Abstract
Background
Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent and serious complication after surgery. Evidence of a relationship between anticholinergic medication and the development of delirium is inconclusive, but studies on POD are rare.
Objectives
The objective of this study was to evaluate the anticholinergic load of preoperative medication in older adult patients and its association with the development of POD.
Methods
This investigation was part of the European BioCog project (http://www.biocog.eu), a prospective multicenter observational study in older adult surgical patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02265263, 15 October 2014). Patients with a Mini–Mental State Examination score ≤ 23 points were excluded. POD was assessed up to 7 days after surgery using the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale, Confusion Assessment Method and a patient chart review. The preoperative anticholinergic load was calculated using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) and the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACBS), and associations with POD were analyzed using logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, comorbidities, duration of anesthesia and number of drugs used.
Results
In total, 837 participants were included for analysis, and 165 patients (19.7%) fulfilled the criteria of POD. After adjusting for confounders, we found no association between preoperative anticholinergic load and the development of POD (ADS [points] odds ratio [OR] 0.928; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.749–1.150; ARS [points] OR 0.832; 95% CI 0.564–1.227; ACBS [points] OR 1.045; 95% CI 0.842–1.296).
Conclusion
This study found no association between the anticholinergic load of drugs used preoperatively and the development of POD in older adult patients without severe preexisting cognitive impairment. Future analyses should examine the influence of intra- and postoperative administration of anticholinergic drugs as well as dosages of and interactions between medications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Depending on the scale used, the anticholinergic load of long-term medications varied considerably. |
This study found no association between the anticholinergic load (according to Anticholinergic Drug Scale, Anticholinergic Risk Scale and Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale) of preoperative long-term medication and the development of postoperative delirium in older adult patients. |
Future analyses should examine the influence of intra- and postoperative administration of anticholinergic drugs as well as dosages of and interactions between medications. |
1 Introduction
Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious neurocognitive complication, presenting as an acute disturbance in attention and cognition that is not based on a preexisting neurocognitive disorder [1, 2]. POD is associated with increased length of hospitalization [3], impaired functional status [4], long-term cognitive impairments [5,6,7] and increased short-term and long-term mortality [1]. The incidence of POD is dependent on predisposing risk factors (e.g., age, cognitive impairment, comorbidity or impaired functional status) and precipitating risk factors (e.g., major surgery) [1, 8]. Older adult patients are particularly at risk of developing POD. The number of older adults undergoing surgery is rising, and demographic changes indicate that this trend will continue. Preoperative optimization, particularly the adaptation of long-term medication, plays an important role in the prevention of delirium.
Given the accumulation of comorbidities in older adults, these patients are more likely to be subject to polypharmacy and inappropriate prescriptions, and anticholinergic adverse effects are frequently described in the literature [9]. Cholinergic neurotransmission plays an important role in cognitive performance [10,11,12,13], and associations between anticholinergic adverse effects and the development of dementia or other cognitive disorders have been described [14, 15]. Few studies have evaluated the relationship between anticholinergic medication and the development of delirium. A recent investigation described an association between anticholinergic burden, according to Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS) score [16], and the development of POD in older patients with cancer [17]. Overall, studies investigating an association with POD are rare, and the evidence regarding anticholinergic medication is so far inconclusive. Over the years, a number of scales have been developed to simply and efficiently map the anticholinergic burden of drugs, although reviews on this topic [18, 19] have criticized that “variation exists in scale development, in the selection of anticholinergic drugs, and [in] the evaluation of their anticholinergic load” [19].
Preoperative adaptation of long-term medication, especially anticholinergic drugs, would be a feasible option to improve treatment. However, an immediate prerequisite for this is the valid mapping of the anticholinergic load of medications.
The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the preoperative long-term medication of older adult patients according to the most cited anticholinergic scales (ADS, Anticholinergic Risk Scale [ARS] [20] and the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale [ACBS] [21]) and to investigate an association between scores on these scales and the development of POD.
2 Methods
2.1 Study Design and Population
This investigation was performed as part of the BioCog project (http://www.biocog.eu), a prospective multicenter observational study conducted at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany, and the University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Utrecht, Netherlands. The goal of the BioCog study is to establish biomarker panels for risk and clinical outcome prediction of POD and postoperative cognitive dysfunction [22]. The study was approved by the local ethics committees (ref.: EA2/092/14 and 14-469) and conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02265263). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, and all local data privacy regulations were followed.
We included patients who were aged ≥ 65 years, of European descent, undergoing elective surgery with an expected surgical duration ≥ 60 min, and able and willing to provide informed consent and undergo magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with a Mini–Mental State Examination score ≤ 23 points were excluded, as well as those who were homeless or could not be reached by phone or postal services for follow-up examinations. In addition, we excluded participants enrolled in any concurrent prospective interventional clinical study during their hospital stay, those who were accommodated in an institution because of an official or judicial order and those with conditions limiting the conduction of the neurocognitive testing, such as neuropsychiatric conditions, hearing impairment or language barriers.
2.2 Baseline Measurements
The following baseline and perioperative measurements were collected to describe study population: age, sex, physical status according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA PS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) [23], duration of anesthesia and site of surgery (intrathoracic/intraabdominal/intrapelvic, peripheral and intracranial operations).
2.3 Postoperative Delirium
POD was defined according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition criteria [24]. Patients were considered delirious if they had ≥ 2 cumulative points on the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale and/or a positive Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) score and/or a positive CAM for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) score and/or descriptions of delirium on patient chart review (e.g., confused, agitated, drowsy, disorientated, delirious, or received antipsychotic therapy for delirium).
Delirium screening commenced in the recovery room and was repeated twice a day, at 08:00 and 19:00 (± 1 h), up to 7 days after surgery. Delirium assessment was conducted independently of the routine hospital procedures by a research team that was trained and supervised by psychiatrists and other delirium experts.
2.4 Anticholinergic Load
The preoperative anticholinergic load was calculated using the ADS [16], the ARS [20] and the ACBS [21], which are the most cited anticholinergic scales. These all assign a certain number of points to a drug, ranging from “0 points” (no anticholinergic activity) to “3 points” (highest anticholinergic activity). An initial analysis merely determined the presence of any anticholinergic medication listed in each of the scales in the patient medication list. This was followed by an analysis considering the total number of points given for each scale. Long-term medication was determined during the preoperative anesthesia consultation by means of anamnesis or reviewing the patient's medical record or medication prescriptions. Long-term medication included both prescription and over-the-counter medication taken regularly at the time of enrollment.
2.5 Statistical Analysis
Baseline characteristics were expressed as median and 25th quartile and 75th quartile, mean ± standard deviation (SD), or frequencies with percentages. Differences between the groups were tested using the Mann–Whitney U test or chi-squared test. The associations between POD and anticholinergic burden (according to ADS, ARS and ACBS) were investigated via multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusting for possible confounding variables selected a priori, including age, CCI, duration of anesthesia and number of long-term medications. No adjustments were made for multiple testing. All analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics, version 23 (IBM; Armonk, NY, USA) and in the R software environment (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2017).
3 Results
A total of 1033 participants were enrolled in two study centers between October 2014 and April 2017. Accounting for early dropouts and missing data, 837 participants could be included in the analysis. Of these, 165 patients (19.7%) developed a POD (Fig. 1). Patients with POD were significantly older, had higher ASA PS and CCI scores and longer duration of anesthesia. Group differences were also seen according to site of surgery. Surgery was most frequently performed on the musculoskeletal system and digestive tract (see Table S1 in the Electronic Supplementary Material). No sex differences were observed (see Table 1).
In total, 23.8% (n = 199) of patients were taking medication with anticholinergic properties preoperatively according to the ADS, 7.2% (n = 60) according to the ARS and 28.7% (n = 240) according to the ACBS. The mean ± SD anticholinergic load score was 0.4 ± 0.9 points for the ADS, 0.13 ± 0.5 points for the ARS and 0.4 ± 0.8 points for the ACBS. In all three scales, amitriptyline was the most frequently prescribed level III agent. In levels I and II, the most frequently taken agents differed between the scales (Table 2 lists the most frequently taken anticholinergic agents per score and level). There were no differences between subjects with and without POD in the distribution of the most frequently taken drugs per level of the anticholinergic scores. A preoperative adjustment of the anticholinergic medication was not routinely undertaken.
A descriptive analysis showed no differences between patients with and without POD in regard to administration of anticholinergic medication according to ADS, ARS and ACBS or the total score of ADS, ARS or ACBS (Table 3). In addition, when considering confounding factors, anticholinergic load (according to ADS, ARS and ACBS) was not associated with the development of POD in the multivariable logistic regression analyses (ADS, odds ratio [OR] 0.955; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.621–1.468; ADS [points] OR 0.928; 95% CI 0.749–1.150; ARS OR 0.784; 95% CI 0.376–1.635; ARS [points] OR 0.832; 95% CI 0.564–1.227; ACBS OR 1.132; 95% CI 0.762–1.681; ACBS [points] OR 1.045; 95% CI 0.842–1.296).
4 Discussion
In summary, we did not find an association between anticholinergic load (according to ADS, ARS and ACBS) and the development of POD. This investigation included patients undergoing elective surgery across a wide range of surgical disciplines, of which nearly 20% developed POD. This is in line with other cohorts and investigations [1].
Cholinergic neurotransmission plays an important role in cognitive performance, and a leading hypothesis model explains the connection between anticholinergic effects and the pathogenesis of delirium [25]. van Gool et al. [25] hypothesized that cholinergic inhibition could suppress the formation of a vicious cycle where neuroinflammation is maintained by the activation of microglia cells. He postulated that any dysfunction in cholinergic neurotransmission could hinder this mechanism and promote the development of delirium [25]. It is conceivable that anticholinergic adverse effects can promote the development of delirium, as this has already been observed in different settings. For example, associations were reported between the anticholinergic load according to the ACBS and the development of delirium in acutely ill patients [26, 27], between the anticholinergic load according to the ARS and the development of delirium in frail older adults living in a nursing home [28], and between the increase in ARS score and development of delirium in palliative care inpatients [29].
However, our analysis could not confirm an association between anticholinergic load and the development of POD in older surgical patients. This is in line with a study investigating patients aged ≥ 65 years with hip fracture, which could not find an association between a high anticholinergic burden, according to a total score of at least 3 in the clinician‐rated ADS, and the development of POD [30]. Furthermore, another study found no association between anticholinergic activity in serum or cerebrospinal fluid, determined according to a muscarinic radio receptor bioassay, and the development of POD [31].
Notably, our results are in contrast with the recently published study on anticholinergic burden and development of POD in older patients with cancer [17], which found an association between anticholinergic burden (ADS) and development of POD. Differing results may be explained by differing target populations (patients with cancer), and generalizability might have been limited by the national design, whereas BioCog was an international multicenter study. Furthermore, in the positive study, 16% of patients were using anticholinergic medication preoperatively and the reported mean ADS score was 0.2 points, whereas preoperative use in our cohort reached 24% and the mean ADS score was 0.4 points. This can be primarily explained by the international design of the BioCog study. The patients treated at the Utrecht study center had significantly higher ADS scores and were significantly more frequently affected by anticholinergic load than the patients treated at the Berlin study center. Lastly, the incidence of POD in the positive study was low at 10%, which could be attributed to patient empowerment through intervention, whereas we observed an incidence of 20% in our cohort.
It must be noted that a well-known issue in the investigation of anticholinergic drugs is that an agent can be rated as having a different level of anticholinergic properties according to the scale used. To deal with this, we calculated the anticholinergic load of the long-term medication using the three most comprehensive scales: ADS, ARS and ACBS. Nevertheless, each scale has advantages and disadvantages that must be taken into account. While the ADS has been validated by a laboratory chemical method showing an association with serum anticholinergic activity, there is no reference in the literature to the establishment of the scale or to the criteria utilized to assign drugs to the different scale levels [16]. Substantial methodological effort was used in the creation of the ARS. After a review of the 500 most commonly prescribed drugs, agents with known potential to cause anticholinergic adverse effects (AEs) were identified and associated with the dissociation constant for the cholinergic receptor. A literature search regarding anticholinergic AEs was then conducted, all information was reviewed by independent assessors and the medication was classified accordingly [20]. The ARS was then validated using both retrospective and prospective designs via associations with anticholinergic AEs [20]. ACBS was based on a literature review of anticholinergic activity and cognitive function in older patients. The identified drugs were then classified by an interdisciplinary team of experts [21]. The ACBS has not been formally validated.
Consequentially, it is not surprising that reported results differ according to the scale used, with not only total scores varying but also the overall prevalence of anticholinergic load. Despite these differences, the results were similar for all three scales, and no association with POD was observed, likely supporting the validity of the results. However, we cannot rule out that the reason we found no association between anticholinergic load and POD is that the anticholinergic load classification is inappropriate in all three scales. It has been discussed that the intake of any anticholinergic drug or the number of anticholinergic drugs is not as decisive as the combination and subsequent interaction of certain anticholinergic agents [9]. In addition, it seems reasonable to consider the dosage of anticholinergic drugs. To our knowledge, the Drug Burden Index is the only scale that takes dosages into account [32]. The index is based on a mathematical formula that includes the anticholinergic and sedative effects of drugs. In contrast to other anticholinergic scales, there is no positive or negative list of drugs for the index. Instead, drugs are identified using local formulary, which vary between countries. Practical application requires the development of a local list from current approved product information [33]. This makes the practical application of this tool very difficult. Another interesting investigation would be to determine whether patients benefit from preoperative adjustment of anticholinergic drugs in terms of developing POD, preferably employing a randomized controlled trial design. Ultimately, the immediate prerequisite for the development of preventive strategies, in the sense of preoperative adaptation of long-term anticholinergic drugs, remains the valid mapping of the anticholinergic load of the substance.
It is conceivable that factors other than preoperative anticholinergic load have a greater influence on the development of POD. Future analyses should also examine the influence of intra- and postoperative administration of anticholinergic drugs.
A key strength of this study is the prospective multicenter design. POD was characterized by a comprehensive, standardized and validated assessment according to current recommendations. The study database contains further information on possible confounders, and we were able to investigate the associations over a wide range of surgical disciplines, reflecting the setting conditions that apply to routine preoperative risk evaluation.
Nevertheless, some important limitations must be considered. The application of further anticholinergic scales and the consideration of interactions, including dosages, could have provided further insight. A criterion of the parent BioCog study excluded patients with severe preoperative cognitive deficits, although they are known to have a very high risk of developing POD. Although the incidence of POD would probably have been higher if these patients had been included, we do not know whether there would have been an association with preoperative anticholinergic load and POD.
5 Conclusion
Our analysis found no association between preoperative anticholinergic load (according to the ADS, ARS and ACBS) and the development of POD in older surgical patients. Future analyses should examine the influence of intra- and postoperative administration of anticholinergic drugs as well as dosages of and interactions between medications.
Change history
18 May 2021
Brief wording: The Funding note is included in the Acknowledgement section and deleted from the Declarations section.
References
Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, Sanders RD, Audisio R, Borozdina A, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(4):192–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000594.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
Radtke FM, Franck M, MacGuill M, Seeling M, Lutz A, Westhoff S, et al. Duration of fluid fasting and choice of analgesic are modifiable factors for early postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(5):411–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283335cee.
Liang CK, Chu CL, Chou MY, Lin YT, Lu T, Hsu CJ, et al. Interrelationship of postoperative delirium and cognitive impairment and their impact on the functional status in older patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery: a prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e110339. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110339.
Drews T, Franck M, Radtke FM, Weiss B, Krampe H, Brockhaus WR, et al. Postoperative delirium is an independent risk factor for posttraumatic stress disorder in the elderly patient: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32(3):147–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000107.
Inouye SK, Marcantonio ER, Kosar CM, Tommet D, Schmitt EM, Travison TG, et al. The short-term and long-term relationship between delirium and cognitive trajectory in older surgical patients. Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc. 2016;12(7):766–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.005.
Lingehall HC, Smulter NS, Lindahl E, Lindkvist M, Engstrom KG, Gustafson YG, et al. Preoperative cognitive performance and postoperative delirium are independently associated with future dementia in older people who have undergone cardiac surgery: a longitudinal cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(8):1295–303. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000002483.
Inouye SK, Charpentier PA. Precipitating factors for delirium in hospitalized elderly persons. Predictive model and interrelationship with baseline vulnerability. JAMA. 1996;275(11):852–7.
Tune LE. Anticholinergic effects of medication in elderly patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(Suppl 21):11–4.
Ballinger EC, Ananth M, Talmage DA, Role LW. Basal forebrain cholinergic circuits and signaling in cognition and cognitive decline. Neuron. 2016;91(6):1199–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.006.
Picciotto MR, Higley MJ, Mineur YS. Acetylcholine as a neuromodulator: cholinergic signaling shapes nervous system function and behavior. Neuron. 2012;76(1):116–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.036.
Soreq H. Checks and balances on cholinergic signaling in brain and body function. Trends Neurosci. 2015;38(7):448–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.05.007.
Bartus RT, Dean RL 3rd, Beer B, Lippa AS. The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science (New York, NY). 1982;217(4558):408–14.
Richardson K, Fox C, Maidment I, Steel N, Loke YK, Arthur A, et al. Anticholinergic drugs and risk of dementia: case-control study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2018;361:k1315. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1315.
Wu YH, Wang CJ, Hung CH, Chen LY, Lin MH, Wang PN, et al. Association between using medications with anticholinergic properties and short-term cognitive decline among older men: a retrospective cohort study in Taiwan. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(Suppl 1):57–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13032.
Carnahan RM, Lund BC, Perry PJ, Pollock BG, Culp KR. The Anticholinergic Drug Scale as a measure of drug-related anticholinergic burden: associations with serum anticholinergic activity. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;46(12):1481–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270006292126.
Mueller A, Spies CD, Eckardt R, Weiss B, Pohrt A, Wernecke KD, et al. Anticholinergic burden of long-term medication is an independent risk factor for the development of postoperative delirium: a clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2020;61:109632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109632.
Welsh TJ, van der Wardt V, Ojo G, Gordon AL, Gladman JRF. Anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews. Drugs Aging. 2018;35(6):523–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0549-z.
Duran CE, Azermai M, Vander Stichele RH. Systematic review of anticholinergic risk scales in older adults. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(7):1485–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1499-3.
Rudolph JL, Salow MJ, Angelini MC, McGlinchey RE. The anticholinergic risk scale and anticholinergic adverse effects in older persons. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(5):508–13. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2007.106.
Boustani M, Campbell N, Munger S, Maidment I, Fox C. Impact of anticholinergics on the aging brain: a review and practical application. Aging Health. 2008;4(3):311–20. https://doi.org/10.2217/1745509x.4.3.311.
Winterer G, Androsova G, Bender O, Boraschi D, Borchers F, Dschietzig TB, et al. Personalized risk prediction of postoperative cognitive impairment—rationale for the EU-funded BioCog project. Eur Psychiatry J Assoc Eur Psychiatr. 2018;50:34–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.10.004.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
Gao Y, Huang C, Zhao K, Ma L, Qiu X, Zhang L, et al. Depression as a risk factor for dementia and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;28(5):441–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.3845.
van Gool WA, van de Beek D, Eikelenboom P. Systemic infection and delirium: when cytokines and acetylcholine collide. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2010;375(9716):773–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61158-2.
Pasina L, Colzani L, Cortesi L, Tettamanti M, Zambon A, Nobili A, et al. Relation between delirium and anticholinergic drug burden in a cohort of hospitalized older patients: an observational study. Drugs Aging. 2019;36(1):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0612-9.
Rigor J, Rueff Rato I, Ferreira PM, Pereira R, Ribeiro C, Teixeira D, et al. Prehospital anticholinergic burden is associated with delirium but not with mortality in a population of acutely Ill medical patients. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(4):481–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.018.
Landi F, Dell’Aquila G, Collamati A, Martone AM, Zuliani G, Gasperini B, et al. Anticholinergic drug use and negative outcomes among the frail elderly population living in a nursing home. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(11):825–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2014.08.002.
Zimmerman KM, Salow M, Skarf LM, Kostas T, Paquin A, Simone MJ, et al. Increasing anticholinergic burden and delirium in palliative care inpatients. Palliat Med. 2014;28(4):335–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216314522105.
Juliebo V, Bjoro K, Krogseth M, Skovlund E, Ranhoff AH, Wyller TB. Risk factors for preoperative and postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(8):1354–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02377.x.
Watne LO, Hall RJ, Molden E, Raeder J, Frihagen F, MacLullich AM, et al. Anticholinergic activity in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in individuals with hip fracture with and without delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(1):94–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12612.
Hilmer SN, Mager DE, Simonsick EM, Cao Y, Ling SM, Windham BG, et al. A drug burden index to define the functional burden of medications in older people. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(8):781–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.8.781.
Kouladjian L, Gnjidic D, Chen TF, Mangoni AA, Hilmer SN. Drug Burden Index in older adults: theoretical and practical issues. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1503–15. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.S66660.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Konstanze Scheurer (Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin) for administrative support with study coordination and management. Kathrin Scholtz supported the study as the clinical monitor. Henning Krampe supported the study by recruiting and supervising students for neuropsychological testing. Data management was provided by Olaf Bender and Alexander Krannich at Koordininierungszentrum für Klinische Studien (KKS Berlin) supported by PharmaImage Biomarkers Solutions GmbH. We thank our team of investigators, medical doctoral students and study nurses: Alissa Wolf, Fatima Yürek, Daniel Hadzidiakos, Friedrich Borchers, Ilse Kant, Simone van Montfort, Gunnar Lachmann, Anika Alon, Sina Rosenblender, Tuba Aslan, Markus Laubach, Felix Müller, Emmanuel Keller, Eleftheria Papadaki, Saya Speidel, Bennet Borak, Steffi Herferth, Johannes Lange, Mario Lamping, Helene Michler, Juliane Dörfler, Anton Jacobshagen, Petra Kozma, Marinus Fislage, Wolf Rüdiger Brockhaus, Luisa Rothe, Pola Neuling, Ken-Dieter Michel, Zdravka Bosancic, Firas Nosirat, Maryam Kurpanik, Sophia Kuenz, Lukas Roediger, Irene Mergele, Anja Nottbrock, Florian Lammers-Litz, Leopold Rupp, Marie Graunke and Victoria Windmann. The authors further wish to thank the team of students and interns of the Department of Anesthesiology at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Maria Heinrich is a participant in the Charité Digital Clinician Scientist Program funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Maria Heinrich, Anika Müller, Andela Cvijan, Rudolf Mörgeli, Jochen Kruppa, Georg Winterer, Arjen J. C. Slooter and Claudia D. Spies have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.
Ethics approval
This was a prospective multicenter observational study conducted at the clinical study centers Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany, and the University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Utrecht, Netherlands. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committees (ref.: EA2/092/14 and 14-469) and conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02265263).
Consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, and all local data privacy regulations were followed.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.
Availability of data and material
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as no consent for this was obtained from participants but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Author contributions
Maria Heinrich, Anika Müller, and Rudolf Mörgeli were involved in data collection and plausibility checks. Maria Heinrich, Anika Müller, and Claudia Spies developed the research question. Maria Heinrich and Jochen Kruppa carried out the analyses. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Maria Heinrich, and all authors commented on subsequent versions and read and approved the final manuscript. Georg Winterer, Arjen Slooter, and Claudia Spies designed and directed the BioCog project.
Additional information
The original Online version of this article was revised : The Funding note was not included in the Acknowledgment section ,However it was misplaced in Declarations section in the original version
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Heinrich, M., Müller, A., Cvijan, A. et al. Preoperative Comparison of Three Anticholinergic Drug Scales in Older Adult Patients and Development of Postoperative Delirium: A Prospective Observational Study. Drugs Aging 38, 347–354 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-021-00839-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-021-00839-5