Abstract
Purpose
Patients with brain metastasis (BM) from solid tumors are in an advanced stage of cancer. BM may occur during a known oncological disease (metachronous BM) or be the primary manifestation of previously unknown cancer (synchronous BM). The time of diagnosis might decisively impact patient prognosis and further treatment stratification. In the present study, we analyzed the prognostic impact of synchronous versus (vs.) metachronous BM occurrence following resection of BM.
Methods
Between 2013 and 2018, 353 patients had undergone surgical therapy for BM at the authors’ neuro-oncological center. Survival stratification calculated from the day of neurosurgical resection was performed for synchronous vs. metachronous BM diagnosis.
Results
Non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) was the most common tumor entity of primary site (43%) followed by gastrointestinal cancer (14%) and breast cancer (13%). Synchronous BM occurrence was present in 116 of 353 patients (33%), metachronous BM occurrence was present in 237 of 353 patients (67%). NSCLC was significantly more often diagnosed via resection of the BM (56% synchronous vs. 44% metachronous situation, p = 0.0001). The median overall survival for patients with synchronous BM diagnosis was 12 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5–16.5) compared to 13 months (95% CI 9.6–16.4) for patients with metachronous BM diagnosis (p = 0.97).
Conclusions
The present study indicates that time of BM diagnosis (synchronous vs. metachronous) does not significantly impact patient survival following surgical therapy of BM. These results suggest that the indication for neurosurgical BM resection should be made regardless of a synchronous or a metachronous time of BM occurrence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Approximately 20-40% of all patients with cancer will develop brain metastasis (BM) [2, 3, 13] and neurosurgical resection is an important pillar of treatment in this vulnerable patient clientele with advanced systemically-spread cancer [5]. In addition to providing unequivocal histological diagnosis of the intracranial tumorous lesion, surgical therapy enables metastatic mass reduction resulting in reduced intracranial pressure, prevention of secondary hydrocephalus and improved overall survival (OS) [14, 22]. BM may occur during a known underlying cancer disease (metachronous situation) pretreated with multimodal therapies like radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and specifically-targeted therapies [1]. Compared with this, BM may be the cause of initially presenting symptoms of a previously unknown systemically-spread cancer disease (synchronous situation) [1]. With regard to the presence or the lack of preceding therapies, the time of BM resection dependent on synchronous versus (vs.) metachronous BM occurrence could have a decisive impact on patient prognosis and thus affect surgical and further conservative oncological decision making.
In the present study, we analyzed the prognostic impact of synchronous vs. metachronous BM diagnosis measured from the day of surgical BM resection in patients that had undergone surgery for BM.
Methods
All patients aged ≥ 18 years (yrs) who had undergone surgery for BM between 01/2013 and 12/2018 at the authors’ neuro-oncological center were registered in a computerized database. Only patients with histopathological proven BM were included in this study. Patients with lost follow-up information regarding the day of death were excluded from further analysis. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Bonn (No. 250/19). Informed consent was not sought as a retrospective study design was chosen.
Pertinent clinical information such as preoperative functional neurological status, comorbidities, radiological features, primary site of cancer and time of diagnosis was assessed. The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was used to classify the patients according to their functional status at admission. Patients were evaluated at admission according to their clinical–functional constitution with KPS ≥ 70% or KPS < 70%, as described previously [20]. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to evaluate the comorbidity burden of patients prior to surgery. After age adjustment, patients with BM were divided into two groups with CCI < 10 and CCI ≥ 10 as previously described [19]. A weekly tumor board meeting was held at initial presentation and during follow-up to discuss treatment strategies for each patient. Decisions were made by interdisciplinary consensus and, when appropriate, coordinated with the referring physician’s previous therapies [18]. In case of multiple BM, indication for resection was hold for the clinically-manifest lesion, for the prevention of mass effects by the resection of the most prevailing BM and/or to prevent acute tumor-related hydrocephalus.
All patients were divided into two groups for further investigations: Patients with BM as manifestation of a known cancer (metachronous situation) and patients with diagnosis of BM as the first manifestation of an unknown cancer disease (synchronous situation).
OS was defined as the time period from the day of surgery for BM until death or last observation in case the date of death was not known.
Statistical analysis and graphical illustration
The data collection of this study was performed using the SPSS computer software package for Windows (Version 27, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Categorical variables were analyzed in contingency tables using the Fisher’s exact test in case of only two variables and using chi-square test if more than two variables were analyzed. To compare data that was not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U-test was chosen. OS rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method using GraphPad Prism software for MacOS (Version 9.4.1, Graphpad Software, Inc., San Diego, California, USA). The Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test was used to compare survival rates. A backward stepwise method was used to construct a multivariate logistic regression model in order to identify predictors of elevated 1-year mortality. Results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The radar plot was generated using R (Version 3.6.2, Vienna, Austria) as previously described [11].
Results
Patient characteristics
Between 2013 and 2018, 388 patients had undergone resection of BM at the neuro-oncological center of the University Hospital Bonn. 35 patients were excluded from further analysis due to the lack of sufficient follow-up information. Therefore, the study cohort was made up of 353 patients with surgically treated BM.
The mean patient age was 64 years (SD ± 12 years) (Table 1). At admission, patients presented with a median KPS of 80 (IQR 70–90) and a median CCI of 11 (IQR 10–12). Most commonly BM originated from NSCLC (n = 153, 43%), followed by gastrointestinal cancer (n = 48, 14%), breast cancer (n = 45, 13%) and melanoma (n = 37, 10%). Supplementary Table S1 depicts comparative hormone receptor status analysis for the tumor of primary site and the BM in patients that had undergone surgery for BM from breast cancer between 2016 and 2019. 112 patients (32%) suffered from multiple BM and 158 patients (45%) presented with additional extracranial metastasis at the time of BM diagnosis. For the overall study cohort, mOS was 13 months (95% CI 10.3–15.7). 204 of 353 patients (58%) died within 1 year after BM resection. For further information on patient characteristics see Table 1.
Synchronous BM occurrence correlates to NSCLC and multiple BM
Synchronous BM diagnosis was present in 116 of 353 patients (33%) with BM, metachronous BM diagnosis occurred in 237 of 353 patients (67%) with BM (Table 2).
BM from NSCLC was significantly more often detected in the synchronous than in the metachronous situation: in 86 of 153 patients (56%) with BM from NSCLC, NSCLC was diagnosed through resection of the BM, whereas in 67 of 153 patients (44%) with BM from NSCLC, the BM occurred during a known NSCLC disease (p < 0.0001). Compared with this, BM from breast and gastrointestinal cancer entities significantly more often occurred in the metachronous situation (breast cancer: 93% metachronous vs. 7% synchronous, p = 0.0001; gastrointestinal cancer: 90% metachronous vs. 10% synchronous, p = 0.0001) (Table 2).
49 of 116 patients (42%) in the group of patients with synchronous BM occurrence revealed multiple BM at the day of BM resection compared to 63 of 237 patients (27%) in the group of patients with metachronous BM occurrence (p = 0.0035). Comparative analysis of age, sex, preoperative KPS and CCI as well as the presence of extracranial metastasis at the time of BM diagnosis revealed a homogeneous distribution between the groups of synchronous and metachronous BM occurrence (Table 2; Fig. 1).
Patient survival following BM resection does not differ between the groups of synchronous and metachronous BM occurrence
71 of 116 patients (61%) in the group of patients with synchronous BM occurrence died within 1 year after BM resection compared to 133 of 237 patients (56%) in the group of patients with metachronous BM occurrence (p = 0.42) (Table 2; Fig. 2). Patients with synchronous BM diagnosis exhibited a mOS of 12 months compared to 13 months in patients with metachronous BM diagnosis when calculated from the day of BM surgery (p = 0.97) (Fig. 2). Survival analysis for the group of patients with solitary BM revealed a mOS of 15 months (95% CI 11.2–18.8) for the synchronous situation and a mOS of 15 months (95% CI 5.9–24.1) for the metachronous situation (p = 0.7) (Supplementary Figure S1).
Similarly, for the subgroup of patients with NSCLC, 1-year mortality rates and mOS did not significantly differ for the synchronous and metachronous situation: 1-year mortality rate of 59% (synchronous) vs. 48% (metachronous), p = 0.19; mOS of 15 mo (95% CI 7.9–22.1) (synchronous) vs. 23 mo (95% CI 14.7–31.3) (metachronous), p = 0.21 (Supplementary Table S2).
Multivariable regression analysis including age, preoperative KPS, tumor entity NSCLC, multiple BM, additional extracranial metastasis, preoperative comorbidity burden objectified by the CCI and time of BM diagnosis (synchronous vs. metachronous) confirmed the variable ‘time of diagnosis (synchronous vs. metachronous)’ not to constitute an independent negative or positive predictor of increased 1-year mortality in patients that had undergone surgery for BM (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.8, 95% CI 0.4–1.3, p = 0.3) (Table 3).
Discussion
BM can occur during a known cancer disease (metachronous BM diagnosis) or be the primary manifestation of a previously unknown underlying oncological disease (synchronous BM diagnosis). The present manuscript indicates that time of BM diagnosis does not impact 1-year mortality and patient survival following surgical therapy of BM when measured from the day of BM resection.
NSCLC was the tumor entity that significantly more often had been diagnosed via the BM, whereas BM from gastrointestinal cancer and breast cancer significantly more often occurred in the course of the known underlying cancer disease. Lung cancer is known to cause the highest number of BM with an incidence of BM in literature ranging from 20% up to as high as 56% of all lung cancer patients depending on histological type, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and stage of disease [4, 10, 13, 24]. In line with our data, BM in breast cancer are reported to occur in 5-14% of cancer patients therefore ranking among the most prevalent cancer entities that develop BM [3, 15, 17, 21]. Our data additionally reveal that in contrast to BM from breast cancer, BM in NSCLC is more frequently diagnosed in the synchronous than in the metachronous situation. This observation might partly be reasoned in breast cancer pathologies that usually get clinically manifest by breast touch and medical check-up examinations while lung cancer quite commonly remains clinically unmasked until advanced stages of disease [9, 12, 23].
In the present series, the mOS rate of patients with metachronous BM occurrence was 13 months compared to 12 months for patients with synchronous BM occurrence when measured from the day of neurosurgical resection. Though survival analysis in patients with BM is confounded by the underlying heterogeneous tumor landscape, the OS data in our study are within the range of published survival data of patients with BM. According to survival analyses based on a multi-institutional database including over 6.900 patients with newly-diagnosed BM, survival data of patients with NSCLC cover a range of 6 mo to 25 mo dependent on preoperative KPS, age and histopathological subclassification [21]. Corresponding data for breast cancer and melanoma are stated 11 mo to 23 mo and 6 mo to 7 mo [21]. The present data additionally reveal that time of BM diagnosis does not significantly impact patient survival measured from the day of BM resection. These results suggest that the intended prognostic benefit of a surgical therapy in these vulnerable patients [7, 25] is present in both patients with metachronous and synchronous BM occurrence. Therefore, the authors recommend that surgical decision making in these patients with systemically spread cancer should be a process independent of the time of BM diagnosis. These findings also fit with the growing knowledge and clinical experience of histopathological and molecular differences between primary cancer and the corresponding BM which may result in different or additional therapeutic implications [8, 16]. In a study of Brastianos et al. 53% of BM revealed potentially clinically informative alterations that had not been detected in the matched primary-tumor sample suggesting that sequencing of tumor of primary site may miss a substantial number of opportunities for targeted therapy [6]. With regard to the identification of so far undetected molecular targets resulting in the improvement of prognosis via extended treatment options, restriction of BM resection in cancer patients with previous systemic cancer treatment seems unreasonable especially with regard to the survival analysis of the present study. Further multicenter studies will be needed to comprehensively elucidate the overall impact of time of diagnosis in the heterogeneous population of patients with BM.
Limitations
The present study weakens from several limitations. The study was conducted in a retrospective fashion and patients were not randomized, but treated according to the preferences of the treating physicians. Furthermore, the patient clientele with BM constitutes quite a heterogeneous study population in regard to the underlying cancer disease as well as pretreatment which might lead to relevant unmasked bias in data analysis. Nevertheless, the present study suggests time of BM diagnosis not to significantly impact patient prognosis in BM surgery and thus provides the basis for the initiation of multicenter registries and further studies.
Conclusions
The present study indicates that time of BM diagnosis (synchronous vs. metachronous) does not significantly impact patient survival when calculated from the day of neurosurgical resection. BM in NSCLC frequently is diagnosed as the first manifestation of the cancer disease (synchronous situation) than it occurs as a long-term consequence of a yet known NSCLC (metachronous situation). These results portend indication for surgical therapy of BM in this vulnerable patient cohort to be a decision independent of the time of BM diagnosis.
Data availability
Restrictions apply to the availability of these data due to privacy restrictions.
References
Achrol AS, Rennert RC, Anders C, Soffietti R, Ahluwalia MS, Nayak L, Peters S, Arvold ND, Harsh GR, Steeg PS, Chang SD (2019) Brain metastases. Nat Rev Dis Primers 5:5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0055-y
Alexandru D, Bota DA, Linskey ME (2012) Epidemiology of central nervous system metastases. Prog Neurol Surg 25:13–29. https://doi.org/10.1159/000331167
Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG, Vigneau FD, Lai P, Sawaya RE (2004) Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. J Clin Oncol 22:2865–2872. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.12.149
Berghoff AS, Schur S, Fureder LM, Gatterbauer B, Dieckmann K, Widhalm G, Hainfellner J, Zielinski CC, Birner P, Bartsch R, Preusser M (2016) Descriptive statistical analysis of a real life cohort of 2419 patients with brain metastases of solid cancers. ESMO Open 1:e000024. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2015-000024
Boire A, Brastianos PK, Garzia L, Valiente M (2020) Brain metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 20:4–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-019-0220-y
Brastianos PK, Carter SL, Santagata S, Cahill DP, Taylor-Weiner A, Jones RT, Van Allen EM, Lawrence MS, Horowitz PM, Cibulskis K, Ligon KL, Tabernero J, Seoane J, Martinez-Saez E, Curry WT, Dunn IF, Paek SH, Park SH, McKenna A, Chevalier A, Rosenberg M, Barker FG 2nd, Gill CM, Van Hummelen P, Thorner AR, Johnson BE, Hoang MP, Choueiri TK, Signoretti S, Sougnez C, Rabin MS, Lin NU, Winer EP, Stemmer-Rachamimov A, Meyerson M, Garraway L, Gabriel S, Lander ES, Beroukhim R, Batchelor TT, Baselga J, Louis DN, Getz G, Hahn WC (2015) Genomic characterization of Brain Metastases reveals branched evolution and potential therapeutic targets. Cancer Discov 5:1164–1177. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0369
Chang Y, Wong CE, Lee PH, Huang CC, Lee JS (2022) Survival outcome of Surgical Resection vs. Radiotherapy in Brain Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-analysis. Front Med 9:768896. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.768896
Ferguson SD, Zheng S, Xiu J, Zhou S, Khasraw M, Brastianos PK, Kesari S, Hu J, Rudnick J, Salacz ME, Piccioni D, Huang S, Davies MA, Glitza IC, Heymach JV, Zhang J, Ibrahim NK, DeGroot JF, McCarty J, O’Brien BJ, Sawaya R, Verhaak RGW, Reddy SK, Priebe W, Gatalica Z, Spetzler D, Heimberger AB (2018) Profiles of brain metastases: prioritization of therapeutic targets. Int J Cancer 143:3019–3026. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31624
Goldsmith SM (2014) A unifying approach to the clinical diagnosis of melanoma including “D” for “Dark” in the ABCDE criteria. Dermatol Pract Concept 4:75–78. https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0404a16
Goncalves PH, Peterson SL, Vigneau FD, Shore RD, Quarshie WO, Islam K, Schwartz AG, Wozniak AJ, Gadgeel SM (2016) Risk of brain metastases in patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer: analysis of the Metropolitan Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data. Cancer 122:1921–1927. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30000
Lehmann F, Schenk LM, Ilic I, Putensen C, Hadjiathanasiou A, Borger V, Zimmermann J, Guresir E, Vatter H, Bode C, Schneider M, Schuss P (2021) Prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients with deep-seated Intracerebral Hemorrhage: risk factors and clinical implications. J Clin Med 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051015
Lux MP, Emons J, Bani MR, Wunderle M, Sell C, Preuss C, Rauh C, Jud SM, Heindl F, Langemann H, Geyer T, Brandl AL, Hack CC, Adler W, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Gass P (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of breast medical tactile examiners (MTEs): a prospective pilot study. Breast Care (Basel) 14:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495883
Nayak L, Lee EQ, Wen PY (2012) Epidemiology of brain metastases. Curr Oncol Rep 14:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-011-0203-y
Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Walsh JW, Dempsey RJ, Maruyama Y, Kryscio RJ, Markesbery WR, Macdonald JS, Young B (1990) A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain. N Engl J Med 322:494–500. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199002223220802
Pelletier EM, Shim B, Goodman S, Amonkar MM (2008) Epidemiology and economic burden of brain metastases among patients with primary breast cancer: results from a US claims data analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108:297–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9601-0
Proescholdt MA, Schodel P, Doenitz C, Pukrop T, Hohne J, Schmidt NO, Schebesch KM (2021) The management of Brain Metastases-Systematic review of neurosurgical aspects. Cancers (Basel) 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071616
Rostami R, Mittal S, Rostami P, Tavassoli F, Jabbari B (2016) Brain metastasis in breast cancer: a comprehensive literature review. J Neurooncol 127:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2075-3
Schafer N, Bumes E, Eberle F, Fox V, Gessler F, Giordano FA, Konczalla J, Onken J, Ottenhausen M, Scherer M, Schneider M, Vatter H, Herrlinger U, Schuss P (2021) Implementation, relevance, and virtual adaptation of neuro-oncological tumor boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide provider survey. J Neurooncol 153:479–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03784-w
Schneider M, Heimann M, Schaub C, Eichhorn L, Potthoff AL, Giordano FA, Guresir E, Ko YD, Landsberg J, Lehmann F, Radbruch A, Schwab KS, Weinhold L, Weller J, Wispel C, Herrlinger U, Vatter H, Schafer N, Schuss P (2020) Comorbidity Burden and Presence of multiple intracranial lesions are Associated with adverse events after Surgical Treatment of patients with brain metastases. Cancers (Basel) 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113209
Schuss P, Schafer N, Bode C, Borger V, Eichhorn L, Giordano FA, Guresir E, Heimann M, Ko YD, Landsberg J, Lehmann F, Potthoff AL, Radbruch A, Schaub C, Schwab KS, Weller J, Vatter H, Herrlinger U, Schneider M (2021) The impact of prolonged mechanical ventilation on overall survival in patients with surgically treated brain metastases. Front Oncol 11:658949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.658949
Sperduto PW, Chao ST, Sneed PK, Luo X, Suh J, Roberge D, Bhatt A, Jensen AW, Brown PD, Shih H, Kirkpatrick J, Schwer A, Gaspar LE, Fiveash JB, Chiang V, Knisely J, Sperduto CM, Mehta M (2010) Diagnosis-specific prognostic factors, indexes, and treatment outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis of 4,259 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77:655–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.025
Vecht CJ, Haaxma-Reiche H, Noordijk EM, Padberg GW, Voormolen JH, Hoekstra FH, Tans JT, Lambooij N, Metsaars JA, Wattendorff AR et al (1993) Treatment of single brain metastasis: radiotherapy alone or combined with neurosurgery? Ann Neurol 33:583–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410330605
Vinas F, Ben Hassen I, Jabot L, Monnet I, Chouaid C (2016) Delays for diagnosis and treatment of lung cancers: a systematic review. Clin Respir J 10:267–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12217
Wang BX, Ou W, Mao XY, Liu Z, Wu HQ, Wang SY (2017) Impacts of EGFR mutation and EGFR-TKIs on incidence of brain metastases in advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 160:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.06.022
Yen CT, Wu WJ, Chen YT, Chang WC, Yang SH, Shen SY, Su J, Chen HY (2021) Surgical resection of brain metastases prolongs overall survival in non-small-cell lung cancer. Am J cancer Res 11:6160–6172
Funding
The authors received no financial support related to this study.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
The present study was approved by the local ethics committee at the University of Bonn.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was not sought as a retrospective study design was used.
Consent to publish
All authors agreed to the publication of the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Potthoff, AL., Heimann, M., Lehmann, F. et al. Survival after resection of brain metastasis: impact of synchronous versus metachronous metastatic disease. J Neurooncol 161, 539–545 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04242-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04242-5