Abstract
The aim of this paper was to evaluate the degree of mycological air contamination and determine the taxonomic diversity of airborne fungi residing in the air of 20 different animal facilities in a zoological garden. The concentrations of fungi in the zoological garden were measured using a MAS-100 air sampler. The collected microorganisms were identified using the combination of molecular and morphological methods. The fungal concentration ranged from 50 to 3.65 × 104 CFU/m3 during the whole study. The quantitative analysis of the fungal aerosol showed that the obtained concentration values were lower than the recommended permissible limits (5 × 104 CFU/m3 for fungi). Environmental factors, including temperature and relative humidity, exerted a varying effect on the presence and concentration of isolated fungi. Relative humidity was shown to correlate positively with the concentration of fungal spores in the air of the facilities studied (rho = 0.57, p < 0.0021). In parallel, no significant correlation was established between temperature and total fungal concentration (rho = − 0.1, p < 0.2263). A total of 112 fungal strains belonging to 50 species and 10 genera were isolated. Penicillium was the dominant genera, including 58.9% of total fungal strains, followed by Aspergillus 25.89%, Cladosporium 3.57%, Talaromyces 3.57%, Mucor 1.78%, Schizophyllum 1.78%, Syncephalastrum 0.89%, Alternaria 0.89%, Absidia 0.89%, and Cunninghamella 0.89%. Our preliminary studies provide basic information about the fungal concentrations, as well as their biodiversity in zoological garden. Further studies are needed to generate additional data from long-term sampling in order to increase our understanding of airborne fungal composition in the zoological garden.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Zoological gardens are one of the most popular attractions visited by tourists worldwide. We should perceive them not only as places where a large diversity of animals is kept, but also as places where people can admire both native and exotic species (Nekolný and Fialová 2018). Both visitors and zoo workers are potentially exposed to bioaerosols which contain bacteria, viruses, pollens, fungi, and mycotoxins (Michalska et al. 2021; Nageen et al. 2023). Among the microorganisms in bioaerosols, fungi are the most numerous group of biological particles (Szulc et al. 2020). Those microorganisms are abundant in the environment and play important roles as symbionts, saprotrophs, or parasites. It is estimated that airborne fungi constitute nearly 25% of the global biomass and, therefore, play a significant role in air pollution affecting human health (almost 150 fungal taxa are associated with allergies) (Nageen et al. 2023).
National and global research about the contamination and the biological diversity of fungi in breeding facilities was carried out mainly in the large-scale poultry houses, barns, and piggeries (Plewa and Lonc 2011; Pusz et al. 2015; Douglas et al. 2018; Seifi et al. 2018; Lee and Kim 2021). Against this background, research on fungal biodiversity and the degree of air and environmental pollution in zoological gardens are scarce (Rivas et al. 2018; Cateau et al. 2022; Álvarez-Pérez et al. 2023; Debergh et al. 2023). The majority of these cited works primarily concentrate on fungi of the genus Aspergillus, with a particular focus on Aspergillus fumigatus, its sensitivity to azole drugs, and the detection of fungi solely in the environment of a single animal group (penguins). They do not usually consider the presence of fungi in other animal habitats and another group of molds. Moreover, the only national study on microbial air contamination was carried out in Krakow’s Zoo (Grzyb and Lenart-Boroń 2019, 2020). The research focused entirely on the determining occurrence of individual bioaerosol (bacterial and fungal) fractions, without taking into account the biodiversity of fungi and their potential toxicity. The studies conducted in animal breeding places other than zoos often showed high concentrations of this group of microorganisms that can be harmful to human and animal health. Among the isolated fungi, the most frequently identified were fungi belonging to the genera Aspergillus (A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. flavus), Penicillium (P. citrinum, P. viridicatum), Cladosporium spp., Alternaria spp., and Scopulariopsis spp. (Plewa and Lonc 2011; Pusz et al. 2015; Seifi et al. 2018). The presence of these poses a risk of disease in people with bronchial asthma, EAA (extrinsic allergic alveolitis), allergic rhinitis, and ODTS (dust-induced toxic syndrome organic), while in animals, it causes pulmonary aspergillosis and mycotoxicosis (Szulc et al. 2020).
Therefore, research in zoological gardens is important because these facilities are not only places for breeding animals but may be a source of dangerous fungi. This is important information, taking into account the specificity of zoos, which are not only a working environment, but also one of the most frequently visited tourist places. Thus, the aim of this paper was to evaluate the degree of mycological air contamination and determine the taxonomic diversity of airborne fungi residing in the air of different animal facilities using the combination of microscopic and genetic analyses.
Materials and methods
Study area
The study was conducted at the Zoological Garden in Wroclaw. This zoo has the largest collection of animals in Poland, with almost 1100 different species in an area covering 33 hectares (https://zoo.wroclaw.pl).
The measurements were carried out inside twenty facilities: two sites of Monkey House, four sites of Apes Pavilion (Pan troglodytes), Papio Pavilion (Papio anubis), three cages with maggots (Macaca sylvanus), five sites in Kongo Pavilion (with crocodiles, manatees, and numerous species of birds), and five sites in East Africa (with the Hippopotamus amphibious, Orycteropus afer, Heterocephalus glaber). The choice of study sites was guided by their convenient accessibility.
Sampling methods
Air samples were taken in October 2022 and in January, April, and June 2023 using a MAS-100 air sampler (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Three parallel samples (two incubated at 27 °C degree, one at 37 °C) were collected at the center point of each location at a height of 1.5 m above the ground and directly struck on the surface of Sabouraud agar. The plates were incubated for about 7 days at 25 °C (two samples) and 37 °C (one sample). The number of fungal colonies was expressed as a total colony-forming units (CFU/m3) and revised by the equation: Pr = N[1/N + 1/N − 1 + 1/N − 2 + 1/N − r + 1] where Pr, r, and N stand for revised colonies, number of viable colonies, and the number of sieve pores, respectively (Feller 1968). The concentration of airborne microorganisms (CFU/m3) was calculated according to the following formula: X = (a × 1000)/V, where “a” is the number of fungal colonies, and “V” is the air volume sampled (m3) (Michalska et al. 2021).
Characterization of meteorological conditions
The air temperature and relative humidity were measured during each sampling session using a thermo-hygrometer (HI9565 HANNA, Poland). The air temperature ranged from 11.2 to 22.7 °C (autumn season), 17.1 to 24 °C (winter season), 18.1 to 24.6 °C (spring season), and 19.4 to 25.6 °C (summer season), respectively. Relative humidity in the autumn season was between 27.9 and 89.4%, in the winter season from 30.8 to 95.5%, in the spring season from 35.5 to 90.8, and in the summer season from 54.7 to 80.1%.
Identification of fungi
Airborne fungi were identified based on their macro- and microscopic features using diagnostic keys (Samson et al. 2014, 2019; Yilmaz et al. 2014; Visagie et al. 2014). Then, the cultured fungi were subjected to molecular identification to confirm species identity. DNA extraction from the selected and dominant fungi was performed using the Tissue DNA Purification Kit (EURx, Gdańsk, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For the diagnostic of the airborne fungi, we used both morphological criteria and molecular analyses based mainly on the sequence of the internal transcribed spacer ITS. In the case of several closely related strains, we sequenced b-tubulin and calmodulin fragment. Amplification parts of the ITS were amplified according to the methods described by White et al. (1990). The ITS was amplified using a pair of primers: ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′). PCR reactions were performed in a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Warsaw, Poland) in a total volume of 12.5 µL. Each PCR reaction contains 6.25 μL of 2 × PCR Mix Plus (A&A Biotechnology, Gdansk, Poland), 0.625 μL of each primer (10 mM), 4 μL of DNA template, and 1 μL of ddH2O. PCR conditions included an initial denaturation step of 95 °C (30 s); 34 cycles of 95 °C (45 s), 55 °C (60 s), and 72 °C (60 s); and the final elongation of 72 °C (3 min).
Calmodulin gene amplification was performed using the set of primers Cmd5 and Cmd6, and amplification of b-tubulin was performed using the primer pairs Bt2a (5-GGT AAC ATC CAA GCT GCT GGT TTC-3) and Bt2b (5-CTC AGT GTA ACC GTG ACC CTT GGC-3) Glass and Donaldson (1995). For both regions, the conditions were as follows: denaturation step of 95 °C (3 min); 40 cycles of 95 °C (45 s), 55 °C (60 s), and 72 °C (60 s); and the final elongation of 72 °C (7 min). The PCR products were visualized in 1% agarose gel staining with SimplySafe (EURx).
All positive samples obtained in the PCR reaction were purified and sequenced (Macrogen, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) using the same primer pairs as in the PCR reaction. The obtained sequences were manually edited using DNA Baser Sequence Assembly software (Heracle BioSoft SRL Romania), and consensus sequences were aligned and compared with sequences deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s GenBank (NCBI, Bethesda, MD, USA) using the BLAST algorithm (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The most representative sequences that form the basis of the phylogenetic tree have been included in the GenBank database (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the Maximum Likelihood method with the MEGA 7.0 software, bootstrapping was performed using 1000 replicates.
Statistical analysis
The data underwent statistical analysis using R version 4.3.1 in RStudia 2023.09.0. Linear regression models and Spearman correlations were computed to evaluate the correlation between fungal abundance and meteorological parameters (humidity and temperature). The Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons were utilized to investigate the influence of qualitative factors, such as location and season, on fungal abundance. For statistical significance, results with p < 0.05 were considered. Margalef’s Index and Jaccard’s Similarity Index were employed to assess the diversity of fungal species at specific research sites. The Jaccard Index was calculated pairwise, and then the average value for each site was obtained.
Results and discussion
Fungal concentrations in air samples
A total of 240 air samples were collected from 20 locations in the zoological garden. Fungi were detected in 234 (97.5%) samples. The concentrations of countable fungal aerosol are presented in Table 2 and ranged from 5.0 × 101 to 3.65 × 104 CFU/m3 (for a temperature of 27 °C). The lowest concentration of fungi was recorded in Papio Pavilion 5 × 101 CFU/m3 (range 5 × 101 –2.5 × 102 CFU/m3). It is worth noticing that this concentration was lower than the recorded at another site, because the air sampling was done just before the morning cleaning of the room. The highest concentration of fungi was recorded in the Apes Pavilion and ranged between 2.02 × 104 and 3.65 × 104 CFU/m3. Similar concentrations were found in the Papio Pavilion (range 1.31 × 104–1.32 × 102 CFU/m3) and the Kongo Pavilion (1.38 × 104–2.61 × 104 CFU/m3). Statistical analysis performed using the Kruskal-Walis test showed statistically significant differences between the sampling location and the CFU/m3 fungi values (Fig. 1).
There have been a lot of studies about microbial and mycological air contamination in animal production premises (Plewa and Lonc 2011; Pusz et al. 2015; Matković et al. 2009) or in the farming environment (Radon et al. 2002; Almatawah et al. 2023), but there are only several publications relating to non-production facilities, such as zoos. In Poland, the first study carried out in the zoological garden was initiated by Grzyb and Lenart-Boroń (2019) and focused mainly on bacterial bioaerosol in the selected animal premises in the Krakow’s Zoological Garden. Another study conducted by Grzyb and Lenart-Boroń (2020) inside the premises where animals are kept demonstrated similar “to our work” total concentration of fungi (range 8.4 × 102–2.84 × 104). The highest median concentration of fungi was recorded in the exotarium (range 9.79 × 103–2.84 × 104 CFU/m3), and the lowest was recorded in rooms for pygmy hippopotamus 966 CFU/m3 (range 8.4 × 102–1.3 × 103 CFU/m3) (Grzyb and Lenart-Boroń 2020). Because of the lack of other studies on the mycological quality of air in zoos, the results of our own research can be compared to other breeding facilities, e.g., poultry houses and cowshed. Matković et al. (2007) observed in the barn the average concentration of fungi ranged from 5.23 × 104 CFU/m3 (at noon) to 8.35 × 104 CFU/m3 (in the morning). The air quality in some farming objects has been described by Radon et al. (2002). According to that author, the total number of fungi in poultry houses and in pig farms was higher than the concentrations of airborne fungi noticed in our research and ranged from 8.3 × 104 to 1.1 × 109 (Radon et al. 2002). Such large differences in the level of microbial contamination between the zoological garden and other breeding premises are most likely due to different methods of air sampling. The sampler used in our investigation has some limitations. This device is characterized by sampling efficiency described by the cuttoff size parameter D50, at the level of 1.7 μm (Górny et al. 2023). All particles above the size would be collected and almost all particles smaller than that size may not be captured by this impactor. Airborne fungal spores typically have an aerodynamic diameter (dae) of 2 to 4 μm, and some species release fragments of 0.3 to 1.3 μm (Madsen et al. 2016). That is why the number of airborne fungi in our research may have been underestimated in relation to the actual concentration in the air. The results of the present study suggest that it is necessary to use the same instruments and methods to assess microbial contamination. The lack of standardization of air sampling methods may lead to incorrect conclusions.
The concentration of airborne fungi varies across different seasons and is dependent on environmental factors such as temperature or relative humidity (Yuan et al. 2022). The important factors that increase the spread of fungi in the air and sustain their growth are temperature and humidity (Pflieger et al. 2020). Therefore, our studies were conducted in a seasonal cycle (spring, summer, autumn, winter), and the environmental conditions (temperature and relative air humidity) were measured during each sampling season using a thermo-hygrometer (Table 3). The lowest recorded temperature (11 °C) was noted in autumn in the room for Papio Pavilion, while the highest temperatures were noted in summer in the Kongo Pavilion (25.5–25.9 °C). Similarly, the highest humidity was observed in winter in East Africa (95.5%) and in the Kongo Pavilion. In general, the relative humidity during the studies varied from 29.3% (in the Apes Pavilion) to 95.5% in the Kongo Pavilion. Environmental parameters (temperature and relative humidity) were correlated with the total number of CFU/m3 noted in all locations, based on Spearman correlation analysis. The relative humidity correlated positively with the total fungal concentration (rho = 0.57, p < 0.0021), while temperature showed no significant correlation with the total fungal concentration at all locations (rho = − 0.1, p < 0.2263) (Figs. 2 and 3).
The concentration of airborne fungi observed at each location varied significantly across the seasons. The highest concentration was recorded in the autumn, reaching a level of 3.65 × 105 CFU/m3 while the lowest levels were observed in the spring and summer, with values of 1.5 × 104 and 1.32 × 104 CFU/m3, respectively. The lowest concentration of fungi (2.5 × 102 CFU/m3) was observed in the winter season. It has been demonstrated that optimal temperature and high relative humidity can contribute to a sudden increase in the concentration of airborne fungi. The medium fungal concentrations varied considerably by season, with the greatest variation noted between summer and autumn (p < 0.0018). A strong variety of airborne fungal concentrations was also noticed between spring and summer (p < 0.0056), while no statistically significant differences were observed between other seasons (Fig. 4).
Interpretation of the results of microbiological air contamination is challenging because of the lack of acceptable limits for microbiological agents. The most commonly used measure of exposure to microbial air pollution is the degree of such pollution, expressed in terms of the number of colony-forming units (CFU) in 1 m3 of air (Górny et al. 2016). The threshold limit values (TLV) were used in the assessment of mycological air contamination. For microbiological agents in the air of occupational and non-occupational environments, TLV was proposed by the Expert Group on Biological Agents at the Polish Interdepartmental Commission for Maximum Admissible Concentrations and Intensities for Agents Harmful to Health in the Working Environment (Górny et al. 2016). These values (5 × 104 CFU/m3 for fungi) were developed as a result of volumetric measurements of environmental bioaerosols. Based on the TLV proposed by the mentioned Expert Group, we can conclude that the quantitative analysis of the fungal aerosol showed lower concentration values than the recommended permissible limits. Nevertheless, this is not equivalent to the absence of microbial contamination in the facilities that were studied. Particularly as some of the values were close to TLV values. The US government agency, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), suggests that a value higher than 1.0 × 103 CFU/m3 indoor may be an indicator of microbial contamination. However, a determination of bioaerosol biodiversity is needed to confirm a health hazard, as certain species may pose a greater health concern than others (OSHA 2015; Rivas et al. 2018).
Biodiversity of airborne fungi
The total number of airborne fungi varied by location (Table 4) and seasons (Table 5). The Margalef’s Index was used to analyze the biodiversity of airborne fungi throughout the study period and in different locations. The highest value of Margalef’s Index (0.93) was recorded at Kongo Pavilion in location no 18 and the lowest (0.00) was observed at East Africa Pavilion in location no 12. Concerning seasons, the highest diversity of airborne fungi was recorded in the winter (34), followed by the autumn (29), and spring (27), whereas the lowest number of strains were noted in the summer (21). The average Jaccard Index for all sites was quite low, at 0.135. The lowest average Jaccard Index, calculated pairwise for each research site, was for the Kongo Pavilion (0.12). This indicates that the Kongo Pavilion had the highest number of unique isolated species compared to other research sites. Direct comparison showed the lowest species similarity between the Kongo Pavilion and the Apes Pavilion (Jaccard Index = 0.06) and between the Kongo Pavilion and the Papio Pavilion (0.08). The highest similarity was found between the Kongo Pavilion and the East Africa Pavilion (0.22).
We used both morphological and molecular identity methods based on sequencing regions of the ITS, b-tubulin, and calmodulin. Using these methods, a total of 112 fungal strains belonging to 10 genera and 50 species were isolated during the whole 1-year-long study. The molecular identification corresponded well with the morphological diagnosis and proved to be a good tool for diagnostic strains that were not identified microscopically. By comparing the partial sequences of the ITS region of the own isolates with the sequences of other isolates available in GenBank, the results showed that the similarity percentage of nucleotide sequences ranged between 95 and 100% (Supplement 1). In most cases, (87%) the sequence data allowed the identification at the species level. The study based on the molecular analysis allowed us to identify 97 out of 112 species of fungi. Diagnosis of thirteen strains belonged to Penicillium genera, and one strain each of the Cladosporium and Absidia genera failed. Analysis of ITS region revealed that they belong to closely related species. Even the sequencing of the less conservative region (b-tubulin) and calmodulin did not allow for the identification of these fungi at the species level.
Most of the airborne fungi isolated in our studies were representatives of Ascomycota (93.75%), while Mucormycota constituted 4.46% of the mycobiota and Basidiomycota for 1.79%. Penicillium was the dominant genera, including 58.9% of total fungal strains, followed by Aspergillus 25.89%, Cladosporium 3.57%, Talaromyces 3.57%, Mucor 1.78%, Schizophyllum 1.78%, Syncephalastrum 0.89%, Alternaria 0.89%, Absidia 0.89%, and Cunninghamella 0.89%. Species belonging to the most representative Penicillium genera were grouped in the seven following sections such as the following: Fasciculata (P. solitum, P. commune, P. allii), Chrysogena (P. chrysogenum, P. lanosocoeruleum, P. rubens, P. vanlyukii), Penicillium (P. griseofulvum, P. glandicola), Ramosa (P. rastrickii), Brevicompacta (P. olsonii, P. brevicompactum, P. bialowieziense), Exilicaulis (P. citreosulfuratum), Aspergilloides (P. glabrum), Citrina (P. citrinum, P. copticola, P. sumataense, P. steckii, P. hetheringtonii) (Fig. 5). Aspergillus genera were represented by six dominant sections: Nigri (A. niger, A. tubigensis), Circumdati (A. ochraceus, A. westerdijkiae, A. ostianus, A. elegans, A. steynii), Flavi (A. flavus), Fumigatus (A. fumigatus), Versicolores (A. versicolor, A. sydowii, A. puulaauensis) (Fig. 6).
Diversity of identified fungi varied between different locations and seasons. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research about the biodiversity of airborne fungi in zoological gardens. Therefore, our results could be compared to the studies obtained for the livestock premises. For instance, in the China poultry houses, researchers observed a different genus composition than in our studies. They isolated mainly Trichosporon, Candida, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, and Alternaria genera (Chen et al. 2021). In other studies, Aspergillus, Scopulariopsis, Penicillium, and Cladosporium were detected in the air of the swine house (Kumari et al. 2016). Comparable results to ours have been reported by Matković et al. 2009. Croatian authors detected Aspergillus and Penicillium genera in dwellings for dairy cows and laying hens.
Some of the fungi isolated in our research may be associated with allergic respiratory diseases (especially in people with a weakened immune system). Filamentous fungi can be a source of polysaccharides such as the β(1 → 3)-glucans. This compound may cause inflammatory airway reactions and also affect the immune system. There is increasing evidence that β(1 → 3)-glucans cause non-specific inflammatory reactions and can be responsible for bioaerosol-induced respiratory symptoms observed in both indoor and occupational environments (Pflieger et al. 2020). The other fungi are important producers of mycotoxins, which have been suggested as one of the major possible causes of health problems. For example, several detected fungi belonging to Aspergilli in sections Circumdati (A. steynii and A. westerdijkiae), Flavi (A. flavus), and Nigri (A. carbonarius and A. niger) are well-known producers of ochratoxins, a mycotoxin teratogenic, carcinogenic, immunosuppressive, and nephrotoxic in animals (Kagot et al. 2019). The other species, such as A. versicolor and A. flavus, produce sterigmatocystin and aflatoxins, respectively. Aflatoxins are the most potent natural carcinogens (Lamoth 2016). What’s more, the identified in our study A. flavus is recognized as an opportunistic animal and human pathogen, while A. fumigatus is the main causative agent of pulmonary invasive aspergillosis (Al-Shaarani et al. 2023). The most abundant Penicillium genera isolated in our studies is listed among the most common allergenic fungal taxa and has been linked to asthma. Whereas, Schizophyllum commune, which accounted for 1.78%, may be the cause of ABPM (allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis) and allergy-related bronchopulmonary infections and sinusitis (Oguma et al. 2023).
Conclusion
This is the first research on culturable airborne fungi at the zoological garden in Poland. The quantitative analysis of the fungal aerosol showed that the obtained concentration values were lower than the recommended permissible limits. But a lot of detected fungi can be harmful to human and animal health. That is why, our study emphasizes the necessity of air quality monitoring.
Similar studies to ours are rarely conducted. Therefore, our preliminary research provides basic information about the fungal concentrations and their biodiversity in these touristic facilities. However, further long-term quantitative, as well as qualitative, and mycotoxicological research is needed to fully understand airborne fungal composition in the zoological garden and its potentially negative impact on human and animal health. Moreover, quantitative and qualitative assessment of mycotoxins in the air is of great importance from the occupational exposure point of view. In addition, our preliminary results along with planned long-term studies of mycological air contamination in the zoo may contribute in the future to the development of microbiological air quality standards by relevant institutions.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Almatawah QA, Al-Khalaifah HS, Aldameer AS, Ali AK, Benhaji AH, Varghese JS (2023) Microbiological indoor and outdoor air quality in chicken fattening houses. J Environ Public Health 29:3512328. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3512328
Al-Shaarani AAQA, Quach ZM, Wang X, Muafa MHM, Nafis MMH, Pecoraro L (2023) Analysis of airborne fungal communities on pedestrian bridges in urban environments. Microorganisms 11(8):2097. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11082097
Álvarez-Pérez S, García ME, Martínez-Nevado E, Blanco JL (2023) Presence of Aspergillus fumigatus with the TR34/L98H Cyp51A mutation and other azole-resistant aspergilli in the air of a zoological park. Res Vet Sci 164:104993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.104993
Cateau E, Leclerc A, Cartier N, Valsecchi I, Bailly É, Le Senechal R, Becerra M, Le Gallou B, Lavergne RA, Chesnay A, Robin JP, Cray C, Goddard N, Thorel M, Guillot J, Mulot B, Desoubeaux G (2022) Aspergillosis in a colony of Humboldt penguins (Spheniscus humboldti) under managed care: a clinical and environmental investigation in a French zoological park. Med Mycol 60(7):myac046. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myac046
Chen G, Ma D, Huang Q, Tang W, Wei M, Li Y, Jiang L, Zhu W, Yu X, Zheng W, Zhang J, Zhang X (2021) Aerosol concentrations and fungal communities within broiler houses in different broiler growth stages in summer. Front Vet Sc 13(8):775502. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.775502
Debergh H, Becker P, Vercammen F, Lagrou K, Haesendonck R, Saegerman C, Packeu A (2023) Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Humboldt penguins - susceptibility patterns and molecular epidemiology of clinical and environmental Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from a Belgian zoo, 2017–2022. Antibiotics 12(3):584. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030584
Douglas P, Robertson S, Gay R, Hansel AL, Gant T (2018) A systematic review of the public health risks of bioaerosols from intensive farming. Int J Hyg Environ Health 221(2):134–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.10.019
Feller W (1968) An introduction to probability theory and its application, Volume II, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, p 704
Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. J Appl Environ Microbiol 61(4):1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995
Górny RL, Harkawy AS, Ławniczek-Wałczyk A, Karbowska-Berent J, Wlazło A, Niesler A, Gołofit-Szymczak M, Cyprowski M (2016) Exposure to culturable and total microbiota in cultural heritage conservation laboratories. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 29(2):255–75. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00630
Górny RL, Gołofit-Szymczak M, Cyprowski M, Ławniczek-Wałczyk A, Stobnicka A, Wolska LA (2023) Poultry house as point source of intense bioaerosol emission. Ann Agric Environ Med 30(3):432–454. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/172770
Grzyb J, Lenart-Boroń A (2019) Bacterial bioaerosol concentration and size distribution in the selected animal premises in a zoological garden. Aerobiologia 35(2):253–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-018-09557-9
Grzyb J, Lenart-Boroń A (2020) Size distribution and concentration of fungal aerosol in animal premises of a zoological garden. Aerobiologia 36:233–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09625-z(0123456789
Kagot V, Okoth S, De Boevre M, De Saeger S (2019) Biocontrol of Aspergillus and Fusarium mycotoxins in Africa: benefits and limitations. Toxins (basel) 11(2):109. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11020109
Kumari P, Woo C, Yamamoto N, Choi HL (2016) Variations in abundance, diversity and community composition of airborne fungi in swine houses across seasons. Sci Rep 6:37929. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37929
Lamoth F (2016) Aspergillus fumigatus-related species in clinical practice. Front Microbiol 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00683
Lee S-J, Kim K-Y (2021) On-site investigation of airborne bacteria and fungi according to type of poultry houses in South Korea. Processes 9(9):1534. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091534
Madsen AM, Larsen ST, Koponen IK, Kling KI, Barooni A, Karottki DG, Tendal K, Wolkoff P (2016) Generation and characterization of indoor fungal aerosols for inhalation studies. Appl Environ Microbiol 82(8):2479–93. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04063-15
Matković K, Vučemilo M, Vinković B, Šeol B, Pavičić Ž, Matković S (2007) Qualitative structure of airborne bacteria and fungi in dairy barn and nearby environment. Czech J Anim Sci 52:249–253
Matković K, Vučemilo M, Vinković B (2009) Airborne fungi in dwellings for dairy cows and laying hens. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 60:395–399. https://doi.org/10.2478/10004-1254-60-2009-1970
Michalska M, Kurpas M, Zorena K, Wąż P, Marks R (2021) Mold and yeast-like fungi in the seaside air of the Gulf of Gdańsk (Southern Baltic) after an emergency disposal of raw sewage. J Fungi (basel) 7(3):219. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030219
Nageen Y, Wang X, Pecoraro L (2023) Seasonal variation of airborne fungal diversity and community structure in urban outdoor environments in Tianjin, China. Front Microbiol 13:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1043224
Nekolný L, Fialová D (2018) Zoo tourism: what actually is a zoo? Czech J Tour 7(2):153–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjot-2018-0008
Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) (2015) Chapter 2 – indoor air quality investigation. In: OSHA technical manual, TED 1–0.15A. https://osha.gov. Accessed 8 Jun 2024
Oguma T, Ishiguro T, Kamei K, Tanaka J, Suzuki J, Hebisawa A, Obase Y, Mukae H, Tanosaki T, Furusho S, Kurokawa K, Watai K, Matsuse H, Harada N, Nakamura A, Shibayama T, Baba R, Fukunaga K, Matsumoto H, Ohba H, Sakamoto S, Suzuki S, Tanaka S, Yamada T, Yamasaki A, Fukutomi Y, Shiraishi Y, Toyotome T, Fukunaga K, Shimoda T, Konno S, Taniguchi M, Tomomatsu K, Okada N, Asano K; Japan ABPM Research Program (2023) Clinical characteristics of allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis caused by Schizophyllum commune. Clin Transl Allergy 31:14(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12327
Pfliegler W, Pócsi I, Győri Z, Pusztahelyi T (2020) The Aspergilli and their mycotoxins: metabolic interactions with plants and the soil biota. Front Microbiol 10:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02921
Plewa K, Lonc E (2011) Analysis of airborne contamination with bacteria and moulds in poultry farming: a case study. Pol J Environ Stud 20(3):725–731
Pusz W, Plaskowska E, Weber W, Kita W (2015) Assessing the abundance of airborne fungi in a dairy cattle barn. Pol J Environ Stud 24(1):241–248. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/29201
Radon K, Danuser B, Iversen M, Monso E, Weber C, Hartung J, Donham K, Palmgren U, Nowak D (2002) Air contaminants in different European farming environments. Ann Agric Environ Med 9:41–48
R Core Team (2023) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org
Rivas AE, Dykstra MJ, Kranz K, Bronson E (2018) Environmental fungal loads in an indoor-outdoor African penguin (Spheniscusdemersus) exhibit. J Zoo Wildl Med 49(3):542–555. https://doi.org/10.1638/2017-0119.1
Samson RA, Visagie CM, Houbraken J, Hong SB, Hubka V, Klaassen CH, Perrone G, Seifert KA, Susca A, Tanney JB, Varga J, Kocsubé S, Szigeti G, Yaguchi T, Frisvad JC (2014) Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Stud Mycol 78:141–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.07.004
Samson RA, Houbraken J, Thrane U, Frisvad JC, Anderen B (2019) Food and indoor fungi. Westerdijk Laboratory Manual series, 2nd edn. Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht
Seifi S, Shokri H, KarimiMadab M (2018) Isolation and characterization of mycoflora of chicken hatcheries in Mazandaran province, north of Iran. Vet Res Forum 9(4):373–378. https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2018.33106
Szulc J, Okrasa M, Dybska-Stępień K, Sulyok M, Nowak A, Otlewska A, Szponar B, Majchrzycka K (2020) Assessment of microbiological indoor air quality in cattle breeding farms. Aerosol Air Qual Res 20(6):1353–1373. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.12.0641
Visagie CM, Houbraken J, Frisvad JC, Hong SB, Klaassen CHW, Perrone G, Seifert KA, Varga J, Yaguchi T, Samson RA (2014) Identification and nomenclature of the genus Penicillium. Stud Mycol 78:343–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.001
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, New York, USA, pp 315–322
Yilmaz N, Visagie CM, Houbraken J, Frisvad SRA (2014) Polyphasic taxonomy of the genus Talaromyces. Stud Mycol 78:175–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.08.001
Yuan C, Wang X, Pecoraro L (2022) Environmental factors shaping the diversity and spatial-temporal distribution of indoor and outdoor culturable airborne fungal communities in Tianjin University Campus, Tianjin. China Front Microbiol 14(13):928921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.928921
Acknowledgements
The authors of this paper would like to express their appreciation to the Wroclaw Zoo Administration for allowing us to conduct our mycological research.
Funding
This research was funded in whole by the National Science Centre, Poland, under the research project “MINIATURA 6,” grant 2022/06/X/NZ8/00430. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC-BY public copyright license to any Author-Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KPT: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, funding acquisition, and writing the original draft. PK: statistical analysis. AD: investigation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Diane Purchase
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Plewa-Tutaj, K., Krzyściak, P. & Dobrzycka, A. Mycological air contamination level and biodiversity of airborne fungi isolated from the zoological garden air — preliminary research. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 43066–43079 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33926-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33926-2