Abstract
Groundwater is the major water reserve in the present context of global warming-related droughts that appear to be more intense in hard rock terrains. The use of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) technologies are increasingly beneficial to groundwater research, by allowing for low cost and larger-scale high-resolution mapping compared to conventional hydrogeological exploration methods. This study aimed at developing a high-resolution map of potential groundwater recharge (GWRpot) zones for the drought-stricken Banka hard rock terrain, straddling the Cameroon Volcanic Line (CVL). Shuttle Radar Tomography Mission (SRTM)-30m and Landsat 8 satellite images constituted the main data source that was ground-truthed through field mapping and used to produce various thematic GIS layers: geology slope, aspect, land use & land cover, drainage density and lineament density of spatial resolution 16m x 16m. The layers were each attributed a fixed score and weight to groundwater recharge, computed using Multi-Influencing Factor (MIF) and Analytical Hierarchy Process of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (AHP-MCDA) techniques. Lastly, a Weighted Overlay Analysis was done using the layers to produce the GWRpot zones for the study area. The resulting map shows that 60% of the study area, covering the south, west-northwest and the north-northeast portions of the map have moderate to very high recharge potentials. This result is particularly useful for groundwater targeting in the area and demonstrates the effectiveness of the method in hard rock terrains where traditional methods have been less efficient in properly delineating groundwater recharge zones.
Article highlights
-
Groundwater is generally the safest and most reliable source of water in water scarce environments, and forms when surface water goes into the ground.
-
More areas where water can enter the ground means more chances of getting enough groundwater. Conventional ways of knowing these areas are time consuming and costly, whereas RS and GIS-based methods are less costly and use lesser time.
-
We used the RS, GIS, high-resolution field mapping and statistical methods of blending several factors to produce the potential groundwater recharge zones on a part of the hardrocks of the CVL, that shows 60% of the study area, covering the south, west-northwest and the north-northeast portions of the area have moderate to very high recharge potentials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Banka subdivision is located within the hardrocks that make up the highlands and steep slopes of the Cameroon Volcanic Line (CVL), Western Cameroon. The locality is prone to having most of its precipitation becoming surface or near-surface run-off, which associates to the recently recorded droughts to lead to chronic water shortages in the area. Groundwater is considered the main solution to the water shortage in the area, although the resource is barely exploited. The first pre-requisite for aquifer formation is precipitation percolation to recharge underground formations [1,2,3]. Therefore, exploration and sustainable management of aquifers demands a good mapping of groundwater recharge zones. Groundwater recharge is effective only when water leaves the unsaturated zone to the saturated zone [4, 5]. Lineaments, drainage patterns, geology, slope, Land use & Land cover (LULC) and climate are some of the factors that affect groundwater recharge [6, 7]. Hence understanding the groundwater recharge potential (GWRpot) of an area requires a careful consideration of these factors [2]. Though done in several parts of the world, such studies have rarely been done in Cameroon, and hence very little is scientifically documented on the groundwater recharge potential of most hardrock regions in Cameroon. Therefore, this piece of work starts shedding light to build the scientific body of knowledge in this branch of studies nation-wide. The study is unique in that its uses high spatial resolution geologic data (1 sample every 400m) in the mix of factors, as compared to the regional geologic data mostly used in the majority of studies [1,2,3, 6, 7] with similar methodologies. The reason for using the detailed geologic map is that regional geologic maps available shows only one rock type in the study area, and will hence not produce an adequate GRWpot map in the study area at this scale since geology is a primordial factor in groundwater recharge zone assessment. The detailed geologic map we produced in this study showed the presence of more than three rock types in the study area, having very different brittle characteristics and hence different recharge potentials. Moreover, the study is self-sponsored and is intended to serve as a model cell for the generation of similar neighbor cells (using bigger funds) which will eventually be part of a regional high-resolution GRWpot map.
[2, 8 and 9] stipulate that the conventional way of calculating GWRpot is through soil moisture modeling from hydrogeological field investigations. Nevertheless, these in-situ investigations are costly and time consuming at catchment level. Remote sensing techniques together with GIS provide a faster and more cost-effective alternative to estimate GWRpot.. The method consists in mapping various factors that affect GWRpot and integrating them to produce a GWRpot map [e.g. 3, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. The integration is done by multiplying each individual raster by their relative weights, which is a measure of their impact on the GWRpot of the area. The attribution of weights is subjective and is based either on literature values [e.g. 11, 17, and 18] or on expert knowledge [13, 15, and 19]. However, the stronger the influence of one factor on others, the larger its importance relative to the others and therefore the larger its relative weight [1, 4, 6, 20,21,22]. This is known as the Multi-Influencing Factor technique (MIF) [2]. Another statistically concise expert-guided way of assigning weight is by using the Analytical Hierarchy process proposed by [23], which ranks the factors after a pair-wise comparison that evaluated relative importance of factors to groundwater recharge.
This study focuses on mapping the potential groundwater recharge zones within Banka subdivision, using RS and GIS techniques. Six factors that influence groundwater recharge including geology (GE), lineament density (LD), drainage density (DD), slope (SL), aspect (AS) and LULC alongside their weights were used to develop a high-resolution map showing groundwater recharge potential zones. Aspect has been scarcely used in groundwater studies, despite it being an important factor that can give an idea about the surfaces that are exposed to solar radiation and hence an estimate of evapotranspiration [2]. Since the study area is a hard rock terrain, this map will facilitate groundwater exploration by zooming-in to the most prolific areas where to concentrate more advanced field investigation techniques. The fact these kinds of studies have not been done in this part of the country according the authors’ knowledge will make this work serve as a base for subsequent studies in this light.
The paper is structured such that we give a brief background and objectives of the study in the introduction, followed in Sect. 2 by an idea of the location, geographic and geologic setting of the study area. The next section describes the material and methods used to attain the set objectives, while Sect. 4 presents and discusses the results that we got. We finally give our conclusions and recommendations for better works in the last section.
2 Location and geology
This study area is located administratively in the Banka subdivision, West Region of Cameroon. It forms a part of the Western Highlands of the Cameroon Volcanic Line (CVL; Fig. 1a-b), and constitutes the highlands, surrounded to the north and NW by the Bambouto Caldera, to the east by the Bamoun plateau and Noun plain, and to the SE by Mounts Bana and Bangou [24, 25]. The landscape is highly undulatory, with steep slopes and occasional deep passes. The nation-wide geologic map of Cameroon (Fig. 1a) shows that basalts and gneisses dominate the area [26]. The drainage network is dendritic and composed of two major (up to 10m wide in some places) watercourses that cross the subdivision (Fig. 1b, c), fed by numerous small springs and streams, sourced from hillsides.
The climate is of Guinean Sudano type with an altitude that favors abundant precipitations reaching an annual average of 1500 mm [27, 28]. The rains used to be concentrated between the months of March and November with strong peaks in July and August. However increasing global warming–related droughts reduced this to barely between July and September. Temperatures also used to go up vertiginously only between December and February and fell sensibly between June and September, but these dry times time have now extended from November to June. Humidity is high with early morning ‘brunettes’ and twilight fog, especially during the dry season.
In terms of LULC, savannah shrub and herbaceous savanna separated with visible and fertile forest corridors dominate the vegetation. A varied range of dominant crops (coffee, cocoa, palm trees, market garden fruits and various food) can be observed in the area, originating from the extensive subsistence agricultural lifestyle of the people. Though concentrated in the south of the study area, habitations flourish mostly along primary tarred (N5, D9) and secondary earth roads that serve the subdivision. Some households and bare land also spottily appear within the study area.
3 Material and methods
The methodology has been summarized in the workflow chart below (Fig. 2) and has been divided into the following activities;
3.1 Preparation of thematic maps
Factors such as geology, slope, aspect, drainage density, lineament density and LULC were chosen to evaluate the GWRpot based on data availability -. Other factors like soil drainage and vertical permeability coefficient of the unsaturated zone may enhance the groundwater potential map, but unfortunately are not available for the area. Geologic mapping was carried out in the study area following a grid sampling methodology. A grid with grid cells 400m x 500m over 20km2 was thrown over the area of interest and the rock samples at each grid node examined (in terms of their mineralogy (color and size), color, texture and structures like fractures and folds). These were registered in order to produce the geologic map layer of the area of interest. Apart from the geology layer, all the other factors were extracted from the SRTM-30m resolution and Landsat 8 of the study area obtained from the USGS database (earthexplorer.usgs.gov). In the GIS environment (ArcMap 10.2), grid cells of resolution 16 x 16m were used in order to ease calculations. The slope and aspect were derived from the SRTM-extracted DEM following the methodology documented by [29] and analysis of errors and quality control of the derived dataset were done as described in [30] as well as [31] respectively. The drainage of the study area was also extracted from the DEM using the hydrology tool in ArcMap 10.2, and the drainage density was calculated and plotted using the line density tool. By using the Line module in PCI Geomatica v8 on the Landsat scene, the lineament map of the area was automatically extracted [32,33,34], from which the line density tool in ArcGIS 10.2 was again used to calculate and make the lineament density. The LULC was extracted from the Landsat 8 scene following a supervised classification with the Classification tool in ArcMap 10.2 (https://appliedsciences.nasa.gov › week2_final). All these factors were prepared and saved as shapefiles compatible for integration within the GIS environment. The 16 x 16 m grid maps for each factor were reclassified into five classes from 1 to 5, with the value of five attributed to categories that favor GWRpot the most [2]. For example, the highest lineament density class was attributed 5 because these areas have the highest discontinuity and hence any precipitation or run-off will rather infiltrate.
GWRpot was finally calculated using the formula:
where r & w are respectively the reclassified values and weight of the factors. This literarily means using the superposition principle to overlay the weightage (r x w) layers of each factor on one another in a GIS environment (Fig. 3). Since the assigned weight per factor are subjective and may vary significantly in reality, we reduced uncertainty by using two different approaches to evaluate them including:
-
The MIF approach, and
-
The Analytical Hierarchy process of Multi-Criteria Decision analysis (AHP-MCDA)
3.2 Assigning Weights
3.2.1 Multi-Influencing Factors (MIF) method
The MIF approach involves a sketch with the interrelationship between the factors and assignment of weights according to the strength of the interrelationships [1, 2, 5, 22]. The sketch used for this study is shown in Fig. 4 and the continuous arrow lines represent major influences while the dash arrow represents minor influences. During weight assignment, continuous arrows from a factor are worth 1 while dash lines still going from a factor represent 0.5 [1, 2, 5], such that for every factor, its influence (wf) also called its weight will be the sum of the weights of all the lines that leave it. For example, a continuous line arrow points from DD to LULC and a dash line arrow from DD to Slope and LD. Therefore, the influence wf of the factor DD on the other factors is 2 points (1 point + 0.5 + 0.5 points). Studies such as those of [1, 2, 5, 20] and [22] calculated the weight of their chosen factors in a similar manner. Since the final map of GWRpot is a cumulative weightage, the relative weight wf,r of each factor is determined following equation 2 below [2]:
where wf is the absolute value of the influence of the factor and n is the number of factors. The calculated weights (influence) and relative weight of each of the factors in this study.
3.2.2 Analytical Hierarchy Process of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (AHP-MCDA) method
Problems characterized by the influence of several parameters are best solved using Multi-Criteria Decision analysis (MCDA) [35]. AHP-based MCDA as described by [23] was also applied in this work to get the weight of the chosen factors from another angle. The pair-wise comparison matrix of the factors was obtained by assigning weights to each factor following the 1-9 scale suggested in [23, 35] where 1= equal, 2 = weak, 3 = moderate, 4 = moderate plus, 5 = strong, 6 = strong plus, 7 = very strong, 8 = super strong, 9 = extreme importance. The Eigenvector technique was used to normalize the assigned weights, after which the consistency test of the choice of weights between pairs was done using the consistency ratio that was calculated as follows:
where CI is the consistency index and RI is the ratio or random index.
In CI, n = number of factors and λ= average value of consistency vector (max eigrn value). RI is a value that depends on ‘n’ values as seen in Table 1.
4 Results and Discussions
4.1 Weightage calculations
Two methods were used to assign weights to the factors chosen to delineate the GWRpot in this study. The multi-influencing factors (MIF) of GWRpot zones namely LD, GE, LULC, SL, DD and AS were assigned corresponding weights (Table 1), after thorough examination using the chart in Fig. 4. The factors are interdependent, each having either a major or minor influence on the other and hence helping to delineate the GWRpot zones. From the MIF methodology of weight assignation,the GE, LD and LULC are the most influential factors. Studies like those of [1, 2, 5, 18] and [38], which used MIF also reached similar conclusions.
Weight assignation using the AHP-MCDA method produced weightages more or less similar to those of MIF after normalization as seeen in Table 2. Since these produce a consistency index < 0.1, they are acceptable and usable in MCDA. From the weightages obtained using AHP, GE, LD and SL are the most prominent factors affecting GWRpot in the area. LULC comes almost indistinguishably after SL, also making SL a factor of major influence as it is expected to be. Similar weightages from AHP and classification of importance have also been obtained by [39] and [40].
Finally, by multiplying each factor class reclassified value in Table 4 by the corresponding class MIF or AHP weight, the overall weights of the factors from either MIF or AHP (Table 4) were obtained. An average overall weight that is obtained by averaging the overall MIF and AHP weights is also shown in Table 4. These overall weights were then integrated into their thematic map classes ArcGIS 10.2 and cumulated per map cell using the Union tool to finally produce the GWRpot map that delineates the various potential recharge zones.
4.2 Geologic map
A geological mapping campaign following a grid of 400x500m was carried out in the study area, in a bid to update the geological information of the area and to ground truth the remotely sensed data. A geologic map of the study area at a scale of 1:15,000 was produced and shows that the area hosts five main rock types; granites, gneisses, pegmatites and basalt (Fig. 5a–e). Basalts dominate the study area, followed by the gneisses. Granites and pegmatites outcrop mainly in the north of the study area. These hardrocks are impervious and will host and transmit water based on their degree of fracturing which is related to their tensile strength or ability to resist brittle deformation. According to the studies of [41,42,43], petrological parameters such as grain size and grade of metamorphism play a dominant role in fracture formation, there by being indirectly related to groundwater occurrence. Based on these parameters, the fracture tendency of the rocks in the study area should increase from normal gneisses, through granites, augen gneisses, pegmatites and finally basalts. These are corroborated by presence of more lineament in basalts than in normal gneisses (Fig. 6). Several structures ranging from millimetric folds and veins through quartz and pegmatite filled veins and metric fractures were identified in the rocks. These show that the area has suffered intense structural deformation that can be associated to the volcanic activities of the CVL [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50].
4.3 Lineament density Map
Structurally controlled linear or curvy linear features identified in satellite imagery as linear alignments are called lineaments [1, 2]. Underlying structures usually manifest on surface topography through these features. The fact that they usually form due to faulting and fracturing generally associates them to secondary porosity and permeability that permits storage and flow of groundwater both vertically and horizontally [1]. Therefore, the density of lineaments in an area can be translated in groundwater recharge and groundwater potential. After the automatic extraction of the lineaments from the Landsat image of the study area, the LD map (Fig. 7) was developed using the line density tool in ArcGIS 10.2. The medium, high and very high lineament densities (all above 4km/km2) are those of high interest, as they will ease water percolation into the underground reservoirs. These classes of interest are mostly seen in the central, southern and western sectors of the study area.
4.4 Land Use and Land Cover (LULC)
The LULC presents forest (40.82%), agricultural (28.10%) and bare land (8.20%) land patterns that favor seepage and cover almost all the study area. The Urban area (18.70%) and waterbodies (4.18%) land patterns allow very little percolation. These LULC classes (Fig. 8) were delineated from Landsat 8 through a supervised classification in ArcGIS 10.2 and intense verification in the field. Similar methodologies were used to produce the LULC that were used in the evaluation of GWRpot [20, 21, 51 and 52,) and of artificial recharge zones [18].
4.5 Slope
Slope is a very important factor in groundwater studies. It has been used in numerous studies to evaluate infiltration, potential location of groundwater and location of artificial recharge zones [1, 2, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 20 and 21]. Rapid run-off usually results from high-angle slopes, hence permitting little water infiltration during and after precipitation [1, 53, and 54]. By analogy, low angle slopes are those of interest for groundwater recharge. Processing of the SRTM-30m data of the study area using the spatial analyst tool in ArcGIS 10.2 produced the slope map (Fig. 9) that has five main classes. The 0-6° slopes fall are the “Very good” class as these areas are flat to nearly flat, allowing for higher infiltration times. Slightly steeper topography with slopes between 6-12° are considered “Good” for groundwater recharge as they produce some run-off and offer lesser infiltration time. Areas with slope between 12-18.5° and those with slopes between 18.5-28° fall in the “Moderate” and “Poor” classes respectively since they produce much run-off. Finally, all zones with slopes >28° fall in the “Very poor” class. [1] proposed a similar classification.
4.6 Drainage density
The measure of the total length of the streams of all orders in a unit area is called drainage density and it defines the closeness of stream channels in an area. It inversely relates to the permeability of an area since the lower the permeability of an area the lower the infiltration of precipitation and therefore the higher the concentration of run-off that can be seen in part as streams. Drainage density is commonly used in groundwater studies [1, 2, 4, 13, 22, 35, 38, 55]. The drainage density map (Fig. 10) of the study area was developed using the line density tool in ArcGIS 10.2 on the drainage map that was extracted from the SRTM-30m satellite image using the Hydrology tool in the same ArcGIS. Five classes are identified on this map including “Very low” (0-3km/km2), “Low” (3-5km/km2), “Medium” (6-10km/km2), “High” (11–15km/km2) and “Very high” (> 15km/km2). The very low, low and medium drainage density are those that are of interest as their inverse relationship earlier mentioned imply higher permeabilities and hence more surface water infiltration to recharge the underground reservoirs. These are seen in the map as corridors that runs NE-SW across the center of the map, N-S in the eastern portion of the map and almost E-W in the southern portion.
4.7 Aspect
Aspect is defined as the compass direction that a topographic slope faces, and is used here as in [2] to qualitatively give a measure of the amount of solar radiation the surfaces in the study area receive. This measure can be in turn used to estimate the amount of evapotranspiration, which is inversely proportion to groundwater recharge since high evapotranspiration means high water uptake by plants to replace the lost one due to the Sun’s heat and vice versa. The aspect map (Fig. 11) of the study area was developed using the aspect tool of ArcGIS 10.2. Since we are in the tropics, cloud cover is thinnest and is assumed a relatively constant factor. Flat facing slopes are expected to receive the highest amount of radiation, given that the sun heats them all day long and is hottest and overhead around noon. This implies they will have a high value of evapotranspiration and hence were put in the “Very low” class meaning they will have lowest groundwater recharge potential. Following a similar logic, the SE & SW fall in the “Low” class, the E & W in the “Moderate” class, the NW & NE in the “High” class and the N, into the “Very high” class. Aspects in the “High and “Very high” classes (which are of interest) appear as almost E-W and NE-SW trending non continuous adjacent corridors in the S, W, NW, NE and E portions of the study area. These zones coincide with most of the parts of the study area where the lineament densities are high and the Drainage Density values are low.
4.8 Groundwater recharge potential map
The groundwater recharge potential of the study area was produced by integration using weighted overlay in a GIS environment of various thematic maps: GE, LD, DD, SL, LULC and AS. Once the overall MIF and AHP weights and the Average overall weights were added to the different thematic maps, the maps were overlaid on one another using the Union tool in ArcGIS. The cumulative weight (CW) of each resulting cell, which is the sum of the weights of the same cell in the layer of each thematic map, was then calculated and used to describe the GWRpot. Hence, the GWRpot zones were delineated by grouping integrated map cells into classes based on their CW. This led to the delineation of five GWRpot classes: the “Very low” with CW in the interval 16-211.73, “Low” with CW in the interval 211.73-268.45, “Moderate” with CW in the interval 268.45- 318.68, “High” with CW in the interval 318.68-388..25 and the “Very high” class with weights in the interval 388.25-487.05. The GWR pot map (Fig. 12) shows that about 60% of the study area has a “Moderate” to “Very high” recharge potential, distributed in the south, west-northwest and the north-northeast of the map, implying that any drop of precipitation that falls in these areas have a greater chance of infiltrating and hence recharging the groundwater reservoirs. This map can be validated by the fact that perineal flowing boreholes and wells in the study area all fall with the zones marked to have moderate, high or very high recharge potential. [1] and [2] used similar arguments when validating their groundwater potential and potential groundwater recharge zone models, hence implying our proposed model is accurate.
5 Conclusions
Groundwater is the safest source of water and forms only from the infiltration of surface water to recharge underground reservoirs. This means the amount and location of groundwater will greatly be enhanced if we know the recharge zones, especially in hardrock terrains that have very low primary porosity and permeability. However, evaluation of potential recharge zones by conventional methods is generally costly and time consuming at large geographic coverage. Since several studies show that GIS and remote sensing techniques offer less costly and faster means of evaluating recharge, we used them to delineate the GWRpot zones in the Banka subdivision of Cameroon, located within the hardrock of the CVL. A number of rock-informative layers of factors that are relevant to groundwater recharge including LULC, DD, LD, SL, GE and AS were outlined and superposed on each other. To reduce the uncertainty of the final weights of each factor the Multi-Influencing Factor (MIF) and Analytical Hierarchy Process of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (AHP-MCDA) were used to evaluate the relative importance (weight) of each factor. The average weights for each factor was to produce the weighted layers which were finally integrated in the GIS environment. Five descriptive classes namely: “Very low”, “Low”, “Moderate”, “High”, and “Very high” were delineated on the final GWRpot map. Our results show that urbanized areas and the hills with steep slopes and high drainage densities made of unfractured gneisses and granitic rocks have poor recharge potentials. Meanwhile, lowland and gently-sloping hills made up of fractured rocks, lower drainage densities and agricultural or bare land have the highest groundwater recharge potential. The fact that 60% of the study area has “moderate” to “Very high” recharge potential implies the study area could host groundwater and hence this GWRpot map can be used as an initial guide for groundwater exploration in the area. Perspectives involve applying this study over the subdivision and even the Region as a whole in order to produce regional (small-scale) maps that give detail distribution of recharge zones, hence better planning groundwater exploration programs. The unavailability of vertical and horizontal soil permeability data is a drawback to our GWRpot map and hence we recommend that the subsequent studies obtain and integrate this factor for a more accurate model.
Data availability
The Landsat 8 and SRTM data are available at earthexplorer.usgs.gov. The geologic data and shapefiles of the study area can be obtained on demand from the corresponding author.
References
Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2012) Delineation of groundwater potential zones in Theni district, Tamil Nadu, using remote sensing. GIS MIF Tech. Geosci Front 3(2):189–196
Singh SK, Zeddies M, Shankar U, Griffiths GA (2018) (2018) Potential groundwater recharge zones within New Zealand. Geosci Front. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.05.018
Maqsoom A, Aslam B, Khalid N, Ullah F, Anysz H, Almaliki AH, Almaliki, AA, Hussein EE (2022) Delineating groundwater recharge potential through remote sensing and geographical information systems. Water 14, 1824
Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) GIS based surface hydrological modelling in identification of groundwater recharge zones. Int J Remote Sens 25:e5759–e5770
Yeh HF, Cheng YS, Lin HI, Lee CH (2016) Mapping groundwater recharge potential zone using a GIS approach in Hualian River Taiwan. Sustai Environ Res 26 (1), 33e43.
Jaiswal R, Mukherjee S, Krishnamurthy J, Saxena R (2003) Role of remote sensing and GIS techniques for generation of groundwater prospect zones towards rural developmentean approach. Int J Remote Sens 24(5):993–1008
Thapa R, Gupta S, Guin S, Kaur H (2017) Assessment of groundwater potential zones using multi-influencing factor (MIF) and GIS: a case study from Birbhum district, West Bengal. Appl Water Sci 7(7):e4117–e4131.
Thorpe HR, Scott DM (1999) An evaluation of four soil moisture models for estimating natural ground water recharge. J Hydrol (New Zealand) 38(2):179–209
White PA, Hong YS, Murray DL, Scott DM, Thorpe HR (2003) Evaluation of regional models of rainfall recharge to groundwater by comparison with lysimeter measurements, Canterbury New Zealand. J Hydrol (New Zealand) 42(1):39–64
Saraf AK, Choudhury PR (1998) Integrated remote sensing and GIS for groundwater exploration and identification of artificial recharge sites. Int J Remote Sens 19:1825–1841.
Solomon S, Quiel F (2006) Groundwater study using remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) in the central highlands of Eritrea. Hydrogeol J 14(5):729–741
Chenini I, Mammou AB, El May M (2010) Groundwater recharge zone mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis: a case study in Central Tunisia (Maknassy Basin). Water Res Manag 24(5):921–939
Hammouri N, El-Naqa A, Barakat M (2012) An integrated approach to groundwater exploration using remote sensing and geographic information system. J Water Res Protect 4:e717–e724. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2012.49081
Kaliraj S, Chandrasekar N, Magesh N (2014) Identification of potential groundwater recharge zones in Vaigai upper basin, Tamil Nadu, using GIS-based analytical hierarchical process (AHP) technique. Arab J Geosci 7 (4), 1385e1401.
Patil SG, Mohite NM (2014) Identification of groundwater recharge potential zones for a watershed using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Geomat Geosci 4(3):485
Mseli Zaina Hussein, Mwegoha William John, Gaduputi Sankaranna (2021) Identification of potential groundwater recharge zones at Makutupora basin. Dodoma Tanzania, Geol, Ecol Landsc,. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2021.1952763
Sener E, Davraz A, Ozcelik M (2005) An integration of GIS and remote sensing in groundwater investigations: a case study in Burdur, Turkey. Hydrogeol J 13:826–834
Senanayake I, Dissanayake D, Mayadunna B, Weerasekera W (2016) An approach to delineate groundwater recharge potential sites in Ambalantota, Sri Lanka using GIS techniques. Geosci Front 7(1):115–124
Krishnamurthy J, Venkatesa Kumar N, Jayaraman V, Manivel M (1996) An approach to demarcate ground water potential zones through remote sensing and a geographical information system. Int J Remote Sens 17(10):1867–1884
Shaban A, Khawlie M, Abdallah C (2006) Use of remote sensing and GIS to determine recharge potential zone: the case of Occidental Lebanon. Hydrogeol Journal 14:433–443
Prasad RK, Mondal NC, Banerjee P, Nandakumar MV, Singh VS (2008) Deciphering potential groundwater zone in hard rock through the application of GIS. Environ Geol 55:467–475
Yeh HF, Lee CH, Hsu KC, Chang PH (2009) GIS for the assessment of the groundwater recharge potential zone. Environ Geol 58(1):185–195
Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process; Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill New York. pp 10
Pouclet A, Wandji P, Ruffet G, Dongmo AK, Tagheu PC, et al. (2014) The mount Manengouba, a complex volcano of the cameroon line: volcanic history, petrological and geochemical features. J Afri Earth Sci, 97:297-321
Marzoli A, Renne PR, Piccirillo EM, Castorina F, Bellieni G, Melfi AJ, Nyobe JB, N’ni J. (1999) Silicic magmas from the continental Cameroon volcanic line (Oku, Bambouto and Ngaoundere): 40Ar/39Ar dates, petrology, Sr–Nd–O isotopes and their petrogenetic significance. Contribut Mineral Petrol 135:133–150
Dumort JC (1968) Carte Géologique De Reconnaissance De La République Fédérale Du Cameroun Feuille NC: NB 32 SE 028, Par la Direction des Mines et de la Géoiogie, C ESPINASSE BRGM Société Nouvelle de Cartographies Lith. Paris
Neba A (1999) Mordern geography of the republic of cameroon, 3rd edn. Neba Publishers, Bamenda, Cameroon
Molua, EL, Lambie CM (2001) Climate, hyhrology and Water Resources in Cameroon. Environmental Issues: Problems and Prospects, Bamenda: Unique Printers, 45–66.
Maune DF, Amar N (2019) Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications. The DEM User’s Manual, 3rd ed; Asprs Publications: Falls Church, VI, USA.
Zhou Q, Liu X (2004) Error analysis on grid-based slope and aspect algorithms: computer science. Photogram Eng Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.70.8.957,CorpusID:13492272
Aba-Fernández MV, Ariza-López FJ, Jiménez-Gamero MD (2021) A new approach to the quality control of slope and aspect classes derived from digital elevation models. Remote Sensing 13:2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112069
Kocal A, Duzgun HS, Karpuz C (2004) Discontinuity mapping with automatic lineament extraction from high resolution satellite imagery; mathematics, environmental science,
Chanlantica S (2018) Methodological Validation for Automated Lineament Extraction by LINE Method in PCI Geomatica and MATLAB based Hough Transformation. Geolog Soc Ind 92:321–328
Akter A, Uddin AMH, Wahid KB, Ahmed S (2020) (2020) Predicting groundwater recharge potential zones using geospatial technique. Sustain Water Res Manag 6:24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00384-w
Saaty TL (2004) Fundamentals of the analytic network process—multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13(3):348–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0171-1
Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1:83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Arshad A., Zhang Z., Zhang W., Dilawar A. (2020) Mapping favorable groundwater potential recharge zones using a GIS-based analytical hierarchical process and probability frequency ratio model: A case
study from an agro-urban region of Pakistan (2020) Geoscience Frontiers 11:1805–1819
Callahan J. T., Choi S. H. (1973) Development of water from fractured crystalline rocks, Republic of Korea. Proc. 2nd Intern. Symp. Ground Water. Palermo. Ente Sviluppo Agricola in Sicilia, pp. 299-3 16.
Larsson L. (1981) Ground water investigations in a granite area of Sardinia, Italy. Report by UNESCO, Reg. Office for Science and Technology for South and Central Asia, New Delhi. pp. 17-25.
UNESCO (1984) Groundwater in Hardrocks. Project 8.6 of the International Hydrological Programme. Imprimerie de la Manutention, Mayenne ISBN 92-3-101980-5
Halliday AN, Davidson JP, Holden P, Dewolf C, Lee DC, Fitton JG (1990) Trace element fractionation in plumes and the origin of HIMU mantle beneath the Cameroon Line. Nature 347:523–528
Halliday AN, Dickin AP, Fallick AE, Fitton JG (1988) Mantle dynamics: A Nd, Sr, Pb and O isotopic study of the Cameroon line volcanic chain. J. Petrol. 29:181–211
Marzoli A., Piccirillo E. M., Renne P. R., Bellieni G., Iacumin M., Nyobe J. B. and Tongwa A. T. (2000) The Cameroon Volcanic Line Revisited: Petrogenesis of Continental Basaltic Magmas from Lithospheric and Asthenospheric Mantle Sources. Journal OF Petrology Vol 41 Number 1.
Gountié Dedzo M, Njonfang E, Nono A, Kamgang P, Zangmo Tefogoum G, Kagou Dongmo A, Nkouathio DG (2012) Dynamic and evolution of the Mounts Bamboutos and Bamenda calderas by study of ignimbritic deposits (West-Cameroon, Cameroon Line). Syllabus Review. Sci. Ser. 3:11–23
Keleko TDA, Tadjou JM, Kamguia J, Tabod CT, Feumoe ANS, Kenfack JV (2013) (2013) Groundwater Investigation Using Geoelectrical Method: A Case Study of the Western Region of Cameroon. Journal of Water Resource and Protection 5:633–641
Ngako KD, Kenfack JV, Pelap FB, Deumanou Messe M, R. (2021) Structural analysis of Haut-Nkam division, Central-Africa using remote sensing data and GIS technics. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.06.008
Elsheikh AA, Gao SS, Liu KH (2014) Formation of the Cameroon Volcanic Line by lithospheric basal erosion: Insight from mantle seismic anisotropy. Journal of African Earth Sciences 100:96–108
Chenyi MLV, Nkouathio DG, Wotchoko P, Kouankap Nono G, D., Zénon I., Guedjeo C. S. and Tchokona Seuwui D. (2017) Volcanology and geochemical study of the volcanic rocks of the Bafmeng area (Mount Oku, Cameroon Volcanic Line). Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 11(2):841–864
Krishnamurthy J, Mani A, Jayaraman V, Manivel M (2000) Groundwater resources development in hard rock terraine—an approach using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Applied Earth Observation Geoinformation 2(3–4):204–215
Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2011) Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu India: a GIS approach. Environmental Earth Science 64:373–381
Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Vetha Roy D (2011) Spatial analysis of trace element contamination in sediments of Tamiraparani estuary, southeast coast of India. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 92:618–628
Gouri SB (2020) An approach to demarcate groundwater recharge potential zone using geospatial technology. Applied Water Science 10:138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01231-1
Acknowledgments
Our deepest thanks to Mr. Kuisseu Theirry Stephane and Mr. Jules Ngantouo for their enriching physical and technical inputs during the geological mapping stage of the project.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, scholarship or other supports were received during this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Mbohlieu Tchawe YOSSA, Anatole E. DJIETO LORDON, and Christopher M. AGYINGI did the conception and design of. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Mbohlieu Tchawe YOSSA, Junior AGBOR-TAKU, Yves N. SHANDINI, Crayton Enga BESSONG .The first draft of the manuscript was written by Mbohlieu Tchawe YOSSA and restructured for better reader experience and understanding by Junior AGBOR-TAKU. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and have read & approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yossa, M.T., Lordon, A.E.D., Agyingi, C.M. et al. Remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS)-based high-resolution mapping of potential groundwater recharge zones on the hard rock terrains of the Cameroon volcanic line (CVL). SN Appl. Sci. 5, 30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-05248-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-05248-w