Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a significant public health problem worldwide. It encompasses a group of chronic disorders characterized by hyperglycemia, resulting from pancreatic islet dysfunction or as a consequence of insulin-producing β-cell death. Organ-on-a-chip platforms have emerged as technological systems combining cell biology, engineering, and biomaterial technological advances with microfluidics to recapitulate a specific organ’s physiological or pathophysiological environment. These devices offer a novel model for the screening of pharmaceutical agents and to study a particular disease. In the field of diabetes, a variety of microfluidic devices have been introduced to recreate native islet microenvironments and to understand pancreatic β-cell kinetics in vitro. This kind of platforms has been shown fundamental for the study of the islet function and to assess the quality of these islets for subsequent in vivo transplantation. However, islet physiological systems are still limited compared to other organs and tissues, evidencing the difficulty to study this “organ” and the need for further technological advances. In this review, we summarize the current state of islet-on-a-chip platforms that have been developed so far. We recapitulate the most relevant studies involving pancreatic islets and microfluidics, focusing on the molecular and cellular-scale activities that underlie pancreatic β-cell function.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Type 2 diabetes: a global pandemic
The maintenance of glucose homeostasis is critical for normal body function. Despite wide daily fluctuations in glucose levels, glucose concentrations need to be maintained within a narrow range to avoid harmful effects of hyperglycemia and to prevent hypoglycemia. This tight regulation is accomplished by the coordinated actions of different organs and tissues, among which the pancreas represents a key player by secreting the blood sugar-lowering insulin hormone by pancreatic β-cells and its opponent glucagon by α-cells.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a group of chronic metabolic disorders all characterized by hyperglycemia. It occurs either when the pancreatic islets do not produce enough insulin or when the peripheral tissues cannot efficiently use the insulin produced by the pancreas. Persistent high blood glucose levels cause generalized vascular damage affecting the kidneys (nephropathy) [1], the eyes (retinopathy) [2], the nerves (neuropathy) [3], and the heart (cardiovascular disease) [4], leading to disabilities and premature death. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), diabetes is among the top 10 causes of death globally. The prevalence of diabetes has been increasing over the recent decades. Indeed, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) reported that in 2019 there were 463 million people between 20 and 79 years worldwide with diabetes, accounting for the 9.3% of the global adult population. If this trend continues, it is expected to increase to 700 million by 2045. The economic burden of diabetes has a high impact on the global healthcare system and the global economy as it has been estimated that the direct annual cost of diabetes worldwide is more than USD 760 billion [5]. This data evidences the need for more clinical and preventive intervention programs and highlights the importance of carrying out more basic research in order to understand the underlying mechanisms of the disease.
According to the etiology of the disease, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classifies diabetes into the following general categories [6]:
-
1.
Type 1 diabetes (T1D). Autoimmune disease in which β-cell destruction usually leads to absolute insulin deficiency. It accounts for 5–10% of all diabetes [7, 8].
-
2.
Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Progressive loss of β-cell insulin action and/or secretion, frequently on the background of insulin resistance. T2D represents more than 90% of all cases worldwide [9].
-
3.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Diabetes with onset or diagnosed during pregnancy that was not clearly overt diabetes prior to gestation. The prevalence of gestational diabetes varies from ~2 to ~12% depending on the different sets of criteria around the world [6, 10].
-
4.
Other types of diabetes comprise monogenic diabetes syndromes (such as neonatal diabetes and maturity-onset of the young [MODY]), diseases of the exocrine pancreas (such as cystic fibrosis and pancreatitis), and drug- or chemical-induced diabetes (such as with glucocorticoids use in the treatment of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or after organ transplantation) [6].
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the most common type of diabetes and represents more than 90% of all diabetes cases worldwide. Therefore, it will be presented in detail in this review. It is characterized by a combination of a decreased response to insulin action in target tissues (e.g., muscle or adipose tissue) and impaired insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells in response to secretory stimuli [9], the latter being the ultimate cause that leads to the development and progression of T2D.
The main players: the islets of Langerhans
The pancreas acts as an exocrine and endocrine organ, being a key player in the regulation of macronutrient digestion and metabolism homeostasis by releasing a variety of digestive enzymes and pancreatic hormones. Over 98% of the pancreas consists of acinar or exocrine cells. As an exocrine gland, it produces several digestive enzymes, such as amylase, pancreatic lipase and trypsinogen, and bicarbonate that are secreted into the duodenum via the pancreatic duct [11]. In contrast, as an endocrine gland, the pancreas secretes various hormones that regulate blood glucose levels. The endocrine cells are clustered together, forming the so-called islets of Langerhans. Pancreatic islets are small, round-shaped structures scattered throughout the exocrine pancreatic tissue that accounts for only 1–2% of the entire organ [12]. They are composed of 5 different endocrine cell types, including glucagon-secreting α-cells, which represent 20–30% of the total islet cells; amylin or islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP), C-peptide, and insulin-secreting β-cells, which account for 60–70% of the total cells; somatostatin-secreting δ-cells, which constitute 3–10% of the total cells; pancreatic polypeptide (PP)-secreting γ-cells, which comprise 3–5% of the total islet cells; and ghrelin-secreting ε-cells, which take up 1% of the total islet cells [13, 14] (Fig. 1A).
β-cells are the predominant cell type within the pancreatic islet in mammals and are the unique source of circulating insulin. In rodent islets, the vastly predominating β-cells are clustered in the core of the islet, surrounded by a mantle of α, δ, and γ cells. In human islets, β-cells intermingle with the other cell types throughout the islet [14]. Human islets tend to contain fewer β-cells and more α-cells compared to rodent islets [15]. Adequate and proper β-cell function requires normal β-cell integrity, which is critical for the appropriate response to continuous fluctuating metabolic demand for insulin.
Under physiological conditions, the maintenance of glucose homeostasis with blood glucose levels within a narrow physiological range relies on the regulation of insulin secretion through nutrient availability, hormones, and neural inputs. Among these factors, glucose is the most important physiological secretagogue for insulin, regulating β-cell function through coordinated stimulation of insulin gene transcription, proinsulin biosynthesis, and insulin secretion from β-cells. Thus, the β-cell is dedicated to convert daily fluctuations in blood glucose concentrations during the postprandial and postabsorptive phases (typically from 4.5 to 8 mM in humans) into large changes in insulin secretion within minutes. Therefore, β-cells are “fuel-sensors” that constantly monitor and respond to dietary nutrients in order to best meet the requirements of the organism by synthesizing and secreting proper amounts of insulin [16].
Glucose enters the β-cells via facilitative glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) in rodents (GLUT1 in humans) [17] and is rapidly phosphorylated by glucokinase and converted to pyruvate by the glycolytic pathway. Pyruvate oxidation in the mitochondria through the tricarboxylic acid cycle leads to a series of reactions that generate NADH from NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide). Of note, unlike many other cell types, mature β-cells express very low levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and do not regenerate NAD+ via lactate formation. Alternatively, β-cells possess high activity of two NADH shuttles, the glycerol-3-phospate and the malate/aspartate shuttle, to transfer NADH into the mitochondrial for oxidative metabolism and ATP (adenosine triphosphate) production. The increase in intracellular ATP/ADP (adenosine triphosphate/adenosine diphosphate) ratio promotes the closure of ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels, depolarization of the plasma membrane, and opening of voltage-dependent calcium [(Ca2+)] channels. The rise in [Ca2+] into the cell is followed by exocytosis of the insulin-containing granules [18] (Fig. 1B).
Insulin is a peptide hormone that orchestrates an integrated anabolic response to nutrient availability. It acts by binding to the insulin receptor on the plasma membrane of target cells [19]. Its synthesis in the β-cells, followed by a quality control, delivery, action, and clearance, is delicately regulated by different organs and tissues. Although many cell types express insulin receptors, the role of insulin in glucose homeostasis is characterized by the direct effects of this peptide on skeletal muscle, liver, and white adipose tissue. Thus, the journey of insulin in the body is an example of a highly coordinated and integrated cellular physiology [20].
Patients with T2D present a progressive decline in pancreatic β-cell function, with concomitant impairment of insulin secretion. Multiple mechanisms underlie this β-cell dysfunction, including glucolipotoxicity [21,22,23,24], oxidative stress [25, 26], endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress [27,28,29], and the formation of amyloid deposits in the islets [30,31,32,33,34,35], all associated with inflammatory responses [36, 37]. All these physiological stressors may impact the β-cell function in the context of metabolic overload and insulin resistance commonly found in human obesity-linked T2D. In this situation, while β-cells initially respond by activating a compensatory response to maintain normoglycemia, expanding β-cell mass and improving their insulin secretory capacity; eventually, they initiate several pathologic programs that synergistically promote β-cell dysfunction and, ultimately, β-cell death [38] (Fig. 2).
Therefore, exploring the pathologic conditions or β-cell stressors that lead to β-cell dysfunction is necessary to understand and intercede in the disease progression, especially in the early stages of the pathology. For this reason, measurements of insulin secretion dynamics, traditionally assessed by glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) assays, are of significant clinical relevance.
Organ-on-a-chip technology
The study of insulin secretion aimed at addressing islet functionality requires monitoring insulin release over time. However, the existing standard assays for islet functionality and viability present limited physiological relevance: usually, it involves numerous animals to assess the capacity of the pancreas to secrete insulin after a glucose challenge and/or static assay incubations of isolated islets subjected to low and high glucose concentrations in order to evaluate the insulin stimulation index. These experiments are laborious, require long processing time, and are usually followed by off-line quantification of insulin by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) or a radioimmunoassay (RIA) [39]. Hence, its readout is not obtained in real-time, making it impossible to measure rapid spatiotemporal responses. Additionally, these measurements do not have the sufficient sensitivity to measure insulin released by a single islet, and consequently these measurements are usually performed using batches of islets.
Harvesting pancreatic islets from rodents or human donors is difficult. For this reason, minimizing the number of islets required for experiments is fundamental. Moreover, the release of hormones from pancreatic islets occurs within minutes in a pulsatile fashion in response to an appropriate stimulus. Thus, to resolve the secretion dynamics, methods able to quantify insulin secretion with high temporal resolution are required.
New high-technological advances have allowed the development of microfluidic organ-on-a-chip (OOC) systems to recapitulate in vivo cellular models with a high level of control. Recently, they have been defined as “microfabricated cell culture devices designed to model the functional units of human organs in vitro” [40]. These new technological devices are emerging as a powerful tool for the study of multifactorial pathologies such as diabetes. Organ-on-a-chips are usually based on polymeric platforms where living microtissues can be cultured and, in combination with microfluidics, mimic specific functions of one or multiple organs (Fig. 3A). The most commonly used material is polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), a silicon-based organic polymer with high biocompatibility characteristics, optical transparency to facilitate imaging applications, and ease of assembly [41, 42].
Numerous easy-to-use compatible micro-scale OOC have been developed modeling different tissues (muscle [43], blood vessels [44], lung [45], gut [46], etc.). Advances in OOC fabrication procedures have also allowed the fabrication of multi-organ-on-a-chip, connecting separated compartments together for monitoring complex interactions between multiple organs in a physiological manner [47,48,49].
The use of organ-on-a-chip devices offers several distinct benefits over conventional techniques for the study of different pathologies (Fig. 3B). The main advantages of these microfluidic systems are (a) the high degree of control over the spatiotemporal organization of in vivo-like tissue architectures, with the potentiality to maintain an optimal microenvironment for the cells; (b) the possibility of performing experiments using less volume of samples, chemicals, and reagents; (c) the capability to precisely control the amount, duration, and intensity of a particular stimulus; and (d) the ability of monitoring in real-time the effects of external cues on cell, tissue, or organ functions. In the context of diabetes research and the study of pancreatic β-cells, specialized cell types which continually monitor and respond to dynamic metabolic fluctuations, this rapid and real-time analysis is of particular interest. In this sense, the development of islet-on-a-chip (IOC) platforms offering continuous monitoring of insulin-producing cells may enable broad implications in understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of the disease. These platforms can contribute to the discovery of potential therapies, and may offer a therapeutic value for transplants.
Over the last decades, a variety of microfluidic devices have been introduced to recreate physiological microenvironments to study the islet function and to assess the quality of these islets for subsequent in vivo transplantation. However, reports describing islet-on-a-chip devices for the physiological analysis of pancreatic islets are still limited compared to other organs or tissues. In this review, we summarize the current state of islet-on-a-chip platforms that have been developed to recapitulate relevant biological native islet physiology for the study of the islet function. We assess whether these advanced in vitro platforms can detect insulin secretion on-line. We evaluate the possibility of using IOC for the analysis of a single islet as well as for the study of long-term islet experiments. And finally, we provide an overview of the technological advances in research on tissue crosstalk by combining pancreatic islets with other cell types through their integration into microphysiological environments.
Islet-on-a-chip: a platform design for the study of the β-cell function
Islet β-cell failure is progressive, particularly after hyperglycemia is established, which leads to a decrease in β-cell functionality, dedifferentiation, and ultimately β-cell death. Therefore, identifying those factors that make islets susceptible to dysfunction and failure is critical to understand islet physiology. However, mechanistic studies of the disease are often hindered by static analysis of the islets that cannot provide the details on temporal dynamics of insulin secretion. Here, we offer a comprehensive review of relevant microfluidic devices that have been developed to address some of these limitations, demonstrating different advantages over conventional off-line techniques to elucidate the mechanisms beneath the islet physiology.
One important requirement for the success of these devices is the suitable design of the system for the study of intact pancreatic islets. Adequate and proper β-cell function requires normal β-cell integrity, which is critical for the appropriate response to continuous and fluctuating metabolic demands for insulin. Pancreatic islets present a unique round-shaped cytoarchitecture that has a high impact on the β-cell function [50]. For this reason, a pertinent design for the immobilization of islets without damaging the islet cytoarchitecture is crucial for the miniaturized perfusion setup. Additionally, the generation of on-chip dynamic environments with the appropriate laminar or turbulent flow also needs to be precisely designed and controlled. This will enable prediction of the nature of the fluid and will allow the performance of unique experiments that are difficult to perform using conventional approaches. One last point to consider when fabricating the microfluidic system is the possibility of obtaining transparent devices that can allow the easy integration of optical detection methods like a biosensing system to evaluate different biochemical and molecular readouts on-line [51].
Multi-islet screening by IOC technology
The first studies involving microfluidics and pancreatic islets were performed by the Kennedy group [52,53,54]. They characterized the development and evaluation of a series of microfluidic devices used for the islet study and illustrated the feasibility of using microfluidics for monitoring β-cell function. These investigations, interrogating a single islet [52, 53], enabled the development of a microfluidic device that incorporated a continuous perfusion and an on-line electrophoresis immunoassay. These first studies were finally completed with the development of a radial microchannel network chip that allowed high-throughput quantitative monitoring of insulin secretion from 4 [54] and 15 [55] islets in parallel. The detection principle was based on on-line immunoassays and established an on-line insulin detection method through mixing of the perfusate with a fluorescent-labeled antibody. Further adjustments allowed the development of a microfluidic electrophoresis chip that was capable of performing serial electrophoretic insulin immunoassays for up to 24h [56]. Following the same procedure, competitive immunoassays on a microfluidic chip were developed to detect and monitor on-line the α-cell secreting hormone, glucagon [57], and to examine the secretory profile of insulin and IAPP (islet amyloid polypeptide) simultaneously [58] (Fig. 4).
Of note, IAPP is a hormone co-secreted by β-cells along with insulin in response to nutrient stimuli [59], and both hormones regulate glucose metabolism in a tightly coordinated manner [60]. Lomasney et al. [58] presented a microfluidic device provided with a two-color detection scheme for on-line measurement of rapid changes in insulin and IAPP in response to glucose through a continuous mixing of fluorescent-labeled antibodies with both peptides secreted by the islet pool and allowing their detection with an inverted fluorescent microscope. Importantly, the human peptide form of IAPP (hIAPP) accumulates, forming amyloid deposits within the pancreas. The aggregation of hIAPP into organized deposits has been considered a pathological characteristic of T2D, contributing to β-cell dysfunction and death and participating in the failure of islet transplantation [61,62,63,64]. Therefore, an instrument able to monitor the oscillatory secretion dynamics of this hormone, together with the ability to follow its aggregation pattern over time, could be an extremely valuable tool in diabetes research.
The demands of high-sensitivity analysis of islet function under oscillatory conditions have required more control over experimental parameters. For instance, microfluidic platforms need to offer exquisite capabilities in controlling chemical gradients for understanding β-cell kinetics. In this respect, the design of a dual perfusion network integrated with on-chip staggered herringbone mixers (SHM) to enhance mixing efficiency demonstrated efficacy in establishing high-resolution temporal glucose gradients and allowed optical detection of two separate islet populations [65].
Different functional assays performed in short time periods provided further information regarding the use of microfluidics as an excellent tool to perform comprehensive islet analysis and to obtain a more significant predictive value for islet functionality. In this sense, several microfluidic chips successfully incorporated intracellular fluorescent detection of Ca2+ and mitochondrial activity to determine islet cell physiological behavior. As mentioned above, non-diabetic β-cells couple changes in blood glucose in order to secrete the appropriate amount of insulin, and GSIS in the islets is coupled to the metabolic state of β-cells, involving both glycolytic and Krebs cycle metabolism. Mitochondria from β-cells play an essential role in this process, generating factors that couple nutrient metabolism to exocytosis of insulin-containing granules. The release of insulin requires an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ levels, which depends on ATP synthesized by the mitochondria. Therefore, the kinetics of insulin secretion is determined by changes of [Ca2+] and mitochondrial activity in β-cells. Interestingly, it has been observed that in isolated islets from T2D patients, glucose induces changes in β-cells that have an impact on mitochondrial metabolism, ATP synthesis, and Ca2+ oscillations [66, 67]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the progressive failure of β-cells are far from being resolved. Limited data on islet metabolism probably resides in the complexity of measuring metabolites while simultaneously stimulating pancreatic islets with oscillatory glucose levels. Microfluidic platforms can take advantage of standard fluorescent labeling methods to allow real-time and non-invasive assessments of metabolic alterations. Indeed, these systems allowed the characterization of the islet functionality by depicting their metabolic activity through fluorescence imagining of calcium influx and mitochondrial membrane potential changes [68, 69], obtaining promising results regarding enhanced spatial-temporal resolution.
The applications of microfluidics for synchronized islet perfusion and fluorescent imaging to simultaneously detect live-cell changes in calcium influx and mitochondrial potentials were the base of a substantial number of devices. However, most of these were usually followed by off-line standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to quantify the amount of secreted insulin [70]. Indeed, the impossibility to detect insulin in real-time has been one of the main limitations of different suitable designs that have been proposed to evaluate islet functionality in response to dynamic glucose stimulation.
Additionally, the integration of glucose and oxygen modulations to IOC platforms has permitted the evaluation of not only the impact of high glucose concentrations but also the effects of hypoxia on the impairment of islet function [71]. The integration of all these desirable features into one single design was recently accomplished, allowing multiparametric measurements of oxygen consumption, NAD(P)H autofluorescence, intracellular Ca2+ levels, and off-line detection of insulin [72]. However, the need to fabricate a borosilicate glass device in contrast to using the widely exploited PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane) polymer to minimize the gas permeability and the strong autofluorescence of the polymeric compound makes this device less suitable for widespread use in all laboratories.
The capability of capturing changes in membrane potentials induced by glucose by electrophysiological recordings also provides meaningful integrative readouts closely linked to functionality in β-cells, as membrane potentials of β-cells oscillate in accordance to different glucose concentrations. Indeed, extracellular recording of glucose-induced electrical activity has already been demonstrated with microelectrode arrays (MEAs) on mouse [73] and human pancreatic islets [74]. To provide immediate information of islet activity, a combination of electrophysiology and microelectronics with microfluidics was proposed, attaining a continuous monitoring of electric signals of dissociated islet cells [75] and entire islets [76]. The use of extracellular non-invasively electrodes allowed an automated recording of the cell activity when exposed to different solutions, obtaining a temporal resolution that could not be reached by other approaches. Non-invasive monitoring of pseudo-islets in biomechanical flow conditions has also been achieved with a Raman microspectroscopy. This technique allowed an on-line tracking of the β-cells in response to glucose and enabled visualization of different molecular structures such as lipids, mitochondria, and nuclei [77].
Interrogating β-cell function at a single islet level
The temporal resolution of many devices when interrogating pancreatic islets has been usually limited by the requirement of working with relatively large volumes of reagents or media and the need to use multiple islets to detect and achieve quantifiable insulin concentrations. Single-islet sensitivity minimizes the number of islets required for testing and enhances the temporal resolution of insulin dynamics. Of interest, pooling islets together entails a decreased temporal resolution in dynamic insulin secretion due to an uncoordinated response of individual islets [18] unless a mechanism for entrainment of pancreatic islets is applied [78]. The advent of microfluidic platforms that precisely rely on a careful design of the microfluidic structures with an accurate control of the flow fostered the integration of several strategies to increase the spatio-temporal control of islets in microfluidics and permitted researchers to resolve the highly dynamic and oscillatory secretion pattern of single islets.
As mentioned above, in 2003, Kennedy and colleagues [52] already presented the first prototype able to interrogate one single islet by a capillary electrophoresis competitive immunoassay. However, the lack of perfusion in the islet chamber was one of the main drawbacks in this first secretion study, resulting in serious limitations in terms of measurements of dynamic insulin secretion and the viability of the islet cells. An advancement over this microfluidic chip, with a continuous perfusion on the islet compartment, was further presented, demonstrating an improvement of the temporal resolution for monitoring insulin secretion while enhancing compatibility with longer-term measurements [53].
The Piston group was also one of the pioneers to use a microfluidic platform for the study of the pancreatic islet function yielding contrasting findings about the critical role of gap junction coupled KATP channel activity in controlling insulin secretion. They developed a microfluidic device capable of partially stimulating an islet by trapping and holding it between two separate fluid streams (with different glucose concentrations), revealing that β-cells are effectively coupled to coordinate an intracellular Ca2+ response only within regions of the islet in contact with a glucose concentration above a threshold [79] (Fig. 5A). They further examined the behavior of individual cells within an intact islet, using a system to hold the islet stationary in a precise location while maintaining an open path for a continuous fluid flow [80, 81]. These approaches permitted time-lapse imaging of similar regions of the islet after different treatments and shed light on the synchronous glucose-dependent bursts of the electrical activity of the β-cells, demonstrating that, in intact islets, β-cells are coupled by gap junctions, which synchronize electrical activity and intracellular Ca2+ oscillations after exposure to stimulatory glucose levels (>7mM for mouse pancreatic islets). However, if glucose concentration is beneath that threshold, β-cells are not sufficiently coupled to spread Ca2+ responses into these regions.
Different approaches emerged to exploit high-throughput analysis at the single islet level. Ismagilov and co-workers fabricated a microfluidic “chemistrode” for stimulating, recording, and analyzing molecular signals from a single murine islet. This device consisted of a V-designed tube with an opening point at the vertices of the V. With this design, a solution could be delivered to the substrate by one arm and removed from the other arm after the delivery of a sequence of multiple molecular signals at the substrate-chemistrode interface with pulses as short as 50 ms [82] (Fig. 5B). A novel microfluidic device aimed at quantifying zinc secretion appeared 1 year later with a similar temporal resolution. Zn2+ ions, which are cosecreted with insulin from β-cells and therefore could serve as a positive indicator of the secretory capacity of these cells, were quantitatively measured by storing in real-time the islet secretions into droplets, allowing the observation of rapid Zn2+ oscillations using a fluorescent indicator [83].
In parallel, a simple method to create temporal gradients of glucose concentrations using two on-chip diaphragm pumps was applied to monitor intracellular calcium levels of a single islet of Langerhans. Following the same scheme, the cell chamber of the chip presented a window below that facilitated fluorescent monitoring of Ca2+ changes, showing that intracellular calcium oscillations were modified and regulated by the glucose waves [84, 85] (Fig. 5C). The ability to monitor Ca2+ oscillation was also implemented to a microfluidic device able to deliver glucose to a restricted area of a single β-cell, confirming how glucose induces a shift in the spatial distribution of insulin granules within the subcellular portion in contact with the glucose flux. These experiments shed light on the intracellular changes undergone by pancreatic islets under different environments and clearly illustrated the feasibility of using microfluidics coupled with optical systems to study single islet metabolism [86].
A simplified fabricated pumpless microfluidic array driven by surface tension allowed determining real-time fluorescent imaging of [Ca2+] without the need of using external pumps to facilitate the delivery of the fluid, which probably made it more applicable for most of the laboratories involved in diabetes research. This system entailed several advantages over conventional microfluidic systems driven with pumps: (i) it required extremely small volume of solutions, therefore achieving a higher analytical spatiotemporal resolution; (ii) it simplified the manageability; and (iii) it avoided bubble generation. Additionally, it allowed the analysis of individual islets from an islet array [87].
A more suited automated perfusion method was developed to investigate the entrainment of insulin secretion from islets in response to glucose waveforms. Of note, insulin secretion from a pancreatic islet is pulsatile, even in response to constant glucose [18, 88]. However, if islets are pooled together in a single chamber with constant glucose, these pulses overlap, resulting in the register of elevated but constant levels of insulin [78]. Periodic variations in glucose can entrain islets and insulin secretion, promoting inter-islet synchronization. With a robust microfluidic system capable of generating different glucose fluctuations to a single islet or a group of islets without dispersion of the waveform, which is significantly difficult to obtain using static techniques, islets could be entrained to generate synchronous insulin pulses in response to oscillatory glucose levels as occurs in vivo [89, 90].
Rapid measurements of changes in insulin levels from a single islet were also possible with a microfluidic device with on-line fluorescent anisotropy immunoassay. The principle of this method was based on the use of fluorescent anisotropy, which measures the depolarization of the fluorescent-labeled insulin versus the free insulin after being excited with linearly polarized light, therefore determining the average anisotropy of the solution. This system demonstrated a very sensitive limit of detection, exhibiting great capability for measuring insulin secretion from a single islet [91]. Similarly, more recently, a fully integrated IOC design using fluorescent anisotropy immunoassay allowed measuring insulin secretion from human islets trapped in parallel. The design of this specific platform was modular and the chip fabrication scalable; therefore, the number of traps on the chip could be altered to offer functional testing using different numbers of islets [92].
The establishment of fluorescence imaging of islets associated with a microfluidic device has also permitted investigating the metabolic control of pancreatic islets exposed to external cues. For instance, it allowed examining the effect of fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21), a potent metabolic regulator [93] that enhances β-cell function and survival on pancreatic islets [94]. To this aim, a unique combination of two-photon and confocal autofluorescence imaging of NAD(P)H and mitochondrial NADH responses in living islets in a microfluidic chip was employed. This enabled gaining mechanistic insights into changes in the mitochondrial metabolism of pancreatic islets exposed to high glucose and palmitate, being both hallmarks of T2D and obesity. The study revealed that FGF-21-treated islets did not show palmitate-induced potentiation of glucose-stimulated mitochondrial activation and insulin secretion. Of interest, β-cells are extremely susceptible to oxidative stress due to high endogenous production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and low expression levels of antioxidative enzymes [25, 26]. For this reason, a reduced stimulation of mitochondrial responses under metabolic stress could be recognized as a strategy to reduce ROS production, contributing to a longer-term survival of islets. Although accumulating evidence suggests that fat storage in tissues contributes to the development and progression of T2D, a recently discovered new class of branched fatty acid esters of hydroxyl fatty acids (FAHFAs) has been described as positive regulators of glucose metabolism, exhibiting anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory properties [95, 96], results that were further questioned by Pflimlin and colleagues [97]. However, in parallel, a microfluidic devices was developed to enable quantitative measurements of insulin release dynamics from single islets in response to FAHFAs, reporting enhanced secretion of insulin in response to this lipid [98]. These observations were in line with the first experiments that indicated that FAHFAs presented significant anti-diabetic effects. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to better comprehend their mechanism of action.
Given the electric characteristics of the islet response together with the need for measuring islet functionality in a rapid, simple, cost-effective, and non-invasive way motivated the development of a dielectric impedance spectroscopy. This technique provided a method able to measure in real-time the cell membrane capacitance and cytoplasmic conductivity, which could be related to stimulus response and functionality assessments. Together with microfluidics, this method offered a tool to detect changes on the dielectric spectra. These alterations correlated with changes in the islet membrane resulting from the fusion of insulin vesicles during secretion in response to dynamic flow, hence offering potential to track islet stimuli response [99].
One of the major challenges of the early platforms was the impossibility to precisely evaluate an individual islet among an entire population, which hindered the assessment of the heterogeneous properties of these pseudo-organs. With this intention, an optimized microfluidic chip, also coupled with real-time microscopy, provided more comprehensive and spatiotemporal analysis of hundreds of islets individually at different time points under different stimulations. This increased the experimental throughput and offered the possibility to identify potential sub-phenotypes among the entire islet population [100].
Recently, an open microfluidic chip with hanging-drop technology that precisely controls fluid enabled the study of time-resolved insulin secretion from single-human islet microtissues [101]. This strategy implied a first step of generating uniform islet spheroids from isolated native human islets, providing control over the size, the endocrine cell composition, and the purity of the sample, and therefore minimizing the inherent heterogeneity of pancreatic islets. With this approach they were able to demonstrate that it is possible to obtain physiological relevant outcomes and corroborated that single islet perfusion enables detection of oscillatory pulsations that are lost when islets are pooled together, probably as a consequence of averaging of asynchronous insulin secretion patterns of the individual islets, as was already suggested before using microfluids [89, 90]. This approach constitutes a robust, simple, and operative tool to recapitulate physiological relevant responses of single islets to glucose and provides the resolution and reproducibility to study novel mechanisms or pharmacological compounds using a small number of replicates.
Label-free detection of insulin secretion
Despite all the advantages of the microfluidics for the study of pancreatic islet physiology, there is a lack of integration with sensing modules capable of directly monitoring insulin secretion, the key physiological event that is usually perturbed in T2D. Previously reported microfluidic perfusion systems developed to study islet functionality by detecting insulin rely on on-line labeling of this hormone by means of immunofluorescent procedures or off-line quantification of the secreted insulin by ELISA. However, to completely exploit the potential of these platforms, there is a need to interface them with an integrated sensing module capable to monitor directly and labelled-free the islet insulin response.
Our group have developed for the first time an IOC device coupled with a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) sensing module to monitor on-line and label-free the insulin secretion in pancreatic islets [102]. These optical biosensors present the advantage of being highly sensitive, enabling on-line, label-free, and cost-effective sensing and have shown great capability to detect all kinds of molecular biomarkers [103,104,105]. Unlike other IOC devices, based on multiple tiny wells to trap the islets [65, 68, 70, 106], we have developed a 3D heterogeneous porous polymeric cryogel scaffold to spatially organize the islets. Indeed, we have recently demonstrated that these macroporous scaffold can be used to generate 3D functional β-cell clusters from rat insulin-producing INS1E cells, representing a suitable model to study pancreatic islet function in vitro [107]. Briefly, the biomimetic islet scaffold is subjected to a microfluidic flow that allows the transfer of different glucose concentrations to the chamber of the islets and helps the delivery of the secreted insulin from the IOC to the on-chip LSPR sensing platform. The integration of both platforms allows a highly sensitive and label-free monitoring of on-line insulin secretion by pancreatic islets under physiological conditions, offering a powerful tool for the future biomedicine and pharmaceutical research related with diabetes.
Long-term studies
In the field of diabetes, it is of interest to develop an in vitro platform setup with the ability to culture islets for long periods. However, most of these studies have used microfluidic devices with short-term applications, mostly as live cell imaging platforms that hold islets stationary while recording multiple real-time physiological changes in response to different treatments. Only few microfluidics platforms have been designed to explore the potential of using islet-on-a-chip devices for long-term purposes. Long-term experiments using microfluidic platforms have been limited in part due to the formation and accumulation of air bubbles in the device. In this sense, Wang et al. proposed a microfluidic platform with an integrated modular bubble trap, demonstrating that a long-term bubble-free system was feasible using a conventional laboratory vacuum for long-term dynamic culture of pancreatic islets [108].
Another issue to take into account when culturing pancreatic islets for long periods is that islet blood vessels are disrupted during the islet isolation process and that static ex vivo culture of islets promotes the loss of the remaining endothelial cells (ECs) [109]. Importantly, pancreatic islets are highly vascularized micro-organs with a dense network of capillaries which facilitate a rapid exchange of nutrients, oxygen, and hormones between endocrine cells and the bloodstream [110]. Hence, it has been suggested that the disruption of the islet vasculature may be the underlying cause explaining why in vitro cultures are unable to sustain primary islets longer than a few days.
Several studies have attempted to examine the integration of islets with microvascular networks [111, 112], showing that vascularized islets significantly enhance survival of diabetic mice after transplantation [113]. The first microfluidic platform aimed at demonstrating that fluidic flow improves maintenance of endothelial cells (ECs) on islet evidenced preserved EC density and reduced necrosis in the core of the islets when exposed to a microfluidic system, indicating that flow rate enhances survival of the β-cells. Additionally, under flow conditions, islets displayed enhanced glucose stimulated Ca2+ response, not only demonstrating the feasibility of using microfluidic chips for long-term cell cultures but also suggesting an optimized strategy to increase EC survival in culture prior to islet transplantation, with probably better outcomes [114]. Recently, a microchip-based engineering of uniform-sized spheroids reaggregated from dispersed rat islets under perfusion system pointed to the same direction. Flow not only enhanced the islet health but also maintained the islet endothelial cells (iECs) in vitro over a month, facilitating diffusion-mediated interactions within the islet. On the contrary, under static conditions, the endothelial cells were lost over time [115].
Overall, these results indicate that perfusion systems could offer a means to sustain islets for longer periods, allowing the identification of factors that may contribute to improved β-cell function over time.
Multi-organ-on-a-chip: seeking new T2D models?
Disorders affecting the metabolic system are often caused by the interaction of multiple factors, involving the crosstalk between different organs and tissues, or even different cellular compartments into the same tissue (Fig. 6). Many physiological stressors can disturb the tightly regulated mechanism of the β-cell function in the context of metabolic overload and insulin resistance commonly found in human obesity-linked T2D [116]. However, there is still a need to further explore the possibilities that these platforms offer for the study of diseases that progress through the disruption of the homeostatic crosstalk between two or more organs as occurs in T2D. Conventional in vitro models to study organ interactions have been limited to co-culturing different cell types and transferring media from cells to cells, failing to recapitulate the time-dependent dynamics of multiorgan interactions. Therefore, to recreate their relevant characteristics in vitro, models with adequate complexity are required.
Organ-on-a-chip platforms represent the perfect candidate tool for the study of multifactorial pathologies such as diabetes, allowing the interplay of different organs and tissues and emulating systemic interactions through on-chip co-cultures of different organs in separate compartments interconnected through microfluidic channels [47, 49]. Such systems were first used to replicate in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses of a specific drug [117, 118]. The concept expanded beyond drug metabolism and successive improvements were established to study cell–cell interactions with the creation of 3D environments and long-term cultures [119, 120].
Few approaches have been described so far interconnecting pancreatic islets with other cell types, evidencing the complexity to monitor complex interactions between different tissues when involving pancreatic islets. One of the first microfluidic two-organ-on-a-chip including β-cells was developed to study the pancreatic islet and liver crosstalk [48]. In the liver, insulin stimulates glycogen synthesis and suppresses hepatic glucose production, but signals to stop glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis. As an anabolic hormone, insulin also promotes protein and lipid synthesis and release from this organ [20].
Based on insulin and glucose regulation, a functional coupling of human pancreatic islet microtissue with liver spheroids composed of primary human stellate cells and HepaRG cells and was developed. To demonstrate its efficacy, pancreatic islets were stimulated with high glucose concentrations, which promoted insulin secretion from β-cells and a concomitant glucose uptake by the liver spheroids. The development of this peristaltic on-chip micropump enabled a continuous pulsatile flow, promoting high tissue perfusion rates and allowing a long-term co-culture up to 15 days. Interestingly, islets in co-culture with liver spheroids maintained the secretory capacity of the β-cells to secrete insulin in response to glucose along the total duration of the experiment; however, islet microtissues cultured alone presented decreased GSIS over time. This enhanced islet functionality has been also recently demonstrated with the development of a new pancreas-liver-on-chip [121]. Functional assays revealed that the crosstalk between primary rat hepatocytes and pancreatic islets under flow conditions resulted in enhanced insulin and C-peptide secretion from islets.
The secretory capacity of the β-cells can be also modulated by other factors. Obesity itself is a risk factor for diabetes as it causes the elevation of several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines that are released by adipocytes and are thought to contribute to the inflammatory process in several tissues including the liver and pancreatic islets [122,123,124]. Apart from inflammatory intermediates, adipocytes secrete nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) and adipokines that can also have an impact on the β-cell function [125, 126]. A simple and effective chip design permitted exposure of adipocyte secretions to a single islet through perfusion and monitoring of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in real-time with an integrated electrophoresis-based immunoassay [127]. Short-term exposure of islets to adipocyte perfusion augmented insulin secretion, demonstrating that acute exposure to adipocyte-released factors can enhance insulin secretion. Of note, lipid signaling is necessary for GSIS and the rapid effect of NEFAs potentiating GSIS has been widely demonstrated in vitro, suggesting that they act to amplify the coupling mechanisms of the metabolic stimulus and the secretion [128]. However, future studies should be directed towards employing organ-on-chip technology to address the long-term effects of these factors released by the adipose tissue on pancreatic islets.
The muscle tissue is also a main player in the development of T2D as, in the postprandial state, skeletal muscle is the predominant site of insulin-mediated glucose uptake. In the muscle tissue, insulin resistance, defined as a complex pathological state in which insulin-dependent cells fail to respond to insulin, is considered to be a primary defect of T2D, occurring before β-cell failure [19, 129]. Indeed, the skeletal muscle itself is considered an endocrine organ that secretes a variety of molecules which can regulate the metabolic function in other tissues and organs [130, 131]. Indeed, muscle-secreted factors have already been proven to influence β-cell function [132, 133] and given that release of skeletal muscle-derived molecules is enhanced by muscle contraction, a platform to interrogate the skeletal muscle and β-cell crosstalk is required to understand and the beneficial effects of exercise associated with β-cell function in patients with prediabetes and T2D [134]. For this reason, bioengineered technologies allowing the formation of aligned myofibers are emerging as new tools for preclinical research [135].
To better comprehend the interaction between skeletal muscle and β-cells, a perfusion platform examined real-time effects of molecules released by contracting C2C12 skeletal muscle myotubes on insulin release by INS1 pseudoislets and human islets. Conditioned media from stimulated myotubes with electric pulses influenced positively insulin secretion in β-cells from non-diabetic and T2D patients and increased the mitochondrial respiratory activity of β-cells [136].
A step forward for personalized medicine using organ-on-chip technology was presented recently with the development of a unique pancreatic function monitoring tool to study cystic fibrosis (CF)-related disorders in vitro [137]. CF is a genetic condition affecting the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), localized on the epithelial cells in multiple organs, including the pancreas [138]. In CF patients, cell–cell signaling between pancreatic ductal epithelial cells (PDECs) and islet cells is disturbed, which consequently affects the secretory capacity of the β-cells [139, 140]. Indeed, subjects with CF have an increasing risk of developing diabetes [141].
The development of a pancreas-on-a-chip allowed mimicry of the functional interface between PDECs and pancreatic islets while monitoring cell–cell functional interaction directly and efficiently using only a small number of patient-derived cells, demonstrating that ductal cells and islets are functionally coupled and corroborating that CFTR plays a relevant role in directly regulating insulin secretion. This patient-derived in vitro model opens the door to personalized medicine as it can be set up for multiple cell types and several analyses.
Conclusions
Several islets-on-a-chip platforms have been designed to combine specific tissue microenvironments and architectures within a microfabricated device that can exhibit functional hallmarks of the native pancreatic islets. These new platforms have emerged as complex in vitro models to study the islet physiology, representing a new way to study β-cell function and failure with high resolution.
However, despite all the improvements to create advanced fabricated platforms, most of the islet-on-chip assays have heavily relied on fluorescence microscopy and have mainly been used for specialized proof-of-concept studies to investigate insulin secretion. There is still a need to design more sophisticated islet-on-chip platforms equipped with built-in sensors that provide valuable real-time data on a cellular level, which cannot be easily measured in animal models. These new approaches may provide comprehensive 3D in vitro solutions for investigating metabolic disease pathophysiology and screening new drugs and therapies for T2D.
References
Fu H, Liu S, Bastacky SI, Wang X, Tian XJ, Zhou D. Diabetic kidney diseases revisited: a new perspective for a new era. Mol Metab. 2019;30:250–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2019.10.005.
Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 2010;376:124–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62124-3.
Pop-Busui R, Boulton AJM, Feldman EL, Bril V, Freeman R, Malik RA, Sosenko JM, Ziegler D. Diabetic neuropathy: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:136–54. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2042.
American Diabetes Association (ADA). 10. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes - 2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:S103–23. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19S010.
International Diabetes Federation (IDF) (2019) IDF Diabetes Atlas - Ninth edition 2019
American Diabetes Association (ADA). Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes - 2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:S13–28. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S002.
Todd JA. Etiology of type 1 diabetes. Immunity. 2010;32:457–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2010.04.001.
Wållberg M, Cooke A. Immune mechanisms in type 1 diabetes. Trends Immunol. 2013;34:583–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2013.08.005.
Kahn SE. The relative contributions of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction to the pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2003;46:3–19.
Spaight C, Gross J, Horsch A, Puder JJ. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Endocr Dev. 2016;31:163–78. https://doi.org/10.1159/000439413.
In’t Veld P, Marichal M. The islets of Langerhands. Chapter 1 - Microscopic anatomy of the human islet of Langerhans. In: Advances in experimental medicine and biology; 2010. p. 1–19.
Folli F, La Rosa S, Finzi G, Davalli AM, Galli A, Dick EJ, Perego C, Mendoza RG. Pancreatic islet of Langerhans’ cytoarchitecture and ultrastructure in normal glucose tolerance and in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes, Obes Metab. 2018;20:137–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13380.
Röder PV, Wu B, Liu Y, Han W. Pancreatic regulation of glucose homeostasis. Exp Mol Med. 2016;48:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2016.6.
Cabrera O, Berman DM, Kenyon NS, Ricordi C, Berggren P-O, Caicedo A. The unique cytoarchitecture of human pancreatic islets has implications for islet cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:2334–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510790103.
Steiner DJ, Kim A, Miller K, Hara M. Pancreatic islet plasticity: interspecies comparison of islet architecture and composition. Islets. 2010;2:135–45. https://doi.org/10.4161/isl.2.3.11815.
Newsholme P, Gaudel C, McClenaghan NH. The islets of Langerhands. Chapter 6 - Nutrient regulation of insulin secretion and β-cell functional integrity. In: Advances in experimental medicine and biology; 2010. p. 91–114.
McCulloch LJ, van de Bunt M, Braun M, Frayn KN, Clark A, Gloyn AL. GLUT2 (SLC2A2) is not the principal glucose transporter in human pancreatic beta cells: implications for understanding genetic association signals at this locus. Mol Genet Metab. 2011;104:648–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.026.
Rutter GA, Pullen TJ, Hodson DJ, Martinez-Sanchez A. Pancreatic β-cell identity, glucose sensing and the control of insulin secretion. Biochem J. 2015;466:203–18. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj20141384.
Petersen MC, Shulman GI. Mechanisms of insulin action and insulin resistance. Physiol Rev. 2018;98:2133–223. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00063.2017.
Tokarz VL, MacDonald PE, Klip A. The cell biology of systemic insulin function. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:2273–89. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201802095.
Bensellam M, Laybutt DR, Jonas JC. The molecular mechanisms of pancreatic β-cell glucotoxicity: recent findings and future research directions. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;364:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2012.08.003.
Leibowitz G, Bachar E, Shaked M, Sinai A, Ketzinel-Gilad M, Cerasi E, Kaiser N. Glucose regulation of β-cell stress in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Obes Metab. 2010;12:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01280.x.
Marshak S, Leibowitz G, Bertuzzi F, Socci C, Kaiser N, Gross DJ, Cerasi E, Melloul D. Impaired beta-cell functions induced by chronic exposure of cultured human pancreatic islets to high glucose. Diabetes. 1999;48:1230–6. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.48.6.1230.
Eizirik DL, Korbutt GS, Hellerstrom C. Prolonged exposure of human pancreatic islets to high glucose concentrations in vitro impairs the beta-cell function. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:1263–8. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI115989.
Robertson RP, Harmon J, Tran PO, Tanaka Y, Takahashi H. Glucose toxicity in beta cells: type 2 diabetes, good radicals gone bad, and the glutathione connection. Diabetes. 2003;52:476–8. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.52.3.581.
Lenzen S, Drinkgern J, Tiedge M. Low antioxidant enzyme gene expression in pancreatic islets compared with various other mouse tissues. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;20:463–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(96)02051-5.
Hotamisligil GS. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease. Cell. 2010;140:900–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.034.
Oslowski CM, Hara T, O’Sullivan-Murphy B, Kanekura K, Lu S, Hara M, Ishigaki S, Zhu LJ, Hayashi E, Hui ST, Greiner D, Kaufman RJ, Bortell R, Urano F. Thioredoxin-interacting protein mediates ER stress-induced β cell death through initiation of the inflammasome. Cell Metab. 2012;16:265–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.07.005.
Rodríguez-Comas J, Moreno-Asso A, Moreno-Vedia J, Martín M, Castaño C, Marzà-Florensa A, Bofill-De Ros X, Mir-Coll J, Montané J, Fillat C, Gasa R, Novials A, Servitja J-M. Stress-induced microRNA-708 impairs β-cell function and growth. Diabetes. 2017;66:1–12. https://doi.org/10.2337/db16-1569.
Haataja L, Gurlo T, Huang CJ, Butler PC. Islet amyloid in type 2 diabetes, and the toxic oligomer hypothesis. Endocr Rev. 2008;29:303–16. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2007-0037.
Kamata K, Mizukami H, Inaba W, Tsuboi K, Tateishi Y, Yoshida T, Yagihashi S. Islet amyloid with macrophage migration correlates with augmented β-cell deficits in type 2 diabetic patients. Amyloid. 2014;21:191–201. https://doi.org/10.3109/13506129.2014.937857.
Masters SL, Dunne A, Subramanian SL, Hull RL, Tannahill GM, Sharp FA, Becker C, Franchi L, Yoshihara E, Chen Z, Mullooly N, Mielke LA, Harris J, Coll RC, Mills KHG, Mok KH, Newsholme P, Nuñez G, Yodoi J, et al. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by islet amyloid polypeptide provides a mechanism for enhanced IL-1β in type 2 diabetes. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:897–904. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1935.
Meier DT, Morcos M, Samarasekera T, Zraika S, Hull RL, Kahn SE. Islet amyloid formation is an important determinant for inducing islet inflammation in high-fat-fed human IAPP transgenic mice. Diabetologia. 2014;57:1884–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-014-3304-y.
Westwell-Roper CY, Chehroudi CA, Denroche HC, Courtade JA, Ehses JA, Verchere CB. IL-1 mediates amyloid-associated islet dysfunction and inflammation in human islet amyloid polypeptide transgenic mice. Diabetologia. 2015;58:575–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-014-3447-x.
Rodríguez-Comas J, Moreno-Vedia J, Obach M, Castano C, de Pablo S, Alcarraz-Vizan G, Diaz-Catalan D, Mestre A, Horrillo R, Costa M, Novials A, Servitja J-M. Alpha1-antitrypsin ameliorates islet amyloid-induced glucose intolerance and beta-cell dysfunction. Mol Metab 100984. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2020.100984.
Donath MY. Targeting inflammation in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: time to start. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:465–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-3873-z.
Eguchi K, Nagai R. Islet inflammation in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:14–23. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-s243.
DeFronzo RA. From the triumvirate to the ominous octet: a new paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 2009;58:773–95. https://doi.org/10.2337/db09-9028.
Shen Y, Prinyawiwatkul W, Xu Z. Insulin: a review of analytical methods. Analyst. 2019;144:4139–48. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9an00112c.
Park SE, Georgescu A, Huh D (2019) Organoids-on-a-chip. Science (80- ) 364:960–965
Torino S, Corrado B, Iodice M, Coppola G. PDMS-based microfluidic devices for cell culture. Inventions. 2018;3:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions3030065.
Grant J, Özkan A, Oh C, Mahajan G, Prantil-Baun R, Ingber DE. Simulating drug concentrations in PDMS microfluidic organ chips. Lab Chip. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1lc00348h.
Ortega MA, Fernández-Garibay X, Castaño AG, De Chiara F, Hernández-Albors A, Balaguer-Trias J, Ramón-Azcón J. Muscle-on-a-chip with an on-site multiplexed biosensing system for: in situ monitoring of secreted IL-6 and TNF-α. Lab Chip. 2019;19:2568–80. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9lc00285e.
Günther A, Yasotharan S, Vagaon A, Lochovsky C, Pinto S, Yang J, Lau C, Voigtlaender-Bolz J, Bolz SS. A microfluidic platform for probing small artery structure and function. Lab Chip. 2010;10:2341–9. https://doi.org/10.1039/c004675b.
Huh D, Matthews BD, Mammoto A, Montoya-Zavala M, Yuan Hsin H, Ingber DE. Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science (80- ). 2010;328:1662–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1188302.
Beaurivage C, Naumovska E, Chang YX, Elstak ED, Nicolas A, Wouters H, van Moolenbroek G, Lanz HL, Trietsch SJ, Joore J, Vulto P, Janssen RAJ, Erdmann KS, Stallen J, Kurek D. Development of a gut-on-a-chip model for high throughput disease modeling and drug discovery. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20225661.
Materne EM, Maschmeyer I, Lorenz AK, Horland R, Schimek KMS, Busek M, Sonntag F, Lauster R, Marx U. The multi-organ chip - a microfluidic platform for long-term multi-tissue coculture. J Vis Exp. 2015;2015:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3791/52526.
Bauer S, Wennbe C, Kanebratt KP, Durieux I, Andersson S, Ewart L, Haynes WG, Maschmeyer I, Ämmälä C, Marx U, Andersson TB. Functional coupling of human pancreatic islets and liver spheroids on-a-chip : Towards a novel human ex vivo type 2 diabetes model. 2017:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14815-w.
Novak R, Ingram M, Marquez S, Das D, Delahanty A, Herland A, Maoz BM, SSF J, Somayaji MR, Burt M, Calamari E, Chalkiadaki A, Cho A, Choe Y, Chou DB, Cronce M, Dauth S, Divic T, Fernandez-Alcon J, et al. Robotic fluidic coupling and interrogation of multiple vascularized organ chips. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0497-x.
Roscioni SS, Migliorini A, Gegg M, Lickert H. Impact of islet architecture on β-cell heterogeneity, plasticity and function. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12:695–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.147.
Ferry MS, Razinkov IA, Hasty J. Microfluidics for synthetic biology: from design to execution. 1st ed: Elsevier Inc.; 2011.
Roper MG, Shackman JG, Dahlgren GM, Kennedy RT. Microfluidic chip for continuous monitoring of hormone secretion from live cells using an electrophoresis-based immunoassay. Anal Chem. 2003;75:4711–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0346813.
Shackman JG, Dahlgren GM, Peters L, Kennedy RT. Perfusion and chemical monitoring of living cells on a microfluidic chip. Lab Chip. 2005;5:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1039/b404974h.
Dishinger JF, Kennedy RT. Serial immunoassays in parallel on a microfluidic chip for monitoring hormone secretion from living cells. Anal Chem. 2007;79:947–54. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061425s.
Dishinger JF, Reid KR, Kennedy RT. Quantitative monitoring of insulin secretion from microfluidic chip. Anal Chem. 2009;81:3119–27. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac900109t.
Reid KR, Kennedy RT. Continuous operation of microfabricated electrophoresis devices for 24 hours and application to chemical monitoring of living cells. Anal Chem. 2009;81:6837–42. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac901114k.
Shackman JG, Reid KR, Dugan CE, Kennedy RT. Dynamic monitoring of glucagon secretion from living cells on a microfluidic chip. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;402:2797–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-5755-7.
Lomasney AR, Yi L, Roper MG. Simultaneous monitoring of insulin and islet amyloid polypeptide secretion from islets of Langerhans on a microfluidic device. Anal Chem. 2013;85:7919–25. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac401625g.
Kahn SE, D’Alessio DA, Schwartz MW, Fujimoto WY, Ensinck JW, Taborsky GJ, Porte D. Evidence of cosecretion of islet amyloid polypeptide and insulin by β-cells. Diabetes. 1990;39:634–8. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.39.5.634.
Westermark P, Andersson A, Westermark GT. Islet amyloid polypeptide, islet amyloid, and diabetes mellitus. Physiol Rev. 2011;91:795–826. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00042.2009.
Jurgens CA, Toukatly MN, Fligner CL, Udayasankar J, Subramanian SL, Zraika S, Aston-Mourney K, Carr DB, Westermark P, Westermark GT, Kahn SE, Hull RL. β-Cell loss and β-cell apoptosis in human type 2 diabetes are related to islet amyloid deposition. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:2632–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.02.036.
Potter KJ, Scrocchi LA, Warnock GL, Ao Z, Younker MA, Rosenberg L, Lipsett M, Verchere CB, Fraser PE. Amyloid inhibitors enhance survival of cultured human islets. Biochim Biophys Acta - Gen Subj. 2009;1790:566–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.02.013.
Ritzel RA, Meier JJ, Lin CY, Veldhuis JD, Butler PC. Human islet amyloid polypeptide oligomers disrupt cell coupling, induce apoptosis, and impair insulin secretion in isolated human islets. Diabetes. 2007;56:65–71. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-0734.
Rodríguez-Comas J, Moreno-Vedia J, Obach M, Castano C, de Pablo S, Alcarraz-Vizan G, Diaz-Catalan D, Mestre A, Horrillo R, Costa M, Novials A, Servitja J-M. Alpha1-antitrypsin ameliorates islet amyloid-induced glucose intolerance and beta-cell dysfunction. Mol Metab. 2020;37:100984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2020.100984.
Lee D, Wang Y, Mendoza-Elias JE, Adewola AF, Harvat TA, Kinzer K, Gutierrez D, Qi M, Eddington DT, Oberholzer J. Dual microfluidic perifusion networks for concurrent islet perifusion and optical imaging. Biomed Microdevices. 2012;14:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-011-9580-0.
Haythorne E, Rohm M, van de Bunt M, Brereton MF, Tarasov AI, Blacker TS, Sachse G, Silva dos Santos M, Terron Exposito R, Davis S, Baba O, Fischer R, Duchen MR, Rorsman P, MacRae JI, Ashcroft FM. Diabetes causes marked inhibition of mitochondrial metabolism in pancreatic β-cells. Nat Commun. 2019:10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10189-x.
Maechler P, Wollheim CB. Mitochondrial function in normal and diabetic β-cells. Nature. 2001;414:807–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/414807a.
Mohammed JS, Wang Y, Harvat TA, Oberholzer J, Eddington DT. Microfluidic device for multimodal characterization of pancreatic islets. Lab Chip. 2009;9:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1039/b809590f.
Adewola AF, Lee D, Harvat T, Mohammed J, Eddington DT, Oberholzer J, Wang Y. Microfluidic perifusion and imaging device for multi-parametric islet function assessment. Biomed Microdevices. 2010;12:409–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-010-9398-1.
Hori T, Yamane K, Anazawa T, Kurosawa O, Iwata H. Compact fluidic system for functional assessment of pancreatic islets. Biomed Microdevices. 2019;21:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-019-0443-4.
Lo JF, Wang Y, Blake A, Yu G, Harvat TA, Jeon H, Oberholzer J, Eddington DT. Islet preconditioning via multimodal microfluidic modulation of intermittent hypoxia. Anal Chem. 2012;84:1987–93. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac2030909.
Schulze T, Mattern K, Früh E, Hecht L, Rustenbeck I, Dietzel A. A 3D microfluidic perfusion system made from glass for multiparametric analysis of stimulus-secretion coupling in pancreatic islets. Biomed Microdevices. 2017;19:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-017-0186-z.
Pfeiffer T, Kraushaar U, Düfer M, Schönecker S, Haspel D, Günther E, Drews G, Krippeit-Drews P. Rapid functional evaluation of beta-cells by extracellular recording of membrane potential oscillations with microelectrode arrays. Pflugers Arch - Eur J Physiol. 2011;462:835–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-011-1029-z.
Schönecker S, Kraushaar U, Guenther E, Gerst F, Ullrich S, Häring HU, Königsrainer A, Barthlen W, Drews G, Krippeit-Drews P. Human islets exhibit electrical activity on microelectrode arrays (MEA). Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2015;123:296–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1547217.
Pedraza E, Karajić A, Raoux M, Perrier R, Pirog A, Lebreton F, Arbault S, Gaitan J, Renaud S, Kuhn A, Lang J. Guiding pancreatic beta cells to target electrodes in a whole-cell biosensor for diabetes. Lab Chip. 2015;15:3880–90. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc00616c.
Perrier R, Pirog A, Ja M, Gaitan J, Catargi B, Renaud S, Raoux M, Lang J. Bioelectronic organ-based sensor for microfluidic real-time analysis of the demand in insulin. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;117:253–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.06.015.
Zbinden A, Marzi J, Schlünder K, Probst C, Urbanczyk M, Black S, Brauchle EM, Layland SL, Kraushaar U, Duffy G, Schenke-Layland K, Loskill P. Non-invasive marker-independent high content analysis of a microphysiological human pancreas-on-a-chip model. Matrix Biol. 2020;85–86:205–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2019.06.008.
Pedersen MG, Mosekilde E, Polonsky KS, Luciani DS. Complex patterns of metabolic and Ca2+ entrainment in pancreatic islets by oscillatory glucose. Biophys J. 2013;105:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.036.
Rocheleau JV, Walker GM, Head SS, McGuinness OP, Piston DW. Microfluidic glucose stimulation reveals limited coordination of intracellular Ca2+ activity oscillations in pancreatic islets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:12899–903. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405149101.
Rocheleau JV, Remedi MS, Granada B, Head WS, Koster JC, Nichols CG, Piston DW. Critical role of gap junction coupled KATP channel activity for regulated insulin secretion. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:221–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040026.
Benninger RKP, Zhang M, Steven Head W, Satin LS, Piston DW. Gap junction coupling and calcium waves in the pancreatic islet. Biophys J. 2008;95:5048–61. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.108.140863.
Chen D, Du W, Liu Y, Liu W, Kuznetsov A, Mendez FE, Philipson LH, Ismagilov RF. The chemistrode : a droplet-based microfluidic device for stimulation and recording with high temporal , spatial , and chemical resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:16843–8.
Easley CJ, Rocheleau JV, Head WS, Piston DW. Quantitative measurement of zinc secretion from pancreatic islets with high temporal resolution using droplet-based microfluidics. Anal Chem. 2009;81:9086–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9017692.
Zhang X, Roper MG. Microfluidic perfusion system for automated delivery of temporal gradients to islets of Langerhans. Anal Chem. 2009;81:1162–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac802579z.
Zhang X, Grimley A, Bertram R, Roper MG. Microfluidic system for generation of sinusoidal glucose waveforms for entrainment of islets of Langerhans. Anal Chem. 2010;82:6704–11. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101461x.
Terao K, Gel M, Okonogi A, Fuke A, Okitsu T, Tada T, Suzuki T, Nagamatsu S, Washizu M, Kotera H. Subcellular glucose exposure biases the spatial distribution of insulin granules in single pancreatic beta cells. Sci Rep. 2014;4:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04123.
Xing Y, Nourmohammadzadeh M, Elias JEM, Chan M, Chen Z, Mcgarrigle JJ, Oberholzer J, Wang Y. A pumpless microfluidic device driven by surface tension for pancreatic islet analysis. Biomed Microdevices. 2016;18:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-016-0109-4.
Pedersen MG, Bertram R, Sherman A. Intra- and inter-islet synchronization of metabolically driven insulin secretion. Biophys J. 2005;89:107–19. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.055681.
Yi L, Wang X, Dhumpa R, Schrell AM, Mukhitov N, Roper MG. Integrated perfusion and separation systems for entrainment of insulin secretion from islets of Langerhans. Lab Chip. 2015;15:823–32. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc01360c.
Dhumpa R, Truong TM, Wang X, Roper MG. Measurement of the entrainment window of islets of Langerhans by microfluidic delivery of a chirped glucose waveform. Integr Biol. 2015;7:1061–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5IB00156K.
Schrell AM, Mukhitov N, Yi L, Adablah JE, Menezes J, Roper MG. Online fluorescence anisotropy immunoassays for monitoring insulin secretion from isolated human islets of Langerhans. Anal Methods. 2017;9:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY02899C.Online.
Glieberman AL, Pope BD, Zimmerman JF, Liu Q, Ferrier JP, Kenty JHR, Schrell AM, Mukhitov N, Shores KL, Tepole AB, Melton DA, Roper MG, Parker KK. Synchronized stimulation and continuous insulin sensing in a microfluidic human islet on a chip designed for scalable manufacturing. Lab Chip. 2019;19:2993–3010. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9lc00253g.
Wente W, Efanov AM, Brenner M, Kharitonenkov A, Köster A, Sandusky GE, Sewing S, Treinies I, Zitzer H, Gromada J. Fibroblast growth factor-21 improves pancreatic β-cell function and survival by activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and Akt signaling pathways. Diabetes. 2006;55:2470–8. https://doi.org/10.2337/db05-1435.
Sun MY, Yoo E, Green BJ, Altamentova SM, Kilkenny DM, Rocheleau JV. Autofluorescence imaging of living pancreatic islets reveals fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF21)-induced metabolism. Biophys J. 2012;103:2379–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.10.028.
Kuda O, Brezinova M, Rombaldova M, Slavikova B, Posta M, Beier P, Janovska P, Veleba J, Kopecky J, Kudova E, Pelikanova T. Docosahexaenoic acid-derived fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids (FAHFAS) with anti-inflammatory properties. Diabetes. 2016;65:2580–90. https://doi.org/10.2337/db16-0385.
Yore MM, Syed I, Moraes-Vieira PM, Zhang T, Herman MA, Homan EA, Patel RT, Lee J, Chen S, Peroni OD, Dhaneshwar AS, Hammarstedt A, Smith U, McGraw TE, Saghatelian A, Kahn BB. Discovery of a class of endogenous mammalian lipids with anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory effects. Cell. 2014;159:318–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.035.
Pflimlin E, Bielohuby M, Korn M, Breitschopf K, Löhn M, Wohlfart P, Konkar A, Podeschwa M, Bärenz F, Pfenninger A, Schwahn U, Opatz T, Reimann M, Petry S, Tennagels N. Acute and repeated treatment with 5-PAHSA or 9-PAHSA isomers does not improve glucose control in mice. Cell Metab. 2018;28:217–227.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.05.028.
Bandak B, Yi L, Roper MG. Microfluidic-enabled quantitative measurements of insulin release dynamics from single islets of Langerhans in response to 5-palmitic acid hydroxy stearic acid. Lab Chip. 2018;18:2873–82. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8lc00624e.
Heileman K, Daoud J, Hasilo C, Gasparrini M, Paraskevas S, Tabrizian M. Microfluidic platform for assessing pancreatic islet functionality through dielectric spectroscopy. Biomicrofluidics. 2015;044125:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4929652.
Nourmohammadzadeh M, Xing Y, Lee W, Bochenek MA, Mendoza-elias JE, Mcgarrigle JJ, Marchese E, Chun-chieh Y, Eddington DT, Oberholzer J, Wang Y. A microfluidic array for real-time live-cell imaging of human and rodent pancreatic islets. Lab Chip. 2016;16:1466–72. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc01173f.
Misun PM, Yesildag B, Forschler F, Neelakandhan A, Rousset N, Biernath A, Hierlemann A, Frey O. In vitro platform for studying human insulin release dynamics of single pancreatic islet microtissues at high resolution. Adv Biosyst. 2020;4:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.201900291.
Ortega MA, Rodríguez-Comas J, Yavas O, Velasco-Mallorquí F, Parra V, Novials A, Servitja JM, Quidant R, Ramón-Azcón J. In-situ LSPR sensing of secreted insulin in organ-on-chip. Biosensors. 2021:1–15.
Aćimović SS, Ortega MA, Sanz V, Berthelot J, Garcia-Cordero JL, Renger J, Maerkl SJ, Kreuzer MP, Quidant R. LSPR chip for parallel, rapid, and sensitive detection of cancer markers in serum. Nano Lett. 2014;14:2636–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl500574n.
Kyriazi M-E, Muskens OL, Kanaras AG. DNA: Gold nanoparticles designed for mRNA sensing in cells: imaging of the gold nanoparticles using two photon photoluminescence spectroscopy: Proc.SPIE; 2019.
Soares L, Csáki A, Jatschka J, Fritzsche W, Flores O, Franco R, Pereira E. Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) biosensing using gold nanotriangles: detection of DNA hybridization events at room temperature. Analyst. 2014;139:4964–73. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4AN00810C.
Silva PN, Green BJ, Altamentova SM, Rocheleau JV. A microfluidic device designed to induce media flow throughout pancreatic islets while limiting shear-induced damage. Lab Chip. 2013;13:4374–84. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc50680k.
Velasco-Mallorquí F, Rodríguez-Comas J, Ramón-Azcón J. Cellulose-based scaffolds enhance pseudoislets formation and functionality. Biofabrication [In Press]. 2021:1–13.
Wang Y, Lee D, Zhang L, Jeon H, Mendoza-Elias JE, Harvat TA, Hassan SZ, Zhou A, Eddington DT, Oberholzer J. Systematic prevention of bubble formation and accumulation for long-term culture of pancreatic islet cells in microfluidic device. Biomed Microdevices. 2012;14:419–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-011-9618-3.
Parr EL, Bowen KM, Lafferty KJ. Cellular changes in cultured mouse thyroid glands and islets of Langerhans. Transplantation. 1980;30:135–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-198008000-00012.
Brissova M, Shostak A, Shiota M, Wiebe PO, Poffenberger G, Kantz J, Chen Z, Carr C, Jerome WG, Chen J, Baldwin HS, Nicholson W, Bader DM, Jetton T, Gannon M, Powers AC. Pancreatic islet production of vascular endothelial growth factor-A is essential for islet vascularization, revascularization, and function. Diabetes. 2006;55:2974–85. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-0690.
Vlahos AE, Cober N, Sefton MV. Modular tissue engineering for the vascularization of subcutaneously transplanted pancreatic islets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:9337–42. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619216114.
Rambøl MH, Han E, Niklason LE. Microvessel network formation and interactions with pancreatic islets in three-dimensional chip cultures. Tissue Eng - Part A. 2020;00:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0186.
Takahashi Y, Sekine K, Kin T, Takebe T, Taniguchi H. Self-condensation culture enables vascularization of tissue fragments for efficient therapeutic transplantation. Cell Rep. 2018;23:1620–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.123.
Sankar KS, Green BJ, Crocker AR, Verity JE, Altamentova SM, Rocheleau JV. Culturing pancreatic islets in microfluidic flow enhances morphology of the associated endothelial cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024904.
Jun Y, Lee J, Choi S, Yang JH, Sander M, Chung S, Lee S-H. In vivo–mimicking microfluidic perfusion culture of pancreatic islet spheroids. Sci Adv. 2019;5:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax4520.
Abdul-Ghani MA, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA. Contributions of β-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance to the pathogenesis of impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1130–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc05-2179.
Huh D, Hamilton GA, Ingber DE. From three-dimensional cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21:745–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.005.From.
Esch MB, King TL, Shuler ML. The role of body-on-a-chip devices in drug and toxicity studies. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;13:55–72. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124629.
Zhang C, Zhao Z, Abdul Rahim NA, Van Noort D, Yu H. Towards a human-on-chip: culturing multiple cell types on a chip with compartmentalized microenvironments. Lab Chip. 2009;9:3185–92. https://doi.org/10.1039/b915147h.
Maschmeyer I, Lorenz AK, Schimek K, Hasenberg T, Ramme AP, Hübner J, Lindner M, Drewell C, Bauer S, Thomas A, Sambo NS, Sonntag F, Lauster R, Marx U. A four-organ-chip for interconnected long-term co-culture of human intestine, liver, skin and kidney equivalents. Lab Chip. 2015;15:2688–99. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc00392j.
Essaouiba A, Okitsu T, Kinoshita R, Jellali R, Shinohara M, Danoy M, Legallais C, Sakai Y, Leclerc E. Development of a pancreas-liver organ-on-chip coculture model for organ-to-organ interaction studies. Biochem Eng J. 2020;164:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2020.107783.
Donath MY, Shoelson SE. Type 2 diabetes as an inflammatory disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2925.
Shoelson SE, Lee J, Goldfine AB. Inflammation and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1793–801. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI29069.and.
Lee H, Lee IS, Choue R. Obesity, inflammation and diet. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2013;16:143–52. https://doi.org/10.5223/pghn.2013.16.3.143.
Muoio DM, Newgard CB. Mechanisms of disease: Molecular and metabolic mechanisms of insulin resistance and β-cell failure in type 2 diabetes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:193–205. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2327.
Makki K, Froguel P, Wolowczuk I. Adipose tissue in obesity-related inflammation and insulin resistance: cells, cytokines, and chemokines. ISRN Inflamm. 2013;2013:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/139239.
Lu S, Dugan CE, Kennedy RT. Microfluidic chip with integrated electrophoretic immunoassay for investigating cell-cell interactions. Anal Chem. 2018;90:5171–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05304.
Prentki M, Corkey BE, Madiraju SRM. Lipid-associated metabolic signalling networks in pancreatic beta cell function. Diabetologia. 2020;63:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-04976-w.
Yaribeygi H, Farrokhi FR, Butler AE, Sahebkar A. Insulin resistance: review of the underlying molecular mechanisms. J Cell Physiol. 2018:8152–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.27603.
Pedersen BK, Febbraio MA. Muscle as an endocrine organ: Focus on muscle-derived interleukin-6. Physiol Rev. 2008;88:1379–406. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.90100.2007.
Hoffmann C, Weigert C. Skeletal muscle as an endocrine organ: the role of myokines in exercise adaptations. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017;7. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a029793.
Bouzakri K, Plomgaard P, Berney T, Donath MY, Pedersen BK, Halban PA. Bimodal effect on pancreatic β-cells of secretory products from normal or insulin-resistant human skeletal muscle. Diabetes. 2011;60:1111–21. https://doi.org/10.2337/db10-1178.
Gómez-Banoy N, Lo JC. Adipokines as key players in β cell function and failure. Clin Sci. 2019;133:2317–27. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20190523.
Pedersen BK, Febbraio MA. Muscles, exercise and obesity: skeletal muscle as a secretory organ. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8:457–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2012.49.
Fernández-Costa JM, Fernández-Garibay X, Velasco-Mallorquí F, Ramón-Azcón J. Bioengineered in vitro skeletal muscles as new tools for muscular dystrophies preclinical studies. J Tissue Eng. 2021;12:10–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731420981339.
Barlow J, Solomon TPJ. Conditioned media from contracting skeletal muscle potentiates insulin secretion and enhances mitochondrial energy metabolism of pancreatic beta-cells. Metabolism. 2019;91:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.004.
Mun KS, Arora K, Huang Y, Yang F, Yarlagadda S, Ramananda Y, Abu-el-haija M, Palermo JJ, Appakalai BN, Nathan JD, Naren AP. Patient-derived panreas-on-a-chip to model cystic fibrosis-related disorders. Nat Commun. 2019:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11178-w.
Marino CR, Matovcik LM, Gorelick FS, Cohn JA. Localization of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in pancreas. JClinInvest. 1991;88:712–6.
Ntimbane T, Mailhot G, Spahis S, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Kleme ML, Melloul D, Brochiero E, Berthiaume Y, Levy E. CFTR silencing in pancreatic β-cells reveals a functional impact on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and oxidative stress response. Am J Physiol - Endocrinol Metab. 2016;310:E200–12. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00333.2015.
Guo JH, Chen H, Ruan YC, Zhang XL, Zhang XH, Fok KL, Tsang LL, Yu MK, Huang WQ, Sun X, Chung YW, Jiang X, Sohma Y, Chan HC. Glucose-induced electrical activities and insulin secretion in pancreatic islet beta-cells are modulated by CFTR. Nat Commun. 2014:5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5420.
Moran A, Dunitz J, Nathan B, Saeed A, Holme B, Thomas W. Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: current trends in prevalence, incidence, and mortality. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1626–31. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0586.
Funding
This review received financial support from the European Research Council program under grants ERC-StG-DAMOC (714317), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the “Severo Ochoa” Program for Centres of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2016-2019) and “Retos de investigación: Proyectos I+D+i” (TEC2017-83716-C2-2-R), the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya (2017-SGR-1079), and Fundación Bancaria “la Caixa”- Obra Social “la Caixa” (project IBEC-La Caixa Healthy Ageing).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rodríguez-Comas, J., Ramón-Azcón, J. Islet-on-a-chip for the study of pancreatic β-cell function. In vitro models 1, 41–57 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44164-021-00005-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44164-021-00005-6