmission of MDR-Ent
In a survey performed at our institution (2008–2010), index patients with carriage of ESBL-Ec or ESBL-Kp (mostly CTX-M-15 producers) were prospectively analyzed together with their hospital and household contacts after discharge. Hospital transmission rates were 4.5% and 8.3% for ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp, respectively. Incidence of ESBL-Kp hospital transmission was significantly higher than that of ESBL-Ec (P < 0.0001) despite the implementation of IPC measures. In the households, transmission rates were 23% for ESBL-Ec and 25% for ESBL-Kp, indicating that this setting exceed the nosocomial for the transmission of ESBL producers [12]. In another study (2008–2009), transmission from infants colonized with CTX-M-15-Kp during an NICU outbreak to parents/relatives was also observed in 32% of the households [156]. It should also be noted that there are numerous accounts in the literature of colonized patients hospitalized in other institutions (including abroad) who imported MDR-Ent to low-prevalence countries [177,178,179,180,181]. These patients can transmit their MDR-Ent and consequently generate outbreaks. Paradigmatic examples of this phenomenon are those associated to the importation of KPC-Kp (e.g., [182, 183]).
With regard to the LTCF setting, data are scarce. In a Dutch analysis performed in 2013–2014, transmission rates of ST131 ESBL-Ec were comparable, or even lower, than those of ESBL-Ec belonging to other lineages [184]. In another survey at a French LTCF (2009), patients and hospital staff carried a wearable sensor to monitor their interactions over a 4-month period. As a result, it was shown that ESBL-Kp can spread between individuals during close-proximity interactions, whereas this was not the case for ESBL-Ec, suggesting that only ESBL-Kp should be controlled by contact reduction interventions [185].
In the community setting, Valverde et al. reported that in 2004–2005, Spanish people with a community-acquired infection (mostly UTI) and their household members represented a reservoir for ESBL-Ec. In particular, 70% and 17% of the patients and relatives were colonized at gut level with ESBL-Ec, respectively. Moreover, 66% of the strains isolated from both groups were indistinguishable by implementing the PFGE analysis [186]. Transmission of MDR-Ent may also occur between returning travelers, who are gut colonized, and their household contacts, though data on this aspect are scarce. In the COMBAT study, a transmission rate of 4.7% was observed between positive travelers upon return and members of the same household who had not traveled [146].
Strategies to decolonize carriers
Since colonized patients are at high-risk of developing severe infections, there have been numerous attempts to eradicate MDR-Ent gut carriage. In a systematic review performed in 2019 by the ESCMID–EUCIC (European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases–European Committee on Infection Control), authors analyzed the available literature (i.e., 27 studies) regarding the strategies to decolonize gut carriers of MDR Gram-negatives. As a result, it was not recommended the routine use of interventions aimed at achieving decolonization from 3GC-R-Ent and CRE. However, these guidelines were mainly based on studies implementing the selective digestive decontamination (SDD) with oral antibiotics. Moreover, for fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), authors did not provide recommendations due to the scarcity of data [187].
In this section, we will provide an overview of the main strategies used to attempt to decolonize MDR-Ent gut carriers. We will also analyze the novel and alternative approaches that may be developed in the near future.
Selective digestive decontamination with antibiotics
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) are prophylactic antibiotic interventions for patients colonized with Staphylococcus aureus or aerobic Gram-negative bacteria. Most studies investigate the effectiveness of SDD and SOD in immunocompromised or critically ill patients [187, 188].
SDD includes topical antibiotics applied to the mouth and stomach, whereas in SOD, antibiotics are applied only in the mouth. Antimicrobial agents with poor enteral absorption used for SDD include COL sulphate, neomycin sulphate, gentamicin, and paromomycin. SDD and SOD can also be combined with a short course of systemic antibiotics (e.g., nitrofurantoin, fluoroquinolones, cotrimoxazole, fosfomycin or erythromycin) [15, 187]. The choice of the topical and systemic antimicrobial agent combinations depends on the resistance patterns, co-occurrence of infection, the targeted colonizing microorganism and institutional preferences.
As anticipated above, routine decolonization of 3GC-R-Ent and CRE gut carriers is not recommended by the ESCMID–EUCIC panel [187]. In such analysis, Tacconelli et al. summarized the results of studies performed until August 2017 and considered the effectiveness of the SDD measuring either microbiological or clinical outcome or both. However, we note that the analysis included 19 studies in which SDD was used to decolonize MDR-Ent carriers, of which only 2 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
In the first RCT (2008-2010), Saidel-Odes et al. administered for 7 days an oral gel with gentamicin and COL sulphate (0.5 g, 4×/day) and an oral solution of gentamicin (80 mg, 4×/day) and COL (1 M units, 4×/day) to 20 patients with CR-Kp gut carriage. After 2 weeks, the rate of CR-Kp colonization was significantly reduced compared to the placebo arm consisting of 20 patients (61.1% vs. 16.1%, respectively; P < 0.0016). A difference between the 2 arms was still maintained at 6 weeks, but with a non-significant difference (58.5% vs. 33.3%, respectively; P = NS) [189]. In the RCT of Huttner et al. (2009–2012), 54 patients (27 in each arm) colonized with ESBL-Ent received oral COL sulphate (50 mg, 4×/day) plus neomycin sulphate (250 mg, 4×/day) for 10 days. Twenty-eight ± 7 days after the SDD, there was no statistical difference regarding the persistence of ESBL-Ent gut colonization between treatment and placebo arms (51.9% vs. 37.0%, respectively; P = 0.27) [190].
Although non-randomized, several studies included in the Tacconelli’s analysis deserve to be mentioned. In a retrospective cohort (2012–2015), Machuca et al. analyzed the clinical effect of a 14-day SDD with gentamicin (80 mg, 4×/day) or streptomycin (80 mg, 3×/day) plus neomycin (40 mg, 3×/day) in 44 individuals colonized with COL-R KPC-Kp. The authors compared the outcome after 180 days with 33 controls. As a result, gentamicin use resulted in a lower risk of crude mortality [hazard ratios, (HR) = 0.15], lower risk of infection with COL-R KPC-Kp (HR = 0.86), and an increased microbiological success (i.e., at least 2 negative rectal swabs after > 48 h after the completion of SDD; HR = 5.67). On the other hand, neomycin plus streptomycin was only associated with a lower risk of mortality (HR = 0.22) [191]. In the retrospective study (2010–2012) of Lübbert et al., 14 patients colonized with KPC-2-Kp received a 7-day course of SDD employing oral COL sulphate (1 M units, 4×/day) and gentamicin (80 mg, 4×/day). Decolonization of KPC-2-Kp was achieved in 6/14 patients (43%) after a mean of 21 days, but was also observed in 23/76 (30%) of the controls (P = 0.102). Of note, SDD treatment resulted in the development of secondary resistance to COL (19% increase in resistance rate) and gentamicin (45% increase) in post-treatment isolates [192]. An increase in aminoglycoside-resistant Gram-negatives was also noted by Oostdijk et al. in 16 Dutch ICUs (2009–2013) implementing the SDD [193].
More recent analyses merit to be cited. In the multicenter RCT of de Lastours et al. (2016–2017), the risk of secondary resistance to COL after its implementation for the SDD was confirmed and the underlying molecular mechanisms of resistance were elucidated [194]. In a cluster-randomized trial (2013–2017) involving 13 European ICUs with 8665 patients, Plantinga et al. showed that SDD (COL plus aminoglycosides) was associated with higher eradication and diminished acquisition of MDR organisms in the rectum compared to the controls (HR = 1.76 and HR = 0.51 for 3GC-R-Ent; HR = 3.17 and HR = 0.56 for CR Gram-negatives, respectively) [195]. Döbele et al. assessed the impact of SDD of hematological patients colonized with ESBL-Ent on the incidence of BSI after chemotherapy. To do so, a stochastic simulation model was created. The model estimated that decolonization prior to chemotherapy reduces the incidence of ESBL-Ent BSI by up to 27%. The greatest benefit was estimated in high prevalence settings, whereas in low-prevalence settings the model estimated no benefit [196].
Overall, in line with the ESCMID–EUCIC panel, we believe that evidence for successful SDD regimens is still limited, mostly because of the lack of well-designed and large/multicenter RCTs with long-term follow-ups. Future studies also need to assess the impact on secondary resistance and disruption patterns in the gut microbiome.
Fecal microbiota transplantation
The fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was initially designed and implemented for the treatment of the recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. It consists in the infusion of liquid stool (via an enteral route, an endoscope, or capsules for ingestion) from a healthy individual into the gut of a patient who suffers from gut dysbiosis. Its mechanism of action is based on the establishment of a new intestinal microbiota community to restore normal gut function [197].
More recently, the FMT has also been shown to be useful for the treatment of other intestinal pathological conditions [198], including the possible eradication of colonization and recurrent infections due to different species of MDROs [199]. In this context, in recent years, the selection and screening of healthy donors together with the collection, preparation and storage of their stools underwent an extensive discussion to reach international standardized procedures. Among them, stool testing must include the search for MDROs (e.g., 3GC-R-Ent and CRE) [200]. This is essential to prevent the transmission of MDROs that could lead to adverse infectious events. For instance, DeFilipp et al. described two patients with a BSI due to ESBL-Ec after receiving FMT from the same donor. One of the patients died because of severe sepsis [201].
In 2016, Manges et al. reviewed some clinical cases where the FMT was positively implemented to solve gut colonization with ESBL-Ent or CPE [202]. For example, a kidney transplant recipient with recurrent ESBL-Ec pyelonephritis leading to graft failure underwent FMT to be eligible for re-transplantation. After 1 week, the rectal culture was still positive for ESBL-Ec. However, a negative result was obtained at the second week, and subsequent rectal cultures remained negative during the 12-week follow-up period; UTIs were also not observed [203]. After the work of Manges et al., more promising and similar cases were described. For instance, a renal transplant recipient was suffering from recurrent UTIs and BSIs due to an ESBL-Kp that was also present in the stool. After several unsatisfactory treatments with meropenem, FMT was implemented and ESBL-Kp was not isolated from both urine and fecal samples during the following 8 months [204].
Several small cohort studies have also been performed on this matter. These analyses were mainly uncontrolled and not randomized (summarized in [15, 199, 205]). Moreover, the overall results were not always promising, as speculated in the single case reports mentioned above. Specifically, FMT was successful against colonization due to MDROs in 63% of the case series studies with a control arm. However, a decolonization rate of only 33–46% was observed for MDR-Ec and MDR-Kp [206]. For example, during 2012-2014, 15 gut carriers of ESBL-Ent underwent an FMT showing successful decolonization only in 3 subjects (at 1-, 2- and 4-weeks follow-up). Seven out of the 12 non-responders underwent a second FMT, but only 3 of them resulted decolonized in all time points (after 1-, 2-, and 4 weeks) [207]. In another multicenter prospective study (2015–2017), 8 patients colonized with CRE underwent FMT. As a result, 1 week and 3 months after the FMT, only 3 (37.5%) and 4 (50%) subjects were free of CRE colonization, respectively [208].
In a multicenter RCT (2016-2017), Huttner et al. evaluated whether 5 days of oral SDD with COL and neomycin followed by FMT could eradicate intestinal carriage with ESBL-Ent and/or CPE. The primary outcome was the detectable gut carriage of these MDR-Ent by culture 35–48 days after randomization. Nine out of 22 (41%) patients who received the treatment resulted negative for ESBL-Ent/CPE, while in the control group were 5/17 (29%). As a result, the use of antibiotics plus FMT slightly decreased MDR-Ent carriage, but the differences were not statistically significant [209]. In another multicenter RCT (2016–2017), Leo et al. also evaluated whether oral SDD with COL and neomycin followed by FMT could eradicate colonization with ESBL-Ent and/or CPE in 16 patients. As a result, 9 (56%) treated carriers and 3 (33.3%) out of 9 controls were considered decolonized 35–48 days after randomization. Metagenomic analyses indicated that antibiotic treatment resulted in a significant change in microbiota composition with reduced species richness and diversity, lower Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, decreased proportions of Proteobacteria and Enterobacteriaceae, and an increase of ARGs abundance. This effect was transient, with a post-FMT microbiota significantly enriched of Bifidobacterium species and Collinsella aerofaciens, which likely limited the gut colonization by MDR-Ent. In contrast, the proportion of Enterobacteriaceae in the post-FMT microbiota was lower compared to the baseline (but without statistical significance). Finally, both ESBL and carbapenemase genes were more abundant at baseline than at any later sampling point in 10 out of 16 cases [210].
Further, authors have also attempted to understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for the positive implementation of FMT. In 2019–2020, Lee et al. investigated with 16S rRNA sequencing the dynamic changes of microbiota before and after the use of FMT to decolonize 10 CPE carriers. The rates of the decolonization were 40%, 50%, and 90% within 1, 3, and 5 months, respectively. A significant alteration was observed in the gut microbiota following FMT, but this was different between early decolonization carriers (within 4 weeks) and late decolonization carriers. In fact, before FMT, the early decolonized patients possessed a higher relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and showed a microbiota convergence with that of their donors within 4 weeks. Of note, the genera Hungatella was only detected in the late decolonization carriers. The authors concluded that molecular characterization of the microbiota of CPE carriers could predict the outcome of FMT and also determine if repeated FMTs are needed [211]. In a recent prospective analysis (2018–2019), Haggai et al. administered oral capsulized FMT for 2 days (15 capsules per day) to 13 CPE carriers. At 1 month, CPE eradication was successful in 9 (69%) patients; 10/13 participants were retested after 6 months and 8/10 of them were negative. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing indicated that bacterial communities showed significant changes in both alpha- and beta-diversities for patients who achieved CPE eradication than those who underwent failure. Notably, in post-FMT samples, beta-diversity analysis identified sample clustering according to treatment outcome. In post-FMT samples, the abundance of Ent decreased in responders and increased in non-decolonized subjects. The post-FMT microbiota of responders was compositionally similar to that of donors, whereas that of non-responders was different and rich of ARGs [212]. In another study (2018), Liu et al. analyzed the longitudinal dynamics of the gut virome and bacteriome in 3 recipients who were successfully decolonized from CRE (two carriers of CR-Kp and one with both CR-Kp and CR-Ec) with two FMTs. After FMTs, the gut microbiota changed greatly and resembled that of the donor, especially when the Ruminococcus genus was dominant. Furthermore, Klebsiella phages expanded with a concordant decrease in Klebsiella spp. and increase in Escherichia phages in the CR-Ec carriers. This may indicate that bacteriophages brought by the FMT may play a key role in MDR-Ent decolonization (see next section) [213].
Overall, the currently available information regarding the use of the FMT to decolonize gut carriers of MDR-Ent indicates that this approach may have beneficial effects on intestinal carriers. However, as already noted by ESCMID–EUCIC [187] several years ago, no definite suggestions can be made. This is mainly due to the limited number of studies on this matter and the lack of standardized protocols. Moreover, these studies have serious limitations, including the lack of true controls and long-term safety data [206]. Therefore, randomized clinical trials involving large sample sizes and consensus on standardized protocols are warranted. In this context, we note that several RCTs are ongoing (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home).
Bacteriophages
Bacteriophages are the most abundant bacterial predators [14]. As evolving and self-replicating biological entities, they benefit from a unique nature compared to traditional antibacterial drugs and are now recognized as a crucial potential alternative in the global fight against antimicrobial resistance (AMR) [214, 215]. They have been used since the 1920s in the former Soviet Union countries and are a valuable prescription-free element of the standard medical practice in this part of the world [216]. In Western countries, the onset and exacerbation of the AMR crisis, combined with recent technological advancements, have provided a boost to the renaissance of phage therapy research [217].
Study reporting on their investigation to treat MDR bacterial infections, either alone or in combination with antibiotics, are now numerous and a great proportion of them show encouraging results [217]. However, scientific articles on their use for decolonization of intestinal carriage are less numerous and even rarer are studies specifically addressing phage-based-decolonization of MDR-Ent. A discrepancy partially explained by the divergences in the study of phage-based decolonization in vivo compared with phage-based treatment of infections. In fact, during the latter, inflammatory processes caused by the bacterial infection stimulate an immune response, which in turn plays a pivotal role in supporting phage action in clearing the infection [83, 217]. Notably, these host-mediated supportive proinflammatory responses are also involved in facilitating the clearance of phage-resistant mutants, which are often less virulent than their susceptible counterparts. In their absence, as in intestinal colonization, phage-resistant mutants often rapidly emerge after treatment [218].
In this regard, we can highlight the study of Feng et al. [218]. In their murine model, a stable colonization with an ST11 CR-Kp was established with a continuous administration of meropenem in drinking water as pre-treatment for 3 days. The targeted strain was then challenged with two lytic phages, alone or in combination, isolated and characterized in the same study. Phage-resistant mutants were characterized by reduced virulence, diminished capsule production, and no change in antimicrobial susceptibility. In this case, phage resistance mechanisms were attributed to capsule polysaccharides and exopolysaccharide coding genes. Moreover, the combination of the two phages (vs. monophage administration) showed a higher and faster reduction in CR-Kp count with no development of adverse events. Notably, the two phages were not administered through the same route. One was given orally, while the other—not detectable in the feces—via enema, possibly introducing a methodological bias. Additionally, in a clinical situation where multiple CR-Kp strains colonize the intestine, a more complex cocktail may be necessary. On this regard, multiple rounds of phage isolation from bacterial phage-resistant mutants would need to be considered to maximize the targeted lytic activity. These considerations as well as further limitations were extensively discussed by the authors [218]. Noteworthy, we also observed the emergence of phage-resistant mutants using a bioreactor system simulating an intestinal colonization with a ST131 CTX-M-15-Ec challenged with a phage cocktail. Interestingly, using the in vitro continuous culture system, we observed an individual-related tendency in the emergence of phage resistance, which might depend on the particular flora of the individual [219].
Researchers from the Institute Pasteur focused on the impact of phage-based decolonization on the intestinal flora [220]. In 2016, they reported encouraging results on the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of three lytic bacteriophages against an antibiotic-resistant uropathogenic Ec (AR-UPEC) strain. Bacteriophages, isolated and characterized in the same study, were used as both single therapy and as a cocktail in an experimental murine model. A continuous antibiotic pressure was not required in order to maintain high levels of colonization (the antibiotic was removed from drinking water 3 days before treatment start). Gut carriage levels and the impact of phage treatment vs. antibiotic treatment on the microbiota composition defined the two study outcomes. Seven days after phage treatment start, the AR-UPEC strain showed a distinct decrease in different gut sections, and the same results could be replicated with a 100-fold higher dose in only 4 days. Notably, in this model, the level of intestinal carriage was higher than the ones described in humans colonized with the same strain (i.e., possible weaker efficacy when administered in a clinical setting). The authors also observed that the bacterial count and phage titre decreased at the same rate, providing further evidence for phage’s self-clearing property in the absence of the host. In regard to the effects on microbiota composition, antibiotic treatment disturbed, at a much higher level, its diversity (based on 16S rRNA sequence analyses), confirming the valuable, highly targeted effects of some bacteriophages [220]. Moreover, they observed an increase in the genus Barnesiella after phage treatment, which was previously associated with a decrease in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium colonization [221]. This observation opens the discussion—not deepened in this review—on the implementation of phages to restore the healthy microbiota as a microbiome-based decolonization approach as with prebiotics, probiotics or symbiotics (i.e., strengthening colonization resistance) [220, 222,223,224].
On this regard, Wang et al. recently investigated the therapeutic effect of the combined administration of phage-cocktail and FTM to treat Salmonella enterica Typhimurium-induced mouse colitis, compared to phage treatment and to FMT alone [225]. The cocktail was composed of 2 phages lytic for serotypes O4 and O9 isolated from sewage and yak feces from Tibet and belonging to the Siphoviridae family. The effect of the combined therapy was evaluated by gavaging fecal matter (or phosphate buffered saline for the control group) 3 h after a single dose of phage cocktail, after which FMT was given at 12, 24, and 36 h after infection. The results clearly showed that the combined therapy phage-FMT was superior to both single treatments. Notably, after 72 h, Salmonella Typhimurium was completely eradicated, clinical symptoms of colitis and pathological damages reduced significantly, and the intestinal barrier and short-chain fatty acid levels recovered. Moreover, analysis of the species richness and diversity showed a shift towards a healthy microbial diversity, including the genus Lactobacillus. This latter has been reported to play a pivotal role in reducing inflammation during colitis in mice, and the prebiotic effect of its increase may be strongly related to treatment success. Noteworthy, prior to implementing this study design, the authors attempted to treat the same mouse model first exclusively with the two combined phages and then exclusively with FMT. In the first case, they were able to show an initial reduction of bacterial count in the colon, but without completely eradicating the pathogenic strain in the long-term and without completely restoring the complex diversity of the intestinal microbiota. In a follow-up investigation, the authors attempted to use FMT as a single treatment, but again without success. Bacterial counts in the colon remained high, as did inflammatory damage, and no significant recovery of the intestinal microbiota was observed. These initial results, together with the outcome of the combined therapy, suggest that both roles—(i) elimination of the pathogen by the phages and (ii) support in restoring the intestinal barrier and microbiota composition by FMT—are necessary for a successful therapy [225].
The challenge of phage therapy as sole treatment strategy was also highlighted by Javaudin et al. in 2021 [226]. In this French study, the authors explored the efficacy of 4 lytic bacteriophages against an ESBL- and OXA-48-Ec in two distinct mouse models of intestinal colonization. Phages were first isolated and characterized, then administered orally and rectally as microencapsulated and non-microencapsulated particles. Colonization models were attained by continuous administration of either amoxicillin or pantoprazole in drinking water, with the latter additionally combined with amoxicillin for the first 8 days. In the first model, phage treatment only transiently reduced the count of the targeted Ec strain 9 days after treatment start, while in the second, the targeted strain was not altered at all by the intervention. The use of encapsulated phages did not modify the targeted bacterial count in either case [226].
In the clinic, phage therapy can currently only be used as extrema ratio treatment and is therefore mostly administered together with several antibiotics, posing a major problem in the data interpretation. With special regard to decolonization from intestinal carriage with MDR-Ent, we can report only on two published case-studies. The first, published in 2019 by Kuipers et al. in The Netherlands and the second in 2020 by Corbellino et al. in Italy [227, 228].
Kuipers et al. reported the successful combined therapy of phages plus meropenem in a 58-year-old renal transplant patient with recurrent UTIs due to an ESBL-Kp and an epididymitis [228]. Although susceptible to carbapenems in vitro, the strains could not be eradicated with repeated treatment courses. A urine sample from the patient was sent to the Eliava Institute of Bacteriophages (Tbilisi, Georgia), which in turn sent a personalized phage cocktail for oral ingestion and bladder irrigation. Detailed information on the content of the cocktail, including dose and endotoxin concentration, was not provided by the Eliava Institute. Upon delivery, the lytic activity of the cocktail against the ESBL-Kp strain was tested by the authors. Phage treatment was then performed by the patient (i.e., bladder irrigation via catheter). The urethritis symptoms diminished within the first days of treatment, rapidly disappeared, and did not recur. Urine cultures remained negative for ESBL-Kp (tested for up to 14 months), and no adverse events were reported [228]. Notably, the patient’s epididymitis was treated in parallel with meropenem for 6 weeks, unfortunately hampering the extrapolation of data on phage effectiveness as a sole treatment strategy.
Corbellino et al. administered a personalized phage treatment to a 57-year-old patient with a high risk of recurrent invasive infections due to a long-standing multi-site colonization (i.e., in the gastrointestinal and urinary tract, as well as in a permanent ureteral stent) with a ST307 KPC-3-Kp [227]. Antibiotic cycles with ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) (still active toward the MDR-Kp isolates) showed to be unsuccessful. Five Kp isolates from urine, rectal swab and ureteral stent were sent to the Eliava Institute. There, a personalized cocktail of lytic phages was prepared over 9 weeks. The patient collected the preparation in person and received instructions for use. The treatment included a 3-week course of the cocktail by oral and intra-rectal routes. Two weeks after treatment, the ureteral stent was replaced and remained MDR-Kp free. The strain was also not detected in the feces, rectal swabs, and urine. Attempts to detect carbapenemase genes from rectal swabs by molecular methods also failed. Notably, following phage therapy, 4 further complicated UTIs and one sepsis occurred. However, in all these 5 distinct episodes, the KPC-3-Kp never reappeared. Despite these promising results, the authors remained cautious about judging the cause of MDR-Kp eradication. For instance, they pointed out that because of the half-life of CZA combined with reduced creatinine clearance (due to the patient’s solitary kidney), a possible synergy between phages and the antibiotic cannot be excluded. In fact, although phages were given in this case as the only treatment, CZA concentration in urine and blood was not measured upon phage treatment start [227]. Moreover, spontaneous decolonization cannot be excluded (see above).
In conclusion, the clinical application of phages, including personalized phage therapy, still needs to overcome a number of concerns and technical barriers to be considered an effective decolonization strategy [227]. Particularly, high-quality data on safety and efficacy from RCTs are crucial to determine their microbiological, epidemiological, and clinical outcomes [214, 227, 229]. This will include a better assessment of the development of phage resistance, their possible transfer of undesirable genes, their interaction with our immune system and microbiome [214, 217, 230,231,232,233]. Lastly, complex pharmaceutical regulatory requirements must be clarified [233]. In particular, obstacles to their production and use in the European Union and the UK must be overcome through new regulations; furthermore, incentives must be created for pharmaceutical companies to increase their interest in this still uncertain area [214]. Notably, personalized phage therapy still falls into the category of new infection control measures, which entails a long and complicated approval process [234]. Only when these challenges will be consistently addressed, phages will be able to contribute in a major way to the global fight against the emergence and selection of new resistant bacteria, including their use as a valuable, well-studied and safe decolonization alternative [219, 227, 233].
Probiotics
Probiotics are food supplements containing alive bacteria or fungi that are intended to be ingested and reach the intestinal tract (mainly the colon) intact. Most probiotics derive from fermented foods (e.g., yogurt, cheese) that contain a large quantity of Lactobacillales able to replace the initial high concentration of Ent in these nutrients thanks to the production of lactic acid. Moreover, probiotic organisms can compete with intestinal pathogens by excreting toxins, antimicrobial compounds (e.g., short-chain fatty acids, microcins) and adherence factors, potentiating the immune system and reinforcing mucosa production [235, 236]. Therefore, probiotics could be implemented as food additives to eradicate the pathogenic and/or MDR-Ent colonizing the intestinal tract in humans and animals. This hypothesis is supported primarily by numerous studies in animal models (e.g., mice) in which the oral administration of Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus fermentum, or Bacillus coagulans had favorable effects on the elimination of pathogenic Ent. Furthermore, probiotics have been positively implemented to prevent and mitigate gut colonization with Ent (including MDR-Ent) in food animal breeding (e.g., broiler) [237].
In humans, the most commonly administered probiotics used to eradicate the gut carriage of MDR-Ent contain lyophilized Saccharomyces boulardii, Lactobacillus, or Bifidobacterium species (individually or in various combinations) [236]. For instance, in the study of Ramos-Ramos et al. (2010–2014), 8 long-term carriers of OXA-48-Ent received for 3 weeks a daily oral administration of a prebiotic (lactitol; Emportal®) plus a probiotic (B. bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus; Infloran®). During the study period, all patients showed a relative reduction on the OXA-48-Ent intestinal loads. However, at weeks 3, 6, and 9, only 4, 6, and 3 patients had negative OXA-48-Ent cultures, respectively [238]. In an RCT (2017–2019), Ljungquist et al. administered twice a day for 2 months a probiotic mixture of 8 different living bacteria (Vivomixx®) to 40 outpatients who were colonized with ESBL-Ent for at least 3 months. At the end of the trial, only 5 (12.5%) of the patients had achieved successful eradication of ESBL-Ent (i.e., 3 consecutive negative cultures at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up) [239]. In a LTCF, Zollner-Schwetz et al. evaluated the impact of the multispecies probiotic OMNi-BiOTiC® 10AAD on the intestinal and inguinal skin colonization due to MDR Gram-negatives in 12 patients (including 8 with Ec and 3 with Klebsiella spp.). At the end of probiotic treatment (week 12), 9/12 patients were still colonized; furthermore, at weeks 20, 24, and 36, patients colonized were 5/12, 5/12, and 8/12, respectively. Analysis of the fecal microbiome at the beginning and at the end of treatment displayed statistically significant growth of the genus Enterococcus [240].
Probiotics have also shown their inability to prevent the intestinal colonization with MDR-Ent. For instance, in the RCT by Wieërs et al. (2017–2019), 120 elderly patients who received amoxicillin-clavulanate for 10 days were treated for 30 days with placebo, S. boulardii CNCM I-745® or a probiotic mixture containing S. boulardii, L. acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, and Bifidobacterium lactis (Bactiol duo®). The prevalence of colonization with ESBL-Ent increased at the end of the antibiotic treatment in the placebo, Saccharomyces and probiotic mixture arms from 10.3%, 7.7%, and 23.1% to 15.4%, 16.7%, and 27.8%, respectively (P = NS). The colonization rates were normalized to the initial values ~ 61 days after the first dose of antibiotics (11.1%, 8.0%, and 19.2%, respectively) indicating no significant differences in the 3 arms [241]. In another RCT (2014–2017), Danish adults traveling to India for 10–28 days received either L. rhamnosus (Dicoflor®) or no probiotics during their overall journey (both arms, n = 30). As a result, preventive treatment with the probiotic had no effect on the occurrence of ESBL-Ent colonization, with the incidence being the same in both randomization groups [242].
In conclusion, in contrast to data from animal studies, probiotic supplements appear to only reduce abundance, but not to completely eradicate MDR-Ent. We also emphasize that although the use of probiotics is well tolerated, it also carries certain risks [236]. In fact, some patients with underlying diseases (e.g., certain inflammatory bowel diseases), immunocompromised, or with predisposing conditions (e.g., central lines and other permanent indwelling catheters) were reported to develop a Lactobacillus spp. BSI and/or endocarditis after receiving a probiotic containing these organisms (e.g., [243,244,245]).
Siderophore-microcins
Microcins (Mcc) are low molecular mass (< 10 kDa) antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), usually secreted by Ent (mainly Ec), that have the capacity to inhibit other bacteria. In some cases, the AMP is post-translationally modified by the linkage of a siderophore moiety derived from enterobactin. These siderophore-Mcc can enter and kill bacteria by mimicking iron–siderophore complexes as a “trojan horse.” So far, four siderophore-Mcc have been described: MccE492, MccH47, MccI47, and MccM. The MccE492 is produced by Kp, while MccI47 is found in Ec. Both MccH47 and MccM have been reported in phylogroup B2 Ec. Overall, Mcc have a role in microbial competitions within the intestinal microflora by exerting potent antibacterial activity against phylogenetically related bacteria [246, 247]. Basically, this is the strategy that pathogenic Ent use to overcome the autochthonous gut flora and to colonize the gastro-intestinal tract. For instance, UPEC strains (phylogroup B2) chromosomally produce MccH47 and MccM to emerge and dominate in the gut as a prerequisite to generate subsequent UTIs [246].
On the other hand, production of Mcc may in turn be implemented as a therapeutic option against the pathogenic Ent. For example, the oral preparation of strain Ec Nissle 1917 is historically used as a probiotic for the treatment of bacterial intestinal diseases. In a mouse model, it was shown that administration of strain Ec Nissle 1917 was able to limit the growth of adherent-invasive Ec and Salmonella enterica in the gut, whereas its mutant (not secreting MccH47 and MccM) was unable to do so [248]. In a recent study, Mortzfeld et al. purified the siderophore MccI47 and showed its potent in vitro activity against MDR-Ent, including ESBL-Ec and KPC-Kp strains. More importantly, they engineered a Nissle 1917 Ec strain with a plasmid expressing MccI47. Then, the recombinant Ec was administered to mice, which showed the capacity to significantly reduce the amount of KPC-Kp colonizing the gut [249]. In another study, the ability of a bacteriophage cocktail and a genetically modified Ec strain Nissle 1917 producing Mcc-C7 (probiotic) to reduce gut colonization due to an ST131 Ec in a murine model was evaluated. ST131 Ec was administered on day 0, while treatment was administered on days 0, 3, and 5. When administered together, the two strategies showed synergistic activity against ST131. Specifically, fecal count was significantly reduced on days 1, 4, and 7; however, on day 10, the count for ST131 was again comparable to the control [250].
Overall, these preliminary studies demonstrate the potential of certain microcins for modulating the gut flora. This is a fundamental step towards the use of engineered probiotics and live biotherapeutic products aimed to selectively remove MDROs from the intestinal tract. Investigations into the optimization, scale-up, and manufacturing of these next-generation therapeutic agents will be needed before entering human trials.
CRISPR-Cas-like methods (microbiome editing)
CRISPR-Cas-based (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) technologies are attractive choices for the development of next-generation antimicrobials [251]. Since its revolutionary conception, CRISPR-Cas-based technologies have found their way to the field of AMR. Specifically, various efforts to fight resistant organisms with CRISPR-Cas technology have been proposed, which take advantage of unique delivery systems [252]. For example, CRIRPS-Cas technology can be advantageous as it can be coupled with specific delivery systems to target specific bacterial species (e.g., delivery of the CRISPR-Cas system to Ec using bacteriophages or conjugative plasmids), and to specifically target ARGs once inside a host bacterium (e.g., CRISPR-Cas targeting the region(s) of an ARG) [252].
In vivo targeting of Ec and other MDR-Ent has been conducted in mouse models with bacteriophage M13 and conjugative plasmids delivery systems [253, 254]. Similarly, both systems have been used as well to target enterohemorrhagic Ec in the Galleria mellonella insect model [255]. In other insect models, CRISPR-Cas systems have been used to target, for example, the ompA gene of Cedecea neteri (rare Gram-negative) in Aedes aegypti (yellow fever mosquito) [256], and an adhesion gene in Snodgrassella alvi important for the gut colonization in bees [257].
A precise methodology to deliver the CRIPR-Cas system and to target specific ARGs (or other sequences; e.g., replicon sequence sites) takes advantage of highly conjugative plasmids (i.e., suicide plasmids). This approach has been used in vitro, for example, by Reuter et al. to target blaOXA-48 and tra genes important for replication in Ec and other Ent species [258]. In a similar approach, He et al. showed that this system can be used to simultaneously target IncX4/I2/HI2 plasmids and ARGs such as mcr-1, blaKPC-2, and blaNDM-5 in Ec [259]. In contrast, other studies have developed CRISPR-Cas systems to successfully target in Ec only ARGs such as ESBL (e.g., blaCTX-M-14), carbapenemase (blaNDM-5) and colistin-resistance (mcr-1) genes [259,260,261,262,263].
It is clear that the use of CRISPR-Cas systems for the targeted decolonization of MDR-Ent is promising. However, before its implementation in humans, further research using in vivo models is needed to address the main CRISPR-Cas problems such as de novo resistance and off-target effects [264].
The need of in vivo models
As discussed above, numerous alternatives could be implemented in the near future to attempt decolonizing intestinal carriers of MDR-Ent. Some of these approaches have already shown promising results in in vitro experiments that could potentially have a significant clinical impact in human medicine (e.g., the CRISPR-Cas approach, [252]). However, these findings remain to be validated in preclinical in vivo models before they can be used in human clinical trials.
The in vivo mouse model has so far represented the gold-standard to study several aspects linked to the intestinal colonization due to Ent pathogens (e.g., [218, 225, 226, 249]). Nevertheless, though this approach exhibits several advantages—such as the gastrointestinal similarities to humans—many strong limitations can be found in terms of cost, societal, ethical, and logistical issues, which can all together generate very long and laborious investigation periods [265]. Therefore, numerous alternative models have been suggested. Among the most prominent there are invertebrates (e.g., Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, G. mellonella) and Danio rerio (Zebrafish), which could provide an innovative, suitable, cost-effective, and highly scalable substitute for the mouse [265]. However, only in G. mellonella and Zebrafish, a gut colonization model with MDR-Ent has been tried so far [266]. In addition, such alternative models do not possess a natural intestinal microbiota similar to that of mammals [267, 268].
Overall, new in vivo models are needed to perform screening and large-scale investigations aimed to study new approaches to decolonize the gut carriers of MDR-Ent. In this context, we emphasize that numerous funding calls focusing on the advancement of the 3R (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) research have been recently launched worldwide [269]. In our laboratory, we are studying and developing a new in vivo model of MDR-Ent intestinal colonization using Zophobas morio larvae (https://data.snf.ch/grants/grant/206400), following a 3R call in Switzerland. Since these larvae possess a human-like microbiota [270, 271], this model could offer numerous advantages over the murine model (e.g., fewer ethical issues, lower costs, faster results, and no need for an animal experimentation facility).
Conclusions
Nowadays, many people in hospital and in the community may be colonized with MDR-Ent at the intestinal level. Identification of such at-risk people is not a particular problem, especially in high-income countries. Indeed, many valid and rapid diagnostic methods have been developed, and both risk factors and predisposing conditions for colonization are now well known. In contrast, effective strategies to eradicate MDR-Ent from the gut are not yet available. Both SDD and FMT may have some beneficial effects, but further RCTs considering also their combination are needed. In addition, the alternative and new decolonization approaches have been evaluated only in vitro or, more rarely, in murine models (mostly for bacteriophages).
We believe that future research should focus on the development of novel decolonization strategies that could be used alone or as a complement to others (e.g., in conjunction with FMT). Their potential should first be evaluated with reliable alternatives and large-scale in vivo model studies before being tested in human clinical trials. The development of these new in vivo models will be a key aspect in this field in the near future.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Change history
11 March 2023
Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note.
References
Jean SS, Harnod D, Hsueh PR (2022) Global threat of Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:823684
Castanheira M, Simner PJ, Bradford PA (2021) Extended-spectrum b-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection. JAC Antimicrob Resist 3(3):092
Dolejska M, Papagiannitsis CC (2018) Plasmid-mediated resistance is going wild. Plasmid 99:99–111
Poirel L, Jayol A, Nordmann P (2017) Polymyxins: antibacterial activity, susceptibility testing, and resistance mechanisms encoded by plasmids or chromosomes. Clin Microbiol Rev 30(2):557–596
Bassetti M, Vena A, Giacobbe DR, Castaldo N (2021) Management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens: recent advances and future directions. Arch Med Res 52(8):817–827
Schwaber MJ, Carmeli Y (2007) Mortality and delay in effective therapy associated with extended-spectrum b-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 60(5):913–920
Ling W, Furuya-Kanamori L, Ezure Y, Harris PNA, Paterson DL (2021) Adverse clinical outcomes associated with infections by Enterobacterales producing ESBL (ESBL-E): a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAC Antimicrob Resist 3(2):068
World Health Organization (2017). Prioritization of pathogens to guide discovery, research and development of new antibiotics for drug-resistant bacterial infections, including tuberculosis. Geneva (WHO/EMP/IAU/2017.12).
Martinson JNV, Walk ST (2020) Escherichia coli Residency in the Gut of Healthy Human Adults. EcoSal Plus 9(1)
Denkel LA, Maechler F, Schwab F, Kola A, Weber A, Gastmeier P, Pfafflin F, Weber S, Werner G, Pfeifer Y, Pietsch M, Leistner R (2020) Infections caused by extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales after rectal colonization with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Infect 26(8):1046–1051
Armand-Lefevre L, Andremont A, Ruppe E (2018) Travel and acquisition of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Med Mal Infect 48(7):431–441
Hilty M, Betsch BY, Bogli-Stuber K, Heiniger N, Stadler M, Kuffer M, Kronenberg A, Rohrer C, Aebi S, Endimiani A, Droz S, Muhlemann K (2012) Transmission dynamics of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the tertiary care hospital and the household setting. Clin Infect Dis 55(7):967–975
Viau R, Frank KM, Jacobs MR, Wilson B, Kaye K, Donskey CJ, Perez F, Endimiani A, Bonomo RA (2016) Intestinal carriage of Carbapenemase-producing organisms: current status of surveillance methods. Clin Microbiol Rev 29(1):1–27
Tacconelli E, Cataldo MA, Dancer SJ, De Angelis G, Falcone M, Frank U, Kahlmeter G, Pan A, Petrosillo N, Rodriguez-Bano J, Singh N, Venditti M, Yokoe DS, Cookson B, European Society of Clinical M (2014) ESCMID guidelines for the management of the infection control measures to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in hospitalized patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(Suppl 1):1–55
Catho G, Huttner BD (2019) Strategies for the eradication of extended-spectrum b-lactamase or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae intestinal carriage. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 17(8):557–569
Palmeira JD, Cunha MV, Carvalho J, Ferreira H, Fonseca C, Torres RT (2021) Emergence and spread of cephalosporinases in wildlife: a review. Animals (Basel) 11 (6)
Schwartz KL, Morris SK (2018) Travel and the spread of drug-resistant bacteria. Curr Infect Dis Rep 20(9):29
Safdar N, Sengupta S, Musuuza JS, Juthani-Mehta M, Drees M, Abbo LM, Milstone AM, Furuno JP, Varman M, Anderson DJ, Morgan DJ, Miller LG, Snyder GM, Committee SR (2017) Status of the prevention of multidrug-resistant organisms in international settings: a survey of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 38(1):53–60
Richter SS, Marchaim D (2017) Screening for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Who, When, and How? Virulence 8(4):417–426
Karanika S, Karantanos T, Arvanitis M, Grigoras C, Mylonakis E (2016) Fecal colonization with extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae and risk factors among healthy individuals: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Infect Dis 63(3):310–318
Endimiani A, Ramette A, Rhoads DD, Jacobs MR (2020) The evolving role of the clinical microbiology laboratory in identifying resistance in gram-negative bacteria: an update. Infect Dis Clin North Am 34(4):659–676
Lautenbach E, Harris AD, Perencevich EN, Nachamkin I, Tolomeo P, Metlay JP (2005) Test characteristics of perirectal and rectal swab compared to stool sample for detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the gastrointestinal tract. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49(2):798–800
Kubiak JM, Hovan M, Davidson E, Douglass C, Burgos K, Walsh TJ, Westblade LF, Satlin MJ (2022) Comparison between perianal swab and stool specimens for detecting colonization with extended-spectrum B-Lactamase-producing and Fluoroquinolone-resistant enterobacterales. J Clin Microbiol 60(7):e0023422
Alizadeh N, Rezaee MA, Kafil HS, Barhaghi MHS, Memar MY, Milani M, Hasani A, Ghotaslou R (2018) Detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae by chromogenic screening media. J Microbiol Methods 153:40–44
Garcia-Fernandez S, Garcia-Castillo M, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Morosini MI, Bala Y, Zambardi G, Canton R (2019) Performance of CHROMID(R) Colistin R agar, a new chromogenic medium for screening of colistin-resistant Enterobacterales. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 93(1):1–4
Abdul Momin MHF, Bean DC, Hendriksen RS, Haenni M, Phee LM, Wareham DW (2017) CHROMagar COL-APSE: a selective bacterial culture medium for the isolation and differentiation of colistin-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. J Med Microbiol 66(11):1554–1561
Girlich D, Grosperrin V, Naas T, Dortet L (2019) CHROMagar ESBL/mSuperCARBA bi-plate medium for detection of ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from spiked stools. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 95(2):107–112
Simner PJ, Martin I, Opene B, Tamma PD, Carroll KC, Milstone AM (2016) Evaluation of multiple methods for detection of gastrointestinal colonization of Carbapenem-resistant organisms from rectal swabs. J Clin Microbiol 54(6):1664–1667
Sadek M, Poirel L, Nordmann P (2020) Optimal detection of extended-spectrum b-lactamase producers, carbapenemase producers, polymyxin-resistant Enterobacterales, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci from stools. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 96(1):114919
Glaser L, Andreacchio K, Lyons M, Alby K (2015) Improved surveillance for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae using chromogenic media with a broth enrichment. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 82(4):284–285
Jazmati N, Hein R, Hamprecht A (2016) Use of an enrichment broth improves detection of extended-spectrum-B-Lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in clinical stool samples. J Clin Microbiol 54(2):467–470
Jazmati N, Jazmati T, Hamprecht A (2017) Importance of pre-enrichment for detection of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (3GCREB) from rectal swabs. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36(10):1847–1851
Ciesielczuk H, Phee LM, Dolphin H, Wilks M, Cherian BP, Wareham DW (2018) Optimal detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from rectal samples: a role for enrichment? J Hosp Infect 98(3):270–274
Blane B, Brodrick HJ, Gouliouris T, Ambridge KE, Kidney AD, Ludden CM, Limmathurotsakul D, Torok ME, Peacock SJ (2016) Comparison of 2 chromogenic media for the detection of extended-spectrum b-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae stool carriage in nursing home residents. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 84(3):181–183
Landman D, Salvani JK, Bratu S, Quale J (2005) Evaluation of techniques for detection of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in stool surveillance cultures. J Clin Microbiol 43(11):5639–5641
Rondinaud E, Ruppe E, Matheron S, Lucet JC, Armand-Lefevre L, group V-Rs, (2020) Screening methods for intestinal carriage of multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales: interest of enrichment broth. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 97(4):115079
Vasala A, Hytonen VP, Laitinen OH (2020) Modern tools for rapid diagnostics of antimicrobial resistance. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:308
Raghavan R, Wang S, Dendukuri N, Kar SS, Mahadevan S, Jagadisan B, Mandal J (2020) Evaluation of LAMP for detection of Shigella from stool samples in children. Access Microbiol 2(11):000169
Francois P, Tangomo M, Hibbs J, Bonetti EJ, Boehme CC, Notomi T, Perkins MD, Schrenzel J (2011) Robustness of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction for diagnostic applications. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 62(1):41–48
Tato M, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Traczewski M, Dodgson A, McEwan A, Humphries R, Hindler J, Veltman J, Wang H, Canton R (2016) Multisite evaluation of Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assay for detection of Carbapenemase-producing organisms in rectal swabs. J Clin Microbiol 54(7):1814–1819
Tenover FC, Canton R, Kop J, Chan R, Ryan J, Weir F, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, LaBombardi V, Persing DH (2013) Detection of colonization by carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative Bacilli in patients by use of the Xpert MDRO assay. J Clin Microbiol 51(11):3780–3787
Oviano M, Torres I, Gonzalez M, Bou G (2016) Evaluation of a novel procedure for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) using the LightMix(R) modular carbapenemase kits. J Antimicrob Chemother 71(12):3420–3423
Girlich D, Bernabeu S, Fortineau N, Dortet L, Naas T (2018) Evaluation of the CRE and ESBL ELITe MGB(R) kits for the accurate detection of carbapenemase- or CTX-M-producing bacteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 92(1):1–7
Antonelli A, Arena F, Giani T, Colavecchio OL, Valeva SV, Paule S, Boleij P, Rossolini GM (2016) Performance of the BD MAX instrument with check-direct CPE real-time PCR for the detection of carbapenemase genes from rectal swabs, in a setting with endemic dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 86(1):30–34
Girlich D, Oueslati S, Bernabeu S, Langlois I, Begasse C, Arangia N, Creton E, Cotellon G, Sauvadet A, Dortet L, Fortineau N, Naas T (2020) Evaluation of the BD MAX check-points CPO assay for the detection of Carbapenemase producers directly from rectal swabs. J Mol Diagn 22(2):294–300
Girlich D, Bogaerts P, Bouchahrouf W, Bernabeu S, Langlois I, Begasse C, Arangia N, Dortet L, Huang TD, Glupczynski Y, Naas T (2021) Evaluation of the Novodiag CarbaR+, a novel integrated sample to result platform for the multiplex qualitative detection of Carbapenem and Colistin resistance markers. Microb Drug Resist 27(2):170–178
Saliba R, Aho-Glele LS, Karam-Sarkis D, Zahar JR (2020) Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction assays for direct screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from rectal swabs: a diagnostic meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 104(3):381–389
Rajapakse N, Vayalumkal J, Lam-Li D, Pearce C, Rees G, Kamhuka L, Peirano G, Pidhorney C, Ledgerwood D, Alfieri N, Hope K, Gregson D, Pitout J, Louie T, Conly J (2014) Pilot testing of an out-of-country medical care questionnaire with screening and cost analysis of preemptive isolation for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a large Canadian health region. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35(4):450–451
Naas T, Ergani A, Carrer A, Nordmann P (2011) Real-time PCR for detection of NDM-1 carbapenemase genes from spiked stool samples. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55(9):4038–4043
Dona V, Bernasconi OJ, Kasraian S, Tinguely R, Endimiani A (2017) A SYBR((R)) Green-based real-time PCR method for improved detection of mcr-1-mediated colistin resistance in human stool samples. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 9:57–60
Girlich D, Ouzani S, Langlois I, Begasse C, Arangia N, Fortineau N, Naas T, Dortet L (2020) Successful use of culture and enrichment for the detection of OXA-181-producing Escherichia coli from rectal swab samples falsely categorized as negative by Xpert(R) Carba-R. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 96(1):114909
Cangelosi GA, Meschke JS (2014) Dead or alive: molecular assessment of microbial viability. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(19):5884–5891
Birgand G, Zahar J-R, Lucet J-C (2018) Insight into the complex epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Clinical Infectious Diseases
Gurieva T, Dautzenberg MJD, Gniadkowski M, Derde LPG, Bonten MJM, Bootsma MCJ (2018) The transmissibility of antibiotic-resistant enterobacteriaceae in intensive care units. Clin Infect Dis 66(4):489–493
Kurz MS, Bayingana C, Ndoli JM, Sendegeya A, Durst A, Pfuller R, Gahutu JB, Mockenhaupt FP (2017) Intense pre-admission carriage and further acquisition of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae among patients and their caregivers in a tertiary hospital in Rwanda. Trop Med Int Health 22(2):210–220
Moremi N, Silago V, Mselewa EG, Chifwaguzi AP, Mirambo MM, Mushi MF, Matemba L, Seni J, Mshana SE (2021) Extended-spectrum b-lactamase blaCTX-M-1 group in gram-negative bacteria colonizing patients admitted at Mazimbu hospital and Morogoro Regional hospital in Morogoro. Tanzania. BMC Res Notes 14(1):77
Nakamura A, Komatsu M, Noguchi N, Ohno Y, Hashimoto E, Matsutani H, Abe N, Fukuda S, Kohno H, Nakamura F, Matsuo S, Kawano S (2016) Analysis of molecular epidemiologic characteristics of extended-spectrum b-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli colonizing feces in hospital patients and community dwellers in a Japanese city. J Infect Chemother 22(2):102–107
Friedmann R, Raveh D, Zartzer E, Rudensky B, Broide E, Attias D, Yinnon AM (2009) Prospective evaluation of colonization with extended-spectrum b-lactamase (ESBL)-producing enterobacteriaceae among patients at hospital admission and of subsequent colonization with ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae among patients during hospitalization. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30(6):534–542
Kizilates F, Yakupogullari Y, Berk H, Oztoprak N, Otlu B (2021) Risk factors for fecal carriage of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains among patients at hospital admission. Am J Infect Control 49(3):333–339
Kiddee A, Assawatheptawee K, Na-Udom A, Boonsawang P, Treebupachatsakul P, Walsh TR, Niumsup PR (2019) Risk factors for extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae carriage in patients admitted to intensive care unit in a tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Microb Drug Resist 25(8):1182–1190
Emmanuel Martinez A, Widmer A, Frei R, Pargger H, Tuchscherer D, Marsch S, Egli A, Tschudin-Sutter S (2019) ESBL-colonization at ICU admission: impact on subsequent infection, carbapenem-consumption, and outcome. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 40(4):408–413
Jalalzai W, Boutrot M, Guinard J, Guigon A, Bret L, Poisson DM, Boulain T, Barbier F (2018) Cessation of screening for intestinal carriage of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a low-endemicity intensive care unit with universal contact precautions. Clin Microbiol Infect 24 (4):429 e427-429 e412
Maseda E, Salgado P, Anillo V, Ruiz-Carrascoso G, Gomez-Gil R, Martin-Funke C, Gimenez MJ, Granizo JJ, Aguilar L, Gilsanz F (2017) Risk factors for colonization by carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria at admission to a Surgical ICU: a retrospective study. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 35(6):333–337
Harbaoui S, Ferjani S, Abbassi MS, Saidani M, Gargueh T, Ferjani M, Hammi Y, Boutiba-Ben Boubaker I (2022) Genetic heterogeneity and predominance of blaCTX-M -15 in cefotaxime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates colonizing hospitalized children in Tunisia. Lett Appl Microbiol
Schaumburg F, Alabi A, Kokou C, Grobusch MP, Kock R, Kaba H, Becker K, Adegnika AA, Kremsner PG, Peters G, Mellmann A (2013) High burden of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Gabon. J Antimicrob Chemother 68(9):2140–2143
Kibwana UO, Manyahi J, Sandnes HH, Blomberg B, Mshana SE, Langeland N, Moyo SJ (2022) Gastrointestinal colonization of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing bacteria among children below five years of age hospitalized with fever in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 30:107–114
van Aartsen JJ, Moore CE, Parry CM, Turner P, Phot N, Mao S, Suy K, Davies T, Giess A, Sheppard AE, Peto TEA, Day NPJ, Crook DW, Walker AS, Stoesser N (2019) Epidemiology of paediatric gastrointestinal colonisation by extended spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in north-west Cambodia. BMC Microbiol 19(1):59
Milic M, Siljic M, Cirkovic V, Jovicevic M, Perovic V, Markovic M, Martic J, Stanojevic M, Mijac V (2021) Colonization with multidrug-resistant bacteria in the first week of life among hospitalized preterm neonates in Serbia risk factors and outcomes. Microorganisms 9 (12)
Arhoune B, El Fakir S, Himri S, Moutaouakkil K, El Hassouni S, Benboubker M, Hmami F, Oumokhtar B (2021) Intense intestinal carriage and subsequent acquisition of multidrug-resistant enterobacteria in neonatal intensive care unit in Morocco. PLoS One 16(6):e0251810
Xu Q, Pan F, Sun Y, Wang C, Shi Y, Zhang T, Yu F, Zhang H (2020) Fecal carriage and molecular epidemiology of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from inpatient children in a pediatric hospital of Shanghai. Infect Drug Resist 13:4405–4415
Rodriguez-Villodres A, Martin-Gandul C, Penalva G, Guisado-Gil AB, Crespo-Rivas JC, Pachon-Ibanez ME, Lepe JA, Cisneros JM (2021) Prevalence and Risk factors for multidrug-resistant organisms colonization in long-term care facilities around the world a review. Antibiotics (Basel) 10 (6)
Flokas ME, Alevizakos M, Shehadeh F, Andreatos N, Mylonakis E (2017) Extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae colonisation in long-term care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 50(5):649–656
Martischang R, Francois P, Cherkaoui A, Gaia N, Renzi G, Agostinho A, Perez M, Graf CE, Harbarth S (2021) Epidemiology of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli from repeated prevalence studies over 11 years in a long-term-care facility. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 10(1):148
Kohler P, Seiffert SN, Kessler S, Rettenmund G, Lemmenmeier E, QallaWidmer L, Nolte O, Seth-Smith HMB, Albrich WC, BaboueeFlury B, Gardiol C, Harbarth S, Munzer T, Schlegel M, Petignat C, Egli A, Hequet D (2022) Molecular epidemiology and risk factors for extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing enterobacterales in long-term care residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc 23(475–481):475
March A, Aschbacher R, Dhanji H, Livermore DM, Bottcher A, Sleghel F, Maggi S, Noale M, Larcher C, Woodford N (2010) Colonization of residents and staff of a long-term-care facility and adjacent acute-care hospital geriatric unit by multiresistant bacteria. Clin Microbiol Infect 16(7):934–944
Broussier M, Gbaguidi-Haore H, Rachidi-Berjamy F, Bertrand X, Slekovec C (2020) Prevalence, genetic diversity of and factors associated with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales carriage in residents of French nursing homes. J Hosp Infect 104(4):469–475
Latour K, Huang TD, Jans B, Berhin C, Bogaerts P, Noel A, Nonhoff C, Dodemont M, Denis O, Ieven M, Loens K, Schoevaerdts D, Catry B, Glupczynski Y (2019) Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes in Belgium in 2015. PLoS One 14(3):e0214327
McKinnell JA, Miller LG, Singh RD, Gussin G, Kleinman K, Mendez J, Laurner B, Catuna TD, Heim L, Saavedra R, Felix J, Torres C, Chang J, Estevez M, Mendez J, Tchakalian G, Bloomfield L, Ceja S, Franco R, Miner A, Hurtado A, Hean R, Varasteh A, Robinson PA, Park S, Tam S, Tjoa T, He J, Agrawal S, Yamaguchi S, Custodio H, Nguyen J, Bittencourt CE, Evans KD, Mor V, McConeghy K, Weinstein RA, Hayden MK, Stone ND, Steinberg K, Beecham N, Montgomery J, DeAnn W, Peterson EM, Huang SS (2020) High prevalence of multidrug-resistant organism colonization in 28 nursing homes: an “Iceberg effect.” J Am Med Dir Assoc 2112(1937–1943):e1932
Nakai M, Oka K, Watanabe G, Kamei K, Tsukada N, Mori R, Nagaya M, Ukai Y, Morioka H, Tetsuka N, Iguchi M, Yagi T (2022) Epidemiology and molecular characterization of fecal carriage of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales among elderly residents in Japan. J Infect Chemother 28(4):569–575
van Duin D, Paterson DL (2020) Multidrug-resistant bacteria in the community: an update. Infect Dis Clin North Am 34(4):709–722
van Duin D, Paterson DL (2016) Multidrug-resistant bacteria in the community: trends and lessons learned. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30(2):377–390
Pitout JD, Nordmann P, Laupland KB, Poirel L (2005) Emergence of Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum b-lactamases (ESBLs) in the community. J Antimicrob Chemother 56(1):52–59
Kelly AM, Mathema B, Larson EL (2017) Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the community: a scoping review. Int J Antimicrob Agents 50(2):127–134
Paiva Y, Nagano DS, Cotia ALF, Guimaraes T, Martins RCR, Perdigao Neto LV, Cortes MF, Marchi AP, Corscadden L, Machado AS, Paula AI, Franco LAM, Neves PR, Levin AS, Costa SF (2021) Colistin-resistant Escherichia coli belonging to different sequence types: genetic characterization of isolates responsible for colonization, community- and healthcare-acquired infections. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 63:e38
Prim N, Turbau M, Rivera A, Rodriguez-Navarro J, Coll P, Mirelis B (2017) Prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae: a four-year cross-sectional study. J Infect 75(6):493–498
Shen Z, Hu Y, Sun Q, Hu F, Zhou H, Shu L, Ma T, Shen Y, Wang Y, Li J, Walsh TR, Zhang R, Wang S (2018) Emerging carriage of NDM-5 and MCR-1 in Escherichia coli from healthy people in multiple regions in China: a cross sectional observational study. EClinicalMedicine 6:11–20
Bezabih YM, Sabiiti W, Alamneh E, Bezabih A, Peterson GM, Bezabhe WM, Roujeinikova A (2021) The global prevalence and trend of human intestinal carriage of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in the community. J Antimicrob Chemother 76(1):22–29
Budel T, Kuenzli E, Clement M, Bernasconi OJ, Fehr J, Mohammed AH, Hassan NK, Zinsstag J, Hatz C, Endimiani A (2019) Polyclonal gut colonization with extended-spectrum cephalosporin- and/or colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a normal status for hotel employees on the island of Zanzibar. Tanzania. J Antimicrob Chemother 74(10):2880–2890
Moser AI, Kuenzli E, Campos-Madueno EI, Budel T, Rattanavong S, Vongsouvath M, Hatz C, Endimiani A (2021) Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli strains and their plasmids in people, poultry, and chicken meat in Laos. Front Microbiol 12:708182
Luvsansharav UO, Hirai I, Nakata A, Imura K, Yamauchi K, Niki M, Komalamisra C, Kusolsuk T, Yamamoto Y (2012) Prevalence of and risk factors associated with faecal carriage of CTX-M b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in rural Thai communities. J Antimicrob Chemother 67(7):1769–1774
Pires J, Kuenzli E, Hauser C, Tinguely R, Kasraian S, Atkinson A, Rauch A, Furrer H, Perreten V, Marschall J, Hatz C, Endimiani A (2018) Intestinal colonisation with extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in different populations in Switzerland: prevalence, risk factors and molecular features. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 12:17–19
Nicolas-Chanoine MH, Gruson C, Bialek-Davenet S, Bertrand X, Thomas-Jean F, Bert F, Moyat M, Meiller E, Marcon E, Danchin N, Noussair L, Moreau R, Leflon-Guibout V (2013) 10-Fold increase (2006–11) in the rate of healthy subjects with extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli faecal carriage in a Parisian check-up centre. J Antimicrob Chemother 68(3):562–568
Islam S, Selvarangan R, Kanwar N, McHenry R, Chappell JD, Halasa N, Wikswo ME, Payne DC, Azimi PH, McDonald LC, Gomez-Duarte OG (2018) Intestinal carriage of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant and extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae in healthy US children. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 7(3):234–240
Birgy A, Cohen R, Levy C, Bidet P, Courroux C, Benani M, Thollot F, Bingen E (2012) Community faecal carriage of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in French children. BMC Infect Dis 12:315
Koningstein M, Leenen MA, Mughini-Gras L, Scholts RM, van Huisstede-Vlaanderen KW, Enserink R, Zuidema R, Kooistra-Smid MA, Veldman K, Mevius D, van Pelt W (2015) Prevalence and risk factors for colonization with extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in children attending daycare centers: a cohort study in the Netherlands. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 4(4):e93-99
Ahmed SF, Ali MM, Mohamed ZK, Moussa TA, Klena JD (2014) Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum b-lactamases and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in a Libyan community. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 13:22
Saleem AF, Allana A, Hale L, Diaz A, Salinas R, Salinas C, Qureshi SM, Hotwani A, Rahman N, Khan A, Zaidi AK, Seed PC, Arshad M (2020) The gut of healthy infants in the community as a reservoir of ESBL and Carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Antibiotics (Basel) 9 (6)
Habibzadeh N, Peeri Doghaheh H, Manouchehri Far M, Alimohammadi Asl H, Iranpour S, Arzanlou M (2022) Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum b-Lactamases and pAmpC producing Enterobacterales in an Iranian community: prevalence, risk factors, molecular epidemiology, and Antibiotic Resistance. Microb Drug Resist 28(9):921–934
Shen Y, Zhou H, Xu J, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Walsh TR, Shao B, Wu C, Hu Y, Yang L, Shen Z, Wu Z, Sun Q, Ou Y, Wang Y, Wang S, Wu Y, Cai C, Li J, Shen J, Zhang R, Wang Y (2018) Anthropogenic and environmental factors associated with high incidence of mcr-1 carriage in humans across China. Nat Microbiol 3(9):1054–1062
Wu PC, Cheng MF, Chen WL, Hung WY, Wang JL, Hung CH (2021) Risk factors and prevalence of mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli in fecal carriages among community children in Southern Taiwan. Front Microbiol 12:748525
Fernandez-Verdugo A, Forcelledo L, Rodriguez-Lozano J, Rodriguez-Lucas C, Barreiro-Hurle L, Canut A, de la Iglesia P, Escudero D, Calvo J, Boga JA, Margolles M, Rodicio MR, Fernandez J (2020) Prospective multicentre study of rectal carriage of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae among health-care workers in Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect 265:649 e641649 e644
Snyman Y, Whitelaw AC, Maloba MRB, Hesseling AC, Newton-Foot M (2021) Carriage of colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in children from communities in Cape Town (Tuberculosis child multidrug-resistant preventive therapy trial sub-study). S Afr J Infect Dis 36(1):241
Yamamoto Y, Kawahara R, Fujiya Y, Sasaki T, Hirai I, Khong DT, Nguyen TN, Nguyen BX (2019) Wide dissemination of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli with the mobile resistance gene mcr in healthy residents in Vietnam. J Antimicrob Chemother 74(2):523–524
Giani T, Sennati S, Antonelli A, Di Pilato V, di Maggio T, Mantella A, Niccolai C, Spinicci M, Monasterio J, Castellanos P, Martinez M, Contreras F, Balderrama Villaroel D, Damiani E, Maury S, Rocabado R, Pallecchi L, Bartoloni A, Rossolini GM (2018) High prevalence of carriage of mcr-1-positive enteric bacteria among healthy children from rural communities in the Chaco region, Bolivia, September to October 2016. Euro Surveill 23 (45)
Lv Z, Shen Y, Liu W, Ye H, Liu D, Liu J, Fu Y, Peng C, Chen K, Deng X, Liu B, He J, Yang L, Xu C, Cai C, Wang Y, Ke Y, Shen J (2022) Prevalence and risk factors of mcr-1-positive volunteers after colistin banning as animal growth promoter in China: a community-based case-control study. Clin Microbiol Infect 28(2):267–272
Atterby C, Osbjer K, Tepper V, Rajala E, Hernandez J, Seng S, Holl D, Bonnedahl J, Borjesson S, Magnusson U, Jarhult JD (2019) Carriage of carbapenemase- and extended-spectrum cephalosporinase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in humans and livestock in rural Cambodia; gender and age differences and detection of blaOXA-48 in humans. Zoonoses Public Health 66(6):603–617
Zurfluh K, Nuesch-Inderbinen MT, Poirel L, Nordmann P, Hachler H, Stephan R (2015) Emergence of Escherichia coli producing OXA-48 b-lactamase in the community in Switzerland. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 4:9
Arum N, Ghafur A, Kazi M, Rao R, Rodrigues C, Ratnamani MS, J P, Alaparthi S, Gnanasoundari P, Premachandran KP, Thirunarayanan MA, (2022) Prevalence of faecal carriage of Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacteriaceae in healthy Indian subjects from the community. Indian J Med Microbiol 40(3):374–377
Al-Mir H, Osman M, Drapeau A, Hamze M, Madec JY, Haenni M (2021) Spread of ESC-, carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Escherichia coli clones and plasmids within and between food workers in Lebanon. J Antimicrob Chemother 76(12):3135–3143
Moghnia OH, Rotimi VO, Al-Sweih NA (2021) Monitoring antibiotic resistance profiles of faecal isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant isolates among food handlers in Kuwait. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 25:370–376
Neut C (2021) Carriage of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Healthy People: Recognition of Several Risk Groups. Antibiotics (Basel) 10 (10)
Dao TL, Hoang VT, Magmoun A, Ly TDA, Baron SA, Hadjadj L, Canard N, Drali T, Gouriet F, Raoult D, Parola P, Marty P, Rolain JM, Gautret P (2021) Acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria and colistin resistance genes in French medical students on internships abroad. Travel Med Infect Dis 39:101940
Niumsup PR, Tansawai U, Na-Udom A, Jantapalaboon D, Assawatheptawee K, Kiddee A, Romgaew T, Lamlertthon S, Walsh TR (2018) Prevalence and risk factors for intestinal carriage of CTX-M-type ESBLs in Enterobacteriaceae from a Thai community. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37(1):69–75
Hu Y, Rubin J, Mussio K, Riley LW (2021) Risk factors for faecal carriage of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in a college community: a penalised regression model. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 26:166–173
Willems RPJ, van Dijk K, Dierikx CM, Twisk JWR, van der Klis FRM, de Greeff SC, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C (2021) Gastric acid suppression, lifestyle factors and intestinal carriage of ESBL and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: a nationwide population-based study. J Antimicrob Chemother 77(1):237–245
Olaru ID, Tacconelli E, Yeung S, Ferrand RA, Stabler RA, Hopkins H, Aiken AM, Kranzer K (2021) The association between antimicrobial resistance and HIV infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 27(6):846–853
Pires J, Bernasconi OJ, Hauser C, Tinguely R, Atkinson A, Perreten V, Dona V, Rauch A, Furrer H, Endimiani A (2017) Intestinal colonisation with extended-spectrum cephalosporin- and colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in HIV-positive individuals in Switzerland: molecular features and risk factors. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49(4):519–521
Manyahi J, Moyo SJ, Tellevik MG, Langeland N, Blomberg B (2020) High prevalence of fecal carriage of extended spectrum b-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae among newly HIV-diagnosed adults in a community setting in Tanzania. Microb Drug Resist 26(12):1540–1545
Said MM, Msanga DR, Mtemisika CI, Silago V, Mirambo MM, Mshana SE (2022) Extended spectrum b-lactamase producing lactose fermenting bacteria colonizing children with human Immunodeficiency virus, sickle cell disease and diabetes mellitus in Mwanza City, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. Trop Med Infect Dis 7 (8)
Surgers L, Chiarabini T, Royer G, Rougier H, Mercier-Darty M, Decre D, Valin N, Woerther PL, Decousser JW, Girard PM, Lacombe K, Boyd A (2022) Evidence of sexual transmission of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing enterobacterales: a cross-sectional and prospective Study. Clin Infect Dis 75(9):1556–1564
Telling K, Brauer A, Laht M, Kalmus P, Toompere K, Kisand V, Maimets M, Remm M, Tenson T, Lutsar I (2020) Characteristics of extended-spectrum B-Lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and contact to animals in Estonia. Microorganisms 8 (8)
van Hoek A, Dierikx C, Bosch T, Schouls L, van Duijkeren E, Visser M (2020) Transmission of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli between broilers and humans on broiler farms. J Antimicrob Chemother 75(3):543–549
Leangapichart T, Lunha K, Jiwakanon J, Angkititrakul S, Jarhult JD, Magnusson U, Sunde M (2021) Characterization of Klebsiella pneumoniae complex isolates from pigs and humans in farms in Thailand: population genomic structure, antibiotic resistance and virulence genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 76(8):2012–2016
Hackmann C, Gastmeier P, Schwarz S, Lubke-Becker A, Bischoff P, Leistner R (2021) Pet husbandry as a risk factor for colonization or infection with MDR organisms: a systematic meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 76(6):1392–1405
van den Bunt G, Fluit AC, Spaninks MP, Timmerman AJ, Geurts Y, Kant A, Scharringa J, Mevius D, Wagenaar JA, Bonten MJM, van Pelt W, Hordijk J (2020) Faecal carriage, risk factors, acquisition and persistence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in dogs and cats and co-carriage with humans belonging to the same household. J Antimicrob Chemother 75(2):342–350
Pires J, Bernasconi OJ, Kasraian S, Hilty M, Perreten V, Endimiani A (2016) Intestinal colonisation with extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in Swiss pets: molecular features, risk factors and transmission with owners. Int J Antimicrob Agents 48(6):759–760
Dazio V, Nigg A, Schmidt JS, Brilhante M, Campos-Madueno EI, Mauri N, Kuster SP, Brawand SG, Willi B, Endimiani A, Perreten V, Schuller S (2021) Duration of carriage of multidrug-resistant bacteria in dogs and cats in veterinary care and co-carriage with their owners. One Health 13:100322
Bassyouni RH, Gaber SN, Wegdan AA (2015) Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum b-lactamase- and AmpC- producing Escherichia coli among healthcare workers. J Infect Dev Ctries 9(3):304–308
Bonneault M, Andrianoelina VH, Herindrainy P, Rabenandrasana MAN, Garin B, Breurec S, Delarocque-Astagneau E, Guillemot D, Andrianirina ZZ, Collard JM, Huynh BT, Opatowski L (2019) Transmission routes of extended-spectrum B-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae in a neonatology ward in Madagascar. Am J Trop Med Hyg 100(6):1355–1362
Duong BT, Duong MC, Campbell J, Nguyen VMH, Nguyen HH, Bui TBH, Nguyen VVC, McLaws ML (2021) Antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria carriage in healthcare workers working in an intensive care unit. Infect Chemother 53(3):546–552
March A, Aschbacher R, Sleghel F, Soelva G, Kaczor M, Migliavacca R, Piazza A, Mattioni Marchetti V, Pagani L, Scalzo K, Pasquetto V, Pagani E (2017) Colonization of residents and staff of an Italian long-term care facility and an adjacent acute care hospital geriatric unit by multidrug-resistant bacteria. New Microbiol 40(4):258–263
Jozsa K, de With K, Kern W, Reinheimer C, Kempf VAJ, Wichelhaus C, Wichelhaus TA (2017) Intestinal carriage of multidrug-resistant bacteria among healthcare professionals in Germany. GMS Infect Dis 5:Doc07
Uelze L, Grutzke J, Borowiak M, Hammerl JA, Juraschek K, Deneke C, Tausch SH, Malorny B (2020) Typing methods based on whole genome sequencing data. One Health Outlook 2:3
Adler A, Baraniak A, Izdebski R, Fiett J, Salvia A, Samso JV, Lawrence C, Solomon J, Paul M, Lerman Y, Schwartzberg Y, Mordechai E, Rossini A, Fierro J, Lammens C, Malhotra-Kumar S, Goossens H, Hryniewicz W, Brun-Buisson C, Gniadkowski M, Carmeli Y, team M, (2014) A multinational study of colonization with extended spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in healthcare personnel and family members of carrier patients hospitalized in rehabilitation centres. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(8):O516-523
Endimiani A, Brilhante M, Bernasconi OJ, Perreten V, Schmidt JS, Dazio V, Nigg A, Gobeli Brawand S, Kuster SP, Schuller S, Willi B (2020) Employees of Swiss veterinary clinics colonized with epidemic clones of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother 75(3):766–768
Peters C, Dulon M, Nienhaus A, Schablon A (2019) Occupational infection risk with multidrug-resistant organisms in health personnel—a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16 (11)
In Voor, ’t Holt AF, Mourik K, Beishuizen B, van der Schoor AS, Verbon A, Vos MC, Severin JA, (2020) Acquisition of multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales during international travel: a systematic review of clinical and microbiological characteristics and meta-analyses of risk factors. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 9(1):71
Schaumburg F, Sertic SM, Correa-Martinez C, Mellmann A, Kock R, Becker K (2019) Acquisition and colonization dynamics of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria during international travel: a prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2510(1287):e1281-1287
Moser AI, Kuenzli E, Budel T, Campos-Madueno EI, Bernasconi OJ, DeCrom-Beer S, Jakopp B, Mohammed AH, Hassan NK, Fehr J, Zinsstag J, Hatz C, Endimiani A (2021) Travellers returning from the island of Zanzibar colonized with MDR Escherichia coli strains: assessing the impact of local people and other sources. J Antimicrob Chemother 76(2):330–337
Pires J, Kraemer JG, Kuenzli E, Kasraian S, Tinguely R, Hatz C, Endimiani A, Hilty M (2019) Gut microbiota dynamics in travelers returning from India colonized with extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a longitudinal study. Travel Med Infect Dis 27:72–80
Bernasconi OJ, Kuenzli E, Pires J, Tinguely R, Carattoli A, Hatz C, Perreten V, Endimiani A (2016) Travelers can import colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, including those possessing the plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60(8):5080–5084
Ruppe E, Andremont A, Armand-Lefevre L (2018) Digestive tract colonization by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in travellers: An update. Travel Med Infect Dis 21:28–35
Buchek G, Mende K, Telu K, Kaiser S, Fraser J, Mitra I, Stam J, Lalani T, Tribble D, Yun HC (2021) Travel-associated multidrug-resistant organism acquisition and risk factors among US military personnel. J Travel Med 28 (3)
Kuenzli E, Jaeger VK, Frei R, Neumayr A, DeCrom S, Haller S, Blum J, Widmer AF, Furrer H, Battegay M, Endimiani A, Hatz C (2014) High colonization rates of extended-spectrum b-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli in Swiss travellers to South Asia—a prospective observational multicentre cohort study looking at epidemiology, microbiology and risk factors. BMC Infect Dis 14:528
Otter JA, Natale A, Batra R, Tosas Auguet O, Dyakova E, Goldenberg SD, Edgeworth JD (2019) Individual- and community-level risk factors for ESBL Enterobacteriaceae colonization identified by universal admission screening in London. Clin Microbiol Infect 25(10):1259–1265
Arcilla MS, van Hattem JM, Haverkate MR, Bootsma MCJ, van Genderen PJJ, Goorhuis A, Grobusch MP, Lashof AMO, Molhoek N, Schultsz C, Stobberingh EE, Verbrugh HA, de Jong MD, Melles DC, Penders J (2017) Import and spread of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by international travellers (COMBAT study): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 17(1):78–85
van Hattem JM, Arcilla MS, Bootsma MC, van Genderen PJ, Goorhuis A, Grobusch MP, Molhoek N, Oude Lashof AM, Schultsz C, Stobberingh EE, Verbrugh HA, de Jong MD, Melles DC, Penders J (2016) Prolonged carriage and potential onward transmission of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Dutch travelers. Future Microbiol 11:857–864
Vink JP, Otter JA, Edgeworth JD (2020) Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae—once positive always positive? Curr Opin Gastroenterol 36(1):9–16
Bar-Yoseph H, Hussein K, Braun E, Paul M (2016) Natural history and decolonization strategies for ESBL/carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae carriage: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 71(10):2729–2739
Oren I, Sprecher H, Finkelstein R, Hadad S, Neuberger A, Hussein K, Raz-Pasteur A, Lavi N, Saad E, Henig I, Horowitz N, Avivi I, Benyamini N, Fineman R, Ofran Y, Haddad N, Rowe JM, Zuckerman T (2013) Eradication of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae gastrointestinal colonization with nonabsorbable oral antibiotic treatment: a prospective controlled trial. Am J Infect Control 41(12):1167–1172
Bart Y, Paul M, Eluk O, Geffen Y, Rabino G, Hussein K (2015) Risk factors for recurrence of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae carriage: case-control study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 36(8):936–941
Birgand G, Armand-Lefevre L, Lolom I, Ruppe E, Andremont A, Lucet JC (2013) Duration of colonization by extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae after hospital discharge. Am J Infect Control 41(5):443–447
Lubbert C, Lippmann N, Busch T, Kaisers UX, Ducomble T, Eckmanns T, Rodloff AC (2014) Long-term carriage of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-2-producing K pneumoniae after a large single-center outbreak in Germany. Am J Infect Control 42(4):376–380
Kim YK, Song SA, Lee JN, Oh M, Jo KM, Kim HJ, Lee JH, Park J, Jang HJ, Kim HK, Kiem S (2018) Clinical factors predicting persistent carriage of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae among patients with known carriage. J Hosp Infect 99(4):405–412
Kim YK, Chang IB, Kim HS, Song W, Lee SS (2021) Prolonged carriage of Carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae: clinical risk factors and the influence of Carbapenemase and organism types. J Clin Med 10 (2)
Lohr IH, Rettedal S, Natas OB, Naseer U, Oymar K, Sundsfjord A (2013) Long-term faecal carriage in infants and intra-household transmission of CTX-M-15-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae following a nosocomial outbreak. J Antimicrob Chemother 68(5):1043–1048
Nordberg V, Jonsson K, Giske CG, Iversen A, Aspevall O, Jonsson B, Camporeale A, Norman M, Naver L (2018) Neonatal intestinal colonization with extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae-a 5-year follow-up study. Clin Microbiol Infect 24(9):1004–1009
Weterings V, van den Bijllaardt W, Bootsma M, Hendriks Y, Kilsdonk L, Mulders A, Kluytmans J (2022) Duration of rectal colonization with extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: results of an open, dynamic cohort study in Dutch nursing home residents (2013–2019). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 11(1):98
van Duijkeren E, Wielders CCH, Dierikx CM, van Hoek A, Hengeveld P, Veenman C, Florijn A, Lotterman A, Smit LAM, van Dissel JT, Maassen CBM, de Greeff SC (2018) Long-term carriage of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the general population in The Netherlands. Clin Infect Dis 66(9):1368–1376
Ruppe E, Armand-Lefevre L, Estellat C, Consigny PH, El Mniai A, Boussadia Y, Goujon C, Ralaimazava P, Campa P, Girard PM, Wyplosz B, Vittecoq D, Bouchaud O, Le Loup G, Pialoux G, Perrier M, Wieder I, Moussa N, Esposito-Farese M, Hoffmann I, Coignard B, Lucet JC, Andremont A, Matheron S (2015) High rate of acquisition but short duration of carriage of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae after travel to the tropics. Clin Infect Dis 61(4):593–600
OstholmBalkhed A, Tarnberg M, Nilsson M, Nilsson LE, Hanberger H, Hallgren A, Southeast Sweden Travel Study G (2018) Duration of travel-associated faecal colonisation with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae—a one year follow-up study. PLoS One 13(10):e0205504
Barreto Miranda I, Ignatius R, Pfuller R, Friedrich-Janicke B, Steiner F, Paland M, Dieckmann S, Schaufler K, Wieler LH, Guenther S, Mockenhaupt FP (2016) High carriage rate of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae at presentation and follow-up among travellers with gastrointestinal complaints returning from India and Southeast Asia. J Travel Med 23:2024
Pires J, Kuenzli E, Kasraian S, Tinguely R, Furrer H, Hilty M, Hatz C, Endimiani A (2016) Polyclonal intestinal colonization with extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae upon traveling to India. Front Microbiol 7:1069
Armand-Lefevre L, Rondinaud E, Desvillechabrol D, Mullaert J, Clermont O, Petitjean M, Ruppe E, Cokelaer T, Bouchier C, Tenaillon O, Ma L, Nooroya Y, Matheron S, The Voyag RSG, Andremont A, Denamur E, Kennedy SP (2021) Dynamics of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales colonization in long-term carriers following travel abroad. Microb Genom 7 (7)
Peng Y, Liang S, Poonsuk K, On H, Li SW, Maurin MMP, Chan CH, Chan CL, Sin ZY, Tun HM (2021) Role of gut microbiota in travel-related acquisition of extended spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Travel Med 28 (3)
Reddy P, Malczynski M, Obias A, Reiner S, Jin N, Huang J, Noskin GA, Zembower T (2007) Screening for extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae among high-risk patients and rates of subsequent bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 45(7):846–852
Christiaens G, Ciccarella Y, Damas P, Hayette MP, Melin P, Nys M, De Mol P (2006) Prospective survey of digestive tract colonization with enterobacteriaceae that produce extended-spectrum b-lactamases in intensive care units. J Hosp Infect 62(3):386–388
Vehreschild MJ, Hamprecht A, Peterson L, Schubert S, Hantschel M, Peter S, Schafhausen P, Rohde H, Lilienfeld-Toal MV, Bekeredjian-Ding I, Libam J, Hellmich M, Vehreschild JJ, Cornely OA, Seifert H (2014) A multicentre cohort study on colonization and infection with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in high-risk patients with haematological malignancies. J Antimicrob Chemother 69(12):3387–3392
Lindblom A, Karami N, Magnusson T, Ahren C (2018) Subsequent infection with extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in patients with prior infection or fecal colonization. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37(8):1491–1497
Laupland KB, Church DL, Vidakovich J, Mucenski M, Pitout JD (2008) Community-onset extended-spectrum b-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli: importance of international travel. J Infect 57(6):441–448
Osthoff M, McGuinness SL, Wagen AZ, Eisen DP (2015) Urinary tract infections due to extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria: identification of risk factors and outcome predictors in an Australian tertiary referral hospital. Int J Infect Dis 34:79–83
Talan DA, Takhar SS, Krishnadasan A, Abrahamian FM, Mower WR, Moran GJ, Group EMINS (2016) Fluoroquinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli infections in patients with pyelonephritis, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 22 (9)
Tham J, Odenholt I, Walder M, Andersson L, Melander E (2013) Risk factors for infections with extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in a county of Southern Sweden. Infect Drug Resist 6:93–97
Banerjee R, Strahilevitz J, Johnson JR, Nagwekar PP, Schora DM, Shevrin I, Du H, Peterson LR, Robicsek A (2013) Predictors and molecular epidemiology of community-onset extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli infection in a Midwestern community. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34(9):947–953
Strysko JP, Mony V, Cleveland J, Siddiqui H, Homel P, Gagliardo C (2016) International travel is a risk factor for extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae acquisition in children: A case-case-control study in an urban US hospital. Travel Med Infect Dis 14(6):568–571
Soraas A, Sundsfjord A, Sandven I, Brunborg C, Jenum PA (2013) Risk factors for community-acquired urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae—a case-control study in a low prevalence country. PLoS One 8(7):e69581
van der Bij AK, Pitout JD (2012) The role of international travel in the worldwide spread of multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother 67(9):2090–2100
Moser AI, Keller PM, Campos-Madueno EI, Poirel L, Nordmann P, Endimiani A (2021) A patient with multiple carbapenemase producers including an unusual Citrobacter sedlakii hosting an IncC blaNDM-1- and armA-carrying plasmid. Pathog Immun 6(2):119–134
Moser AI, Campos-Madueno EI, Sendi P, Perreten V, Keller PM, Ramette A, Endimiani A (2021) Repatriation of a patient with COVID-19 contributed to the importation of an emerging carbapenemase producer. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 27:267–272
Seiffert SN, Perreten V, Johannes S, Droz S, Bodmer T, Endimiani A (2014) OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky isolate of sequence type 198 in a patient transferred from Libya to Switzerland. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58(4):2446–2449
Seiffert SN, Marschall J, Perreten V, Carattoli A, Furrer H, Endimiani A (2014) Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae co-producing NDM-1, OXA-48, CTX-M-15, CMY-16, QnrA and ArmA in Switzerland. Int J Antimicrob Agents 44(3):260–262
Wendt C, Schutt S, Dalpke AH, Konrad M, Mieth M, Trierweiler-Hauke B, Weigand MA, Zimmermann S, Biehler K, Jonas D (2010) First outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae in Germany. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29(5):563–570
Weterings V, Zhou K, Rossen JW, van Stenis D, Thewessen E, Kluytmans J, Veenemans J (2015) An outbreak of colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Netherlands (July to December 2013), with inter-institutional spread. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34(8):1647–1655
Overdevest I, Haverkate M, Veenemans J, Hendriks Y, Verhulst C, Mulders A, Couprie W, Bootsma M, Johnson J, Kluytmans J (2016) Prolonged colonisation with Escherichia coli O25:ST131 versus other extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing E. coli in a long-term care facility with high endemic level of rectal colonisation, the Netherlands, 2013 to 2014. Euro Surveill 21 (42)
Duval A, Obadia T, Boelle PY, Fleury E, Herrmann JL, Guillemot D, Temime L, Opatowski L, i-Bird Study g (2019) Close proximity interactions support transmission of ESBL-K pneumoniae but not ESBL-E coli in healthcare settings. PLoS Comput Biol 15(5):e1006496
Valverde A, Grill F, Coque TM, Pintado V, Baquero F, Canton R, Cobo J (2008) High rate of intestinal colonization with extended-spectrum-b-lactamase-producing organisms in household contacts of infected community patients. J Clin Microbiol 46(8):2796–2799
Tacconelli E, Mazzaferri F, de Smet AM, Bragantini D, Eggimann P, Huttner BD, Kuijper EJ, Lucet JC, Mutters NT, Sanguinetti M, Schwaber MJ, Souli M, Torre-Cisneros J, Price JR, Rodriguez-Bano J (2019) ESCMID-EUCIC clinical guidelines on decolonization of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria carriers. Clin Microbiol Infect 25(7):807–817
Plantinga NL, Bonten MJ (2015) Selective decontamination and antibiotic resistance in ICUs. Critical Care 19(1):1–7
Saidel-Odes L, Polachek H, Peled N, Riesenberg K, Schlaeffer F, Trabelsi Y, Eskira S, Yousef B, Smolykov R, Codish S, Borer A (2012) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of selective digestive decontamination using oral gentamicin and oral polymyxin E for eradication of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carriage. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 33(1):14–19
Huttner B, Haustein T, Uckay I, Renzi G, Stewardson A, Schaerrer D, Agostinho A, Andremont A, Schrenzel J, Pittet D, Harbarth S (2013) Decolonization of intestinal carriage of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae with oral colistin and neomycin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 68(10):2375–2382
Machuca I, Gutierrez-Gutierrez B, Perez Cortes S, Gracia-Ahufinger I, Serrano J, Madrigal MD, Barcala J, Rodriguez-Lopez F, Rodriguez-Bano J, Torre-Cisneros J (2016) Oral decontamination with aminoglycosides is associated with lower risk of mortality and infections in high-risk patients colonized with colistin-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 71(11):3242–3249
Lubbert C, Faucheux S, Becker-Rux D, Laudi S, Durrbeck A, Busch T, Gastmeier P, Eckmanns T, Rodloff AC, Kaisers UX (2013) Rapid emergence of secondary resistance to gentamicin and colistin following selective digestive decontamination in patients with KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: a single-centre experience. Int J Antimicrob Agents 42(6):565–570
Oostdijk EAN, Kesecioglu J, Schultz MJ, Visser CE, de Jonge E, van Essen EHR, Bernards AT, Purmer I, Brimicombe R, Bergmans D, van Tiel F, Bosch FH, Mascini E, van Griethuysen A, Bindels A, Jansz A, van Steveninck FAL, van der Zwet WC, Fijen JW, Thijsen S, de Jong R, Oudbier J, Raben A, van der Vorm E, Koeman M, Rothbarth P, Rijkeboer A, Gruteke P, Hart-Sweet H, Peerbooms P, Winsser LJ, van Elsacker-Niele AW, Demmendaal K, Brandenburg A, de Smet A, Bonten MJM (2014) Effects of decontamination of the oropharynx and intestinal tract on antibiotic resistance in ICUs: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 312(14):1429–1437
de Lastours V, Poirel L, Huttner B, Harbarth S, Denamur E, Nordmann P (2020) Emergence of colistin-resistant Gram-negative Enterobacterales in the gut of patients receiving oral colistin and neomycin decontamination. J Infect 80(5):578–606
Plantinga NL, Wittekamp BHJ, Brun-Buisson C, Bonten MJM, group RGIs, (2020) The effects of topical antibiotics on eradication and acquisition of third-generation cephalosporin and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in ICU patients; a post hoc analysis from a multicentre cluster-randomized trial. Clin Microbiol Infect 26(4):485–491
Dobele S, Mazzaferri F, Dichter T, de Boer G, Friedrich A, Tacconelli E (2022) Modelling and simulation of the effect of targeted decolonisation on incidence of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing enterobacterales bloodstream infections in haematological patients. Infect Dis Ther 11(1):129–143
Soveral LF, Korczaguin GG, Schmidt PS, Nunes IS, Fernandes C, Zarate-Blades CR (2022) Immunological mechanisms of fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. World J Gastroenterol 28(33):4762–4772
Baunwall SMD, Terveer EM, Dahlerup JF, Erikstrup C, Arkkila P, Vehreschild MJGT, Ianiro G, Gasbarrini A, Sokol H, Kump PK, Satokari R, De Looze D, Vermeire S, Nakov R, Brezina J, Helms M, Kjeldsen J, Rode AA, Kousgaard SJ, Alric L, Trang-Poisson C, Scanzi J, Link A, Stallmach A, Kupcinskas J, Johnsen PH, Garborg K, Rodríguez ES, Serrander L, Brummer RJ, Galpérine KT, Goldenberg SD, Mullish BH, Williams HRT, Iqbal TH, Ponsioen C, Kuijper EJ, Cammarota G, Keller JJ, Hvas CL (2021) The use of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in Europe: a Europe-wide survey. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe 9:100181
Saha S, Tariq R, Tosh PK, Pardi DS, Khanna S (2019) Faecal microbiota transplantation for eradicating carriage of multidrug-resistant organisms: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect 25(8):958–963
Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Kelly CR, Mullish BH, Allegretti JR, Kassam Z, Putignani L, Fischer M, Keller JJ, Costello SP, Sokol H, Kump P, Satokari R, Kahn SA, Kao D, Arkkila P, Kuijper EJ, Vehreschild MJG, Pintus C, Lopetuso L, Masucci L, Scaldaferri F, Terveer EM, Nieuwdorp M, Lopez-Sanroman A, Kupcinskas J, Hart A, Tilg H, Gasbarrini A (2019) International consensus conference on stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut 68(12):2111–2121
DeFilipp Z, Bloom PP, Torres Soto M, Mansour MK, Sater MRA, Huntley MH, Turbett S, Chung RT, Chen YB, Hohmann EL (2019) Drug-resistant E. coli bacteremia transmitted by fecal microbiota transplant. N Engl J Med 381(21):2043–2050
Manges AR, Steiner TS, Wright AJ (2016) Fecal microbiota transplantation for the intestinal decolonization of extensively antimicrobial-resistant opportunistic pathogens: a review. Infect Dis (Lond) 48(8):587–592
Singh R, van Nood E, Nieuwdorp M, van Dam B, ten Berge IJ, Geerlings SE, Bemelman FJ (2014) Donor feces infusion for eradication of Extended Spectrum b-Lactamase producing Escherichia coli in a patient with end stage renal disease. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(11):O977-978
Grosen AK, Povlsen JV, Lemming LE, Jorgensen SMD, Dahlerup JF, Hvas CL (2019) Faecal microbiota transplantation eradicated extended-spectrum B-Lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae from a renal transplant recipient with recurrent urinary tract infections. Case Rep Nephrol Dial 9(2):102–107
Macareno-Castro J, Solano-Salazar A, Dong LT, Mohiuddin M, Espinoza JL (2022) Fecal microbiota transplantation for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review. J Infect 84(6):749–759
Dharmaratne P, Rahman N, Leung A, Ip M (2021) Is there a role of faecal microbiota transplantation in reducing antibiotic resistance burden in gut? A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Ann Med 53(1):662–681
Singh R, de Groot PF, Geerlings SE, Hodiamont CJ, Belzer C, Berge I, de Vos WM, Bemelman FJ, Nieuwdorp M (2018) Fecal microbiota transplantation against intestinal colonization by extended spectrum b-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae: a proof of principle study. BMC Res Notes 11(1):190
Dinh A, Fessi H, Duran C, Batista R, Michelon H, Bouchand F, Lepeule R, Vittecoq D, Escaut L, Sobhani I, Lawrence C, Chast F, Ronco P, Davido B (2018) Clearance of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae vs vancomycin-resistant enterococci carriage after faecal microbiota transplant: a prospective comparative study. J Hosp Infect 99(4):481–486
Huttner BD, de Lastours V, Wassenberg M, Maharshak N, Mauris A, Galperine T, Zanichelli V, Kapel N, Bellanger A, Olearo F, Duval X, Armand-Lefevre L, Carmeli Y, Bonten M, Fantin B, Harbarth S, group RGWs, (2019) A 5-day course of oral antibiotics followed by faecal transplantation to eradicate carriage of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Microbiol Infect 25(7):830–838
Leo S, Lazarevic V, Girard M, Gaia N, Schrenzel J, de Lastours V, Fantin B, Bonten M, Carmeli Y, Rondinaud E, Harbarth S, Huttner BD (2020) Metagenomic characterization of gut microbiota of carriers of extended-spectrum B-Lactamase or Carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae following treatment with oral antibiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation: Results from a multicenter randomized trial. Microorganisms 8 (6)
Lee J-J, Yong D, Suk KT, Kim DJ, Woo H-J, Lee SS, Kim B-S (2021) Alteration of gut microbiota in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae carriers during fecal microbiota transplantation according to decolonization periods. Microorganisms 9(2):352
Bar-Yoseph H, Carasso S, Shklar S, Korytny A, Even Dar R, Daoud H, Nassar R, Maharshak N, Hussein K, Geffen Y, Chowers Y, Geva-Zatorsky N, Paul M (2021) Oral capsulized fecal microbiota transplantation for eradication of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae colonization with a metagenomic perspective. Clin Infect Dis 73(1):e166–e175
Liu Q, Zuo T, Lu W, Yeoh YK, Su Q, Xu Z, Tang W, Yang K, Zhang F, Lau LHS, Lui RNS, Chin ML, Wong R, Cheung CP, Zhu W, Chan PKS, Chan FKL, Lui GC, Ng SC (2022) Longitudinal evaluation of gut bacteriomes and viromes after fecal microbiota transplantation for eradication of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. MSystems 7(3):0151021
Herridge WP, Shibu P, O'Shea J, Brook TC, Hoyles L (2020) Bacteriophages of Klebsiella spp., their diversity and potential therapeutic uses. J Med Microbiol 69 (2):176-194
Ofir G, Sorek R (2018) Contemporary phage biology: from classic models to new insights. Cell 172(6):1260–1270
Salmond GP, Fineran PC (2015) A century of the phage: past, present and future. Nat Rev Microbiol 13(12):777–786
Lin DM, Koskella B, Lin HC (2017) Phage therapy: an alternative to antibiotics in the age of multi-drug resistance World. J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 8(3):162–173
Fang Q, Feng Y, McNally A, Zong Z (2022) Characterization of phage resistance and phages capable of intestinal decolonization of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in mice. Commun Biol 5(1):48
Bernasconi OJ, Campos-Madueno EI, Dona V, Perreten V, Carattoli A, Endimiani A (2020) Investigating the use of bacteriophages as a new decolonization strategy for intestinal carriage of CTX-M-15-producing ST131 Escherichia coli: An in vitro continuous culture system model. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 22:664–671
Galtier M, De Sordi L, Maura D, Arachchi H, Volant S, Dillies MA, Debarbieux L (2016) Bacteriophages to reduce gut carriage of antibiotic resistant uropathogens with low impact on microbiota composition. Environ Microbiol 18(7):2237–2245
Ubeda C, Bucci V, Caballero S, Djukovic A, Toussaint NC, Equinda M, Lipuma L, Ling L, Gobourne A, No D, Taur Y, Jenq RR, van den Brink MR, Xavier JB, Pamer EG (2013) Intestinal microbiota containing Barnesiella species cures vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium colonization. Infect Immun 81(3):965–973
Tosh PK, McDonald LC (2012) Infection control in the multidrug-resistant era: tending the human microbiome. Clin Infect Dis 54(5):707–713
Ruppe E, Lixandru B, Cojocaru R, Buke C, Paramythiotou E, Angebault C, Visseaux C, Djuikoue I, Erdem E, Burduniuc O, El Mniai A, Marcel C, Perrier M, Kesteman T, Clermont O, Denamur E, Armand-Lefevre L, Andremont A (2013) Relative fecal abundance of extended-spectrum-b-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains and their occurrence in urinary tract infections in women. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57(9):4512–4517
Choy A, Freedberg DE (2020) Impact of microbiome-based interventions on gastrointestinal pathogen colonization in the intensive care unit. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 13:1756284820939447
Wang X, Xing Y, Ji Y, Xi H, Liu X, Yang L, Lei L, Han W, Gu J (2022) The combination of phages and faecal microbiota transplantation can effectively treat mouse colitis caused by Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Front Microbiol 13:944495
Javaudin F, Bemer P, Batard E, Montassier E (2021) Impact of phage therapy on multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli intestinal carriage in a murine model. Microorganisms 9 (12)
Corbellino M, Kieffer N, Kutateladze M, Balarjishvili N, Leshkasheli L, Askilashvili L, Tsertsvadze G, Rimoldi SG, Nizharadze D, Hoyle N, Nadareishvili L, Antinori S, Pagani C, Scorza DG, Romano ALL, Ardizzone S, Danelli P, Gismondo MR, Galli M, Nordmann P, Poirel L (2020) Eradication of a multidrug-resistant, carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate following oral and intra-rectal therapy with a custom made, lytic bacteriophage preparation. Clin Infect Dis 70(9):1998–2001
Kuipers S, Ruth MM, Mientjes M, de Sevaux RGL, van Ingen J (2019) A Dutch case report of successful treatment of chronic relapsing urinary tract infection with bacteriophages in a renal transplant patient. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64 (1)
Furfaro LL, Payne MS, Chang BJ (2018) Bacteriophage therapy: clinical trials and regulatory hurdles. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:376
Arena F, Giani T, Antonelli A, Colavecchio OL, Pecile P, Viaggi B, Favilli R, Rossolini GM (2018) A new selective broth enrichment automated method for detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from rectal swabs. J Microbiol Methods 147:66–68
Roach DR, Debarbieux L (2017) Phage therapy: awakening a sleeping giant. Emerg Top Life Sci 1(1):93–103
Harper DR (2018) Criteria for selecting suitable infectious diseases for phage therapy. Viruses 10 (4)
Brives C, Pourraz J (2020) Phage therapy as a potential solution in the fight against AMR: obstacles and possible futures. Palgrave Commun 6
Pirnay JP, Verbeken G, Ceyssens PJ, Huys I, De Vos D, Ameloot C, Fauconnier A (2018) The Magistral Phage. Viruses 10 (2)
Karbalaei M, Keikha M (2022) Probiotics and intestinal decolonization of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms; a reality or fantasy? Ann Med Surg (Lond) 80:104269
Newman AM, Arshad M (2020) The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in combating multidrug-resistant organisms. Clin Ther 42(9):1637–1648
Hung YP, Lee CC, Lee JC, Tsai PJ, Hsueh PR, Ko WC (2021) The potential of probiotics to Eradicate Gut Carriage of Pathogenic or Antimicrobial-Resistant Enterobacterales. Antibiotics (Basel) 10 (9)
Ramos-Ramos JC, Lazaro-Perona F, Arribas JR, Garcia-Rodriguez J, Mingorance J, Ruiz-Carrascoso G, Borobia AM, Pano-Pardo JR, Herruzo R, Arnalich F (2020) Proof-of-concept trial of the combination of lactitol with Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus for the eradication of intestinal OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Gut Pathog 12:15
Ljungquist O, Kampmann C, Resman F, Riesbeck K, Tham J (2020) Probiotics for intestinal decolonization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Microbiol Infect 26(4):456–462
Zollner-Schwetz I, Scarpatetti M, Pichler G, Pux C, Klymiuk I, Trajanoski S, Krause R (2020) Effect of a multispecies probiotic on intestinal and skin colonization by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in patients in a long-term care facility: a pilot study. Nutrients 12(6):1586
Wieers G, Verbelen V, Van Den Driessche M, Melnik E, Vanheule G, Marot JC, Cani PD (2020) Do probiotics during in-hospital antibiotic treatment prevent colonization of gut microbiota with multi-drug-resistant bacteria? A randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing Saccharomyces to a mixture of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Saccharomyces. Front Public Health 8:578089
Dall LB, Lausch KR, Gedebjerg A, Fuursted K, Storgaard M, Larsen CS (2019) Do probiotics prevent colonization with multi-resistant Enterobacteriaceae during travel? A randomized controlled trial. Travel Med Infect Dis 27:81–86
Skljarevski S, Barner A, Bruno-Murtha LA (2016) Preventing avoidable central line-associated bloodstream infections: implications for probiotic administration and surveillance. Am J Infect Control 44(11):1427–1428
Meini S, Laureano R, Fani L, Tascini C, Galano A, Antonelli A, Rossolini GM (2015) Breakthrough Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG bacteremia associated with probiotic use in an adult patient with severe active ulcerative colitis: case report and review of the literature. Infection 43(6):777–781
Pasala S, Singer L, Arshad T, Roach K (2020) Lactobacillus endocarditis in a healthy patient with probiotic use. IDCases 22:e00915
Massip C, Oswald E (2020) Siderophore-microcins in Escherichia coli: determinants of digestive colonization, the first step toward virulence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:381
Baquero F, Lanza VF, Baquero MR, Del Campo R, Bravo-Vazquez DA (2019) Microcins in Enterobacteriaceae: peptide antimicrobials in the eco-active intestinal chemosphere. Front Microbiol 10:2261
Sassone-Corsi M, Nuccio SP, Liu H, Hernandez D, Vu CT, Takahashi AA, Edwards RA, Raffatellu M (2016) Microcins mediate competition among Enterobacteriaceae in the inflamed gut. Nature 540(7632):280–283
Mortzfeld BM, Palmer JD, Bhattarai SK, Dupre HL, Mercado-Lubo R, Silby MW, Bang C, McCormick BA, Bucci V (2022) Microcin MccI47 selectively inhibits enteric bacteria and reduces carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae colonization in vivo when administered via an engineered live biotherapeutic. Gut Microbes 14(1):14
Porter SB, Johnston BD, Kisiela D, Clabots C, Sokurenko EV, Johnson JR (2022) Bacteriophage cocktail and microcin-producing probiotic Escherichia coli protect mice against gut colonization with multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli sequence type 131. Front Microbiol 13:887799
Duan C, Cao H, Zhang LH, Xu Z (2021) Harnessing the CRISPR-Cas systems to combat antimicrobial resistance. Front Microbiol 12:716064
Goren M, Yosef I, Qimron U (2017) Sensitizing pathogens to antibiotics using the CRISPR-Cas system. Drug Resist Updat 30:1–6
Lam KN, Spanogiannopoulos P, Soto-Perez P, Alexander M, Nalley MJ, Bisanz JE, Nayak RR, Weakley AM, Yu FB, Turnbaugh PJ (2021) Phage-delivered CRISPR-Cas9 for strain-specific depletion and genomic deletions in the gut microbiome. Cell Rep 37(5):109930
Neil K, Allard N, Roy P, Grenier F, Menendez A, Burrus V, Rodrigue S (2021) High-efficiency delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 by engineered probiotics enables precise microbiome editing. Mol Syst Biol 17(10):e10335
Citorik RJ, Mimee M, Lu TK (2014) Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 32(11):1141–1145
Hegde S, Nilyanimit P, Kozlova E, Anderson ER, Narra HP, Sahni SK, Heinz E, Hughes GL (2019) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene deletion of the ompA gene in symbiotic Cedecea neteri impairs biofilm formation and reduces gut colonization of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 13(12):e0007883
Leonard SP, Perutka J, Powell JE, Geng P, Richhart DD, Byrom M, Kar S, Davies BW, Ellington AD, Moran NA, Barrick JE (2018) Genetic engineering of bee gut microbiome bacteria with a toolkit for modular assembly of broad-host-range plasmids. ACS Synth Biol 7(5):1279–1290
Reuter A, Hilpert C, Dedieu-Berne A, Lematre S, Gueguen E, Launay G, Bigot S, Lesterlin C (2021) Targeted-antibacterial-plasmids (TAPs) combining conjugation and CRISPR/Cas systems achieve strain-specific antibacterial activity. Nucleic Acids Res 49(6):3584–3598
He YZ, Kuang X, Long TF, Li G, Ren H, He B, Yan JR, Liao XP, Liu YH, Chen L, Sun J (2021) Re-engineering a mobile-CRISPR/Cas9 system for antimicrobial resistance gene curing and immunization in Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother 77(1):74–82
Ruotsalainen P, Penttinen R, Mattila S, Jalasvuori M (2019) Midbiotics: conjugative plasmids for genetic engineering of natural gut flora. Gut Microbes 10(6):643–653
Li P, Wan P, Zhao R, Chen J, Li X, Li J, Xiong W, Zeng Z (2022) Targeted elimination of blaNDM-5 gene in Escherichia coli by conjugative CRISPR-Cas9 system. Infect Drug Resist 15:1707–1716
Dong H, Xiang H, Mu D, Wang D, Wang T (2019) Exploiting a conjugative CRISPR/Cas9 system to eliminate plasmid harbouring the mcr-1 gene from Escherichia coli. Int J Antimicrob Agents 53(1):1–8
Wang P, He D, Li B, Guo Y, Wang W, Luo X, Zhao X, Wang X (2019) Eliminating mcr-1-harbouring plasmids in clinical isolates using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. J Antimicrob Chemother 74(9):2559–2565
Uribe RV, Rathmer C, Jahn LJ, Ellabaan MMH, Li SS, Sommer MOA (2021) Bacterial resistance to CRISPR-Cas antimicrobials. Sci Rep 11(1):17267
Freires IA, Sardi JC, de Castro RD, Rosalen PL (2017) Alternative animal and non-animal models for drug discovery and development: bonus or burden? Pharm Res 34(4):681–686
Zhang X, Zhao Y, Wu Q, Lin J, Fang R, Bi W, Dong G, Li J, Zhang Y, Cao J, Zhou T (2019) Zebrafish and Galleria mellonella: models to identify the subsequent infection and evaluate the immunological differences in different Klebsiella pneumoniae intestinal colonization strains. Front Microbiol 10:2750
Allonsius CN, Van Beeck W, De Boeck I, Wittouck S, Lebeer S (2019) The microbiome of the invertebrate model host Galleria mellonella is dominated by Enterococcus. Anim Microbiome 1(1):7
Han G, Lee HJ, Jeong SE, Jeon CO, Hyun S (2017) Comparative analysis of Drosophila melanogaster gut microbiota with respect to host strain, sex, and age. Microb Ecol 74(1):207–216
Hubrecht RC, Carter E (2019) The 3Rs and Humane Experimental Technique: Implementing Change. Animals (Basel) 9 (10)
Luo L, Wang Y, Guo H, Yang Y, Qi N, Zhao X, Gao S, Zhou A (2021) Biodegradation of foam plastics by Zophobas atratus larvae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) associated with changes of gut digestive enzymes activities and microbiome. Chemosphere 282:131006
Yang SS, Ding MQ, He L, Zhang CH, Li QX, Xing DF, Cao GL, Zhao L, Ding J, Ren NQ, Wu WM (2021) Biodegradation of polypropylene by yellow mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) and superworms (Zophobas atratus) via gut-microbe-dependent depolymerization. Sci Total Environ 756:144087
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Bern. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) grant No. 192514 (to AE) and by the National Research Programme “Advancing 3R - Animals, Research and Society” (NRP 79) grant No. 206400 (to AE). Edgar I. Campos-Madueno and Yasmine Eddoubaji are PhD students (2021-2024 and 2022-2025, respectively) supported by SNF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Andrea Endimiani designed the review conception. Edgar I. Campos-Madueno, Melika Moradi, Odette J. Bernasconi, Aline I. Moser, and Andrea Endimiani wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Remaining authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Campos-Madueno, E.I., Moradi, M., Eddoubaji, Y. et al. Intestinal colonization with multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales: screening, epidemiology, clinical impact, and strategies to decolonize carriers. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 42, 229–254 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04548-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04548-2