Abstract
The sphingosine kinase-1/sphingosine 1-phosphate (SphK1/S1P) signaling pathway has been reported to modulate the expression of the canonical transcription factor hypoxia-inducible HIF-1α in multiple cell lineages. HIF-2α is also frequently overexpressed in solid tumors but its role has been mostly studied in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common form of kidney cancer, where HIF-2α has been established as a driver of a more aggressive disease. In this study, the role of SphK1/S1P signaling with regard to HIF-2α was investigated in various cancer cell models including ccRCC cells. Under hypoxic conditions or in ccRCC lacking a functional von Hippel-Lindau (V HL) gene and expressing high levels of HIF-2α, SphK1 activity controls HIF-2α expression and transcriptional activity through a phospholipase D (PLD)-driven mechanism. SphK1 silencing promotes a VHL-independent HIF-2α loss of expression and activity and reduces cell proliferation in ccRCC. Importantly, downregulation of SphK1 is associated with impaired Akt and mTOR signaling in ccRCC. Taking advantage of a monoclonal antibody neutralizing extracellular S1P, we show that inhibition of S1P extracellular signaling blocks HIF-2α accumulation in ccRCC cell lines, an effect mimicked when the S1P transporter Spns2 or the S1P receptor 1 (S1P1) is silenced. Here, we report the first evidence that the SphK1/S1P signaling pathway regulates the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible HIF-2α in diverse cancer cell lineages notably ccRCC, where HIF-2α has been established as a driver of a more aggressive disease. These findings demonstrate that SphK1/S1P signaling may act as a canonical regulator of HIF-2α expression in ccRCC, giving support to its inhibition as a therapeutic strategy that could contribute to reduce HIF-2 activity in ccRCC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The bioactive sphingolipid sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is a critical regulator of multifarious physiological and pathophysiological processes including cancer.1, 2, 3 S1P can be formed by the phosphorylation of sphingosine, the backbone of sphingolipids, and by the sphingosine kinase-1 (SphK1) isoform.4 S1P is a ligand for five high-affinity G protein-coupled receptors (S1P1–5), with specific effects dictated by the expression pattern of S1P receptor subtypes expressed in a particular tissue.5 S1P is produced intracellularly and exerts its paracrine or autocrine effects by being secreted by specific transporters such as spinster 2 (Spns2).6, 7, 8 Alternative GPCR-independent signaling of S1P also exists9 with recent studies establishing direct modulation of intracellular proteins.10, 11 In cancer, S1P metabolism is often dysregulated directing attention to the SphK1/S1P signaling pathway as a target for anticancer drug discovery.12, 13, 14 SphK1 expression is upregulated in tumors, and high SphK1 expression is correlated with a significant decrease in survival rate in patients with several forms of cancer.15 In some cases, as in ccRCC, plasma levels of S1P are substantially elevated compared with healthy control levels.16 A number of preclinical studies have established that pharmacological inhibition of SphK1 could be efficacious in decreasing tumor size or sensitize to therapeutics.17, 18, 19, 20 Interestingly, the anticancer activity of an anti-S1P monoclonal antibody (sphingomab),21 which neutralizes S1P and inhibits its extracellular signaling, provides evidence of the importance of exogenous S1P in mediating tumor growth and metastatic potential,22, 23, 24 including murine models of ccRCC.16
Hypoxia is a characteristic of solid tumors, and the adaptation of cancer cells to hypoxia is instrumental in the development of aggressive phenotype and associated with a poor prognostic in patients.25 At the cellular level, the adaptation to hypoxia is predominantly mediated by the hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), consisting of an oxygen-sensitive α-subunit and a constituvely expressed β-subunit, that regulate the expression of target genes promoting angiogenesis, glycolysis, metastasis, increased tumor growth and resistance to treatments.25 HIF-1α and HIF-2α are the best-characterized HIF-α subunits.26 Although HIF-1α is ubiquitously expressed, HIF-2α has a more limited tissue expression and is particularly detected in highly vascularized organs or hypoxic tissues including kidney epithelial cells.27 Despite their extensive sequence similarity and co-expression in various cancer cell types, HIF-1α and HIF-2α have non-overlapping roles in tumor progression.28 The distinct roles of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in promoting tumor growth have been mainly defined in von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease-associated clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC),29 which results in a constitutive expression of either HIF-1α and HIF-2α or HIF-2α alone, and where the role for HIF-2α as a driver of a more aggressive disease has been firmly established.30, 31
We previously identified SphK1/S1P signaling as a new modulator of HIF-1α activity under hypoxia owing to a decreased proteasome degradation of HIF-1α subunit mediated by the Akt/GSK3β pathway in various cancer cell models.32 More recently, we reported in a prostate cancer animal model that sphingomab, a monoclonal antibody neutralizing extracellular S1P, could reduce hypoxia and associated vascular network malfunction by interfering with HIF-1 activity thus enhancing delivery and efficacy of docetaxel, the standard chemotherapy.24
Here, we report that the SphK1/S1P signaling pathway may act as a canonical regulator of HIF-2α expression in multiple cancer cell lineages (lung, prostate and glioma) as well as in ccRCC cell lines (CAKI-1, A498 and 786-O) representing the sub-groups found in human clinic. Therefore, we suggest that targeting the SphK1/S1P signaling represents a strategy that could potentially be exploited in therapeutic approaches to decrease HIF-2 activity in cancer and more particularly in ccRCC. The humanized version of the anti-S1P mAb, sonepcizumab, is currently in a phase II trial in RCC patients (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Results
SphK1 activity regulates HIF-2α expression under hypoxia in multiple cancer cell lineages
To address whether SphK1 has a regulatory role in HIF-2α expression under hypoxia, an siRNA strategy targeting SphK1 (siSphK1) was used. As previously reported,32 mRNA level and SphK1 activity were markedly decreased (60–90% range) in all cancer cell lines (prostate PC-3, lung A549, glioblastoma U87, ccRCC CAKI-1 and A498) treated with siSphK1 compared with scrambled siRNA (siScr) (Figure 1a). In all cell lines, hypoxia was associated with a remarkable expression of HIF-2α, which was significantly reduced by siSphK1 treatment (Figures 1b and f), suggesting that SphK1 regulates HIF-2α in addition to HIF-1α as previously published.32, 33, 34
Considering the critical role of HIF-2α in ccRCC,29, 31 the molecular mechanisms of HIF-2α regulation by SphK1 were further investigated in three ccRCC cell lines, representing the sub-groups found in human clinic (expressing either HIF-1α and HIF-2α or HIF-2α alone). 786-0 and A498 ccRCC cells lack a functional VHL gene and express only HIF-2α, whereas CAKI-1 (pVHL wild-type) can produce both HIF-1α and HIF-2α. Noteworthy, in VHL-defective A498 where HIF-2α is constitutively present under normoxia due to a lack of degradation, the silencing of SphK1 also repressed its expression (Figure 1f).
Involvement of Phospholipase D in regulating HIF-2α SphK1-driven expression in ccRCC
Because phospholipase D (PLD) activity has been involved in the control of HIF-2α expression in ccRCC35 and is an upstream regulator of SphK1 in a different physiological context,36 we next examined the interactions between PLD and SphK1 signaling with regard to HIF-2α expression. In hypoxic CAKI-1, A498 cells (Figure 2a) and 786-O cells (Supplementary Figure 1A), an early transient increase in PLD activity (peaking at 15–30 min) followed by activation of SphK1 (peaking at 60 min) was observed. Accordingly, accumulation of HIF-2α did not occur before 2–3 h of hypoxia in CAKI-1 cells (Figure 2a, inset). Confirming that SphK1 activation was a consequence of PLD stimulation, butan-1-ol (1-ButOH), a potent inhibitor of PLD activation, markedly inhibited SphK1 activity in all ccRCC cell lines (Figure 2b and Supplementary Figure 1B). To rule out any possible non-specific effect of the alcohols on SphK1 activity, cells were treated in the presence of t-butanol (t-ButOH), a tertiary alcohol, which is not a substrate for PLD inhibition. As expected, t-ButOH did not alter SphK1 activity in ccRCC cell lines (Figure 2b and Supplementary Figure 1B). Unlike t-ButOH, 1-ButOH markedly inhibited HIF-2α expression in CAKI-1 cells (Figure 2c, left), as well as in normoxic and hypoxic A498 cells (Figure 2c, right) and in 786-0 cells (Supplementary Figure 1c). To investigate which PLD isozyme could be involved in the PLD/SphK1/HIF-2α signaling sequence, siRNAs directed to PLD1 and PLD2 isoforms were used.37 A roughly 50% PLD knock-down in CAKI-1, A498 and in 786-0 cells was achieved without additive effect when both siRNAs were combined (Supplementary Figure 2). Both PLD1 and PLD2 siRNAs significantly reduced—although not to the same extent—SphK1 activity in CAKI-1 (Figure 2d, left), A498 (Figure 2d, right) and 786-0 cells (Supplementary Figure 1D). Accordingly, the downregulation of SphK1 activity was accompanied by a marked reduction in HIF-2α expression in hypoxic CAKI-1 cells (Figure 2e, left), as well as in normoxic and hypoxic A498 (Figure 2e, right) and 786-O cells (Supplementary Figure 1E). These data suggest that both PLD1 and PLD2 isozymes are likely required for regulation of HIF-2α through SphK1 signaling in ccRCC cell lines.
SphK1 silencing promotes a VHL-independent HIF-2α loss of activity and reduced cell proliferation in ccRCC
To establish whether SphK1 silencing was correlated with an inhibition of HIF-2 transcriptional activity, VHL-defective A498 and 786-O cells only known to express HIF-2α (vis-à-vis HIF-1α) under either normoxia and hypoxia38, 39 were used to avoid the confounding role of HIF-1α we previously reported to be regulated by SphK1 activity.32 Accordingly in both VHL-defective A498 and 786-O cells, SphK1 silencing was associated with a decreased HIF-2α protein expression (Figure 3a, right). The role of HIF-2α transcriptional activity was further investigated by a transient-transfection assay with an HRE reporter gene (pHRE-Luc) for HIF-2α. Accordingly, HRE-mediated transcription was remarkably decreased in A498 and 786-O cells treated with siSphK1 (Figure 3a, left) in both normoxia and hypoxia. We next analyzed the level of GLUT-1 and cyclin D1, two well-established specific target proteins of HIF-2α in VHL-defective ccRCC.40, 41 Under normoxia and hypoxia, SphK1 silencing significantly reduced levels of both glucose transporter GLUT-1 (Figure 3b) and cyclin D1 (Figure 3c) in both cell lines. Cyclin D1 is an important regulator of cell-cycle progression, and in vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that HIF-2α-only-expressing ccRCC cells proliferate faster than their HIF-2α and HIF-1α co-expressing counterparts.42, 43 Therefore, we next assessed cell proliferation in SphK1-silenced VHL-defective ccRCC cells. [3H]Thymidine incorporation assay clearly showed that SphK1-silenced A498 and 786-O cells proliferated much slower than their siScr-silenced counterparts (Figure 3d, left) and showed a survival disadvantage (Figure 3d, right) in both normoxia and hypoxia in line with the findings that HIF-2α likely contributes to tumor cell survival.39
SphK1 silencing is associated with impaired Akt, mTOR, p70S6K and 4E-BP1 phosphorylation in ccRCC
Akt/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling is often activated in cancer and was previously shown to impact HIF-2α expression.35 To explore whether the loss of HIF-2α expression induced by SphK1 silencing was correlated with the inhibition of mTOR signaling, we examined the effect of siSphK1 on levels of total or phosphorylated forms of mTOR (p-mTOR) in A498 and 786-O cells. Under both normoxia and hypoxia, the levels of p-mTOR were clearly reduced after treatment with siSphK1 while total mTOR was not affected (Figure 4a). The regulation of cap-dependent translation initiation by mTOR involves direct phosphorylation of its substrates eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) and ribosomal protein kinase S6 (p70S6K).44, 45 Activated p70S6K phosphorylates the 40S ribosomal protein S6 whereas phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 disrupts its inhibitory interaction with eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF-4E). SphK1 silencing slightly decreased phosphorylation of p70S6K (Figure 4b) and 4E-BP1 (Figure 4c) in both A498 and 786-O cells.
By activating the tuberous sclerosis complex TSC1/TSC2 leading the activation of mTOR, Akt may represent a mechanistic link between S1P signaling and mTOR signaling as S1P regulates Akt phosphorylation as a ligand for five high-affinity G-coupled receptors (S1P1-5) 46 in various physiological conditions.3 SphK1 silencing in both A498 and 786-O cells was accompanied by a significant reduction in Akt phosphorylation (Figure 4d).
Collectively, these findings suggest that SphK1 silencing reduces the canonical Akt/mTOR pathway.
SphK1 inhibition does not impact on protein synthesis and stability of HIF-2α in ccRCC
SphK1 signaling could regulate HIF-2α expression and activity at the levels of transcription, translation or protein stability. SphK1 silencing did not alter the mRNA level of HIF-2α in both normoxia and hypoxia in both A498 (Figure 5a) and 786-O (Supplementary Figure 3A) VHL-defective ccRCC cells. We next used the proteasome inhibitor MG132 to determine whether the regulatory process mediated by SphK1 was related to proteasome-dependent degradation of HIF-2α. MG132 treatment did not reverse the HIF-2α decrease observed in SphK1-silenced VHL-defective ccRCC A498 (Figure 5b) and 786-O cells (Supplementary Figure 3B). Similar findings were observed in VHL-positive CAKI-1 ccRCC and A549 lung cancer (Supplementary Figure 3C), suggesting that SphK1 activity regulates HIF-2α content regardless of the presence or absence of VHL.
Following our observation that SphK1 silencing induces a reduced phosphorylation of p70S6K and 4E-BP1 (Figures 4b and c), we analyzed the impact of SphK1 reduction on protein synthesis and accessed the translational regulation of HIF-2α mRNA. Silencing of SphK1 in A498 has no impact on total protein synthesis (Figure 5c) or polysomes formation (Figure 5d), suggesting that the decreased HIF-2α protein abundance is not associated with a global protein synthesis shutdown under normoxic condition. We then measured the translation efficiency of HIF-2α mRNA upon SphK1 silencing. We first confirmed that HIF-2α mRNA abundance remained unchanged on samples used for polysomes fractionation (Figure 5e). We then measured relative abundance of HIF-2α and SphK1 mRNAs in polysomal fractions. TBP and β-actin mRNAs were used as controls. The data indicate that HIF-2α, TBP and β-actin mRNAs relative distribution along polysome fractions remains unchanged upon SphK1 silencing (Supplementary Figure 4) and consequently show no variation of translation efficiency (Figure 5f). In contrast upon siSphK1 transfection, SphK1 mRNA was strongly decreased (70%) at the transcriptional level and was much less translated (10%) as a consequence of a reduced abundance over other mRNAs.
These data indicate that the reduction of HIF-2α protein levels by SphK1 downregulation is not to be due to a translation of HIF-2α mRNA or an enhanced degradation of HIF-2α protein. The slight reduction of 4E-BP1 and p70S6K phosphorylation downstream mTOR observed upon SphK1 silencing was not sufficient to induce a decrease in global protein synthesis, suggesting that other mechanisms might be involved.
Neutralization of exogenous S1P decreases HIF-2α content in ccRCC
Owing to the fact that recent studies suggest that exogenous S1P could regulate adaptation to hypoxia through the content of HIF-1α in cancer24, 34 and non-cancer cells,47 we examined the contribution of extracellular S1P in the regulation of HIF-2α in our ccRCC cell models. We took advantage of the monoclonal antibody sphingomab that binds to and neutralizes extracellular S1P,21, 22, 23, 24, 48 which is currently in Phase II clinical trial for metastatic ccRCC. As seen in Figure 6a, sphingomab inhibited HIF-2α protein expression in a concentration-dependent manner in CAKI-1, A498 and 786-O cell lines. This finding is consistent with many reports showing that S1P is produced intracellularly by SphK1 and exerts its paracrine/autocrine effects by being secreted into the tumor microenvironment.48 Spinster 2 (Spns2) is believed to be the primary transporter in the release of S1P.6 Thus, when CAKI-1 and A498 cells were treated with Spns2-specific siRNAs, the expression of Spns2 protein decreased to less than 20–30% of the control with two different siRNAs (Figure 6b). In line with our recent data suggesting an autocrine effect of S1P in regulating HIF-1α in hypoxic prostate cancer cells,24 the silencing of Spns2 was associated with a significant inhibitory effect on HIF-2α accumulation under hypoxia in both CAKI-1 and A498 cells (Figure 6b).
These data establish the exclusive contribution of exogenous S1P mediating the effect of SphK1-driven signaling to regulate HIF-2α content in ccRCC cell lines.
S1P1 is upregulated under hypoxia and mediates the effect of S1P on HIF-2α
Exogenous S1P is a ligand for five high-affinity G protein-coupled receptors (S1P1–5), with specific effects depending on the suite of S1P receptor subtypes expressed.5 Representative CAKI-1 and A498 ccRCC cells express all S1P receptors, we evaluated their involvement in both HIF-1α and HIF-2α regulation. We show that S1P1 mRNA is increased after 60 min of hypoxia, while S1P2–5 mRNA expression is unchanged (Figure 7a). To investigate the contribution of S1P1 in the regulation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in our models, the targeting of S1P1 was achieved with the specific antagonist W146. HIF-2α expression was markedly reduced in both A498 and CAKI-1 cells (Figure 7b). Similarly, the downregulation of S1P1 by siRNA strategy in A498 and CAKI-1 cells or shRNA in CAKI-1 cells (Supplementary Figure 5) was accompanied by a strong decrease in HIF-2α expression (Figures 7c and d). We also observed a significant reduction in HIF-1α accumulation under hypoxia in CAKI-1 cells that can produce both HIF-1α and HIF-2α (Figures 7b and c). Similar findings were found in prostate PC-3 and glioblastoma U87 cells (Supplementary Figure 6), suggesting a potential exclusive contribution of S1P1 receptor subtype in mediating the effect of S1P on both HIF-1α and HIF-2α content in cancer cells.
Discussion
HIF-2α is frequently overexpressed in solid tumors,49 but its role has been mostly studied in ccRCC, the most common form of kidney cancer, where it has emerged as a key driver in the development and progression of the disease.50 A majority of ccRCC (50–80%) exhibit a genetic inactivation of VHL gene resulting in the loss of pVHL, which normally mediates ubiquitination of HIF-2α and its subsequent degradation, leading to a constitutive accumulation of HIF-2α.51 HIF-2α is both necessary and sufficient to support tumor growth of ccRCC,52, 53 whereas the activity of HIF-1α has been shown to be dispensable as its expression is often silenced.54, 55, 56 In particular, tumor-promoting genes encoding cyclin D1, TGFα and VEGF have been shown to be driven specifically by HIF-2α,41 and HIF-2α-only-expressing ccRCC appears to exhibit a more aggressive clinical behavior.31
The relationship between S1P metabolism and HIF signaling has recently emerged in cancer cells from different origins (prostate, thyroid, glioma, lung, kidney and breast) with the majority of studies32, 33, 34 establishing that the SphK1/S1P signaling controls the regulation of HIF-1α under hypoxic conditions reviewed in Ader et al.57 and Cuvillier et al.,58 whereas an upstream effect of HIF-1α on SphK1/S1P signaling was proposed using a CoCl2 chemically-induced model of hypoxia in U87 glioma cells.59 With respect to HIF-2α, earlier studies have suggested that HIF-2α transcriptionally upregulates SphK1 expression in CoCl2-induced HIF-2α activation in glioma-derived U87 cells.59 Although this manuscript was in preparation, Salama et al.60 reported that HIF-2α was also acting upstream of SphK1/S1P signaling in 786-O ccRCC. As shown in Supplementary Figure 7, we did not find any effect of HIF-2α on SphK1 expression in ccRCC models exhibiting different VHL status (CAKI-1 and A498). In contrast, we show here for the first time that the SphK1/S1P signaling regulates HIF-2α content and activity not only in ccRCC but also in other tumor types (lung, prostate, glioma), suggesting a possible universal regulatory role in cancer cells.
Considering the critical role of HIF-2α in ccRCC pathogenesis, we further detailed the molecular mechanisms of HIF-2α regulation by the SphK1/S1P signaling in various ccRCC models representing the sub-groups found in human clinic,29 and by taking advantage of the features of A498 and 786-O VHL-defective cells that only express HIF-2α,38, 39 and not HIF-1α we previously reported to be regulated by SphK1 signaling.32
As previously published for HIF-1α,32 a significant rise in SphK1 activity (peaking at 60 min) before HIF-2α accumulation (2–3 h) was observed under hypoxia. PLD activity (peaking at 15–30 min) is known to regulate HIF-2α accumulation in ccRCC,61 but a novel finding is that SphK1 is a downstream target of PLD under hypoxia as described earlier in different physiological settings.36, 62 Using A498 and 786-O VHL-defective cells that only express HIF-2α, we demonstrate that SphK1 activity controls not only HIF-2α protein content but also its transcriptional activity, as downregulation of specific HIF-2-regulated genes such as GLUT-1 or cyclin D1 was observed in SphK1-silenced cells. Accordingly, the proliferation rate and the cell viability were significantly inhibited in SphK1-silenced A498 and 786-O cells, demonstrating that SphK1 activity promotes a survival advantage in accord with the notion that HIF-2α contributes to tumor cell survival.39
Importantly, we discovered that SphK1 signaling does not regulate HIF-2α protein content in ccRCC and non-ccRCC cells by a proteasome-dependent mechanism, suggesting a general mode of action regardless of the origin of the cell lines used and the presence or not of pVHL. Rather, SphK1 activity regulates the canonical mTOR pathway, which is often dysregulated in cancer and has a crucial role in the control of HIF-2α translation.61
Although, we observed a small decrease in 4E-BP1 and p70S6K phosphorylation, this was not sufficient to induce a marked decrease in global protein synthesis or poly-ribosomes assembly, neither to specifically reduce HIF-2α mRNA translation. Recent studies establish that autophagy might be accountable for HIF-2α protein downregulation in renal cancer.63 Sphingolipid-mediated regulation of autophagy exists but the contribution of S1P signaling remains enigmatic and not yet studied in the hypoxia context (reviewed in Li et al.64). On the basis of our data, we may suspect that SphK1-dependent downregulation of Akt/mTOR pathway might impact the autophagy process leading to the reduction of HIF-2α protein abundance.
We also show that Akt represents a mechanistic link between SphK1/S1P signaling and mTOR signaling, as SphK1 silencing abrogates the Akt/mTOR stimulation. Because Akt signaling can be activated by all Gi-coupled S1P receptor subtypes5, 65 and because S1P has been shown to be released from hypoxic cells,24, 59, 66 we explored the effects of the neutralization of extracellular S1P with anti-S1P monoclonal antibody sphingomab.13 Similar to our recent data showing that sphingomab could block HIF-1α accumulation and activity in prostate cancer cell and animal models,24 our findings firmly establish the contribution of extracellular S1P in the regulation of HIF-2α as the silencing of S1P exporter Spns2 as well as the use of sphingomab markedly reduced HIF-2α in all ccRCC subtypes. These data are consistent with our recent report that SphK1 is upregulated in mice xenografts after resistance to VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase inhibition.16 Moreover, sphingomab retarded the growth of A498 and 786-O xenografts, particularly after resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibition was established.16 In the current work establishing the HIF-2/S1P/hypoxia axis, we also established that S1P1 mRNA is upregulated under hypoxia and required for both HIF-1α and HIF-2α accumulation in several human tumor cell lines, while S1P3 has previously been shown to be involved in the regulation of HIF-1α in a thyroid cancer model.34
In summary, the present report demonstrates that the SphK1/S1P signaling pathway is a potent regulator of HIF-2 in human cancer notably in ccRCC, the most common form of kidney cancer. This disease is aggressive, notoriously resistant to conventional chemotherapy, and is almost invariably an incurable condition.67 SphK1/S1P inhibition might represent an alternative therapeutic strategy to current mTOR- or VEGF-targeted agents, as S1P is widely appreciated as a general growth-like factor and a potent protector against apoptosis in addition to its specific regulatory role on HIF-2. The targeting S1P metabolism is ongoing with a humanized version of that anti-S1P mAb, which is being investigated as a treatment for metastatic ccRCC in patients that have failed up to three targeted therapies (www.lpath.com). Anti-S1P strategies could not only provide a beneficial therapeutic option in ccRCC, but also in other cancers as the role of HIF-2 as an oncoprotein might extend beyond renal carcinomas.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Culture medium and antibiotics were from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland). Serum was from Perbio (Brebières, France). MG132 was obtained from Merck Millipore (Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France). W146 was from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA). The murine monoclonal anti-S1P antibody, sphingomab, was as described previously.21 [γ-32P] ATP and [9,10-3H(N)]-palmitic acid were from Perkin (Courtaboeuf, France). TLC plates were from VWR (Fontenay sous Bois, France). All other reagents were from Sigma (Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France).
Cell culture
Human prostate PC-3 and lung A549 cell lines were obtained from DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany). Human U87 glioblastoma and ccRCC CAKI-1 cells were from ATCC (Molsheim, France). Human ccRCC A498 and 786-O were kindly supplied by Dr G Melillo (NCI, Frederick, MD, USA). CAKI-1 shS1P1 and CAKI-1 shCtrl have been established by the Plateau de Vectorologie de Rangueil (CRCT, Toulouse, France) using a pLKO.1-puro-CMV-tGFP plasmid containing a ‘Non Target Control’ sequence for shCtrl or a GCTGCTCAAGACCGTAATTAT sequence for shS1P1 (clone ID: TRCN0000011360; Sigma). Cells were cultured in RPMI containing 10% FBS at 37 °C in 5% CO2 humidified incubators. Cell lines were routinely verified by the following tests: morphology examination, growth analysis and mycoplasma detection (MycoAlert; Lonza). All experiments were started with low-passaged cells (<15 times). Hypoxia (0.1% O2, 5% CO2, 94.5% N2) was achieved using an In Vivo2 hypoxic workstation (Ruskinn, Bridgend, UK).
RNA interference experiments
Transient interference was achieved by double-stranded human siRNAs 5′-GGGCAAGGCCUUGCAGCUCdTdT-3′ (siSphK1) as previously reported;32, 68 5′-AAGGAAACCUAGUAACUGAGC-3′ (siPLD1) and 5′-AAUGGGGCAGGUUACUUUGCU-3′ (siPLD2);37 5′-GGUGGUGUUCAUUCUCAU-3′, 5′-GCUAUAUCACAAUGCUGAA-3′, 5′-GAAGCGCUCUUUACUUGGU-3′ (siS1P1, pool);59 and MISSION predesigned siRNAs from Sigma for human Spns2: Spns2 siRNAa: 5′-CGCUCAUGCUCUGCCCUUUdTdT-3′; and Spns2 siRNAb: 5′-CACUCAUCCUCAUUCUGGUdTdT-3′.24 Aleatory sequence siScr was from Eurogentec (Angers, France). Transfections were carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 in OPTI-MEM medium according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, Villebon-sur-Yvette, France).
SphK1 and PLD enzymatic assays
The protocol for the determination of SphK1 enzymatic activity has been described in details previously.69 PLD activity was determined as reported by Brizuela et al.36 with slight modifications. Cells were treated with the primary alcohol, 1-butanol (0.3%), instead of ethanol (1%). The TLC plates were developed in this case with the superior phase from a mixture of ethylacetate/isooctan/acetic acid/water (55/25/10/50).
Reporter gene assay
For luciferase assays, cells were plated in 24-well plates and transfected, using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen), with 150 ng of the reporter vector (pRE-tk-LUC) containing three copies of the HRE from the erythropoietin gene and 50 ng of Renilla luciferase plasmid DNA, as an internal control. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were incubated under normoxic (20% O2) or hypoxic conditions (0.1% O2) for 16 h. Cells were then lysed and luciferase activities were measured using the Dual Luciferase Assay Kit (Promega, Charbonnières-les-Bains, France) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Results were quantified with a MicroBeta TRILUX luminescence counter (Perkin Elmer, Villebon-sur-Yvette, France), and normalized values were expressed as the fold induction over control cells.
Western-blot analysis and antibodies
Rabbit anti-HIF-2α (Novus, Littleton, CO, USA), mouse anti-HIF-1α (BD, San Jose, CA, USA), rabbit anti-GLUT-1 (ThermoScientific, Villebon-sur-Yvette, France), mouse anti-cyclin D1, rabbit anti-p70S6K, rabbit anti-phospho-p70S6K (Thr389), rabbit anti-phospho-p70S6K (Thr421/Ser424), rabbit anti-mTOR, rabbit anti-phospho-mTOR (Ser2448), rabbit anti-4E-BP1, rabbit anti-phospho 4E-BP1 (Ser65), rabbit anti-Akt, rabbit anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), rabbit anti-Spns2 (Sigma), anti-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), mouse anti-puromycin (Millipore, 12D10) were used as primary antibodies. Proteins were visualized by an ECL detection system (Perbio, Villebon-sur-Yvette, France) using anti-rabbit or anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). Densitometry quantitation was determined using the Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France), and 1 μg was reversed transcribed to cDNA using the SuperScript Frist Stand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the MESA Blue PCR Master mix (Eurogentec). Reactions were performed using hSphK1-specific primers (forward 5′-CTGGCAGCTTCCTTGAACCAT-3′; reverse, 5′-TGTGCAGAGACAGCAGGTTCA-3′), hHIF-2α-specific primers (forward, 5′-TCCCACCAGCTTCACTCTCT-3′; reverse, 5′-TCAGAAAAAGGCCACTGCTT-3′), hS1P1-specific primers (forward, 5′-AAATTCCACCGACCCATGTA-3′; reverse, 5′-AGTTATTGCTCCCGTTGTGG-3′), hS1P2-specific primers (forward, 5′-CACCTGGCGGTACAAAGAAT-3′; reverse, 5′-GTCAAGTGGCAGCTGATGAA-3′), hS1P3-specific primers (forward, 5′-GCTTCAGGAAATGGAAGCTG-3′; reverse, 5′-TCAGGATGCTGTGAAACTGC-3′), hS1P4-specific primers (forward, 5′-CTGCTCTTCACCGCCCTGGC-3′; reverse, 5′-GAAGCCGTAGACGCGGCTGG-3′), hS1P5-specific primers (forward, 5′-GTGAGGTGGGAGCCATAGAA-3′; reverse, 5′-TTGGCTGAGTCTCCCAGAGT-3′) and actin-specific primers (forward, 5′-ATTGGCAATGAGCGGTTCC-3′; reverse, 5′-GGTAGTTTCGTGGATGCCACA-3′). β-Actin-specific primers (forward primer, 5′-GCAAAGACCTGTACGCCAAC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-AGTACTTGCGCTCAGGAGGA-3′), TBP-specific primers (forward primer, 5′-TGACCTAAAGACCATTGCACTTCG-3′; reverse primer, 5′-CGTGGTTCGTGGCTCTCTTATC-3′). For analysis, all genes were normalized to expression of zeta polypeptide (YWHAZ) gene as an endogenous control. For experiment on translational regulation of HIF-2α mRNA, β-actin and TBP mRNA were used as an endogenous control.
Sunset assay
The SUnSET assay was used to monitor the rate of protein synthesis as described.70 Briefly, 10 min before harvesting the cells, puromycin was added to culture medium at 1 μg/ml. Cell extracts were then processed for western blotting using anti-puromycin antibody.
Polysome analysis, RNA isolation, microarray and associated RT-qPCR
Cells were washed twice with cold PBS containing 100 μg/ml cycloheximide, collected and lysed in a hypotonic lysis buffer (5 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2.5 mm MgCl2, 1.5 mm KCl, 100 μg/ml cycloheximide, 2 mm DTT, 0.5% Triton X-100 and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate). Lysates were loaded onto 10–45% sucrose density gradients (20 mm HEPES-KOH (pH 7.6), 100 mm KCl, 5 mm MgCl2) and centrifuged at 45 000 r.p.m. (SW 55 Ti rotor; Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France) for 45 min at 4 °C. Gradients were fractionated, and the optical density at 254 nm was continuously recorded using an ISCO fractionator (Teledyne ISCO; Lincoln, NE, USA).
Polysome fractions were pooled by two polysome-associated mRNAs, and RNA was isolated using TRIzol-LS (Thermo Fisher, Villebon-sur-Yvette, France). A parallel sample was collected from the postnuclear lysates that were loaded onto the sucrose gradient cytoplasmic mRNA, and RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Thermo Fisher). RT-qPCRs were carried out using RevertAid H Minus Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher) and SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
Statistical analysis
The statistical significance of differences between the means of two groups was evaluated by unpaired Student’s t-test. All statistical tests were two-sided, and the level of significance was set at P<0.05. Calculations were done using Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
References
Pyne NJ, Pyne S . Sphingosine 1-phosphate and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2010; 10: 489–503.
Pitson SM . Regulation of sphingosine kinase and sphingolipid signaling. Trends Biochem Sci 2011; 36: 97–107.
Maceyka M, Harikumar KB, Milstien S, Spiegel S . Sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling and its role in disease. Trends Cell Biol 2012; 22: 50–60.
Xia P, Gamble JR, Wang L, Pitson SM, Moretti PA, Wattenberg BW et al. An oncogenic role of sphingosine kinase. Curr Biol 2000; 10: 1527–1530.
Takabe K, Paugh SW, Milstien S, Spiegel S . "Inside-out" signaling of sphingosine-1-phosphate: therapeutic targets. Pharmacol Rev 2008; 60: 181–195.
Kawahara A, Nishi T, Hisano Y, Fukui H, Yamaguchi A, Mochizuki N . The sphingolipid transporter spns2 functions in migration of zebrafish myocardial precursors. Science 2009; 323: 524–527.
Fukuhara S, Simmons S, Kawamura S, Inoue A, Orba Y, Tokudome T et al. The sphingosine-1-phosphate transporter Spns2 expressed on endothelial cells regulates lymphocyte trafficking in mice. J Clin Invest 2012; 122: 1416–1426.
Nagahashi M, Kim EY, Yamada A, Ramachandran S, Allegood JC, Hait NC et al. Spns2, a transporter of phosphorylated sphingoid bases, regulates their blood and lymph levels, and the lymphatic network. FASEB J 2013; 27: 1001–1011.
Van Brocklyn JR, Lee MJ, Menzeleev R, Olivera A, Edsall L, Cuvillier O et al. Dual actions of sphingosine-1-phosphate: extracellular through the Gi-coupled receptor Edg-1 and intracellular to regulate proliferation and survival. J Cell Biol 1998; 142: 229–240.
Hait NC, Allegood J, Maceyka M, Strub GM, Harikumar KB, Singh SK et al. Regulation of histone acetylation in the nucleus by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Science 2009; 325: 1254–1257.
Alvarez SE, Harikumar KB, Hait NC, Allegood J, Strub GM, Kim EY et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate is a missing cofactor for the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRAF2. Nature 2010; 465: 1084–1088.
Cuvillier O . Downregulating sphingosine kinase-1 for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2008; 12: 1009–1020.
Sabbadini RA . Sphingosine-1-phosphate antibodies as potential agents in the treatment of cancer and age-related macular degeneration. Br J Pharmacol 2011; 162: 1225–1238.
Pyne S, Bittman R, Pyne NJ . Sphingosine kinase inhibitors and cancer: seeking the golden sword of Hercules. Cancer Res 2011; 71: 6576–6582.
Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wan Z, Liu S, Cao Y, Zeng Z . Sphingosine kinase 1 and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e90362.
Zhang L, Wang X, Bullock AJ, Callea M, Shah H, Song J et al. Anti-S1P antibody as a novel therapeutic strategy for VEGFR TKI resistant renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21: 1925–1934.
Pchejetski D, Doumerc N, Golzio M, Naymark M, Teissie J, Kohama T et al. Chemosensitizing effects of sphingosine kinase-1 inhibition in prostate cancer cell and animal models. Mol Cancer Ther 2008; 7: 1836–1845.
Paugh SW, Paugh BS, Rahmani M, Kapitonov D, Almenara JA, Kordula T et al. A selective sphingosine kinase 1 inhibitor integrates multiple molecular therapeutic targets in human leukemia. Blood 2008; 112: 1382–1391.
Kapitonov D, Allegood JC, Mitchell C, Hait NC, Almenara JA, Adams JK et al. Targeting sphingosine kinase 1 inhibits Akt signaling, induces apoptosis, and suppresses growth of human glioblastoma cells and xenografts. Cancer Res 2009; 69: 6915–6923.
Pchejetski D, Boehler T, Brizuela L, Sauer L, Doumerc N, Golzio M et al. FTY720 (Fingolimod) sensitizes prostate cancer cells to radiotherapy by inhibition of sphingosine kinase-1. Cancer Res 2010; 70: 8651–8661.
O'Brien N, Jones ST, Williams DG, Cunningham HB, Moreno K, Visentin B et al. Production and characterization of monoclonal anti-sphingosine-1-phosphate antibodies. J Lipid Res 2009; 50: 2245–2257.
Visentin B, Vekich JA, Sibbald BJ, Cavalli AL, Moreno KM, Matteo RG et al. Validation of an anti-sphingosine-1-phosphate antibody as a potential therapeutic in reducing growth, invasion, and angiogenesis in multiple tumor lineages. Cancer Cell 2006; 9: 225–238.
Ponnusamy S, Selvam SP, Mehrotra S, Kawamori T, Snider AJ, Obeid LM et al. Communication between host organism and cancer cells is transduced by systemic sphingosine kinase 1/sphingosine 1-phosphate signalling to regulate tumour metastasis. EMBO Mol Med 2012; 4: 761–775.
Ader I, Gstalder C, Bouquerel P, Golzio M, Andrieu G, Zalvidea S et al. Neutralizing S1P inhibits intratumoral hypoxia, induces vascular remodelling and sensitizes to chemotherapy in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 13803–13821.
Semenza GL . Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell 2012; 148: 399–408.
Semenza GL . Hypoxia-inducible factors: mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2012; 33: 207–214.
Wiesener MS, Jurgensen JS, Rosenberger C, Scholze CK, Horstrup JH, Warnecke C et al. Widespread hypoxia-inducible expression of HIF-2alpha in distinct cell populations of different organs. FASEB J 2003; 17: 271–273.
Keith B, Johnson RS, Simon MC . HIF1alpha and HIF2alpha: sibling rivalry in hypoxic tumour growth and progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2012; 12: 9–22.
Kaelin WG Jr. . Kidney cancer: now available in a new flavor. Cancer Cell 2008; 14: 423–424.
Rankin EB, Rha J, Unger TL, Wu CH, Shutt HP, Johnson RS et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2 regulates vascular tumorigenesis in mice. Oncogene 2008; 27: 5354–5358.
Gordan JD, Lal P, Dondeti VR, Letrero R, Parekh KN, Oquendo CE et al. HIF-alpha effects on c-Myc distinguish two subtypes of sporadic VHL-deficient clear cell renal carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2008; 14: 435–446.
Ader I, Brizuela L, Bouquerel P, Malavaud B, Cuvillier O . Sphingosine kinase 1: a new modulator of hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha during hypoxia in human cancer cells. Cancer Res 2008; 68: 8635–8642.
Cho SY, Lee HJ, Jeong SJ, Kim HS, Chen CY, Lee EO et al. Sphingosine kinase 1 pathway is involved in melatonin-induced HIF-1alpha inactivation in hypoxic PC-3 prostate cancer cells. J Pineal Res 2011; 51: 87–93.
Kalhori V, Kemppainen K, Asghar MY, Bergelin N, Jaakkola P, Tornquist K . Sphingosine-1-phosphate as a regulator of hypoxia-induced factor-1alpha in thyroid follicular carcinoma cells. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e66189.
Toschi A, Lee E, Gadir N, Ohh M, Foster DA . Differential dependence of hypoxia-inducible factors 1 alpha and 2 alpha on mTORC1 and mTORC2. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 34495–34499.
Brizuela L, Dayon A, Doumerc N, Ader I, Golzio M, Izard JC et al. The sphingosine kinase-1 survival pathway is a molecular target for the tumor-suppressive tea and wine polyphenols in prostate cancer. FASEB J 2010; 24: 3882–3894.
Padron D, Tall RD, Roth MG . Phospholipase D2 is required for efficient endocytic recycling of transferrin receptors. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17: 598–606.
Maxwell PH, Wiesener MS, Chang GW, Clifford SC, Vaux EC, Cockman ME et al. The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature 1999; 399: 271–275.
Bertout JA, Majmundar AJ, Gordan JD, Lam JC, Ditsworth D, Keith B et al. HIF2alpha inhibition promotes p53 pathway activity, tumor cell death, and radiation responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 14391–14396.
Baba M, Hirai S, Yamada-Okabe H, Hamada K, Tabuchi H, Kobayashi K et al. Loss of von Hippel-Lindau protein causes cell density dependent deregulation of CyclinD1 expression through hypoxia-inducible factor. Oncogene 2003; 22: 2728–2738.
Raval RR, Lau KW, Tran MG, Sowter HM, Mandriota SJ, Li JL et al. Contrasting properties of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and HIF-2 in von Hippel-Lindau-associated renal cell carcinoma. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25: 5675–5686.
Gordan JD, Bertout JA, Hu CJ, Diehl JA, Simon MC . HIF-2alpha promotes hypoxic cell proliferation by enhancing c-myc transcriptional activity. Cancer Cell 2007; 11: 335–347.
Biswas S, Troy H, Leek R, Chung YL, Li JL, Raval RR et al. Effects of HIF-1alpha and HIF2alpha on growth and metabolism of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma 786-0 xenografts. Journal of oncology 2010; 2010: 757908.
Hara K, Yonezawa K, Kozlowski MT, Sugimoto T, Andrabi K, Weng QP et al. Regulation of eIF-4E BP1 phosphorylation by mTOR. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 26457–26463.
Gingras AC, Gygi SP, Raught B, Polakiewicz RD, Abraham RT, Hoekstra MF et al. Regulation of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation: a novel two-step mechanism. Genes Dev 1999; 13: 1422–1437.
Rosen H, Gonzalez-Cabrera PJ, Sanna MG, Brown S . Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor signaling. Annu Rev Biochem 2009; 78: 743–768.
Michaud MD, Robitaille GA, Gratton JP, Richard DE . Sphingosine-1-phosphate: a novel nonhypoxic activator of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in vascular cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2009; 29: 902–908.
Brizuela L, Martin C, Jeannot P, Ader I, Gstalder C, Andrieu G et al. Osteoblast-derived sphingosine 1-phosphate to induce proliferation and confer resistance to therapeutics to bone metastasis-derived prostate cancer cells. Mol Oncol 2014; 8: 1181–1195.
Patel SA, Simon MC . Biology of hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha in development and disease. Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 628–634.
Jonasch E, Futreal PA, Davis IJ, Bailey ST, Kim WY, Brugarolas J et al. State of the science: an update on renal cell carcinoma. Mol Cancer Res 2012; 10: 859–880.
Kaelin WG . Von hippel-lindau disease. Annu Rev Pathol 2007; 2: 145–173.
Kondo K, Kim WY, Lechpammer M, Kaelin WG Jr . Inhibition of HIF2alpha is sufficient to suppress pVHL-defective tumor growth. PLoS Biol 2003; 1: E83.
Zimmer M, Doucette D, Siddiqui N, Iliopoulos O . Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor is sufficient for growth suppression of VHL-/- tumors. Mol Cancer Res 2004; 2: 89–95.
Shinojima T, Oya M, Takayanagi A, Mizuno R, Shimizu N, Murai M . Renal cancer cells lacking hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha expression maintain vascular endothelial growth factor expression through HIF-2alpha. Carcinogenesis 2007; 28: 529–536.
Beroukhim R, Brunet JP, Di Napoli A, Mertz KD, Seeley A, Pires MM et al. Patterns of gene expression and copy-number alterations in von-hippel lindau disease-associated and sporadic clear cell carcinoma of the kidney. Cancer Res 2009; 69: 4674–4681.
Shen C, Beroukhim R, Schumacher SE, Zhou J, Chang M, Signoretti S et al. Genetic and functional studies implicate HIF1alpha as a 14q kidney cancer suppressor gene. Cancer discovery 2011; 1: 222–235.
Ader I, Malavaud B, Cuvillier O . When the sphingosine kinase-1/sphingosine 1-phosphate pathway meets hypoxia signaling: new targets for cancer therapy. Cancer Res 2009; 69: 3723–3726.
Cuvillier O, Ader I, Bouquerel P, Brizuela L, Gstalder C, Malavaud B . Hypoxia, therapeutic resistance, and sphingosine 1-phosphate. Adv Cancer Res 2013; 117: 117–141.
Anelli V, Gault CR, Cheng AB, Obeid LM . Sphingosine Kinase 1 Is Up-regulated during Hypoxia in U87MG Glioma Cells: ROLE OF HYPOXIA-INDUCIBLE FACTORS 1 AND 2. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 3365–3375.
Salama MF, Carroll B, Adada M, Pulkoski-Gross M, Hannun YA, Obeid LM . A novel role of sphingosine kinase-1 in the invasion and angiogenesis of VHL mutant clear cell renal cell carcinoma. FASEB J 2015; 29: 2803–2813.
Toschi A, Edelstein J, Rockwell P, Ohh M, Foster DA . HIF alpha expression in VHL-deficient renal cancer cells is dependent on phospholipase D. Oncogene 2008; 27: 2746–2753.
Delon C, Manifava M, Wood E, Thompson D, Krugmann S, Pyne S et al. Sphingosine kinase 1 is an intracellular effector of phosphatidic acid. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 44763–44774.
Liu XD, Yao J, Tripathi DN, Ding Z, Xu Y, Sun M et al. Autophagy mediates HIF2alpha degradation and suppresses renal tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2015; 34: 2450–2460.
Li Y, Li S, Qin X, Hou W, Dong H, Yao L et al. The pleiotropic roles of sphingolipid signaling in autophagy. Cell Death Dis 2014; 5: e1245.
Cuvillier O . [Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors: from biology to physiopathology]. Med Sci (Paris) 2012; 28: 951–957.
Schnitzer SE, Weigert A, Zhou J, Brune B . Hypoxia enhances sphingosine kinase 2 activity and provokes sphingosine-1-phosphate-mediated chemoresistance in A549 lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 2009; 7: 393–401.
Costa LJ, Drabkin HA . Renal cell carcinoma: new developments in molecular biology and potential for targeted therapies. Oncologist 2007; 12: 1404–1415.
Pchejetski D, Golzio M, Bonhoure E, Calvet C, Doumerc N, Garcia V et al. Sphingosine kinase-1 as a chemotherapy sensor in prostate adenocarcinoma cell and mouse models. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 11667–11675.
Brizuela L, Cuvillier O . Biochemical methods for quantifying sphingolipids: ceramide, sphingosine, sphingosine kinase-1 activity, and sphingosine-1-phosphate. Methods Mol Biol 2012; 874: 1–20.
Martineau Y, Azar R, Muller D, Lasfargues C, El Khawand S, Anesia R et al. Pancreatic tumours escape from translational control through 4E-BP1 loss. Oncogene 2014; 33: 1367–1374.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (Equipe Labellisée LIGUE to OC, Equipe Labellisée LIGUE to SP and Allocation de thèse to PB and DM), Fondation de France (to OC), the Labex TOUCAN (to SP), the Comité 31 of the Ligue Contre le Cancer (to IA), Université Paul Sabatier de Toulouse (to IA), Allocation de thèse from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (to CG and DM), Allocation de 4ème année de thèse from the Fondation ARC (to CG) and Bourse Angiogenèse from Roche (to OC). YM was a recipient of a post-doctoral fellow from Fondation de France and from Investissements d’Avenir (PHUC-CAPTOR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Authors would like to disclose that Dr Sabbadini is a founder of Lpath, and has stock in the company and is an inventor.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Oncogenesis website
Rights and permissions
Oncogenesis is an open-access journal published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Bouquerel, P., Gstalder, C., Müller, D. et al. Essential role for SphK1/S1P signaling to regulate hypoxia-inducible factor 2α expression and activity in cancer. Oncogenesis 5, e209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2016.13
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2016.13
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The role of sphingosine-1-phosphate in autophagy and related disorders
Cell Death Discovery (2023)
-
The Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Axis: an Emerging Therapeutic Opportunity for Endometriosis
Reproductive Sciences (2023)
-
Increased phospholipase D activity contributes to tumorigenesis in prostate cancer cell models
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (2020)
-
Targeting the SPHK1/HIF1 Pathway to Inhibit Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells Niche
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer (2020)
-
Molecular Basis of Sex Difference in Neuroprotection induced by Hypoxia Preconditioning in Zebrafish
Molecular Neurobiology (2020)