Abstract
In the present paper, some new generalizations of dynamic inequalities of Hardy-type in two variables on time scales are established. The integral and discrete Hardy-type inequalities that are given as special cases of main results are original. The main results are proved by using the dynamic Jensen inequality and the Fubini theorem on time scales.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The renowned discrete Hardy inequality [1] states that:
Theorem 1.1
If \(\{a_{n}\}\) is a nonnegative real sequence and \(p>1\), then
Hardy discovered this inequality while attempting to sketch an easier proof of Hilbert’s inequality for double series which was known at that time.
Using the calculus of variations, Hardy himself in [2] gave the following integral analogous of inequality (1.1).
Theorem 1.2
If f is a nonnegative integrable function over a finite interval (0, x) such that \(f\in L^{p}(0,\infty )\) and \(p>1\), then
It’s worthy to mention that inequalities (1.1) and (1.2) are sharp in the sense that the constant \((\frac{p}{(p-1)})^{p}\) can not be replaced by a smaller one.
In [3], Hardy and Littlewood extended inequality (1.1), and obtained the following two discrete inequalities.
Theorem 1.3
Let \(\{a_n\}\) be a nonnegative real sequence.
- (i):
-
If \(p>1\) and \(\gamma >1\), then
$$\begin{aligned} \sum \limits _{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{1}{n^\gamma }\bigg (\sum \limits _{k=1}^{n}a_k\bigg )^p \le K(p,\gamma )\sum \limits _{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{1}{n^{\gamma -p}}a_n^p. \end{aligned}$$(1.3) - (ii):
-
If \(p>1\) and \(\gamma <1\), then
$$\begin{aligned} \sum \limits _{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{1}{n^\gamma }\bigg (\sum \limits _{k=n}^{\infty }a_k\bigg )^p \le K(p,\gamma )\sum \limits _{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{1}{n^{\gamma -p}} a_n^p, \end{aligned}$$(1.4)where \(K(p,\gamma )\) in inequalities (1.3) and (1.4) is a nonnegative constant depends on p and \(\gamma \).
In [2], Hardy established the continuous versions of inequalities (1.3) and (1.4) as follows:
Theorem 1.4
Let f be a nonnegative integrable function on \((0,\infty )\).
- (i):
-
If \(p>1\) and \(m>1\), then
$$\begin{aligned} \int \limits _{0}^{\infty }\frac{1}{x^m}\bigg (\int \limits _{0}^{x}f(t)dt\bigg )^pdx \le \Big ( \frac{p}{m-1}\Big )^p\int \limits _{0}^{\infty }\frac{1}{x^{m-p}}f^p(x)dx. \end{aligned}$$(1.5) - (ii):
-
If \(p>1\) and \(m<1\), then
$$\begin{aligned} \int \limits _{0}^{\infty }\frac{1}{x^m}\bigg (\int \limits _{x}^{\infty }f(t)dt\bigg )^pdx \le \Big (\frac{p}{1-m}\Big )^p\int \limits _{0}^{\infty }\frac{1}{x^{m-p}}f^p(x)dx. \end{aligned}$$(1.6)
The reverse of inequality (1.2) was proven by Hardy and Littlewood in [3]. Their result is written as:
Theorem 1.5
If \(0<p<1\) and f is a nonnegative integrable function on \((x,\infty )\) such that \(f\in L^p(0,\infty )\), then
In the same paper [3], the authors proved the following sharp inequality.
Theorem 1.6
If \(p>1\) and f is a nonnegative integrable function on \((x,\infty )\) such that \(f\in L^p(0,\infty )\), then
which by a trivial transformation can be written as
The discrete version of inequality (1.9) was given in [4] as follows:
Theorem 1.7
If \(\{a_n\}\) is a nonnegative real sequence and \(p>1\), then
Hardy [5] generalized (1.1) and proved the following result.
Theorem 1.8
If \(p>1\), \(a_n>0\), \(\lambda _n>0\), for \(n\ge 1\) and \(\Lambda _n = \sum \nolimits _{k=1}^{n}\lambda _n\), then
The study of Hardy-type inequalities have attracted many researchers and several refinements and extensions have been done to the previous results, we refer the readers to the papers [2, 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], the books [4, 14,15,16] and the references cited therein.The theory of time scales, which has recently received a lot of attention, was initiated by Stefan Hilger in his PhD thesis in order to unify discrete and continuous analysis [17]. The general idea is to prove a result for a dynamic equation or a dynamic inequality where the domain of the unknown function is so-called time scale \({\mathbb {T}}\), which may be an arbitrary closed subset of the real line \({\mathbb {R}}\) see [18, 19]. The three most popular examples of calculus on time scales are differential calculus, difference calculus, and quantum calculus (see [20]), i.e., when \( {\mathbb {T}} = {\mathbb {R}}\), \({\mathbb {T}} = {\mathbb {Z}}\) and \({\mathbb {T}} = \overline{q^{{\mathbb {Z}}}} = \{q^z: z \in {\mathbb {Z}}\}\cup \{0\}\) where \(q > 1 \) respectively. In books [18, 19], Bohner and Peterson introduce most basic concepts and definitions related with the theory of time scales. During the past decade a number of dynamic inequalities has been established by some authors who were motivated by some applications of dynamic equations, for example, when studying the behavior of solutions of certain class of dynamic equations on a time scale \( {\mathbb {T}}\), see [21,22,23,24,25,26,27] and the references cited therein.
In [28], Řehák has given the time scales version of Hardy inequality (1.2) as follows:
Theorem 1.9
Let \({\mathbb {T}}\) be a time scale, and \(f\in C_{rd}([a,\infty )_{\mathbb {T}},[0,\infty ))\), \( \Lambda (t)=\int \limits _{a}^{t}f(s)\Delta s\), for \(t\in [a,\infty )_{\mathbb {T}}\).
unless \(f\equiv 0\).
Furthermore, if \(\mu (t)/t\rightarrow 0\) as \(t\rightarrow \infty \), then inequality (1.12) is sharp.
In [29], Saker and O’Regan established a generalization of Řehák’s result in the following form.
Theorem 1.10
Let \(a\in [0,\infty )_{\mathbb {T}}\) and define, for \(t\in [0,\infty )_{\mathbb {T}}\),
If \(p\ge q>1\), then
In [30], Ozkan and Yildirim gave the following result among many other results.
Theorem 1.11
Let \(a\in [0,\infty )_{\mathbb {T}}\) and \(u, \lambda \in C_{rd}\big ([a,b]_{\mathbb {T}},{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\) such that the delta integral \(\displaystyle \int \limits \limits _{x}^{b}\frac{u(t)}{(t-a)(\sigma (t)-a)}\Delta t\) converges. If \(f\in C_{rd}\big ([a,b]_{\mathbb {T}},(\alpha ,\beta )\big )\) where \(\alpha \), \(\beta \in {\mathbb {R}}\) and \(\Phi \in C\big ((\alpha ,\beta ),{\mathbb {R}}\big )\) is convex, then
For more results on Hardy-type inequalities on time scales we refer to [31,32,33,34,35,36, 36,37,38, 38,39,40] and references therein.
In this paper, we prove some generalizations of Hardy-type dynamic inequalities that were given recently by Ozkan and Yildirim in [30]. The obtained results extend some known Hardy-type integral inequalities, unify and extend some continuous inequalities and their corresponding discrete analogues. The paper is arranged as follows: In Sect. 2, some basic concepts of the calculus on time scales and useful lemmas are introduced. In Sect. 3, we state and prove the main results. In Sect. 4, we stated the conclusion.
2 Preliminaries and Lemmas on Time Scales
First we presented some preliminaries on calculus of time scales and some universal symbols used in this article. Throughout the paper \({\mathbb {R}}\) and \({\mathbb {Z}}\) denote the set of all real numbers and the set of all integers, respectively.
A time scale \({\mathbb {T}}\) is an arbitrary nonempty closed subset of the real numbers. We assume throughout that \({\mathbb {T}}\) has the topology that it inherits from the standard topology on the real numbers \({\mathbb {R}}\). We define the forward jump operator \(\sigma : {\mathbb {T}}\rightarrow {\mathbb {T}}\) by
and the backward jump operator \(\rho : {\mathbb {T}}:\rightarrow {\mathbb {T}}\) is defined by
In the previous two definitions, we set \(\inf \emptyset =\sup {\mathbb {T}}\) (i.e., if t is the minimum of \({\mathbb {T}}\), then \(\sigma (t)=t\)) and \( \sup \emptyset =\inf {\mathbb {T}}\) (i.e., if t is the maximum of t, then \( \rho (t)=t\)), where \(\emptyset \) is the empty set.
A point \(t \in {\mathbb {T}}\) with \(\inf {\mathbb {T}}< t < \sup {\mathbb {T}}\), is said to be right-dense if \(\sigma (t) = t\), left-dense if \(\rho (t) = t\), right-scattered if \(\sigma (t)>t\), and left-scattered if \(\rho (t)<t\). Points that are simultaneously right-dense and left-dense are called dense points, and points that are simultaneously right-scattered and left-scattered are called isolated points.
A function \(g: {\mathbb {T}}\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) is said to be right-dense continuous (rd-continuous) if g is continuous at all right-dense points in \({\mathbb {T}}\), and at all the left-dense points in \({\mathbb {T}}\), the left-sided limits of g exist. The set of all such rd-continuous functions is denoted by \(C_{rd}({\mathbb {T}})\). A function \(f: {\mathbb {T}}\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) is said to be left-dense continuous (ld-continuous) if f is continuous at all the left-dense points in \({\mathbb {T}}\), and at all the right-dense points in \({\mathbb {T}}\), the right-sided limits of f exist. The set of all such ld-continuous functions is denoted by \(C_{ld}({\mathbb {T}})\).
The forward and backward graininess functions \(\mu \) and \(\nu \) for a time scale \({\mathbb {T}}\) are defined by \(\mu (t):= \sigma (t)-t\) and \( \nu (t):=t-\rho (t)\), respectively.
The set \({\mathbb {T}}^{\kappa }\)is introduced as follows: If \({\mathbb {T}}\) has a left–scattered maximum \(t_1\), then \({\mathbb {T}}^{\kappa } = {\mathbb {T}}-\{t_1\} \), otherwise \({\mathbb {T}}^{\kappa } = {\mathbb {T}}\).
The interval [a, b] in \({\mathbb {T}}\) is defined by
We define the open intervals and half-closed intervals similarly.
Let \(f: {\mathbb {T}} \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) be a real valued function on a time scale \({\mathbb {T}}\). Then, for \(t\in {\mathbb {T}}^{\kappa }\), we define \( f^\Delta (t)\) to be the number (if it exists) with the property that given any \(\varepsilon > 0\) there is a neighborhood U of t such that, for all \( s\in U\), we have
In this case, we say that f is delta differentiable on \({\mathbb {T}} ^{\kappa } \) provided \(f^\Delta (t)\) exists for all \(t\in {\mathbb {T}}_{\kappa }\).
For \(f: {\mathbb {T}} \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\), we define the function \( f^\sigma : {\mathbb {T}} \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) by \(f^\sigma =f \circ \sigma \), that is \(f^{\sigma }(t)=f(\sigma (t))\), for all \(t\in {\mathbb {T}}\). Similarly, we define the function \(f^{\rho }: {\mathbb {T}} \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) by \( f^{\rho }=f\circ \rho \), that is \(f^{\rho }(t)=f(\rho (t))\), for all \(t\in {\mathbb {T}}\). A time scale \({\mathbb {T}}\) is said to be regular if the following two conditions are satisfied simultaneously: (1) \( \sigma (\rho (t))=t \), and (2) \(\rho (\sigma (t))=t\), for all \(t\in {\mathbb {T}}\).
We frequently use the following important relations between time scales calculus on \({\mathbb {T}}\) and continuous calculus on \({\mathbb {R}}\), and discrete calculus on \({\mathbb {Z}}\). Note that:
- (i):
-
If \({\mathbb {T}}={\mathbb {R}}\), then
$$\begin{aligned} \sigma (t)=t,\ \mu (t)=0,\ f^\Delta (t)=f^{\prime }(t),\ \int \limits _{a}^{b}f(t)\Delta t=\int \limits _{a}^{b}f(t)dt. \end{aligned}$$(2.3) - (ii):
-
If \({\mathbb {T}}={\mathbb {Z}}\), then
$$\begin{aligned} \sigma (t)=t+1,\ \mu (t)=1,\ f^\Delta (t)=\Delta f(t),\ \int \limits _{a}^{b}f(t)\Delta t=\sum \limits _{t=a}^{b-1}f(t). \end{aligned}$$(2.4)
It is known that (see [19]) if \(g \in C_{rd}(T)\), then the definite integral \(G(t):=\int \limits _{t_0}^{t} g(s)\Delta s\) exists, \(t_0 \in {\mathbb {T}}\), and satisfies \(G^\Delta (t) = g(t)\), \(t \in {\mathbb {T}}\). The improper integral is defined as
Lemma 2.1
(Fubini’s Theorem on Time Scales, see [41]) Let f be bounded and \(\Delta \)-integrable over \(R=[a,b)\times [c,d)\) and suppose that the single integrals
exist for each \(t\in [a,b)\) and for each \(s\in [c,d)\), respectively. Then the iterated integrals
exist and the equality
holds.
Lemma 2.2
(Dynamic Jensen’s Inequality, see[25]) Suppose that \(a,b\in {\mathbb {T}}\) with \(a<b\) and \(-\infty \le \alpha \le \beta \le \infty \). Further, let \(f\in C_{rd}\big ([a,b]_{\mathbb {T}},(\alpha ,\beta )\big )\) and \(h\in C_{rd}\big ([a,b]_{\mathbb {T}},{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\). If \(\Phi \in C\big ((\alpha ,\beta ),{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\) is convex, then
3 Main Results
We need the following lemma, which gives a two-dimensional dynamic Jensen’s inequality, in the proof of our main results.
Lemma 3.1
Suppose that \(a,b,c,d\in {\mathbb {T}}\) with \(a<b\) and \(c<d\). Further, let \(f\in C_{rd}\big ([a,b]_{\mathbb {T}}\times [c,d]_{\mathbb {T}},(\alpha ,\beta )\big )\), \(g\in C_{rd}\big ([c,d]_{\mathbb {T}},{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\) and \(h\in C_{rd}\big ([a,b]_{\mathbb {T}},{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\). If \(\Phi \in C\big ((\alpha ,\beta ),{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\) is convex, where C is the space of all continuous functions, then
Proof
This lemma is a direct extension of the [25, Theorem 2.2.6]. \(\square \)
Remark 3.2
In Lemma 3.1, if we put \(g(t)=h(t)=1\), we get [30, Theorem 3.1].
Theorem 3.3
Let \(a\in [0,\infty )_{\mathbb {T}}\) and \(u, \lambda \in C_{rd}\big ([a,b)_{\mathbb {T}},{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\) such that the delta integral \(\displaystyle \int \limits _{x}^{b}\frac{\lambda (t)u(t)}{\int \limits ^{t}_{a}\lambda (x)\Delta x\int \limits ^{\sigma (t)}_{a}\lambda (x)\Delta x}\Delta t\) converges. If \(f\in C_{rd}\big ([a,b)_{\mathbb {T}},(\alpha ,\beta )\big )\) and \(\Phi \in C\big ((\alpha ,\beta ),{\mathbb {R}}\big )\) is convex, then
Proof
Employing the dynamic Jensen inequality (2.5) and Fubini’s theorem (Lemma 2.1) on time scales, we obtain
which is our desired result. \(\square \)
Below, we present various applications of Theorem 3.3.
Remark 3.4
If we put \(\lambda (t)=1\) in Theorem 3.3, then we recapture Theorem 1.11.
Corollary 3.5
In Theorem 3.3, if \(u(x)=1\) and b is finite, then inequality (3.2) reads
while for \(b\rightarrow \infty \) it becomes
Corollary 3.6
If we take \(\Phi (u)=u^p\), where \(p>1\) is a constant, then inequalities (3.3) and (3.4) respectively be
Remark 3.7
If we put \(\lambda (t)=1\) in Corollary 3.5 and 3.6, then we recapture Corollary 2.1 and Corollary 2.2 in [30] respectively, which is a time scale version of Hardy’s inequality.
Corollary 3.8
If we take \(\Phi (u)=\exp (u)\) and replace f by \(\ln f\), then inequalities (3.3) and (3.4) respectively be
Remark 3.9
If we put \(\lambda (t)=1\) in Corollary 3.8. then we recapture Corollary 2.3 in [30].
Corollary 3.10
If \({\mathbb {T}}={\mathbb {R}}\) in Theorem 3.3, then, using relations (2.3), inequality (3.2) reduces to
Corollary 3.11
If \({\mathbb {T}}={\mathbb {Z}}\) in Theorem 3.3, then, using relations (2.4), inequality (3.2) reduces to
Theorem 3.12
Suppose that a, b, c, \(d\in [0,\infty )_{\mathbb {T}}\), \(f\in C_{rd}\big ([a,b)_{\mathbb {T}}\times [c,d)_{\mathbb {T}},{\mathbb {R}}\big )\), \(g\in C_{rd}\big ([c,d)_{\mathbb {T}},{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\) and \(h\in C_{rd}\big ([a,b)_{\mathbb {T}},{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\). If \(\Phi \in C\big ((\alpha ,\beta ),{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\) is convex, then
Proof
By using two-dimensional dynamic Jensen inequality (3.1) and Fubini’s theorem on time scales, we get
This concludes the proof. \(\square \)
Remark 3.13
If we put \(g(t)=h(t)=1\) in Theorem 3.12, then we recapture [30, Theorem 3.2].
Corollary 3.14
In Theorem 3.12, if we take \(\Phi (u)=u^p\), where \(p>1\) is a constant, then we have
Corollary 3.15
In Theorem 3.12, if we take \(\Phi (u)=\exp (u)\) and replace f by \(\ln f\), then we have
Corollary 3.16
If \({\mathbb {T}}={\mathbb {R}}\) in Theorem 3.12, then, using relations (2.3), inequality (3.5) reduces to
Corollary 3.17
If \({\mathbb {T}}={\mathbb {Z}}\) in Theorem 3.12, then, using relations (2.4), inequality (3.5) reduces to
Our aim in the following theorem is to establish a dynamic Hardy inequality for several functions.
Theorem 3.18
Assume that \(a\in [0,\infty )_{\mathbb {T}}\) and \(\lambda , f_1, f_2, \dots , f_n\in C_{rd}\big ([a,\infty )_{\mathbb {T}},{\mathbb {R}}_+\big )\). Define \(\Lambda (t):=\int \nolimits _{a}^{t}\lambda (s)\Delta s\) and \(F_k(t):=\int \nolimits _{a}^{t}\lambda (s)f_k(s)\Delta s\) for \(k=1,2,\dots ,n\). If \(p\ge q>1\), then
Proof
By utilizing the discrete Jensen inequality, we have
and thus
Multiplying both sides of (3.7) by \(\lambda (t)/\big (\Lambda ^\sigma (t)\big )^q\) and integrating the resulting inequality over t from a to \(\infty \) yield
Applying inequality (1.13) to the right-hand side of the last inequality implies
The proof is complete. \(\square \)
Remark 3.19
If we put \(\lambda (t)=1\) in Theorem 3.18, then we recapture [30, Theorem 4.1].
Corollary 3.20
If \({\mathbb {T}}={\mathbb {R}}\) in Theorem 3.18, then, using relation (2.3), inequality (3.6) reduces to
where \(\Lambda (t):=\int \limits _{a}^{t}\lambda (s)ds\) and \(F_k(t)=\int \limits _{a}^{t}\lambda (s)f_k(s)ds\) for \(k=1,2,\dots ,n\).
Corollary 3.21
If \({\mathbb {T}}={\mathbb {Z}}\) in Theorem 3.18, then, using relation (2.4), inequality (3.6) reduces to
where \(\Lambda (t):=\sum \nolimits _{s=a}^{t-1}\lambda (s)\) and \(F_k(t)=\sum \nolimits _{s=a}^{t-1}\lambda (s)f_k(s)\) for \(k=1,2,\dots ,n\).
4 Conclusion
Hardy-type inequalities have many applications and are subject to strong research: see the books [4, 16, 42] and the recent publications [29, 35, 36, 38, 43]. In this manuscript, by employing the Fubini’s theorem and Jensen inequality on time scales,, several new Hardy-type inequalities are proved. The results extend several dynamic inequalities known in the literature, being new even in the discrete and continuous. As a future work, will try to generalize these inequalities by using \(\alpha \)- conformable calculus.
References
Hardy, G.H.: Note on a theorem of Hilbert. Math. Z. 6(3–4), 314–317 (1920)
Hardy, G.H.: Notes on some points in the integral calculus (lxit). Messenger Math. 57, 12–16 (1928)
Littlewood, J.E., Hardy, G.H.: Elementary theorems concerning power series with positive coefficients and moment constants of positive functions. J. Reine Angew. Math. 157, 141–158 (1927)
Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E., Pólya, G.: Inequalities. Springer Science & Business Media, Cambridge at the University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge (1952)
Hardy, G.H.: Notes on some points in the integral calculus (lx). Messenger Math 54, 150–156 (1925)
Andersen, K.F., Muckenhoupt, B.: Weighted weak type Hardy inequalities with applications to Hilbert transforms and maximal functions. Studia Math. 72(1), 9–26 (1982)
Andersen, K.F., Heinig, H.P.: Weighted norm inequalities for certain integral operators. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 14(4), 834–844 (1983)
Bennett, G.: Some elementary inequalities. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 38(152), 401–425 (1987)
Bennett, G.: Some elementary inequalities. II. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 39(156), 385–400 (1988)
Bennett, G.: Some elementary inequalities. III. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 42(166), 149–174 (1991)
Copson, E.T.: Note on Series of Positive Terms. J. London Math. Soc. 3(1), 49–51 (1928)
Heinig, H.P.: Weighted norm inequalities for certain integral operators. II. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 95(3), 387–395 (1985)
Leindler, L.: Generalization of inequalities of Hardy and Littlewood. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 31, 279–285 (1970)
Kufner, A., Persson, L.-E.: Weighted Inequalities of Hardy Type. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc, River Edge, NJ (2003)
Kufner, A., Maligranda, L., Persson, L.-E.: The Hardy Inequality. Vydavatelský Servis, Plzeň, About its history and some related results (2007)
Opic, B., Kufner, A.: Hardy-Type Inequalities. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow (1990)
Hilger, S.: Analysis on measure chains–a unified approach to continuous and discrete calculus. Results Math. 18(1–2), 18–56 (1990)
Bohner, M., Peterson, A.: Advances in dynamic equations on time scales. Birkhäuser Boston Inc, Boston, MA (2003)
Bohner, M., Peterson, A.: Dynamic Equations on Time Scales. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, An Introduction with Applications, (2001)
Kac, V., Cheung, P.: Quantum Calculus. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, New York (2002)
Abdeldaim, A., El-Deeb, A.A.: On generalized of certain retarded nonlinear integral inequalities and its applications in retarded integro-differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 256, 375–380 (2015)
Agarwal, R.P., Bohner, M., Peterson, A.: Inequalities on time scales: a survey. Math. Inequal. Appl. 4(4), 535–557 (2001)
El-Deeb, A.A.: On some generalizations of nonlinear dynamic inequalities on time scales and their applications. Appl. Anal. Discret. Math. 13(2), 440–462 (2019)
El-Deeb, A. A., El-Sennary, H. A., Khan, Z. A.: Some Steffensen-type dynamic inequalities on time scales. Adv. Difference Equ., 246, (2019)
Agarwal, R., O’Regan, D., Saker, S.: Dynamic inequalities on time scales. Springer, Cham (2014)
Hilscher, R.: A time scales version of a Wirtinger-type inequality and applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 141(1–2), 219–226 (2002)
Řehák, P.: Hardy inequality on time scales and its application to half-linear dynamic equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 5, 495–507 (2005)
Řehák, P.: Hardy inequality on time scales and its application to half-linear dynamic equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 5, 495–507 (2005)
Saker, S.H., O’Regan, D., Agarwal, R.: Generalized hardy, copson, leindler and bennett inequalities on time scales. Math. Nachr. 287(5–6), 686–698 (2014)
Ozkan, U.M., Yildirim, H.: Hardy-Knopp-type inequalities on time scales. Dynam. Syst. Appl. 17(3–4), 477–486 (2008)
El-Deeb, A.A., Mohamed, K.A., Baleanu, D., Rezk, H.M.: Weighted dynamic hardy-type inequalities involving many functions on arbitrary time scales. J. Inequal. Appl. 2022(1), 1–23 (2022)
El-Deeb, A.A., Makharesh, S.D., Almarri, B.: Some new inverse hilbert inequalities on time scales. Symmetry 14(11), 2234 (2022)
El-Deeb, Ahmed A., Awrejcewicz, Jan: Diamond-\(\alpha \) hardy-type inequalities on time scales. Symmetry 14(10), 2047 (2022)
El-Deeb, A.A.: Novel dynamic hardy-type inequalities on time scales. Math. Method. Appl. Sci. 46(5), 5299–5313 (2023)
Saker, S.H., Alzabut, J., Saied, A.I., O’Regan, D.: New characterizations of weights on dynamic inequalities involving a hardy operator. J. Inequal. Appl. 2021(1), 1–24 (2021)
Saker, S.H., Saied, A.I., Krnić, M.: Some new dynamic hardy-type inequalities with kernels involving monotone functions. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales Serie A Matemáticas 114(3), 1–16 (2020)
Saker, S.H., Awwad, E., Saied, A.: Some new dynamic inequalities involving monotonic functions on time scales. J. Funct. Sp. 2019(1), 7584836 (2019)
Rezk, H.M., Saied, A.I., AlNemer, G., Zakarya, M.: On Hardy-knopp type inequalities with kernels via time scale calculus. J. Math. 2022(1), 7997299 (2022)
Awwad, E., Saied, A.I.: Some new multidimensional Hardy-type inequalities with general kernels on time scales. J. Math. Inequal. 16(1), 393–412 (2022)
Saker, S.H., Saied, A.I., Anderson, D.R.: Some new characterizations of weights in dynamic inequalities involving monotonic functions. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 20(2), 1–22 (2021)
Bohner, M., Guseinov, GSh.: Multiple integration on time scales. Dynam. Syst. Appl. 14(3–4), 579–606 (2005)
Agarwal, Ravi P.: Donal O’Regan, Samir H Saker, et al. Hardy type inequalities on time scales. Springer, (2016)
Kaijser, Sten, Persson, Lars-Erik., Öberg, Anders: On carleman and knopp’s inequalities. J. Approx. Theory 117(1), 140–151 (2002)
Acknowledgements
The author would like to express his great gratitude to all the reviewers for many valuable comments, remarks and suggestions that made the final version of the manuscript better organized and presented. I owe a debt of gratitude to my former MSc student Hamza A. Elsennary for offering many useful suggestions concerning this paper.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.A. El-Deeb wrote and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors announce that there are not any Conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
El-Deeb, A.A. Some Generalizations of Dynamic Hardy-Knopp-Type Inequalities on Time Scales. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 23, 251 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-024-01102-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-024-01102-z