Abstract
Purpose: Drought stress is an important challenge to global food security and agricultural output. Dramatic and quick climate change has made the problem worse. It caused unexpected impacts on the growth, development, and yield of different plants. Hence, the ultimate yield does not fulfill the required demand. Understanding the biochemical, ecological, and physiological reactions to these pressures is essential for improved management. Chitosan applications have a wide prospect of addressing abiotic issues. Moreover, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles have a positive impact on increasing plant tolerance to abiotic stress, like drought stress. The current research investigated the consequences of drought stress on the morpho-physiological and biochemical parameters of Vicia faba plants, a comparison of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles, and their ameliorating capacity towards drought stress. Methods: A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the beneficial role of either chitosan (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 gL− 1) or chitosan NPs (10, 20, and 30 mgL− 1) in inducing the Vicia faba tolerance to drought stress (60% water field capacity). Results: Drought stress significantly affected vegetative growth parameters of the shoot system, photosynthetic pigments, and indole acetic acid, accompanied by significant increases in vegetative growth parameters of the root system, some chemical composition of dry leaf tissues (total soluble sugar, soluble protein, proline, phenolic compound, glutathione, α tocopherol), hydrogen peroxide, malonialdehyde, lipoxygenase, and antioxidant enzyme activities (catalase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase). All applied treatments. chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles, at all concentrations, improved plant tolerance to drought stress via increasing vegetative growth parameters, photosynthetic pigments, indole acetic acid, total soluble sugar, soluble protein, proline, phenolic compound, glutathione, α tocopherol, and antioxidant enzyme activities, accompanied by decreases in hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde, and lipoxygenase enzyme. It is worthy to mention that 20 mgL− 1 chitosan nanoparticles was the most optimal treatment either under well water conditions (90% water field capacity) or drought stress conditions (60% water field capacity). Moreover, it is obvious from these results that the response of bean plants grown under well watered conditions was more pronounced than that of those plants grown under drought stress conditions to 20 mgL− 1 chitosan nanoparticles. Conclusions: Hence, it can be concluded that chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles can mitigate the negative impacts of drought stress by improving the photosybthetic pigments, endogenous indole acetic acid, and osmolyte contents, as well as the non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidant compounds of the Vicia faba plant.
Highlights
Chitosan and chitosan NPs improved vegetative growth parameters, photosynthetic pigments, and some osmolytes of faba bean grown under drought stress (60% WFC).
Chitosan and chitosan NPs decreased hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde, and lipoxygenase of fresh leaf tissues of faba bean.
Chitosan and chitosan NPs increased two antioxidant substance (glutathione, and α tocopherol), and antioxidant enzyme activities.
Chitosan and chitosan NPs improved faba bean plant tolerance to drought stress.
Chitosan NPs at 20mgL-1 was the most optimal treatment either under well water conditions (90% WFC) or drought stress conditions (60% WFC).
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Drought stress is one of the alarming global abiotic stresses disturbing plant growth and crop production. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reported that 45% of agricultural land was exposed to drought stress. Moreover, it is estimated that crop yield losses typically range from 30 to 90% under drought stress conditions (Dietz et al. 2021). Drought stress induces several devastating impacts on plants via disturbing various physiological, biochemical, and metabolic processes such as changes in the carbon assimilation rate, reducing cell turgor, inducing oxidative stress, variations in leaf gas exchange, enzyme activity, and ion balance (Anjum et al. 2017).The plant response to drought stress is complicated and depends on plant development stage, genetic variability, as well as the duration and severity of stress. Drought stress causes overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to oxidative damage (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2020; Hanafy and Sadak 2023). In order to maintain normal plant growth and development under drought stress, it is crucial to maintain a balance between ROS generation and scavenging. So, plants have evolved a variety of morphological, physiological-biochemical, and molecular mechanisms to successfully slow down ROS damage and maintain cellular redox balance during drought (Seleiman et al. 2021). Plants have evolved an osmotic adjustment process via increasing the biosynthesis of osmolytes (glycine betaine, proline, free amino acids, and total soluble carbohydrates) (Din et al. 2011). The main roles of these compounds are to improve osmoregulation, protect the structure of different biomolecules and membranes, stabilize different physiological processes needed for plant growth, and scavenge over accumulated radicals (Ashraf et al. 2011). In addition, higher plants have evolved several adaptive mechanisms for reducing oxidative damage through the biosynthesis of various antioxidants. Hence, enhancing the antioxidant defense system is a key strategy for effectively scavenging, detoxifying, and neutralizing excess ROS (Wu et al. 2017). The antioxidant defense system includes non-enzymatic antioxidants (phenolic compounds, ascorbate, glutathione, carotenoids, flavanones, and anthocyanins) and antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, monodehydroascorbate reductase, dehydroascorbater eductase, glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase, and glutathione S-transferase) (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2020). The main antioxidant enzyme is superoxide dismutase (SOD), which converts ROS into H2O2, buffer peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) enzymes (Noctor et al. 2000). To improve plant tolerance to different abiotic stresses, a number of substances, including growth regulators, osmoprotetants, and antioxidants, are successfully used. Exogenous application of plant development modulators, such as chitosan, is one method for improving plants´s ability to withstand drought (Sadak et al. 2022).
Chitosan is a linear cationic polysaccharide composed of glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine linked through β‐ (1–4) glucosidic linkages (Srinivasa and Tharanathan 2007). Chitosan can be extracted from marine crustaceans like shrimp, crab, and pinfish or from the exoskeletons of most insects under the name of chitin, which can be transformed into chitosan by extracting the acetyl group and turning it into amino. Chitosan is safe, nontoxic, inexpensive, and friendly to the environment and is characterized by biocompatibility, biodegradability, and bioactivity (Katiyar et al. 2015). Besides, chitosan application has a wide prospect of addressing abiotic issues (Malerba and Cerana 2020).In addition, chitosan induced the expression of a variety of genes involved in plant defense responses that, in some cases, resulted in increased synthesis of secondary plant metabolites (Sadak et al. 2022). Furthermore, chitosan treatment induced over-expression of genes involved in photosynthesis, changes in the programming of protein metabolism, and an enhancement of various storage proteins and hormone metabolism (Landi et al. 2017). Recently, the use of chitosan has induced drought resistance and improved the efficiency of water use (Sadak et al. 2022).
Modernistic nanotechnology has proven its position in agriculture and related industries. Therefore, increasing plant growth and productivity through the application of nanofertilizers can open new perspectives in agricultural practices. Nanofertilizers promise to be a safe way to enrich nutrients in plants without doing harm to the environment. Chitosan nanoparticles (nano-chitosan) are environmentally friendly and bioactive (Agnihotri et al. 2004). Therefore, it can introduce different biological activities with altered physicochemical properties like surface area, size, cationic nature, etc. (Chandra et al. 2015). Chitosan nanoparticles are easily absorbed by the epidermis of leaves and translocated to stems, which facilitates the uptake of active molecules and enhances the growth and productivity of several crop plants (Malerba and Cerana 2020). In addition, chitosan nanoparticles alleviated the adverse effect of drought stress on white lupine seedlings (Bakhoum et al. 2022).
Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) is a major leguminous crop that is grown in Egypt. It is an important source of protein for human and animal consumption. Faba bean seeds have a high content of protein and micronutrients and are also a good source of energy and dietary fibre (Khazaei and Vandenberg 2020). The average protein ranges from 24 to 35%, making it one of the most protein-rich pulses (starchy grain legumes). Faba bean is not only nutritionally important but also plays a critical role in reducing nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs to agricultural production systems through symbiotic fixation of atmospheric N2 (Mansour et al. 2021). Faba bean is highly sensitive to water stress compared with other legumes (Bakhoum et al. 2022). In addition, in 2020, broad bean production in Egypt was 190.000 tonnes, while its consumption was 460.000 tonnes (Abo-Alhassan et al. 2022). Due to the great gap between the production and consumption of faba beans, it is necessary to increase their production to decrease this gap, especially when grown under drought stress.
As far as we know, not many studies have examined how chitosan and its nanoform treatments affect the morphological and physiological properties of the Vicia faba plant under drought stress. Hence, this investigation aimed to evaluate the impact of various chitosan and its nanoform levels on different studied parameters of Vicia faba grown under drought stress. So, it is imperative to understand in further detail how this plant responds to exogenous treatment of chitosn and its nanoform under drought stress in order to boost its pigments and endogenous IAA and counteract the negative impacts of drought stress by altering certain morpho-physiological features of this plant. As a result, this investigation can help researchers choose the ideal chitosan and its nanoform levels to improve faba bean drought tolerance.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Experimental Procedures
This study was conducted at the greenhouse of the National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt (30° 3’ 0” N / 31° 15’ 0” E), during two successive winter seasons 2020/2021 and 2021/ 2022. Faba bean (Vicia faba L. cv. Giza 461) seeds were obtained from the Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Egypt. Faba bean seeds were selected for uniformity by choosing those of equal size and with the same color. The selected seeds were washed with distilled water, sterilized with a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for about 2 min and thoroughly washed again with distilled water. Ten uniformly air dried faba bean seeds were sown along a centre row in each pot at a 30-mm depth in plastic pots, each filled with about 7.0 kg of clay soil mixed with sandy soil in a proportion of 3:1(v: v), respectively.
At sowing, granular commercial rhizobia was incorporated into the top 30 mm of the soil in each pot with the seeds. Granular ammonium sulphate 20.5% N at a rate of 40 kg N ha-1, and single superphosphate (15% P2O5) at a rate of 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 were added to each pot. The N and P fertilizers were mixed thoroughly into the soil of each pot immediately before sowing. Ten days after sowing (DAS), faba bean seedlings were thinned to four seedlings per pot and irrigated with equal volumes of tap water until 15 DAS. Starting from 15th day, pots were divided into two groups. The first group of faba bean seedlings was sprayed twice with three levels of chitosan at 0.5, 1 and 2 gL-1 at 15 and 22 DAS. While, the second group of faba bean seedlings was sprayed with three levels of nano-chitosan at 10, 20, and 30 mgL-1 at 15 and 22 DAS. The control treatments were sprayed by tap water. Further, each group was divided into two sub-groups, in the first sub-group, bean seedlings were irrigated with tap water at 90% water field capacity. While, second sub-group, bean seedlings were irrigated with tap water at 60% water field capacity throughout the rest of the experiment (60 days).
The soil field capacity in the pots was estimated by saturating the soil in the pots with water and weighing them after they had been drained for 48 h. Treatments were arranged at the green-house benches in a complete randomized block design with six replicates for each treatment.
2.2 Measurements
Plant samples were collected after 60 days from sowing for measurement of some growth parameters (i.e. shoot height, root length, branches and leaves number, shoot and root fresh weights /plant, shoot and root dry weights /plant), as well as some biochemical analysis.
2.3 Biochemical Analysis
Photosynthetic pigments: Chlorophylls and carotenoids contents in plant leaves were estimated using the method of Li and Chen (2015). Indole acetic acid content was extracted and estimated by the method of Gusmiaty et al. (2019).The level of H2O2 was determined according to Jana and Choudhuri (1981). The level of lipid peroxidation was measured by determining the malondialdehyde (MDA) content according to Hodges et al. (1999). Lipoxygenase (EC 1.13.11.12) activity was evaluated according to Doderer et al. (1992).
Assay of antioxidant enzymes activities: Enzymes were extracted following the method of Chen and Wang (2006). Catalase (CAT) (EC 1.11.1.6) activity was determined according to the method of Chen and Wang (2006). Peroxidase (POX) (EC 1.11.1.7) activity was evaluated using the method of Kumar and Khan (1982). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (EC 1.12.1.1) activity was measured according to Chen and Wang (2006). The level of ascorbate peroxidase (ASP) (EC 1.11.1.11) activity was estimated using Chen and Asada (1992) method. Glutathione reductase enzyme (GR)(EC 1.6.4.2) activity was evaluated according to the method of Foyer et al. (1995).
Assay of non Enzymatic Antioxidants
Non enzymatic antioxidants were extracted as the method described by Gonzalez et al. (2003). A known weight of the fresh samples (1 g) was homogenized with 85% cold methanol (50 mL v/v) for three times at 90 °C. The free radical scavenging activity by 2,2, -diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) method was estimated according to Gyamfi et al. (1999). Total phenolic content was estimated as the method described by Gonza’lez et al. (2003).The content of glutathione (non-protein SH group) was estimated according to the method of Paradiso et al. (2008). α-tocopherol content was assayed according to the method described by Jargar et al. (2012).
Assay of Compatible Solute
Proline (Pro) content was determined by Kalsoom et al. (2016). Total soluble sugars (TSS) were estimated by the method of Mecozzi (2005). Total soluble nitrogen (TSN) content was measured by the method of Horwilz (2002).
2.4 Statistical Analysis
Data average of two seasons was statistically analyzed by analysis of variance. The differences among means were determined by least significant differences (LSD) according to Silva and Azevedo (2016) and compared by Duncan’s test (p ≤ 0.05) and presented by standard deviation.
3 Results
3.1 Vegetative Growth Parameters
Drought stress significantly reduced the vegetative growth parameters of the shoot system of the bean plant accompanied by significant increases in the vegetative growth parameters of the root system relative to those grown under well watered conditions (Table 1). Since then, drought stress conditions have significantly reduced shoot dry weight/plant by 51.16% and significantly increased root dry weight /plant by 128.05% relative to well watered conditions.
Both chitosan and chitosan NPs at all concentrations caused marked increases in vegetative growth parameters of the shoot and root systems of bean plants grown either under well watered conditions or drought stress conditions. The most optimal treatment was 20 mg L− 1 chitosan NPs. Since it significantly increased shoot and root dry weight by 83.72% and 45.39% respectively in plants grown under well watered conditions. Likewise, it significantly increased shoot and root dry weight by 29.46% and 17.24% respectively in plant grown under drought stress conditions. It is obvious from these results that the response of bean plants grown under well watered condition was more pronounced than that of those grown under drought stress conditions to 20 mgL− 1 chitosan NPs. Moreover, the promotive effect of 20 mg L− 1 chitosan NPs on shoot dry weight was more pronounced than its effect on root dry weight.
3.2 Photosynthetic Pigments
Under drought stress conditions, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total photosynthetic pigment decreased significantly accompanied by a significant increase in carotenoid and the ratio of chlorophyll a/ chlorophyll b relative to plants grown under well watered conditions (Table 2). Since, drought stress conditions have significantly reduced total photosynthetic pigment by 21.69% relative to well watered conditions.
While, chitosan and chitosan NPs significantly increased all components of photosynthetic pigments either in plants grown under well watered conditions or drought stress conditions, except chitosan at 2gL− 1 that caused non significant increases in chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b in fresh leaf tissues of plants grown under drought stress conditions. The optimum treatments that caused the highest significant increases in total photosynthetic pigments were chitosan at 1 gL− 1 and chitosan NPs at 20mgL− 1 either in plants grown under well watered conditions or drought stress conditions. 20mgL− 1 chitosan NPs followed by 1 gL− 1 chitosan significantly increased the total photosynthetic pigment of the well watered faba bean plant by 79.55% and 14.71% respectively relative to corresponding control. On the other hand, total photosynthetic pigment of bean plant grown under drought stress conditions was increased via 1 gL− 1 chitosan by 13.37% followed by and chitosan NPs at 20mgL− 1 by 11.46% relative to the corresponding control.
3.3 Endogenous Indole Acetic acid (IAA)
Table 2 shows that drought stress conditions significantly decreased IAA by 95.25%relative to well watered conditions. Whereas, all applied treatments significantly increased IAA either in plants grown under well watered or drought stress conditions. Chitosan NPs at 20 mgL− 1 significantly increased IAA by 121.84% in plants grown under well watered conditions and by 106.23% in plants grown under drought stress conditions.
3.4 Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) and Malondialdeyhde (MDA)
Figure 1 shows that drought stress conditions significantly increased H2O2 by (59.66%) and MDA by (46.20%) in fresh bean leaf tissues relative to those grown under well watered conditions. Meanwhile, the applied treatments chitosan and chitosan NPs significantly decreased H2O2 and MDA contents in bean plants grown either under well water conditions (90%) or drought stress conditions (60%). Moreover, 20 mgL− 1 chitosan NPs was the optimum treatment. Since, bean plants grown under well watered conditions and treated with 20mgL− 1 chitosan NPs was characterized by significant decreases in H2O2(11.21%) and MDA (17.18%) relative to the corresponding control.
Regarding drought stress conditions and treatment with 20mgL− 1 chitosan NPs, it was noted more significant decreases in H2O2 (22.64%) and MDA (25.63%) relative to corresponding controls.
3.5 Lipoxygenase (LOX) Enzyme and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities
Figures (2, 3 and 4) shows that drought stress conditions significantly increased LOX (105.63%) and GR (44.99%) catalase (CAT) (44.96%), peroxidase (POX) (61.05%), superoxide dismutase (SOD)(28.20%) and ascorbate peroxidase (ASP) (27.03%) in fresh bean leaf tissues relative to those grown under well watered condition. All applied treatments significantly decreased LOX activity accompanied by significant increases in CAT, POX, SOD, ASP, GR activities in bean plant grown either under well water condition or drought stress conditions.
Moreover, 20 mgL− 1 chitosan NPs was the optimum treatment. Since, bean plant grown under well watered condition and treated by20mgL− 1 chitosan NPs was characterized by significant decrease in LOX (14.49%) accompanied by significant increases in CAT (47.23%), POX (94.62%), SOD (35.89%), ASP (40.54%), and GR (101.12%) relative to corresponding controls.
Regarding drought stress conditions and treatment by 20 mgL− 1 chitosan nanoparticles, it was noted a significant decrease in LOX (29.26%), accompanied by significant increase in CAT (61.07%), POX (74.12%), SOD (63.41%), ASP (23.40%), and GR (118.72%) relative to corresponding control. It is clear that significant decrease in LOX accompanied by significant increases in CAT, POX, SOD, ASP, GR were more pronounced in fresh leaf of bean plant grown under drought stress conditions as compared to those grown under well watered conditions.
3.6 Phenolic Compound, DPPH, Glutathione (GSH), and α-tocopherol (α-Toco)
Figure 5 shows that drought stress conditions significantly increased phenolic compounds (34.43%), DPPH (67.22%), glutathione (25.15%), and α-tocopherol (35.85%) in the dry leaf tissues of bean plants relative to a well watered condition.
All applied treatments significantly increased phenolic compounds, DPPH, glutathione and α-tocopherol in bean plants grown either under well watered conditions or drought stress conditions. Chitosan NPs at 20mgL− 1 was the most optimal treatment. The bean plants grown under well watered conditiona and treated with chitosan NPs at 20mg L− 1 was characterized by significant increases in phenolic compounds (62.50%), DPPH (67.15%), glutathione (46.37%), and α-tocopherol (30.62%) relative to the corresponding control. On the other hand, bean plants grown under drought stress conditions and treated with chitosan NPs at 20mgL− 1 were characterized by significant increases in phenolic compound (54.41%), DPPH (62.13%), glutathione (63.83%), and α-tocopherol (45.65%) relative to the corresponding control.
It is clear that, the increments in DPPH due 20mgL− 1 chitosan NPs were more pronounced in bean plants grown under well watered conditions than those grown under drought stress conditions. On the other hand, glutathione and α-tocopherol showed opposite trends.
3.7 Total Soluble Sugar, Soluble Protein, Proline
Figure 6 shows that drought stress conditions significantly increased total soluble sugar (35.88%), total soluble protein (20.41%) and proline (45.99%) in the dry leaf tissues of bean plants relative to a well watered condition. All applied treatments significantly increased total soluble sugar, total soluble protein and proline in bean plants grown either under well watered conditions or drought stress conditions.
Chitosan NPs at 20mgL− 1 were the most optimal treatment. The bean plant grown under well watered conditions and treated with chitosan NPs at 20mgL− 1 was characterized by significant increases in total soluble sugar (51.96%), total soluble protein (41.94%) and proline (51.82%) relative to the corresponding control. On the other hand, bean plant grown under drought stress conditions and treated with chitosan NPs at 20mgL− 1 was characterized by significant increases in total soluble sugar (41.40%), total soluble protein (41.34%) and proline (32.64%), relative to corresponding controls.
4 Discussion
Drought is one of the greatest abiotic stresses that slows down plant growth and causes different metabolic variations (Bakhoum et al. 2022). Drought stress significantly influenced the growth of various metabolic pathways in Vicia faba plants. Exogenous treatment of chitosan and its nanoform reduced the negative influence of drought stress on faba bean plants. Low water irrigation caused variations in a variety of biochemical, physiological, and molecular attributes that reduced nutrient availability and decreased plant growth and productivity (Kapoor et al. 2020).
According to the current investigation, the faba bean plants showed lower growth parameters under drought stress. These results supported the data obtained before from different plant species (AbdElhamid et al. 2021).The reduced effect of drought stress on shoot growth criteria of bean plants might result from disorders caused by drought stress on physiological and biochemical processes such as plant growth regulators, photosynthetic assimilation activities, and the activities of key enzymes responsible for the different vital metabolic processes (Anjum et al. 2017). Dawood and Sadak (2014) and Bakry et al. (2019) stated that both the fresh and dry weights of canola and wheat shoots decreased with decreasing water holding capacity and referred to these decreases as disorders induced by water stress and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). On the other side, the increases in root growth criteria of bean plants under drought stress may be due to the adaptation of bean plants to drought stress to increase water and mineral absorption. During drought, the root system is usually elongated to improve uptake of water from the soil, whereas shoot growth is inhibited (Sharp et al. 2004).
Impaired photosynthesis in faba plants is among the significant signs of drought stress influences. These reductions are substantiated by the earlier results of Sadak and Bakhoum (2022) and Hussain et al. (2023). These decreases might be due to oxidation of photosynthetic pigments and damage to the photosynthetic apparatus which leads to a decrease in photosynthetic carbon assimilation and decreasing enzyme activities of the Calvin cycle (Din et al. 2011); as well as, increasing chlorophyll degradation by proteolytic enzymes such as chlorophyllase (Jomo et al. 2016), deterioration in chloroplast molecules and finally stomatal closure (Jomo et al. 2016). Hence, the decrease in carotenoids content under drought stress might be associated with the degradation of β-carotene (Sultana et al. 1999).
Additionally, drought stress significantly decreased the IAA contents of bean leaves. These reductions of different phytohormones as IAA might attributed be to the decreases in enzyme activity which participate in phytohormone synthesis and/or increases in enzymes that participate in its degradation (Vaseva-Gemisheva et al. 2005). Dawood and Sadak (2014) confirmed these decreases in canola leaves and attributed these decreases to the destruction of IAA by increasing the activity of IAA oxidase.
Whereas, Amir et al. (2021) mentioned that drought induced a noticeable accretion in the accumulation of total soluble sugars, proline, ascorbic acid, anthocyanins, and secondary metabolites that protect plants against oxidative damages caused by drought. Drought stress increased oxidative stress damage in terms of reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and lipoxygenase (LOX), leading to lipid peroxidation and membrane damage. MDA content is one of the degradation products of polyunsaturated fatty acids of bio membranes and is used to evaluate lipid peroxidation and as a sign of membrane cellular damage. Drought stress constrained plant cell metabolism, such as photosynthesis or respiration, induced the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as H2O2 and destroyed the balance between ROS generation and quenching, resulting in the accumulation of malondialdehyde (MAD) in plants (Gharibi et al. 2016). These results are in good agreement with those reported by Laxa et al. (2019), who found that the extreme drought stress increased O2·− production rate and H2O2 content of plants, resulting in higher MDA content and an increase in membrane permeability. These increases in MDA and H2O2 may be due to inadequate induction of the antioxidant system. In addition, increased LOX activity (Fig. 3) might have contributed to the lipid peroxidation of membrane lipids and thereby significantly participate to the oxidative damage in water-deficient plants. Increased LOX activity is responsible for the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids and thus enhances lipid peroxidation under stress conditions (Sánchez-Rodríguez et al. 2012).
Under drought stress, plants have an internal strategy that decreases stress caused by oxidative stress via the scavenging of accumulated ROS (Kapoor et al. 2020). Both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants have a strong ability to scavenge excess ROS. It was intriguing to see how drought increased the antioxidant system of the faba bean plant by raising enzyme activity and non-enzymatic component concentration (Sadak and Bakry 2020).The increased catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (ASP), and glutathione reductase (GR) activities in faba bean. Plants under drought stress may be attributed to their resistance to stress. It is well known that superoxide dismutase (SOD) acts as a first line of defense via the detoxification of superoxide radicals to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which can be scavenged by catalase (CAT) and different classes of peroxidases, glutathione peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase (ASX), thereby preventing oxidative damage (Noctor et al. 2000). Likewise, ascorbate peroxidase (ASP) is a key enzyme in the glutathione ascorbate pathway that helps to regenerate NADP+ and converts H2O2 to water (Jimenez et al. 1998). H2O2 is reduced to H2O via ascorbate and reduced glutathione (GSH), and as a result, oxidized glutathione (GSSG) is formed, which is recycled back to GSH by the action of glutathione reductase (GR) using NADPH as a reductant (Foyer and Noctor 2014). Enhanced GR activities in response to drought stress serve to maintain the ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione and thus the redox potential of glutathione (Chan et al. 2013).
Abiotic stresses disrupt the dynamic equilibrium of ROS, leading to the accumulation of an excessive amount of ROS and resulting in oxidative stress. At this time, plants encourage their antioxidant defense systems to eliminate excessive ROS. The antioxidant defense system has a beneficial role in enhancing plant performance and mitigating the effects of abiotic stresses by overcoming the toxic effects of active oxygen species and enhancing their tolerance to stress. An increase in antioxidant levels is attributed to its ability to scavenge free radicals that prevent lipid peroxidation and therefore protect the cell membrane from damage (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2020; Sadak and Ramadan 2021).
Drought induces disturbances in the metabolic process, leading to an increase in the synthesis of phenolic compounds. Phenolic compounds have a major role in the antioxidant activity of plants because they scavenge free radicals arising from their high reactivity as hydrogen or electron donors, stabilize and delocalize the unpaired electron (chain-breaking function), and have the ability to chelate transition metal ions (Krol et al. 2014). Moreover, these metabolites may participate in reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging mainly through the antioxidative enzymes utilizing polyphenols as co-substrates (Sgherri et al. 2003). Another mechanism underlying the antioxidative properties of phenolic compounds is their ability to decrease membrane fluidity (Gaballah et al. 2006).The strong positive correlation between total phenolics and antioxidant activity (DPPH) had already been observed in soybeans, which suggests that this increase in seed antioxidant activity is contributed by the presence of a high amount of phenolic compounds (Kumar et al. 2009).
Likewise, hydrophilic (e.g., glutathione) and lipophilic antioxidants (α-tocopherol) are essential components of the antioxidant defense system. Since glutathione and α-tocopherol (vitamin E) help to maintain the integrity of the photosynthetic membranes under oxidative stress (Munne´-Bosch and Alegre 2002). Drought stress increased glutathione accumulation in sunflower seedlings (Sgherri and Navari-Izzo 1995). Tocopherols protect lipids and other membrane components by physically quenching and chemically reacting with O2 in chloroplasts and can prevent the chain propagation step in lipid autoxidation, which makes them an effective free radical trap and protects the membranes from oxidative damage (Marquardt et al. 2015).
In response to drought stress, different physiological and biochemical mechanisms have been developed in plants to adapt to or tolerate stress. The present work shows that drought stress increased the proline, soluble protein, and total soluble sugar contents of bean plants. Proline and soluble sugars were accumulated in plant cells under drought stress and served as osmolytes to maintain and protect plant macromolecules and structures from stress injury, eventually increasing the plant’s tolerance to drought stress (Wu et al. 2017 and Elewa et al. 2017). Proline acts as a nitrogen source during periods of growth inhibition and plays important roles in protecting subcellular structures (cell membrane) by reducing lipid oxidation through scavenging free radicals and protecting cellular redox potential (Ashraf and Foolad 2007). During drought, proline can act as a signaling molecule, modulate mitochondrial function, and influence cell proliferation by triggering specific genes to recover from stress (Szabados and Savoure 2009). Soluble sugar protects plants from dehydration and oxidative injury (Wu et al. 2017) and acts as ROS scavengers to improve membrane stabilization (Hosseini et al. 2014). In addition, water stress caused a remarkable increase in sugar content that might play a role in the osmotic adjustment and increased the resistance of plants to drought stress (Keyvan 2010).
Nevertheless, foliar treatment of chitosan and chitosan NPs reduced the detrimental effects of drought stress on the growth attributes of faba beans. These results may be explained by the increased uptake of water and essential nutrients brought about by adjusting cell osmotic pressure, as well as a decrease in the accumulation of harmful free radicals due to increased antioxidant and enzyme activities (Malerba and Cerana 2020). In addition to the activation of the ROS scavenging system, enhanced stomatal conductance, and stimulated growth of xylem (Hidangmayum et al. 2019; Malerba and Cerana 2020). In addition, the hydrophilic nature of chitosan may alleviate stress effects by reducing cell water content and accelerating several biological macromolecules’ activities (Chakraborty et al. 2020). Regarding chitosan NPs, using nanoparticles as nutrients in plant cells at the needed time helps enhance the release of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer and their uptake by plants, thus decreasing nutrient loss (Behboudi et al. 2019). Moreover, chitosan and chitosan NPs treatments improved the impaired effect of drought stress on the photosynthetic pigments of bean plants. These increases could be attributed to the role of chitosan in improving cytokinin contents that stimulate chlorophyll synthesis and/or increasing the availability of amino compounds released from chitosan (Chibu and Shibayama 2001).Likewise, chitosan increased the chlorophyll and carotenoids of plants by activating the expression of genes responsible for the biosynthesis of photosynthetic pigments (Naderi et al. 2015). Moreover, chitosan NPs might act as an efficient photocatalyst, improving photosynthetic pigments, stomatal conductance, and net photosynthetic CO2-fixation activity (Choudhary et al. 2017). Recently, Mosavikia et al. (2020) concluded that milk thistle seed priming with chitosan NPs improved physiological mechanisms such as the synthesis of photosynthetic pigment and antioxidant enzyme activity.
The enhanced effect of chitosan and chitosan NPs on the increased IAA contents of bean plants grown under water stress might lead to an improvement in enzyme activity and as a result increased growth parameters in treated plants. Furthermore, these increases might be due to the induced effect of chitosan on auxin-related gene expression that accelerates IAA biosynthesis and reduces IAA oxidase activity (Li et al. 2018). Exogenous chitosan and chitosan NPs treatments decreased the H2O2 and MDA contents of bean plants grown under water stress. On the other hand, application of chitosan lessened the production of MDA and H2O2 through increasing antioxidant compounds that scavenge ROS and prevent cellular membranes from oxidative stress (Hawrylak-Nowak et al. 2020). In addition, charge-charge interactions between positively charged chitosan amine groups and negatively charged membrane phospholipids promote a signal that will lead to the octadecanoid pathway (Almeida et al. 2020). Moreover, chitosan treatments deceased LOX, these decreases may be attributed to the role of chitosan in enhancing the antioxidant defense system and decreased lipid peroxidation of membrane lipids via scavenging excess ROS produced by water deficit stress. Vanda et al. (2019) stated that treatment of Melissa ofcinalis shoots by chitosan led to a noticeable induction of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), catalase (CAT), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), and lipoxygenase (LOX) activities.
Regarding the increased activities of different studies on antioxidant enzymes, the activities of catalase and peroxidase in milk thistle were improved by chitosan treatment (Safikhan et al. 2018). Chitosan elicitation seems to promote the accumulation of catalase, thus corroborating their potential for improving plants’ antioxidant defenses (da Silva et al. 2021). It is likely that chitosan activates superoxide dismutase and catalase involved in the detoxification of H2O2 in plants. Moreover, the application of antioxidants decreased the generation of free radicals and lipid peroxidation when plants were stressed (Malik and Ashraf 2012). The usefulness of elicitors as chitosan is a strategy for inducing and promoting the formation of secondary metabolites and can increase the activity of specific enzymes associated with the formation of secondary metabolites (Rao and Ravishankar 2002). Application of chitosan increased the activities of phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) and tyrosine ammonialyase (TAL), the key enzymes of the phenylpropanoid pathway involved in the biosynthesis of phenolic compounds (Vanda et al. 2019). Moreover, Hawrylak-Nowak et al. (2020) reported the stimulatory role of chitosan on secondary metabolites as phenolic compounds through inducing certain genes involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Furthermore, chitosan and chitosan NPs increased the proline, soluble protein, and total soluble sugar contents of bean plants grown under drought stress. Since, chitosan application could induce a significant difference in organic acids, sugars, and amino acids in the leaves of wheat seedlings (Zhang et al. 2017) and significantly increase the soluble sugar content under severe drought in basil plants (Pirbalouti et al. 2017).
5 Conclusion
According to the results obtained in our study, drought stress (60% water irrigation) decreased faba bean growth attributes of the shoot system, including photosynthetic pigments and indole acetic acid. While it increased root system parameters, antioxidant enzymes, and antioxidant compounds in addition to some osmoprotectant compounds. These findings supported the negative impact of drought via demonstrating how it stresses faba bean plants. On the contrary, exogenous chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles treatments of faba bean plants reduced these negative effects and enhanced the growth of the plant. Chitosan and its nanoform modulated photosynthetic pigments, indole acetic acid, total soluble sugar, soluble protein, proline, phenolic compound, glutathione, α tocopherol, and antioxidant enzyme activities (catalase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase) accompanied by decreases in hydrogen peroxide, lipid peroxidation, and lipoxygenase. It was noticed in this study that 20 mg L− 1 chitosan nanoparticles was the most optimum treatment either under well water condition (90% water field capacity) or drought stress condition (60% water field capacity). Moreover, it is obvious that the response of bean plants grown under well watered condition was more pronounced than that of those grown under drought condition to 20 mgL− 1 chitosan nanoparticles. It can be concluded that either chitosan or its nanoforn induce drought tolerance in barley plants.
References
AbdElhamid EMA, Sadak MS, Ezzo MI, Abdalla AM (2021) Impact of glycine betaine on drought tolerance of Moringa oleifera plant grown under sandy soil. Asian J Plant Sci 20:578–589.https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2021.578.589
Abo-Alhassan AM, Hassanein AM, Abd El-Aziz MA, Abou-Tahoun AM (2022) Effect of phosphorus and potassium fertilization on drought tolerance of broad bean (Vicia faba L). Sci J Agricultural Sci 4:114–124. https://doi.org/10.21608/sjas.2022.132843.1215
Agnihotri SA, Mallikarjuna NN, Aminabhavi TM (2004) Recent advances in chitosan-based micro-and nanoparticles in drug delivery. J Controlled Release 100:5–28
Almeida LG, Magalhães PC, Décio K, Marcos da S, AmauriAlves A (2020) Chitosan application in the induction of water defcit tolerance in maize plants. Acta Scientiarum Agron 42:e42463. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42463
Amir SB, Rasheed R, Ashraf MA, Hussain I, Iqbal M (2021) Hydrogen sulfide mediates defense response in safflower by regulating secondary metabolism, oxidative defense, and elemental uptake under drought. Physiol Plant 172:795–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13267
Anjum SA, Ashraf U, Zohaib A, Tanveer M, Naeem M, Ali I, Tabassum T, Nazir U (2017) Growth and developmental responses of crop plants under drought stress: A review. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture104: 267–276. https://doi.org/10.13080/za.2017.104.034
Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress tolerance. Environ Experimental Botany59:206–216
Ashraf M, Akram NA, Al-QurainyF, Foolad MR (2011) Chapter five– drought tolerance: roles of organic osmolytes, growth regulators, and mineral nutrients. Adv Agron 111:249–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00002-3
Bakhoum GSh, Sadak MS, Tawfik MM (2022b) Chitosan and Chitosan nanoparticle effect on growth, productivity and some biochemical aspects of Lupinus termis L plant under drought conditions. Egypt J Chem 65(5):537–549. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem202197832.4563
Bakry AB, Sadak MS, El-Karamany MF, Tawfik MM (2019) Sustainable production of two wheat cultivars under water stress conditions. Plant Archives 19(2):2307–2315
Behboudi F, Tahmasebi-Sarvestani Z, Kassaee MZ, Modarres-Sanavy SA, Sorooshzadeh A, Mokhtassi-Bidgoli A (2019) Evaluation of chitosan nanoparticles effects with two application methods on wheat under drought stress. J Plant Nutr 42:1439–1451
Chakraborty M, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahman M, Khan MA, Bhowmik P, Mahmud NU, Tanveer M, Islam T (2020) Mechanism of plant growth promotion and disease suppression by chitosan biopolymer. Agriculture 10:624
Chan KX, Wirtz M, Phua SY, Estavillo GM, Pogson BJ (2013) Balancing metabolites in drought: the sulfur assimilation conundrum.Trends in Plant Science. 18:18–29
Chandra S, Chakraborty N, Dasgupta A, Sarkar J, Panda K, Acharya K (2015) Chitosan nanoparticles: a positive modulator of innate immune responses in plants. Sci Rep 5:15195. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15195
Chen G, Asada K (1992) Inactivation of ascorbate peroxidase by thoils requires hydrogen peroxide. Plant Cell Physiol 33:117–123
Chen JX, Wang XF (2006) Plant physiology experimental guide.High Educ Press Beijing, China. 24–25, 55–56
Chibu H, Shibayama H (2001) Effects of Chitosan applications on the growth of several crops. In: Uragami T, Kurita K, Fukamizo T (eds) Chitin and chitosan in life science. Yamaguchi, Japan, pp 235–239
Choudhary RC, Kumaraswamy RV, Kumari S, Sharma SS, Pal A, Raliya A, Biswas P, Saharan V (2017) Cu-chitosan nanoparticle boost defense responses and plant growth in maize (Zea mays L). Sci Rep 7(1):9754. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-08571-0
da Silva MN, SantosC, CruzA, López-Villamor A, Vasconcelos M (2021) Chitosan increases Pinuspinaster tolerance to the pinewood nematode (Bursaphele Nchusxylophilus) by promoting plant antioxidative metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83445-0. Scientific Reports11: 3781.
Dawood MG, Sadak MS (2014) Physiological role of glycinebetaine in alleviating the deleterious effects of drought stress on canola plants (Brassica napus L). Middle East J Agric Res 3:943–954
Dietz KJ, Zorb C, Geilfus CM (2021) Drought and crop yield. Plant Biol 23:881–893
Din J, Kans SU, Ali J, Gurmani AR (2011) Physiological and agronomic response of canola varieties to drought stress. J Anim Plant Sciences21:78–82
Doderer A, Kokkelink I, Veen VDS, Valk B, Schram A, Douma A (1992) Purification and characterization of two lipoxygenase isoenzymes from germinating barley. Biochimical Biophyslogy Acta 1120:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4838(92)90429-H
Elewa TA, Sadak MS, Dawood MG (2017) Improving drought tolerance of quinoa plant by foliar treatment of trehalose. Agricultural Eng Int Special Issue:245–245
Foyer CH, Noctor G (2011) Ascorbate and glutathione: the heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiol 155(1):2–18
Foyer CH, Souriau N, Perret S, Lelandais M, Kunert KJ, Pruvost C, Jounanin L (1995) Overexpression of glutathione reductase but not glutathione synthetase leads to increases in antioxidant capacity and resistance to photoinhibition in poplar trees. Plant Physiol 109:1047–1057. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.3.1047
Gaballah MS, Ouda SA, Mandour MS, Rady MM (2006) Predicting the role of antioxidants and irrigation sunflower grown under saline condition. Proceeding (515) Environmentally sound Technology in water Resources Management
Gharibi S, Tabatabaei B, SaeidiG, Hossein SA (2016) Goli 3 effect of drought stress on total phenolic, lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant activity of AchilleaSpecies. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 178:796–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-015-1909-3
Gonza’lez M, Guzma’n B, Rudyk R, Romano E, Molina MAA (2003) Spectrophotometric determination of phenolic compounds in propolis. Am J Pharmacol 22:243–248
Gusmiaty A, Restu M, Payangan RY (2019) Production of IAA (indole acetic acid) of the rhizosphere fungus in the Suren community forest stand. Earth Environ Sci 343. IOP Conf. Ser.https://doi.org/10.1088/1755?1315/343/1/012058
Gyamfi MA, Yonamine M, Aniya Y (1999) Free radical scavenging action of medicinal herbs from Ghana:Thonningia sanguinea on experimentally induced liver injuries. Gen Pharmacol 32:661–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-3623(98)00238-9
Hanafy RS, Sadak MS (2023) Foliar Spray of stigmasterol regulates physiological processes and antioxidant mechanisms to improve yield and quality of sunflower under drought stress. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01197-4
Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan M, Zulfiqar F, Raza A, Mohsin SM, Mahmud JA, Fujita M (2020) Fotopoulos, V. reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 9:681
Hawrylak-Nowak B, Dresler S, Rubinowska K, Matraszek-Gawron R (2020) Eliciting effect of foliar application of Chitosan lactate on the phytochemical properties of Ocimum basilicumL and Melissa Ofcinalis L. Food Chem 342:128358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j
Hidangmayum A, Dwivedi P, Katiyar D, Hemantaranjan A (2019) Application of chitosan on plant responses with special reference to abiotic stress.Physiology and Molecular Biology of plants. 25:313–326
Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Forney C, Prange PK (1999) Improving the thiobarbaturic acid reactive substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207:604–611
Horwilz W (2002) Official methods of A.O.A.C. International Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2077–2417,USA
Hosseini SM, Hasanloo T, Mohammadi S (2014) Physiological characteristics, antioxidant enzyme activities, and gene expression in 2 spring canola (Brassica napusL.) Cultivars under drought stress conditions. Turkish J Agricultural Forestry 38:1–8
Hussain I, Ayub A, Nayab A, Ashraf MA et al (2023) Exogenous application of silicon and zinc attenuates drought tolerance in Eruca sativa L. through increasing chlorophyll pigments, osmoprotectants, and modulating defense mechanisms. J Plant GrowthRegulation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-11116-7
Jana S, Choudhuri MA (1981) Glycolate metabolism of three submerged aquatic angiosperms during aging. Aquat Bot 12:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(82)90026-2
Jargar JG, Hattiwale SH, Das S, Dhundasi SA, Das KK (2012) A modified simple method for determination of serum α -tocopherol (vitamin E).Journal of Basic Clinical. Physiological Pharmacol 223:45–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2011-0033
Jimenez A, Hernandez JA, Pastori G, Del Rıo A, Sevilla F (1998) Role of the ascorbate glutathione cycle of mitochondria and peroxisomes in the senescence of pealeaves. Plant Physiol 118:1327–1335
Jomo M, Netondo W, Musyimi M (2016) Drought inhibition of chlorophyll content among seven Amaranthuss species. Int J Adv Res Sci Eng Technol 3:1362–1371. http://www.ijarset.com/upload/2016/february/2_ijarset_jomooscar.pdf
Kalsoom U, Bennett IJ, Boyce MC (2016) A review of extraction and analysis: methods for studying osmoregulants in plants. Chromatogr J Sep Tech 7:1. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7064.1000315
Kapoor D, Bhardwaj S, Landi M, Sharma A, Ramakrishnan M, Sharma A (2020) The impact of drought in plant metabolism: how to exploit tolerance mechanisms to increase crop production. Appl Sci 10:5692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165692
Katiyar D, Hemantaranjan A, Singh B (2015) Chitosan as a promising natural compound to enhance potential physiological responses in plant: a review. Indian J Plant Physiol 20(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-015-0139-6
Keyvan S (2010) The effects of drought stress on yield, relative water content, proline, soluble carbohydrates and chlorophyll of bread wheat cultivars. J Anim Plant Sci 8(3):1051–1060. http://www.biosciences.elewa.org
Khazaei H, Vandenberg A (2020) Seed mineral composition and protein content of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) with contrasting tannin contents. Agronomy 10(4):511. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040511
Krol A, Amarowicz R, Weidner S (2014) Changes in the composition of phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of grapevine roots and leaves (Vitis vinifera L.) under continuous of long-term drought stress. Acta Physiologyical Planturm 36:1491–1499
Kumar KB, Khan PA (1982) Peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in excised ragi (Eleusine coracana cv. PR 202) leaves during senescence. Indian J Expermental Biology 20:412–416
Kumar V, Rani A, Dixit AK, Bhatnagar D, Chauhan GS (2009) Relative changes in tocopherols, isoflavones, total phenolic content, and antioxidative activity in soybean seeds at different reproductive stages. J Agric Food Chem 57(7):2705–2710
Landi L, De MiccolisAngelini RM, Pollastro E, Feliziani S, Faretra F, Romanazzi G (2017) Global transcriptome analysis and identification of differentially expressed genes in strawberry after preharvest application of benzothiadiazole and chitosan. Front Plant Sci 8:235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00235
Laxa M, Liebthal M, Telman W, Chibani K, Dietz KJ (2019) The role of the plant antioxidant system in drought tolerance, vol 8. Antioxidants, p 94
Li Y, Chen M (2015) Novel chlorophylls and new directions in photosynthesis research. Funct Plant Biol 42:493–501
Li R, He J, Xie H, Wang W, Bose SK, Sun Y, Hu J, Yin H (2018) Effects of Chitosan nanoparticles on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Int J Biol Macromol 126:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.118
Malerba M, Cerana R (2020) Chitin and Chitosan-based derivatives in plant protection against biotic and abiotic stresses and in recovery of contaminated soil and water. Polysaccharides1:21–30
Malik S, Ashraf M (2012) Exogenous application of ascorbic acid stimulates growth and photosynthesis of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) Under drought. Soil Environ 31:72–77
Mansour E, Desoky ME, Ali MA, Abdul-Hamid MA, Ullah H, Attia A, Datta A (2021) Identifying drought-tolerant genotypes of faba bean and their agro-physiological responses to different water regimes in an arid Mediterranean environment. Agric Water Manage 247:106754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106754
Marquardt D, Kučerka N, Katsaras J, Harroun TA (2015) α-Tocopherol’s location in membranes is not affected by their composition. Langmuir 31:4464–4472. https://doi.org/10.1021/la502605c
Mecozzi M (2005) Estimation of total carbohydrate amount in environmental samples by the phenol-sulphuric acid method assisted by multivariate calibration. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 79:84–90
Mosavikia AA, Mosavi SG, Seghatoleslami M, Baradaran R (2020) Chitosan nanoparticle and pyridoxine seed priming improves tolerance to salinity in milk thistle seedling (Silybumm Arianum(L.) Gaertn). Notulae Botanicae HortiAgrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 48:221–233. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha48111777
Munne´-Bosch S, Alegre L (2002) The function of tocopherols and tocotrienols in plants. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 21:31–57
Naderi S, Khajeh H, Ahmadi H (2015) The effect of chitosan on some morphological indices in Lepidium sativumL. The First Conference of Medicinal Herbs and Herbal Medicines, Tehran, Center for the Sustainable Development of Science and Technology Farzin
Noctor G, Veljovic-Jovanovic S, Foyer CH (2000) Peroxide processing in photosynthesis: antioxidant coupling and redox signaling. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 355:1465–1475
Paradiso A, Berardino R, de Pinto MC, di Toppi LS, Storelli MM, Tommasi F, De Gara L (2008) Increase in ascorbate–glutathione metabolism as local and precocious systemic responses induced by cadmium in durum wheat plants. Plant Cell Physiol 49:362–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcn013
Pirbalouti AG, Malekpoor F, Salimi A, Golparvar A (2017) Exogenous application of chitosan on biochemical and physiological characteristics, phenolic content and antioxidant activity of two species of basil (Ocimum Ciliatum and Ocimum basilicum) under reduced irrigation. Sci Hort 217:114–122
Rao RS, Ravishankar GA (2002) Plant cell cultures: chemical factories of secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv 20:101–153
Sadak MS, Bakry BA (2020) Alleviation of drought stress by melatonin foliar treatment on two flax varieties under sandy soil. Physiological Mol Bioliology Plants 26:907–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00789-z
Sadak MS, Tawfik MM, Bakhoum, GSh (2022) Role of chitosan and chitosan-based nanoparticles on drought tolerance in plants: probabilities and prospects. In: Nanomaterial-Plant Interactions Role of Chitosan and Chitosan-Based Nanomaterials in Plant Sciences, Edited by:Santosh Kumar and Sundararajan V. Madihally.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85391-0.00013-7
Sadak MS, Ramadan AA (2021) Impact of melatonin and tryptophan on water stress tolerance in white lupine (Lupinus termis L). Physiological Mol Bioliology Pl 27(3):469–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-021-00958-8
Sadak MS, Bakhoum GB (2022) Selenium-inducedmodulations in growth, productivity and physiochemical responses to waterdeficiency in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) grown in sandy soil. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 44:102449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102449
Safikhan S, Khoshbakht K, Chaichi MR, Amini A, Motesharezadeh B (2018) Role of chitosan on the growth, physiological parameters and enzymatic activity of milk thistle (Silybum marianum(L.) Gaertn) in a pot experiment. J Appl Res Med Aromatic Plants 10:49–58
Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Rubio-Wilhelmi MDM, Blasco B, Leyva R, Romero L, Ruiz JM (2012) Antioxidant response resides in the shoot in reciprocal grafts of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive cultivars in tomato under water stress. Plant Sci 188–189:89–96
Seleiman MF, Al-SuhaibaniN,Ali N, Akmal M, Alotaibi M, Refay Y, Dindaroglu T, Abdul-Wajid HH, Battaglia ML (2021) Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants (Basel) 10:259
Sgherri CLM, Navari-Izzo F (1995) Sunflower seedlings subjected to increasing water deficit stress: oxidative stress and defence mechanisms. Physiolia Plant 93:25–30
Sgherri C, Cosi E, Navari-Izzo F (2003) Phenols and antioxidative status of Raphanus sativus grown in copper excess. Physiolical Plant 118:21–28
Sharp RE, Poroyko V, Hejlek LG, Spollen WG, Springer GK, Bohnert HJ, HNguyen HT( (2004) Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. J Exp Bot 55(407):2343–2235. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh276
Silva FAS, Azevedo CAV (2016) The Assistat Software Version 7.7 and its use in the analysis of experimental data. Afr J Agric Res 11(39):3733–3740
Srinivasa PC, Tharanathan RN (2007) Chitin/chitosan - safe, ecofriendly packaging materials with multiple potential uses. Food Reviews Int 23(1):53–72
Sultana N, Ikeda T, Itoh R (1999) Effect of NaCl salinity on photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation in developing rice grains. Environ Experimental Botany42:211–220
Szabados L, Savoure A (2009) Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci 15:89–97
Vanda GF, Shabani L, Razavizadeh R (2019) Chitosan enhances rosmarinic acid production in shoot cultures of Melissa Ofcinalis L. through the induction of methyl jasmonate. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-019-0274-x. Botanical Studies60:26
Vaseva-Gemisheva I, Lee D, Karanov E (2005) Response of Pisum sativum cytokinin oxidase /dehydrogenase expression and specific activity to drought stress and herbicide treatments. Plant Growth Regulators 46:199–208
Wu HH, Zou YN, Rahman MM, Ni QD, W, QS (2017) Mycorrhizas alter sucrose and proline metabolism in trifoliate orange exposed to drought stress. Sci Rep 7:42389
Zhang X, Li K, Xing R, Liu S, Li P (2017) Metabolite profiling of wheat seedlings induced by chitosan: Revelation of the enhanced carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Front Plant Sci 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02017
Funding
No funding was received.
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dawood, M.G., El-Awadi, Ms. & Sadak, M.S. Chitosan and its Nanoform Regulates Physiological Processes and Antioxidant Mechanisms to Improve Drought Stress Tolerance of Vicia faba Plant. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01934-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01934-3