Abstract
Introduction
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab when added to standard of care lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) who cannot adequately control their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) despite optimized LLT in Canada.
Methods
An incremental cost-utility analysis was conducted using a Markov cohort state transition model adapted to the Canadian setting. Analyses were conducted from a public health and societal perspective using a lifetime time horizon for Canada. Scenario analyses were conducted on the basis of recommendations from the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) dyslipidemia guidelines.
Results
In ASCVD patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L, adding evolocumab to optimized statin therapy with or without ezetimibe is associated with an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of $66,453 CAD. Furthermore, for every 100 patients treated with evolocumab for lifetime, adding evolocumab to optimized LLT will prevent approximately 52 cardiovascular (CV) events, of which seven would be fatal. The results are generally robust using univariate and simultaneous variation in model input parameters. Scenario analyses for patient populations as per the CCS guidelines suggest that evolocumab added to optimized LLT may be considered cost-effective, given an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) threshold of CAD$100,000 per QALY gained. Limitations associated with this analysis should be interpreted in the context of data and modeling assumptions used.
Conclusion
Overall, this analysis supports reimbursement of evolocumab by payers in patients with ASCVD who cannot reach LDL-C thresholds despite optimized LLT to reduce unnecessary fatal and non-fatal CV events.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Why carry out this study? |
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a major public health problem associated with increasing incidence, hospitalizations, mortality and considerable economic burden in Canada. |
As a result of recent clinical studies published, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are now universally recommended across global lipid guidelines as add-ons to lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) with statin (± ezetimibe) when treatment intensification is required. |
Evolocumab is one such PCSK9 inhibitor that has demonstrated reduced risk of recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events in patients whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are above threshold despite optimized LLT. A robust clinical development program has consistently demonstrated significant reductions in LDL-C in patients on statin therapy, with a favorable safety profile. |
This study was conducted to understand the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab when used as an add-on treatment for patients with ASCVD who cannot adequately control their LDL-C despite optimized LLT in Canada. |
What was learned from the study? |
The base case considered patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) and baseline LDL-C ≥1.8 mmol/L with evolocumab as add-on treatment to optimized LLT of statins with or without ezetimibe. These patients with ASCVD are at higher risk of additional CV events. |
Scenario analyses were also conducted on the basis of additional recommendations included in the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines. |
To our knowledge, this is the first Canadian study to assess the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab as an add-on treatment for patients with ASCVD with LDL-C above the recommended threshold levels despite optimized LLT in the context of the updated Canadian Cardiovascular Society dyslipidemia guidelines. |
This analysis supports reimbursement of evolocumab by payers in patients with ASCVD who cannot reach LDL-C thresholds despite optimized LLT to reduce unnecessary fatal and non-fatal CV events. |
Introduction
Hypercholesterolemia is a lipid metabolism disorder characterized by unusually high cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoproteins in blood. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) refers to all clinical conditions of atherosclerotic origin, including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), myocardial infarction (MI), stable or unstable angina, coronary artery disease documented by angiography, coronary or other arterial revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery, femoral popliteal bypass graft surgery, etc.), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), documented carotid disease, peripheral artery disease (PAD), and abdominal aortic aneurysm [1]. Numerous interventional, epidemiologic, and genetic studies have established elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as an important modifiable risk factor for ASCVD [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), i.e., a history of prior myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina, and patients with familial hypercholesterolemia with ASCVD or another major risk factor are most likely to experience a fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular event [8]. The mean LDL-C of 10,000 patients with ASCVD receiving standard of care is estimated to be 3.2 mmol/L, accounting for an additional 113 MIs, 137 ischemic strokes (IS), and 72 deaths over 1 year [9]. Therefore, aggressive and timely LDL-C lowering is extremely important in such a high-risk patient population [5, 10,11,12].
With increasing incidence, hospitalizations, and mortality, ASCVD is a major public health problem associated with considerable economic burden in Canada [13,14,15,16]. In 2017–2018, there were 71,192 hospitalizations associated with acute MI alone, making it the third most common cause of hospitalization in Canada [16]. Heart disease and stroke were the second and third leading cause of death in Canada in 2018 [17]. While most patients with MI or stroke survive, there are serious long-term consequences to non-fatal acute cardiovascular (CV) events [18] including impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL), decreased mobility and functionality, worsening anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sexual dysfunction [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Diminishing HRQoL caused by initial MI is also associated with progression of atherosclerosis and deteriorating outcomes [25]. In 2010, the direct and indirect cost resulting from CV diseases in Canada was estimated to be $13.1 billion CAD and $0.64 billion CAD, respectively [26].
As a result of recent clinical studies published, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are now universally recommended across global lipid guidelines as add-ons to lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) with statin (± ezetimibe) when treatment intensification is required. The 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Guidelines [1] for the Management of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Adult recommends treatment intensification with PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with ASCVD and LDL-C levels ≥ 1.8 mmol/L despite receiving maximally tolerated dose of statins with or without ezetimibe. In addition, specific subsets of patients with ASCVD and additional CV risk factors such as history of MI, recurrent MI, and recent ACS were shown to derive the largest benefit from treatment intensification with PCSK9 inhibitors (Supplementary Table S1). Furthermore, in patients whose LDL-C levels remain above 2.2 mmol/L, PCSK9 inhibitors are recommended as second-line therapy. The rationale for this recommendation is based on the fact that ezetimibe lowers LDL-C by approximately 20% when added to maximally tolerated statin, meaning that patients with LDL-C > 2.2 mmol/L will not reach threshold LDL-C levels with ezetimibe intensification alone.
Evolocumab is one such PCSK9 inhibitor that has demonstrated reduced risk of recurrent CV events in patients whose LDL-C levels are above threshold despite optimized LLT. A robust clinical development program has consistently demonstrated significant reductions in LDL-C in patients on statin therapy, with a favorable safety profile. In 2017, the FOURIER outcomes trial demonstrated a significant reduction in CV outcomes and favorable safety profile of evolocumab in patients with ASCVD [27,28,29]. Evolocumab was originally approved by Health Canada in September 2015 as an adjunct to diet and maximally tolerated statin in patients with ASCVD who require additional lowering of LDL-C. Following the publication of FOURIER in June 2018, Health Canada approved evolocumab as “an adjunct to diet and standard of care therapy (including moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering therapy), to reduce the risk of MI, stroke, and coronary revascularization in adult patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease” [30].
This study was conducted to understand the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab when used as an add-on treatment for patients with ASCVD who cannot adequately control their LDL-C despite optimized LLT in Canada. The base case considered patients with prior MI and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L with evolocumab as add-on treatment to optimized LLT of statins with or without ezetimibe. In Quebec, 77% of ACS related hospitalizations were due to MI and 23% due to unstable angina [13], thus MI patients represent the bulk of ACS at clinical presentation. These patients with ASCVD are at higher risk of additional CV events [13]. Scenario analyses were also conducted on the basis of additional recommendations included in the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines.
Methods
The cost-utility analysis (CUA) assessed whether evolocumab as an add-on treatment represents a cost-effective use of healthcare resources in Canada for the prevention of CV events in patients with ASCVD who cannot adequately control their LDL-C despite optimized LLT of statins with or without ezetimibe. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Model Structure
A Markov cohort state transition model incorporating the value of preventing multiple events to account for the impact of further events on risk, costs, and utility was used in this economic evaluation. A systematic literature review of modeling-based economic evaluations using CV outcomes (as opposed to intermediate endpoints) was performed to gain insights into modeling methods germane to the development of this CUA [31]. This model was updated for Canada from previously published models for multiple geographies [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Baseline CV event rates were based on findings from statin-treated patients with ASCVD in a routine clinical setting [40, 35] and efficacy data was taken from FOURIER [27, 35]. The model comprises 11 main health states (Supplementary Fig. S1): “other ASCVD”; MI; IS; post-MI; post-IS; MI2+; IS2+; post-MI2+; post-IS2+; CV death; and non-CV death. The “other ASCVD” health state captures less severe CV events that are not impacted by the treatment effect, such as unstable angina or PAD. The states for MI and IS cover the first year period after the event; post-event health states cover the subsequent years. Additionally, the model includes composite health states that are a combination of either two or three post-event health states that were created to retain memory of previous CVD events.
Target Population
To assess cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab added to background LLT (i.e., maximally tolerated statins with or without ezetimibe), one base-case and five scenario analyses were considered. The base-case analysis has been submitted to and evaluated by Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), the health technology assessment agency in Quebec. This evolocumab submission received a positive listing recommendation by INESSS [41]. The populations and subgroups considered in the base-case and scenario analysis are aligned with the populations recommended by the 2021 CSS guidelines [1].
Base-case: Adding evolocumab to patients with prior MI and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L receiving maximally tolerated statins with or without ezetimibe.
Scenario analyses:
-
1.
Adding evolocumab to patients with recurrent MI (second MI within 2 years) and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L receiving background LLT of maximally tolerated statins with or without ezetimibe
-
2.
Adding evolocumab to patients with recent ACS (< 1 year) and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L receiving background LLT of maximally tolerated statins with or without ezetimibe
-
3.
Adding evolocumab to patients with ASCVD and baseline LDL-C > 2.2 mmol/L receiving background LLT of maximally tolerated statins
-
4.
Adding evolocumab to patients with prior MI and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L receiving maximally tolerated statins with or without ezetimibe (base-case population) assuming retirement age of 70 years
-
5.
Adding evolocumab to patients with prior MI and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L receiving background LLT of maximally tolerated statins with or without ezetimibe (base-case population), using medication costs from Ontario Drug Benefit formulary
Note: The model assumes the normal retirement age of 65 years with exception of scenario 4. To assess the impact of indirect costs in the base-case population, scenario 4 assumes the retirement age of 70 years.
Baseline Patient Characteristics
The model uses a baseline CV event rate obtained from statin-treated patients with ASCVD in a routine clinical setting. The baseline CV event rates were derived from observational data from the USA, using a retrospective observational cohort design in patients with ASCVD. The Truven MarketScan database, a large-scale database of claims for the commercially insured and patients with Medicare Supplemental insurance, was used to estimate the rates of non-fatal CV events [40, 35]. The rate of CV death was thus estimated separately by combining NHANES mortality files (2004–2012) [42] and National Vital Statistics Mortality Report 2012 [40, 35]. The CV event rate, defined as non-fatal MI, non-fatal IS, and CV death, in this US practice-based population was 6.40 per 100 patient-years.
The baseline CV event rates are adjusted by age and LDL-C level to ensure they are appropriate for the modeled population of interest. The baseline CV rate is also adjusted for each population depending on the patient’s CV history, as described in Supplementary Table S2.
The directly observed or predicted, then adjusted composite CV event rates at baseline are disaggregated to CV event-specific annual rates for MI, IS, and CV death.
Mortality from non-CVD causes is assumed to be the same as that of the general population and is taken from Canadian national life tables by age and gender [43, 44]. Patients are at concurrent risk of both CV events and non-CVD death. Since these risks are provided by distinct and hence unrelated data sources, it is possible that the sum of all risks can be greater than one. To avoid negative transition probabilities, competing risk adjustment [45] was implemented in the model, whereby in each cycle non-CVD death is first taken into account and CV event-specific transition probabilities are then applied, conditional on being alive.
Treatment Efficacy
Reduction in LDL-C
This economic evaluation employs evolocumab’s efficacy on LDL-C reduction observed in the FOURIER outcomes trial: At 48 weeks, the least-squares mean percentage reduction in LDL-C levels with evolocumab on top of background LLT, as compared with placebo, was 59% (95% CI 58–60%; p < 0.001) [27]. A randomized open-label extension study, OSLER-1 [46, 47], reported similar, sustained reductions in LDL-C for up to 5 years of evolocumab treatment. Thus, the CV event rate reduction, related to the relative LDL-C lowering at week 48, is assumed to remain constant over the modeled time horizon.
Therapy Persistence
Annual completion data from the FOURIER outcomes trial was used to model for discontinuation of evolocumab, using Kaplan–Meier estimates for discontinuation for any reason other than death.
Reduction in CV Event Rates
As summarized by the recent consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS), LDL-C is not merely a biomarker of increased risk but a causal factor in the pathophysiology of CVD [4]. This causal relationship between lowering LDL-C level by 1 mmol/L and reduction of CV events, as reported by the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration (CTTC) meta-analyses, is utilized in this CUA (Table 1) [48]. Pooling all 26 statin trials (a total of 169,138 individuals with a median follow-up of 4.9 years), the rate ratio (RR) for any major vascular event per 1 mmol/L (defined as CHD death, non-fatal MI, stroke, revascularization) of LDL-C reduction was 0.78 (95% CI 0.76–0.80). The model uses endpoint-specific RR reported in Table 1.
Results from the FOURIER outcomes trial with evolocumab showed a statistically significant 20% relative risk reduction in major CV (CV death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke—3-point MACE) events over a median follow-up of 2.2 years [27]. Pre-specified landmark analyses were conducted for patients alive at the end of first year to estimate the effect of evolocumab on outcomes beyond the first year. As a result of this analyses, it was found that the magnitude of relative risk reduction of major CV events grew over time, from 16% in the first year to 25% beyond the first year. When considering time exposure, evolocumab had very similar effects on the risk of major vascular events per 1 mmol/L of LDL-C reduction as compared to statin-based CTTC meta-analysis.
Given that results from FOURIER (after accounting for LDL-C reduction and study duration) are aligned with the overall evidence base for LDL-C-lowering agents [27], it stands to reason to base the treatment effect in the model on the well-established relationship between absolute LDL-C lowering and reduced CV event rates observed in the meta-analyses conducted by the CTTC.
Application of Treatment Effect in the Model
There are three steps in the model to apply the impact of treatment on incidence of CV events:
-
(i)
Definition of baseline LDL-C level: Mean LDL-C of the patient population being evaluated.
-
(ii)
Calculation of absolute LDL-C reduction: The absolute reduction in LDL-C is computed by multiplying the baseline LDL-C level with the relative LDL-C reduction associated with the use of evolocumab as add-on to statin. The treatment effect on LDL-C is taken from the FOURIER outcomes trial. As non-LLTs were permitted in the trial, the model assumes that the impact of non-lipid-modifying therapies on LDL-C is similar across all treatment arms.
-
(iii)
Application of a relationship between LDL-C reduction and improved CV outcomes.
To construct the rate of CV events after treatment, the rate ratios per 1 mmol/L of LDL-C reduction (taken from the CTTC meta-analyses; see Table 1) are applied to the age- and event-specific transition rates at baseline using the following formula:
where, rtx = rate after treatment, r0 = rate at baseline, RR = rate ratio per 1 mmol/L of LDL-C reduction, ΔLDLc = absolute LDL-C reduction in mmol/L.
The modified CV event-specific annual rates are then converted into risks (transition probabilities) for patients treated with evolocumab added to background LLT.
Utility Values and Costs
Measuring and Valuation of Health
CVD health state utilities (Table 1) are derived from a utility study based on a general population sample in the UK [19]. Total QALYs are calculated by applying the state-specific utilities to the probabilities of residing in each state over the modeled lifetime time horizon.
Resource Use and Costs
Medical cost estimates (Supplementary Table S3) relevant to the public healthcare and societal perspective were derived from pertinent Canadian data sources. Given that the modeled patient population is older than the normal retirement age of 65 years in the base case and scenarios 1–3 and 5, only medication costs and other direct healthcare costs associated with the modeled CVD health states are considered. Indirect costs, such as productivity losses and informal care costs, are included in scenario 4, wherein retirement age is assumed to be 70 years. All costs are reported in 2021 CAD$. Total costs are calculated by multiplying the state-specific costs by the probabilities of residing in each health state.
Medication Cost
Medications costs in scenarios 1–4 are based on the list price of drugs according to the Liste des médicaments du régime général (27 May 2021) provided by the Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ) [49]. Additionally, a wholesaler markup fee of 6.5% and dispensing fee of CAD$9.00 were assumed when calculating the annual medication costs finally implemented in the economic model. Medication costs in scenario 5 are based on the list price of drugs according to Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary assuming a wholesaler markup fee of 8.0% and dispensing fee of CAD$8.83 (Supplementary Table S4 [50, 51]).
Health State Costs
The costs per modeled health state including first-year acute and short-term costs as well as post-event costs for subsequent years are applied in the economic evaluation. Direct costs for the health states for MI, IS, and “other ASCVD” were estimated from ICES claims data in the age group ≥ 60 years, based on publicly funded health services records in Ontario [52]. The cost estimate for CV death was obtained from Table 10 of CADTH’s Pharmacoeconomic Review Report on rivaroxaban [53].
This model includes indirect costs beyond the healthcare sector when analyzing scenario 4 with retirement age of 70 years, to reflect the societal perspective in Canada. Indirect costs stem from (i) short-term absenteeism, presenteeism, and caregiver time; (ii) early retirement; (iii) premature mortality.
Economic Analysis
The analysis assumed a lifetime horizon due to the chronic nature of hypercholesterolemia. The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is the primary measure of health benefit. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is calculated as the difference in costs divided by the difference in QALYs. No equity issues were considered relevant to this analysis. An additional QALY has the same weight regardless of the other characteristics of the individuals receiving the health benefit. Additionally, the model evaluates non-fatal CV event rates for MI and IS, RV rates, life years (LY), CV death rates, the 10-year CV event risk, and the number needed to treat (NNT). Costs and outcomes are discounted at an annual rate of 1.5%.
Sensitivity Analyses
Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to reflect input parameter uncertainty and assess its impact on model results.
Univariate Sensitivity Analysis
One-way sensitivity analyses were performed, in which one parameter was varied at a time relative to its base-case value. They were conducted on the following parameters:
-
Reduction in LDL-C
-
CV event rate ratios (per 1 mmol/L LDL-C reduction)
-
Hazard ratios to adjust baseline CV event rates
-
Baseline CV event rates
-
CVD health state costs
-
CVD health state utilities
Efficacy parameters, hazard ratios to adjust baseline CV event rates, and health state utilities were changed to the lower and upper bound of their 95% confidence intervals (CI). A standard error of 10% of the mean values was assumed to calculate the 95% CIs for health state costs.
Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was additionally conducted to fully examine the combined effect of parameter uncertainty on the incremental cost per QALY gained. Appropriate probability distributions were assigned to model parameters on the basis of their respective means and standard errors. Values for parameters were then sampled by Monte Carlo simulation with 1000 iterations in each loop. The model allows the flexible use of alternative distributions.
Results
The results from cost-effectiveness analysis of evolocumab when used as an add-on treatment for patients with ASCVD, who are unable to obtain recommended LDL-C thresholds with conventional LLTs, are detailed in this section.
The results are summarized in three key parts:
Base-Case Results for Patients with prior MI
Adding evolocumab to optimized LLT of maximally tolerated statins with or without ezetimibe is associated with an incremental cost per QALY gained of CAD$66,453, in ASCVD patients with prior MI, and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L (Table 2).
Further, the rate of CV events over a patient’s lifetime is decreased by approximately 21% by adding evolocumab to background LLT in patients with prior MI and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L. The reduction in fatal and non-fatal CV events when evolocumab is added to background LLT would translate into cost savings of approximately CAD$1.86 million for event costs in 100 patients over a lifetime time horizon. Sixteen patients need to be treated to avoid one major CV event (defined as non-fatal MI, non-fatal IS, and CV death) in patients treated with evolocumab added to background LLT compared with background LLT.
Sensitivity Analysis Results
Deterministic Sensitivity Analysis
All parameters that affect the base-case ICER by more than 1% are shown in the tornado diagram (Fig. 1). The ICER is mostly sensitive to the rate ratios per 1 mmol/L of LDL-C reduction for non-fatal IS and CV death events, taken from CTTC meta-analyses. Overall, the one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that base-case results were robust to changes in model input parameters.
Probabilistic Analysis
Results of probabilistic analyses are summarized alongside deterministic estimates in the tornado diagram. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) for the base case illustrates that evolocumab is cost-effective over a range of cost-per-QALY thresholds (Fig. 2). A cost-effectiveness plane (CEP) was also generated for the base case (Fig. 3). This is presented as a scatter plot of every individual simulation as a combination of incremental costs and incremental QALYs. The dotted line illustrates commonly cited thresholds of CAD$100,000 per QALY. Add-on treatment with evolocumab has 99.9% probability of being cost-effective, at a threshold of CAD$100,000.
Scenario Analyses
The cost-effectiveness of evolocumab was also assessed in alternative population definitions that were highlighted in the 2021 CCS guidelines as they can benefit the most from intensified LLT. In addition to these alternative populations, scenarios 4 and 5 explore the impact of different assumptions in the base-case population: increasing the retirement age to 70 years to assess the impact on indirect costs (scenario 4) and using the drug costs based on ODB-Ontario (as a proxy for Canadian drug costs outside of Quebec) instead of RAMQ-Quebec (scenario 5). Table 3 depicts the deterministic and probabilistic scenario analyses results.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first Canadian study to assess the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab as an add-on treatment for patients with ASCVD with LDL-C above the recommended threshold levels despite optimized LLT in the context of the updated Canadian Cardiovascular Society dyslipidemia guidelines.
When used in patients with prior MI and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L, adding evolocumab to background LLT of maximally tolerated statins with or without ezetimibe is associated with an ICER of CAD $66,453/QALY.
For every 100 patients treated with evolocumab for a lifetime, adding evolocumab to optimized LLT of maximally tolerated statins with or without ezetimibe will prevent approximately 52 major CV (defined as non-fatal MI, non-fatal IS, and CV death) events, of which seven would be fatal.
Sensitivity analyses suggest that these findings are generally robust to univariate and simultaneous variation in the model input parameters. At an ICER threshold of CAD$100,000/QALY, the use of evolocumab as an add-on treatment has a 99.9% probability of being cost-effective.
Additionally, scenario analyses were conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab in very high risk populations that were highlighted in the 2021 CCS guidelines as priority groups to receive PCSK9 inhibitors. The results suggest that evolocumab added to background LLT may be considered a cost-effective use of resources, given an ICER threshold of CAD$100,000 per QALY gained, supporting its listing as add-on to optimized statin with or without ezetimibe in patients with recurrent MI with baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L, recent ACS, with baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L and as add-on to optimized statin in patients with ASCVD with baseline LDL-C > 2.2 mmol/L to reduce unnecessary fatal and non-fatal CV events. Further, results of the scenario analysis assuming retirement age of 70 years and thereby including indirect costs also suggest that adding evolocumab to background LLT in patients with prior MI and baseline LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L is considered cost-effective. Finally, the results of the scenario analysis considering medications costs based on the list price of drugs according to Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary are aligned with cost-effectiveness base-case analysis considering RAMQ list prices.
The results of this study align with previous cost-effectiveness studies conducted internationally in the USA and in Saudi Arabia, which found that evolocumab is cost-effective in patients with ASCVD based on Markov models. A cost-effectiveness study from a US-specific societal perspective published in 2019 by Fonarow et al. [36] concluded that adding evolocumab to statin therapy with or without ezetimibe was associated with increased costs and improved outcomes in patients with very high risk ASCVD as defined by the 2018 guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association. Base-case ICERs ranged from $7667 to $56,655 USD per QALY gained for a range of subgroups of patients with ASCVD. Similarly, a study conducted in Saudi Arabia published in 2021 by Alghamdi et al. [54] that evaluated cost-effectiveness of evolocumab for the treatment of dyslipidemia concluded that adding evolocumab to a statin with or without ezetimibe was associated with ICERs ranging from $41,757 to $60,708 USD per QALY in patients with clinically evident ASCVD and baseline LDL cholesterol ≥ 70 or ≥ 100 mg/dL.
The analysis does have some limitations. The predictions of the model were based on extrapolation beyond the duration of the FOURIER trial. Furthermore, any differences in compliance and adherence to evolocumab therapy than those modeled in the analysis based on the FOURIER trial will likely impact cost and clinical effectiveness. There are assumptions made to help simplify the model while ensuring its robustness as a result of a paucity of evidence such as grouping “other ASCVD” as a single health state and its utility value is assumed to be equal to the value attributed to subsequent years of MI. All analyses were conducted considering evolocumab list price in Quebec and Ontario; cost-effectiveness is expected to improve if confidential price discounts are applied as a result of reimbursement agreement and/or third-party negotiations.
There continues to be a high clinical burden of ASCVD and substantial unmet need for secondary prevention of ASCVD in Canada. Specifically, the high clinical burden of ASCVD has been demonstrated by an increasing prevalence rate in Ontario over the past two decades, consequently impacting the economic burden of treatment, which is expected to increase over time [55]. However, current CCS dyslipidemia guidelines have evolved with lower thresholds and new medications, providing opportunity to improve patient outcomes in secondary prevention and reduce this clinical and economic burden in Canada.
Conclusion
This economic evaluation assesses whether evolocumab as an add-on treatment for patients with ASCVD with LDL-C above the recommended threshold levels despite optimized LLT represents a cost-effective use of resources in Canada, having received a positive listing recommendation from INESSS. The results of the analysis suggest that the addition of evolocumab to background LLT in patients with ASCVD and LDL-C levels ≥ 1.8 mmol/L can be considered cost-effective. Various scenario analyses further demonstrated the robustness of the analyses with ICERs similar to the base-case analysis. Results of this analysis strengthen the demonstrated clinical value with confidence that evolocumab provides economic value in patients with ASCVD and inadequate control over LDL-C despite optimized LLT in populations highlighted in the 2021 CCS guidelines.
References
Pearson GJ, Thanassoulis G, Anderson TJ, et al. 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(8):1129–50.
Bhatnagar D, Soran H, Durrington PN. Hypercholesterolaemia and its management. BMJ. 2008;337:a993.
Roth GA, Fihn SD, Mokdad AH, Aekplakorn W, Hasegawa T, Lim SS. High total serum cholesterol, medication coverage and therapeutic control: an analysis of national health examination survey data from eight countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(2):92–101.
Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(32):2459–72.
Catapano A, Graham I, De Backer G, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2999–3058.
Goldstein JL, Brown MS. A century of cholesterol and coronaries: from plaques to genes to statins. Cell. 2015;161(1):161–72.
Landmesser U, John Chapman M, Farnier M, et al. European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society Task Force consensus statement on proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors: practical guidance for use in patients at very high cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(29):2245–55.
Goldberg AC, Hopkins PN, Toth PP, et al. Familial hypercholesterolemia: screening, diagnosis and management of pediatric and adult patients: clinical guidance from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2011;5(3):133–40.
Amgen Inc. Goal achievement among clinical ASCVD and/or HeFH patients after adding ezetimibe to statin therapy. IMS Data. Amgen data on file 2016.
Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S1-45.
Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082–143.
Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk: the task force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J. 2019;41(1):111–88.
Charles River Associates. The burden of acute coronary syndrome: The second leading cause of death in Canada. http://www.crai.com/sites/default/files/publications/Burden-of-acute-coronary-syndrome-in-Canada.pdf. Accessed January 8, 2020.
Chen G, Farris MS, Cowling T, et al. Treatment and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol management in patients diagnosed with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Alberta. Can J Cardiol. 2019;35(7):884–91.
The Conference Board of Canada. Mortality due to heart disease and stroke 2019. https://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/provincial/health/heart.aspx#ftn3-ref. Accessed August 27, 2019.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. Hospital stays in Canada 2019. https://www.cihi.ca/en/hospital-stays-in-canada. Accessed August 27, 2019.
Statistics Canada. Leading causes of death, total population, by age group 2019. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310039401. Accessed August 27, 2019.
Heart and Stroke Foundation. 2014 Report on the Health of Canadians 2014. https://www.heartandstroke.ca/-/media/pdf-files/canada/2017-heart-month/heartandstroke-reportonhealth-2014.ashx?la=en&hash=9860137823BF864C3DE8B4CBBD9F57826A7C40C3. Accessed November 12, 2019.
Matza LS, Stewart KD, Gandra SR, et al. Acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular events on health state utilities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):1–11.
Bach J-P, Riedel O, Pieper L, Klotsche J, Dodel R, Wittchen H-U. Health-related quality of life in patients with a history of myocardial infarction and stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;31(1):68–76.
Simpson E, Pilote L. Quality of life after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Can J Cardiol. 2003;19(5):507–11.
Schweikert B, Hunger M, Meisinger C, König H-H, Gapp O, Holle R. Quality of life several years after myocardial infarction: comparing the MONICA/KORA registry to the general population. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(4):436–43.
De Leon CFM, Krumholz HM, Vaccarino V, et al. A population-based perspective of changes in health-related quality of life after myocardial infarction in older men and women. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(7):609–16.
Brink E, Grankvist G, Karlson BW, Hallberg LR-M. Health-related quality of life in women and men one year after acute myocardial infarction. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(3):749–57.
Agewall S, Henareh L. Low self-estimated quality of life after myocardial infarction and future cardiovascular risk. Int J Cardiol. 2012;157(1):128–9.
Public Health Agency of Canada. Economic burden of illness in Canada 2010. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/science-research/economic-burden-illness-canada-2010/economic-burden-illness-canada-2010.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2019.
Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1713–22.
Nicholls SJ, Puri R, Anderson T, et al. Effect of evolocumab on progression of coronary disease in statin-treated patients: the GLAGOV randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(22):2373–84.
Puri R, Nissen SE, Somaratne R, et al. Impact of PCSK9 inhibition on coronary atheroma progression: rationale and design of Global Assessment of Plaque Regression with a PCSK9 Antibody as Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound (GLAGOV). Am Heart J. 2016;176:83–92.
Amgen Canada Inc. Repatha (evolocumab). Product Monograph 2019.
Amgen Inc. A systematic review of cardiovascular outcomes-based cost effectiveness analyses of lipid lowering therapies. Amgen data on file 2016.
Gandra SR, Villa G, Fonarow GC, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of LDL-C lowering with evolocumab in patients with high cardiovascular risk in the United States. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39(6):313–20.
Toth PP, Danese M, Villa G, et al. Estimated burden of cardiovascular disease and value-based price range for evolocumab in a high-risk, secondary-prevention population in the US payer context. J Med Econ. 2017;20(6):555–64.
Villa G, Lothgren M, Kutikova L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab in patients with high cardiovascular risk in Spain. Clin Ther. 2017;39(4):771-86.e3.
Fonarow GC, Keech AC, Pedersen TR, et al. Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab therapy for reducing cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(10):1069–78.
Fonarow GC, van Hout B, Villa G, Arellano J, Lindgren P. Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of evolocumab in patients with very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(7):691–5.
Borissov B, Urbich M, Georgieva B, Tsenov S, Villa G. Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab in treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia in Bulgaria: measuring health benefit by effectively treated patient-years. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017;5(1):1412753.
Lindh M, Banefelt J, Fox KM, et al. Cardiovascular event rates in a high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk population: estimates from Swedish population-based register data. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019;5(3):225–32.
Landmesser U, Lindgren P, Hagström E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab in patients with a history of myocardial infarction in Sweden. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022;8(1):31–8.
Jena AB, Blumenthal DM, Stevens W, Chou JW, Ton T, Goldman DP. Value of improved lipid control in patients at high risk for adverse cardiac events. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(6):e199–207.
Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS). REPATHA Prévention secondaire des événements cardiovasculaires. Avis transmis au ministre en juillet 2020. https://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/INESSS/Inscription_medicaments/Avis_au_ministre/Aout_2020/Repatha_2020_07.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2021.
CDC. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/. Accessed January 18, 2016.
Statistics Canada. Life expectancy and other elements of the life table, Canada, all provinces except Prince Edward Island. Table 13-10-0114-01, Quebec. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310011401. Accessed September 4, 2019.
Statistics Canada. Deaths, by cause, Chapter IX: Diseases of the circulatory system (I00 to I99). Table 13-10-0147-01. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310014701. Accessed September 4, 2019.
Maruszczak M, Villa G, Lothgren M. Risk adjustments in economic models-what is their impact on predicted rates? Value in Health. 2017;20(9):A753–4.
Koren MJ, Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, et al. Long-term low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering efficacy, persistence, and safety of evolocumab in treatment of hypercholesterolemia: results up to 4 years from the open-label OSLER-1 extension study. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(6):598–607.
Koren MJ, Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, et al. Final report of the OSLER-1 study: long-term evolocumab for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2018;138(Suppl_1):A14154-A.
Baigent C, et al. Cholesterol treatment trialists collaboration (CTTC), efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670–81.
Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ). Liste des médicaments du régime general. May 27, 2021. http://www.ramq.gouv.qc.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/liste_med/2019/liste_med_2019_12_18_en.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2021.
IQVIA. Total Prescription (TRx) by Strength and Molecule. Amgen data on file 2019.
Ministry of Health Ontario. Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary/Comparative Drug Index. June 30, 2021. https://www.formulary.health.gov.on.ca/formulary/. Accessed on July 15, 2021.
ICES. Patient cost by event type. Amgen data on file 2019.
CADTH. Pharmacoeconomic Review Report Rivaroxaban (XARELTO) 2019.
Alghamdi A, Balkhi B, Altowaijri A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of evolocumab for the treatment of dyslipidemia in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Pharmacoecon Open. 2022;6(2):277–91.
Mackinnon ES, Goeree R, Goodman SG, et al. Increasing prevalence and incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in adult patients in Ontario, Canada From 2002 to 2018. CJC Open. 2022;4(2):206–13.
Acknowledgements
Funding
This study was funded by Amgen. Amgen is also funding the journal’s Rapid Service and Open Access Fees.
Medical Writing Support
Medical writing support was provided by Purva Barot, MBA, Sarah Iqbal-Khan, MBA and Brad Millson, MBS from IQVIA.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Raina Rogoza, Laura Martinez, Michael Urbich, Manon Jobin, Dr Jean Grégoire and Salimah Champsi. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Raina Rogoza, Michael Urbich and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Prior Presentation
This manuscript is based on work that has been previously presented and shared. Please find the details below: Abstract/ Poster presented at ISPOR Europe 2020 (Milan, Italy). Poster: https://europe2020-ispor.ipostersessions.com/default.aspx?s=0B-87-7A-06-82-D7-0C-C5-05-F3-59-18-A2-46-33-0B Abstract: https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(20)32796-0/fulltext#articleInformation (Value in Health, Vol. 23, Suppl. 2, S495, December 1, 2020). Repatha ACS submission to INESSS in January 2020. INESSS recommendation, July 2020: https://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/INESSS/Inscription_medicaments/Avis_au_ministre/Aout_2020/Repatha_2020_07.pdf.
Disclosures
Salimah Champsi, Manon Jobin, Raina M. Rogoza and Laura Martinez are employees of Amgen. Dr Jean Grégoire is currently affiliated with Montreal Heart Institute and received funding from Amgen for this research. Michael Urbich is currently affiliated with Biogen and was an employee of Amgen when this research was executed.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Grégoire, J., Champsi, S., Jobin, M. et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Evolocumab in Adult Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Canada. Adv Ther 39, 3262–3279 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02130-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02130-4