Abstract
Purpose
Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) is a rare multisystem histiocytosis, whose cardiovascular involvement has not been systematically characterized so far. We aimed to systematically (qualitatively and quantitatively) describe the features of cardiovascular involvement in a large cohort of ECD patients and to evaluate its impact on myocardial fibrosis extension and cardiac function.
Material and methods
Among 54 patients with biopsy-proven ECD, 29 patients (59 ± 12 years, 79% males) underwent 1.5-T CMR using a standardized protocol for qualitative and quantitative assessment of disease localization, evaluation of atrial and ventricular function, and assessment of non-dense and dense myocardial fibrosis.
Results
The right atrioventricular (AV) groove was the most commonly affected cardiac site (76%) followed by the right atrial walls (63%), thoracic aorta (59%), and superior vena cava (38%). Right AV groove involvement, encasing the right ventricular artery, was associated with non-dense myocardial fibrosis in the infero-septal (20/26 patients) and the inferior (14/26 patients) mid-basal left ventricular (LV) wall. In two patients with right AV groove localization, LGE revealed myocardial infarction in the same myocardial segments. Three out of five patients with left AV groove involvement had non-dense LGE on the lateral LV mid-basal wall. Bulky right atrial pseudomass was associated with atrial dysfunction and superior and inferior vena cava stenosis.
Conclusions
In ECD patients, AV groove localization is associated with LV wall fibrosis in the downstream coronary territories, suggesting hemodynamic alterations due to coronary encasement. Conversely, atrial pseudomass ECD localizations impact on atrial contractility causing atrial dysfunction and are associated with atrio-caval junction stenosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) is a rare systemic non-Langerhans cells histiocytosis of unknown etiology characterized by multiorgan xanthomatous infiltration by CD68 + , CD1a − foamy histiocytes (1,2). Its clinical presentation is heterogeneous, ranging from isolated bone involvement to multisystemic and sometimes life-threatening phenotypes (1,2). Bone pain due to skeletal infiltration is the most common clinical manifestation, occurring in approximately 95% of patients. Involvement of central nervous system (CNS) and of cardiovascular system are independent predictors of fatal outcome [1, 3, 4]. Specifically, in patients with cardiac localization, mortality rate at 3 years is 60% [1, 4].
Cardiovascular involvement in ECD is poorly characterized for scarcity of data from systematic screenings with advanced imaging modalities. Available data are mainly derived from case reports [5, 6] or small case series with heterogeneous imaging evaluation [4, 7]. Cardiac involvement is estimated to occur in 50–70% [8, 9] of patients. The most common findings are pericardial infiltration with effusion [2] and right atrioventricular groove pseudo-tumoral masses [4, 7, 10, 11]. Although cardiac ECD can be asymptomatic, some patients develop arrhythmias, valvular heart disease, ischemia, or heart failure [12]. Therefore, given its prognostic impact, a deeper understanding of the cardiac functional and structural impairment in ECD is of fundamental importance for risk stratification and therapeutic management.
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the imaging modality of choice for morphofunctional assessment of the cardiac chambers and for the identification of ECD involvement for its superior soft tissue resolution [13,14,15].
The aim of the present study is to qualitatively and quantitatively characterize ECD cardiac involvement, and to investigate the impact of site and extension of ECD cardiac involvement on cardiac chamber volumes, function, and structural remodeling.
Materials and methods
Study population
This observational retrospective study includes 54 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven ECD referred to our Institution (IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy) between June 2009 and December 2021.
In previous studies were included data on 25 [16] and 1 of 56 patients [17]. These previous articles dealt with treatment efficacy.
In the present study we included all patients with clinical suspicion of cardiac involvement at multimodality evaluation (clinical evaluation, laboratory test, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography) who underwent CMR for disease confirmation and characterization before therapy start (Fig. 1). Only 29 of 54 patients met this inclusion criteria and were included in the present study. The study was approved by the Ethic Committee and all patients signed informed consent.
CMR protocol
CMR was performed with 1.5-T system (Achieva dStream, Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) using a 32-element cardiac phased-array coil. T2-weighted short-tau inversion recovery (T2-STIR) sequences were acquired using a body coil. All images were acquired during breath-holding periods. CMR protocol included: multiplanar (axial, sagittal and coronal planes) 2-D balanced turbo field echo (BTFE) images and axial and sagittal T2-STIR and proton density (PD) sequences covering the entire mediastinum; steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine, T2-STIR, black-blood PD, PD-fat-saturated (PD-fat-sat) sequences and 10-min post-contrast (0.15 mmol/kg of gadobutrol: Gadovist, Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany) three dimension inversion recovery T1w (3D-IR-T1w) images acquired in the short-axis, 2-chamber and 4-chamber long-axis cardiac views.
In a subgroup of ten patients who underwent CMR after 2016 T1 mapping acquisition was performed. Both native and post-contrast T1 mapping were acquired in the same three short-axis planes (base, mid-ventricle, apex) and in a single four chambers long-axis view, using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence with 5(3)3 and 4(1)3(1)2 sampling scheme, respectively.
CMR analysis
All CMRs were analyzed by a cardiac radiologist with 10 years of experience in cardiac imaging and revised by a senior cardiac radiologist with 17 years of experience using a dedicated cardiac analysis software (CVI42v.5.13.5, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Calgary, AB, Canada).
Left and right ventricle end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV), ejection fractions (EF) and myocardial mass were extracted from automatic segmentation of endocardial and epicardial contours in the end-diastolic and end-systolic short-axis cine-SSFP images, and manually corrected when necessary.
Atrial ESV, EDV and EF were assessed by biplane area-length method after semiautomatic tracing of the endocardial contours in 2-chambers and 4-chambers long-axis views.
Myocardial edema was assessed on T2-STIR images as areas characterized by relative hyperintensity at visual assessment and by the measurement of T2-ratio (positive ≥ 1.9). The SI of myocardium resulted from semiautomatic contouring of endocardial and epicardial left ventricular borders, while the SI of the reference skeletal muscle resulted from a manual ROI of at least 10 mm2 placed in a chest wall muscle.
Myocardial fibrosis was assessed as Late Gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on 3D-IR-T1w images and classified as non-dense scar (signal intensity ≥ + 3SD on normal myocardium) and dense scar (signal intensity ≥ 5SD on normal myocardium). Both non-dense and dense scar were quantified as percentage of LV wall mass. Additionally, LGE was classified according to the transmural pattern (sub-endocardial, mid-wall, sub-epicardial or transmural) and the segmental (AHA 16 segments model) involvement.
Native T1 mapping and ECV values were obtained after outlining endocardial and epicardial edges on the short-axis slices (base, mid-ventricle, apex), with an automatic offset of 10% from endocardial and epicardial borders to reduce partial volume effect. Local reference value were for native T1 ≤ 1045 ms, and for ECV < 27%.
Site of cardiovascular involvement was firstly visually assessed on axial PD, BTFE and LGE images, and then quantified on the sequence showing the best image quality, by tracing contours slice-per-slice in order to cover the entire mass and compute the mass volume. Additionally, maximum mass thickness was manually measured on axial images.
Pericardial effusion and pericardial thickening were visually identified and manually measured at the thickest point. Similarly, aortic wall infiltration was visually identified and manually measured at the thickest point.
Vascular stenosis or dilatation at the level of ECD infiltration were assessed as vascular diameter change in comparison to a reference vascular diameter measured at a level without ECD infiltration.
Statistical analysis
Data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS for macOS version 28.0.1.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Data are reported as medians and interquartile ranges [IQRs] or frequencies and relative percentages. Mann–Whitney U test for unpaired samples was used to compare continuous variables. A value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Study population
Patients were mainly men (M:F = 23:6), with a median age of 61 [IQR, 52–65] years. All patients had skeletal involvement (Table 1). About two-third of patients had at least one of the following central nervous system signs (20 of 29; 69%): diabetes insipidus (18 of 20, 90%), cerebellar ataxia (9 of 20, 45%) or papilledema (3 of 20, 15%). Exophthalmos, diplopia, or visual impairment were present in 14 subjects (48%), as signs of retro-orbital involvement. Retroperitoneal space infiltration, and consequent renal involvement, was found in 15 patients (53%), mainly manifesting as chronic kidney failure (13 of 15, 86%). In one-half of patients (15 of 29; 52%) there was radiological evidence of pulmonary involvement, mainly with few symptoms such as cough or chest discomfort (Table 1).
CMR findings: cardiovascular localization site and extent
Three out of 29 patients had chronic kidney failure and CMR was performed without contrast media. Cardiovascular involvement was found in 22 of 29 patients (76%). Detailed information about cardiovascular localization of ECD at CMR is reported in Table 2 and Fig. 2.
ECD cardiovascular localization at CMR was characterized by intermediate signal in PD images, mild hyperintensity in PD-fat-sat, and high signal intensity in T2-STIR and LGE images and were present in 22/29 patients (76%).
Right AV groove localization (median mass volume: 19 [IQR, 12–46] mL, maximum thickness: 16 [IQR, 16–27] mm) was present in all patients with cardiovascular involvement. Right atrial wall infiltration was found in 14 of 29 patients (48%; median mass volume: 21 [IQR, 6–38] mL, maximum thickness: 16 [IQR, 15–20] mm), and had always a pseudotumor appearance. Five patients (17%) had also left AV groove infiltration (median amount of mass: 6 [IQR, 4–10] mL).
Pericardial late enhancement was present in 16 patients (55%; pericardium median thickness: 2.5 [IQR 2–3.3] mm) and was associated with pericardial effusion in 14 of them (median thickness: 10 mm [IQR 7–20] mm). In eight patients it had a circumferential distribution. Thoracic aorta was the most affected mediastinal vessel (17 of 29, 59%), with maximum wall thickness of 20 mm (median value: 8 [IQR, 6–9] mm). In nine patients (31%), its involvement had the appearance of “coated aorta” [18]. No patient had lumen stenosis. Superior and inferior atrio-caval junctions were affected in 38% (11/29) and 24% (7/29) of patients, respectively. Median severity of stenosis was 45% [IQR, 31–51] for superior atrio-caval junction involvement and 12% [IQR, 5–28] for inferior atrio-caval junction involvement.
The overall volume of ECD cardiovascular localizations was 32 [IQR, 14–99] mL and it correlated with the number of anatomical structures involved (rho: 0.886, p < 0.001).
CMR findings: myocardial characteristics and remodeling
Main myocardial findings at CMR are reported in Table 3. Ventricles’ volumes and ejection fraction were globally in the range of normality (LVEDV/BSA: 63 [IQR, 53.5–74.7] mL/m2; RVEDV/BSA: 60 [IQR, 52–66] mL/m2; LVEF: 64 [IQR, 60–66] %; RVEF: 62 [IQR, 55–69] %), as well as the end-diastolic LV wall mass (LV-EDWM/BSA: 52 [IQR, 46–64] mL/m2). Myocardial T2-ratio was slightly increased in patients with ECD cardiac involvement compared to those without cardiac involvement (2.1 [IQR, 2–2.2] vs 1.65 [IQR, 1.6–1.7]), p < 0.001). This finding indicates a slight diffuse myocardial edema in the former group. All participants except one (25 of 26; 95%) had non-dense LGE (between + 3 and + 5 SD), with a median non-dense scar burden of 5.8 (IQR, 4.2–8.1)%. Non-dense fibrosis had a transmural pattern in most cases (22 of 26; 84%), mostly involving the infero-septal mid-basal wall (20 of 26; 77%), the inferior wall (14 of 26; 54%), and the lateral mid-basal wall (3 of 26; 11%) (Fig. 3). LGE in the infero-septal and inferior mid-basal wall was always associated with right AV groove involvement and right coronary artery encasement (Fig. 3A–C). Lateral LGE was associated with left AV groove ECD involvement (Fig. 3B,D). Specifically, three out of five patients (60%) with left AV groove involvement had lateral LGE, while no patient without left AV groove involvement had lateral LGE. Among patients with evidence of LGE, only two had large dense scars (≥ + 5SD) with transmural involvement, suggestive for inferior myocardial infarction (Fig. 4) involving 6% and 12% of LV myocardial wall, respectively, associated with right AV pseudomasses of 23 mL and 34 mL, respectively. One of these two patients underwent invasive coronary angiography showing a diffuse reduction of right coronary artery caliber (Fig. 4).
In patients with right atrial pseudomass (14 of 29, 48%), right atrial ESV was not significantly different as compared with patients without (p = 0.77). However, right atrial EDV was significantly higher (EDV/BSA: 18 [IQR, 10–25] mL/m2 vs 10.6 [IQR, 7–12] mL/m2, p = 0.04), and atrial ejection fraction was significantly lower (RA-EF: 45 [IQR, 29.7–60] % vs 56 [IQR, 52–69] %, p = 0.03). Of note, in the majority of patients (10 out of 11, 91%) with a right atrial pseudomass volume > 20 mL a depressed right atrial EF (< 46%) was depicted, considering a normal range of 52.9 ± 6.7% [19] (Fig. 5).
Vena cava stenosis was associated with bulky right atrial pseudomass. Specifically, median pseudomass volume in presence versus absence of superior vena cava stenosis was 37.8 [IQR, 24.8–38.6] mL vs 4.8 [4–5.9] mL (p = 0.002); whereas median pseudomass volume in presence versus absence of inferior vena cava stenosis was 37.9 [33–39] mL vs 5.95 [4.5–7] mL, (p = 0.04) (Fig. 6).
In the subgroup of ten patients with mapping data availability, native T1 mapping values and ECV values were slightly increased in those with ECD cardiac localization (native T1 mapping: 1067 [IQR, 1059–1098] ms vs 1027 [IQR, 1019–1042] ms, p = 0.04; ECV: 31 [IQR, 30–32] % vs 26 [IQR, 25.9–26.9] %, p = 0.017).
Discussion
ECD is a rare multisystem histiocytosis associated with a poor prognosis, especially when the cardiovascular system is involved [20]. Cardiovascular ECD manifestations are the consequence of peri-adventitial infiltration by foamy histiocytes, with consequent development of peri-vascular and pericardial lesions [21]. Based on current available evidence, cardiovascular involvement in ECD is considered not to significantly affect cardiac function and remodeling [7]. However, systematic studies with adequate and homogeneous imaging modalities investigating the association between ECD cardiac localization and myocardial structural remodeling or cardiac chamber function are lacking.
In agreement with previous studies [2, 4, 10, 11], in our work we confirmed that right AV groove infiltration with right coronary artery encasement is the most common ECD cardiac localization. In addition, we observed that AV groove infiltration was associated with slight diffuse myocardial edema and variable degree of myocardial fibrosis with coronary distribution. LGE was characterized by non-dense fibrosis with transmural involvement in all but two patients showing inferior myocardial infarction involving 6% and 12% of the left ventricular wall. The rate of myocardial infarction found in our population (9%) is in-line with previous histologic data (11%) [21].
The most important finding of our study is that, regardless of the amount of AV pseudomasses, coronary artery encasement, due to ECD localization, seems responsible for various degrees of myocardial fibrosis. This finding substantially differs from what had been previously reported in the English literature where absence of cardiac scars or presence of only patchy LGE with non-coronary distribution was associated with cardiac ECD involvement [7, 11]. These differences could be explained by the lower rate of observed coronary encasements [7, 11], and by the different method for LGE analysis. Indeed, in the aforementioned studies [7, 11], a pure qualitative assessment affected by reader subjectivity and experience and the research of only dense scars, might be responsible for this discrepancy.
The localization and the transmural distribution of myocardial non-dense LGE we found in our population suggest ischemia as the first etiological hypothesis. Extrinsic compression or direct infiltration of coronary artery walls by histiocytes may induce vascular stenosis and increase coronary wall stiffness, thus impacting on coronary hemodynamic and promoting extracellular matrix remodeling processes in their perfusion territories. This mechanism could explain the accumulation of regional interstitial fibrosis with coronary distribution, as observed in our study population. Interestingly, a postmortem case report by Vaideeswar et al. [22] described an extensive infiltration of epicardial coronary arteries and evidence of critical arterial stenosis by transmural intimal plaques composed of large aggregates of foamy macrophages and lymphocytes, merged to peri-coronary ECD infiltrates. Moreover, coronary vessels infiltration by pathological histiocytes could lead to increased coronary artery stiffness and endothelial dysfunction even in the absence of morphologically critical stenoses. As a consequence, the impaired vasodilation in response to the need of increased blood supply, could also be responsible for myocardial ischemia. The potential impact of peri-coronary inflammatory infiltration on downstream perfusion is supported by recent findings from Nomura CH et al. [23] who documented reduced coronary flow reserve in patients with peri-coronary fat inflammation, even in absence of non-obstructive coronary disease.
It could be speculated that the ischemic mechanism is intrinsically associated with the inflammatory process underlying myocardial fibrosis in ECD patients. Indeed, ECD lesions were demonstrated to be characterized by spontaneous production of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) [24], responsible for histiocytes’ recruitment [25]. Remarkably, IL-6 was found in vascular endothelial cells not only within ECD lesions, but also in the healthy contiguous tissues [24]. T2 signal is a well-known noninvasive MR biomarker of inflammatory infiltration and edema [26]. Indeed, specifically in ECD patients with cardiac involvement, we observed diffuse myocardial edema as disclosed by an increased T2-STIR ratio. Although the complex pathogenetic mechanisms underlying ECD are still unclear, myocardial edema might be the consequence of regional pro-inflammatory cytokine production by tissue infiltrates. Moreover, the pro-inflammatory activity in peri-adventitial coronary ECD lesions may cause a chronic inflammatory state in downstream coronary circulation, which could be responsible for pro-fibrotic pathways induction in the corresponding myocardial territories. Notably, in a previous work we demonstrated that circulating levels of chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18), which is involved in the collagen production and fibroblast proliferation, is higher in ECD patients compared to controls [27]. Additionally, we recently reported a case of myocardial infiltration by foamy cells in a patient with ECD and cardiac involvement [17].
Our findings are further corroborated by mapping results, which demonstrated diffuse alteration of native T1 values and diffuse expansion of ECV, in patients with ECD-related cardiac disease, with higher values in the posterior-septal and inferior walls in those with right peri-coronary infiltration.
Myocardial fibrosis is a known prognostic CMR biomarker, being associated with the development of ventricular arrhythmias, cardiac remodeling, and heart failure [28, 29]. However, the prognostic value in our cohort of patients was not investigated. Early identification of myocardial fibrosis in patients with ECD might be useful to improve patients’ risk stratification and to tailor treatment.
In-line with previous studies [4, 7, 11] biventricular function was preserved in all our patients. This observation might be related to the absence of diffuse myocardial infiltration, as opposed to other infiltrative disorders.
In our study, we observed right atrial pseudomasses in 14 (48%) patients. This finding is in-line with previous data, in which it was reported with a frequency between 31 and 69% [10, 12, 19, 30,31,32]. The increase in its amount was associated with reduced atrial contractility, with significant impairment in patients with right atrial pseudomasses. Right atrium dysfunction could potentially impact on arrhythmias onset and heart failure development [33].
Bulky right atrium pseudomasses (median mass volume: 34 mL) were associated with vena cava stenosis. In only two patients we found superior vena cava stenosis in absence of right atrium involvement. Although only few cases are reported worldwide [21, 34], in our cohort we found superior and inferior vena cava involvement in 38% and 24% of patients, respectively. This could be considered a consequence of the atrio-caval compression by the right atrial pseudomass rather than the extent of the myocardial infiltration to the surrounding vessels, as already observed at histology [34, 35].
We observed pericardial involvement and infiltration of thoracic aorta in 28% and 59% of our patients, respectively, in-line with previous reports [10, 12, 30,31,32]. No association between these findings and myocardial remodeling was found in our study.
Our study has some limitations. First, the sample size is relatively small. However, ECD is a very rare condition, and all our patients were studied homogeneously with the same imaging modality. Second, data about interobserver reliability lack. Nevertheless, all measurements were taken with a quantitative and semiquantitative approach to overcome subjectivity of visual interpretation, and were obtained in consensus by two readers with different experience. Finally, mapping data are available only in a subgroup of patients. Future studies aiming at assessing the reversibility of these findings after targeted and anti-inflammatory therapies [16] would be useful to improve patients’ management and risk stratification.
References
Campochiaro C, Tomelleri A, Cavalli G et al (2015) Erdheim-Chester disease. Eur J Intern Med 26:223–229
Goyal G, Heaney ML, Collin M et al (2020) Erdheim-Chester disease: consensus recommendations for evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment in the molecular era. Blood 135:1929–1945
Arnaud L, Hervier B, Néel A et al (2011) CNS involvement and treatment with interferon-α are independent prognostic factors in Erdheim-Chester disease: a multicenter survival analysis of 53 patients. Blood 117:2778–2782
Haroche J, Cluzel P, Toledano D et al (2009) Cardiac involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease. Circulation 119:e597–e598
Nicolazzi MA, Carnicelli A, Fuorlo M et al (2015) Cardiovascular involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease. Medicine 94:e1365
Ponsiglione A, Puglia M, Barbuto L et al (2015) Cardiac involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: MRI findings and literature revision. Acta Radiol Open 4:205846011559227
Gianfreda D, Palumbo AA, Rossi E et al (2016) Cardiac involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: an MRI study. Blood 128:2468–2471
Mazor RD, Manevich-Mazor M, Shoenfeld Y (2013) Erdheim-Chester Disease: a comprehensive review of the literature. Orphanet J Rare Dis 8:137
Quinaglia-Silva T, Medina F, Ramos CD, Coelho-Filho OR (2018) Cardiac involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 11:e008531
Bravetti M, Azoulay L-D, Cohen-Aubart F et al (2019) Correlation of BRAF V600E mutation with cardiac involvement assessed by heart imaging in a monocentric series of 205 patients with Erdheim-Chester disease. J Clin Oncol 37:7019–7019
Ghotra AS, Thompson K, Lopez-Mattei J et al (2019) Cardiovascular manifestations of Erdheim-Chester disease. Echocardiography 36:229–236
Das JP, Xie L, Riedl CC et al (2019) Cardiothoracic manifestations of Erdheim-Chester disease. Br J Radiol 92:20190473
di Cesare E, Cademartiri F, Carbone I et al (2013) Clinical indications for the use of cardiac MRI. By the SIRM Study Group on Cardiac Imaging. Radiol Med 118:752–798
Esposito A, Gallone G, Palmisano A et al (2020) The current landscape of imaging recommendations in cardiovascular clinical guidelines: toward an imaging-guided precision medicine. Radiol Med 125:1013–1023
Francone M, Aquaro GD, Barison A et al (2021) Appropriate use criteria for cardiovascular MRI: SIC – SIRM position paper Part 2 (myocarditis, pericardial disease, cardiomyopathies and valvular heart disease). J Cardiovasc Med 22:515–529
Campochiaro C, Cavalli G, Farina N et al (2022) Efficacy and improved tolerability of combination therapy with interleukin-1 blockade and MAPK pathway inhibitors for the treatment of Erdheim-Chester disease. Ann Rheum Dis 81:e11–e11
Campochiaro C, Tomelleri A, Farina N et al (2021) Myocarditis as a manifestation of Erdheim-Chester disease: successful use of anti- IL1 and BRAF inhibitor combination therapy. Scand J Rheumatol 51(3):243–245
Cui R, Chen M, Dai S-M (2021) Coated aorta in Erdheim-Chester disease. Rheumatology 60:986–987
Maceira AM, Cosin-Sales J, Prasad SK, Pennell DJ (2016) Characterization of left and right atrial function in healthy volunteers by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18(1):64
Veyssier-Belot C, Cacoub P, Caparros-Lefebvre D et al (1996) Erdheim-Chester disease clinical and radiologic characteristics of 59 cases. Medicine 75:157–169
Haroche J, Amoura Z, Dion E et al (2004) Cardiovascular involvement, an overlooked feature of Erdheim-Chester disease. Medicine 83:371–392
Vaideeswar P, Vaz WF (2011) Erdheim-Chester disease with extensive coronary arterial involvement. Pathology 43:375–378
Nomura CH, Assuncao-Jr AN, Guimarães PO et al (2020) Association between perivascular inflammation and downstream myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:599–605
Stoppacciaro A, Ferrarini M, Salmaggi C et al (2006) Immunohistochemical evidence of a cytokine and chemokine network in three patients with Erdheim-Chester disease: Implications for pathogenesis. Arthritis Rheum 54:4018–4022
Dagna L, Girlanda S, Langheim S et al (2010) Erdheim-Chester disease: report on a case and new insights on its immunopathogenesis. Rheumatology 49:1203–1206
Esposito A, Campana L, Palmisano A et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging at 7T reveals common events in age-related sarcopenia and in the homeostatic response to muscle sterile injury. PLoS ONE 8:e59308
Pacini G, Cavalli G, Tomelleri A et al (2018) The fibrogenic chemokine CCL18 is associated with disease severity in Erdheim-Chester disease. Oncoimmunology 7:e1440929
Liang C, Wang K, Li Q et al (2019) Influence of the distribution of fibrosis within an area of myocardial infarction on wave propagation in ventricular tissue. Sci Rep 9:14151
Liu T, Song D, Dong J et al (2017) Current understanding of the pathophysiology of myocardial fibrosis and its quantitative assessment in heart failure. Front Physiol 8:238
Cohen-Aubart F, Emile J-F, Carrat F et al (2018) Phenotypes and survival in Erdheim-Chester disease: results from a 165-patient cohort. Am J Hematol 93:E114–E117
Haroche J, Cohen-Aubart F, Amoura Z (2020) Erdheim-Chester disease. Blood 135:1311–1318
Estrada-Veras JI, O’Brien KJ, Boyd LC et al (2017) The clinical spectrum of Erdheim-Chester disease: an observational cohort study. Blood Adv 1:357–366
Schuster A, Backhaus SJ, Stiermaier T et al (2020) Impact of right atrial physiology on heart failure and adverse events after myocardial infarction. J Clin Med 9:210
Tao M, Palmer B, Tavakoli S, Trejo Bittar HE (2020) Erdheim-Chester Disease. JACC Case Rep 2:1959–1965
Loeffler AG, Memoli VA (2004) Myocardial involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med 128:682–685
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by AP, CC, AT, DV, EB, GDL, GC, LD and AE. Data analysis were performed by AP, CBM, AE. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AP and AE, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the San Raffaele Ethical Committee (PanImmuno Protocol).
Ethical standards
This is an observational study including human participants and it was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Palmisano, A., Campochiaro, C., Vignale, D. et al. Cardiovascular involvement in Erdheim–Chester diseases is associated with myocardial fibrosis and atrial dysfunction. Radiol med 128, 456–466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01616-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01616-7