Abstract
Vocational activity holds many benefits for people with severe mental illness. The purpose of the present study is to explore potential benefits of vocational activity on self-esteem and benefits as described by employment specialists. Data from 148 adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders participating in a comprehensive vocational rehabilitation program was collected as part of the Job Management Program (JUMP) study. Assessments were conducted at inclusion, post intervention (10 months) and 2 years after inclusion. Multiple regressions and mixed between-within subjects analysis of variance were applied to assess potential effects of vocational activity on self-esteem as measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. One hundred and twenty-one reports submitted by the employment specialists post intervention were assessed through a qualitative approach based on thematic analysis. Statistical analyses indicate that vocational activity might be beneficial for self-esteem. Qualitative analysis indicate that vocational activity may provide opportunities for experiencing capability, achievement, and positive social interaction, and be beneficial for well-being, self-confidence, and self-esteem. Vocational activity may be beneficial for well-being and self-esteem among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Statistical analysis indicate that vocational activity may have a positive effect on self-esteem, and there was a non-significant trend indicating that competitive employment may be particularly favourable. However, more research is needed regarding potential differences in effect between types of vocational activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Although schizophrenia historically was considered to have a deteriorating course (Albert & Weibell, 2019), recovery is considered a feasible treatment goal today (Liberman & Kopelowicz, 2005). Consequently, there is currently greater emphasis on functional outcomes (Bechi et al. 2017) such as employment and social functioning. Despite findings indicating that the majority of people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) want to work (Gühne et al., 2021; Westcott et al., 2015), employment rates remain low. International estimates range from 10 to 20% (Owen et al., 2016), and estimates from Norway are even lower at 4–13% (Evensen et al., 2015; Helle & Gråwe, 2007). To remedy this, vocational rehabilitation programs have been developed to help people with SSDs and other severe mental disorders (SMIs) gain and maintain employment. Such programmes include Individual Placement and Support (IPS) and the IPS-inspired Job Management Program (JUMP) where there is close collaboration between mental health workers and employment specialists to provide vocational support for people with SSDs (Sveinsdottir et al., 2020).
Research on the aforementioned vocational rehabilitation programmes have found that receiving such support has beneficial effects on vocational outcomes (Bond et al., 2020; Falkum et al. 2017). Several studies have also shown advantages of employment in itself for people with SSDs (Drake, 2018). The positive outcomes reported include increased likelihood of symptomatic recovery, financial freedom, social inclusion and increased quality of life (QoL) (Coombes et al., 2016; Raeside & McQueen, 2021; Schennach et al., 2012). A few studies also indicate that employment has a positive influence on self-esteem (Luciano et al., 2014; Negrini et al., 2014), and that competitive employment may be particularly favourable (Bond et al., 2001). Self-esteem refers to how individuals view themselves, both generally (global self-esteem) and in specific domains (Rentzsch et al., 2018). Findings suggest self-esteem is associated with well-being and may predict QoL in individuals with SSDs and other psychotic disorders (Eklund & Bäckström, 2005; Eklund et al., 2018). However, studies often include mixed samples including participants with SSDs together with participants with other diagnosis. Thus, more research is needed to determine the impact of employment specifically for people with SSDs.
Employment specialists play an important role in vocational rehabilitation programs by creating opportunities for their clients to attain and retain work. They develop relationships with employers to help their clients find work related to their preferences and provide support for clients and employers during the vocational rehabilitation (Marino & Dixon, 2014; Moen et al., 2021; Spjelkavik, 2012). As such, employment specialists are an important part of interdisciplinary collaboration in treatment of people with SSDs and are well equipped to assess individual resources and support needs related to employment. They are also in a unique position to observe the impact employment has on the individuals they are supporting.
The aim of this study was twofold. Firstly, we wanted to assess whether vocational activity influenced self-reported self-esteem among people with SSDs. We hypothesised that vocational activity had beneficial effects on self-esteem, and that this effect differed depending on type of vocational activity. Secondly, we wanted to investigate other potential benefits of vocational activity for this group as described by the employment specialists. To this end, we conducted qualitative analyses on post-intervention reports provided by the employment specialists for each individual participant.
Material and Methods
The Job Management Program
The Job Management Program (JUMP) study was a quasi-experimental study investigating the effects of a multisite vocational rehabilitation program provided in collaboration between Norwegian health and welfare services. Adults with SSDs from six counties in Norway were offered a comprehensive vocational rehabilitation program. Participants worked in work placements, sheltered work and/or ordinary employment for 10 months while receiving close support from employment specialists. Sheltered work refers to jobs in sheltered workshops that have reduced work demands. Work placements are in ordinary places of employment and include ordinary work demands, but are funded through employment schemes from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV). The employment specialists were based in sheltered workshops and provided support for around ten participants each (Falkum et al., 2017; Lystad et al., 2017). The vocational rehabilitation program followed several of the IPS principles, such as following the place-then-train principle, but IPS fidelity was not assessed (Sveinsdottir et al., 2020).
Participants also received individual sessions of either cognitive remediation (CR-group) or cognitive behavioural therapy techniques (CBT-group) for six months. The CR intervention used a computerized training program and emphasised potential transfer values between training and vocational activity. The CBT intervention focused on work-related difficulties. Both interventions were delivered twice a week by the employment specialists, who had undertaken 40 h of training about various aspects of SSDs (e.g. symptoms and treatment) and either basic principles of CR or basic methods of CBT. Allocation to the interventions was randomized on county-level. Participants from counties Oslo, Oppland and Nord-Trøndelag received CBT, while participants from the counties of Vest-Agder, Telemark and Buskerud received CR. For more detail about the different interventions, see e.g. Falkum et al., 2017 or Lystad et al. 2017.
Participants
Participants were recruited between August 2009 and March 2013. They were referred from vocational services, local mental health centres or through self-referral. Inclusion criteria were having a diagnosed SSD, speaking Norwegian well enough to ensure valid neuropsychological test performance, no previous head injury with loss of consciousness for more than 10 min or requiring medical treatment and IQ of 70 or more. Items one to three on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (Wing et al, 1998) were used to assess risk of violence and suicide, and severe substance and/or alcohol dependence. A score of three or higher on either item lead to exclusion. Four participants had competitive employment at inclusion but were included because they needed support in order to maintain employment (Lystad, 2016). The subject flow is displayed in Fig. 1.
Assessments and Measures
Clinical, cognitive and functional assessments were conducted at inclusion, post intervention (i.e. approximately 10 months after inclusion), and 2 years after inclusion (2-year follow-up). In addition, the employment specialists submitted reports to the research group for each participant post intervention. Data from all three measuring points are reported in the current paper, including the qualitative reports. Only measures relevant for the current paper are presented here. All clinical assessments were performed by trained and calibrated clinicians (Bull, 2016).
Clinical Characteristics
Diagnosis was determined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) using the Norwegian version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) PLUS (Sheehan et al., 1998). M.I.N.I. PLUS is a more detailed version of the original M.I.N.I., and has good reliability and agreement with other diagnostic interviews (Sheehan et al, 1997; Lecrubier et al, 1997). The Longitudinal observation, Expert opinion, All Data (LEAD) (Kranzler et al., 1994; Spitzer, 1983) procedure was applied when necessary. Psychotic symptoms were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (SCI-PANSS) (Kay et al, 1987). The structured interview has improved on the already satisfactory inter-rater reliability of the original version of PANSS (von Knorring & Lindström, 1994).
Duration of illness (DOI) was defined as the time from first contact with mental health services for psychotic symptoms (retrieved from hospital records) to inclusion to the study (Evensen, 2016). Main dosages of antipsychotic medication were converted to a measure of defined daily dose (DDD) (World Health Organization, 2011) for statistical purposes.
Functional Outcome
The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale—split version (Endicott et al., 1976) was used as a measure of general functioning (GAF-F) and psychological symptoms (GAF-S). The two scales are given a score between 1 and 100, with higher scores indicating higher level of functioning. The split version is based on the traditional GAF scale, which is an overall measure of impairment due to mental disorder using a single score. The Norwegian version of the split version of GAF has been validated against other clinical measures (Pedersen & Karterud, 2012).
Employment and educational history was gathered through structured interviews. Highest level of completed education is reported according to the Norwegian educational system, categorized as less than primary school (< 9 years), primary school (9 years), high school/vocational school (12 years), college (13–15 years), and university (17 + years). Employment history is reported as whether or not the individual had any experience with vocational activity before inclusion (yes/no) and months of previous working experience fulltime and part-time. Employment specialists collected information about current vocational status at all assessment points, and registered hours spent in vocational activity per week (Bull, 2016). Vocational activity was reported as no vocational activity, sheltered work, work placement, or competitive employment (including higher education).
Intellectual Functioning
Intelligence quotient (IQ) was assessed with the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) two-subtest estimates of IQ (WASI, 2007). The Norwegian version appears to be a reliable tool for screening intellectual functioning. However, Norwegian norms are not available and use of US norms (as in the current study) may cause slight overestimation of intellectual functioning (Siqveland et al., 2014).
Self-Esteem
The Norwegian version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSS) (Rosenberg, 1965) was used to measure global self-esteem. This is a 10-item self-report questionnaire where each item has four alternative responses ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Half or the items are negatively worded and these scores were reversed before the sum scores were calculated. Each item is given a score from 1 to 4, therefore the total score ranges from 10 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher self-esteem (Rosenberg, 1965). The factor structure and internal reliability of the RSS has been replicated across various cultures and languages (Schmitt & Allik, 2005). Findings from the Swedish version suggest good internal consistency, validity, at least some sensitivity to change, and that it can be used to measure of global self-esteem (Eklund et al., 2018).
Statistical Analyses
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 27) (IBM Corp, 2020) was used for all statistical analyses. Levels of significance were set at p = 0.05. All tests were two-tailed. The effect sizes were interpreted by the guidelines developed by Cohen (1988). Thus, eta squared (η2) was categorized as large, moderate and small effects at the values 0.14, 0.06 and 0.01 (Pallant, 2020). A previous study found no significant baseline differences between the CR and CBT groups except for gender and DOI at baseline, nor any differences post intervention or at 2-year follow-up regarding how many had employment, type of employment or hours worked per week (Evensen et al., 2017). The two groups were therefore treated as one sample in the current paper.
Standard multiple regressions were conducted to assess whether degree of involvement in vocational activity predicted differences in self-esteem post intervention and at 2-year follow-up. RSS sum scores were used as dependent variables, while gender, age, education, baseline sum scores on the PANSS symptom scales and hours worked per week were included as independent variables.
To investigate whether different types of vocational activity affected self-esteem differently, a mixed between-within subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted. The predictor variable was type of vocational activity post intervention. Gender, age, education and baseline sum scores on the SCI-PANSS scales were included as covariates, while RSS sum scores on the three measuring points were the dependent variables. The four participants with competitive employment at inclusion were excluded from this analysis to prevent potential effects of competitive employment at baseline from affecting the results.
Qualitative Analysis
Employment specialists in the JUMP study wrote a post-intervention report for each participant (N = 121) describing key events during the intervention, their experience of collaborating with different agencies, their evaluation of the JUMP method, the individual participants’ work affiliation and ability to work. They also included additional information that was important to support the participant (Template Appendix A). The discrepancy between the number of reports and the total number of participants is due to a combination of factors such as drop-out and clerical error.
The reports were anonymized and marked with participant id/numbers. They were investigated through a qualitative approach based on thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke (2006) and Joffe (2011). The reports were read several times and key words noted to generate the coding frame. The coding frame included information regarding benefits of the intervention, the intrinsic value of employment, the importance of receiving a salary, factors that contributed to a positive development and challenges during the intervention. With further analysis the included material was reviewed and reorganized into two meta-codes termed “beneficial results of vocational rehabilitation” and “processes of positive development”. Examples from the final coding frame are displayed in Table 1.
The included segments were assessed multiple times, searching for patterns. Experiences that were mentioned in several reports and were descriptive of multiple codes were regarded as themes. For example, the codes “acknowledgement from others” and “belonging to a group” both included segments describing that participants had beneficial interactions with other people due to vocational activity. This was included in the theme “positive interpersonal experiences”. The final themes were broadened skillsets, positive interpersonal experiences, increased well-being and increased self-esteem.
The first author conducted the initial coding. Multiple authors discussed how to interpret the themes. Translations of the included material from Norwegian to English were made after the qualitative approach through collaboration among the authors. Some of the segments were rephrased because they included expressions that are not used in English. The original quotes and corresponding translations are included in Appendix B.
Ethical Considerations
All participants provided written informed consent. The JUMP study was approved by the Regional Committee of Medical Research Ethics and the Norwegian Data Protection Authority. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01139502.
Results from the Statistical Analyses
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample are presented in Table 2.
Table 3 shows mean RSS scores and standard deviations by vocational status for all measuring points. Because of missing data the sample sizes differs somewhat from what is reported in Fig. 2.
Standard Multiple Regressions
In the standard multiple regressions there was a significant effect of hours worked per week on the RSS sum score post intervention (Beta = 0.19, B = 0.11, SE = 0.05, p = 0.029). The model was significant and explained 17.80% of the variance (F = 3.57, p = 0.002). None of the other independent variables contributed significantly to the model. At 2-year follow-up, the model was no longer significant (F = 1.74, p = 0.108).
Mixed Between-Within Subjects ANOVA
In the mixed between-within subjects ANOVA, the effect of vocational status post intervention on the RSS sum scores across the three measuring points was not significant F(6, 162) = 1.72, p = 0.119. Due to missing data, only 92 participants were included in this analysis. Of these, six participants had competitive employment, 43 had work placements, 31 had sheltered work and 12 had no vocational activity post intervention. Because methodological challenges related to different group-sizes may potentially cloud actual effects, we report the different trends between the groups regarding the development in self-esteem. Participants with competitive employment showed an increase in RSS scores throughout the study, while persons with work placements had an initial increase that stagnated after the intervention ended. The group with sheltered work had the smallest increase in RSS scores, and the participants with no vocational activity had a decrease in scores. Figure 3 illustrates the estimated marginal means for the RSS sum scores divided by vocational status post intervention.
Results from the Qualitative Approach
The employment specialists reported several benefits of vocational rehabilitation for the participants. The participants showed an increased belief in themselves as well as improvement in work-related skills and well-being. These improvements were attributed to vocational achievements and positive interpersonal interactions.
Broadened Skillsets
The improvement in skills reported for some participants was regarded as a positive result in itself, as well as being a process where developments in one area contributed to advances in other areas. The reported improvements included improvements in cognitive functioning (for both the CR- and CBT-group), increased ability to cope with stress and to interact with other people. The following is an example from one of the reports:
The vocational training has had a very good effect on the ability to pay attention, interaction, and the social aspect. The participant is much less sensitive to external events (which can take attention away from the tasks at work), experiences increased capability and is much more comfortable in interactions with other people.
Such changes in competencies were believed to increase the participants’ chance of succeeding with later work-related efforts and apparently made them more comfortable with certain tasks and/or situations in their current vocational activity. Moreover, they seemed to increase the participants’ well-being. For example, it was reported that improved cognitive functioning could contribute to positive changes in social life by making the participants more competent and comfortable participating in social situations.
Positive Interpersonal Experiences
Employment specialists considered positive interpersonal experiences to be part of a beneficial process that supported the favourable changes during vocational rehabilitation. Such experiences were associated with increased self-esteem, improved QoL and well-being in several reports. Importantly, positive results were often attributed to a combination of multiple processes. As such, experiencing achievement and positive interpersonal interactions appeared to be particularly potent when combined. One employment specialist wrote that the participant experienced capability and a sense of community at work. He expressed that employment was very important for him and gave weekly feedback about these experiences.
The following excerpt from another report also illustrates the significance of experiencing both competence and social support: “She receives feedback/acknowledgement from other people. She described an experience of achievement, learning new things and being valued. This influenced her dignity and perception of herself.”
These kinds of changes were described for various reports despite the fact that several participants changed vocational activity up to multiple times during the intervention period.
Increased Well-Being
Another aspect that was considered a potential benefit of vocational rehabilitation was improved well-being. This was described as an increase in optimism or hope, more expression of pleasant emotions and bettered social lives. The following is an example: “Gradually, [he] has expressed some more optimism, and belief that he has the possibility to create a better future through work and an identity as a “valuable citizen” among other things.” One employment specialist wrote the following after speaking with a participants’ therapist in the mental health services: “…they also say that he has developed a lot during the time in the project. He is much happier and more content than they have seen him before. He shows greater capability and self-confidence than before.”
Increased Self-Esteem
In terms of the participants’ view of themselves, some appeared to have a more positive view of their abilities after the intervention. The following excerpt illustrates this: “Participant […] made very nice progress in the project. She had good resources to begin with but has built her self-confidence and belief in herself through the project.” Importantly, such results were also reported for participants who had experienced difficulties during the vocational rehabilitation. In this regard, one employment specialist wrote: “Despite many interrupted internships during the project, the participant has a belief that she will be able to manage some tasks in competitive employment (albeit in a reduced work-time percentage)”.
Experiences with achievement was considered to contribute to advantageous results. In regard to this, one employment specialist wrote: “The project gave him the opportunity to enter competitive employment. Through experiencing that he could cope with working life, it gave him self-confidence.” Another report reads: “He describes that doing and experiencing that he is capable has given him confidence in his ability. …exposing himself, stepping out of his comfort zone and experiencing that he survived doing so, has been the largest success factor.”
As in the previous example, an aspect that was mentioned in several instances was that the participants challenged themselves. As such, their experiences with being capable may have been related to situations they initially found daunting.
Discussion and Conclusion
The first aim of the current study was to assess whether vocational activity influences self-esteem in individuals with SSDs. We found that hours spent in vocational activity had a positive effect on self-esteem. This finding has two important implications. Firstly, in line with our hypothesis, it suggests that being engaged in vocational activity may positively influence self-esteem for people with SSDs. Self-esteem appears to be associated with various aspects of mental health—e.g. psychotic symptoms (Romm et al., 2011; Smith et al., 2006)—and has been suggested as target of intervention for reduce risk of suicide among people with SSDs (Jian et al. 2022). Hence, other aspects of mental health may also profit from improved self-esteem. Mental health services should therefore support individuals’ goals regarding employment. Secondly, a potential positive impact of vocational activity on self-esteem may depend on the degree of exposure. Thus, it is not simply having some form of vocational activity that is important, but also the amount of time spent in said activity. This is an important consideration to have in mind when searching for vocational activity.
Regarding our hypothesis that type of vocational activity would have differential effect on self-esteem, the picture is less clear. The lack of statistical significance in the results is probably due to methodological issues and insufficient statistical power as the group sizes were variable and the smallest group (competitive employment) only had six participants. There was a trend in the data suggesting ordinary employment may be particularly beneficial, but more research is needed to firmly establish this. Regardless, based on the results there were no indications that ordinary employment would be less beneficial than other forms of vocational activity for self-esteem. This is in line with previous research that has not found employment to be harmful for the mental health of this group when compared to unemployment (Luciano et al., 2014).
The second aim of the study was to explore potential advantages of vocational activity for people with SSDs as described by employment specialists. The qualitative results indicate that taking part in vocational activities hold multiple benefits, and that these potentiate each other. Learning new skillsets and experiencing that one is capable builds self-confidence and self-esteem, as do positive social interactions. This is in keeping with earlier research showing that employment may provide opportunities for positive interpersonal experiences, improve well-being, and contribute to an increase in skills (Dunstan et al., 2017), and that vocational activity may improve QoL (Marwaha & Johnson, 2004).
Taken together, the findings from this mixed methods approach suggest vocational activity may have beneficial effects for people with SSDs that may contribute to improve QoL, including increased social and vocational skills, well-being, and self-esteem. With regard to competitive versus other types of employment it has been suggested that receiving wages may be related to a greater increase in QoL as compared to not receiving wages (Bryson et al., 2002), though conflicting findings have been reported (e.g. Luciano et al., 2014; Ådnanes et al., 2018). This discrepancy may partly be due to differences in outcome measures or problems with measuring these consepts due to their subjective nature (Luciano et al., 2014).
It should be noted that other factors may also have contributed to the findings in this study. For instance, the comprehensive support provided by the employment specialists may, in itself, have had beneficial effects for the participants. Findings suggest that clients appreciate the close support from the employment specialists (e.g. Chen & Lal, 2020; Fyhn et al. 2020). A previous study on IPS in Denmark also found that some of the participants experienced the IPS method as contributing to bettered self-esteem (Gammelgaard et al. 2017). Hence, the reported results may reflect the combined effect of vocational rehabilitation and the experience of receiving support. In addition, site specific effects – such as different cultures and attitudes in the different counties and individual differences between employment specialists – may have influenced the reported results. Although there is limited research on the specific effects of employment specialists’ characteristics, their skills, knowledge, and competencies have been found to be associated with their clients’ outcomes (Bakkeli et al., 2020).
Strengths
The mixed-methods approach provides a broader perspective on the effects of vocational activity, incorporating both reports from the employment specialists as well as self-reported self-esteem data. The use of standardized measures such as RSS enables comparison between studies, while the qualitative approach allows for a detailed investigation of the participants’ development. The employment specialists are also an important voice in understanding and optimizing vocational support for this population.
The therapeutic interventions (CBT and CR) provided in JUMP may have made the participants better equipped to handle the demands of vocational activity and to uphold vocational activity over time.
Limitations and Directions for Future Research
Though studies on the RSS have found it to be a valid assessment tool for measurement of global self-esteem, it has been suggested that its sensitivity to change should be more thoroughly investigated. Some sensitivity to change has been demonstrated, but it is uncertain how large change is needed for it to be detected by the questionnaire (Eklund et al., 2018; Schmitt & Allik, 2005). Thus it is possible that the RSS was not sensitive enough to detect a potential change. Although using the mean RSS scores is the most common use of the RSS, it has been proposed that categorizing RSS scores into levels of self-esteen may provide a more accurate and sensitive description of self-esteem (García et al. 2019). In addition, vocational activities may encapsulate a specific domain of self-esteem, which we were unable to disentangle with the RSS. As such, future studies may benefit from utilizing other methods such as including domain-specific measures of self-esteem.
Participants may have gone through several changes in vocational status throughout the study. Changes where participants gained vocational activity reflect that the interventions were successful. Nevertheless, they have statistical implications in terms of what types of analyses may be carried out. In addition, the participants with a certain vocational activity (e.g. competitive employment) may not have had this long enough for effects to occur before assessments were made. Insufficient statistical power due to small group sizes may also have disguised potential effects. Future studies may benefit from larger sample sizes, as well as closer monitoring of potential fluctuations in self-esteem and vocational activity.
One person conducted the qualitative assessments and that individual will naturally influence the interpretations. There may also be a bias in the material as the person that had provided the support for the participant served as informants. Consequently, adverse events may have been underreported. The template for the reports did not specifically ask what the employment specialists considered benefits of vocational activity. To counteract this limitation, interpretations were only made from explicit statements where changes were attributed to vocational activity or rehabilitation. Future research may profit from more direct questioning about the consequences of gaining vocational activity and the possible significance of receiving wages.
References
Ådnanes, M., Kalseth, J., Ose, S. O., Ruud, T., Rugkåsa, J., & Puntis, S. R. (2018). Quality of life and service satisfaction in outpatients with severe or non-severe mental illness diagnoses. Qual. of Life Res., 28(3), 713-724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2039-5
Albert, N., & Weibell, M. A. (2019). The outcome of early intervention in first episode psychosis. Int. rev. of Psychiatry 31(5-6), 413-424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2019.1643703
Bakkeli, V., Frøyland, K., & Spjelkavik, Ø. (2020). Kvalitetsarbeid i Supported Employment-tjenester (AFI-rapport 2020–04). Retrieved from https://oda.oslomet.no/oda-xmlui/handle/10642/8835
Bechi, M, Bosa, M., Spangaro, M., Buonocore, L., Cocchi, F.Guglielmino, C., Smeraldi, E., & Cavallaro, R. (2017). Exploring functioning in schizophrenia: Predictors of functional capacity and real-world behaviour. Psychiatry Res., 251, 118-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.019
Bond, G. R., Resnick, S. G., Drake, R. E., Xie, H., McHugo, G. J., & Bebout, R. R. (2001). Does competitive employment improve nonvocational outcomes for people with severe mental illness? J. of Consult. and Clin. Psychol., 69(3), 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.3.489
Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Becker, D. R. (2020). An update on individual placement and support. World Psychiatry, 19(3), 390-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20784
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. in Psychol., 3(2), 77-101. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryson, G., Lysaker, P., & Bell, M. (2002). Quality of life benefits of paid work activity in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull., 28(2), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006935
Bull, H. (2016). Apathy, vocational rehabilitation and functional outcome in persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. (PhD Doctorial dissertation). University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo.
Chen, N. & Lal. S. (2020). Stakeholder perspectives on ips for employment: A scoping review. Can. J. of Occup. Ther., 87(4), 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417420946611
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coombes, K., Haracz, K., Robson, E., & James, C. (2016). Pushing through: Mental health consumers' experiences of an individual placement and support employment programme. The Br. J. of Occup. Ther., 79(11), 651-659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022616658297
Drake, R. E. (2018). Employment and schizophrenia: Three innovative research approaches. Schizophr. Bull., 44(1), 20-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx170
Dunstan, D., Falconer, A., & Price, I. (2017). The relationship between hope, social inclusion, and mental wellbeing in supported employment. The Aust. J. of Rehabil. Couns., 23(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrc.2017.5
Eklund, M. & Bäckström, M (2005). A model of subjective quality of life for outpatients with schizophrenia and other psychoses. Qual. Life. Res., 14(4), 1157-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-2960-7
Eklund, M., Bäckström, M., & Hansson, L. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of the swedish version of rosenberg's self-esteem scale. Nord. J. of Psychiatry, 72(5), 318-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2018.1457177
Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1976). The global assessment scale: A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch. of Gen. Psychiatr., 33(6), 766-771. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012Evensen, S., Wisløff, T.,
Evensen, S., Ueland, T., Lystad, J. U., Bull, H., Klungsøyr, O., Martinsen, E. W. & Falkum, E. (2017) Employment outcome and predictors of competitive employment at 2-year follow-up of a vocational rehabilitation programme for individuals with schizophrenia in a high-income welfare society, Nord. J. of Psychiatry, 71(3), 180-187, https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2016.1247195
Evensen, S. (2016). Vocational rehabilitation for individuals with schizophrenia: The societal case. (PhD Doctorial thesis). Oslo University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo.
Evensen, S., Wisløff T., Lystad, J. U., Bull, H., Ueland, T. & Falkum, E. (2015) Prevalence, employment rate, and cost of schizophrenia in a high-income welfare society: a population-based study using comprehensive health and welfare registers, Schizophr. Bull., 42 (2), 476–483, https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbv141
Falkum, E., Klungsøyr, O., Lystad, J. U., Bull, H. C., Evensen, S., Martinsen, E. W., Friis, S. & Ueland, T. (2017). Vocational rehabilitation for adults with psychotic disorders in a Scandinavian welfare society. BMC Psychiatry, 17(24). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1183-0
Fyhn, T., Ludvigsen, K., Reme, S. E. & Schaafsma, F. (2020). A structured mixed method process evaluation of randomized controlled trial of individual placement and support (ips). Implement. Sci. Commun. 1(95). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00083-9
Gammelgaard, I., Christensen, T. N., Eplov, L. F., Jensen, S. B., Stenager, E., & Petersen, K. S. (2017). ‘I have potential’: Experiences of recovery in the individual placement and support intervention. Int. J. of Soc. Psychiatry, 63(5), 400-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764017708801
García, J. A., y Olmos, F. C., Matheu, M. L., & Carreño, T. P. (2019). Self esteem levels vs global scores on the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Heliyon, 5(3), e01378–e01378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01378
Gühne, U., Pabst, A., Löbner, M., Breilmann, J., Hasan, A., Falkai, P., Kilian, R., Allgöwer, A., Ajayi, K., Baumgärtner, J., Brieger, P., Frasch, K., Heres, S., Jäger, M., Küthmann, A., Putzhammer, A., Schneeweiß, B., Schwarz, M., Becker, T., … Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2021). Employment status and desire for work in severe mental illness: results from an observational, cross-sectional study. Soc. Psychiatry and Psychiatr. Epidemiol., 56(9), 1657–1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02088-8
Helle, S. & Gråwe, R. W. (2007). Sysselsetting og trygd blant personer med schizofrenidiagnose. Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening, 44(11), 1358-1362.IBM Corp. Released 2020. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp
Jian, C.-R., Wang, P.-W., Lin, H.-C., Huang, M.-F., Yeh, Y.-C., Liu, T.-L., Chen, C.-S., Lin, Y.-P., Lee, S.-Y., Chen, C.-H., Wang, Y.-C., Chang, Y.-P., Chen, Y.-L., & Yen, C.-F. (2022). Association between self-stigma and suicide risk in individuals with schizophrenia: Moderating effects of self-esteem and perceived support from friends. Int. J. of Environ. Res. and Public Health, 19(22), 15071. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215071
Joffe, H. (2011). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 209-223). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987). The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull., 13(2), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/13.2.261
Kranzler, H. R., Hadden, R. M., Babor, T. F., & Rounsaville, B. J. (1994). Longitudinal, Expert, All Data procedure for psychiatric diagnosis in patients with psychoactive substance use disorders. J. of Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 182(5), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199405000-00005
Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D. V., Weiller, E., Amorim, P., Banora, I., Sheehann, K. H., Janavs, J., & Dunbar, G. C. (1997). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structures interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur. Psychiatr., 12(5), 22-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8
Liberman, R. P. & Koperlowicz, A. (2005). Recovery from schizophrenia: A concept in search of research. Psychiatr. Serv., 56(6), 735-742. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.56.6.735
Luciano, A., Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (2014). Does employment alter the course and outcome of schizophrenia and other severe mental illnesses? A systematic review of longitudinal research. Schizophr. Res., 159(2), 312-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2014.09.010
Lystad, J. U., Falkum, E., Haaland, V. Ø., Bull, H., Evensen, S., McGurk, S. R. & Ueland, T. (2017). Cognitive remediation and occupational outcome in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A 2 year follow-up study. Schizophr. Res., 185, 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2016.12.020
Lystad, J. U. (2016). Neurocognition, cognitive remediation and functional outcome in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. (PhD Doctoral Thesis). University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo.
Marino, A. L., & Dixon, B. L. (2014). An update on supported employment for people with severe mental illness. Curr. Opin. in Psychiatry, 27(3), 210-215. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000058
Marwaha, S., & Johnson, S. (2004). Schizophrenia and employment: A review. Soc. Psychiatry and Psychiatr. Epidemiol., 39(5), 337-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0762-4
Moen, E., Walseth, L., & Larsen, I. (2021). Experiences of participating in individual placement and support: A meta‐ethnographic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. Scand. J. of Caring Sci., 35(2), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12848
Negrini, A., Corbière, M., Fortin, G., & Lecomte, T. (2014). Psychosocial well-being construct in people with severe mental disorders enrolled in supported employment programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 50(8), 932-942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-014-9717-8
Owen, M., Sawa, A. & Mortensen P. B. (2016). Schizophrenia. The Lancet, 388(10039), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01121-6
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th. ed.). London: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education.
Pedersen, G., & Karterud, S. (2012). The symptom and function dimensions of the global assessment of functioning (GAF) scale. Compr. Psychiatr., 53(3), 292-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.04.007
Raeside, C. & McQueen, J. (2021), Getting back to work: Experiences of the individual placement and support model from those with mental health conditions, an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Work (Reading Mass.) 70(3), 973-983. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-213617
Rentzsch, K., Schröder-Abé, M., & Wrus, C. (2018). Stability and change in domain‐specific self‐esteem and global self‐esteem. Eur. J. of Pers. 32(4), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2167
Romm, K. L., Rossberg, J. I., Hansen, C. F., Haug, E., Andreassen O. A., & Melle, I. (2011). Self-esteem is associated with premorbid adjustment and positive psychotic symptoms in early psychosis. BMC Psychiatry 11(1), 136–136. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-136
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Schennack, R., Musil, R., Möller, H & Riedel, M (2012). Functional outcomes in schizophrenia: Employment status as a metric of treatment outcome. Curr. Psychiatr. Rep., 14, 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0261-3
Schmitt, D. P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the rosenberg self-esteem scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. J. of Personal. and Soc. Psychol., 89(4), 623-642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623
Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Keskiner, Schinka, J., Knapp, E., Sheehan, M. F. & Dunbar, G. C. (1997). The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability. Eur. Psychiatr., 12(5), 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83297-X
Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Hergueta, T., Baker, R & Dunbar, G. C. (1998). The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. The J. of Clin. Psychiatry, 59, 22-33. Retrieved from https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.uio.no/scholarly-journals/mini-international-neuropsychiatric-interview-m-i/docview/42377708/se-2?accountid=14699
Siqveland, J., Dalsbø, T. K., Harboe, I., & Leiknes, K. A. (2014). Måleegenskaper ved den norske versjonen av wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI) (978–82–8121–902–1). Retrieved from https://www.fhi.no/publ/2014/maleegenskaper-ved-den-norske-versjonen-av-wechsler-abbreviated-scale-of-in/
Smith, B., Fowler, D. G., Freeman, D., Bebbington, P., Bashforth, H., Garety, P., Dunn, G., & Kuipers, E. (2006). Emotion and psychosis: Links between depression, self-esteem, negative schematic beliefs and delusions and hallucinations. Schizophr. Res., 86(1), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2006.06.018
Spitzer, R. L. (1983). Psychiatric diagnosis: Are clinicians still necessary? Compr. Psychiatry, 24(5), 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-440X(83)90032-9
Spjelkavik, Ø. (2012). Supported employment in norway and in the other nordic countries. J. of Vocat. Rehabil., 37(3), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2012-0611
Sveinsdottir, V., Bull, H. C., Evensen, S., Reme, S. E., Knutzen, T., & Lystad, J. U. (2020). A short history of individual placement and support in norway. Psychiatr. Rehabil. J., 43(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000366
von Knorring, L., & Lindström, E. (1994). Swedish experiences with the structured clinical interview for the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenia (SCI-PANSS). Eur. Psychiatr., 9(3), 145-147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0924933800001139
WASI. (2007). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence, norwegian manual supplement. Stockholm, Sweden: Hartcourt Assessment Inc.
Westcott, C., Waghorn, G., McLean, D., Statham, D., & Mowry, B. (2015). Interest in employment among people with schizophrenia, Am. J. of Psychiatr. Rehabil. 18(2), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2014.954162
Wing, J. K., Beevor, A. S., Curtis, R. H., Park, B. G., Hadden, S., & Burns, A. (1998). Health of the nation outcome scales (HoNOS). Research and development. Br. J. of Psychiatry, 172, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.172.1.11
World Health Organization (2011). World Health Organization: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC/DDD index 2011.
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to the study participants for their time and effort devoted to participation in the JUMP study. We also wish to thank the clinical- and vocational staff and employment specialists at the six intervention sites for their work in recruitment, testing and intervention management.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Oslo (incl Oslo University Hospital). This study was supported by The Norwegian Directorate of Health (08/9457), The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, The South Eastern Norway Health Authority (9297) and The National Council for Mental Health/Health and Rehabilitation (2008/2/0310).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception of the JUMP-study was done by EF and TU. Data collection was performed by JUL, HCB, VØH and SE. Drafting and analyses were conducted by JUL and OS-P. All authors contributed to revising the manuscript, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical Approval
The JUMP study was approved by the Regional Committee of Medical Research Ethics and the Norwegian Data Protection Authority. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01139502.
Consent to Participate
All participants provided written informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
The template for the qualitative reports. Translated to English by the first author.
Front of Sheet
The purpose of this report is to describe essential elements from the support you have provided to the participants during the intervention period. This is a separate report in regard to the one you will send to NAV though much of the content may be the same. When the participant has ended the intervention period, this report and anonymised data are to be sent with registration sheets for work and activity to the project manager from health services in each county.
-
1.
Central problems and events
-
a.
Describe the participants’ main challenges in relation to carry out the work (e.g. suspicion in relation to co-workers, slow working pace, low endurance etc.).
-
b.
Describe eventual special events that have occurred in the intervention period and how you solved these (e.g. events aggression at work, rise in symptoms, conflicts between participant and others. Solutions contacted therapist, spoke with supervisor).
-
a.
-
2.
Collaboration
-
a.
How many and which people/agencies did you collaborate with in the support of the participant?
-
b.
Did joint training about psychosis and vocational rehabilitation make it easier to collaborate across agencies and in which way? (e.g. easier to achieve contact, greater flexibility, better understanding)
-
c.
How important do you think collaboration across agencies was for the support of the participant?
-
a.
-
3.
Method
-
a.
Which elements of the method worked well in the support of the participant? (Look at the back of the sheet for specification in regard to cognitive behavioural therapy or cognitive remediation)
-
b.
Which elements of the method was difficult in the support of the participant? (difficult elements may also have worked well). (Look at the back of the sheet for specification in regard to cognitive behavioural therapy or cognitive remediation). In your opinion, were the intervention methods themselves essential for the result of the vocational rehabilitation of the participant? Please elaborate.
-
a.
-
4.
Work affiliation and work ability
-
a.
Describe the participants’ motivation for employment and eventual changes during the intervention period.
-
b.
How has the participant attendance been? (i.e. has the participant mostly met as planned for intervention and work, please specify if it is different for intervention/work)
-
c.
Were special measures implemented to secure attendance? (e.g. sms, phone, pickup)
-
d.
Describe the need for support and individual tailoring to adaptation needs and potential changes during the intervention period (e.g. How close/frequent contact have you had with participant and supervisor and has this changes during the intervention period)
-
e.
What is the plan for employment/education further on?
-
a.
-
5.
Other important information from the support of the participant.
Back of Sheet
For cognitive remediation:
-
(a)
Which elements of the method worked well in the support of the participant?
The computer training in itself
Conversation about transfer between work and training setting
Focus on use of strategies training/work
-
(b)
Which elements of the method was difficult in the support of the participant? (difficult elements may also have worked well).
The computer training in itself
Conversation about transfer between work and training setting
Focus on use of strategies training/work
For cognitive behaviour therapy:
-
(a)
Which elements of the method worked well in the support of the participant?
(e.g. the ABC-model, the mastery model, exposure, motivating conversations, homework, Socratic dialogue)
-
(b)
Which elements of the method was difficult in the support of the participant? (difficult elements may also have worked well).
(e.g. the ABC-model, the mastery model, exposure, motivating conversations, homework, Socratic dialogue)
Appendix B
The original quotes from the qualitative reports and the English translations (made by the first author), listed in order of appearance. The translations were made after the qualitative approach was completed.
Original quote | English translation |
---|---|
“Han beskriver at det er det å gjøre og erfare at han mestrer som har gitt ham troen på at han kan.” | “He describes that doing and experiencing that he is capable has given him confidence in his ability.” |
“… opplevde å bli likt, anerkjent og bekreftet. Hun beskrev at i stedet for å kjente seg trykt ned, opplevde hun å bli løftet opp. Hun hadde kollegaer, hun hadde en tilhørighet, og hun beskriver at selvtilliten økte, ved at hun så på seg selv som en av alle de andre.” | “She … experienced being liked, acknowledged, and validated. … She had colleagues, a sense of belonging … her self-confidence increased as she saw herself as one among the others.” |
“Hun har ekspedert familiemedlemmer i kafeen, og det å få vise at hun kan har gitt henne troen på at hun har noe å by på.” | “She has served family members in the café, and being able to show that she can has given her faith that she has something to offer.” |
“… har fått et mer positivt syn på seg selv.” | “… has gained a more positive view of himself.” |
“Det å kunne fortelle til andre at hun hadde jobb styrket hennes selvfølelse.” | “Being able to tell others that she had a job strengthened her self-esteem.” |
“… samt at han fikk en bredere sosial omgangskrets og fikk venner han fortsatt har kontakt med.” | “… and that he gained a broader social network and made friends here that he is still in contact with.” |
“Etter hvert har _ tilkjennegitt noe mer optimisme, og tro på at han har mulighet til å skape seg en bedre fremtid …” | “Gradually … has shown somewhat more optimism and belief that he has the opportunity to create a better future…” |
“Arbeidstreningen har gitt meget god effekt på evnen til oppmerksomhet.” | “The vocational training has given a very good effect on the ability to pay attention.” |
“Deltaker [deltakernummer] hadde en veldig fin utvikling i prosjektet. Hun hadde også i utgangspunktet ok ressurser, men har gjennom prosjektet bygget selvtillit og tro på seg selv” | “Participant […] made very nice progress in the project. She had good resources to begin with but has built her self-confidence and belief in herself through the project.” |
“På tross av mange avbrutte praksissteder i gjennom prosjektet, så har deltaker tro på at hin skal kunne mestre noen oppgaver i ordinær jobb (dog i redusert stillingsprosent)” | “Despite many interrupted internships during the project, the participant has a belief that she will be able to manage some tasks in competitive employment (albeit in a reduced work-time percentage)” |
“Arbeidstreningen har gitt meget god effekt på evnen til oppmerksomhet, samspill og det sosiale aspektet. Deltager er mye mindre følsom for ytre hendelser (som kan ta bort oppmerksomhet fra arbeidsoppgavene), og han er mye mer komfortabel i samspill med andre mennesker. Deltageren selv opplever økt mestring og beskriver seg selv som mye mer sosial og utadvendt enn tidligere.” | “The vocational training has had a very good effect on the ability to pay attention, interaction and the social aspect. The participant is much less sensitive to external events (which can take attention away from the tasks at work), experiences increased capability and is much more comfortable in interactions with other people.” |
“Etter hvert har _ tilkjennegitt noe mer optimisme, og tro på at han har mulighet til å skape seg en bedre fremtid via bl.a. arbeid og en identitet som «verdifull samfunnsborger.” | “Gradually, [he] has expressed some more optimism, and belief that he has the possibility to create a better future through work and an identity as a “valuable citizen” among other things.” |
“… de sier også at han har utviklet seg mye i tiden i prosjektet. Han er mye gladere og mer fornøyd enn de har sett ham tidligere. Han viser større mestring og selvtillit enn tidligere.” | “…they also say that he has developed a lot during the time in the project. He is much happier and more content than they have seen him before. He shows greater capability and self-confidence than before.” |
“Prosjektet gav han anledning til å komme inn i en ordinær jobb. Gjennom å erfare at han mestret arbeidslivet, gav dette han selvtillit.” | “The project gave him the opportunity to enter competitive employment. Through experiencing that he could cope with working life, it gave him self-confidence.” |
“Han beskriver at det er det å gjøre og erfare at han mestrer som har gitt han troen på at han kan. Jeg vil si at det å få eksponere seg, og utfordre flytsonen, og erfare at man overlever, har vært den største suksessfaktoren.” | “He describes that doing and experiencing that he is capable has given him confidence in his ability. …exposing himself, stepping out of his comfort zone and experiencing that he survived doing so, has been the largest success factor.” |
“Hun får tilbakemeldinger/bekreftelser fra andre. Hun opplever seg verdsatt som den hun er, og hun beskrev at hun opplevde at hun kunne på til noe, og lære nye ting. Dette gjorde noe med hennes verdighet, og generelt sitt syn på seg selv, beskriver hun.” | “She receives feedback/acknowledgement from other people. She described an experience of achievement, learning new things and being valued. This influenced her dignity and perception of herself.” |
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Schjøtt-Pedersen, O., Bull, H.C., Falkum, E. et al. Exploring the Benefits of Vocational Activity for People with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder in Norway. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Ment. Health (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-024-00389-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-024-00389-0