Highlights
-
Synthesis of high-entropy perovskite oxide for air electrode in reversible proton ceramic electrochemical cells.
-
Triple-conducting high-entropy air electrodes exhibit excellent structural stability and oxygen catalytic activity.
-
The peak power density and current density of the cell with high-entropy air electrode in the fuel cell and electrolysis modes are 1.21 W cm−2 and − 1.95 A cm−2 at 600 °C, respectively.
Abstract
Reversible proton ceramic electrochemical cell (R-PCEC) is regarded as the most promising energy conversion device, which can realize efficient mutual conversion of electrical and chemical energy and to solve the problem of large-scale energy storage. However, the development of robust electrodes with high catalytic activity is the main bottleneck for the commercialization of R-PCECs. Here, a novel type of high-entropy perovskite oxide consisting of six equimolar metals in the A-site, Pr1/6La1/6Nd1/6Ba1/6Sr1/6Ca1/6CoO3−δ (PLNBSCC), is reported as a high-performance bifunctional air electrode for R-PCEC. By harnessing the unique functionalities of multiple elements, high-entropy perovskite oxide can be anticipated to accelerate reaction rates in both fuel cell and electrolysis modes. Especially, an R-PCEC utilizing the PLNBSCC air electrode achieves exceptional electrochemical performances, demonstrating a peak power density of 1.21 W cm−2 for the fuel cell, while simultaneously obtaining an astonishing current density of − 1.95 A cm−2 at an electrolysis voltage of 1.3 V and a temperature of 600 °C. The significantly enhanced electrochemical performance and durability of the PLNBSCC air electrode is attributed mainly to the high electrons/ions conductivity, fast hydration reactivity and high configurational entropy. This research explores to a new avenue to develop optimally active and stable air electrodes for R-PCECs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
With the continuous exploitation and use of fossil fuels, the problems of energy crisis and environmental degradation are becoming more serious. Renewable energy sources (such as solar, wind and tidal energy) are gradually replacing traditional thermal power supply for electricity generation while alleviating environmental pollution, but these renewable energy faces the mismatch of the supply and demand structure and the difficulty of regional energy dispatch. Consequently, the development of clean, efficient and portable energy conversion devices is highly desirable but currently remains a technological challenge [1]. Compared with traditional solid oxide cells (SOCs) which rely mainly on oxygen-ion conduction, reversible proton ceramic electrochemical cells (R-PCECs) relying on proton conduction have attracted extensive attention due to their low energy consumption and efficient energy conversion [2, 3]. Because proton conduction requires a lower energy barrier, R-PCECs could facilitate the shift in operating temperature from high to intermediate temperatures (500–700 °C), giving rise to improve the durability and mutual matching of various devices of the cells and reduce the cost of raw materials [4,5,6]. However, one of the technical difficulties for R-PCECs is the insufficient electrocatalytic activity of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) from air electrodes. Therefore, it is of special significance to develop high-performance bifunctional air electrodes with high electrochemical activity and stability for R-PCECs [7].
Although many mixed ionic (O2−) and electronic (e−) conducting (MIEC) materials, such as SrCo0.9Nb0.1O3−δ (SCN) [8, 9], Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ (BSCF) [7, 10] and La0.4Sr0.6Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ (LSCF) [11, 12], can be candidates for SOC air electrodes, they are demonstrated to be unsuitable as air electrodes for R-PCECs due to weak proton conductivity and poor tolerance to high concentration of steam [13, 14]. Triple-conducting (e−/O2−/H+) oxides (TCO) are the main focus of recent developments in air electrodes for R-PCECs that allow fast transport of electrons, oxygen ions and protons [15, 16]. TCO as air electrodes can extend the active sites from the three-phase boundary (TPB) of the MIEC electrodes to the entire surface, showing great potential for the application of R-PCECs. For example, BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ (BCFZY) was reported as a promising TCO air electrode material with excellent electrochemical performance and durability [17, 18]. PrNi0.5Co0.5O3−δ (PNC) possesses good hydration ability and exhibits commendable electrochemical performance for PCECs in electrolysis mode [19]. Besides the single-phase TCO, nanocomposites prepared by physical composite, impregnation and self-assembly were also designed as promising TCO air electrodes for R-PCECs [20, 21]. Nevertheless, these TCO suffer from the problems of high thermal expansion coefficient, insufficient electrical conductivity and low bifunctionality for both ORR and OER, hence still requiring more advanced air electrodes for R-PCECs [3, 22].
Recently, a new family of metal oxide, high-entropy oxides (HEOs), is attracting growing interest, which offers broad possibilities for adjusting the material functionalities, including electrocatalysis, ionic storage and superconductor [23,24,25]. Owing to the perovskite crystal structure, the cocktail effect, as well as the synergistic interaction of different ions, high-entropy perovskite oxides (HEPOs) can display some unique structures and catalytic properties and have been successfully used in the application of air electrodes for SOCs [26, 27]. For instance, high- or medium-entropy perovskite oxides La0.7Sr0.3(Co0.2Cr0.2Fe0.2Mn0.2Ni0.2)O3−δ and Sr(FeαTiβCoγMnζ)O3−δ have been employed as favorable oxygen electrodes [28, 29]. Unfortunately, the increase of B-site configuration entropy can effectively improve the structural stability of electrode materials, but inevitably sacrifices the electrocatalytic activity of SOC cathodes. To address this issue, some A-site configuration HEPOs, such (La0.2Pr0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2Gd0.2)2CuO4 and La0.2Pr0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2Sr0.2MnO3−δ, were also designed and reported to significantly improve the oxygen-ion conductivity and overall electrochemical activity of air electrodes [30, 31]. Compared with common perovskites, the introduction of more metal cations into the specific lattice of perovskites provides abundant possibilities for better design and tailoring of catalysts. This facilitates the excellent activity of the electrode catalyst in various catalytic reaction processes (ORR and OER). Meanwhile, the uniform distribution of various cations further enhances the entropy-dominated stabilization effect in the perovskite oxide, which will improve the tolerance of the catalyst under complex operating conditions. Therefore, under this premises, combining the concept of high entropy with perovskite oxides to form HEPOs opens new opportunities for designing high-performance bifunctional air electrodes for R-PCECs.
Inspired by aforementioned considerations, here we demonstrate for the first time a high-entropy perovskite oxide, Pr1/6La1/6Nd1/6Ba1/6Sr1/6Ca1/6CoO3−δ (PLNBSCC) derived from the PrBaCo2O5−+δ (PBC) prototype, as a highly ORR and OER active and stable air electrodes for R-PCECs. Due to the unique properties of rare earth and alkaline earth oxides with good ionic and electronic conductivity and promoting hydration reaction, under the synergistic strengthening of the abundant trivalent rare earth elements and divalent alkaline earth metal elements at the A-site, the triple conductivity and hydration ability of PLNBSCC are significantly improved. When the PLNBSCC air electrode was applied to a single cell supported by a Ni-BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3−δ (BZCYYb) fuel electrode, promising stability and exceptional performances have been demonstrated in both modes at 600 °C, with peak power density of 1.21 W cm−2 in fuel cell operation and current density of − 1.95 A cm−2 under the electrolysis operation (1.3 V), while retaining robust operation at high steam concentrations and thermal cycling tolerance. Our findings provide a new framework for developing advanced R-PCEC electrodes via designing high-entropy structures.
2 Experimental Section
2.1 Materials Synthesis and Cell Fabrication
The high-entropy perovskite oxide PLNBSCC was synthesized via the sol–gel method. Pr(NO3)3·6H2O, La(NO3)3·6H2O, Nd(NO3)3·6H2O, Ba(NO3)2, Sr(NO3)2 Ca(NO3)2·6H2O and Co(NO3)2·6H2O were initially dissolved in deionized water. Then, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and citric acid (CA) as complexing agents were employed with a 2:1:1 mol ratio for citric acid/total metal ions/EDTA. The pH value of the solution adjusted to ~ 7 by adding NH3 aqueous solution. The solution was stirred and heated at 90 °C until it became a transparent gel. The gel-like intermediate product was heated at 200 °C for 10 h to obtain the precursor, which was placed in a chamber furnace and calcined at 1000 °C for 5 h to obtain the electrode powder. Other electrodes and electrolyte powders were prepared by the same method. Anode powders consisting of BZCYYb, NiO and starch with a 3.5:6.5:1 mass ratio were prepared by ball milling (pulverisette 6, FRITSCH) and dried. Then, the half-cells with the configuration of Ni-BZCYYb/BZCYYb anode supported were fabricated by co-pressing and high-temperature sintering at 1450 °C for 5 h. Furthermore, Gd0.2Ce0.8O1.9 (GDC) and BZCYYb electrolyte disks were prepared by dry pressing and sintering at 1350 and 1400 °C for 10 h, respectively. The spin-coating method to fabricate half-cells is described as follows. The same anode powder (0.35 g) as described above was dry-pressed (10 MPa) into a disk shape and calcined at 1000 °C in still air for 2 h to obtain a pretreated anode support layer. Electrolyte slurry was prepared by ball milling of BZCYYb, ethyl cellulose, ethanol and ethylene glycol according to the ratio of 1 g:0.1 g:10 mL:2 mL for 1 h. Subsequently, the anode support layer was fixed on the spin coater, the electrolyte slurry was covered with the anode support layer, and spin coating was performed at 8000 rpm for 30 s, which was repeated three times, and the obtained half-cell was sintered at 1450 °C for 5 h.
The electrode powder, isopropanol, ethylene glycol and glycerol were added to the ball mill tank according to the ratio (1 g:10 mL:2 mL:1 mL) and ball milled at 400 rpm for 30 min to obtain cathode slurry. Subsequently, the slurry was sprayed on the electrolyte side of the half-cell and both sides of the electrolyte disk, respectively, and sintered at 1000 °C for 2 h to obtain single cells (Ni-BZCYYb/BZCYYb/electrode) and symmetrical cells (electrode/BZCYYb/electrode). It was important to note that the effective area of the air electrode was limited to 0.25 cm−2 in a single cell. A sliver pastes and mesh-like sliver were also painted onto the surface of electrode for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) test and area specific resistance (ASR) stability test, respectively. To evaluate the oxygen-ion and electronic conductivities of PLNBSCC and PBC electrodes, PLNBSCC and PBC powders were pressed into pellets and disks, respectively, and calcined at 1190 and 1200 °C for 10 h, respectively. Dense rods and pellets (polished to a thickness of 0.6 mm) were used for electrical conductivity testing and oxygen permeability testing, respectively.
2.2 Electrochemical Testing
In PCFC mode, the air electrode side was exposed to flow air (100 mL min−1), and the anode side was fed with dry hydrogen gas at flow rate of 80 mL min−1. In PCEC mode, steam was mixed into the air at different flow rates by a high-pressure constant flow pump, and the total gas flow rate for the air electrode was 100 mL min−1. In addition, the rate of hydrogen production by electrolysis was tested using hydrogen as reduction anode, followed by argon (60 mL min−1) as the carrier gas. Meanwhile, hydrogen production was estimated using gas chromatograph (GC-9860-5CNJ) with in situ thermal conductivity detector (TCD). The I–V and power density curves of cells were captured by fuel cell test workstation (Keithley 2420) based on a four-probe configuration. The conductivities of the different electrodes were measured under dry or humid air conditions at a flow rate of 100 mL min−1 by a four-probe direct current method using a Keithley 2420. EIS measurements of single cells and symmetric cells were performed using an electrochemical workstation (Solartron 1287 + 1260A). Among them, the EIS of the fuel cell and electrolysis modes were performed at the open circuit voltage (OCV) and the nominal voltage of 1.3 V, respectively.
2.3 Basic Characterizations
Ambient X-ray diffraction (XRD) of powders was acquired by Bruker D8 Advance, and in situ high-temperature XRD were performed for sample structure characterization by high-temperature accessories (Rigaku D/max 2500 V). Surface and cross-sectional topography of powders and cells were obtained by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JEOL-S4800). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images, high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images along with the corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) elemental mapping were carried out with a FEI talos F200× G2 and super-x instrument. The surface element states were probed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) at room temperature (Thermo ESCALAB 250). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, Model STA 449 F3, NETZSCH) was used to detect changes in the mass of the sample over time and temperature. The in situ infrared (IR) spectra of the perovskite oxides were taken on an IR spectrometer (IS50 FTIR) and an in situ diffuse reflectance test cell containing an MCT detector in wet air atmosphere with a temperature rate of 5 °C min−1.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Analysis of Composition and Structure
The PLNBSCC and PBC perovskite oxides were synthesized by a facile sol–gel method and the microscopic morphologies were initially observed by SEM (Fig. S1). The PLNBSCC oxide was confirmed its crystallization as a single-phase cubic perovskite structure by XRD measurements (Fig. S2). In addition, XRD refinement data further revealed that PLNBSCC is a space group of Pm-3m with lattice parameters of a = b = c = 3.8301(3) Å (Fig. 1a, Rp = 3.51%, Rwp = 4.55%, χ2 = 1.79). Meanwhile, the parent oxide PBC was shown a typical layered perovskite structure, space group P4/mmm, with a = b = 3.9103(6) Å, and c = 7.6557(6) Å after Rietveld refinement (Fig. S3, Table S1) [32, 33]. Here, the transformation of the crystal structure from layered perovskite to cubic perovskite is realized by increasing the number of A-site cation species of PBC, which is based on the entropy stabilization effect generated by the increase in the configurational entropy of the perovskite oxide system. The configurational entropy of the oxide system can be calculated by Eq. (1) [34, 35].
where A, B and M represent the number of element species at the A-site cation, B-site cation and anion sites, respectively, xa, xb and xj represent the mole fraction of the corresponding elements, and R is the gas constant [25]. Therefore, when the atomic fractions of all elements are equal, the doping number versus configurational entropy of A-site cations is shown in Fig. 1b (the influence of possible oxygen vacancies and electron holes is not taken into consideration). Obviously, the A-site configuration entropy of PLNBSCC is 1.79R, while the configurational entropy of PBC oxide as a simple double perovskite is 0, since the Pr and Ba positions can be clearly divided. Therefore, PLNBSCC and PBC are regarded as high-entropy and low-entropy perovskite oxides, respectively [36]. It is noteworthy that the increase of configuration entropy enables the stable formation of cubic structure of PLNBSCC oxide material at lower temperatures (Fig. S4). PBC oxide exhibited characteristic peaks of BaCoO3 and PrCoO3 at 700 and 800 °C, and poor crystallinity compared to PLNBSCC at 900 and 1000 °C, which indicates that the enhancement of configurational entropy can drive the structural stability [35]. Furthermore, to probe the distribution of elements in PLNBSCC, the homogeneity of Pr, La, Nd, Ba, Sr, Ca, Co and O elements was revealed by HAADF-STEM image and EDX elemental mapping (Fig. 1c). Moreover, the EDX spectrum shown in Fig. 1d indicates that the atomic ratio of each element is close to the theoretical stoichiometric ratio. The cubic configuration of the high-entropy perovskite oxide PLNBSCC was then investigated by HRTEM. The lattice spacing shown in Fig. 1e is 2.701 Å, which corresponds to the (110) lattice plane of PLNBSCC oxide.
3.2 Electrochemical Performance of Symmetrical Cells
The remarkable kinetic rate of oxygen reduction reaction at the air electrode is the guarantee for R-PCECs to obtain high electrochemical performance in fuel cell mode. EIS of symmetric cells supported by Gd0.2Ce0.8O1.9 (GDC) electrolyte were firstly tested, which was stripped the effect of the proton conduction of the electrode on the ORR activity [4, 37]. Figure 2a shows EIS curves of symmetric cells with PLNBSCC electrode tested at 700, 650, 600, 550 and 500 °C, with polarization resistances (Rp) of 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.12 and 0.33 Ω cm2, respectively. However, the Rp of the PBC air electrode were significantly higher than that of the PLNBSCC under the same conditions (Fig. S5). The XRD patterns indicated that no obvious phase reaction was found after calcination of the air electrode and the electrolyte in equal mass, ensuring that the experimental results are valid (Fig. S6). Moreover, it is well known that there are many factors affecting the ORR kinetics on the surface of air electrode and the reaction process is intricate. Distribution of relaxation time (DRT) is an efficient tool to deconvolute EIS spectrum to better explore the rate-determining step of the electrochemical reaction at the air electrode [38,39,40]. Figure 2b shows the DRT fitting curves of the EIS data obtained for PLNBSCC and PBC electrodes in air at 600 °C. DRT plots can generally be divided into high-frequency (HF) region, intermediate-frequency (IF) region and low-frequency (LF) region according to the frequency range and represent the electron and ion migration of electrodes, surface ion exchange and gas diffusion, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2b, the areas of HF peak P1 and IF peak P2 of PLNBSCC air electrode are lower than those of PBC electrode, indicating that the high-entropy PLNBSCC oxide has faster charge transfer and the bulk diffusion of oxygen is also greatly improved [41]. Moreover, at the same temperature, the Rp values of PLNBSCC are substantially lower than the reported air electrode materials, including La0.2Pr0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2Ba0.1Sr0.1Co0.2Fe0.6Ni0.1Cu0.1O3−δ (LPNSBSCFNC), (La0.2Pr0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2Gd0.2)2CuO4 (LPNSGC), SrFe0.25Ti0.25Co0.25Mn0.25O3−δ (SFTCM), Ba(Co0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1)0.975O3−δ (BCFZY0.925), Ba2Bi0.1Sc0.2Co1.7O6-δ (BBSC), PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co2O5+δ (PBSC) and PBC-GDC electrodes (Fig. 2c) [4, 10, 30, 31, 42,43,44,45]. Meanwhile, the lowest activation energy exhibited by the PLNBSCC air electrode also confirms that the ORR activity is less temperature-dependent, suggesting that the R-PCECs with PLNBSCC electrode has the potential to be applied at lower temperatures.
The hydration reaction of the air electrode is an important reaction process that determines the proton introduction ability and the mass transfer on the electrode surface [18, 46]. The EIS of BZCYYb electrolyte-supported symmetric cells with different air electrodes tested in argon atmosphere with 5 vol% water pressure (H2O-Ar) was used to investigate their hydration reactivity. EIS curves of PLNBSCC and PBC electrodes are shown in Fig. S7a–b, the Rp of PLNBSCC and PBC are 4.7 and 7.5 Ω cm2 at 600 °C, respectively.
The lower Rp and activation energy indicates that high-entropy PLNBSCC oxide has better hydration capacity compared with PBC oxide (Fig. S8). In addition, the EIS of PLNBSCC and PBC was also measured under dry air and shown in Fig. S9a. Meanwhile, (Pr1/3La1/3Nd1/3)0.5Ba0.5CoO3−δ (PLNBC) and Pr0.5(Ba1/3Sr1/3Ca1/3)0.5CoO3−δ (PBSCC) were also successfully synthesized (Figs. S10 and S11), and the respective EIS was obtained under the same conditions (Fig. S9c, d). In contrast, the lowest Rp of the PLNBSCC electrode were confirmed excellent ORR activity on proton conducting symmetric cell (Fig. S12).
To investigate the electrochemical activity of the air electrode catalysts under practical operating conditions, the EIS curves of PLNBSCC, PLNBC, PBSCC and PBC air electrodes at 5% H2O–air were obtained at 700–500 °C (Figs. 2d and S13a–c). As shown in Fig. 2d, the Rp of the high-entropy PLNBSCC air electrode are 0.07, 0.16, 0.35, 0.81 and 2.09 Ω cm2 at 700, 650, 600, 550, and 500 °C, respectively. Compared with dry air conditions, the introduction of water vapor greatly reduces Rp, because the hydration reaction accelerates the surface ion exchange and bulk proton conductivity [47]. Nevertheless, the PLNBSCC air electrode still has the lowest Rp values compared to the PLNBC, PBSCC and PBC air electrodes, and their EIS curves are also compared at 550 °C in Fig. 2e. The deconvolution peaks fitted by DRT can be clearly observed that the areas of the intermediate-frequency peak P1 and the low-frequency peak P2 of the PLNBSCC electrode are lower than those of the other electrodes (Fig. 2f). This indicates that the excellent ORR activity of the high-entropy PLNBSCC electrode is due to the fast reaction kinetics, which are closely related to the fast electron and ion conduction and the hydration reaction. The Arrhenius plots in Fig. 2g indicate that the high-entropy PLNBSCC electrode has a lower activation energy, which implies its feasibility for low-temperature applications (Table S2) [15, 48]. In addition, in order to reveal the optimization effect on the overall structure–activity of PBC with the gradual introduction of each element, (Pr1/3Ba1/3Ca1/3)2Co2O5+δ (PBCC), Pr1/4La1/4Ba1/4Ca1/4CoO3−δ (PLBCC) and Pr1/5La1/5Ba1/5Sr1/5Ca1/5CoO3−δ (PLBSCC) electrodes were synthesized, and the ASRs of their symmetric cells were obtained under 5% H2O–air condition. The results show that with the sequential addition of Ca, La, Sr and Nd, the configurational entropy of the electrode gradually increases, which is accompanied by the stabilization of the structure and the enhancement of the activity (Fig. S14 and Table S3). Furthermore, the stability test of the symmetric cell with PLNBSCC as the air electrode at 600 °C with 5% H2O–air has a lower decay rate than the layered perovskite PBC electrode (Fig. S15). At the same time, the high-temperature in situ XRD patterns and room-temperature XRD patterns shown in Figs. S16 and S17 indicate good structural stability and phase compatibility with electrolyte, respectively [49].
3.3 Conductivity and Hydration Reaction
The underlying reasons for the significantly enhanced ORR activity of the high-entropy air electrode PLNBSCC compared with PBC were further explored. Oxygen vacancies (Ov) content as an index to measure the activity and rate of electrochemical reaction is because the surface electrochemical reaction and bulk ion transport of air electrode depend on Ov. The oxygen non-stoichiometries of PLNBSCC and PBC oxides were determined by iodometric titration method to be 0.252 and 0.323, respectively [43]. Since the PLNBSCC is a single perovskite structure, the PLNBSCC oxide have more oxygen vacancy content under the same mass condition. Furthermore, probing the state of oxygen on the surface of the air electrodes helps to reveal the evolution of its electrochemical reaction [50, 51]. Figure 3a shows XPS spectra of the O 1s of PLNBSCC and PBC samples at room temperature. The surface adsorbed oxygen (Oadsorb) and lattice oxygen (Olattice) accounted for 79.4% and 20.6% of the PLNBSCC sample, respectively. The deconvolution peak area ratio of Oadsorb to Olattice of PLNBSCC (3.85) is much higher than that of PBC (3.22) [52]. Moreover, the loss of oxygen at high temperature was also characterized by TGA (Fig. S18). However, PLNBSCC oxide exhibited slightly higher mass loss than PBC. Overall, the high-entropy PLNBSCC air electrode has abundant oxygen vacancies to ensure the rapid progress of the electrochemical reaction. Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that the enhanced electrochemical activity of the high-entropy PLNBSCC oxide is partly due to the modification of its surface oxygen species and abundant oxygen vacancy content [53, 54].
In addition, the oxygen-ion (O2−) conductivities of PLNBSCC and PBC were also obtained through an oxygen permeable membrane with a thickness of ~ 0.7 mm at 500–800 °C. The oxygen permeability of PLNBSCC in the tested temperature range is higher than that of layered perovskite oxide PBC (Fig. S19), indicating its higher O2− conductivity (Fig. 3b). For example, at 750 °C, the O2− conductivity is 0.064 S cm−1 for PLNBSCC electrode, while the O2− conductivity is 0.026 S cm−1 for PBC electrode, respectively. Compared with the ionic conductivity, the electronic conductivity of perovskite oxides dominates the total conductivity and plays a crucial role in the ORR and OER processes of air electrodes. The conductivities of PLNBSCC and PBC oxides in dry and humid air atmospheres obtained by 4-probe DC conductivity method are revealed in Fig. 3c. In the temperature range of 500–800 °C, the conductivity of high-entropy PLNBSCC oxide increases from 950 to 2038 S cm−1 in dry air, while that of PBC increases from 650 to 1330 S cm−1. Therefore, the conductivity of PLNBSCC completely outperforms than that of PBC. Furthermore, the conductivity of the PLNBSCC air electrode shows outstanding advantages compared to the best-known advanced air electrodes, e.g., in the temperature range of 750–300 °C, the conductivities of perovskite oxides BCFZY, BSCF, LSCF and PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co1.5Fe0.5O5+δ (PBSCF) are 0.4–2, 18–21, 260–302 and 303–726 S cm−1, respectively (Fig. 3d) [55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. Therefore, such excellent high conductivity of PLNBSCC provides a guarantee for commercialization. Importantly, the conductivity of PLNBSCC oxide in wet air condition is lower than that measured in air below 675 °C. On the contrary, there was no significant change in PBC oxide. This is because in humid atmosphere, the PLNBSCC oxides introduce proton conductivity through hydrogenation reaction, resulting in some electron holes being occupied (Eq. 2) [51, 64].
where the \({\text{O}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \times }\), h· and \({\text{OH}}_{{\text{O}}}^{ \cdot }\) represent lattice oxygen, electron holes and hydroxide formed by the attachment of protons to lattice oxygen, respectively. Thus, the high-entropy oxide PLNBSCC can again be confirmed as a triple conductor with electrons, oxygen ions and protons. In addition, the hydration reaction uses oxygen vacancies as reaction sites to dissociate water and form hydroxides based on lattice oxygen, thus providing a prerequisite for proton conduction. To characterize the hydration ability of PLNBSCC and PBC oxides, the high-temperature in situ IR spectra were measured as shown in Fig. 3e [7, 65]. No obvious hydroxyl peaks were found in PLNBSCC and PBC oxides in dry air at 400 °C (3000–3600 cm−1), and then treated in 5% H2O–air atmosphere for 2 h, PLNBSCC oxide had more obvious hydroxyl characteristic peak compared with PBC oxide, indicating that PLNBSCC has excellent hydration reactivity [39]. Therefore, the excellent electrochemical activity and reaction kinetic rate of the high-entropy PLNBSCC electrode is attributed to the excellent electrons/ions conductivity and hydration reactivity.
3.4 Performance and Stability of R-PCECs
The excellent electrochemical activity and entropy-driven stabilization of the high-entropy PLNBSCC air electrode was further confirmed by R-PCEC. SEM micrograph of the section of an as-prepared single cell with a porous support layer Ni-BZCYYb as fuel electrode, dense BZCYYb electrolyte with a thickness of 19 µm and PLNBSCC air electrode is shown in Fig. S20. Figure 4a demonstrates the typical I–V and power density curves of a single cell using PLNBSCC air electrode with extraordinary peak power densities (PPDs) of 1.09, 0.81 and 0.57 W cm−2 at 600, 550 and 500 °C in fuel cell operation, respectively. Furthermore, the PPDs of the single cell with double perovskite oxide PBC as air electrode were also obtained as shown in Fig. S21a. At the same time, R-PCECs with the well-recognized BCFZY and BSCF air electrodes were also tested under the same conditions (Fig. S21b–c). Figure 4b depicts the comparison of PPDs obtained with PLNBSCC, PBC, BCFZY and BSCF electrodes. The PPDs of 0.66, 0.72 and 0.59 W cm−2 were obtained for PBC, BCFZY and BSCF electrodes at 600 °C, and compared with these electrodes, the PPD of PLNBSCC electrode is increased by 65%, 51% and 85%, respectively. The remarkable improvement of the electrochemical performance of the single cell with PLNBSCC air electrode is inseparable from the contribution of excellent ORR activity and high conductivity. Figure 4c exhibits the voltage characteristics of the single cell with PLNBSCC air electrode at different current densities (0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 A cm−2) for fuel cell operation. Notably, the single cell still maintained stable voltage feedback without significant degradation in the endurance test up to 500 h, this suggests that the increase in entropy drives the stability of the electrode [66]. Furthermore, the porous PLNBSCC electrode provided good gas diffusion and maintained close contact with the electrolyte layer, which ensured stable operation of the single cell (Fig. S22) [42].
The typical I–V curves of R-PCEC with PLNBSCC air electrode were obtained under 10% H2O–air to further evaluate the OER activity and electrolysis performance of the electrode. As shown in Fig. 4d, at 600, 550 and 500 °C, the current densities of electrolysis corresponding to a voltage of 1.3 V were − 1.53, − 1.21 and − 0.84 A cm−2, respectively. To its credit, the electrolysis performance achieved by the PLNBSCC electrode is one of the highest measurements of R-PCEC reported so far. As the water pressure increased to 30%, the current density obtained by the cell in electrolysis mode increased to − 1.73 A cm−2, indicating the excellent hydration and water adsorption capacity of the PLNBSCC electrode (Fig. S23). Meanwhile, the current densities obtained for the PBC electrode were − 1.09, − 0.80 and − 0.53 A cm−2 (1.3 V) at 600, 550 and 500 °C, respectively (Fig. S24a). The I–V curves of BCFZY and BSCF air electrodes in electrolysis mode were also measured at 500–600 °C (Fig. S24b, c). The current densities of single cell with PLNBSCC electrode were higher than those of the cells with PBC, BCFZY and BSCF as air electrodes (e.g., 40%, 33% and 101% at 600 °C, respectively) (Fig. S24d). However, the stability of the reversible operation of R-PCECs in both electrolysis and fuel cell modes is an important indicator to measure the feasibility of in practical operation [67, 68]. As shown in Fig. 4e, the cell was first run in fuel cell mode for 20 min (0.2 A cm−2), and subsequently switched to hydrogen production mode for consistent run time under 10% H2O–air (− 0.8 A cm−2). After 500 min of continuous operation, a fast dynamic response per cycle of 10 min was performed. The single cell with PLNBSCC air electrode maintained stable operation without obvious decay during the 1120-min cycle test. On the other hand, the single cell with PLNBSCC electrode also maintained a relatively stable performance output under different voltage cycling tests (Fig. S25).
The degradation of the electrocatalysis activity of the air electrode with the prolonged fluctuation of the test temperature is still a drawback faced by most electrodes. As shown in Fig. 4f, during 5 cycles from 500 to 600 °C, the single cell was operated at a consistent current density of − 0.8 A cm−2, and the corresponding feedback voltage values remain stable at different temperatures, indicating the good thermal matching and compatibility between the PLNBSCC electrode and the electrolyte (Fig. S26). The excellent electrolytic activity of the high-entropy air electrode PLNBSCC was further demonstrated by testing its hydrogen production rate and Faradaic efficiency (FE) under different current densities at 600 °C and 30% H2O–air. The hydrogen production rates were 3.83, 5.04, 6.58, 7.47 and 8.23 mL cm−2 min−1 at current densities of − 0.6, − 0.8, − 1.0, − 1.2 and − 1.4 A cm−2, respectively, and corresponding FE reached more than 80% (Fig. 4g) [3, 19, 69]. Besides, the long-term (200 h) stability test of a single cell under electrolysis operation was performed to verify the durability of the high-entropy PLNBSCC air electrode, as shown in Fig. 4h, and the smooth voltage feedback indicates the excellent electrochemical stability of PLNBSCC electrode. At the same time, it also performed well within 200 h in the tolerance test at different water pressures (30% and 10%) (Fig. 4i). In addition, the high-entropy PLNBSCC air electrode was treated at 550 °C for 24 h in a 30% H2O–air atmosphere and still maintained good structural stability, and no extra impurity peaks were found (Fig. S27).
3.5 Optimization of Single-Cell Structure
The electrochemical performance of R-PCECs is limited mainly due to the large Rp caused by the slow kinetic rates of ORR and OER at the air electrodes combined with the ohmic resistance (Ro) dominated by the electrolyte. The designed high-entropy PLNBSCC air electrode has been demonstrated to exhibit excellent ORR and OER activity. Here, a thinner electrolyte layer was prepared by spin coating, which further improved the electrochemical performance, optimized the cell structure, and reduced Ro [70, 71]. Figure 5a depicts the I–V and power density curves of the single cell using PLNBSCC air electrode and spin-coated electrolyte layer, the peak power densities of the single cell in fuel cell mode were 1.21, 0.96 and 0.66 W cm−2 at 600, 550 and 500 °C, respectively. In addition, the current densities measured in the electrolysis mode were − 1.95, − 1.47 and − 1.11 A cm−2 (1.3 V), respectively (Fig. 5b). Compared with the single cell prepared by the dry pressing method, the electrochemical performance is significantly improved. For example, the electrolytic performance is improved by 27.5% at 600 °C. Figure 5c exhibits the cross-sectional SEM morphology of the single cell prepared by the spin-coating method after testing [72]. The dense electrolyte layer with a thickness of about 6.5 μm was in close contact with the air and fuel electrodes [73, 74]. Meanwhile, the EIS curves of R-PCECs for fuel cell operation (open circuit voltage condition) and electrolysis operation (1.3 V) are shown in Fig. 5d. The Ro values were 0.12, 0.13 and 0.14 Ω cm2 for fuel cell mode at 600, 550 and 500 °C, respectively, while the Rp values were 0.17, 0.27 and 0.46 Ω cm2. The extremely low Rp and Ro are attributed to the excellent electrochemical activity of the high-entropy PLNBSCC and the thinner electrolyte layer, respectively. Therefore, compared with the advanced air electrodes reported so far, such as PrBa0.8Ca0.2Co2O5+δ-BaCoO3−δ (PBCC-BCO), La0.8Sr0.2Co0.7Ni0.3O3−δ (LSCN8273), (La0.6Sr0.4)0.95Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ-Pr1−xBaxCoO3−δ (LSCF-PBC), Sr0.9Ce0.1Fe0.8Ni0.2O3−δ (SCFN), La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ-BaCoO3−δ (LSCF-BC), (PrBa0.8Ca0.2)0.95Co2O6−δ (PBCC) and PNC electrodes [4, 19, 39, 67, 75,76,77]. PLNBSCC air electrode exhibits one of the highest electrochemical performances in R-PCECs (Fig. 5e and Table S4).
4 Conclusion
In summary, a cubic high-entropy perovskite oxide PLNBSCC was designed and successfully synthesized by performing A-site doping based on the classical PBC prototype by a facile sol–gel method, which demonstrates significantly enhanced ORR and OER activities as air electrodes for R-PCECs. The enhanced electrochemical performance is attributed to the promotion of the overall triple conductivity and hydration by various trivalent rare earth elements and divalent alkaline earth metal elements at the A-site. Not only that, the significant improvement in the structural stability of the PLNBSCC air electrode driven by the increase in effective entropy enables the single cell to perform well in long-term stability, thermal cycling tolerance, high water pressure tolerance and bifunctional cycling tests. Meanwhile, spin coating was used to prepare a thinner electrolyte layer to optimize the cell structure, enabling the high-entropy PLNBSCC oxide as a bifunctional R-PCEC air electrode to exhibit excellent electrochemical performance in the intermediate temperature range. This work not only demonstrates an outstandingly active and durable R-PCEC air electrode, but also opens a new boulevard for developing advanced high-entropy structured R-PCEC electrodes.
References
C. Duan, J. Huang, N. Sullivan, R. O’Hayre, Proton-conducting oxides for energy conversion and storage. Appl. Phys. Rev. 7(1), 011314 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5135319
W. Bian, W. Wu, B. Wang, W. Tang, M. Zhou et al., Revitalizing interface in protonic ceramic cells by acid etch. Nature 604(7906), 479–485 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04457-y
C. Duan, R. Kee, H. Zhu, N. Sullivan, L. Zhu et al., Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production. Nat. Energy 4(3), 230–240 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0333-2
Y. Niu, Y. Zhou, W. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Evans et al., Highly active and durable air electrodes for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells enabled by an efficient bifunctional catalyst. Adv. Energy Mater. 12(12), 2103783 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202103783
R. Ren, Z. Wang, C. Xu, W. Sun, J. Qiao et al., Tuning the defects of the triple conducting oxide BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ perovskite toward enhanced cathode activity of protonic ceramic fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(31), 18365–18372 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta04335g
I. Zvonareva, X.-Z. Fu, D. Medvedev, Z. Shao, Electrochemistry and energy conversion features of protonic ceramic cells with mixed ionic-electronic electrolytes. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 439–465 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee03109k
Z. Liu, D. Cheng, Y. Zhu, M. Liang, M. Yang et al., Robust bifunctional phosphorus-doped perovskite oxygen electrode for reversible proton ceramic electrochemical cells. Chem. Eng. J. 450, 137787 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.137787
K. Zhu, Y. Yang, D.M. Huan, X.Y. Hu, N. Shi et al., Theoretical and experimental investigations on K-doped SrCo0.9Nb0.1O3-δ as a promising cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Chemsuschem 14(18), 3876–3886 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202101100
Y.S. Chou, E.C. Thomsen, R.T. Williams, J.F. Choi, N.L. Canfield et al., Compliant alkali silicate sealing glass for solid oxide fuel cell applications: thermal cycle stability and chemical compatibility. J. Power Sources 196(5), 2709–2716 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.020
Z.P. Shao, S.M. Haile, A high-performance cathode for the next generation of solid-oxide fuel cells. Nature 431(7005), 170–173 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02863
H.-T. Lim, J.-H. Song, M.G. Jung, H.W. Park, The effect of fabrication conditions for GDC buffer layer on electrochemical performance of solid oxide fuel cells. Nano-Micro Lett. 5(3), 151–158 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.245
D. Oh, D. Gostovic, E.D. Wachsman, Mechanism of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ cathode degradation. J. Mater. Res. 27(15), 1992–1999 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2012.222
X. Xu, C. Su, Z. Shao, Fundamental understanding and application of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ perovskite in energy storage and conversion: past, present, and future. Energy Fuels 35(17), 13585–13609 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02111
G. Yang, C. Su, H. Shi, Y. Zhu, Y. Song et al., Toward reducing the operation temperature of solid oxide fuel cells: our past 15 years of efforts in cathode development. Energy Fuels 32(12), 15169–15194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01887
R. Ren, Z. Wang, X. Meng, X. Wang, C. Xu et al., Tailoring the oxygen vacancy to achieve fast intrinsic proton transport in a perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3(5), 4914–4922 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c00486
M. Papac, V. Stevanovic, A. Zakutayev, R. O’Hayre, Triple ionic-electronic conducting oxides for next-generation electrochemical devices. Nat. Mater. 20(3), 301–313 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00854-8
C. Duan, J. Tong, M. Shang, S. Nikodemski, M. Sanders et al., Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures. Science 349(6254), 1321–1326 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab3987
M. Liang, Y. Zhu, Y. Song, D. Guan, Z. Luo et al., A New durable surface nanoparticles-modified perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells from selective cation exsolution under oxidizing atmosphere. Adv. Mater. 34(10), 2106379 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202106379
H. Ding, W. Wu, C. Jiang, Y. Ding, W. Bian et al., Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 1970 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15677-z
Y. Song, Y. Chen, W. Wang, C. Zhou, Y. Zhong et al., Self-assembled triple-conducting nanocomposite as a superior protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode. Joule 3(11), 2842–2853 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.004
Y. Wang, K. Pei, B. Zhao, Y. Zhao, H. Wang et al., Enhanced electrochemical performance of a Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.7Fe0.2Ni0.1O3−δ–BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3−δ composite oxygen electrode for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Energy Fuels 35(17), 14101–14109 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02148
X. Li, Z. Chen, Y. Yang, D. Huan, H. Su et al., Highly stable and efficient Pt single-atom catalyst for reversible proton-conducting solid oxide cells. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 316, 121627 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121627
L. Tang, Y. Yang, H. Guo, Y. Wang, M. Wang et al., High configuration entropy activated lattice oxygen for O2 formation on perovskite electrocatalyst. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2112157 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202112157
A. Sarkar, L. Velasco, D. Wang, Q. Wang, G. Talasila et al., High entropy oxides for reversible energy storage. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 1–9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05774-5
A. Sarkar, Q. Wang, A. Schiele, M.R. Chellali, S.S. Bhattacharya et al., High-entropy oxides: fundamental aspects and electrochemical properties. Adv. Mater. 31(26), e1806236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201806236
S. Jiang, T. Hu, J. Gild, N. Zhou, J. Nie et al., A new class of high-entropy perovskite oxides. Scripta Mater. 142, 116–120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.040
S.H. Albedwawi, A. AlJaberi, G.N. Haidemenopoulos, K. Polychronopoulou, High entropy oxides-exploring a paradigm of promising catalysts: a review. Mater. Des. 202, 109534 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109534
J. Dąbrowa, A. Olszewska, A. Falkenstein, C. Schwab, M. Szymczak et al., An innovative approach to design SOFC air electrode materials: high entropy La1−xSrx(Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni)O3−δ (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3) perovskites synthesized by the sol–gel method. J. Mater. Chem. A 8(46), 24455–24468 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta06356h
L. Shen, Z. Du, Y. Zhang, X. Dong, H. Zhao, Medium-entropy perovskites(FeαTiβCoγMnζ)O3−δ as promising cathodes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 295, 120264 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120264
S. Zhao, N. Li, L. Sun, Q. Li, L. Huo et al., A novel high-entropy cathode with the A2BO4-type structure for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 895, 162548 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162548
Y. Yang, H. Bao, H. Ni, X. Ou, S. Wang et al., A novel facile strategy to suppress Sr segregation for high-entropy stabilized La0.8Sr0.2MnO3-δ cathode. J. Power Sources 482, 228959 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228959
S.N. Marshenya, B.V. Politov, A.Y. Suntsov, I.A. Leonidov, S.A. Petrova et al., Improved structural stability, electron transport and defect formation in PrBaCo2-xAlxO6–δ. J. Alloys Compd. 767, 1041–1047 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.089
L. Zhu, B. Wei, Z. Lü, J. Feng, L. Xu et al., Performance degradation of double-perovskite PrBaCo2O5+δ oxygen electrode in CO2 containing atmospheres. Appl. Surf. Sci. 416, 649–655 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.298
D.B. Miracle, O.N. Senkov, A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta Mater. 122, 448–511 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.081
C.M. Rost, E. Sachet, T. Borman, A. Moballegh, E.C. Dickey et al., Entropy-stabilized oxides. Nat. Commun. 6(1), 1–8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9485
K. Guruvidyathri, K.C. Hari Kumar, J.W. Yeh, B.S. Murty, Topologically close-packed phase formation in high entropy alloys: a review of calphad and experimental results. JOM 69(11), 2113–2124 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2566-5
E. Fabbri, L. Bi, D. Pergolesi, E. Traversa, Towards the next generation of solid oxide fuel cells operating below 600 °C with chemically stable proton-conducting electrolytes. Adv. Mater. 24(2), 195–208 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201103102
T.H. Wan, M. Saccoccio, C. Chen, F. Ciucci, Influence of the discretization methods on the distribution of relaxation times deconvolution: implementing radial basis functions with DRTtools. Electrochim. Acta 184, 483–499 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.097
Y. Song, J. Liu, Y. Wang, D. Guan, A. Seong et al., Nanocomposites: a new opportunity for developing highly active and durable bifunctional air electrodes for reversible protonic ceramic cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 11(36), 2101899 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202101899
Z. Liu, Y. Chen, G. Yang, M. Yang, R. Ji et al., One-pot derived thermodynamically quasi-stable triple conducting nanocomposite as robust bifunctional air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic cells. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 319, 121929 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121929
A.P. Tarutin, Y.G. Lyagaeva, A.I. Vylkov, M.Y. Gorshkov, G.K. Vdovin et al., Performance of Pr2(Ni, Cu)O4+δ electrodes in protonic ceramic electrochemical cells with unseparated and separated gas spaces. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 93, 157–168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.03.056
C. Duan, D. Hook, Y. Chen, J. Tong, R. O’Hayre, Zr and Y co-doped perovskite as a stable, high performance cathode for solid oxide fuel cells operating below 500 °C. Energy Environ. Sci. 10(1), 176–182 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ee01915c
X. Kuai, G. Yang, Y. Chen, H. Sun, J. Dai et al., Boosting the activity of BaCo0.4 Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ perovskite for oxygen reduction reactions at low-to-intermediate temperatures through tuning b-site cation deficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 9(38), 1902384 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201902384
Y. Chen, Y. Bu, B. Zhao, Y. Zhang, D. Ding et al., A durable, high-performance hollow-nanofiber cathode for intermediate-temperature fuel cells. Nano Energy 26, 90–99 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.001
Q. Yang, G. Wang, H. Wu, B.A. Beshiwork, D. Tian et al., A high-entropy perovskite cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 872, 159633 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159633
Y. Chen, T. Hong, P. Wang, K. Brinkman, J. Tong et al., Investigate the proton uptake process of proton/oxygen ion/hole triple conductor BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-δ by electrical conductivity relaxation. J. Power Sources 440, 227122 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227122
Y. Xu, F. Hu, Y. Guo, J. Zhang, Y. Huang et al., Probing oxygen reduction and water uptake kinetics of BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1-xZnxO3-δ cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Sep. Purif. Technol. 297, 121482 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121482
A. Seong, J. Kim, D. Jeong, S. Sengodan, M. Liu et al., Electrokinetic proton transport in triple (H+/O2−/e−) conducting oxides as a key descriptor for highly efficient protonic ceramic fuel cells. Adv. Sci. 8(11), 2004099 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202004099
J.H. Kim, K. Jang, D.-K. Lim, S. Ahn, D. Oh et al., Self-assembled nano-composite perovskites as highly efficient and robust hybrid cathodes for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 10(5), 2496–2508 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta08178k
X. Xi, J. Liu, Y. Fan, L. Wang, J. Li et al., Reducing d-p band coupling to enhance CO2 electrocatalytic activity by Mg-doping in Sr2FeMoO6-δ double perovskite for high performance solid oxide electrolysis cells. Nano Energy 82, 105707 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105707
X. Xu, H. Wang, M. Fronzi, X. Wang, L. Bi et al., Tailoring cations in a perovskite cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells with high performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(36), 20624–20632 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta05300j
F. He, Q. Gao, Z. Liu, M. Yang, R. Ran et al., A New pd doped proton conducting perovskite oxide with multiple functionalities for efficient and stable power generation from ammonia at reduced temperatures. Adv. Energy Mater. 11(19), 2003916 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202003916
X. Xu, H. Wang, J. Ma, W. Liu, X. Wang et al., Impressive performance of proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells using a first-generation cathode with tailored cations. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(32), 18792–18798 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta06676d
S. Choi, C.J. Kucharczyk, Y. Liang, X. Zhang, I. Takeuchi et al., Exceptional power density and stability at intermediate temperatures in protonic ceramic fuel cells. Nat. Energy 3(3), 202–210 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0085-9
T. Yu, X. Mao, G. Ma, A novel cobalt-free perovskite La0.6Sr0.4Fe0.9Mo0.1O3−δ cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 40(8), 13747–13751 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.050
A. Zhu, G. Zhang, T. Wan, T. Shi, H. Wang et al., Evaluation of SrSc0.175Nb0.025Co0.8O3-δ perovskite as a cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells: the possibility of in situ creating protonic conductivity and electrochemical performance. Electrochim. Acta 259, 559–565 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.037
L. Zhao, J. Shen, B. He, F. Chen, C. Xia, Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of PrBaCo2−xFexO5+δ as cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36(5), 3658–3665 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.064
X. Mao, T. Yu, G. Ma, Performance of cobalt-free double-perovskite NdBaFe2−xMnxO5+δ cathode materials for proton-conducting IT-SOFC. J. Alloys Compd. 637, 286–290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.001
Q. Nian, L. Zhao, B. He, B. Lin, R. Peng et al., Layered SmBaCuCoO5+δ and SmBaCuFeO5+δ perovskite oxides as cathode materials for proton-conducting SOFCs. J. Alloys Compd. 492(1–2), 291–294 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.073
T. Yu, X. Mao, G. Ma, Performance of cobalt-free perovskite La0.6Sr0.4Fe1−xNbxO3−δ cathode materials for proton-conducting IT-SOFC. J. Alloys Compd. 608, 30–34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.04.071
L. Jiang, T. Wei, R. Zeng, W.-X. Zhang, Y.-H. Huang, Thermal and electrochemical properties of PrBa0.5Sr0.5Co2−xFexO5+δ (x = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5) cathode materials for solid-oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources 232, 279–285 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.064
A. Mineshige, J. Izutsu, M. Nakamura, K. Nigaki, J. Abe et al., Introduction of A-site deficiency into La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3–δ and its effect on structure and conductivity. Solid State Ionics 176(11–12), 1145–1149 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2004.11.021
M. Liang, F. He, C. Zhou, Y. Chen, R. Ran et al., Nickel-doped BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-δ as a new high-performance cathode for both oxygen-ion and proton conducting fuel cells. Chem. Eng. J. 420, 127717 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127717
P. Wang, D. Xu, J. Cheng, T. Hong, Proton uptake kinetics and electromotive force in BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-δ cathode material with e−/O2−/H+ three mobile carriers for protonic ceramic fuel cells. Ionics 27(3), 1185–1192 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-021-03914-4
A. Perrichon, N. Torino, E. Jedvik Granhed, Y.-C. Lin, S.F. Parker et al., Local coordination environments and vibrational dynamics of protons in hexagonal and cubic Sc-doped BaTiO3 proton-conducting oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C 124(16), 8643–8651 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01705
D. Wu, K. Kusada, Y. Nanba, M. Koyama, T. Yamamoto et al., Noble-metal high-entropy-alloy nanoparticles: atomic-level insight into the electronic structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144(8), 3365–3369 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c13616
W. Tang, H. Ding, W. Bian, W. Wu, W. Li et al., Understanding of A-site deficiency in layered perovskites: promotion of dual reaction kinetics for water oxidation and oxygen reduction in protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 8(29), 14600–14608 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta05137c
S. Choi, T.C. Davenport, S.M. Haile, Protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for hydrogen production and electricity generation: exceptional reversibility, stability, and demonstrated faradaic efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 12(1), 206–215 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee02865f
J.-S. Shin, H. Park, K. Park, M. Saqib, M. Jo et al., Activity of layered swedenborgite structured Y0.8Er0.2BaCo3.2Ga0.8O7+δ for oxygen electrode reactions in at intermediate temperature reversible ceramic cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 9(1), 607–621 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta11000k
M. Choi, J. Paik, D. Kim, D. Woo, J. Lee et al., Exceptionally high performance of protonic ceramic fuel cells with stoichiometric electrolytes. Energy Environ. Sci. 14(12), 6476–6483 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee01497h
J.-H. Jia, Y.-J. Ke, X. Li, H.-R. Zhang, Z.-P. Yu et al., A large magnetocaloric effect of GdCoO3−δ epitaxial thin films prepared by a polymer assisted spin-coating method. J. Mater. Chem. C 7(47), 14970–14976 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tc04464g
I. Jang, S. Kim, C. Kim, H. Lee, H. Yoon et al., Interface engineering of yttrium stabilized zirconia/gadolinium doped ceria bi-layer electrolyte solid oxide fuel cell for boosting electrochemical performance. J. Power Sources 435, 226776 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226776
K.-R. Lee, C.-J. Tseng, S.-C. Jang, J.-C. Lin, K.-W. Wang et al., Fabrication of anode-supported thin BCZY electrolyte protonic fuel cells using NiO sintering aid. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44(42), 23784–23792 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.097
I. Jang, S. Kim, C. Kim, H. Yoon, T. Song, Enhancement of oxygen reduction reaction through coating a nano-web-structured La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ thin-film as a cathode/electrolyte interfacial layer for lowering the operating temperature of solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources 392, 123–128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.106
Y. Zhou, E. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. Liu, L. Zhang et al., An active and robust air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 1511–1520 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00432
N. Wang, H. Toriumi, Y. Sato, C. Tang, T. Nakamura et al., La0.8Sr0.2Co1-xNixO3-δ as the efficient triple conductor air electrode for protonic ceramic cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 4(1), 554–563 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c02447
Y. Zhou, W. Zhang, N. Kane, Z. Luo, K. Pei et al., An efficient bifunctional air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31(40), 2105386 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202105386
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (21878158 and 21706129), State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (Open Fund Project No. ZJUCEU2021001) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20221312).
Funding
Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Z., Tang, Z., Song, Y. et al. High-Entropy Perovskite Oxide: A New Opportunity for Developing Highly Active and Durable Air Electrode for Reversible Protonic Ceramic Electrochemical Cells. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00967-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00967-6