Abstract
Purpose
Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma (GHPA) is an insidious disease with persistent hypersecretion of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1, causing increased morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have investigated the transcription of GHPA. However, the gene regulatory landscape has not been fully characterized. The objective of our study was to unravel the changes in chromatin accessibility and transcription in GHPA.
Methods
Six patients diagnosed with GHPA in the Department of Neurosurgery at Huashan Hospital were enrolled in our study. Primary pituitary adenoma tissues and adjacent normal pituitary specimens with no morphologic abnormalities from these six patients were obtained at surgery. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq) were applied to investigate the underlying relationship between gene expression and chromatin accessibility changes in GHPA.
Results
Totally, 1528 differential expression genes (DEGs) were identified by transcriptomics analyses, including 725 up-regulated and 803 down-regulated. Further, we obtained 64 significantly DEGs including 10 DEGs were elevated and 54 DEGs were negligibly expressed in tumors tissues. The up-regulated DEGs were mainly involved in terms related to synapse formation, nervous system development and secretory pathway. In parallel, 3916 increased and 2895 decreased chromatin-accessible regions were mapped by ATAC-seq. Additionally, the chromatin accessible changes were frequently located adjacent to transcription factor CTCF and Rfx2 binding site.
Conclusions
Our results are the first to demonstrate the landscape of chromatin accessibility in GHPA, which may contribute to illustrate the underlying transcriptional regulation mechanism of this disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma (GHPA) is characterized by increased growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1) secretion [1]. It can cause disproportionate skeletal, tissue, and organ growth, which are associated with significant morbidity and higher mortality [2]. Notably, in the last decade, although effective treatments have been largely improved for GHPA, including advanced surgical procedure, development of new radiotherapy techniques and availability of new medical therapies, ~40% proportion of patients still cannot completely achieve normal levels of GH and IGF-1 [3].
It is undeniable that alterations in mountainous genes have been involved in the onset and development of GHPA. Mutations in the α-subunit of the heterotrimeric Gs (Gsα), the stimulatory G protein (GNAS), α-subunit of protein kinase C (PKC) and aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) have been discovered to be associated with GHPA [4,5,6,7]. Furthermore, multiplatform analysis has been performed to identify the epigenomic underpinnings of GHPA, which reveals that hypomethylation of promoter regions would increase the expression of GH1, somatostatin receptor 5 (SSTR5) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in GHPA [8]. On the contrary, genes like high-mobility group A1 (HMGA1), HMGA2, and E2F Transcription Factor 1 (E2F1) have been reported to be down-regulated in GHPA [9]. The complex genetic network in GHPA allows for better understanding of tumor pathology. However, information on expression levels of somatotropinoma genes and how these are specifically regulated are still limited. Thus, exploring the regulatory elements of genes and their corresponding transcription factors (TFs) is critically important for elucidating the process of GHPA.
As a dynamic central regulator of transcription, chromatin is compacted in the nucleus and restricts the access of TFs to cis-regulatory elements [10]. In order to successfully interact with cis-regulatory elements, such as promoters and enhancers, TFs must induce chromatin remodeling of nucleosomal structures to result in different levels of chromatin accessibility [10]. Specifically, open chromatin regions allow transcription machinery components to access cis-regulatory elements and activate gene transcription, while closed chromatin regions impair the accessibility of promoters and enhancers to transcription factors and induce gene silencing [11]. Up to now, chromatin accessibility has been investigated in various diseases, which largely facilitates the acquisition of gene expression [12]. However, the role of chromatin remodeling in GHPA has not been investigated yet.
Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq) has been regarded as a robust and sensitive method for mapping genome-wide chromatin accessibility and TFs binding [13]. This is because during the analysis of ATAC-seq, DNA accessibility is probed with a hyperactive Tn5 transposase, which allows to simultaneously fragment and integrate the sequencing adapters preferentially in functional regions with accessible chromatin [13]. ATAC-seq has been widely adopted to investigate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of various tumors [14, 15].
In this study, we firstly utilized both ATAC-seq and mRNA-seq to investigate the pattern of genome-wide chromatin accessibility and characterize the chromatin accessibility landscape in GHPA.
Material and methods
Collection and storage of tissue specimens
Patients with GHPA were recruited from the Department of Neurosurgery at Huashan Hospital, affiliated with Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University. The diagnosis of GHPA was based on clinical manifestations, endocrine laboratory tests, and imaging data. Primary pituitary adenoma tissues and adjacent normal pituitary specimens with no morphologic abnormalities were obtained at surgery. It was histologically confirmed with blinding to sample identity by at least two senior pathologists after surgical resection. Previous studies have demonstrated that the use of normal pituitary tissue obtained at surgery is the preferred control in order to avoid inconsistencies in the treatment of tissue in autopsy specimens [16, 17]. In addition, the influence of heterogeneous factors such as age, gender and other diseases can also be avoided.
Totally, six GHPA tumor tissues and six corresponding para-adenoma normal tissues were obtained and immediately stored in liquid nitrogen. Owing to the small sample size, number of cells available for testing, especially for normal tissues, was limited. Thus, in ATAC-seq library preparation, we set the tumor as two aliquots, each one containing three samples, as well as for para-adenoma normal tissues. This study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committees of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University. Tissue samples and corresponding clinical materials were obtained with the written consent from all patients.
RNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing
The frozen tissues were ground separately using a liquid nitrogen-cooled mortar and pestle. The pulverized powder was then transferred into 1.5 ml RNase free falcon tubes containing 1 ml TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). The homogenates were further purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) and run on Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 to asses RNA integrity. The mRNAseq library preparation from 1 μg of total RNA was performed with TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 2 × 150 paired-end sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform (Novogene Biotech, China).
Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq)
The ATAC-seq libraries were prepared as previously described [18, 19]. Briefly, the frozen tissues were ground separately using a liquid nitrogen-cooled mortar and pestle. The pulverized powder was then transferred into 1.5 ml falcon tubes containing lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl at pH7.4, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2 and 0.1% IGEPAL CA-630 [Sigma-Aldrich]) for 10 min on ice to prepare the nuclei. Immediately after lysis, nuclei were spun at 500 × g for 5 min to remove the supernatant. Nuclei were then incubated with the Tn5 transposome (Vazyme Biotech, China) and tagmentation buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. After the tagmentation, the stop buffer was added directly into the reaction to end the tagmentation. PCR was performed to amplify the library for 10–12 cycles using the following PCR conditions: 72 °C for 3 min; 98 °C for 30 s; and thermocycling at 98 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 3 min; following by 72 °C 5 min. After the PCR reaction, libraries were purified with Agencourt Ampure XP beads (Beckman, USA) to remove contaminating primer dimers and quantitated using Qubit 2.0 Fluorimeter (Invitrogen, USA). All libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten with 150 bp paired-end reads (Novogene Biotech, China).
mRNA-seq data processing
The quality control of mRNA sequencing data was performed via FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Reads from RNA-seq experiments were aligned to human genome build hg19 using STAR [20]. The mRNA expression of a gene was quantified by fragments per kilobase million reads (FPKM) based on RefSeq gene annotation using Cuffdiff [21]. Differential expression genes (DEGs) were identified by a p value < 0.05, fold change (FC) > 1.5 and the average FPKM > 5 for at least one of the two groups. The aligned BAM files were converted to bigWig format and normalized by reads per kilobase million (RPKM) with the bamCoverage script in deepTools 2.0 [22]. The deepTools 2.0 and ggplot2 [23] from R package were used for data normalization and visualization.
ATAC-seq data processing
The quality of sequenced ATAC-seq data was evaluated with FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). All sequencing data were mapped onto the hg19 human genome assembly using Bowtie2 [24] with an insert size of less than or equal to 2000 bp (command line parameter -X 2000). Duplicate reads were removed with SAMtools [25], only non-duplicate reads kept in the BAM format were used for the subsequent analysis. MACS2 [26] was used to identify regions of ATAC-seq peaks (with the parameters --shift -100 --extsize 200). Picard Tools (v.2.2.4, https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) and ggplot2 [23] were used to plot the distribution of paired-end sequencing fragment sizes. For visualization, the BAM files were converted to the bigWig format using the bamCoverage [22]. The heatmaps and average profiles were also generated using the plotHeatmap and plotProfile functions in deepTools.
GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis
The Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were performed using clusterProfiler [27], which is an R package for functional classification and enrichment of gene clusters using hypergeometric distribution. The enriched terms with p value< 0.05 were considered significant.
Annotation of genomic regions
To annotate the location of ATAC-seq signal in terms of important genomic features, the annotatePeaks.pl script in HOMER [28] was used to assign the peak files in BED format to promoter-TSS (by default defined from −1 Kb to +100 bp of transcription start site), TTS (by default defined from −100 bp to +1 Kb of transcription termination site), Intron, Intergenic, Exon, etc. with default parameters.
Differential analysis of chromatin accessibility and mRNA expression
For purposes of assessing the alteration of chromatin accessibility genome-wide, deepTools was used to compute the average scores (RPKM normalized values) for transposase hypersensitive sites in each sample. Hyper-accessible regions (hyper) associated with increased ATAC-seq signal were defined if the regions showed fold change (FC) > 1.5 in the tumor group as compared to the normal group. On the contrary, the hypo-accessible regions associated with decreased ATAC-seq signal were defined if the regions showed fold change >1.5 in normal group compared to tumor group. The heatmaps and average profiles of regions expanded to ±1.5 Kb surrounding differentially accessible regions (DARs) center were generated using the plotHeatmap and plotProfile functions in deepTools [22]. The annotation of DARs to genomic features was performed using the HOMER suite tool annotatePeaks [28], then the DARs neighboring genes were overlapped with DEGs from mRNA-seq data, so as to address the global relationship between the ATAC-seq signal at differentially accessible regions and the transcription levels of the corresponding DEGs.
Transcription factor motif enrichment and occurrences analysis
The findMotifsGenome function in HOMER v4.9 [28] were used to analyze transcription factor (TF) motif enrichment of ATAC-seq peak summits (with option -size -200,200), which was also used to predict binding sites and target genes of top 50 enriched TFs. The annotatePeaks.plscript was used to identify the nearest genes of predicted TF binding sites.
Statistical analysis and data visualization
If not specified, R platform (https://www.R-project.org/) was used to compute statistics and generate plots. Fisher’s exact test, Student’s t test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to assess the significance. Fold change, p values and false discovery rate were calculated in analysis. Significant differences for all quantitative data were considered when *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Genome browser images were made using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) [29] with bigWig files processed as described above.
Results
The characteristics of mRNA expression in GHPA
To investigate gene expression profiles of GHPA, mRNA-seq was used to examine genotypic changes in tumors and adjacent normal pituitary tissues (Fig. S1A, B). A total of 1528 differential expression genes (DEGs) were identified using Cuffdiff [21], among which 725 genes were up-regulated and 803 genes were down-regulated (Fig. 1A, Fig. S1C, D). In order to reveal the crucial candidate genes associated with GHPA, we obtained 64 significantly DEGs, which were filtered by q value < 0.05, |log2fold change| ≥2 and average FPKM ≥ 10. As shown in Fig. 1B, 10 of these 64 DEGs, including CBLN1, FHIT and BPIFA1, were elevated in the tumors, and the other 54 DEGs were negligibly expressed, such as ESAM, TGFBR2, ID1 and FSHB. Furthermore, GO enrichment analysis was performed to reveal the probable biological process, cellular components, and specific molecular functions of all DGEs. As shown in Fig. 1C, the up-regulated DEGs were mainly involved in terms related to synapse formation, nervous system development and secretory pathway. Meanwhile, the down-regulated DEGs were mainly relevant to cardiovascular system development, growth factor response and extracellular matrix organization (Fig. 1D). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was consistent with the enrichment in GO terms. As shown in Fig. 1E, up-regulated DEGs were significantly enriched in various hormone-related signaling pathways (such as insulin, relaxin, prolactin, growth hormone, thyroid hormone, estrogen and GnRH signaling pathways) and proliferation-related signaling pathways (ErbB, neurotrophin, hedgehog, and chemokine signaling pathway). The downregulated DEGs largely enriched in focal adhesion, PI3K-Akt, MAPK, and TGF-beta signaling pathways (Fig. 1F).
The accessible chromatin landscape of GHPA
To gain insight into the transcriptional mechanisms of GHPA, ATACseq was performed to assess the chromatin accessibility landscape. As the chromatin could be fragmented into mono-, di- and tri-nucleosome patterns, the fragments distribution was similar in each of our sample (Fig. 2A). This indicated that chromatin was accessible to transposase in the same degree for all these samples. Furthermore, the genome-wide analysis of transposase hypersensitive sites distribution over functional genomic elements suggested that promoter-TSS, introns and intergenic regions were preferentially accessible to Tn5 transposase (Fig. 2B). Moreover, our result demonstrated that ATAC-seq signal was significantly enriched at ±1 Kb region surrounding the TSS (Fig. 2C). This conformed to the pattern of previous studies in multiple organisms and suggested that the majority of cis-regulatory regions were located in the vicinity of gene core promoters and that open chromatin at these sites was predictive of active transcription [30, 31]. In total, there were 6811 peaks of different accessible regions (DARs) been obtained (|fold change| > 1.5), including 3916 hyper-accessible open peaks and 2895 hypo-accessible close peaks (Fig. 2D). To better understand the potent role of the above DARs in regulating transcription, we calculated and classified the distances of these specific regions to TSS. Newly opened regions indicated a significant enrichment in 104–105 bp away from TSS, while a shrink of hyper-accessible regions was displayed within 0–103 bp. On the contrary, regions with a distance beyond 104 bp to TSS, which were defined as newly closed, comprised an enormous part of all regions. An increased proportion of hypo-accessible regions was discovered with more than 1000 bp distance from TSS, which indirectly suggested distal cis-regulatory element like enhancer might be deactivated (Fig. 2E, F). Further analysis revealed that a majority of DARs distributed at the intron and distal intergenic regions, as shown in Fig. 2G, H, suggesting that DARs might represent distal regulatory elements such as enhancers.
Association between gene expression and chromatin accessibility in GHPA
To establish whether the alterations in gene expression changes associated with chromatin accessibility, we performed an integrated analysis with mRNA-seq and ATAC-seq data. By assigning differential accessible sites to their nearest genes, 281 and 164 DEGs were identified to be related to the hyper- and hypo-accessible regions respectively (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Tables 1, 2). Interestingly, most of the DEGs near hypo-accessible regions were significantly down-regulated (p < 0.0001), but the relationship between the hyper-accessible regions and their nearest DEGs was slight (Fig. 3B). It suggested that decreased chromatin accessibility contributed greatly to the down-regulation of genes associated with GHPA. Terminally, 31 key DEGs were identified to correlate with changes in chromatin accessibility, with |log2fold change| > 1. Genes like Somatostatin Receptor 1 (SSTR1), Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Transcription Factor 1 (SREBF1), Wnt Family Member 5B (WNT5B) and Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone Receptor (GHRHR) were significantly upregulated nearby the hyper-accessible regions. On the contrary, restrained chromatin accessibility diminished expression of several genes such as Sorbitol Dehydrogenase (SORD), Dual specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6), Laminin subunit alpha-2 (LAMA2), WW Domain Containing Transcription Regulator 1 (WWTR1, commonly listed as TAZ), Metalloproteinase inhibitor 3 (TIMP3), Yes1 Associated Transcriptional Regulator (YAP1) and Follicle Stimulating Hormone Subunit Beta (FSHB) (Fig. 3C).
To deeply insight into the functional role and the latent signaling pathway of the DARs and DEGs, KEGG pathways analysis were performed. The DEGs associated with hyper-accessible regions were enriched in pathways relative to Insulin, Estrogen, GH, ErbB, Axon guidance, and cAMP signaling pathway (Fig. 4A). The activation of these pathways was implicated in proliferation, invasion, and GH secreting level of GHPA. Meanwhile, the DEGs associated with hypo-accessible regions might desensitize TGF-beta, Hippo and MAPK signaling pathway, which may trigger the proliferation and secretion of pituitary tumors in an inactive form (Fig. 4B). Next, as shown in Fig. 4C, we set out to identify the core genes in KEGG pathway networks relative to hyper- or hypo-accessible regions, respectively.
The increased chromatin accessibility at promoter-TSS regions or distal regulatory elements may contribute to significant up-regulation of SSTR1, WNT5B, and GHRHR (Fig. 4D, Fig. S2). Visualization of ATAC-seq signals and mRNA-seq expression levels at GHRHR locus revealed a significant accessibility peak enriched in GHRHR intron region and elevated mRNA expression compared with normal tissue. Hyper-accessible 5′-UTR at SSTR1 in tumor contribute to the expression of SSTR1 mRNA. The intergenic and intron regions at WNT5B have marked as two discrete peaks, which was accompanied with an enhanced expression of WNT5B in tumor. Meanwhile, down-regulation of genes, such as WWTR1, YAP1, and FSHB, were closely linked to nearby decreased chromatin accessibility (Fig. 4D, Fig. S2). Intervening in the accessibility of specific intron, intergenic or promoter-TSS regions might enervate chromatin accessibility, leading to attenuate these gene expressions.
Prediction of transcription factors involved in chromatin accessibility changes between the para-adenoma normal tissues and GHPA
Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that regulate gene expression through binding to specific DNA sites in cis-regulatory regions of target genes [32]. Normally, chromatin accessibility to DNA is a prerequisite for the binding of TFs. Recently, numerous studies have revealed that TFs play an important role in promoting tumor metastasis and migration through ATAC-seq [33]. To examine potential TFs located in the differentially accessible regions between tumoral tissues and para-adenoma normal tissues, we searched for responsible TFs using motif discovery software HOMER [28]. As accessible chromatin sites are often obligated if TFs bind to their cognate DNA sequence motifs, the integration of TF motifs and chromatin accessibility data from ATAC-seq can predict TF occupancy on chromatin [18, 34]. Using the ±200 bp flanking sequences around summits of ATAC-seq peaks to identify motif occurrences and thus predict binding sites for TFs, we identified that 264 and 39 potential TFs were in hyper- and hypo-accessible regions respectively (p < 0.01, Supplementary Tables 3, 4). As shown in Fig. 5A, the hyper-accessible regions were highly enriched for GRE, PGR, ARE and evolutionarily conserved RFX family transcription factors, while the hypo-accessible regions were enriched for CTCF, RFX, and KLF family transcription factors. To obtain potential regulators of DEGs associated with GHPA, we performed the analysis of the binding sites of top 50 TFs enriched in DARs using HOMER (v4.10) [28] (Fig. 5B). The results showed that ETV1 and KLF14 potentially bound to the hyper-accessible sites of GHRHR and WNT5B gene body in GHPA, and the down-regulation of FSHB, WWTR1 and YAP1 might be closely correlated with the absence of CTCF, which functions as an insulator in chromatin reorganization and could mediate long-range enhancer-promoter interaction to regulate gene expression [35]. Altogether, our data demonstrated that the decreased chromatin accessibility, which led to the reduced binding capacity of critical TFs, might be responsible for the down-regulation of key DEGs associated with GHPA.
Discussion
The genome-wide landscape of GHPA has been investigated in a few studies, but the variation of chromatin state in GHPA has never been investigated [8, 36]. As chromatin structure change exerts significant influence on gene transcription, it has become the “hot spot” in the study of pathological mechanism of various diseases [37, 38]. The commonly genome-wide chromatin accessibility profiling methodologies include MNase-seq, DNase-seq, FAIRE-seq and ATAC-seq, which can further analyze the alterations in the accessible chromatin state and understand the molecular mechanisms of several diseases [11, 39]. Due to its speed, simplicity, and low input cell number requirement, ATAC-seq has been implicated as an accurate and sensitive measure of genome-wide chromatin accessibility [40]. Moreover, ATAC-seq has also been widely adopted to predict TF binding motifs in these regulatory regions [41].
Here, based on the RNA-seq, 64 significantly DEGs were obtained, including 10 upregulated DEGs and 54 down-regulated DEGs, in GHPA compared with normal pituitary tissues. It is worth noting that most up-regulated DEGs in tumors participate in various hormone-related signaling pathways (such as insulin, prolactin, and growth hormone) and pathways in GH synthesis, secretion and action. GH secretion by the somatotroph cells is mediated by ghrelin and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and inhibited by somatostatin and IGF-1 feedback inhibition [42]. The effects of GH-releasing hormone are mediated by GHRH-receptor (GHRHR), a seven transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor which is expressed primarily on the cell surface of somatotrophs in the anterior pituitary [43]. Under physical conditions, GHRH specifically binding to GHRHR facilitates somatotroph cell growth, growth hormone gene transcription and growth hormone secretion [44]. Consistent with the previous result [45], our data show that the expression of GHRHR is significantly up-regulated in GHPA compared with normal pituitary tissues. Somatostatin binds to SSTR1-5 to inhibit GH secretion [46]. Previous studies have reported that SSTRs expression is increased in tumor tissue of GHPA patients [47]. Elevated expression of SSTRs has been considered as a valuable indicator in predicting biochemical response to somatostatin analogs treatment [48]. Here, our data show the expression of SSTR1 is up-regulated in GHPA compared with normal pituitary tissue. There are few previous studies in investigating the level of SSTR1 in GHPA. However, our results suggest that additional research is needed to uncover this issue, which may provide potential target for GHPA treatment.
Additionally, our data reveal that the down-regulated DGEs are enriched in signaling pathways that included focal adhesion pathway. Focal adhesion, a subcellular structure between the cell and the extracellular matrix, plays an important role in cell migration through tissues [49]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the invasion and metastasis of several malignant tumors, such as breast cancer and gastric cancer, are closely related to focal adhesion [50, 51]. From RNA-seq data, we find genes which encode collagen family are significantly down-regulated. Collagen is one of the essential components which participate in the formation of focal adhesion [52]. Suppression of collagen might breach focal adhesion and dramatically enhance the invasion of tumor cells [53, 54]. Therefore, we speculate that decreased collagen in GHPA may interfere with the formation of focal adhesion, leading to potential invasion of tumor.
Further, ATAC-seq were undertook to reveal the noticeable alterations in transcriptomes and chromatin accessibility of GHPA. Comparing with normal pituitary tissues, there are 64 significantly DEGs identified in GHPA, the proportion of down-regulated DEGs is higher than that of up-regulated DEGs, which is corresponding to previous studies [55, 56]. Combined with our ATAC-seq date, most of the DEGs near hypo-accessible regions are significantly down-regulated, which clearly suggests that decreased chromatin accessibility contributes to the down-regulation of genes. Furthermore, these hypo-accessible chromatin regions were rich in the motifs of critical regulatory factors, such as CTCF, Rfx2, and SF1. According to these data, we speculate that, by affecting the DNA-binding ability of TFs and transcriptional regulators in promoter and/or enhancer, the global decreases in chromatin accessibility could inhibit the expression of critical genes associated with GHPA. For example, it is probably that the significant decrease in chromatin openness leads to loss of chromatin insulator CTCF binding, which impairs the long-range interactions between promoters and enhancers of FSHB.
In conclusion, our study is the first to depicture global changes in chromatin accessibility and transcription in GHPA. Combination of these data can provide relevant insight into the tumor biology, especially in regulatory network that contributes to tumor formation and growth. Our results demonstrated that the decreased chromatin-accessible regions are depleted for TF binding consensus motifs, which will lead the expression decrease in GHPA terminally. However, we are aware of the limitations of this research. Firstly, the sample size of GHPA and control group is small. Secondly, more informative is needed to validate the present findings in vitro and in vivo. The mechanism and functional consequence behind the interactions between TFs and chromatin accessibility change regions is worth further investigation.
References
G.U. Mehta, R.R. Lonser, Management of hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. Neuro-Oncology 19(6), 762–773 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now130
O.M. Dekkers, N.R. Biermasz, A.M. Pereira, J.A. Romijn, J.P. Vandenbroucke, Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93(1), 61–67 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-1191
S. Melmed, Pituitary-tumor endocrinopathies. N. Engl. J. Med. 382(10), 937–950 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1810772
J. Lyons, C.A. Landis, G. Harsh, L. Vallar, K. Grünewald, H. Feichtinger, Q.Y. Duh, O.H. Clark, E. Kawasaki, H.R. Bourne, Two G protein oncogenes in human endocrine tumors. Science 249(4969), 655–659 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2116665
L. Vallar, A. Spada, G. Giannattasio, Altered Gs and adenylate cyclase activity in human GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Nature 330(6148), 566–568 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/330566a0
V. Alvaro, L. Lévy, C. Dubray, A. Roche, F. Peillon, B. Quérat, D. Joubert, Invasive human pituitary tumors express a point-mutated alpha-protein kinase-C. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 77(5), 1125–1129 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.77.5.8077302
S. Barry, M. Korbonits, Update on the genetics of pituitary tumors. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 49(3), 433–452 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2020.05.005
M.P. Salomon, X. Wang, D.M. Marzese, S.C. Hsu, N. Nelson, X. Zhang, C. Matsuba, Y. Takasumi, C. Ballesteros-Merino, B.A. Fox et al. The epigenomic landscape of pituitary adenomas reveals specific alterations and differentiates among acromegaly, Cushing’s disease and endocrine-inactive subtypes. Clin. Cancer Res. 24(17), 4126–4136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-17-2206
D. D’Angelo, D. Palmieri, P. Mussnich, M. Roche, A. Wierinckx, G. Raverot, M. Fedele, C.M. Croce, J. Trouillas, A. Fusco, Altered microRNA expression profile in human pituitary GH adenomas: down-regulation of miRNA targeting HMGA1, HMGA2, and E2F1. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97(7), E1128–E1138 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-3482
T.C. Voss, G.L. Hager, Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15(2), 69–81 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3623
Y. Wang, X. Zhang, Q. Song, Y. Hou, J. Liu, Y. Sun, P. Wang, Characterization of the chromatin accessibility in an Alzheimer’s disease (AD) mouse model. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 12(1), 29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00598-2
M. Saqcena, L.J. Leandro-Garcia, J.L.V. Maag, V. Tchekmedyian, G.P. Krishnamoorthy, P.P. Tamarapu, V. Tiedje, V. Reuter, J.A. Knauf, E. de Stanchina et al., SWI/SNF complex mutations promote thyroid tumor progression and insensitivity to redifferentiation therapies, Cancer Discov. (2020) https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.Cd-20-0735
J.D. Buenrostro, B. Wu, H.Y. Chang, W.J. Greenleaf, ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 109, 21.29.21–21.29.29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb2129s109
A. Swoboda, R. Soukup, O. Eckel, K. Kinslechner, B. Wingelhofer, D. Schörghofer, C. Sternberg, H.T.T. Pham, M. Vallianou, J. Horvath et al., STAT3 promotes melanoma metastasis by CEBP-induced repression of the MITF pathway, Oncogene (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01584-6
P. Whongsiri, W. Goering, T. Lautwein, C. Hader, G. Niegisch, K. Köhrer, M.J. Hoffmann, W.A. Schulz, Many different LINE-1 retroelements are activated in bladder cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(24), (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249433
E. Manojlovic Gacic, M. Skender-Gazibara, I. Soldatovic, D. Dundjerovic, N. Boricic, S. Raicevic, V. Popovic, Immunohistochemical expression of p16 and p21 in pituitary tissue adjacent to pituitary adenoma versus pituitary tissue obtained at autopsy: is there a difference. Endocr. Pathol. 26(2), 104–110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-015-9358-7
M. Korbonits, H.S. Chahal, G. Kaltsas, S. Jordan, Y. Urmanova, Z. Khalimova, P.E. Harris, W.E. Farrell, F.X. Claret, A.B. Grossman, Expression of phosphorylated p27(Kip1) protein and Jun activation domain-binding protein 1 in human pituitary tumors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87(6), 2635–2643 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.6.8517
J.D. Buenrostro, P.G. Giresi, L.C. Zaba, H.Y. Chang, W.J. Greenleaf, Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10(12), 1213–1218 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2688
M.R. Corces, A.E. Trevino, E.G. Hamilton, P.G. Greenside, N.A. Sinnott-Armstrong, S. Vesuna, A.T. Satpathy, A.J. Rubin, K.S. Montine, B. Wu et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat. Methods 14(10), 959–962 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4396
A. Dobin, C.A. Davis, F. Schlesinger, J. Drenkow, C. Zaleski, S. Jha, P. Batut, M. Chaisson, T.R. Gingeras, STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29(1), 15–21 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
C. Trapnell, A. Roberts, L. Goff, G. Pertea, D. Kim, D.R. Kelley, H. Pimentel, S.L. Salzberg, J.L. Rinn, L. Pachter, Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7(3), 562–578 (2012)
F. Ramirez, F. Dundar, S. Diehl, B.A. Gruning, T. Manke, deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(Web Server issue), W187–W191 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku365
Hadley Wickham, Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. (Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2009).
B. Langmead, S.L. Salzberg, Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9(4), 357–359 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
H. Li, B. Handsaker, A. Wysoker, T. Fennell, J. Ruan, N. Homer, G. Marth, G. Abecasis, R. Durbin, Subgroup genome project data processing, the sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16), 2078–2079 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Y. Zhang, T. Liu, C.A. Meyer, J. Eeckhoute, D.S. Johnson, B.E. Bernstein, C. Nusbaum, R.M. Myers, M. Brown, W. Li, et al., Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9(9), R137 2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137
G. Yu, L.G. Wang, Y. Han, Q.Y. He, clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16(5), 284–287 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118
S. Heinz, C. Benner, N. Spann, E. Bertolino, Y.C. Lin, P. Laslo, J.X. Cheng, C. Murre, H. Singh, C.K. Glass, Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38(4), 576–589 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004
H. Thorvaldsdottir, J.T. Robinson, J.P. Mesirov, Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 14(2), 178–192 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs017
C. Doganli, M. Sandoval, S. Thomas, D. Hart, Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-Seq) protocol for zebrafish embryos. Methods Mol. Biol. 1507, 59–66 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6518-2_5
M. Bozek, R. Cortini, A.E. Storti, U. Unnerstall, U. Gaul, N. Gompel, ATAC-seq reveals regional differences in enhancer accessibility during the establishment of spatial coordinates in the Drosophila blastoderm. Genome Res. 29(5), 771–783 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.242362.118
S.A. Lambert, A. Jolma, L.F. Campitelli, P.K. Das, Y. Yin, M. Albu, X. Chen, J. Taipale, T.R. Hughes, M.T. Weirauch, The human transcription factors. Cell 175(2), 598–599 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.045
J. Tome-Garcia, P. Erfani, G. Nudelman, A.M. Tsankov, I. Katsyv, R. Tejero, B. Zhang, M. Walsh, R.H. Friedel, E. Zaslaysky et al., Analysis of chromatin accessibility uncovers TEAD1 as a regulator of migration in human glioblastoma. Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) ARTN 4020 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06258-2
M.R. Corces, J.M. Granja, S. Shams, B.H. Louie, J.A. Seoane, W. Zhou, T.C. Silva, C. Groeneveld, C.K. Wong, S.W. Cho et al., The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers. Science 362 (6413), (2018) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav1898
G. Ren, W. Jin, K. Cui, J. Rodrigez, G. Hu, Z. Zhang, D.R. Larson, K. Zhao, CTCF-mediated enhancer-promoter interaction is a critical regulator of cell-to-cell variation of gene expression. Mol. Cell 67(6), 1049–1058 e1046 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.026
N. Välimäki, H. Demir, E. Pitkänen, E. Kaasinen, A. Karppinen, L. Kivipelto, C. Schalin-Jäntti, L.A. Aaltonen, A. Karhu, Whole-genome sequencing of growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 100(10), 3918–3927 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-3129
C. Kuppe, M.M. Ibrahim, J. Kranz, X. Zhang, S. Ziegler, J. Perales-Patón, J. Jansen, K.C. Reimer, J.R. Smith, R. Dobie et al. Decoding myofibroblast origins in human kidney fibrosis. Nature 589(7841), 281–286 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2941-1
V. Rai, D.X. Quang, M.R. Erdos, D.A. Cusanovich, R.M. Daza, N. Narisu, L.S. Zou, J.P. Didion, Y. Guan, J. Shendure et al. Single-cell ATAC-Seq in human pancreatic islets and deep learning upscaling of rare cells reveals cell-specific type 2 diabetes regulatory signatures. Mol. Metab. 32, 109–121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2019.12.006
Y.L. Qu, C.H. Deng, Q. Luo, X.Y. Shang, J.X. Wu, Y. Shi, L. Wang, Z.G. Han, Arid1a regulates insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism. EBioMedicine 42, 481–493 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.021
J.D. Buenrostro, P.G. Giresi, L.C. Zaba, H.Y. Chang, W.J. Greenleaf, Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10(12), 1213–1218 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2688
M.R. Corces, J.M. Granja, S. Shams, B.H. Louie, J.A. Seoane, W. Zhou, T.C. Silva, C. Groeneveld, C.K. Wong, S.W. Cho et al., The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers. Science 362(6413), (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav1898
D. Ben-Avraham, D.R. Govindaraju, T. Budagov, D. Fradin, P. Durda, B. Liu, S. Ott, D. Gutman, L. Sharvit, R. Kaplan et al. The GH receptor exon 3 deletion is a marker of male-specific exceptional longevity associated with increased GH sensitivity and taller stature. Sci. Adv. 3(6), e1602025 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602025
M. Alba, R. Salvatori, Familial growth hormone deficiency and mutations in the GHRH receptor gene. Vitam. Horm. 69, 209–220 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0083-6729(04)69007-8
K.S. Alatzoglou, M.T. Dattani, Genetic causes and treatment of isolated growth hormone deficiency-an update. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 6(10), 562–576 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2010.147
M.B. Lopes, B.D. Gaylinn, M.O. Thorner, M.H. Stoler, Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor mRNA in acromegalic pituitary tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 150(6), 1885–1891 (1997)
M. Theodoropoulou, G.K. Stalla, Somatostatin receptors: from signaling to clinical practice. Front Neuroendocrinol. 34(3), 228–252 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.07.005
K. Kiseljak-Vassiliades, M. Xu, T.S. Mills, E.E. Smith, L.J. Silveira, K.O. Lillehei, J.M. Kerr, B.K. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, M.E. Wierman, Differential somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 1-5 expression and downstream effectors in histologic subtypes of growth hormone pituitary tumors. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 417, 73–83 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2015.09.016
W. Liu, L. Xie, M. He, M. Shen, J. Zhu, Y. Yang, M. Wang, J. Hu, H. Ye, Y. Li et al., Expression of somatostatin receptor 2 in somatotropinoma correlated with the short-term efficacy of somatostatin analogues. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2017 (9606985 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9606985
S. Haam, J.H. Han, H.W. Lee, Y.W. Koh, Tumor nonimmune-microenvironment-related gene expression signature predicts brain metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma patients after surgery: a machine learning approach using gene expression profiling. Cancers 13 (17), (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174468
K.R. Levental, H. Yu, L. Kass, J.N. Lakins, M. Egeblad, J.T. Erler, S.F. Fong, K. Csiszar, A. Giaccia, W. Weninger et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 139(5), 891–906 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.027
S. Wu, M. Chen, J. Huang, F. Zhang, Z. Lv, Y. Jia, Y.Z. Cui, L.Z. Sun, Y. Wang, Y. Tang et al. ORAI2 promotes gastric cancer tumorigenicity and metastasis through PI3K/Akt signaling and MAPK-dependent focal adhesion disassembly. Cancer Res. 81(4), 986–1000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0049
N.M. Coelho, C. González-García, M. Salmerón-Sánchez, G. Altankov, Arrangement of type IV collagen on NH2 and COOH functionalized surfaces. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108(12), 3009–3018 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.23265
M.A. Morrissey, R. Jayadev, G.R. Miley, C.A. Blebea, Q. Chi, S. Ihara, D.R. Sherwood, SPARC promotes cell invasion in vivo by decreasing type IV collagen levels in the basement membrane. PLoS Genet. 12(2), e1005905 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005905
X.M. Piao, B. Hwang, P. Jeong, Y.J. Byun, H.W. Kang, S.P. Seo, W.T. Kim, J.Y. Lee, Y.S. Ha, Y.S. Lee et al., Collagen type VI‑α1 and 2 repress the proliferation, migration and invasion of bladder cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 59(1), (2021) https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2021.5217
J. Li, C. Li, J. Wang, G. Song, Z. Zhao, H. Wang, W. Wang, H. Li, Z. Li, Y. Miao et al. Genome-wide analysis of differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs in primary gonadotrophin adenomas by RNA-seq. Oncotarget 8(3), 4585–4606 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13948
Y. Long, M. Lu, T. Cheng, X. Zhan, X. Zhan, Multiomics-based signaling pathway network alterations in human non-functional pituitary adenomas. Front. Endocrinol. 10(835) (2019) https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00835
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 81802496), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant number 81725011), the National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals, Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (Grant number SHDC2020CR2004A) and National Project in Promoting The Diagnosis And Treatment Of Major Diseases by MDT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Meng Wang, Chenxing Ji, Yichao Zhang, Xuelong Wang, Gang Wei and Zhao Ye. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committees of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University.
Consent to participate
The patients provided written informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, M., Ji, C., Zhang, Y. et al. Global changes in chromatin accessibility and transcription in growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma. Endocrine 78, 329–342 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03155-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03155-z