Abstract
Optical rectification of femtosecond laser pulses has emerged as the dominant technique for generating single- and few-cycle terahertz (THz) pulses. The advent of the tilted pulse front pumping (TPFP) velocity matching technique, proposed and implemented two decades ago, has ushered in significant advancements of these THz sources, which are pivotal in the realm of THz pump-probe and material control experiments, which need THz pulses with microjoule energies and several hundred kV/cm electric field strengths. Furthermore, these THz sources are poised to play a crucial role in the realization of THz-driven particle accelerators, necessitating millijoule-level pulses with tens of MV/cm electric field strengths. TPFP has enabled the efficient velocity matching in lithium niobate crystals renowned for their extraordinary high nonlinear coefficient. Moreover, its adaptation to semiconductor THz sources has resulted in a two-hundred-times enhancement in conversion efficiency. In this comprehensive review, we present the seminal achievements of the past two decades. We expound on the conventional TPFP setup, delineate its scaling limits, and elucidate the novel generation TPFP configurations proposed to surmount these constraints, accompanied by their preliminary outcomes. Additionally, we provide an in-depth analysis of the THz absorption, refractive index, and nonlinear coefficient spectra of lithium niobate and widely used semiconductors employed as THz generators, which dictate their suitability as THz sources. We underscore the far-reaching advantages of tilted pulse front pumping, not only for LN and semiconductor-based THz sources but also for selected organic crystal-based sources and Yb-laser-pumped GaP sources, previously regarded as velocity-matched in the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ultrashort terahertz (THz) pulses with sub-pJ energy and 100 V/cm electric field are widely used for time-domain THz spectroscopy (TDTS)1 and THz imaging2. For more advanced applications such as THz pump-probe and nonlinear spectroscopic measurements, THz pulses with elevated energy and electric field (usually 1 μJ & >100 kV/cm) enable the precise examination of excitation evolution within the sub-ps time range3,4. The same pulses are applicable usually for the manipulation of matters, including lattice and molecular excitations and field-free orientation of molecules5,6, as well as controlling electron beams, charge-, and spin- waves7, and material structures8. THz pulses with even higher energy (on the level of mJ) and electric field (on the level of MV/cm) are needed for enhancement of high harmonic generation9, acceleration of charged particles10,11,12,13, and generation of carrier-envelope-phase stable attosecond pulses14.
These THz pulses (regardless of their energy) are generated by photoconductive antennas15, by laser-induced plasma16, in spintronic structures17, and by optical rectification in nonlinear crystals18,19,20,21,22, all of them driven by ultrashort laser pulses. Photoconductive antennas, mostly used in TDTS devices, generate single-cycle pulses with a spectral bandwidth of 4–6 THz, with pulse energies in the sub-pJ range15. In dual-color laser plasmas, THz pulses with even 20 THz broad spectrum can be achieved16. In case of pumping at mid-infrared wavelength (3.9 μm) THz pulses with energies up to the sub-mJ-level were generated23, although its utilization has not been spread due to the unusual pumping wavelength and the properties of the THz propagation.
Optical rectification (OR, see Ch. 2) is a nonlinear optical frequency conversion process. The time trace of the electric field, the spectrum, and the conversion efficiency of THz pulses generated via OR, besides the pump pulse duration, strongly depend on the properties of the used nonlinear optical crystal. The most important properties are the nonlinear optical coefficient, the optical and THz absorption spectrum, and the optical and THz refractive index spectrum. The last two are important since it determines the fulfillment of phase matching, which is crucial for all the nonlinear frequency conversion processes.
Fig. 1 shows through some typical examples the energies (Fig. 1a) and conversion efficiencies (Fig. 1b) of THz pulse generation by OR in the last 20 years. Based on the used nonlinear material (NM) the following groups were selected: organic crystals (circles), semiconductors (triangles), and lithium niobate (LN) ferroelectric crystal (squares). The filled symbols correspond to tilted pulse front pumping (TPFP), which will be detailed later. As can be seen, for the same material, applying TPFP increases the efficiency by several orders.
Although both the THz energy and conversion efficiency depend on the pumping conditions, primarily of the energy and pulse duration, and in our experience, the measured energy values could differ by a factor of two with different THz energy meters, it seems to be obvious that organic crystals24,25,26 provide the highest efficiencies. At first sight this could be surprising since no special phase matching was applied, only collinear pumping was used. This could be owing to that organic crystals have the largest nonlinear optical coefficients (3–5 times larger than LN, and 6–10 times larger than semiconductors). On the other side, their damage threshold is low (typically around 20 mJ/cm2) and they show crystal degradation over prolonged exposure26. It is also noteworthy, that these materials require pump sources different from the widespread Ti:sapphire (Ti:s) and Yb-based high energy femtosecond lasers, they provide efficient generation with only special pump sources (with e.g. 1.3–1.7 μm wavelength lasers or with OPA-s), which significantly decreases the wall-plug efficiency.
In case of ZnTe and GaP semiconductors, collinearly phase-matched OR is realized when they are pumped at Ti:s20 and Yb lasers27,28,29,30, respectively. However, since their bandgap are relatively low, the significant 2-photon and 3-photon absorption (2PA - in case of ZnTe, 3PA - in case of GaP) at these wavelengths reduces the available conversion efficiency to around 0.02%27,29,30 due to the generation of free carriers which increases the THz absorption28. This conversion efficiency can be increased by at least two orders of magnitude when longer pumping wavelength31,32,33 and TPFP34,35,36 are applied. It is important to highlight, that while organic crystals work with high efficiency only at specific wavelengths, semiconductors utilizing TPFP can be pumped at various wavelengths, the only demand is that the pumping wavelength should be long enough to suppress the low-order multiphoton absorptions (MPA).
LN and lithium tantalate (LT) ferroelectric materials have a THz refractive index significantly larger (by more than twice) than the optical refractive index. Hence the phase matching for efficient THz generation was only realized in TPFP scheme 36,37. Since these materials own large bandgaps, when pumped by Ti:s lasers there is no 2PA, when pumped by Yb lasers neither 3PA occurs. Moreover, for the large bandgap, the 3PA and 4PA coefficients are much smaller38, than in case of semiconductors. For this, the pumping intensity can be significantly larger than in case of semiconductors or organic crystals. For Ti:s laser pumping saturation of the efficiency is predicted39 above 30 GW/cm2 and for Yb-laser pumping saturation becomes observable28 only above 100 GW/cm2. Hence the conversion efficiency of THz generation can exceed 1% and the generated pulse energies exceed 1 mJ40. At present, LN in TPFP scheme provides the highest energy (see Fig. 1a) and this is the most common OR-based THz source.
In this comprehensive review, we will delve into the remarkable achievements of tilted pulse front pumping over the past two decades. We will also illuminate its inherent limitations while providing a thought-provoking outlook on the promising future possibilities it holds.
Terahertz pulse generation by optical rectification
Optical rectification is a second-order nonlinear optical process, which was observed first in 1962 when with an approximately 60 ns long ruby laser pulse a static electric field was generated around a KDP crystal41. For THz generation, the same nonlinear optical process is applied with much shorter, a few picosecond42, or sub-ps pumping laser pulse durations.
Assuming that the Gaussian shape pump pulse does not change significantly during the THz generation process, the
expression gives a good approximation of the THz energy spectrum43, where \(L\) is the crystal length, \(\Omega\) is the angular frequency, \({d}_{{eff}}\) is the nonlinear optical coefficient, \({I}_{0}\) is the peak intensity of the pump, τ is the FWHM of the pump pulse duration, \({\mu }_{0}\) is the vacuum permeability, nTHZ and np are the phase refractive index for the THz and pump pulse, respectively. The phase-mismatch is
where c is the speed of the light and \({n}_{p}^{{gr}}\left({\omega }_{0}\right)\) is the group refractive index of the pump pulse. Hence the condition for phase matching, \(\Delta k=0\), is only fulfilled if the THz-related phase refractive index and the pump-related group index are equal. Or, equivalently, if the phase velocity of THz and the group velocity of the pump is equal:
In case of velocity matching Eq. 1 has a maximum at \(\Omega =\frac{2\sqrt{2\mathrm{ln}\left(2\right)}}{\tau }\). Hence, in case of a lossless medium the \({\nu }_{0}\) peak frequency of the generated THz radiation is:
thus, the THz frequency can be tuned by the pulse duration of the pump pulse. The spectral bandwidth is 1.16 times the peak frequency. Accordingly, in a lossless medium, for 100 fs pump pulse duration, the peak THz frequency and bandwidth are \({\nu }_{0}=3.75\) THz and \(\Delta \nu =4.33\) THz, respectively.
In reality, the peak frequency and bandwidth are strongly affected by the dispersion and absorption in the THz range of the applied nonlinear crystal. The stronger the THz dispersion and the longer the crystal, the narrower the spectral bandwidth of the generated THz radiation. Figure 2a presents the THz refractive indices of the most commonly used crystals (LN – right scale, ZnTe, GaP, GaAs – left scale) for THz generation. Generally, approaching zero frequency the refractive index become frequency-independent, while at higher frequencies, close to the lowest transverse optical phonon frequency of the given material, the refractive index increases rapidly. Figure 2b shows the THz absorption of the same materials. The absorption increases monotonically with the frequency, leading to the suppression of higher-frequency components. One can observe that semiconductors have significantly lower absorption than LN at preferably large spectral range. The absorption of LN can be strongly reduced by cooling it to 100 K44.
Taking into account the THz absorption, the conversion efficiency of velocity matched THz generation at \(\Omega\) angular frequency can be written as34
where I is the pump intensity, and \({\alpha }_{{THz}}\) is the THz absorption. The conversion efficiency depends squarely on the effective nonlinear coefficient, \({d}_{{eff}}\), which is not equal to the \({d}_{{eff}}\) value valid for the optical frequency conversion processes (i.e. SHG), rather can be determined by34
where \({r}_{{eff}}\) is the clamped electro-optic coefficient of the material. Figure 2c shows the frequency dependence of the nonlinear coefficient for the four discussed materials on a broad frequency range. A rapid change of the value of \({d}_{{eff}}\) can be observed for all the materials around the transverse-optical (TO) phonon resonances indicated by vertical lines. The order of the location of the minimum, and maximum close to the TO phonon resonance is the opposite for LN and semiconductors. The reason for this is that the signs of the nonlinearities of electrons and phonons are different in semiconductors, while they are identical in LN. Also, for this reason the nonlinear coefficient, valid for OR, is smaller in semiconductors, while in LN is preferably (more than 5 times) larger than what is valid for optical frequency conversion. In the case of LN, approaching the phonon frequency on the low-frequency side, the enhancement of \({d}_{{eff}}\) can be observed. However, these large \({d}_{{eff}}\) values can not be utilized, due to the strong increase of the THz absorption on the same frequency range as can be seen in Fig. 2b.
Assuming \(I=10\) \({\rm{GW}}/{{\rm{cm}}}^{2}\) pumping intensity for the presented materials, one can get the efficiencies in Fig. 2d, according to (5). Based on this, it can be stated that if the velocity matching is satisfied, for low frequencies ( < 1 THz) cryogenically cooled LN is the most suitable, while for higher frequencies (1.5–4.5 THz), GaAs is the best. For efficient THz generation, the fulfillment of (3) velocity matching condition is necessary. Since the refractive index of LN in the few THz regime is approximately twice as much as the visible and infrared group indices, despite its large nonlinear coefficient LN is unsuitable for collinearly THz generation. For ZnTe, GaP, and GaAs, there are pumping wavelengths (0.81 μm, 1.0 μm, 1.36 μm) available for collinear phase matching at 2 THz, however, at these wavelengths the pumping pulses with a few GW/cm2 intensities already generate a large number of free carriers owning to MPA. The generated free carriers inflict significant absorption at low THz frequencies34,45,46,47. For this, even the \(I=10\) \({\rm{GW}}/{{\rm{cm}}}^{2}\) pumping intensity is too large to be used, thus the conversion efficiency of THz generation can not exceed the 0.01% level (see Fig. 1b, empty triangles).
The reason that the conversion efficiency could be larger by several orders of magnitude is the application of TPFP, which enables, on the one hand, the velocity matching in LN despite that the THz refractive index is significantly larger than the optical refractive index34,35, and on the other hand, in case of semiconductors, it also enables the velocity matching for pumping wavelengths long enough to suppress the low order MPA31,32,33,34.
Tilted pulse front pumping technique for terahertz pulse generation in Lithium Niobate crystal
The mechanism of the tilted pulse front setup is illustrated in Fig. 3a. The intensity front of the pump pulse is tilted by a \(\gamma\) angle compared to the phase front, which is perpendicular to the propagation. The pump propagates to \(z{\prime}\) direction, while the generated THz radiation propagates perpendicularly to the pulse front, to the direction of \(z\). According to the figure, the pump pulse front and the phase front of the generated THz radiation stay on each other during their propagation (along different directions), and so the THz radiation can continuously get stronger if the
relation is satisfied35. In the case of pulse front tilt, Eq. (7) has to be fulfilled instead of the velocity matching condition (3). This can be achieved with suitable \(\gamma\) in all the cases where \({\nu }_{{THz}}\le {\nu }_{p}^{{gr}}\). This necessary tilting angle for congruent LN at 1030 nm pumping and velocity matching at 0.5 THz, depending on the crystal temperature, is between 62.0-63.4°48.
Pulse front tilt can be introduced by a dispersive optical element49,50, like by a prism or a grating. However, in the case of LN, the necessary large tilt angle is not feasible by a prism, thus the pulse front tilt is set by reflection or transmission diffraction grating.
The pulse front tilt introduced by diffraction off the grating is
according to Fig. 3b, where \(\alpha\) is the angle of incidence and \(\beta\) is the angle of diffraction.
Diffraction on the grating not only produces pulse front tilt, but angular dispersion as well49,50,51, thus temporal and spatial chirp is created during the propagation35,51,52,53, the tilting of the pulse front decreases, and the pulse duration expands51. To avoid these distortions and to have proper control of the pulse front tilt, the conventional tilted pulse front scheme includes an imaging part (lens35, or telescope36), according to Fig. 3c. In the case of flawless imaging the beam is free from spatial chirp in the imaging plane and the pulse duration is equal to the value before the diffraction on the grating. However, the tangent of the pulse front tilt decreases with the amount of the magnification (M) of the imaging. (Usually, cases with \(M < 1\) are applied, this is why the tilting angle increases.) As the pump pulse enters into the NM the tangent of the tilting angle decreases by the ng group refractive index of the NM, thus the tilting angle inside the NM is
The tilting angle should fulfill the velocity matching condition (7). The tilting in air \(\left({\gamma }_{A}\right)\) before the NM should be larger than this according to: \(\tan \left({\gamma }_{A}\right)={n}_{g}\cdot \tan \left({\gamma }_{M}\right)\). This γA in the case of LN is between 76.4° and 77.2° depending on the temperature.
According to the
grating equation, where \(\lambda\) is the wavelength of the incident light and p is the grating period, Eq. (8) can be written as
At a given grating with a p grating period, the required pulse front tilt angle \({\gamma }_{M}\) can be produced by an incidence angle of
Since the diffraction efficiencies of the gratings are maximal at Littrow configuration \(\left(\alpha =\beta \right)\), it is convenient to implement a setup close to this.
As evident from Fig. 1, the introduction of the TPFP technique has led to a substantial increase of several orders of magnitude in both the generated THz pulse energies and the conversion efficiencies within a few years.
Sadly, the several 10% efficiencies of the nonlinear frequency conversion processes, usual in the optical range, are unachievable for THz generation by OR. The main reason for this is that the conversion efficiency is proportional to the square of the generated frequency (see Eq. 5), and the latter is smaller by a few hundred times for OR than for SHG. In the case of LN, the available conversion efficiency is strongly limited by the significant absorption in the THz range (Fig. 2b), too. However, its nonlinear optical constant, d, is five times higher in the THz than in the optical regime (Fig. 2c). For considerably high conversion efficiency a high pumping intensity is necessary (in the case of LN ~ 100 GW/cm2 level). This pumping intensity is not limited primarily by the damage threshold (which, in the case of LN can be higher than 1 TW/cm2 for fs pulse duration), rather the temporal- and spectral distortion of the pump owning to the nonlinear refractive index, which has drastic consequences on the process of THz generation54,55,56. According to numerical calculations, the maximum obtainable conversion efficiency is around 1–2%54,55,56.
It should be noted that since the average photon energy of a pumping photon of, for example, 1.03 μm is more than 500 times higher than a photon of 0.5 THz, a 1% energy conversion efficiency equivalent to a photon conversion efficiency of 500%. Throughout THz generation, the intensity of the higher frequency components of the pump is decreasing, while the intensity of the lower frequency components is increasing, thus the pump spectrum shifts to the red during OR57. Since only a part of the THz radiation generated by OR leaves the LN crystal, as a consequence of THz absorption and Fresnel reflection at the output surface, the amount of the observable relative redshift of the pump can be typically 2–10 times of the one corresponding to the conversion efficiency.
Of course, the remarks on the conversion efficiency in the last two paragraphs are not true to the TPFP setup only, but to every OR process. There is, however, one more detrimental property of the TPFP setup on the available efficiency: Together with the pulse front tilt there is always present angular dispersion in the beam49,50,51 which leads to group delay dispersion (GDD)50,51,58. This GDD coming from TPFP in the case of LN with a pulse front tilt of γ = 63° is more than one order of magnitude bigger than the GDD coming from the material dispersion of LN! For the strong GDD, the ultrashort pump pulse duration will expand quickly during the propagation, thus THz generation is only effective in a short crystal length (the effective generation length is short59). This efficiency-reducing effect can be decreased by using longer FT-limited pump pulses, according to theoretical considerations59, and experiments60,61,62. Theoretically, the generated THz pulse energy can be increased even at a given conversion efficiency just by increasing simultaneously the pumping energy and spot size. The latter one is required since the pumping intensity can not be increased to any extent, since: (i) the damage threshold of the nonlinear material, (ii) the intensity dependent strength of the nonlinear refractive index, and (iii) the MPA. However, one should avoid simultaneously increasing the pumping energy and spot size beyond a certain level. Both the experiments63 and the numerical calculations54,55,56 show that by increasing the pump spot size, the conversion efficiency increases first (since the propagation direction of the pump and the THz is different, and the effect of the corresponding walk-off is smaller for larger pumping spot size), but after a certain size it significantly drops. There are two primary reasons for the decrease in conversion efficiency when using excessively large spot sizes: (i) imaging error (in the plane of dispersion) and (ii) prism shape of the crystal. Both effects are amplified as the tilting angle required for velocity matching increases. In the case of LN, where \(\gamma \approx 63^\circ\), these limitations become more pronounced compared to semiconductors, where \(\gamma \approx 30^\circ\) (Fig. 7).
As it was mentioned above, the diffraction grating illuminated by the pumping beam has to be imaged into the NM for the THz pulse to be generated by a pumping beam that has the same pulse duration (usually Fourier limited) as it had before the diffraction, and has no spatial chirp22,35. Imaging both with a single lens or with a confocal telescope (relay-imaging) can be used21,22,28,31,32,34,35,36,54,55,64,65. In case of low pumping energy ( < 1 mJ) spherical lens(es)22,28,31,32,35,36,66, in case of high pumping energy ( > 100 mJ) cylindrical lens(es) should be applied40 for providing the appropriate pumping intensities. In order to obtain maximum pump-to-THz conversion and optimal THz beam characteristics in a conventional TPFP setup the following conditions have to be fulfilled64: (i) Velocity matching of pump and THz requires a certain tilt angle γ of the pump pulse front inside the crystal given by Eq. (7). (ii) The pump pulse front has to be plane in the crystal. (iii) The image of the grating should be parallel with the pulse front. This alignment ensures that the pump pulse duration remains equal to the transform-limited value along the entire tilted pulse front. According to geometrical optical considerations, in paraxial approximation, all the above three conditions are fulfilled simultaneously59,64 if the sine of the incidence angle on the grating is equal to
where \({\lambda }_{0}\) is the average wavelength of the pump, p is the period of the grating, n, and ng is the (phase) index and group index of the NM,
and the magnification of the imaging system (the single lens or the two-lens telescope) is
For an Yb-laser pumping (λ = 1.03 μm) these eqations are satisfied with good accuracy using for example an optical grating with 1/p = 1400 mm-1 groove density at 37.6o incidence angle and a telescope with M = 2/3 (details are given in Ref. 64).
However, in non-paraxial cases (finite spot size), based on ray-tracing calculation, in the presence of angular dispersion, the imaging errors cause significant distortions, for example: curved images and curved pulse fronts59,64. The strongest limitation on the maximum spot size of the pump comes from the difference between the curvature of the image and the curvature of the pulse front. For this reason, as depicted in Fig. 4a, the pulse duration varies with the transverse position within the cross-section of the beam in the plane of the angular dispersion in the paraxial image plane, and it can be significantly larger than its Fourier-limited value64. The shorter the Fourier-limited pulse duration, the larger this pulse lengthening.
From the modeling of four different imaging systems (singlet or achromatic single-lens, and telescope consisting of singlet or achromatic lenses, respectively), the achromatic lenses are more advantageous (see Fig. 4a) and using a telescope will decrease the pulse lengthening at the edges of the beam compared to using a single lens. Moreover, the telescope causes less curved pulse front tilt, therefore the radius of the phase front of the exiting THz beam from LN reaches 1 m64, thus the divergence of the beam will be small. In contrast, for a single lens, the radius of curvature is 6 cm only. So, regarding a single lens, the THz beam owns a large divergence and a significant astigmatism, since in the case of a spherical lens in the plane perpendicular to the angular dispersion, a much longer radius of curvature is expected, and in the case of a cylindrical lens, the radius of curvature in this plane is even infinitely long. These problems can be reduced by using a lens with a longer focal length59, but the best is using telescope for imaging64. It should be noted, that the generating setup with which the highest THz pulse energy was delivered (1.4 mJ) so far, consisted of a telescope40.
According to Fig. 4b, the relationship between the local pulse duration and the transverse position varies with the longitudinal position in the vicinity of the imaging plane. The reason for the behaviors presented in Fig. 4a and b is the presence of the angular dispersion in the pulse front tilted beam50,51,58, which causes group velocity dispersion (GDD)50, and the curved image surface. After diffracting off the grating, the duration of the pump pulse undergoes rapid changes throughout its propagation.
As depicted in Fig. 4c, the prism shape of the LN crystal causes the pump pulse to travel varying distances across its cross-section, even without considering imaging errors. It is shown that the path length of the pump beam is considerably shorter on the same side as the apex of the prism, compared to the opposite side. Moreover, the path lengths of the THz radiation generated at various positions within the cross-section are significantly influenced by the transversal position. Consequently, the resulting THz pulse exhibits non-uniformity both spectrally and in the temporal evolution of the electric field55,67,68. This inherent inhomogeneity poses limitations on achieving strong focus as well.
Despite the substantial increase in the generated THz pulse energy achieved by employing conventional TPFP in an LN nonlinear medium (as illustrated in Fig. 1a), it is clear that addressing the aforementioned challenges is crucial for enabling the generation of higher energy THz pulses with significantly higher peak electric fields. Consequently, there is a pressing need to eliminate or at least mitigate the issues mentioned earlier. Overcoming these limitations will pave the way for the production of higher energy THz pulses with enhanced peak electric field characteristics.
New-generation terahertz sources
Pálfalvi et al. proposed a new setup idea, free from the aforementioned obstacles related to the increase of the pump beam size, the so-called contact grating (CG) THz source in 200865. Here, the pulse front tilt is introduced not by the diffraction on a separate optical grating, but on the CG structure realized on the entry surface of the NM crystal as can be seen in Fig. 5a. The incoming pump beam hits the CG perpendicularly, then the two beams created by the diffraction on the CG propagate with \({\pm \gamma }_{M}\) angle to the original propagation direction creating the right pulse front tilt to generate THz radiation. There is no need for imaging and plan-parallel crystals can be used. Nevertheless, the implementation of this elegant and ideal setup is technically difficult in LN for the enormous pulse front tilt angle and the correspondingly high diffraction angle. As it was shown by Nagashima et al. 69, if the pump beam arrives at the rectangular grating profile on LN from air, then the diffraction efficiency is only 40%. This can be increased up to 90% if it comes from bulk quartz69 or velocity-matching liquid70. The coupling-in efficiency into the crystal can be improved by evaporating a Fabry-Perot structure between the crystal and the grating71. With this structure, a diffraction efficiency of 71% was achieved (where the grating period was 420 nm), although the THz conversion efficiency (partially because of the high THz coupling-out losses and the disadvantageously long 1 ps pump pulse duration) was only 0.015%. With the setup shown in Fig. 5a, but using semiconductors instead of LN, conversion efficiencies above 1% are expected33,72,73 for the significantly smaller pulse front tilt angle (see details in the following chapter).
For easier manufacturing the hybrid setup as depicted in Fig. 5b was proposed74. Here the pulse front tilt is introduced in two steps, by a separate transmission grating and by the contact grating itself. This imposes a less challenging material processing74. In the case of LN the grating period can be 620 nm instead of 420 nm74. This setup also contains imaging, however, the imaging error going to be more than three times smaller compared to the conventional TPFP setup since only half of the pulse front tilt is created by the separate grating. In this system the NM is also prism-shaped, however, its angle is advantageously less than half compared to the prism in the conventional setup (LN: 30.2° instead of 63.2°) leading to a much more homogeneous THz beam.
In Fig. 5c, the grating structure is not on the entry surface of the plan-parallel NM, but on its back surface. This one is called a reflective nonlinear slab, RNLS75,76. The operating principle is the following: The pump beam enters perpendicularly into the crystal and goes all the way to the reflective diffraction grating. There is no velocity matching up to this point, thus THz generation does not occur either. However, after the diffraction in the \(\pm {1}^{{st}}\) (or higher) orders with an angle of \({\gamma }_{M}\) as the pump beam propagates backward in the NM, the velocity matching in (7) going to be satisfied and the pumping intensity front is parallel with the front and back surfaces of the crystal, thus the generated THz pulse leaves the crystal perpendicularly through the front surface. The RNLS, similarly to the CG (Fig. 5a), can be increased in its cross-section enabling the upscaling of the energy of the THz pulses by the beam diameter and pump energy. Moreover, the propagation of the pump pulse inside the NM is identical along the cross section of the crystal, thus the beam quality of the generated THz radiation is excellent, and the time evolution of the electric field is uniform along the cross-section. In a newly proposed version of RNLS, both the front and back surfaces are plane and the reflection and diffraction of the pump beam does not occur inside the NM, but on the grating structure right behind the crystal, which is realized on a material that is easier to process than LN76. In this case, there is a medium with a higher refractive index than LN, which is located between the NM and the grating and provides optical contact. This can be i.e. selenium or As2Se3. According to the numerical calculations the optimal crystal length is only a few mm54,56.
As it was mentioned in the previous chapter, in the conventional TPFP setup, in relation to the angular dispersion, the pulse duration changes with the propagation of the pump pulse. To avoid this Ofori-Okai et al. proposed a setup77, where instead of the optical grating of the conventional setup a reflective stair-step echelon introduces the pulse front tilt (Fig. 5d). Along the propagation direction, the spatial distance between the beamlets created by the reflection on the stair steps of \(W\) width and \(H\) height is \(2H\). For this, the angle of the tilted pulse front is
Similarly to the conventional TPFP setup, the tangent of this varies according to what was mentioned before Eq. (9) for the magnification of the imaging and due to the entry of the pump pulse into the NM, thus the introduced pulse front tilt inside the NM is:
It should be noted that this pulse front tilt angle applies to the average pulse front tilt, the individual beamlets are not tilted, and the velocity matching is not fulfilled for them. Thus, the w size of the beamlets cannot exceed78
where \(w=W\times M\). From the other side, the beamlets cannot have any small size either, since as their initial size decreases, the divergence of the beamlets increases and after a few mm of propagation \(\left({z}^{{\prime} }\right)\) the size of the beamlets will be so large that the \(w\) averaged over the \(0-z{\prime}\) traveling range will be larger than in the case of a larger initial \(w\). The efficiency of this setup was experimentally demonstrated by ultrashort pulses77. With 1 mJ pulse energy, 39 fs FT limited pump pulses and a reflective stair-step echelon with \(W=150\) \(\mu m\) step height and applying \(M=0.2\) magnification, they could achieve 0.33% conversion efficiency. Using a similar setup with 280 fs pump pulse duration, Guilamand et al. accomplished 1.3% efficiency proving that the segmented pulse front tilt can be efficient for longer than 100 fs pulse duration as well79.
Just like in the previous case, the aim of the following setup is also to avoid the pulse duration change coming from the angular dispersion, but here the pulse front tilt is introduced by a segmented phase mask, so called multistep phase mask (MSPM), placed on the NM80 (Fig. 5e). The setup is obviously free from imaging errors, however according to numerical calculations56 the achievable efficiency may be slightly smaller compared to the previous case, since the distortions of the pump beam are caused by diffraction as it propagates through the phase mask.
Noteworthy, is that both the last two setups have prism-shaped NM-s which definitely limits the upscaling of the size and THz energy.
The THz source proposed by Pálfalvi et al. enables the use of segmented pulse front tilt and plane parallel NM81. This hybrid-type setup is shown in Fig. 5f. The operating principle is as follows: The transmission grating and the imaging introduce that \({\gamma }_{A}\) pulse front tilt directly before the entry surface of the NM, which is needed inside the NM to the velocity matching according to (7) (in case of conventional setup, the required angle is greater, see below (9)). A step structure is formed on the entrance surface of the crystal (nonlinear echelon slab, NLES) with step height (H) and width (W) to satisfy:
Thus, while the tilted pumping pulse enters through the steps, it is decomposing to beamlets with tilt angles of \(\tan \left({\gamma }_{M}\right)=\tan \left({\gamma }_{A}\right)/{n}_{g}\) which is smaller than the average pulse front tilt γA, that is unchanged. Hence the NM has plane parallel sides and every beamlet propagates identically (apart from imaging errors), the quality of the generated THz beam going to be excellent for even big pumping diameters as well56. The first implementation of a small-sized hybrid THz source setup containing NLES demonstrated its functionality82. Although the achieved efficiency was only 0.05%, but a tenfold increase is expected if the pump beam size and energy are increased and the NLES is cryocooled. Difficult to estimate, but further significant increase in the efficiency is likely from better-quality manufacturing of the NLES.
According to additional suggestion67, the imaging can be omitted by using wedged shape NLES with 8-10°. This angle can be further decreased if the transmission grating is used not in exactly Littrow configuration83. With the first implementation of the wedged shaped NLES 40 \(\mu\)J THz energy and 0.1% efficiency were demonstrated by 500 fs and 200 fs pump pulse durations84. This efficiency can be increased eightfold by cryocooling the NLES, using sLN as a crystal material, and better-quality manufacturing of the NM. According to the investigations, the wedged shaped NLES provides excellent beam quality84.
In the case of plane parallel NLES, the imaging can also be omitted by using volume holographic gratings85, hence they provide more than 90% diffraction efficiency even if they are not in Littrow configuration86,87.
A comprehensive comparison of the different TPFP schemes can be found in Table 1.
High-energy semiconductor-based terahertz sources
As it was mentioned earlier, for some semiconductors the velocity matching (3) can be satisfied at near-infrared wavelengths, however in these cases the free carriers generated through low-order MPA inflict THz absorption.
For a typical example, Fig. 6a shows the pumping intensity dependence of the created free carrier concentration for different levels of MPA and the resulting THz absorption at 2 THz (Fig. 6b) when GaP is pumped by 100 fs pulses. In Fig. 6c and d, the absorption spectrum caused by TO phonon-polariton alone (wo MPA, light blue) and by phonon-polaritons combined with different orders of MPA can be seen in case of pumping intensities of 10 (Fig. 6c) and 20 \({\rm{GW}}/{\rm{c}}{{\rm{m}}}^{2}\) (Fig. 6d). According to Fig. 6b, if GaP is pumped by a Ti:s laser with 800 nm wavelength, an absorption coefficient of 10 cm-1 is resulted even at 1.8 GW/cm2 pumping intensity due to the free carrier absorption coming from 2PA, which strictly limits the THz conversion efficiency. In case of pumping at 1.03 μm by Yb lasers instead of Ti:s 3PA will be the lowest order MPA, and according to Fig. 6b, this enables to use of six-times higher pumping intensities, which can lead to six-times higher conversion efficiency. Moreover, according to Fig. 6b, by further increasing the pumping wavelength (>1.8 μm), where 4PA dominates, the available pump intensity can be larger by an additional factor of two, and another twofold increase is expected in conversion efficiency. The longer wavelength provides significant (more than one order of magnitude by MPA orders) absorption decrease in a broad frequency range (see Fig. 6c and d) not only at 2 THz.
Suppression of the lower-order MPA by longer wavelength pumping has a huge advantage, but as mentioned, the velocity-matching condition (3) is generally not satisfied in this case. However, by using a tilted pulse front pumping with an appropriate γ angle, the velocity-matching condition (7) can be met. Figure 7 shows the dependence of the required pulse front tilt angle for velocity matching on the pumping wavelength for four different semiconductors and LN. The colors identify the semiconductors, the black curve corresponds to LN, and the solid and dotted sections indicate odd and even order MPA, respectively. As can be seen, for semiconductors the required pulse front tilt angle is advantageously only half of the 63° required for LN, even when using pumping with a long enough wavelength to allow only >6 order MPA.
Since the refractive index also exhibits dispersion in the THz range (Fig. 2a), velocity matching is only fulfilled for a specific THz frequency. To characterize how the efficiency of THz generation decreases at frequencies different from this, it is useful to introduce the “coherence length” concept for the OR process, too. According to Eq. (1) (in the absence of THz absorption), if \({dk}\,\ne\, 0\), the efficiency of THz generation is maximal for
crystal length, which can be defined as the coherence length, \({l}_{c}\). Since the efficiency of THz generation is proportional to L2, a larger coherence length is very advantageous. Fig. 8a–d shows the contour plot of \({l}_{c}\) as a function of the pumping wavelength and THz frequency for different semiconductors. As can be seen in Fig. 8a, for example lc > 5 mm can be achieved for 1 THz frequency in the case of ZnTe when the pumping wavelength is around 820 nm. This was exploited in Ti:s-pumped ZnTe THz sources for a decade. However, it can also be seen that lc > 5 mm only applies for \(\nu\) < 2 THz, while for GaAs and GaP, the lc > 5 mm inequality is fulfilled for a wider THz frequency range (0–3 and 0–4 THz, respectively) for the appropriate pumping wavelength (1.35 and ≈1.0 µm, respectively) (see Fig. 8b and c). Accordingly, with these materials (as their THz absorption is also more favorable), wider bandwidth THz pulses or THz pulses tunable over a larger frequency range can be generated.
Comparing the three materials from the perspective of MPA, it can be concluded that 2PA occurs when pumping ZnTe at a wavelength of 0.82 μm or GaAs at a wavelength of 1.35 μm, while 3PA is the lowest-order MPA in GaP when pumped at approximately 1.0 μm. Recognizing this, ≈1.03 μm wavelength Yb-fiber lasers were used to pump GaP-based THz sources27. The importance of avoiding lower-order MPA was also demonstrated experimentally by OR with ZnTe and GaP using ≈1.03 μm laser pulses28. Although the non-linear optical coefficient of ZnTe is approximately three times larger than that of GaP, significantly higher efficiency was achieved using GaP, in which 3PA was the lowest-order MPA, compared to ZnTe, in which 2PA also occurred35. THz pulses were generated in GaAs by OR with 1.8 μm laser pulses with an efficiency of 0.05%32. In this case, as with pumping at ≈1.03 μm wavelength in ZnTe, velocity matching was ensured by using TPFP arrangement. By pumping ZnTe crystal at 1.7 μm (beyond the 3PA edge), it was possible to use a pump intensity as high as 15 GW/cm2, resulting in two orders of magnitude larger THz generation efficiency (0.7%) compared to pumping at 0.8 μm31. In this case, velocity matching was also ensured by using a TPFP arrangement.
The effect of velocity matching using TPFP on the pumping wavelength and THz frequency dependence of lc is shown in Fig. 8c and d. In the case of Fig. 8c, there is no pulse front tilt, while in the case of Fig. 8d, a pulse front tilt of 21 degrees is assumed, which results in velocity matching at 1.9 μm pumping wavelength for 1 THz. Although the shape of the \({l}_{c}\) contour plot changed in Fig. 8d, the \({l}_{c}\left({\omega }_{{THz}}\right)\) function remained unchanged. This is shown in Fig. 8e, where the curves corresponding to the two cases overlap perfectly. In conclusion, by employing TPFP, it becomes possible to utilize longer pump wavelengths, thereby avoiding low-order MPA, while simultaneously maintaining the broad spectrum of the THz pulses generated with enhanced efficiency.
It is worth noting that it is generally accepted that velocity matching is fulfilled in the case of collinear configuration for Yb-pumped GaP. However, this is only approximately true, even for frequencies below 1 THz the phase matching precisely achieved only around 1.005 \(\mu m\). Thus, in this case, the application of TPFP can also be useful. This is illustrated in Fig. 8f. It can be observed that without TPFP, assuming a 5 mm thick GaP, the coherence length is significantly greater than the crystal thickness for frequencies only < 1.5 THz. This limits the bandwidth of the generated THz pulses and their generation efficiency. In contrast, by applying a pulse front tilt of γ=9°, for example, the coherence length exceeds 5 mm across the entire 0.0–3.6 THz range, enabling high-efficiency THz generation over this wide range. In Ref. 88, a CG formed on a 2 mm thick GaP crystal was used with a pulse front tilt of γ=11°, resulting in an observed increase in both the efficiency and bandwidth of THz generation.
Certainly, the novel TPFP THz source configurations introduced in the preceding chapter can also be implemented with semiconductors, offering even easier feasibility due to the reduced tilt angle requirement65,80,81,82,83,84,85,88,89. For example, by implementing a contact grating arrangement with a ZnTe nonlinear crystal as shown in Fig. 5a, and using 1.7 μm pump pulses with a pumping intensity of 8 GW/cm², an outstanding 0.3% THz generation efficiency was achieved among semiconductor sources33. The crystal damage threshold is above 100 GW/cm², but increasing the pumping intensity above 8 GW/cm² resulted in decreased efficiency due to the absorption of free charge carriers generated by 4PA.
The utilization of longer wavelengths allows for higher pump intensities to be employed, resulting in enhanced THz generation efficiency, while simultaneously avoiding the occurrence of 4PA, 5PA, etc. Currently, the Ho laser operating around 2.0 μm is the longest wavelength high-energy femtosecond laser available. Pump pulses with longer wavelengths than this can be generated using an optical parametric amplifier (OPA), but their efficiency decreases with wavelength. Model calculations that examine the joint efficiency of the THz and pump sources and take into account the effect of the nonlinear refractive index of NM show that it is not worthwhile to use OPA with wavelengths longer than 2.0 or 3.0 μm for GaP and GaAs, respectively90.
However, in recent times, several manuscripts have appeared that aim to generate CO2 laser pulses with the shortest possible duration. Today, even ps-length CO2 laser pulses are available91, which can be further compressed using external optical devices92,93,94,95 or other alternative methods96. For pump pulses around 10 μm generated by CO2 laser, it is likely that only the damage threshold of semiconductor crystals and other nonlinear optical processes such as second harmonic generation during THz generation or pump self-phase-modulation will limit the pumping intensity. Calculations indicate that a conversion efficiency of over 1% can be achieved in GaAs97.
Pulse front tilt in organic materials
Until now, the utilization of TPFP in organic materials has not even been considered. This is probably due to two inherent properties of organic materials: (i) they have extraordinary large nonlinear coefficients, (ii) they can be grown only in the form of thin plates. Organic crystals are usually characterized by a THz frequency- and pump wavelength-dependent generation length which serves as figure of merit and is defined as follows24:
where \({\alpha }_{{THz}},{\alpha }_{{opt}}\) represent the absorptions in the THz and optical regime, and \({l}_{c}\) is the coherence length. To explore the potential impact of pulse front tilting, we should substitute \({n}_{g}/\cos (\gamma )\) instead of the group refractive index of the material \({n}_{p}^{{gr}}\) in the formula of coherence length (20). An insightful calculation involving a 0.5 mm thick DAST crystal pumped by 2.06 μm wavelength (the wavelength of a thulium-doped laser, or close to a holmium laser, which is much more widespread than a chrome forsterite laser with ~1.3 μm, typically used for pumping organic crystals) demonstrates this phenomenon (Fig. 9). By using this long wavelength (similarly to ref. 25), 2PA can be avoided, however, without TPFP the velocity matching is lost. Figure 9. illustrates that pulse front tilting can lead to a significant increase in the generation length on a broad THz spectral range above 1.5 THz, thereby preventing the narrowing of the spectrum that would typically occur in the case of thicker crystals. The black curve corresponds to a collinearly pumped configuration. The first minima in the spectrum correspond to the high THz absorption of the crystal, while the subsequent minima above 2 THz are a result of velocity mismatch. However, by introducing an appropriate pulse front tilt (red curve), the generation length increases over the entire range above 1.5 THz. This effect stems from the ability of pulse front tilting to achieve an enlarged coherence length in this range. Importantly, the generation length has a direct connection to the conversion efficiency. Specifically, if the generation length expands by 3-4 times, the efficiency rises by the square of this increase. Leveraging this insight, it becomes possible to extend the lifespan of these vulnerable crystals by pumping them at substantially lower energies while still generating THz pulse energies with the same level in a more efficient way and the lower pumping enables to avoid cascading effects and the detrimental effect of the nonlinear refractive index.
Detection of terahertz pulses
In principle, velocity matching is essential not only for THz pulse generation using OR, but also for THz pulse detection with EOS98,99. Nevertheless, the EOS technique using tilted pulse front probe pulses has not yet become widespread, probably because in this case the negative effect of the velocity mismatch on the detection bandwidth can be simply reduced by using a thinner EO crystal.
However, as recently demonstrated experimentally88, by ensuring velocity matching through the application of tilted pulse fronts in both THz generation and detection crystals, a combined OR and EOS-based time-domain terahertz spectroscopy (TDTS) system achieved a 400-fold increase in THz signal and a 35 dB larger dynamic range compared to using thin crystals. In this experiment a CG was used, similarly to (ref. 33), to achieve TPFP in the OR crystal, and the same technique was applied to the EOS crystal as well. This approach resulted in a compact setup. It is important to note that a 1.03 μm wavelength Yb laser was employed for pumping and detection, and GaP crystals for OR and EOS. This combination results in a relatively low level of velocity mismatch. If a 2 μm laser is used in GaP for OR (to achieve higher THz generation efficiency) and for EOS, a larger degree of velocity mismatch would occur in collinear arrangements, making the application of tilted pulse front velocity matching even more advantageous.
In addition to velocity matching, tilted pulse fronts have been also employed for single-shot THz pulse detection setups. In these configurations, the tilted pulse front was utilized to create a continuously varying time delay along the cross-section of the EOS probe beam, enabling single-shot measurements. Using optical grating to create a tilted probe pulse front an excellent measurement quality was demonstrated100.
Summary
In this paper, the results achieved in the past two decades by using the TPFP technique for velocity-matching in OR-based THz sources were reviewed. The paper begins with a brief introduction to the conventional TPFP setup, followed by a discussion of the key design considerations. The advent of conventional TPFP THz sources marked a monumental breakthrough, propelling THz pulse energy from LN and semiconductors to unprecedented heights, and enabling widespread application of nonlinear THz measurements and material/process control experiments. Furthermore, it has unlocked a realm of possibilities for compact THz-driven particle acceleration, ushering in a new era of potential and advancement. However, several limitations associated with the conventional TPFP setup need to be addressed for the realization of this vision. In recent years, new-generation scalable TPFP THz source setups have been proposed and promising initial results have been demonstrated. Further technical development is required to improve the optical quality of the micro/nano-structured surfaces needed in these new-generation sources. The ongoing development is expected to yield highly efficient THz sources capable of routinely generating THz pulses with millijoules of energy. Furthermore, these sources not only facilitate the attainment of high energies but also enable the enhancement of beam quality and focusing, resulting in tens of megavolts per centimeter of electric field. This advancement significantly contributes to the field of extreme-field THz science and technology. THz driven acceleration, molecular orientation, material control, enhancement of high-harmonic-generation are just a few examples of areas which will strongly benefit from these developments.
It is also foreseen that applications requiring THz pulses with energy levels only in the μJ range, such as THz pump-probe measurements, will significantly benefit from the development of new-generation THz sources, such as semiconductor CG-s.
Additionally, exploring the application of TPFP with new nonlinear materials, such as organic crystals, holds promise for achieving further success. Moreover, it is essential to prioritize the development of the entire pump laser-THz source system, as it is vital for enhancing overall performance. Incorporating previously overlooked lasers, such as the efficient implementation of CO2 lasers for pumping, could notably enhance system efficiency, as demonstrated in this study.
In summary, TPFP THz sources have experienced significant success over the past two decades, and their future prospects are expected to be even more promising.
References
Schmuttenmaer, C. A. Exploring dynamics in the far-infrared with terahertz spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 104, 1759–1780 (2004).
Serita, K. Terahertz imaging evaluation of early-stage breast cancer using point terahertz sources. J. Imaging Soc. Jpn. 61, 600–607 (2022).
Hebling, J. et al. High-power THz generation, THz nonlinear optics, and THz nonlinear spectroscopy. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14, 345–353 (2008).
Hoffmann, M. C. Nonlinear terahertz spectroscopy. in Terahertz Spectroscopy and Imaging (eds Peiponen, K. E., Zeitler, A. & Kuwata-Gonokami, M.) (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2012), 355-388.
Fleischer, S. et al. Molecular orientation and alignment by intense single-cycle THz pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 163603 (2011).
Egodapitiya, K. N., Li, S. & Jones, R. R. Terahertz-induced field-free orientation of rotationally excited molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 103002 (2014).
Kampfrath, T., Tanaka, K. & Nelson, K. A. Resonant and nonresonant control over matter and light by intense terahertz transients. Nat. Photonics 7, 680–690 (2013).
Salén, P. et al. Matter manipulation with extreme terahertz light: progress in the enabling THz technology. Phys. Rep. 836-837, 1–74 (2019).
Kovács, K. et al. Quasi-phase-matching high-harmonic radiation using chirped THz pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 193903 (2012).
Pálfalvi, L. et al. Evanescent-wave proton postaccelerator driven by intense THz pulse. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.-Accelerators Beams 17, 031301 (2014).
Ronny Huang, W. et al. Terahertz-driven, all-optical electron gun. Optica 3, 1209–1212 (2016).
Zhang, D. F. et al. Segmented terahertz electron accelerator and manipulator (STEAM). Nat. Photonics 12, 336–342 (2018).
Hibberd, M. T. et al. Acceleration of relativistic beams using laser-generated terahertz pulses. Nat. Photonics 14, 755–759 (2020).
Tóth, G. et al. Single-cycle attosecond pulses by Thomson backscattering of terahertz pulses. J. Optical Soc. Am. B 35, A103–A109 (2018).
Burford, N. M. & El-Shenawee, M. O. Review of terahertz photoconductive antenna technology. Optical Eng. 56, 010901 (2017).
Buldt, J. et al. Gas-plasma-based generation of broadband terahertz radiation with 640 mW average power. Opt. Lett. 46, 5256–5259 (2021).
Wang, M. R. et al. Spintronics based terahertz sources. Crystals 12, 1661 (2022).
Zhang, X. C. et al. Terahertz optical rectification from a nonlinear organic crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 3080–3082 (1992).
Rice, A. et al. Terahertz optical rectification from 〈110〉 zinc‐blende crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1324–1326 (1994).
Blanchard, F. et al. Generation of 1.5 µJ single-cycle terahertz pulses by optical rectification from a large aperture ZnTe crystal. Opt. Express 15, 13212–13220 (2007).
Kunitski, M. et al. Optimization of single-cycle terahertz generation in LiNbO3 for sub-50 femtosecond pump pulses. Opt. Express 21, 6826–6836 (2013).
Hebling, J. et al. Tunable THz pulse generation by optical rectification of ultrashort laser pulses with tilted pulse fronts. Appl. Phys. B 78, 593–599 (2004).
Koulouklidis, A. D. et al. Observation of extremely efficient terahertz generation from mid-infrared two-color laser filaments. Nat. Commun. 11, 292 (2020).
Brunner, F. D. J. et al. A hydrogen-bonded organic nonlinear optical crystal for high-efficiency terahertz generation and detection. Opt. Express 16, 16496–16508 (2008).
Gollner, C. et al. Highly efficient THz generation by optical rectification of mid-IR pulses in DAST. APL Photonics 6, 046105 (2021).
Zaccardi, Z. B. et al. Enabling high-power, broadband THz generation with 800-nm pump wavelength. Opt. Express 29, 38084–38094 (2021).
Chang, G. Q. et al. Power scalable compact THz system based on an ultrafast Yb-doped fiber amplifier. Opt. Express 14, 7909–7913 (2006).
Hoffmann, M. C. et al. Efficient terahertz generation by optical rectification at 1035 nm. Opt. Express 15, 11706–11713 (2007).
Drs, J. et al. Optical rectification of ultrafast Yb lasers: pushing power and bandwidth of terahertz generation in GaP. J. Optical Soc. Am. B 36, 3039–3045 (2019).
Meyer, F. et al. Milliwatt-class broadband THz source driven by a 112 W, sub-100 fs thin-disk laser. Opt. Express 27, 30340–30349 (2019).
Polónyi, G. et al. High-energy terahertz pulses from semiconductors pumped beyond the three-photon absorption edge. Opt. Express 24, 23872–23882 (2016).
Blanchard, F. et al. Terahertz pulse generation from bulk GaAs by a tilted-pulse-front excitation at 1.8 μm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 241106 (2014).
Fülöp, J. A. et al. Highly efficient scalable monolithic semiconductor terahertz pulse source. Optica 3, 1075–1078 (2016).
Hebling, J. et al. Generation of high-power terahertz pulses by tilted-pulse-front excitation and their application possibilities. J. Optical Soc. Am. B 25, B6–B19 (2008).
Hebling, J. et al. Velocity matching by pulse front tilting for large area THz-pulse generation. Opt. Express 10, 1161–1166 (2002).
Stepanov, A. G., Hebling, J. & Kuhl, J. Efficient generation of subpicosecond terahertz radiation by phase-matched optical rectification using ultrashort laser pulses with tilted pulse fronts. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3000–3002 (2003).
Lee, K. S. et al. Characterization of terahertz generation based on the different structures of lithium tantalate crystals. Proceedings of 2015 40th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves. Hong Kong, China: IEEE, 1-2. (2015).
Benis, S. et al. Three-photon absorption spectra and bandgap scaling in direct-gap semiconductors. Optica 7, 888–899 (2020).
Zhong, S. C. et al. Optimization of terahertz generation from LiNbO3 under intense laser excitation with the effect of three-photon absorption. Opt. Express 23, 31313–31323 (2015).
Zhang, B. L. et al. 1.4‐mJ high energy terahertz radiation from lithium niobates. Laser Photonics Rev. 15, 2000295 (2021).
Bass, M. et al. Optical rectification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 446–448 (1962).
Yang, K. H., Richards, P. L. & Shen, Y. R. Generation of far‐infrared radiation by picosecond light pulses in LiNbO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 19, 320–323 (1971).
Vodopyanov, K. L. Optical generation of narrow-band terahertz packets in periodically-inverted electro-optic crystals: conversion efficiency and optimal laser pulse format. Opt. Express 14, 2263–2276 (2006).
Wu, X. J. et al. Temperature dependent refractive index and absorption coefficient of congruent lithium niobate crystals in the terahertz range. Opt. Express 23, 29729–29737 (2015).
Schall, M. & Jepsen, P. U. Above-band gap two-photon absorption and its influence on ultrafast carrier dynamics in ZnTe and CdTe. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 4771–4773 (2002).
Penzkofer, A. & Bugayev, A. A. Two-photon absorption and emission dynamics of bulk GaAs. Optical Quantum Electron. 21, 283–306 (1989).
Catalano, I. M., Cingolani, A. & Minafra, A. Multiphoton transitions at the direct and indirect band gaps of gallium phosphide. Solid State Commun. 16, 417–420 (1975).
Stepanov, A. G. et al. Scaling up the energy of THz pulses created by optical rectification. Opt. Express 13, 5762–5768 (2005).
Bor, Z. et al. Femtosecond pulse front tilt caused by angular dispersion. Optical Eng. 32, 2501–2504 (1993).
Hebling, J. Derivation of the pulse front tilt caused by angular dispersion. Optical Quantum Electron. 28, 1759–1763 (1996).
Martinez, O. E. Pulse distortions in tilted pulse schemes for ultrashort pulses. Opt. Commun. 59, 229–232 (1986).
Akturk, S. et al. Pulse-front tilt caused by spatial and temporal chirp. Opt. Express 12, 4399–4410 (2004).
Akturk, S. et al. Spatio-temporal couplings in ultrashort laser pulses. J. Opt. 12, 093001 (2010).
Ravi, K. et al. Limitations to THz generation by optical rectification using tilted pulse fronts. Opt. Express 22, 20239–20251 (2014).
Ravi, K. et al. Theory of terahertz generation by optical rectification using tilted-pulse-fronts. Opt. Express 23, 5253–5276 (2015).
Wang, L. et al. Tilted‐pulse‐front schemes for terahertz generation. Laser Photonics Rev. 14, 2000021 (2020).
Yeh, K. L. et al. Generation of 10 μJ ultrashort terahertz pulses by optical rectification. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 171121 (2007).
Martinez, O. E. Grating and prism compressors in the case of finite beam size. J. Optical Soc. Am. B 3, 929–934 (1986).
Fülöp, J. A. et al. Design of high-energy terahertz sources based on optical rectification. Opt. Express 18, 12311–12327 (2010).
Fülöp, J. A. et al. Generation of sub-mJ terahertz pulses by optical rectification. Opt. Lett. 37, 557–559 (2012).
Fülöp, J. A. et al. Efficient generation of THz pulses with 0.4 mJ energy. Opt. Express 22, 20155–20163 (2014).
Huang, S. W. et al. High conversion efficiency, high energy terahertz pulses by optical rectification in cryogenically cooled lithium niobate. Opt. Lett. 38, 796–798 (2013).
Kroh, T. et al. Parameter sensitivities in tilted-pulse-front based terahertz setups and their implications for high-energy terahertz source design and optimization. Opt. Express 30, 24186–24206 (2022).
Tokodi, L., Hebling, J. & Pálfalvi, L. Optimization of the tilted-pulse-front terahertz excitation setup containing telescope. J. Infrared, Millim., Terahertz Waves 38, 22–32 (2017).
Pálfalvi, L. et al. Novel setups for extremely high power single-cycle terahertz pulse generation by optical rectification. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 171107 (2008).
Stummer, V. et al. Programmable generation of terahertz bursts in chirped-pulse laser amplification. Optica 7, 1758–1763 (2020).
Tóth, G. et al. Numerical investigation of imaging-free terahertz generation setup using segmented tilted-pulse-front excitation. Opt. Express 27, 7762–7775 (2019).
Bodrov, S. B., Stepanov, A. N. & Bakunov, M. I. Generalized analysis of terahertz generation by tilted-pulse-front excitation in a LiNbO3 prism. Opt. Express 27, 2396–2410 (2019).
Nagashima, K. & Kosuge, A. Design of rectangular transmission gratings fabricated in LiNbO3 for high-power terahertz-wave generation. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 49, 122504 (2010).
Ollmann, Z., Hebling, J. & Almási, G. Design of a contact grating setup for mJ-energy THz pulse generation by optical rectification. Appl. Phys. B 108, 821–826 (2012).
Tsubouchi, M. et al. Contact grating device with Fabry–Perot resonator for effective terahertz light generation. Opt. Lett. 39, 5439–5442 (2014).
Ollmann, Z. et al. Design of a high-energy terahertz pulse source based on ZnTe contact grating. Opt. Commun. 315, 159–163 (2014).
Bakunov, M. I. & Bodrov, S. B. Terahertz generation with tilted-front laser pulses in a contact-grating scheme. J. Optical Soc. Am. B 31, 2549–2557 (2014).
Pálfalvi, L. et al. Hybrid tilted-pulse-front excitation scheme for efficient generation of high-energy terahertz pulses. Opt. Express 24, 8156–8169 (2016).
Tóth, G. et al. Single-cycle scalable terahertz pulse source in reflection geometry. Opt. Express 27, 30681–30691 (2019).
Krizsán, G. et al. Lithium niobate and lithium tantalate based scalable terahertz pulse sources in reflection geometry. Opt. Express 28, 34320–34327 (2020).
Ofori-Okai, B. K. et al. THz generation using a reflective stair-step echelon. Opt. Express 24, 5057–5068 (2016).
Ravi, K. & Kärtner, F. Analysis of terahertz generation using tilted pulse fronts. Opt. Express 27, 3496–3517 (2019).
Guiramand, L. et al. Near-optimal intense and powerful terahertz source by optical rectification in lithium niobate crystal. Photonics Res. 10, 340–346 (2022).
Avetisyan, Y. et al. Design of a multistep phase mask for high-energy terahertz pulse generation by optical rectification. J. Infrared, Millim., Terahertz Waves 38, 1439–1447 (2017).
Pálfalvi, L. et al. Numerical investigation of a scalable setup for efficient terahertz generation using a segmented tilted-pulse-front excitation. Opt. Express 25, 29560–29573 (2017).
Nugraha, P. S. et al. Demonstration of a tilted-pulse-front pumped plane-parallel slab terahertz source. Opt. Lett. 44, 1023–1026 (2019).
Illés, G. et al. Terahertz generation by imaging-free nonlinear echelon slab. Proceedings of the Optica High-brightness Sources and Light-driven Interactions Congress 2022. Budapest: Optica Publishing Group, JW5A.13. (2022).
Krizsán, G. et al. Demonstration of an imaging-free terahertz generation setup using segmented tilted-pulse-front excitation. Opt. Lett. 48, 3777–3780 (2023).
Krizsán, G. et al. Uniformly scalable lithium niobate THz pulse source in transmission geometry. Opt. Express 30, 4434–4443 (2022).
Blanche, P. A. et al. Volume phase holographic gratings: large size and high diffraction efficiency. Optical Eng. 43, 2603–2612 (2004).
Baldry, I. K., Bland‐Hawthorn, J. & Robertson, J. G. Volume phase holographic gratings: polarization properties and diffraction efficiency. Publ. Astronomical Soc. Pac. 116, 403–414 (2004).
Cui, W. et al. Broadband and high‐sensitivity time‐resolved THz system using grating‐assisted tilted‐pulse‐front phase matching. Adv. Optical Mater. 10, 2101136 (2022).
Tibai, Z. et al. Scalable microstructured semiconductor THz pulse sources. Opt. Express 30, 45246–45258 (2022).
Mbithi, N. M. et al. Investigation of terahertz pulse generation in semiconductors pumped at long infrared wavelengths. J. Optical Soc. Am. B 39, 2684–2691 (2022).
Polyanskiy, M. N. et al. Demonstration of a 2 ps, 5 TW peak power, long-wave infrared laser based on chirped-pulse amplification with mixed-isotope CO2 amplifiers. OSA Contin. 3, 459–472 (2020).
Hanna, M. et al. Nonlinear temporal compression in multipass cells: theory. J. Optical Soc. Am. B 34, 1340–1347 (2017).
Kaumanns, M. et al. Multipass spectral broadening of 18 mJ pulses compressible from 1.3 ps to 41 fs. Opt. Lett. 43, 5877–5880 (2018).
Lavenu, L. et al. Nonlinear pulse compression based on a gas-filled multipass cell. Opt. Lett. 43, 2252–2255 (2018).
Shumakova, V. et al. Multi-millijoule few-cycle mid-infrared pulses through nonlinear self-compression in bulk. Nat. Commun. 7, 12877 (2016).
Panagiotopoulos, P. et al. Multi-terawatt femtosecond 10 µm laser pulses by self-compression in a CO2 cell. OSA Contin. 3, 3040–3047 (2020).
Illés, G. et al. Possibility of CO2 laser pumped terahertz sources, CLEO Europe 2023 CC-P.9 FRI. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEO/Europe-EQEC57999.2023.10232626 (2013).
Wu, Q. & Zhang, X. C. 7 terahertz broadband GaP electro-optic sensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1784–1786 (1997).
Leitenstorfer, A. et al. Detectors and sources for ultrabroadband electro-optic sampling: experiment and theory. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1516–1518 (1999).
Kawada, Y. et al. Single-shot terahertz spectroscopy using pulse-front tilting of an ultra-short probe pulse. Opt. Express 19, 11228–11235 (2011).
Acknowledgements
This project has received funding from the HUN-REN Hungarian Research Network. The project has been supported by Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary, financed under the TKP2021-EGA-17 funding scheme. National Research, Development and Innovation Office (2018-1.2.1-NKP-2018-00009) has supported the project.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Pécs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.H.: supervised the manuscript and contributed to all the chapters. G.T.: conceptualized the first version of the manuscript and contributed to the first five chapters with special regard to the theoretical description of the THz sources. G.P.: collected the reference data, contributed to chapter 1, 2, 5, 6, with special regard to the effect of pulse front tilt on the coherence length of semiconductors and on the generation length of organic crystals. G.P edited and finalized the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tóth, G., Polónyi, G. & Hebling, J. Tilted pulse front pumping techniques for efficient terahertz pulse generation. Light Sci Appl 12, 256 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023-01293-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023-01293-1
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Bright terahertz electron gun opens new opportunities
Nature Photonics (2024)