Abstract
Almost 400 genes affect yeast telomere length, including Est1, which is critical for recruitment and activation of telomerase. Here we use mass spectrometry to identify novel telomerase regulators by their co-purification with the telomerase holoenzyme. In addition to all known subunits, over 100 proteins are telomerase associated, including all three subunits of the essential Cdc48-Npl4-Ufd1 complex as well as three E3 ubiquitin ligases. The Cdc48 complex is evolutionarily conserved and targets ubiquitinated proteins for degradation. Est1 levels are ∼40-fold higher in cells with reduced Cdc48, yet, paradoxically, telomeres are shorter. Furthermore, Est1 is ubiquitinated and its cell cycle-regulated abundance is lost in Cdc48-deficient cells. Deletion of the telomerase-associated E3 ligase, Ufd4, in cdc48-3 cells further increases Est1 abundance but suppresses the telomere length phenotype of the single mutant. These data argue that, in concert with Ufd4, the Cdc48 complex regulates telomerase by controlling the level and activity of Est1.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Owing to the properties of conventional DNA polymerases, the very ends of linear DNA molecules require a special replication mechanism, which in almost all eukaryotes is provided by telomerase, a telomere-dedicated reverse transcriptase. The catalytic core of telomerase consists of the reverse transcriptase (hTERT, humans; Est2, budding yeast) and a templating RNA (hTR, humans; TLC1, budding yeast). In addition, the telomerase holoenzyme contains accessory proteins that are essential for the stability and/or activity of the telomerase holoenzyme in vivo.
Est1 is the best conserved of the telomerase accessory proteins, present from yeasts to humans. In budding and fission yeasts, Est1 is essential for telomerase-mediated telomere maintenance with roles in both recruitment and activation of telomerase1,2,3. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase accessory protein Est3 (refs 4, 5), which is also essential for in-vivo telomerase activity, is found only in budding yeasts. However, structural predictions suggest that it is similar to the mammalian TPP1 (refs 4, 5), a telomere structural protein that increases telomerase processivity6,7. In budding yeast, Est3 interacts directly with both Est1 (ref. 8) and Est2 (refs 9, 10), and its association with Est1 is required for its recruitment to telomeres in vivo8.
Telomerase activity is tightly regulated. Part of this regulation is at the level of abundance, as telomerase is either absent (most human somatic cells)11 or present in very low amounts, fewer than one complex per telomere (budding and fission yeasts)1,12,13. Even in human stem cells that express telomerase, its activity is low, as heterozygous mutations that reduce the abundance of a telomerase component or telomere structural protein can cause premature death as a result of stem cell failure (reviewed in refs 14, 15). Likewise, telomerase RNA is haplo-insufficient for maintenance of telomere length in both budding13 and fission yeasts, as is the fission yeast Est1 (Webb and Zakian, in preparation). Telomerase is upregulated in ∼85% of human tumours15 and its expression promotes tumorigenesis16. Thus, understanding telomerase regulation is relevant to ageing and cancer.
In budding and fission yeast, telomerase action is cell cycle regulated, occurring only in late S/G2 phase17,18. In budding yeast, part of this regulation is due to the cell cycle-regulated expression of Est1, which is low in G1 phase (∼20 molecules per cell) and high at the end of the cell cycle (∼110 molecules per cell) when telomerase is active1,19. Although Est1 is the only core subunit of S. cerevisiae telomerase whose abundance is cell cycle regulated, given that it is required to recruit Est3 into the holoenzyme and to telomeres8, Est3 action is also cell cycle regulated. Although Est1 regulation is not sufficient to restrict telomerase to a short window of the cell cycle20, its biology is key for understanding cell cycle regulation of telomerase.
In budding and fission yeasts, genetics has been extremely successful at identifying a large number of genes whose mutation affects telomere length (reviewed in refs 21, 22). However, for most of these genes, it is not known whether they affect telomeres directly. We reasoned that mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of telomerase might identify proteins with direct effects on telomerase. Indeed, MS has been extremely useful for identifying novel telomerase components and regulators from both ciliates23,24,25 and human cultured cells26,27,28. However, the very low abundance of yeast telomerase has hampered attempts to use MS, to identify proteins that co-purify with telomerase.
We describe methods to purify active telomerase from budding yeast and to identify interacting proteins by MS. This approach identified multiple candidates for novel telomerase regulatory proteins, including the three subunits of a Cdc48 complex, Cdc48, Npl4 and Ufd1. Cdc48, an AAA ATPase, is an evolutionarily conserved protein that is the catalytic subunit of several multi-protein complexes that contain ubiquitin receptors, such as Npl4 and Ufd1 (reviewed in ref. 29). These complexes act as segregases that recognize and remove ubiquitinated proteins from multi-protein complexes30,31,32. From yeasts to humans, Cdc48 complexes are implicated in a plethora of diverse nuclear and cytoplasmic processes, including cell cycle progression, membrane fusion, repair of double-strand breaks, termination of DNA replication, modification of transcription factors, postmitotic reassembly of the nuclear envelope and export of proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria (reviewed in ref. 33). However, Cdc48 has not been linked previously to telomerase. The diverse phenotypes associated with loss of Cdc48 are mostly due to its role in promoting proteasome-mediated degradation, where it acts at a step after ubiquitination and before degradation of target proteins34,35. Mutations of its human homologue, p97 or VCP (valosin-containing protein), cause a dominant multi-organ and progressive degenerative syndrome of the muscles, bone and brain, called VCP disease36.
Here we report a previously unrecognized mechanism of telomerase regulation in which the Cdc48-Npl4-Ufd1 complex affects Est1 abundance, activity and cell cycle regulation, as well as telomere length. Moreover, deletion of a telomerase-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase (E3 Ub), Ufd4, which has also not been linked previously to telomeres, results in long telomeres, while its deletion from cdc48-3 cells suppresses the short telomere length phenotype of cdc48-3 cells. These data suggest that Ufd4 ubiquitinates Est1 and this modified Est1 is removed from the holoenzyme by the Cdc48 complex. As the Cdc48 complex and Est1 are both highly conserved, these data may be relevant to telomerase regulation in humans.
Results
Generation of a telomerase-overexpressing strain
The low abundance of S. cerevisiae telomerase has thwarted previous attempts to study it by MS. To circumvent this problem, we generated a strain that overexpressed (OE) each of the four essential telomerase subunits: TLC1 RNA, Est1, Est2 and Est3 (hereafter OE strain). The chromosomal copy of the gene for each component was put under the control of the strong and inducible GAL1 promoter. To aid in immunopurification of the holoenzyme, Est1 and Est2 were expressed as green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions (Fig. 1a). A strain with a GAL1-regulated nuclear-localized GFP was used as a specificity control as it allowed elimination of proteins with nonspecific associations to the resin or GFP tag (Fig. 1a, Control). The telomerase OE strain had normal viability, growth rate and cell cycle progression (Fig. 1b).
Western blot analysis using an anti-GFP antibody readily detected Est1 and Est2 in the OE strain (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1A). However, the level of overexpression of these proteins could not be determined, because neither Est1-GFP nor Est2-GFP expressed from its endogenous promoter was detectable by western blotting (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1C). Therefore, we used the abundance of TLC1 RNA in wild-type (WT) versus telomerase OE strain to estimate the extent of overexpression (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1D). Northern analysis indicated approximately ten times more telomerase RNA in the OE strain than in WT cells (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1D). As TLC1 is the subunit present in the lowest number per cell, this value is a good approximation of the maximum level of holoenzyme overexpression1,8,13.
To determine whether the OE telomerase was active, we used Southern analysis to determine telomere length in two independent isolates of the OE strain (Fig. 1e). Telomeres in the two OE isolates progressively lengthened over four successive restreaks. By restreak four, telomeres were ∼80–130 bp longer than the ∼300 bp in the galactose grown control. Thus, the OE telomerase is active.
Proteomic profiling of purified telomerase
GFP-tagged telomerase components Est1 and Est2 were immuno-affinity purified using high-titre polyclonal rabbit anti-GFP antibodies and extraction conditions that optimized telomerase recovery37. As telomerase activity is regulated during the cell cycle, telomerase was purified from cells arrested in either late G1 phase by treatment with α-factor (telomerase inactive) or in G2/M phase by treatment with nocodazole (telomerase active) (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1A)17,18. Lysates were treated (or not) with DNase I to distinguish proteins with DNA-dependent associations and resolved by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) before MS analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1B).
To determine the specificity of individual protein interactions, we used the SAINT (Significance Analysis of INTeractome) algorithm to calculate specificity scores by comparing proteins that co-isolated with telomerase to GFP controls38. The SAINT algorithm employs a probabilistic scoring method incorporating the number of spectra detected in both experimental and control isolations, frequency of detection across biological replicates and protein length. We adopted a stringent SAINT score cutoff of 0.8, which retained only the most prominent interactions (top ∼5%, Supplementary Data 1). Using these criteria, a combined total of 115 proteins were identified in the G1 and G2/M isolations (89 with G1 phase telomerase and 72 with G2/M phase telomerase; Supplementary Data 1). Of these, 32% were telomerase associated after DNase I treatment (37 proteins in both G1 and in G2/M phases; these proteins are in bold and italics in Supplementary Data 1).
Isolation method identified all known telomerase subunits
As expected, given the isolation strategy, GFP-tagged Est1 and Est2 were both identified with high confidence from immuno-isolates, as demonstrated by very high sequence coverage (Est1: 78%; Est2: 70%) and high spectral counts (Supplementary Data 1). Likewise, the other essential telomerase protein, Est3, which was not GFP tagged, was present with high confidence in the immuno-isolates (Supplementary Data 1). TLC1 RNA has an Sm protein-binding site near the 3′-end of the molecule, whose mutation leads to reduced TLC1 levels and short telomeres, and two of the seven Sm proteins, Smd1 and Smd3, bind TLC1 RNA in vivo39. All seven Sm proteins (Smd1, Smd2, Smd3, Smb1, Sme1, Smx2 and Smx3) were identified with high specificity scores; Sme1 was the only one that was not present in both G1 and G2/M phase telomerase. With the exception of Smx2 and Smx3, all of these associations were DNase I resistant (Supplementary Data 1). In addition, 32 of the G1 and G2/M telomerase-associated proteins had been linked previously to telomere length or telomerase regulation (Supplementary Data 1). Thus, all known telomerase subunits and 22 proteins with reported links to telomere biology were present in the immuno-isolates, representing ∼30% of the 115 proteins identified. However, the majority of the associated proteins that co-purified with Est1/Est2 had not been linked previously to telomerase and are candidates for new telomerase regulators.
Analysis of the telomerase interactome
We used information from STRING-db40 and Cytoscape41, to generate a functional protein interaction network (Fig. 2a). Proteins were clustered into functional protein complexes and groupings using Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) annotations and STRING connectivity (Table 1 and Fig. 2a).
Multiple proteins involved in proteolysis were detected in both G1 and G2/M telomerase, although they were often enriched in G1 isolations (Table 1). This subset includes Cdc48, Npl4 and Ufd1, which act in a complex to target ubiquitinated proteins for proteosomal degradation (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2). The Cdc48 cofactor Shp1 was also more abundant in G1 phase telomerase isolations, as were 22 of the 32 subunits of the proteasome (Fig. 2a and Table 1). Three E3 Ub ligases, Tom1, Ubr1 and Ufd4, as well as the deubiquitinase, Ubp15, were also telomerase associated with increased interaction abundance in G1 phase (Fig. 2a and Table 1).
In addition to the Cdc48 and proteasome complexes, other multi-subunit complexes were telomerase associated. For example, Pop1, Pop6 and Pop7 are components of both RNase MRP and nuclear RNase P. Both complexes are involved in RNA processing42.
Among the most prominent associations with known telomere functions were Yku70 and Yku80, which form a heterodimer that binds telomeres and telomerase RNA (reviewed in ref. 21). However, the association of both proteins was DNase sensitive (Fig. 2a, hexagon-shaped nodes), suggesting that the Yku70/80 complex is not part of the holoenzyme. Similarly, the telomerase association of Hsp82, a protein implicated in regulating the DNA-binding activity of Cdc13 (ref. 43), was DNase sensitive.
Using the DAVID Bioinformatics Database44, we determined whether specific functional classes were more highly represented in the telomerase isolations than in the yeast genome as a whole. This functional annotation demonstrated significant (P<0.05, modified Fisher’s exact test (EASE)44) enrichment of proteins in telomere maintenance/assembly, RNA splicing, RNA 3′-end processing/catabolism, messenger RNA processing/catabolism, proteolysis, ubiquitin-dependent processes and small nucleolar RNA processing (Fig. 2b).
The Cdc48 complex affects telomere length
To determine whether novel telomerase-associated protein had effects on telomere maintenance, we started with the Cdc48 complex as all three of its subunits, Cdc48, Npl4 and Ufd1, were among the most prominent telomerase-associated proteins with SAINT scores of 1 in both G1 and G2/M phase, and the association of each subunit was DNase resistant. In addition, the recovered peptides had high amino acid sequence coverage (an average of 76% for Cdc48, 36% for Npl4 and 37% for Ufd1).
If the association of the Cdc48 complex with telomerase is functionally important, we expect its loss to affect telomere length. As each of the three subunits is essential, we examined telomere length as well as other phenotypes in strains with temperature-sensitive alleles, cdc48-3, npl4-1 and ufd1-2 (ref. 45). Each of these strains arrests at mitosis when grown at 37 °C, the restrictive temperature for all three alleles. Although cdc48-3 cells are viable at 25 °C (permissive temperature) and 30 °C (semi-permissive temperatures), proteolytic defects of are evident at both temperatures45.
DNA prepared from the mutant strains grown at both 25° and 30 °C was digested with restriction enzymes and subjected to Southern blot analysis using a probe for telomeric DNA (Fig. 3a). Telomeres in cdc48-3 cells were about 40 bp shorter than an otherwise isogenic WT strain at both 25 °C and 30 °C. This short telomere phenotype was rescued by introducing a centromere plasmid containing CDC48 (pRS316-CDC48 (ref. 46 and Fig. 3b). Similarly, a cdc48-3 telomerase OE strain had shorter telomeres than WT cells at both 25 °C and 30 °C (Fig. 3c). Thus, the effects of the cdc48-3 mutation on telomere length cannot be rescued by overexpression of telomerase. In addition, npl4-1 cells had telomeres that were modestly shorter than the WT isogenic control at both 25 °C and 30 °C, whereas ufd1-2 cells had WT length telomeres (Fig. 3a). We focused additional experiments on cdc48-3 cells as this mutant had the largest effect on telomere length.
Telomeric silencing is modestly reduced in cdc48-3 cells
To provide more evidence for an effect of the Cdc48 complex on telomeres, we examined the level of telomere position effect (TPE) in mutant versus WT cells. TPE refers to the reversible repression of telomeric gene transcription47. In otherwise isogenic strains, cells with long telomeres have more TPE than cells with short telomeres. To monitor TPE, we integrated the URA3 gene adjacent to the left telomere of chromosome VII. Silencing of URA3 allows growth in the presence of 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA). Consistent with the telomere length data, cdc48-3 cells had ∼5 × lower TPE than WT cells, whereas TPE levels in npl4-1 and ufd1-2 cells were the same as WT (Supplementary Fig. 3IA,B,C). TPE was also lower in cdc48-3 cells that overexpress telomerase (Supplementary Fig. 3IIA). The TPE data provide additional support for a telomeric role for the Cdc48 complex.
Cdc48 complex regulates Est1 abundance
Given that the Cdc48 complex promotes proteasome-mediated degradation of its target proteins, we considered that its effects on telomere length and TPE might reflect altered abundance of one or more telomere proteins. To test this possibility, we used western analysis to determine the levels of five Myc-tagged proteins, Est1, Est2, Cdc13, Yku80 and Pif1, and an untagged protein, Rap1, which was detected using a polyclonal antiserum48. Est1 and Est2 are core telomerase subunits, Cdc13 and Yku80 are telomere-binding proteins that affect both telomere structure and recruitment of telomerase, Rap1 is a telomere-binding protein that is essential for telomere protection and TPE, and Pif1 is a DNA helicase that removes telomerase from DNA ends (reviewed in ref. 21). We compared the abundance of each protein in WT and cdc48-3 cells grown at both 25 °C and 30 °C using α-tubulin as a loading control (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 4).
Western blot analysis revealed that Est2, Cdc13, Yku80, Pif1 and Rap1 were expressed at about the same levels in cdc48-3 and WT cells, while Est1 levels were much higher in cdc48-3 cells (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 4A). This difference was evident in cdc48-3 cells grown at both 25 °C and 30 °C compared with WT cells grown at the same temperatures. To estimate the increase in Est1 levels in cdc48-3 cells, we did western blot analysis on a dilution series of the extract from both WT and mutant cells. As the western signal in the undiluted WT extract was comparable to that in a 40-fold dilution of the cdc48-3 extract, Est1 abundance was about 40 times higher in mutant cells (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 4B). Likewise, Est1 was more abundant in both 25 °C- and 30 °C-grown npl4-1 and ufd1-2 cells compared with WT (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 4C). In ufd1-2 cells, the Est1 increase was more evident at the more restrictive temperature of 30 °C than at 25 °C. As each mutation affected Est1 levels, the short telomeres in cdc48-3 cells are probably due to reduced Cdc48 complex and the more modest effects of the other mutations probably reflect differences in the strengths of the three conditional alleles.
The Cdc48 complex was identified by MS as co-purifying with the Est1-GFP and Est2-GFP, and western blot analysis showed that Est1 abundance was Cdc48 dependent (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 4A). If the Cdc48 complex interacts specifically with Est1, Est1 should also be present in a Cdc48 immunoprecipitate. To test this possibility, we immunoprecipitated Cdc48 with a goat anti-Cdc48 polyclonal antiserum (Abgent) in cells expressing Est1-Myc. The low-abundance Est1 was readily detected in anti-Cdc48 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 4D), confirming the Est1-Cdc48 interaction.
Short cdc48-3 telomeres are not due to limited Est3
Given the activation function of Est1, a priori one expects telomere lengthening rather than the observed telomere shortening when Est1 is OE, as it was in cdc48-3 cells. To test this possibility, we OE Est1 by placing its transcription under the control of the galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter. As reported previously49, overexpression of Est1 in our WT background resulted in telomere lengthening (∼80 bps) (Fig. 3d). However, telomeres were even shorter in cdc48-3 cells expressing Est1 from the GAL1 promoter than in cdc48-3 cells alone (25 °C; Fig. 3d). Thus, the positive impact of OE Est1 on telomere length requires the Cdc48 complex.
Est3 interacts directly with Est1 and requires it for telomere binding8. Thus, another possibility for short telomeres in cdc48-3 cells is that the very high levels of Est1 sequester Est3 from telomeres. If this model is correct, overexpression of Est3 in cdc48-3 cells might restore telomeres to a more WT-like length. However, Est3 overexpression had little or no effect on telomere length in cdc48-3 or WT cells (Supplementary Fig. 5), suggesting that telomere shortening in cdc48-3 cells is not a consequence of cells being limited for Est3.
Est1 is ubiquitinated in cdc48-3 cells
Est1 is cell cycle regulated19 by a process that depends on both the E3 Ub ligase CDH1/APC50 and the proteasome20, although it is not clear whether either dependency is direct, and ubiquitinated Est1 (Est1-Ub) has not been detected. Our data suggest that when the Cdc48 complex is compromised, Est1 will be ubiquitinated but not degraded, leading to the accumulation of Est1-Ub. To test this model, we asked whether Est1-Ub is present in WT and cdc48-3 cells by expressing Myc-tagged Est1 and His6-tagged ubiquitin under the control of the copper-inducible CUP1 promoter in both WT and cdc48-3 cells51. Lysates were prepared from log phase cells grown overnight in media containing copper and His6-ubiquitinated proteins were isolated using Ni-conjugated agarose beads (QIAGEN). Eluted proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE and analysed by western blots using anti-Myc (Clontech) to detect Est1 (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 6A) and anti-His antibodies (Novagen) to detect all ubiquitinated proteins (Supplementary Fig. 6B).
In both copper-treated strains, many proteins were present in the anti-His western blotting, but not in the non-copper-treated controls (Supplementary Fig. 6B, compare lanes 2 and 4 with 1 and 3). Myc-tagged Est1 was among the Ni-affinity isolated proteins from copper-treated cells, indicating that at least a fraction of the Est1 was ubiquitinated both in the presence and absence of the Cdc48 complex (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 6A). Although Est1-Ub was evident in both WT and cdc48-3 cells, it was about 70–80 times more abundant in the latter (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 6A). After adjusting for Est1 being ∼40 times more abundant in cdc48-3 versus WT cells, the fraction of Est1 that was ubiquitinated was almost twice as high in cdc48-3 compared with WT cells. Although the Cdc48 complex is often described as recognizing polyubiquitinated proteins, in four independent experiments only mono-Ub Est1 was detected. Likewise, a recent paper reports that Cdc48 complexes in yeast and mammals extract monoubiquitinated transcription factors from DNA52.
To determine whether Est1 was ubiquitinated in a cell cycle-dependent manner, we arrested WT and cdc48-3 cells in G1 phase with α-factor and G2/M phase with nocodazole, and isolated ubiquitinated proteins from both as in Fig. 5a. In both WT and cdc48-3 cells, levels of mono-Ub Est1 were similar in G1 and G2/M phases (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 6C). Thus, the Cdc48 complex could extract Est1-Ub from telomerase in both G1 and G2/M phases.
Cell cycle regulation of Est1 is lost in cdc48-3 cells
Est1 is the only core telomerase subunit whose abundance varies with the cell cycle1,8,19. Est1 levels are approximately five times higher in G2/M (109±60.3 molecules per cell; here and elsewhere represents average±s.d.) than in G1 phase (20.3±11.6)1. To determine whether the Cdc48 complex is responsible for the cell cycle-regulated abundance of Est1, we arrested WT and cdc48-3 cells in late G1 phase with α-factor. We then released cells from the arrest, allowing them to proceed through a synchronous cell cycle as monitored by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Fig. 5c). As shown previously, in WT cells Est1 was much less abundant in G1 phase than later in the cell cycle (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 6E). However, in cdc48-3 cells Est1 levels were as high in G1 phase as they were throughout the rest of the cell cycle (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 6E). Thus, the low level of Est1 in G1 phase is Cdc48 dependent.
Ufd4 affects telomere length and Est1 abundance
Budding yeast encodes ∼80 E3 Ub ligases29. Because three of these ligases Tom1, Ubr1 and Ufd4 were telomerase associated (Supplementary Data 1), we considered them as candidates for the E3 Ub ligase that modifies Est1. We also considered another E3 Ub ligase, Cdh1, which had been implicated previously in Est1 regulation50. We anticipated that deletion of the correct E3 Ub ligase would result in higher levels of Est1 and hence longer telomeres in otherwise WT cells. Est1 abundance in cdc48-3 cells lacking the appropriate E3 ligase should be even higher than in cdc48-3 cells alone but the short telomere phenotype of the strain should be suppressed. In two experiments, only ufd4Δ had all of the expected phenotypes (Fig. 5e,f and Supplementary Figs 6D and 7). Thus, Ufd4 is probably the E3 Ub ligase that cooperates with the Cdc48 complex to regulate Est1 abundance and degradation.
Discussion
So far, MS analysis of telomerase has been accomplished only in Tetrahymena cells, as they undergo massive new telomere formation and immortalized human cells, both of which have atypically high levels of telomerase. As yeast telomerase is present in less than one complex per telomere, its isolation is challenging. We (and others) were not successful at purifying telomerase-associated proteins from budding yeast expressing endogenous levels of telomerase. Statistically robust preparations of telomerase-associated proteins required telomerase overexpression (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1D) and optimized lysis conditions.
Telomerase overexpression had no detectable effects on growth rate or cell cycle progression (Fig. 1b). Moreover, even though telomeres were longer in the OE strains indicating that the OE telomerase was active, telomeres were not pathologically long as seen in certain mutant backgrounds, such as cdc13-5 or rap1ts cells53,54 (Fig. 1e). The robust association of all known telomerase subunits with the immunoprecipitated complex indicates that the isolated complex is authentic (Supplementary Data 1). Moreover, ∼30% of the telomerase-associated proteins were previously reported to affect telomeres, an enrichment over the ∼8% of yeast genes reported to affect telomere length (Supplementary Data 1).
The telomerase association of 35% of the 115 proteins, such as the Yku complex, was lost after DNase I treatment (Supplementary Data 1). The Ku complex is telomere associated in yeasts55 and mammals56. The DNase sensitivity of YKu70/80 and Sir4, another telomere structural protein, probably indicates that their association arises from telomerase that was telomere-associated at the time of cell lysis. However, we do not think these associations necessarily lack biological relevance, as Rap1, the most abundant telomere-binding protein, and the G-tail binding CST complex were not telomerase associated57. We speculate that telomerase-binding proteins such as the Yku complex have a particularly close proximity with telomerase when it is telomere bound, thus generating a favourable environment for interaction.
We identified telomerase-associated proteins from both G1 phase, when telomerase is not active, and G2/M phase, when it is. Proteins with roles in protein modification were more abundant in G1 than in G2/M phase telomerase. Degradation of telomerase subunits, such as Est1, or of other positive regulators of the enzyme in G1 phase could explain why telomerase is not active in G1 phase. In contrast, proteins involved in chromatin, silencing, transcription and translation were more highly represented in G2/M phase telomerase, perhaps reflecting a need to remodel telomeric chromatin for telomerase access. Nonetheless, all of the DNAse-resistant, telomerase-associated proteins were present with high specificity in both preparations, perhaps because factors that limit telomerase activity to late S/G2 phase are telomere rather than telomerase-associated. In addition, cell cycle regulation may be influenced in part by posttranslational modifications of telomerase subunits.
Our study identified an unanticipated pathway of telomerase regulation that involves the essential and multifunctional Cdc48-Npl4-Ufd1 complex and the E3 Ub ligase Ufd4. All four of these proteins were among the most significant telomerase-associated proteins in our MS analysis (Supplementary Data 1), yet none was linked previously to telomeres. The Cdc48 complex physically interacted with Est1 (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 4D) and affected its abundance and cell cycle regulation (Figs 4a and 5c,d, and Supplementary Figs 4 and 6E). When the abundance of the Cdc48 complex was impaired by temperature-sensitive mutations in any of its three subunits, Est1 levels increased as much as 40-fold (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 4B), at least a fraction of the accumulated Est1 was monoubiquitinated (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 6A), and its cell cycle-regulated abundance was lost (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 6E).
Overexpression of Est1 in WT cells results in telomere lengthening49 (see also Fig. 3d), consistent with its being a telomerase activator. However, hyper-elongation of telomeres on Est1 overexpression was Cdc48 dependent (Fig. 3d) and cdc48-3 cells had short telomeres (Fig. 3a). These data suggest that Est1-Ub is a less effective telomerase activator than unmodified Est1. If this model is correct, deletion of the E3 Ub ligase responsible for Est1 ubiquitination should result in more Est1 and long telomeres. Indeed, deletion of the telomerase-associated E3 Ub ligase UFD4 resulted in longer telomeres and more Est1 in WT cells (Fig. 5e,f and Supplementary Fig. 6D). Moreover, deleting UFD4 from cdc48-3 cells increased Est1 abundance even more but had a positive effect on telomere length, presumably because the fraction of ubiquitinated Est1 was reduced and therefore Est1 was better able to promote telomerase activity.
Why is it important to limit holoenzyme assembly to a small window in the cell cycle? A cell cycle-regulated holoenzyme is probably not important for telomere length control, because when the holoenzyme is assembled prematurely in G1 phase, it does not lengthen telomeres20. However, double-strand breaks can occur anytime in the cell cycle and their repair by telomere addition, which results in loss of all sequences distal to the site of the break, is a much less favourable outcome than repair by homologous or even non-homologous recombination. In the absence of the Cdc48 complex, Est1 was more abundant and no longer cell cycle regulated (Fig. 5c,d and Supplementary Fig. 6E). Based on these data, we propose that the Cdc48 complex is part of a regulatory circuit that prevents premature assembly of the telomerase holoenzyme in G1 and early S phase (Fig. 6). However, the Cdc48 complex was also abundantly associated with telomerase in G2/M phase and Est1 was ubiquitinated to similar extents in G1 and G2/M phase (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 6C), suggesting that the complex may also function to disassemble the holoenzyme at the end of the cell cycle (Supplementary Data 1). Such an activity would be similar to the role of Cdc48-Npl4-Ufd1 in disassembling the replisome at the end of S phase58,59. Moreover, in genetic backgrounds that allow the precocious assembly of the replisome in G1 phase, the Cdc48 complex can also disassemble it at this time58. Thus, there is precedent for proposing that the Cdc48 complex can prevent telomerase holoenzyme formation in G1 phase and promote its disassembly at the end of the cell cycle.
In carrying out its diverse functions, the Cdc48 complex acts on its substrates when they are bound to a subcellular structure, such as the endoplasmic reticulum or chromatin58,59. This property in combination with our model provides an explanation for an otherwise puzzling aspect of telomere biology, the telomere bound but unengaged association of the catalytic core of telomerase, Est2 and TLC1, in G1 phase when telomerase is not active19. We speculate that the transient chromatin association of a precociously assembled telomerase holoenzyme is required to make it a substrate for Cdc48-mediated disassembly.
In summary, we propose that the Cdc48 complex prevents premature assembly of the telomerase holoenzyme early in the cell cycle and promotes its regulated disassembly at the end of the cell cycle. These actions would narrow the cell cycle window in which de novo telomere addition can occur. Given the conserved functions of the Cdc48 complex in DNA repair and replication, its role in telomerase regulation may also be conserved.
Methods
S. cerevisiae growth conditions and strains
All experiments were performed in the W303 background (RAD5 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15). Genotypes of the yeast strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Telomerase was prepared for MS analyses from a strain in which Est1, Est2, Est3 and Tlc1 were OE from the GAL1 promoter at their endogenous loci and as the only copies of the genes in the cell. Telomerase OE strains were cultured in 2% galactose, because they senesce on glucose medium. In addition, Est1 and Est2 were expressed as GFP fusion proteins: the amino-terminal GFP tag was separated from EST1 or 2 by a five-glycine linker, which increases the functionality of epitope-tagged S. cerevisiae proteins60. The gene encoding the Bar1 protease was deleted by insertion of the NatMX cassette61. A bar1::NatMX strain expressing GFP fused to a nuclear localization signal (NLS) from SV40 T antigen at the URA3 locus (ura3::GAL-GFP-NLS) and expressed from the GAL1 promoter was used in parallel experiments to assess nonspecific interactions with the GFP tag.
Cell cycle arrest and FACS analysis were carried out19. Briefly, the cells were cultured in YEP-rich media to OD660 ∼0.15 and transferred to media containing 20 ng ml−1 α-factor (Sigma) or 15 μg ml−1 nocodazole (Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h at 30 °C (or for 6 h at 25 °C for temperature-sensitive strains) for arrest at G1 (α-factor) or G2/M phase (nocodazole). Cell cycle position was verified by FACS analyses.
Immuno-affinity purification of telomerase
For MS experiments, two litres of cells were grown to mid-log phase (OD660=0.5) in YEP+galactose and were harvested by centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min at 6,118g. Cell pellets were resuspended in freezing buffer (20 mM Na-HEPES, 1.2% polyvinylpyrrolidone (W/V), pH 7.4) containing 1 × protease inhibitor cocktail (0.02 mg ml−1 pancreas extract, 0.05 mg ml−1 pronase, 0.005 mg ml−1 thermolysin, 0.0015, mg ml−1 chymotrypsin, 0.33 mg ml−1 papain; Roche) and were frozen dropwise in liquid nitrogen62. The frozen cell pellets were cryogenically ground using a Retsch MM301 Mixer Mill (15 cycles × 2.5 min at 30 Hz; Retsch, Newton, PA), to achieve a minimum of 85% cell lysis, as assessed using light microscopy. Approximately 12 g of frozen cell powder were resuspended in lysis buffer (100 mM Hepes KOH, pH 7.9, 300 mM potassium acetate, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 10% glycerol, 0.1% NP-40, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM β-glycerophosphate, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 × protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche))63 in a ratio of 5 ml of lysis buffer per 1 g of cells. Cell lysates were homogenized using a PT 10–35 Polytron (Kinematica) for three cycles of 10 s each, with a 1-min ice incubation between each set. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min at 10,876g. The supernatant was incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with ∼20 mg of M-270 epoxy magnetic beads (Life Technologies) conjugated with 50 μg of in-house-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-GFP antibodies44,64. Following incubation, the beads were separated from the solution on a magnet and were washed six times with 1 ml cold lysis buffer. Proteins were eluted from the beads in 40 μl of 1 × LDS sample buffer (Life Technologies) and incubated with agitation for 10 min at room temperature, followed by incubation for 10 min at 70 °C. Eluted proteins were alkylated with 50 mM iodoacetamide for 30 min at room temperature in the dark.
The isolated protein complexes were separated on a 4%–12% bis-Tris NuPAGE precast gradient gel (Life Technologies), to reduce sample complexity, and stained with SimpleBlue Coomassie (Life Technologies) for visualization of proteins. Samples were prepared for in-gel digestion by excising gel bands as 1-mm sections. Gel sections from a single immuno-isolation were pooled into approximately ten equal fractions and placed into individual wells of a 96-well plate. The gel pieces were destained in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC), 50% acetonitrile (ACN) at room temperature with gentle shaking for 15 min. Next, the samples underwent two rounds of dehydration in 100% ACN and rehydration in 50 mM ABC. After a final, third dehydration step in 100% ACN, the gel pieces were resuspended in a solution of 50 mM ABC and 12.5 ng μl−1 sequencing grade modified trypsin (Promega) for overnight digestion at 37 °C. Peptides were extracted from the gel pieces in 0.5% formic acid (FA) at room temperature with gentle shaking for 4 h, followed by a second extraction in 0.5% FA/50% ACN at room temperature with gentle shaking for 2 h. The peptides were concentrated by vacuum centrifugation and acidified with 1% FA before a final volume of 9 μl for MS analysis.
To determine whether the observed protein interactions were or were not dependent on an association with DNA, the experiments were repeated by comparing cells treated (10 μg ml−1 for 30 min) or not treated with DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich). The experimental workflow was the same as above, except the starting material for each isolation was 1 litre of cells. This comparison allowed us to determine which interactions were likely mediated by association with DNA. In some cases, proteins that passed our specificity criteria (described below) in the initial large-scale experiment using 2 l of cells were not identified in the smaller scale experiment (1 litre cells). These experiments are labelled as ‘DNA-dependency inconclusive’ (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Data 1).
Mass spectrometry
Before direct infusion, samples were desalted using StageTips and an Empore C18 filter (3M)65 and MS analyses were performed66. Briefly, tryptic peptides were separated and analysed by nanoscale liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem MS (MS/MS) on a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLC system (Dionex Corporation) (running mobile phases: A (aqueous), 0.1% FA/H2O; B (organic), 0.1% FA/97% ACN/2.9%H2O) directly coupled to an LTQ-Orbitrap XL (ThermoFisher Scientific) instrument. Samples were separated on a nanocapillary reverse-phase PepMapC18 analytical column (75 μm by 15 cm; particle size 1.8 μm) (Dionex Corporation) with a 90-min linear gradient (4%–35% mobile phase B). Mass spectra were acquired over the m/z range from 350 to 1,700 (r=30,000 at m/z 400), with data-dependent selection and fragmentation of the top ten most intense precursor ions by collision-induced dissociation. Precursor ions were selected in the ion trap (isolation width=2.00 Da, normalized collision energy=30%, activation q=0.250, activation time=30 ms). MS/MS data searches were carried out using the following parameters: precursor mass tolerance=0.02 Da; fragment mass tolerance=0.5 Da.
Data and network analyses
MS/MS spectra from raw files corresponding to single biological samples were extracted using Proteome Discoverer (v.1.3, ThermoFisher Scientific) running the SEQUEST (version 1.20) search engine against a database of S. cerevisiae protein sequences (UniProt-SwissProt, 2010-11) and common contaminant sequences. Spectra were searched against indexed peptide databases generated from both the forward sequences and the reversed, concatenated protein sequences. The search parameters included full enzyme specificity with a maximum of two missed cleavages. Parent and fragment ion mass tolerances were limited to 10 p.p.m. and 0.5 Da, respectively. All searches incorporated static modification of cysteine by carbamidomethylation (+57 Da) and variable modifications of methionine by oxidation (+16 Da) of serine, threonine and tyrosine by phosphorylation (+80 Da), and of lysine by acetylation (+42 Da). Percolator in ProteomeDiscoverer and PeptideProphet in Scaffold (v 3.3.1; Proteome Software) were used to calculate probabilities for spectral matches67. The X!Tandem (GPM 2010.12.1.1, Beavis Informatics) subset database refinement search was selected to include additional variable modifications: deamidation of asparagine and glutamine (+1 Da), pyro-Glu formation of peptide N-terminal glutamate (+17 Da) and diglycine modification of lysine (+114.1 Da), with the high mass accuracy option enabled.
Scaffold confidence filters were selected to reduce peptide false discovery rates (<1%). Unweighted spectrum counts from resulting protein lists were exported and used for subsequent analyses. To determine specificity of interaction, proteins were filtered using the SAINT algorithm. A SAINT specificity filter of 0.8 was selected to retain high confidence interactions. Proteins passing the SAINT P>0.8 in either α-factor-treated or nocodazole-treated isolations were included in the merged set of proteins for fold-change analyses. Unweighted spectrum counts for individual proteins were normalized to GFP spectrum counts from each isolation and averaged. Fold changes are represented as the log2-transformed ratios of average spectrum count values (G1/G2M). Protein networks were generated using STRING-db40 and Cytoscape41, incorporating the built-in Gene Ontology annotation functionality for clustering of protein complexes (Gene Ontology Full: geneontology.org/ontlogy/gene_ontology_edit.obo; Gene Association File for S. cerevisiae: geneontology.org/gene-associations/gene_association.sgd.gz, curator: SGD).
Gene Ontology enrichment analyses were performed using the Gene Functional Annotation Tool operating on the DAVID Bioinformatics 6.7 online platform (NIAID/NIH)44,68. Proteins identified in telomerase isolations were uploaded as a single protein list using SGD_ID annotations. Proteins enriched in either G1 isolations were uploaded as a separate protein list. Corresponding GO annotations were searched using the whole S. cerevisiae genome as background library. Functional Annotation Clustering was performed using the following parameters: Gene Ontology=GOTERM_BP_FULL, Classification Stringency=Highest). DAVID cluster enrichment scores are expressed as the geometric mean of P-values for individual genes within each cluster.
Western blotting
Cells were grown in rich medium to mid-log phase for asynchronous cell growth or to early log phase for cell cycle synchrony. Cells were pelleted, resuspended in 0.1 M NaOH and pelleted. The whole-cell protein was extracted using protein sample buffer69. Protein were separated in 8% SDS–PAGE gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore). Membranes were blocked in TBST (10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20) with 5% milk. Probes used for western blot analysis included mouse anti-GFP monoclonal serum (Roche, 11814460001, dilution 1:1,000), mouse anti-Myc monoclonal antibodies (Clontech, 631206, dilution 1:500), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Bio-Rad, 1706515, dilution 1:5,000), goat anti-mouse immuno-globulin G polyclonal antibodies (Bio-Rad, 1721011, 1:3,000) and rabbit anti-goat immunoglobulin G polyclonal antibodies (Abcam, 6,741, 1:5,000). The full lane view of the these data are shown in the Supplementary Figs.
Co-immunoprecipitation of Cdc48
Cells were grown asynchronously in rich medium to mid-log phase. Extracts were prepared by the glass-bead lysis in TMG-50 (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM MgCl2, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, Complete Mini EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche)). Total protein was adjusted to 0.5% (v/v) Tween-20 and 200 U ml−1 of RNasin (Promega) and SuperRNasin (Ambion) and incubated overnight with goat polyclonal anti-Cdc48 antibodies (Abgent) at 4 °C. Dynabeads Protein G (Life Technologies) equilibrated with TMG-50 with 0.5% (v/v) Tween-20 were added and incubated for 4 h at 4 °C. Beads were washed three times with TMG-50 with 0.5% (v/v) Tween-20, and once with TMG-50. The co-immunoprecipitated samples were resuspended in TMG-50 and protein was extracted using protein sample buffer.
Southern blotting
Genomic DNA was isolated from cells using a MasterPure Yeast DNA Isolation kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies), genomic DNA was digested with XhoI, separated on 0.8% agarose gels, transferred to Hybond N+ nylon membrane (GE Healthcare) and hybridized with a randomly primed 32P-labelled telomere probe isolated from pCT300 (ref. 70).
Telomere position effect
TPE was assessed in strains having URA3 adjacent to the left telomere of chromosome VII (ref. 47). Cells growing in YEP+2% glucose (or 2% galactose for OE strains) were diluted to a concentration of 2 × 107 cells per ml. Then, tenfold serial dilutions of the cell suspensions were made and 3 μl of each dilution was spotted onto synthetic complete (YC) plates, YC plates without uracil (YC-ura) and YC plates containing 0.1% 5-FOA (Toronto Research Chemical) (YC+5-FOA). The plates were incubated at 25 °C for 3 days.
Purification of ubiquitinated proteins
Cells were transformed with a plasmid (YEp352-6HisUb) harbouring 6His-tagged ubiquitin under the CUP1-inducible promoter51. The cells were grown in media lacking uracil (to select for the plasmid). 6His-Ubiquitin was induced by 24 h treatment with 0.1 mM CuSO4. Cells were harvested and lysed with guanidinium lysis buffer (6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH8.0, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH8.0, 10 mM imidazole, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mg ml−1 N-methyl maleimide, 0.1 mM MG-132, 1 × protease inhibitor). Purification of 6His-ubiquitinated proteins was performed using the Ni-NTA (Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid) agarose beads (QIAGEN). The beads were washed with urea buffer (8 M urea, 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.4, Tris-HCl pH 6.4, 10 mM imidazole, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% Triton X-100) and subsequently eluted with protein sample buffer. Eluted protein samples were separated by SDS–PAGE and analysed by western blots using anti-Myc (Clontech) and anti-His antibodies (Novagen).
Additional information
How to cite this article: Lin, K.-W. et al. Proteomics of yeast telomerase identified Cdc48-Npl4-Ufd1 and Ufd4 as regulators of Est1 and telomere length. Nat. Commun. 6:8290 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9290 (2015).
References
Wu, Y. & Zakian, V. A. The telomeric Cdc13 protein interacts directly with the telomerase subunit Est1 to bring it to telomeric DNA ends in vitro. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20362–20369 (2011).
Webb, C. J. & Zakian, V. A. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Ccq1 and TER1 bind the 14-3-3-like domain of Est1, which promotes and stabilizes telomerase-telomere association. Genes Dev. 26, 82–91 (2012).
Singh, S. M. & Lue, N. F. Ever shorter telomere 1 (EST1)-dependent reverse transcription by Candida telomerase in vitro: evidence in support of an activating function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5718–5723 (2003).
Lee, J., Mandell, E. K., Tucey, T. M., Morris, D. K. & Lundblad, V. The Est3 protein associates with yeast telomerase through an OB-fold domain. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 990–997 (2008).
Yu, E. Y., Wang, F., Lei, M. & Lue, N. F. A proposed OB-fold with a protein-interaction surface in Candida albicans telomerase protein Est3. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 985–989 (2008).
Wang, F. et al. The POT1-TPP1 telomere complex is a telomerase processivity factor. Nature 445, 506–510 (2007).
Xin, H. et al. TPP1 is a homologue of ciliate TEBP-beta and interacts with POT1 to recruit telomerase. Nature 445, 559–562 (2007).
Tuzon, C. T., Wu, Y., Chan, A. & Zakian, V. A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase subunit Est3 binds telomeres in a cell cycle- and Est1-dependent manner and interacts directly with Est1 in vitro. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002060 (2011).
Friedman, K. L., Heit, J. J., Long, D. M. & Cech, T. R. N-terminal domain of yeast telomerase reverse transcriptase: recruitment of Est3p to the telomerase complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 1–13 (2003).
Talley, J. M., DeZwaan, D. C., Maness, L. D., Freeman, B. C. & Friedman, K. L. Stimulation of yeast telomerase activity by the ever shorter telomere 3 (Est3) subunit is dependent on direct interaction with the catalytic protein Est2. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 26431–26439 (2011).
Kim, N. W. et al. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science 266, 2011–2015 (1994).
Marguerat, S. et al. Quantitative analysis of fission yeast transcriptomes and proteomes in proliferating and quiescent cells. Cell 151, 671–683 (2012).
Mozdy, A. D. & Cech, T. R. Low abundance of telomerase in yeast: implications for telomerase haploinsufficiency. RNA 12, 1721–1737 (2006).
Batista, L. F. & Artandi, S. E. Understanding telomere diseases through analysis of patient-derived iPS cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23, 526–533 (2013).
Savage, S. A. Human telomeres and telomere biology disorders. Prog. Mol. Biol. Trans. Sci. 125, 41–66 (2014).
Bernardes de Jesus, B. & Blasco, M. A. Telomerase at the intersection of cancer and aging. Trends Genet. 29, 513–520 (2013).
Diede, S. J. & Gottschling, D. E. Telomerase-mediated telomere addition in vivo requires DNA primase and DNA polymerases alpha and delta. Cell 99, 723–733 (1999).
Marcand, S., Brevet, V., Mann, C. & Gilson, E. Cell cycle restriction of telomere elongation. Curr. Biol. 10, 487–490 (2000).
Taggart, A. K., Teng, S. C. & Zakian, V. A. Est1p as a cell cycle-regulated activator of telomere-bound telomerase. Science 297, 1023–1026 (2002).
Osterhage, J. L., Talley, J. M. & Friedman, K. L. Proteasome-dependent degradation of Est1p regulates the cell cycle-restricted assembly of telomerase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 720–728 (2006).
Wellinger, R. J. & Zakian, V. A. Everything you ever wanted to know about Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres: beginning to end. Genetics 191, 1073–1105 (2012).
Liu, N. N., Han, T. X., Du, L. L. & Zhou, J. Q. A genome-wide screen for Schizosaccharomyces pombe deletion mutants that affect telomere length. Cell Res. 20, 963–965 (2010).
Min, B. & Collins, K. An RPA-related sequence-specific DNA-binding subunit of telomerase holoenzyme is required for elongation processivity and telomere maintenance. Mol. Cell 36, 609–619 (2009).
Witkin, K. L. & Collins, K. Holoenzyme proteins required for the physiological assembly and activity of telomerase. Genes Dev. 18, 1107–1118 (2004).
Witkin, K. L., Prathapam, R. & Collins, K. Positive and negative regulation of Tetrahymena telomerase holoenzyme. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 2074–2083 (2007).
Fu, D. & Collins, K. Purification of human telomerase complexes identifies factors involved in telomerase biogenesis and telomere length regulation. Mol. Cell 28, 773–785 (2007).
Venteicher, A. S. et al. A human telomerase holoenzyme protein required for Cajal body localization and telomere synthesis. Science 323, 644–648 (2009).
Venteicher, A. S., Meng, Z., Mason, P. J., Veenstra, T. D. & Artandi, S. E. Identification of ATPases pontin and reptin as telomerase components essential for holoenzyme assembly. Cell 132, 945–957 (2008).
Finley, D., Ulrich, H. D., Sommer, T. & Kaiser, P. The ubiquitin-proteasome system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 192, 319–360 (2012).
Jentsch, S. & Rumpf, S. Cdc48 (p97): a “molecular gearbox” in the ubiquitin pathway? Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 6–11 (2007).
Rumpf, S. & Jentsch, S. Functional division of substrate processing cofactors of the ubiquitin-selective Cdc48 chaperone. Mol. Cell 21, 261–269 (2006).
Bar-Nun, S. The role of p97/Cdc48p in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation: from the immune system to yeast. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 300, 95–125 (2005).
Buchberger, A. Roles of Cdc48 in regulated protein degradation in yeast. Subcell. Biochem. 66, 195–222 (2013).
Hitchcock, A. L. et al. The conserved npl4 protein complex mediates proteasome-dependent membrane-bound transcription factor activation. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 3226–3241 (2001).
Hoppe, T. et al. Activation of a membrane-bound transcription factor by regulated ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent processing. Cell 102, 577–586 (2000).
Ju, J. S. & Weihl, C. C. Inclusion body myopathy, Paget’s disease of the bone and fronto-temporal dementia: a disorder of autophagy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, R38–R45 (2010).
Cristea, I. M., Williams, R., Chait, B. T. & Rout, M. P. Fluorescent proteins as proteomic probes. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 4, 1933–1941 (2005).
Choi, H. et al. SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat. Methods. 8, 70–73 (2011).
Seto, A. G., Zaug, A. J., Sobel, S. G., Wolin, S. L. & Cech, T. R. Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase is an Sm small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle. Nature 401, 177–180 (1999).
Jensen, L. J. et al. STRING 8--a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D412–D416 (2009).
Cline, M. S. et al. Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2366–2382 (2007).
Chamberlain, J. R., Lee, Y., Lane, W. S. & Engelke, D. R. Purification and characterization of the nuclear RNase P holoenzyme complex reveals extensive subunit overlap with RNase MRP. Genes Dev. 12, 1678–1690 (1998).
DeZwaan, D. C., Toogun, O. A., Echtenkamp, F. J. & Freeman, B. C. The Hsp82 molecular chaperone promotes a switch between unextendable and extendable telomere states. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 711–716 (2009).
Huang, da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).
Hsieh, M. T. & Chen, R. H. Cdc48 and cofactors Npl4-Ufd1 are important for G1 progression during heat stress by maintaining cell wall integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 6, e18988 (2011).
Tran, J. R., Tomsic, L. R. & Brodsky, J. L. A Cdc48p-associated factor modulates endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation, cell stress, and ubiquitinated protein homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 5744–5755 (2011).
Gottschling, D. E., Aparicio, O. M., Billington, B. L. & Zakian, V. A. Position effect at S. cerevisiae telomeres: reversible repression of Pol II transcription. Cell 63, 751–762 (1990).
Conrad, M. N., Wright, J. H., Wolf, A. J. & Zakian, V. A. RAP1 protein interacts with yeast telomeres in vivo: overproduction alters telomere structure and decreases chromosome stability. Cell 63, 739–750 (1990).
Zhang, M. L. et al. Yeast telomerase subunit Est1p has guanine quadruplex-promoting activity that is required for telomere elongation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 202–209 (2010).
Ferguson, J. L., Chao, W. C., Lee, E. & Friedman, K. L. The anaphase promoting complex contributes to the degradation of the S. cerevisiae telomerase recruitment subunit Est1p. PLoS ONE 8, e55055 (2013).
Ossareh-Nazari, B. et al. Ubiquitylation by the Ltn1 E3 ligase protects 60S ribosomes from starvation-induced selective autophagy. J. Cell. Biol. 204, 909–917 (2014).
Ndoja, A., Cohen, R. E. & Yao, T. Ubiquitin signals proteolysis-independent stripping of transcription factors. Mol. Cell 53, 893–903 (2014).
Chandra, A., Hughes, T. R., Nugent, C. I. & Lundblad, V. Cdc13 both positively and negatively regulates telomere replication. Genes Dev. 15, 404–414 (2001).
Kyrion, G., Boakye, K. A. & Lustig, A. J. C-terminal truncation of RAP1 results in the deregulation of telomere size, stability, and function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5159–5173 (1992).
Gravel, S., Larrivee, M., Labrecque, P. & Wellinger, R. J. Yeast Ku as a regulator of chromosomal DNA end structure. Science 280, 741–744 (1998).
Chai, W., Ford, L. P., Lenertz, L., Wright, W. E. & Shay, J. W. Human Ku70/80 associates physically with telomerase through interaction with hTERT. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 47242–47247 (2002).
Vodenicharov, M. D. & Wellinger, R. J. DNA degradation at unprotected telomeres in yeast is regulated by the CDK1 (Cdc28/Clb) cell-cycle kinase. Mol. Cell 24, 127–137 (2006).
Maric, M., Maculins, T., De Piccoli, G. & Labib, K. Cdc48 and a ubiquitin ligase drive disassembly of the CMG helicase at the end of DNA replication. Science 346, 1253596 (2014).
Moreno, S. P., Bailey, R., Campion, N., Herron, S. & Gambus, A. Polyubiquitylation drives replisome disassembly at the termination of DNA replication. Science 346, 477–481 (2014).
Sabourin, M., Tuzon, C. T., Fisher, T. S. & Zakian, V. A. A flexible protein linker improves the function of epitope-tagged proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 24, 39–45 (2007).
Van Driessche, B., Tafforeau, L., Hentges, P., Carr, A. M. & Vandenhaute, J. Additional vectors for PCR-based gene tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe using nourseothricin resistance. Yeast 22, 1061–1068 (2005).
Cristea, I. M. & Chait, B. T. Affinity purification of protein complexes. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, pdb prot5611 doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5611 (2011).
Gambus, A. et al. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 358–366 (2006).
Cristea, I. M. & Chait, B. T. Conjugation of magnetic beads for immunopurification of protein complexes. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, pdb prot5610 doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5610 (2011).
Rappsilber, J., Mann, M. & Ishihama, Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1896–1906 (2007).
Greco, T. M., Yu, F., Guise, A. J. & Cristea, I. M. Nuclear import of histone deacetylase 5 by requisite nuclear localization signal phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 10, M110 004317 (2011).
Joshi, P. et al. The functional interactome landscape of the human histone deacetylase family. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 672 (2013).
Huang, da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1–13 (2009).
Kushnirov, V. V. Rapid and reliable protein extraction from yeast. Yeast 16, 857–860 (2000).
Runge, K. W. & Zakian, V. A. TEL2, an essential gene required for telomere length regulation and telomere position effect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3094–3105 (1996).
Acknowledgements
We thank Rey-Huei Chen (Academia Sinica, Taiwan) for providing cdc48-3, npl4-1 and ufd1-2 strains, and Jeffrey Brodsky (Pittsburgh University) for CDC48 plasmids. We are grateful to Catherine Dargemont, David Toczyski and Xiaolan Zhao for strains and advice for detecting ubiquitin. We thank Carly Lay Geronimo and Preeti Joshi for contributions to some of the experiments, Chris Webb for guidance on the Northern experiments and for helpful comments on the manuscript, and Christina DeCoste for FACS assistance. This work was supported by NIH grants to VAZ (GM43265) and IMC (DA026192, HD073044). K.R.M. was supported by a grant from the New Jersey Commission on Cancer Research and A.J.G. was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.R.M. began the project. Through considerable trial and error, she constructed and characterized the telomerase OE strain and developed the lysis conditions. K.W.L. designed and carried out almost all of the rest of the experiments. A.J.G. and I.M.C. are responsible for Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2, and Table 1. A.C. contributed to multiple experiments and is responsible for Figs 1e, 5e, 5f and Supplementary Fig. 6D and 7. I.M.C. helped design and interpret MS data and V.A.Z. did the same for all other experimental data. All of the authors contributed to writing the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-7, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary References. (PDF 1658 kb)
Supplementary Data 1
Proteins co-immunoprecipitated with telomerase in alpha-factor treatment (G1 phase) or nocodazole treatment (G2/M phase). Bold and Italic represent proteins resistant to DNase I treatment; Dark red represent DNA-dependency inconclusive; X Known telomerase component; # Proteins known to affect telomere length from genome wide screen; * Proteins associated with telomere biology from another criterion. (XLSX 23 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, KW., McDonald, K., Guise, A. et al. Proteomics of yeast telomerase identified Cdc48-Npl4-Ufd1 and Ufd4 as regulators of Est1 and telomere length. Nat Commun 6, 8290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9290
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9290
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Telomerase subunit Est2 marks internal sites that are prone to accumulate DNA damage
BMC Biology (2021)
-
Stability and nuclear localization of yeast telomerase depend on protein components of RNase P/MRP
Nature Communications (2020)
-
In the line-up: deleted genes associated with DiGeorge/22q11.2 deletion syndrome: are they all suspects?
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2019)
-
Identification of a TRBD zinc finger-interacting protein in Giardia duodenalis and its regulation of telomerase
Parasites & Vectors (2019)
-
Fine tuning the level of the Cdc13 telomere-capping protein for maximal chromosome stability performance
Current Genetics (2019)