Abstract
Purpose
Emotional eating during negative emotions might underlie disordered eating behavior (i.e., binge eating and food restriction). Positive emotions, by contrast, seem to promote healthier eating behavior. Naturalistic research on the links between emotions and eating across individuals with binge-eating disorder (BED), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge-purge anorexia nervosa (AN-BP), and restrictive anorexia nervosa (AN-R) is, however, lacking.
Methods
Individuals without eating disorders (comparison group, CG, n = 85), and patients with BED (n = 41), BN (n = 50), AN-BP (n = 26), and AN-R (n = 29) participated in an ecological momentary assessment study. Six daily notifications over eight days prompted ratings of momentary food craving and emotional states differing in valence and arousal.
Results
Results supported specific emotion-food-craving patterns in each group. Compared to the CG, arousing negative emotions and higher cravings co-occurred in patients with BN. In patients with AN-BP (at trend level also in patients with AN-R) less arousing negative emotions and lower cravings co-occurred. In patients with AN, positive emotions and higher cravings co-occurred whereas in patients with BED less arousing positive emotions and lower cravings co-occurred.
Conclusion
The found emotion-craving associations may underlie group-specific (dys-)functional eating behaviors, i.e., binge eating and food restriction during negative emotions in patients with BN and AN, and normalized appetitive responses during positive emotions in patients with BED and AN. Therapeutic efforts could target arousing negative emotions in patients with BN, and less arousing negative emotions in patients with AN. Positive emotions could be used in a salutogenetic approach in patients with BED and AN.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Emotional eating typically refers to associations of negative emotional states with overeating that are not driven by homeostasis [1]. Overeating in connection with negative emotions is considered a risk and maintenance factor for eating disorders [2, 3], but undereating has been reported to be affected by negative emotions as well, while positive emotions also seem to play a role in this context [4]. Questionnaire research suggests that the different subtypes of eating disorders have specific emotional eating ‘profiles’ [e.g., 4]. The current study investigates food cravings and their associations with positive and negative emotional states in patients with binge-eating disorder (BED), bulimia nervosa (BN), the binge-purge subtype of anorexia nervosa (AN-BP), the restrictive subtype of anorexia nervosa (AN-R), and individuals without (lifetime) eating disorders (‘comparison group’, CG).
Emotional eating theories
This section introduces theories explaining changes in eating behaviors due to emotional states. Learning-based theories such as the affect regulation model have been prominent in emotional eating research [5]. Since an intake of palatable foods can improve the emotional state, individuals might learn to resort to this response when in negative emotional states even in the absence of hunger. Overeating in response to negative emotional states is thus maintained through negative reinforcement [1, 5]. At higher intensities, such overeating might escalate into binge eating [2, 6, 7]. On the other hand, severe food restriction (i.e., in patients with AN) could fulfill a similar inhibition or escape function in the regulation of negative emotions [cf. affect regulation model, escape theory and emotional or experiential avoidance; 5, 8, 9]. Here, the affect regulation account would assume that weight fears are reduced through restriction, a mechanism that is also maintained through negative reinforcement.
Moreover, emotional eating is not just limited to negative emotions. Recent evidence suggests normalizations of food intake during positive emotions in individuals with eating disorders [4, 10,11,12]. The affect regulation model does not apply here since positive emotions do not elicit the need for downregulation. However, positive emotions have been shown to ‘broaden’ the cognitive-behavioral repertoire and counteract negative emotions [cf. broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions; 13,14,15]. Through this mechanism, positive emotions could make health goals more accessible in individuals with an eating disorder [16]. Thus, positive emotions may help patients to make better decisions about their behaviors, possibly leading to less restriction in patients with AN and less binge eating in patients with BN and BED.
Evidence for emotional eating in different eating disorders
Questionnaire research offers some support for the aforementioned theories: In line with the affect regulation model, patients with binge-type eating disorders (BN, BED) reported overeating during negative emotions, while patients with restrictive-type eating disorders (AN) reported undereating—the opposite pattern [4, 17]. In line with the broaden-and-build theory, patients with ANr, ANbp, BN and BED reported adopting healthier eating patterns during positive emotional states [less overeating in binge-type eating disorders—less undereating in restrictive-type eating disorders; 4]. While some studies suggest that positive emotions lead to healthier eating behaviors in eating disorders, other studies indicate that they can also trigger unhealthy eating behaviors [18,19,20,21], highlighting the need for further investigation.
Evidence from ecological momentary assessments
To avoid reporting biases of emotional eating trait questionnaires [22] and to capture the contextualized nature of eating behavior in everyday life, ecological momentary assessments (EMA) is considered the method of choice [23]. Regarding negative emotions, EMA studies in patients with binge-type eating disorders (BED, BN, AN-BP) found negative emotions to precede binge eating [24,25,26]. Crucially, and consistent with the negative reinforcement assumption of the affect regulation model, other studies showed that negative emotions are reduced after binge-eating episodes, at least in the short term [27,28,29,30]. In patients with restrictive eating disorders (AN-R and AN-BP), negative affect was associated with a higher likelihood of restriction (i.e., undereating) at the following day [31], which is consistent with the affect regulation model.
However, not all EMA research is consistent with the described patterns and theories: While negative emotions seem to improve briefly after binge-eating episodes [29], they seem to aggravate over the longer term [27], which appears to be inconsistent with the negative reinforcement assumption of the affect regulation model. However, the more immediate reinforcing consequence may be the more potent reward mechanism and, thus in line with the affect regulation model. Further, in patients with AN, the temporal sequence (and causal direction) of negative emotions and restriction is not as clear as there are mostly day-level data that only show covariation of negative emotions and restriction [32]. In addition, some evidence was found for negative emotional overeating patterns in patients with AN who experience binge eating [31] and for negative emotional undereating in patients with binge-type eating disorder [33]. These ambiguities and the limited literature across different eating disorders highlight the need for further EMA research on emotional states and eating behaviors.
Mapping the emotional space on valence and arousal
The type of emotions that drive emotional eating seem to differ between eating disorders, e.g., sadness might be related to undereating in patients with AN-R but not in patients with AN-BP [4]. Likewise, while binge-eating might be related to anger and frustration in patients with BN, depressiveness might play a role in patients with BED [34]. However, as different studies assessed different emotions it becomes difficult to determine overall emotional eating patterns. There is currently no consensus about which emotional states should be examined and whether they should be analyzed independently (as single-items) or aggregated to emotional-state scales. This variability can cause methodological challenges since emotions differ in both valence (negative vs. positive) and arousal levels (high vs. low), impacting metabolic processes and appetitive responses [35]. Thus, instead of aggregating emotion items to arbitrary scales, this study explored the factor structure of the emotion items accounting for valence and arousal [36,37,38,39].
Food craving as a shared antecedent of eating behavior across patients with different eating disorders and individuals without eating disorder
Despite existing studies on emotional eating across some eating disorders [e.g., 40, 41], no study has applied a unified measure to compare food craving in patients with AN-R, AN-BP, BN, BED, and control individuals, addressing a significant gap in understanding universal eating behavior predictors. Thus, food craving was chosen as an outcome measure as it is a common predictor and mediator of various overt eating behaviors [42, 43]: increased food craving could predict binge eating, while decreased food craving could predict restriction. The validity of food cravings in emotional eating studies is further supported by laboratory studies and food craving diaries in patients with BN and BED [44,45,46]. This level of abstraction is necessary as, studying emotional eating across eating disorders and in healthy individuals on the same variable precludes measuring overt eating behaviors that are only shown by patients with certain eating disorders and that are not seen in healthy individuals at all (i.e., severe restriction and binge eating).
Aims and hypotheses
Under the affect regulation model, negative emotions and higher food cravings (as proxy for binge eating) were expected to co-occur in patients with binge-type eating disorders [BN and BED; i.e., 2, 24], and negative emotions and lower food cravings (as proxy of restriction) were expected to co-occur in patients with AN-R [31] relative to individuals in the CG. Due to the mixed symptomology in AN-BP (i.e., restriction, binge eating, and purging) their emotion-food-craving patterns might take an intermediate position between the patients with AN-R and those with BN [17, 47].
Further, positive emotional states may foster functional eating patterns in patients with eating disorders as reported empirically [4, 10, 11, 16] and as suggested by the broaden-and-build theory [13, 15]. Thus, positive emotions and lower food cravings were expected to co-occur in patients with binge-type eating disorders (i.e., less dysfunctional eating behavior), while positive emotions and higher food cravings were expected to co-occur in patients with AN-R, relative to individuals from the CG [4].
The study also explores group differences in food cravings as a function of emotional states with different valence (negative vs. positive) and arousal levels (high vs. low). Negative emotions with high arousal (i.e., anger and frustration) and higher food cravings were expected to co-occur in patients with BN. Negative emotions with low arousal (i.e., depressiveness) and higher food cravings were expected to co-occur in patients with BED, relative to individuals from the CG. Such eating disorder specific associations of binge eating and high vs. low arousal negative emotions have been found by Castellini et al. [34].
Methods
Participants
Most patients with eating disorders (n = 83) were recruited from the waiting list for inpatient treatment at a large clinic in southern Germany specialized on eating disorder treatment. Additional patients (n = 36) and individuals in the CG were recruited from the general public. The ethics committees of the University of Salzburg and the University of Munich approved the study, and all participants signed an informed consent form.
In total, 204 participants were categorized into the following diagnostic groups: CG n = 58, AN-R n = 29, AN-BP n = 26, BN n = 50 and BED n = 41. All patients fulfilled diagnostic criteria for current AN-R, AN-BP, BN or BED from the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-5 [DSM-5; 48]. Exclusion criteria were ‘eating disorders otherwise specified’, ‘eating disorders not otherwise specified’, and positive screening for psychosis. Exclusion criteria for the CG were current or lifetime eating disorders, a body mass index < 18.5 kg/m2 or ≥ 25.0 kg/m2. All participants were ≥ 14 years old and of female sex. The sample comprised university students (38.7%), employees (31.9%) and other occupations (29.4%). As expected, groups differed regarding body mass index (BED > BN > CG > AN-BP and AN-R). Patients with BED were older than the participants in the other groups (see Table 1).
Measures
Clinical diagnostic interviews
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV [SCID; 49] and the Eating Disorder Examination [EDE; 50] were conducted. Both interviews were adapted to DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. This was necessary as no DSM-5 conform interviews were available in German at the beginning of data acquisition (January 2018–May 2021). Trained, female, master-level students, graduate students, and post-doctoral researchers conducted the diagnostic interviews.
Sociodemographic measures and trait questionnaires
Participants reported sociodemographic data (i.e., age, weight, height, years of education) and questionnaire data (i.e., eating disorder pathology, depressiveness, trait food craving, emotional eating) via an online questionnaire.
EMA measures
Participants received six EMA signals (9 am, 11.30 am, 2 pm, 4.30 pm, 7 pm, and 9.30 pm) per day for 8 days, each probing momentary emotions and momentary food craving, as well as other variables that are not relevant here. Responses could be delayed for up to one hour, thereafter EMA signals expired.
Momentary food craving
Participants were asked to rate their momentary food craving on a continuous rating slider (“Do you have a desire to eat something tasty right now?”; from not at all [0], to very much [100]). Thus, the intensity of momentary food craving was measured by assessing its ‘desire to eat’ component [51].
Momentary emotional states
Participants were asked to rate their momentary emotional state on continuous rating sliders (“How are you feeling right now?” irritable, worried, nervous or stressed, tense, depressed, bored, dissatisfied with myself, relaxed, calm, cheerful, and enthusiastic; from not at all [0], to very much [100]). The 11 emotion items were presented in randomized order.
Procedure
At the start of the study, all participants signed the informed consent form and completed an online questionnaire about sociodemographic data and trait measures. Participants underwent the clinical diagnostic interview (~ 1-2 h) on the phone and were instructed on how to install and use the customized EMA application PsyDiary. The day of the installation was not used in the analyses and served to familiarize the user with the app. Participants responded to six signal-contingent EMA questionnaires per day for 8 days. Parts of the present sample participated in a larger project (for a list of all related and unrelated papers on parts of this project, see AppendixA). All participants received personalized feedback on their EMA data and either 1–2 course credits (for psychology students at the University of Salzburg) or €10–25–depending on their EMA response rate.
Statistical analyses
Multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of emotion items
Aggregation of EMA emotion items [i.e., from the Positive and Negative Affect Scale, PANAS; 52] to positive and negative emotion scales is often criticized for overtly reducing important facets of emotions [i.e., arousal; 36,37,38,39]. Therefore EMA emotion items were grouped empirically on distinct scales by performing several multilevel confirmatory factor analyses using the R package lavaan [53]. Considering literature [36,37,38,39] five different factor solutions were optimized and tested against each other.
The data were nested (level1–observations in level2–participants). Thus, a random intercept effect was specified for participants. The models were estimated with robust maximum likelihood. Several analyses tested the impact of lower loading items on the psychometric properties of the scales and compared all solutions. The Chi-square test, the comparative fit index (CFI), the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI), the root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA), and the standardized root mean residual (SRMR) were used as main test values [54,55,56]. See AppendixB for details.
Group differences in the association of momentary emotional states and food craving
To investigate the main hypotheses, a multilevel modeling approach was used. All multilevel models were set up with nested random effect structure [57]. Rstudio [58] and the package lme4 [59] were used to calculate the multilevel models. ‘Momentary food craving’ was modeled as a dependent variable. The four continuous ‘momentary emotional-state scales’ (as determined by the multilevel confirmatory factor analyses) were person-mean centered with the R package misty [60] and modeled as level1 predictors, in four separate models. ‘Group’ was modeled as a categorical level2 predictor. Multilevel interactions between ‘momentary emotional-state scales’ and ‘group’ were added to assess group-specific associations of emotions and food craving. In a forward model selection process, random intercepts (for participants) and random slopes (for emotional states) were tested in addition to the fixed effects (emotional states, groups and their multilevel interaction). The final models were controlled for overly influential cases by excluding participants with values over four times the mean Cook’s distance with the R package Influence ME [61]. The R package lmerTest [62] was then used to examine the results of the multilevel models: Omnibus tests were used to test for significant interactions between each emotional-state scale and group. Significant interactions were followed up with pairwise comparisons of the simple slopes of each possible pair of groups. Code and data are available at the Open Science Framework [63]. See AppendixC for a priori power analyses.
Results
In total 7904 (of 9792 possible) EMA signals were answered before the timeout of the respective questionnaire and thus analyzed. On average 38.75 of 48 EMA signals were answered per participant, representing a compliance of 80.73% (SD = 13.42, range 50–100%). Groups did not differ in their compliance with the EMA protocol (see Table 1).
Multilevel confirmatory factor analyses of emotion items
Threshold values for goodness-of-fit indices were met (i.e., CFI > 0.95 and TLI > 0.90 [73], RMSEA < 0.08 [55], SRMR < 0.08 [56]). Regarding the Chi-square test, the lowest possible value was looked for [73, 74].
The final best fitting model (see modeld; Table 2) included all 11 original emotion items on the following four latent factors and outperformed several other factor solutions: (1) negative valence high arousal (NegHigh): irritable, nervous-stressed, tense; (2) negative valence low arousal (NegLow): depressed, bored, worried, dissatisfied with myself; (3) positive valence low arousal (PosLow): relaxed, calm; (4) positive valence high arousal (PosHigh): cheerful, enthusiastic. The covariances are not fixed to 0 as fixing them worsened the model fit (cf. modeld and modele; Table 2).
Mean scores were calculated for each scale. McDonald’s omega (ω) coefficients –as estimates of model-based reliability–were satisfactory to good (level1: ωNegHigh = 0.76, ωNegLow = 0.59, ωPosHigh = 0.81, ωPosLow = 0.76; level2: ωNegHigh = 0.84, ωNegLow = 0.82, ωPosHigh = 0.88, ωPosLow = 0.82). Table3 reports group means of the resulting four EMA scales (NegHigh, NegLow, PosHigh, PosLow) as well as food craving. Compared to CG participants, individuals in the eating disorder groups reported higher negative emotions and lower positive emotions, except for individuals with BED.
Group-specific associations of emotions with food craving
Regarding the four multilevel models testing the main hypotheses about group-specific associations of emotions and food craving: Omnibus tests indicated interactions between ‘group’ and each of the four ‘emotion scales’ (all p’s ≤ 002). This justified follow-up pairwise comparisons of the simple slopes of food craving predicted seperatly by each of the four ‘emotion scales’ (NegHigh, NegLow, PosHigh and PosLow; i.e., negative or positive valence and high or low arousal) of all groups against each other (CG, AN-R, AN-BP, BN, BED). The results from these pairwise comparisons can be found in Table 4 and Fig. 1.
Discussion
The present study is the first to examine the association of empirically grouped emotional states with food craving in everyday life in patients with AN-R, AN-BP, BN and BED compared to individuals without eating disorders and with normal weight. Unique emotional food craving patterns in each group were found: Negative emotions covaried with dysfunctional patterns of food craving (i.e., higher food craving in the BN group and lower food craving in both AN groups), while positive emotions covaried with food craving patterns that approach ‘healthy’ food craving levels of the CG (higher food craving in both AN groups and lower food craving in the BED group).
Negative emotions and food craving
In AN-BP (and in AN-R at trend level), compared to the CG, elevated NegLow emotions and lower food craving co-occurred. This is in line with qualitative and questionnaire research in AN [4, 75,76,77]. Interestingly, when testing the slopes of AN-BP and AN-R, opposing patterns were revealed during NegHigh (higher food craving in AN-BP, lower food craving in AN-R). Thus, in AN-R, negative emotional states show a more generalized hypo-appetite link to food craving. In AN-BP (compared to AN-R), the direction of that link is more arousal-dependent, which could underlie the mixed symptom presentation in AN-BP (i.e., restriction, binge-eating, and purging). This difference further supports the distinction between the two subtypes as emphasized in other research as well [4, 17, 78, 79].
In BN, elevated NegHigh emotions and higher food craving co-occurred, a pattern that was not seen in individuals of the CG. This is in line with findings on emotion-related binge eating [e.g., 80, 81]. Similar results were also obtained in a food-craving-diary study and a laboratory food-cue-reactivity experiment [44, 46].
The BED group did not differ from the CG regarding negative emotion-related food craving, unlike EMA studies on emotion-related binge-eating would suggest [e.g., 2, 34]. The BED sample, however, might have been less pathological compared to previous studies (i.e., no differences between BED and CG on trait depressiveness and NegHigh, PosHigh and PosLow; see Tables 1, 3).
Positive emotions and food craving
In AN-R and AN-BP, compared to the CG, evidence for higher food craving during elevated positive emotions was found (irrespective of emotional arousal). This could be considered a healthy and functional response in underweight patients as it might encourage food intake. In BED lower food craving during elevated PosLow was found—again, a potentially healthy response in a group with frequent overweight. From this angle, food craving levels in AN-R, AN-BP and BED seem to ‘normalize’ (approaching CG food craving levels) during higher intensities of positive emotional states (see Fig. 1C–D). This is in line with evidence describing healthier eating behavior during positive emotional states in clinical samples [4, 10, 11]. That said, some literature suggests the contrary, i.e., that positive emotional states can also trigger unhealthy eating behaviors [18,19,20,21]. This might explain why no such normalization was observed in the BN group.
Dimensional emotion models in emotional eating theories
The high specificity of emotion-food-craving associations in each eating disorder group in the present results clearly contrasts with a uniform ‘negative-overeating’ construct (i.e., generally increased appetitive responses during negative emotions). The results suggest that the emotion-food-craving associations depend on a) eating disorder (sub)group, b) valence (positive vs. negative), and c) arousal (high vs. low) of the co-occurring emotional state. These differentiated patterns may explain some of the inconsistencies in literature when either emotional states of varying arousal or different eating disorder (sub-)groups are combined, as frequently done in experimental and EMA studies [e.g., 24, 82].
On a very general level, the results suggest that several mechanisms might be at play across eating disorders. This heterogeneity would explain the multitude of emotional eating theories. The findings specifically support the value of the affect regulation model to explain ‘negative emotional overeating’ in BN and ‘negative emotional undereating’ in AN-BP (and AN-R). The broaden-and-build theory may further explain healthier eating patterns during positive emotions in both AN groups and in BED: The repertoire of accessible cognitions and actions is broadened and thus, may help the patients to think of the bigger picture and act out healthier behaviors [16].
Strengths and limitations
The present study comprised a large sample (N = 204 participants and N = 7904 EMA observations), including female patients with AN-R, AN-BP, BN, BED, and a large female CG. Statistical reliability of emotion scales was assured by means of multilevel confirmatory factor analysis. The multilevel modeling approach further assured adequate accounting of the full within- and between-person variance of the EMA data. These statistical and methodological points support the internal and external validity of the findings.
Yet, as indicated above, the results rest on the assumption that food craving is a valid proxy for subsequent food intake. While there is good evidence in that regard [42, 43, 83,84,85,86,87] more research on actual binge-eating episodes and restriction is needed. Further, as the sample comprises female individuals only, the findings cannot be generalized to male individuals. The present study focused on female participants because they tend to show more emotional (binge) eating compared to males [88], and because of concern about not finding an adequate proportion of male patients for all eating disorder subgroups in a reasonable period. Therefore, replications with male participants are warranted.
What is already known on this subject?
While negative emotions are often related to maladaptive (disordered) eating behaviors, there is equivocality regarding which specific negative emotions may drive emotional over-/undereating in different eating disorders [4, 34]. Thus, the present study aimed to close two gaps: (1) grouping emotions on emperical dimensions that relate to different eating behaviors (e.g., valence and arousal dimensions of emotions [36,37,38,39]). (2) Assessing emotions and food cravings across different eating disorders.
What this study adds?
The present study illustrates that emotions and food craving are uniquely associated for each eating disorder. However, emotional valence and arousal need to be considered to find these unique associations. Hence, the present results can guide subgroup-specific theorizing and targeted interventions on both binge eating (in binge-type eating disorders) and restriction (in restrictive-type eating disorders): a traditional ‘problem-centered’ approach would focus on the reduction of negative emotions, addressing both hyper-appetitive (i.e., increased food craving in BN during NegHigh states) and hypo-appetitive eating behaviors (i.e., depressed food craving in AN-BP and AN-R during NegLow states). The results on positive emotions also command to a salutogenetic approach of eating disorder treatment that focuses on increasing positive emotions [89], particularly regarding the reduction of binge-eating urges in BED and stimulation of appetitive behaviors in AN-R [cf., 10, 16]. As for novel interventions, emotions with specific valence and arousal levels could be detected in real-time during daily life [90] to trigger context-appropriate interventions [91], i.e., to stimulate appetitive behaviors or prevent binge eating.
Data availability
Data and R code are available at the Open Science Framework [https://osf.io/euzm3/].
References
Macht M (2008) How emotions affect eating: a five-way model. Appetite 50:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.002
Schaefer LM, Smith KE, Anderson LM, Cao L, Crosby RD, Engel SG et al (2020) The role of affect in the maintenance of binge-eating disorder: evidence from an ecological momentary assessment study. J Abnorm Psychol 129(4):387–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000517
Lavender JM, Utzinger LM, Cao L, Wonderlich SA, Engel SG, Mitchell JE et al (2016) Reciprocal associations between negative affect, binge eating, and purging in the natural environment in women with bulimia nervosa. J Abnorm Psychol 125(3):381–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000135
Reichenberger J, Schnepper R, Arend AK, Richard A, Voderholzer U, Naab S et al (2021) Emotional eating across different eating disorders and the role of body mass, restriction, and binge eating. Int J Eat Disord 54(5):773–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23477
Macht M, Simons G (2011) Emotional eating. In: Nyklícek I, Vingerhoets A, Zeelenberg M (eds) Emotion regulation and well-being. Springer, New York
Larsen RJ, Prizmic Z (2004) Affect regulation Handbook of self-regulation. Res Theor Appl 12:40–61
Deaver CM, Miltenberger RG, Smyth J, Meidinger A, Crosby R (2003) An evaluation of affect and binge eating. Behav Modif 27(4):578–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445503255571
Heatherton TF, Baumeister RF (1991) Binge eating as escape from self-awareness. Psychol Bull 110(1):86–108
Schmidt U, Treasure J (2006) Anorexia nervosa: valued and visible a cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model and its implications for research and practice. Br J Clin Psychol 45(3):343–66. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X53902
Cardi V, Leppanen J, Leslie M, Esposito M, Treasure J (2019) The use of a positive mood induction video-clip to target eating behaviour in people with bulimia nervosa or binge eating disorder: an experimental study. Appetite 133(400–4):30529607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.001
Cardi V, Esposito M, Clarke A, Schifano S, Treasure J (2015) The impact of induced positive mood on symptomatic behaviour in eating disorders. an experimental, AB/BA crossover design testing a multimodal presentation during a test-meal. Appetite. 87:192–8
Cardi V, Leppanen J, Treasure J (2015) The effects of negative and positive mood induction on eating behaviour: A meta-analysis of laboratory studies in the healthy population and eating and weight disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 57:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.011
Fredrickson BL (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol 56(3):218
Fredrickson BL, Joiner T (2018) Reflections on positive emotions and upward spirals. Perspect Psychol Sci 13(2):194–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617692106
Huppert FA, Baylis N, Keverne B, Fredrickson BL (2004) The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359(1449):1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
Tchanturia K, Dapelo MAM, Harrison A, Hambrook D (2014) Why study positive emotions in the context of eating disorders? Curr Psychiatry Rep 17(1):537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-014-0537-x
Ricca V, Castellini G, Fioravanti G, Sauro CL, Rotella F, Ravaldi C et al (2012) Emotional eating in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Compr Psychiatry 53(3):245–251
Barnhart WR, Braden AL, Jordan AK (2020) Negative and positive emotional eating uniquely interact with ease of activation, intensity, and duration of emotional reactivity to predict increased binge eating. Appetite 2020(151):104688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104688
Manchón J, Quiles MJ, Quiles Y, López-Roig S (2021) Positive and negative emotional eating are not the same—the Spanish version of the positive-negative emotional eating scale (PNEES). Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709570
Sultson H, Kukk K, Akkermann K (2017) Positive and negative emotional eating have different associations with overeating and binge eating: construction and validation of the positive-negative emotional eating scale. Appetite 116:423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.035
Evers C, Adriaanse M, de Ridder DTD, de Witt Huberts JC (2013) Good mood food positive emotion as a neglected trigger for food intake. Appetite 68:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.04.007
Bongers P, Jansen A (1932) Emotional eating is not what you think it is and emotional eating scales do not measure what you think they measure. Front Psychol 2016(7):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01932
Engel SG, Crosby RD, Thomas G, Bond D, Lavender JM, Mason T et al (2016) Ecological momentary assessment in eating disorder and obesity research: a review of the recent literature. Curr Psychiatry Rep 18(4):1–9
Haedt-Matt AA, Keel PK (2011) Revisiting the affect regulation model of binge eating: a meta-analysis of studies using ecological momentary assessment. Psychol Bull 137:660–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023660
Dingemans A, Danner U, Parks M (2017) Emotion regulation in binge eating disorder: a review. Nutrients 9(11):1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9111274
Berg KC, Crosby RD, Cao L, Crow SJ, Engel SG, Wonderlich SA et al (2015) Negative affect prior to and following overeating-only, loss of control eating-only, and binge eating episodes in obese adults. Int J Eating Dis 48(6):641–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22401
Smyth JM, Wonderlich SA, Heron KE, Sliwinski MJ, Crosby RD, Mitchell JE et al (2007) Daily and momentary mood and stress are associated with binge eating and vomiting in bulimia nervosa patients in the natural environment. J Consult Clin Psychol 75:629–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.629
Kockler TD, Santangelo PS, Ebner-Priemer UW (2018) Investigating binge eating using ecological momentary assessment: the importance of an appropriate sampling frequency. Nutrients 10(1):105
Berg KC, Cao L, Crosby RD, Engel SG, Peterson CB, Crow SJ et al (2017) Negative affect and binge eating: Reconciling differences between two analytic approaches in ecological momentary assessment research. Int J Eat Disord 50(10):1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22770
De Young KP, Lavender JM, Wonderlich SA, Crosby RD, Engel SG, Mitchell JE et al (2013) Moderators of post-binge eating negative emotion in eating disorders. J Psychiatr Res 47(3):323–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.11.012
Engel SG, Wonderlich SA, Crosby RD, Mitchell JE, Crow S, Peterson CB et al (2013) The role of affect in the maintenance of anorexia nervosa: evidence from a naturalistic assessment of momentary behaviors and emotion. J Abnorm Psychol 122(3):709–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034010
Haynos AF, Crosby RD, Engel SG, Lavender JM, Wonderlich SA, Mitchell JE et al (2015) Initial test of an emotional avoidance model of restriction in anorexia nervosa using ecological momentary assessment. J Psychiatr Res 68:134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.06.016
Russell SL, Haynos AF, Crow SJ, Fruzzetti AE (2017) An experimental analysis of the affect regulation model of binge eating. Appetite 110:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.007
Castellini G, Mannucci E, Lo Sauro C, Benni L, Lazzeretti L, Ravaldi C et al (2012) Different moderators of cognitive-behavioral therapy on subjective and objective binge eating in Bulimia Nervosa and binge eating disorder: a three-year follow-up study. Psychother Psychosom 81(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329358
Bazhan N, Zelena D (2013) Food-intake regulation during stress by the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Brain Res Bull 95:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.04.002
Fahrenberg J. Self-reported subjective state. Single item or scales like AD-ACL and PANAS. European Network of Ambulatory Assessment Statements and Open Commentaries. 2006. 21 10
Russell JA (1980) A circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(6):1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
Russell JA, Weiss A, Mendelsohn GA (1989) Affect grid: a single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. J Pers Soc Psychol 57(3):493–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.493
Wilhelm P, Schoebi D (2007) Assessing mood in daily life. Eur J Psychol Assess 23(4):258–267. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.258
Wonderlich JA, Crosby RD, Engel SG, Crow SJ, Peterson CB, Le Grange D et al (2022) Negative affect and binge eating: assessing the unique trajectories of negative affect before and after binge-eating episodes across eating disorder diagnostic classifications. Int J Eat Disord 55(2):223–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23648
Smith KE, Mason TB, Schaefer LM, Juarascio A, Dvorak R, Weinbach N et al (2020) Examining intra-individual variability in food-related inhibitory control and negative affect as predictors of binge eating using ecological momentary assessment. J Psychiatr Res 120:137–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.10.017
Chao A, Grilo CM, White MA, Sinha R (2014) Food cravings, food intake, and weight status in a community-based sample. Eating Behaviors. 15:478–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.06.003
Ng L, Davis C (2013) Cravings and food consumption in binge eating disorder. Eat Behav. 14(4):472–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.08.011
Schnepper R, Richard A, Georgii C, Arend A-K, Naab S, Voderholzer U et al (2021) Bad mood food? Increased versus decreased food cue reactivity in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa during negative emotions. Eur Eat Disord Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2849
Arend A-K, Schnepper R, Lutz APC, Eichin KN, Blechert J (2022) Prone to food in bad mood—Emotion-potentiated food-cue reactivity in patients with binge-eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23683
Waters A, Hill A, Waller G (2001) Bulimics’ responses to food cravings: is binge-eating a product of hunger or emotional state? Behav Res Ther 39(8):877–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00059-0
Haynos AF, Roberto CA, Attia E (2015) Examining the associations between emotion regulation difficulties, anxiety, and eating disorder severity among inpatients with anorexia nervosa. Comprehensive Psychiatr 60:93–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.03.004
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC2013. ISBN: 0890425574.
Wittchen H, Zaudig M, Fydrich T. Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Achse I und II. Handanweisung. Göttingen, Bern, Toronto, Seattle: Hogrefe; 1997.
Hilbert A, Tuschen-Caffier B, Ohms M (2004) Eating disorder examination: deutschsprachige version des strukturierten Essstörungsinterviews. Diagnostica 50:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.2.98
Cepeda-Benito A, Gleaves DH, Fernández MC, Vila J, Williams TL, Reynoso J (2000) The development and validation of Spanish versions of the state and trait food cravings questionnaires. Behav Res Ther 38:1125–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00141-2
Watson D, Tellegen A (1985) Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychol Bull 98(2):219–235
Rosseel Y, Oberski D, Byrnes J, Vanbrabant L, Savalei V, Merkle E, et al. R Package ‘lavaan’. 2017.
Beauducel A, Wittmann WW (2005) Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Struct Equ Model 12(1):41–75
Browne MW, Cudeck R (1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res 21(2):230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
West SG, Taylor AB, Wu W. Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling2012. 209–31 p.
Bliese PD. Multilevel modeling in R (2.5). 2013.
Allaire J. RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA. 2012.
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Yanagida T. R Package ‘misty’. 2020.
Nieuwenhuis R, te Grotenhuis M, Pelzer B (2012) Tools for detecting influential data in mixed effects models. R Journal. 4(2):38–47
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. R Package ‘lmertest’. 2015.
Arend A-K. Code and Data for. Emotional food craving across the eating disorder spectrum: an ecological momentary assessment study. Retrieved from https://osf.io/euzm3/. 2024.
Fairburn CG, Cooper Z (1993) The eating disorder examination. In: Fairburn CG, Wilson GT (eds) Binge eating: nature, assessment and treatment, 12th edn. Guilford, New York, pp 317–360
Hilbert A, Tuschen-Caffier B. Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire—Deutschsprachige Übersetzung. 2. Auflage ed. Tübingen: dgvt Verlag; 2016.
Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Roberts RE, Allen NB (1997) Center for epidemiologic studies depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychol Aging 12(2):277–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.277
Hautzinger M, Bailer M, Hofmeister D, Keller F (2012) Allgemeine Depressionsskala [General Depression Scale], 2nd edn. Hogrefe, Göttingen
Hormes JM, Meule A (2016) Psychometric properties of the english food cravings questionnaire-trait-reduced (FCQ-T-r). Eating Behav 2016(20):34–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.11.011
Meule A, Hermann T, Kübler A (2014) A short version of the food cravings questionnaire-trait: the FCQ-T-reduced. Front Psychol 5:190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00190
Meule A, Reichenberger J, Blechert J (2018) Development and preliminary validation of the salzburg emotional eating scale. Front Psychol. 9:88. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00088
van Strien T, Frijters JE, Bergers G, Defares PB (1986) The dutch eating behavior questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. Int J Eat Disord 5(2):295–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2%3c295::AID-EAT2260050209%3e3.0.CO;2-T
Nagl M, Hilbert A, de Zwaan M, Braehler E, Kersting A (2016) The German version of the dutch eating behavior questionnaire: psychometric properties, measurement invariance, and population-based norms. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0162510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162510
Weiber R, Mühlhaus D (2010) Strukturgleichungsmodellierung [Structural equation modelling]. Springer, Berlin
Bentler PM, Bonett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88(3):588
Meule A, Richard A, Schnepper R, Reichenberger J, Georgii C, Naab S et al (2019) Emotion regulation and emotional eating in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Eat Disord 29(1):175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2019.1642036
Kyriacou O, Easter A, Tchanturia K (2009) Comparing views of patients, parents, and clinicians on emotions in anorexia: a qualitative study. J Health Psychol 14(7):843–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309340977
Kim Y-R, Lim S-J, Treasure J (2011) Different patterns of emotional eating and visuospatial deficits whereas shared risk factors related with social support between anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Psychiatry Investig 8(1):9–14. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2011.8.1.9
Peat C, Mitchell JE, Hoek HW, Wonderlich SA (2009) Validity and utility of subtyping anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 42(7):590–594. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20717
Danner UN, Sternheim L, Bijsterbosch JM, Dingemans AE, Evers C, van Elburg AA (2016) Influence of negative affect on decision making in women with restrictive and binge-purge type anorexia nervosa. Psychiat Res 239:39–46
Berg KC, Crosby RD, Cao L, Peterson CB, Engel SG, Mitchell JE et al (2013) Facets of negative affect prior to and following binge-only, purge-only, and binge/purge events in women with bulimia nervosa. J Abnormal Psychol 122(1):111–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029703
Engelberg MJ, Steiger H, Gauvin L, Wonderlich SA (2007) Binge antecedents in bulimic syndromes: An examination of dissociation and negative affect. Int J Eat Disord 40(6):531–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20399
Evers C, Dingemans A, Junghans AF, Boevé A (2018) Feeling bad or feeling good, does emotion affect your consumption of food? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 92:195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.028
Boswell RG, Kober H (2016) Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review. Obesity Rev 17(2):159–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12354
Richard A, Meule A, Reichenberger J, Blechert J (2017) Food cravings in everyday life: An EMA study on snack-related thoughts, cravings, and consumption. Appetite 113:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.037
Van den Eynde F, Koskina A, Syrad H, Guillaume S, Broadbent H, Campbell IC et al (2012) State and trait food craving in people with bulimic eating disorders. Eating Behav 13:414–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.07.007
Sobik L, Hutchison K, Craighead L (2005) Cue-elicited craving for food: a fresh approach to the study of binge eating. Appetite 44(3):253–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.12.001
Wonderlich JA, Breithaupt LE, Crosby RD, Thompson JC, Engel SG, Fischer S (2017) The relation between craving and binge eating: Integrating neuroimaging and ecological momentary assessment. Appetite 117:294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.07.005
Tanofsky MB, Wilfley DE, Spurrell EB, Welch R, Brownell KD (1997) Comparison of men and women with binge eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord 21(1):49–54
Antonovsky A (1996) The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion1. Health Promot Int 11(1):11–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/11.1.11
Arend A-K, Kaiser T, Pannicke B, Reichenberger J, Naab S, Voderholzer U et al (2023) toward individualized prediction of binge-eating episodes based on ecological momentary assessment data: item development and pilot study in patients with bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder. JMIR Med Inform. https://doi.org/10.2196/41513
Smith KE, Juarascio A (2019) From ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to ecological momentary intervention (emi): past and future directions for ambulatory assessment and interventions in eating disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep 21(7):53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1046-8
Preprint statement
A preprint of this manuscript can be found at the Open Science Framework [https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2acnb].
Funding
Open access funding provided by Paris Lodron University of Salzburg. This work was supported in whole, or in part, by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ERC-StG-2014 639445 NewEat) and the Austrian Science Fund (FWF; KLI762.B and P 34542).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.-K.A., J.B. and J.R designed the study. A.-K.A. and J.R. conducted the study. T.Y. advised A.-K.A. regarding data analyzes. A.-K.A. prepared and analyzed the data, the figure, the open code, and the open data on OSF. A.-K.A. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. J.B. and U.V. commissioned the study. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Consent for publication
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Arend, AK., Blechert, J., Yanagida, T. et al. Emotional food craving across the eating disorder spectrum: an ecological momentary assessment study. Eat Weight Disord 29, 58 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-024-01690-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-024-01690-4