Abstract
Introduction
Anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a high incidence and is associated with many disease conditions. Iron dysmetabolism is an important contributor to anemia in CKD patients.
Methods
ALTAI, a randomized, active-controlled, phase 4 trial, investigated the efficacy of roxadustat versus recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on gastrointestinal iron absorption in patients with anemia of CKD (stage 4/5). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to day 15 in gastrointestinal iron absorption (serum iron area under the concentration-time curve; AUC0–3h) following single-dose oral iron.
Results
Twenty-five patients with a mean age of 55.1 years were randomized 1:1 to roxadustat (n = 13) or rHuEPO (n = 12). Baseline iron profiles were similar between treatment groups. Change from baseline to day 15 in serum iron AUC0–3h was not statistically significantly different between the roxadustat and rHuEPO groups. Mean (SD) change from baseline in serum iron AUC0–3h was 11.3 (28.2) g × 3 h/dl in the roxadustat group and − 0.3 (9.7) g × 3 h/dl in the rHuEPO group. Roxadustat treatment was associated with decreased hepcidin and also increased transferrin, soluble transferrin receptor, and total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), with nominal significance. The proportion of patients experiencing one or more adverse events was 38.5% when treated with roxadustat and 16.7% with rHuEPO.
Conclusions
The study showed no significant difference between roxadustat and rHuEPO in iron absorption but was underpowered because of recruitment challenges.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04655027.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Why carry out this study? |
Roxadustat administration has been associated with decreased serum hepcidin levels and increased total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) and/or serum transferrin, but its effect on iron absorption in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear |
This study investigated the effect of roxadustat on gastrointestinal iron absorption in patients with anemia of CKD |
What was learned from the study? |
In this smaller-than-planned study, no significant difference was seen in iron absorption between roxadustat and rHuEPO although roxadustat showed a trend towards greater absorption promoting ability |
Larger, well-designed, and appropriately controlled clinical trials are needed to evaluate any roxadustat-mediated benefit of enhanced iron absorption in patients with CKD-related anemia |
Although underpowered, the findings are consistent with prior reports of reduction in hepcidin and increase in transferrin and TIBC seen with roxadustat compared with erythropoietin-treated patients |
Introduction
Anemia is associated with many health problems [1,2,3]. Both absolute iron deficiency and dysfunctional iron homeostasis contribute to anemia in CKD patients [2, 4, 5]. Inappropriately high levels of hepcidin expression in particular can significantly restrict erythropoiesis [6]. Current standard of care for anemia in patients with CKD is based on iron supplementation and/or erythropoietin (EPO) therapy [7, 8]. However, these therapies do not correct the underlying iron dysmetabolism associated with anemia of CKD [9].
Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are a new class of orally administered drugs for the treatment of anemia of CKD. HIF-PHIs activate the HIF oxygen-sensing pathway and are efficacious in correcting and maintaining hemoglobin (Hb) levels in CKD patients. In addition to promoting erythropoiesis through the increase in endogenous EPO production, HIF-PHIs have been shown to modulate iron metabolism, reduce hepcidin levels, provide increases in total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) and transferrin levels, and potentially reduce the need for intravenous (IV) iron supplementation [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. However, there is no sufficient direct evidence of iron absorption in patients with CKD treated with HIF-PHIs. Dedicated studies are therefore needed to establish the extent to which HIF-PHIs may impact iron absorption, providing more information for future iron management.
Roxadustat is an HIF-PHI indicated in several countries including China [10, 23, 24]. Phase 1 and 2 studies suggested that roxadustat ameliorates many of the abnormalities of iron dysmetabolism in CKD [25, 26]. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of roxadustat were demonstrated in phase 3 studies in > 13,000 patients with anemia of CKD [27,28,29,30,31,32].
This phase 4 study (ALTAI, clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04655027) was designed to investigate changes in gastrointestinal iron absorption with roxadustat in patients with anemia of CKD in the Chinese population.
Methods
Further information is provided in the supplementary materials.
Study Design
ALTAI was a phase 4, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, parallel design, prospective study conducted in multiple sites in China comparing the effect of roxadustat (oral tablets) and rHuEPO [either IV or subcutaneous (SC)] on gastrointestinal iron absorption in patients with anemia of stage 4 and 5 CKD (NCT04655027). Eligible patients were identified and enrolled by the investigator at each participating site from February 22, 2021, with the last patient visit on October 12, 2021. The study comprised a screening period (≤ 3 weeks), a treatment period of 2 weeks, and a follow-up period of 4 weeks (Fig. 1).
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences International Ethical Guidelines, applicable International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, and applicable local health and regulatory requirements. All participants provided written informed consent. The final study protocol and informed consent form were approved by the applicable independent ethics committee or institutional review board for each site (protocol D5741C00002; approved July 13, 2021).
To evaluate eligibility, Hb levels had to be assessed twice, ≥ 7 days apart, during the screening period and could be assessed up to three times during the screening period. Screening period assessments for transferrin saturation (TSAT), ferritin, vitamin B12, serum folate, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and total bilirubin level (TBL) had to be available prior to starting the treatment period.
A ferrokinetic study was performed on day 1 and day 15, in which patients had blood samples taken for serum iron and TIBC immediately before administration of a single oral dose of 100 mg elemental iron (T0h); further samples for serum iron were taken at times T1h, T2h, and T3h following oral iron ingestion [allowing calculation of serum iron area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0–3 h)] (Fig. S1 in the supplementary material). The investigators aimed to minimize variability in relation to dialysis by mandating that the ferrokinetic study on Day 1 had to be completed prior to randomization and prior to the hemodialysis procedure at Days 1 and 15. For patients on peritoneal dialysis, there were no timing restrictions for dialysis in relation to timing of the ferrokinetic study. In addition, while patients could take roxadustat at any time before or after dialysis, on Day 1, roxadustat could be taken only following completion of the ferrokinetic study. On Day 15, roxadustat was taken ≥ 6 h before start of the ferrokinetic study. For patients already on rHuEPO, dosing of rHuEPO occurred on Day 1 but not before the randomization visit; if randomized to rHuEPO, administration of rHuEPO occurred following completion of the ferrokinetic study and on day 15 (latter within 1–2 h prior to start of the ferrokinetic study.
Patients taking oral iron before the study could continue to do this during the study, except on days 1 and 15; oral iron dose was not changed during the treatment period. Food restrictions were applied only on days 1 and 15 for the ferrokinetic study; on these days for ~ 4 h before and 3 h during the ferrokinetic study, no ingestion of foods containing more than trace amounts of iron was allowed. Hemoglobin, erythrocyte count, and corpuscular volume were evaluated on days 1, 8, and 15.
Patients
Patients were eligible if aged ≥ 18 years and they met the following criteria at screening. Hemodialysis patients were required to be on three times weekly dialysis with evidence of adequate dialysis. Achievement of adequate dialysis was defined as a stdKt/V ≥ 2.1 in hemodialysis, and a total (renal + peritoneal dialysis) weekly Kt/V ≥ 1.7 documented twice during 16 weeks pre-screening. All dialysis patients must have been on a stable rHuEPO dose, had a mean Hb level of 9–12 g/dl, and had ferritin ≥ 100 ng/ml and TSAT ≥ 20%. For patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD: stage 4 or 5 CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2; on a stable dose of rHuEPO for 4 weeks before screening or rHuEPO-naive (no erythropoiesis-stimulating agent for > 6 weeks pre-screening); mean Hb level 9–12 g/dl for rHuEPO users and 7–10 g/dl for rHuEPO-naive; and ferritin ≥ 50 ng/ml and TSAT ≥ 15%. Key exclusion criteria were chronic inflammatory diseases, autoimmune liver disease, previous bowel resection, celiac disease, hereditary hematologic disease, gastroenteritis (in 4 weeks prior to randomization), history of severe liver disease, intolerance of oral iron, known hemosiderosis, and malignancy. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria are provided in the supplementary materials.
Study Treatment
Roxadustat doses were administered three times weekly ≥ 2 days apart, but ≤ 4 days apart, and the roxadustat dose was not adjusted during the study (except for safety reasons as judged by the investigator). The starting dose of roxadustat was calculated based on the patient’s body weight, according to approved guidance [33]. In patients with dialysis-dependent CKD, initial doses were based on the patient’s weight prior to dialysis: 100 mg (patient weight, 45 to < 60 kg) or 120 mg (patient weight, ≥ 60 kg). Patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD were dosed with 70 mg (body weight, 45 to < 60 kg) or 100 mg (body weight, ≥ 60 kg). All patients randomized to rHuEPO received a uniform brand of short-acting rHuEPO (SEPO) according to the approved dosage (see supplementary materials) [34]. Medications prohibited during the study included any rHuEPO treatment other than the study treatment, iron-chelating agents, IV iron, TRIFERIC® in dialysate, and vitamin C.
Endpoints
The primary endpoint was the change from baseline (day 1) to day 15 in gastrointestinal iron absorption (serum iron AUC0–3 h) following administration of a single dose of oral iron, compared between roxadustat and rHuEPO. Serum iron AUC0–3 h was defined as the area between the serum iron concentration curve over hours 0 to 3 following ingestion of iron, relative to the concentration at T0h immediately before administration of a single oral dose of 100 mg elemental iron. The full definition and calculation of AUC0–3 h is provided in the supplementary materials.
Secondary endpoints were: interaction effects of key baseline variables (hs-CRP and hepcidin) on change from baseline to day 15 in serum iron AUC0–3 h following administration of a single dose of oral iron, compared between roxadustat and rHuEPO, and change from baseline in key indices of iron metabolism (serum iron, ferritin, TIBC, TSAT, transferrin, and soluble transferrin receptor) and hepcidin levels, and interaction effects between key baseline variables (hs-CRP and hepcidin) following administration of a single dose of oral iron, compared between roxadustat and rHuEPO. Safety was assessed as the incidence of adverse events (AEs), measurement of vital signs, and laboratory safety measures.
Statistical Analysis
Initially, a maximum of 104 patients with anemia of CKD were planned to be screened to allow randomization of a minimum of 46 patients with anemia of CKD. Sample size requirements were estimated based on similar published and unpublished studies [25]. Due to lower-than-anticipated recruitment associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (notably the non-dialysis-dependent CKD population), the protocol was amended to target a maximum of 60 eligible randomized patients allowing randomization of a minimum of 20 patients with anemia of CKD. Here, the calculated minimum sample size required to achieve a two-sided significance level of 0.05 and power of 90% was based on a treatment difference in AUC log-fold change of log(2.7) and a conservative effect due to roxadustat of 2.7-times baseline, while accounting for 20% of patients failing to take any study treatment or failing to provide a post-baseline AUC measurement. Additionally, randomization strata were dropped from the analysis models. After clinical data lock, serum iron AUC0–3 h values were reported to be negative for two patients. Consequently, planned log-transformation of AUC data was not possible and untransformed AUC data were used for the efficacy analysis. A sensitivity analysis set was further introduced for analysis of observed positive-valued cases required for analysis of log-fold change, without imputation for missing data. Treatment and interaction effects were evaluated by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The ANCOVA models used to assess treatment effect were adjusted for study treatment and baseline hs-CRP (≤ upper limit of normal [ULN], > ULN; level ≤ 10.0 mg/l, > 10.0 mg/l). ANCOVA models to assess interaction effects were adjusted for study treatment, baseline biomarker value, and baseline biomarker-treatment interaction. All analyses were performed using SAS®, version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Patients
A total of 51 patients were screened. Twenty-six were considered ineligible and 25 were randomized (roxadustat, n = 13; rHuEPO, n = 12); 24 patients completed the study; one patient was withdrawn during the study for not meeting the eligibility criteria post-randomization (Fig. S2 in the supplementary material). Demographic characteristics were generally comparable between the two treatment groups: mean age was 55.1 years, most were aged < 75 years, female (64.0%), and of mean body weight 61.7 kg (Table 1). Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. Most patients were rHuEPO-treated at baseline (88.0%), and the mean time from initial diagnosis of CKD was 120.9 (range 20–378) months; the etiology of CKD was chronic glomerulonephritis in 48.0% (n = 12) of patients and was unknown in 24.0% (n = 6) of patients (Table 1).
Among the 22 patients with dialysis-dependent CKD, 11 (44.0% of total study population) received hemodialysis and 11 (44.0%) received PD, and there were three (12.0%) patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD (rHuEPO-naive). No patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD who were rHuEPO users were enrolled in the study. In patients with dialysis-dependent CKD, mean (standard deviation [SD]) time from initial dialysis to randomization was 75.5 (58.5) months for roxadustat and 91.5 (85.3) months for rHuEPO. All patients who were dialysis dependent had been on dialysis for ≥ 20 months.
At baseline, mean (SD) serum iron area under the AUC was 21.4 (23.3) g × 3 h/dl for roxadustat and 18.7 (25.6) g × 3 h/dl for rHuEPO, while respective mean (SD) serum iron concentrations were 14.0 (4.0) μmol/l and 14.9 (6.9) μmol/l. Iron profiles were similar between the two treatment groups, with a mean (SD) Hb level of 106.1 (10.3) g/l for roxadustat and 105.4 (9.3) g/l for rHuEPO, and mean (SD) erythrocyte counts (1012/L) of 3.5 (0.5) for roxadustat and 3.4 (0.3) for rHuEPO. In addition, 84.6% of patients in the roxadustat group had a baseline hs-CRP ≤ 10.0 mg/l, seen in all patients in the rHuEPO group (Table 1).
Prior and Concomitant Medication
All 25 patients were being treated for cardiovascular disease and reported use of prior medications including beta-blocking agents in 16 (64.0%), selective calcium-channel blockers in 12 (48.0%), and lipid-modifying agents in 10 (40.0%) patients (Table S1 in the supplementary material). Reported concomitant treatments included beta-blocking agents in 17 (68.0%), selective calcium-channel blockers with mainly vascular effects in 12 (48.0%), lipid-modifying agents in 10 (40.0%), and treatments for blood and blood forming organs in 23 (92.0%) patients (Table S2 in the supplementary material).
Efficacy
For the primary outcome measure (change from baseline to day 15 in serum iron AUC0–3 h), serum iron AUC0–3 h values were unexpectedly reported as negative for two patients at day 1 and/or day 15 (roxadustat, n = 1; rHuEPO, n = 1). In contrast to other participants, these two patients each had a markedly elevated serum concentration of ferritin at baseline and day 15 (patient 1, 1455/1184 µg/l; patient 2, 1246/1196 µg/l, respectively). In addition, these two patients showed elevated hepcidin (312/190 µg/l and 272/295 µg/l, respectively) and a tendency for elevated hs-CRP (8.9/31.7 mg/dl and 0.4/0.6 mg/dl, respectively). Nevertheless, the negative serum iron AUC0–3 h values necessitated change in the primary analysis method to evaluate absolute change from baseline rather than fold-change as planned; the findings from this study must therefore be viewed in this context. Change in the primary outcome measure (FAS) was numerically higher for roxadustat versus rHuEPO, but not statistically significantly different between the two treatment groups (P = 0.212) (Table 2 and Fig. 2A). Data for the per-protocol analysis set are provided in Table S3 in the supplementary material. The mean (SD) change from baseline in serum iron AUC0–3 h was 11.3 (28.2) g × 3 h/dl for roxadustat and − 0.3 (9.7) g × 3 h/dl for rHuEPO, although the baseline values were similar for the two treatment groups [21.4 (23.3) g × 3 h/dl and 18.7 (25.6) g × 3 h/dl, respectively]. Mean (SD) change in Hb (g/dl) from baseline at day 15 was 6.5 (6.5) for roxadustat and 0.1 (7.3) for rHuEPO. Equivalent values for erythrocyte count (1012/l) were 0.2 (0.2) for roxadustat and < 0.1 (0.2) for rHuEPO.
When change from baseline in serum iron AUC0–3 h was assessed, adjusted for baseline levels of hepcidin and hs-CRP, or as part of the sensitivity analysis, numerical trends were similar (Table 2). As any significant difference in change from baseline of serum iron AUC could not be confirmed between the two treatment groups, analyses for the secondary endpoints were treated as exploratory, and reported P-values are nominal.
Secondary Endpoints
Indices of Iron Metabolism
Mean (SD) values for all evaluated iron indices (serum iron, ferritin, TIBC, TSAT, transferrin, soluble transferrin, soluble transferrin receptor, and hepcidin concentration) before administration of oral iron at day 1 and day 15 are shown in Table S4 in the supplementary material, and the relative change from baseline to day 15 is shown in Table 2. Relative change in serum iron concentration from baseline to day 15 was numerically higher for roxadustat versus rHuEPO, although mean (SD) baseline levels were similar for roxadustat (14.02 [4.01] μmol/l) and rHuEPO (14.87 [6.93] μmol/l) (Fig. 2B and Table S4 in the supplementary material). A similar trend was seen for mean (SD) serum iron concentration; here, the mean (SD) change from baseline to day 15 was 2.08 (7.92) μmol/l for roxadustat versus –0.85 (7.62) μmol/l for rHuEPO (Fig. 2C and Table S4 in the supplementary material).
For TIBC, transferrin, and soluble transferrin receptor, trends in relative change from baseline at day 1 to day 15 were numerically higher for roxadustat versus rHuEPO; conversely, levels were numerically lower for ferritin and TSAT, and markedly lower for hepcidin (Table 2). When relative change from baseline in the various iron indices were analyzed using the ANCOVA model, with additional adjustments for study treatment and baseline hs-CRP, nominally significant treatment effects were seen for TIBC, transferrin, soluble transferrin receptor, and hepcidin (each P < 0.05; Table 2).
Safety
Overall, five patients from the roxadustat group experienced a total of eight AEs (abdominal infection, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, seizure, open angle glaucoma, back pain, muscle spasm [× 2]), each mild in intensity, and two patients from the rHuEPO group experienced a total of two AEs (hyperkalemia), both moderate in intensity. The event of back pain in the roxadustat group was considered possibly related to study treatment. All events resolved before the end of the study (Table 3). No serious AEs or deaths were reported, and no discontinuations due to an AE were reported. No clinically meaningful changes in mean values were noted for clinical laboratory safety parameters (including relating to Hy’s law) or vital signs.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to explore iron absorption in patients with anemia of CKD treated with HIF-PHIs. Iron dysmetabolism, related to absorption, transport, and utilization, is a well-known important cause of anemia in CKD patients, where iron and erythropoietin administration have limited effect [6, 35, 36].
Previous studies demonstrating improvement in indicators of iron metabolism mediated by HIF-PHIs will have inevitably provided great encouragement to clinical researchers and physicians. For example, HIF-PHIs have been shown to significantly decrease hepcidin levels, a key iron regulatory hormone, which can degrade the mammalian iron exporter ferroportin in iron-absorptive enterocytes and iron-recycling macrophages [36]. This decrease in hepcidin with HIF-PHIs may promote release of iron from enterocytes into the circulation through ferroportin [36]. In addition, divalent metal transporter 1, an apical iron transporter of enterocytes, is regulated by local hypoxia; here, iron absorption may be increased by HIF-PHIs through divalent metal transporter 1 [37]. This phase 4 study was designed to observe the actual effect of roxadustat on iron absorption in patients with CKD.
In this study, change of serum iron AUC0–3 h was not statistically significantly different between the roxadustat and rHuEPO groups. Unexpected negative AUC0–3 h values obtained from two patients required a change in the primary analysis method. Interestingly, the two patients with negative AUC0–3 h were characterized throughout the study by marked elevations in serum ferritin and hepcidin, and a tendency towards elevated hs-CRP concentrations, consistent with possible raised inflammatory status, and potential restricted capacity for uptake of dietary iron [38]. The sensitivity analysis, excluding patients with negative AUC0–3h values, also yielded a negative result that was potentially contributed to by the relatively small sample size. Significant recruitment challenges, including rigorous patient requirements such as need for frequent visits, multiple blood testing during the ferrokinetic studies, stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria, and the COVID-19 pandemic, led to fewer randomized patients than the initial target of 46. Despite this, the findings provide ‘pilot’ guidance for future studies towards sample size calculation, patient recruitment, and study design.
The smaller-than-expected sample size compromised the reliable performance of any meaningful subgroup analyses. Also, not being able to confirm significance for the primary analysis meant the secondary efficacy analysis had to be considered exploratory, with P-values rendered nominal. While not confirmatory, the observed decrease in hepcidin and increases in serum iron, transferrin, and TIBC for roxadustat relative to rHuEPO were generally consistent with prior reports of greater reductions in hepcidin [26, 28] and increases in iron and TIBC [25, 28,29,30] for roxadustat compared with EPO-treated patients. The changes seen are hypothesized as being indicative of increased iron absorption and release of iron from intracellular stores for erythropoiesis in roxadustat-treated patients [26, 27, 29]. The incidence of AEs was generally low, and the safety profile (types of AE reported) was consistent with the population under study and the known safety profile of roxadustat [27,28,29,30,31,32].
Key limitations were, first, recruitment difficulties led to truncation of the intended sample size, and unexpected negative values for AUC resulted in a post hoc change to the planned statistical method. A sample size of 46 patients, 23 per arm, was calculated as needed to provide 80% power at the 0.05 alpha level (two-sided) to detect a treatment difference of AUC change from baseline. The existence of negative AUC values required an analysis of AUC change from baseline rather than AUC fold change from baseline, resulting in inadequate power as the target sample size was not reached. As a result, significant differences between treatment groups could not be assessed appropriately. As any significant difference in change from baseline of serum iron AUC could not be confirmed between treatment groups, analyses for the secondary endpoints were treated as exploratory. Caution is therefore required in interpretation of the results. Based on this, we consider that a very high ferritin level should be an exclusion criterion in ferrokinetic research. Second, all patients enrolled were Chinese, and potential inter-ethnic differences in iron absorption will preclude extrapolation of findings to other ethnic groups. Third, dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent patients may present different iron absorption characteristics; here, small sample size again meant it was not possible to conduct effective subgroup analysis.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the study showed no significant difference in iron absorption between the treatment groups. However, the trends identified in this study suggest the need for larger, well-designed, and appropriately controlled clinical trials to evaluate any roxadustat-mediated benefits of enhanced iron absorption in patients with CKD-related anemia. It will also be important to further investigate the predicted ferrokinetic properties of HIF-PHIs and determine their impact on IV iron supplementation needs.
Data Availability
Data underlying the findings described in this manuscript may be obtained in accordance with AstraZeneca’s data sharing policy described at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Data for studies directly listed on Vivli can be requested through Vivli at www.vivli.org. Data for studies not listed on Vivli could be requested through Vivli at https://vivli.org/members/enquiries-about-studies-not-listed-on-the-vivli-platform/. AstraZeneca Vivli member page is also available outlining further details: https://vivli.org/ourmember/astrazeneca/.
References
Nakhoul G, Simon JF. Anemia of chronic kidney disease: treat it, but not too aggressively. Cleve Clin J Med. 2016;83:613–24.
Palaka E, Grandy S, van Haalen H, McEwan P, Darlington O. The impact of CKD anaemia on patients: incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes-a systematic literature review. Int J Nephrol. 2020;2020:7692376.
Fraser SD, Roderick PJ, May CR, et al. The burden of comorbidity in people with chronic kidney disease stage 3: a cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16:193.
Haase VH. Mechanisms of hypoxia responses in renal tissue. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24:537–41.
Covic A, Jackson J, Hadfield A, Pike J, Siriopol D. Real-world impact of cardiovascular disease and anemia on quality of life and productivity in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. Adv Ther. 2017;34:1662–72.
Pagani A, Nai A, Silvestri L, Camaschella C. Hepcidin and anemia: a tight relationship. Front Physiol. 2019;10:1294.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Anemia Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for anemia in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:279–335.
Hanna RM, Streja E, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Burden of anemia in chronic kidney disease: beyond erythropoietin. Adv Ther. 2021;38:52–75.
Widness JA, Lombard KA, Ziegler EE, et al. Erythrocyte incorporation and absorption of 58Fe in premature infants treated with erythropoietin. Pediatr Res. 1997;41:16–23.
Chen N, Hao C, Peng X, et al. Roxadustat for anemia in patients with kidney disease not receiving dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1001–10.
Macdougall IC, Akizawa T, Berns JS, Bernhardt T, Krueger T. Effects of molidustat in the treatment of anemia in CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14:28–39.
Akizawa T, Yamaguchi Y, Otsuka T, Reusch M. A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, two-arm, open-label study of intermittent oral dosing of roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in Japanese erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naïve chronic kidney disease patients not on dialysis. Nephron. 2020;144:372–82.
Brigandi RA, Johnson B, Oei C, et al. A novel hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (GSK1278863) for anemia in CKD: a 28-day, phase 2A randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67:861–71.
Holdstock L, Cizman B, Meadowcroft AM, et al. Daprodustat for anemia: a 24-week, open-label, randomized controlled trial in participants with chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J. 2019;12:129–38.
Parmar DV, Kansagra KA, Patel JC, et al. Outcomes of desidustat treatment in people with anemia and chronic kidney disease: a phase 2 study. Am J Nephrol. 2019;49:470–8.
Akizawa T, Nangaku M, Yamaguchi T, et al. A placebo-controlled, randomized trial of enarodustat in patients with chronic kidney disease followed by long-term trial. Am J Nephrol. 2019;49:165–74.
Akizawa T, Macdougall IC, Berns JS, et al. Iron regulation by molidustat, a daily oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephron. 2019;143:243–54.
Besarab A, Provenzano R, Hertel J, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging and pharmacodynamics study of roxadustat (FG-4592) to treat anemia in nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:1665–73.
Chen N, Qian J, Chen J, et al. Phase 2 studies of oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor FG-4592 for treatment of anemia in China. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32:1373–86.
Provenzano R, Besarab A, Sun CH, et al. Oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor roxadustat (FG-4592) for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:982–91.
Akizawa T, Iwasaki M, Otsuka T, Reusch M, Misumi T. Roxadustat treatment of chronic kidney disease-associated anemia in Japanese patients not on dialysis: a phase 2, randomized, double-blind. Placebo-Controlled Trial Adv Ther. 2019;36:1438–54.
Pergola PE, Spinowitz BS, Hartman CS, Maroni BJ, Haase VH. Vadadustat, a novel oral HIF stabilizer, provides effective anemia treatment in nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2016;90:1115–22.
The Pharma Letter. Second approval in China for roxadustat. 2019. https://www.thepharmaletter.com/article/second-approval-in-china-for-Roxadustat. Accessed Nov 11, 2022.
Chen N, Hao C, Liu BC, et al. Roxadustat treatment for anemia in patients undergoing long-term dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1011–22.
Besarab A, Chernyavskaya E, Motylev I, et al. Roxadustat (FG-4592): correction of anemia in incident dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:1225–33.
Pergola PE, Charytan C, Little DJ, et al. Changes in iron availability with roxadustat in non-dialysis-dependent and dialysis-dependent patients with anemia of CKD. Kidney360. 2022;3:1511–28.
Fishbane S, El-Shahawy MA, Pecoits-Filho R, et al. Roxadustat for treating anemia in patients with CKD not on dialysis: results from a randomized phase 3 study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32:737–55.
Fishbane S, Pollock CA, El-Shahawy M, et al. Roxadustat versus epoetin alfa for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis: results from the randomized phase 3 ROCKIES study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33:850–66.
Charytan C, Manllo-Karim R, Martin ER, et al. A randomized trial of roxadustat in anemia of kidney failure: SIERRAS study. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6:1829–39.
Provenzano R, Shutov E, Eremeeva L, et al. Roxadustat for anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease incident to dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36:1717–30.
Shutov E, Sulowicz W, Esposito C, et al. Roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients not on dialysis: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ALPS). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36:1629–39.
Coyne DW, Roger SD, Shin SK, et al. Roxadustat for CKD-related anemia in non-dialysis patients. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6:624–35.
FibroGen Inc. FibroGen announces approval of roxadustat in China for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis [press release]. 2018. https://investor.fibrogen.com/news-releases/news-release-details/fibrogen-announces-approval-roxadustat-china-treatment-anemia. Accessed Nov 11, 2022.
3SBio Inc. 3SBIO Inc. 2018. http://www.3sbio.com/en/. Accessed Nov 11, 2022.
Sheetz M, Barrington P, Callies S, et al. Targeting the hepcidin-ferroportin pathway in anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85:935–48.
Camaschella C, Nai A, Silvestri L. Iron metabolism and iron disorders revisited in the hepcidin era. Haematologica. 2020;105:260–72.
Qian ZM, Wu XM, Fan M, et al. Divalent metal transporter 1 is a hypoxia-inducible gene. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226:1596–603.
Dignass A, Farrag K, Stein J. Limitations of serum ferritin in diagnosing iron deficiency in inflammatory conditions. Int J Chronic Dis. 2018;2018:9394060.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the patients, their families, and all investigators involved in this study.
Medical Writing, Editorial, and other Assistance.
Medical writing support was provided by Carl V Felton, PhD, and editorial support was provided by Jess Galbraith, BSc, and Mel Ward, BA, all of Core (a division of Prime, Knutsford and London, UK), supported by AstraZeneca according to Good Publication Practice 2022 guidelines (https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M22-1460).
Funding
This research was co-funded by FibroGen, Inc., and AstraZeneca (grant number not applicable).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Haiting Wu, Yiging Wu, Alexis Hofherr, Xuemei Li; Methodology: Haiting Wu, Stephen Rush, Yiging Wu, Alexis Hofherr, Katie Mohan, Xuemei Li; Formal analysis: Alexis Hofherr, S Stephen Rush; Investigation: Hong Cheng, Caili Wang, LI Yao, Shuguang Qin, Li Zuo, Zhao Hu, Chun Zhang, Yiging Wu, Alexis Hofherr, Xuemei Li; Writing – original draft preparation: Hong Cheng, Caili Wang, LI Yao, Shuguang Qin, Li Zuo, Zhao Hu, Chun Zhang, Yiging Wu, Alexis Hofherr, Katie Mohan, Stephen Rush; Writing – review & editing: all authors; supervision: Alexis Hofherr, Katie Mohan; Project administration: Katie Mohan. All authors read and approved the present version of the manuscript for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The sponsor was involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and data checking of information provided in the manuscript. However, ultimate responsibility for opinions, conclusions, and data interpretation lies with the authors. Roxadustat was developed through collaboration between FibroGen, Inc., Astellas, and AstraZeneca. Haiting Wu, Hong Cheng, Caili Wang, LI Yao, Shuguang Qin, Li Zuo, Zhao Hu, Chun Zhang, and Xuemei Li, declare no conflicts of interest. Alexis Hofherr and Stephen Rush are employees of, and hold or may hold stock in, AstraZeneca. Katie Mohan is a contractor working on behalf of AstraZeneca and Yiging Wu, is an employee of FibroGen, Inc.
Ethical Approval
All participants provided written informed consent prior to performance of any screening tests or assessments. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences International Ethical Guidelines, applicable International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, and applicable local health and regulatory requirements. The final study protocol and informed consent form were approved by the applicable independent ethics committee or institutional review board for each site (protocol D5741C00002; approved July 13, 2021).
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, H., Cheng, H., Wang, C. et al. Roxadustat and Oral Iron Absorption in Chinese Patients with Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 4 Study (ALTAI). Adv Ther 41, 1168–1183 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02741-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02741-5