Abstract
The dynamic disasters of deep mining coal and rock mass are frequent and easy to be instable. Aiming at the deformation of coal-rock roadway under the coupled static and dynamic load, a new equipment which can simulate the actual situation dynamic environment is used to carry out the coupled static-dynamic loading test of coal-rock combination. The failure law and mechanical behavior of combination are studied. Test results show that weak structure significantly affects mechanical response of coal-rock combination. The coal part with lower strength firstly reaches the crack initiation stress. The strength of the combination is dominated by the coal part. The post-peak stage of the stress–strain curve under the coupled static and dynamic load presents a stepped reduction, which shows yield process. The dynamic load level has a significant effect on the mechanical behaviors of the combination. The elastic modulus decreases under dynamic loading. The peak stress of the combination is positively correlated with the dynamic load level in a certain range, and the peak strain was negatively correlated. The energy accumulation and dissipation are closely related to the failure of the samples. The strain energy is more concentrated in the area where the failure occurs first. The AE energy under dynamic load is developed from the traditional “four-stages” characteristic under static load to three stages. The interval release stage appears because of the appearance of intermittent disturbance load makes the AE energy of the sample change intermittently. The dynamic instability of samples accompanies a sudden increase in AE energy rate, hysteresis loop area and strain. Compared with the shear failure of single lithology sample, the failure mode of the combinations is mainly tensile, and it turns into tensile-shear failure under dynamic load. The fragmentation of samples is different under different failure modes. The fragmentation index can characterize the failure mode and crack propagation characteristics of coal-rock combination. The research provides reference for large deformation dynamic disasters of surrounding rock.
Article highlights
-
The coupled static and dynamic load test is carried out used the self-developed creep and dynamic disturbance impact loading test system.
-
The stepped stress reduction of the stress–strain curve of coal-rock combination, the precursor information of the failure and the characterization of the failure mode are obtained.
-
Mechanical response and failure analysis of deep coal-rock combination are studied by acoustic emission and DIC technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Coal resource mining develops into the deep as needed (Li et al. 2017), the coal-rock mass is usually under quasi-static and dynamic disturbance load in the production (Li et al. 2023). The dynamic disasters caused by high stress and mining-induced disturbance occur frequently with mining depth increasing, which poses a great hazard to safety production in coal mine (He et al. 2005; Pytlik et al. 2016). The failure characteristics of deep coal-rock combination are affected by the structure of surrounding rock (Zuo et al. 2017; Pan et al. 2020; Dou et al. 2014), except its own mechanical properties. The layered structure leads to the deterioration of mechanical properties of coal rock mass and the change of failure mode. The angle of bedding plane is the main factor (Tan et al. 2018; Li et al. 2021; He et al. 2020). The sidewall of the coal-rock roadway is a coal-rock combination, which is a common form of surrounding rock in roadway. Therefore, studying the mining-induced response of deep coal-rock combination is of great significance to promote the safe and efficient mining of coal mine.
Lots of scholars have made many useful explorations in the failure characteristics of coal-rock combinations the single static or dynamic loading test. A critical distance theory for predicting rock failure strength under dynamic loading was proposed (Pelekisa and Susmel 2017). Liu et al. (2004) proposed a coal-rock interaction model and found that the elastic modulus of the combination increased with the increase of the proportion of rock. Zuo et al. (2011c, 2021) found that the failure was mainly splitting in coal-rock combination under uniaxial condition, and that was mainly shear in triaxial test. Zhang et al. (2020) pointed out that the coal proportion was the main factor influencing mechanical responses of combinations. Zhang et al. (2012) found that the tensile failure was concentrated in the coal part of the combination under uniaxial loading. Liu et al. (2014) found that the coal part was compressed between the upper and lower rock to induce radial tensile stress. Zhao et al. (2008) studied the precursory information of deformation and failure of combination, and pointed out that coal-rock combination is more prone to instability.
The damage of coal rock mass under stress is accompanied by the accumulation and dissipation of energy (Tahmasebinia et al. 2018; Dok et al. 2021). It is more conducive to reflect the essential characteristics of the overall failure of rock by energy (Wen et al. 2019). Zuo et al. (2011a) analyzed the mechanical nature of layered failure in deep roadway surrounding rock under combined static and dynamic load. Zhu et al. (2007) revealed the instability process of roadway triggered by dynamic load by numerical method. Zuo et al. (2011b), Zuo and Song (2022) pointed out that the coal was the main body of the elastic energy accumulation in a combined sample. Xie et al. (2005) believed that the input energy of rock was equal to the sum of dissipation energy and release elastic strain energy. Feng et al. (2021) pointed out that the strain rate affects the change of energy and the fractal characteristics of fragments. Liu et al. (2021) proposed a model of wing-crack propagation for tensile under static and dynamic coupled loading. Zhang et al. (2006) studied the AE characteristics of granite failure under uniaxial multi-stage loading conditions, and pointed out that the number of AE events is directly related to crack propagation. Wang et al. (2019) concluded that there was a positive correlation between cumulative damage and impact times. Wang et al. (2020) studied the AE energy characteristics of during the rock fracture process, and the sharp increase of dissipation energy at peak stress led to the fundamental change of rock internal structure. He et al. (2015) pointed out the different stages of AE energy accumulation and the correlation between fracture mode and frequency. Dong and Zhao (2015) established models for rock energy dissipation and AE based on AE characteristics and stress–strain relationship. Li et al. (2010) and Ding et al. (2023) found the AE energy could reflect the rock failure information and load state. Wang et al. (2017) collected the AE energy characteristic parameters of rock damage process and found the relationship between AE energy and stress strain curve.
The existing research shows that the structure of coal-rock combination is more prone to dynamic disasters under high stress and disturbance conditions (excavation blasting, roof caving, fault sliding, etc.) (Dou et al. 2021; Cai et al. 2019; He et al. 2017; Yu et al. 2022; Ma et al. 2022). However, the existing research results are obtained under the test conditions of single static load or single impact load, which does not match the actual situation. The occurrence of deep rock disasters is closely related to the change of stress. High static stress and stress disturbance are not independent to each other. And the stress disturbance is multiple continuous, instead of a single short-term. As per the above, based on the self-developed experimental equipment that can realize creep and dynamic disturbance impact loading, aiming at the problem of easy instability of coal-rock roadway, this paper intends to study the mechanical behavior of coal-rock combination under the static stress and disturbance. It provides a reference for the prevention of dynamic disasters such as large deformation and rock burst in deep roadway.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Testing equipment
The self-developed creep and dynamic disturbance impact loading test system (Wen et al. 2021, 2022b) in Fig. 1a was used to carry out the loading test of the sample under the coupled static and dynamic load, which is different from the way of drop-hammer impact and SHPB (Yang et al. 2023; Zhu et al. 2019). The system can realize custom waveform input methods such as sine wave, triangular wave and seismic wave. It can simulate the instability of coal-rock mass under the static load and dynamic disturbance such as blasting, roof break, fault slip and earthquake in underground engineering. The different combination of static load and dynamic load can be realized. Main parameters of system in Table 1.
A comparative test was carried out to verify the stability and reliability of the test system. The results obtained by the creep and dynamic disturbance impact loading test system and the Shimadzu AG-X250 test machine are shown in Fig. 1b. It indicates the test system can meet the experimental requirements.
2.2 Samples preparation
The coal, rock sample and coal-rock combination were used as the object in the research. The samples are from the coal-rock roadway on site. The parameters of samples are shown in Table 2. The single coal, single rock and combinations were made with a specification of Ф50 × 100 mm. The ratio of rock and coal in combination is 0:1 (C), 1:0(R), 1:1(RC-1), 2:1(RC-2), 3:1(RC-3), 1:1:1(RCR), as shown in Fig. 2. The non-parallelism and non-verticality of the ends of samples are less than 0.02 mm. The Marble glue is a mixed chemical binder and is widely circulated and applied to the bonding between various types of stone or used to fill the surface of stone and repair broken marks. It has the advantages of fast gel speed, short curing time and high bonding strength. The bond strength of glue reaches 103 MPa (Yu et al. 2022), which is sufficient to meet the strength requirements of the interface compared to the general rock, and the thickness of the adhesive is less than 1 mm when the specimen is bonded. There are no obvious defects in the samples.
The quality, density and wave velocity of each sample were measured before the test to minimize the influence of heterogeneity on the test results. The samples with the same or similar parameters were selected for the test.
The 16-channel SH-II AE system is used to record the process of sample internal fracture initiation and energy release. The AE parameters are shown in Table 3. The AE sensor was directly attached to the surface of the sample using Vaseline to ensure good linkage. The digital image correlation (DIC) system is used to track the surface displacement and strain of the sample. Black and white points were applied to the surface of the sample to form a randomly distributed speckle pattern for DIC analysis (Fig. 3). The dual-camera resolution of the DIC system is 4096 × 3000 pixels, and the deformed digital image is recorded at a speed of 1 fps. Two high-intensity LED lights are used to provide diffuse, uniform and constant light.
2.3 Testing scheme
-
(1)
The static load.
The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of the tests were carried out. The loading process was controlled by displacement until the sample destroyed. The whole test process was recorded in real time by servo control and data acquisition system.
-
(2)
The coupled static and dynamic load.
The UCS of the sample is used as reference for the design of the coupled static and dynamic load test scheme. The loading path includes static loading stage and dynamic loading stage. The static load simulates the static stress state of surrounding rock, and the dynamic load simulates the dynamic disturbance caused by excavation blasting, roof caving, fault sliding, He et al. (2014).
As shown in Fig. 4, firstly, the uniaxial loading test was carried out. The initial static stress of 1 MPa was applied to the sample. The static loading rate was 0.1 mm/min. In the second stage, the coupled static and dynamic load test was carried out (Liu et al. 2019), and the static stress level \(\sigma_{s}\), disturbance amplitude A, cycle number N, frequency \(f\) (\(T = {1/ f}\)) were used to characterize the cyclic sinusoidal waveform with wavelength \(\lambda\).
As in previous studies, in the second stage, different loading schemes were set by changing the static stress level and disturbance amplitude, as shown in Table 4. The disturbance is loaded until the sample is destroyed. If the disturbance loading is finished before failure, the loading is continued at a rate of 0.1 mm/min until the sample is destroyed.
3 Result analysis
3.1 Mechanical properties and dynamic instability
The stress–strain curves of the samples under static load are shown in Fig. 5. It is found that the trend of stress–strain curves of all samples is relatively consistent, and the samples are less affected by heterogeneity, but the mechanical parameters are different in different groups of samples.
The peak stress of C, R, RC-1, RC-2, RC-3 and RCR samples were in average 22.14 MPa, 35.80 MPa, 15.87 MPa, 15.39 MPa, 26.00 MPa and 15.09 MPa, respectively. The crack initiation stress (CIS) point refers the energy threshold when the combined samples begin to damage, accompanied by the generation of AE energy. After the CIS point appears, the stress–strain curve of the rock shows the nonlinear stage. The CIS of different samples is shown in Fig. 6. The CIS of the combination decreases with the rock proportion increases, less than the single rock sample. The degree of fracture development is higher than that of the rock part. The strain is larger and the accumulated energy is more in the coal part. The CIS of coal part is less than that of rock part. Therefore, the crack firstly expands in the coal part.
Figure 7 shows the changes of peak stress, peak strain and elastic modulus of combined samples under static loading. The peak strain of combined sample is \(\varepsilon_{RCR} > \varepsilon_{{RC{ - 1}}} > \varepsilon_{{RC{ - 2}}} > \varepsilon_{{RC{ - 3}}}\). With the increase of rock proportion, the peak strain of the sample decreases gradually. The coal part continues to deform before overall failure result in peak strain of RCR is larger. The larger the proportion of rock, the greater the elastic modulus. The peak stress is similar to the trend of its elastic modulus. Liu et al. (2004) and Zhang et al. (2018) got a similar result.
The relationship between the elastic modulus, stress and strain of combination with the change of dynamic load level is shown in Fig. 8. The mechanical parameters of the combination under the coupled static and dynamic load were analyzed. The dynamic load level of 20%UCS has little effect on the mechanical parameters, which is basically close to the mechanical parameters under static loading. The elastic modulus decreases with the dynamic load. When the sample is damaged at the same strain level, the decrease of elastic modulus leads to the decrease of bearing capacity. The worse the integrity of the rock mass, the smaller the corresponding elastic modulus.
The stress of single rock sample and single coal sample increase first and then decrease with the increase of dynamic load level. The strain and stress of combinations are significantly affected by the dynamic load level and the rock proportion. The strain is positively correlated with the dynamic load level. The same is true for stress to rock proportion. That is obvious strain-rate effect (Yin et al. 2012; Liang et al. 2023), which may cause strain rock burst.
The result of combinations under different dynamic load levels was analyzed in Fig. 9. The dynamic load level has a significant influence on the strength of combination. The peak stress of the sample under dynamic disturbance is less than that under static load. It indicates that disturbance makes the combination more prone to damage and instability. When the dynamic load exceeds 60%UCS, the instability of the most samples appear with the unevenly changed hysteresis loop area. The hysteresis loop area can be used to characterize the amount of energy released that promotes the further development of microcracks in the sample. The sudden increase of the hysteresis loop area indicates that the energy release increases, and the damage of the sample increases rapidly. The hysteresis loop area in the instability stage of the combined sample increases with the increase of the number of cycles, and the strain increment is also greater than other dynamic disturbance stages. The rapid increase of strain and hysteresis loop area during the disturbance loading is the precursor for the instability of the combination.
3.2 AE characteristics and rock damage evolution
AE and DIC technology were used to monitor the damage and crack development of samples. Figure 10 shows the AE response and damage evolution of the samples under static loading. The post-peak failure mode of the combined sample presents a stepped reduction in the stress–strain curve. It shows yield process instead of brittle failure. The coal part absorbs energy in the pre-peak stage and plays a buffering role. The maximum energy rate corresponds to the value of UCS. When the stress decreases by step, the AE energy rate increases sharply.
The AE energy events mainly occur in the post-peak stage, and only a relatively small amount of energy events are detected in the pre-peak stage (Fig. 10a). These are compaction stage I, elastic–plastic stage II, post-peak stage III and instability stage IV during the loading process. The AE energy rate is less than 1 × 105 in compaction stage I because the primary microcracks closed and energy dissipation. The cumulative energy increases significantly with the stress increases, the new cracks begin to develop and penetrate. The strain is obtained by DIC technology to characterize the development of cracks (Fig. 10b). The strain concentration begins to appear in the coal part of sample with AE energy mutation. With the increase of stress, the strain region becomes more concentrated and expanded. When the sample is destroyed, the coal part is doomed to failure firstly.
Figure 11 shows the failure and AE energy of the combination under the coupled static and dynamic load. The AE energy changed obviously into three stages, namely, energy growth stage, interval release stage and instantaneous release stage. It is different from the “four-stages” under static loading.
In the stage I*, no new cracks are developed inside the combination, the cumulative energy is at a low level. The release energy rate is less than 2 × 104, which is mostly frictional signal of primary crack closure. In the stage II*, the damage of the combinations under dynamic load level of 20%UCS is less, and the peak energy rate meets the peak stress. The dynamic load level of 40%UCS has a great influence on the damage of the combinations. The released energy increases significantly when the dynamic load is 60%UCS, and the combination is unstable during the third dynamic disturbance loading. When the peak stress occurs or the disturbance stage fails, the instantaneous release stage (stage III*) happens, then the sample breaks. The energy release is concentrated in the early stage of the disturbance loading process. It indicates the influence of dynamic disturbance to the combined sample is more significant in the early stage.
3.3 Crack propagation characteristics
The crack propagation and failure modes of combinations under static loading are showed in Fig. 12. The local high strain of the single coal sample is generated firstly at the end of the sample. During the loading process, axial splitting cracks are generated on both sides, and expand upward along the axial direction of the sample. Tensile cracks are developed at both ends of the sample, then extend to the middle, leading to splitting tensile failure (Fig. 12a). And one main crack gradually extends to both ends of the sample, and semi-X shear failure finally formed (Fig. 12b).
The failure characteristic of combinations is different from that of single coal and rock samples. As shown in Fig. 12c–e, the length and number of cracks in the rock increase with the increase of rock proportion. The bearing capacity of the combinations is determined by the coal part with low strength. Stress concentration appears in the splice of the sample. The cracks are densely developed in vertical parallel. With the decrease of the bearing capacity of the coal part, the regional stress concentration in the rock part makes the rock occur tensile cracks. There are no penetrating cracks in the rock mass above and below the coal part in the RCR sample (Fig. 12f). Statistics on the failure modes of all samples found that of the combined sample are divided into three types: shear slip failure, splitting tensile failure and tension-shear combined failure.
Compared with shear failure in the single rock and single coal samples, tensile failure often occurs in the combined samples. The failure is mainly flake stripping. It corresponds to the falling of sidewalls in coal-rock roadway. The tensile failure can be reduced by bolt support on sidewalls to enhance the integrity of surrounding rock.
The failure mode changed from shear to splitting under the coupled dynamic-static loading and final impact damage occurs (Lyu et al. 2020). Figure 13 shows the crack characteristics and failure modes of combinations under the coupled static and dynamic load.
The failure of single coal sample and single rock sample are tensile-shear failure mode under the dynamic load. When the dynamic load level is 20%UCS, the shear cracks are main with V-shaped type. When the dynamic load level is 40%UCS, the shear crack penetrates the sample with mainly tensile failure. The overall instability of the sample occurs during the loading process when the dynamic load level is 60%UCS. The spalling fragments number of coal is more than that of rock. And the average fragments size of coal is smaller than that of rock.
The failure characteristics of combinations are similar under the coupled static and dynamic load. However, the low strength coal part is more broken than the high strength rock part (Chen et al. 2021; Wen et al. 2022a). The crack initiation position is mostly in the coal part, and the crack is splitting tensile. With the increase of stress, the crack gradually develops the coal-rock interface. Based on Griffith theory, when the stress is greater than the strength of rock at the crack tip, the crack begins to develop inside the rock. Compared with the static loading, the failure mode of the combination is mostly tension-shear combined failure (Luo et al. 2020). The initial failure of the sample is dominated by splitting tensile, followed by shear crack in the later stage.
4 Discussion
-
(1)
Stress characteristics and AE energy.
Weaker structure affects the mechanical properties of coal-rock mass (Han et al. 2020). Different from the rapid post-peak failure of a single coal or rock mass, that of the combined sample presents a stepped reduction until the sample is failure. With the increase of dynamic load, the stepped reduction of stress process gradually disappears. The strength of the sample under dynamic load is greater than that under quasi-static load. The reason is that the coupled static and dynamic load makes the sample strain strengthened, and the strength of the sample is improved. Singh (1989), Miao et al. (2022) and Xu et al. (2009) have reached the same conclusion based on a single coal or rock mass. The CIS of rock part is greater than that of coal part. There are differences in mechanical properties of different parts of the combination leads to its different failure modes and failure time. Microscopically, it shows a sudden increase in AE energy rate. Macroscopically, the sample appears splitting and shedding phenomena.
In Figs. 10 and 11, the stage of stress–strain curve corresponds to the energy dissipation process. The division of stress stages under static loading and the coupled static and dynamic load is different. The appearance of intermittent disturbance load makes the AE energy of the sample change intermittently. The interval release stage appears and the energy gradually accumulates.
-
(2)
Failure and crack evolution.
The failure mode of the combined sample under the coupled static and dynamic load is important for exploring the internal crack development and the failure mechanism (Hao et al. 2020). The distribution of rock fragments under different loading modes and failure modes is different. Therefore, the fragmentation index can be used to explain the failure mode (Yang et al. 2021). The size of fragments is closely related to the proportion of coal-rock, static load, dynamic load and internal original cracks, et al.
The fragments distribution of the sample is shown in Fig. 14. Under the coupled static and dynamic load, the scale span of the broken block of the combined sample is large, showing long strip block, irregular polygon block and powder debris, and accompanied by local burst, fragments ejection and other dynamic phenomena.
The cumulative percentage and size of fragments under different dynamic load levels are shown in Fig. 15. The percentage of fragments with size greater than 10 mm is greater than 60%, and the fragments are mostly long strips. The minimum percentage of fragments with size less than 10 mm is only 8.4%, and the fragments are polygonal blocks and powder. The long strip-shaped fragments show that the stress is transmitted along the axial in the sample, and the failure is mainly tensile failure. The irregular polygonal block fragments and semi-powder fragments indicate that the stress is transferred along the non-axial direction in the sample. During the failure process, the fragments against each other results in the generation of powder debris, and the tensile-shear failure is presented. Therefore, the larger the cumulative percentage of fragments greater than 10 mm, the greater the possibility of tensile failure; on the contrary, it tends to tensile-shear failure.
5 Conclusions
The structure of coal rock mass affects the mechanical response of surrounding rock. The peak stress of coal-rock combination is determined by low-strength coal. The post-peak stage of the stress–strain curve of the combined sample under the coupled static and dynamic load presents a stepped reduction. The elastic modulus decreases under the coupled static and dynamic load. The peak stress of the combined sample is positively correlated with the dynamic load level within a certain range, and the peak strain is negatively correlated. When the stress by step decreases, the AE energy rate increases sharply. AE energy rate is positively correlated with peak stress.
Dynamic load aggravates the damage and instability of coal-rock combination. The AE energy under static load can be divided into four stages: slow growth stage, rapid growth stage, dissipation (relatively stable) stage and instantaneous release stage. The appearance of intermittent disturbance load makes “four-stages” develop into three stages: energy growth stage, interval release stage and instantaneous release stage. The sudden increase of AE energy rate, hysteresis loop area and strain can be the precursor information of instability of coal-rock combination under the coupled static and dynamic load.
The failure mode of coal-rock combination is affected by coal-rock ratio and dynamic load. The failure modes of samples under static load include shear failure, splitting tensile failure and tension-shear combined failure. The failure mode of the under dynamic load is mainly tensile-shear failure. The application of dynamic load leads to instantaneous energy release and stress concentration. The fragmentation is different under different failure modes. The fragmentation index can explain the failure mode and crack propagation characteristics of coal-rock combination under the coupled static and dynamic load.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
Cai W, Dou LM, Wang GF et al (2019) Mechanism of fault reactivation and its induced coal burst caused by coal mining activities. J Min Saf Eng 36(6):1193–1202. https://doi.org/10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2019.06.016
Chen X, Shi XZ, Zhou J et al (2021) High strain rate compressive strength behavior of cemented paste backfill using split Hopkinson pressure bar. Int J Min Sci Technol 31:387–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.03.008
Ding Z, Feng XJ, Wang EY et al (2023) Acoustic emission response and evolution of precracked coal in themeta-instability stage under graded loading. Eng Geol 312:106930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106930
Dok G, Caglar N, Ilki A et al (2021) Residual load bearing capacity and failure mechanism of impacted high-strength reinforced concrete shear beams. Eng Fail Anal 121:105185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105185
Dong CL, Zhao GM (2015) Constitutive model of rock damage based on energy dissipation and acoustic emission. Chin J Underground Space Eng 11(5):1116–1122
Dou LM, Mu ZL, Li ZL et al (2014) Research progress of monitoring, forecasting and prevention of rockburst in underground coal mining in China. Int J Coal Sci Technol 1(3):278–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-014-0044-z
Dou LM, Cao JR, Cao AY et al (2021) Research on types of coal mine tremor and propagation law of shock waves. Coal Sci Technol 49(6):23–31. https://doi.org/10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.06.003
Feng P, Xu Y, Dai F (2021) Effects of dynamic strain rate on the energy dissipation and fragment characteristics of cross-fissured rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 138:14600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104600
Han ZY, Li DY, Ranjith PG et al (2020) Experimental study of stress wave propagation and energy characteristics across rock specimens containing cemented mortar joint with various thicknesses. Int J Rock Mech Min 131:104352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104352
Hao XJ, Du WS, Zhao YX et al (2020) Dynamic tensile behaviour and crack propagation of coal under coupled static-dynamic loading. Int J Min Sci Technol 30:659–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.06.007
He MC, Xie HP, Peng SP et al (2005) Study on rock mechanics in deep mining engineering. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 16:2803–2813
He MC, Liu DQ, Gong WL et al (2014) Development of a testing system for impact rock burst. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 33(09):1729–1739. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.09.001
He MC, Zhao F, Zhang Y et al (2015) Feature evolution of dominant frequency components in acoustic emissions of instantaneous strain-type granitic rockburst simulation tests. Rock Soil Mech. 36(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2015.01.001
He J, Dou LM, Wang WS et al (2017) Study on mechanism and types of hard roof inducing rock burst. J Min Saf Eng 34(6):1122–1127. https://doi.org/10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2017.06.013
He QY, Li YC, Li DQ et al (2020) Microcrack fracturing of coal specimens under quasi-static combined compression-shear loading. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 12:1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.01.009
Li N, Wang EY, Zhao EL et al (2010) Experiment on acoustic emission of rock damage and fracture under cyclic loading and multi-stage loading. J China Coal Soc 35(7):1099–1103. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2010.07.030
Li XB, Gong FQ, Tao M et al (2017) Failure mechanism and coupled static-dynamic loading theory in deep hard rock mining: a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9:767–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.04.004
Li J, Zhao J, Gong SY (2021) Mechanical anisotropy of coal under coupled biaxial static and dynamic loads. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 143:104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104807
Li YZ, Dai F, Liu Y et al (2023) Effects of pre-static loads on the dynamic pure mode I and mixed mode I–II fracture characteristics of rock. Eng Fract Mech 279:109047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109047
Liang YP, Kong FJ, Zou QL, Zhang BC (2023) Effect of strain rate on mechanical response and failure characteristics of horizontal bedded coal under quasi-static loading. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energ Geo-Resour 9:52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-023-00587-3
Liu JX, Tang CA, Zhu WC et al (2004) Study on coal-rock series combination model and rock burst mechanism. Chin J Geotech Eng 26(2):276–280
Liu J, Wang EY, Song DZ et al (2014) Effects of rock strength on mechanical behavior and acoustic emission characteristics of samples composed of coal and rock. J China Coal Soc 39(4):685–691. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2013.1490
Liu Y, Lu CP, Liu B et al (2019) Slip and instability mechanisms of coal-rock parting-coal structure (CRCS) under coupled dynamic and static loading. Energy Sci Eng 7:2703–2719. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.454
Liu Y, Dai F, Pei PD (2021) A wing-crack extension model for tensile response of saturated rocks under coupled static-dynamic loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 146:104893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104893
Luo DN, Su GS, Zhang GL (2020) True-triaxial experimental study on mechanical behaviours and acoustic emission characteristics of dynamically induced rock failure. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:1205–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01970-x
Lyu PF, Chen XH, Chen GB et al (2020) Experimental study on dynamic mechanical responses of coal specimens under the combined dynamic-static loading. Arabian J Geosci 13:935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05985-5
Ma JY, Li DY, Zhu QQ et al (2022) The mode I fatigue fracture of fine-grained quartz-diorite under coupled static loading and dynamic disturbance. Theor Appl Fract Mech 117:103140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103140
Miao ST, Pan PZ, Yu PY et al (2022) Fracture behaviour of two microstructurally different rocks exposed to high static stress and cyclic disturbances. Rock Mech Rock Eng 55(6):3621–3644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02810-1
Pan JF, Qi QX, Liu SH et al (2020) Characteristics, types and prevention and control technology of rock burst in deep coal mining in China. J China Coal Soc 45(1):111–121. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.YG19.1638
Pelekisa I, Susmel L (2017) The Theory of Critical Distances to assess failure strength of notched plain concrete under static and dynamic loading. Eng Fail Anal 82:378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.07.018
Pytlik A, Prusek S, Masny W (2016) A methodology for laboratory testing of rockbolts used in underground mines under dynamic loading conditions. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 116(12):1101–1110. https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2016/v116n12a2
Singh SK (1989) Fatigue and strain hardening behaviour of graywacke from the flagstaff formation, New South Wales. Eng Geol 26:171–179
Tahmasebinia F, Zhang CG, Canbulat I et al (2018) Numerical and analytical simulation of the structural behaviour of fully grouted cable bolts under impulsive loading. Int J Min Sci Technol 28:807–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.08.012
Tan LH, Ren T, Yang XH et al (2018) A numerical simulation study on mechanical behaviour of coal with bedding planes under coupled static and dynamic load. Int J Min Sci Technol 28:791–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.08.009
Wang X, Wen ZJ, Mikael R et al (2017) Experimental study of strength properties of coal-rock under non-uniformly distributed load. Rock Soil Mech 38(3):101–108. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2017.03.014
Wang P, Yin TB, Li XB et al (2019) Dynamic properties of thermally treated granite subjected to cyclic impact loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:991–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1606-y
Wang ZH, Zhou HW, An L et al (2020) Failure process characteristics and energy evolution of granite under cyclic loading and unloading condition. J China Univ Min Technol 49(5):874–881. https://doi.org/10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.001188
Wen ZJ, Tian L, Jiang YJ et al (2019) Research on damage constitutive model of inhomogeneous rocks based on strain energy density. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 38(07):1332–1343. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.1125
Wen ZJ, Huang J, Jiang YJ et al (2021) Development and experiment of a coupled static-dynamic cyclic loading test system. J Cent South Univ (sci Technol) 52(08):2817–2827. https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2021.08.027
Wen ZJ, Jing SL, Meng FB et al (2022a) Control technology for floor heave of Jurassic soft rock in the Erdos Basin of China: a case study. J Cent South Univ 29(12):4051–4065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-022-5173-8
Wen ZJ, Meng FB, Jiang YJ, Jing SL (2022b) Development and application of a series of experimental devices for coal mining dynamic behavior research. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour 8(2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-022-00372-8
Xie HP, Ju Y, Li LY (2005) Criteria for strength and structural failure of rocks based on energy dissipation and energy release principles. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 24(17):3003–3010
Xu SC, Feng XT, Chen BR (2009) Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics. Rock Soil Mech 30(10):2929–2934. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2009.10.055
Yang XH, Ren T, Tan LH et al (2021) Fragmentation characteristic and energy dissipation of coal under impact load. Int J Geomech 21(5):04021057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002007
Yang ZY, Zhou L, Zhou CL et al (2023) Research on the dynamic failure behavior of fissured tunnel subjected to combined dynamic and static loads. Theor Appl Fract Mech 124:103780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.103780
Yin ZQ, Li XB, Jin JF et al (2012) Failure characteristics of high stress rock induced by impact disturbance under confining pressure unloading. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61158-8
Yu WJ, Pan B, Li K et al (2022) Mechanical properties and fracture evolution law of rock-coal-rock combination. J China Coal Soc 47(3):1155–1168. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.xr21.1563
Zhang R, Xie HP, Liu JF et al (2006) Experimental study on acoustic emission characteristics of rock failure under uniaxial multilevel loadings. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 12:2584–2588
Zhang ZT, Liu JF, Wang L et al (2012) Effects of combination mode on mechanical properties and failure characteristics of the coal-rock combinations. J China Coal Soc 37(10):1677–1681. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2012.10.021
Zhang HW, Elsworth D, Wan ZJ (2018) Failure response of composite rock-coal samples. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour 4:175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-018-0082-x
Zhang CY, Pan JF, Xia YX et al (2020) Research on impact failure characteristics of coal-rock combination bodies under true triaxial loading and unloading conditions. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 39(08):1522–1533. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0112
Zhao YX, Jiang YD, Zhu J et al (2008) Experimental study on precursor information of deformation of composite samples before failure. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 02:339–346
Zhu WC, Zuo YJ, Shang SM et al (2007) Numerical simulation of instable failure of deep rock tunnel triggered by dynamic disturbance. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 05:915–921
Zhu WC, Li SH, Li S et al (2019) Influence of dynamic disturbance on the creep of sandstone: an experimental study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1642-7
Zuo JP, Song HQ (2022) Energy evolution law and differential energy instability model of coal-rock combined body. J China Coal Soc 47(08):3037–3051. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2021.1566
Zuo YJ, Ma CD, Zhu WC et al (2011a) Model test study of mechanism of layered fracture within surrounding rock of tunnels in deep stratum tunnelling under dynamic disturbance. Rock Soil Mech 32(10):2929–2936. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2011.10.009
Zuo JP, Pei JL, Liu JF et al (2011b) Investigation on acoustic emission behavior and its time-space evolution mechanism in failure process of coal-rock combined body. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(08):1564–1570
Zuo JP, Xie HP, Wu AM et al (2011c) Investigation on failure mechanisms and mechanical behaviors of deep coal-rock single body and combined body. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(1):84–92
Zuo JP, Chen Y, Wang C (2017) Failure mechanics and model of deep coal-rock combined bodies. Science Press, Beijing, pp 1–11
Zuo JP, Chen Y, Song HQ (2021) Study progress of failure behaviors and nonlinear model of deep coal-rock combined body. J Cent South Univ (sci Technol) 52(08):2510–2521. https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2021.08.002
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51974174, 52274130, 52204140), and Shandong Excellent Youth Fund (ZR2019YQ26).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZW and YJ made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; SJ wrote the main manuscript text; JW checked the manuscript and ensured article quality; WD guided the design and modification of the picture; All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests as defined by Springer, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The Authors confirm: that neither the manuscript nor any parts of its content are currently under consideration or published in another journal; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors; all of the material is owned by the authors and/or no permissions are required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jing, S., Wen, Z., Jiang, Y. et al. Mechanical behaviors and failure characteristics of coal-rock combination under quasi-static and dynamic disturbance loading: a case based on a new equipment. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour. 10, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-023-00717-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-023-00717-x