Abstract
While the share of renewable energy sources increased within the last years with an ongoing upward trend, the energy sector is facing the problem of storing large amounts of electrical energy properly. To compensate daily and seasonal fluctuations, a sufficient storage system has to be developed. The storage of hydrogen in the subsurface, referred to as Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS), shows potential to be a solution for this problem. Hydrogen, produced from excess energy via electrolysis, is injected into a subsurface reservoir and withdrawn when required. As hydrogen possesses unique thermodynamic properties, many commonly used correlations can not be simply transferred to a system with a high hydrogen content. Mixing processes with the present fluids are essential to be understood to achieve high storage efficiencies. Additionally, in the past, microbial activity, e.g. by methanogenic archaea, was observed, leading to a changing fluid composition over time. To evaluate the capability of reservoir simulators to cover these processes, the present study establishes a benchmark scenario of an exemplary underground hydrogen storage scenario. The benchmark comprises of a generic sandstone gas reservoir and a typical gas storage schedule is defined. Based on this benchmark, the present study assesses the capabilities of the commercial simulator Schlumberger ECLIPSE and the open-source simulator DuMux to mimic UHS related processes such as hydrodynamics but also microbial activity. While ECLIPSE offers a reasonable mix of user-friendliness and computation time, DuMux allows for a better adjustment of correlations and the implementation of biochemical reactions. The corresponding input data (ECLIPSE format) and relevant results are provided in a repository to allow this simulation study’s reproduction and extension.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Code availability
Not applicable
References
Buzek, F., Onderka, V., Vančura, P., Wolf, I.: Carbon isotope study of methane production in a town gas storage reservoir. Fuel 73(5), 747–752 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(94)90019-1
Rohöl-Aufsuchungs Aktiengesellschaft: AXIOM angewandte Prozesstechnik GesmbH, Verbund AG, Montanuniversität Leoben, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz: Underground Sun Storage: Publizierbarer Endbericht. https://www.underground-sun-storage.at/fileadmin/bilder/SUNSTORAGE/Publikationen/UndergroundSunStorage_Publizierbarer_Endbericht_3.1_web.pdf (2017)
Rohöl-Aufsuchungs Aktiengesellschaft: Underground Sun Conversion: Projektbeschreibung. https://www.underground-sun-conversion.at/das-projekt/projektbeschreibung.html. Accessed 02.06.2020 (2019)
Tek, M. R.: Underground storage of natural gas: theory and practice. In: NATO ASI Series, Series E: Applied Sciences, 0168-132X, vol. 171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0993-9. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (1989)
Paterson, L.: The implications of fingering in underground hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 8(1), 53–59 (1983)
Oldenburg, C. M.: Carbon dioxide as cushion gas for natural gas storage. Energy Fuels 17(1), 240–246 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef020162b
Pfeiffer, W. T., Bauer, S.: Subsurface porous media hydrogen storage–scenario development and simulation. Energy Procedia 76, 565–572 (2015)
Ho, C. K., Webb, S. W.: Gas Transport in Porous Media. Theory and Applications of Transport in Porous Media, vol. 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3962-X (2006)
Feldmann, F., Hagemann, B., Ganzer, L., Panfilov, M. B.: Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic and gas mixing processes in underground hydrogen storages. Environ. Earth Sci. 75(16), 103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5948-z
Chabab, S., Theveneau, P., Coquelet, C., Corvisier, J., Paricaud, P.: Measurements and predictive models of high-pressure h2 solubility in brine (h2o+ nacl) for underground hydrogen storage application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45(56), 32206–32220 (2020)
Carden, P. O., Paterson, L.: Physical, chemical and energy aspects of underground hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 4(6), 559–569 (1979)
Cypionka, H.: Grundlagen der Mikrobiologie, 4. überarb. und aktualisierte aufl. edn. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05096-1 (2010)
Strobel, G., Wirth, M., Hagemann, B., Ganzer, L.: Utilization of microfluidics to investigate microbial activity in underground hydrogen storage. 2021(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202121039(2021)
Thauer, R. K., Fuchs, G.: Methanogene bakterien. Naturwissenschaften 66(2), 89–94 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373499
Sabatier, P.: La Catalyse en Chimie Organique. Librairie Polytechnique, Paris (1913)
Hogeweg, A.S., Strobel, G., Hagemann, B.: Data for: benchmark study for the simulation of underground hydrogen storage operations. https://doi.org/10.25625/0ICEBA
Hogeweg, S., Strobel, G., Hagemann, B.: UHS Benchmark study: dataset, Clausthal-Zellerfeld. https://www.ite.tu-clausthal.de/en/research/subsurface-energy-and-gas-storage/uhs-benchmark-study. Accessed 19 Apr 2022 (2022)
Brooks, R. H., Corey, A. T.: Hydraulic properties of porous media. Colorado State University Hydrology Paper. Colorado State University, Colorado (1964)
Gecko Instruments GmbH: Die Erdgaszusammensetzungen in Deutschland: Erdgas Weser Ems L. https://www.gecko-instruments.de/media/Erdgaszusammensetzung/Erdgas_Weser_Ems_L.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2020
Schlumberger: Reference Handbook (2020)
Koch, T., Gläser, D., Weishaupt, K., Ackermann, S., Beck, M., Becker, B., Burbulla, S., Class, H., Coltman, E., Emmert, S., Fetzer, T., Grüninger, C., Heck, K., Hommel, J., Kurz, T., Lipp, M., Mohammadi, F., Scherrer, S., Schneider, M., Seitz, G., Stadler, L., Utz, M., Weinhardt, F., Flemisch, B.: Dumux 3—an open-source simulator for solving flow and transport problems in porous media with a focus on model coupling. Comput. Math. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.012 (2020)
Søreide, I., Whitson, C.H.: Peng-Robinson predictions for hydrocarbons, CO2, N2, and H2 S with pure water and naCI brine. Fluid Phase Equilib. 77, 217–240 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(92)85105-H
Stiel, L. I., Thodos, G.: The viscosity of nonpolar gases at normal pressures. AIChE J. 7(4), 611–615 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690070416
Lohrenz, J., Bray, B. G., Clark, C. R.: Calculating viscosities of reservoir fluids from their compositions. J. Petrol. Tech. 16(10), 1171–1176 (1964). https://doi.org/10.2118/915-PA
Peng, D. -Y., Robinson, D. B.: A new two-constant equation of state. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15(1), 59–64 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1021/i160057a011
Bastian, P., Blatt, M., Dedner, A., Dreier, N. -A., Engwer, C., Fritze, R., Gräser, C., Grüninger, C., Kempf, D., Klöfkorn, R., Ohlberger, M., Sander, O.: The Dune framework: basic concepts and recent developments. Comput. Math. Appl. 81, 75–112 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.06.007
Hagemann, B.: Numerical and Analytical Modeling of Gas Mixing and Bio-reactive Transport During Underground Hydrogen Storage, 1. edn. Schriftenreihe des Energie-Forschungszentrums Niedersachsen, vol. Band 50. Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen (2018)
Hagemann, B., Ganzer, L., Panfilov, M.: Field scale modeling of bio-reactions during underground hydrogen storage. In: ECMOR XVI—16th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery. Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802116. EAGE Publications BVNetherlands, Barcelona (2018)
Strobel, G., Hagemann, B., Wirth, M., Ganzer, L.: Pore-scale modeling of microbial growth in a two-phase saturated porous medium. In: ECMOR XVII (September 14–17, 2020). https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202035171, pp 1–14. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Edinburgh (2020)
Acknowledgments
This publication is based upon work supported and funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWI - Project No. 03EI3021C), the Clausthal University of Technology (Project: “CliMb”), and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation - Project No. 433108788).
The authors acknowledge the support of the involved institutions.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Conflict of interest/Competing interests
Not applicable
Additional information
Supplementary information
Not applicable
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hogeweg, S., Strobel, G. & Hagemann, B. Benchmark study for the simulation of Underground Hydrogen Storage operations. Comput Geosci 26, 1367–1378 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10163-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10163-5