Abstract
Introduction
MRI is very accurate in selecting young women with cervical cancer for fertility-sparing surgery (FSS), in particular radical hysterectomy (RH). In order to improve obstetrical outcomes, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by cold knife conization (CKC) has been proposed as alternative technique.
Objective
To investigate the role of MRI in evaluation of response to treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), followed by CKC, in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stage IB2-IIA1 with tumor size 2 – 4 cm, desiring to preserve their fertility.
Methods
13 young women (23–36 years old) with cervical cancer stage IB2-IIA1 desiring to preserve their fertility were included. Tumor diameter at baseline and after treatment was detected on 1.5 T MRI. Treatment response was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) and then compared to histopathology result.
Results
MRI correctly assessed 11 out of 13 cases, according to RECIST 1.1, compared to histopathology. Among these 7 patients with partial response (PR), 2 cases of CR, 1 SD and 1 PD with persistence or enlargement of primary tumor.
Conclusion
Our pilot study supports the usefulness of MRI in assessment of treatment response after NACT, followed by CKC.
Trial registration number
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02323841
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cervical cancer represents the fourth-most common cancer in women and the leading gynecologic malignancy, accounting approximately 570,000 cases and 311,000 deaths in 2018 worldwide [1]. In Europe, during last years, both mean age of pregnant women and number of nulliparous women have increased [2]. Age-specific incidence data indicate that 43% of patients with cervical cancer have less than 45 years [3]. As a consequence, numerous young women diagnosed with cervical cancer are still desiring to become pregnant.
In women with early stage cervical cancer (ECC), fertility-sparing surgery techniques include laparoscopic, abdominal or vaginal radical trachelectomy (RT) and cold knife conization (CKC) with or without pelvic lymph nodes dissection. Currently, RT is proposed as fertility-sparing surgery (FSS), alternative to radical hysterectomy, in patients with ECC staged IA1-IB1, as by the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification [4].
According to a recent metanalysis, RT and CKC present similar oncologic outcomes in terms of recurrence rates, but CKC presents better obstetrical outcomes in terms of pregnancy rate (36% for CKC vs. 20% for RT) [5].
The National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN) guidelines suggested RT as an alternative to radical hysterectomy (RH) in young women desiring to preserve fertility with [4, 6] disease limited to cervix, tumor size < 2 cm (or < 2.5 cm if exophytic lesion), absence of parametrial extension, an estimated distance of ≥ 1 cm from the proximal aspect of the tumor to the internal os, absence of lymphadenopathies or metastatic disease. Some authors have proposed neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by CKC as a safe and effective approach in ECC [7,8,9].
MRI is reported to be very accurate in selecting patients eligible for FSS [10, 11], in tumor size evaluation and deep stromal invasion assessment [12]. In the evaluation of parametrial invasion, the specificity and negative predictive value of MRI were 97% and 100%, respectively [13]. Furthermore, MRI has demonstrated very high sensitivity and specificity in assessment of internal os involvement, 90% and 98%, respectively. Moreover, MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) assumes an important role in the evaluation of tumor response after chemotherapy [14, 15]. DWI with high resolution reduced field-of-view (FOV) improves tumor delineation [16]. In addition, MRI is highly sensitive and accurate (90.7% and 91.7%, respectively) in tumor size evaluation after FSS, especially in patients who have undergone cone biopsy before MRI examination [17]. 3 Tesla MRI is more reliable in assessment of parametrial invasion and uterine corpus invasion in early stage cervical cancer [18].
The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of MRI, including DWI, in the evaluation of response to treatment after NACT, followed by CKC, in patients with ECC (FIGO 2018 stage IB2-IIA1) with tumor size 2–4 cm, desiring to preserve their fertility.
Methods and materials
Study protocol
The present study is part of a single-center protocol prospectively aiming to assess oncological and the obstetrical outcomes of early stage IB2-IIA1 cervical cancer patients, as by the FIGO 2018 classification, with tumor size 2–4 cm, and wishing to preserve their fertility [19].
The study protocol consisting of neoadjuvant platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02323841) was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (N. 12,650/13). All patients signed written informed consent in order to agree the procedures and for their data to be collected.
In the present study, we assess MRI performance, including DWI, in evaluating response to treatment after NACT followed by CKC. Histopathology was used as reference standard.
Work-up and eligible criteria
Between March 2014 and the end of September 2018, 25 consecutive patients with cervical cancer FIGO stage IB2-IIA1 > 2 cm wishing to preserve fertility were prospectively enrolled.
Further inclusion criteria were histologically assessed diagnosis of cervical cancer, stage FIGO IB2-IIA1 with tumor diameter between 2 and 4 cm, squamous and adenocarcinoma histotype, absence of nodal disease, age 18—40 years, no menopausal status, wish to preserve fertility, refusal of radical treatment. Exclusion criteria were neuroendocrine cervical tumors or other rare histology, such as glassy cells or clear cell carcinoma, ongoing pregnancy at the time of diagnosis.
Preoperative and post-NACT assessment consisted of clinical examination, colposcopy, transvaginal pelvic ultrasound (US), abdominal-pelvic nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PET-CT. Tumor dimension was evaluated by MRI and physical examination. Lymph nodes status was determined by MRI preoperatively and then established at pathology after laparoscopic lymphadenectomy.
At the beginning of the study, all patients were submitted to pelvic lymphadenectomy. After the growing evidence about the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in early stage cervical cancer (FIGO stage IA, IB1 and IB2) [20], starting from 2015, we considered this nodal assessment approach in our study, after adequate patient information and consent.
NACT
After laparoscopic pelvic lymph node evaluation, eligible women underwent NACT administered for 3 cycles including cisplatin 70 mg/m2, and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, every 21 days. After completion of NACT, the patients underwent clinical-instrumental re-assessment, including MRI. During chemotherapy, GnRH analogs or estroprogestin contraceptive pills in a continuous regimen, based on the patient choice, were used to protection of the ovarian reserve and to improve potential fertility.
MRI protocol
All patients were scanned with a 1.5-T MR scanner using a standard 8-channel phased-array body coil. Patients are encouraged to fast 4 h and empty the bladder prior to MRI examination to reduce peristalsis-related motion artifacts. An anti-peristaltic agent is administered intramuscularly at the start of the examination to further reduce peristalsis. Conventional sequences included axial T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences for panoramic pelvic evaluation and high-resolution T2-weighted sequences performed in the sagittal, axial oblique (perpendicular) and coronal oblique planes (parallel) along the long axis of the cervix. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is performed in the sagittal and axial oblique planes in the same orientation as T2-wieghted planes (b = 0 and 800–1000 s/mm2) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps obtained. Large field-of-view single-shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) images from the top of the kidneys to the iliac crests are acquired to exclude hydronephrosis and para-aortic lymphadenopathy. Technical parameters are reported in Table 1.
Imaging analysis
Two radiologists, with multi-year expertise in gynecologic imaging, reviewed MRI images in consensus on a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY). Firstly, T2-weighted images were evaluated. The readers had to detect the presence of intermediate or high T2-WI signal intensity of cervical carcinoma. Tumor diameters were assessed on sagittal, and oblique axial and coronal T2-WI. Maximum tumor diameter (TD) was chosen between the major diameter along the three axes. At baseline MRI examination, the readers evaluated eventual parametrial involvement, distance of the tumor from internal os and eventual vaginal extension of the tumor. Tumor diffusion restriction was qualitatively evaluated on DWI sequence. Last, occurrence of pelvic and/or lumboaortic lymphadenopathies was researched on conventional images.
After NACT conclusion, treatment response was assessed on MRI according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) [21]: complete response (CR): disappearance of the clinically evident disease, partial response (PR): reduction > 30% of the maximum tumor diameter; stable disease (SD): reduction of the tumor diameter not sufficient to define itself as PR; disease progression (PD): at least > 20% increase in the tumor diameter.
Radiological response to NACT was compared to histopathology result, representing our reference standard.
At follow-up MRI examination, tumor recurrence was investigated.
Surgical treatment(s) and assessment of pathologic response to NACT.
Patients with CR or PR were treated with CKC. Patients with SD or PD were proposed for radical hysterectomy (RH) and/or chemo-radiation. Pathological responses were defined as follows: complete disappearance of tumor in the cervix (pR0); remaining disease with ≤ 3 mm stromal invasion, including in situ carcinoma (pR1); residual disease with > 3 mm stromal invasion or multiple foci < 3 mm on surgical specimen (pR2) [22]. After CKC, in the presence of preneoplastic lesion (SIL) on the resection margins, the patient was counseled for re-conization by diathermic loop (LEEP/LLETZ) or for RH in the presence of residual neoplastic lesion on the resection margins. Histopathology result was considered the gold standard.
Follow-up procedures
Clinical-instrumental follow-up was performed every 6 months in the first two years and every year from the third year on. Each follow-up visit includes gynecological examination, pap test, colposcopy and MRI. Patients could start their attempts to conceive only after the first six-months follow-up.
Results
Patients’ characteristics.
Between March 2014 and September 2018, 25 consecutive patients were enrolled.
8 out of 25 patients refused to participate, preferring RH as primary treatment option.
Four patients were not admitted after screening procedures: in 3 patients lymph node metastases were found (2 micro- and 1 macro-metastasis) and 1 patient, 40 years old, with AMH serum levels of 0.06 ng/ml, and FSH and LH levels underlying a pre-menopausal status, resulting in a final study population of 13 patients (Table 2).
All patients were of Caucasian race, 11 were Italian, 1 was born in Ukraine and 1 was born in Poland. The median age was 29 years (range 23–36 years). Seven patients (53.8%) had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 6 (46.1%) adenocarcinoma (AD). Grade of tumor differentiation was G2 in 8 patients (61.5%), and G3 in the remaining 5 (38.5%).
The mean time between the end of NACT and MRI imaging was 19 days (range: 8–55).
At the end of March 2020, the median follow-up was of 37 months (range: 18–76). In this group, 1 distant recurrence in the liver, in the absence of loco-regional recurrence, was detected at 1st follow-up MRI; patient was managed by atypical liver resection and RH and still alive without evidence of disease after 72 months.
Before data collection, only 3 patients tried to conceive and 2 became pregnant, both spontaneously. The 2 patients underwent a cesarean section (at 34 weeks because of pPROM and at 37 weeks, because of PROM, respectively). The newborns are currently in good conditions.
Tumor response evaluation.
The median maximum tumor diameter assessed at baseline MRI was 30 mm (range 22–40 mm). Median maximum tumor diameter assessed at post-treatment MRI was 9 mm (range 0–40 mm). Three patients achieved CR (23.1%), and 8 patients (61.5%) showed PR. The two patients remaining experienced SD (15,3%) and were treated with RH; one of them experienced PD (7.7%) and died of disease after 15 months (Table 3).
Histological evaluation.
Eleven responding patients were considered eligible for FSS and all underwent CKC. At conclusive analysis of surgical specimens, the absence of residual disease (pR0) was observed in 3 patients (27.3%). The presence of residual disease was observed in 8 cases, respectively, with macroscopic disease (pR2: > 3 mm stromal invasion) in 2 cases (18.2%) and microscopic disease (pR1: ≤ 3 mm stromal invasion) in 6 cases (54.5%) (Table 3).
MRI performance in tumor response assessment.
A case was considered correctly classified when imaging assessment according to RECIST 1.1 (CR, PR, SD or PD) corresponded to histopathological result (pR0, pR1, pR2) (Table 3).
MRI correctly assessed 11 out of 13 cases: 7 patients with PR (Fig. 1) corresponding to 2 patients with macroscopic residual (pR2) and 5 with microscopic residual (pR1), 2 cases of CR, assessed as PR0 on histology, 1 SD and 1 PD with persistence or enlargement of primary tumor.
One patient identified as PR on MRI had no residual disease (pR0) on surgical specimen. One patient classified as CR had still evidence of disease on histology, presenting microscopic residual (pR1).
Discussion
The results from our series confirm the usefulness of MRI, including DWI, in tumor response evaluation after NACT in patients with ECC (FIGO 2018 stage IB2-IIA1). In fact, tumor response was properly assessed in 11 out of 13 cases, investigating both conventional and diffusion-weighted images. In 1 out of 13 patients, CR was assigned at post-NACT evaluation (Fig. 2); on histology, this patient had a microscopic residual ≤ 3 mm (pR1).
MRI has a primary role in cervical cancer staging [1], fertility-sparing surgery selection [10] and monitoring treatment response after NACT or chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) [15, 23]. Several post-chemotherapy modifications, such as edema, inflammation and necrosis can mimic tumor residual on conventional imaging [24]. The addition of DWI increased MRI performance in tumor response assessment after non-surgical treatment [23]. In our series, only 1 out of 13 case was configured as PR on MRI, while the absence of residual disease (pR0) was detected on histological sample. In this patient, post-NACT MRI was performed only 8 days after the end of treatment. The short interval time between the end of treatment and MRI examination could be cause of false positive MRI interpretation as already reported in the literature in the evaluation of tumor response after chemo-radiation therapy or radiotherapy. In fact, the optimal time between neoadjuvant therapy (chemo-radiation therapy or radiotherapy alone) and post-treatment MRI has been reported to be 4–6 weeks or 3 months, in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer [14, 25]. However, there are no currently studies investigating MRI timing in response evaluation after chemotherapy alone in cervical cancer.
To our knowledge, there are no studies currently in literature investigating MRI performance in tumor response assessment in ECC treated with NACT followed by CKC. MRI was used to assess clinical response after NACT only in the retrospective study published by Salihi et al. [8], including 11 patients, but its performance was not investigated. Some differences in study population are present between our series and Salihi’s. Only patients with maximum tumor diameter between 2 and 4 cm were prospectively enrolled in our study, while Salihi et al. [8] included patients with tumor size ≤ 3 cm, with a median tumor diameter of 15 mm. Tumor size was < 2 cm in 7 patients (64%) and > 2 cm and in 4 cases (36%) [8]. Other authors assessed the effectiveness of NACT followed by CKC [7] or trachelectomy [26], but MRI performance was not investigated.
After CKC, cervix appearance on MRI may vary according to the depth of the conization. High signal intensity in the cervical region may be depicted on T2-weighted images, causing it to look smaller than usual [27] (Figs. 3–4). As resultant, asymmetry in the length of the anterior or posterior lips of the cervix should be also considered during imaging follow-up, in order to avoid residual misdiagnosis [10]. In our series, cervical shape modifications were observed and correctly diagnosed as post-conization modifications, being aware of CKC location. Ideal cervical length, measured on sagittal T2WI from the internal to external os, should be > 2.5 cm [11]. In case of extra conization, this information is important to avoid obstetrical complications, such as cervical incompetence and future preterm delivery.
Moreover, DWI has demonstrated to be helpful in differentiate between post-treatment modifications and residual disease after CKC [28]. According to this paper, DWI was helpful, in doubtful cases, in distinguishing residual tumor from other different aspects related to previous chemo- and surgery treatments in our experience.
The advantages of the present study are represented by prospective construction, homogeneity of series, including patients with same tumor size, treatment workflow, complete imaging dataset and histopathological analysis as gold standard.
The present study has some limitations. First, the choice to cluster patients with microscopic and macroscopic residual disease on histopathology in the PR group. This decision was supported by data on prognosis of patients with microscopic residual disease (pR1), which is worse than that of patients with the absence of residual disease (pR0) [29]. Other limits are small sample size and long-recruitment time (2014–2018), which can be explained by the proposal of an experimental approach (NACT followed by CKC) in a restricted population (FIGO staging IB2-IIA1 with tumor size 2–4 cm, desiring to preserve their fertility). The variable lead time between the end of NACT and MRI represents another limit of the study, due to small sample size; in fact, only one patient underwent MRI 55 days after the end of NACT.
In conclusion, considering increasing incidence of cervical cancer among young women, several fertility-sparing treatment options have been proposed, in order to obtain successful oncological and obstetrical outcomes. As consequence, imaging assumes a crucial role in tumor response evaluation and follow-up of these patients. In this context, our results encourage the use of MRI in assessment of tumor response in patients with ECC desiring to preserve their fertility treated with NACT followed by CKC, even if larger studies are necessary to validate our data.
Data availability
All patients signed written informed consent in order to agree the procedures and for their data to be collected.
Abbreviations
- CKC:
-
Cold knife conization
- CR:
-
Complete response
- DWI:
-
Diffusion-weighted imaging
- ECC:
-
Early stage cervical cancer
- FSS:
-
Fertility-sparing surgery
- LACC:
-
Locally advanced cervical cancer
- NACT:
-
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- PACS:
-
Picture archiving and communication system
- PD:
-
Disease progression
- PR:
-
Partial response
- RH:
-
Radical hysterectomy
- RT:
-
Radical trachelectomy
- SD:
-
Stable disease
- TD:
-
Tumor diameter
References
Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R (2018) Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 143(Suppl 2):22–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12611
Serrano B, Brotons M, Bosch FX, Bruni L (2018) Epidemiology and burden of HPV-related disease. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 47:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.08.006
Seli E, Tangir J (2005) Fertility preservation options for female patients with malignancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17(3):299–308. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000169108.15623.34
Koh WJ, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR et al (2013) Cervical cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 11(3):320–343. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2013.0043
Zhang Q, Li W, Kanis MJ et al (2017) Oncologic and obstetrical outcomes with fertility-sparing treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8(28):46580–46592. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16233
Moro F, Bonanno GM, Gui B, Scambia G, Testa AC (2021) Imaging modalities in fertility preservation in patients with gynecologic cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 31(3):323–331. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-002109
Maneo A, Chiari S, Bonazzi C, Mangioni C (2008) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conservative surgery for stage IB1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111(3):438–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.023
Salihi R, Leunen K, Van Limbergen E, Moerman P, Neven P, Vergote I (2015) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by large cone resection as fertility-sparing therapy in stage IB cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 139(3):447–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.043
Burbano J, Heredia F, Sanabria D, Ardila EG, Viveros-Carreno D, Rodriguez J (2021) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to fertility-sparing surgery in cervical tumors larger than 2 cm: a systematic review on fertility and oncologic outcomes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 31(3):387–398. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001765
Rockall AG, Qureshi M, Papadopoulou I et al (2016) Role of imaging in fertility-sparing treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Radiographics 36(7):2214–2233. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150254
McEvoy SH, Nougaret S, Abu-Rustum NR et al (2017) Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: how MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42(10):2488–2512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1179-3
Epstein E, Testa A, Gaurilcikas A et al (2013) Early-stage cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound - a European multicenter trial. Gynecol Oncol 128(3):449–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.09.025
Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Wenaden AE, Shepherd JH, Reznek RH (2007) The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17(3):629–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00829.x
Feng Y, Liu H, Ding Y et al (2020) Combined dynamic DCE-MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer. Tumori 106(2):155–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891619886656
Himoto Y, Fujimoto K, Kido A et al (2014) Assessment of the early predictive power of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for uterine cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(4):751–757. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000124
Hwang J, Hong SS, Kim HJ et al (2018) Reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with cervical cancer. Br J Radiol 91(1087):20170864. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170864
Li X, Wang L, Li Y, Song P (2017) The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in combination with conventional magnetic resonance imaging for improving tumor detection for early cervical carcinoma treated with fertility-sparing surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27(8):1761–1768. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001113
Roh HJ, Kim KB, Lee JH, Kim HJ, Kwon YS, Lee SH (2018) Early cervical cancer: predictive relevance of preoperative 3-tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Surg Oncol 2018:9120753. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9120753
de Vincenzo R, Ricci C, Fanfani F et al (2020) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization in stage IB2-IIA1 cervical cancer larger than 2 cm: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.006
Tax C, Rovers MM, de Graaf C, Zusterzeel PL, Bekkers RL (2015) The sentinel node procedure in early stage cervical cancer, taking the next step; a diagnostic review. Gynecol Oncol 139(3):559–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.076
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
Buda A, Fossati R, Colombo N et al (2005) Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the SNAP01 (Studio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian Collaborative Study. J Clin Oncol 23(18):4137–4145. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.172
Gui B, Micco M, Valentini AL et al (2018) Prospective multimodal imaging assessment of locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered by chemoradiation followed by radical surgery-the “PRICE” study 2: role of conventional and DW-MRI. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5768-5
Mayr NA, Taoka T, Yuh WT et al (2002) Method and timing of tumor volume measurement for outcome prediction in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52(1):14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01808-9
Boss EA, Massuger LF, Pop LA et al (2001) Post-radiotherapy contrast enhancement changes in fast dynamic MRI of cervical carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(4):600–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1084
Robova H, Rob L, Halaska MJ, Pluta M, Skapa P (2015) Review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trachelectomy: which cervical cancer patients would be suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery? Curr Oncol Rep 17(5):446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-015-0446-0
Noël P, Dubé M, Plante M, St-Laurent G (2014) Early cervical carcinoma and fertility-sparing treatment options: MR imaging as a tool in patient selection and a follow-up modality. Radiographics 34(4):1099–1119. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.344130009
Sun J, Wu G, Shan F, Meng Z (2019) The Value of IVIM DWI in Combination with Conventional MRI in Identifying the Residual Tumor After Cone Biopsy for Early Cervical Carcinoma. Acad Radiol 26(8):1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.09.027
Ferrandina G, Gambacorta A, Gallotta V et al (2014) Chemoradiation with concomitant boosts followed by radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer: long-term results of the ROMA-2 prospective phase 2 study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90(4):778–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.033
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None
Ethics approval
Ethics approval obtained by Institutional Ethical Committee (N. 12650/13).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Russo, L., Gui, B., Miccò, M. et al. The role of MRI in cervical cancer > 2 cm (FIGO stage IB2-IIA1) conservatively treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization: a pilot study. Radiol med 126, 1055–1063 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01377-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01377-1