Abstract
Young adults experiencing homelessness (YAEH) are at elevated risk for HIV compared to their stably housed peers. Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective at preventing HIV infection, yet YAEH have been largely overlooked in PrEP efforts to date despite YAEH reporting high overall interest in PrEP. We assessed individual, social, and structural variables associated with PrEP interest and use among a sample of 195 YAEH (ages 18–25) recruited from drop-in centers across Los Angeles County who met criteria for HIV risk. In the current sample, though most had heard of PrEP (81.0%), the majority were not interested in taking PrEP (68.2%) and only a minority had used/were using PrEP (11.8%). YAEH who identified as sexual and/or gender minority, reported knowing someone who had used PrEP, or recently accessed sexual health services were more likely to have used and/or reported interest in using PrEP. Those who reported more episodes of heavy drinking were less likely to report having used PrEP. Suggestions are provided for better integrating PrEP-related services into existing behavioral and health service programs for YAEH, as well as leveraging peers and fostering positive social norms to reduce PrEP-related stigma and increase interest and use of PrEP among YAEH.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nearly 10% of young adults ages 18 to 25 experience homelessness each year in the United States [1]. Compared to housed youth populations, young adults experiencing homelessness (YAEH) self-report engaging in HIV risk behaviors (e.g., inconsistent condom use; having multiple or concurrent sexual partners; trading sex) more frequently [2,3,4] Approximately 8% of YAEH report HIV infection [5] and YAEH are 16 times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV than their stably housed peers [6]. YAEH are also among the marginalized populations at highest risk for mental health problems [7, 8] and substance use, [7, 9] both of which have been independently associated with HIV transmission risk among YAEH [10,11,12,13].
Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective biomedical intervention for preventing HIV infection [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. PrEP is currently widely promoted as a prevention strategy for individuals at risk for HIV. Despite PrEP being indicated for YAEH, [22] and high reported interest in taking PrEP among YAEH, [23] prior work shows that a disproportionately low number of YAEH have been reached by PrEP interventions to date [24, 25]. This may be due, in part, to ongoing concerns about the ability of YAEH to consistently take daily PrEP pills in order to remain protected [26]. With the recent FDA approval of a long-acting injectable formulation of PrEP (lasting 1–2 months), there is now an additional option available for YAEH who may otherwise struggle with adherence to daily pill regimines [27].
Previous work has indicated significant individual, social, and structural barriers to PrEP uptake for young adults in general. Individual factors have included low levels of PrEP knowledge, [28] perceived high cost, [28, 29] mental health factors like depression, [30, 31] and substance use [30, 32]. Social factors have included experiencing PrEP-related stigma [33] and lack of social support from peers for PrEP [33, 34]. Structural factors have included lack of insurance coverage, transportation difficulties, housing instability [32] and lack of access, [29] engagement, and retention in health care [32]. Although knowledge of PrEP is relatively low among YAEH, a majority report willingness to take PrEP once informed about it. For example in a study of over 1,400 YAEH across seven US cities, only 29% had ever heard about PrEP but once informed about it, 59% reported they were likely to take it if available [25]. This highlights an important missed opportunity to inform and offer PrEP to YAEH. Currently little is known about factors associated with interest and use of PrEP among YAEH.
The current study addresses these gaps in the literature through two aims. The first aim assesses overall levels of awareness, interest, and use of PrEP among YAEH. The second aim identifies individual, social, and structural variables associated with PrEP interest and use. Participants in the current study comprise a diverse sample of YAEH ages 18–25 accessing services from drop-in centers serving youth experiencing homelessness in Los Angeles County.
Methods
Participants
Participants were a subsample of individuals participating in a cluster crossover randomized controlled trial evaluating a substance use and sexual health risk reduction program for 18- to 25 year olds experiencing homelessness [35]. Individuals were recruited to participate in the trial when accessing services (e.g., food, clothing) from one of three youth drop-in centers in Los Angeles County and were compensated for their participation. Of the 276 participants in the trial, they were eligible for the present analyses if they met one or more of the following HIV risk criteria: identifying as transgender, gender nonbinary, or as a cisgender sexual minority man who has sex with men; report having received an STI diagnosis, HIV test, or accessing HIV/STI services in the last 3 months; report engaging in condomless sex in the last 3 months; or report use of illicit substances other than cannabis (e.g., methamphetamine, heroin) in the past 30 days. Furthermore, participants must have completed the 6-month follow-up survey and responded to a question (described below) regarding PrEP interest or use. This resulted in an analytic sample of N = 195. All study protocols and measures were approved by the Human Subjects Protection Committee of the RAND Corporation. Further details on recruitment strategy and study design are available in the published protocol [35].
Measures
A scannable self-report paper-pencil baseline survey was administered in English to participants who provided written consent to participate in the study. A staff member was present to provide assistance when completing the survey. A 6-month follow-up survey was conducted either in-person, via web-based administration, or by phone. The current study utilized measures of sociodemographic, mental health, substance use, sexual behavior, HIV/STI testing, diagnosis, and service access from the baseline survey and PrEP awareness, interest, intent, and current or past PrEP use from the 6-month follow up survey when the PrEP items were added.
Socio-Demographic Characteristics
Items included age, gender identity, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, age of first homeless episode, length of current homeless episode, education, and employment status. To reduce multicollinearity for analytic purposes, we collapsed sexual and gender minority status into a 3-level variable consisting of cisgender females combined with straight cisgender males, gay and bisexual cisgender men, and gender diverse individuals.
Mental Health
Mental functioning was assessed with the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) for symptoms of depression in the past 2 weeks (e.g., feeling down, depressed, or hopeless; 0 = not at all to 3 = nearly every day) [36]. The resulting score had a range of 0–24, and participants were classified as depressed if their score was 10 or greater [36].
Substance Use
Items from the Monitoring the Future survey [37] assessed number of days, in the last 30 days that participants engaged in substance use, including heavy alcohol use (5 + drinks in one day), cannabis use, and use of other illicit drugs (e.g., heroin, methamphetamine, hallucinogens).
Sexual Behavior
Participants completed separate items asking about the number of times they had anal or vaginal sex with primary partners and with casual partners, as well as the number of these times that they used a condom, in the last 3 months. Based on this information we derived variables indicating the percentage of sexual events with primary partners and with casual partners that were condom-protected (0-100%).
HIV/STI Testing/Diagnosis and Service Access
Participants reported if they had been tested for HIV in the last 3 months, as well as whether they had been diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection (STI; including, but not limited to HIV) during this period. Separate items assessed whether participants had accessed formal mental health, sexual health, substance use, or housing services during the past 90 days.
Social Support from Friends
Participants were asked to rate the degree to which they received support from their friends during the last 30 days with 3 items from the PROMIS Pediatric Peer Relationships Scale (e.g., I was able to count on my friends, my friends and I helped each other out) [38]. Participants answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale with answers ranging from 1 = never to 5 = almost always.
PrEP Awareness, Interest, Intent, and Current or Past Use
To assess knowledge of PrEP, participants were asked two items of whether they had heard of PrEP (yes/no) and whether they knew anyone who had used PrEP (yes/no). To assess experience with PrEP, participants were asked to select one of the following responses: currently using PrEP; had used PrEP in the past, but were not currently using it; were interested in using PrEP and had already made plans to use it; were interested in using PrEP, but had not made any plans to use it; or had no interest in using PrEP. PrEP items were preceded by a definition of PrEP as “where someone who does not have HIV takes HIV medications to reduce the chances of being infected (before being possibly exposed to HIV).” For the purposes of analyses, we categorized participants into 3 groups: (a) Current/prior PrEP use; (b) PrEP interested but no prior use; and (c) not interested in PrEP and no prior use.
Data Analysis
Bivariate multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine associations between each predictor variable of interest and the likelihood of: (1) current/prior PrEP use; or (2) PrEP interested but no prior use, with not interested in PrEP and no prior use serving as the reference. A multivariable multinomial logistic regression model was then evaluated in which all marginally significant (p < 0.10) bivariate predicators of PrEP current/past use and/or PrEP interest were included as independent variables. All analyses were conducted using SAS statistical software v9.4 [39].
Results
Participant Characteristics
The analytic sample consisted of 195 YAEH who reported not being HIV-positive and who met one or more HIV risk inclusion criteria. Table 1 presents sample characteristics. The majority of participants (80.5%) were between 21 and 25 years of age, with about 20% between 18 and 21 years of age. The sample was highly diverse in terms of racial and ethnic backgrounds with 37.1% identifying as non-Hispanic Black or African American, 30.4% identifying as Hispanic/Latinx, 16.5% identifying as non-Hispanic White, and the remaining 16.0% identifying as another non-Hispanic racial category or multiracial. The majority of the sample (61.5%) identified as cisgender male, 23.1% identified as cisgender female, and 15.4% identified as gender diverse. Half of the sample (51.0%) identified as straight/heterosexual, 18.8% identified as gay/lesbian, and the remaining 30.3% identified as bisexual/other. Just under half (45.3%) experienced homelessness for the first time prior to age 18. There was wide variation in the length of most recent homeless episode with answers ranging from less than a month to over two years. There was also wide variation in terms of education level with just under one third (32.0%) having not finished high school, 42.3% having obtained a high school diploma or equivalent, and about one-forth (25.8%) having more than a high school degree. The majority of our sample (76.8%) reported being currently unemployed.
In terms of substance use and sexual behaviors, 42.6% reported heavy drinking behavior (5 or more drinks) during the last 30 days, 81% reported cannabis use during the last 30 days, and 36.9% reported using drugs other than cannabis in the last 30 days. In terms of sexual behavior, 30.9% reported condomless sex with primary partners in the last 3 months and 19.2% reported condomless sex with casual partners in the last 3 months. 7.2% reported having been diagnosed with an STI in the last 3 months and 65.6% reported having been tested for HIV in the last 3 months.
Regarding mental health and social support and service utilization, 32.8% of the sample screened positive for a probable depressive disorder during the last two weeks. In terms of social support, about one third (31.8%) reported never or almost never receiving social support, 34.4% reported sometimes receiving social support, and 33.9% reported always receiving social support when needed. Service utilization was quite high overall with 51.3% accessing mental health services, 45.6% accessing sexual health services, 38.0% accessing substance use services, and 66.7% accessing housing services in the last 3 months.
With respect to having awareness of PrEP, 158 (81.0%) YAEH reported that they had heard of PrEP, and 72 (36.9%) reported that they knew someone who had taken PrEP. With respect to the outcome for this analysis, interest and use of PrEP, YAEH were grouped into three categories based on: (a) current or prior use of PrEP; (b) no current/prior use but interest in PrEP; and (c) no current/prior use and no interest in PrEP. Twenty-three (11.8%) of the YAEH in this sample reported that they were currently using or had used PrEP in the past. An additional 39 (20.0%) YAEH in this sample reported that they were interested in taking PrEP. The remaining YAEH 133 (68.2%) reported that they had no interest in using PrEP.
Bivariate Analysis
As a first step in our analysis, we assessed for bivariate associations between the individual, social and structural hypothesized to be associated with both PrEP interest and PrEP use (see Table 2).
Individual Factors
Sexual and gender minority status significantly predicted both current/past PrEP use and current interest in using PrEP. Specifically, gay and bisexual cisgender identified men were more likely than cisgender women or cisgender straight identified men to report current or past PrEP use than to report not being interested in using PrEP [odds ratio (OR) = 9.05, 95% confidence interval (CI)=(2.80, 29.24), p < 0.001]. Gay and bisexual cisgender identified men were also more likely than cisgender women or cisgender straight identified men to report being interested in using PrEP than to report not being interested in using PrEP [OR = 2.80, 95% CI=(1.21, 6.47), p < 0.05]. Gender diverse individuals were more likely than cisgender women or cisgender straight identified men to report current or past PrEP use than to report not being interested in using PrEP [OR = 8.91, 95% CI=(2.61, 30.61), p < 0.001].
For substance use, participants who reported more days of heavy alcohol use in the last 30 days were less likely to report current or past use of PrEP than to report not being interested in using PrEP [OR = 0.40, 95% CI= (0.19, 0.87), p < 0.05].
Social Factors
Participants who reported knowing someone who had used PrEP were more likely to report past or current use of PrEP themselves (n = 20, 27.8%) than to report not being interested in using PrEP [OR = 20.20, 95% CI=(5.60, 72.33), p < 0.001]. Participants who reported knowing someone who had used PrEP were also more likely to report being interested in using PrEP (n = 19, 26.4%) than to report not being interested in using PrEP [OR = 2.88, 95% CI=(1.37, 6.04), p = 0.01].
Structural Factors
Finally, examination of structural factors indicated that participants who recently accessed sexual health services were marginally more likely to report interest in PrEP (n = 24, 27.0%) than were those who did not recently access sexual health services (n = 15, 14.2%) [OR = 2.27, 95% CI=(1.09, 4.72), p < 0.05].
Multivariable Models
Each of the variables found to have at least a marginal (p < 0.10) association with the three-level PrEP use and interest outcome variable (current/past PrEP use, interested in PrEP, or no interest in PrEP) was then entered into a multivariable model. In the bivariate multinomial models described above, sexual and gender minority status, last-month heavy drinking (days had 5 + drinks), sexual health service utilization during the last 3 months, and knowing someone who has used PrEP were all found to have at least marginal associations and were thus entered into the multivariable model.
Table 3 illustrates effects of the bivariately significant or marginal predictor variables together in one model on the probabilities of reporting current or past PrEP use and of being interested in using PrEP vs. being not using or interested in using PrEP.
When comparing those YAEH who endorsed current or past PrEP use to those who were not interested, results showed that those who identified as gay or bisexual cisgender men were significantly more likely to endorse current or past use of PrEP as compared to cisgender women or straight identified cisgender men [OR = 5.25, 95% CI=(1.38, 19.93), p < 0.05]. In addition, those who identified as gender diverse were significantly more likely to endorse current or past use of PrEP as compared to cisgender women or straight identified cisgender men [OR = 5.21, 95% CI=(1.41, 19.32), p = .05]. The model suggests that those who reported more days of heavy drinking in the last 30 days were significantly less likely to endorse current or past use of PrEP [OR = 0.36, 95% CI=(0.16, 0.86), p = .05]. Finally, the model suggests that that those who reported knowing someone who has used PrEP were significantly more likely to endorse current or past use of PrEP compared to those who reported not knowing someone who has used PrEP [OR = 5.29, 95% CI=(1.69, 16.27), p = .01].
Interest in PrEP vs. Not Interested in PrEP
When comparing those YAEH who endorsed current interest in PrEP to those who did not, the model suggests that those who recently accessed sexual health services were significantly more likely to be interested in using PrEP [OR = 2.22, 95% CI=(1.03, 4.76), p = 0.04]. In addition, the model suggests that those who knew someone who had used PrEP were significantly more likely to be interested in using PrEP [OR = 2.35, 95% CI=(1.02, 5.39), p = 0.04].
Discussion
YAEH have disproportionately high risk for HIV compared to their stably housed peers [24]. This study sought to assess predictors of PrEP use and interest among a racially, ethnically, and SGM diverse sample of YAEH who report one or more behavioral risk factors associated with HIV. Prior work suggests that although awareness of PrEP has been relatively low among YAEH, many report willingness to take PrEP once informed about it [25]. Among those YAEH found to meet risk criteria for HIV in our current Los Angeles-based sample, over 80% reported that they were aware of PrEP and more than 1 in 3 reported knowing someone who had taken PrEP. However, about two-thirds reported that they were not interested in taking PrEP, with rates of interest in taking PrEP (20%) and use of PrEP in the past (11.8%) being relatively low.
We aimed to elucidate key individual, social, and structural factors associated with interest and use of PrEP among YAEH at risk for HIV. At the individual level, identifying as either a cisgender sexual minority male or as a person who is gender diverse was significantly associated with PrEP interest among YAEH. This is not surprising given that outreach and marketing for PrEP interventions has specifically focused on sexual and gender minority individuals [40, 41]. Given the disproportionate risk for HIV, it seems appropriate that there would be more interest among YAEH who identify as members of certain sexual and gender minority groups as they may be at higher relative risk. It is important to recognize that all YAEH participants from all sexual and gender categories met criteria for at least one known HIV risk factor. Therefore, it is important that future PrEP interventions targeting YAEH include members of all sexualities and gender identities in their outreach and marketing materials and ensure that intervention content is culturally appropriate and representative of all YAEH who may be at risk.
More frequent heavy drinking was associated with a lower likelihood of current or past use of PrEP. This finding highlights the importance of integrating PrEP into existing behavioral health interventions that simultaneously address mental health, substance use, and sexual health needs of YAEH. Long-acting injectable formulations of PrEP may be a particularly useful intervention for YAEH with mental health and substance use concerns that may affect PrEP adherence and persistence.
On the social level, peer influence may be a particularly salient motivator for PrEP use. Knowing someone who had taken PrEP was a strong correlate of both interest in and use of PrEP among YAEH. According to social norms theory, individuals often overestimate the number of their peers who engage in “risk” behaviors and underestimate the number of their peers who engage in “protective” behaviors [42]. These misperceptions may cause individuals to act in a way that is consistent with the misperceived social norm [42]. In the example of engaging in a health behavior like PrEP, YAEH may be less likely to take PrEP if they do not believe anyone in their peer group is taking it. PrEP-related stigma has also been reported as a significant barrier to PrEP use among YAEH [23, 43]. Knowing someone who has taken or is currently taking PrEP may be an indication that PrEP use has been normalized among members one’s peer group. Peers or other members of their social network may serve as role models providing examples of who should take PrEP and why it is important. Future work to increase uptake of PrEP among YAEH should focus on reducing misperceptions about PrEP use and PrEP-related stigma within the social networks of YAEH by encouraging open discussions about PrEP use with their peers. A promising social network-based PrEP interventions could be adapted for use among YAEH [44,45,46,47].
Finally, on a structural level, it seems key that information about PrEP and linkage to PrEP programs take place in the context of HIV and STI counseling and health service programs. Our results indicate that YAEH who recently received these services appear to be particularly interested in PrEP and are likely to be good candidates for PrEP use. Offering long-acting injectable PrEP at the same time YAEH are receiving other HIV/STI health services may be a particularly useful way of capitalizing on their interest in PrEP. While offering PrEP or information about PrEP to YAEH in sexual health service setting may seem intuitive, many providers hesitate to offer PrEP to youth under 18 because of their perceptions of potential ethical and legal issues when prescribing PrEP to a minor [31].
This study was not without limitations. For example, the study was limited to young adults recruited from the Los Angeles area. PrEP information and medication is possibly more accessible to YAEH in the Los Angeles metropolitan area than in some other areas of the country due to state-funded PrEP coverage programs and multiple ongoing interventions focused on increasing knowledge and access to PrEP among youth in the Los Angeles area. As a result, results from this study may not generalize to YAEH in other areas of the country. This study was also limited to self-report data and, as such, we are unable to confirm whether those who reported PrEP use were indeed taking PrEP. Finally, as PrEP was not the original focus of the study, we are limited in the number and type of PrEP-related questions assessed. Future work should extend PrEP questions to focus on how and why participants may be interested or not interested in using PrEP and on preferences for PrEP formulation (e.g. long-acting, daily pills) and delivery (e.g., nurse administered in drop-in centers, pharmacist delivered in community pharmacies).
This study extends prior work suggesting that YAEH have a general interest in taking PrEP once they are aware of it, [23, 25] by finding that YAEH who identify as sexual and/or gender minority, know someone who had used PrEP, or recently accessed sexual health services are more likely to have used and/or report interest in using PrEP. Those who reported more episodes of heavy drinking were less likely to report having used PrEP. Our study suggests that interventions focused on increasing information and uptake of PrEP may be well received in drop-in centers offering mental and sexual health care services to YAEH. Finally, leveraging peer groups of YAEH and fostering positive social norms around PrEP use are likely to help further reduce PrEP-related stigma and create a sense of normality around taking PrEP. Given the relatively high risk for HIV among YAEH, the high efficacy of PrEP, and the recent approval of a long-acting injectable formulation, efforts must focus on increasing access and uptake of PrEP among YAEH to end the United States HIV epidemic.
References
Morton MH, Dworsky A, Matjasko JL, et al. Prevalence and correlates of youth homelessness in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62(1):14–21.
Tevendale HD, Lightfoot M, Slocum SL. Individual and environmental protective factors for risky sexual behavior among homeless youth: an exploration of gender differences. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(1):154–64.
Hsu H-T, Fulginiti A, Rice E, Rhoades H, Winetrobe H, Danforth L. But everyone is doing it (sort of)! Perceived sexual risks in the social environment and the impact on homeless youth engagement in concurrent sexual relationships. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(11):3508–18.
Barman-Adhikari A, Hsu H-T, Begun S, Portillo AP, Rice E. Condomless sex among homeless youth: the role of multidimensional social norms and gender. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(3):688–702.
Rabinovitz S, Desai M, Schneir A, Clark L. No way home: understanding the needs and experiences of homeless youth in Hollywood. Hollywood CA: Homeless Youth Partnership. 2010.
Ray N. An epidemic of homelessness. National, Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute, National Coalition for the Homeless. 2006.
Grafsky EL, Letcher A, Slesnick N, Serovich JM. Comparison of treatment response among GLB and non-GLB street-living youth. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33(5):569–74.
Whitbeck LB, Chen X, Hoyt DR, Tyler KA, Johnson KD. Mental disorder, subsistence strategies, and victimization among gay, lesbian, and bisexual homeless and runaway adolescents. J Sex Res. 2004;41(4):329–42.
Collins J, Slesnick N. Factors associated with motivation to change HIV risk and substance use behaviors among homeless youth. J social work Pract addictions. 2011;11(2):163–80.
Wilson E, Garofalo R, Harris R, et al. Transgender Advisory Committeethe adolescent medicine trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. Transgender female youth and sex work: HIV risk and a comparison of life factors related to engagement in sex work. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(5):902–13.
Herbst JH, Jacobs ED, Finlayson TJ, et al. Estimating HIV prevalence and risk behaviors of transgender persons in the United States: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(1):1–17.
Garofalo R, Deleon J, Osmer E, Doll M, Harper GW. Overlooked, misunderstood and at-risk: exploring the lives and HIV risk of ethnic minority male-to-female transgender youth. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(3):230–6.
Clements-Nolle K, Marx R, Guzman R, Katz M. HIV prevalence, risk behaviors, health care use, and mental health status of transgender persons: implications for public health intervention. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):915.
Volk JE, Marcus JL, Phengrasamy T, et al. No new HIV infections with increasing use of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in a clinical practice setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(10):1601–3.
Molina J-M, Capitant C, Spire B, et al. On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2237–46.
McCormack S, Dunn D. Pragmatic open-label randomised trial of preexposure prophylaxis: the PROUD study. 2015:23–6.
Liu AY, Cohen SE, Vittinghoff E et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection integrated with municipal-and community-based sexual health services. JAMA Intern Med. 2015:1–11.
Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.
Grant RM, Anderson PL, McMahan V, et al. Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(9):820–9.
Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):399–410.
Baeten JM, Donnell D, Mugo NR, et al. Single-agent tenofovir versus combination emtricitabine plus tenofovir for pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 acquisition: an update of data from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(11):1055–64.
Organization WH. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations. World Health Organization; 2016.
Santa Maria D, Gallardo KR, Narendorf S, et al. Implications for PrEP uptake in young adults experiencing homelessness: a mixed methods study. AIDS Educ Prev. 2019;31(1):63–81.
Call J, Gerke D, Barman-Adhikari A. Facilitators and barriers to PrEP use among straight and LGB young adults experiencing homelessness. J Gay Lesbian Social Serv. 2022;34(3):285–301.
Santa Maria D, Flash CA, Narendorf S, et al. Knowledge and attitudes about pre-exposure prophylaxis among young adults experiencing homelessness in seven US cities. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(5):574–80.
Straub DM. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for Homeless Youth: A Rights-Based perspective. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(5):549–50.
Sharfstein JM, Killelea A, Dangerfield D. Long-acting cabotegravir for HIV prevention: issues of access, cost, and equity. JAMA. 2022;327(10):921–2.
Bauermeister JA, Meanley S, Pingel E, Soler JH, Harper GW. PrEP awareness and perceived barriers among single young men who have sex with men in the United States. Curr HIV Res. 2013;11(7):520.
Pérez-Figueroa RE, Kapadia F, Barton SC, Eddy JA, Halkitis PN. Acceptability of PrEP uptake among racially/ethnically diverse young men who have sex with men: the P18 study. AIDS Educ prevention: official publication Int Soc AIDS Educ. 2015;27(2):112.
Gerke DR, Call J, Auslander WF. The syndemic factors of violence exposure, Substance Use, and Mental Health problems: Relationships to sexual risk behaviors in HIV-Negative Young Men who have sex with men. J Soc Social Work Res. 2022;13(2):235–59.
Miller SJ, Harrison SE, Sanasi-Bhola K. A scoping review investigating relationships between depression, anxiety, and the PrEP care continuum in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):11431.
Blashill AJ, Brady JP, Rooney BM, et al. Syndemics and the PrEP cascade: results from a sample of young latino men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49:125–35.
Budhwani H, Yigit I, Maragh-Bass AC, et al. Validation of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) medication scales with youth on PrEP: PrEP confidence scale and PrEP difficulties Scale. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2022;36(11):443–50.
Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Wilton L, Koblin BA, et al. The role of social support in HIV testing and PrEP awareness among young black men and transgender women who have sex with men or transgender women. J Urb Health. 2020;97:715–27.
Tucker JS, D’Amico EJ, Pedersen ER, Rodriguez A, Garvey R. Study protocol for a group-based motivational interviewing brief intervention to reduce substance use and sexual risk behavior among young adults experiencing homelessness. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2020;15(1):1–12.
Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009;114(1–3):163–73.
Johnston L, O’malley PM, Bachman JG. Monitoring the future: national survey results on drug use, 1975–2003. 2004.
DeWalt DA, Thissen D, Stucky BD, et al. PROMIS Pediatric peer Relationships Scale: development of a peer relationships item bank as part of social health measurement. Health Psychol. 2013;32(10):1093.
SAS Statistical Software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA; 2013.
Nakelsky S, Moore L, Garland WH. Using evaluation to enhance a pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) social marketing campaign in real time in Los Angeles County, California. Eval Program Plan. 2022;90:101988.
Kudrati SZ, Hayashi K, Taggart T. Social media & PrEP: a systematic review of social media campaigns to increase PrEP awareness & uptake among young Black and Latinx MSM and women. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(12):4225–34.
Prentice DA, Miller DT. Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1993;64(2):243.
Allan-Blitz L-T, Mena LA, Mayer KH. The ongoing HIV epidemic in american youth: challenges and opportunities. Mhealth. 2021;7.
Kelly JA, Amirkhanian YA, Walsh JL, et al. AIDSImpact Special Issue Social Network intervention to increase Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness, interest, and use among african american men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 2020;32(SUP2):40.
da Silva DT, Bouris A, Ramachandran A, et al. Embedding a linkage to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) care intervention in Social Network Strategy and Partner Notification Services: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021;86(2):191.
Pagkas-Bather J, Young LE, Chen Y-T, Schneider JA. Social network interventions for HIV transmission elimination. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020;17:450–7.
Terui S, Goldsmith JV, Daugherty CD, Briscoe JR. A student-driven HIV/PrEP communication intervention using a modified social network strategy. J Am Coll Health. 2021;69(3):326–30.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (Grant R01AA025641; PI: Tucker) with additional funding for Storholm provided by the National Institute of Mental Health (Grant R01MH126762; PI: Storholm).
Conflict of InterestNo conflicts of interest exist for any of the study authors.
Ethical ApprovalAll study protocols and procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the RAND Corporation and were performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Informed ConsentWe obtained informed consent from all participants included in this study.
Open access funding provided by SCELC, Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Storholm, E.D., Klein, D.J., Pedersen, E.R. et al. Sociodemographic and Behavioral Risk Correlates of PrEP Interest and Use Among Young Adults Experiencing Homelessness in Los Angeles. AIDS Behav 28, 1216–1226 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-023-04144-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-023-04144-7