Abstract
Ferroptosis is a form of cell death that is triggered by the presence of ferrous ions and is characterized by lipid peroxidation induced by these ions. The mechanism exhibits distinct morphological characteristics compared to apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. A notable aspect of ferroptosis is its ability to inhibit uncontrolled tumor replication and immortalization, especially in malignant, drug-resistant, and metastatic tumors. Additionally, immunotherapy, a novel therapeutic approach for tumors, has been found to have a reciprocal regulatory relationship with ferroptosis in the context of anti-tumor therapy. A comprehensive analysis of ferroptosis and immunotherapy in tumor therapy is presented in this paper, highlighting the potential for mutual adjuvant effects. Specifically, we discuss the mechanisms underlying ferroptosis and immunotherapy, emphasizing their ability to improve the tumor immune microenvironment and enhance immunotherapeutic effects. Furthermore, we investigate how immunotherapeutic factors may increase the sensitivity of tumor cells to ferroptosis. We aim to provide a prospective view of the promising value of combined ferroptosis and immunotherapy in anticancer therapy by elucidating the mutual regulatory network between each.
Graphical Abstract
Ferroptosis in the tumor microenvironment involves intricate crosstalk between tumor cells and immune cells. Through MHC recognition, CD8+T cells activate the JAK1/STAT1 pathway in tumor cells, impairing the function of System Xc and reducing GSH and GPX4 expression to promote tumor cell ferroptosis. Additionally, activation of the STAT1-IRF1-ACSL4 pathway could also promote ferroptosis. The blockade of the antioxidant pathway in tumor cells induces ferroptosis, and the released DAMPs could promote DCs maturation through the cGAMP-STING-TBK1 pathway, leading to antigen presentation that activates CD8+T cells. The release of DAMPs also induces the M1-type polarization of macrophages, which exerts an anti-tumor effect. The anti-tumor effects of CD8+T cells could also be enhanced by blocking inhibitory immune checkpoints such as PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4, and LAG3. Abbreviations: ACSL4, acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4; BH4, tetrahydrobiopterin; cGAMP, cyclic GMP-AMP; CTLA4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4; DCs, dendritic cells; DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; DHODH, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; GSH, glutathione; HIF-1α, Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α;IFN-γ, interferon-γ; IRF1, interferon regulatory factor 1;IRP1, iron regulatory protein 1; JAK 1, janus kinase; LAG3, lymphocyte activation gene 3; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; NRF2, nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2; PD-1, programmed death protein -1; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; ROS, reative oxygen species; STAT1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; STING, stimulator of interferon genes; TBK1, TANK-binding kinase 1 TLR2, toll-like receptor 2. This diagram was drawn by Figdraw (www.figdraw.com).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent programmed death characterized by lipid peroxidation, proposed by Stockwell and colleagues in 2012 [1]. Ferroptosis exhibits distinct morphological differences from other programmed deaths, such as apoptosis, necrosis, autophagy, etc. These differences include mitochondrial atrophy, a reduced number of mitochondrial cristae, and unique phospholipid oxidation features. The process of ferroptosis is mainly regulated by a combination of intracellular executive systems, such as ferrous ion overload and lipid peroxidation, and the antagonistic effects of defense systems, such as antioxidant systems. The antioxidant system mainly consists of the glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1), dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), Fas-associated factor 1 (FAF1), and other antioxidant pathways [2]. Upon disruption or insufficient function of the intracellular antioxidant system, ferroptosis is triggered by an accumulation of iron and lipid peroxidation [3]. Ferroptosis is fatal for almost all cells, including tumor cells.
Tumor generation is mainly dependent on the accumulation of mutant proto-oncogenes, which induce metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells, helping them adapt to harsh survival environments such as oxidative stress, accelerating cancer cell proliferation, and also conferring invasive, metastatic, and drug-resistant capabilities [4]. Notably, ferroptosis may be a common endpoint of most aberrant metabolic pathways [5]. Specific genetic mutations, unique metabolic modalities, and high-load oxidative stress all contribute to making tumor cells more susceptible to ferroptosis. Tumor drug resistance can be reversed by targeting ferroptosis susceptibility [6]. Relevant studies have demonstrated that immunotherapy and ferroptosis share a reciprocal regulatory role. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) derived from CD8+T cells can stimulate ferroptosis in cancer cells via polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) [7].
The academic community has been facing a significant challenge in recent years regarding immune tolerance in tumor therapy, which can be co-induced through pathways such as the activation of co-stimulatory factors on T-cell surfaces. To counteract immune tolerance, immunotherapeutic agents, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been employed [8]. Significantly, ICIs, such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4), programmed death protein-1 (PD-1), and its ligand programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), have been found to induce lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis in tumor cells [9]. Studies have also shown that ICIs are hindered by the ferroptosis inhibitor rilastatin 1 [10]. Consequently, exploring the potential strategy of mutual crosstalk between immunotherapy and ferroptosis may hold promise for cancer treatment. A comprehensive overview of the therapeutic network pathways involved in ferroptosis and immunotherapy is presented here. Additionally, we elucidate the interplay between immunotherapy and ferroptosis pathways, highlighting their synergistic effect in targeting and eliminating tumor cells. These findings offer novel insights and potential directions for the development of natural antitumor drugs.
Tumors and ferroptosis
Among cancer patients with non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer, ferroptosis targeted therapy has demonstrated effectiveness. The primary mechanisms driving ferroptosis involve the Fenton reaction brought about by excessive intracellular accumulation of ferrous ions (promoting uptake and inhibiting storage and efflux) and oxidative stress-induced lipid peroxidation of PUFA (Fig. 1). Cisplatin and dihydroartemisinin modulate the transportation and discharge of substantial quantities of Fe2+ from lung cancer cells by means of iron-regulatory proteins/iron response elements, thereby initiating ferroptosis [11]. Ficolin 3 enhances ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing de novo synthesis of MUFA via down-regulation of the insulin receptor β (IR-β)/sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP1c) axis, leading to elevated levels of PUFA-enriched phospholipids and intracellular ROS [12]. In contrast, The intracellular defense against ferroptosis heavily relies on the antioxidant system, this system includes various components such as GPX4, FSP1, DHODH, FAF1, tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), and nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (NRF2) (Fig. 2). Inhibitors such as erastin, temozolomide, and lutazosulfapyridine have been found to decrease system Xc- activity, resulting in reduced cystine uptake and increased generation of ROS, ultimately promoting ferroptosis in tumor cells. With both systems working in tandem to regulate ferroptosis process. Notably, tumor cell ferroptosis is also intricately connected to energy metabolism due to the heightened metabolic requirements for growth. The treatment of ferroptosis of tumor is described in detail in the reference [13].
Tumor and immunotherapy
Immunotherapy is used in novel therapies to treat many types of cancer by harnessing the immune system to kill tumour cells [14]. The tumor microenvironment harbors a diverse array of immune cell types, including adaptive immune cells like CD8+T cells, CD4+T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and B cells, as well as myeloid immune cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and innate immune cells such as natural killer (NK) cells and innate lymphoid-like cells [15]. In the tumor microenvironment, immune cells vary substantially in composition and function even among patients with the same cancer type. These variations can be attributed to variables such as age, gender, body weight, and microbiota. There is evidence that tumor-associated immune cells contribute to tumor progression, although their effect can be contradictory. Tumor immunotherapy is a promising avenue for controlling tumor growth by regulating immune cells. While certain immune cells can inhibit tumor growth, others can promote it (Fig. 3). As a matter of fact, immunotherapy is highly dependent on immune cells functioning effectively within the microenvironment, especially in “hot” tumor types such as non-small cell lung cancer [16]. However, tumor cells in “hot” tumors typically exhibit an elevated expression of PD-L1 to facilitate their proliferation and metastasis. This overexpression allows them to bind to PD-1 on immune cells, thereby evading immune surveillance. On the other hand, “cold” tumors, such as pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, and osteosarcoma, are characterized by a lower infiltration of immune cells. Consequently, these tumors exhibit a reduced expression of inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules since they do not require counteractive measures against immune cell surveillance and cytotoxicity [17]. The selection of immunotherapeutic approaches and the prognosis of tumor treatment heavily rely on the intricate and ever-changing nature of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Clinical tumor treatment has witnessed significant therapeutic prospects through tumor immunotherapy, encompassing adoptive cell therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, neoantigen vaccine therapy, and other modalities. The immunotherapy of tumor is described in detail in the reference [18].
Crosstalk between ferroptosis and immune response in tumors
Ferroptosis and immune cells
Ferroptosis has emerged as a promising approach in the field of tumor therapy, demonstrating significant antitumor efficacy in ferrotic tumor cells, albeit exhibiting a limited impact on certain malignant tumors. The tumor microenvironment encompasses a heterogeneous population of tumor cells and immune cells. Ferroptosis decreases the ability of immune cells, specifically T and B cells, to eliminate tumor cells, whereas inducing ferroptosis in tumor cells enhances the therapeutic potential of immunotherapy [19]. Immunotherapy and ferroptosis can therefore be combined to improve antitumor treatment. Depending on the immune microenvironment, tumors can be classified as “hot” or “cold”: hot tumors have a high number of immune T cells, while cold tumors have a low number of immune cells. In the case of “hot” tumors, the use of ferroptosis inducers as the primary therapeutic approach may result in a preferential elimination of immune cells rather than tumor cells. This selective effect can diminish the efficacy of inhibitory immune checkpoint blockers and potentially facilitate tumor progression [20]. Activating ferroptosis in “cold” tumors could enhance demise of tumors while targeting myeloid suppressor cells, Tregs, and M2-type macrophages selectively. Tumor immunotherapy can be enhanced through this process by ameliorating immunosuppressive conditions within the TME, which augments immune cell infiltration. Nanomaterials are increasingly being explored as potential mechanisms for controlling ferroptosis in tumor cells in recent years. It has been shown that this approach increases ferroptosis of tumor cells by promoting DC maturation. Combining this strategy with tumor immunotherapy has proven effective for triple-negative breast cancer, melanoma, and glioblastoma.
CD8+T cells, which serve as the primary cytotoxic cells against tumors, release IFN-γ to downregulate the expression levels of subunits SLC3A2 and SLC7A11 in the system Xc- [21]. Additionally, IFN-γ induces the binding of arachidonic acid (AA) to phospholipids on the membrane, resulting in the formation of AA-PLs by upregulating ACSL4 expression [22]. These two pathways collectively facilitate ferroptosis in tumor cells. High mobility group box-1 protein (HMGB1), phosphatidylethanolamine, and calreticulin are among damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) released by ferroptosis of tumor cells, which encourage DCs maturation and antigen presentation. By increasing the function of DCs, CD8+T cells are ultimately able to kill more tumors [23]. Moreover, DAMPs enhance immune responses against tumors by polarizing M1-type macrophages (TAMs) [24]. In contrast, ferroptosis induces PTGS2 expression, resulting in the production of PGE2 and the suppression of innate and acquired immune responses to tumors. Interestingly, cholesterol promotes the progression of CD8+T cells towards ferroptosis via fatty acid uptake via CD36, and the use of ferroptosis inducers may inhibit their activity as well [25]. Therefore, the relationship between ferroptosis and immunotherapy does not necessarily exhibit a positive regulatory effect. GPX4 depletion within the TME also causes ferroptosis, which inhibits CD8+T cell recognition and elimination of tumors. However, overexpression of GPX4 induces tumor cells to resist ferroptosis, thus diminishing its anti-tumor effects. Consequently, leveraging the inhibitory potential of ferroptosis as a supplementary approach to immunotherapy appears to be a viable strategy. In addition, Tregs may assist tumor cells in evading immune surveillance. Thus, both Treg reduction and ferroptosis promotion may enhance immunotherapy effectiveness. It is necessary to explore the relationship between Tregs and antitumor therapies in more detail [26]. GPX4 deficiency causes ferroptosis in M2 macrophages because nitric oxide synthase is not expressed. Conversely, macrophages of the M1 subtype exhibit high epitaxial expression of iNOS, leading to the release of NO with antioxidant properties, thereby reducing GPX4 dependency and susceptibility to ferroptosis. Through the STAT3 pathway, ferroptosis in tumor cells can promote fatty acid oxidation in macrophages, leading to their polarization towards the M2 subtype, which promotes tumor growth. Under high oxidative stress conditions within the tumor microenvironment, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumor cells secrete the KRAS G12D protein, which in turn stimulates fatty acid oxidation in macrophages and facilitates their polarization towards the M2-type through the STAT3 pathway [27]. The absence of the GPX4 and the use of ferroptosis inducers both lead to a reduction in M2-type macrophages and promote the repolarization of M2-type macrophages towards the M1-type [28]. AGE-mediated polarization of M2-type macrophages is observed in pancreatic cancer through excretion of KRAS-G12D by tumor cells during ferroptosis. Modulating the TME to attenuate the immune response is a crucial strategy. Moreover, DCs and NK cells are also prone to ferroptosis, which consequently confers resistance to immunotherapy in tumor cells. Activation of the SMAD pathway by macrophages through transforming growth factor β1 amplifies the vulnerability of tumor cells to ferroptosis. Additionally, ferrous tumor cells can impede the functioning of DCs, NK cells, and other immune cells by releasing lipid metabolites, thereby facilitating immune evasion. Interleukin 4 induced protein 1 (IL4I1) is an amino acid oxidase that plays a significant role in facilitating immune evasion of tumor cells through the enhancement of tryptophan metabolism [29]. Additionally, IL4I1 induces the production of indole-3-pyrubate (I3P), effectively scavenges free radicals in tumor cells, and inhibits oxidative stress and ferroptosis. Anti-PD-L1 antibody and exogenous PUFA intake have been found to effectively promote ferroptosis in tumor cells [30]. Furthermore, the interaction between ferrous tumor cells and immune cells within the TME is of great importance. Ferroptosis in tumor cells is induced through an inhibition of the transport of fatty acids from tumor cells to immune cells, as well as a promotion of immune cell regulation of ferroptosis.
Ferroptosis is hampered by the high intracellular expression of the system Xc- in MDSCs within the tumor microenvironment, coupled with the absence of the unsaturated fatty acid peroxidation pathway. Furthermore, the promotion of ferroptosis in polymorphonuclear-myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSCs) has been found to enhance T cell lipid uptake, induce ferroptosis in these cells, and suppress tumor immunity [31]. By inhibiting ferroptosis in PMNs, the transformation of immunosuppressive PMN-MDSCs can be avoided, leading to a reduction of immunosuppressive factors. Maintaining the integrity and functionality of the antioxidant pathway in anti-tumor immune cells can effectively enhance their ability to kill tumor cells. The compound NC06 has the ability to target MDSCs and induce ferroptosis through ASAH2, thereby improving the immunosuppressive environment [32]. Tumor infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) and PMN-MDSCs share similar functionalities and can facilitate tumor cell metastasis by the suppression of NK cells and effector T cells. TINs induce the up-regulation of siderophores via Acod1-dependent activation of sideroblasts and the Keap/Nrf2-associated antioxidant pathway [33]. Consequently, the inhibition or knockdown of Acod1 may synergistically enhance the effectiveness of immune checkpoint blockers by engaging a novel pathway, thereby bolstering immunotherapeutic efficacy in “hot” tumors.
Ferroptosis-mediated immunotherapy
Ferroptosis exhibits a dual nature in the context of tumor immunotherapy, as it can induce impairments in the functionality of anti-tumor immune cells, including T cells and NK cells. Conversely, it can also trigger ferroptosis in tumor cells and tumor-promoting immune cells, such as M2-type macrophages, thereby augmenting the efficacy of immunotherapeutic interventions. Tumor cells can be targeted to undergo ferroptosis, which has potential benefits for immunotherapy (Fig. 3). The utilization of PD-L1 blockers elicits the secretion of IFN-γ by CD8+T cells, leading to the inhibition of transcription and expression of SLC7A11 and SLC3A2, thereby reducing GPX4 production via the JAK1/STAT1 pathway and facilitating ferroptosis in tumor cells [34]. Additionally, IFN-γ can stimulate ACSL4 expression through the STAT1/IRF1 pathway, catalyzing PUFA promoting ferroptosis [34]. However, CD8+T cells can also assume an antioxidant role by decreasing the M1/M2 macrophage ratio and enhancing SLC3A2 expression upon binding to TYRO3, which impedes tumor cell ferroptosis and fosters tumor progression. In various studies, PD-1 resistance has been observed [35]. These studies have demonstrated that cystatase not only inhibits GSH synthesis by degrading cystine and cysteine, thereby inducing ferroptosis, but also hinders the suppressive effects of immune checkpoints, thereby enhancing the anti-tumor immune response. Thus, immunotherapy and ferroptosis therapy are a promising combination following radiation therapy for tumors. Furthermore, the inclusion of ferroptosis inducers synergistically augments the efficacy of PD-L1 blockers, which target inhibitory immune checkpoints. The SAPE-OOH signaling pathway exhibited by ferrous tumor cells can also activate TLR2 receptors or compensatory mechanisms in macrophages, thereby enhancing the phagocytic activity of macrophages [36]. However, the GPX4 inhibitor, which acts as an antioxidant, displays greater sensitivity towards CD8+T cells and CD4+T cells, leading to a preferential induction of ferroptosis in killer T cells rather than tumor cells. Tissue immunotherapy tolerance may be developed by elevated PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune T cells compared with PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. The presence of PD-1 inhibitors in the tumor microenvironment promotes the activity of CD8+T cells. However, the intricate nature of tumors also results in a constrained immune response. DCs identify and exhibit tumor-associated antigens to CD8+T cells in reaction to signals related to lipid peroxidation associated with ferroptosis. This process stimulates the secretion of IFN-γ and enhances ferroptosis in tumor cells. Remarkably, mice subjected to a combined treatment of immunotherapy and ferroptosis inducers displayed robust anti-tumor effects. The induction of ferroptosis in tumor cells holds promise as an immunotherapeutic strategy. When magnetic nanoparticles are encapsulated with RSL-3, they can be used to precisely target tumor sites through the influence of external light beams. This targeting mechanism induces redox and metabolic disturbances within tumor cells, ultimately resulting in ferroptosis. PD-L1 blockers also facilitate T-lymphocyte infiltration into the tumor, which enhances immunotherapy effectiveness [37].
It is important to note that various tumor diseases necessitate distinct therapeutic regimens due to the presence of diverse disease-inducing factors. For instance, in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma, the reduction of GPX4 proves ineffective in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation and instead leads to the impairment of anti-tumor immune cell functionality. The phenomenon can be attributed to the immunosuppressive TME shaped by MDSCs. Ferroptosis inducers and HMGB1 blockers can effectively suppress the growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. By targeting the inhibition of PGAM1, the AKT/LCN2 pathway is inhibited, leading to the promotion of ferroptosis through the accumulation of intracellular ROS. Additionally, PGAM1 inhibits PD-L1, enhancing the immune response against tumors [38]. Furthermore, the inhibition of APOC1 expression promotes ferroptosis in M2-type macrophages and induces their repolarization towards M1 macrophages. Within the tumor microenvironment, APOC1 expression is positively correlated with CD8+T cells and NK cells that are anti-tumor immune cells. Through the inhibition of immune checkpoint blockers, APOC1 further modifies the immune microenvironment, improving the effectiveness of anti-tumor immunotherapy. Poor prognosis is associated with low APOL3 expression in colorectal cancer. APOL3 plays a role in the ubiquitination of LDHA, thereby increasing tumor cell sensitivity to the ferroptosis-inducing protein RSL3. Additionally, the APOL3-LDHA pathway facilitates the expression of IFN-γ, thereby augmenting anti-tumor immunity [39]. The promotion of FBXO10 protein transcription and expression, the induction of ACSL4 degradation, the inhibition of ferroptosis are facilitated by the PKC pathway through the action of CYP1B1-derived 20-HETE. The combination of CYP1B1 inhibition and inhibitory immune checkpoint blockers effectively enhances anti-tumor immunotherapy. Upon the failure of immunotherapy, the ANO1 gene is upregulated, activating the PI3K-Akt pathway, resulting in the expression of NRF2/SLC7A11 proteins and inhibiting oxidative stress in tumor cells. Furthermore, ANO1 has been shown to stimulate the expression of TGF-β, facilitate the aggregation of tumor-associated fibroblasts, suppress the immunoreactivity of CD8+T cells, and decrease the secretion of TNF-α, granzyme B, and IFN-γ. Proliferation and metastasis of tumors are ultimately accelerated by these effects. In the context of bladder cancer, the mitochondria-targeting drug BQR liposome (BQR@MLipo) specifically targets the mitochondria of tumor cells. This targeted approach leads to the release of buchinha, which inhibits the activity of the mitochondria-specific antioxidant DHODH. Consequently, lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis are induced. This information was reported in a study [40]. Moreover, the liberation of mitochondrial DNA (MtDNA) alongside DAMPs like ATP triggers the initiation of the cGAS-STING pathway and associates with the receptors found on diverse antigen-presenting cells. This process amplifies the recognition and presentation of antigens by DCs and macrophages. In the context of brain cell tumors, the coadministration of ferroptosis inhibitors and inhibitory immune checkpoint blockers diminishes the infiltration of TAMs and fosters the repolarization of macrophages towards the M1 phenotype. Consequently, this intervention augments the infiltration of tumors and enhances the cytotoxic potential of CD8+T cells [41]. KEAP1 is specifically methylated by protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) in triple-negative breast cancer cells, inhibiting intracellular iron transport. In the context of immunotherapy for TNBC, the combination of PRMT5-targeted inhibitors could effectively enhance the induction of ferroptosis in TNBC by CD8+T cells, thereby promoting cell death [42]. Similarly, in prostate cancer cells, the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L (HnRNP L) induces the stable expression of YY1, which in turn upregulates the production of PD-L1. There is an inverse relationship between upregulation of PD-L1 expression and PD-L1 expression itself. Inhibition of HnRNP L promotes anti-tumor immune function and CD8+T cell-induced ferroptosis of tumor cells.
Combination of ferroptosis inducers and immunotherapeutic agents
Ferroptosis inducers (concomitant immunotherapy)
Tumor cell ferroptosis can be induced by ferroptosis inducers through various pathways, and the activation of ferroptosis-based TME immune responses can occur through multiple pathways as well. Additionally, the immune response can further augment tumor cell ferroptosis through positive feedback, thereby reinforcing the efficacy of ferroptosis inducers. Ferroptosis inducers have demonstrated efficacy in producing anti-tumor effects in various types of cancers, including TNBC, melanoma, glioblastoma, as evidenced by the findings presented in Table 1. Specifically, in the case of bladder cancer, the use of BQR@MLipo has been shown to effectively target and inhibit DHODH activity, leading to mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and subsequent induction of ferroptosis in bladder cancer cells. Through the cGAS-STING pathway, DAMPs, such as calreticulin, ATP, and HMGB1, promote DCs and macrophages’ recognition of tumor antigens and facilitate the infiltration of CD8+T cells into tumors, thereby stimulating tumor immunity [40]. The administration of COF-919 induces ferroptosis in TNBC by promoting the accumulation of ROS and lipid peroxidation, while simultaneously reducing GSH and GPX4 expression. TME immunosuppression is improved with DAMPs since they induce DC maturation and CD8+T cell infiltration into tumors, suppress Treg and MDSC activity, and suppress M2-type macrophage function [43]. Additionally, PAMAM not only affects the function of GPX4, but also inhibits the expression of FSP1, thereby inducing ferroptosis [44]. MTX-LDH@MnO2 induces ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4 and BH4 expression [45]. Similarly, FeGd-HN@TA-Fe2+-SN38 nanoparticles have been shown to induce the Fenton reaction and endoplasmic reticulum stress in tumor cells, leading to lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis. Additionally, the release of exosomes containing damaged DNA has been found to induce DCs maturation through the cGAMP-STING-TBK1 pathway, while the secretion of IFN-β activates CD8+T cells, resulting in the release of IFN-γ and subsequent inhibition of GSH and GPX4 expression in tumor cells [46]. Furthermore, the compound TCPP-TK-PEGPAMAM-FA has been shown to stimulate lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis in tumor cells by inhibiting the HIF-1α pathway and subsequent endogenous lipid droplet biosynthesis [47]. In osteosarcoma, however, Cu/ZIF-8@U-104@siNFS1-HA induces ferroptosis in tumor cells, resulting in the polarization of macrophages to the M1 type and enhanced immune response against tumors [48]. In the case of melanoma, the compound TPL@TFBF, which does not rely on GPX4, induces tumor cell ferroptosis through the NRF2 pathway, thereby promoting immune responses and inhibiting tumor proliferation and metastasis [49]. The metal-phenolic networks nanoplatform exhibits dual functionality by inducing ferroptosis in tumor cells and inhibiting PD-L1 expression, thereby enhancing anti-tumor immune responses [50]. Nevertheless, ferroptosis inducers may negatively affect normal cells as well as antitumor immune cells within the TME, resulting in reduced effectiveness. To elucidate how these drugs target tumor cells in the TME, further investigation is needed. Additionally, future studies should explore the possibility of enhancing the precision targeting of ferroptosis inducers to tumor cells through the use of dual material coating. The initial substance facilitates the discharge of the ferroptosis inducer within the TME, whereas the subsequent substance facilitates the discharge of the ferroptosis inducer within the tumor cells via the tumor antigen, thereby mitigating the deleterious impact of the ferroptosis inducer on non-tumor cells.
Immunotherapeutic drugs (accompanied by ferroptosis of tumor cells)
Immunotherapeutic medications have the potential to enhance tumor cell ferroptosis by stimulating immune cell activation and releasing substances, such as IFN-γ, to impede the antioxidant function of tumor cells. As a result of using S-biAb/dEGCG@NPs in glioblastoma, CD8+T-cells were infiltrated into the TME. This led to the release of IFN-γ, which effectively inhibited the expression of SLC3A2 and SLC7A11 in tumor cells. Consequently, there was a reduction in the levels of GSH and GPX4, ultimately promoting ferroptosis [72]. Conversely, in hepatocellular carcinoma, the application of CH-OD-SSZ hydrogel triggered the release of chemokines, including NLRP3, IL-1β, and TNF-α, via the MAPK pathway. During this process, M1-type macrophages polarized and DCs within the TAM population matured. Collectively, these events facilitated immune responses within tumor cells and had the potential to induce immunogenic ferroptosis [73]. There is evidence that immunotherapeutic medications facilitate the ability of immune cells to infiltrate tumors, and the combination of inhibitory immune checkpoint inhibitors also enhances the antitumor effects. Immunotherapeutic drugs solely necessitate targeting the TME rather than anti-tumor immune cells, thereby diminishing the intricacy and expense of drug manufacturing while concurrently heightening drug safety.
Combination of immunotherapeutic agents and ferroptosis inducers
The concurrent utilization of immunotherapeutic drugs and ferroptosis inducers demonstrates a synergistic impact on suppressing tumor growth. This effect is achieved through the induction of ferroptosis via diverse pathways and the activation of immune responses through distinct mechanisms. This combined approach has exhibited efficacy in various types of cancer, including melanoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and TNBC (Table 2). In the case of colon cancer, the application of Fish oil-based microemulsion has been observed to obstruct the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, augment the infiltration of CD8+T cells within the TME, and stimulate the release of IFN-γ, thereby promoting the induction of ferroptosis in tumor cells. On the contrary, the administration of fish oil results in an excessive accumulation of PUFA in tumor cells, thereby facilitating ferroptosis. The immune response triggers ferroptosis in tumor cells, while tumor cell ferroptosis reciprocally enhances the immune response, thereby synergistically augmenting the antitumor efficacy [74]. In the context of TNBC, the utilization of MOF@GOx@MnO2@PEG: MGMP could induce tumor cell ferroptosis by suppressing the expression of tumor cell GSH and GPX4. Additionally, PD-L1 antibodies can strengthen the immune response and exert anti-tumor effects [75]. A hybrid nanoparticle, siProminin2@PSN-FeNP, increases the immune response against tumors by working with oxaliplatin to reduce iron efflux from tumor cells, thus enhancing ferroptosis. Melanoma cells were shown to undergo ferroptosis through the Keap1-NRF2-heme oxygenase 1 (Hmox1) pathway when Gel@WA-cRGD inhibited GSH and GPX4 expression. Additionally, the combination of PD-L1 has been observed to augment the antitumor effect [76]. Moreover, fe@OVA-IR820 has been found to synergistically exert an antitumor effect when combined with CTLA-4 antibody [77]. The variation in tumor types and TME necessitates the identification of rational and stable therapeutic formulations for different types of tumors when utilizing a combination of ferroptosis inducers and immunotherapeutic agents. Additionally, it is crucial to exercise caution in order to prevent the impairment of antitumor immune cells by ferroptosis-inducing agents, as this may hinder the efficacy of immunotherapeutic drugs.
Summary and prospects
Over the past three years, researches have predominantly focused on the utilization of combined anti-tumor therapy involving ferroptosis therapy and immunotherapy. The main goal of this approach is to induce ferroptosis in tumor cells, resulting in the release of DAMPs from the cells. DAMPs stimulate DCs maturation and promote CD8+T cell and NK cell antitumor responses through antigen presentation. Further, CD8+T cells can be enhanced to recognize tumor cells with the implementation of inhibitory immune checkpoint blockers. This comprehensive strategy has exhibited significant efficacy in suppressing tumor development across a diverse range of oncology experiments. Ferroptosis induction in anti-tumor immune cells remains to be determined when high concentrations of ferroptosis inducers are introduced. This phenomenon could potentially result in diminished therapeutic effectiveness, necessitating higher drug dosages and potentially causing adverse effects. Therefore, further advancements are required to enhance the precision of ferroptosis inducers in targeting tumor cells. Future research should focus on the development of tumor cell therapy strategies that specifically enhance the functionality of anti-tumor immune cells within the TME, while also coordinating the stimulation of tumor-promoting cells and inducing ferroptosis in tumor cells. By inhibiting diverse negative feedback mechanisms within the TME, immune cells cannot initiate ferroptosis via cytokines and other signaling pathways after tumor cells have ferroptosed. Tumor-specific antigens can serve as binding sites for ferroptosis inducers, enabling precise targeting of tumor cells, with the release of ferroptosis inducers occurring exclusively upon phagocytosis by tumor cells. This approach holds promise for enhancing therapeutic targeting efficacy while minimizing undesirable side effects. Furthermore, the induction of ferroptosis has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing the immunosuppressive state within the TME. Consequently, the integration of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) or T cell receptor-gene engineered T cells (TCR-T) therapies with ferroptosis inducers presents a promising therapeutic approach. Moreover, the implementation of gene editing technology can mitigate T-cell sensitivity to ferroptosis and minimize the interference of ferroptosis inducers with the immune response. Notably, the mechanism by which NK cells act upon tumors differs from that of T cells, thus highlighting the potential value of exploring CAR-NK cell therapies in diverse TMEs. The efficacy of tumor therapy relies on the enduring presence of immune cells and their consistent ability to eliminate tumor cells. TME can vary significantly among individuals, necessitating the development of distinct therapeutic protocols tailored to specific TME. These protocols aim to enhance immune responses and establish highly effective and enduring therapeutic strategies, which constitute the fundamental principles of antitumor therapy.
With the rapid advancement of analytical technologies, the utilization of high-resolution techniques such as spatial histology has enabled a deeper understanding of the intricate interactions occurring within TME. This includes elucidating the coordination between tumor cell ferroptosis and immune cell therapy, which collectively contribute to the exertion of antitumor effects. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) represent the most prevalent component of the TME, which is made up of tumor cells, immune cells, and fibroblasts. Due to metabolic demands, both tumor cells and CAFs release lactate, resulting in a weakly acidic environment (pH 5.5–6.6) within the TME. Lactate, a significant carbon source utilized for lipid synthesis, plays a crucial role in the promotion of MUFA production and the inhibition of ACSL4 through the hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 1 (HCAR1)/ monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1)- sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP1)- stearyl coA desaturase 1 (SCD1) pathway, thereby inhibiting the ferroptosis in tumor cells. The CAF also induces ferroptosis in NK cells and facilitates tumor cells’ resistance to immune response. Firstly, the up-regulation of iron regulatory genes, such as ferritin 1 and heparin, in CAFs enhances the efflux of iron ions to NK cells. Secondly, CAFs stimulate the expression of NCOA4 in NK cells via follicle suppressor-like protein 1 (FSTL1), leading to ferritin autophagy and subsequent ferroptosis in NK cells. CAFs have been found to exert their protective effects on tumor cells by targeting arachidonate-15-lipoxygenase (ALOX15) and releasing cysteine and GSH to counteract oxidative stress and ferroptosis.
Autophagy plays a crucial role in cell survival and the regulation of iron homeostasis. In the context of pancreatic cancer, autophagy facilitates the secretion of IL-6 from tumor cells, up-regulates FPN expression in CAF, leading to enhanced iron efflux, and subsequently increases the synthesis of LIP and ISC in tumor cells. This process also promotes the expression of succinate dehydrogenase complex iron sulfur subunit B (SDHB), thereby improving mitochondrial function and supporting tumor development. Conversely, in conditions of autophagy deficiency, reduced levels of LIP result in decreased SDHB expression and compromised mitochondrial function. Iron supplementation or ectopic expression of SDHB or ISC assembly 1 (ISCA1) can improve mitochondrial defects and promote tumour progression [88]. Furthermore, the degradation of FPN autophagy through the selective autophagy receptor nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4) leads to the release of iron, which helps maintain the LIP in the cytosol and supports the synthesis of ISC proteins to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis. In pancreatic cancer, the upregulation of ferritin autophagy mediated by NCOA4 enhances iron metabolism and promotes tumour growth [89]. However, elevated Fe2+ may also promote ferroptosis in tumour cells to exert anti-tumour effects. Suppression of autophagy-related genes ATG5 and ATG7 has been shown to decrease intracellular Fe2+ levels and attenuate ferroptosis. The interplay between autophagy and ferroptosis represents a promising avenue for future investigation. Cuproptosis, a recently proposed phenomenon in 2022, is distinguished by the copper-dependent accumulation of lipoylated proteins and represents a novel regulated mechanism of cellular demise. Intracellularly, GSH effectively chelates copper ions, thereby mitigating cuproptosis, while concurrently inhibiting lipid peroxidation to attenuate ferroptosis. GSH within cells serves as a pivotal focal point for intercommunication between ferroptosis and cuproptosis, as the depletion of GSH induced by ferroptosis or the GSH complexation reaction during cuproptosis fosters an amplifying effect on the alternate cell death process. As an example, inhibiting GSH synthesis and ferredoxin 1 degradation facilitates the accumulation of lipoylated proteins and cuproptosis by inducing ferroptosis. The concurrent utilization of both mechanisms of cell death could be contemplated as a means to augment the eradication of tumor cells. Alternatively, it is worth investigating whether tumor cells that are unresponsive to ferroptosis can be targeted using cuproptosis, and vice versa.
It is equally important to understand the significance of the “stimulus responsiveness” of the TME along with the synergistic potential of ferroptosis and immunotherapy. Addressing the specific targeting of the TME and mitigating systemic toxicities are imperative considerations in antitumor therapy. Conventional chemotherapy lacks precise tumor targeting, leading to indiscriminate cell death in both malignant and healthy cells. Conversely, the utilization of specialized nanomaterials exhibits a targeted effect on the TME, thereby circumventing adverse effects on normal cells and minimizing the impact on patients’ prognoses. The acidic microenvironment (approximately pH 5.5) resulting from the heightened metabolic activity of tumors facilitates the degradation or cleavage of nanomaterials sensitive to pH. This process enables the release of tumor therapeutic drugs such as Fe2+, cisplatin, adriamycin, and artemisinin, among others, thereby enhancing the efficacy of tumor therapy. It is important to highlight that the acidity in normal cellular lysosomes (pH approximately 4.5) surpasses that of the TME. Consequently, the pH sensitivity of nanomaterials must be carefully regulated during their design. The requirements for drug release from nanomaterials must adhere to two specific criteria: firstly, they must align with the acidic range commonly found in TME, while simultaneously excluding the acidic range present in normal cellular and lysosomal environments. Additionally, the elevated levels of ROS in tumor cells can be targeted by nanomaterials. The ROS-induced cleavage of chemical double bonds facilitates the release of antitumor drugs, such as GSH scavengers, diethyl maleate (DEM), and monocarboxylic acid transporter 4, which in turn inhibit siRNAs. In the context of increased levels of ROS, GSH is also elevated to preserve the equilibrium within the TME. Various materials, including cancer cell membrane-coated nanocarriers and pyrite nanoenzymes constructed from metal-organic frameworks and glucose oxidase (GOX), have the ability to release antitumor drugs such as cinnamaldehyde and irons in response to elevated GSH levels. Insufficient blood supply and disrupted vasculature resulting in a high metabolic rate contribute to the development of hypoxic conditions within the TME. Nanocarriers incorporating azobenzene linkers have the capability to liberate antitumor drugs, including GSH scavengers, sorafenib, and ferritin, in hypoxic environments. It is important to acknowledge that the effective delivery of these nanomaterials to tumors necessitates circumventing specific circumstances, such as acidic conditions in the skin, heightened ROS levels resulting from other diseases, increased GSH due to liver proliferation, and cellular hypoxia in diverse conditions. Furthermore, it is imperative to acquire a more extensive and intricate comprehension of the stage-specific metabolic mechanisms exhibited by distinct tumors. This knowledge is crucial in order to ascertain the optimal selection of nanomaterials and ensure that the drugs encapsulated within them can effectively target the tumor microenvironment, ultimately leading to the efficient eradication of malignant cells.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR et al (2012) Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell 149:1060–1072
Stockwell BR (2022) Ferroptosis turns 10: emerging mechanisms, physiological functions, and therapeutic applications. Cell 185:2401–2421
Liang D, Feng Y, Zandkarimi F et al (2023) Ferroptosis surveillance independent of GPX4 and differentially regulated by sex hormones. Cell 186:2748–2764e2722
Pavlova NN, Thompson CB (2016) The emerging Hallmarks of Cancer Metabolism. Cell Metabol 23:27–47
Sun S, Shen J, Jiang J, Wang F, Min J (2023) Targeting ferroptosis opens new avenues for the development of novel therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Therapy 8:372
Balihodzic A, Prinz F, Dengler MA, Calin GA, Jost PJ, Pichler M (2022) Non-coding RNAs and ferroptosis: potential implications for cancer therapy. Cell Death Differ 29:1094–1106
Liao P, Wang W, Wang W et al (2022) CD8(+) T cells and fatty acids orchestrate tumor ferroptosis and immunity via ACSL4. Cancer Cell 40:365–378e366
Wang Y, Zhang H, Liu C et al (2022) Immune checkpoint modulators in cancer immunotherapy: recent advances and emerging concepts. J Hematol Oncol 15:111
VanderWalde A, Bellasea SL, Kendra KL et al (2023) Ipilimumab with or without nivolumab in PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade refractory metastatic melanoma: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nat Med 29:2278–2285
Costa I, Barbosa DJ, Benfeito S et al (2023) Molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis and their involvement in brain diseases. Pharmacol Ther 244:108373
Yu J, Zhong B, Zhao L et al (2023) Fighting drug-resistant lung cancer by induction of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1)-mediated ferroptosis. Drug Resist Updates: Reviews Commentaries Antimicrob Anticancer Chemother 70:100977
Yuan Y, Xu J, Jiang Q et al (2024) Ficolin 3 promotes ferroptosis in HCC by downregulating IR/SREBP axis-mediated MUFA synthesis. J Experimental Clin cancer Research: CR 43:133
Zhou Q, Meng Y, Li D et al (2024) Ferroptosis in cancer: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Signal Transduct Target Therapy 9:55
Cheng C, Amos CI (2022) A refined use of mutations to guide immunotherapy decisions. Nature 612:639–641
de Visser KE, Joyce JA (2023) The evolving tumor microenvironment: from cancer initiation to metastatic outgrowth. Cancer Cell 41:374–403
Zhang J, Huang D, Saw PE, Song E (2022) Turning cold tumors hot: from molecular mechanisms to clinical applications. Trends Immunol 43:523–545
Ullman NA, Burchard PR, Dunne RF, Linehan DC (2022) Immunologic strategies in pancreatic Cancer: making Cold tumors Hot. J Clin Oncology: Official J Am Soc Clin Oncol 40:2789–2805
Fenton GA, Mitchell DA (2023) Cellular Cancer Immunotherapy Development and Manufacturing in the clinic. Clin cancer Research: Official J Am Association Cancer Res 29:843–857
Yang F, Xiao Y, Ding JH et al (2023) Ferroptosis heterogeneity in triple-negative breast cancer reveals an innovative immunotherapy combination strategy. Cell Metabol 35:84–100e108
Gao W, Wang X, Zhou Y, Wang X, Yu Y (2022) Autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in tumor immunotherapy. Signal Transduct Target Therapy 7:196
Zhou X, Zou L, Liao H et al (2022) Abrogation of HnRNP L enhances anti-PD-1 therapy efficacy via diminishing PD-L1 and promoting CD8(+) T cell-mediated ferroptosis in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Acta Pharm Sinica B 12:692–707
Liu Y, Niu R, Deng R, Song S, Wang Y, Zhang H (2023) Multi-enzyme co-expressed dual-atom nanozymes induce Cascade Immunogenic Ferroptosis via activating Interferon-γ and Targeting Arachidonic Acid Metabolism. J Am Chem Soc 145:8965–8978
Zhu MY, Wang T, Wang HD et al (2023) LW-213 induces immunogenic tumor cell death via ER stress mediated by lysosomal TRPML1. Cancer Lett 577:216435
Huang C, Lin B, Chen C et al (2022) Synergistic Reinforcing of Immunogenic Cell Death and Transforming Tumor-Associated Macrophages Via a Multifunctional Cascade Bioreactor for Optimizing Cancer Immunotherapy. Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla) 34:e2207593
Ma X, Xiao L, Liu L et al (2021) CD36-mediated ferroptosis dampens intratumoral CD8(+) T cell effector function and impairs their antitumor ability. Cell Metabol 33:1001–1012e1005
Hu S, Ma J, Su C et al (2021) Engineered exosome-like nanovesicles suppress tumor growth by reprogramming tumor microenvironment and promoting tumor ferroptosis. Acta Biomater 135:567–581
Li H, Yang P, Wang J et al (2022) HLF regulates ferroptosis, development and chemoresistance of triple-negative breast cancer by activating tumor cell-macrophage crosstalk. J Hematol Oncol 15:2
Tang B, Zhu J, Wang Y et al (2023) Targeted xCT-mediated ferroptosis and Protumoral polarization of Macrophages is effective against HCC and enhances the efficacy of the Anti-PD-1/L1 response. Adv Sci (Weinheim Baden-Wurttemberg Germany) 10:e2203973
Ye F, Wang L, Li Y, Dong C, Zhou L, Xu J (2023) IL4I1 in M2-like macrophage promotes glioma progression and is a promising target for immunotherapy. Front Immunol 14:1338244
Xiang W, Lv H, Xing F et al (2023) Inhibition of ACLY overcomes cancer immunotherapy resistance via polyunsaturated fatty acids peroxidation and cGAS-STING activation. Sci Adv 9:eadi2465
van Vlerken-Ysla L, Tyurina YY, Kagan VE, Gabrilovich DI (2023) Functional states of myeloid cells in cancer. Cancer Cell 41:490–504
Zhu H, Klement JD, Lu C et al (2021) Asah2 Represses the p53-Hmox1 Axis to Protect Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells from Ferroptosis. Journal of immunology (Baltimore) 206:1395–1404
Zhao Y, Liu Z, Liu G et al (2023) Neutrophils resist ferroptosis and promote breast cancer metastasis through aconitate decarboxylase 1. Cell Metabol 35:1688–1703e1610
Cao T, Zhou J, Liu Q et al (2023) Interferon-γ induces salivary gland epithelial cell ferroptosis in Sjogren’s syndrome via JAK/STAT1-mediated inhibition of system Xc(). Free Radic Biol Med 205:116–128
Jiang Z, Lim SO, Yan M et al (2021) TYRO3 induces anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy resistance by limiting innate immunity and tumoral ferroptosis. J Clin Investig 131
Luo X, Gong HB, Gao HY et al (2021) Oxygenated phosphatidylethanolamine navigates phagocytosis of ferroptotic cells by interacting with TLR2. Cell Death Differ 28:1971–1989
Wang Y, Chen F, Zhou H et al (2023) Redox Dyshomeostasis with Dual Stimuli-Activatable Dihydroartemisinin Nanoparticles to Potentiate Ferroptotic Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer. Small Methods 7:e2200888
Zheng Y, Wang Y, Lu Z et al (2023) PGAM1 inhibition promotes HCC Ferroptosis and synergizes with Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy. Adv Sci (Weinheim Baden-Wurttemberg Germany) 10:e2301928
Lv Y, Tang W, Xu Y et al (2023) Apolipoprotein L3 enhances CD8 + T cell antitumor immunity of colorectal cancer by promoting LDHA-mediated ferroptosis. Int J Biol Sci 19:1284–1298
Ding Q, Tang W, Li X et al (2023) Mitochondrial-targeted brequinar liposome boosted mitochondrial-related ferroptosis for promoting checkpoint blockade immunotherapy in bladder cancer. J Controlled Release: Official J Controlled Release Soc 363:221–234
Jiang Y, Zhao J, Li R et al (2022) CircLRFN5 inhibits the progression of glioblastoma via PRRX2/GCH1 mediated ferroptosis. J Experimental Clin cancer Research: CR 41:307
Wang Z, Li R, Hou N et al (2023) PRMT5 reduces immunotherapy efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer by methylating KEAP1 and inhibiting ferroptosis. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 11
Zhang L, Song A, Yang QC et al (2023) Integration of AIEgens into covalent organic frameworks for pyroptosis and ferroptosis primed cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun 14:5355
Zhou Y, Chen K, Lin WK et al (2023) Photo-enhanced synergistic induction of ferroptosis for Anti-cancer Immunotherapy. Adv Healthc Mater 12:e2300994
Liu Z, Kang R, Yang N et al (2024) Tetrahydrobiopterin inhibitor-based antioxidant metabolic strategy for enhanced cancer ferroptosis-immunotherapy. J Colloid Interface Sci 658:100–113
Guo S, Xiong W, Zhu J et al (2023) A STING pathway-activatable contrast agent for MRI-guided tumor immunoferroptosis synergistic therapy. Biomaterials 302:122300
Zhang Q, Wang X, Zhao Y et al (2023) Nanointegrative in situ reprogramming of Tumor-intrinsic lipid Droplet Biogenesis for Low-Dose Radiation-activated ferroptosis immunotherapy. ACS Nano 17:25419–25438
Wang Z, Zhou P, Li Y et al (2023) A Bimetallic Polymerization Network for Effective Increase in Labile Iron Pool and Robust Activation of cGAS/STING Induces Ferroptosis-Based Tumor Immunotherapy. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany):e2308397
Wang S, Guo Q, Xu R, Lin P, Deng G, Xia X (2023) Combination of ferroptosis and pyroptosis dual induction by triptolide nano-MOFs for immunotherapy of Melanoma. J Nanobiotechnol 21:383
Liu P, Shi X, Peng Y, Hu J, Ding J, Zhou W (2022) Anti-PD-L1 DNAzyme Loaded Photothermal Mn(2+) /Fe(3+) hybrid metal-phenolic networks for cyclically amplified Tumor ferroptosis-immunotherapy. Adv Healthc Mater 11:e2102315
Wang WJ, Ling YY, Zhong YM, Li ZY, Tan CP, Mao ZW (2022) Ferroptosis-enhanced Cancer immunity by a ferrocene-appended Iridium(III) Diphosphine Complex. Angewandte Chemie (International ed English) 61:e202115247
Han W, Duan X, Ni K, Li Y, Chan C, Lin W (2022) Co-delivery of dihydroartemisinin and pyropheophorbide-iron elicits ferroptosis to potentiate cancer immunotherapy. Biomaterials 280:121315
Li LG, Yang XX, Xu HZ et al (2023) A dihydroartemisinin-loaded Nanoreactor motivates Anti-cancer Immunotherapy by Synergy-Induced ferroptosis to Activate Cgas/STING for Reprogramming of Macrophage. Adv Healthc Mater 12:e2301561
Han N, Yang ZY, Xie ZX et al (2023) Dihydroartemisinin elicits immunogenic death through ferroptosis-triggered ER stress and DNA damage for lung cancer immunotherapy. Phytomedicine: Int J Phytotherapy Phytopharmacology 112:154682
Liang JL, Jin XK, Zhang SM et al (2023) Specific activation of cGAS-STING pathway by nanotherapeutics-mediated ferroptosis evoked endogenous signaling for boosting systemic tumor immunotherapy. Sci Bull 68:622–636
Xie B, Zhao H, Ding YF et al (2023) Supramolecularly Engineered Conjugate of Bacteria and cell membrane-coated magnetic nanoparticles for enhanced ferroptosis and immunotherapy of tumors. Adv Sci (Weinheim Baden-Wurttemberg Germany) 10:e2304407
Song WF, Zeng JY, Ji P, Han ZY, Sun YX, Zhang XZ (2023) Self-assembled copper-based nanoparticles for glutathione activated and enzymatic Cascade-enhanced ferroptosis and immunotherapy in Cancer Treatment. Small 19:e2301148
Yu Y, Huang Z, Chen Q et al (2022) Iron-based nanoscale coordination polymers synergistically induce immunogenic ferroptosis by blocking dihydrofolate reductase for cancer immunotherapy. Biomaterials 288:121724
Li K, Xu K, He Y et al (2023) Oxygen Self-Generating Nanoreactor mediated ferroptosis activation and immunotherapy in Triple-negative breast Cancer. ACS Nano 17:4667–4687
Xie L, Li J, Wang G et al (2022) Phototheranostic metal-phenolic networks with antiexosomal PD-L1 enhanced ferroptosis for synergistic immunotherapy. J Am Chem Soc 144:787–797
Lei L, Dong Z, Xu L et al (2022) Metal-fluorouracil networks with disruption of mitochondrion enhanced ferroptosis for synergistic immune activation. Theranostics 12:6207–6222
Pei Z, Lei H, Wu J et al (2023) Bioactive vanadium disulfide nanostructure with dual Antitumor effects of Vanadate and Gas for Immune-Checkpoint blockade-enhanced Cancer Immunotherapy. ACS Nano 17:17105–17121
Ruan Y, Zhuang H, Zeng X et al (2023) Engineered Microbial Nanohybrids for Tumor-Mediated NIR II Photothermal Enhanced Ferroptosis/Cuproptosis and Immunotherapy. Advanced healthcare materials:e2302537
Deng X, Liu T, Zhu Y et al (2024) Ca & mn dual-ion hybrid nanostimulator boosting anti-tumor immunity via ferroptosis and innate immunity awakening. Bioactive Mater 33:483–496
Wang H, Guan Y, Li C et al (2023) PEGylated manganese-zinc Ferrite nanocrystals combined with Intratumoral Implantation of micromagnets enabled synergetic prostate Cancer Therapy via Ferroptotic and Immunogenic Cell Death. Small 19:e2207077
Yu K, Chen Y, Zhang L et al (2023) Cancer-Erythrocyte membrane-mimicking Fe(3)O(4) Nanoparticles and DHJS for Ferroptosis/Immunotherapy synergism in tumors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:44689–44710
Chen M, Shen Y, Pu Y et al (2023) Biomimetic inducer enabled dual ferroptosis of tumor and M2-type macrophages for enhanced tumor immunotherapy. Biomaterials 303:122386
Liu B, Ji Q, Cheng Y et al (2022) Biomimetic GBM-targeted drug delivery system boosting ferroptosis for immunotherapy of orthotopic drug-resistant GBM. J Nanobiotechnol 20:161
Yang N, Pan X, Zhou X et al (2023) Biomimetic Nanoarchitectonics with Chitosan Nanogels for Collaborative Induction of Ferroptosis and Anticancer Immunity for Cancer Therapy. Advanced healthcare materials:e2302752
Yang Q, Liu T, Zheng H et al (2023) A nanoformulation for immunosuppression reversal and broad-spectrum self-amplifying antitumor ferroptosis-immunotherapy. Biomaterials 292:121936
Liu J, Zhan J, Zhang Y et al (2023) Ultrathin clay nanoparticles-mediated mutual reinforcement of ferroptosis and Cancer immunotherapy. Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla, p e2309562
Fan R, Chen C, Mu M et al (2023) Engineering MMP-2 activated nanoparticles carrying B7-H3 bispecific antibodies for ferroptosis-enhanced Glioblastoma Immunotherapy. ACS Nano 17:9126–9139
Meng J, Yang X, Huang J et al (2023) Ferroptosis-Enhanced Immunotherapy with an Injectable Dextran-Chitosan Hydrogel for the Treatment of Malignant Ascites in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Advanced Science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) 10:e2300517
Yang X, Li W, Li S et al (2023) Fish oil-based microemulsion can efficiently deliver oral peptide blocking PD-1/PD-L1 and simultaneously induce ferroptosis for cancer immunotherapy. J Controlled Release: Official J Controlled Release Soc 365:654–667
Zhang K, Ma Z, Li S et al (2022) Disruption of dual homeostasis by a metal-organic framework nanoreactor for ferroptosis-based immunotherapy of tumor. Biomaterials 284:121502
Cheng Z, Xue C, Liu M et al (2023) Injectable microenvironment-responsive hydrogels with redox-activatable supramolecular prodrugs mediate ferroptosis-immunotherapy for postoperative tumor treatment. Acta Biomater 169:289–305
Ma S, Liang X, Yang N et al (2023) Boosting cancer immunotherapy by biomineralized nanovaccine with ferroptosis-inducing and photothermal properties. Biomaterials Sci 11:518–532
Shi W, Feng W, Li S et al (2023) Ferroptosis and necroptosis produced autologous tumor cell lysates co-delivering with combined immnoadjuvants as Personalized in situ nanovaccines for Antitumor Immunity. ACS Nano 17:14475–14493
Ling YY, Wang WJ, Hao L et al (2022) Self-amplifying Iridium(III) photosensitizer for ferroptosis-mediated immunotherapy against transferrin receptor-overexpressing Cancer. Small 18:e2203659
Wang Y, Chen Q, Song H et al (2022) A Triple Therapeutic Strategy with Antiexosomal Iron Efflux for enhanced ferroptosis therapy and immunotherapy. Small 18:e2201704
Dai X, Zhang J, Bao X et al (2023) Induction of Tumor ferroptosis-dependent immunity via an Injectable Attractive Pickering Emulsion Gel. Adv Mater (Deerfield Beach Fla) 35:e2303542
Chin YC, Yang LX, Hsu FT et al (2022) Iron oxide@chlorophyll clustered nanoparticles eliminate bladder cancer by photodynamic immunotherapy-initiated ferroptosis and immunostimulation. J Nanobiotechnol 20:373
Guo W, Wu Z, Chen J et al (2022) Nanoparticle delivery of mir-21-3p sensitizes melanoma to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy by promoting ferroptosis. J Immunother Cancer 10
Hou G, Qian J, Wang Y et al (2023) Hydrazide/Metal/Indocyanine Green Coordinated Nanoplatform for Potentiating reciprocal ferroptosis and immunity against Melanoma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:37143–37156
Lei H, Li Q, Pei Z, Liu L, Yang N, Cheng L (2023) Nonferrous Ferroptosis Inducer Manganese Molybdate nanoparticles to enhance Tumor Immunotherapy. Small 19:e2303438
Bao Y, Li G, Li S et al (2023) Multifunctional tumor-targeting Carbon dots for Tumor Microenvironment activated ferroptosis and immunotherapy in Cancer Treatment. ACS applied materials & interfaces
Li Q, Su R, Bao X et al (2022) Glycyrrhetinic acid nanoparticles combined with ferrotherapy for improved cancer immunotherapy. Acta Biomater 144:109–120
Mukhopadhyay S, Encarnación-Rosado J, Lin EY et al (2023) Autophagy supports mitochondrial metabolism through the regulation of iron homeostasis in pancreatic cancer. Sci Adv 9:eadf9284
Santana-Codina N, Del Rey MQ, Kapner KS et al (2022) NCOA4-Mediated ferritinophagy is a pancreatic Cancer dependency via maintenance of Iron Bioavailability for Iron-Sulfur Cluster proteins. Cancer Discov 12:2180–2197
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by Major Project of Henan Province (221100310400); Collaborative Innovation Center ofResearch and Development on the Whole Industry Chain of Yu-Yao, Henan Province (Henan Science and Technology (2023) No. 175); Key Project of International Cooperation of Henan Province (231111521200); Qihuang Scholars (Letter of the National Humanist Education of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2022-6)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zhiguo Mao and Yilong Hu equally contributed to the conception and design of the research; Mingsan Miao contributed to the design of the research; Mingsan Miao, Yinan Zhao, Xiaolei Zhang, Lin Guo, Xiaoran Wang, and Jinying Zhang critically revised the manuscript; and Zhiguo Mao drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript, agree to be fully accountable for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the work, and read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflicts of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mao, Z., Hu, Y., Zhao, Y. et al. The Mutual Regulatory Role of Ferroptosis and Immunotherapy in Anti-tumor Therapy. Apoptosis 29, 1291–1308 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-024-01988-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-024-01988-9