Abstract
Introduction
Donanemab, a monoclonal antibody directed against an insoluble, modified, N-terminal truncated form of amyloid beta, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with early, symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in the phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial. Here, we report clinical outcomes, biomarkers, and safety results for the Japanese subpopulation.
Methods
TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 (N = 1736) was conducted in eight countries, including Japan (enrollment June 2020–November 2021; database lock April 2023). Participants (60–85 years) with early, symptomatic AD (mild cognitive impairment/mild dementia), Mini-Mental State Examination score 20–28, and confirmed amyloid and tau pathology were randomized 1:1 (stratified by tau status) to intravenous donanemab (700 mg for three doses, then 1400 mg/dose) or placebo every 4 weeks for 72 weeks. Primary outcome was change from baseline to week 76 in integrated Alzheimer’s Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) score. Other outcomes included clinical measures of cognitive and functional impairment, biomarkers, and safety.
Results
Of 88 Japanese participants (43 placebo, 45 donanemab), 7 in each group discontinued. Least-squares mean (LSM) change from baseline in iADRS score at week 76 was smaller with donanemab than with placebo in the combined (low-medium tau and high tau) and low-medium tau (N = 76) subpopulations (LSM change difference: 4.43 and 3.99, representing 38.8% and 40.2% slowing of disease progression, respectively). Slowing of AD progression with donanemab was also observed for other clinical outcomes. Marked decreases in amyloid plaque and plasma phosphorylated tau 217 were observed; amyloid clearance (< 24.1 Centiloids) was observed in 83.3% of the combined donanemab and 0% of the combined placebo groups. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities of edema/effusions occurred in ten (22.2%) donanemab-treated participants (one [2.2%] symptomatic) and one (2.3%) placebo-treated participant.
Conclusions
The overall efficacy and safety of donanemab in Japanese participants were similar to the global TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 population.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04437511.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that is usually first recognized clinically by the onset of cognitive impairment [1]. Although the molecular mechanisms underlying AD are complex, the formation of extracellular amyloid plaques in the cerebral cortex is considered an initiating event [2,3,4,5]. Intracellular neurofibrillary tangles containing the highly phosphorylated protein tau are also present, and there is evidence for synergies between tau and amyloid that contribute to the progression of AD [6]. Standard pharmacologic agents for AD, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, are considered symptomatic treatment and do not target or affect the underlying pathology of the disease [1]. Recently, a number of amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been developed in the hope that these treatments may slow the progression of AD, especially if administered in the early stages [7, 8].
Donanemab is an immunoglobulin G1 mAb directed against an insoluble, modified, N-terminal truncated form of amyloid beta (N3pGlu Aβ) present only in brain amyloid plaques [9]. Donanemab binds to N3pGlu Aβ and aids plaque removal through microglial-mediated phagocytosis [9]. The potential efficacy of donanemab in the treatment of early, symptomatic AD was first demonstrated in the phase 2 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ trial [10]. Donanemab treatment resulted in a significantly smaller reduction in the integrated Alzheimer’s Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) score, a composite score for cognition and activities of daily living [11], over 76 weeks compared with placebo [10]. These results were confirmed in the global, phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial (least-squares mean [LSM] change from baseline in iADRS: − 10.19 for donanemab vs. − 13.11 for placebo, difference 2.92 [95% confidence interval, (CI), 1.51–4.33], p < 0.001 in the combined, i.e., overall] population) [12]. In addition to meeting the primary iADRS outcome, donanemab was associated with slowing of disease progression based on several clinical measures (Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB], Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (13-item) (ADAS-Cog13), Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory, instrumental items [ADCS-iADL]) as well as by marked decreases in biomarkers, including amyloid plaque level and plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (P-tau217) [12]. These results were more pronounced in participants with low to medium levels of tau pathology based on positron emission tomography (PET) [12]. As reported for other amyloid-targeting antibodies [10, 13,14,15], the incidence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) and infusion-related reactions was higher in the donanemab group than in the placebo group [12].
In Japan, the prevalence of AD and other dementias has been increasing rapidly over recent decades [16,17,18,19], and an analysis of 2019 Global Burden of Disease data reported that the rate of AD increase in the Japanese population is among the highest in the world [20]. Dementia currently affects > 5 million people in Japan, and an estimated 4 million have AD [20, 21]. The prevalence of dementia among Japanese people aged 65 years and older is expected to exceed 25% by 2035 [17]. With the rapid aging of the Japanese population, the number of people living with AD will increase markedly in the near future. Despite this, no published study to date has examined the efficacy of amyloid-targeting antibodies specifically in Japanese patients with AD, although Japanese subpopulation results of phase 3 aducanumab trials have been published in abstract form [22]. In addition, the safety of amyloid-targeting antibodies in Japanese patients has only been reported as part of preliminary, single-dose, pharmacokinetic studies of discontinued compounds (solanezumab, bapineuzumab) [23, 24]. Here, we report key clinical outcomes, biomarkers, and safety results for the Japanese subpopulation of TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2.
Methods
Study design
TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04437511) was a global, phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of donanemab conducted at 277 sites in eight countries [12], including 31 sites in Japan. Participants were enrolled between June 19, 2020, and November 5, 2021, with the database lock for the 76-week double-blind period occurring on April 28, 2023. The trial was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Council for Harmonisation Guideline for Good Clinical Practice, and local regulatory requirements. The protocol was approved by ethics review boards at each study site (Supplemental Table S1). Participants and their study partners provided written informed consent before any study procedures were conducted. An independent data safety monitoring board provided trial oversight.
Study population
Participants aged 60 to 85 years were eligible for inclusion if they had early, symptomatic AD characterized by gradual and progressive change in memory function, a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 20 to 28, and confirmed AD pathology based on PET for both amyloid (assessed with 18F-florbetapir13 or 18F-florbetaben14) and tau (18F-flortaucipir). Participants also had to have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with ≤ 4 cerebral microhemorrhages, ≤ 1 area of superficial siderosis, no amyloid-related imaging abnormalities of edema or effusions (ARIA-E), no intracerebral hemorrhage > 1 cm, and no severe white matter disease. Full eligibility criteria were described previously [12].
Treatment protocol
Randomization was performed using a computer-generated sequence and interactive web-response system, with stratification by tau pathology (low-medium tau or high tau) and study site. Baseline tau levels were categorized based on visual and quantitative PET scans [10, 12, 25,26,27]. Enrolled participants were randomized 1:1 to intravenous donanemab (700 mg for three doses, followed by 1400 mg per dose) or placebo every 4 weeks for 72 weeks, with final efficacy and safety data for the double-blind period collected at week 76. Participants in the donanemab group were switched to placebo in a blinded manner if their amyloid level was < 11 Centiloids at any single PET scan (week 24, week 52, or week 76) or was ≥ 11 but < 25 Centiloids at two consecutive PET scans.
Outcome measures
Details of the study outcomes have been described in the global TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 publication [12]. All outcomes reported herein were prespecified for the combined (low-medium tau + high tau) population and the low-medium tau population, including the Japanese subpopulation. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to week 76 in iADRS score. The iADRS is a validated scoring system that combines the ADAS-Cog13 with the ADCS-iADL [11]. The iADRS has been used in previous clinical trials to measure the level of impairment in cognition and daily functioning in participants with early AD [10, 28, 29]. iADRS scores range from 0 to 144, with lower scores indicating greater deficit [29].
Other clinical outcomes reported for the Japanese subpopulation include changes from baseline to week 76 in the CDR-SB (range 0–18, higher scores indicate greater impairment), ADAS-Cog13 (range 0–85, higher scores indicate greater overall cognition deficit), and ADCS-iADL (range 0–59, lower scores indicate greater impairment in daily function) as secondary outcomes, and slowing of disease progression based on iADRS and CDR-SB, the proportion of participants with no progression by CDR-SB at week 52, and the risk of progression to the next stage of disease based on the CDR–Global Score (CDR-GS; range 0 [no dementia] to 3 [severe dementia]) score as exploratory outcomes.
Biomarker outcomes reported for the Japanese subpopulation include the change from baseline to week 76 in amyloid plaque level (in Centiloids) and the proportion of participants achieving amyloid clearance (defined as < 24.1 Centiloids measured by PET) at weeks 24, 52, and 76 as secondary outcomes and the change from baseline to week 76 in P-tau217 [30] as an exploratory outcome. Plasma P-tau217 was measured using the plasma tau multianalyte assay (C2N Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO, USA). Imaging (amyloid and tau PET) was performed locally and assessed centrally. Plasma biomarkers were measured at a central laboratory.
Safety was a secondary outcome and included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), deaths, adverse events (AEs) leading to study or treatment discontinuation, and TEAEs related to study treatment. AEs were classified using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 25.1. AEs of special interest for amyloid-targeting antibodies [10, 13,14,15] included ARIA-E, ARIA of microhemorrhages and hemosiderin deposits (ARIA-H), and infusion-related reactions. ARIA and macrohemorrhage events were analyzed by MedDRA Preferred Term (PT) and also by central MRI analysis/TEAE PT cluster.
Statistical analysis
Sample size calculations for the global trial based on statistical power were described previously and were based on the low-medium tau population [12]; no power calculations were performed for the Japanese subpopulation. Analyses of clinical and biomarker outcomes were conducted on the efficacy evaluable set of the Japanese subpopulation, which consisted of all randomized participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. Outcomes were analyzed separately for the combined population and for the low-medium tau population. Outcomes in the high tau population, which were analyzed post hoc for the global trial [12], were not conducted for the Japanese subpopulation because of the small number of participants (n = 5 in the donanemab group, n = 7 in the placebo group).
Statistical analyses were as previously described, with imputation of missing data [12]. Imputation was used for the ADCS-iADL if < 30% was missing, for the ADAS-Cog13 if ≤ 3 items were missing, and for CDR if one box was missing. If the number of missing items was larger than the number defined, the total score at that visit was considered missing. The iADRS score was considered missing if either the ADCS-iADL or ADAS-Cog13 score was missing. For clinical outcomes, changes from baseline in iADRS, ADAS-Cog13, and ADCS-iADL were analyzed by a natural cubic spline model with two degrees of freedom (NCS2) as the primary analyses and by a mixed model for repeat measures (MMRM) as sensitivity analyses. Changes from baseline in CDR-SB score were analyzed by MMRM as the primary analysis and by NCS2 as a sensitivity analysis. Slowing of disease progression by iADRS and CDR-SB scores was expressed as a percentage by dividing the LSM change difference at week 76 (donanemab—placebo) by the LSM change from baseline at week 76 in the placebo group. Delay in disease progression was estimated using a time progression model for repeated measures [31]. The probability of no progression at week 52, defined as CDR-SB score change from baseline ≤ 0, was estimated using a generalized linear mixed model. The risk of progression across 76 weeks, in which progression was defined as any increase from baseline in CDR-GS at two consecutive visits, was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model.
For biomarkers (amyloid and plasma P-tau217), changes from baseline were analyzed by an MMRM. For the proportion of participants with amyloid clearance, 95% CIs were calculated using the Wilson score method. Frontal lobe tau PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) was analyzed by analysis of covariance.
Safety analyses were conducted on all Japanese randomized participants exposed to the study drug in the combined population.
Analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute) or R Project version 4.3.0 (R Foundation).
Results
Participant disposition and baseline characteristics
Of 1736 participants randomized globally [12], 88 (5.1%) were from Japan; of these, 43 were allocated to placebo and 45 to donanemab (Fig. 1). Seven participants (16.3%) in the placebo group discontinued the study, with n = 3, because of an AE; seven participants in the donanemab group (15.6%) discontinued, with n = 5 because of withdrawal by the participant. A total of 74 (84.1%) participants completed the 76-week double-blind period.
Within the Japanese subpopulation, baseline participant characteristics were similar in the donanemab and placebo treatment groups, except for the proportion of female participants and the proportion of participants who were apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers being somewhat higher in the donanemab group than in the placebo group (Table 1). Baseline characteristics were also generally similar to those in the global trial population, although the proportion of participants with low-medium tau was higher (86.4% for Japan vs. 68.1% for global) [12].
Primary outcome: iADRS change from baseline
The LSM change from baseline in iADRS score at week 76 was smaller in the donanemab group than in the placebo group (Fig. 2; Table 2). In the combined population, the LSM (95% CI) change difference between donanemab and placebo by NCS2 analysis was 4.43 (− 0.17, 9.03), representing a 38.8% slowing of clinical progression. In the low-medium tau population, the LSM (95% CI) change difference between donanemab and placebo by NCS2 analysis was 3.99 (− 0.98, 8.97), representing a 40.2% slowing of clinical progression. Similar results were seen when analyzed by an MMRM (Table 2).
Other clinical outcomes
CDR-SB and CDR-GS
For the CDR-SB score change from baseline to week 76, the LSM (95% CI) change difference between donanemab and placebo (as analyzed by an MMRM) in the combined population was − 0.23 (− 1.33, 0.87), with a 14.2% slowing of progression in the combined population and 0.08 (− 1.03, 1.20), with a − 7.4% slowing of progression in the low-medium tau population (Table 2). It was noted that two participants in the placebo group of the low-medium tau population had large improvements from baseline in CDR-SB score; when analyses were repeated with these participants excluded, the difference between placebo and donanemab at weeks 52 and 76 was increased (Supplemental Fig. S1). The probability of no progression at week 52 by CDR-SB score was 0.47 for donanemab and 0.25 for placebo in the combined population and 0.51 for donanemab and 0.33 for placebo in the low-medium tau population. Based on CDR-GS, the risk of disease progression to the next AD stage over 76 weeks was 33.9% lower [hazard ratio (HR) 0.661 (95% CI 0.256, 1.703)] in the combined population and 25.7% lower [HR 0.743 (95% CI 0.258, 2.143)] in the low-medium tau population with donanemab compared with placebo (Table 2).
ADAS-Cog13 and ADCS-iADL
For the ADAS-Cog13 score change from baseline to week 76 by NCS2, the LSM (95% CI) change difference between donanemab and placebo was − 2.71 (− 4.97, − 0.46), with a 50.3% slowing of progression in the combined population and − 1.52 (− 3.72, 0.67), with a 39.0% slowing of progression in the low-medium tau population (Table 2). For the ADCS-iADL score change from baseline to week 76 by NCS2, the LSM (95% CI) change difference between donanemab and placebo was 1.24 (− 2.44, 4.91), with a 26.9% slowing of progression in the combined population, and 1.54 (− 2.55, 5.63), with a 33.1% slowing of progression in the low-medium tau population.
Biomarkers
The LSM change from baseline in amyloid plaque level measured by PET was greater in the donanemab group than in the placebo group at 24, 52, and 76 weeks in both the combined and low-medium tau Japanese populations (Fig. 3; Table 3). In the donanemab group, amyloid decreased by an LSM of 72.27 Centiloids in the combined population and by an LSM of 74.91 Centiloids in the low-medium tau population at week 76 (Fig. 3). In contrast, small increases in amyloid were observed in the placebo group. Amyloid clearance (defined as < 24.1 Centiloids) in the donanemab group was achieved in the combined and low-medium tau populations, respectively, by 46.5% and 50.0% of participants at week 24, 71.8% and 76.5% at week 52, and 83.3% and 87.5% at week 76 (Fig. 4; Table 3). These proportions were greater than in the placebo group where no participants achieved amyloid clearance at any time point. Of participants in the donanemab group who had a PET scan at the week 24, week 52, or week 76 visits, 32.6%, 53.8%, and 81.1%, respectively, met the treatment completion criteria based on amyloid plaque level (Fig. 1).
Greater decreases in plasma P-tau217 were seen in the donanemab-treated group compared with placebo at weeks 12, 24, 52, and 76 for both the combined and low-medium tau populations (Fig. 5; Table 3).
There was no difference between donanemab and placebo in frontal lobe tau SUVr change from baseline in either the combined or the low-medium tau Japanese population (Table 3).
Safety
In the combined population, SAEs occurred in eight (18.6%) Japanese participants in the placebo group and seven (15.6%) participants in the donanemab group (Table 4). There were no deaths in either treatment group. In the placebo group, three (7.0%) participants discontinued treatment because of an AE. In the donanemab group, four (8.9%) participants discontinued treatment because of an AE; of these, two (4.4%) were due to ARIA-E events and two (4.4%) were due to infusion-related reactions.
TEAEs were experienced by 33 (76.7%) participants in the placebo group and 41 (91.1%) participants in the donanemab group (Table 4). Of these, 9 (20.9%) and 22 (48.9%) had TEAEs deemed related to study treatment for placebo and donanemab, respectively. By PT, ARIA-H and ARIA-E were the most common TEAEs in the donanemab group (26.7% and 22.2%, respectively) and were observed at a lower incidence in the placebo group (7.0% and 2.3%, respectively). Other common (≥ 5% incidence) TEAEs in the donanemab group were COVID-19 (13.3%), arthralgia (11.1%), infusion-related reaction, back pain, and nasopharyngitis (6.7% each); these TEAEs occurred at a lower rate in the placebo group. TEAEs in the System Organ Class “musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders” (including arthralgia) were also more common in the donanemab group than in the placebo group (31.1% vs. 9.3%).
When assessed by central MRI or TEAE cluster, 10 (22.2%) participants in the donanemab group had ARIA-E, 1 (2.2%) of which was symptomatic (confusional state), and 16 (35.6%) had ARIA-H (Table 5). In the placebo group, one (2.3%) and five (11.6%) participants had ARIA-E and ARIA-H, respectively. There were no intracerebral hemorrhages > 1 cm or SAEs of ARIA in either treatment group.
Discussion
Given the rapidly increasing number of people in Japan who are living with AD [20, 21], advances in effective treatment options are urgently needed. In this analysis of the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Japanese subpopulation, the changes in clinical and biomarker outcomes with donanemab, as well as the safety profile of donanemab observed, were similar to those seen in the overall study population [12]. The results of TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 suggest that donanemab can help patients stay in early, symptomatic AD longer, a period when they have less cognitive and functional difficulty in their daily lives. This is important not only by extending the time that patients can continue to live independently but also by providing a preparatory period in which patients can continue their familiar lifestyle and familiar relationships in the community [32] as well as contributing to the development of a “living with dementia” society [33].
For the primary outcome, change from baseline to week 76 in iADRS score, the change difference between donanemab and placebo was slightly higher in Japanese participants compared with the global TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 population in both the combined (4.43 vs. 2.92) and low-medium tau (3.99 vs. 3.25) populations. These differences were also reflected in the slowing of clinical progression (38.8% and 22.3% in the combined population, and 40.2% and 35.1% in the low-medium tau population, for Japanese and global participants, respectively). Most other clinical outcomes were also similar between Japanese and global populations, with the exception of slowing of progression by CDR-SB. When analyzed by an MMRM, no slowing was observed in the Japanese low-medium tau population (− 7% slowing) in contrast to the global low-medium tau population (36% slowing) [12]. However, the sensitivity analysis by NCS2 (Table 2) resulted in slowing of progression rates in the Japanese subpopulation similar to those in the global analysis. On inspection, two participants in the placebo group were found to have disproportionately high baseline CDR-SB scores, resulting in large improvements from baseline to week 76; a reanalysis by the MMRM with these two participants removed resulted in a positive slowing of clinical progression by donanemab (Supplemental Fig. S1). A few such “outliers” with unusually large improvements in CDR-SB were also observed in the global population in both donanemab and placebo groups; it is likely that the two outliers in the Japanese subpopulation were both in the placebo group by chance because of the small sample size.
The identification of biomarkers for AD, particularly PET-based imaging of neuropathology, has greatly enhanced diagnosis and the monitoring of disease progression [1, 3, 34,35,36]. Donanemab treatment markedly reduced the level of amyloid by approximately 72–75 Centiloids in the Japanese subpopulation and by 87–88 Centiloids in the global population. Moreover, a majority participants in both populations achieved amyloid clearance (< 24.1 Centiloids) at each time point, with 83.3–87.5% of the Japanese donanemab group and 76.4–80.1% of the global donanemab group achieving clearance at week 76. The numerical differences between the global and Japanese populations in the absolute reduction of amyloid and the proportion achieving clearance may be related to differences in baseline amyloid levels (80.76–89.89 Centiloids vs. 100.9–103.5 Centiloids in the Japanese and global populations, respectively). Nevertheless, the amyloid results are consistent with the mechanism of action of donanemab, an antibody directed toward the amyloid protein present in plaques without interacting with other amyloid species [9]. Donanemab also dramatically reduced levels of the plasma biomarkers P-tau217, as seen in the global population [12]. Similar results were seen in the phase 2 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ trial of donanemab [37] as well as in a global phase 3 trial of another amyloid-targeting antibody, lecanemab [38].
The safety profile of donanemab in Japanese participants was similar to that seen in the global population, including a higher incidence of ARIA compared with placebo (40.0% vs. 14.0% in the Japanese subpopulation, 36.8% vs. 14.9% in the global population). As noted, ARIA events have been observed previously in phase 3 trials of aducanumab [39], lecanemab [38], and donanemab (TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2) [12], as well as in trials of the earlier amyloid-targeting antibodies gantenerumab [40] and bapineuzumab [41]. Most cases of ARIA are asymptomatic and resolve with study drug discontinuation or dose reduction. In the global TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial, study drug discontinuations due to ARIA and SAEs of ARIA occurred at rates of 3.3% and 2.0%, respectively, while symptomatic ARIA-E occurred in 6.1% of donanemab-treated participants [12]. In the Japanese subpopulation, two participants (4.4%) discontinued treatment because of an ARIA event (both ARIA-E), there were no ARIA SAEs, and one participant (2.2%) with ARIA-E was symptomatic (confusional state). Although the sample size of the Japanese subpopulation was too small to directly compare the rates of these less-common events against the global population, our results suggest that Japanese patients are not more susceptible to ARIA than non-Japanese patients. We also observed a higher incidence of musculoskeletal and connective tissues TEAEs in the Japanese donanemab group than in the placebo group; this difference was not observed in the global population and may be related to the smaller sample size of the Japanese subpopulation.
This is the first analysis of an amyloid-targeting antibody in Japanese patients with AD participating in a large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial assessed a broad range of clinical and biomarker outcomes, as well as safety, over 76 weeks and was designed with a blinded switch from donanemab to placebo in participants who achieved amyloid clearance [12]. To capture individuals in the early stages of AD, patients with MMSE scores from 20 to 28 were eligible for inclusion, meaning that some participants may have had only mild cognitive impairment at baseline (15.9% of the Japanese subpopulation had MMSE ≥ 27); these patients may have responded especially well to donanemab. The analyses were adjusted for a range of prespecified demographic and clinical characteristics; however, analyses were not adjusted for other potential confounding factors, such as APOE ε4 carrier status (which differed slightly between treatment groups). Although the sample size of the Japanese subpopulation was not powered to detect statistical differences, the safety and efficacy of donanemab were consistent with that of the global population [12]. In addition, the discontinuation rate was lower in the Japanese subpopulation than in the overall global population (15.9% vs. 23.3%), further strengthening the results despite the small sample size. However, further follow-up is required to assess long-term safety and efficacy of donanemab in both the Japanese and global populations, and a 78-week, double-blind extension to TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 is underway. Biological factors, such as body size and genetic profile [42,43,44,45], and cultural factors, such as lifestyle, are similar between Japan and other Asian countries, especially East Asia, and these may differ from most Western countries. Therefore, extrapolation of the study findings to the broader Asian population could be applicable. However, further research in a more diverse Asian population is needed.
In conclusion, the overall efficacy, safety, and biomarker changes with donanemab in Japanese participants in the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial were generally similar to those reported for the global population, although no direct statistical comparison was conducted. These results, together with the high rate of treatment completion, suggest that donanemab could be beneficial in the treatment of early, symptomatic AD in both the global and Japanese populations, although confirmatory research is required.
Data Availability
Eli Lilly and Company provides access to all individual participant data collected during the trial, after anonymization, with the exception of pharmacokinetic or genetic data. Data are available to request 6 months after the indication studied has been approved in the United States and the European Union and after primary publication acceptance, whichever is later. No expiration date of data requests is currently set once data are made available. Access is provided after a proposal has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose and after receipt of a signed data sharing agreement. Data and documents, including the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, clinical study report, blank or annotated case report forms, will be provided in a secure data sharing environment. For details on submitting a request, see the instructions provided at www.vivli.org.
References
Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC, et al. Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):33.
Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297(5580):353–6.
Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(4):535–62.
Selkoe DJ. The origins of Alzheimer disease: a is for amyloid. JAMA. 2000;283(12):1615–7.
Selkoe DJ, Hardy J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8(6):595–608.
Busche MA, Hyman BT. Synergy between amyloid-β and tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Neurosci. 2020;23(10):1183–93.
Leisher S, Bohorquez A, Gay M, et al. Amyloid-lowering monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of early Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Drugs. 2023;37(8):671–7.
Yadollahikhales G, Rojas JC. Anti-amyloid immunotherapies for Alzheimer’s disease: a 2023 clinical update. Neurotherapeutics. 2023;20(4):914–31.
Demattos RB, Lu J, Tang Y, et al. A plaque-specific antibody clears existing β-amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease mice. Neuron. 2012;76(5):908–20.
Mintun MA, Lo AC, Duggan Evans C, et al. Donanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(18):1691–704.
Wessels AM, Siemers ER, Yu P, et al. A combined measure of cognition and function for clinical trials: the integrated Alzheimer’s Disease Rating Scale (iADRS). J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2015;2(4):227–41.
Sims JR, Zimmer JA, Evans CD, et al. Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease: the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;330(6):512–27.
Barakos J, Purcell D, Suhy J, et al. Detection and management of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in patients with Alzheimer’s disease treated with anti-amyloid beta therapy. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9(2):211–20.
Barakos J, Sperling R, Salloway S, et al. MR imaging features of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(10):1958–65.
Doessegger L, Banholzer ML. Clinical development methodology for infusion-related reactions with monoclonal antibodies. Clin Transl Immunol. 2015;4(7): e39.
Sekita A, Ninomiya T, Tanizaki Y, et al. Trends in prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia in a Japanese community: the Hisayama Study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010;122(4):319–25.
Nakahori N, Sekine M, Yamada M, Tatsuse T, Kido H, Suzuki M. Future projections of the prevalence of dementia in Japan: results from the Toyama Dementia Survey. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):602.
Yoshida D, Ohara T, Hata J, et al. Lifetime cumulative incidence of dementia in a community-dwelling elderly population in Japan. Neurology. 2020;95(5):e508–18.
Shimizu H, Mori T, Yoshida T, et al. Secular trends in the prevalence of dementia based on a community-based complete enumeration in Japan: the Nakayama Study. Psychogeriatrics. 2022;22(5):631–41.
Li X, Feng X, Sun X, Hou N, Han F, Liu Y. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2019. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14: 937486.
Iwatsubo T, Niimi Y, Akiyama H. Editorial: Alzheimer’s disease research in Japan: a short history, current status and future perspectives toward prevention. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(4):462–4.
Toda Y, Matsuda N, Jin M, et al. Japanese subgroup analyses from Phase 3 clinical trials of aducanumab. Dementia Japan. 2021;35(4):620.
Arai H, Umemura K, Ichimiya Y, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of bapineuzumab in a single ascending-dose study in Japanese patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16(5):644–50.
Uenaka K, Nakano M, Willis BA, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of the amyloid β monoclonal antibody solanezumab in Japanese and white patients with mild to moderate alzheimer disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2012;35(1):25–9.
Devous MD Sr, Joshi AD, Navitsky M, et al. Test-retest reproducibility for the tau PET imaging agent flortaucipir F 18. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(6):937–43.
Fleisher AS, Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD Sr, et al. Positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]flortaucipir and postmortem assessment of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(7):829–39.
Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD, Kennedy I, et al. A multicentre longitudinal study of flortaucipir (18F) in normal ageing, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Brain. 2019;142(6):1723–35.
Honig LS, Vellas B, Woodward M, et al. Trial of solanezumab for mild dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(4):321–30.
Wessels AM, Dennehy EB, Dowsett SA, Dickson SP, Hendrix SB. Meaningful clinical changes in Alzheimer disease measured with the iADRS and illustrated using the donanemab TRAILBLAZER-ALZ study findings. Neurol Clin Pract. 2023;13(2): e200127.
Salvadó G, Ossenkoppele R, Ashton NJ, et al. Specific associations between plasma biomarkers and postmortem amyloid plaque and tau tangle loads. EMBO Mol Med. 2023;15(5): e17123.
Raket LL. Progression models for repeated measures: estimating novel treatment effects in progressive diseases. Stat Med. 2022;41(28):5537–57.
Toki H, Tai M, Nojima S. Maintaining continuity of self as perceived by people in the early stages of dementia: a qualitative study. Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2023;31(1):56–61.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. The Dementia Symposium Commemorating the G7 Health Ministers’ Meeting in Nagasaki: Collaboration in the International Community for Advancing Dementia Measures in a New Era. 2023. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/001099055.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2023.
Jack CR Jr, Albert MS, Knopman DS, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):257–62.
McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–9.
Teunissen CE, Verberk IMW, Thijssen EH, et al. Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: towards clinical implementation. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(1):66–77.
Pontecorvo MJ, Lu M, Burnham SC, et al. Association of donanemab treatment with exploratory plasma biomarkers in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease: a secondary analysis of the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(12):1250–9.
van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(1):9–21.
Salloway S, Chalkias S, Barkhof F, et al. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in 2 phase 3 studies evaluating aducanumab in patients with early Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(1):13–21.
Ostrowitzki S, Lasser RA, Dorflinger E, et al. A phase III randomized trial of gantenerumab in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9(1):95.
Vandenberghe R, Rinne JO, Boada M, et al. Bapineuzumab for mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease in two global, randomized, phase 3 trials. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016;8(1):18.
Kang S, Gim J, Lee J, et al. Potential novel genes for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in East-Asian descent identified by APOE-stratified genome-wide association study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;82(4):1451–60.
Kurose K, Sugiyama E, Saito Y. Population differences in major functional polymorphisms of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics-related genes in Eastern Asians and Europeans: implications in the clinical trials for novel drug development. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2012;27(1):9–54.
Man M, Farmen M, Dumaual C, et al. Genetic variation in metabolizing enzyme and transporter genes: comprehensive assessment in 3 major East Asian subpopulations with comparison to Caucasians and Africans. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;50(8):929–40.
Miyashita A, Kikuchi M, Hara N, Ikeuchi T. Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease: an East Asian perspective. J Hum Genet. 2023;68(3):115–24.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the contribution and dedication of all of the patients with Alzheimer’s disease, their families, and their caregivers who participated in this study, along with trial site investigators and personnel, and members of the data monitoring committee.
Medical Writing and Editorial Assistance
Medical writing assistance was provided by Rebecca Lew, PhD, CMPP and Prudence Stanford, PhD, CMPP of ProScribe-Envision Pharma Group, and was funded by Eli Lilly Japan K.K. ProScribe’s services complied with international guidelines for Good Publication Practice.
Funding
This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company, the manufacturer/licensee of donanemab. Eli Lilly Japan K.K. funded the journal’s Rapid Service Fee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published. All authors participated in the interpretation of study results, and in the drafting, critical revision, and approval of the final version of the manuscript. Shoichiro Sato, John Sims, and Naohisa Hatakeyama were involved in the study design. Sadao Katayama was an investigator in the study. Shoichiro Sato, John Sims, Naohisa Hatakeyama, and Sadao Katayama were involved in data collection. Shinji Fujikoshi conducted the statistical analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Shoichiro Sato, Naohisa Hatakeyama, Hideaki Katagiri, and Shinji Fujikoshi are employees of Eli Lilly Japan K.K. and minor shareholders in Eli Lilly and Company. Sadao Katayama was an investigator in the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial and has received lecture fees from Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., and Kowa Pharmaceutical Industry Co., Ltd. John Sims is an employee of and minor shareholder in Eli Lilly and Company.
Ethical Approval
This trial was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Council for Harmonisation Guideline for Good Clinical Practice, and local regulatory requirements. The protocol was approved by ethics review boards at each study site. Participants and their partners provided written informed consent before any study procedures were conducted. Permission to use the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale and the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale was obtained from the copyright holders before the start of the study.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, S., Hatakeyama, N., Fujikoshi, S. et al. Donanemab in Japanese Patients with Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Subpopulation Analysis of the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Randomized Trial. Neurol Ther 13, 677–695 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-024-00604-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-024-00604-x