Abstract
Photoperiodism is an adaptive response used by organisms to assess day length and anticipate upcoming seasons and to coordinate their (or their offspring’s) development and physiology with the environmental changes. These physiological mechanisms have long been studied to understand insect life cycles, combat pests, conserve endangered species, and rear beneficial insects. Recent genetic manipulations have greatly expanded our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying photoperiodism. Here, I review our current knowledge of the physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying photoperiodic time measurement, photoreception, and circadian clocks, which constitute insect photoperiodism modules, with a special emphasis on photoperiodic time measurement models.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Most temperate insects and mites have evolved a seasonal timing system that enables them to use day length (photoperiod) as a cue to coordinate their development and physiology (or that of their offspring) with the annual changes in the environment (Denlinger 2022). This biological ability is termed photoperiodism and the organismal response to photoperiod is referred to as a photoperiodic response. The most prevalent photoperiodic event is diapause, characterized by the suppression or arrest of development or reproduction in conjunction with an extensive shutdown of metabolic activity (Koštál 2006). Diapause is an adaptive, plastic phenotype and a form of dormancy that allows insects and mites to persist in seasonally variable environments. Diapause at egg (embryonic), larval (or nymphal), and pupal stages are characterized by developmental arrest or retardation, while that at the adult stage manifests as a cessation of reproduction. For example, the flesh fly, Sarcophaga similis develops into an adult without any interruption during long summer days, whereas it overwinters at the pupal stage by entering diapause characterized by developmental arrest (Goto 2009) (Fig. 1). Adult female jewel wasp, Nasonia vitripennis that is a parasitoid of the flesh fly, lays eggs that develop into adulthood without developmental interruption under long days, but enters diapause at the final (4th) instar larval stage under short days, due to maternal induction of photoperiodic diapause (Mukai and Goto 2016) (Fig. 1). Most insects destined to enter diapause accumulate additional energy reserves before the onset of diapause. Sufficient energy reserves and low metabolic activity ensure a high probability of survival during and after adverse seasons (Hahn and Denlinger 2011).
Photoperiodism was first demonstrated in plants a century ago (Garner and Allard 1920). Shortly thereafter, it was described in the strawberry root aphid Aphis forbesi (Marcovitch 1923). Being a crucial mechanism regulating insect life history, photoperiodism has been the focus of numerous studies in various biological fields spanning from molecular biology to ecology. Photoperiodic regulation of diapause is important not only from a basic biology perspective, but also from that of applied entomology. To combat various pests or to conserve endangered species, it is crucial to understand their life cycles and environmental adaptations, which are mainly regulated by photoperiodism. Particularly, predictive models to accurately determine the seasonal activity of insects require knowledge of environmental cues that regulate developmental speed, initiate diapause, and terminate diapause (Grevstad et al. 2022; Grevstad and Coop 2015; Kumar et al. 2015; Lindestad et al. 2019; Nielsen et al. 2016; Peffers et al. 2021; Pollard et al. 2020).
One of the greatest challenges for the industry of biological control agents and beneficial species is to store the agents without incurring a significant loss of vitality (Colinet and Boivin 2011). Diapause is suitable for increasing their shelf lives and reducing the costs of continuously maintaining a colony. However, to successfully manage diapause in the program, knowledge of the environmental cues regulating diapause entry and termination is a necessity (Ichikawa et al. 2020; Li et al. 2018). Artificial light at night (ALAN) is a serious issue in urbanization that causes disruption of physiological function and behavior in birds and mammals, including humans (Stevenson et al. 2015). ALAN disrupts insect photoperiodic responses and interferes with local adaptations (Fyie et al. 2021; Mukai et al. 2021; van Geffen et al. 2014; Westby and Medley 2020). In contrast, prevention of photoperiodic diapause by extending day length or by administering light pulse at selected times during the night using supplemental artificial light can promote “ecological suicide” of pest species (Ankersmit 1968; Beach and Craig 1979; Berlinger and Ankersmit 1976; Hayes et al. 1970, 1974; Schechter et al. 1971). Such photoperiodic manipulations are very attractive due to their non-reliance on chemicals. Although extensive field trials were conducted in the late 1960s and 1970s, only a few recent attempts have tested the viability of this approach possibly due to the economic feasibility of the installation of light sources and energy. Such attempts would benefit from more energy-efficient light sources such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (Shimoda and Honda 2013).
Insect photoperiodism is constituted by several physiological modules (see below). In this review, I present our current knowledge of the physiological and molecular mechanisms of some of the modules, including the photoperiodic time measurement system, photoreceptors, and circadian clocks, with a special emphasis on photoperiodic time measurement models.
Physiological mechanisms underlying photoperiodism
Figure 2 describes the physiological modules that constitute insect photoperiodism (Goto and Numata 2014). Photoreceptors extract photic information from environments. This is subsequently transferred to a circadian clock, which is a biological time-keeping system that controls the biological rhythms within a period of approximately 24 h; it sets its own phase and conveys the temporal information to a photoperiodic time measurement system. The photoperiodic time measurement system assesses the length of day or night by referring to the photic information from photoreceptors and/or to the temporal information from the circadian clock. A counter system accumulates the number of long days and/or short days. When the number of photoperiodic cycles exceeds an internal threshold in the counter system, endocrine effectors activate or inactivate target organs to induce or avert diapause.
The model insect, Drosophila melanogaster, may also show photoperiodic responses in female ovarian development, male spermatogenesis and accessory gland development, energy resource accumulation, and gene expression (Kubrak et al. 2016; Saunders et al. 1989). However, this photoperiodic response is weak and variable. Further, the response is observed only at a low temperature, which is very close to the lower limit of their development (developmental zero). Furthermore, temperature plays a major role in the induction of dormancy while photoperiod has little or no effect in this species (Anduaga et al. 2018; Emerson et al. 2009b; Erickson et al. 2020). Despite several studies on D. melanogaster (Abrieux et al. 2020; Nagy et al. 2019; Sandrelli et al. 2007; Tauber et al. 2007), only the molecular elements that are possibly involved in photoperiodic response are described in this review.
Photoperiodic time measurement
Photoperiodic time measurement is the core module in insect photoperiodism. Erwin Bünning first proposed that photoperiodic time measurement is one of the functions of the circadian clock (Bünning 1936). Later Bünning’s hypothesis was further cultivated into the external coincidence model (Pittendrigh and Minis 1964). In this model, time measurement is based on a single circadian clock that is entrainable to light and positions the photoinducible phase (φi) at the late scotophase (Fig. 3). The φi is critical for photoperiodic assessment. During autumn, φi falls in the dark phase, which induces a short-day response. During summer, a longer light phase delays the phase of the clock and φi, thus, falls in the light period, which elicits a long-day response. Thus, light plays two roles in this model, i.e., entraining the oscillator and inducing an event determined by the φi. For the sake of simplicity, this mechanism of time measurement is usually discussed as a qualitative or all-or-none mechanism in most studies (i.e., the system distinguishes long from short days, or short from long nights). However, insects measure photoperiod quantitatively (Goto 2009; Goto and Numata 2009b). Thus, insects measure how long the φi is exposed to light. The photoperiodic response of flesh fly species (Sarcophaga argyrostoma, Sarcophaga crassipalpis, and S. similis) is a perfect example of the external coincidence model (Goto and Numata 2009a; Gnagey and Denlinger 1984; Saunders 1979).
Another influential clock-based model is the internal coincidence model, which proposes the involvement of two circadian clocks; one clock is entrained to dawn (dawn oscillator) and the other to dusk (dusk oscillator) (Tyshchenko 1966) (Fig. 3). The phase relationships between these oscillators produce long-day or short-day effects; certain phases of these oscillators are active, and long-day responses are induced when these active phases overlap (Danilevsky et al. 1970). In this model, light plays the single role of entraining these two oscillators. The photoperiodic response of N. vitripennis best fits this model (Saunders 1974).
Another influential model is the hourglass model, which does not propose the involvement of an oscillator but involves an hourglass or non-repetitive timer. The photoperiodic response of the vetch aphid, Megoura viciae, strongly supports this model (Lees 1973). However, the role of a circadian oscillator in photoperiodic timing has also been revealed in this species (Vaz Nunes and Hardie 1993). The hourglass model is considered to be a variation of the external coincidence model, which involves an oscillator dampening below the threshold in extended periods of darkness (Saunders 2010). Another aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, also displays a circadian clock that is dampened easily under constant darkness, which operates the rhythmicity of metabolism and locomotor activity (Barberà et al. 2017, 2022; Beer et al. 2017).
Although several models have been proposed to explain various photoperiodic responses under different experimental conditions (Vaz Nunes and Saunders 1999), the molecular mechanisms underlying these models remain unknown.
Photoreceptors and photopigments
Several methods, such as surgical ablation, covering with paints that prevent light penetration, supplemental illumination, and transplantation of the cultured organ, have been used to identify the photoreceptive organ responsible for photoperiodism (Goto et al. 2010). Extraretinal photoreception has long been believed to be significant in photoperiodism. For example, the blow fly Calliphora vicina continues to be sensitive to photoperiod even after surgical removal of the optic lobes that connect the compound eyes to the central brain, suggesting possible photoreception in the cerebral lobe (Saunders and Cymborowski 1996). Supplemental illumination at the central region of the dorsal area of the head disrupted the photoperiodic response in M. viciae, suggesting possible photoreception in the brain (Lees 1964). Furthermore, transplantation experiments demonstrated that cultured brain successfully distinguished photoperiods in vitro in tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta and silkmoth Bombyx mori (Bowen et al. 1984; Hasegawa and Shimizu 1987). The significance of the retinal photoreceptors has also been demonstrated. For example, the anterior and posterior eyes (simple eyes) were removed in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae, either bilaterally or unilaterally using a laser ablation system, to investigate their role in its photoperiodic termination of diapause. Intact females terminate diapause in response to long-day conditions, whereas they remain in diapause when exposed to short-day conditions or constant darkness (Fig. 4). Bilateral and unilateral removal of the anterior eyes did not affect photoperiodic discrimination. Similarly, bilateral and unilateral removal of the posterior eyes did not affect photoperiodic discrimination. Contrarily, mites with no eyes, via the bilateral removal of both anterior and posterior eyes, failed to discriminate photoperiods and remained in diapause, irrespective of the photoperiod (Fig. 4). Thus, in T. urticae, both anterior and posterior eyes function as photoreceptors and mediate photoperiodic regulation of diapause (Hori et al. 2014). In the carabid beetle Leptocarabus kumagaii, stemmata (larval eyes) are indispensable for the photoperiodic regulation of larval diapause. However, the stemmata-derived organs are not necessary for photoperiodic regulation of adult diapause. The adults use compound eyes for photoreception (Shintani et al. 2009). Surgical removal of the compound eyes, in the cricket Modicogryllus siamensis, eliminated the photoperiodic response, indicating the compound eyes to be the photoreceptors (Sakamoto and Tomioka 2007). In the brown-winged green bug Plautia stali, retinal and extraretinal photoreceptors were proposed to be involved in the photoperiodic induction of diapause (Morita and Numata 1999). Thus, either retinal or extraretinal photoreceptors or both are responsible for photoreception in photoperiodism.
Arthropods use opsins as photoreceptive molecules to receive light (Van Der Kooi et al. 2021). Opsins generally exhibit a narrow range of spectral sensitivity, however, each species possesses multiple opsins with distinct spectral classes that enable them to receive the light of a broad range of wavelengths. Opsins are commonly observed in the retinal photoreceptor where they contribute to color vision (Van Der Kooi et al. 2021), but also act as circadian photoreceptors (Senthilan et al. 2019). Opsins are also reported in extraretinal photoreception (Shimizu et al. 2001; Velarde et al. 2005). Although their roles are still unknown, photoentrainment of the clock by the extraretinal photoreceptor is demonstrated in D. melanogaster and is proposed in the honeybee Apis mellifera (Beer and Helfrich-Förster 2020; Helfrich-Förster 2020). Classic dietary-deficiency experiments suggest that a vitamin A-based pigment, opsins, plays a role in photoreception in insect photoperiodism (Goto et al. 2010). Furthermore, the involvement of the retinal photoreceptor in photoperiodism also indicates the significance of opsin.
The role of opsins in photoperiodic response was directly examined using RNA interference (RNAi) in M. siamensis, whose photoperiodic photoreceptor is the compound eyes (Sakamoto and Tomioka 2007). This species shows photoperiod-dependent changes in the nymphal period. RNAi of three opsins (UV-, blue-, and long wavelength-sensitive opsins), which are expressed in the compound eyes, resulted in partial disruption of the long-day response. Interestingly, though RNAi of UV-sensitive opsins also disrupted the short-day response, RNAi of other opsins did not (Tamaki et al. 2013). These results indicate that opsins are the photoreceptive molecules involved in the photoperiodic response, but their specific roles are different. The monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus, relies on photoreception by the brain, not by the compound eyes, for photoperiodic regulation of ovarian development. The loss-of-function mutant of neither inactivation nor after potential B (ninaB1), which encodes the rate-limiting enzyme that converts carotenoids into retinaldehyde, displayed a loss of the ability to respond to short days to suppress ovarian development in this species, suggesting the involvement of opsin in the brain in photoperiodic discrimination (Iiams et al. 2019).
Insects and mites possess another photoreceptor called cryptochrome. Notably, the two forms of cryptochrome are encoded by the genes Drosophila-type cryptochrome (CRY-d, dCRY or CRY1) and mammalian-type cryptochrome (CRY-m, mCRY or CRY2). CRY-d absorbs light of a short wavelength, from UV to blue and functions as the main photopigment that resets the circadian clock (phase delays and advances) (Berndt et al. 2007; Stanewsky et al. 1998). In contrast, CRY-m has lost the ability of photoreception and acts as a transcriptional repressor in the circadian clock system (Merlin et al. 2013; Yuan et al. 2007). Many insects possess both cryptochromes. However, during the course of insect evolution, a lineage including the higher Diptera such as D. melanogaster lost cry-m, while some lineages in Hymenoptera and Coleoptera independently lost cry-d (Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2022a). Insects that lost cry-d possibly use opsins as the photopigments responsible for photoentrainment of the circadian clock (Beer and Helfrich-Förster 2020).
The role of CRY-d in photoperiodism was also examined in M. siamensis via RNAi (Ueda et al. 2018). RNAi of cry-d partially prevented long-day response. Interestingly, RNAi enhanced the short-day response with a further delay of adult emergence and further increment of the moulting number in comparison with that in the control short-day insects. However, CRY-d is not the major photoreceptor for the entrainment of the circadian clock in a cricket (Kutaragi et al. 2018; Tokuoka et al. 2017). No other studies have demonstrated the role of cry-d in the photoperiodism of insects, where cry-d plays a central role in the photoentrainment of the circadian clock. Thus, the significance of cry-d in insect photoperiodism is still unknown.
Photoreception and photoperiodic time measurement
In S. similis, which measures photoperiod via external coincidence, a systematic interruption of scotophase by a short light pulse revealed that light pulses at the early and late phases of scotophase effectively prevented diapause entry (Goto and Numata 2009a) (Fig. 5). The early scotophase is sensitive to light at wavelengths ≤ 470 nm, but not at wavelengths ≥ 583 nm. In contrast, the late scotophase is sensitive to light of a broad range of wavelengths, ranging from 395 to 660 nm (Goto and Numata 2009a). The sensitivity at the early scotophase is higher than that at the late scotophase. These results indicate that distinct photoreceptors mediate the photoperiodic response. The spectral sensitivity and the role of light in external coincidence (photoentrainment) suggest a possibility that CRY-d is responsible for photoreception at the early scotophase. In contrast, the broad spectral sensitivity suggests that several types of opsins operate light perception during the late scotophase, i.e., φi. Photoentrainment of the circadian clock through CRY-d in the brain is demonstrated in D. melanogaster larvae (Klarsfeld et al. 2004). Fly larvae also possess a photoreceptive organ, Bolwig’s organ, which is located on the mouth hook and expresses Rhodopsin 5 and 6 (Sprecher et al. 2011). S. similis may use CRY-d in the brain and opsins in the Bolwig’s organ to display a photoperiodic response. This hypothesis has to be further verified.
Similarly, distinct spectral sensitivity was reported in M. viciae, which may also measure photoperiod via external coincidence using the dampening oscillator. The early scotophase exhibits maximal sensitivity at 450–470 nm with a rapid fall at shorter and longer wavelengths. Maximum action is still in the 450–470 nm region during the late phase; however, the most striking feature is the considerable extension of sensitivity at longer wavelengths (Lees 1981). The results indicate that this species also used distinct photoreceptors for photoperiodism, which was verified to be in the brain (Lees 1964). Immunostaining with 20 antibodies directed against invertebrate and vertebrate opsins and phototransduction proteins revealed positive signals in an anterior ventral neuropile region of the protocerebrum (Gao et al. 1999). The expression of several opsins and cry-d in the brain was also reported in another aphid A. pisum (Barberà et al. 2022; Colizzi et al. 2021; Collantes-Alegre et al. 2018). The large cabbage butterfly Pieris brassicae also measures photoperiod via external coincidence. A systematic interruption of scotophase by a short light pulse revealed that light pulses at the early and late phases of scotophase effectively prevented diapause entry. The larvae that were fed a vitamin A-deficient diet lost the photosensitivity at the late scotophase but not at the early scotophase (Claret and Volkoff 1992). These results suggest the involvement of a non-opsin photoreceptor, possibly CRY-d, in photoreception at the early scotophase and the involvement of opsins at the late scotophase.
Tomioka and his colleagues discussed the results of RNAi directed to opsins in the photoperiodic response in M. siamensis, based on the external coincidence model (Tamaki et al. 2013). Partial disruption of the long-day effect in RNAi of UV-, blue- and long wavelength-sensitive opsins possibly indicates prevention of photoperiodic time measurement by disturbing light detection at φi. On the contrary, disruption of the short-day response through RNAi of UV-sensitive opsin suggests the involvement of UV-sensitive opsin in the photic entrainment of a circadian clock responsible for photoperiodic time measurement. This is a fascinating hypothesis, but it is unclear whether the external coincidence model is indeed applicable to the photoperiodic time measurement of this species.
Photoreceptors responsible for photoperiodism that measure photoperiod via internal coincidence have not been extensively studied. In N. vitripennis, the action spectra at the early scotophase and late scotophase are very similar with maximum sensitivity between 554 and 586 nm and considerable sensitivity extending up to 617 nm (Saunders 1975). This indicates that a single photoreceptor system regulates the entrainment of the dawn and dusk oscillator. This species does not possess cry-d gene in its genome and, thus, opsins are hypothesized to play a role in the photoentrainment of the oscillators (Saunders 2012). This species possesses at least 3 opsin genes (UV-, blue-, and long wavelength-sensitive opsins), but their functions have not been examined yet.
Previous studies investigated the relationship between the photoreceptor involved in photoperiodism and that involved in the circadian locomotor activity rhythm (Goto et al. 2010). Some studies have revealed that photoperiodism and circadian rhythm share the same photoreceptors, while others revealed discrepancies. For example, in cricket, Dianemobius nigrofasciatus, and blow fly, Protophormia terraenovae, surgical removal of the compound eyes prevented the adults from responding to the photoperiod to control embryonic and adult diapause (Shiga and Numata 1996, 1997). However, the same operation did not interfere with the photic entrainment of the circadian locomotor rhythms in both species (Hamasaka et al. 2001, Shiga et al. 1999). These results indicate the involvement of the brain CRY-d in photic entrainment of the circadian clock and that of opsins expressed in the retinal photoreceptor in photoperiodic time measurement. By contrast, removal of the optic lobes did not interfere with photoperiodic control of larval diapause and with the entrainment of circadian activity rhythms in C. vicina (Cymborowski et al. 1994; Saunders and Cymborowski 1996). This indicates that both responses used extraretinal receptors in a part of the brain other than the optic lobe. It is of interest to investigate how this species measured photoperiods. It is also interesting to investigate the spectral sensitivity at the early and late scotophases and the possible involvement of opsins and/or CRY-d in photoperiodism.
The molecular machinery of the circadian clock
The molecular mechanism of the circadian clock regulating circadian behavior has been investigated mainly in D. melanogaster (Patke et al. 2020). The basic mechanisms of the clock are transcriptional-translational negative feedback loops, consisting of the circadian clock genes (hereafter, clock genes) that produce rhythmic gene expression in a period of approximately 24 h (Fig. 6). In brief, the protein products of Clock (Clk) and cycle (cyc) (i.e., CLK and CYC) form a heterodimer, which activates the transcription of period (per) and timeless (tim) genes from late day to early night. Subsequently, the protein products of per and tim (i.e., PER and TIM) are accumulated during the night. They form a heterodimer at late night, enter the nucleus, and repress the transcriptional activity of the CLK/CYC complex. The repression reduces the mRNA levels of per and tim, which results in a reduction of their proteins, and finally releases the CLK/CYC complex from repression. Then the next round begins. Based on their roles, PER and TIM are regarded as negative regulators, while CLK and CYC as positive regulators. The transcriptional targets of CLK–CYC include downstream “clock-controlled genes”, whose cyclic expression confers circadian rhythmicity to cell and tissue function. The rhythmic expression of Clk is regulated by a negative element vrille (vri) and a positive element Par domain protein 1 (Pdp1) in the second loop. CLK–CYC activity is negatively regulated by clockwork orange (cwo) in the third loop (Tomioka and Matsumoto 2019).
Although the basic machinery is nearly identical to D. melanogaster, few significant variations exist among insects (Fig. 6). One of the striking variations of the clock machinery is the presence or absence of cry-d, cry-m, and/or tim. Ancestral insects possessed these, but during the course of insect evolution, a lineage in Blattodea lost cry-d, and one of its descendant lineages further lost tim. Independent loss of cry-d is assumed to have occurred in lineages of Heteroptera, Psocodea, and Coleoptera and the ancestor of Hymenoptera. Loss of tim and cry-m occurred in Hymenoptera and a lineage in the suborder Brachycera, respectively (Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2022a). Causal involvement of CRY-m as a transcriptional repressor in the circadian feedback loop is demonstrated in butterflies, as well as a mosquito, a beetle, a honeybee, and a cricket (Tokuoka et al. 2017; Yuan et al. 2007; Zhu et al. 2006, 2008) (Fig. 6). In addition, cry-m has several splicing variants and some of the protein products are speculated to form a complex with other CRY-m or CRY-d proteins and repress their transcription by inhibiting CLK/CYC transcriptional activity in a cricket (Tokuoka et al. 2017). Moreover, both CRY-d and CRY-m are also involved in the photic entrainment pathway of the circadian clock (Kutaragi et al. 2018). Since tim has also been lost in several insect lineages of Hymenoptera and Termitidae in addition to the absence of cry-d, their clockwork appears to be simplified (Beer and Helfrich-Förster 2020; Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2022a) (Fig. 6). tim plays an important role in the circadian clockwork of D. melanogaster (Sehgal et al. 1994), but not in Orthoptera and Hemiptera (Danbara et al. 2010; Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2022a). The amino acid sequence of PER in D. melanogaster possesses the threonine–glycine (TG) repeat region that is proposed to provide temperature compensation for the circadian clock (Sawyer et al. 1997). However, such a long thread of TG was not found even in other dipterans (Goto and Denlinger 2002). CLK of D. melanogaster has the polyglutamine (Q) region, which forms a coiled coil and is involved in transcription activation (Allada et al. 1998), but the region is not found in other insect species (Sandrelli et al. 2008). CLK is the main transcriptional activator in Drosophila, but its role substitutes for CYC in other insects (Sandrelli et al. 2008). Oscillatory patterns of the core elements are also diversified among insect species (Tomioka and Matsumoto 2019). Therefore, the clockwork diversity must be considered while interpreting the results of genetic manipulations.
Involvement of clock genes in insect photoperiodism
Two approaches have been adopted to assess the role of clock genes in insect photoperiodism. One is the photoperiodic regulation of clock gene expression under distinct photoperiods (Saunders 2020). For example, the peak in per expression shifts with the timing of scotophase onset in S. crassipalpis. A shift in tim is less pronounced but the amplitude of the tim peak is severely dampened under long days (Goto and Denlinger 2002). Photosensitive larvae of S. crassipalpis show peak expression of both mRNAs during the light phase under long days and during the dark phase under short days (Koštál et al. 2009). In the head of N. vitripennis, the peaks of per and cry-m mRNA oscillations occurred in late photophase under long-day and in the middle of the scotophase under short-day conditions (Bertossa et al. 2014), although such photoperiodic difference was less pronounced in another strain (Mukai and Goto 2016). In a holocyclic strain of A. pisum, the per mRNA amounts peaked at late photophase and late scotophase under long and short days, respectively. In addition, the expression of core clock genes was higher at any time in aphids reared under short days than in those reared under long days. By contrast, such differences were not detected in the anholocyclic (no photoperiodic) strain of the same species (Barberà et al. 2017). These distinct patterns of expression under long and short days suggest that photoperiodic information could be transformed into oscillation patterns to determine photoperiodic responses such as diapause. However, such photoperiodic difference is simply one aspect of circadian rhythmicity, rather than the photoperiodic regulation of diapause. Thus, their utility is limited.
Recently, more instructive studies involving genetic manipulation have been conducted to clarify the involvement of clock genes in the photoperiodic response of a diverse range of insect species in the orders Orthoptera (Goto and Nagata 2022; Sakamoto et al. 2009), Heteroptera (Ikeno et al. 2010; Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2017; Tamai et al. 2019), Coleoptera (Zhu et al. 2019), Hymenoptera (Mukai and Goto 2016), Lepidoptera (Iiams et al. 2019; Ikeda et al. 2021; Mohamed et al. 2014), and Diptera (Meuti et al. 2015; Pavelka et al. 2003). These studies used species with all the diapause stages (embryonic, nymphal, larval, pupal, and adult diapauses) regulated by distinct endocrine cascades. Furthermore, these studies were conducted in long-day species (reproduce or develop under long days) and in a short-day species (reproduce or develop under short days) (Table S1).
Loss of function of per, mediated by genome editing technology, resulted not only in the disruption of the circadian rhythms during adult emergence and egg hatching but also in the disruption of the photoperiodic response in B. mori. The knockout adults failed to respond to short days and produced non-diapause eggs (Ikeda et al. 2019, 2021). Females of the cry-m knockout strains in the linden bug Pyrrhocoris apterus failed to enter diapause under any photoperiods, although a small portion of individuals entered diapause under much shorter day lengths (Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2022b). The cabbage beetle, Colaphellus bowringi, enters diapause in response to long days and accumulates more lipid as an overwintering energy reserve. Knockdown of per and tim resulted in a reduction of the lipid content in diapause-destined individuals, which is a typical phenotype in non-diapause-destined individuals (Zhu et al. 2019). In P. apterus, Clk RNAi does not affect reproduction in males under long days. However, it destroys the ability of diapause males to switch to reproductive mode after the transfer to long days (Urbanová et al. 2016). These results strongly support the involvement of Clk in photoperiodic time measurement.
More instructive approaches have been adopted in some species. In the bean bug, Riptortus pedestris, the effects of RNAi targeted to per, cry-m, cyc, and Clk on the photoperiodic regulation of reproductive organ development were examined. Simultaneously, cuticle deposition rhythm was also observed as an output of the clock function (Ikeno et al. 2010, 2011a, b, c, 2013). The insect cuticle is thickened by the alternation of the deposition of chitin microfibrils in two different orientations (lamellate and non-lamellate layers), which is regulated by the circadian clock (Ikeno et al. 2010; Ito et al. 2008). RNAi targeted to per, cry-m, cyc and Clk arrested the clock and, thereby, produced a single layer, but the layers deposited were depending on which clock genes were downregulated. RNAi targeted to per and cry-m resulted in the deposition of a single non-lamellate layer, whereas that of cyc and Clk resulted in a single lamellate layer (Ikeno et al. 2010, 2011a, 2013) (Fig. 7). These results suggest that RNAi of per and cry-m and that of cyc and Clk arrested the clock at different phases. This agrees with the roles of these genes in the circadian clock; the former and the latter genes act as negative and positive regulators, respectively (Fig. 6). RNAi directed to per and cry-m and that directed to cyc and Clk also result in different responses in reproductive organ development. The former resulted in reproductive organ development (female ovary and male accessory gland) even under diapause-inducing short days, whereas the latter resulted in suppression of the development even under diapause-averting long days (Ikeno et al. 2010, 2011b, c, 2013) (Fig. 7). Distinct phenotypes induced by silencing negative and positive regulators are also observed in the photoperiodic regulation of lipid accumulation in R. pedestris and the photoperiodic ovarian development in D. plexippus (Iiams et al. 2019; Omura et al. 2016). These results suggest that the photoperiodic time measurement is a function of the circadian clock, which comprises the clock genes. They further imply the causal significance of light input and the circadian clock, i.e., the external coincidence model. In intact insects, the circadian clock regulates the oscillatory expression of a key gene (gene x) that governs the position of φi. Only under long-day conditions, φi is exposed to light and the light-activation of an unknown factor occurs, thereby eliciting a long-day response (Fig. 8). In RNAi of the negative elements, constitutive activation of the positive elements leads to a high level of x throughout the day and thereby, light activation of the factor occurs even under short days. By contrast, in RNAi of the positive elements, transcription of the gene x does not occur. Therefore, light activation of the factor never occurs irrespective of the photoperiodic conditions (Fig. 8) (Ikeno 2012). The model proposed here needs to be verified in future studies.
In N. vitripennis, per RNAi females failed to discriminate photoperiods and remained non-diapause producers even under short days (Mukai and Goto 2016) (Fig. 9). Interestingly, per RNAi females laid diapause-destined eggs in response to the low-temperature treatment (Mukai and Goto 2016) (Fig. 9). This indicates that per RNAi did not disrupt the maternal physiology that is directly involved in the production of diapause-destined eggs, however, it possibly affected photoperiodic time measurement. The photoperiodic time measurement of this species is satisfactorily assumed to be an internal coincidence (Saunders 1974). The RNAi results indicate that either dawn or dusk oscillators or both are comprised of per. D. melanogaster shows a distinct bimodal rhythm in its locomotor activity. These morning and evening peaks are regulated by morning (M) and evening (E) oscillators, respectively. Since the M and E oscillators track dawn and dusk, respectively, the phase angle between the two oscillators under different day lengths differs (Yoshii et al. 2012). M oscillators are considered to reside in the four small lateral ventral neurons (s-LNvs) expressing a neuropeptide, pigment-dispersing factor (PDF), and E oscillators in the 5th s-LNv and the 3–4 dorsal lateral neurons (LNds) (Grima et al. 2004; Stoleru et al. 2004). These cells are the primary candidates for the dawn and dusk oscillators in the internal coincidence model in N. vitripennis. In D. melanogaster, CRY-d in the E oscillators limits their ability to track dusk during long days, whereas light signaling from the visual system increases this ability. CRY-d signaling dampens PDP1 oscillation, whereas signaling from the visual system increases these amplitudes. Thus, light inputs from CRY-d and the visual system have different effects on photoperiodic locomotor activity (Kistenpfennig et al. 2018). However, N. vitripennis does not possess cry-d in its genome and opsins are its only photopigments. The photic input pathway, the location of PER-expressing clock neurons in the brain, their networks, and their role as the M and E oscillators in N. vitripennis must be investigated in future studies.
Discrepancies of the roles of clock genes in photoperiodism
Although clock genes play a crucial role in photoperiodic time measurement, striking discrepancies in the photoperiodic phenotypes after gene silencing are also observed, as shown in Table S1. For example, knockdown of per resulted in a long-day response in R. pedestris, A. pernyi, C. pipiens, N. vitripennis, and B. mori, whereas it resulted in an intermediate response between long and short days in M. siamensis (Ikeda et al. 2021; Ikeno et al. 2010, 2011b; Meuti et al. 2015; Mohamed et al. 2014; Mukai and Goto 2016; Omura et al. 2016; Sakamoto et al. 2009). RNAi targeted to cry-m induced a long-day response in R. pedestris and C. pipiens, whereas it induced a short-day response in M. siamensis (Ikeno et al. 2011c; Meuti et al. 2015; Ueda et al. 2018). In P. apterus, RNAi targeted to cry-m induced a weak short-day response in males, but null mutants of the gene induced a strong long-day response in females (Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2022b; Urbanová et al. 2016). The short-day response was also induced by loss of function of cry-m in D. plexippus (Iiams et al. 2019). RNAi targeted to Clk induced a long-day response in D. nigrofasciatus, whereas it induced a short-day response in R. pedestris and P. apterus (Goto and Nagata 2022; Ikeno et al. 2013; Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2017; Urbanová et al. 2016). In addition, distinct phenotypes induced by silencing negative and positive regulators were observed in R. pedestris and D. plexippus, but not in P. apterus, in which RNAi targeted to cry-m, Clk, and cyc produced the short-day response (Iiams et al. 2019; Ikeno et al. 2010, 2011b, c, 2013; Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2017; Omura et al. 2016; Urbanová et al. 2016).
Although the reasons behind these discrepancies are largely unknown, several possibilities can be proposed. It could be based on the difference in photoperiodic time measurement among insects. Photoperiodic time measurement has been extensively studied in a limited number of species such as T. urticae, M. viciae, Pectinophora gossypiella, Ostrinia nubilalis, Pieris spp., Mamestra brassicae, N. vitripennis, Sarcophaga spp., and Calliphora vicina (Saunders 2002). On the contrary, the recent advance in our knowledge is based on species including M. siamensis, R. pedestris, P. apterus, and C. pipiens (Table S1), in which photoperiodic time measurement has rarely been investigated. Among these species, the circadian clock may be involved in photoperiodic time measurement differently. Divergence of the circadian clock machinery and their functions among insects may also cause discrepancies, at least partly (Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2022a; Tomioka and Matsumoto 2019). Furthermore, the discrepancies may be caused by the malfunction of the peripheral circadian clock that is also involved in a downstream diapause program, or by the pleiotropic effect of the clock gene in the diapause programme (Emerson et al. 2009a). In the gut of P. apterus, transcript of cry-m and an isoform transcript of Pdp1 (Pdp1iso1) are inversely regulated under diapause and reproductive conditions; the former remains high in diapausing but low in reproductive females, while the latter remains high in reproductive but low in diapausing females, with no daily oscillation. Their expression is indispensable for diapause-/non-diapause-specific gene expression in the gut. Notably, the expression of cry-m and Pdp1iso is controlled by Clk and cyc, as well as juvenile hormone, which directly determines the diapause/non-diapause phenotype. These results suggest a noncircadian function downstream of photoperiodic time measurement (Bajgar et al. 2013a, b). In D. nigrofasciatus, Clk is thought to be involved not only in photoperiodic time measurement but also in the production of diapause eggs (Goto and Nagata 2022). Females of this species deposit non-diapause eggs under long days, whereas they deposit diapause eggs under short days. When female crickets were reared under short days and transferred to long days, they gradually increased the number of non-diapause eggs while reducing that of diapause eggs. Clk RNAi induces long-day response even under short days (a gradual increment of the proportion of non-diapause eggs), suggesting the involvement of Clk in photoperiodic time measurement (Goto and Nagata 2022). Interestingly, Clk RNAi enabled females to deposit non-diapause eggs immediately irrespective of the photoperiod. This immediate effect cannot be adequately explained in terms of the dysfunction of a circadian clock involved in photoperiodic time measurement. This immediate response indicates the involvement of Clk in the production of diapause-type eggs (Goto and Nagata 2022). However, the processes that are regulated by Clk and whether Clk itself or a peripheral circadian clock including Clk is involved in the process have not been elucidated. In Drosophila triauraria, crossing between a northern population with a clear photoperiodic response and southern strains with no photoperiodic ability revealed that the additive association of tim and cry-d alleles affected diapause incidence (Yamada and Yamamoto 2011). No interaction between these alleles but their additive association suggests that these genes are independently involved in the diapause programme, i.e., noncircadian function.
Circadian outputs
Circadian output elements on insect photoperiodism are still largely unknown, but some clues are evident. Because this topic is beyond the scope of this review, I have described it very briefly. PDF is one of the crucial circadian output neuropeptides regulating circadian locomotor behavior in D. melanogaster and other insect species (Shafer and Yao 2014). Its significance in the photoperiodic response is proposed in D. melanogaster, C. pipiens, and P. stali, but was denied in R. pedestris (Hasebe et al. 2022; Ikeno et al. 2014; Meuti et al. 2015; Nagy et al. 2019). In R. pedestris, a significance of glutamate was proposed (Des Marteaux et al. 2022). Interestingly, in P. apterus, the loss-of-function mutants of pdf failed to enter diapause under a short-day condition, but they were able to enter diapause under much shorter day lengths; i.e., a 3-h shortening of the critical day length (CDL) (Kotwica-Rolinska et al. 2022b). The CDL is the length of the light fraction of the light-dark cycle that separates a strong long-day response from a strong short-day response in the photoperiodic response curve. These results indicate that PDF is involved in the photoperiod-dependent diapause induction but additional clock-regulated factors are also involved in the response. In D. melanogaster, the short neuropeptide F (sNPF) similarly regulates its dormancy as PDF (Nagy et al. 2019).
In the Chinese oak moth, Antheraea pernyi and the cabbage army moth, Mamestra brassicae, the involvement of melatonin, dopamine, and serotonin was evident (Mohamed et al. 2014; Noguchi and Hayakawa 1997; Wang et al. 2013, 2015a, 2015b). Further extensive studies on output molecules are awaited.
Clock genes and local adaptations
The time of diapause entry is determined by the CDL. Although the term CDL is widely used in the literature, most insects measure the “night length”, not the “day length”, and therefore, the term “critical night length (CNL)” is more appropriate (Saunders 2013). The CNL is the difference between 24 h and the CDL. Latitudinal cline provides an expansive view of the adaptation of insects to spatial environmental heterogeneity. The latitudinal cline with shorter CNL in strains from higher latitudes is widely observed in various species (Hut et al. 2013). Moreover, the rapid evolution in changing CNL has been measured or inferred in the field after the colonization of several invasive species (Bean et al. 2012; Gomi 2007; Tanaka et al. 2015; Urbanski et al. 2012). The significance of the latitudinal cline in CNL can be explained in terms of ecological aspects. Nights are shorter at higher latitudes between the spring and autumn equinoxes, but the climate is colder and the summer ends earlier than in areas at lower latitudes. Therefore, insects at higher latitudes likely enter diapause earlier by responding to the shorter night length (Hut et al. 2013).
S. similis, in which time measurement occurs via external coincidence, also shows a clear latitudinal cline in CNL in the photoperiodic induction of diapause; a strain from higher latitudes has a shorter CNL than a strain from lower latitudes (Fig. 10). The phase positions of the φi, which can be verified by night interruption photoperiods, also showed a clear latitudinal cline; a strain from a higher latitude possesses a φi at an earlier phase in the scotophase than a strain from a lower latitude (Fig. 10). These results indicate that the qualitatively different photoperiodic time measurement systems among geographic strains causally induce the latitudinal difference in the CNLs (Fig. 10) (Yamaguchi and Goto 2019). The difference in the φi position might be from the difference in the circadian clock and needs to be further verified.
N. vitripennis, in which time measurement is an internal coincidence, also shows a clear latitudinal cline in the CNL (Paolucci et al. 2013). Interestingly, the free-running period of the circadian clock-regulated locomotor activity rhythm is longer in strains from higher latitudes than in those from lower latitudes; i.e., the former has a slower clock than the latter (Paolucci et al. 2019). In addition, the quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis using two geographic strains revealed that two genomic regions, which contain per, cyc and cry-m, are associated with photoperiodic diapause induction. Moreover, a clinal distribution of two main haplotypes of per correlates with the latitudinal cline for diapause induction (Paolucci et al. 2016), and oscillation patterns of per, cry-m, cyc, and Clk are distinct between geographic strains (Dalla Benetta et al. 2019). A latitudinal cline of the circadian clock elements or their regulatory elements may causally produce the circadian behavioral phenotype and the photoperiodic response in N. vitripennis. A causal relationship between the latitudinal clines of tim alleles and the photoperiodic response is also reported in D. melanogaster (Sandrelli et al. 2007; Tauber et al. 2007).
Recent genomic studies have also detected an association between the clock genes and the photoperiodic induction of diapause. A genome-wide scan between two populations of the butterfly Pararge aegeria that differ strongly in their diapause induction thresholds identified four genes present in two chromosomal regions, one with the gene per, and the other with genes kinesin, carnitine O-acetyltransferase, and tim. The frequency of the loci also showed a clear latitudinal cline among the five geographic strains (Pruisscher et al. 2018). A further population genomic approach identified candidate genes showing signs of divergent selection potentially associated with population differences (diapause thresholds and voltinism) among nine Scandinavian populations of P. aegeria. The candidate genes include some components of the circadian clock including tim, per, cry-d, and cwo (Lindestad et al. 2022). A comparison of two populations of the butterfly Pieris napi that differ in the propensity to enter diapause revealed a few genomic regions that showed a high divergence between populations. Genotyping diapausing and directly developing siblings (non-diapause) from backcrosses of these populations identified that a single genomic region, which contained the three major clock genes cyc, Clk and per, is associated with diapause induction (Pruisscher et al. 2021).
Conclusion
Figure 11 summarizes our current knowledge of the physiological modules and molecular elements regulating insect photoperiodism. Retinal and/or extraretinal photoreceptors are used for photoreception. Opsins in the retinal or extraretinal photoreceptors and CRY-d in the brain may play a role in photoperiodic regulation. However, only one study has directly confirmed the role of opsins in photoperiodism. Different opsin genes may play different roles. The possible involvement of CRY-d also needs to be further studied. The mechanism of transfer of photic information to photoperiodic time measurement and circadian clocks is still unknown. S. similis, in which photoperiods are assessed via external coincidence, may use distinct photoreceptors through distinct neural pathways. N. vitripennis, in which photoperiods are assessed via internal coincidence, may use opsins in the retinal or extraretinal photoreceptor to set the phase of circadian oscillators.
Clock genes are causally involved in photoperiodic time measurement, but they also play a crucial role in other processes downstream of photoperiodic time measurement. The role of each clock gene has to be verified to understand how the clock is involved in photoperiodic time measurement in each species. Although classic physiological studies have established photoperiodic time measurement models, little information is available on their molecular elements. The molecular dissection of φi in the external coincidence model and that of the active phases in the internal coincidence model need to be elucidated in future studies. The distinct photoperiodic response observed in local populations may provide us with some clues. Several genomic studies revealed the link between diapause characteristics and clock genes. In S. similis, a latitudinal cline in the CNL was linked with the qualitative difference in photoperiodic time measurement and/or circadian clock. Although we still do not know how their photoperiodic time measurements are different, the significance of per is also proposed in a latitudinal cline in Nasonia. Local populations possess a common tool kit, but the selection pressure has favored some alleles producing different responses. It is of great interest to see how the expressions or the functions of the genes detected are different among populations. This may be the first step for the molecular dissection of photoperiodic time measurement. This also clarifies the molecular elements that govern local adaptation.
References
Abrieux A, Xue Y, Cai Y et al (2020) EYES ABSENT and TIMELESS integrate photoperiodic and temperature cues to regulate seasonal physiology in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:15293–15304. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004262117
Allada R, White NE, So WV et al (1998) A mutant Drosophila homolog of mammalian clock disrupts circadian rhythms and transcription of period and timeless. Cell 93:791–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81440-3
Anduaga AM, Nagy D, Costa R, Kyriacou CP (2018) Diapause in Drosophila melanogaster – photoperiodicity, cold tolerance and metabolites. J Insect Physiol 105:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2018.01.003
Ankersmit GW (1968) The photoperiod as a control agent against Adoxophyes reticulana (Lepidoptera; Tortricidae). Entomol Exp Appl 11:231–240
Bajgar A, Dolezel D, Hodkova M (2013a) Endocrine regulation of non-circadian behavior of circadian genes in insect gut. J Insect Physiol 59:881–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2013.06.004
Bajgar A, Jindra M, Dolezel D (2013b) Autonomous regulation of the insect gut by circadian genes acting downstream of juvenile hormone signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:4416–4421. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217060110
Barberà M, Collantes-Alegre JM, Martínez-Torres D (2017) Characterisation, analysis of expression and localisation of circadian clock genes from the perspective of photoperiodism in the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 83:54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.02.006
Barberà M, Collantes-Alegre JM, Martínez-Torres D (2022) Mapping and quantification of cryptochrome expression in the brain of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insect Mol Biol 31:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/imb.12747
Beach RF, Craig GB (1979) Photoinhibition of diapause in field populations of Aedes atropalpus. Environ Entomol 8:392–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/EE/8.3.392
Bean DW, Dalin P, Dudley TL (2012) Evolution of critical day length for diapause induction enables range expansion of Diorhabda carinulata, a biological control agent against tamarisk (Tamarix spp.). Evol Appl 5:511–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00262.x
Beer K, Helfrich-Förster C (2020) Model and non-model insects in chronobiology. Front Behav Neurosci 14:601676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.601676
Beer K, Joschinski J, Arrazola Sastre A et al (2017) A damping circadian clock drives weak oscillations in metabolism and locomotor activity of aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Sci Rep 7:14906. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15014-3
Berlinger MJ, Ankersmit GW (1976) Manipulation with the photoperiod as a method of control of Adoxophyes orana (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Entomol Exp Appl 19:96–107
Berndt A, Kottke T, Breitkreuz H et al (2007) A novel photoreaction mechanism for the circadian blue light photoreceptor Drosophila cryptochrome. J Biol Chem 282:13011–13021. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608872200
Bertossa RC, Van De Zande L, Beukeboom LW, Beersma DGM (2014) Phylogeny and oscillating expression of period and cryptochrome in short and long photoperiods suggest a conserved function in Nasonia vitripennis. Chronobiol Int 31:749–760. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2014.880451
Bowen MF, Saunders DS, Bollenbacher WE, Glbert LI (1984) In vitro reprogramming of the photoperiodic clock in an insect brain - retrocerebral complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81:5881–5884. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.18.5881
Bünning E (1936) Die endogene Tagesrhythmik als Grundlage der photoperiodischen Reaktion. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 54:590–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1937.tb01941.x
Claret J, Volkoff N (1992) Vitamin A is essential for two processes involved in the photoperiodic reaction in Pieris brassicae. J Insect Physiol 38:569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(92)90108-P
Colinet H, Boivin G (2011) Insect parasitoids cold storage: a comprehensive review of factors of variability and consequences. Biol Control 58:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCONTROL.2011.04.014
Colizzi FS, Beer K, Cuti P et al (2021) Antibodies against the clock proteins period and cryptochrome reveal the neuronal organization of the circadian clock in the pea aphid. Front Physiol 12:705048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.705048
Collantes-Alegre JM, Mattenberger F, Barberà M, Martínez-Torres D (2018) Characterisation, analysis of expression and localisation of the opsin gene repertoire from the perspective of photoperiodism in the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. J Insect Physiol 104:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.11.009
Cymborowski B, Lewis RD, Hong SF, Saunders DS (1994) Circadian locomotor activity rhythms and their entrainment to light-dark cycles continue in flies (Calliphora vicina) surgically deprived of their optic lobes. J Insect Physiol 40:501–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(94)90123-6
Dalla Benetta E, Beukeboom LW, van de Zande L (2019) Adaptive differences in circadian clock gene expression patterns and photoperiodic diapause induction in Nasonia vitripennis. Am Nat 193:881–896. https://doi.org/10.1086/703159
Danbara Y, Sakamoto T, Uryu O, Tomioka K (2010) RNA interference of timeless gene does not disrupt circadian locomotor rhythms in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Insect Physiol 56:1738–1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.07.002
Danilevsky AS, Goryshin NI, Tyshchenko VP (1970) Biological rhythms in terrestrial arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 15:201–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.15.010170.001221
Denlinger DL (2022) Insect diapause. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Des Marteaux L, Xi J, Mano G, Goto SG (2022) Circadian clock outputs regulating insect photoperiodism: a potential role for glutamate transporter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 589:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.12.014
Emerson KJ, Bradshaw WE, Holzapfel CM (2009a) Complications of complexity: integrating environmental, genetic and hormonal control of insect diapause. Trends Genet 25:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2009.03.009
Emerson KJ, Uyemura AM, McDaniel KL et al (2009b) Environmental control of ovarian dormancy in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A 195:825–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-009-0460-5
Erickson PA, Weller CA, Song DY et al (2020) Unique genetic signatures of local adaptation over space and time for diapause, an ecologically relevant complex trait, in Drosophila melanogaster. PLOS Genet 16:e1009110. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1009110
Fyie LR, Gardiner MM, Meuti ME (2021) Artificial light at night alters the seasonal responses of biting mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol 129:104194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2021.104194
Gao N, Von Schantz M, Foster RG, Hardie J (1999) The putative brain photoperiodic photoreceptors in the vetch aphid, Megoura viciae. J Insect Physiol 45:1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(99)00082-7
Garner WW, Allard HA (1920) Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. J Agric Res 18:553–606
Gnagey AL, Denlinger DL (1984) Photoperiodic induction of pupal diapause in the flesh fly, Sarcophaga crassipalpis: embryonic sensitivity. J Comp Physiol B 154:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00683221
Gomi T (2007) Seasonal adaptations of the fall webworm Hyphantria cunea (Drury) (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) following its invasion of Japan. Ecol Res 22:855–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0327-y
Goto SG (2009) Genetic analysis of diapause capability and association between larval and pupal photoperiodic responses in the flesh fly Sarcophaga similis. Physiol Entomol 34:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2008.00650.x
Goto SG, Denlinger DL (2002) Short-day and long-day expression patterns of genes involved in the flesh fly clock mechanism: period, timeless, cycle and cryptochrome. J Insect Physiol 48:803–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00108-7
Goto SG, Nagata M (2022) The circadian clock gene (Clock) regulates photoperiodic time measurement and its downstream process in maternal induction of embryonic diapause in a cricket. Eur J Entomol 119:12–22. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2022.002
Goto SG, Numata H (2009a) Possible involvement of distinct photoreceptors in the photoperiodic induction of diapause in the flesh fly Sarcophaga similis. J Insect Physiol 55:401–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.11.008
Goto SG, Numata H (2009b) Alteration of the pupal diapause program and regulation of larval duration by photoperiod in the flesh fly Sarcophaga similis Meade (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Appl Entomol Zool 44:603–609. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2009.603
Goto SG, Numata H (2014) Insect photoperiodism. In: Hoffmann KH (ed) Insect molecular biology and ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 217–244
Goto SG, Shiga S, Numata H (2010) Photoperiodism in insects: perception of light and the role of clock genes. In: Nelson RJ, Denlinger DL, Somers DE (eds) Photoperiodism: the biological calendar. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 258–286
Grevstad FS, Coop LB (2015) The consequences of photoperiodism for organisms in new climates. Ecol Appl 25:1506–1517. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-2071.1
Grevstad FS, Wepprich T, Barker B et al (2022) Combining photoperiod and thermal responses to predict phenological mismatch for introduced insects. Ecol Appl. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2557
Grima B, Chélot E, Xia R, Rouyer F (2004) Morning and evening peaks of activity rely on different clock neurons of the Drosophila brain. Nature 431:869–873. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02935
Hahn DA, Denlinger DL (2011) Energetics of insect diapause. Annu Rev Entomol 56:103–121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085436
Hamasaka Y, Watari Y, Arai T et al (2001) Retinal and extraretinal pathways for entrainment of the circadian activity rhythm in the blow fly, Protophormia terraenovae. J Insect Physiol 47:867–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00059-2
Hasebe M, Kotaki T, Shiga S (2022) Pigment-dispersing factor is involved in photoperiodic control of reproduction in the brown-winged green bug, Plautia stali. J Insect Physiol 137:104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2022.104359
Hasegawa K, Shimizu I (1987) In vivo and in vitro photoperiodic induction of diapause using isolated brain-suboesophageal ganglion complexes of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J Insect Physiol 33:959–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(87)90008-4
Hayes DK, Sullivan WN, Oliver MZ, Schechter MS (1970) Photoperiod manipulation of insect diapause: a method of pest control? Science 169:382–383
Hayes DK, Cawley BM, Sullivan WN et al (1974) The effect of added light pulses on overwintering and diapause, under natural light and temperature conditions, of four species of Lepidoptera. Environ Entomol 3:863–865. https://doi.org/10.1093/EE/3.5.863
Helfrich-Förster C (2020) Light input pathways to the circadian clock of insects with an emphasis on the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A 206:259–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-019-01379-5
Hori Y, Numata H, Shiga S, Goto SG (2014) Both the anterior and posterior eyes function as photoreceptors for photoperiodic termination of diapause in the two-spotted spider mite. J Comp Physiol A 200:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-013-0872-0
Hut RA, Paolucci S, Dor R et al (2013) Latitudinal clines: an evolutionary view on biological rhythms. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0433
Ichikawa A, Ikeda M, Goto SG (2020) Cold storage of diapausing larvae and post-storage performance of adults in the blowfly Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Appl Entomol Zool 55:321–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-020-00685-8
Iiams SE, Lugena AB, Zhang Y et al (2019) Photoperiodic and clock regulation of the vitamin A pathway in the brain mediates seasonal responsiveness in the monarch butterfly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:25214–25221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913915116
Ikeda K, Daimon T, Sezutsu H et al (2019) Involvement of the clock gene period in the circadian rhythm of the silkmoth Bombyx mori. J Biol Rhythms 34:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730419841185
Ikeda K, Daimon T, Shiomi K et al (2021) Involvement of the clock gene period in the photoperiodism of the silkmoth Bombyx mori. Zoolog Sci 38:523–530. https://doi.org/10.2108/zs210081
Ikeno T (2012) Photoperiodic response under the control of circadian clock genes in the bean bug Riptortus pedestrsis. Ph. D. thesis, Osaka City University, Japan
Ikeno T, Tanaka SI, Numata H, Goto SG (2010) Photoperiodic diapause under the control of circadian clock genes in an insect. BMC Biol 8:116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-8-116
Ikeno T, Katagiri C, Numata H, Goto SG (2011a) Causal involvement of mammalian-type cryptochrome in the circadian cuticle deposition rhythm in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. Insect Mol Biol 20:409–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2011.01075.x
Ikeno T, Numata H, Goto SG (2011b) Circadian clock genes period and cycle regulate photoperiodic diapause in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris males. J Insect Physiol 57:935–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.04.006
Ikeno T, Numata H, Goto SG (2011c) Photoperiodic response requires mammalian-type cryptochrome in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 410:394–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.05.142
Ikeno T, Ishikawa K, Numata H, Goto SG (2013) Circadian clock gene clock is involved in the photoperiodic response of the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. Physiol Entomol 38:157–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/phen.12013
Ikeno T, Numata H, Goto SG, Shiga S (2014) Involvement of the brain region containing pigment-dispersing factor-immunoreactive neurons in the photoperiodic response of the bean bug, Riptortus pedestris. J Exp Biol 217:453–462. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.091801
Ito C, Goto SG, Shiga S et al (2008) Peripheral circadian clock for the cuticle deposition rhythm in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800145105
Kistenpfennig C, Nakayama M, Nihara R et al (2018) A Tug-of-War between cryptochrome and the visual system allows the adaptation of evening activity to long photoperiods in Drosophila melanogaster. J Biol Rhythms 33:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730417738612
Klarsfeld A, Malpel S, Michard-Vanhée C et al (2004) Novel features of cryptochrome-mediated photoreception in the brain circadian clock of Drosophila. J Neurosci 24:1468–1477. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3661-03.2004
Koštál V (2006) Eco-physiological phases of insect diapause. J Insect Physiol 52:113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.09.008
Koštál V, Závodská R, Denlinger D (2009) Clock genes period and timeless are rhythmically expressed in brains of newly hatched, photosensitive larvae of the fly, Sarcophaga crassipalpis. J Insect Physiol 55:408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.12.011
Kotwica-Rolinska J, Pivarciova L, Vaneckova H, Dolezel D (2017) The role of circadian clock genes in the photoperiodic timer of the linden bug Pyrrhocoris apterus during the nymphal stage. Physiol Entomol 42:266–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/phen.12197
Kotwica-Rolinska J, Chodáková L, Smýkal V et al (2022a) Loss of timeless underlies an evolutionary transition within the circadian clock. Mol Biol Evol 39:msab346. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab346
Kotwica-Rolinska J, Damulewicz M, Chodakova L et al (2022b) Pigment dispersing factor is a circadian clock output and regulates photoperiodic response in the linden bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus. Front Physiol 13:884909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.884909
Kubrak OI, Kucerová L, Theopold U et al (2016) Characterization of reproductive dormancy in male Drosophila melanogaster. Front Physiol 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00572
Kumar S, Neven LG, Zhu H, Zhang R (2015) Assessing the global risk of establishment of Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using CLIMEX and MaxEnt niche models. J Econ Entomol 108:1708–1719. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov166
Kutaragi Y, Tokuoka A, Tomiyama Y et al (2018) A novel photic entrainment mechanism for the circadian clock in an insect: involvement of c-fos and cryptochromes. Zool Lett 4:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-018-0109-8
Lees AD (1964) The location of the photoperiodic receptors in the aphid Megoura viciae Buckton. J Exp Biol 41:119–133. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.41.1.119
Lees AD (1973) Photoperiodic time measurement in the aphid Megoura viciae. J Insect Physiol 19:2279–2316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(73)90237-0
Lees AD (1981) Action spectra for the photoperiodic control of polymorphism in the aphid Megoura viciae. J Insect Physiol 27:761–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(81)90066-4
Li Y, Wang M, Gao F et al (2018) Exploiting diapause and cold tolerance to enhance the use of the green lacewing Chrysopa formosa for biological control. Biol Control 127:116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCONTROL.2018.08.024
Lindestad O, Wheat CW, Nylin S, Gotthard K (2019) Local adaptation of photoperiodic plasticity maintains life cycle variation within latitudes in a butterfly. Ecology 100:e02550. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2550
Lindestad O, Nylin S, Wheat CW, Gotthard K (2022) Local adaptation of life cycles in a butterfly is associated with variation in several circadian clock genes. Mol Ecol 31:1461–1475. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16331
Marcovitch S (1923) Plant lice and light exposure. Science 58:537–538. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.58.1513.537-a
Merlin C, Beaver LE, Taylor OR et al (2013) Efficient targeted mutagenesis in the monarch butterfly using zinc-finger nucleases. Genome Res 23:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.145599.112
Meuti ME, Stone M, Ikeno T, Denlinger DL (2015) Functional circadian clock genes are essential for the overwintering diapause of the Northern house mosquito, Culex pipiens. J Exp Biol 218:412–422. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.113233
Mohamed AAM, Wang Q, Bembenek J et al (2014) N-acetyltransferase (nat) is a critical conjunct of photoperiodism between the circadian system and endocrine axis in Antheraea pernyi. PLoS ONE 9:e92680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092680
Morita A, Numata H (1999) Localization of the photoreceptor for photoperiodism in the stink bug, Plautia crossota stali. Physiol Entomol 24:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3032.1999.00130.x
Mukai A, Goto SG (2016) The clock gene period is essential for the photoperiodic response in the jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Appl Entomol Zool 51:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-015-0384-1
Mukai A, Yamaguchi K, Goto SG (2021) Urban warming and artificial light alter dormancy in the flesh fly. R Soc Open Sci 8:210866. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210866
Nagy D, Cusumano P, Andreatta G et al (2019) Peptidergic signaling from clock neurons regulates reproductive dormancy in Drosophila melanogaster. PLOS Genet 15:e1008158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008158
Nielsen AL, Chen S, Fleischer SJ (2016) Coupling developmental physiology, photoperiod, and temperature to model phenology and dynamics of an invasive heteropteran, Halyomorpha halys. Front Physiol 7:165. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHYS.2016.00165/BIBTEX
Noguchi H, Hayakawa Y (1997) Role of dopamine at the onset of pupal diapause in the cabbage armyworm Mamestra brassicae. FEBS Lett 413:157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00848-X
Omura S, Numata H, Goto SG (2016) Circadian clock regulates photoperiodic responses governed by distinct output pathways in the bean bug, Riptortus pedestris. Biol Rhythm Res 47:937–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2016.1212515
Paolucci S, Van de Zande L, Beukeboom LW (2013) Adaptive latitudinal cline of photoperiodic diapause induction in the parasitoid Nasonia vitripennis in Europe. J Evol Biol 26:705–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12113
Paolucci S, Salis L, Vermeulen CJ et al (2016) QTL analysis of the photoperiodic response and clinal distribution of period alleles in Nasonia vitripennis. Mol Ecol 25:4805–4817. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13802
Paolucci S, Dalla Benetta E, Salis L et al (2019) Latitudinal variation in circadian rhythmicity in Nasonia vitripennis. Behav Sci (basel) 9:115. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9110115
Patke A, Young MW, Axelrod S (2020) Molecular mechanisms and physiological importance of circadian rhythms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21:67–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0179-2
Pavelka J, Shimada K, Kostal V (2003) TIMELESS : a link between fly’s circadian and photoperiodic clocks? Eur J Entomol 100:255–265. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2003.041
Peffers CS, Pomeroy LW, Meuti ME (2021) Critical photoperiod and its potential to predict mosquito distributions and control medically important pests. J Med Entomol 58:1610–1618. https://doi.org/10.1093/JME/TJAB049
Pittendrigh CS, Minis DH (1964) Theentrainment of circadian oscillations by light and their role as photoperiodic clocks. Amer Natural 98:261–294
Pollard CP, Griffin CT, de Andrade Moral R et al (2020) phenModel: a temperature-dependent phenology/voltinism model for a herbivorous insect incorporating facultative diapause and budburst. Ecol Modell 416:108910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108910
Pruisscher P, Nylin S, Gotthard K, Wheat CW (2018) Genetic variation underlying local adaptation of diapause induction along a cline in a butterfly. Mol Ecol 27:3613–3626. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14829
Pruisscher P, Nylin S, Wheat CW, Gotthard K (2021) A region of the sex chromosome associated with population differences in diapause induction contains highly divergent alleles at clock genes. Evolution 75:490–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14151
Sakamoto T, Tomioka K (2007) Effects of unilateral compound-eye removal on the photoperiodic responses of nymphal development in the cricket Modicogryllus siamensis. Zoolog Sci 24:604–610. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.24.604
Sakamoto T, Uryu O, Tomioka K (2009) The clock gene period plays an essential role in photoperiodic control of nymphal development in the cricket Modicogryllus siamensis. J Biol Rhythms 24:379–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730409341523
Sandrelli F, Tauber E, Pegoraro M et al (2007) A molecular basis for natural selection at the timeless locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 316:1898–1900. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138426
Sandrelli F, Costa R, Kyriacou CP, Rosato E (2008) Comparative analysis of circadian clock genes in insects. Insect Mol Biol 17:447–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00832.x
Saunders DS (1974) Evidence for ‘dawn’ and ‘dusk’ oscillators in the Nasonia photoperiodic clock. J Insect Physiol 20:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(74)90125-5
Saunders DS (1975) Spectral sensitivity and intensity thresholds in Nasonia photoperiodic clock. Nature 253:732–734. https://doi.org/10.1038/253732a0
Saunders DS (1979) External coincidence and the photoinducible phase in the Sarcophaga photoperiodic clock. J Comp Physiol A 132:179–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610722
Saunders DS (2002) Insect clocks, 3rd edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Saunders DS (2010) Controversial aspects of photoperiodism in insects and mites. J Insect Physiol 56:1491–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.05.002
Saunders DS (2012) Insect photoperiodism: seeing the light. Physiol Entomol 37:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2012.00837.x
Saunders DS (2013) Insect photoperiodism: measuring the night. J Insect Physiol 59:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.11.003
Saunders DS (2020) Dormancy, diapause, and the role of the circadian system in insect photoperiodism. Annu Rev Entomol 65:373–389. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025116
Saunders DS, Cymborowski B (1996) Removal of optic lobes of adult blow flies (Calliphora vicina) leaves photoperiodic induction of larval diapause intact. J Insect Physiol 42:807–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(96)00007-8
Saunders DS, Henrich VC, Gilbert LI (1989) Induction of diapause in Drosophila melanogaster: photoperiodic regulation and the impact of arrhythmic clock mutations on time measurement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:3748–3752. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.10.3748
Sawyer LA, Hennessy JM, Peixoto AA et al (1997) Natural variation in a Drosophila Clock gene and temperature compensation. Science 278:2117–2120. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5346.2117
Schechter MS, Hayes DK, Sullivan WN (1971) Manipulation of photoperiod to control insects. Isr J Entomol 6:143–168
Sehgal A, Price JL, Man B, Young MW (1994) Loss of circadian behavioral rhythms and per RNA oscillations in the Drosophila mutant timeless. Science 263:1603–1606. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8128246
Senthilan PR, Grebler R, Reinhard N et al (2019) Role of rhodopsins as circadian photoreceptors in the Drosophila melanogaster. Biology (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/biology8010006
Shafer OT, Yao Z (2014) Pigment-dispersing factor signaling and circadian rhythms in insect locomotor activity. Curr Opin Insect Sci 1:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COIS.2014.05.002
Shiga S, Numata H (1996) Effects of compound eye-removal on the photoperiodic response of the band-legged ground cricket, Pteronemobius nigrofasciatus. J Comp Physiol A 179:625–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216127
Shiga S, Numata H (1997) Induction of reproductive diapause via perception of photoperiod through the compound eyes in the adult blow fly, Protophormia terraenovae. J Comp Physiol A 181:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050090
Shiga S, Numata H, Yoshioka E (1999) Localization of the photoreceptor and pacemaker for the circadian activity rhythm in the band-legged ground cricket, Dianemobius nigrofasciatus. Zoolog Sci 16:193–201. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.16.193
Shimizu I, Yamakawa Y, Shimazaki Y, Iwasa T (2001) Molecular cloning of Bombyx cerebral opsin (boceropsin) and cellular localization of its expression in the silkworm brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 287:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5540
Shimoda M, Honda K (2013) Insect reactions to light and its applications to pest management. Appl Entomol Zool 48:413–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-013-0219-x
Shintani Y, Shiga S, Numata H (2009) Different photoreceptor organs are used for photoperiodism in the larval and adult stages of the carabid beetle, Leptocarabus kumagaii. J Exp Biol 212:3651–3655. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.034033
Sprecher SG, Cardona A, Hartenstein V (2011) The Drosophila larval visual system: high-resolution analysis of a simple visual neuropil. Dev Biol 358:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.07.006
Stanewsky R, Kaneko M, Emery P et al (1998) The cryb mutation identifies cryptochrome as a circadian photoreceptor in Drosophila. Cell 95:681–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81638-4
Stevenson TJ, Visser ME, Arnold W et al (2015) Disrupted seasonal biology impacts health, food security and ecosystems. Proc R Soc B 282:20151453. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1453
Stoleru D, Peng Y, Agosto J, Rosbash M (2004) Coupled oscillators control morning and evening locomotor behaviour of Drosophila. Nature 431:862–868. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02926
Tamai T, Shiga S, Goto SG (2019) Roles of the circadian clock and endocrine regulator in the photoperiodic response of the brown-winged green bug Plautia stali. Physiol Entomol 44:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/phen.12274
Tamaki S, Takemoto S, Uryu O et al (2013) Opsins are involved in nymphal photoperiodic responses in the cricket Modicogryllus siamensis. Physiol Entomol 38:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/phen.12015
Tanaka K, Murata K, Matsuura A (2015) Rapid evolution of an introduced insect Ophraella communa LeSage in new environments: temporal changes and geographical differences in photoperiodic response. Entomol Sci 18:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12087
Tauber E, Zordan M, Sandrelli F et al (2007) Natural selection favors a newly derived timeless allele in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 316:1895–1898. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138412
Tokuoka A, Itoh TQ, Hori S et al (2017) cryptochrome genes form an oscillatory loop independent of the per/tim loop in the circadian clockwork of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Lett 3:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-017-0066-7
Tomioka K, Matsumoto A (2019) The circadian system in insects: cellular, molecular, and functional organization. Adv Insect Phys 56:73–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aiip.2019.01.001
Tyshchenko VP (1966) Two-oscillatory model of the physiological mechanism of insect photoperiodic reaction. Zh Obshch Biol 27:209–222
Ueda H, Tamaki S, Miki T et al (2018) Cryptochrome genes mediate photoperiodic responses in the cricket Modicogryllus siamensis. Physiol Entomol 43:285–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/phen.12258
Urbanová V, Bazalová O, Vaněčková H, Dolezel D (2016) Photoperiod regulates growth of male accessory glands through juvenile hormone signaling in the linden bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 70:184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.01.003
Urbanski J, Mogi M, O’Donnell D et al (2012) Rapid adaptive evolution of photoperiodic response during invasion and range expansion across a climatic gradient. Am Nat 179:490–500. https://doi.org/10.1086/664709
Van Der Kooi CJ, Stavenga DG, Arikawa K et al (2021) Evolution of insect color vision: from spectral sensitivity to visual ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 66:435–461. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-061720-071644
van Geffen KG, van Grunsven RHA, van Ruijven J et al (2014) Artificial light at night causes diapause inhibition and sex-specific life history changes in a moth. Ecol Evol 4:2082–2089. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1090
Vaz Nunes M, Hardie J (1993) Circadian rhythmicity is involved in photoperiodic time measurement in the aphid Megoura viciae. Experientia 49:711–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01923957
Vaz Nunes M, Saunders D (1999) Photoperiodic time measurement in insects: a review of clock models. J Biol Rhythms 14:84–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/074873049901400202
Velarde RA, Sauer CD, Walden KKO et al (2005) Pteropsin: a vertebrate-like non-visual opsin expressed in the honey bee brain. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 35:1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.09.001
Wang Q, Mohamed AAM, Takeda M (2013) Serotonin receptor B may lock the gate of PTTH release/synthesis in the Chinese silk moth, Antheraea pernyi; a diapause initiation/maintenance mechanism? PLoS ONE 8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079381
Wang Q, Egi Y, Takeda M et al (2015a) Melatonin pathway transmits information to terminate pupal diapause in the Chinese oak silkmoth Antheraea pernyi and through reciprocated inhibition of dopamine pathway functions as a photoperiodic counter. Entomol Sci 18:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12083
Wang Q, Hanatani I, Takeda M et al (2015b) D2-like dopamine receptors mediate regulation of pupal diapause in Chinese oak silkmoth Antheraea pernyi. Entomol Sci 18:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12099
Westby KM, Medley KA (2020) Cold nights, city lights: artificial light at night reduces photoperiodically induced diapause in urban and rural populations of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 57:1694–1699. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa139
Yamada H, Yamamoto MT (2011) Association between circadian clock genes and diapause incidence in Drosophila triauraria. PLoS ONE 6:e27493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027493
Yamaguchi K, Goto SG (2019) Distinct physiological mechanisms induce latitudinal and sexual differences in the photoperiodic induction of diapause in a fly. J Biol Rhythms 34:293–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730419841931
Yoshii T, Rieger D, Förster CH (2012) Two clocks in the brain: an update of the morning and evening oscillator model in Drosophila. Prog Brain Res 199:59–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59427-3.00027-7
Yuan Q, Metterville D, Briscoe AD, Reppert SM (2007) Insect cryptochromes: gene duplication and loss define diverse ways to construct insect circadian clocks. Mol Biol Evol 24:948–955. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm011
Zhu H, Yuan Q, Briscoe AD et al (2006) The two CRYs of the butterfly. Curr Biol 16:730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.026
Zhu H, Sauman I, Yuan Q et al (2008) Cryptochromes define a novel circadian clock mechanism in monarch butterflies that may underlie sun compass navigation. PLoS Biol 6:e4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060004
Zhu L, Tian Z, Guo S et al (2019) Circadian clock genes link photoperiodic signals to lipid accumulation during diapause preparation in the diapause-destined female cabbage beetles Colaphellus bowringi. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 104:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.11.001
Acknowledgements
I am most grateful for the invitation by the Japanese Society of Applied Entomology and Zoology to write this review in recognition of the Society’s Award. I appreciate Drs Masahito T. Kimura at Hokkaido University, David L. Denlinger at Ohio State University, Hideharu Numata at Kyoto University, Sakiko Shiga at Osaka University, Tetsuo Gotoh at Ryutsu Keizai University, and all my colleagues for their guidance and encouragement for my research.
Funding
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19H02971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Goto, S.G. Photoperiodic time measurement, photoreception, and circadian clocks in insect photoperiodism. Appl Entomol Zool 57, 193–212 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-022-00785-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-022-00785-7