Abstract
Sea level rise (SLR) due to global climate change negatively impacts coastal zones, in particular wetland and mangrove ecosystems. Mangroves in the Mekong Delta (MD) in Vietnam provide critical ecosystem services in the region; however, escalated relative SLR is likely to affect all ecosystems in the region, with mangroves probably more vulnerable than others. Given the fact that documented information and studies on SLR impacts on mangroves are limited for the region, this study aims to investigate potential changes in mangrove distribution in response to future SLR scenarios in the coastal area in the south of the MD using the Sea Level Affects Marshes Model (SLAMM). Wetland maps for 2013 derived from Landsat 8 OLI sensor, digital elevation model (DEM), and localized site-specific parameters (i.e., subsidence/accretion, erosion, historic trend of SLR, and over-wash) were used as input for the SLAMM to simulate spatial distribution of mangroves under different relative SLR scenarios (i.e., RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP8.5, more extreme SLR), and surface elevation change (i.e., subsidence, stable, and accretion) scenarios by the year 2100. Simulation results show that the average annual mangrove losses are likely to be 0.54% and 0.22% for subsidence and stable scenarios, respectively. The findings demonstrate the considerable impacts of SLR on MD mangrove ecosystems and the strong influence of subsidence processes. Inundation was also identified as a main driver responsible for the mangrove loss by the end of this century. Our results are in agreement with findings of other studies at global scales and observed data at regional scales. The results also demonstrate the potential of the approach developed herein for simulating mangrove dynamics under future relative SLR scenarios in the region with acceptable accuracy. The findings from the present study are useful sources for development of proper strategies for minimizing the impacts of SLR on mangrove ecosystems and their vital associated services, to protect and conserve the mangrove ecosystems in the region.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Mangrove forests are highly productive ecosystems in tropical and subtropical coastal regions, which benefit human society and ecosystems. Mangrove forests deliver critical ecosystem services to support the livelihood of millions of coastal communities worldwide, and annually contribute at least 1.6 billion (US dollar) to the global economy (Costanza et al. 1997; Hauser et al. 2017; George et al. 2019). Mangrove ecosystems not only protect coastal areas and associated populations from threats of natural hazards, i.e., floods, storms, and erosion (Giri et al. 2011; Ismail et al. 2012; Kathiresan 2012; Menéndez et al. 2020), but also importantly contribute to the enhancement of coastal water quality and biodiversity conservation by providing essential habitats for coastal flora and fauna (Giri et al. 2011; Kuenzer and Tuan 2013; Murchie 2015; McFadden et al. 2016). In addition, mangroves play a critical role in climate change mitigation by sequestering carbon (Tuan et al. 2015; Lovelock and Duarte 2019) and facilitating coastal accretion in response to sea level rise (SLR) (Krauss et al. 2017; Van De Lageweg and Slangen 2017).
Despite these critical functions and beneficial ecosystem services, mangroves have been degraded and deforested worldwide due to anthropogenic activities, climate change, and other human activities (Costanza et al. 2014; Richards and Friess 2016; Ghosh et al. 2019; Veettil et al. 2019b; Mafi-Gholami et al. 2020a, b). Globally, the total area of mangroves declined by around 35% in the 1980s (Lewis et al. 2016), while annual loss rates in Southeast Asia were double the global loss rate over the same period (Strong and Minnemeyer 2015). Importantly, climate change has been estimated to be responsible for 10–15% of mangrove loss, with corresponding declines in the ecosystem services they provide (Alongi 2008; Gilman et al. 2008). Due to being positioned in transition zones between ocean and lands, mangrove ecosystems are especially sensitive to SLR (Gilman et al. 2007; Ellison 2012). Therefore, among climate-associated factors, SLR is recognized as one of the major factors that adversely affect coastal wetlands and mangroves in the long term (LaFever et al. 2007; Kassakian et al. 2017), and so it controls the current and expected area and health of mangrove ecosystems globally (Lovelock et al. 2015, 2017). Previous studies concluded that global mangrove losses are inevitable unless mitigation and restoration measures in response to SLR are implemented (Gilman et al. 2006; Alongi 2008; Nicholls and Cazenave 2010; Ellison 2012). Loss of fringe mangroves is likely to cause adverse effects on ecological services, such as increases of shoreline erosion, exacerbation of impacts of storms, flood hazards, and tidal waves, and hence directly threatening coastal communities and their livelihoods (Barbier et al. 2008; Polidoro et al. 2010). Loss of mangroves can also lead to reduction in coastal water quality and biodiversity loss (Gilman et al. 2007). Hence, it is essential to plan appropriate mitigation and restoration strategies for the sustainability of mangrove ecosystems based on comprehensive and robust information on the potential distributions of mangroves under future climate scenarios.
Projecting responses of coastal wetlands to SLR has become a core research issue due to the complex and interacting physical, chemical, and biological processes that influence coastal wetland evolution, and the importance for natural resource management and policy making (Wiegert et al. 1981; Wu et al. 2015; Gopalakrishnan and Kumar 2020). Several models have been developed to project responses of coastal wetlands to SLR in response to this demand. These models include relatively simple models (Park et al. 1989; Doyle et al. 2003, 2010; Rogers et al. 2012; Strauss et al. 2012) as well as more complex ones (Costanza et al. 1990; Morris et al. 2002; Mudd et al. 2004, 2009; D'Alpaos et al. 2007; Kirwan and Murray 2007; Schile et al. 2014; Lovelock et al. 2015). While complex models take into account feedbacks and interactions between hydrology, sediment, sea level, and vegetation, and are thus likely to generate the most accurate and reliable projections, they require a lot of data and are computationally intensive. This means that they cannot be practically applied in many contexts, such as where limited data are available, or where projections beyond the local scale are sought (Martin et al. 2000; Wu et al. 2015). In these contexts, simpler models are required, which, while they do not incorporate feedbacks and interactions, have nonetheless proven to be reliable in validation exercises (Kirwan and Temmerman 2009; Wu et al. 2015). An example of such a simple model is the Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM).
SLAMM, a GIS-based model, is capable of simulating the dominant processes involved in coastal wetland change and shoreline alteration due to long-term SLR (Craft et al. 2009; Mcleod et al. 2010). The model focuses on analysis at landscape scales based on high spatial resolution data, which enable its predictions to be more realistic in comparison to other approaches (Craft et al. 2009; Clough et al. 2010). Other advantages of SLAMM are that it is open source, relatively easy to use, uses publicly available data, and can be used at a range of scales, from local to regional and subcontinental scales (Clough et al. 2010; Wu et al. 2015). Moreover, SLAMM has been steadily improved compared to its original version (Clough et al. 2010, 2016; Wu et al. 2015; Mogensen and Rogers 2018) and has been used to project the impacts of SLR on coastal wetlands, including mangroves and saltmarshes (Akumu et al. 2011; Li et al. 2015; Payo et al. 2016; Ekberg et al. 2017; Wu et al. 2017; Mogensen & Rogers 2018; Propato et al. 2018; Fernandez-Nunez et al. 2019; Raw et al. 2020; Wikramanayake et al. 2020). Although the model has been widely used in the USA, and some other areas, there is still a need to test its effectiveness in application as management tool in other parts of the world (Fernandez-Nunez et al. 2019).
The Mekong Delta (MD) in Vietnam includes approximately 66,000 ha of mangrove forests (Stefan 2018). However, this area has been significantly reduced, particularly in coastal areas of Tra Vinh, Soc Trang, Ca Mau, and Kien Giang Provinces, due to SLR and local anthropogenic activities, such as conversion of mangroves to aquaculture and agriculture (SIWRP 2017; Oanh et al. 2020; Dang et al. 2021b). While SLR has been identified as one of the key factors threatening mangrove ecosystems in the long term in the region (Duyen et al. 2015; Lovelock et al. 2015; Smajgl et al. 2015; Veettil et al. 2019a; Oanh et al. 2020), long-term threats caused by SLR for mangroves in the MD remain understudied. At a global scale, Lovelock et al. (2015) developed a model to project the potential submergence of mangroves in Indo-Pacific regions due to SLR by the end of this century. The model predicted the potential for mangroves to persist within an appropriate inundation regime (between highest astronomical tide and mean sea level) based on the known ecophysiology of mangroves in response to SLR. However, the model did not consider critical processes, including tidal range, subsidence, and coastal erosion, which are also likely to affect mangrove coverage (Payo et al. 2016). For local to regional scales, some studies have used digital elevation models (DEMs) to project changes in mangrove coverage under different future SLR scenarios (Veettil et al. 2019a; Oanh et al. 2020); however, these studies did not consider potentially important feedback processes operating in mangrove ecosystems, such as self-adaptation of mangroves to SLR, land subsidence and uplift, sedimentation, and vegetation regression and succession (Stralberg et al. 2011; Ellison 2012).
In this context, this study aims to assess the potential impacts of SLR on mangrove ecosystems in Ca Mau province in the MD using SLAMM (Park et al. 1989). The main objectives of this study are to (1) simulate spatial distribution of mangroves under various future SLR scenarios by the year 2100, (2) identify potential changes in mangrove coverage due to impacts of SLR, and (3) discuss feasible mitigation measures for conservation of mangrove ecosystems in the MD. This work will pinpoint affected mangrove areas under future SLR scenarios, and identify those areas experiencing severe threats, and so contribute to the improvement of mangrove ecosystem management and conservation in the MD.
Materials and methods
Study area
The study focused on the southernmost region of Vietnam, including the coastal area of Ngoc Hien district and parts of Nam Can and Dam Doi districts of Ca Mau province in the MD. The study area is located between latitude 8°33′–8°50′N and longitude 104°43′–105°18′E, covering an area of around 1000 km2 (Fig. 1). The area has tropical monsoon climate with two distinct seasons. The dry season spans from December to April, whereas the wet season lasts from May to November. The study area is mostly flat and positioned in low-lying region of the MD, and hence severely vulnerable to the SLR impacts (Nguyen and Woodroffe 2016).
The study area has a critical ecological role in the region due to its high biodiversity and the ecosystem services it provides (Hauser et al. 2017). Mangrove forests in Ngoc Hien district are the largest in the region and include the last reserve of old-growth mangrove forests in Vietnam. These forests are also internationally acknowledged as a Ramsar site and UNESCO Biosphere Reserve (Tue et al. 2014; Van et al. 2015). The fringe mangroves in the study area are likely to be limited at their landward side due to extensive aquacultural and agricultural land use in those areas, which will prevent the inland migration of mangroves and potentially squeeze the fringe mangrove area.
Methodology
There were three main stages to the approach used:
-
(1)
Dataset preparation and processing for spatial modelling, including DEM and wetland map.
-
(2)
SLAMM approach for projecting SLR impacts on mangroves.
-
(3)
Change analysis for identifying changes in mangrove extent and important factors of the changes.
The particular tasks involved in these stages are presented in the flow chart in Fig. 2 and described in detail in the following sections.
Dataset preparation and processing
Digital elevation model (DEM) and slope generation
In the SLAMM, elevation is considered as the most important factor influencing model accuracy as conversions between wetland classes are mainly driven by elevation (Clough et al. 2016; Fernandez-Nunez et al. 2019). Elevation data with high vertical resolution is essential for this kind of study since small changes in elevation are potentially important to the low-lying landscape (Ghosh et al. 2019). The present study used the high-resolution (i.e., 5-m spatial resolution, and better than 1-m vertical accuracy) DEM data, which was obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE), Vietnam. The DEM was constructed in 2008 using (1) survey points, and (2) the elevation points and contour lines of the topographical maps, which were acquired from photogrammetric data and geodetic survey (Trần et al. 2016; Minderhoud et al. 2019). The data is characterized by coordinate reference system of WGS_1984_UTM_Zone_48N, and vertical reference of the Vietnam’s geodetic Hon Dau datum. The datum experiences elevation origin at mean sea level of the tide gauge at Hon Dau, an island offshore of Hai Phong province in Vietnam (Minderhoud et al. 2019). The DEM, afterward, was resampled to a spatial resolution of 15 m for further analysis due to the limitation of computer capacity and was clipped based on the boundary of the study area.
Slope data is another essential input for SLAMM. The slope data (in degrees) was calculated from the DEM using spatial analysis tool in ArcGIS 10.4.1. The calculated slope data returned a mean value of 0.23° with the largest slopes ranging from 2.61 to 6.82° at the transition from lands along rivers and canals to mangroves (Fig. 1). The DEM and slope data in raster format were subsequently converted to ASCII Text format utilizing the data conversion tool in ArcGIS 10.4.1 for further analysis in SLAMM.
Wetland map
The present study used a wetland map, which was derived from Landsat 8 OLI images in 2013. The Landsat image was pre-processed, utilizing atmospheric correction, radiometric correction, seamless mosaicking, and sub-setting and enhancement of spatial resolution by the image fusion technique. The Combined Mangrove Recognition Index (CMRI) (Gupta et al. 2018) and supervised classification approaches were used in combination to identify wetland categories. The overall accuracy and kappa coefficient of the classified wetland map were 90.67% and 0.89, respectively. See Dang et al. (2021b) for complete details of the classification approach of the wetland map. Although wetland map for the year 2020 in the study area is available, the wetland in 2013 was selected for the analysis in SLAMM since observation data for the period 2013/2020 was subsequently used to validate the model.
The classified wetland map with 15-m spatial resolution included four categories: open water, inland water, mangrove forests, and sparse mangroves. The wetland map imported into ArcGIS 10.4.1 was extracted using the 15-m spatial resolution DEM to attain the same cell size and extent. The wetland map was subsequently reclassified into corresponding SLAMM categories (Table 1) using the spatial analysis tool in ArcGIS 10.4.1, based on knowledge, experience, and ecological definitions described in the SLAMM 6.2 technical document (Clough et al. 2012). The wetland map in SLAMM categories was afterward converted to ASCII Text format for the modelling exercise in SLAMM.
Sea Level Affects Marshes Model (SLAMM) approach
Sea Level Affects Marshes Model conceptualization
Changes in wetland areas within the study area in response to SLR were simulated using SLAMM version 6.2 beta obtained from http://warrenpinnacle.com. The SLAMM approach assumes that wetland habitats correspond to a range of vertical elevations as a function of tidal range. The SLAMM considers five principal processes, erosion, inundation, accretion, overwash, and saturation; however, the current work only focussed on the influence of erosion, inundation, accretion, and overwash. These four processes are outlined below. Saturation, which simulates migration of fresh marshes and coastal swamps onto adjacent uplands as a response of the fresh water table rising to sea level (Clough et al. 2012), was excluded. This is because fresh marsh and coastal swamp categories are absent from the study area, and the study zone is surrounded by intensive aquaculture and agriculture lands (Liu et al. 2020; Dang et al. 2021b), which limit the inland migration of mangroves (Payo et al. 2016). It is also worth noting that SLAMM focuses broadly on wetland categories rather than mangrove ecosystems specifically. However, for tropical coastal systems, mangroves are the only wetland category included in SLAMM and are identified as lands with 0.50% or more mangrove cover (Clough et al. 2012; Payo et al. 2016).
Inundation
The increase of water levels and salt boundary is tracked by lowering elevations of each cell due to SLR, hence maintaining the mean tide level constant at 0. Impacts of land subsidence vary spatially and are incorporated in these elevation calculations. The influence on each cell is determined based on the minimum elevation as well as the slope of that cell (Clough et al. 2012).
Erosion
Erosion is triggered according to a maximum fetch threshold (9 km) and the proximity of the wetland to open ocean or estuarine water. If such conditions are satisfied, horizontal erosion will occur with a rate defined by site-specific parameters. Within a specific site or sub-site, erosion parameters for swamps, marshes, and tidal flats could be specified. Erosion rates of tidal flats pertain to both estuarine beaches and tidal flats if the beach experiences sufficient fetch to cause erosion. Erosion parameters for the tidal flats additionally apply to ocean beaches if the specific module of beach erosion is inactivated (Clough et al. 2012).
Accretion
SLR is offset based on vertical accretion and sedimentation utilizing mean or site-specific values for each wetland category. Accretion rates could vary spatially within a specified model domain (Clough et al. 2012).
Overwash
SLAMM assumes overwash to occur in barrier islands of under 500-m width during each 25-year time step due to storms. Sediment transportation and beach migration are also considered (Clough et al. 2012).
Model setup and site parameters
The wetland map in SLAMM categories, DEM, and slope files in ASCII Text format were used as primary data inputs for modelling in SLAMM. There are also important model parameters, such as relative SLR scenarios and site parameters (Table 2) which were required for SLAMM simulations. In SLAMM, wetland classes are in quasi-equilibrium with SLR, and each wetland class is able to convert into another category only once for each time step. The present study used a 5-year time step for simulating wetland changes for the period 2020/2100. Table 2 presents the list of data inputs and SLAMM parameters utilized for predictions of wetland/mangrove changes in the study area under various SLR scenarios.
Relative SLR scenarios
Relative SLR (i.e., the balance of Eustatic SLR, subsidence, and sedimentation) was used in this study. SLR was predicted to have discernible effects on coastal mangrove ecosystems at the end of the century. According to our testing results and previous studies (Lovelock et al. 2015; Payo et al. 2016; Ghosh et al. 2019; Wikramanayake et al. 2020), the present study therefore considered different SLR scenarios by the year 2100. The four different SLR scenarios by 2100 are 0.45 m, 0.55 m, 0.75 m, and 1.40 m for the RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP8.5, and more extreme scenarios, respectively, for the MD. The RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP8.5 scenarios used are the regional scenarios, which were developed by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE), Vietnam, used projections identical to the IPCC Special Report on Ocean and Cryosphere (Chapter 4) (Oppenheimer et al. 2019). According to the report, RCP2.6 is a low emission scenario in which global warming relative to 1850–1900 is projected to be likely below 2 °C and more likely than not to exceed 1.5 °C by the year 2100. For RCP4.5, a medium emission scenario, warming is likely below 3 °C and more likely than not to exceed 2 °C. For RCP8.5, a high emission scenario, warming is likely to exceed 2 °C and more likely than not to exceed 4 °C at the end of this century (Oppenheimer et al. 2019). Especially, RCP8.5 is considered to be unrealistically pessimistic, an extreme “no action” scenario (Hausfather and Peters 2020). Meanwhile, a higher value of 1.40 m of SLR was considered in this study to evaluate the more extreme scenario for Indo-Pacific region including the MD based on Horton et al. (2014) and Lovelock et al. (2015), which is considered plausible but unlikely (Jevrejeva et al. 2014). However, it is worth noting that the latest IPCC report (AR6) projects a global high-end scenario of 1.70 m (Arias et al. 2021).
Land subsidence in the MD due to natural processes of soil compaction and subsurface dissolution (i.e., formation of caves and sinkholes in karst landscapes), as well as the effects of anthropogenic activities (viz., ground-water extraction), occurs at annual rates of several centimeters. This rate exceeds current absolute SLR by an order of magnitude (Erban et al. 2014; Minderhoud et al. 2017). The mean annual subsidence rate for the MD was identified at 6.05 mm/year for the period of 1987–2006 based on surface water level trend analysis (Fujihara et al. 2016); similarly, using the InSAR-derived approach, rates of 6–7 mm/year from 1988 to 2009 were determined for undeveloped land-use categories, such as marshland and wetland forest in the MD (Minderhoud et al. 2018). In the present study, the subsidence, stable, and accretion scenarios refer to the net surface elevation change as a result of processes of subsidence and vertical accumulation of sediments. We used the average net surface elevation change of − 6.50 mm/year, hereafter referred to as the subsidence scenario, in the MD for the SLAMM simulations, and assumed the rate to be constant until 2100. To evaluate the sensitivity of the simulation results in response to uncertainties on surface elevation change, simulations were also performed employing net surface elevation change of 0 mm/year and + 6.50 mm/year, hereafter referred to as the stable and accretion scenarios, respectively.
Site parameters
The study area was divided into 2 sites using the defined polygon function in SLAMM software due to the difference in terms of site-specific characteristics. Sites 1 and 2 represent the West and East Sea areas, respectively (Fig. 1). It is critical to note that tidal range and erosion rates are much higher for site 2 in comparison to site 1. The specific parameters for each sub-site are shown in Table 2.
In SLAMM, wetland types are assumed to remain from mean lower low water (MLLW, mean of the lower low water height each day) as the lower elevation boundary for this category up to an elevation equivalent to the mean high higher water (MHHW, mean of the higher high-water height each day). The Great Diurnal Tide Range (GT), which represents the difference between MLLW and MHHW, is hence an important parameter in SLAMM to evaluate any changes in wetland coverage. The present study used the GT values of 0.18 and 1.80 m for site 1 and site 2, respectively (Hak et al. 2016). The values were observed in Song Doc station (West Sea) and Ganh Hao station (East Sea), which were the closest stations to site 1 and site 2, respectively. It is assumed that these values remain constant over time and under different SLR scenarios. It is noted that the lowest and highest elevations for mangroves were assumed as mean tide level and salt boundary (or MHHW in the present study), respectively, in SLAMM based on Clough (2010) and Clough et al. (2012).
The historic trend of SLR in the study area is based on two sources. First, long-term rates of sea level change in the Ca Mau River for the period of 1979–2001 were determined from tide gauges and satellite altimetry; and second, an analysis of surface water level trends for the period from 2011 to 2014 (Lovelock et al. 2015). These SLR estimations were 5.74 mm/year and 5.00 mm/year, respectively (Lovelock et al. 2015); hence, we averaged the values for the two periods and set the historic trend of SLR to 5.37 mm/year for the region. Vertical accretion rate estimates for fringe mangroves range from 1.6 to 8.6 mm/year (average rate of 5.10 mm/year) (Krauss et al. 2014). For the MD, estimates vary from 3.00 to 5.00 mm/year according to Saintilan et al. (2020); however, the authors also found that mangroves were capable of accreting at 6.50 mm/year in the early Holocene, which are comparable to median values of surface elevation gain in Lovelock et al. (2015). Therefore, a mean accretion rate of 4.00 mm/year was used as a conservative estimate for the study area. Tidal flat erosion was set to 0 and 12.79 mm/year for site 1 and site 2, respectively, based on Liu et al. (2017). An overwash value of 25 years, as defined in the model, was used because this value also accords approximately to storm frequency in the MD (Danh 2015).
Model accuracy assessment
To assess the accuracy of SLAMM, the simulated mangrove areas obtained from the model were compared to observation data. Of particular relevance is the study by Dang et al. (2021b), which analyzed Landsat 8 OLI images for the MD over the period 2013–2020. The distribution of mangroves in 2020 was simulated using SLAMM approach, as per the above description, based on initiated wetland map 2013. For this period, we tested the three scenarios of elevation changes, namely subsidence, stable, and accretion. The results showed that mangrove losses were nearly same for the three scenarios, and mainly due to erosion, but not inundation. This is understandable because within this 7-year period, mangroves were not affected by inundation due to SLR. Therefore, we used the modelled results of the stable/no net subsidence scenario to compare with the observed data. The spatial and quantitative changes of mangroves obtained from SLAMM for the period 2013–2020, assuming no net subsidence, were validated against the observation data from Dang et al. (2021b).
Change analysis
Spatial analysis and potential change of mangroves
The impact of SLR on mangrove ecosystems in the study area was analyzed using spatial analysis functions in ArcGIS 10.4.1 software. Wetland maps under different SLR scenarios by 2100 were overlaid with the initial wetland map of 2013 to identify any changes in area and conversions between wetland categories. The analysis also included the identification of impacted zones of mangrove areas under various SLR scenarios.
Variable importance of mangrove loss
The contribution of erosion and inundation processes to mangrove losses was identified using spatial analysis techniques in ArcGIS 10.4.1. The analysis separated the proportion of mangrove losses by the year 2100 due to inundation and erosion. A straightforward analysis combined cell conversions with ground elevation, which is relative to mean sea level (Payo et al. 2016). Inundated cells were identified as those converted cells with elevation relative to mean sea level of below zero, whereas eroded cells were converted cells, which have elevation above this threshold.
Results
Model accuracy assessment
Figure 3 shows the loss or conversion of mangroves in the study area for the period 2013/2020 according to observation data from Dang et al. (2021b) and our simulation results using SLAMM. Dang et al. (2021b) found a total net loss of mangroves through conversion to ocean open water along the East coast of the MD of 11.23 km2, equating to an annual loss rate of 1.60 km2. This rate compares well to simulated mangrove loss for the period 2013–2020 obtained from SLAMM, assuming no net subsidence, of 10.3 km2 (annual loss rate of 1.47 km2). In the SLAMM, this loss was mostly to ocean open water, except very small area of less than 1 km2 which was converted to tidal flat. However, the progradation of mangroves observed in the West Sea site (the Gulf of Thailand) over this period was not simulated by SLAMM.
Future projections of mangrove extent
Simulated maps of spatial distribution and projected area of mangroves under different relative SLR scenarios for 2100, produced by the SLAMM approach, are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. For the stable scenario of surface elevation change, mangrove area was projected to range from 732.44 to 354.24 km2 for the RCP2.6 and more extreme SLR scenarios, respectively, whereas, for the accretion scenario, the figure slightly increased to 770.88–632.02 km2 for the corresponding SLR scenarios. In contrast, the figures considerably decreased to 588.04–106.27 km2 under RCP2.6 and more extreme scenarios with the subsidence scenario.
Changes in mangrove extent
Overall, mangrove extents are consistently reduced under the RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP8.5, and more extreme SLR scenarios for the year 2100 in comparison to the year 2013. Unsurprisingly, mangrove loss was higher for the more extreme SLR and subsidence scenarios (Figs. 6 and 7). For the stable scenarios, projected annual loss rates ranged from 0.10% (0.79 km2) to 0.64% (5.07 km2) under the RCP2.6 and more extreme scenarios, respectively, whereas for the accretion scenarios, the figure slightly decreased to 0.05% (0.37 km2) and 0.24% (1.91 km2) for the same scenarios. For the subsidence scenarios, the projected annual loss rates were much greater, with rates of 0.31% (2.42 km2) and 0.93% (7.91 km2) for the RCP2.6 and more extreme scenarios, respectively.
Figure 6 shows the potential conversions of mangroves and other wetland categories under the 12 relative SLR scenarios by the year 2100. Mangrove loss was mostly due to its conversion to estuarine open water due to SLR. The conversion was taking place mostly in the West Sea for the lower SLR scenarios (RCP2.6 and RCP4.5 with the stable and accretion scenarios) and extended to the East Sea and further inland under higher SLR scenarios. A very small area of mangrove (less than 0.10%) was transferred to tidal flat in the east sea of the study area. Finally, there were conversions of inland open water to estuarine open water in the study area.
Variable importance of mangrove loss
The relative importance of inundation and erosion as drivers of mangrove loss in the model is shown in Table 3. The findings show that inundation was dominant in 9 of the 12 scenarios, and thus can be expected to be the main cause for mangrove loss in the study area by 2100. Erosion was, however, dominant under accreting conditions for most SLR scenarios (i.e., RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5) due to high erosion rates in along the East Sea coast under these scenarios. Inundation remains the dominant driver with the accretion scenario under the more extreme SLR scenario.
The sensitivity of the model to inundation versus erosion was calibrated using different rates of erosion. We increased erosion rates up to 100 m/year and tested the model for the RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 scenarios. The results show that mangrove loss by the year 2100 due to erosion only increased by less than 1% for the three subsidence scenarios. Therefore, the use of a constant value of 12.79 m/year for annual erosion rate had minimal influence on the relative contribution of inundation and erosion to the loss of mangrove.
Discussion
Model projections and performance
Findings from the present study suggest that SLR with substantial inundation will have adverse effects on mangrove ecosystems in the study area by the end of this century. For the worst case (more extreme SLR and subsidence scenarios), mangrove loss was projected to be 80.60% (annual loss rate of 0.93% or 7.91 km2), whereas the figure for more extreme SLR and no subsidence scenarios was 55.68% (annual loss rate of 0.64% or 5.07 km2). The more extreme SLR scenarios are plausible but unlikely (Jevrejeva et al. 2014), and so the RCP8.5 SLR scenario is likely to be more reasonable in representing the risk for mangrove ecosystems. Under the RCP8.5 SLR scenario, mangroves are projected to decrease by 45.84% (annual loss rate of 0.53% or 4.17 km2) in combination with the subsidence scenario, in comparison to a decrease of 15.74% (annual loss rate of 0.18% or 1.43 km2) in combination with the stable scenario.
The level of mangrove loss due to SLR projected in the present study is similar to that which has been predicted in previous modelling and observational studies. Among the modelling studies, mangroves were projected to decrease by 0.13–0.20%/year (Gilman et al. 2007, 2008) and 0.10%/year (Payo et al. 2016) for mangroves in the Pacific Islands and the Sundarban (Bangladesh) respectively by 2100 assuming no subsidence. These rates are similar to the average annual loss rate 0.22% for mangroves obtained in our study. For the subsidence scenarios, the rate of 0.54%/year found in the present study is somewhat higher than the loss of 0.37%/year from Payo et al. (2016). This can be attributed to the higher rate of subsidence of − 6.50 mm/year used in the present study in comparison to − 2.50 mm/year subsidence rate used in the Sundarban modelling.
Our findings also show that the erosion process critically contributes to mangrove loss under all scenarios. The validation shows that the modelling results of mangrove changes with the annual loss rate of 1.47 km2/year in the East Sea due to erosion correspond well to observation data for the period 2013/2020 (Dang et al. 2021b). This projection is also in agreement with the observations of Liu et al. (2017), which showed that the shoreline in the East Sea of Ca Mau province eroded by 1.71 km2/year over the period of 2005–2015. These findings, therefore, demonstrate that the simple erosion rule used in SLAMM is capable of reproducing the observed mangrove loss due to erosion from 2013 to 2020 in the study area, thus validating the model’s capacity to simulate mangrove changes with reasonable accuracy.
While the SLAMM correctly identified erosion as an important process driving shoreline retreat in the East Sea of Ca Mau province between 2013 and 2020, it did not project the progradation of mangroves observed in the West Sea site (the Gulf of Thailand) over this period. This issue is partly due to the use of the constant net subsidence for the whole study area. In addition, the low wave energy of the West Sea site in combination with high sediment supplied from the erosion of the East Sea shoreline led to land aggradation for mangrove growth in this area (Tran Thi et al. 2014; Marchesiello et al. 2019; Phan 2020). These specific coastal geomorphological processes in the study area are not fully captured in SLAMM, and so these areas of progradation are not reproduced in the simulation model.
In relation to the mechanism of SLR-induced mangrove loss, our findings agree with previous studies. Gilman et al. (2008), in particular, proposed that SLR with considerable inundation is likely to be the key driving force of mangrove loss by 2100. Our simulation results suggest that inundation due to SLR was the dominant driver under 9 out of 12 relative SLR scenarios by 2100 (Table 3). However, subsidence rates do influence the contribution of erosion to mangrove loss, with erosion demonstrated as a dominant cause of mangrove loss under the accretion scenarios. Payo et al. (2016) also suggested that erosion might remain as a main driver of mangrove loss depending on net subsidence rate.
Model uncertainties, study limitations, and contributions
The above validation demonstrates that our approach appears to accurately project mangrove distribution under different SLR scenarios based on comparison with global studies and regional observed data. However, the SLAMM approach is sensitive to several factors, which are likely to influence simulation accuracies. There are also limitations in the current study, which are necessary to highlight directions for future studies. Table 4 summarizes the uncertainties of the SLAMM and the present study as well.
Elevation data is one of the key factors that critically affect the accuracy of simulation output in SLAMM because conversion between wetland habitats is mainly governed by elevation (Wu et al. 2015; Clough et al. 2016; Payo et al. 2016; Fernandez-Nunez et al. 2019). In the present study, a DEM with vertical accuracy of less than 1 m was used to model the impacts of SLR on the mangrove ecosystems. The DEM was constructed using survey points and elevation points derived from photogrammetric data and geodetic survey, which is a common and reliable practice to produce accurate elevation data in Vietnam (Minderhoud et al. 2019). Hence, this topographic data can be currently considered as the best available elevation data for the study area. The DEM was also used for SLR projections for the whole of Vietnam (Trần et al. 2016) and other studies on SLR impacts in the MD region (Dang et al. 2020, 2021a). Moreover, in a similar approach to our study, Payo et al. (2016) utilized a DEM with vertical accuracy of less than 1 m to produce relatively realistic simulation results. Nevertheless, it is possible to improve vertical accuracy in DEMs and therefore improve the accuracy of modelling. For example, LiDAR data can provide vertical accuracy of up to around 10 cm, and thus is recommended for model improvement (Clough et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2015).
Although the simple erosion rule in SLAMM seems to be effective in capturing the linearity of erosion processes in the study area, this function has some limitations, which must be taken into account in further studies. In particular, wave energy, which is likely to play a critical role in shoreline erosion, particularly in areas with persistent winds, is not adequately considered in SLAMM (Wu et al. 2017). According to our calibration results, SLAMM also tends to be insensitive to erosion rates, which is also found in previous studies (Chu-Agor et al. 2010; Payo et al. 2016; Wu et al. 2017). For regions where erosion processes are non-linear and more complex, it is likely that the model would not project changes as accurately (Wu et al. 2015). In addition, horizontal accretion within coastal wetlands, which may impact simulations of mangrove changes in the study area, is not considered in SLAMM (Wolters et al. 2005; Clough et al. 2012; Li et al. 2015). These limitations of empirical models call for hybrid modelling approaches, which include empirical algorithms, and mechanistically simulated key wetland processes (viz., accretion and erosion) (Wu et al. 2017).
There are also several processes that critically influence coastal mangrove habitats which are not considered in SLAMM. These processes include positive feedback between mangrove growth and sedimentation (Gilman et al. 2008), changes in hydrological regimes, storms, erosion rates and sediment supply due to climate changes, SLR, and dam construction under future climate and SLR scenarios. The use of fixed net subsidence rate for the entire study area is also a limitation since subsidence or accretion rates spatially vary and are influenced by local coastal geomorphological processes. In particular, lands at Ca Mau Cape in the West Sea site are likely to prograde due to high accretion resulting from the redistribution of eroded sediment from the East Sea. These specific processes, which may modify the general subsidence rate, were not adequately captured in SLAMM, likely explaining the failure of SLAMM to simulate locally aggraded mangrove areas in comparison to the observed period of 2013/2020 (Dang et al. 2021b). It is also likely that subsidence rates will vary over time as boundary conditions change due to SLR and storms.
While the present study only focuses on the impacts of relative SLR on mangrove ecosystems, it is critical to acknowledge that other factors, such as climate change itself and local anthropogenic activities, also affect mangrove ecosystems in the region. Climate change causes increases in temperature, stronger seasonality in rainfall and temperature, and extreme events (i.e., storms, floods, heat waves, and droughts) leading to moisture stress, and hydrological and thermal disturbance (Gopalakrishnan et al. 2019). All these factors affect seedling survival, growth rates, and productivity (Krauss et al. 2008; Veettil et al. 2019b; Dang et al. 2021a; Salimi et al. 2021), and therefore reduce mangrove area. In addition, regional and local anthropogenic activities, such as development of aquaculture and agriculture, over-exploitation of natural resources, and over-fishing are likely to reduce mangrove coverage in the region (VNEPA 2005; Dinh 2016; Hong et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2020).
Despite these limitations, SLAMM is the only landscape model currently available for resource managers that includes essential processes controlling the impacts of SLR on coastal wetlands, such as subsidence and uplift processes, erosion, inundation, accretion, and overwash (Craft et al. 2009; Clough et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2015). Other advantages of this model include its capacity to incorporate uncertainty in spatial inputs (viz., vertical datum and DEM) and specify localized parameters (Clough et al. 2016). Importantly, the model has been shown to simulate wetland changes more accurately than other available methods, such as the growing cluster model (GrC) and the random constraint match model (RCM) (Wu et al. 2015). SLAMM is, therefore, potentially capable of simulating wetland changes by using high vertical accuracy of elevation data, accurate site-specific parameters, and meaningful evaluation of model accuracy (Wu et al. 2015; Mogensen & Rogers 2018). The present study used the best available DEM with reasonable vertical accuracy and precise localized parameters, and our assessment of model accuracy suggests an acceptable agreement between the modelled results and local observed data.
Implications for adaptation measures for conservation of mangrove ecosystems in the Mekong Delta
The potential spatial distribution of mangrove maps under various relative SLR scenarios produced in the present study are a useful resource for conservation and restoration of mangrove ecosystems in the region. Importantly, the maps can aid in identifying suitable areas for conservation and protection. In particular, the remaining mangrove area under high and extreme relative SLR scenarios is recommended as a high priority for protection and conservation. Measures such as the establishment of conservation reserves for these areas with effective buffer zones are valuable to protect core conservation mangroves from the effects of other non-conservation land uses. Autonomous adaptation should also be facilitated by establishing protected natural habitat corridors to support landward migration of mangrove species (Dang et al. 2021a).
Simulation results show that the East Sea shoreline is under persistent erosion risk, potentially leading to mangrove loss, and therefore reduction in the sheltering and wave buffering functions of mangroves. Adaption measures such as wave mitigation, accretion facilitation, and mangrove reforestation/restoration are recommended to not only protect the existing coastal areas from storm surges and erosion but also advance the shoreline to the sea in long-term strategies by taking advantage of river alluvium in the MD. To strengthen shorelines and minimize erosion, mangrove reforestation measures combining accretion facilitation solutions are recommended to be progressively implemented seaward (Tran Thi et al. 2014). Mangrove reforestation is considered the best solution for coastal erosion mitigation in the eastern coast of the MD as mangroves can reduce waves and trap sediment (Phan et al. 2015; Marchesiello et al. 2019); however, the approach does not seem sufficient enough in rapid eroding coasts exposed to high energy waves (Marchesiello et al. 2019). Therefore, wave reduction measures are recommended to be implemented in the short-term (Tran Thi et al. 2014). Infrastructure for wave mitigation, in particular sea dykes, can reduce wave energy; however, large-scale dyke construction potentially lead to the serious squeezing of coastal habitats and mangroves in the MD (Phan et al. 2015; Marchesiello et al. 2019). Hence, while implementing such measures, it is essential to pay critical consideration to mangrove areas and biodiversity conservation of saline and estuarine species (Tran Thi et al. 2014; Dinh 2016).
For the West Sea (the Gulf of Thailand) site, in particular, Ca Mau Cape, mangroves remain stable without erosion effects, and potentially support land aggradation due to accretion of river alluvium and eroded sediments derived from the East Sea within mangrove areas. These mangrove forests are likely to enhance shoreline stability and promote land propagation by trapping sediments, and so critically contribute to reduction of land subsidence and expansion of mangrove ecosystems in the region. In addition, the expanded area in the Ca Mau Cape region where newly formed mangroves are growing naturally can be also useful as laboratory sites for scientific activities on mangrove ecosystems (Tran Thi et al. 2014). These areas are, therefore, optimized zones for conservation and preservation of mangrove ecosystems for the region, which should be strictly protected and conserved while mangroves become established at higher elevations.
By 2100, SLR and subsidence are likely to inundate a substantial portion of the fringe mangroves in the study area. Importantly, our findings demonstrate the importance of processes controlling subsidence to the amount of mangrove loss. Hence, for long-term conservation of the ecosystems, it will be useful to develop measures to mitigate land subsidence to reduce the inundation risks.
Apart from SLR, increasing coastal urbanization leads to overexploitation of ground water extraction, which severely exacerbates subsidence in the MD (Minderhoud et al. 2017; Nicholls et al. 2021). Measures such as restriction of groundwater extraction, flood control, and sedimentation supply could be an effective solutions to minimize subsidence and loss of elevation on deltas, particularly in agricultural areas (Minderhoud et al. 2017; Nicholls et al. 2021). Factors such as maintaining coarse sediment supply and the general health of mangrove communities will likely be important. Coarse sediment provides the raw material for accretion to occur, while the mangroves themselves help to trap these sediments (Phan et al. 2015; Marchesiello et al. 2019) and restoration and maintenance of healthy mangroves via protections and management interventions will likely contribute to their sediment trapping capacity. In addition, land use strategies that provide mangrove ecosystems an avenue to migrate further inland are also necessary to preserve the fringe mangroves in the region. These strategies can provide managers with local “levers” to mitigate SLR impacts in the circumstance that there is little the local managers can do to reduce SLR other than as part of a global effort.
Conclusions
The current study projected SLR impacts on mangrove ecosystems in the south of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, under different relative SLR scenarios by the year 2100, with the aid of the Sea Level Affects Marshes Model (SLAMM). The model is able to simulate the critical processes involved in the dynamics of coastal mangrove ecosystems. The use of the best available elevation data with high vertical accuracy and precisely localized site-specific parameters improved the simulation results. The accuracy assessment showed that our simulation results were in accord with previous modelling studies for mangroves in other regions and with observed data from the MD itself. The developed approach, therefore, demonstrates its capacity to simulate mangrove changes under future relative SLR scenarios in the study area despite SLAMM’s uncertainties.
Our findings suggest considerable effects of SLR on mangrove ecosystems with the full effect being dependent net subsidence rate. Average annual mangrove losses are projected to be 0.54%, 0.22%, and 0.10% for the subsidence, stable, and accretion scenarios, respectively, by the year 2100 compared to the extents recorded in 2013. Inundation was identified as a key driving factor for mangrove loss in the MD by the year 2100, although erosion was more important when land surface elevation was increasing. The simulated mangrove distribution under future SLR scenarios is a useful resource to identify the most valuable areas for protection and conservation of mangroves. Importantly, the current study provides an innovative perspective on the SLR impacts on the critical mangrove ecosystems in the MD, which have not been taken into account in previous studies. Spatial information on mangrove habitats can significantly support resource managers and policy makers in developing appropriate adaptation and mitigation strategies for minimizing the SLR impacts on mangrove ecosystems and their important services, and for long-term mangrove protection and conservation in the region.
References
Akumu CE, Pathirana S, Baban S, Bucher D (2011) Examining the potential impacts of sea level rise on coastal wetlands in north-eastern NSW, Australia. J Coast Conserv 15:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-010-0114-3
Alongi DM (2008) Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.024
Arias P, Bellouin N, Coppola E, Jones R, Krinner G et al. (2021) Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group14 I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Technical Summary
Barbier EB, Koch EW, Silliman BR, Hacker SD, Wolanski E et al (2008) Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science 319:321–323. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150349
Chu-Agor M, Muñoz-Carpena R, Kiker G, Emanuelsson A, Linkov I (2010) Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of SLAMM for the purpose of habitat vulnerability assessment and decision making. Paper presented at the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change
Clough J (2010) Salt elevation. SLAMM forum - Warren Pinnacle Consulting, Inc. Available online: http://warrenpinnacle.com/SLAMMFORUM/index.php?topic=111.msg337#msg337 (Accessed on 05 January 2022)
Clough J, Park R, Fuller R (2010) SLAMM 6 beta technical documentation, Release 6.0 Beta. Warren Pinnacle Consulting: Warren, VT
Clough J, Park R, Fuller R (2012) Sea level affecting marshes model, Version 6.2. Technical Documentation. Warren Pinnacle Consulting, Waitsfield, VT
Clough J, Polaczyk A, Propato M (2016) Modeling the potential effects of sea-level rise on the coast of New York: integrating mechanistic accretion and stochastic uncertainty. Environ Model Softw 84:349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.023
Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
Costanza R, De Groot R, Sutton P, Van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ et al (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Change 26:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
Costanza R, Sklar FH, White ML (1990) Modeling coastal landscape dynamics. Bioscience 40:91–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311342
Craft C, Clough J, Ehman J, Joye S, Park R et al (2009) Forecasting the effects of accelerated sea-level rise on tidal marsh ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ 7:73–78. https://doi.org/10.1890/070219
D’Alpaos A, Lanzoni S, Marani M, Rinaldo A (2007) Landscape evolution in tidal embayments: modeling the interplay of erosion, sedimentation, and vegetation dynamics. J Geophys Res 112:F01008. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000537
Dang ATN, Kumar L, Reid M (2020) Modelling the potential impacts of climate change on Rice cultivation in Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Sustainability 12:9608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229608
Dang ATN, Kumar L, Reid M, Anh LNT (2021a) Modelling the susceptibility of wetland plant species under climate change in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Ecol inform 101358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101358
Dang ATN, Kumar L, Reid M, Nguyen H (2021b) Remote sensing approach for monitoring coastal wetland in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: change trends and their driving forces. Remote Sens 13:3359. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173359
Danh VT (2015) Adaptation to sea level rise in the Vietnamese Mekong River Delta: should a sea dike be built? In: James D, Franscisco HA (eds) Cost-benefit studies of natural resource management in Southeast Asia Springer Singapore, pp 345–367
Dinh QT (2016) Vietnam - Mekong Delta Integrated Climate Resilience and Sustainable Livelihoods (MD-ICRSL) Project: Environmental assessment (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Available online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/855731468312052747/Regional-environmental-assessment-report (accessed on 15 Aug 2020)
Doyle TW, Girod GF, Books MA (2003) Modeling mangrove forest migration along the southwest coast of Florida under climate change. In Integrated Assessment of the Climate Change Impacts on the Gulf Coast Region Gulf Coast Climate Change Assessment Council (GCRCC); Louisiana State University Graphic Services, pp 211–222
Doyle TW, Krauss KW, Conner WH, From AS (2010) Predicting the retreat and migration of tidal forests along the northern Gulf of Mexico under sea-level rise. Forest Ecol Manag 259:770–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.023
Duyen PLM, Tan TT, Tri VPD, Hang TTL, Takagi H (2015) Vulnerability assessment in the coastal plain of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Can Tho Univ J Scie 1:27–32. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jen.2015.013
Ekberg MLC, Raposa KB, Ferguson WS, Ruddock K, Watson EB (2017) Development and application of a method to identify salt marsh vulnerability to sea level rise. Estuaries Coasts 40:694–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0219-0
Ellison J (2012) Climate change vulnerability assessment and adaptation planning for mangrove systems. World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Washington, DC, pp. 130. ISBN 978–92–990069–0–0
Erban LE, Gorelick SM, Zebker HA (2014) Groundwater extraction, land subsidence, and sea-level rise in the Mekong Delta. Vietnam Environ Res Lett 9:084010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/8/084010
Fernandez-Nunez M, Burningham H, Díaz-Cuevas P, Ojeda-Zújar J (2019) Evaluating the response of Mediterranean-Atlantic saltmarshes to sea-level rise. Resources 8:50. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8010050
Fujihara Y, Hoshikawa K, Fujii H, Kotera A, Nagano T (2016) Analysis and attribution of trends in water levels in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Hydrol Process 30:835–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10642
George G, Krishnan P, Mini K, Salim S, Ragavan P et al (2019) Structure and regeneration status of mangrove patches along the estuarine and coastal stretches of Kerala, India. J for Res 30:507–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0600-2
Ghosh MK, Kumar L, Kibet Langat P (2019) Geospatial modelling of the inundation levels in the Sundarbans mangrove forests due to the impact of sea level rise and identification of affected species and regions. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 10(1):1028–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1564373
Gilman E, Ellison J, Coleman R (2006) Pacific island mangroves in a changing climate and rising sea. United Nation Environment Program and Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Program. Reg Sea Rep Stud 179:1–58
Gilman E, Ellison J, Coleman R (2007) Assessment of mangrove response to projected relative sea-level rise and recent historical reconstruction of shoreline position. Environ Monit Assess 124:105–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9212-y
Gilman EL, Ellison J, Duke NC, Field C (2008) Threats to mangroves from climate change and adaptation options: a review. Aquat Bot 89:237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.009
Giri C, Ochieng E, Tieszen LL, Zhu Z, Singh A et al (2011) Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:154–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00584.x
Gopalakrishnan T, Hasan MK, Haque A, Jayasinghe SL, Kumar L (2019) Sustainability of coastal agriculture under climate change. Sustainability 11:7200. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247200
Gopalakrishnan T, Kumar L (2020) Potential impacts of sea-level rise upon the Jaffna Peninsula, Sri Lanka: how climate change can adversely affect the coastal zone. J Coast Res 36:951–960. https://doi.org/10.2112/jcoastres-d-19-00155.1
Gupta K, Mukhopadhyay A, Giri S, Chanda A, Majumdar SD et al (2018) An index for discrimination of mangroves from non-mangroves using LANDSAT 8 OLI imagery. MethodsX 5:1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.011
Hak D, Nadaoka K, Bernado LP, Le Phu V, Quan NH et al (2016) Spatio-temporal variations of sea level around the Mekong Delta: their causes and consequences on the coastal environment. Hydrol Res Lett 10:60–66. https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.10.60
Hauser LT, Vu GN, Nguyen BA, Dade E, Nguyen HM et al (2017) Uncovering the spatio-temporal dynamics of land cover change and fragmentation of mangroves in the Ca Mau peninsula, Vietnam using multi-temporal SPOT satellite imagery (2004–2013). Appl Geogr 86:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.06.019
Hausfather Z, Peters GP (2020) RCP8. 5 is a problematic scenario for near-term emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117:27791–27792. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017124117
Hong HTC, Avtar R, Fujii M (2019) Monitoring changes in land use and distribution of mangroves in the southeastern part of the Mekong River Delta. Vietnam Trop Ecol 60:552–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-020-00053-1
Horton BP, Rahmstorf S, Engelhart SE, Kemp AC (2014) Expert assessment of sea-level rise by AD 2100 and AD 2300. Quat Sci Rev 84:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.11.002
Ismail H, Abd Wahab A, Alias NE (2012) Determination of mangrove forest performance in reducing tsunami run- up using physical models. Nat Hazards 63:939–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0200-y
Jevrejeva S, Grinsted A, Moore JC (2014) Upper limit for sea level projections by 2100. Environ Res Lett 9:104008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/104008
Kassakian J, Jones A, Martinich J, Hudgens D (2017) Managing for no net loss of ecological services: an approach for quantifying loss of coastal wetlands due to sea level rise. Environ Manage 59:736–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0813-0
Kathiresan K (2012) Importance of mangrove ecosystem. Int J Mar Sci 2:70–89. https://doi.org/10.5376/ijms.2012.02.0010
Kirwan M, Temmerman S (2009) Coastal marsh response to historical and future sea-level acceleration. Quat Sci Rev 28:1801–1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.02.022
Kirwan ML, Murray AB (2007) A coupled geomorphic and ecological model of tidal marsh evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:6118–6122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700958104
Krauss KW, Cormier N, Osland MJ, Kirwan ML, Stagg CL et al (2017) Created mangrove wetlands store belowground carbon and surface elevation change enables them to adjust to sea-level rise. Sci Rep 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01224-2
Krauss KW, Lovelock CE, McKee KL, López-Hoffman L, Ewe SM (2008) Environmental drivers in mangrove establishment and early development: a review. Aquat Bot 89:105–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.014
Krauss KW, McKee KL, Lovelock CE, Cahoon DR, Saintilan N et al (2014) How mangrove forests adjust to rising sea level. New Phytol 202:19–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12605
Kuenzer C, Tuan VQ (2013) Assessing the ecosystem services value of Can Gio Mangrove Biosphere Reserve: combining earth-observation-and household-survey-based analyses. Appl Geogr 45:167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.08.012
LaFever DH, Lopez RR, Feagin RA, Silvy NJ (2007) Predicting the impacts of future sea-level rise on an endangered lagomorph. Environ Manage 40:430–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0204-z
Lewis RR, Milbrandt EC, Brown B, Krauss KW, Rovai AS et al (2016) Stress in mangrove forests: early detection and preemptive rehabilitation are essential for future successful worldwide mangrove forest management. Mar Pollut Bull 109:764–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.03.006
Li S, Meng X, Ge Z, Zhang L (2015) Evaluation of the threat from sea-level rise to the mangrove ecosystems in Tieshangang Bay, southern China. Ocean Coast Manage 109:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.02.006
Liu JP, DeMaster DJ, Nguyen TT, Saito Y, Nguyen VL et al (2017) Stratigraphic formation of the Mekong River Delta and its recent shoreline changes. Oceanography 30:72–83. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2017.316
Liu X, Chen D, Duan Y, Ji H, Zhang L et al (2020) Understanding land use/land cover dynamics and impacts of human activities in the Mekong Delta over the last 40 years. Glob Ecol Conserv 22:e00991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00991
Lovelock CE, Cahoon DR, Friess DA, Guntenspergen GR, Krauss KW et al (2015) The vulnerability of Indo-Pacific mangrove forests to sea-level rise. Nature 526:559–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15538
Lovelock CE, Duarte CM (2019) Dimensions of blue carbon and emerging perspectives. Biol Lett 15:20180781. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0781
Lovelock CE, Feller IC, Reef R, Hickey S, Ball MC (2017) Mangrove dieback during fluctuating sea levels. Sci Rep 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01927-6
Mafi-Gholami D, Jaafari A, Zenner EK, Kamari AN, Bui DT (2020a) Spatial modeling of exposure of mangrove ecosystems to multiple environmental hazards. Sci Total Environ 740:140167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140167
Mafi-Gholami D, Zenner EK, Jaafari A (2020b) Mangrove regional feedback to sea level rise and drought intensity at the end of the 21st century. Ecol Indic 110:105972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105972
Marchesiello P, Nguyen NM, Gratiot N, Loisel H, Anthony EJ et al (2019) Erosion of the coastal Mekong delta: Assessing natural against man induced processes. Continental Shelf Res 181:72–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2019.05.004
Martin JF, White ML, Reyes E, Kemp GP, Mashriqui H (2000) PROFILE: evaluation of coastal management plans with a spatial model: Mississippi Delta, Louisiana, USA. Environ Manage 26:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010075
McFadden TN, Kauffman JB, Bhomia RK (2016) Effects of nesting waterbirds on nutrient levels in mangroves, Gulf of Fonseca, Honduras. Wetl Ecol Manag 24:217–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-016-9480-4
Mcleod E, Poulter B, Hinkel J, Reyes E, Salm R (2010) Sea-level rise impact models and environmental conservation: a review of models and their applications. Ocean Coast Manag 53:507–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.06.009
Menéndez P, Losada IJ, Torres-Ortega S, Narayan S, Beck MW (2020) The global flood protection benefits of mangroves. Sci Rep 10:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61136-6
Minderhoud P, Coumou L, Erban L, Middelkoop H, Stouthamer E (2018) The relation between land use and subsidence in the Vietnamese Mekong delta. Sci Tot Environ 634:715–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.372
Minderhoud P, Coumou L, Erkens G, Middelkoop H, Stouthamer E (2019) Mekong delta much lower than previously assumed in sea-level rise impact assessments. Nat Commun 10:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11602-1
Minderhoud P, Erkens G, Pham V, Bui VT, Erban L et al (2017) Impacts of 25 years of groundwater extraction on subsidence in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. Environ Res Lett 12:064006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7146
Mogensen LA, Rogers K (2018) Validation and comparison of a model of the effect of sea-level rise on coastal wetlands. Sci Rep 8:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19695-2
Morris JT, Sundareshwar P, Nietch CT, Kjerfve B, Cahoon DR (2002) Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83:2869–2877. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2869:ROCWTR]2.0.CO;2
Mudd SM, Fagherazzi S, Morris JT, Furbish DJ (2004) Flow, sedimentation, and biomass production on a vegetated salt marsh in South Carolina: toward a predictive model of marsh morphologic and ecologic evolution. Ecogeomorphol Tidal Marshes Coast Estuarine Stud 59:165–187. https://doi.org/10.1029/CE059p0165
Mudd SM, Howell SM, Morris JT (2009) Impact of dynamic feedbacks between sedimentation, sea-level rise, and biomass production on near-surface marsh stratigraphy and carbon accumulation. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 82:377–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2009.01.028
Murchie KJ (2015) Recreational fisheries as conservation tools for mangrove habitats. Pap Presented Am Fisheries Soc Symp. https://doi.org/10.47886/9781934874424.ch3
Nguyen TT, Woodroffe CD (2016) Assessing relative vulnerability to sea-level rise in the western part of the Mekong River Delta in Vietnam. Sustain Sci 11:645–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0336-2
Nicholls RJ, Cazenave A (2010) Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science 328:1517–1520. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185782
Nicholls RJ, Lincke D, Hinkel J, Brown S, Vafeidis AT et al (2021) A global analysis of subsidence, relative sea-level change and coastal flood exposure. Nat Clim Change 11:338–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00993-z
Oanh PT, Tamura M, Kumano N, Nguyen QV (2020) Cost-benefit analysis of mixing gray and green infrastructures to adapt to sea level rise in the Vietnamese Mekong River Delta. Sustainability 12:10356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410356
Oppenheimer M, Glavovic BC, Hinkel J, van de Wal R, Magnan AK, Abd-Elgawad A et al (2019) Sea level rise and implications for low-lying islands, coasts and communities. In: Pörtner H-O et al (eds) IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate
Park RA, Trehan MS, Mausel PW, Howe RC (1989) The effects of sea level rise on US coastal wetlands. The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States: Sea level rise. Appendix B, 5
Payo A, Mukhopadhyay A, Hazra S, Ghosh T, Ghosh S et al (2016) Projected changes in area of the Sundarban mangrove forest in Bangladesh due to SLR by 2100. Clim Change 139:279–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1769-z
Phan H (2020) Coastal and seasonal hydrodynamics and morphodynamics of the Mekong Delta. Doctoral thesis at Delft University of Technology, Available online: https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:2bcb33bf-5b73-4873-9168-08b1e7a2836f (accessed on 10 May 2021)
Phan LK, van Thiel de Vries JS, Stive MJ (2015) Coastal mangrove squeeze in the Mekong Delta. J Coast Res 31:233–243. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814689977_0087
Polidoro BA, Carpenter KE, Collins L, Duke NC, Ellison AM et al (2010) The loss of species: mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. PLoS One 5:e10095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010095
Propato M, Clough JS, Polaczyk A (2018) Evaluating the costs and benefits of marsh-management strategies while accounting for uncertain sea-level rise and ecosystem response. PLoS ONE 13:e0200368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200368
Raw J, Riddin T, Wasserman J, Lehman T, Bornman T (2020) Salt marsh elevation and responses to future sea-level rise in the Knysna Estuary, South Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci 45:49–64. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2019.1662763
Richards DR, Friess DA (2016) Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:344–349. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510272113
Rogers K, Saintilan N, Copeland C (2012) Modelling wetland surface elevation dynamics and its application to forecasting the effects of sea-level rise on estuarine wetlands. Ecol Modell 244:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.06.014
Saintilan N, Khan N, Ashe E, Kelleway J, Rogers K et al (2020) Thresholds of mangrove survival under rapid sea level rise. Science 368:1118–1121. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba2656
Salimi S, Almuktar SA, Scholz M (2021) Impact of climate change on wetland ecosystems: a critical review of experimental wetlands. J Environ Manage 286:112160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112160
Schile LM, Callaway JC, Morris JT, Stralberg D, Parker VT (2014) Modeling tidal marsh distribution with sea-level rise: evaluating the role of vegetation, sediment, and upland habitat in marsh resiliency. PLoS One 9:e88760. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088760
SIWRP (2017) Review Seadyke Planning from Quang Ngai to Kien Giang. Southern Institute of Water Resources Planning, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development : Hanoi, Vietnam
Smajgl A, Toan TQ, Nhan DK, Ward J, Trung NH et al (2015) Responding to rising sea levels in the Mekong Delta. Nat Clim Change 5:167–174. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2469
Stefan AG (2018) Coastal protection for the Mekong Delta: a decision support tools. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH: Bonn and Eschborn, Germany
Stralberg D, Brennan M, Callaway JC, Wood JK, Schile LM et al (2011) Evaluating tidal marsh sustainability in the face of sea-level rise: a hybrid modeling approach applied to San Francisco Bay. PLoS ONE 6:e27388. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027388
Strauss BH, Ziemlinski R, Weiss JL, Overpeck JT (2012) Tidally adjusted estimates of topographic vulnerability to sea level rise and flooding for the contiguous United States. Environ Res Lett 7:014033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014033
Strong A, Minnemeyer S (2015) Satellite data reveals state of the world’s mangrove forests. Retrieved from http://www.wri.org/blog/2015/02/satellitedata-reveals-state-world#0027s-mangrove-forests
Trần T, Nguyễn VT, Huỳnh TLH, Mai VK, Nguyễn XH et al (2016) Kịch bản biến đổi khí hậu và nước biển dâng cho Việt Nam. Nhà xuất bản Tài Nguyên Môi Trường và Bản Đồ Việt Nam, Bộ Tài Nguyên và Môi Trường, Hà Nội, 188 p, [Climate change and sea level rise scenarios for Vietnam. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Ha Noi]
Tran Thi V, Tien Thi Xuan A, Phan Nguyen H, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Koedam N (2014) Application of remote sensing and GIS for detection of long-term mangrove shoreline changes in Mui Ca Mau. Vietnam Biogeosci 11:3781–3795. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3781-2014
Tuan QV, Kuenzer C, Oppelt N (2015) How remote sensing supports mangrove ecosystem service valuation: a case study in Ca Mau province, Vietnam. Ecosyst Serv 14:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.007
Tue NT, Dung LV, Nhuan MT, Omori K (2014) Carbon storage of a tropical mangrove forest in Mui Ca Mau National Park, Vietnam. Catena 121:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.008
Van De Lageweg WI, Slangen A (2017) Predicting dynamic coastal delta change in response to sea-level rise. J Mar Sci Eng 5:24. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse5020024
Van T, Wilson N, Thanh-Tung H, Quisthoudt K, Quang-Minh V et al (2015) Changes in mangrove vegetation area and character in a war and land use change affected region of Vietnam (Mui Ca Mau) over six decades. Acta Oecol 63:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2014.11.007
Veettil BK, Quang NX, Trang NTT (2019a) Changes in mangrove vegetation, aquaculture and paddy cultivation in the Mekong Delta: a study from Ben Tre Province, southern Vietnam. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 226:106273. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECSS.2019.106273
Veettil BK, Ward RD, Quang NX, Trang NTT, Giang TH (2019b) Mangroves of Vietnam: historical development, current state of research and future threats. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 218:212–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2018.12.021
VNEPA (2005) Overview of wetlands status in Vietnam following 15 years of Ramsar convention implementation; Viet Nam Environment Protection Agency, IUCN Vietnam: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2005. Available online: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2005-2105.pdf (accessed on Sept 2020)
Wiegert R, Pomeroy L, Wiebe W (1981) Ecology of salt marshes: an introduction. In: Pomeroy LR, Wiegert RG (eds) The ecology of a salt marsh. Springer, New York, pp 3–19
Wikramanayake E, Or C, Costa F, Wen X, Cheung F et al (2020) A climate adaptation strategy for Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar site: steppingstone to climate proofing the East Asian-Australasian Flyway. PLoS One 15:e0239945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239945
Wolters M, Bakker JP, Bertness MD, Jefferies RL, Möller I (2005) Saltmarsh erosion and restoration in south-east England: squeezing the evidence requires realignment. J Appl Ecol 42:844–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01080.x
Wu W, Zhou Y, Tian B (2017) Coastal wetlands facing climate change and anthropogenic activities: a remote sensing analysis and modelling application. Ocean Coast Manage 138:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.01.005
Wu W, Yeager KM, Peterson MS, Fulford RS (2015) Neutral models as a way to evaluate the Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM). Ecol Modell 303:55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.008
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Vietnam, for data support and Warren Pinnacle Consulting, Inc. for software support.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions The authors gratefully acknowledge UNE in Australia for financial support to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Wolfgang Cramer
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dang, A.T.N., Reid, M. & Kumar, L. Assessing potential impacts of sea level rise on mangrove ecosystems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Reg Environ Change 22, 70 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01925-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01925-z