Abstract
In the last decade, there has been an increase in publications on technology-based interventions for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Virtual reality based assessments and intervention tools are promising and have shown to be acceptable amongst individuals with ASD. This scoping review reports on 49 studies utilizing virtual reality and augmented reality technology in social skills interventions for individuals with ASD. The included studies mostly targeted children and adolescents, but few targeted very young children or adults. Our findings show that the mode number of participants with ASD is low, and that female participants are underrepresented. Our review suggests that there is need for studies that apply virtual and augmented realty with more rigorous designs involving established and evidenced-based intervention strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD; autism from hereon) refers to a spectrum of neurodevelopmental conditions marked by impairments in social communication and the presence of repetitive behavior patterns and interests (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Individuals with autism are heterogeneous in their levels of general functioning. For example, some individuals with autism develop advanced expressive language ability, show more subtle difficulties in social interactions, and their repetitive behavior patterns are associated with adherence to routines in their daily life (Horwitz et al., 2020). Others may have impaired expressive language, extensive difficulties with social interaction, and their repetitive behavior takes the form of stereotyped movements (Hattier et al., 2011; Kjellmer et al., 2012).
Already at an early age, individuals with autism show tendencies of orienting themselves mostly to non-social stimuli, at the expense of social stimuli, and this orientation can have cascading effects on their social and linguistic development (Gale et al., 2019). The preference for non-social stimuli and restrictive behavior might be related to challenges for individuals with autism when encountering society. Individuals with autism commonly have lower quality peer friendships with fewer reciprocal relationships and lower acceptance by their classmates (Chamberlain et al., 2007). Difficulties individuals with autism experience in educational settings are often related to making sense of social stimuli and unpredictable social environments (Lüddeckens, 2020). In fact, individuals with autism show significantly more school refusal behavior than their neurotypical peers (Munkhaugen et al., 2017). A high prevalence of school refusal behavior can possibly be attributed to difficulties experienced at school, perhaps due to social difficulties in interaction with peers and teachers. Many individuals with autism experience bullying during their school years (Skafle et al., 2019).
The social communicative impairments defining the disorder makes social skills an important target in educational interventions (Wolstencroft et al., 2018). Many different definitions of social skills have emerged in the literature (Wolstencroft et al., 2018). The term social skill is used interchangeably with other terms, such as social competence and social functioning (see Cordier et al., 2015). In this review, we define the term social skills broadly as a behavior that is performed in a social context and involves interpersonal engagement (Cordier et al., 2015; Wolstencroft et al., 2018). This engagement is not restricted to live human-to-human interactions in this study since we also include human–computer interactions (e.g., engagement with robotic avatars etc.).
Technology, such as virtual reality (VR), seems promising in regard to practicing social skills (Howard & Gutworth, 2020), and represent cost effective ways of meeting the social and, ultimately, the educational needs of individuals with autism. VR technology displays artificial environments that may emulate real world scenarios by generating visual and auditory stimuli, with realistic images or other sensations that can surround the end user. Augmented reality (AR) provides artificial visual and auditory information superimposed on the veridical, real-world environment. AR is often presented through tablets and smartphones in addition to AR-glasses. VR can be presented with various tools such as Head-Mounted Displays (HMD) and Cave Automatic Virtual Environment (CAVE), and even desktop or laptop computers. VR HMDs are goggles presenting virtual environments that provide a sense of surrounding the user completely. CAVE is a tool that uses two-dimensional projected displayed arranged around the user to present a pseudo three-dimensional environment. VR/AR and CAVE all provide opportunities where the users can interact through specialized controllers, computer vision techniques (e.g., through motion capture techniques), and other computer-based sensing systems (e.g., eye-tracking, speech recognition etc.).
In the last decade, the number of publications including computer-based or VR/AR assessments and interventions involving individuals with autism has increased significantly (Dechsling et al., 2020). The majority of studies on autism and VR/AR focus on social and emotional skills (Lorenzo et al., 2018; Mesa-Gresa et al., 2018), with multiple studies reporting benefits through skill training (e.g., Didehbani et al., 2016; Kandalaft et al., 2013; Maskey et al., 2014; Newbutt et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017). In addition, computer technology methods have been described as highly motivating for many individuals with autism (Dechsling et al., 2020; Newbutt et al., 2016, 2020; Yang et al., 2017).
A few previous reviews have summarized evidence on VR and assessments or interventions on social skills for individuals with autism. Miller and Bugnariu (2016) conducted a systematic literature search on autism and VR. The included 29 studies were published before July 2015 and focused on both assessments and interventions of social skills and graded them in different levels of the immersion on the apparatus used. The authors presented a useful table on classification of virtual environment characteristics by levels of immersion. An example of a low immersion virtual environment would be one delivered via computer monitor or tablet; a high immersion environment would be one presented through an HMD.
Mesa-Gresa and colleagues conducted a systematic review on the effectiveness of various types of VR-interventions for children with autism, including social skills (Mesa-Gresa et al., 2018), while Lorenzo et al. (2018) focused on identifying variables used in studies that applied VR for students with autism. After excluding studies with participants above 18 years of age in their review, Mesa-Gresa et al. (2018) included 31 studies and concluded that there is moderate evidence for the effectiveness of VR-interventions for children with autism. Lorenzo et al. (2018) on the other hand, included 12 studies and concluded that immersive virtual reality is a promising tool for improving the skills of students with autism. Nevertheless, they pointed out several weaknesses in the studies included, such as small sample sizes and control groups consisting of individuals without autism.
These reviews had some methodological issues limiting their results in terms of providing an exhaustive overview, such as the choice to exclude some age-cohorts. In addition, both reviews used a limited set of search databases. Mesa-Gresa et al. (2018) only searched three databases (Web of Science, PubMed and Scimago Journal & Country Rank), and not psychology and education specific databases such as PsycInfo and ERIC. Lorenzo et al. (2018) did not report which databases they searched. Based on the information they provided, it seems likely that only Web of Science was used with a search string limited to only two search terms.
The rapid development of the research field on autism and VR/AR (Dechsling et al., 2020) combined with the extensive number of journals publishing studies in this domain (both technology- and autism specialized as well as general journals), and the narrow search strategies in previous reviews, warrants a review to map and evaluate the extant research. A transparent review, targeting VR/AR interventions on social skills for individuals with autism, using more exhaustive search string and a more diverse set of search platforms than previous reviews. Scoping reviews are useful when navigating a complex and heterogeneous literature and are commonly conducted to summarize and explore the breadth and depth of the literature, identify gaps, and inform future research (Peters et al., 2020; Tricco et al., 2016).
The objectives of this review are to provide a comprehensive summary of studies where VR/AR-interventions have been used to improve social skills in individuals with autism; to evaluate the literature including the methodology used and the social skills targeted; and to identify research gaps in the literature.
Method
Search Strategy
An information retrieval specialist searched the databases: PsycINFO, PubMed, ERIC, Education Research Complete, IEEE Xplore, and the search platform Web of Science, on February 3rd, 2021. The following search string from Dechsling et al. (2021) was used: (Pervasive development disorder OR pdd OR pdd-nos OR pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified OR autism OR autistic OR autism spectrum disorder OR autism spectrum disorders OR Asperger OR asd OR autism spectrum condition* OR asc AND Virtual Reality OR vr OR hmd OR Head-mounted display OR Immersive Virtual Environment OR Augmented Reality OR Artificial Reality OR Oculus OR Immersive Technolog* OR Mixed Reality OR Hybrid Reality OR Immersive Virtual Reality System OR 3D Environment* OR htc vive OR cave OR Virtual Reality Exposure OR vre). The first and second author also searched the references in other reviews (Lorenzo et al., 2018; Mesa-Gresa et al., 2018; Miller & Bugnariu, 2016) for potential additional studies. No limitations regarding language or publication year were applied in the search, but the search was limited to peer-reviewed publications and to publications that included human participants.
Inclusion and Exclusion of Studies
The study inclusion criteria when screening were as follows: (1) Peer-reviewed studies in English published 2010 or after, (2) included participants diagnosed with autism, (3) included interventions on social skills as defined below (4) used VR/AR-equipment (not restricted to HMD), and (5) involved a human–computer interaction to be evaluated as a VR/AR-intervention. The exclusion criteria were: (1) Grey literature (e.g., dissertations, posters, etc.), (2) studies published before 2010, (3) studies not written in English, (4) studies where the participants did not act or interact in the virtual environment, (4) studies where VR/AR skill improvement was not directly directed to individuals with autism (e.g. VR teaching of professionals working with various populations).
The inclusion criteria on social skills were widely defined as studies with the aim or outcome regarding some social interactions, such as communication, emotion recognition, joint attention, pretend play, and job interview skills. Feasibility studies, pilot studies, and peer-reviewed conference papers were included if they reported interventional data on participants.
Screening and Data Extraction
The first and second author screened the publications from the search consulting the PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al., 2009). After removing duplicates, the initial search results were screened for titles and abstracts by the first and second author for relevance within ASD* and Virtual Reality*, and then selected studies were eventually screened for full text articles. Disagreements were resolved through discussions.
From the included studies, we extracted the following information: authors, publication year, study type (e.g., case-study, pilot-study, randomized controlled trials etc.), duration and aim of the intervention. Information about sample size, age range, and intelligence quotient (IQ) were also extracted, whenever applicable. In addition, we replicated the coding process from Dechsling et al. (2020) to assess the reported acceptability (“i.e., participant reports on usability, enjoyment, likeability, tolerability and so on”, p. 163) data in the included studies.
Results
After removing duplicates, the initial search resulted in 599 publications and the screening resulted in 49 publications meeting the inclusion criteria. See Flow chart (Fig. 1) for the details. One relevant article was included after manually searching the reference lists of included publications and the aforementioned reviews. The publications are published in psychology/psychiatry journals (19), educational journals (8), information technology journals (6), hybrid journals of education and technology (11), and the rest in miscellaneous journals (e.g., biomedicine, pediatrics, sociology). The matrix in the Supplementary Appendix contains an overview of the included articles.
The total number of participants with autism in the included publications was 652. The gender distribution of the participants in this sample were male n = 604, and female n = 48, meaning 7.4% of participants were female (which is lower than the reported male-to-female gender ratio of approximately 3:1 in autism [Loomes et al., 2017]). Note that the reported number of female participants in this total sample may be inaccurate due to 12% of the studies not reporting gender distribution.
The mean and median number of participants with autism per publication were 13.3 and 10.0 respectively, range was 2–99 (note that if we exclude Burke et al. (2020) the range would be 2–40), and the mode number was 3 participants. The age of participants with autism ranged from 2 to 38 years old. The studies included mainly children and adolescents, with approximately 16% of the studies involving adult individuals with autism (20–38 years of age, Fig. 2).
The interventions were mostly directed towards individuals with intellectual functioning above the Intelligence Quotient (IQ) cut-off score for intellectual disability (IQ ≥ 70), and around the general population average. However, scarcely above half of the studies in the sample reported participants’ IQ-scores.
The majority of studies were case-studies and feasibility (pilot/exploratory) studies (Fig. 3), while only three randomized controlled trials (Smith et al., 2014; Strickland et al., 2013; White et al., 2016). Mean duration of the interventions was 8.75 weeks, ranging from < 1 to 40 weeks.
The studies in our sample targeted: (1) various social interaction skills (e.g., Ke & Moon, 2018; Lorenzo et al., 2019), joint attention (e.g., Amaral et al., 2018; Ravindran et al., 2019), job interview skills (e.g., Burke et al., 2018, 2020; Smith et al, 2014; Strickland et al., 2013; Ward & Esposito, 2019), pretend play (e.g., Bai et al., 2015), collaboration and communication (Bernardini et al., 2014; Crowell et al., 2019; Malinverni et al., 2017; Moon & Ke, 2019; Trepagnier et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2018). Or (2) social knowledge such as emotion recognition (Chen et al., 2016; Didehbani et al., 2016; Serret et al., 2014), broader emotional competence (Lorenzo et al., 2016), and social cognition (Chen et al., 2016). Or (3) a combination of both such as emotion recognition and responses (Chen et al., 2015; Ip et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2017), social attention and gestures (Lee, 2020; Lee et al., 2018), or social understanding and cognition (Cheng et al., 2015; Kandalaft et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2017, 2018).
The software and/or hardware that is used in the different studies are listed in Table 1 and reveal a wide range of equipment used aiming at providing a virtual reality environment or augmented reality (Fig. 4). Several levels of immersion were covered by this literature with low immersion apparatus and environments such as monitor-based interventions, and high-immersion apparatus such as VR in HMDs and CAVE. In between, one can find the use of motion cameras (Kinect), laptops with or without additional equipment such as joysticks, headsets and different kinds of software. Eight of the included studies used HMD’s, either AR-goggles, smart-glasses or VR-goggles.
Acceptability was reported in 21 of the 49 included studies. None of the studies reported negative evaluations, while 81% of the studies reported positive evaluations, and 19% reported inconclusive evaluations.
Discussion
The aim of this scoping review was to identify intervention studies using VR/AR to improve social skills for individuals with autism. We identified 49 studies with various focus, intervention types, and technology within the scope of autism and social skills. Although this field of research is young, the median and mode number of participants across studies are noteworthy as the number of participants in such quantitative studies could be quite essential as a prerequisite for reliability and validity. Apart from eight studies like for example Burke et al. (2020), Ip et al. (2018), and Lorenzo et al. (2016), most of the studies are characterized with a small number of participants and short duration of the interventions.
Another remarkable finding is that the female participants with autism are underrepresented in our sample considering the male-to-female ratio within the autism spectrum. There might be several reasons why female participants are underrepresented. Some suggest females with autism to have less overt challenges related to social interaction, or that there are differences in social strategies between genders which makes the challenges more difficult to detect in females (Hiller et al., 2016), and that such strategies might camouflage other symptoms (Rynkiewicz et al., 2016). Therefore, it could be issues related to the likelihood of females being discovered in a selection process. However, May et al. (2016) found no differences in social ability between genders with autism, but some differences in communication ability, so there seems to be no reason to exclude females from this field of research based on differences in symptoms between genders. For example, Kanfiszer et al. (2017) interviewed several women with autism that explained challenges in daily life due to lack of skills and confidence when interacting with others. It is of course important to remember that such challenges should be met with both enhancing the individual’s skills, and with an increased awareness by the society. We have pointed to the novelty and rapid growth of the research field on social skills intervention in VR/AR, and as the evidence syntheses are emerging, there is a risk of unnoticed gender bias being part of such intervention practices. The underrepresentation of females should be seen as one shortcoming within this research area. Future research should have a greater emphasis and focus on recruiting female participants to balance the gender representation according to the gender ratio. It also calls for an investigation of which factors are present during the recruitment and selection process of participants, and furthermore investigations on elements important for females using VR/AR.
Further, this review shows that very few studies include individuals scoring below the threshold for an Intellectual Disability (ID) diagnosis. A selection bias of participants above this threshold for ID is found in most areas of autism research (Russell et al., 2019), and it seems that social skills interventions using VR/AR are no exception. Our findings could therefore be argued to complement Russell et al.’ (2019) and add this research area of technological interventions to the list of selection biased autism research.
Most of the studies focus on training various skills for social interaction. Play skills and job-related social skills are subdomains with few VR-intervention studies while job-interview skills are more frequent. There might be several factors that could influence the difficulties in implementing and intervening play skill-training into the computerized virtual environment. For instance, play skills are traditionally most relevant for younger children, which are least likely to tolerate the equipment, and understand and act upon the virtual environment. Interventions on job-related social skills are on the other hand an up-and-coming area of research (Grob et al., 2019). Emotional skills however, a domain that has been popular in computer-based interventions for individuals with autism (Ramdoss et al., 2012), are targeted by fewer studies included in this review. This could perhaps be because the development of VR/AR interventions have focused on skills where the traditional computer-based interventions fall short.
It is difficult to compare studies on social skills due to inconsistent definitions and intervention strategies (Ke et al., 2018). Technology-based interventions on social skills are no exception given the number of feasibility-, usability-, and pilot-studies in our overall sample, which confirms that the research field is still youthful. The novelty of the field can also explain the relatively low number of participants in most of the studies. There is a need for studies with more participants, which also use participants with autism as controls as opposed to using participants without autism. Only one study (Amaral et al., 2018) included participants in the age cohorts above 31 years old which indicates that the research field of using VR/AR on social skills with adults with autism over 30 is an untouched research area.
A variety of methods should be used when establishing causation since no method can reveal all relevant information (Anjum et al., 2020). Variation in types of studies should be considered a strength in evidence-based approaches. Since the majority of studies in our review are case- or feasibility studies, there is a need for more randomized controlled trials, which take into account necessary quality considerations (see for example Sandbank et al., 2020), to conclude on the effectiveness of using VR/AR. However, more replication studies, and studies using statistical methods developed for trials using rigorous single-case and multiple single-case designs (e.g., Shadish et al., 2014) can also contribute to building the evidence base in this research area. We welcome a diversity of studies which will impact the rigour and the generalizability of research applying VR/AR for individuals with autism.
The recency of the field can also explain the variety of methodology applied in the different studies in our sample. A variety of methodology is not a problem in itself, rather a strength once there is a sufficient number of studies converging towards the same outcome. However, an approach on using VR/AR in already established and evidence-based interventions might be warranted. For instance, Sandbank et al. (2020) concluded in their meta-analysis that there is a need for connecting technological tools with established intervention approaches and theoretical groundwork. Dechsling et al. (2021) provide examples on how to apply VR in Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBI; see Schreibman et al., 2015), the intervention approach considered most promising for helping children with autism in regard to social communication (Sandbank et al., 2020). Researchers and interventionists using VR/AR-technology should look at the most promising intervention approaches available, such as NDBI, when developing their intervention protocols and hereunder software development, with appropriate cultural adjustments. To obtain this there might be a need for clinical researchers and technology researchers to collaborate across disciplines in developing and designing robust VR/AR intervention studies. But most importantly, researchers should focus on involving individuals with autism in decision-making and development of such studies and technology (Parsons et al., 2020). In addition, strategies on assessing acceptability and stakeholder’s opinions should be implemented.
After summarizing the reports of participants with autism, across 63 studies utilizing VR/AR/computer-based tools in miscellaneous ways, Dechsling et al. (2020) found that computer-based equipment and HMDs were feasible and widely accepted amongst individuals with autism. Those findings are in accordance with the reports from the sample in our review showing a high acceptance rate among the studies reporting acceptability. However, an important note is that only 43% of the studies report such data. Recent findings from Newbutt et al. (2020) suggest further that individuals with autism prefer HMDs with controllers rather than tablets and HMDs with less opportunities to interact. However, HMDs such as VR/AR-goggles are only used in 16% of the studies in our overall sample. This indicates a need for more research on the effectiveness using high-immersive technology, in line with the conclusions of Miller and Bugnariu (2016). AR-/smartglasses are used in very few studies and research should investigate for example whether such glasses could be beneficial in aiding individuals with social cues in daily social encounters. Further considerations regarding cost and benefits using high-immersive versus low-immersive technological tools both in research and clinical practice should also be done, as well as other normative considerations (Dechsling et al., 2020). Individual considerations should be taken into account when applying various technologies. Some individuals may for example have sensory issues that makes a high immersive CAVE more feasible than HMDs (Dechsling et al., 2021).
The number of studies found both in computer-related journals and autism related journals shows the need for a broad search in databases and journals when reviewing studies on VR/AR, and autism. Our review identified a higher number of studies than the previous reviews, indicating a rapid growth of research in this area. This growth can be illustrated by the fact that the studies published from 2018 represent 41% of the total studies included in our review. The rapid growth of research in VR/AR is probably due to technological advancements making VR/AR software and equipment (e.g., HMDs) more affordable and widely available (Dechsling et al., 2020; Howard & Gutworth, 2020). These technological advancements offer new possibilities, for example can researchers and clinicians create an indefinite amount of different real-world scenarios VR intervention programs, in many cases also scenarios impossible to incorporate into traditional interventions (e.g., accident simulation, flights etc.; Manca et al., 2013). In regards to autism, an increased awareness of the possibilities combined with an awareness of the acceptability from individuals with autism, hereunder better equipment reducing notions of cybersickness, have contributed to the increased use of VR/AR in autism research. In social skills training in particular, VR/AR represents new possibilities for the development of social skills training programs where clients easily can get extensive and intensive training on social skills in situations and environments that mimics real-life. As pointed out by Dechsling et al. (2021), new VR/AR interventions can be based on existing evidence-based practices, and thus make them more affordable and easier to provide, broader availability at remote locations, and at the same time reduce unwanted geographical variation between clinics and service sites. However, as noted by the informants in Parsons et al. (2020), future research and development should focus on participatory design and to include stakeholders which also communicate without using speech since it is important also to include the opinions of marginalized groups.
Limitations
The main limitations of this review are (1) omitting the grey literature search, and (2) restricting the field on publication year. Excluding grey literature might have biased our sample of included studies because, traditionally, studies with significant and novel results have greater chance to be published (i.e., “file drawer problem”; Rosenthal, 1979). Similarly, we could have excluded some relevant studies that have been published before 2010, which might have weakened the comprehensiveness of this study. Also, we did not conduct a meta-analysis on effects of interventions. However, considering the scarcity of rigorous designs, most notably the low amount of RCTs and lack of comparison groups with individuals with autism (Nordahl-Hansen et al., 2020), conducting a meta-analysis of intervention effects is still premature.
Conclusion
This scoping review reveals that the number of studies using VR/AR in social skills intervention for individuals with autism have continued to increase, but that there are still gaps to be addressed (see Table 2 for a summary of the identified gaps). We have identified work by several authors and research teams, and a heterogeneity in terms of demographics, study aims and methodology. Still, a minority of the studies apply HMDs, but we suggest future studies investigate these tools further as soft- and hardware developments have increased the usability of HMDs.
It is important to consider the relatively low representation of female participants, and efforts should be made to recruit more gender-balanced samples. Furthermore, researchers and practitioners should strive towards identifying potential gender differences that might influence the effects. There is a need to investigate further the effectiveness of using VR/AR with individuals below ID threshold as they are also underrepresented in this research area as well.
Most studies lack a clear theoretical grounding in evidence-based approaches and we suggest more studies using rigorous designs, and studies including more participants with individuals with autism as controls. More interventions are needed for different age groups, most notably younger children and older adults. As the acceptance and feasibility of using VR/AR are heavily documented, it is time to utilize this technology in established evidence-based practices aiming at enhancing social skills helping individuals with autism maneuver in society. We recommend that future research build on collaborative interdisciplinary efforts including technology and software developers, autism researchers and individuals with autism.
References
The asterisk in the reference list indicates the included publications listed in Table 1.
*Amaral, C., Mouga, S., Simões, M., Pereira, H. C., Bernardino, I., Quental, H., Playle, R., McNamara, R., Oliveira, G., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2018). A feasibility clinical trial to improve social attention in autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) using a brain computer interface. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00477
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Anjum, R. L., Copeland, S., & Rocca, E. (2020). Medical scientists and philosophers worldwide appeal to EBM to expand the notion of ‘evidence.’ BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 25, 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111092
*Babu, P. R. K., & Lahiri, U. (2020). Multiplayer interaction platform with gaze tracking for individuals with autism. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 28(11), 2443–2450. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3026655
*Bai, Z., Blackwell, A. F., & Coulouris, G. (2015). Using augmented reality to elicit pretend play for children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 21(5), 598–610. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2385092
*Beach, J., & Wendt, J. (2016). Using virtual reality to help students with social interaction skills. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 16(1), 26–33.
*Bernardini, S., Porayska-Pomsta, K., & Smith, T. J. (2014). ECHOES: An intelligent serious game for fostering social communication in children with autism. Information Sciences, 264, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.10.027
*Burke, S. L., Bresnahan, T., Li, T., Epnere, K., Rizzo, A., Partin, M., Ahlness, R. M., & Trimmer, M. (2018). Using virtual interactive training agents (ViTA) with adults with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(3), 905–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3374-z
*Burke, S. L., Li, T., Grudzien, A., & Garcia, S. (2020). Brief report: Improving employment interview self-efficacy among adults with autism and other developmental disabilities using virtual interactive training agents (ViTA). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51, 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04571-8
Chamberlain, B., Kasari, C., & Rotheram-Fuller, E. (2007). Involvement or isolation? The social networks of children with autism in regular classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0164-4
*Chen, C. H., Lee, I. J., & Lin, L. Y. (2015). Augmented reality-based self-facial modeling to promote the emotional expression and social skills of adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36C, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.015
*Chen, C.-H., Lee, I. J., & Lin, L.-Y. (2016). Augmented reality-based video-modeling storybook of nonverbal facial cues for children with autism spectrum disorder to improve their perceptions and judgments of facial expressions and emotions. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part A), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.033
*Cheng, Y. F., Chiang, H. C., Ye, J., & Cheng, L. H. (2010). Enhancing empathy instruction using a collaborative virtual learning environment for children with autistic spectrum conditions. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1449–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.008
*Cheng, Y., Huang, C.-L., & Yang, C.-S. (2015). Using a 3D immersive virtual environment system to enhance social understanding and social skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30(4), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615583473
*Cheng, Y. F., & Huang, R. W. (2012). Using virtual reality environment to improve joint attention associated with pervasive developmental disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(6), 2141–2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.023
*Cheng, Y. F., & Ye, J. (2010). Exploring the social competence of students with autism spectrum conditions in a collaborative virtual learning environment - The pilot study. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1068–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.011
*Chung, P. J., Vanderbilt, D. L., & Soares, N. S. (2015). Social behaviors and active videogame play in children with autism spectrum disorder. Games for Health, 4(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2014.0125
Cordier, R., Speyer, R., Chen, Y.-W., Wilkes-Gillan, S., Brown, T., Bourke-Taylor, H., et al. (2015). Evaluating the psychometric quality of social skills measures: a systematic review. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e103299.
*Crowell, C., Mora-Guiard, J., & Pares, N. (2019). Structuring collaboration: Multi-user full-body interaction environments for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 58, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.11.003
Dechsling, A., Shic, F., Zhang, D., Marschik, P. B., Esposito, G., Orm, S., Sütterlin, S., Kalandadze, T., Øien, R. A., & Nordahl-Hansen, A. (2021). Virtual reality and naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103885
Dechsling, A., Sütterlin, S., & Nordahl-Hansen, A. (2020). Acceptability and normative considerations in research on autism spectrum disorders and virtual reality. In D. Schmorrow & C. Fidopiastis (Eds.), Augmented cognition. Human cognition and behavior. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50439-7_11
Didehbani, N., Allen, T., Kandalaft, M., Krawczyk, D., & Chapman, S. (2016). Virtual reality social cognition training for children with high functioning autism. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.033
Gale, C. M., Eikeseth, S., & Klintwall, L. (2019). Children with autism show atypical preference for non-social stimuli. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 10355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46705-8
Grob, C. M., Lerman, D. C., Langlinais, C. A., & Villante, N. K. (2019). Assessing and teaching job-related social skills to adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(1), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.503
*Halabi, O., El-Seoud, S. A., Alja’am, J. M., Alpona, H., Al-Hemadi, M., & Al-Hassan, D. (2017). Design of immersive virtual reality system to improve communication skills in individuals with autism. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(5), 50–64.
Hattier, M. A., Matson, J. L., Tureck, K., & Horovitz, M. (2011). The effects of gender and age on repetitive and/or restricted behaviors and interests in adults with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2346–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.028
*Herrero, J. F., & Lorenzo, G. (2020). An immersive virtual reality educational intervention on people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) for the development of communication skills and problem solving. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 1689–1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10050-0
Hiller, R. M., Young, R. L., & Weber, N. (2016). Sex differences in pre-diagnosis concerns for children later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 20(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314568899
Horwitz, E. H., Schoevers, R. A., Greaves-Lord, K., de Bildt, A., & Hartman, C. A. (2020). Adult manifestation of milder forms of autism spectrum disorder; autistic and non-autistic psychopathology. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(8), 2973–2986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04403-9
Howard, M. C., & Gutworth, M. B. (2020). A meta-analysis of virtual reality training programs for social skills development. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103707
*Ip, H. H., Wong, S. W., Chan, D. F., Byrne, J., Li, C., Yuan, V. S., Lau, K. S. Y., & Wong, J. Y. (2018). Enhance emotional and social adaptation skills for children with autism spectrum disorder: A virtual reality enabled approach. Computers & Education, 117, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.010
Kandalaft, M. R., Didehbani, N., Krawczyk, D., Allen, T., & Chapman, S. (2013). Virtual reality social cognition training for young adults with high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1544-6
Kanfiszer, L., Davies, F., & Collins, S. (2017). ‘I was just so different’: The experiences of women diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder in adulthood in relation to gender and social relationships. Autism, 21(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316687987
*Ke, F., & Im, T. (2013). Virtual-reality-based social interaction training for children with high-functioning autism. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(6), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420945603
*Ke, F., & Lee, S. (2016). Virtual reality based collaborative design by children with high-functioning autism: Design-based flexibility, identity, and norm construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(7), 1511–1533. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1040421
*Ke, F., & Moon, J. (2018). Virtual collaborative gaming as social skills training for high-functioning autistic children. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(4), 728–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12626
*Ke, F., Moon, J., & Sokolikj, Z. (2020). Virtual reality-based social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Special Education Technology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420945603
Ke, F., Whalon, K., & Yun, J. (2018). Social skill interventions for youth and adults with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 88, 3–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317740334
Kjellmer, L., Hedvall, Å., Fernell, E., Gillberg, C., & Norrelgen, F. (2012). Language and communication skills in preschool children with autism spectrum disorders: Contribution of cognition, severity of autism symptoms, and adaptive functioning to the variability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(1), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.003
*Lee, I. J. (2020). Kinect-for-windows with augmented reality in an interactive roleplay system for children with an autism spectrum disorder. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1710851
*Lee, I. J., Chen, C. H., Wang, C. P., & Chung, C. H. (2018). Augmented reality plus concept map technique to teach children with ASD to use social cues when meeting and greeting. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(3), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0382-5
*Liu, R., Salisbury, J. P., Vahabzadeh, A., & Sahin, N. T. (2017). Feasibility of an autism-focused augmented reality smartglasses system for social communication and behavioral coaching. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 5, 145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2017.00145
Loomes, R., Hull, L., & Mandy, W. P. L. (2017). What is the male-to-female ration in autism spectrum disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 56(6), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.03.013
*Lorenzo, G., Gómez-Puerta, M., Arráez-Vera, G., & Lorenzo-Lledó, A. (2019). Preliminary study of augmented reality as an instrument for improvement of social skills in children with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9768-5
Lorenzo, G., Lledó, A., Arráez-Vera, G., & Lorenzo-Lledó, A. (2018). The application of immersive virtual reality for students with ASD: A review between 1990–2017. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9766-7
*Lorenzo, G., Lledó, A., Pomares, J., & Roig, R. (2016). Design and application of an immersive virtual reality system to enhance emotional skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. Computers & Education, 98, 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.018
*Lorenzo, G., Pomares, J., & Lledó, A. (2013). Inclusion of immersive virtual learning environments and visual control systems to support the learning of students with Asperger syndrome. Computers & Education, 62, 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.028
Lüddeckens, J. (2020). Approaches to inclusion and social participation in school for adolescents with autism spectrum conditions (ASC)—A systematic research review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-020-00209-8
*Malinverni, L., Mora-Guiard, J., Padillo, V., Valero, L., Hervas, A., & Pares, N. (2017). An inclusive design approach for developing video games for children with autism spectrum disorder. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.018
Manca, D., Brambilla, S., & Colombo, S. (2013). Bridging between virtual reality and accident simulation for training of process-industry operators. Adcances in Engineering Software, 55, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.09.002
Maskey, M., Lowry, J., Rodgers, J., McConahie, H., & Parr, J. R. (2014). Reducing specific phobia/fear in young people with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) through a virtual reality environment intervention. PLoS ONE, 9, e100374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100374
May, T., Cornish, K., & Rinehart, N. J. (2016). Gender profiles of behavioral attention in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20(7), 627–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712455502
Mesa-Gresa, P., Gil-Gómez, H., Lozano-Quilis, J., & Gil-Gómez, J.-A. (2018). Effectiveness of virtual reality for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: An evidence-based systematic review. Sensors, 18, 2486. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082486
Miller, H. L., & Bugnariu, N. L. (2016). Level of immersion in virtual environments impacts the ability to assess and teach social skills in autims spectrum disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19, 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0682
*Milne, M., Luerssen, M. H., Lewis, T. W., Leibbrandt, R. E., & Powers, D. M. W. (2010). Development of a virtual agent based social tutor for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Barcelona, pp. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2010.5596584
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
*Moon, J., & Ke, F. F. (2019). Exploring the treatment integrity of virtual reality-based social skills training for children with high-functioning autism. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1613665
Munkhaugen, E. K., Gjevik, E., Pripp, A. H., Sponheim, E., & Diseth, T. H. (2017). School refusal behaviour: Are children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder at a higher risk? Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 41, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2017.07.001
Newbutt, N., Bradley, R., & Conley, I. (2020). Using virtual reality head-mounted displays in schools with autistic children: Views, experiences, and future directions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 23(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0206
Newbutt, N., Sung, C., Kuo, H., & Leahy, M. J. (2016). The potential of virtual reality technologies to support people with an autism condition: A case study of acceptance, presence and negative effects. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 14, 149–154.
Nordahl-Hansen, A., Dechsling, A., Sütterlin, S., Børtveit, L., Zhang, D., Øien, R. A., & Marschik, P. B. (2020). An overview of virtual reality interventions for two neurodevelopmental disorders: intellectual disabilities and autism. In D. Schmorrow & C. Fidopiastis (Eds.), Augmented cognition. Human cognition and behaviour. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (Vol. 12197). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50439-7_17
*Parsons, S. (2015). Learning to work together: Designing a multi-user virtual reality game for social collaboration and perspective-taking for children with autism. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 6, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.12.002
Parsons, S., Yuill, N., Good, J., & Brosnan, M. (2020). Whose agenda? Who knows best? Whose voice? Co-creating a technology research roadmap with autism stakeholders. Disability & Society, 35(2), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1624152
Peters, M., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Ramdoss, S., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., Mulloy, A., Lang, R., & O’Reilly, M. (2012). Computer-based interventions to improve social and emotional skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2011.651655
*Ravindran, V., Osgood, M., Sazawal, V., Solorzano, R., & Turnacioglu, S. (2019). Virtual reality support for joint attention using the floreo joint attention module: Usability and feasibility pilot study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 2(2), e14429. https://doi.org/10.2196/14429
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
Russell, G., Mandy, W., Elliott, D., White, R., Pittwood, T., & Ford, T. (2019). Selection bias on intellectual ability in autism research: A cross-sectional review and meta-analysis. Molecular Autism, 10, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-019-0260-x
Rynkiewicz, A., Schuller, B., Marchi, E., Piana, S., Camurri, A., Lassalle, A., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2016). An investigation of the “female camouflage effect” in autism using a computerized ADOS-2 and a test of sex/gender differences. Molecular Autism, 7, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-016-0073-
Sandbank, M., Bottema-Beutel, K., Crowley, S., Cassidy, M., Dunham, K., Feldman, J. I., Crank, J., Albarran, S. A., Raj, S., Mahbub, P., & Woynaroski, T. G. (2020). Project AIM: Autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000215
Schreibman, L., Dawson, G., Stahmer, A. C., Landa, R., Rogers, S. J., McGee, G. G., Kasari, C., Ingersoll, B., Kaiser, A. P., Bruinsma, Y., McNerney, E., Wetherby, A., & Halladay, A. (2015). Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: Empirically validated treatments for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(8), 2411–2428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2407-8
*Serret, S., Hun, S., Iakimova, G., Lozada, J., Anastassova, M., Santos, A., Vesperini, S., & Askenazy, F. (2014). Facing the challenge of teaching emotions to individuals with low- and high-functioning autism using a new Serious game: A pilot study. Molecular Autism, 5, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-5-37
Shadish, W. R., Hedges, L. V., & Pustejovsky, J. E. (2014). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: A primer and applications. Journal of School Psychology, 52(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.005
Skafle, I., Nordahl-Hansen, A., & Øien, R. A. (2019). Short report: Social perception of high school students with ASD in Norway. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04281-w
*Smith, M., Ginger, E., Wright, K., Wright, M., Taylor, J., Humm, L., Olsen, D. E., Bell, M. D., & Fleming, M. (2014). Virtual reality job interview training in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 44(10), 2450–2463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2113-y
*Stichter, J., Laffey, J., Galyen, K., & Herzog, M. (2014). iSocial: Delivering the social competence intervention for adolescents (SCI-A) in a 3D virtual learning environment for youth with high functioning autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 44(2), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1881-0
*Strickland, D., Coles, C., & Southern, L. (2013). JobTIPS: A transition to employment program for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 43(10), 2472–2483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1881-0
*Trepagnier, C. Y., Olsen, D. E., Boteler, L., & Bell, A. B. (2011). Virtual conversation partner for adults with autism. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1–2), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0255
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Sharpe, J. P., Wilson, K., Kenny, M., Warren, R., Wilson, C., Stelfox, H. T., & Straus, S. E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
*Tsai, W. T., Lee, I. J., & Chen, C. H. (2020). Inclusion of third-person perspective in CAVE-like immersive 3D virtual reality role-playing games for social reciprocity training of children with an autism spectrum disorder. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00724-9
*Uzuegbunam, N., Wong, W. H., Cheung, S. C. S., & Ruble, L. (2018). MEBook: Multimedia social greetings intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders. Ieee Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(4), 520–535. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2772255
*Vahabzadeh, A., Keshav, N. U., Abdus-Sabur, R., Huey, K., Liu, R., & Sahin, N. T. (2018). Improved socio-emotional and behavioral functioning in students with autism following school-based smartglasses intervention: Multi-stage feasibility and controlled efficacy study. Behavioral Sciences, 8(10), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8100085
*Wang, X., Laffey, J., Xing, W., Galyen, K., & Stichter, J. (2017). Fostering verbal and non-verbal social interactions in a 3D collaborative virtual learning environment: A case study of youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders learning social competence in iSocial. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 1015–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9512-7
*Ward, D. M., & Esposito, M. C. K. (2019). Virtual reality in transition program for adults with autism: Self-efficacy, confidence, and interview skills. Contemporary School Psychology, 23(4), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0195-9
*White, S. W., Richey, J. A., Gracanin, D., Coffman, M., Elias, R., LaConte, S., & Ollendick, T. H. (2016). Psychosocial and computer-assisted intervention for college students with autism spectrum disorder: Preliminary support for feasibility. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(3), 307–317. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc5241080/
Wolstencroft, J., Robinson, L., Srinivasan, R., Kerry, E., Mandy, W., & Skuse, D. (2018). A systematic review of group social skills interventions, and meta-analysis of outcomes, for children with high functioning ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(7), 2293–2307.
Yang, Y. J. D., Allen, T., Abdullahi, S. M., Pelphrey, K. A., Volkmar, F. R., & Chapman, S. B. (2017). Brain responses to biological motion predict treatment outcome in young adults with autism receiving Virtual Reality Social Cognition Training: Preliminary findings. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 93, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.03.014
*Yang, Y. J. D., Allen, T., Abdullahi, S. M., Pelphrey, K. A., Volkmar, F. R., & Chapman, S. B. (2018). Neural mechanisms of behavioral change in young adults with high-functioning autism receiving virtual reality social cognition training: A pilot study. Autism Research, 11(5), 713–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1941
*Zhang, L., Fu, Q., Swanson, A., Weitlauf, A., Warren, Z., & Sarkar, N. (2018). Design and evaluation of a collaborative virtual environment (CoMove) for autism spectrum disorder intervention. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 11(2), 1–22.
*Zhang, L., Warren, Z., Swanson, A., Weitlauf, A., & Sarkar, N. (2018b). Understanding performance and verbal-communication of children with ASD in a collaborative virtual environment. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 48(8), 2779–2789.
*Zhao, H., Swanson, A. R., Weitlauf, A. S., Warren, Z. E., & Sarkar, N. (2018). Hand-in-hand: A communication-enhancement collaborative virtual reality system for promoting social interaction in children with autism spectrum disorders. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48(2), 136–148.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the specialist librarian Grete Gluppe at the Section for Library at Østfold University College for contributing with information retrieval.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Ostfold University College. No funding was received for conducting this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AD: principal author, conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, visualization; SO: formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft; TK: methodology, writing—review & editing; SS: writing—review & editing, supervision; RAØ: writing—review & editing; FS: writing—review & editing; AN-H (P.I.): conceptualization, methodology, writing—review & editing, supervision, project administration.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dechsling, A., Orm, S., Kalandadze, T. et al. Virtual and Augmented Reality in Social Skills Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Scoping Review. J Autism Dev Disord 52, 4692–4707 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05338-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05338-5