Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the world's leading lung disease and lacks effective and specific clinical strategies. Probiotics are increasingly used to support the improvement of the course of inflammatory diseases. In this study, we evaluated the potential of a lactic acid bacteria (LAB) combination containing Limosilactobacillus reuteri GMNL-89 and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei GMNL-133 to decrease lung inflammation and emphysema in a COPD mouse model. This model was induced by intranasal stimulation with elastase and LPS for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of oral LAB administration. The results showed that the LAB combination decreased lung emphysema and reduced inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) in the lung tissue of COPD mice. Microbiome analysis revealed that Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia muciniphila, reduced in the gut of COPD mice, could be restored after LAB treatment. Microbial α-diversity in the lungs decreased in COPD mice but was reversed after LAB administration, which also increased the relative abundance of Candidatus arthromitus in the gut and decreased Burkholderia in the lungs. Furthermore, LAB-treated COPD mice exhibited increased levels of short-chain fatty acids, specifically acetic acid and propionic acid, in the cecum. Additionally, pulmonary emphysema and inflammation negatively correlated with C. arthromitus and Adlercreutzia levels. In conclusion, the combination of L. reuteri GMNL-89 and L. paracasei GMNL-133 demonstrates beneficial effects on pulmonary emphysema and inflammation in experimental COPD mice, correlating with changes in gut and lung microbiota, and providing a potential strategy for future adjuvant therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by irreversible obstruction of the airways and is associated with an inflammatory disorder of the airways [1, 2]. Several etiological factors, such as cigarette smoking, long-term exposure to air pollution, and pathogenic infections, pose a high risk for the development of COPD [3,4,5]. Lung parenchymal destruction (emphysema), central airway inflammation (chronic bronchitis), and peripheral airway inflammation (respiratory bronchiolitis) are the pathological hallmarks of COPD [6]. The chronic inflammation of COPD is considered to result from immune cell infiltration and accumulation at the local lung site, with high levels of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and chemokines/chemokine receptors, including CXC chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1), CXCL8, CXC chemokine receptor 3, triggering lymphoid aggregates, magnifying downstream inflammatory effects, and increasing cytotoxic activity [7,8,9]. Although several targeted drugs for COPD aim to block lung inflammation—such as infliximab, which blocks TNF-α—current pharmacological therapies still have limited effects and show few valuable results in clinical trials [10, 11].
Changing the gut microbiota through probiotic intervention is closely linked to improvements lung inflammation and injury [12]. Several metabolites or products, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and amino acids, from the gut microbiota also contribute to respiratory health through the gut-lung axis [13, 14]. Probiotics such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium show anti-inflammatory effects by decreasing pulmonary inflammation in COPD mouse models [15, 16]. In our previous study, L. reuteri GMNL-89 was shown to have a beneficial effect in the attenuation of systemic lupus erythematosus-induced hepatitis and liver injury [17]. Moreover, the inhibitory effect of gemcitabine on tumor growth in pancreatic cancer can be synergistically enhanced by the intervention of probiotic compositions, L. reuteri GMNL-89 and L. paracasei GMNL-133 [18].
Despite the limited effectiveness of current pharmacological therapy and the largely unknown pathogenesis of COPD, it is worthwhile to clarify the relationship between gut and lung microbiota with lung inflammation in COPD. Previously, we found that L. reuteri GMNL-89 has an anti-inflammatory effect on liver inflammation in lupus-prone mice [17], and L. paracasei GMNL-133 reduces symptoms in children with atopic dermatitis [19]. Additionally, several studies suggest that probiotic combinations may be more effective than single strains [19,20,21,22,23]. In this study, we use a combination of GMNL-89 and GMNL-133 in a mouse model of COPD to investigate whether a probiotic intervention can ameliorate conditions such as emphysema and lung inflammation, by reducing immune cell infiltration and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. In addition, we aim to elucidate the metabolites of the gut microbiota that influence the disease process of COPD through the gut-lung axis. Correlation between lung inflammation and gut/lung microbiota in COPD mouse will be observed.
Materials and Methods
Animals and Treatment
BALB/cByJNarl male mice aged 8–10 weeks, were obtained from the National Laboratory Animal Centre, Tainan, Taiwan. The study protocol was approved by the IACUC Laboratory Animal Center of GenMont Biotech Incorporation (Taiwan IACUC No. 194, GenMont Biotech Incorporation No. 110009). The mouse model of COPD was established by exposure to elastase and LPS, as described in a previous study by Ganesan et al. [24]. Briefly, COPD was induced via the intranasal route with 1.5 U of porcine pancreatic elastase (Cat No. E7885, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) on day 1 and 8 µg of LPS from E. coli O26:B6 (Cat. No. L2654, Sigma-Aldrich) on day 4 for four consecutive weeks. Mice that received a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution served as the control group. The experimental procedure is shown in Fig. 1A. After exposure to elastase/LPS for four weeks, each mouse in the LAB or COPD/LAB groups was orally gavaged with 109 colony-forming unit (CFU) of probiotic compositions (GMNL-89 plus GMNL-133 at a ratio of 1:1) in 200 µl of PBS every day, five days per week for two consecutive weeks. The control mice were fed 200 µl of PBS by oral gavage. After two weeks of probiotic administration, the mice were sacrificed.
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF) Collection and Lung Histology Analysis
The collection of BALF was conducted according to the protocol described by Van Hoecke et al. [25]. The fluids were then centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 min to separate the cell pellet and the supernatant. Total cell counts of the BALFs were measured under light microscopy after staining with Giemsa. The cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in PBS, and analyzed by flow cytometry for infiltrated immune cells, which were stained with fluorescence-conjugated antibodies including anti-CD45, anti-CD11b, and anti-Ly6G. Macrophages and neutrophils were defined as CD45+/CD11b+ [26] and CD45+/Ly6G+ [27], respectively, and quantified by calculating the total number of BALF cells multiplied by the percentage of each cell type. For histological analysis, the left lung tissues from the sacrificed mice were perfused transtracheally with 10% formalin in PBS. The samples were embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 µm thickness, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The mean linear intercept length (MLI) was used to assess emphysematous changes in the lungs using ImageJ software (version 1.53v, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), based on the analytical settings by Crowley et al. [28]. The levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were determined by immunohistochemistry using the biotin-avidin method. Images of the slides were captured and analyzed using the TissueFAX Plus Imaging System (TissueGnostics, Vienna, Austria).
DNA Extraction and Analysis of Microbiota By Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
DNA from the fecal samples was extracted using the Quick-DNA fungal/bacterial kit (Zymo Research Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA). Reaction mixtures were prepared with 5 µl of 2 × Rotor-Gene SYBR Green PCR Master Mixes (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), 2 µl of DNA from fecal extract and 3 µl of forward and reverse primers. The primer sequences of the targeted microbes (L. reuteri, L. paracasei, Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium, Akkermansia muciniphila) and the internal control (total bacteria) are listed in Table 1. The reaction mixtures were analyzed on the Roter Gene Q 2plex machine (QIAGEN). Relative quantification of changes in specific bacterial species was calculated using the Eq. 2−△△Ct. ΔCt was calculated as the difference between the Ct of the target bacteria primers and the Ct of the total bacteria primers (Ct_target bacteria − Ct_total bacteria). ΔΔCt was calculated as the difference between the ΔCt measured in each treatment and the ΔCt measured in the control group. Values derived from the 2−ΔΔCt method represent fold changes between a treated sample and a control.
16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing
Inferior lobe of the lung and ileum intestine samples from each group were collected at the sacrifice timepoint, as shown in Fig. 1A, and all specimens were extracted using a QIAGEN DNA kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA samples were analyzed with a 260/280 OD in the range of 1.8 to 2.0. For 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) amplicons, PCR was performed by using metagenomic DNA as a template, which was amplified with the bacterial-specific primers S17 (5’-TCG TCG GCA GCG TCA GAT GTG TAT AAG AGA CAG CCT ACG GGN GGC WGC AG-3’) and A21 (5’-GTC TCG TGG GCT CGG AGA TGT GTA TAA GAG ACA GGA CTA CHV GGG TAT CTA ATC C-3’). A fragment analyzer (5300; Agilent Technologies) was used to verify the amplified DNA sizing, and an Illumina MiSeq platform was used to sequencing. DNA samples were assigned indices and Illumina sequencing adapters with the Nextera XT Index Kit v2. After library construction, the samples were mixed using a 600-cycle MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 at a final concentration of 4 pM, loaded onto a MiSeq cartridge, and then transferred onto the instrument. Automated cluster generation and a 2 × 300 bp paired-end sequencing run were performed. The sequences generated passed through a filtering process to obtain the qualified reads. The total reads were merged, low-quality and chimera sequences were removed, and OTUs at a 97% similarity with the Greengenes database (v13.8) were clustered. We employed the QIAGEN CLC Microbial Genomics Module (v10.1.1) for further analysis.
Bioinformatic Analysis
The processing and statistical analysis of meta-taxonomic data were performed as previously described [29]. To determine differences in microbial composition among groups, the Shannon diversity index was used to analyze the alpha diversity of the taxonomic composition. The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) with weighted UniFrac was used to measure the beta diversity. The Qiagen CLC Microbial Genomics Module was used in combination with linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) to produce the OTU table. To identify specific microbial markers among groups, LEfSe was performed using the Galaxy/Hutlab web tool with a 0.05 alpha value as the cutoff for the factorial Kruskal–Wallis test, pairwise Wilcoxon test, and a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score cutoff of 2.0. Spearman’s correlation (calculated using the corrplot package v0.84) and principal component analysis (PCA; performed using the ade4 package v1.7–16) were applied using the R language (v4.0.2).
Analysis and Measurement of SCFAs
Gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) was used to measure the concentrations of five SCFAs: acetic acid (AA), propionic acid (PA), butyric acid (BA), iso-BA, and pentanoic acid (PenA) in cecal contents [30], as performed by the Health Technology Center in Chung Shan Medical University (Taichung, Taiwan). Briefly, 5 µL of the 100 µM internal standard was mixed with 100 µL of the sample and 100 µL of propyl formate. After vortexing and centrifugation, the supernatant was subjected to GC analysis using an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph. A sample of 0.2–0.4 g of cecal matter was dissolved in reverse osmosis water and vortexed for 2 min. The mixture was then centrifuged at 6000 × g for 5 min. The suspension was collected and filtered through a 0.45 µm filter. 1 mL of the filtered sample was acidified with 2.0 mL of 50% sulfuric acid, extracted with 1 mL of ether using a vortexing device for 2 min, and then centrifuged at 4000 × g for 5 min. After resting at 4 °C for 30 min, the ether fraction of the suspension was used for GC-FID analysis. Each SCFA was quantified in units of µmole/g of cecal content.
Statistical Analysis
Experimental results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and expressed as percentage of treatment groups in comparison with control groups. For normally distributed data, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's multiple comparison test was used for more than two groups, and Student's t-test was used for two groups. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
L. reuteri GMNL-89 and L. paracasei GMNL-133 Oral Combination Ameliorates Lung Emphysema in Experimental Copd Mice
First, it was observed whether the oral administration of LAB containing GMNL-89 and GMNL-133 could ameliorate the LPS/elastase induced pulmonary emphysema. Mice were intranasally challenged with LPS/elastase to induce emphysema. The emphysema was characterized by alveolar wall destruction and abnormally large spaces surrounding the terminal bronchioles (Fig. 1B, COPD group). In the COPD group receiving LAB (Fig. 1B, COPD + LAB), the pulmonary emphysema spaces were restored. The LAB-only group exhibited normal characteristics in lung sections (Fig. 1B, LAB). The MLI of the lung, used to evaluate experimental emphysema [31], was apparently increased in the COPD group (Fig. 1C) but was restored in the COPD + LAB group (Fig. 1C). Thus, our results suggest that the oral administration of L. reuteri GMNL-89 and L. paracasei GMNL-133 holds potential therapeutic value in the treatment of pulmonary emphysema.
Oral Administration of a Combination of L. reuteri GMNL-89 and L. paracasei GMNL-133 Decreases Pulmonary Inflammation in Experimental COPD Mice
In addition to emphysema changes, the infiltrations of macrophages and neutrophils in the lung were examined by collecting BALF followed by flow cytometric analysis. The results showed that oral administration of GMNL-89 combined with GMNL-133 significantly reduced total leukocyte infiltration (Fig. 2A) and the levels of infiltrating macrophages (Fig. 2B) and neutrophils (Fig. 2C). IL-6 and TNF-α, known to be important inflammatory mediators in COPD, were observed to be significantly increased in the lung tissue of COPD mice compared to control mice (Fig. 3A). Both the levels of IL-6 (Fig. 3A and B) and TNF-α (Fig. 3C and 3D) were significantly reduced when COPD mice were treated with LAB. Furthermore, the decreased levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in the lung tissues of COPD mice treated with LAB were confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. S1). Therefore, the combination of L. reuteri GMNL-89 and L. paracasei GMNL-133 not only mitigates pulmonary emphysema but also significantly reduces pulmonary inflammation by decreasing leukocyte infiltration and inflammatory cytokine levels in experimental COPD mice, underscoring its therapeutic efficacy.
L. reuteri GMNL-89 and L. paracasei GMNL-133 Combination Modulates Gut and Lung Beneficial Bacteria Abundance in Experimental COPD Mice
Then, the relative abundance of beneficial gut bacteria, Bifidobacterium and A. muciniphila, was determined by qPCR from stool samples collected on the last day after a two-week period of probiotics consumption. Both Bifidobacterium and A. muciniphila levels decreased in the stool of COPD mice; however, their levels were restored when the COPD mice were administered LABs (Fig. 4). In the intestine and lung tissues of mice in the four groups, the expression levels of Lactobacillus spp., L. reuteri, and L. paracasei were also determined at this final timepoint. In the intestine, the relative abundance of L. reuteri significantly increased in the LAB-only and COPD + LAB groups (Fig. S2A). The abundance of L. paracasei also showed an increasing trend following LAB administration, although no statistical difference was observed among the four groups (Fig. S2A). Total Lactobacillus spp. abundances did not show significant differences among the groups (Fig. S2A). In the lungs, L. paracasei abundance was significantly reduced in COPD mice (Fig. S2B). Total Lactobacillus spp. levels were noticeably decreased in COPD mice but were restored in the COPD + LAB group (Fig. S2B).
Changes in Gut and Lung Microbiota in Experimental COPD Mice After Oral Consumption of L. reuteri GMNL-89 and L. paracasei GMNL-133 Combination
NGS 16S rRNA gene analysis was used to determine the changes in gut and lung microbiota in experimental COPD mice, with and without the administration of a LAB combination. The alpha diversity of lung and gut microbiota decreased in COPD mice, and this loss of alpha diversity was reversed after consuming the LAB combination (Fig. 5A). Beta diversity results showed no statistical difference among the four groups in lung and gut microbiota (Fig. 5B). We further analyzed the relative abundance of bacterial expression in the four groups by LEfSe. In the lung microbiota, there was an increase in the abundance of the Burkholderia genus in the COPD groups compared to the control group. The increase in the abundance of Burkholderia was inhibited by the consumption of the LAB combination (Fig. 4C, left panel). In the gut microbiota, Candidatus arthromitus increased in COPD mice after consuming LAB compared to the COPD group (Fig. 4C, right). The increase in C. arthromitus levels was also observed in the LAB-only group compared to the control group (Fig. 4C, right). Further analysis by LEfSe revealed that the genus Prevotella and the family Lachnospiraceae had the highest abundance in COPD mice after oral administration of LAB compared to the control mice. In addition, the relative abundance of Prevotella genus and Lachnospiraceae family was statistically different between the COPD and COPD + LAB groups (Fig. S3).
Oral Administration of L. reuteri GMNL-89 and L. paracasei GMNL-133 Combination Affects the Level of SCFAs in the Intestine of Experimental COPD Mice
SCFAs are known as important mediators in the gut-lung axis with immunomodulatory effects [32]. The levels of SCFAs, such as AA, PA, iso-BA, BA, and PA, in the cecal samples were detected using the GC-FID method. The individual level of each SCFA relative to the total level of the five SCFAs was measured and presented as a percentage (Fig. 6A to E). The proportions of the five SCFAs among the four groups are presented in a pie chart (Fig. 6F). The percentage of AA was significantly increased in the COPD mice group after consuming LAB, compared to the COPD group (Fig. 6A and F). PA (Fig. 6B) and PenA (Fig. 6E) also increased significantly in the LAB-administered groups, regardless of COPD induction. However, compared with the control mice, the percentage of BA decreased in the two groups receiving LAB (Fig. 6D and F). Among the four groups, there was no statistical difference in the level of iso-BA (Fig. 6C and F).
Correlations Between Lung Destruction and the Abundance of Bacteria in the Gut and Lungs
Furthermore, we were interested in the correlation between lung inflammation and beneficial bacteria in the gut and lung. Results showed that the inflammatory cytokine IL-6 in the lung was negatively correlated with the abundance of C. arthromitus in the gut (Fig. 7A). The estimation of lung emphysema by MLI values displayed a negative correlation with the abundance of Adlercreutzia in the gut (Fig. 7B). Additionally, both the MLI values (Fig. 7C) and the inflammatory cytokine TNF-α (Fig. 7D) were negatively correlated with the abundance of Lactobacillus spp. in the lung.
Discussion
Gut Microbiota and Lung Health Through Gut-lung Axis
In COPD, disrupting the gut-lung axis can lead to dysbiosis of both the gut and lung microbiota, including decreased microbiota diversity, altered microbial composition, increased pro-inflammatory cytokines, and a dysfunctional immune response [33]. In our study, an increased abundance of the phylum Firmicutes and the genera Lactobacillus and C. arthromitus was observed in the intestines of mice with combined LAB administration (Fig. 5). Gut microbiota may influence the immune response and further regulate airway homeostasis through the gut-lung axis. Recently, a gut microbiome-activated Th17 response against fungi in the respiratory tract was discovered [34, 35]. Interestingly, our results also showed that the lung inflammatory cytokine IL-6 was negatively correlated with the intestinal abundance of C. arthromitus (Fig. 7A). C. arthromitus, also known as segmented filamentous bacteria, could activate the Th17 response through the release of endocytic vesicles and the transfer of cell wall proteins into the intestine [36, 37]. In addition, we found that the level of pulmonary emphysema was negatively correlated with the abundance of Adlercreutzia in the intestine (Fig. 7B). Studies have reported that an increasing abundance of Adlercreutzia in the intestine has a beneficial effect on various diseases, including ulcerative colitis, influenza virus infection, and depression [38,39,40]. Interestingly, B. animalis subsp. lactis intervention could increase Adlercreutzia abundance, leading to increased acetate and butyrate release into circulation, which in turn increases acetate and butyrate receptor expression and leads to inhibition of lung inflammation and immune cell infiltration [41]. Furthermore, in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis without concomitant inflammatory bowel disease, a significant decrease in A. equolifaciens was observed in the gut microbiota [42]. In our study, a decrease in Oscillospira abundance in the intestines was also observed in the COPD group, and this decrease was reversed in COPD mice with LAB administration (data not shown). Oscillospira, capable of producing short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate, has recently been suggested as a candidate for next-generation probiotics [43]. The administration of other probiotics, such as Bacillus coagulans and B. subtilis, has also been shown to positively regulate the abundance of Oscillospira in the gut [44, 45]. Intestinal Oscillospira may regulate the distal organs through circulating route, such as the gut-brain axis, however, the role of Oscillospira needs further clarification [46].
The Pathological Role of Gut Prevotella in the Lung Inflammation
In the LEfSe analysis, we found that the genus Prevotella and the family Lachnospiraceae in the gut had significant influence scores when comparing the COPD and LAB-consuming groups (Fig. S3B). Intestinal Prevotella spp. abundance was also decreased in LAB-supplemented COPD mice compared with the COPD group (data not shown). Recently, intestinal Prevotella has been associated with chronic inflammatory states [47]. The gut microbiota of smokers contained more Prevotella compared to that of non-smokers [48]. Intestinal Prevotellaceae also served as colitogenic bacteria that could trigger Th17-mediated inflammation and neutrophil activation in some inflammatory diseases such as periodontitis, rheumatoid arthritis, bacterial vaginosis, intestinal dysbiosis [49]. Prevotella might be associated with a presumed COPD subtype linked to the rate of lung function deterioration. By analyzing the gut microbiota from stool samples of COPD patients, the group with declining lung function had a lower proportion of Prevotella_9 compared to controls. Moreover, Prevotella_2 abundance was further reduced in the decline group after one year [50]. The regulated mechanisms of the intestinal microbiota involved in the decline of lung function needs further investigation.
The Lung Microbiota in the COPD
The balance of the lung microbiota is important for the maintenance of lung health. Dysbiosis of the lung microbiome has been implicated in the development of lung diseases such as asthma, COPD, lung cancer, and respiratory tract infections [51]. It has been reported that COPD patients have increased levels of Proteobacteria and decreased levels of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Streptococcus, Haemophilus influenzae, and Prevotella spp. compared to healthy subjects [52]. In our study, a correlation between pulmonary emphysema, inflammation, and the expression of lung bacteria was also observed. Interestingly, the abundance of Lactobacillus spp. in the lung was negatively correlated with both lung emphysema and the level of the inflammatory cytokine TNF-α in the lung (Fig. 7). This suggests that the Lactobacilli in the lungs may play an important role in maintaining lung health. Some in vivo studies have shown that probiotics administered intranasally to the respiratory tract can alleviate lung diseases, indicating that lung Lactobacillus is associated with lung microbiome balance [53, 54]. Additionally, intranasal inoculation of lactobacilli in the respiratory tract restored the level of tryptindole-3-acetic acid from tryptophan metabolism, which alleviated the neutrophil-predominant COPD [55].
SCFA and Lung Function in COPD
SCFAs produced by the gut microbiome play a role in the gut-lung axis by transferring to the lungs and managing lung diseases [56, 57]. For instance, butyrate has broad effects on immune cells in lung disorders such as allergic asthma, COPD, and pulmonary fibrosis [58, 59]. Antunes et al. demonstrated that administering acetate to the respiratory tract could enhance antiviral immunity and had an interferon-enhancing effect to ameliorate the virus-induced inflammatory response during rhinovirus infection [60]. In our study, we analyzed five selected SCFAs in the cecal contents using GC-FID and quantified the concentration of each SCFA based on standards. Consequently, the total SCFA concentration could only be presented as the sum of these five SCFAs. The results indicated that the induction of COPD decreased the total SCFA concentration in the cecal contents, although not to a statistically significant extent. Additionally, administration of LAB did not increase the total SCFA concentration (Fig. S4). Therefore, we focused on analyzing the percentage of each SCFA. Significantly increased proportions of AA were observed after consuming LAB, regardless of whether COPD was induced (Fig. 6A). Furthermore, the proportions of PA and PenA also increased in the LAB-treated group compared to the control mice (Fig. 6B and E), while BA decreased in the LAB-treated group (Fig. 6D). It is known that different gut microbes are responsible for producing different SCFAs. For example, Firmicutes species, including Lactobacillaceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Lachnospiraceae, are the primary producers of BA and PA [61, 62], whereas Bifidobacteria can metabolize lactulose to produce AA [63]. These altered proportions of individual SCFAs indicate changes in gut microbiota composition following the induction of COPD and oral feeding of LAB. Further studies are needed to determine the role of butyrate in the intranasal elastase/LPS-induced COPD model.
Conclusion
In this study, the oral administration of the probiotic composition containing L. reuteri GMNL-89 and L. paracasei GMNL-133 improved pulmonary emphysema and inflammation in mice with LPS/elastase-induced COPD. The diversity of the microbial community in the intestine, altered by the probiotic intervention, could change the content of SCFAs in the intestine. This change may further regulate the lung microbiota and significantly improve lung dysfunction and inflammation via the gut-lung axis. The composition of the probiotics, containing GMNL-89 and GMNL-133, offers an alternative therapeutic avenue for COPD management.
Data Availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
Hogg JC, Chu F, Utokaparch S et al (2004) The nature of small-airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 350(26):2645–2653. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032158
Corlateanu A, Covantev S, Mathioudakis AG, Botnaru V, Siafakas N (2016) Prevalence and burden of comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Investig 54(6):387–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resinv.2016.07.001
Wang C, Xu J, Yang L et al (2018) Prevalence and risk factors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China (the China Pulmonary Health [CPH] study): a national cross-sectional study. Lancet 391(10131):1706–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30841-9
Halpin DMG, Criner GJ, Papi A, Singh D, Anzueto A, Martinez FJ, Agusti AA, Vogelmeier CF (2021) Global initiative for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease. The, 2020 GOLD science committee report on COVID-19 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 203(1):24–36. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202009-3533SO
Vij N, Chandramani-Shivalingappa P, Van Westphal C, Hole R, Bodas M (2018) Cigarette smoke-induced autophagy impairment accelerates lung aging, COPD-emphysema exacerbations and pathogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 314(1):C73-c87. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00110.2016
Szilasi M, Dolinay T, Nemes Z, Strausz J (2006) Pathology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pathol Oncol Res 12(1):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02893433
Jogdand P, Siddhuraj P, Mori M et al (2020) Eosinophils, basophils and type 2 immune microenvironments in COPD-affected lung tissue. Eur Respir J. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00110-2019
Henrot P, Prevel R, Berger P, Dupin I (2019) Chemokines in COPD: from implication to therapeutic use. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20112785
Barnes PJ (2018) Targeting cytokines to treat asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nat Rev Immunol 18(7):454–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-018-0006-6
Guo P, Li R, Piao TH, Wang CL, Wu XL, Cai HY (2022) Pathological mechanism and targeted drugs of COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 17:1565–1575. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S366126
Roche N (2007) Where current pharmacological therapies fall short in COPD: symptom control is not enough. Eur Respir Rev 16(105):98–104. https://doi.org/10.1183/09059180.00010503
Wu Y, Pei C, Wang X et al (2022) Probiotics ameliorates pulmonary inflammation via modulating gut microbiota and rectifying Th17/Treg imbalance in a rat model of PM25 induced lung injury. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 244:114060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114060
Wang X, Zhang P, Zhang X (2021) Probiotics regulate gut microbiota: an effective method to improve immunity. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26196076
Ma PJ, Wang MM, Wang Y (2022) Gut microbiota: A new insight into lung diseases. Biomed Pharmacother 155:113810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113810
Nam W, Kim H, Kim J, Nam B, Bae C, Kim J, Park S, Lee J, Sim J (2021) Lactic acid bacteria and natural product complex ameliorates ovalbumin-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in mice. J Med Food 24(5):517–526. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2020.4853
Eom JE, Kim GD, Kim YI et al (2023) Bulb of Lilium longiflorum Thunb Extract Fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus Reduces Inflammation in a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Model. J Microbiol Biotechnol 33(5):634–643. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2301.01022
Hsu TC, Huang CY, Liu CH, Hsu KC, Chen YH, Tzang BS (2017) Lactobacillus paracasei GMNL-32, Lactobacillus reuteri GMNL-89 and L. reuteri GMNL-263 ameliorate hepatic injuries in lupus-prone mice. Br J Nutr 117(8):1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001039
Chen SM, Chieng WW, Huang SW, Hsu LJ, Jan MS (2020) The synergistic tumor growth-inhibitory effect of probiotic Lactobacillus on transgenic mouse model of pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine. Sci Rep 10(1):20319. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77322-5
Wang IJ, Wang JY (2015) Children with atopic dermatitis show clinical improvement after Lactobacillus exposure. Clin Exp Allergy 45(4):779–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12489
Huang CF, Chie WC, Wang IJ (2018) Efficacy of Lactobacillus administration in school-age children with asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10111678
Tsai WH, Yeh WL, Chou CH, Wu CL, Lai CH, Yeh YT, Liao CA, Wu CC (2023) Suppressive effects of lactobacillus on depression through regulating the gut microbiota and metabolites in C57BL/6J mice induced by ampicillin. Biomedicines. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041068
Chapman CM, Gibson GR, Rowland I (2011) Health benefits of probiotics: are mixtures more effective than single strains? Eur J Nutr 50(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-010-0166-z
McFarland LV (2021) Efficacy of single-strain probiotics versus multi-strain mixtures: systematic review of strain and disease specificity. Dig Dis Sci 66(3):694–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06244-z
Ganesan S, Faris AN, Comstock AT et al (2010) Quercetin prevents progression of disease in elastase/LPS-exposed mice by negatively regulating MMP expression. Respir Res 11(1):131. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-11-131
Van Hoecke L, Job ER, Saelens X, Roose K (2017) Bronchoalveolar lavage of murine lungs to analyze inflammatory cell infiltration. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/55398
Duan M, Steinfort DP, Smallwood D, Hew M, Chen W, Ernst M, Irving LB, Anderson GP, Hibbs ML (2016) CD11b immunophenotyping identifies inflammatory profiles in the mouse and human lungs. Mucosal Immunol 9(2):550–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2015.84
Swamydas M, Luo Y, Dorf ME, Lionakis MS (2015) Isolation of mouse neutrophils. Curr Protoc Immunol 110:3 20 21-23 20 15. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142735.im0320s110
Crowley G, Kwon S, Caraher EJ, Haider SH, Lam R, Batra P, Melles D, Liu M, Nolan A (2019) Quantitative lung morphology: semi-automated measurement of mean linear intercept. BMC Pulm Med 19(1):206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0915-6
Jhong JH, Tsai WH, Yang LC, Chou CH, Lee TY, Yeh YT, Huang CH, Luo YH (2022) Heat-killed Lacticaseibacillus paracasei GMNL-653 exerts antiosteoporotic effects by restoring the gut microbiota dysbiosis in ovariectomized mice. Front Nutr 9:804210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.804210
Huang YC, Huang LT, Sheen JM et al (2020) Resveratrol treatment improves the altered metabolism and related dysbiosis of gut programed by prenatal high-fat diet and postnatal high-fat diet exposure. J Nutr Biochem 75:108260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2019.108260
Rocha NN, de Oliveira MV, Braga CL et al (2017) Ghrelin therapy improves lung and cardiovascular function in experimental emphysema. Respir Res 18(1):185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-017-0668-9
Ashique S, De Rubis G, Sirohi E et al (2022) Short Chain Fatty Acids: Fundamental mediators of the gut-lung axis and their involvement in pulmonary diseases. Chem Biol Interact 368:110231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110231
Qu L, Cheng Q, Wang Y, Mu H, Zhang Y (2022) COPD and gut-lung axis: how microbiota and host inflammasome influence COPD and related therapeutics. Front Microbiol 13:868086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.868086
McAleer JP, Nguyen NL, Chen K et al (2016) Pulmonary Th17 antifungal immunity is regulated by the gut microbiome. J Immunol 197(1):97–107. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1502566
Scheffold A, Bacher P (2020) Anti-fungal T cell responses in the lung and modulation by the gut-lung axis. Curr Opin Microbiol 56:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2020.06.006
Hedblom GA, Reiland HA, Sylte MJ, Johnson TJ, Baumler DJ (2018) Segmented filamentous bacteria - metabolism meets immunity. Front Microbiol 9:1991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01991
Ladinsky MS, Araujo LP, Zhang X et al (2019) Endocytosis of commensal antigens by intestinal epithelial cells regulates mucosal T cell homeostasis. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat4042
Dong Y, Liao W, Tang J, Fei T, Gai Z, Han M (2022) Bifidobacterium BLa80 mitigates colitis by altering gut microbiota and alleviating inflammation. AMB Express 12(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-022-01411-z
Lu W, Fang Z, Liu X, Li L, Zhang P, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W (2021) The potential role of probiotics in protection against influenza a virus infection in mice. Foods. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040902
Zhang X, Chen S, Zhang M et al (2021) Effects of fermented milk containing Lacticaseibacillus paracasei strain shirota on constipation in patients with depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072238
Nan X, Zhao W, Liu WH et al (2023) Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL-99 ameliorates colitis-related lung injury in mice by modulating short-chain fatty acid production and inflammatory monocytes/macrophages. Food Funct 14(2):1099–1112. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2fo03374g
Bajer L, Kverka M, Kostovcik M et al (2017) Distinct gut microbiota profiles in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 23(25):4548–4558. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i25.4548
Yang J, Li Y, Wen Z, Liu W, Meng L, Huang H (2021) Oscillospira - a candidate for the next-generation probiotics. Gut Microbes 13(1):1987783. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.1987783
Zhao S, Peng X, Zhou QY, Huang YY, Rao X, Tu JL, Xiao HY, Liu DM (2021) Bacillus coagulans 13002 and fructo-oligosaccharides improve the immunity of mice with immunosuppression induced by cyclophosphamide through modulating intestinal-derived and fecal microbiota. Food Res Int 140:109793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109793
Liu YL, Yan T, Li XY, Duan YL, Yang X, Yang XJ (2020) Effects of Bacillus subtilis and antibiotic growth promoters on the growth performance, intestinal function and gut microbiota of pullets from 0 to 6 weeks. Animal. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731120000191
Zhu S, Jiang Y, Xu K, Cui M, Ye W, Zhao G, Jin L, Chen X (2020) The progress of gut microbiome research related to brain disorders. J Neuroinflammation 17(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-1705-z
Ley RE (2016) Gut microbiota in 2015: Prevotella in the gut: choose carefully. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 13(2):69–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2016.4
Benjamin JL, Hedin CR, Koutsoumpas A et al (2012) Smokers with active Crohn’s disease have a clinically relevant dysbiosis of the gastrointestinal microbiota. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18(6):1092–1100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21864
Larsen JM (2017) The immune response to Prevotella bacteria in chronic inflammatory disease. Immunology 151(4):363–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12760
Chiu YC, Lee SW, Liu CW, Lan TY, Wu LS (2022) Relationship between gut microbiota and lung function decline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a 1-year follow-up study. Respir Res 23(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-01928-8
Yagi K, Huffnagle GB, Lukacs NW, Asai N (2021) The lung microbiome during health and disease. Int J Mol Sci 22(19):10872. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910872
Sze MA, Dimitriu PA, Suzuki M et al (2015) Host response to the lung microbiome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 192(4):438–445. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201502-0223OC
Yuksel N, Gelmez B, Yildiz-Pekoz A (2023) Lung microbiota: its relationship to respiratory system diseases and approaches for lung-targeted probiotic bacteria delivery. Mol Pharm 20(7):3320–3337. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00323
Jamalkandi SA, Ahmadi A, Ahrari I, Salimian J, Karimi M, Ghanei M (2021) Oral and nasal probiotic administration for the prevention and alleviation of allergic diseases, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nutr Res Rev 34(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954422420000116
Yan Z, Chen B, Yang Y et al (2022) Multi-omics analyses of airway host-microbe interactions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease identify potential therapeutic interventions. Nat Microbiol 7(9):1361–1375. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01196-8
Liu Q, Tian X, Maruyama D, Arjomandi M, Prakash A (2021) Lung immune tone via gut-lung axis: gut-derived LPS and short-chain fatty acids’ immunometabolic regulation of lung IL-1β, FFAR2, and FFAR3 expression. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 321(1):L65-l78. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00421.2020
Hildebrand CB, Lichatz R, Pich A, Mühlfeld C, Woltemate S, Vital M, Brandenberger C (2023) Short-chain fatty acids improve inflamm-aging and acute lung injury in old mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 324(4):L480-l492. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00296.2022
Yip W, Hughes MR, Li Y, Cait A, Hirst M, Mohn WW, McNagny KM (2021) Butyrate shapes immune cell fate and function in allergic asthma. Front Immunol 12:628453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.628453
Corrêa RO, Castro PR, Moser R, Ferreira CM, Quesniaux VFJ, Vinolo MAR, Ryffel B (2022) Butyrate: Connecting the gut-lung axis to the management of pulmonary disorders. Front Nutr 9:1011732. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1011732
Antunes KH, Singanayagam A, Williams L et al (2023) Airway-delivered short-chain fatty acid acetate boosts antiviral immunity during rhinovirus infection. J Allergy Clin Immunol 151(2):447-457.e445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2022.09.026
Louis P, Young P, Holtrop G, Flint HJ (2010) Diversity of human colonic butyrate-producing bacteria revealed by analysis of the butyryl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase gene. Environ Microbiol 12(2):304–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02066.x
Louis P, Hold GL, Flint HJ (2014) The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Microbiol 12(10):661–672. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3344
Odenwald MA, Lin H, Lehmann C et al (2023) Bifidobacteria metabolize lactulose to optimize gut metabolites and prevent systemic infection in patients with liver disease. Nat Microbiol 8(11):2033–2049. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-023-01493-w
Funding
This work is supported by the E-Da hospital (Y.-T. Y., grant No. EDAHI-108001), Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital (H. -T. S.), and Changhua Christian Hospital (B. -Y. W.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, HTS, WHT, BYW, and WWC; data curation and analysis, HTS, CHC, WWC, and YTF; funding acquisition and resources, HTS, YTY, BYW, and WHT; original draft writing, YTF and YTY; manuscript review and editing, HTS, WHT, YTF, BYW, and WWC. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
Ethical Statements
There was no involvement of human subjects in this study. Protocols of animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the IACUC Laboratory Animal Center of GenMont Biotech Incorporation with the approval number as 110,009.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, HT., Fang, YT., Tsai, WH. et al. A Lactobacillus Combination Ameliorates Lung Inflammation in an Elastase/LPS—induced Mouse Model of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-024-10300-9
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-024-10300-9