Abstract
Research into TBI biomarkers has accelerated rapidly in the past decade owing to the heterogeneous nature of TBI pathologies and management, which pose challenges to TBI evaluation, management, and prognosis. TBI biomarker proteins resulting from axonal, neuronal, or glial cell injuries are widely used and have been extensively studied. However, they might not pass the blood-brain barrier with sufficient amounts to be detected in peripheral blood specimens, and further might not be detectable in the cerebrospinal fluid owing to flow limitations triggered by the injury itself. Despite the advances in TBI research, there is an unmet clinical need to develop and identify novel TBI biomarkers that entirely correlate with TBI pathologies on the molecular level, including mild TBI, and further enable physicians to predict patient outcomes and allow researchers to test neuroprotective agents to limit the extents of injury. Although the extracellular vesicles have been identified and studied long ago, they have recently been revisited and repurposed as potential TBI biomarkers that overcome the many limitations of the traditional blood and CSF assays. Animal and human experiments demonstrated the accuracy of several types of exosomes and miRNAs in detecting mild, moderate, and severe TBI. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the traditional TBI biomarkers that are helpful in clinical practice. Also, we highlight the emerging roles of exosomes and miRNA being the promising candidates under investigation of current research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability and death worldwide [1]. TBI affects approximately 50 million individuals annually [2]. It can result from exposure to a blow or blast, rapid head deceleration or acceleration, and skull penetration [3]. These factors may lead to internal hemorrhage, bruises, lacerations, focal and diffuse injuries, hypoxia, and interference in axonal connectivity [4]. TBI may also give rise to many neurodegenerative disorders and increase survivors’ risk of developing chronic behavioral and neurological impairment that affects the quality of their lives. Factors underlying the susceptibility of individuals to develop these disorders are still intensively unknown.
TBI can cause alteration in cognition and attention, anxiety, aggression, depression, and personality changes. It is also believed to raise the risk of developing some diseases, including Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease [5]. According to the Glasgow Coma Scale Score (GCS), TBI severity can be classified into mild, moderate, and severe injuries [6]. TBI severity can be determined by the location and nature of the injury and the occurrence of complications such as elevated intracranial pressure [7]. The pathophysiology of TBI was reported to include the release of cytokines, chemical mediators, and many neurotransmitters that contribute to the process of tissue injury. Also, nitric oxide and calcium both play a significant role in apoptosis induction [8]. TBI-heterogeneous nature has limited the complete understanding of its pathophysiology, and this has mainly been reflected in the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Therefore, there is an urgent need for better diagnostic modalities for TBI.
Brain injuries cause a yearly economic burden, encouraging researchers to find effective, safe, and cheap TBI monitoring methods [3]. Some studies have investigated some molecules released in the body fluids due to pathological mechanisms of TBI [9]. Of these biofluid biomarkers, extracellular vesicles (EVs) and miRNAs have been reported to be promising biomarkers for TBI [9]. Recently, miRNAs and EVs have gained significant attention in the scientific community for their actions in many pathological and physiological processes. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the traditional TBI biomarkers that are helpful in clinical practice. Also, we highlight the emerging roles of exosomes and miRNA being the promising candidates under investigation of current research.
The Urgent Need for More TBI Biomarkers
TBI is not a single event, but it includes complex pathological processes. TBI may involve a primary injury that arises immediately after the trauma and secondary injuries resulting in a series of molecular and cellular reactions that last for a long time after the trauma, leading to neuronal and astroglia injuries, axonal disruption, and inflammation. A comprehensive understanding of TBI pathophysiological processes is essential to develop neuroprotective and therapeutic interventions [10]. Integration of biomarkers, clinical examination, and imaging techniques can lead to proper severity detection, outcome prediction, and evaluation of response to clinical management after TBI [11]. TBI biomarkers are needed to diagnose TBI and advance neuroprotective and therapeutic clinical trials. The lack of reliable biomarkers that entirely correlate with the pathogenesis and progression of TBI leads to undiagnosed or late-diagnosed disease.
Mild TBI patients mostly show no symptoms for days or weeks after injury. Neuroimaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT), imaging spectroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) help evaluate gross head injuries but not mild TBI since imaging cannot detect minute neural and structural changes [12, 13]. Besides, MRI may be unavailable in clinical settings or costly for some patients [14]. On the other hand, fluid biomarkers are more accurate tools for assessing TBI pathophysiology. Current conventional fluid biomarkers of TBI are limited as they exist in minimal concentrations; therefore, they require sensitive assays. Furthermore, they might be undetectable in many cases owing to the limitations in their diffusion across the blood-brain barrier in some patients and further challenged by the fluid disturbance and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow limitations inflicted by the brain injury. Therefore, there is an unmet clinical need to find fluid biomarkers to detect all TBIs; assess the severity of TBIs, including mild TBI; and predict the risk of developing long-term consequences such as post-concussive syndrome and chronic traumatic encephalopathy [15].
According to Wang et al. [10], the ideal and reliable fluid biomarker of TBI should meet the following criteria: (1) First, head trauma should induce the release of that biomarker into accessible body fluids; (2) the biomarker level must increase significantly in TBI patients than in healthy people; (3) the biomarker should correlate quantitatively and qualitatively with injury severity; and (4) the level of the biomarker should be associated with other clinical diagnostic tools as GCS, CT, and MRI [10].
Traditional Techniques of TBI Biomarker Measurement
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Immunochemical techniques usually assess TBI biomarkers. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the most frequently used test, especially sandwich ELISA. In sandwich ELISA, the antigen (the biomarker of interest) reacts with two types of antibodies, capturing and detection antibodies. Antibody detection produces a color change that indicates the presence of the antigen. In addition to this technique, another one is multiplex ELISA that can react with more than one antigen simultaneously in a single sample. Multiplex ELISA provides a comprehensive and accurate quantification of the biomarkers. ELISA sensitivity relies on the quality of the used antibody. When the antibody cross-reacts with other antigens, the test will increase the biomarker concentration than the real one. Blood samples commonly show increased biomarkers incorrectly because blood contains many plasma proteins [15].
Mass Spectrometry
Mass spectrometry (MS) is a common technique that assesses proteins in an antibody-independent manner [15, 16]. It is used in laboratory examinations to detect small molecules like hormones, vitamins, and drugs. MS also measures proteins that indicate neural degeneration after TBI, which is used in preclinical studies to discover new TBI biomarkers [16]. It measures biomarkers with high sensitivity, making it an ideal diagnostic and prognostic modality [11].
Types of TBI Biomarkers
Research in the past decades revealed several molecules that can mirror the changes and the pathophysiological reactions of TBI. These molecules act as potential biomarkers and denote processes such as neuronal injury, glial injury, axonal injury, and inflammation (Fig. 1). We summarized the potential biomarkers, their targets, and their association with different pathologies and severities of TBI (Table 1).
Neuronal Cell Body Injury
Neuron-Specific Enolase
Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is a neuronal cytoplasmic enzyme that plays a role in the glycolytic pathway of nerve cells. In this regard, extracellular NSE indicates neuron cell injury [17]. Serum NSE concentration rises in the first 12 h after TBI and declines within hours or days. Patients with secondary NSE increase exhibit more severe outcomes. Moderate and severe TBI patients, who suffer from persistently elevated serum NSE levels, are significantly at risk of poor neurological effects and mortality [18, 19]. Serum NSE usually increases in patients with a GCS score ≤ 3 [19]. The main drawback of using NSE as a TBI diagnostic tool is its high erythrocyte concentrations. Therefore, hemolysis increases serum NSE, even without the coexistence of any TBI [18].
Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1
Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) is an enzymatic protein in the cytoplasm nerve cells. UCH-L1 contributes to removing abnormal neuronal proteins in both physiological and pathological conditions [11, 20]. Studies evaluated serum and CSF UCH-L1 concentration elevation within the first 6–24 h after TBI [21]. Increased serum UCH-L1 is attributed to the breakdown of BBB after moderate to severe TBI [22,23,24]. Serum UCH-L1 concentration after TBI correlates with injury severity and clinical outcomes, including GCS score at the time of admission and lesions on CT [25, 26]. Within 3 months after severe TBI, mortality is associated with elevated serum and CSF concentration of UCH-L1 in the first 6 h after injury [21]. Finally, UCH-L1 is a potential prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for mild, moderate, and severe TBIs.
Glial Cell Injury Biomarkers
S100B Protein
S100B is a calcium-binding protein present in astroglial cells [10]. Brain trauma and ischemic injuries activate astroglial cells [27,28,29,30,31,32], which release the S100B protein into the extracellular space. S100B proteins diffuse into CSF and then to blood [33]. Although S100B proteins protect the neurons against post-TBI inflammation, they increase the phosphorylation of tau proteins that cause neurodegeneration [33, 34]. Several studies link elevated S100B protein levels with increased injury severity, poor clinical outcomes [11, 35], and increased mortality [36]. Similarly, S100B protein level can predict the occurrence of the post-concussion syndrome after mild TBI [10, 36]. There is also a positive association between S100 protein levels and intracranial pressure and cranial CT after TBI [36].
S100B protein levels can predict normal CT after mTBI, reducing unnecessary CT scans. S100B protein is currently used in the early control of minimal, mild, and moderate TBI in Scandinavia according to their head injury management guidelines in adults [37]. Although many studies recommend S100B as a prognostic biomarker after TBI, other studies reported a weak prediction tool, especially with long-term outcomes [33, 35, 38]. Another limitation is the extra-neural release of S100B protein from cardiac muscle, adipose tissue, and skeletal muscles [10, 39].
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an intermediate filament in astroglial cells [10, 33]. GFAP also exists in non-myelinating Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous system and enteric glial cells. GFAP supports the neurons, maintains their structure, and helps in activating glial cells [11]. Astroglial cells are activated after TBI to induce gliosis or glial scar formation, so the expression of GFAP increases [31, 32, 40,41,42,43,44,45,46].
TBI exacerbates the release of GFAP or its breakdown products (GFAP-BDPs) in CSF and blood [47]. Studies show a positive correlation between GFAP levels and TBI severity [26] [11]. GFAP can assess mTBI and evaluate the need for neuroimaging as CT and MRI, which will reduce unnecessary CT and MRI. Thus, GFAP may identify the need for intensive monitoring and predict poor outcomes and the risk for developing cognitive and psychiatric disabilities [14, 26].
Axonal Injury Biomarkers
Neurofilament Proteins
Neurofilament proteins (NFs) are specific neuronal and axonal proteins. NFs are the primary component of the neuronal cytoskeleton to provide integrity and mechanical support. NFs consist of three different polypeptide subunits: a light subunit (NF-L, 68 kDa), a medium subunit (NF-M, 160 kDa), and a heavy subunit (NF-H, 200 kDa) [48, 49]. NFs undergo phosphorylation. Phosphorylated filaments interact with each other to increase neuronal stability [49, 50]. After TBI, intracellular calcium increases and activates various calcium-dependent enzymes like proteases, calpains, and phosphatase calcineurin. These enzymes act on NFs and lead to their dephosphorylation, proteolysis, and dissociation. NF-L, NF-M, and NF-H are released into extracellular space, then to CSF and blood [48, 50]. Due to NF specificity for neurons and axons, their extra-neural detection indicates neural death and axonal disintegration [50].
NF release lasts for days after the trauma, which may predict the occurrence of chronic morbidities and cognitive disability [10]. Studies reported that NF-L and NF-H increase in the first 2 weeks after severe TBI, indicating poor outcomes [51]. Serum NF-L levels correlate with CT lesions. Initial NF-L levels can predict the outcomes 12 months after TBI [49, 52]. NF-L concentration is a sensitive and reliable biomarker in assessing sports-related concussions [53]. Serum phosphorylated NF-H is also a specific biomarker for axonal injury, especially white matter axons [54]. PNF-H levels are associated with injury severity and can predict mortality [11].
Myelin Basic Protein
Myelin basic protein (MBP) is the second major protein in the CNS, and it does exist in oligodendroglia. TBI causes axonal damage and the release of MBP in the blood. However, its release occurs 1–3 days after the injury [55, 56]. Elevated serum MBP levels may last for 2 weeks indicating poor outcome, especially intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) [57]. There is an association between increased MBP levels and the increased risk of mortality [58, 59].
Because MBP release is delayed and its initial levels do not correlate with the GCS [58], it is not suitable for the emergency room screening biomarker. MBP is not specific for CNS injury, as injury in the peripheral nerves also increases MBP blood concentration. The presence of both peripheral nerve damage and TBI makes MBP an inaccurate diagnostic and prognostic biomarker [56].
Tau Protein
Tau is a microtubule-associated protein (MAP) expressed mainly in the neurons to stabilize axonal microtubules [10, 11]. Normally, tau undergoes phosphorylation to control microtubules’ movement. When this phosphorylation is abnormally excessive, tau accumulates and forms neurofibrillary tangles. These tangles impair neuronal functions and cause neurodegenerative diseases [60]. TBI–related cerebral ischemia induces tau hyperphosphorylation [61], suggesting TBI contributes to chronic neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment [56].
TBI increases tau release in CSF. CSF tau concentration positively correlates with TBI severity and poor outcomes [62, 63]. Previously, Wang et al. demonstrated that serum tau protein peaks 2 days after TBI, while serum tau level reflects injury severity and predicts the clinical outcome [61]. CSF tau is a more accurate diagnostic and prognostic tool than serum tau. Some studies reported that serum tau does not correlate with CT lesions and cannot predict post-concussion syndrome [64].
Inflammation Biomarkers
Inflammatory biomarker measurement after TBI could potentially help in disease progression monitoring, injury diagnosis, and prediction of long-term outcomes. The inflammatory blood biomarkers could be elevated in response to any disease-causing cellular injury, so they are not highly specific for TBI. However, few studies have reported that these biomarkers could possess a potential clinical utility for TBI patients [65]. Both primary and secondary TBIs stimulate inflammatory processes via activation of inflammatory proteins, mainly cytokines released from activated microglia and leukocytes [66]. These cytokines are elevated after TBI and include interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and TNF-α. The prolonged release of these cytokines contributes to neurodegenerative diseases [67]. Previously, serum IL-1 beta level has been found correlated with injury severity, GCS, and prognosis [68]. IL6 levels in blood increase after TBI and can evaluate injury severity, but it is a poor outcome predictor [66]. Other cytokines IL-8, IL-10, and TNF-α are excessively produced after TBI, but their correlation with injury severity and outcomes is yet to be confirmed [11, 66]. Moderate and severe cerebral hypoperfusion was associated with high levels of IL-8 in the serum of TBI patients [69]. Because biofluid biomarkers of TBI undergo rapid updates, it is extremely difficult to assess a reliable biomarker.
Previously, adiponectin, a marker of inflammation, was reported to be elevated in the plasma of TBI patients and was found to be an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes and mortality. Also, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a marker of inflammation and a cytokine, was an important predictor for 1-year mortality in TBI patients. HMGB1 works by translocation to the cytoplasm from the nucleus in early TBI. Following that, it enters phagocytic microglia. According to these findings, HMGB1 may serve as a promising therapeutic target for TBI patients in addition to serving as a biomarker [70,71,72].
Galectin-3 is a lectin family member which was reported to be also involved in microglial activation. Recent studies have shown that galectin-3 concentrations increase in the plasma of TBI patients. Also, it may play a role as a hospital mortality indicator. On the other hand, poorer outcomes may be associated with lower plasma levels of Ficolin 3, which is a lectin complement pathway activator [73, 74]. In addition, elevated levels of mannose-binding lectins (MBL) have been noticed in the serum of TBI patients [75].
Extracellular Vesicles
EVs are membranous particles secreted by different cells into body fluids and take part in intercellular communication [76]. EVs are secreted from all types of brain cells. In general, they are lined by a lipid bilayer and contain specific markers on their surface and intraluminal DNA, RNA, protein, and metabolites which act as indicators for the state of glial cells and neurons. They are involved in pathology and recovery processes during CNS injuries [77,78,79].
EVs are classified into three subtypes, apoptotic cells, exosomes, and MVs [76]. Apoptotic cells are secreted during apoptosis by separating the plasma membrane of the dying cell from the cytoskeleton because of the elevated hydrostatic pressure. They are large, with a size range between 50 and 5000 nm and characterized by containing dying cells’ DNA [80, 81]. The second subtype is called MVs or MPs, with size ranging between 100 and 1000 nm. They are developed through the extracellular budding of the plasma membrane of the cells [80]. Several enzymes and calcium signaling play a role in inducing this outward budding [82]. The third subtype of EVs is called exosome, cup-like shapes with a size range from 30 to 120 nm2. They are produced by forming intraluminal vesicles inside intracellular multivesicular bodies by the intraluminal budding of endosomal compartments. These intraluminal vesicles are secreted as exosomes extracellularly through the fusion of bodies with the parent cell plasma membrane [82]. Exosome structures contain non-coding RNAs, proteins, and mRNAs. These components are protected from degradation by the lipid bilayer of exosomes [83]. Exosomes and miRNAs are gaining much attention recently as promising biomarkers for TBI.
EVs are essential biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of malignancy and different diseases such as TBI, which makes competent isolation a big challenge for scientists and researchers. Exosome isolation is either from raw biological fluids or conditioned cell culture. Specific components of biological fluids, including lipoproteins, chylomicrons, and microvesicles, interfere with exosome isolation, making isolating exosomes from these fluids very challenging. On the other hand, isolation from conditioned cell culture is not as difficult as in raw biological fluid [84, 85]. There are two sub-groups of isolation techniques, conventional and microfluidics approaches. Although the traditional approach does not demonstrate high efficiency, it is the most used method [86].
Filtration is efficiently sized based on extracellular isolation using a membrane with a suitable pore to filtrate EVs [87]. There is a new effective and flexible technique based on the size of EVs that separates EVs from a colloidal mixture using a permeable membrane subjected to a tangential flow called tangential flow filtration [88]. There are many other size-based methods like size exclusion chromatography and polymer precipitation [89].
Because of their nanoscale size, extracellular isolation faces many difficulties, as it takes more than 6 h in size-based extracellular isolation, so it is a time-consuming method. Also, it contributes to cellular debris co-purification and does not selectively separate particular sub-types; however, the inadequacy in biological sample magnetism makes immunomagnetic sorting facing huge success in selective and effective EV isolation [90,91,92].
Microfluidics provide a method like the micron-sized channel to filter small volumes of fluids (microliter to picolitre) [93, 94]. The microfluidic-based method can be classified into two groups, the active method, which is characterized by an external force, while the second is called the passive method, which uses hydrodynamic and surface forces [95].
EVs can be detected normally in healthy people. However, EV levels increase in some pathological conditions like TBI [23]. It was found that EVs in the plasma of TBI patients suffering from alterations in consciousness have GFAP ten times more than normal individuals or conscious patients [55]. Also, a difference in miRNA expression in EVs was detected between TBI patients (especially with altered consciousness) and normal individuals. All of these indicate that EVs can be promising biomarkers for TB (Table 2) [55].
Linkage Between EVs and Brain Injury
EVs may contribute to regeneration after stressful conditions. Oligodendrocytes, for example, release EVs that transfer antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase 1 and catalase to the neurons in response to oxidative stress [110]. Additionally, microglia-derived EVs containing miR-124 contribute to regeneration, suppress autophagy, decrease proinflammatory mediators, and increase anti-inflammatory mediators’ production [79].
As previously mentioned, TBI leads to abnormal folding and accumulation of proteins that contribute to neurodegenerative disease development and poor patients’ prognosis. These abnormal proteins stimulate a stress response called unfolded protein response (UPR). UPR originates from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to attenuate cellular stress and restore protein homeostasis (proteostasis). Proteostasis is achieved by decreasing the translation of new proteins and degrading the abnormal misfolded proteins [111]. UPR mediates proteostasis through three main pathways: PERK (protein kinase RNA–like endoplasmic reticulum kinase), ATF6 (activating transcription factor 6), and IRE1 (inositol requiring enzyme 1). Experimental studies reported that PERK pathway is activated after focal and diffuse TBI to maintain cell survival in such a stressful condition [112]. Other studies showed a promising therapeutic role of PERK pathway activation after TBI [113]. Additionally, ER stress and PERK pathway activation have been linked to increased EV expression to induce vascular calcification [114]. From this study, we hypothesize that ER stress after TBI may produce EVs with a different cargo that indicates UPR and correlates with a lower risk of neurodegenerative diseases. We suggest conducting experimental studies to examine this hypothesis and detect the EVs that reflect UPR after brain injury.
Autophagy is a homeostatic process in which there is a fusion of cytoplasm parts within multi-membraned vesicles termed autophagosomes, and then they undergo degradation by lysosomes [115, 116]. Recent studies have reported that there is persistent activation of the autophagy pathway after TBI, leading to neurological dysfunction including learning, sensory, motor, and memory impairments. These findings open the doors for finding a novel therapeutic intervention for TBI by the possibility of neuronal autophagy suppression [117,118,119].
It has been found that an increasing number of miRNAs can play a vital role in the modulation of autophagy major cascades, including autophagy induction, vesicle elongation, vesicle nucleation, autophagosome retrieval, autophagosome formation, autophagosome fusion to endosome/lysosome, autolysosome cargo degradation, and autolysosome formation, through targeting important autophagy molecular component or complexes [120]. For example, miR-21-5p, which was found to be upregulated in cultured neurons after scratch injury and in the brain cortex after TBI, has been reported to participate in autophagy regulation in several diseases in their pathological processes. It has been also observed that miR-21-5p targets Rab11a, which is known to be involved in both early and late stages of autophagy, suggesting that miR-21-5p expression may have an essential role in autophagy suppression [121]. Beside miR-21-5p, miR-124-3p may be involved in neuronal autophagy inhibition and nerve protection against injury as they increase in microglial exosomes following TBI. These findings provide a novel solution for nerve injury treatment following TBI through the introduction of microglial exosomes enriched with miR-124-3p [122].
Exosomes
According to many studies, exosomes can be an effective diagnostic and prognostic modality for TBI. Secretion of exosomes after TBI may serve to get rid of excess cellular products resulting from pathological processes or tissue damage induced by the disease [123, 124]. It was reported that exosomal RNA cargo could help identify patients susceptible to therapeutic failure and for intervention response monitoring. Changes in RNA profiles of exosomes may indicate disease recurrence and reflect the state of the originating cells [125]. A study that compared exosomes in the CSF of TBI patients and healthy individuals reported that the proteins in exosomes of TBI patients are five times more than exosomes obtained from the healthy population. These exosomes were suggested to have a potential role in cell-to-cell communication, and the detection of these exosomes may be beneficial for TBI diagnosis [23]. There are new techniques developed for monitoring exosomes like real-time PCR and microarray-based technologies and deep sequencing [126]. It was also found that there is a high increase in levels of exosomal GFAP in the blood of TBI patients with diffuse injury compared with those with focal injury. There was also a correlation between elevated levels of serum exosomal UCH-L1 and early mortality following TBI, which reflects the importance of this biomarker assessment [127]. Besides, increased exosomal levels of the neurofilament light (NFL) chain have been detected in patients with repetitive mild TBI and those with diffuse injury. NFL is an important marker for axonal injury resulting from degeneration or damages, including TBI (Table 2) [128].
Another subtype of EVs used for TBI diagnosis is microparticles (MPs) or microvesicles (MVs). MPs were reported to participate in the incidence and progression of injuries caused by TBI [129]. According to a study performed on mice, MPs may contribute to neuroinflammation following TBI as they can trigger microglial activation and many immunological responses [130]. MPs were found in high concentration in patients with severe TBI compared with healthy people [131]. These MPs are derived from leukocytes, endothelium, and platelets, and they have been suggested to help detect brain vascular injury as a result of TBI. Also, MPs carry proteins or antigens derived from brain cells, making them reliable TBI biomarkers [131,132,133]. Elevated levels of endothelial-derived MPs in the blood and CSF of TBI patients in the first days may indicate the level of vascular damage and a valuable tool for studying vascular and neuronal apoptosis [134].
Micro RNA
MiRNAs are a large group of small, endogenous, and highly conserved non-coding RNAs that modulate protein synthesis and gene expression at the post-transcriptional stage [135]. Initially, miRNAs are transcribed as long precursors in the nucleus called pri-miRNAs. Later, pri-miRNA is split by RNase Drosha to form many stem-loop products that are called pre-miRNAs [136]. Pre-miRNAs are transferred to the cytoplasm to be cleaved into the miRNA duplex by one of the ribonuclease family enzymes named Dicer. Half of this duplex transforms into mature miRNA while another half, called minor miRNA, will decay [137, 138].
Numerous miRNAs have been detected as gene modulators, and it has been shown that miRNAs regulate more than one-third of the human gene expression [138]. Several miRNAs are expressed in the cerebellum, hippocampus, midbrain, and frontal cortex [139,140,141]. Alteration of the profiles of miRNA expression is relevant to brain aging and brain growth [142]. Also, miRNA plays a significant role in synapse formation [143], differentiation, maturation, and neural genesis [141].
MiRNAs play a critical role in brain development and structuring the complicated neural network. However, miRNA abnormalities are relevant to many neurodegenerative diseases and several brain injuries such as TBI. Also, ischemic brain injuries lead to changes in miRNA levels, which further affects neuroprotective and pathophysiological processes. CNS comprises the highest miRNA concentration and diversity. It has been reported that 70% of miRNA molecules are expressed in the brain and spinal cord [144]. MiRNA expression develops throughout all the stages of neurodevelopment and differs across the regions of the brain [145]. MiRNAs also exhibit variations in intracellular localization within neurons [146]. Interestingly, MiRNA enrichment within the dendritic or axonal compartments implies that miRNAs might have special regulating functions in synapse formation, protein expression, and the construction of neuronal circuits [147]. Therefore, MiRNA expression is very critical to CNS function and development. Dysregulated miRNA levels have been correlated with impaired memory, learning, and cognition, in addition to various neuropsychiatric disorders [148]. These distinct characteristics resulted in a significant increase in miRNA utility as a biomarker for the pathology of CNS.
Investigations of miRNA release in TBI cases centered basically on serum miRNA variation among a few TBI cases and controls. Many studies demonstrated miRNA profile in the CSF and serum plasma after various severities of TBI at several points in time (Tables 2 and 3) [68, 78, 79, 98, 145, 149]. Redell and his colleagues showed that in the first 24 h of injury and by using the microarray method, there was a miR-92a and miR-16 downregulation in a lot of severe TBI cases and a miR-765 upregulation in other mild and severe cases [98]. Bhomia and colleagues evaluated miRNA profile in the serum plasma and CSF of patients who were classified into three distinct groups, mild and moderate TBI (MM-TBI), severe TBI, and patients who had orthopedic injuries with samples obtained in 44 h following the injury and compared with a control group of healthy individuals. In both MM-TBI and severe TBI groups, 18 and 20 miRNAs have been detected, of which ten existed at both TBI severities. Four out of these ten miRNAs have also been detected in the CSF [100].
Di Pietro and his colleagues investigated 754 miRNAs in the serum plasma of five severe TBI cases, five mild TBI cases, and five controls of healthy individuals at various points in time post-injury. Ten miRNAs were detected that changed with time. Two miRNA candidates (miR-502 and miR-425-5p) were validated earlier in thirty patients with TBI, and two miRNA candidates (miR-335 and miR-21) were validated for the control group of healthy individuals [99]. Finally, saliva has also been examined as a potential biomarker source for TBI. Changes in salivary miRNA have been detected in pediatrics with long-term concussion symptoms [150]. In patients with long post-concussive symptoms, five miRNAs (let-7a-3p, miR-133a-5p, miR-320c-1, miR-769-5p, and miR-320c-1) have been detected; 3 of them (miR-629, let-7b-5p, and miR-320c-1) were related to memorial complications, fatigue, and headache that developed within 4 weeks after head injury [101].
Promising miRNA Candidates and Their Molecular Functions
In TBI patients, miR-320c is one of the most promising biomarker candidates. miR-320c has been altered in the serum plasma of adult patients with severe TBI and the saliva in pediatric patients with mild TBI [98, 150, 151]. In addition to this, this miRNA exhibits longitudinal variance in the patients’ CSF following severe TBI and estimates approximately the TBI symptom duration. Many previous studies have found that the levels of miR-320c in depressed individuals in their cerebral cortex change after suicide [152]. These outcomes are interesting given the relationship between prolonged concussion symptoms and the mode of depression. miR-320c role in neuroplasticity may facilitate this association [101].
Another intriguing candidate as a TBI biomarker is miR-92a. MiR-92a has been upregulated in the serum of cases with mild TBI and the CSF and serum plasma in cases with severe TBI [98, 100]. In acute and subacute post-injury periods, MiR-92a has been upregulated. Studies have demonstrated that the higher upregulated miR-92a suppresses angiogenesis following the ischemic events [153, 154]. Therefore, the miR-92a acute upregulation might be crucial in individuals with severe TBI in patients with ICH or neurovascular comorbidities.
In multiple human TBI studies, various changes in the level of miR-30 were detected. MiR-30 expression changes have been observed in the serum plasma of cases with severe TBI within hours and days post-injury. In addition to serum plasma, changes in miR-30 have also been noted in CSF within weeks after TBI. It has been reported that there are changes in the miR-30 release in both blood and saliva [98,99,100, 148]. MiR-30 also has a magnificent role in neuroinflammation, and the pro-inflammatory cytokines negatively regulate it. A decreased miR-30 expression has been related to cell morphology changes, cell adherence loss, and increased cell migration because of the tight junction breakdown [155,156,157]. Thus, miR-30 can play a pivotal role in BBB maintenance. In Tables 2 and 3 and Fig. 2, we summarize data of the relevant studies conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different types of MiRNAs in TBI patients.
Conclusions
Due to the heterogeneous nature of TBI etiology, pathology, and clinical course, current conventional TBI biomarkers have several limitations in the clinical setting and TBI research. Neuroimaging by CT and MRI is limited to detecting gross head injuries without the minute neural injuries or the structural changes and their high costs. Fluid biomarkers seem reliable and more plausible for accurate correlation with neuronal, axonal, or glial cell injuries. However, current conventional fluid proteins might exist in small amounts that require sensitive assays and might even be undetectable.
Although exosomes and miRNA are minute structures whose levels significantly rise in TBI patients compared to healthy controls, they further demonstrated high accuracy in detecting TBI. For TBI patients with diffuse injuries, high levels of exosomal GFAP and NF light chains were detected. Several studies demonstrated miRNA profile changes in the CSF and serum plasma after various severities of TBI at several points in time. They showed the significant correlation between different levels of miRNA in the CSF and the blood of patients and the severity of the injury, which helps diagnose TBI patients and determines the severity of their injury. In addition, the isolation of exosomes and miRNAs is a more feasible process than the conventional fluid proteins. However, the current limitation for miRNA biomarkers is the variable expression in different individuals, particularly those with altered consciousness. This heterogeneity challenges determining the optimal miRNAs and cutoff values for TBI diagnosis and prognosis. Despite the current knowledge on the potential of exosomes and miRNAs, these biomarkers have not yet been optimized for clinical practice. However, according to the existing literature, they hold the promise as future biomarkers. Further research into exosomes and miRNAs in different TBI pathologies and at different time intervals is recommended to move them from the bedside to practice.
Data Availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Mollayeva T, Mollayeva S, Colantonio A (2018) Traumatic brain injury: sex, gender and intersecting vulnerabilities. Nat Rev Neurol 14(12):711–722. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0091-y
Jiang JY, Gao GY, Feng JF, Mao Q, Chen LG, Yang XF, Liu JF, Wang YH et al (2019) Traumatic brain injury in China. Lancet Neurol 18(3):286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30469-1
Dixon KJ (2017) Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 28(2):215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2016.12.001
Williams WH, Chitsabesan P, Fazel S, McMillan T, Hughes N, Parsonage M, Tonks J (2018) Traumatic brain injury: a potential cause of violent crime? Lancet Psychiatry 5(10):836–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30062-2
Pearn ML, Niesman IR, Egawa J, Sawada A, Almenar-Queralt A, Shah SB, Duckworth JL, Head BP (2017) Pathophysiology associated with traumatic brain injury: current treatments and potential novel therapeutics. Cell Mol Neurobiol 37(4):571–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-016-0400-1
Vella MA, Crandall ML, Patel MB (2017) Acute management of traumatic brain injury. Surg Clin North Am 97(5):1015–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2017.06.003
Martinez B, Peplow PV (2017) MicroRNAs as diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for traumatic brain injury. Neural Regen Res 12(11):1749–1761. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.219025
Ladak AA, Enam SA, Ibrahim MT (2019) A review of the molecular mechanisms of traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg 131:126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.039
Karnati HK, Garcia JH, Tweedie D, Becker RE, Kapogiannis D, Greig NH (2019) Neuronal enriched extracellular vesicle proteins as biomarkers for traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 36(7):975–987. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.5898
Wang KK, Yang Z, Zhu T, Shi Y, Rubenstein R, Tyndall JA, Manley GT (2018) An update on diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for traumatic brain injury. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 18(2):165–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2018.1428089
Azar S, Hasan A, Younes R, Najdi F, Baki L, Ghazale H, Kobeissy FH, Zibara K et al (2017) Biofluid proteomics and biomarkers in traumatic brain injury. Methods Mol Biol 1598:45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6952-4_3
Shin SS, Bales JW, Edward Dixon C, Hwang M (2017) Structural imaging of mild traumatic brain injury may not be enough: overview of functional and metabolic imaging of mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav 11(2):591–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-017-9684-0
Rakib F, Al-Saad K, Ahmed T, Ullah E, Barreto GE, Md Ashraf G, Ali MHM (2021) Biomolecular alterations in acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) imaging spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 248:119189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2020.119189
Gill J, Latour L, Diaz-Arrastia R, Motamedi V, Turtzo C, Shahim P, Mondello S, DeVoto C et al (2018) Glial fibrillary acidic protein elevations relate to neuroimaging abnormalities after mild TBI. Neurology 91(15):e1385–e1389. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006321
Zetterberg H, Blennow K (2016) Fluid biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury and related conditions. Nat Rev Neurol 12(10):563–574. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.127
Sarkis GA, Mangaonkar MD, Moghieb A, Lelling B, Guertin M, Yadikar H, Yang Z, Kobeissy F et al (2017) The application of proteomics to traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 17(3):23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0736-z
Lorente L (2017) Biomarkers associated with the outcome of traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Sci 7(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7110142
Cheng F, Yuan Q, Yang J, Wang W, Liu H (2014) The prognostic value of serum neuron-specific enolase in traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(9):e106680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106680
Mercier E, Boutin A, Shemilt M, Lauzier F, Zarychanski R, Fergusson DA, Moore L, McIntyre LA et al (2016) Predictive value of neuron-specific enolase for prognosis in patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ Open 4(3):E371–E382. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20150061
Gong B, Leznik E (2007) The role of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 in neurodegenerative disorders. Drug News Perspect 20(6):365–370. https://doi.org/10.1358/dnp.2007.20.6.1138160
Mondello S, Linnet A, Buki A, Robicsek S, Gabrielli A, Tepas J, Papa L, Brophy GM et al (2012) Clinical utility of serum levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase as a biomarker for severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery 70(3):666–675. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318236a809
Li J, Yu C, Sun Y, Li Y (2015) Serum ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 as a biomarker for traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 33(9):1191–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.023
Mondello S, Thelin EP, Shaw G, Salzet M, Visalli C, Cizkova D, Kobeissy F, Buki A (2018) Extracellular vesicles: pathogenetic, diagnostic and therapeutic value in traumatic brain injury. Expert Rev Proteomics 15(5):451–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2018.1464914
Liu MC, Akinyi L, Scharf D, Mo J, Larner SF, Muller U, Oli MW, Zheng W et al (2010) Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 as a biomarker for ischemic and traumatic brain injury in rats. Eur J Neurosci 31(4):722–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07097.x
Papa L, Akinyi L, Liu MC, Pineda JA, Tepas JJ 3rd, Oli MW, Zheng W, Robinson G et al (2010) Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase is a novel biomarker in humans for severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 38(1):138–144. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b788ab
Mondello S, Muller U, Jeromin A, Streeter J, Hayes RL, Wang KK (2011) Blood-based diagnostics of traumatic brain injuries. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 11(1):65–78. https://doi.org/10.1586/erm.10.104
Barreto GE, White RE, Xu L, Palm CJ, Giffard RG (2012) Effects of heat shock protein 72 (Hsp72) on evolution of astrocyte activation following stroke in the mouse. Exp Neurol 238(2):284–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.08.015
Adelson JD, Barreto GE, Xu L, Kim T, Brott BK, Ouyang YB, Naserke T, Djurisic M et al (2012) Neuroprotection from stroke in the absence of MHCI or PirB. Neuron 73(6):1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.020
Barreto G, White RE, Ouyang Y, Xu L, Giffard RG (2011) Astrocytes: targets for neuroprotection in stroke. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem 11(2):164–173. https://doi.org/10.2174/187152411796011303
Barreto GE, Sun X, Xu L, Giffard RG (2011) Astrocyte proliferation following stroke in the mouse depends on distance from the infarct. PLoS One 6(11):e27881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027881
Barreto G, Santos-Galindo M, Diz-Chaves Y, Pernia O, Carrero P, Azcoitia I, Garcia-Segura LM (2009) Selective estrogen receptor modulators decrease reactive astrogliosis in the injured brain: effects of aging and prolonged depletion of ovarian hormones. Endocrinology 150(11):5010–5015. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-0352
Barreto G, Veiga S, Azcoitia I, Garcia-Segura LM, Garcia-Ovejero D (2007) Testosterone decreases reactive astroglia and reactive microglia after brain injury in male rats: role of its metabolites, oestradiol and dihydrotestosterone. Eur J Neurosci 25(10):3039–3046. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05563.x
Kawata K, Tierney R, Langford D (2018) Blood and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Handb Clin Neurol 158:217–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63954-7.00022-7
Hearst SM, Walker LR, Shao Q, Lopez M, Raucher D, Vig PJ (2011) The design and delivery of a thermally responsive peptide to inhibit S100B-mediated neurodegeneration. Neuroscience 197:369–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.09.025
Kleindienst A, Schmidt C, Parsch H, Emtmann I, Xu Y, Buchfelder M (2010) The passage of S100B from brain to blood is not specifically related to the blood-brain barrier integrity. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol 2010:801295. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/801295
Pfortmueller CA, Drexel C, Krahenmann-Muller S, Leichtle AB, Fiedler GM, Lindner G, Exadaktylos AK (2016) S-100 B concentrations are a predictor of decreased survival in patients with major trauma, independently of head injury. PLoS One 11(3):e0152822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152822
Unden J, Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B, Scandinavian Neurotrauma C (2013) Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries in adults: an evidence and consensus-based update. BMC Med 11:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-50
Abbasi M, Sajjadi M, Fathi M, Maghsoudi M (2014) Serum S100B protein as an outcome prediction tool in emergency department patients with traumatic brain injury. Turk J Emerg Med 14(4):147–152. https://doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.74317
Papa L, Silvestri S, Brophy GM, Giordano P, Falk JL, Braga CF, Tan CN, Ameli NJ et al (2014) GFAP out-performs S100beta in detecting traumatic intracranial lesions on computed tomography in trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury and those with extracranial lesions. J Neurotrauma 31(22):1815–1822. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.3245
Crespo-Castrillo A, Yanguas-Casas N, Arevalo MA, Azcoitia I, Barreto GE, Garcia-Segura LM (2018) The synthetic steroid tibolone decreases reactive gliosis and neuronal death in the cerebral cortex of female mice after a stab wound injury. Mol Neurobiol 55(11):8651–8667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-018-1008-x
Barreto GE (2016) Targeting astrocytes in brain injuries: a translational research approach. Prog Neurobiol 144:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.09.001
Barreto GE, Black JA (2014) Introduction. Astrocytes in the injured brain: is gliosis adaptive or maladaptive? Neurosci Lett 565:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.01.052
Barreto GE, Gonzalez J, Torres Y, Morales L (2011) Astrocytic-neuronal crosstalk: implications for neuroprotection from brain injury. Neurosci Res 71(2):107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2011.06.004
Martin-Jimenez C, Gaitan-Vaca DM, Areiza N, Echeverria V, Ashraf GM, Gonzalez J, Sahebkar A, Garcia-Segura LM et al (2019) Astrocytes mediate protective actions of estrogenic compounds after traumatic brain injury. Neuroendocrinology 108(2):142–160. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495078
Acaz-Fonseca E, Avila-Rodriguez M, Garcia-Segura LM, Barreto GE (2016) Regulation of astroglia by gonadal steroid hormones under physiological and pathological conditions. Prog Neurobiol 144:5–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.06.002
Baez-Jurado E, Vega GG, Aliev G, Tarasov VV, Esquinas P, Echeverria V, Barreto GE (2018) Blockade of neuroglobin reduces protection of conditioned medium from human mesenchymal stem cells in human astrocyte model (T98G) under a scratch assay. Mol Neurobiol 55(3):2285–2300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0481-y
Zhang Z, Zoltewicz JS, Mondello S, Newsom KJ, Yang Z, Yang B, Kobeissy F, Guingab J et al (2014) Human traumatic brain injury induces autoantibody response against glial fibrillary acidic protein and its breakdown products. PLoS One 9(3):e92698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092698
Siedler DG, Chuah MI, Kirkcaldie MT, Vickers JC, King AE (2014) Diffuse axonal injury in brain trauma: insights from alterations in neurofilaments. Front Cell Neurosci 8:429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00429
Tomar GS, Singh GP, Lahkar D, Sengar K, Nigam R, Mohan M, Anindya R (2018) New biomarkers in brain trauma. Clin Chim Acta 487:325–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.10.025
Yuan A, Rao MV, Veeranna, Nixon RA (2017) Neurofilaments and neurofilament proteins in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a018309
Lambertsen KL, Soares CB, Gaist D, Nielsen HH (2020) Neurofilaments: the C-reactive protein of neurology. Brain Sci 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010056
Shahim P, Gren M, Liman V, Andreasson U, Norgren N, Tegner Y, Mattsson N, Andreasen N et al (2016) Serum neurofilament light protein predicts clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep 6:36791. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36791
Khalil M, Teunissen CE, Otto M, Piehl F, Sormani MP, Gattringer T, Barro C, Kappos L et al (2018) Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 14(10):577–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0058-z
Anderson KJ, Scheff SW, Miller KM, Roberts KN, Gilmer LK, Yang C, Shaw G (2008) The phosphorylated axonal form of the neurofilament subunit NF-H (pNF-H) as a blood biomarker of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 25(9):1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2007.0488
Kim HJ, Tsao JW, Stanfill AG (2018) The current state of biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury. JCI Insight 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.97105
Mehta T, Fayyaz M, Giler GE, Kaur H, Raikwar SP, Kempuraj D, Selvakumar GP, Ahmed ME et al (2020) Current trends in biomarkers for traumatic brain injury. Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg 12(4):86–94
Berger RP, Adelson PD, Pierce MC, Dulani T, Cassidy LD, Kochanek PM (2005) Serum neuron-specific enolase, S100B, and myelin basic protein concentrations after inflicted and noninflicted traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurosurg 103(1 Suppl):61–68. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2005.103.1.0061
Yamazaki Y, Yada K, Morii S, Kitahara T, Ohwada T (1995) Diagnostic significance of serum neuron-specific enolase and myelin basic protein assay in patients with acute head injury. Surg Neurol 43(3):267–270; discussion 270-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68231-8_86
Thomas DG, Palfreyman JW, Ratcliffe JG (1978) Serum-myelin-basic-protein assay in diagnosis and prognosis of patients with head injury. Lancet 1(8056):113–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90415-4
Alonso AC, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K (1996) Alzheimer’s disease hyperphosphorylated tau sequesters normal tau into tangles of filaments and disassembles microtubules. Nat Med 2(7):783–787. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0796-783
Wang J, Li J, Han L, Guo S, Wang L, Xiong Z, Chen Z, Chen W et al (2016) Serum tau protein as a potential biomarker in the assessment of traumatic brain injury. Exp Ther Med 11(3):1147–1151. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3017
Ost M, Nylen K, Csajbok L, Ohrfelt AO, Tullberg M, Wikkelso C, Nellgard P, Rosengren L et al (2006) Initial CSF total tau correlates with 1-year outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurology 67(9):1600–1604. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000242732.06714.0f
Franz G, Beer R, Kampfl A, Engelhardt K, Schmutzhard E, Ulmer H, Deisenhammer F (2003) Amyloid beta 1-42 and tau in cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurology 60(9):1457–1461. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000063313.57292.00
Papa L, Ramia MM, Edwards D, Johnson BD, Slobounov SM (2015) Systematic review of clinical studies examining biomarkers of brain injury in athletes after sports-related concussion. J Neurotrauma 32(10):661–673. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2014.3655
Visser K, Koggel M, Blaauw J, van der Horn HJ, Jacobs B, van der Naalt J (2022) Blood-based biomarkers of inflammation in mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 132:154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.11.036
Woodcock T, Morganti-Kossmann MC (2013) The role of markers of inflammation in traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol 4:18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00018
Johnson VE, Stewart JE, Begbie FD, Trojanowski JQ, Smith DH, Stewart W (2013) Inflammation and white matter degeneration persist for years after a single traumatic brain injury. Brain 136(Pt 1):28–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws322
Tasci A, Okay O, Gezici AR, Ergun R, Ergungor F (2003) Prognostic value of interleukin-1 beta levels after acute brain injury. Neurol Res 25(8):871–874. https://doi.org/10.1179/016164103771953998
Stein DM, Lindell AL, Murdock KR, Kufera JA, Menaker J, Bochicchio GV, Aarabi B, Scalea TM (2012) Use of serum biomarkers to predict cerebral hypoxia after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 29(6):1140–1149. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2149
Shen LJ, Yang SB, Lv QW, Zhang GH, Zhou J, Guo M, Huang HB, Li Z et al. (2014) High plasma adiponectin levels in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Clin Chim Acta 427:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.047
Wang KY, Yu GF, Zhang ZY, Huang Q, Dong XQ (2012) Plasma high-mobility group box 1 levels and prediction of outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. Clin Chim Acta 413(21-22):1737–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2012.07.002
Gao TL, Yuan XT, Yang D, Dai HL, Wang WJ, Peng X, Shao HJ, Jin ZF et al (2012) Expression of HMGB1 and RAGE in rat and human brains after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72(3):643–649. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823c54a6
Shen YF, Yu WH, Dong XQ, Du Q, Yang DB, Wu GQ, Zhang ZY, Wang H et al (2016) The change of plasma galectin-3 concentrations after traumatic brain injury. Clin Chim Acta 456:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.02.029
Pan JW, Gao XW, Jiang H, Li YF, Xiao F, Zhan RY (2015) Low serum ficolin-3 levels are associated with severity and poor outcome in traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation 12:226. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0444-z
Yu W, Le HW, Lu YG, Hu JA, Yu JB, Wang M, Shen W (2015) High levels of serum mannose-binding lectins are associated with the severity and clinical outcomes of severe traumatic brain injury. Clin Chim Acta 451(Pt B):111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2015.10.017
Karttunen J, Heiskanen M, Lipponen A, Poulsen D, Pitkanen A (2019) Extracellular vesicles as diagnostics and therapeutics for structural epilepsies. Int J Mol Sci 20(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061259
Fruhbeis C, Frohlich D, Kuo WP, Kramer-Albers EM (2013) Extracellular vesicles as mediators of neuron-glia communication. Front Cell Neurosci 7:182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00182
Yang Y, Boza-Serrano A, Dunning CJR, Clausen BH, Lambertsen KL, Deierborg T (2018) Inflammation leads to distinct populations of extracellular vesicles from microglia. J Neuroinflammation 15(1):168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1204-7
Beard K, Meaney DF, Issadore D (2020) Clinical applications of extracellular vesicles in the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 37(19):2045–2056. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.6990
Borges FT, Reis LA, Schor N (2013) Extracellular vesicles: structure, function, and potential clinical uses in renal diseases. Braz J Med Biol Res 46(10):824–830. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20132964
Wickman G, Julian L, Olson MF (2012) How apoptotic cells aid in the removal of their own cold dead bodies. Cell Death Differ 19(5):735–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2012.25
Todorova D, Simoncini S, Lacroix R, Sabatier F, Dignat-George F (2017) Extracellular vesicles in angiogenesis. Circ Res 120(10):1658–1673. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.309681
Mathivanan S, Simpson RJ (2009) ExoCarta: a compendium of exosomal proteins and RNA. Proteomics 9(21):4997–5000. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200900351
Yuana Y, Levels J, Grootemaat A, Sturk A, Nieuwland R (2014) Co-isolation of extracellular vesicles and high-density lipoproteins using density gradient ultracentrifugation. J Extracell Vesicles 3. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v3.23262
Wu M, Ouyang Y, Wang Z, Zhang R, Huang PH, Chen C, Li H, Li P et al (2017) Isolation of exosomes from whole blood by integrating acoustics and microfluidics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(40):10584–10589. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1709210114
Caradec J, Kharmate G, Hosseini-Beheshti E, Adomat H, Gleave M, Guns E (2014) Reproducibility and efficiency of serum-derived exosome extraction methods. Clin Biochem 47(13-14):1286–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.06.011
Lamparski HG, Metha-Damani A, Yao JY, Patel S, Hsu DH, Ruegg C, Le Pecq JB (2002) Production and characterization of clinical grade exosomes derived from dendritic cells. J Immunol Methods 270(2):211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1759(02)00330-7
Busatto S, Vilanilam G, Ticer T, Lin WL, Dickson DW, Shapiro S, Bergese P, Wolfram J (2018) Tangential flow filtration for highly efficient concentration of extracellular vesicles from large volumes of fluid. Cells 7(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells7120273
Tiwari S, Kumar V, Randhawa S, Verma SK (2021) Preparation and characterization of extracellular vesicles. Am J Reprod Immunol 85(2):e13367. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.13367
Xia N, Hunt TP, Mayers BT, Alsberg E, Whitesides GM, Westervelt RM, Ingber DE (2006) Combined microfluidic-micromagnetic separation of living cells in continuous flow. Biomed Microdevices 8(4):299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-006-0033-0
Hyun KA, Kim J, Gwak H, Jung HI (2016) Isolation and enrichment of circulating biomarkers for cancer screening, detection, and diagnostics. Analyst 141(2):382–392. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5an01762a
Ko J, Carpenter E, Issadore D (2016) Detection and isolation of circulating exosomes and microvesicles for cancer monitoring and diagnostics using micro-/nano-based devices. Analyst 141(2):450–460. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5an01610j
Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442(7101):368–373. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05058
Dietzel A (2016) A brief introduction to microfluidics. In: Dietzel A (ed) Microsystems for pharmatechnology manipulation of fluids, particles, droplets, and cells. Springer, Germany, pp. 1–21
Salafi T, Zeming KK, Zhang Y (2016) Advancements in microfluidics for nanoparticle separation. Lab Chip 17(1):11–33. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc01045h
Lei P, Li Y, Chen X, Yang S, Zhang J (2009) Microarray based analysis of microRNA expression in rat cerebral cortex after traumatic brain injury. Brain Res 1284:191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.074
Hu Z, Yu D, Almeida-Suhett C, Tu K, Marini AM, Eiden L, Braga MF, Zhu J et al (2012) Expression of miRNAs and their cooperative regulation of the pathophysiology in traumatic brain injury. PLoS One 7(6):e39357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039357
Redell JB, Moore AN, Ward NH 3rd, Hergenroeder GW, Dash PK (2010) Human traumatic brain injury alters plasma microRNA levels. J Neurotrauma 27(12):2147–2156. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1481
Di Pietro V, Ragusa M, Davies D, Su Z, Hazeldine J, Lazzarino G, Hill LJ, Crombie N et al (2017) MicroRNAs as novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of mild and severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 34(11):1948–1956. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2016.4857
Bhomia M, Balakathiresan NS, Wang KK, Papa L, Maheshwari RK (2016) A panel of serum MiRNA biomarkers for the diagnosis of severe to mild traumatic brain injury in humans. Sci Rep 6:28148. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28148
Hicks SD, Johnson J, Carney MC, Bramley H, Olympia RP, Loeffert AC, Thomas NJ (2018) Overlapping microRNA expression in saliva and cerebrospinal fluid accurately identifies pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 35(1):64–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5111
Qin X, Li L, Lv Q, Shu Q, Zhang Y, Wang Y (2018) Expression profile of plasma microRNAs and their roles in diagnosis of mild to severe traumatic brain injury. PLoS One 13(9):e0204051. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204051
Manek R, Moghieb A, Yang Z, Kumar D, Kobessiy F, Sarkis GA, Raghavan V, Wang KKW (2018) Protein biomarkers and neuroproteomics characterization of microvesicles/exosomes from human cerebrospinal fluid following traumatic brain injury. Mol Neurobiol 55(7):6112–6128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0821-y
Ko J, Hemphill M, Yang Z, Sewell E, Na YJ, Sandsmark DK, Haber M, Fisher SA et al (2018) Diagnosis of traumatic brain injury using miRNA signatures in nanomagnetically isolated brain-derived extracellular vesicles. Lab Chip 18(23):3617–3630. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8lc00672e
Kuharic J, Grabusic K, Tokmadzic VS, Stifter S, Tulic K, Shevchuk O, Lucin P, Sustic A (2019) Severe traumatic brain injury induces early changes in the physical properties and protein composition of intracranial extracellular vesicles. J Neurotrauma 36(2):190–200. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5515
Goetzl EJ, Elahi FM, Mustapic M, Kapogiannis D, Pryhoda M, Gilmore A, Gorgens KA, Davidson B et al (2019) Altered levels of plasma neuron-derived exosomes and their cargo proteins characterize acute and chronic mild traumatic brain injury. FASEB J 33(4):5082–5088. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201802319R
Cheng Y, Pereira M, Raukar N, Reagan JL, Queseneberry M, Goldberg L, Borgovan T, LaFrance WC Jr et al (2019) Potential biomarkers to detect traumatic brain injury by the profiling of salivary extracellular vesicles. J Cell Physiol 234(8):14377–14388. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28139
Winston CN, Romero HK, Ellisman M, Nauss S, Julovich DA, Conger T, Hall JR, Campana W et al (2019) Assessing neuronal and astrocyte derived exosomes from individuals with mild traumatic brain injury for markers of neurodegeneration and cytotoxic activity. Front Neurosci 13:1005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01005
Puffer RC, Cumba Garcia LM, Himes BT, Jung MY, Meyer FB, Okonkwo DO, Parney IF (2020) Plasma extracellular vesicles as a source of biomarkers in traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 134(6):1921–1928. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.4.JNS20305
Fruhbeis C, Frohlich D, Kuo WP, Amphornrat J, Thilemann S, Saab AS, Kirchhoff F, Mobius W et al (2013) Neurotransmitter-triggered transfer of exosomes mediates oligodendrocyte-neuron communication. PLoS Biol 11(7):e1001604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001604
Scheper W, Hoozemans JJ (2015) The unfolded protein response in neurodegenerative diseases: a neuropathological perspective. Acta Neuropathol 130(3):315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1462-8
Brady RD, Bird S, Sun M, Yamakawa GR, Major BP, Mychasiuk R, O'Brien TJ, McDonald SJ et al (2021) Activation of the protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) pathway of the unfolded protein response after experimental traumatic brain injury and treatment with a PERK inhibitor. Neurotrauma Rep 2(1):330–342. https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2021.0001
Chen Y, Holstein DM, Aime S, Bollo M, Lechleiter JD (2016) Calcineurin beta protects brain after injury by activating the unfolded protein response. Neurobiol Dis 94:139–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2016.06.011
Furmanik M, van Gorp R, Whitehead M, Ahmad S, Bordoloi J, Kapustin A, Schurgers LJ, Shanahan CM (2021) Endoplasmic reticulum stress mediates vascular smooth muscle cell calcification via increased release of Grp78 (glucose-regulated protein, 78 kDa)-loaded extracellular vesicles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 41(2):898–914. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315506
Klionsky DJ (2004) Cell biology: regulated self-cannibalism. Nature 431(7004):31–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/431031a
Levine B, Kroemer G (2008) SnapShot: macroautophagy. Cell 132(1):162 e161–162 e163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.026
Sun L, Gao J, Zhao M, Cui J, Li Y, Yang X, Jing X, Wu Z (2015) A novel cognitive impairment mechanism that astrocytic p-connexin 43 promotes neuronic autophagy via activation of P2X7R and down-regulation of GLT-1 expression in the hippocampus following traumatic brain injury in rats. Behav Brain Res 291:315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.049
Sun L, Zhao M, Wang Y, Liu A, Lv M, Li Y, Yang X, Wu Z (2017) Neuroprotective effects of miR-27a against traumatic brain injury via suppressing FoxO3a-mediated neuronal autophagy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 482(4):1141–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.12.001
Sun L, Liu A, Zhang J, Ji W, Li Y, Yang X, Wu Z, Guo J (2018) miR-23b improves cognitive impairments in traumatic brain injury by targeting ATG12-mediated neuronal autophagy. Behav Brain Res 340:126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.020
Su Z, Yang Z, Xu Y, Chen Y, Yu Q (2015) MicroRNAs in apoptosis, autophagy and necroptosis. Oncotarget 6(11):8474–8490. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3523
Li D, Huang S, Zhu J, Hu T, Han Z, Zhang S, Zhao J, Chen F et al (2019) Exosomes from MiR-21-5p-increased neurons play a role in neuroprotection by suppressing Rab11a-mediated neuronal autophagy in vitro after traumatic brain injury. Med Sci Monit 25:1871–1885. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.915727
Li D, Huang S, Yin Z, Zhu J, Ge X, Han Z, Tan J, Zhang S et al (2019) Increases in miR-124-3p in microglial exosomes confer neuroprotective effects by targeting FIP200-mediated neuronal autophagy following traumatic brain injury. Neurochem Res 44(8):1903–1923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-019-02825-1
Ferreira JV, Rosa Soares A, Ramalho JS, Ribeiro-Rodrigues T, Maximo C, Zuzarte M, Girao H, Pereira P (2019) Exosomes and STUB1/CHIP cooperate to maintain intracellular proteostasis. PLoS One 14(10):e0223790. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223790
Shi M, Sheng L, Stewart T, Zabetian CP, Zhang J (2019) New windows into the brain: central nervous system-derived extracellular vesicles in blood. Prog Neurobiol 175:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.01.005
Takeshita N, Hoshino I, Mori M, Akutsu Y, Hanari N, Yoneyama Y, Ikeda N, Isozaki Y et al (2013) Serum microRNA expression profile: miR-1246 as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 108(3):644–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.8
Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C (2014) Exosome platform for diagnosis and monitoring of traumatic brain injury. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 369(1652). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0503
Mondello S, Guedes VA, Lai C, Czeiter E, Amrein K, Kobeissy F, Mechref Y, Jeromin A et al (2020) Circulating brain injury exosomal proteins following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: temporal profile, outcome prediction and therapy implications. Cells 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040977
Guedes VA, Kenney K, Shahim P, Qu BX, Lai C, Devoto C, Walker WC, Nolen T et al (2020) Exosomal neurofilament light: a prognostic biomarker for remote symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury? Neurology 94(23):e2412–e2423. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009577
Zhao Z, Zhou Y, Tian Y, Li M, Dong JF, Zhang J (2017) Cellular microparticles and pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Protein Cell 8(11):801–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-017-0414-6
Kumar A, Stoica BA, Loane DJ, Yang M, Abulwerdi G, Khan N, Kumar A, Thom SR et al (2017) Microglial-derived microparticles mediate neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation 14(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0819-4
Nekludov M, Bellander BM, Gryth D, Wallen H, Mobarrez F (2017) Brain-derived microparticles in patients with severe isolated TBI. Brain Inj 31(13-14):1856–1862. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1358395
Nekludov M, Mobarrez F, Gryth D, Bellander BM, Wallen H (2014) Formation of microparticles in the injured brain of patients with severe isolated traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 31(23):1927–1933. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.3168
Andrews AM, Lutton EM, Merkel SF, Razmpour R, Ramirez SH (2016) Mechanical injury induces brain endothelial-derived microvesicle release: implications for cerebral vascular injury during traumatic brain injury. Front Cell Neurosci 10:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00043
Morel N, Morel O, Petit L, Hugel B, Cochard JF, Freyssinet JM, Sztark F, Dabadie P (2008) Generation of procoagulant microparticles in cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral blood after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 64(3):698–704. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31816493ad
Nam JW, Rissland OS, Koppstein D, Abreu-Goodger C, Jan CH, Agarwal V, Yildirim MA, Rodriguez A et al (2014) Global analyses of the effect of different cellular contexts on microRNA targeting. Mol Cell 53(6):1031–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.013
Zeng Y (2006) Principles of micro-RNA production and maturation. Oncogene 25(46):6156–6162. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209908
Suzuki HI, Miyazono K (2011) Emerging complexity of microRNA generation cascades. J Biochem 149(1):15–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvq113
Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP (2005) Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 120(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035
Barry G (2014) Integrating the roles of long and small non-coding RNA in brain function and disease. Mol Psychiatry 19(4):410–416. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.196
Shao NY, Hu HY, Yan Z, Xu Y, Hu H, Menzel C, Li N, Chen W et al (2010) Comprehensive survey of human brain microRNA by deep sequencing. BMC Genomics 11:409. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-409
Chen W, Qin C (2015) General hallmarks of microRNAs in brain evolution and development. RNA Biol 12(7):701–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2015.1048954
Eda A, Takahashi M, Fukushima T, Hohjoh H (2011) Alteration of microRNA expression in the process of mouse brain growth. Gene 485(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2011.05.034
Fiore R, Schratt G (2007) MicroRNAs in vertebrate synapse development. ScientificWorldJournal 7:167–177. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2007.196
Adlakha YK, Saini N (2014) Brain microRNAs and insights into biological functions and therapeutic potential of brain enriched miRNA-128. Mol Cancer 13:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-13-33
Ziats MN, Rennert OM (2014) Identification of differentially expressed microRNAs across the developing human brain. Mol Psychiatry 19(7):848–852. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.93
Bak M, Silahtaroglu A, Moller M, Christensen M, Rath MF, Skryabin B, Tommerup N, Kauppinen S (2008) MicroRNA expression in the adult mouse central nervous system. RNA 14(3):432–444. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.783108
Corbin R, Olsson-Carter K, Slack F (2009) The role of microRNAs in synaptic development and function. BMB Rep 42(3):131–135. https://doi.org/10.5483/bmbrep.2009.42.3.131
Wang W, Kwon EJ, Tsai LH (2012) MicroRNAs in learning, memory, and neurological diseases. Learn Mem 19(9):359–368. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.026492.112
Mitra B, Rau TF, Surendran N, Brennan JH, Thaveenthiran P, Sorich E, Fitzgerald MC, Rosenfeld JV et al (2017) Plasma micro-RNA biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis after traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. J Clin Neurosci 38:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.12.009
Johnson JJ, Loeffert AC, Stokes J, Olympia RP, Bramley H, Hicks SD (2018) Association of salivary microRNA changes with prolonged concussion symptoms. JAMA Pediatr 172(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3884
Taheri S, Tanriverdi F, Zararsiz G, Elbuken G, Ulutabanca H, Karaca Z, Selcuklu A, Unluhizarci K et al (2016) Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for traumatic brain injury-induced hypopituitarism. J Neurotrauma 33(20):1818–1825. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.4281
Lopez JP, Fiori LM, Gross JA, Labonte B, Yerko V, Mechawar N, Turecki G (2014) Regulatory role of miRNAs in polyamine gene expression in the prefrontal cortex of depressed suicide completers. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 17(1):23–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145713000941
Bonauer A, Carmona G, Iwasaki M, Mione M, Koyanagi M, Fischer A, Burchfield J, Fox H et al (2009) MicroRNA-92a controls angiogenesis and functional recovery of ischemic tissues in mice. Science 324(5935):1710–1713. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1174381
Doebele C, Bonauer A, Fischer A, Scholz A, Reiss Y, Urbich C, Hofmann WK, Zeiher AM et al (2010) Members of the microRNA-17-92 cluster exhibit a cell-intrinsic antiangiogenic function in endothelial cells. Blood 115(23):4944–4950. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-01-264812
Joglekar MV, Patil D, Joglekar VM, Rao GV, Reddy DN, Mitnala S, Shouche Y, Hardikar AA (2009) The miR-30 family microRNAs confer epithelial phenotype to human pancreatic cells. Islets 1(2):137–147. https://doi.org/10.4161/isl.1.2.9578
Cano A, Perez-Moreno MA, Rodrigo I, Locascio A, Blanco MJ, del Barrio MG, Portillo F, Nieto MA (2000) The transcription factor snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat Cell Biol 2(2):76–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/35000025
Wu Y, Zhou BP (2010) TNF-alpha/NF-kappaB/Snail pathway in cancer cell migration and invasion. Br J Cancer 102(4):639–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605530
Funding
Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study concept and design: Ahmed Negida and Hazem Ghaith. Searching the literature: Mohamed Essam Abdelrahman, Mohamed H. Nafady, and George E. Barreto. Data collection: Mohamed H. Nafady, Mahmoud Ahmed Ebada, Eshak I. Bahbah, Mohamed Essam Abdelrahman, and George E. Barreto. Manuscript drafting: Asmaa Ahmed Nawar, Mohamed Diaa Gabra, Mahmoud Ahmed Ebada, Eshak I. Bahbah, Hazem Ghaith, George E. Barreto, and Ghulam Md Ashraf. Manuscript revision: Ahmed Negida and George E. Barreto. Supervision: Ahmed Negida.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ghaith, H.S., Nawar, A.A., Gabra, M.D. et al. A Literature Review of Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers. Mol Neurobiol 59, 4141–4158 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-022-02822-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-022-02822-6