Abstract
Background
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are forms of non-coding RNAs that have crucial roles in regulation of various biological processes of several malignant tumors. circKIF4A is closely associated with malignant progression of a variety of cancers. However, the molecular mechanisms as well as roles of circKIF4A in osteosarcoma (OS) have not yet been clearly elucidated.
Methods
We evaluated the expression of circKIF4A in OS. Colony-formation, cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8), transwell and mice metastasis model assays were done to explore the roles of circKIF4A in vitro and in vivo. TargetScan database, double luciferase, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis (RT-qPCR), and RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) were done to investigate the associated molecular mechanisms.
Results
In both OS cells and tissues, circKIF4A (hsa_circ_0007255) was found to be upregulated. In vitro and in vivo, circKIF4A knockdown markedly suppressed OS proliferation as well as metastasis. circKIF4A enhanced OS growth as well as metastasis by sponging miR-515-5p and by upregulating SLC7A11.
Conclusions
We identified the biological significance of the circKIF4A-miR-515-5p-SLC7A11 axis in OS cell proliferation and metastasis, which is important in OS monitoring and treatment. More studies on circKIF4A will inform on the diagnostic markers for early OS screening.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Osteosarcoma (OS), a primary malignant bone tumor whose origin is in the mesenchymal tissues, occurs more often in the long bones of children and young people under 25 [1]. The cause and mechanism of its pathogenesis are not yet clear. At present, the accepted treatment mode for osteosarcoma is surgical resection combined with preoperative and postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although the chemotherapy regimen continues to improve and the treatment effect is improved, the 5-year survival rate for patients with osteosarcoma is still 60–70% [2]. Mainly due to the side effects of chemotherapeutics and the lack of specific molecular targets. Therefore, it is important to find specific molecular targets for osteosarcoma treatment, and then to develop targeted drugs with exact curative effect and high safety, which will improve the prognosis and survival rate of patients with osteosarcoma.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are abundant non-coding covalently closed RNAs. They are composed of exon or intron precursor mRNA reverse splicing sequence, without upstream head or downstream tail [3]. Compared with the linear mRNA, their structure, which is circular, enhances their stability and resistance to RNA exonucleases [4]. As novel forms of endogenous non-coding RNAs, their expressions in various cells and tissues are elevated, and they are potential miRNA sponges for regulating the expression of several key downstream genes, splicing or acting as transcription factors encoding proteins [5]. Due to advances in circRNA-sequencing as well as bioinformatics analyses, more and more abnormally expressed circRNAs in tumors have been identified [6]. CircRNAs are involved in many biological processes of malignant tumors [7].
circKIF4A (hsa_circRNA_0007255, chr13: 69549254-69553539) is derived from the exon region of the KIF4A gene. In glioma tissues, circKIF4A levels are significantly increased. Inhibition of circKIF4A can suppress clone formation, migration as well as invasive abilities of glioma cells, and increase their apoptosis [8]. In ovarian cancer tissues, circKIF4A levels are elevated. CircKIF4A knockdown suppresses ovarian cancer cell proliferation as well as migration, and as a kind of ceRNA, circKIF4A can upregulate JAM3 levels via sponge adsorption of miR-127 to enhance ovarian cancer progression [9]. In addition, circKIF4A can upregulate NOTCH2 levels by sponge adsorption of miR-375/1231 to enhance bladder cancer progression [10]. In triple-negative breast cancer, the circKIF4A/miR-375/KIF4A axis can regulate its progress through competitive endogenous RNA, and circKIF4A is a novel prognostic marker as well as treatment target for TNBC [11]. In addition, circKIF4A silencing can regulate ZEB1 expression through sponge adsorption of miR-152 to hinder cell metastasis and promote cell apoptosis in breast cancer [12]. circKIF4A promotes malignant progression of papillary thyroid cancer by sponging miR-1231, GPX4 upregulation and suppresses ferroptosis [13]. However, the functions and molecular mechanisms of circKIF4A in bone growth and metastasis of OS are still unclear. Based on the above research background, we evaluated the significance of circKIF4A on OS growth as well as metastasis, and explored the possible mechanisms of circKIF4A in regulating the progression of OS.
Materials and methods
Tissue samples
Thirty pairs of fresh OS tissues with their matching non-cancerous bone tissues were acquired from the department of orthopedics in Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and was permitted by the Ethical Committee of Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital. Informed consents were obtained from all patients prior to their inclusion. Study protocols were prepared prior to the study without registration.
Cell culture
OS cell lines SOSP-9607, HOS, U2OS, SW1353, and Saos-2, as well as the normal human osteoblast line hFOB1.19 were bought from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Cell line maintenance and culture was done as instructed by ATCC. Cell authenticity was confirmed by DNA fingerprinting.
RT-qPCR
The TRIzol reagent (Sigma, USA) was used for total cellular RNA extraction. The SYBR Premix Ex Taq Kit (Takara, Japan) was used for RT-qPCR assays. The primers used in this study were: SLC7A11, F: 5′-GGTGGTGTGTTTGCTGTC-3′, R: 5′-GCTGGTAGAGGAGTGTGC-3′ and GAPDH, F: 5′-GACCCCTTCATTGACCT-3′, R: 5′-CCACCACCCTGTTGCTGT-3′. The circRNA quantification process was comparable to that of mRNA. Before transcription, treatment with RNase R was done to remove linear RNA. Gene expressions were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method and GAPDH was used as the mRNA and circRNA control while U6 was the miRNA control.
Subcellular location of circRNA
Treatment with RNase R was used to assess circKIF4A stability. First, for 20 min, total RNA (1 µg) was treated with RNase R (3U/µg, Epicentre Technologies, USA) at 37 °C. Then, purification was done using the the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (74204, Qiagen, Germany), as instructed by the manufacturer. After transcription, expression levels of circKIF4A as well as its linear gene, KIF4A, were evaluated by RT-qPCR.
Western blot analysis
Extraction of cellular proteins was done using the RIPA lysis buffer and the phenylmethylsulphonyls fluoride (PMSF) reagent. Separation of the target protein was done using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. Transfer conditions were 200 mA for 2 h on PVDF membranes. Overnight incubation of the membranes was done in the presence of anti-SLC7A11 and anti-β-actin antibodies (1:2000) at 4 °C, after which they were incubated with specific secondary antibodies at room temperature (RT) for 3 h.
RNase R digestion assay
Total RNA (5 µg) from OS cells Saos-2 and U2OS were treated with the control solution or RNase R (8.5 U/µg) and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. The resultant RNA solution was purified, followed by RT-qPCR quantification.
Actinomycin D assay
Linear mRNA transcription in OS cells U2OS and Saos-2 were digested by exposure to 5 ug/mL of actinomycin D for 0 h, 8 h, 16 h, or 24 h. Then, Saos-2 and U2OS cell lines were harvested at set time points. Quantification of linear KIF4A mRNA as well as the circular circKIF4A was done by RT-qPCR.
Cell counting kit-8 assay
The U2OS as well as Saos-2 OS cell lines were digested and resuspended. Then, seeding of si-circCTR and si-circKIF4A transfected cancer cells in a 96-well plate (103 cells/well) was followed by incubation at 37 °C. Prior to measurements, 10 µL of the cell counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) solution was added into every well, followed by 1 h of incubation at 37 °C [14, 15].
Clone formation experiment
Logarithmic growth phase U2OS and Saos-2 cells were digested using 0.25% trypsin, beat them into individual cells and dilute it in gradient multiples for 3 parallel samples each group. The cells of each group were seeded in a six-well plate (100 cells per well), gently shake the cells to spread them evenly. Then place them in a 5% CO2 environment at 37 °C, and incubated until there were macroscopically visible clones in the cell culture plate. Subsequent stain the clones using crystal violet, after which colony counting was microscopically performed.
Quantitative analysis of GSH/GSSG
Operate based on the manufacturer’s instructions (ab138881, Abcam, USA). Add the deproteinized samples and standards into wells. Thiol Green was added in the assay buffer for GSH detection, or add GSSG probe for total glutathione (GSH + GSSG) detection. Incubate the mixture at RT for 30 min. Then analyze the samples using a microplate reader. Calculation of GSSG levels was done by subtracting GSH from the total glutathione levels.
Transwell assay
The OS cells (104 cells/well) were resuspended after which they were transferred into upper chambers filled with serum-free medium. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) medium (20%) was loaded into the lower chambers. Then, cell fixation was done in methanol and stained with crystal violet (0.5%). Cell imaging and counting was done by microscopy [16] (Olympus IX73, Japan).
Dual luciferase reporter assay
The U2OS as well as Saos-2 OS cell lines were seeded in 96-well plates (103 cells/well). The constructed reporting vectors (circKIF4A-wt/mut or SLC7A117 3′-UTR-wt/mut), the miRNA mimics, as well as their controls were transfected into OS cells by Lipofectamine 3000. Cell harvesting was done after 48 h for the assessment of Renilla and firefly luciferase activities via the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (E1910, Promega, USA). Determination of relative luciferase activities was done by normalization of the firefly luciferase activities to Renilla luciferase activities.
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP)
The RIP assays were conducted using the Anti-Ago2 antibody. Expression levels of circKIF4A, SLC7A11 and miR-515-5p were determined after RNA purifications. Transfection of the MS2bs-circKIF4A vector, MS2bs-circKIF4A-mt vector as well as the MS2bs-Rluc vector into U2OS and Saos-2 cells was followed by 48 h of incubated. Then, the RIP assay was conducted. miR-515-5p abundance was evaluated after purification of the RNA complexes.
RNA pull-down assay
In this assay, U2OS as well as Saos-2 (104 cells/well) were first transfected with the biotin-labeled miR-515-5p or the miR-negative control (RiboBio, China). Cells were harvested after 48 h, lysed using the lysis buffer followed by 2 h of incubation in the presence of streptavidin beads (Thermo Scientific Fisher, USA) at RT. Then, beads were obtained and washed twice using PBS. Finally, the RNeasy Mini Kit (74,104, Qiagen, Germany) was used to clean eluted RNAs that had been attached to the beads. Finally, the abundance of SLC7A11 was assessed by RT-qPCR.
Mouse metastasis model
Take 6-week-old nude mice and randomly divide them into 2 groups with 5 mice in each group. The U2OS OS cells (2 × 106 cells/well) stably inhibiting circKIF4A (sh-circKIF4A) as well as its control (sh-CTR) were injected into nude mice with 200 µL of cell suspension through the tail vein [17]. After 4 weeks the mice were sacrificed. There were 5 pairs of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens, after deparaffinization, hydration and blocking were performed. HE stained lung metastasis specimens from the experimental group were compared with the control specimens under the microscope. The stained lung specimens were used for microscopic counting of metastatic sites.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS 23.0 and shown as mean ± SD. Comparisons of means between groups was done by the student’s t-test. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.
Results
CircKIF4A is upregulated in OS
We explored circKIF4A levels in OS cells and osteoblasts. Relative to normal human osteoblast hFOB1.19, circKIF4A was markedly upregulated in SOSP-9607, HOS, SW1353, Saos-2 as well as U2OS cell lines, particularly in U2OS and Saos-2 cells, detected by RT-qPCR (Fig. 1A). Thirty pairs of OS patient samples and corresponding non-cancerous bone tissue samples were collected and used for expression analysis of circKIF4A. circKIF4A was markedly elevated in all OS tissues (Fig. 1B). The circular structure as well as stabilities of circKIF4A were assessed by actinomycin D and RNase R assays. circKIF4A exhibited a high resistance to RNA exonuclease (RNase R) (Fig. 1C). Consistently, the circular form of circKIF4A was associated with a longer half-life span, relative to linear KIF4A mRNA (Fig. 1D).
CircKIF4A silencing inhibited OS cell growth and metastasis
To evaluate the roles of circKIF4A in OS progression, circKIF4A was knocked down in U2OS as well as Saos-2 cells using the small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting circKIF4A (si-circ_0007255) (Fig. 2A). The CCK-8 assays revealed that circKIF4A silencing markedly suppressed U2OS and Saos-2 cell proliferations (Fig. 2B). The colony-formation assay confirmed these results (Fig. 2C, D). To determine if circKIF4A silencing inhibited OS cell invasion, invasion assays were conducted. circKIF4A silencing suppressed U2OS and Saos-2 cell invasions in vitro (Fig. 2E, F). In addition, circKIF4A silencing inhibited the metastatic abilities of the U2OS cell line (Fig. 2G). The results demonstrated that lung metastasis nodule counts were remarkably low in the sh-circKIF4A group, relative to the sh-CTR group (Fig. 2H). HE staining was used to show the morphology of lung tissues and the number of nodules (Fig. 2I).
CircKIF4A is a sponge of miR-515-5p in OS
circKIF4A was shown to be localized in the cytoplasms of U2OS and Saos-2 cell lines (Fig. 3A). Potential interactions between multiple miRNAs and circRNAs were assessed using the Circular RNA Interactome database. Among the miRNAs, miR-515-5p bound the circKIF4A sequence with a potential interacting site (Fig. 3B). Relative to the normal human osteoblast hFOB1.19, miR-515-5p was all significantly suppressed in SOSP-9607, HOS, SW1353, Saos-2 as well as U2OS cell lines (Fig. 3C). Then, we determined if miR-515-5p could bind to circKIF4A. The relative luciferase activity was markedly suppressed upon co-transfection of miR-515-5p with the WT 3′-circKIF4A plasmid, when compared to transfection with the MUT 3′-circKIF4A plasmid (Fig. 3D). To confirm direct interactions between circKIF4A and miR-515-5p, RIP assay to pulldown circKIF4A was performed. It was found that miR-515-5p was highly upregulated in the MS2bs-circKIF4A overexpressed group in OS cells U2OS and Saos-2 (Fig. 3E).
CircKIF4A enhances OS progression via the circKIF4A-miR-515-5p-SLC7A11 axis
Potential targeting genes for miR-515-5p were determined by TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org), microT (https://bio.tools/DIANA-microT), miRDB (http://mirdb.org) and miRMap (https://mirmap.ezlab.org) databases. The data indicated that SLC7A11 contains conserved binding sites for miR-515-5p in the intersection of the results of these four databases (Fig. 4A). Compared with hFOB1.19, SLC7A11 was all significantly upregulated in SOSP-9607, HOS, SW1353, Saos-2 and U2OS cells (Fig. 4B). Then, we determined if miR-515-5p could directly bind the 3′-UTR of SLC7A11 mRNA. The relative luciferase activity was markedly suppressed upon cotransfection of miR-515-5p with the WT 3′-UTR-SLC7A11 plasmid, relative to the MUT 3′-UTR-SLC7A114 plasmid (Fig. 4C). Meanwhile, compared with the miR-CTR group, exogenous miR-515-5p contributed to suppression of SLC7A11 mRNA expression levels (Fig. 4D). The RIP assay revealed that circKIF4A, SLC7A11 as well as miR-515-5p were highly enriched in the anti-AGO2 group in Saos-2 and U2OS OS cells (Fig. 4E). Enrichment to RNA induced silencing complex (RISC) of SLC7A11 was significantly elevated after circKIF4A silencing whether it’s in Saos-2 and U2OS cells (Fig. 4F). After transfecting with si-circKIF4A in OS cells, SLC7A11 protein levels were markedly decreased. That’s to say, circKIF4A silencing markedly suppressed SLC7A11 protein levels (Fig. 4G). Moreover, circKIF4A knock-down suppressed total GSH/GSSG ratios in Saos-2 and U2OS cells (Fig. 4H). Exogenous miR-515-5p inhibitor (HmiR-AN0571-SN-10, the control was CmiR-AN0001-SN, GeneCopoeia, China) rescued the expression of SLC7A11 which is reduced by si-circKIF4A, while the expression of SLC7A11 was the lowest when miR-515-5p and si-circKIF4A were co-introduced at the same time, comparing with the miR-CTR, si-circCTR, miR-515-5p, miR-515-5p inhibitor and si-circKIF4A groups (Fig. 4I).
Discussion
OS, which is the most prevalent primary solid malignant tumor of bone tissues, is also one of the main causes of death in bone tumor patients [18, 19]. OS has a high degree of malignancy and early metastasis. It is easy to relapse and metastasize after treatment. The patient’s prognostic outcomes for OS are poor and the 5-year survival rate is relatively low. Invasion as well as metastasis mechanisms of OS are yet to be fully established, and it is still a hot and difficult point of current research [20, 21]. Thus, it is important to identify specific molecular targets for OS treatment, and then to develop targeted drugs with exact curative effect and high safety, which will improve the prognostic outcomes as well as survival rates for OS patients.
CircRNAs are highly expressed in cells and tissues, and are potential miRNA sponges for regulating the expressions of various key genes closely relatively to malignant tumor [22]. circKIF4A is significant in malignant progression of a variety of tumors [8,9,10,11,12,13]. We tested circKIF4A levels in OS cells and tissues. circKIF4A was markedly upregulated in OS. Multiple studies have shown that the expression of circKIF4A was up-regulated in various tumors, it was relatively cancerous [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Subsequently, siRNA and shRNA were used for circKIF4A knockdown in OS cells, the results revealed that circKIF4A silencing remarkably reduced the effect of circKIF4A on the growth, clone formation, invasion and lung metastasis in vitro as well as in vivo. Thus, we investigated its molecular mechanisms. CircRNAs regulate and communicate among themselves via competitive binding to shared miRNAs according to the ceRNA theory [23, 24]. We found that circKIF4A is an miR-515-5p sponge in OS, and regulatory relationships were verified via the dual luciferase reporter as well as RIP assays. Relative to circKIF4A, miR-515-5p expressions were markedly decreased in OS, further verifying the combination of the two. miR-515-5p inhibits various cancer processes, for instance, it acts as a prostate cancer inhibitor by targeting TRIP13 [25], suppresses HCC migration as well as invasion via the IL6/JAK/STAT3 pathway [26], inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation, migration as well as invasion via the hsa_circ_0008039/miR-515-5p/CBX4 axis [27]. The functions of miR-515-5p in OS is basically the same as the above researches.
We established that miR-515-5p binds SLC7A11 3′-UTRs, and its expression was confirmed to be markedly suppressed by miR-515-5p. SLC7A11 is a molecule closely related to ferroptosis, a new mode of cell death. Compared to apoptosis, autophagy, pyrolysis and necrosis, the biochemical regulation mechanism, morphological characteristics and genetic background of ferroptosis are also different from the classic cell death mode. It is caused by iron ion-dependent lipid peroxide damage. The morphological characteristics of ferroptosis cells under the electron microscope are mainly manifested as mitochondrial shrinkage, smaller volume, increased density of mitochondrial bilayer membrane, rupture of the outer membrane, mitochondrial cristae decrease or disappear, no obvious change in nucleus volume, and no chromatin concentration [28]. The biochemical characteristics are mainly manifested in the accumulation of iron ions and reactive oxygen species (ROS), cystine/glutamate antiporter inhibition, reduced glutathione synthesis, NAPDH oxidation, lipid peroxides accumulation on the cell membrane, etc. [29]. The mechanism of ferroptosis is the Fenton reaction between free iron ions and peroxides in the cell, so that the polyunsaturated fatty acids on the biofilm are further peroxidized, and its occurrence is regulated by a variety of genes. System Xc is a vital antioxidant system on the cell membrane. It is made up of two subunits coded by SLC7A11 as well as SLC3A2. Its main function is to take up cystine from the outside of the cell and discharge glutamate to the outside of the cell. After being taken up by System Xc, cystine is further reduced to cysteine via ethanethiol and other pathways to participate in the synthesis of glutathione. Glutathione then specifically and efficiently removes lipid peroxides with the participation of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), thereby inhibiting the occurrence of ferroptosis [29]. When SLC7A11 is inhibited, or the activity of GPX4 decreases, lipid peroxides cannot be metabolized through the glutathione reduction pathway. In turn, the Fenton reaction with ferrous ions produces a large amount of ROS, which causes lipid peroxides to accumulate on the cell membrane, thereby inducing ferroptosis. A number of studies have shown that inhibiting SLC7A11, GPX4 or other ferroptosis related molecules can reduce the production of glutathione, thereby promoting tumor cell ferroptosis and suppressing tumor growth and metastasis [30,31,32,33].
We quantitatively evaluated the effects of circKIF4A on ferroptosis of OS cells by total GSH/GSSG ratio and SLC7A11 protein expression, the results demonstrated that circKIF4A silencing significantly reduced SLC7A11 protein expression and GSH/GSSG ratio. circKIF4A is elevated in papillary thyroid carcinoma and the circKIF4A/miR-1231/GPX4 axis plays a crucial function in tumor proliferation as well as ferroptosis [25]. Similar to GPX4, SLC7A11 is also a molecule that is closely associated with ferroptosis and malignant progression of several tumors. The above findings imply that circKIF4A may play vital roles in the growth and metastasis of OS by circKIF4A/miR-1231/GPX4 axis, and this process may be closely related to ferroptosis. We will expand the sample size to further confirm the mechanism in the future.
Conclusions
circKIF4A exerts if effects OS growth and metastasis via the circKIF4A-miR-515-5p-SLC7A11 axis. These findings provide a theoretical basis for the development of new therapeutic strategies and have potential prognostic implications for OS.
Data availability
All authors approved that all data and materials as well as software application or custom code support our published claims and comply with field standards. Data will be made available if needed.
References
Fathizadeh H, Mirzaei H, Asemi Z (2019) Melatonin: an anti-tumor agent for osteosarcoma. Cancer Cell Int 19:319. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-1044-2
Li J, Yang Z, Li Y, Xia J, Li D, Li H, Ren M, Liao Y, Yu S, Chen Y, Yang Y, Zhang Y (2016) Cell apoptosis, autophagy and necroptosis in osteosarcoma treatment. Oncotarget 7:44763–44778. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8206
Qu S, Yang X, Li X, Wang J, Gao Y, Shang R, Sun W, Dou K, Li H (2015) Circular RNA: a new star of noncoding RNAs. Cancer Lett 365:141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2015.06.003
Ebbesen KK, Hansen TB, Kjems J (2017) Insights into circular RNA biology. RNA Biol 14:1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2016.1271524
Goodall GJ, Wickramasinghe VO (2021) RNA in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 21:22–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-020-00306-0
Vo JN, Cieslik M, Zhang Y, Shukla S, Xiao L, Zhang Y, Wu YM, Dhanasekaran SM, Engelke CG, Cao X, Robinson DR, Nesvizhskii AI, Chinnaiyan AM (2019) The landscape of circular RNA in cancer. Cell 176:869-881e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.021
Han B, Chao J, Yao H (2018) Circular RNA and its mechanisms in disease: from the bench to the clinic. Pharmacol Ther 187:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.01.010
Huo LW, Wang YF, Bai XB, Zheng HL, Wang MD (2020) circKIF4A promotes tumorogenesis of glioma by targeting miR-139-3p to activate Wnt5a signaling. Mol Med 26:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-020-00159-1
Sheng S, Hu Y, Yu F, Tong W, Wang S, Cai Y, Zhu J (2020) circKIF4A sponges miR-127 to promote ovarian cancer progression. Aging 12:17921–17929. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103389
Shi YR, Wu Z, Xiong K, Liao QJ, Ye X, Yang P, Zu XB (2020) Circular RNA circKIF4A sponges miR-375/1231 to promote bladder cancer progression by upregulating NOTCH2 expression. Front Pharmacol 11:605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00605
Tang H, Huang X, Wang J, Yang L, Kong Y, Gao G, Zhang L, Chen ZS, Xie X (2019) circKIF4A acts as a prognostic factor and mediator to regulate the progression of triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer 18:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0946-x
Jin Y, Yang L, Li X, Liu F (2020) Circular RNA KIF4A promotes cell migration, invasion and inhibits apoptosis through miR-152/ZEB1 axis in breast cancer. Diagn Pathol 15:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-00963-7
Chen W, Fu J, Chen Y, Li Y, Ning L, Huang D, Yan S, Zhang Q (2021) Circular RNA circKIF4A facilitates the malignant progression and suppresses ferroptosis by sponging miR-1231 and upregulating GPX4 in papillary thyroid cancer. Aging 13:16500–16512. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.203172
Peng F, Xiong L, Peng C (2020) (-)-Sativan inhibits tumor development and regulates miR-200c/PD-L1 in triple negative breast cancer cells. Front Pharmacol 11:251. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00251
Wang L, Peng F, Peng C, Du JR (2021) Gut microbiota in tumor microenvironment: a critical regulator in cancer initiation and development as potential targets for Chinese medicine. Am J Chin Med 49:609–626. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X21500270
Peng F, Xiong L, Xie X, Tang H, Huang R, Peng C (2020) Isoliquiritigenin derivative regulates miR-374a/BAX axis to suppress triple-negative breast cancer tumorigenesis and development. Front Pharmacol 11:378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00378
Peng F, Tang H, Du J, Chen J, Peng C (2021) Isoliquiritigenin suppresses EMT-induced metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer through miR-200c/C-JUN/[Formula: see text]-catenin. Am J Chin Med 49:505–523. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X21500233
Isakoff MS, Bielack SS, Meltzer P, Gorlick R (2015) Osteosarcoma: current treatment and a collaborative pathway to success. J Clin Oncol 33:3029–3035. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4895
Santak G, Francina M, Gotovac N (2021) A low grade osteosarcoma of the colon. Acta Chir Belg 121:267–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2019.1689647
Friebele JC, Peck J, Pan X, Abdel-Rasoul M, Mayerson JL (2015) Osteosarcoma: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 44:547–553
Luetke A, Meyers PA, Lewis I, Juergens H (2014) Osteosarcoma treatment—where do we stand? A state of the art review. Cancer Treat Rev 40:523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.11.006
Chen Y, Yang F, Fang E, Xiao W, Mei H, Li H, Li D, Song H, Wang J, Hong M, Wang X, Huang K, Zheng L, Tong Q (2019) Circular RNA circAGO2 drives cancer progression through facilitating HuR-repressed functions of AGO2-miRNA complexes. Cell Death Differ 26:1346–1364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-018-0220-6
Tay Y, Rinn J, Pandolfi PP (2014) The multilayered complexity of ceRNA crosstalk and competition. Nature 505:344–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12986
Verduci L, Strano S, Yarden Y, Blandino G (2019) The circRNA-microRNA code: emerging implications for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Mol Oncol 13:669–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12468
Zhang X, Zhou J, Xue D, Li Z, Liu Y, Dong L (2019) MiR-515-5p acts as a tumor suppressor via targeting TRIP13 in prostate cancer. Int J Biol Macromol 129:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.127
Ni JS, Zheng H, Ou YL, Tao YP, Wang ZG, Song LH, Yan HL, Zhou WP (2020) miR-515-5p suppresses HCC migration and invasion via targeting IL6/JAK/STAT3 pathway. Surg Oncol 34:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2020.03.003
Yuan XW, Yan TQ, Tong H (2020) Effect of miR-515-5p on proliferation and drug sensitivity of retinoblastoma cells. Cancer Manag Res 12:12087–12098. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S271165
Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, Patel DN, Bauer AJ, Cantley AM, Yang WS, Morrison B, Stockwell BR (2012) Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell 149:1060–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042
Stockwell BR, Friedmann Angeli JP, Bayir H, Bush AI, Conrad M, Dixon SJ, Fulda S, Gascon S, Hatzios SK, Kagan VE, Noel K, Jiang X, Linkermann A, Murphy ME, Overholtzer M, Oyagi A, Pagnussat GC, Park J, Ran Q, Rosenfeld CS, Salnikow K, Tang D, Torti FM, Torti SV, Toyokuni S, Woerpel KA, Zhang DD (2017) Ferroptosis: a regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell 171:273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.021
Sleire L, Skeie BS, Netland IA, Forde HE, Dodoo E, Selheim F, Leiss L, Heggdal JI, Pedersen PH, Wang J, Enger PO (2015) Drug repurposing: sulfasalazine sensitizes gliomas to gamma knife radiosurgery by blocking cystine uptake through system Xc-, leading to glutathione depletion. Oncogene 34:5951–5959. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.60
Yagoda N, von Rechenberg M, Zaganjor E, Bauer AJ, Yang WS, Fridman DJ, Wolpaw AJ, Smukste I, Peltier JM, Boniface JJ, Smith R, Lessnick SL, Sahasrabudhe S, Stockwell BR (2007) RAS-RAF-MEK-dependent oxidative cell death involving voltage-dependent anion channels. Nature 447:864–868. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05859
Yu M, Gai C, Li Z, Ding D, Zheng J, Zhang W, Lv S, Li W (2019) Targeted exosome-encapsulated erastin induced ferroptosis in triple negative breast cancer cells. Cancer Sci 110:3173–3182. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14181
Yang WS, SriRamaratnam R, Welsch ME, Shimada K, Skouta R, Viswanathan VS, Cheah JH, Clemons PA, Shamji AF, Clish CB, Brown LM, Girotti AW, Cornish VW, Schreiber SL, Stockwell BR (2014) Regulation of ferroptotic cancer cell death by GPX4. Cell 156:317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.010
Funding
This study was funded by the Science and Technology Department of Hunan Province, China (2018JJ6071).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: PH and FL; Administrative support: MZ; Provision of study materials or patients: ZW and HG; Collection and assembly of data: PH and FL; Data analysis and interpretation: PH and FL; Manuscript writing: All authors; Final approval of manuscript: All authors. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
He, P., Liu, F., Wang, Z. et al. CircKIF4A enhances osteosarcoma proliferation and metastasis by sponging MiR-515-5p and upregulating SLC7A11. Mol Biol Rep 49, 4525–4535 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-07296-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-07296-2