Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) on the control of pediatric myopia. Electronic databases were systematically searched.
Methods
Standardized mean differences (SMDs) of outcomes were calculated. Eight studies with 357 patients with pediatric myopia were included. The SMD for the increase in mean axial length (AL) in the PSR and control group was − 1.19 (95% CI − 1.71, − 0.68).
Results
The SMD for decrease of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) LogMAR in the PSR and control group was 0.85 (95% CI 0.28, 1.43). The SMD for change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at the time of surgery and at the end of the follow-up period in the PSR group was − 0.01 (95% CI − 0.48, 0.47).
Conclusion
This meta-analysis indicates that PSR surgery may be an effective therapeutic strategy to control the progression of myopia in childhood with acceptable adverse effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Myopia has become a major global public health problem [1, 2], especially high myopia, because it is progressive, its complications can lead to visual impairment, low vision, and even blindness, thus it has attracted great attention [3]. Visual acuity decline is caused by myopic macular degeneration, which is strongly related to the length of ocular axis [4,5,6]. Myopia is prevalent in East and Southeast Asia. The morbidity of myopia among young people is about 80–90%, accompanied by a relatively high prevalence of high myopia among young people (10–20%) [7]. It is predicted that by the year of 2050 there will be 4.8 billion myopic people (nearly half of the world population) and 938 million people with high myopia (10% of the global population) [8]. Studies have shown that when children develop myopia at a lower age, myopia progresses faster [9, 10]. Therefore, the preventing or control of the progression of myopia in myopic children is of significant importance [11].
Extensive high myopia includes persistent lengthening of the eyeball, thinning of the sclera and localized expansion of the posterior sclera [12, 13]. It is worth noting that the axial length is closely related to refractive status, because long eyes are more inclined to be nearsighted than short eyes [14]. Therefore, the control of the elongation of ocular axis throughout childhood may be very important to keep normal vision (at least 20/20 using a Snellen chart) and may become the main goal of preventing myopia [15, 16]. Posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) was first proposed by Shevelev and later improved by Thompson [14, 17]. The use of posterior buckles on the thinner sclera can provide local stabilization, which may slow down the development of axial elongation and myopia [18]. Although the surgical effectiveness may be controversial, several studies have confirmed the benefits of stabilizing axial lengthening and refractive status [19,20,21]. Nevertheless, this approach of surgery remains to be performed at considerable ophthalmic centers in a great number of countries for patients with myopia including children [14, 21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
No systematic review and meta-analysis have yet been performed to investigate or quantitatively define the therapeutic effect of PSR surgery in children. The aim of this study was to quantify the efficacy of PSR on the control of axial elongation and refractive progression via meta-analysis.
Materials and methods
The meta-analysis was conducted based on the guidance of the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) [28]. All included studies had declared ethical approvals and informed consent in the original articles, no ethical approval or informed consent was needed in this study.
Search strategy and study selection
We comprehensively searched the electronic databases including Pubmed, Embase, Web of science and the Cochrane Library up to June 23, 2022. Only citations in English were included. The following keywords and terms were used: myopia, scleral buckle, posterior scleral reinforcement, buckling, reinforcement, scleroplasty, snyder thompson. Search strategies for databases was provided in Table S1. In addition, the references of the included articles were also screened for additionally eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) ≤ 18 years old (2) myopia; (3) PSR operation was used for controlling myopia progression; (4) Studies evaluated the indicators for surgery effects and/or safety such as mean change in spherical equivalent (SE) from the time of surgery to the end of the follow-up period in the PSR and control group, the increase in mean axial length (AL) in the PSR and control group, decrease of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) LogMAR in the PSR and control group, change of axial length/horizontal corneal radius of curvature ratio (AL/hCRC) in the PSR and control group, and change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at the time of surgery and at the end of the follow-up period in the PSR group (the decrease of SE, AL, AL/hCRC, IOP while the increase of BCVA represent the alleviation of myopia). Exclusion criteria included: (1) The data to be analyzed cannot be extracted or calculated; (2) Case reports or series, reviews, comments, editorials, and animal studies; (3) Non-English reports. If studies were performed by the identical research group, studies with the most sufficient information were included. Two independent researchers performed the database search and study selection. Disagreements were addressed through discussion.
Data extraction and quality assessments
Two investigators (Yu tang & Jing Chen) independently screened the title and abstract of enrolled articles on the basis of the inclusion criteria. Then a full-text evaluation of the studies was performed for the final eligibility. Moreover, the following information of included studies was extracted or calculated from the raw data provided in the articles included: family name of the first author, year of publication, country of participants, number of participants, and operation outcomes aforementioned. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies was used to judge the risk of bias for each included study.
Statistical analysis
The R Project for Statistical Computing (Version 4.0.2) was used for statistical analyzes on the study level. We calculated pooled estimates of the standardized mean difference (SMD) of outcomes aforementioned in both PSR and control groups, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Cochran Q and I2 statistics were introduced to qualitatively and quantitatively explore the heterogeneity in studies included. Nonsignificant, low, moderate, and high heterogeneity were rated as I2 values of 0%-, 25%-, 50%, and 75%-, respectively [29]. Egger’s method was used to statistically test publication bias [30]. Sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the robust of the pooled overall outcomes. A p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant [31].
Results
Study selection and characteristics
Four hundred citations were identified from the databases searched. Eighty-six duplicates were removed and 302 studies were excluded through an initial screening. After a full text reading of the remaining 12 articles, 8 studies comprising 357 patients were finally regarded as inclusion in this meta-analysis (Fig. 1). Additional citations were not identified through bibliography screening of the enrolled articles. Baseline characteristics of included studies were displayed in Table 1. The quality of included studies was assessed as high in accordance with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (Table S2).
Treatment effects
Four studies reported outcomes on SE, the SMD for mean change of SE from the time of surgery to the end of the follow-up period in the PSR and control group was − 1.29 (95% CI − 1.97, − 0.62; I2 = 80%, p < 0.01), which indicated better performance of PSR than the control group (Fig. 2). Six included studies reported results on AL, the SMD for the increase of AL in the PSR and control group was − 1.19 (95% CI − 1.71, − 0.68; I2 = 78%, p < 0.01), which indicated better performance of PSR than the control group (Fig. 3).
Four studies reported outcomes on BCVA, the SMD for increase of BCVA LogMAR in the PSR and control group was 0.85 (95% CI 0.28, 1.43; I2 = 68%, p = 0.02), which indicated better performance of PSR than the control group (Fig. 4). Two studies reported results on AL/hCRC, the SMD for increase of AL/hCRC in the PSR and control group was 0.15 (95% CI − 0.46, − 0.76; I2 = 56%, p = 0.13), which indicated better performance of the control group than PSR (Fig. 5).
Safety
Conjunctival congestion and edema were the most common adverse events among the patients who underwent PSR in included studies and alleviated after several weeks. Three studies reported outcomes on IOP, the SMD for increase of IOP at the time of surgery and at the end of the follow-up period in the PSR group was − 0.01 (95% CI − 0.48, 0.47; I2 = 69%, p = 0.04), which revealed the decrease of IOP was greater in PSR group than the control group (Fig. 6).
Publication bias
Significant publication bias was not detected by Egger’s tests for all aspects of the analysis. The respective p values were 0.8443, 0.3516, 0.9260, and 0.4882 for the pooled analysis of SE, AL, BCVA and IOP (Figures S1–S4).
Sensitivity analysis
Results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that no outlier was identified in all sensitivity analysis (Table 2).
Discussion
Myopia poses a great impact on public health and socio-economic well-being [8, 32, 33]. Myopia refers to the increase of axial length and the thinning of sclera, which may be due to the decrease of collagen synthesis and the increase of collagen degradation [34,35,36]. Generalized high myopia may involve scleral degeneration, eye lengthening, and choroidal, macular, and peripheral retinal lesions [37]. Posterior sclera reinforcement can control the development of myopia. This meta-analysis looked at PSR’s effects in treating myopia in a pediatric population. It concluded that the PSR group showed significant improvements in SE, AL, and BCVA compared to the control group, with no significant adverse effects.
Previous laboratory studies have shown that the strengthening of the sclera to the fovea can improve the microcirculation in the macula [35, 38]. Furthermore, current data support that PSR operation imposes eye elongation and show advantages of this surgery. Although the IOP change in PSR group was statistically significant from preoperative to the end of follow-up, we believe that this change is not clinically significant. Furthermore, slight edema in conjunctiva and congestion were commonly found in the PSR group in several included studies and were alleviated over several weeks. Due to limited information on adverse event rates, results on these rates were not synthesized. In addition, the Snyder–Thompson surgery type were used in most included studies, the surgical procedure utilized in the Xue et al. [21] the genipin-crosslinked donor sclera for posterior scleral reinforcement, findings in this study reveal favorable safety and effectiveness of this type of surgery to restrain eye globe elongation in patients < 18-years old within a 2- to 3-year follow-up.
Our results displayed significant heterogeneity in the pooled analysis of change in SE, AL, BCVA LogMAR, and AL/hCRC in PSR and control groups, the possible reasons may be attributed to study design, patients’ characteristics, procedure of surgery, experience of surgeons. In addition, 3 studies used self-control which may be another cause of high heterogeneity in this study. Subgroup analysis was not carried out due to the limited number of studies in each subgroup. All these potential sources for significant heterogeneity need to be further investigated. Egger’s tests for publication bias revealed that there was no significant publication bias in the current study. Results of sensitivity analysis suggested that the pooled outcomes in this study were robust after omitting study one after another. This study provided updated information on the effectiveness and safety of PSR the treatment of children with myopia. Of the eight included studies, seven were conducted in China. Therefore, we cannot be certain of the applicability of the results of this meta-analysis in other countries, and practitioners should interpret the results with care in the context of the Chinese healthcare system and patient characteristics when applying and interpreting the results. Moreover, subgroup analysis based on surgical technique was not done due to limited number of included studies, more relevant studies are needed to investigate the efficacy and safety under different surgical approaches.
Conclusions
Despite the limitations of the current study, we may conclude that PSR is an effective operation to control the development of myopia and axial elongation, although adverse effects including edema and congestion are inevitable, they are durable and can be alleviated in several weeks. Well-designed studies with large sample sizes are warranted.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Németh J, Tapasztó B, Aclimandos WA et al (2021) Update and guidance on management of myopia. European Society of Ophthalmology in cooperation with International Myopia Institute. Eur J Ophthalmol 31:853–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672121998960
Cho P, Tan Q (2019) Myopia and orthokeratology for myopia control. Clin Exp Optom 102:364–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12839
Xiang ZY, Zou HD (2020) Recent epidemiology study data of myopia. J Ophthalmol 2020:4395278. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4395278
Ohno-Matsui K, Kawasaki R, Jonas JB et al (2015) International photographic classification and grading system for myopic maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 159:877-883.e877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.022
Takano M, Kishi S (1999) Foveal retinoschisis and retinal detachment in severely myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma. Am J Ophthalmol 128:472–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00186-5
Ohno-Matsui K, Jonas JB (2019) Posterior staphyloma in pathologic myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res 70:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.12.001
Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS, Guo X, Ding X, He M, Rose KA (2018) The epidemics of myopia: etiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Res 62:134–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004
Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S (2016) Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 123:1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Dong LM, Everett D, Norton T, Kurtz D, Manny R, Marsh-Tootle W, Scheiman M (2007) Factors associated with high myopia after 7 years of follow-up in the correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET) cohort. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 14:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/01658100701486459
Lee SS, Lingham G, Sanfilippo PG, Hammond CJ, Saw SM, Guggenheim JA, Yazar S, Mackey DA (2022) Incidence and progression of myopia in early adulthood. JAMA Ophthalmol 140:162–169. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.5067
Wu PC, Huang HM, Yu HJ, Fang PC, Chen CT (2016) Epidemiology of myopia. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 5:386–393. https://doi.org/10.1097/apo.0000000000000236
Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen EC, Chua WH (2005) Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 25:381–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00298.x
Jagadeesh D, Philip K, Fedtke C, Jong M, Ly A, Sankaridurg P (2020) Posterior segment conditions associated with myopia and high myopia. Clin Exp Optom 103:756–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.13060
Chen MJ, Dai JH, Chu RY, Qian YF (2013) The efficacy and safety of modified Snyder-Thompson posterior scleral reinforcement in extensive high myopia of Chinese children. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:2633–2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2429-x
Baird PN, Saw SM, Lanca C et al (2020) Myopia. Nat Rev Dis Primers 6:99. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-00231-4
Brajkovich HL (1980) Dr. Snellen’s 20/20: the development and use of the eye chart. J Sch Health 50:472–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1980.tb03134.x
Thompson FB (1978) A simplified scleral reinforcement technique. Am J Ophthalmol 86:782–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(78)90121-6
Miao Z, Li L, Meng X, Guo L, Cao D, Jia Y, He D, Huang L, Wang L (2019) Modified posterior scleral reinforcement as a treatment for high myopia in children and its therapeutic effect. Biomed Res Int 2019:5185780. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5185780
Shen ZM, Zhang ZY, Zhang LY, Li ZG, Chu RY (2015) Posterior scleral reinforcement combined with patching therapy for pre-school children with unilateral high myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253:1391–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-2963-9
Zhu SQ, Pan AP, Zheng LY, Wu Y, Xue AQ (2018) Posterior scleral reinforcement using genipin-cross-linked sclera for macular hole retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 102:1701–1704. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311340
Xue A, Zheng L, Tan G, Wu S, Wu Y, Cheng L, Qu J (2018) Genipin-crosslinked donor sclera for posterior scleral contraction/reinforcement to fight progressive myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:3564–3573. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23707
Dong XR, Liu J, Bu J (2020) The efficacy of modified posterior scleral reinforcement with round scleral patches in Chinese children with high myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258:1543–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04646-3
Gao SM, Liu YL, Ma ST, Li LX, Mao YY (2022) Clinical observation of posterior scleral reinforcement in the treatment of progressive high myopia in Chinese children: a retrospective study. Bmc Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02375-1
Hu H, Wang J, Fang M, Zhong H, Deng H (2018) Axial length/corneal radius of curvature ratio assessment of posterior sclera reinforcement for pathologic myopia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:128
Széll N, Boross A, Facskó A, Sohajda Z (2021) Results with posterior scleral reinforcement for progressive highly myopic children in Hungary. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1328-2586
Xue A, Bao F, Zheng L, Wang Q, Cheng L, Qu J (2014) Posterior scleral reinforcement on progressive high myopic young patients. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom 91:412–418. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000201
Zhu SQ, Wang QM, Xue AQ, Zheng LY, Su YF, Yu AY (2014) Posterior sclera reinforcement and phakic intraocular lens implantation for highly myopic amblyopia in children: a 3-year follow-up. Eye (Basingstoke) 28:1310–1314. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.200
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, Thomas J (2019) Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:Ed000142. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.Ed000142
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Xu C, Gertner G (2007) Extending a global sensitivity analysis technique to models with correlated parameters. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:5579–5590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.04.003
Zheng YF, Pan CW, Chay J, Wong TY, Finkelstein E, Saw SM (2013) The economic cost of myopia in adults aged over 40 years in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:7532–7537. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12795
Ma Y, Wen Y, Zhong H et al (2022) Healthcare utilization and economic burden of myopia in urban China: a nationwide cost-of-illness study. J Glob Health 12:11003. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.11003
McBrien NA (2013) Regulation of scleral metabolism in myopia and the role of transforming growth factor-beta. Exp Eye Res 114:128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2013.01.014
McBrien NA, Gentle A (2003) Role of the sclera in the development and pathological complications of myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res 22:307–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-9462(02)00063-0
Yang J, Wu S, Zhang C, Yu W, Dai R, Chen Y (2022) Global trends and frontiers of research on pathologic myopia since the millennium: a bibliometric analysis. Front Public Health 10:1047787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1047787
Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM (2012) Myopia. Lancet 379:1739–1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60272-4
Jacob JT, Gebhardt BM, Lewando J (1996) Synthetic scleral reinforcement materials. II. Collagen types in the fibrous capsule. J Biomed Mater Res 32:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199610)32:2%3c181::Aid-jbm5%3e3.0.Co;2-p
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was supported by Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission Sustainable Development Project(KCXFZ20211020163814021); Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (SZSM201812090) and Shenzhen Fund for Guangdong Provincial High-level Clinical Key Specialties (No. SZGSP014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HD contributed to Conception and design; YT contributed to Administrative support; YT and ZL contribtued to Provision of study materials or patients; ZT and JC contributed to Collection and assembly of data; ZT contributed to Data analysis and interpretation; All authors contributed to Manuscript writing and Final approval of manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article exist.
Ethical approval and Consent to participate
This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Tang, Y., Lin, Z. et al. Effect and safety posterior scleral reinforcement on controlling myopia in children: a meta-analysis. Int Ophthalmol 44, 8 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-02929-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-02929-w