Abstract
In this work, NiO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst with different additives prepared by excessive dipping method, was investigated in CO methanation in an attempt to improve the reaction activity and enhance the anti-coking property. The influences of additives, such as Zr, Co, Ce, Zn and La, on catalysts in performance of CO methanation were studied in a fixed-bed reactor. The catalysts were characterized by XRD, H2-TPR, H2-TPD and CO-TPD. The results showed that the addition of the additives could promote the dispersion of nickle species on support and decrease the crystallite size of Nickel species. The reduction temperatures of catalysts were all reduced except the one with Mg. The catalytic results showed that additives improved the reaction activity of CO methanation. Especially, the addition of La gave the best catalytic performance of 100 % CO conversion and 99.61 % CH4 selectivity, respectively. The space–time yield of CH4 was achieved as high as 2134.5 g kg−1 h−1.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Methanation is one of the core technologies of coal to synthetic natural gas (SNG) process [1]. This technology requires catalyst with high activity and high stability due to the high exothermic of the methanation reaction [2–4]. Currently, commercial methanation technology was mastered by Lurgi (LURGI), Johnson Matthey (DAVY) and Topsoe (TOPSØE) [5]. All of these technologies are performed in adiabatic fixed-bed reactor. Ni-based catalyst is the most widely investigated system due to its high efficiency and low cost. NiO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst has received renewed interests for the methanation of carbon monoxide.
It is known that the main reasons for Ni-based catalyst deactivation are the carbon deposition and sintering in methanation reaction process [6–8]. The addition of rare earth oxide can change the interaction between NiO and the support, as well as the pH of the catalyst surface to improve the Ni dispersion. They are beneficial for the catalyst activity, stability and resistance to carbon deposition [9]. The suitable content of MgO could increase the monolayer capacity of NiO on the surface of the supports. And the reduction of the nickel grain was become smaller due to the introduction of Mg additives. But MgO would enhance the chemical interaction between the NiO and the supports, resulting in a new formation of NiO–Al2O3–MgO catalyst, which was not easy to be reduced [10]. Jun et al. [11] developed a Ni–Co bimetallic aerogel catalyst prepared by a sol–gel method for the production of SNG via CO methanation. The catalyst exhibited higher conversion of CO, higher yield and selectivity of CH4. Moreover, the NiCo catalyst showed no deactivation in 100 h reaction. This good stability was attributed to the superior property. However, the aerogel NiCo catalyst showed poor fluidization through the nanoparticle agglomerates. Guido et al. developed nickel doped with cobalt catalyst for hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming. The structure characteristic of Ni–Co–Zn–Al catalyst was studied [12]. The calcination of the layered precursors performed a high surface area of mixed oxides. It was a well distributed mixture of a rock salt phase (NiO), a wurtzite phase (ZnO) and a spinel phase. But application of catalyst with Zn and Co in the process of methane had not been reported. In the last decade, many efforts have been made to improve the catalytic performance of the Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. The addition of small amount of second metal, such as Mg, Co, Zr, Ce, La and Zn has been attempted to enhance the stability and catalytic activity of the methanation of carbon monoxide [13].
Although the Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalysts have been reported in some methanation reaction of H2-rich syngas, there are few works reported on methanation catalysts promoted by different additives. Especially, the optimized amount of structural promoter, electronic promoter and lattice defects promoter in methanation reaction have not been reported. In this work, the effect of different additives metal oxides on the interactions of NiO and support, and carbon deposition resistance over such catalysts has been studied. The selection of different additives for Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalysts with low Ni contents for syngas methanation was conducted. A series of NixMyA1 (M = Mg, Co, Zr, Ce, La, Zn) catalysts were prepared using excessive dipping method and characterized using XRD, H2-TPR, H2-TPD and CO-TPD. The influences of different additives on the performances of NixMyAl catalysts were investigated.
Experiment
Catalyst preparation
The catalysts were prepared with excessive dipping method. First, Ni(NO3)2·6H2O were mixed with Mg(NO3)2, Co(NO3)2·6H2O, La(NO3)3·6H2O, Ce(NO3)3·6H2O, Zr(NO3)4·5H2O and Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, respectively. Then, the Al2O3 (surface area 246 m2/g, Shandong Aluminum Co. Ltd) were impregnated in the different solution for 24 h at room temperature, dried for 12 h at 120 °C then calcined for 4 h at 450 °C to give the oxide catalyst. The catalysts were noted as NixMyAl (M = Mg, Co, Zr, Ce, La, Zn) catalyst. The catalyst composes of 12 wt% of NiO and 4 wt% MzOw (M = Mg, Co, Zr, Ce, La, Zn).
Catalyst evaluation
Initially, the catalyst was loaded into a pressurized fixed-bed reactor and reduced with H2/N2 mixture gas at the ratio of 1:4 at 550 °C for 4 h. Then, the reactor was cooled to 200 °C. The pressure of the system was slowly increased with nitrogen gas. The feed gas was switched into the reactor gradually to the desired pressure. The activity of methanation catalyst was tested at 400 °C with the reaction pressure of 1 MPa. The flow ratio of the H2/CO was 3:1 at the space velocity of 12,000 h−1.
Catalyst characterization
The crystalline structure of the catalyst was determined with X-ray diffraction (XRD) recorded on a powder diffractometer (Bruker Advance D8, 40 kV, 40 mA) using a Cu Ka radiation source in the range of 10°–85°. H2-TPR was carried out in a quartz-tube fixed-bed micro reactor system. The sample (20 mg) was pretreated with Ar at 300 °C for 1 h and then cooling to 50 °C. Afterwards, the flowing gas was switched to 10 vol% H2/Ar and heated to 800 °C at a ramping rate of 10 °C/min. H2-TPD and CO-TPD experiments were performed with similar procedure. The sample was pretreated in Ar flow (50 ml/min) at 300 °C for 1 h, then cooling to 50 °C and kept at this temperature for 40 min in 10 vol% H2/Ar or 10 vol% CO/Ar. Afterward, the sample was swept with He for 60 min. Finally, the desorption step was performed from 50 to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min with He flow of 50 ml/min. The desorbed products were all monitored using TCD.
Results and discussion
The influences of additives on the catalytic activity of the nickel-based catalyst for CO methanation
The catalytic results of the catalyst for CO methanation are shown in Table 1. The loading amount of additives and NiO were 4 and 12 % in weight, respectively. The results showed that the addition of La, Zn, Ce, Co and Zr into Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalyst improved the catalytic performance of CO methanation. The most effective catalyst was the one with La promoter. The CO conversion was 100 %, and CH4 selectivity was 99.6 % at CH4 space–time yield of 2134.5 g/kg h. However, the Mg promoter decreased the catalytic activity. In summary, it was showed that they would change the chemical environment and the state, which would ultimately affect the catalytic activity for CO methanation.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization
The XRD characterization of the catalyst was shown in Fig. 1. The diffraction peaks at the 2θ peaks of 37.2°, 43.2° were the characteristic peaks of NiO. Compared with Ni12Al catalyst, the introduction of Zr, Co, Ce, Zn and La additives decreases the intensity of diffraction peak of NiO. The diffraction peak tends to become broader due to high dispersion of NiO. The dispersion of NiO decreased in the order La > Co > Ce >> Zr > Zn. It was reported that the rare earth metal of La can effectively improves the dispersion of NiO on the surface of the support and the particle size of NiO crystal descended after calcinations [14, 15]. The peaks of Ni12Mg4Al sample at the 2θ peaks of 37.1°, 43.1°, 62.6° are due to MgNiO2. It showed that the MgNiO2 formation was difficult to be reduced due to the strong interaction between MgO and NiO. The peaks of Ni12Ce4Al at the 2θ of 28.5°, 33°, 47.4° and 56.3° belong to CeO2, The Ce3+ was oxidized to Ce4+ after Ce was introduced into the γ-Al2O3, The filling of Ce4+ in Al2O3 crystal lattice vacancies made the original lattice distorted because of different valence of Ce4+ and Al3+. Therefore, Ce4+ mainly located on the surface of the crystal phase with a lower energy state or precipitate to form crystal [16, 17]. The characteristic diffraction peaks of Zr, Co, Zn and La oxides were not observed in XRD spectra. This indicated that Zr, Co, La and Zn were well dispersed on the surface of the support [18]. It suggests that the introduction of additives could improve the dispersion of NiO on the surface of γ-Al2O3.
The XRD characterization of the reduced catalyst for CO methanation as shown in Fig. 2. The 2θ peaks of 44.4°, 51.8°, 76.3° were the characteristic diffraction peaks of nickel. The characteristic diffraction peaks of nickel were decreased compared with the catalyst Ni12Al, when Zr, Co, Ce, Zn, La, Mg additives is introduced. Considering the particle size data of nickel in Table 2, the catalyst of nickel particle size had been decreased. The Ni12Ce4Al and Ni12La4Al catalysts showed the weakest peak intensity of nickel. This indicated that the addition of La and Ce additives in the process of catalyst preparation could effectively reduce the particle size of nickel. The 2θ peaks of 37.1°, 43.1°, 62.6° belong to MgNiO2 formation of characteristic diffraction peaks. It indicated that the MgNiO2 formation could not be reduced completely in the reduction condition of 550 °C [19]. Therefore the quantity of nickel in the surface of active center could be reduced and the activity of CO methanation was not enhanced. In addition, all the catalysts do not have characteristic diffraction peaks of oxide of Zr, Co, Ce, Zn, La, maybe due to the formation of amorphous phases. Another reason for this is probably that Zr, Co, Ce, Zn, La metal or oxide grain is too small to be detected by XRD. In summary, the introduction of additives changed the chemical environment of the catalyst surface as well as the particle size of the nickel [20].
H2-TPR characterization
The H2-TPR characterization of the catalyst for CO methanation was shown in Fig. 3. The Gauss fitting analysis of H2-TPR spectrum was given in Table 3. It was observed that H2 consumption started at about 300 °C for all the Ni-based catalysts. The reducible NiO species are usually classified to three types, including low temperature peak α (200–350 °C), middle temperature peak β (300–600 °C), high temperature peak γ1 (500–700 °C) [21]. Each peak corresponded to different states of NiO species. The peaks located in the temperature region (200–350 °C) were assigned to α-type NiO species, which was attributed to free nickel oxides possessing a weak interaction with alumina support. The middle temperature peaks (300–600 °C) represent β-type NiO species, which has a stronger interaction with alumina than the α-type NiO. It could be further classified into β1-type (300–500 °C) and β2-type (400–600 °C). The former peak located at 300–500 °C was attributed to the more reducible NiO in Ni-rich mixed oxide phase. While the latter at 400–600 °C was attributed to the less reducible one in Al-rich phase. The high temperature peaks (500–700 °C) were assigned to γ1-type NiO species, which was stable nickel aluminum phase with the spinel structure. The new high temperature reduction peak γ2-type at 680 °C was assigned to the reduction peak of MgNiO2, when the Mg promoter was employed. This showed that addition of Mg promoter increased the reduction temperature of the catalyst. The reduction peak of NiO at the low temperature region shifted to lower temperature direction, and the peak area was increased. The high temperature reduction peak also shifted to low temperature direction, and the area of reduction peak was reduced when the promoter of Ce, Zr, La was introduced. It was suggested that the introduction of Ce, Zr, La make the NiO easier to be reduced, while inhibiting the strong interaction between NiO and γ-Al2O3 [22]. The low temperature reduction peaks of Ni-based catalysts with Ce promoter and CeO2 were overlapped. Combined with the catalyst hydrogen consumption data in Table 4, it could be noticed that the catalyst consumption of La promoter was larger compared with Ce, Zr additives. The number of active center nickel was also the largest in all the reduced catalyst. The Co promoter was introduced to greatly decrease the reduction temperature of the catalyst. The reduced Co was also an important catalytic active center in the process of methanation [23]. The reduction peak shifted to the lower temperature, and the peak area decreased after the introduction of the Zn promoter. This shows that Zn has an inhibitory effect on the Ni-based catalyst [24].
CO-TPD characterization
The CO-TPD characterization results of the catalysts are showed in Fig. 4. All of the catalysts had a low temperature desorption peak near 100 °C, which is attributed to the desorption of CO absorbed on nickel on the surface of the catalyst. The low temperature peak of CO desorption of the catalyst with promoter shifted to a even lower temperature compared to the results of Ni12Al catalyst. This showed that nickel surface was reduced when the additives were introduced. At the same time, there were three other chemical desorption peaks named α, β and γ, ranging from 400 to 600 °C, corresponding to three different states of the Ni species [25]. CO desorption temperature of the catalyst is related to desorption activation energy [26]. The adsorbed component with lower activation energy was easily desorbed from the catalyst, which leads to the decrease of desorption temperature. The adsorption component with high desorption activation energy was more conducive to the adsorption on the catalyst, which leads to the increase of desorption temperature [27]. The γ-desorption peak disappeared when Mg promoter was added. The α-desorption peak was attributed to NiO of loading on the surface of the support. The β-desorption peak was attributed to the MgNiO2 formation. CO desorption peak area was relatively small due to a large number of MgNiO2 formation, which is difficult to be reduced. The CO desorption peak area of catalyst Ni12Co4Al was slightly increased. This indicated that the introduction of Co promoter improved the dispersion of Ni species on the catalyst surface and enhanced the adsorption of CO. The γ-desorption peak disappeared in Ni12Zr4Al, but α-desorption peak area and β-desorption peak area were greatly increased. Thus, the introduction of Zr promoter improved the dispersion of Ni to a great extent and enhanced the adsorption of CO. The β-desorption peak and the γ-desorption peak of CO desorption were disappeared on Ni12Ce4Al and Ni12La4Al catalyst. The α-desorption peak area was increased. Therefore, the introduction of rare earth elements Ce, La can improve the dispersion of nickel on the surface, as well as reduce the CO desorption peak temperature and the desorption activation energy, which was more beneficial for the adsorption of CO form the activated site.
H2-TPD characterization
The H2-TPD profiles of the supported Ni-based catalysts usually contain two or more desorption peaks. The number of desorption peaks reveals the types of catalyst surface active sites. The H2-TPD results of the catalyst for CO methanation are given in Fig. 5. All the H2-TPD profiles of the catalysts showed a low temperature desorption peak (nearby 150 °C) and a high temperature desorption peak (nearby 400 °C). The low temperature peak was attributed to desorption of hydrogen adsorbed on the metal surface, and the high temperature peak was attributed to desorption of the hydrogen spillover hydrogen adsorbed on the surface of the oxide [28].
The Ni12Al catalyst H2-TPD profiles have desorption peak (90 °C) and a satellite peak (150 °C) at low temperature. This can be attributed to the weak and strong adsorption of hydrogen on the nickel surface. The desorption peak at high temperature (400 °C) was attributed to the desorption peak of spillover hydrogen [29]. The low temperature desorption peak disappeared when the Mg promoter was introduced. This showed that the amount of adsorbed hydrogen on the surface of nickel metal was very low. It is likely that the MgNiO2 formation occurred during the calcination process. It was hard to be reduced, and directly affected the quantity of active center of nickel. The two desorption peaks (400 and 460 °C) with larger area at high temperature were also showed. This indicated that there was a large number of spillover hydrogen [30]. It was possible that a small amount of MgNiO2 formation was reduced for high dispersion of nickel with strong ability to activate hydrogen. There were a desorption peak (100 °C) and a satellite peak (130 °C) in the low temperature range, when the Zr, Co, Ce, Zn and La promoter were introduced into the catalyst. These two desorption peaks could be attributed to weak adsorption and strong adsorption of hydrogen on the surface of nickel. The high temperature desorption peak (400 °C) shifted to the low temperature direction. The area of high temperature desorption peak was significantly increased when the catalyst was added with La, Co and Zr. This indicated that the spillover hydrogen and the quantity of activate hydrogen on the catalyst surface were increased. The Co has also an important catalytic activity in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, but the ability to stick to its metallic cobalt is weak in harsh environment. There is a strong interaction between Ni and Zr, which makes it easy to form Ni–ZrO2 and reduces the dispersion of nickel. The introduction of La promoter not only increased the number of spillover hydrogen on the catalyst surface, but also reduced the activation temperature of the spillover hydrogen.
Conclusion
To develop a high reaction activity and anti-coking coal to natural gas CO methanation catalyst, La, Zn, Ce, Co, Zr and Mg additives were introduced to the Ni/γ-A12O3 during catalyst preparation. The rare earth metal La, Zr and Ce can effectively improve the dispersion of NiO on the surface of the support. This makes the nickel grains become easier reduced and gives higher catalytic activity. The La promoter introduced into the catalyst could effectively increase the amount of easily reduced NiO and provide more active centers. It was beneficial to generate active carbon species, which increased the number of spillover hydrogen on the catalyst surface and reduced the activation energy of hydrogen in CO methanation reaction.
References
Kopyscinski J, Schildhauer TJ, Biollaz SMA (2010) Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass—a technology review from, 1950 to 2009. Fuel 89:1763–1783
Gao J, Wang Y, Ping Y et al (2012) A thermodynamic analysis of methanation reactions of carbon oxides for the production of synthetic natural gas. RSC Adv 2:2358–2368
Bligaard T, Nørskov JK, Dahl S et al (2004) The Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi relation and the volcano curve in heterogeneous catalysis. J Catal 224:206–217
Frøseth V, Storsæter S, Borg Ø et al (2005) Steady state isotopic transient kinetic analysis (SSITKA) of CO hydrogenation on different Co catalysts. Appl Catal A 289:10–15
Kopyscinski J, Schildhauer TJ et al (2010) Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass—a technology review from 1950 to 2009. Fuel 89(8):1763–1783
Lebarbier VM, Dagle RA et al (2014) Sorption-enhanced synthetic natural gas (SNG) production from syngas: a novel process combining CO methanation, water-gas shift, and CO2 capture. Appl Catal B 144:223–232
Huang Yu, Chen Haoyi, Jixin Su, Xiao Tiancun (2014) Highly active and selective catalyst for synthetic natural gas (SNG) production. Appl Petrochem Res 4:181–188
Trimm DL (1999) Catalysts for the control of coking during steam reforming. Catal Today 49:3–10
Alvarezgalvan M (2008) Performance of La, Ce-modified alumina-supported Pt and Ni catalysts for the oxidative reforming of diesel hydrocarbons. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33(2):652–663
Liu J, Shen W et al (2013) Syngas methanation for substitute natural gas over Ni–Mg/Al2O3 catalyst in fixed and fluidized bed reactors. Catal Commun 38:35–39
Li J, Zhou L et al (2013) Enhanced methanation over aerogel NiCo/Al2O3 catalyst in a magnetic fluidized bed. Ind Eng Chem Res 52(20):6647–6654
Busca G, Costantino U et al (2010) Nickel versus cobalt catalysts for hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming: Ni–Co–Zn–Al catalysts from hydrotalcite-like precursors. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35(11):5356–5366
Hwang S, Lee J et al (2012) Hydrogenation of carbon monoxide to methane over mesoporous nickel-M-alumina (M = Fe, Ni Co, Ce, and La) xerogel catalysts. J Ind Eng Chem 18(1):243–248
Chowdhury Muhammad B I, Hossain Mohammad M, Charpentier Paul A (2011) Effect of supercritical water gasification treatment on Ni/La2O3-Al2O3-based catalysts. Appl Catal A: General 405:84–92
Bang Y, Seo JG, Song IK (2011) Hydrogen production by steam reforming of liquefied natural gas (LNG) over mesoporous Ni-La-Al2O3 aerogel catalysts: effect of La content. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:8307–8315
Aruna ST, Kini NS et al (2010) Synthesis of nanocrystalline CeAlO3 by solution-combustion route. Mater Chem Phys 119(3):485–489
Wang Y-Z, Li F-M et al (2013) A comparative study on the catalytic properties of high Ni-loading Ni/SiO2 and low Ni-loading Ni-Ce/SiO2 for CO methanation. J Fuel Chem Technol 41(8):972–977
Kustov AL, Frey AM, Larsen KE et al (2007) CO methanation over supported bimetallic Ni-Fe catalysts: from computational studies towards catalyst optimization. Appl Catal A 320:98–104
Romero A, Jobbágy M et al (2010) Ni(II)–Mg(II)–Al(III) catalysts for hydrogen production from ethanol steam reforming: influence of the activation treatments. Catal Today 149(3–4):407–412
Iriondo A, Barrio VL, Cambra JF et al (2008) Hydrogen production from glycerol over nickel catalysts supported on Al2O3 modified by Mg, Zr, Ce or La. Top Catal 49:45–46
Hu D, Gao J et al (2012) Enhanced investigation of CO methanation over Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for synthetic natural gas production. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(13):4875–4886
Zhang H, Dong Y et al (2013) Effects of composite oxide supports on catalytic performance of Ni-based catalysts for CO methanation. Chin J Catal 34:330–335
Kok E, Scott J, Cant N et al (2011) The impact of ruthenium, lanthanum and activation conditions on the methanation activity of alumina-supported cobalt catalysts. Catal Today 164:297–301
Busca G, Costantino U et al (2010) Nickel versus cobalt catalysts for hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming: Ni–Co–Zn–Al catalysts from hydrotalcite-like precursors. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35(11):5356–5366
Yu Y, Jin G et al (2013) Synthesis of natural gas from CO methanation over SiC supported Ni–Co bimetallic catalysts. Catal Commun 31:5–10
Zhang J, Xu H, Jin X et al (2005) Characterizations and activities of the nano-sized Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/La–Al2O3 catalysts for NH3 decomposition. Appl Catal A 290:87–96
Engbæk J, Lytken O, Nielsen JH et al (2008) CO dissociation on Ni: the effect of steps and of nickel carbonyl. Surf Sci 602:733–743
Zhang H, Dong Y et al (2013) Effects of composite oxide supports on catalytic performance of Ni-based catalysts for CO methanation. Chin J Catal 34(2):330–335
Prins R (2012) Hydrogen spillover. Facts and fiction. Chem Rev 112(5):2714–2738
Zhang H, Dong Y et al (2013) Effects of composite oxide supports on catalytic performance of Ni-based catalysts for CO methanation. Chin J Catal 34(2):330–335
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission for the support of the project. Professor Shuren Hao is also appreciated for his constructive advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
He, Z., Wang, X., Liu, R. et al. Perfomances of different additives on NiO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst in CO methanation. Appl Petrochem Res 6, 235–241 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13203-016-0160-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13203-016-0160-3