Abstract
Introducing superconductivity into two-dimensional (2D) films with nontrivial topology has been intensively pursued as one of the feasible scenarios to realize 1D topological superconductor. Prevailing endeavors mostly exploit the external gating or proximity effect of a traditional superconductor, by which the critical temperatures (\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\)) are limited to several Kelvin range. Here, we report on the discovery of interface-enhanced superconductivity in monolayer 1T′-MoTe2 film. A thermally driven phase transition from Mo6Te6 nanowires to 1T′-MoTe2 films, grown on SrTiO3(001) surface by the molecular beam epitaxial methods, is demonstrated. A combined study of scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy, electrical transport and magnetization measurements indicates the \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) of MoTe2 film is around 30 K, two orders of magnitude larger than its 3D counterpart crystal. This study shows that interfacial engineering is an efficient way to tune monolayer 1T′-MoTe2 film into superconducting states, and thus may pave the way toward higher-\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) 1D intrinsic topological superconductivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) in 1T′ phase have been intensively studied as promising candidates for quantum spin Hall (QSH) insulators [1]. The QSH gap and the conducting edge channels have been detected in WSe2, WTe2 and MoTe2 by scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS) or transport measurements [2–4]. Ensuring research based on the nontrivial topological properties includes the strain-induced phase transition from semimetal to topological insulator in WTe2 and symmetry-enforced topological metallic states along a grain boundary in MoTe2 [5, 6]. Moreover, the coexistence of superconductivity and topologically nontrivial edge states has been long thought to realize one-dimensional (1D) topological superconductors (TSC) [7–12]. Sundry methods have been utilized to introduce cooper pairing into these topological 2D films. For example, voltage gating has been used to drive monolayer 1T′-WTe2 into the superconducting phase with the critical temperature \((T_{\mathrm{c}}) \sim 1~\text{K}\) [13]. The proximity-induced superconductivity has been observed in WTe2/NbSe2 heterostructure with the \(T_{\mathrm{c}} \sim 6~\text{K}\) [14]. Very recently, the enhancement of superconductivity in monolayer 1T′-MoTe2 was reported, where the \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) increased up to ∼8 K in the hole-dominated region [15]. A change in the Coulomb interaction with dimensionality has been proposed to account for the enhancement in \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) via spin fluctuations. However, the transition temperatures achieved by the above endeavors are still relatively low. Alternative approaches are highly craved to realize higher-\(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) superconductivity in these 2D topological films.
Interfacial engineering is an efficient way to tune the electronic properties of 2D materials [16]. In particular, interface-enhanced superconductivity has stimulated tremendous interest due to its great potential for raising \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) [17–22], for the most prominent example, monolayer FeSe grown on SrTiO3 (STO) [18]. Interface-related processes such as interfacial charge transfer and electron-phonon coupling (EPC) are perceived as two critical mechanisms accounting for the enhancement effect [23–29]. Up to date, interface-enhanced superconductivity has not yet been achieved in monolayer 1T′-TMDs [30, 31]. In this work, we report on the observation of interface-enhanced superconductivity in monolayer 1T′-MoTe2 film grown on the STO(001) substrate by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). The ex situ electrical transport and magnetization measurements confirm the superconductivity and give the \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) of 30 K, two orders of magnitude increase compared with the 3D counterpart crystal (\(T_{\mathrm{c}} \sim 0.25~\text{K}\)) [32]. The U-shape superconducting gaps show the attenuation as a response to the temperature rise or external magnetic field.
2 Results and discussions
The wide-area STM image in Fig. S1 shows a step-and-terrace structure of the STO surface with a constant height of 0.4 nm. The corresponding magnified STM image in Fig. 1(a) shows a double-layer TiO2-terminated \(2 \times 2\) surface reconstruction [33–35]. This \(2 \times 2\) reconstruction can be identified in the fast Fourier transformed (FFT) images [see details in Fig. S2]. In addition to the ordered structures, the irregular dark and bright features on the surface possibly associated with crystal defects such as O vacancies or Ti clusters are visible. Figure 1(b)–1(d) show a series of typical STM topographic images of \(\mathrm{Mo}_{\mathrm{x}}\mathrm{Te}_{\mathrm{y}}\) on STO substrate at different growth temperatures. After growth, the samples were annealed at the same temperatures for 30 minutes under Te atmosphere. Figure 1(b) gives the STM image of 1D Mo6Te6 nanowires formed at 350 °C due to a Te-deficient environment, which has been well studied in the previous report [36]. With decreasing growth temperature down to 300 °C, the mixed phase of the Mo6Te6 nanowires and MoTe2 islands arises [see Fig. 1(c)]. At optimal growth temperatures ranging from 240 °C to 260 °C, the Mo6Te6 nanowires will disappear and monolayer MoTe2 film is synthesized accordingly. An overall large-scale STM image shows that the coverage of MoTe2 film is ∼93% [see Fig. 1(d)]. The RHEED patterns before and after the MoTe2 film growth are shown in Fig. 1(e). Using the lattice constant of STO ∼ 3.9 Å as a reference, one can get the lattice constant a of 1T′-MoTe2 on STO ∼ 6.5 Å. 1T′ phase has a rectangle lattice, which can be taken as a distorted structure compared with 1T phase as illustrated in Fig. 1(f).
Figure 2(a) shows the height of the MoTe2 film in different regions. The height of the MoTe2 film generally varies from 0.7 to 0.8 nm, which is lower than that grown on graphene (from 0.9 to 1 nm) [37]. This reduced height reflects the enhancement of the interlayer coupling between MoTe2 film and STO substrate. In addition, the spatial-dependent height provides clues to different coupling strengths, resulting from varied stoichiometry and contrasting density of states between the MoTe2 film and the STO surface. The epitaxial film consists of massive domains, which are generally dozens of nm2 in size. Figure 2(b) shows the tunneling current image of the striped 1T′ phase with different orientations. Statistics of the orientations show that domains with an angle of 120° dominate [see Fig. 2(c)]. The atomically resolved image in Fig. 2(d) shows that the lattice constants a and b are \(6.44\pm 0.05\) Å and \(3.52 \pm 0.05\) Å, respectively. The enlarged lattice than bulk values (\(a = 0.633\text{ nm}\) and \(b = 0.347\text{ nm}\)) suggests tensile strains, which are induced by \(2 \times 2\) surface reconstruction of the STO substrate. The \(dI/dV\) spectra shown in Fig. 2(e) reveal the electronic properties of the MoTe2 film. In a smaller bias range (−0.2 to +0.2 V), we found that an energy gap attenuates the intensity of the density of state (DOS) near the Fermi level.
Strikingly, Fig. 3(a) exhibits a high-resolution \(dI/dV\) spectrum as shown by the black circles within a narrower energy window (−20 to +20 mV). This U-shape gap is symmetric around the Fermi level, suggesting the occurrence of superconductivity. The influences of STO substrate are excluded in Fig. S3. We attempted to fit the STS results with Dynes model [38],
where Δ represents the superconducting gap and Γ denotes the effective energy broadening. A nice fitting to the gap with a fully gapped s-wave function gives a Δ of 5.8 meV and a Γ value of 0.45 meV, as shown by the red curve. Compared with the previously reported superconducting energy gaps in MoTe2 [39–41], this surprisingly large gap potentially indicates a higher \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) in MoTe2/STO system. In general, the gap size varies from 5 meV to 6 meV in different regions. To distinguish the possible superconducting gap with a band gap or coulomb gap, we performed ex situ electrical transport measurements. Before being transferred out of the MBE high vacuum growth chamber, an amorphous Te capping layer with a thickness of 20 nm was deposited on MoTe2 films at room temperature to provide protection from degradation in the air. Figure 3(b) exhibits the temperature dependence of the sheet resistance of sample No. 1. With decreasing temperature from 50 K to 2 K, the sheet resistance of the sample gradually increases and saturates, then begins to decrease at 30 K and drops to zero at 5 K, which is distinct with the behavior when the sample has a band gap or coulomb gap. The transport technique is a macroscopic probe compared with STS measurement. Therefore, we attributed this broad downturn of the resistance during the cooling to these possible reasons such as pronounced domain boundaries or the related defects in MoTe2 film, and interstitial Ti clusters at the interface. The Te/STO heterostructure under the preparation conditions identical to Te/MoTe2/STO heterostructure does not show superconducting behavior [see Fig. S4]. This indicates that the superconductivity comes from the monolayer MoTe2.
To further confirm the superconductivity, we carried out ex situ magnetization measurements for sample No. 2. The temperature dependence of VSM magnetization of the sample is shown in Fig. 3(c), measured in both zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) modes. The magnetic field is 30 Oe, applied perpendicular to the STO(001) plane. Clearly, the M-T curves exhibit a drop at \(T_{\mathrm{c}} \sim 30~\text{K}\), indicating the diamagnetic response. Please notice that the data include the contributions from MoTe2 film, Te protection layer and STO substrate. Therefore, the background signal from the protection layer and substrate leads to the rise in the M-T curves at low temperatures [see Fig. S5]. Considering the transition temperature 30 K as the \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) and the largest gap size 6 meV in the tunneling spectra, \(\Delta /k_{B} T_{c}\) of the sample is ∼2.32 (\(k_{B}\) is the Boltzmann constant), which is larger than the weak coupling BCS condition with a value of 1.76. We further checked the temperature and magnetic field dependence of the \(dI/dV\) spectra. With increasing temperature, the coherence peaks are gradually weakened and the gaps become shallower [see Fig. 3(d)]. The extracted normalized zero-bias conductance (ZBC) remains to be zero until the temperature is beyond 13.8 K. Remarkably, when applying the external magnetic field along the Z direction, the superconducting gaps are rather robust against the magnetic field as shown in Fig. 3(e). The extracted normalized ZBC remains to be zero until the magnetic field is beyond 9 T.
To further disclose the possible mechanism of the enhancement of the \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\), we discussed the interface between MoTe2 and STO. The work functions of STO and MoTe2 are 4.5 eV and 4.9 eV [42, 43], respectively. Electrons would transfer from the STO substrate to the MoTe2 films. Oxygen vacancies on the STO surface also induce charge transfer and enhance binding energy at the interface. Moreover, it’s proposed that the smaller interlayer distance between the superconducting layer and oxide substrate corresponds to the stronger interfacial bonding and then contributes to the optimization of superconductivity [44, 45]. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the lower height reflects the smaller interlayer distance between the MoTe2 film and the STO substrate. Therefore, our results reveal that strong interface coupling at the MoTe2/STO heterostructure plays an important role.
In summary, monolayer 1T′-MoTe2 film on the STO(001) substrate has been successfully synthesized. The interface-enhanced superconductivity in MoTe2/STO heterostructure with the \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) of 30 K has been demonstrated by ex situ electrical transport and magnetization measurements. Our work will stimulate more investigations on interfacial superconductivity in monolayer 1T′-TMDs on oxide substrates. More importantly, our findings establish the groundwork for a possible path toward the realization of topological superconductivity with high \(T_{\mathrm{c}}\) by interfacial engineering.
3 Methods
The epitaxy growth and characterization of MoTe2 films were performed in an ultrahigh vacuum MBE-STM system (Unisoku 1300) with a base pressure of \(1 \times 10^{-10}\) Torr. The 0.5% wt Nb-doped STO(001) substrate was prepared by direct heating up to 950 °C for 1 h. The MoTe2 films were then grown on STO(001) surface by coevaporating high-purity Mo (99.95%) and Te (99.999%) from electron-beam evaporators and standard Knudsen cells, respectively, with the flux ratio of Mo:Te ∼1:20. The growth process was monitored by in-situ reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED) and the growth rate was ∼50 minutes per monolayer. The STM topographic images were acquired under a constant current mode and processed with WSXM software. The tunneling spectra were acquired at ∼4.2 K unless otherwise stated. For wide (narrow)-energy-scale tunneling spectra, the magnitude of the bias modulation for the lock-in technique was 5 (0.5) mV at a frequency of 951 Hz. The electrical transport measurements were performed in a physical property measurement system (PPMS-9T) with the standard four-probe method. The vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) magnetization measurements were performed in a magnetic property measurement system (MPMS3).
Availability of data and materials
All the data and materials relevant to this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Qian X, Liu J, Fu L, Li J (2014) Quantum spin Hall effect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Science 346:1344
Keum DH, Cho S, Kim JH et al. (2015) Bandgap opening in few-layered monoclinic MoTe2. Nat Phys 11:482
Wu S, Fatemi V, Gibson QD, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Cava RJ, Jarillo-Herrero P (2018) Observation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 Kelvin in a monolayer crystal. Science 359:76–79
Chen P, Pai WW, Chan YH, Sun WL, Xu CZ, Lin DS, Chou MY, Fedorov AV, Chiang TC (2018) Large quantum-spin-Hall gap in single-layer 1T′ WSe2. Nat Commun 9:2003
Zhao C, Hu M, Qin J et al. (2020) Strain tunable semimetal–topological-insulator transition in monolayer 1T′-WTe2. Phys Rev Lett 125:046801
Kim HW, Kang SH, Kim HJ et al. (2020) Symmetry dictated grain boundary state in a two-dimensional topological insulator. Nano Lett 20:5837–5843
Fu L, Kane CL (2008) Superconducting proximity effect and Majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator. Phys Rev Lett 100:096407
Alicea J (2012) New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems. Rep Prog Phys 75:076501
Hart S, Ren H, Wagner T, Leubner P, Muhlbauer M, Brune C, Buhmann H, Molenkamp LW, Yacoby A (2014) Induced superconductivity in the quantum spin Hall edge. Nat Phys 10:638–643
Sun HH, Zhang KW, Hu LH et al. (2016) Majorana zero mode detected with spin selective Andreev reflection in the vortex of a topological superconductor. Phys Rev Lett 116:257003
Bocquillon E, Deacon RS, Wiedenmann J, Leubner P, Klapwijk TM, Brüne C, Ishibashi K, Buhmann H, Molenkamp LW (2016) Gapless Andreev bound states in the quantum spin Hall insulator HgTe. Nat Nanotechnol 12:137
Zhu Z, Papaj M, Nie XA et al. (2021) Discovery of segmented Fermi surface induced by Cooper pair momentum. Science 374:1381
Sajadi E, Palomaki T, Fei ZY, Zhao WJ, Bement P, Olsen C, Luescher S, Xu XD, Folk JA, Cobden DH (2018) Gate-induced superconductivity in a monolayer topological insulator. Science 362:922
Lupke F, Waters D, De La Barrera SC, Widom M, Mandrus DG, Yan J, Feenstra RM, Hunt BM (2020) Proximity-induced superconducting gap in the quantum spin Hall edge state of monolayer WTe2. Nat Phys 16:526
Rhodes DA, Jindal A, Yuan NFQ et al. (2021) Enhanced superconductivity in monolayer Td-MoTe2. Nano Lett 21:2505
Hwang HY, Iwasa Y, Kawasaki M, Keimer B, Nagaosa N, Tokura Y (2012) Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces. Nat Mater 11:103
Reyren N, Thiel S, Caviglia AD et al. (2007) Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides. Science 317:1196–1199
Wang QY, Li Z, Zhang WH et al. (2012) Interface-induced high-temperature superconductivity in single unit-cell FeSe films on SrTiO3. Chin Phys Lett 29:037402
Gozar A, Logvenov G, Kourkoutis LF et al. (2008) High-temperature interface superconductivity between metallic and insulating copper oxides. Nature 455:782–785
Wang L, Ma X, Xue QK (2016) Interface high-temperature superconductivity. Supercond Sci Technol 29:123001
Ding C, Gong G, Liu Y et al. (2019) Signature of superconductivity in orthorhombic CoSb monolayer films on SrTiO3(001). ACS Nano 13:10434
Shao ZB, Fu ZG, Li SJ et al. (2019) Strongly compressed few-layered SnSe2 films grown on a SrTiO3 substrate: the coexistence of charge ordering and enhanced interfacial superconductivity. Nano Lett 19:5304
Ge JF, Liu ZL, Liu C et al. (2015) Superconductivity above 100 K in single-layer FeSe films on doped SrTiO3. Nat Mater 14:285–289
Song Q, Yu TL, Lou X et al. (2019) Evidence of cooperative effect on the enhanced superconducting transition temperature at the FeSe/SrTiO3 interface. Nat Commun 10:758
Lee JJ, Schmitt FT, Moore RG et al. (2014) Interfacial mode coupling as the origin of the enhancement of Tc in FeSe films on SrTiO3. Nature 515:245–248
Lee DH (2015) What makes the Tc of FeSe/SrTiO3 so high? Chin Phys B 24:117405
Kulić ML, Dolgov OV (2017) The electron–phonon interaction with forward scattering peak is dominant in high Tc superconductors of FeSe films on SrTiO3 (TiO2). New J Phys 19:013020
Zhao W, Li M, Chang CZ et al. (2018) Direct imaging of electron transfer and its influence on superconducting pairing at FeSe/SrTiO3 interface. Sci Adv 4:eaao2682
Rosenstein B, Shapiro BY (2021) Phonon mechanism explanation of the superconductivity dichotomy between FeSe and FeS monolayers on SrTiO3 and other substrates. Phys Rev B 103:224517
Li HF, Chen AX, Wang L et al. (2020) Molecular beam epitaxy growth and strain-induced bandgap of monolayer 1T′-WTe2 on SrTiO3(001). Appl Phys Lett 117:161601
Chen W, Hu M, Zong J, Xie X, Meng Q, Yu F, Wang L, Ren W, Chen A, Liu G, Xi X, Li FS, Sun J, Liu J, Zhang Y (2021) Epitaxial growth of single-phase 1T′-WSe2 monolayer with assistance of enhanced interface interaction. Adv Mater 33:2004930
Qi Y, Naumov PG, Ali MN et al. (2016) Superconductivity in Weyl semimetal candidate MoTe2. Nat Commun 7:11038
Ohsawa T, Iwaya K, Shimizu R et al. (2010) Thickness-dependent local surface electronic structures of homoepitaxial thin films. J Appl Phys 108:073710
Lin Y, Becerra-Toledo AE, Silly F et al. (2011) The (\(2 \times 2\)) reconstructions on the SrTiO3(001) surface: a combined scanning tunneling microscopy and density functional theory study. Surf Sci 605:L51
Silly F, Newell DT, Castell MR (2006) SrTiO3(001) reconstructions: the (\(2 \times 2\)) to c (\(4 \times 4\)) transition. Surf Sci 600:219
Zhu H, Wang Q, Zhang C et al. (2017) New Mo6Te6 sub-nanometer-diameter nanowire phase from 2H-MoTe2. Adv Mater 29:1606264
Dong L, Wang GY, Zhu Z et al. (2018) Charge density wave states in 2H-MoTe2 revealed by scanning tunneling microscopy. Chin Phys Lett 35:066801
Dynes RC, Garno JP, Hertel GB, Orlando TP (1984) Tunneling study of superconductivity near the metal-insulator transition. Phys Rev Lett 53:2437–2440
Cho S, Kang SH, Yu HS et al. (2017) Te vacancy-driven superconductivity in orthorhombic molybdenum ditelluride. 2D Mater 4:021030
Li Y, Gu Q, Chen C et al. (2018) Nontrivial superconductivity in topological MoTe2–xSx crystals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:9503–9508
Naidyuk Y, Kvitnitskaya O, Bashlakov D et al. (2018) Surface superconductivity in the Weyl semimetal MoTe2 detected by point contact spectroscopy. 2D Mater 5:045014
Zhang H, Zhang D, Lu X et al. (2017) Origin of charge transfer and enhanced electron-phonon coupling in single unit-cell FeSe films on SrTiO3. Nat Commun 8:214
Biswal B, Mishra S, Yadav R et al. (2022) Work function of van der Waals topological semimetals: experiment and theory. Appl Phys Lett 120:093101
Peng R, Zou K, Han MG et al. (2020) Picoscale structural insight into superconductivity of monolayer FeSe/SrTiO3. Sci Adv 6:eaay4517
Song Y, Chen Z, Zhang Q et al. (2021) High temperature superconductivity at FeSe/LaFeO3 interface. Nat Commun 12:5926
Acknowledgements
We thank R.-S. Jiang, G.-Y. Wang, J.-L. Jiao, and J. Ma for the helpful discussions.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University. We thank National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11790313, No. 92065201, No. 11874256, No. 11874258, No. 12074247, No. 12174252 and No. 11861161003), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grants No. 2019YFA0308600, 2020YFA0309000), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB28000000) and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grants No. 2019SHZDZX01, No. 19JC1412701, No. 20QA1405100) for financial support. We thank the financial support from Innovation program for Quantum Science and Technology (Grant No. 2021ZD0302500).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JJ conceived the project and designed the experiments. BY conducted the epitaxial growth of MoTe2/SrTiO3 heterostructures and STM characterizations with the assistance of CZ, BX, HC and JC. BY and HM performed the BCS fitting. BY carried out the electrical transport and magnetization measurements under the supervision of HY, XL, LL, DG, SW, YL, CL, HZ and JJ. All the authors were engaged in discussing and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
Jin-feng Jia is the Executive Editor for Quantum Frontiers and was not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish, this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
44214_2023_34_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary information. See Additional file 1 for more details on the experiments presented in this study. (PDF 292 kB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, B., Zhao, C., Xia, B. et al. Interface-enhanced superconductivity in monolayer 1T′-MoTe2 on SrTiO3(001). Quantum Front 2, 9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44214-023-00034-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44214-023-00034-0