Abstract
Introduction
The (un)targeted analysis of endogenous compounds has gained interest in the field of forensic postmortem investigations. The blood metabolome is influenced by many factors, and postmortem specimens are considered particularly challenging due to unpredictable decomposition processes.
Objectives
This study aimed to systematically investigate the influence of the time since death on endogenous compounds and its relevance in designing postmortem metabolome studies.
Methods
Femoral blood samples of 427 authentic postmortem cases, were collected at two time points after death (854 samples in total; t1: admission to the institute, 1.3–290 h; t2: autopsy, 11–478 h; median ∆t = 71 h). All samples were analyzed using an untargeted metabolome approach, and peak areas were determined for 38 compounds (acylcarnitines, amino acids, phospholipids, and others). Differences between t2 and t1 were assessed by Wilcoxon signed-ranked test (p < 0.05). Moreover, all samples (n = 854) were binned into time groups (6 h, 12 h, or 24 h intervals) and compared by Kruskal–Wallis/Dunn’s multiple comparison tests (p < 0.05 each) to investigate the effect of the estimated time since death.
Results
Except for serine, threonine, and PC 34:1, all tested analytes revealed statistically significant changes between t1 and t2 (highest median increase 166%). Unpaired analysis of all 854 blood samples in-between groups indicated similar results. Significant differences were typically observed between blood samples collected within the first and later than 48 h after death, respectively.
Conclusions
To improve the consistency of comprehensive data evaluation in postmortem metabolome studies, it seems advisable to only include specimens collected within the first 2 days after death.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Metabolomics (metabolic profiling) aims to comprehensively analyze endogenous low molecular weight compounds within biological systems, (e.g., amino acids and lipids). It represents the downstream output of the -omics cascade (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics/peptidomics) and is also highly influenced by environmental factors, such as lifestyle habits, diseases, and drug intake. Over the years, a number of metabolomics techniques have been established in a variety of disciplines for biomarker search or for generating hypotheses, as different environmental stimuli may lead to particular changes within the metabolome (Castillo-Peinado & Luque de Castro, 2016; Johnson et al., 2016; Patti et al., 2012; Steuer et al., 2019, 2021; Wishart, 2016; Zeki et al., 2020). In this regard, untargeted metabolome acquisition approaches which theoretically measure all compounds simultaneously are used. Data acquisition is followed by sophisticated data evaluation strategies and statistical methods to identify compounds of interest. Depending on the data set and underlying question, simple univariate statistics, i.e., (non)parametric significance testing in combination with fold-change analysis, as well as multivariate statistics for multifactorial phenomena, or holistic models applying machine learning algorithms can be applied (Anwardeen et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2023; Pomyen et al., 2020; Procopio et al., 2023). Recently, the (un)targeted analysis of endogenous compounds has also gained interest in the field of forensic postmortem investigations, e.g., for assessment of biomarkers of the postmortem interval (PMI) (Bonicelli et al., 2022; Chighine et al., 2023; Donaldson & Lamont, 2013, 2014; Locci et al., 2019, 2021; Mora-Ortiz et al., 2019; Pesko et al., 2020; Peyron et al., 2019), postmortem redistribution (PMR) (Brockbals et al., 2020, 2021), or the improved interpretation of the cause of death (COD) (Cao et al., 2023; Elmsjo et al., 2021, 2022; Nariai et al., 2022; Ward et al., 2022).
However, the highly dynamic nature of the metabolome needs to be considered during the study design to allow observed effects to be attributable to the research question. Postmortem specimens are considered even more challenging as death is a dynamic process in itself, which introduces other, unpredictable variations. From numerous investigations and routine experience, the phenomenon of PMR is well recognized in forensic toxicology. PMR refers to all artificial changes in the postmortem concentrations of drugs after death (Pelissier-Alicot et al., 2003; Skopp, 2004, 2010). While certainly not fully understood, passive diffusion, degradation, or drug neo-formation represent the most common underlying mechanisms, as do factors such as the drug properties (lipophilicity, protein binding affinity, volume of distribution, basicity). Both ante- and postmortem biochemical processes also play a role (Drummer & Gerostamoulos, 2023; Peters & Steuer, 2018). Recent studies suggest the COD, manner of death (Elmsjo et al., 2021, 2022; Ward et al., 2022) and, the PMI between death and sample collection (Bonicelli et al., 2022; Chighine et al., 2023; Donaldson & Lamont, 2013, 2014; Locci et al., 2019, 2021; Mora-Ortiz et al., 2019; Pesko et al., 2020; Peyron et al., 2019) contribute to the postmortem metabolome composition. For instance, decreased levels of short-, medium- and long-chain acylcarnitines in human blood were observed to be related to oxycodone intoxication (Elmsjo et al., 2022). Elmsjo et al., reported higher concentrations of cortisol, phenylacetylglutamine, valerylcarnitine, or phenylalanine, or decreased concentrations of palmitoylcarnitine and various lysophosphatidylcholines in blood samples were associated with deaths attributed to pneumonia relative to a control group (Elmsjo et al., 2021). Previous studies also investigate the potential of using PMI-dependent concentration changes of endogenous molecules for biochemical estimation of the time of death. A variety of endogenous compounds were shown to increase with time, including different amino acids (hydroxyproline, tyrosine, phenylalanine), creatinine, citrate cycle intermediates (α-ketoglutarate, succinate), lactate, niacinamide, taurine, or uracil (Donaldson & Lamont, 2014; Du et al., 2018; Mora-Ortiz et al., 2019; Pesko et al., 2020). In contrast to human forensic investigations, where femoral blood or serum are the most commonly used matrix most studies on PMI estimation were performed in either animal models and/or specimens other than femoral blood (Chighine et al., 2023; Donaldson & Lamont, 2014; Du et al., 2018; Locci et al., 2019, 2021; Mora-Ortiz et al., 2019; Pesko et al., 2020); that said, there is still a lack of comprehensive studies with sufficient case numbers (Zelentsova et al., 2020). According to a recent publication, PMI can be considered the main driving force of postmortem metabolome changes, highlighting the need for more data and standardization for postmortem metabolomics studies that aim to answer research questions other than assessing the PMI (Chighine et al., 2021).
Our current study aimed to comprehensively investigate the influence of the time since death on the endogenous compound composition of human femoral blood samples. To this end, we have compiled a unique, exceptionally extensive postmortem data set consisting of 427 cases, each with paired blood samples (854 in total) collected at two different time points after death. This dataset should allow the systematic investigation of blood collection time after death and its relevance in future postmortem metabolome study designs.
2 Experimental
2.1 Chemical and reagents
Acetylcarnitine (C2), adenine, adenosine, alanine, arginine, carnitine (C0), cholic acid, cortisol, cortisone, creatinine, decanoylcarnitine (C10), dodecanoylcarnitine (lauroylcarnitine, C12), glycocholic acid, hexadecanoylcarnitine (palmitoylcarnitine, C16), hippuric acid, histidine, inosine, isoleucine, kynurenine, leucine, levothyroxine, lysine, methionine, octadecanoylcarnitine (stearoylcarnitine, C18), octanoylcarnitine (C8), ornithine, phenylalanine, proline, propionylcarnitine (C3), reserpine, riboflavin, serine, taurine, taurocholic acid, tetradecanoylcarnitine (myristoylcarnitine, C14), threonine, tryptophane, tyrosine, uracil, uric acid, valine, and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis-(pentafluorphenyl)-porphyrin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Buchs, Switzerland). The lipids 1-palmiotyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (lyso PC 16:0), 1-oleoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (lyso PC 18:1), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (PC 34:1), 1-stearoyl-2-linoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (PC 36:2), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (PE 34:1) and 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamin (PE 36:4) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids and were delivered by LuBio Science (Zurich, Switzerland). Deuterated and heavy-labeled internal standards (IS), arginine 13C6, creatinine N-methyl-D3, and phenylalanine-D1 (purity > 98%) were purchased from Cambridge isotope laboratories, which were delivered by ReseaChem Life Science (Burgdorf, Switzerland) or Sigma-Aldrich (Buchs, Switzerland). Water, acetonitrile (ACN) and methanol (MeOH) of HPLC grade were obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). All other chemicals used were from Merck (Zug, Switzerland) and of the highest grade available.
2.2 Postmortem femoral blood samples
Femoral blood samples from authentic forensic cases were collected at two time points after death during the routine toxicological investigation at the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine (VIFM), Melbourne, Australia. Upon mortuary admission of a deceased, approximately 2 to 5 mL of postmortem femoral blood was collected by leg puncture (blind stick) as soon as practicable, as per provisions of the Coroners Act 2008 (Victoria) (t1). A second femoral blood sample was collected during the medico-legal autopsy (t2) after preparation of the femoral vein. For cases where the time of death (ToD) could only be narrowed down to a specific day but no exact time (n = 163) and admission to the VIFM on a later day, ToD was defined as 12 pm of the estimated day of death. If admission to the VIFM was on the same day as the estimated day of death, ToD was specified to be between 12 am and mortuary admission of the body (t1). These timings were used to calculate the pre-admission and pre-autopsy intervals per case [defined as the time between death and sample collection at mortuary admission (t1) / autopsy (t2)]. All postmortem blood samples were preserved in 1% w/v sodium fluoride and potassium oxalate and stored at 4 °C until shipment. Samples were transported to the Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine (ZIFM, Switzerland; exempt specimens, no import/export permission required) in a temperature-controlled environment at 4 °C and immediately frozen at − 80 °C upon receipt until re-analysis for drug and metabolome changes. Anonymized information on the estimated ToD and sampling time points were provided for further data analysis. From an initial 477 cases (Brockbals et al., 2021), 427 were included in the current study. Case selection was based on the detectability of one or more drugs (of abuse) independent to the cause of death. Re-analysis of the samples in an anonymized format for the specific research project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the VIFM (EC 20-2019; EC 23-1275). The individuals cannot be identified from the information provided. Hence, no written informed consent from the individuals or their relatives was needed for this study. Additionally, the study was conducted in full conformance with the Swiss ethical laws, particularly those covering the use of human material in research.
2.3 Sample preparation
To 150 μL of postmortem blood, 15 μL IS solution (0.025 mM creatinine-d3, 0.03 mM L-arginine (13C6), and 0.04 mM L-phenylalanine-D1) were added, followed by the addition of 450 μL of a MeOH/acetone mixture (90:10 v/v) for protein precipitation. The samples were shaken and stored at − 20 °C overnight. Subsequently, the samples were resuspended, centrifuged at 14′000 rpm for 15 min, and one aliquot (50 μL) of the supernatant was transferred to an autosampler vial for analysis by reversed-phase chromatography (RP) as detailed below. A second aliquot (50 μL) was stored at − 80 °C for analysis by hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) approximately 1 month later. Before analysis, all samples were centrifuged again (14′000 rpm for 15 min).
In addition, a femoral blood pool sample was prepared from 11 authentic postmortem blood samples collected at the ZIFM, stored in aliquots at − 80 °C, thawed, and extracted identically to the study samples each day for quality control purposes.
2.4 HR-MS analysis
Analysis was performed on a Thermo Fisher Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) coupled with a high-resolution (HR) time of flight (TOF) instrument system (TripleTOF 6600 Sciex, Turbo V ion source, Concord, Ontario, Canada) as described in detail elsewhere (Boxler et al., 2019; Steuer et al., 2020).
Briefly, two chromatographic columns were applied, (a) a RP column (XSelect HSST RP-C18 column; 150 mm × 2.1 mm i.d; 2.5 µm particle size; Waters, Baden, Daettwil, Switzerland) with 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water or 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in methanol as mobile phases A and B, respectively; gradient elution starting at 100% A with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, increase to 100% B between 1 and 15 min, held for 3 min and re-equilibrated for 2 min (0.7 mL/min flow rate after 15 min); 20 min total run time; (b) a Merck SeQuant ZIC HILIC column (150 mm × 2.1 mm i.d; 3.5 µm particle size) with 25 mM ammonium acetate and 0.1% (v/v) acetic acid in water and 0.1% (v/v) acetic acid in ACN as mobile phases C and D, respectively; gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min over 15 min; starting conditions were 95% D, decreased to 40% D between 1 and 10 min, further decreased to 10% D until 12 min, hold for 1 min and re-equilibrated for 4 min.
HR-MS (resolving power (full width at half-maximum, FWHM at 400 m/z) of 30,000) and MS/MS (resolving power 15,000 in MS2) data were acquired by data-dependent acquisition (DDA) after electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive mode for RP chromatography and negative mode for HILIC chromatography, respectively. The following settings were applied: full scan over a mass range from m/z 50 to m/z 1000 (accumulation time 50 ms, CE 5 eV) and MS2 scan (accumulation time for each DDA experiment 100 ms, CE 35 eV with a CE spread of 15 eV) after dynamic background subtraction on the five most intense ions with an intensity threshold above 100 cps and exclusion time of 5 s (half peak width) after two occurrences in high sensitivity mode. Data acquisition was controlled by Analyst TF software (version 1.7, Sciex).
All sample extracts were divided into 17 batches, with samples t1 and t2 from one case assigned to the same batch. Per batch, samples were measured in randomized order (total time period 1 month per chromatographic method). A system suitability test (SST) containing arginine, cortisol, cortisone, creatinine, glycocholic acid, hippuric acid, leucine, raffinose, riboflavin, and tryptophan (concentration 10 μg/ml each) was measured at the beginning of each measurement batch to check the general instrument performance via retention time and peak area comparison after peak integration in MultiQuant V 2.1 (Sciex). Automatic MS and MS/MS calibration was performed every 10 sample injections using a pooled blood sample (450 μL supernatant) fortified with 45 μL of a self-prepared calibration solution (creatinine, leucine, arginine, hippuric acid, tryptophane, inosine, cortisol, cortisone, riboflavin, glycocholic acid, taurocholic acid, reserpine, levothyroxine and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis-(pentafluorphenyl)-porphyrin, 7.1 μg/ml per analyte). Additionally, a pooled blood sample was repeatedly injected following each calibration and evaluated for intra- and inter-batch differences in retention time and peak area.
2.5 Data processing and data analysis
Data analysis was done in a targeted approach through peak integration of 38 analytes (given in Table 1) in MultiQuant V 2.1 (Sciex). After raw data export to Microsoft Excel, further data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel, GraphPad Prism 10.0.2, and R (R_Core_Team, 2023) in R Studio (R Version 4.3.1. “Beagle Scouts”; RStudio version 2023.03.0 + 386) with the following R packages: tidyverse (Wickham et al., 2019), gridExtra (Auguie, 2017), trelliscopeis (Hafen & Schloerke, 2021), flextable (Gohel & Skintzos, 2023), ggforce (Pedersen, 2022), readxl (Wickham & Bryan, 2023), and lubridate (Grolemund & Wickham, 2011).
2.5.1 Quality control
ISs were monitored to identify outliers (Grubbs test (GraphPad Prism 10.0.2) on batch-normalized IS peak areas, p < 0.05) and for quality control purposes, considering a variation (relative standard deviation, RSD) of < 30% as sufficiently robust among the authentic samples. The mean and range of retention times and peak areas of all 38 analytes were determined in the pool samples. Intra- and inter-batch differences were calculated using Microsoft Excel. Deviations (standard deviation) of a maximum of 0.05 min or 0.2 min, and 20% or 30% in peak areas were considered acceptable within and between batches, respectively.
2.5.2 Evaluation of normalization procedures
To account for inter-batch differences originating from technical variation, all analyte peak areas were normalized to the mean (n = 5) of the batch’s pool-sample analyte peak area (batch correction). Two different sample normalization strategies were evaluated: normalization to heavy-labeled ISs (IS-normalization) and probabilistic quotient normalization (PQN).IS-normalization was performed by dividing the analyte’s peak through the IS area. Metaboanalyst 6.0 (Pang et al., 2024) was used for PQN normalization of the whole data set (38 analytes, 854 samples).
2.5.3 Postmortem changes between two time points of the same case (paired)
Percent differences of raw peak areas between t2 and t1 were calculated for each case (n = 427) and analyte. Subgroups, in terms of increasing time intervals, were formed according to the time difference (Δt) between t2 and t1 as follows: 0–12 h,12–24 h, 24–36 h, 36–48 h, 48–72 h, 72–96 h, 96–120 h, 120–144 h, and > 144 h. A paired Wilcoxon signed ranked test (p < 0.05; ns > 0.05, * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001; p-values adjusted for multiple testing according to “holm”) was applied between t2 and t1 peak areas for all cases and in Δt subgroups.
2.5.4 Postmortem changes over time (unpaired analysis)
Subgroups were formed according to the time difference of each individual blood sample (tx_ToD, n = 854) to the known or estimated ToD as follows: 0–6 h (group 1), 6–12 h (group 2), 12–24 h (group 3), 24–36 h (group 4), 36–48 h (group 5), 48–72 h (group 6), 72–96 h (group 7), 96–120 h (group 8), 120–144 h (group 9), > 144 h (group 10). Statistical differences between groups were assessed by application of a Kruskal Wallis test (p < 0.05; ns > 0.05, * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001) followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05; ns > 0.05, * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001) after false-discovery rate correction by the Holm method. Percent differences of the median normalized peak area of each group to group 1 (0–6 h) were calculated.
2.5.5 Correlations
The percent changes (paired and unpaired analysis) were correlated with the possible influencing factors logP (lipophilicity), molecular weight (MW), and retention time in two different chromatographic settings by Spearman correlation analysis in GraphPad Prism 10.0.2. The corresponding characteristics and references used for correlations are summarized in Table 1.
3 Results
3.1 Sample cohort and analysis
The sample cohort consisted of blood samples from 427 authentic forensic cases with two collection time points after death (t1 and t2) per case (n = 854 blood samples). Median (and range) collection times after death were 8 h (1.3–290 h) for t1, and 88 h (11–478 h) for t2, respectively, resulting in a median Δt between t1 and t2 samples of 71 h (6.4–434 h). The different sampling procedures for t1 and t2 revealed no statistically significant differences for 24 analytes when exemplarily comparing t1 and t2 samples collected between 24 and 36 h (best-balanced time-group with n = 33 t1 vs. n = 45 t2 samples, nonparametric Mann–Whitney test, p < 0.05). The 12 analytes with significant findings, all pointed towards lower concentrations at t2 (median difference − 31%). Manner of death was natural in 195 cases, accidental in 69 cases, suicide in 57 cases, and remained unknown in 106 cases. The age of the deceased at the ToD ranged from 15 to 98 years (mean/median 59 years). No correlation could be observed between age of the deceased and the time between death and t1 (Spearman rank correlation coefficient: 0.23, linear model R2 = 0.04; data not shown). Additionally, no trend was found that would indicate longer/shorter time intervals until first sample collection or Δt with different manner of deaths (data not shown in detail). All cases included in the current study tested positive for at least one drug or alcohol during a comprehensive routine drug screening (Di Rago et al., 2021); 210 for opioids, 216 for benzodiazepines, 216 for antidepressants, 97 for antipsychotics, 43 for cannabis, and 36 for stimulants (amphetamines, cocaine). Significant influences of storage and shipping conditions were considered negligible, as shown in a preceding study (Brockbals et al., 2021). QTOF analysis allowed for sufficient targeted processing of 38 endogenous compounds following separation by standard RP chromatography. For analytes with a low RP retention time, trends in time-dependent changes were confirmed by HILIC chromatography mode before inclusion in the results (n = 18 analytes as detailed in Table S2).
3.2 Quality control and evaluation of normalization strategies
IS were used for quality assessment throughout the analytical batch. A performed Grubbs test indicated three samples as potential outliers based on one out of the three IS, but no sample was classified as a potential outlier for all three IS. IS RSDs as well as RSDs of all analytes within the QC pools and the authentic samples are provided in the supplementary information (Table S1). The set criteria of ± 30% for pool samples and IS were fulfilled for all analytes in RP mode except for (lyso)phospholipids, serine, and threonine.
All samples were batch-corrected to account for instrument variation over a 1-month measuring period. In addition, two common normalization strategies were evaluated. In targeted (semi-quantitative) analysis, using the respective isotopically labelled IS of an analyte represents the gold standard to account for variation resulting from the laboratory handling, while PQN is a common normalization method in untargeted analysis accounting for many features (Dieterle et al., 2006). Effects of the different procedures are exemplified in Fig. 1 for two compounds with matching heavy-labelled IS (creatinine, phenylalanine), and two additional compounds with high time-dependent effects in the current study (C0 and taurine), for paired (A) and unpaired analysis (B). General trends of increasing concentrations over time and observed significant differences remain comparable among the two normalization approaches compared to only batch-corrected data, while the magnitude of change is lower for PQN normalization.
3.3 Postmortem changes in endogenous compounds between two time points of the same case (paired; t2 vs. t1)
An overview of medianpercent differences for the chosen 38 analytes over all analyzed cases is provided in Table 1. Exemplified for (acyl)carnitines with increasing carbon side chain length and different amino acids, the extent and distribution of time-dependent changes is depicted in Fig. 2; for all other analytes visual representation can be found in the Supplementary information in Fig. S1. Except for serine, threonine, and PC 34:1, all compounds revealed significant differences between t2 and t1 (p < 0.05). For octanoylcarnitine (C8), decanoylcarnitine (C10), lauroylcarnitine (C12), arginine, ornithine, proline, valine, cortisol, lyso PC 16:0, and lyso PC 18:1 median decreases were observed, while all other analytes showed significant median increases from t1 to t2. Overall, changes mainly ranged from− 50% to + 100% (corresponding to a fold change of two) when considering their interquartile range. Exceptions presented carnitine (C0), acetylcarnitine (C2), decanoylcarnitine (C10), lauroylcarnitine (C12), alanine, taurine, cholic acid, uracil, and lyso PE 18:0. Here, maximum median differences between t2 and t1 reached from − 63% [decanoylcarnitine (C10)] to 166% (cholic acid) and 141% (taurine). Still, large inter-individual variations were observed for all samples and also subgroups with increasing Δt intervals (< 6 h—> 144 h) (see supplementary information Table S2).
Endogenous compounds were categorized into four patterns of median changes depending on the length of the Δt:
-
(a)
Steady increase: alanine, creatinine, proline, tryptophane, taurine, uracil, valine, carnitine (C0), acetylcarnitine (C2), propionylcarnitine (C3), steraroylcarnitine (C18), lysoPE 18:0, PE 34:1, PE 36:2.
-
(b)
Constant median change for the time intervals of approximately 24 to 36 h followed by an increase with longer Δt: histidine, leucine/isoleucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, uric acid, palmitoylcarnitine (C16), cholic acid.
-
(c)
Decrease: cortisol, decanoylcarnitine (C10), lauroylcarnitine (C12).
-
(d)
No or < 30% change over time: arginine, inosine, ornithine, serine, threonine, octanoylcarnitine (C8), myristoylcarnitine (C14), kynurenine, lysoPC 16:0, lysoPC 18:1, PC 34:1, PC 36:2.
Representative examples are depicted in Fig. 3a for taurine taurine (a), tyrosine (b), decanoylcarnitine (C10) and cortisol (c), and octanoylcarnitine (C8) (d).
3.4 Postmortem changes in endogenous compounds according to their time since death (unpaired; tx_ToD)
To determine whether the actual time after death plays a decisive role, or is even more important than the time interval between t2 and t1, all samples (n = 854) were binned into groups according to the individual samples’ time since death (ToD to t1 and ToD to t2, tx_ToD) and were statistically compared for differences in an analyte’s normalized peak area. In nine cases, t1 and t2 blood samples were binned within the same group therefrom five cases had a sampling time > 144 h. A Kruskal–Wallis test revealed significant changes between above mentioned groups for all tested endogenous compounds except for arginine, octanoylcarnitine (C8), cortisol, and PC 34:1 (Table 1). Median percent differences of each group (1–10) to group 1 (0–6 h, earliest) are summarized in Table S2 of the Supplementary information. The highest median changes were observed for carnitine (C0) (+ 274%), taurine (+ 361%), and cholic acid (+ 1190%), as well as decanoylcarnitine (C10) (− 80%) and lauroylcarnitine (C12) (− 42%).
As shown in Fig. 4, the correlation per analyte of its median Δt changes from paired analysis to the highest median %change of each group (2–10) to group 1 (unpaired analysis) indicated good agreement (spearman correlation R2 0.91) despite other expected influencing factors in unpaired analysis. Figure 3b exemplifies box plots of the normalized peak area (left y-axis) and the median percentage change to time group1 (right y-axis). Boxplots of all other analytes are presented in Fig.S2. Also, for individual compounds, the time-dependent changes of the unpaired samples matched well with paired Δt data (Fig. 3a,b). The exception was cortisol, which decreases significantly between t2 and t1 (paired analysis) but showed no trend in the normalized peak areas with respect to the respective time since death of the blood samples. In contrast, myristoylcarnitine (C14), and lyso PC18:1 showed no trend as a function of Δt length but an increase or decrease as a function of time since death (Table S2).
For statistical analysis between all groups, Dunn’s post-hoc test was applied on Kruskal–Wallis significant analytes. Significant differences are given as a so-called p-value heat map for the chosen examples in Fig. 3c and all remaining compounds in the Supplementary information in Fig. S3. Significant changes between groups most often appeared with increasing time since death, while the initial 36 or even 48 h indicated relatively stable normalized peak areas. Few exceptions were observed for alanine, taurine, tryptophan, valine, carnitine (C0), and acetylcarnitine (C2), in line with findings from paired analysis between t2 and t1.
3.5 Correlations
To find the underlying causes for the varying behavior between different compounds, the percent changes (paired and unpaired analysis) were correlated with the possible influencing factors. No correlations existed between percent change and lipophilicity or molecular weight (supplementary information Fig. S4A, B). In RP chromatography, the highest percent changes occurred for compounds eluting in the first two minutes and around 15 min of the chromatogram (Fig. S4C). HILIC chromatography (ESI negative) used for selected compounds indicated a similar extent of percental change despite compound elution around five to ten minutes. Further direct comparison of the observed postmortem changes for 18 compounds between RP and HILIC chromatography (Tables S2 and S3) also did not find any differences caused by the applied chromatography, with the exception of proline and valine. Both amino acids revealed increases in HILIC chromatography, in line with other amino acids, and appeared to be stable or slightly decreased when analyzed in RP mode. Examples from lysine (no difference, retention time RP 0.8, HILIC 9.6, respectively) and proline (different postmortem behavior, retention time RP 0.9 min, HILIC 6.2 min, respectively) are given in Fig. 5.
4 Discussion
(Un)targeted metabolome approaches have gained significant interest in forensic toxicology analysis, including postmortem cases (Bonicelli et al., 2022; Brockbals et al., 2020, 2021; Chighine et al., 2023; Donaldson & Lamont, 2013, 2014; Elmsjo et al., 2021, 2022; Locci et al., 2019, 2021; Mora-Ortiz et al., 2019; Pesko et al., 2020; Peyron et al., 2019). Due to study design and ethical restrictions in controlled human studies, postmortem research typically involves random routine cases. However, the metabolome is highly dynamic and, even in living people, susceptible to many environmental factors influencing the metabolic profile or particular biomarkers. Postmortem specimens such as blood represent an even greater challenge given the well-recognized issues of postmortem changes or PMR, seen with drugs (Butzbach, 2010; Drummer & Gerostamoulos, 2023; Mantinieks et al., 2021; McIntyre & Escott, 2012; Pelissier-Alicot et al., 2003; Peters & Steuer, 2018; Skopp, 2010). So far, little is known about such (additional) confounding factors originating from death itself, but severe influences are expected, particularly from the time since death. A better understanding of these factors will significantly improve the experimental design of future postmortem metabolome studies.
Our current study comprised one of the most extensive data sets in the context of postmortem studies and is characterized by two blood collection time points per case. Despite the non-controlled sample collection, the study cohort can be considered representative of typical forensic postmortem cases, as different manners of death, a large age range, and a wide variety of collection time points were included. No systematic differences or correlations in age of the deceased or manner of death in relation to the PMI were found.
Thirty-eight endogenous compounds were chosen for detailed, time-dependent evaluation of postmortem changes from an untargeted acquired data set. These included metabolites of different compound classes with significantly different physicochemical properties, such as amino acids, acylcarnitines, (lyso)phopsholipids, bile acids, steroids, etc. The targeted processing method originally (during method development) included more endogenous compounds, from which we focused on analytes that could be measured with sufficient analytical precision. Of those, some could not reliably be detected in the postmortem sample cohort and were dropped subsequently, e.g. the nucleobase adenine and the nucleoside adenosine (Boxler et al., 2019). Of course, it is only a small selection of analytes and not representative of the complete metabolome. However, the chosen targeted compounds were previously described in (postmortem) or generally forensic metabolome studies. They were proposed as predictive biomarkers, e.g., as intoxication markers for oxycodone poisoning (Elmsjo et al., 2022) or the postmortem interval (Donaldson & Lamont, 2014; Mora-Ortiz et al., 2019). Batch normalization was performed based on pooled sample peak areas measured within the same batch to account for analytical bias. In addition, individual sample normalization to account for, e.g., extraction effects is commonly applied. For targeted (semi-/quantitative) analysis, matching isotopically labelled IS per analyte represent the gold standard for normalization. In (targeted) metabolomics, most often, such IS are not available for all compounds of interest. If a general IS (isotopically labelled, but not matching the analyte of interest) is used to normalize another analyte, the analyte of interest needs careful evaluation during method development and validation, and in the worst case the use of a general IS can increase variation rather than compensate for it (Boxler et al., 2019). In untargeted metabolomics, where compounds of interest are a priori unknown, specific or general IS-use is therefore unfeasible. PQN was demonstrated as a versatile sample normalization strategy of untargeted datasets of thousands of features, where a quotient for each feature is calculated in relation to a reference sample (pool), and the median of all feature quotients is used as a sample’s individual normalization/dilution factor (Dieterle et al., 2006). However, PQN can be biased, if, e.g., a large proportion of the features are changed because of a systematic rather than a dilution/extraction variation effect (Correia et al., 2022). In this current semi-targeted analysis, only 38 compounds were evaluated, from which several were already described to show PMI-dependent changes (Donaldson & Lamont, 2014; Mora-Ortiz et al., 2019). It is therefore possible, that PQN might attribute actual effects of the PMI to dilution effects, consequently underestimating the real time- dependent effect (Fig. 1). Given the descriptive nature of the current study, the final data evaluation was based on batch-normalized data only, to avoid overfitting effects of PQN normalization.
When performing a paired analysis of two blood samples from the same individual, it could be proposed that variables other than the time could be excluded. All case-specific parameters, like cause or manner of death, age, etc., remain identical. However, looking only at the %Δt change between t2 and t1 left out the actual time effect, i.e., the time since the death occurred. For instance, specific forensic postmortem cases can have a time difference between t1 and t2 of 12 h, but information, if death occurred one, two, or more days before blood collection, is not considered. We, therefore, additionally compared metabolite changes according to the time since death, although higher variability can be expected. Individual analysis increased the total number of samples to 854, as t1 and t2 were evaluated separately. Both data evaluation strategies (time intervals between paired t1 and t2 samples vs. unpaired analysis in groups according to the time since death of individual samples) returned very well-matching results (Figs. 3, 4). Cortisol poses one crucial example, where paired data evaluation was able to indicate time-dependent changes, but evaluation of random (non-paired) samples showed no trend. Generally, increases outweighed decreases over time (Table 1). Concerning the median and interquartile changes, almost all analytes ranged between a fold change of plus/minus two, but inter-individual variation was high (Figs. 2, and S1). Taurine and uracil, as two compounds exceeding the described range and showing time-dependent concentration increases, were already described as potential biomarkers of the PMI. However, in contrast to the current results, concentration decreases over time were described in mice (Mora-Ortiz et al., 2019).
If univariate statistics are employed for metabolome data evaluation in controlled studies of living people, often fold-changes of 1.5 or 2 are used as one of several filter criteria for interesting features. Considering our (paired) results, it was shown that already the time factor can introduce such variation for some analytes (Fig. 2). Depending on the research question and sample selection, higher fold-changes might be advisable in postmortem metabolome analysis to improve biological significance and avoid random findings. As in line with former works (Chighine et al., 2021), PMI is one of the main influencing factors on the metabolome; controlling or accounting for different PMIs within the study cohort is highly important for future postmortem metabolome studies. Our data suggest that the influence of PMI is most homogenous within the first 48 h after death. As such, the most reliable results would be obtained if a sufficiently high number of blood samples taken within the first 48 h after death can be used, ensuring the least influence of the PMI on concentration changes of endogenous analytes. Alternatively, PMI among study groups should be as balanced as possible.
Using correlation analysis, we attempted to find causes for the observed differences in postmortem behavior depending on the substance. Based on existing knowledge of exogenous compounds, e.g., lipophilicity, the volume of distribution (Vd), or the ratio of cardiac to peripheral blood (C/P-ratio) can help predict PMR (Han et al., 2012; Skopp, 2010), we aimed to compare different chemical properties of the endogenous compounds. Thereby, Vd is not available for endogenous metabolites, as they are typically not administered in known amounts to calculate their expected blood/plasma concentration in relation to the dose. C/P ratios or general distribution of endogenous metabolites would be interesting for further investigation of underlying PMR mechanisms but was out of scope for the current study that focused on femoral blood samples only. No correlations between logP or molecular weight and the extent of postmortem change could be observed (Fig. S4). Comparison of retention time and %change pointed towards more severe postmortem changes for those analytes eluting within the first two minutes of the RP chromatography. This could be due to similar physicochemical properties of these substances but also due to matrix effects. Typically, the first three minutes, as well as the end of a RP chromatography, are prone to matrix effects, given salts and extremely polar vs. highly lipophilic compounds (phospholipids), respectively (Van Eeckhaut et al., 2009).
Further, it is well known that postmortem samples are more susceptible to matrix effects than samples of living persons (Drummer, 2007; Saar et al., 2009). Eighteen analytes were additionally evaluated in a different chromatographic system (HILIC) and ESI negative ionization, a typically complementary method, to exclude matrix effects as the leading cause of the observed time-dependent changes. Only for proline and valine, a different time-dependent behavior was observed when changing the analytical methodology, which points towards a matrix effect for these two compounds in RP chromatography (Fig. 5, Tables S2, S3). Apart from that, HILIC has led to the same results as RP (Figs. S4 and 5, Tables S2, S3), but with overall higher variation. So far, no common physico-chemical properties could be deduced, allowing for a likelihood prediction of postmortem changes in endogenous metabolites.
The water content of postmortem blood samples demonstrates high variation ranging from 60 to 90% (Skopp, 2004), possibly contributing to a certain (minor) extent to the observed concentration changes. PQN normalization could compensate for these effects, however, as discussed above, more compounds/features in an untargeted data processing workflow will be necessary for a conclusion.
The changes in endogenous substances probably occur due to the lack of energy after death, accompanied by the cessation of aerobic and partial continuation of anaerobic metabolic pathways. Other studies in animal models found modulations in metabolites associated with anaerobic metabolism, such as lactate (Mora-Ortiz et al., 2019). In the broadest sense, our results also confirm previous studies with limited numbers of animals showing significant increases in amino acid levels. Different underlying mechanisms were discussed, among others, protein catabolism in postmortem cells leading to accumulation in blood after cell lysis or decreased protein synthesis (Donaldson & Lamont, 2014). A higher number of endogenous compounds or an untargeted data evaluation will be necessary to uncover biological mechanisms, e.g., through pathway analysis. Ideally, future research should apply an adapted experimental setup to include/extend the analysis to macromolecules (carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, DNA or RNA) and different (blood-surrounding) tissues that might influence concentrations of small endogenous molecules through distribution, changes in protein binding, or general postmortem degradation.
5 Conclusions
The current study comprises one of the most extensive data sets in the context of time-dependent postmortem studies focusing on endogenous compounds. Comparable to drugs, we observed changes in blood levels of nearly all endogenous compounds in a time-dependent manner after death. Our paired analysis of two individual blood samples collected from the same individual proved highly valuable, as time since death represents the only variable. Additional unpaired sample evaluation purely based on the time since death, generally indicated, similar results to those of the matched time intervals, despite more confounders and higher variation. As PMI is one of the main influencing factors on postmortem metabolome changes, controlling or accounting for different PMIs within the study cohort is highly important for future postmortem metabolome studies. Most reliable results can be expected if blood samples preserved within the first 48 h after death can be used and/or PMI among study groups is balanced.
Data availability
As routine samples from forensic investigations were analyzed, data acquired during this study is not intended to be publicly available but can be provided upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Anwardeen, N. R., Diboun, I., Mokrab, Y., Althani, A. A., & Elrayess, M. A. (2023). Statistical methods and resources for biomarker discovery using metabolomics. BMC Bioinformatics, 24, 250. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05383-0
Auguie, B. (2017). gridExtra: Miscellaneous functions for "grid" graphics. R package version 2.3.
Bonicelli, A., Mickleburgh, H. L., Chighine, A., Locci, E., Wescott, D. J., & Procopio, N. (2022). The ‘ForensOMICS’ approach for postmortem interval estimation from human bone by integrating metabolomics, lipidomics, and proteomics. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83658
Boxler, M. I., Schneider, T. D., Kraemer, T., & Steuer, A. E. (2019). Analytical considerations for (un)-targeted metabolomic studies with special focus on forensic applications. Drug Testing and Analysis, 11, 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2540
Brockbals, L., Staeheli, S. N., Kraemer, T., & Steuer, A. E. (2020). Postmortem metabolomics: Correlating time-dependent concentration changes of xenobiotic and endogenous compounds. Drug Testing and Analysis, 12, 1171–1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2814
Brockbals, L., Wartmann, Y., Mantinieks, D., Glowacki, L. L., Gerostamoulos, D., Kraemer, T., & Steuer, A. E. (2021). Postmortem metabolomics: Strategies to assess time-dependent postmortem changes of diazepam, nordiazepam, morphine, codeine. Mirtazapine and Citalopram. Metabolites, 11, 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11090643
Butzbach, D. M. (2010). The influence of putrefaction and sample storage on post-mortem toxicology results. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, 6, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-009-9130-8
Cao, J., Wei, X., Liu, M. F., An, G. S., Li, J., Du, Q. X., & Sun, J. H. (2023). Forensic identification of sudden cardiac death: A new approach combining metabolomics and machine learning. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 415, 2291–2305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-04651-5
Castillo-Peinado, L. S., & Luque de Castro, M. D. (2016). Present and foreseeable future of metabolomics in forensic analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta, 925, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.04.040
Chen, C., Wang, J., Pan, D., Wang, X., Xu, Y., Yan, J., Wang, L., Yang, X., Yang, M., & Liu, G. P. (2023). Applications of multi-omics analysis in human diseases. MedComm, 4, e315. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.315
Chighine, A., Locci, E., Nioi, M., & d’Aloja, E. (2021). Looking for Post-mortem metabolomic standardization: Waiting for godot-the importance of post-mortem interval in forensic metabolomics. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 34, 1946–1947. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c00211
Chighine, A., Stocchero, M., Ferino, G., De-Giorgio, F., Conte, C., Nioi, M., d’Aloja, E., & Locci, E. (2023). Metabolomics investigation of post-mortem human pericardial fluid. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 137, 1875–1885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03050-w
Correia, G. D. S., Takis, P. G., Sands, C. J., Kowalka, A. M., Tan, T., Turtle, L., Ho, A., Semple, M. G., Openshaw, P. J. M., Baillie, J. K., Takats, Z., & Lewis, M. R. (2022). (1)H NMR signals from urine excreted protein are a source of bias in probabilistic quotient normalization. Analytical Chemistry, 94, 6919–6923. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00466
Di Rago, M., Pantatan, S., Hargreaves, M., Wong, K., Mantinieks, D., Kotsos, A., Glowacki, L., Drummer, O. H., & Gerostamoulos, D. (2021). High throughput detection of 327 drugs in blood by LC-MS-MS with automated data processing. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 45, 154–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaa057
Dieterle, F., Ross, A., Schlotterbeck, G., & Senn, H. (2006). Probabilistic quotient normalization as robust method to account for dilution of complex biological mixtures. Application in 1H NMR metabonomics. Analytical Chemistry, 78, 4281–4290. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac051632c
Donaldson, A. E., & Lamont, I. L. (2013). Estimation of post-mortem interval using biochemical markers. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46, 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2013.784356
Donaldson, A. E., & Lamont, I. L. (2014). Metabolomics of post-mortem blood: Identifying potential markers of post-mortem interval. Metabolomics, 11, 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-014-0691-5
Drummer, O. H. (2007). Requirements for bioanalytical procedures in postmortem toxicology. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 388, 1495–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1238-7
Drummer, O. H., & Gerostamoulos, D. (2023). Post-mortem redistribution of drugs and other factors affecting interpretation: A review. Wires Forensic Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1480
Du, T., Lin, Z., Xie, Y., Ye, X., Tu, C., Jin, K., Xie, J., & Shen, Y. (2018). Metabolic profiling of femoral muscle from rats at different periods of time after death. PLoS ONE, 13, e0203920. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203920
Elmsjo, A., Vikingsson, S., Soderberg, C., Kugelberg, F. C., & Green, H. (2021). Post-mortem metabolomics: A novel approach in clinical biomarker discovery and a potential tool in death investigations. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 34, 1496–1502. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00448
Elmsjo, A., Soderberg, C., Jakobsson, G., Green, H., & Kronstrand, R. (2022). Postmortem metabolomics reveal acylcarnitines as potential biomarkers for fatal oxycodone-related intoxication. Metabolites. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12020109
Gohel, D., & Skintzos, P. (2023). flextable: Functions for Tabular Reporting. R package version 0.9.3.
Grolemund, G., & Wickham, H. (2011). Dates and times made easy with lubridate. J Stat Softw, 40, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i03
Hafen, R., & Schloerke, B. (2021). trelliscopejs: Create Interactive Trelliscope Displays. R package version 0.2.6.
Han, E., Kim, E., Hong, H., Jeong, S., Kim, J., In, S., Chung, H., & Lee, S. (2012). Evaluation of postmortem redistribution phenomena for commonly encountered drugs. Forensic Science International, 219, 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.01.016
Johnson, C. H., Ivanisevic, J., & Siuzdak, G. (2016). Metabolomics: Beyond biomarkers and towards mechanisms. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 17, 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.25
Locci, E., Stocchero, M., Noto, A., Chighine, A., Natali, L., Napoli, P. E., Caria, R., De-Giorgio, F., Nioi, M., & d’Aloja, E. (2019). A (1)H NMR metabolomic approach for the estimation of the time since death using aqueous humour: An animal model. Metabolomics, 15, 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-019-1533-2
Locci, E., Stocchero, M., Gottardo, R., De-Giorgio, F., Demontis, R., Nioi, M., Chighine, A., Tagliaro, F., & d’Aloja, E. (2021). Comparative use of aqueous humour (1)H NMR metabolomics and potassium concentration for PMI estimation in an animal model. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 135, 845–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02468-w
Mantinieks, D., Gerostamoulos, D., Glowacki, L., Di Rago, M., Schumann, J., Woodford, N. W., & Drummer, O. H. (2021). Postmortem drug redistribution: A compilation of postmortem/antemortem drug concentration ratios. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 45, 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaa107
McIntyre, I. M., & Escott, C. M. (2012). Postmortem Drug Redistribution. Journal of Forensic Research. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7145.1000e108
Mora-Ortiz, M., Trichard, M., Oregioni, A., & Claus, S. P. (2019). Thanatometabolomics: Introducing NMR-based metabolomics to identify metabolic biomarkers of the time of death. Metabolomics, 15, 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-019-1498-1
Nariai, M., Abe, H., Hoshioka, Y., Makino, Y., & Iwase, H. (2022). Biomarker profiling of postmortem blood for diabetes mellitus and discussion of possible applications of metabolomics for forensic casework. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 136, 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02767-w
Pang, Z., Lu, Y., Zhou, G., Hui, F., Xu, L., Viau, C., Spigelman, A. F., MacDonald, P. E., Wishart, D. S., Li, S., & Xia, J. (2024). MetaboAnalyst 6.0: towards a unified platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae253
Patti, G. J., Yanes, O., & Siuzdak, G. (2012). Innovation: Metabolomics: The apogee of the omics trilogy. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 13, 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3314
Pedersen, T. (2022). ggforce: Accelerating 'ggplot2'. R package version 0.4.1.
Pelissier-Alicot, A. L., Gaulier, J. M., Champsaur, P., & Marquet, P. (2003). Mechanisms underlying postmortem redistribution of drugs: A review. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 27, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/27.8.533
Pesko, B. K., Weidt, S., McLaughlin, M., Wescott, D. J., Torrance, H., Burgess, K., & Burchmore, R. (2020). Postmortomics: The potential of untargeted metabolomics to highlight markers for time since death. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 24, 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2020.0084
Peters, F. T., & Steuer, A. E. (2018). Antemortem and postmortem influences on drug concentrations and metabolite patterns in postmortem specimens. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1297
Peyron, P. A., Lehmann, S., Delaby, C., Baccino, E., & Hirtz, C. (2019). Biochemical markers of time since death in cerebrospinal fluid: A first step towards “Forensomics.” Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, 56, 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2019.1619158
Pomyen, Y., Wanichthanarak, K., Poungsombat, P., Fahrmann, J., Grapov, D., & Khoomrung, S. (2020). Deep metabolome: Applications of deep learning in metabolomics. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 18, 2818–2825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.09.033
Procopio, A., Cesarelli, G., Donisi, L., Merola, A., Amato, F., & Cosentino, C. (2023). Combined mechanistic modeling and machine-learning approaches in systems biology—A systematic literature review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 240, 107681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107681
R_Core_Team. (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Saar, E., Gerostamoulos, D., Drummer, O. H., & Beyer, J. (2009). Comparison of extraction efficiencies and LC-MS-MS matrix effects using LLE and SPE methods for 19 antipsychotics in human blood. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 393, 727–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2498-6
Skopp, G. (2004). Preanalytic aspects in postmortem toxicology. Forensic Science International, 142, 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.02.012
Skopp, G. (2010). Postmortem toxicology. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, 6, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9150-4
Steuer, A. E., Brockbals, L., & Kraemer, T. (2019). Metabolomic strategies in biomarker research-new approach for indirect identification of drug consumption and sample manipulation in clinical and forensic toxicology? Frontiers in Chemistry, 7, 319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00319
Steuer, A. E., Kaelin, D., Boxler, M. I., Eisenbeiss, L., Holze, F., Vizeli, P., Czerwinska, J., Dargan, P. I., Abbate, V., Liechti, M. E., & Kraemer, T. (2020). Comparative untargeted metabolomics analysis of the psychostimulants 3,4-Methylenedioxy-Methamphetamine (MDMA), amphetamine, and the novel psychoactive substance mephedrone after controlled drug administration to humans. Metabolites. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10080306
Steuer, A. E., Brockbals, L., & Kraemer, T. (2021). Untargeted metabolomics approaches to improve casework in clinical and forensic toxicology—“Where are we standing and where are we heading?” Wires Forensic Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1449
Van Eeckhaut, A., Lanckmans, K., Sarre, S., Smolders, I., & Michotte, Y. (2009). Validation of bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assays: Evaluation of matrix effects. Journal of Chromatography. B Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 877, 2198–2207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.01.003
Ward, L. J., Engvall, G., Green, H., Kugelberg, F. C., Soderberg, C., & Elmsjo, A. (2022). Postmortem metabolomics of insulin intoxications and the potential application to find hypoglycemia-related deaths. Metabolites. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010005
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T., Miller, E., Bache, S., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D., Spinu, V., … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Wickham, H., & Bryan, J. (2023) readxl: Read Excel Files. R package version 1.4.3
Wishart, D. S. (2016). Emerging applications of metabolomics in drug discovery and precision medicine. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 15, 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.32
Zeki, O. C., Eylem, C. C., Recber, T., Kir, S., & Nemutlu, E. (2020). Integration of GC-MS and LC-MS for untargeted metabolomics profiling. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 190, 113509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113509
Zelentsova, E. A., Yanshole, L. V., Melnikov, A. D., Kudryavtsev, I. S., Novoselov, V. P., & Tsentalovich, Y. P. (2020). Post-mortem changes in metabolomic profiles of human serum, aqueous humor and vitreous humor. Metabolomics, 16, 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-020-01700-3
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Maja Keller and Dr. Tom Schneider for their technical support.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Zurich. This research was funded by the Emma Louise Kessler fond of the Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LB, AS: Conceptualization, methodology. AS, RS, YW: formal analysis. AS, RS, YW, LG: investigation. LG, DG, DM, TK, AS: resources. AS, RS, YW, DM: data curation. AS: writing—original draft preparation. LB, YW, DM, LG, DG, TK: writing—review and editing. AS: visualization, supervision. LB, DM: project administration. LB, DG, TK, AS: funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
The retrospectively study was performed in an anonymized format for the specific research project and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the VIFM (EC 20-2019; EC 23-1275). The individuals cannot be identified from the information provided. Hence, no written informed consent from the individuals or their relatives was needed for this study. Additionally, the study was conducted in full conformance with the Swiss ethical laws, particularly those covering the use of human material in research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Steuer, A.E., Wartmann, Y., Schellenberg, R. et al. Postmortem metabolomics: influence of time since death on the level of endogenous compounds in human femoral blood. Necessary to be considered in metabolome study planning?. Metabolomics 20, 51 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-024-02117-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-024-02117-y